Podcasts about Harry Harlow

Dr. John P. Gluck was honored with PETA's Trailblazing Advocacy Award in 2021 for being a shining example of ethics in science. In this conversation with Emil Guillermo, Dr. Gluck-- a one-time animal experimenter who studied with the infamous Harry Harlow--describes his transformation from an animal experimenter to a compassionate bioethicist committed to a cruelty-free science. Gluck's book, "Voracious Science and Vulnerable Animals," has become a guide for a new generation of scientists seeking to practice a science aligned with their ethical identity.  Gluck describes his transition and how he remains haunted by the faces of the animals he experimented on.  For more, go to PETA.org The PETA Podcast PETA, the world's largest animal rights organization, is 9 million strong and growing. This is the place to find out why.  Hosted by Emil Guillermo. Powered by PETA activism.  Music provided by CarbonWorks. Go to Apple podcasts and subscribe. Contact and follow host Emil Guillermo on X @emilamok, substack, or patreon. Or at www.amok.com,   Please subscribe, rate, and review wherever you get your podcasts. Thanks for listening to THE PETA PODCAST!  Copyright ©2020-25

Send me a Text Message about the show!What does it mean to be a "good" mother?  And who determines those measures?  Nancy Reddy joins me for a conversation about motherhood.  Her new book, "The Good Mother Myth: Unlearning Our Bad Ideas About How to Be a Good Mom" is part memoir, part research based, and ALL thought provoking.  -What are the four major myths that contribute to an impossible standard for a mother to uphold?  We talk about that.-What were the major researchers on motherhood; Dr Spock, Harry Harlow, John Bowlby, etc like as parents?  We talk about that.-What do we need to do to de-bunk these myths and start supporting ourselves and other moms and dads better?  We talk about that.It's a fantastic, authentic, and vulnerable conversation.  My favorite kind.Nancy Reddy is the author of The Good Mother Myth, published by St. Martin's Press in January 2025. Her previous books include the poetry collections Pocket Universe and Double Jinx, a winner of the National Poetry Series. With Emily Pérez, she's co-editor of The Long Devotion: Poets Writing Motherhood. Her essays have appeared in Slate, Poets & Writers, Romper, The Millions, and elsewhere. She writes the newsletter Write More, Be Less Careful and teaches writing at Stockton University. https://www.nancyreddy.com/Also mentioned in this episode:Mother Brain: https://www.chelseaconaboy.com/Support the showKeep up with all things WeSTAT on any (or ALL) of the social feeds:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/westatpod/Threads: https://www.threads.net/@westatpodFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/westatpod/LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/westatpod/Twitter: https://x.com/WeSTATpodHave a topic or want to stay in touch via e-mail on all upcoming news?https://www.westatpod.com/Help monetarily support the podcast by subscribing to the show! This is an easy way to help keep the conversations going:https://www.buzzsprout.com/768062/supporters/new

Tem gente que não acredita em amizade entre homens e mulheres. Mas o que a ciência tem a dizer sobre isso? E sobre as tais "Cinco Linguagens do Amor" que infestam a internet? E qual a relação disso com a teoria do apego? Esta é a segunda e última parte.Confira o papo entre o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.>> OUÇA (58min 18s)*Naruhodo! é o podcast pra quem tem fome de aprender. Ciência, senso comum, curiosidades, desafios e muito mais. Com o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.Edição: Reginaldo Cursino.http://naruhodo.b9.com.br*APOIO: INSIDERIlustríssima ouvinte, ilustríssimo ouvinte do Naruhodo,Feliz ano novo! E ano novo pede roupa nova. Ou não! Porque as minhas peças INSIDER continuam como novas, mesmo depois de tanto tempo de uso.Aliás, já te falei que minhas peças favoritas são as camisetas oversized INSIDER? Eu adoro. Sério.Mas, péra aí... Você ainda não experimentou INSIDER? Então o momento é agora: usando o cupom NARUHODO, você tem um desconto especial.Sabe o que mais? Em janeiro, ao aplicar o cupom NARUHODO nos kits, você terá um valor final ainda mais vantajoso! E você sabe: os kits INSIDER são opções super práticas e inteligentes de se vestir bem.Para aproveitar, o jeito mais fácil é usar o endereço https://bit.ly/naruhodo-janeiro-2025 ou clicar no link da descrição deste episódio: o cupom será aplicado automaticamente no carrinho.É tempo de novos ares. É tempo de kits INSIDER.#InsiderStore*REFERÊNCIASAutonomy promotion, responsiveness, and emotion regulation promote effective social support in times of stresshttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352250X16300884Popular Psychology Through a Scientific Lens: Evaluating Love Languages From a Relationship Science Perspectivehttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09637214231217663Ciúmes e exclusividade amorosa: uma investigação psicanalítica (2024)https://repositorio.usp.br/item/003217828I love the way you love me: Responding to partner's love language preferences boosts satisfaction in romantic heterosexual coupleshttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0269429Testing the predictions of Chapman's five love languages theory: Does speaking a partner's primary love language predict relationship quality?https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jmft.12747Regulatory Effectiveness of Social Supporthttps://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/2020-10243-001.htmlThe power and limits of friendship in Spinoza's Ethicshttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09608788.2023.2173137Responsiveness in cultural-ecological contexthttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X23000556?casa_token=fdnbcHV6aXMAAAAA:hBUGLuyR7Q9RzQtZIw-vH1mkG0v5kCXLoW8im1ije0KOdEcmtu5ri5l5EIorjNIJIwaF3kwfHwOpposite-Sex Friendship: Sex Differences and Similarities in Initiation, Selection, and Dissolutionhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/01461672012710007?casa_token=bVVs0sS9akgAAAAA:LyTuHvXT_BS3FSnqVH4CW_U278503FXMh5oYPvfCszgiPivUFRLp54s55DOaJs5alsNZXwNLi8g_A test of Aristotle's model of friendship for young adults' same-sex and opposite-sex relationshipshttps://www.proquest.com/openview/f9dccd61981c21bd055c6c7b243ffd9b/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1819178Culture and Gender Differences in the Perception of Friendship by Adolescentshttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1080/002075996401089Sex differences in friendship preferenceshttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S109051382100074X?casa_token=BetQqoONPVUAAAAA:Cci4lpNNVni4wOfyD3p9h-5qfkfjZ-Tt8vQ9l5XGnPW8UGWUrK6p8-BJvhRGTdl4chp9vPPkaAATTACHMENT AND LOSShttps://mindsplain.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/ATTACHMENT_AND_LOSS_VOLUME_I_ATTACHMENT.pdfMate preference dissimilarity predicts friendship attraction at zero-acquaintance for men, not womenhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/02654075241230457?casa_token=ColhnKgl5ckAAAAA%3AXWQAeNKnupwsNCqORgOFagZzpqANn5U6J-mrqJfL2Qk1AY4mBlfzm9r1Rm9IeIqchy7zjs9xETagPhenomenological Study of Rental friend in Urban Communitieshttps://ijrss.org/index.php/ijrss/article/view/367“When Strangers Meet”: John Bowlby and Harry Harlow on Attachment Behaviorhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12124-008-9079-2How Do Ideal Friend Preferences and Interaction Context Affect Friendship Formation? Evidence for a Domain- General Relationship Initiation Processhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1948550619845925?casa_token=mZ2AiVCFwXIAAAAA%3AfJhftSHLaJjE-jgUvgJ-_oYBV8aE6xCsDD9uUFZHsRJ0tuzy8IqahSr-7ntXSHLKUHfVAvLymHrjFriendships and their Developmental Significancehttps://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315785042-8/friendships-developmental-significance-willard-hartupWhy people make friends: The nature of friendshiphttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/pere.12352Naruhodo #216 - Por que sentimos ciúmes?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCSVc17yJ-gNaruhodo #84 - O que leva uma pessoa a ser transgênero?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ww7ruLRXVMMNaruhodo #103 - Testes de personalidade funcionam?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZl_y6N6hHANaruhodo #215 - Por que uma multidão cantando parece afinada?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJypXtz3bZMNaruhodo #382 - Quem ama o feio bonito lhe parece?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xI_DO_epNMgNaruhodo #369 - É mais difícil fazer amigos quando envelhecemos?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7yl-9-T6xcNaruhodo #70 - Existe amor à primeira vista?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76pd3mDwg0gNaruhodo #92 - Como funciona a "química" entre duas pessoas?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtB7qEoNrIUNaruhodo #230 - Por que quando olhamos para uma pessoa ela nos olha de volta?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_86RQ8y_peYNaruhodo #311 - O apego mãe-bebê é algo inato?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkcIZBPNOQgNaruhodo #411 - Por que traímos? - Parte 1 de 2https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVruX3MhxigNaruhodo #412 - Por que traímos? - Parte 2 de 2https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Towh8afX65YNaruhodo #430 - Por que é tão difícil deixar o rancor de lado?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0IesoD4A9ANaruhodo #261 - O que a solidão pode causar nas pessoas?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02dPRPGcqVsNaruhodo #95 - Pessoas bonitas são privilegiadas?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjJTy3vlXOANaruhodo #415 - Subir escadas pode ajudar pessoas com transtornos psiquiátricos?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqhtO6W03CcNaruhodo #277 - O que é singularidade? - Parte 1 de 2https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7-5xGhHrpKsNaruhodo #278 - O que é singularidade? - Parte 2 de 2https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euBpSfbX3lkNaruhodo #404 - Por que algumas pessoas gostam de terminar as coisas e outras não?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTSZ--4TKMk*APOIE O NARUHODO!O Altay e eu temos duas mensagens pra você.A primeira é: muito, muito obrigado pela sua audiência. Sem ela, o Naruhodo sequer teria sentido de existir. Você nos ajuda demais não só quando ouve, mas também quando espalha episódios para familiares, amigos - e, por que não?, inimigos.A segunda mensagem é: existe uma outra forma de apoiar o Naruhodo, a ciência e o pensamento científico - apoiando financeiramente o nosso projeto de podcast semanal independente, que só descansa no recesso do fim de ano.Manter o Naruhodo tem custos e despesas: servidores, domínio, pesquisa, produção, edição, atendimento, tempo... Enfim, muitas coisas para cobrir - e, algumas delas, em dólar.A gente sabe que nem todo mundo pode apoiar financeiramente. E tá tudo bem. Tente mandar um episódio para alguém que você conhece e acha que vai gostar.A gente sabe que alguns podem, mas não mensalmente. E tá tudo bem também. Você pode apoiar quando puder e cancelar quando quiser. O apoio mínimo é de 15 reais e pode ser feito pela plataforma ORELO ou pela plataforma APOIA-SE. Para quem está fora do Brasil, temos até a plataforma PATREON.É isso, gente. Estamos enfrentando um momento importante e você pode ajudar a combater o negacionismo e manter a chama da ciência acesa. Então, fica aqui o nosso convite: apóie o Naruhodo como puder.bit.ly/naruhodo-no-orelo

Acercarse a la familia Roy tiene un coste. Inicialmente implica un esfuerzo y, sin darte cuenta, de repente estás inmerso en ese mar de vilezas y vulnerabilidades que a nivel espectador te rompen un poco. No era fácil realizar un análisis de una familia tan compleja, pero separando los elementos principales conseguimos aportar un poco de luz a lo que les sucede a los descendientes de Logan Roy. Con Salvador Ruiz Murugarren hablamos de apego, de personalidad narcisista, de trauma intergeneracional y de la riqueza material versus la riqueza emocional, entre otras cuestiones. Locura compartida con Salvador Ruiz Murugarren. NOTAS DEL PODCAST Os dejo un artículo científico del psiquiatra Pablo Malo sobre la personalidad y el ambiente. Sobre el apego, el amor y las relaciones materno filiales dejo otro artículo sobre Harry Harlow. Y ⁠este artículo⁠ sobre John Bowlby. AGRADECIMIENTOS Locuciones: Estela Prádanos, Nuria Caicoya y Juan Ochoa Intervención: Jaime García Cantero

Parenting comes with a lot of expectations, but have you ever stopped to ask where they come from? On this episode of This Is Woman's Work, we unpack the myth of “the good mother” with Nancy Reddy, author of The Good Mother Myth. Nancy shares her personal experience of confronting the unrealistic ideal of motherhood: endlessly patient, always available, and completely selfless. She hilariously and heartbreakingly debunks these outdated ideals, rooted in flawed mid-20th-century research by figures like Harry Harlow and Dr. Spock. Nancy explains how bad science from the past continues to haunt modern parenting, creating pressure, guilt, and shame for today's mothers. But this conversation is about more than debunking myths—it's about empowerment. Because when you prioritize what matters and let go of perfectionism, you're not just doing woman's work—you're modeling it. Connect with Nancy: Newsletter: https://nancyreddy.substack.com/  Book: https://read.macmillan.com/lp/the-good-mother-myth-9781250336644/  IG: https://www.instagram.com/nancy.o.reddy/  Essay: I Was Promised That The “Golden Hour” Would Make Me A Mom:  https://slate.com/human-interest/2022/04/golden-hour-c-section-bonding-attachment-baby-friendly-hospitals.html Related Podcast Episodes: 126 / The Parenting Map with Dr. Shefali 090 / Unmasking Modern Motherhood with Katherine Wintsch 155 / Executive Motherhood with Ashley Quinto Powell Share the Love: If you found this episode insightful, please share it with a friend, tag us on social media, and leave a review on your favorite podcast platform!

Matt Crawford speaks with author Nancy Reddy about her book, The Good Mother Myth: Unlearning Our Bad Ideas About How to Be a Good Mom. When Reddy had her first child, she found herself suddenly confronted with the ideal of a being a perfect mother, but what is that and who defines it? For answers, Reddy turned to the mid-20th century social scientists and psychologists whose work still forms the basis of so much of what we believe about parenting. It seems ludicrous to imagine modern moms taking advice from midcentury researchers. Yet, their bad ideas about so-called “good” motherhood have seeped so pervasively into our cultural norms. In The Good Mother Myth, Reddy debunks the flawed lab studies, sloppy research, and straightforward misogyny of researchers from Harry Harlow, who claimed to have discovered love by observing monkeys in his lab, to the famous Dr. Spock, whose bestselling parenting guide included just one (1!) illustration of a father interacting with his child. This timely and thought-provoking book will make you laugh, cry, and want to scream (sometimes all at once). Blending history of science, cultural criticism, and memoir, The Good Mother Myth pulls back the curtain on the flawed social science behind our contemporary understanding of what makes a good mom.

Tem gente que não acredita em amizade entre homens e mulheres. Mas o que a ciência tem a dizer sobre isso? E sobre as tais "Cinco Linguagens do Amor" que infestam a internet? E qual a relação disso com a teoria do apego? Esta é a primeira parte de duas.Confira o papo entre o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.>> OUÇA (51min 29s)*Naruhodo! é o podcast pra quem tem fome de aprender. Ciência, senso comum, curiosidades, desafios e muito mais. Com o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.Edição: Reginaldo Cursino.http://naruhodo.b9.com.br*APOIO: INSIDERIlustríssima ouvinte, ilustríssimo ouvinte do Naruhodo,Feliz ano novo! E ano novo pede roupa nova. Ou não! Porque as minhas peças INSIDER continuam como novas, mesmo depois de tanto tempo de uso.Aliás, já te falei que minhas peças favoritas são as camisetas oversized INSIDER? Eu adoro. Sério.Mas, péra aí... Você ainda não experimentou INSIDER? Então o momento é agora: usando o cupom NARUHODO, você tem um desconto especial.Sabe o que mais? Em janeiro, ao aplicar o cupom NARUHODO nos kits, você terá um valor final ainda mais vantajoso! E você sabe: os kits INSIDER são opções super práticas e inteligentes de se vestir bem.Para aproveitar, o jeito mais fácil é usar o endereço https://bit.ly/naruhodo-janeiro-2025 ou clicar no link da descrição deste episódio: o cupom será aplicado automaticamente no carrinho.É tempo de novos ares. É tempo de kits INSIDER.#InsiderStore*REFERÊNCIASAutonomy promotion, responsiveness, and emotion regulation promote effective social support in times of stresshttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352250X16300884Popular Psychology Through a Scientific Lens: Evaluating Love Languages From a Relationship Science Perspectivehttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09637214231217663Ciúmes e exclusividade amorosa: uma investigação psicanalítica (2024)https://repositorio.usp.br/item/003217828I love the way you love me: Responding to partner's love language preferences boosts satisfaction in romantic heterosexual coupleshttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0269429Testing the predictions of Chapman's five love languages theory: Does speaking a partner's primary love language predict relationship quality?https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jmft.12747Regulatory Effectiveness of Social Supporthttps://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/2020-10243-001.htmlThe power and limits of friendship in Spinoza's Ethicshttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09608788.2023.2173137Responsiveness in cultural-ecological contexthttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X23000556?casa_token=fdnbcHV6aXMAAAAA:hBUGLuyR7Q9RzQtZIw-vH1mkG0v5kCXLoW8im1ije0KOdEcmtu5ri5l5EIorjNIJIwaF3kwfHwOpposite-Sex Friendship: Sex Differences and Similarities in Initiation, Selection, and Dissolutionhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/01461672012710007?casa_token=bVVs0sS9akgAAAAA:LyTuHvXT_BS3FSnqVH4CW_U278503FXMh5oYPvfCszgiPivUFRLp54s55DOaJs5alsNZXwNLi8g_A test of Aristotle's model of friendship for young adults' same-sex and opposite-sex relationshipshttps://www.proquest.com/openview/f9dccd61981c21bd055c6c7b243ffd9b/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1819178Culture and Gender Differences in the Perception of Friendship by Adolescentshttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1080/002075996401089Sex differences in friendship preferenceshttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S109051382100074X?casa_token=BetQqoONPVUAAAAA:Cci4lpNNVni4wOfyD3p9h-5qfkfjZ-Tt8vQ9l5XGnPW8UGWUrK6p8-BJvhRGTdl4chp9vPPkaAATTACHMENT AND LOSShttps://mindsplain.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/ATTACHMENT_AND_LOSS_VOLUME_I_ATTACHMENT.pdfMate preference dissimilarity predicts friendship attraction at zero-acquaintance for men, not womenhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/02654075241230457?casa_token=ColhnKgl5ckAAAAA%3AXWQAeNKnupwsNCqORgOFagZzpqANn5U6J-mrqJfL2Qk1AY4mBlfzm9r1Rm9IeIqchy7zjs9xETagPhenomenological Study of Rental friend in Urban Communitieshttps://ijrss.org/index.php/ijrss/article/view/367“When Strangers Meet”: John Bowlby and Harry Harlow on Attachment Behaviorhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12124-008-9079-2How Do Ideal Friend Preferences and Interaction Context Affect Friendship Formation? Evidence for a Domain- General Relationship Initiation Processhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1948550619845925?casa_token=mZ2AiVCFwXIAAAAA%3AfJhftSHLaJjE-jgUvgJ-_oYBV8aE6xCsDD9uUFZHsRJ0tuzy8IqahSr-7ntXSHLKUHfVAvLymHrjFriendships and their Developmental Significancehttps://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315785042-8/friendships-developmental-significance-willard-hartupWhy people make friends: The nature of friendshiphttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/pere.12352Naruhodo #216 - Por que sentimos ciúmes?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCSVc17yJ-gNaruhodo #84 - O que leva uma pessoa a ser transgênero?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ww7ruLRXVMMNaruhodo #103 - Testes de personalidade funcionam?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZl_y6N6hHANaruhodo #215 - Por que uma multidão cantando parece afinada?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJypXtz3bZMNaruhodo #382 - Quem ama o feio bonito lhe parece?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xI_DO_epNMgNaruhodo #369 - É mais difícil fazer amigos quando envelhecemos?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7yl-9-T6xcNaruhodo #70 - Existe amor à primeira vista?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76pd3mDwg0gNaruhodo #92 - Como funciona a "química" entre duas pessoas?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtB7qEoNrIUNaruhodo #230 - Por que quando olhamos para uma pessoa ela nos olha de volta?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_86RQ8y_peYNaruhodo #311 - O apego mãe-bebê é algo inato?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkcIZBPNOQgNaruhodo #411 - Por que traímos? - Parte 1 de 2https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVruX3MhxigNaruhodo #412 - Por que traímos? - Parte 2 de 2https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Towh8afX65YNaruhodo #430 - Por que é tão difícil deixar o rancor de lado?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0IesoD4A9ANaruhodo #261 - O que a solidão pode causar nas pessoas?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02dPRPGcqVsNaruhodo #95 - Pessoas bonitas são privilegiadas?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjJTy3vlXOANaruhodo #415 - Subir escadas pode ajudar pessoas com transtornos psiquiátricos?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqhtO6W03CcNaruhodo #277 - O que é singularidade? - Parte 1 de 2https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7-5xGhHrpKsNaruhodo #278 - O que é singularidade? - Parte 2 de 2https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euBpSfbX3lkNaruhodo #404 - Por que algumas pessoas gostam de terminar as coisas e outras não?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTSZ--4TKMk*APOIE O NARUHODO!O Altay e eu temos duas mensagens pra você.A primeira é: muito, muito obrigado pela sua audiência. Sem ela, o Naruhodo sequer teria sentido de existir. Você nos ajuda demais não só quando ouve, mas também quando espalha episódios para familiares, amigos - e, por que não?, inimigos.A segunda mensagem é: existe uma outra forma de apoiar o Naruhodo, a ciência e o pensamento científico - apoiando financeiramente o nosso projeto de podcast semanal independente, que só descansa no recesso do fim de ano.Manter o Naruhodo tem custos e despesas: servidores, domínio, pesquisa, produção, edição, atendimento, tempo... Enfim, muitas coisas para cobrir - e, algumas delas, em dólar.A gente sabe que nem todo mundo pode apoiar financeiramente. E tá tudo bem. Tente mandar um episódio para alguém que você conhece e acha que vai gostar.A gente sabe que alguns podem, mas não mensalmente. E tá tudo bem também. Você pode apoiar quando puder e cancelar quando quiser. O apoio mínimo é de 15 reais e pode ser feito pela plataforma ORELO ou pela plataforma APOIA-SE. Para quem está fora do Brasil, temos até a plataforma PATREON.É isso, gente. Estamos enfrentando um momento importante e você pode ajudar a combater o negacionismo e manter a chama da ciência acesa. Então, fica aqui o nosso convite: apóie o Naruhodo como puder.bit.ly/naruhodo-no-orelo

Timely and thought-provoking, Nancy Reddy's The Good Mother Myth: Unlearning Our Bad Ideas About How to Be a Good Mom unpacks and debunks the bad ideas that have for too long defined what it means to be a "good" mom. When Nancy Reddy had her first child, she found herself suddenly confronted with the ideal of a perfect mother—a woman who was constantly available, endlessly patient, and immediately invested in her child to the exclusion of all else. Reddy had been raised by a single working mother, considered herself a feminist, and was well on her way to a PhD. Why did doing motherhood "right" feel so wrong?  For answers, Reddy turned to the mid-20th century social scientists and psychologists whose work still forms the basis of so much of what we believe about parenting. It seems ludicrous to imagine modern moms taking advice from midcentury researchers. Yet, their bad ideas about so-called “good” motherhood have seeped so pervasively into our cultural norms. In The Good Mother Myth, Reddy debunks the flawed lab studies, sloppy research, and straightforward misogyny of researchers from Harry Harlow, who claimed to have discovered love by observing monkeys in his lab, to the famous Dr. Spock, whose bestselling parenting guide included just one (1!) illustration of a father interacting with his child. This timely and thought-provoking book will make you laugh, cry, and want to scream (sometimes all at once). Blending history of science, cultural criticism, and memoir, The Good Mother Myth pulls back the curtain on the flawed social science behind our contemporary understanding of what makes a good mom. This interview was conducted by Dr. Shui-yin Sharon Yam, author of the new book Doing Gender Justice: Queering Reproduction, Kin, and Care (Johns Hopkins University Press).  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

Timely and thought-provoking, Nancy Reddy's The Good Mother Myth: Unlearning Our Bad Ideas About How to Be a Good Mom unpacks and debunks the bad ideas that have for too long defined what it means to be a "good" mom. When Nancy Reddy had her first child, she found herself suddenly confronted with the ideal of a perfect mother—a woman who was constantly available, endlessly patient, and immediately invested in her child to the exclusion of all else. Reddy had been raised by a single working mother, considered herself a feminist, and was well on her way to a PhD. Why did doing motherhood "right" feel so wrong?  For answers, Reddy turned to the mid-20th century social scientists and psychologists whose work still forms the basis of so much of what we believe about parenting. It seems ludicrous to imagine modern moms taking advice from midcentury researchers. Yet, their bad ideas about so-called “good” motherhood have seeped so pervasively into our cultural norms. In The Good Mother Myth, Reddy debunks the flawed lab studies, sloppy research, and straightforward misogyny of researchers from Harry Harlow, who claimed to have discovered love by observing monkeys in his lab, to the famous Dr. Spock, whose bestselling parenting guide included just one (1!) illustration of a father interacting with his child. This timely and thought-provoking book will make you laugh, cry, and want to scream (sometimes all at once). Blending history of science, cultural criticism, and memoir, The Good Mother Myth pulls back the curtain on the flawed social science behind our contemporary understanding of what makes a good mom. This interview was conducted by Dr. Shui-yin Sharon Yam, author of the new book Doing Gender Justice: Queering Reproduction, Kin, and Care (Johns Hopkins University Press).  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/gender-studies

Timely and thought-provoking, Nancy Reddy's The Good Mother Myth: Unlearning Our Bad Ideas About How to Be a Good Mom unpacks and debunks the bad ideas that have for too long defined what it means to be a "good" mom. When Nancy Reddy had her first child, she found herself suddenly confronted with the ideal of a perfect mother—a woman who was constantly available, endlessly patient, and immediately invested in her child to the exclusion of all else. Reddy had been raised by a single working mother, considered herself a feminist, and was well on her way to a PhD. Why did doing motherhood "right" feel so wrong?  For answers, Reddy turned to the mid-20th century social scientists and psychologists whose work still forms the basis of so much of what we believe about parenting. It seems ludicrous to imagine modern moms taking advice from midcentury researchers. Yet, their bad ideas about so-called “good” motherhood have seeped so pervasively into our cultural norms. In The Good Mother Myth, Reddy debunks the flawed lab studies, sloppy research, and straightforward misogyny of researchers from Harry Harlow, who claimed to have discovered love by observing monkeys in his lab, to the famous Dr. Spock, whose bestselling parenting guide included just one (1!) illustration of a father interacting with his child. This timely and thought-provoking book will make you laugh, cry, and want to scream (sometimes all at once). Blending history of science, cultural criticism, and memoir, The Good Mother Myth pulls back the curtain on the flawed social science behind our contemporary understanding of what makes a good mom. This interview was conducted by Dr. Shui-yin Sharon Yam, author of the new book Doing Gender Justice: Queering Reproduction, Kin, and Care (Johns Hopkins University Press).  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/intellectual-history

Timely and thought-provoking, Nancy Reddy's The Good Mother Myth: Unlearning Our Bad Ideas About How to Be a Good Mom unpacks and debunks the bad ideas that have for too long defined what it means to be a "good" mom. When Nancy Reddy had her first child, she found herself suddenly confronted with the ideal of a perfect mother—a woman who was constantly available, endlessly patient, and immediately invested in her child to the exclusion of all else. Reddy had been raised by a single working mother, considered herself a feminist, and was well on her way to a PhD. Why did doing motherhood "right" feel so wrong?  For answers, Reddy turned to the mid-20th century social scientists and psychologists whose work still forms the basis of so much of what we believe about parenting. It seems ludicrous to imagine modern moms taking advice from midcentury researchers. Yet, their bad ideas about so-called “good” motherhood have seeped so pervasively into our cultural norms. In The Good Mother Myth, Reddy debunks the flawed lab studies, sloppy research, and straightforward misogyny of researchers from Harry Harlow, who claimed to have discovered love by observing monkeys in his lab, to the famous Dr. Spock, whose bestselling parenting guide included just one (1!) illustration of a father interacting with his child. This timely and thought-provoking book will make you laugh, cry, and want to scream (sometimes all at once). Blending history of science, cultural criticism, and memoir, The Good Mother Myth pulls back the curtain on the flawed social science behind our contemporary understanding of what makes a good mom. This interview was conducted by Dr. Shui-yin Sharon Yam, author of the new book Doing Gender Justice: Queering Reproduction, Kin, and Care (Johns Hopkins University Press).  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Timely and thought-provoking, Nancy Reddy's The Good Mother Myth: Unlearning Our Bad Ideas About How to Be a Good Mom unpacks and debunks the bad ideas that have for too long defined what it means to be a "good" mom. When Nancy Reddy had her first child, she found herself suddenly confronted with the ideal of a perfect mother—a woman who was constantly available, endlessly patient, and immediately invested in her child to the exclusion of all else. Reddy had been raised by a single working mother, considered herself a feminist, and was well on her way to a PhD. Why did doing motherhood "right" feel so wrong?  For answers, Reddy turned to the mid-20th century social scientists and psychologists whose work still forms the basis of so much of what we believe about parenting. It seems ludicrous to imagine modern moms taking advice from midcentury researchers. Yet, their bad ideas about so-called “good” motherhood have seeped so pervasively into our cultural norms. In The Good Mother Myth, Reddy debunks the flawed lab studies, sloppy research, and straightforward misogyny of researchers from Harry Harlow, who claimed to have discovered love by observing monkeys in his lab, to the famous Dr. Spock, whose bestselling parenting guide included just one (1!) illustration of a father interacting with his child. This timely and thought-provoking book will make you laugh, cry, and want to scream (sometimes all at once). Blending history of science, cultural criticism, and memoir, The Good Mother Myth pulls back the curtain on the flawed social science behind our contemporary understanding of what makes a good mom. This interview was conducted by Dr. Shui-yin Sharon Yam, author of the new book Doing Gender Justice: Queering Reproduction, Kin, and Care (Johns Hopkins University Press).  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Timely and thought-provoking, Nancy Reddy's The Good Mother Myth: Unlearning Our Bad Ideas About How to Be a Good Mom unpacks and debunks the bad ideas that have for too long defined what it means to be a "good" mom. When Nancy Reddy had her first child, she found herself suddenly confronted with the ideal of a perfect mother—a woman who was constantly available, endlessly patient, and immediately invested in her child to the exclusion of all else. Reddy had been raised by a single working mother, considered herself a feminist, and was well on her way to a PhD. Why did doing motherhood "right" feel so wrong?  For answers, Reddy turned to the mid-20th century social scientists and psychologists whose work still forms the basis of so much of what we believe about parenting. It seems ludicrous to imagine modern moms taking advice from midcentury researchers. Yet, their bad ideas about so-called “good” motherhood have seeped so pervasively into our cultural norms. In The Good Mother Myth, Reddy debunks the flawed lab studies, sloppy research, and straightforward misogyny of researchers from Harry Harlow, who claimed to have discovered love by observing monkeys in his lab, to the famous Dr. Spock, whose bestselling parenting guide included just one (1!) illustration of a father interacting with his child. This timely and thought-provoking book will make you laugh, cry, and want to scream (sometimes all at once). Blending history of science, cultural criticism, and memoir, The Good Mother Myth pulls back the curtain on the flawed social science behind our contemporary understanding of what makes a good mom. This interview was conducted by Dr. Shui-yin Sharon Yam, author of the new book Doing Gender Justice: Queering Reproduction, Kin, and Care (Johns Hopkins University Press).  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/politics-and-polemics

Timely and thought-provoking, Nancy Reddy's The Good Mother Myth: Unlearning Our Bad Ideas About How to Be a Good Mom unpacks and debunks the bad ideas that have for too long defined what it means to be a "good" mom. When Nancy Reddy had her first child, she found herself suddenly confronted with the ideal of a perfect mother—a woman who was constantly available, endlessly patient, and immediately invested in her child to the exclusion of all else. Reddy had been raised by a single working mother, considered herself a feminist, and was well on her way to a PhD. Why did doing motherhood "right" feel so wrong?  For answers, Reddy turned to the mid-20th century social scientists and psychologists whose work still forms the basis of so much of what we believe about parenting. It seems ludicrous to imagine modern moms taking advice from midcentury researchers. Yet, their bad ideas about so-called “good” motherhood have seeped so pervasively into our cultural norms. In The Good Mother Myth, Reddy debunks the flawed lab studies, sloppy research, and straightforward misogyny of researchers from Harry Harlow, who claimed to have discovered love by observing monkeys in his lab, to the famous Dr. Spock, whose bestselling parenting guide included just one (1!) illustration of a father interacting with his child. This timely and thought-provoking book will make you laugh, cry, and want to scream (sometimes all at once). Blending history of science, cultural criticism, and memoir, The Good Mother Myth pulls back the curtain on the flawed social science behind our contemporary understanding of what makes a good mom. This interview was conducted by Dr. Shui-yin Sharon Yam, author of the new book Doing Gender Justice: Queering Reproduction, Kin, and Care (Johns Hopkins University Press).  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/book-of-the-day

️ En este episodio de La Teoría de la Mente, exploramos uno de los sentimientos más poderosos y reconfortantes que podemos experimentar: la complicidad. Ese lazo profundo que nos une a alguien de una manera casi mágica, donde una mirada basta para entenderse. Acompañados de la canción “Us” de Regina Spektor, reflexionamos sobre esa conexión especial que nos permite compartir un “mundo propio” con otra persona, un espacio donde nos sentimos menos solos y donde, sin importar las tormentas de la vida, siempre tenemos a alguien a nuestro lado. ️❤️ "Us" de Regina Spektor, lanzada en 2004, habla precisamente de esos vínculos únicos que nos hacen sentir tan próximos al otro que hasta parece que el mundo exterior desaparece. En su letra, Regina nos habla de relaciones tan significativas que se merecen una estatua, una metáfora de esos lazos tan profundos que perduran en el tiempo. En este episodio, exploramos la historia y la ciencia detrás de la complicidad, desde el origen de la palabra —que viene de "complicitas", que significa "plegar juntos"— hasta estudios científicos que demuestran el impacto de las relaciones profundas en nuestra salud y felicidad. Estudios de la Universidad de Harvard y de la Universidad Brigham Young han confirmado que la calidad de nuestras relaciones afecta directamente nuestro bienestar físico y mental. No se trata de tener muchas conexiones, sino de tener algunas realmente significativas. La calidad de nuestras relaciones puede incluso reducir el estrés y mejorar nuestra salud cardiovascular. Compartimos también la reflexión del experimento de Harry Harlow con los monos rhesus, que nos recuerda la importancia de la calidez y la conexión más allá de lo material. Y evocamos la historia de Ciudadano Kane, en la que el protagonista, al final de su vida, anhela un recuerdo de su infancia que simboliza algo que el dinero no puede comprar: una conexión auténtica. Este episodio nos recuerda que la verdadera complicidad no puede comprarse ni forzarse; solo puede surgir cuando existe una conexión genuina entre dos personas. Terminamos el episodio invitándote a buscar ese "rosebud" en tu vida —esa conexión sincera que, al igual que en la canción de Regina Spektor, se convierte en un pequeño mundo compartido, un refugio bajo la lluvia donde la soledad se disipa. No importa si es perfecta; lo importante es que sea verdadera. Que encuentres a alguien que te entienda sin palabras, alguien con quien puedas crear un pequeño universo de complicidad. ✨ Palabras clave: complicidad, relaciones significativas, conexión emocional, Regina Spektor, canción Us, estudio de Harvard, salud mental, Ciudadano Kane, rosebud, vínculos profundos, calidad de relaciones, bienestar emocional, interacción humana, vínculo íntimo, conexión sincera, psicología social, experimentos científicos, canciones inspiradoras, introspección, felicidad y salud, podcast de relaciones, salud emocional, AMADAG TV, Teoría de la Mente. Hashtags: #Complicidad #ReginaSpektor #BienestarEmocional #RelacionesProfundas #PsicologíaSocial #LaTeoríaDeLaMente Enlaces Importantes Nuestra escuela de ansiedad: www.escuelaansiedad.com Nuestro nuevo libro: www.elmapadelaansiedad.com Visita nuestra página web: http://www.amadag.com Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Asociacion.Agorafobia/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/amadag.psico/ ▶️ YouTube AMADAG TV: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC22fPGPhEhgiXCM7PGl68rw

In Episode 105 of the Coffee with Karim Podcast, we dive into the essential foundations of family connection, exploring the power of attention, affection, and approval in parent-child relationships. Discover insights on nurturing bonds, the human need for intimacy, and navigating family challenges in the digital age, including screen time and effective communication. Perfect for parents, educators, and anyone looking to strengthen family ties. More Info on Studies René Spitz's Observational Studies (1940s): René Spitz was a psychoanalyst who studied infants in orphanages and hospitals. He observed that children who lacked maternal care or consistent adult attention developed what he called “anaclitic depression,” showing signs of developmental delays, emotional withdrawal, and increased mortality. His work highlighted the psychological harm caused by emotional neglect, as many infants in orphanages during this period received minimal affection, and caregivers often focused solely on physical needs. Harry Harlow's Experiments with Rhesus Monkeys (1950s): Although not directly on humans, Harlow's work with rhesus monkeys profoundly impacted how we understand attachment. Harlow found that young monkeys preferred soft, comforting "mothers" over wire ones that only provided food. This work suggested that emotional bonds and comfort are vital to development, reinforcing the importance of nurturing environments for infants and challenging the practice in orphanages where emotional support was often overlooked. Romanian Orphanage Studies (1990s): In the 1990s, psychologists and researchers began studying children in Romanian orphanages who had been raised in extremely deprived conditions. These studies found that children raised without consistent caregivers and social interaction had severe cognitive, emotional, and physical delays. Many children experienced attachment disorders, struggled with emotional regulation, and had long-term developmental impacts.

How is the brain affected by solitary confinement? How would you deal with being stranded on a deserted island? And do baby monkeys make the best therapists?  SOURCES:William Broyles Jr., screenwriter, journalism, and former U.S. Marine Corps officer.Beatriz Flamini, Spanish mountaineer.Craig Haney, professor of psychology at the University of California Santa Cruz.Harry Harlow, 20th-century American psychologist.Sarah Hepola, author.Nelson Mandela, former president of South Africa.Tree Meinch, freelance writer, editor, and freediver.Alexander Selkirk, 18th-century Scottish privateer and Royal Navy officer.Cheryl Strayed, writer and podcast host. RESOURCES:"The Impact of Isolation on Brain Health," by Vibol Heng, Craig Haney, and Richard Jay Smeyne (Neurobiology of Brain Disorders, 2023)."What Happens When Humans Are Extremely Isolated?" by Tree Meinch (Discover, 2023)."Spanish Climber Leaves Cave After 500 Days in Isolation," by Ciarán Giles (AP News, 2023)."Solitary Confinement Is Not 'Solitude': The Worst Case Scenario of Being 'Alone' in Prison," by Craig Haney (The Handbook of Solitude, 2021).This Tender Land, by William Kent Krueger (2019).Wild: From Lost to Found on the Pacific Crest Trail, by Cheryl Strayed (2012)."The Real Robinson Crusoe," by Bruce Selcraig (Smithsonian Magazine, 2005)."Lost at Sea and Back Again," by Sarah Hepola (The Austin Chronicle, 2000)."Social Recovery of Monkeys Isolated for the First Year of Life: I. Rehabilitation and Therapy," by Melinda Novak and Harry Harlow (Developmental Psychology, 1975). EXTRAS:"Do You Need a Hug?" by No Stupid Questions (2024)."What Makes a Good Gathering?" by No Stupid Questions (2024)."What to Do When Everything Looks Like a Catastrophe?" by No Stupid Questions (2022).Cast Away, film (2000).

Do humans need touch to survive? Do any of us get enough touch throughout our lives? And why doesn't Angela want to hug anyone for eight seconds? SOURCES:Ophelia Deroy, chair of the department of philosophy of mind and cognitive neuroscience at Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich.Kory Floyd, professor of communications at the University of Arizona.Harry Harlow, 20th-century American psychologist.Sirin Kale, associate editor at Vice.Christy Kane, clinical mental health counselor.Carmen Rasmusen Herbert, country music artist and columnist.Virginia Satir, 20th-century clinical social worker and family therapist. RESOURCES:"A Systematic Review and Multivariate Meta-Analysis of the Physical and Mental Health Benefits of Touch Interventions," by Julian Packheiser, Helena Hartmann, Kelly Fredriksen, Valeria Gazzola, Christian Keysers, and Frédéric Michon (Nature Human Behaviour, 2024)."WHO Advises Immediate Skin to Skin Care for Survival of Small and Preterm Babies," by the World Health Organization (2022)."Affective Interpersonal Touch in Close Relationships: A Cross-Cultural Perspective," by Agnieszka Sorokowska, Supreet Saluja, Ilona Croy, et al. (Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2021)."Results Revealed for The Touch Test: The World's Largest Study of Touch," (BBC Media Centre, 2020)."How 8-Second Hugs Can Counteract the Negative Side Effects From Electronics," by Carmen Rasmusen Herbert (Deseret News, 2018)."Confidence is Higher in Touch Than in Vision in Cases of Perceptual Ambiguity," by Merle T. Fairhurst, Eoin Travers, Vincent Hayward, and Ophelia Deroy (Nature: Scientific Reports, 2018)."The Life of the Skin-Hungry: Can You Go Crazy from a Lack Of Touch?" by Sirin Kale (Vice, 2016)."Warm Partner Contact Is Related to Lower Cardiovascular Reactivity," by Karen M. Grewen, Bobbi J. Anderson, Susan S. Girdler, and Kathleen C. Light (Behavioral Medicine, 2010)."The Nature of Love," by Harry Harlow (American Psychologist, 1958). EXTRAS:"Did Covid-19 Kill the Handshake?" by No Stupid Questions (2020).

Join me as I explore the transformative power of building deep, meaningful connections in our lives, especially poignant in an age where superficial online interactions are often mistaken for genuine relationships. I reflect on Erik Newton's heartfelt Twitter story about the profound love he shared with his late wife, revealing the timeless truth that at life's end, it's the depth of our relationships that truly matters. This touching narrative serves as a profound reminder of the importance of fostering and nurturing our most significant relationships, and how they shape the legacy of love we leave behind. I also discuss the insights of early psychologists and the groundbreaking work of British psychiatrist John Bowlby, who pioneered the concept of attachment theory. The historical journey from the 18th century to Bowlby's 20th-century research, including the Strange Situation experiment and Harry Harlow's primate studies, illuminates the critical need for emotional connections in our development. This conversation underscores the essential nature of these bonds for our psychological well-being, urging us to prioritize and deepen our connections with those who are important to us. Join my weekly newsletter. Learn more about my books and courses. Join The Essentialism Academy. Follow me on LinkedIn, Instagram, X, Facebook, and YouTube. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Hey! Únete a este canal para acceder a sus beneficios: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6ovKbWpg3jEsvisKXPbEwQ/join Unete al exclusivo de TikTok y nuestros Lives todos los domingos https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMMX1Aq5A/ 00:00 Intro 02:07 Harry Harlow y su experimento 17:46 Volver Al Futuro 3: ¿Era Necesaria? Canal de Berny:  @bhruy  Banda de Polo:  @losdiosesmusik  ¡Disfruten este episodio! Volver Al Futuro 3: ¿Era Necesaria? | Geeks Supremos EP 175 _________________________________________________________________________ Recuerden seguirnos en las redes sociales como Geeks Supremos. Twitter: https://twitter.com/GeeksSupremos Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/geekssuprem... Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/7FkvYOW... Anchor: https://anchor.fm/geekssupremos Facebook: https://https://www.facebook.com/GeeksSupremos Grupo de Face: https://www.facebook.com/groups/276372618378578 Youtube: ​⁠@GeeksSupremos Correo para mandar historias: historiasgeekssupremos@gmail.com ___________________________________________________________________________ Redes de Los Dioses Musik Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/track/3PvRzV... Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/losdiosesmu... TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@losdiosesmusik Youtube: ​⁠@losdiosesmusik Apple Music: https://music.apple.com/mx/artist/los...

From Harry Harlow's first scientific presentation on love in 1958, scientists (and romanticists) have long been fascinated with this most powerful of human emotions. How do our interpersonal interactions in the home, the church, and the marketplace create or disarm frictions, and how can we utilize the fascinating findings of Harry Harlow's monkeys to help transform our realm of influence? Join Dr. Lisa Dunne on today's show to find out more!  

Join me as I explore the transformative power of building deep, meaningful connections in our lives, especially poignant in an age where superficial online interactions are often mistaken for genuine relationships. I reflect on Eric Newton's heartfelt Twitter story about the profound love he shared with his late wife, revealing the timeless truth that at life's end, it's the depth of our relationships that truly matters. This touching narrative serves as a profound reminder of the importance of fostering and nurturing our most significant relationships, and how they shape the legacy of love we leave behind. I also discuss the insights of early psychologists and the groundbreaking work of British psychiatrist John Bowlby, who pioneered the concept of attachment theory. The historical journey from the 18th century to Bowlby's 20th-century research, including the Strange Situation experiment and Harry Harlow's primate studies, illuminates the critical need for emotional connections in our development. This conversation underscores the essential nature of these bonds for our psychological well-being, urging us to prioritize and deepen our connections with those who are important to us. Join my weekly newsletter. Learn more about my books and courses. Join The Essentialism Academy. Follow me on LinkedIn, Instagram, X, Facebook, and YouTube.

In Episode 12 of The KindlED Podcast, hosts Kaity and Adriane dive deep into the secret to healthy brain development and why kids need strong relationships with the adults in their lives! They tackle the neuroscience and psychology behind what scientists call “attachment theory” and outline how you can start improving relationships with the young people in your life. 

Dr. John P. Gluck was honored with PETA's Trailblazing Advocacy Award in 2021 for being a shining example of ethics in science. In this conversation with Emil Guillermo,  Gluck--the one-time animal experimenter--who studied with the infamous Harry Harlow, describes his own transformation from an animal experimenter to a compassionate bioethicist committed to a cruelty-free science. Gluck's book, "Voracious Science and Vulnerable Animals" has become a guide for scientists, especially of a new generation, seeking to practice a science aligned with their ethical identity. It hasn't been easy. Gluck admits he remains haunted by the faces of the animals he experimented on.  For more go to PETA.org You may also contact us at PETA.org The PETA Podcast PETA, the world's largest animal rights organization, is 9 million strong and growing. This is the place to find out why. Hear from insiders, thought leaders, activists, investigators, politicians, and others why animals need more than kindness—they have the right not to be abused or exploited in any way. Hosted by Emil Guillermo. Powered by PETA activism. Contact us at PETA.org Music provided by CarbonWorks. Go to Apple podcasts and subscribe. Contact and follow host Emil Guillermo on Twitter @emilamok Or at www.amok.com Please subscribe, rate and review wherever you get your podcasts. Thanks for listening to THE PETA PODCAST! Originally published Oct.28, 2020;  Sept.15, 2021; July 6, 2022; Aug. 23,2023;  Copyright ©2020-2-23

We tend to take these claims for granted: “Human beings are essentially relational.” “No man is an island.” “We're created for connection.” “We're made for relationships.” And testing the limits of this can be pretty much diabolical. Evan Rosa traces two stories of parental deprivation: Harry Harlow's "Monkey Love Experiments" and the horror of 1990's discovery of Romanian asylums for orphans, documented in the 1990 report "The Shame of a Nation,” on 20/20.Then psychologist Mari Clements (Glenville State College, formerly Fuller School of Psychology) discusses the importance of healthy marriage dynamics for young children's development and how it provides a secure emotional base; the relational imago Dei; the close emotional bonds that must take place early in life in order to provide the relational stability relational creatures need; we talk about important phases of human development, into adulthood; and the theological backdrop to these questions of the human drive and need for emotional connection.This episode was made possible in part by the generous support of Blueprint 1543. For more information, visit Blueprint1543.org.About Mari ClementsMari Clements is Associate Vice President for Academic Affairs and Professor of Psychology at Glenville State College. Prior to this, she taught at Fuller School of Psychology and Penn State University.Show NotesWe tend to take these claims for granted: “Human beings are essentially relational.” “No man is an island.” “We're created for connection.” “We're made for relationships.” And testing the limits of this can be pretty much diabolical.Harry Harlow's Monkey Love Experiments—Rhesus Monkeys (Video)“The Shame of a Nation,” 20/20 (1990) (Video)How family dynamics and marital conflict impacts children“If you stay in your marriage for the sake of the children, then you deserve, and your child deserves, for you to work on your marriage for the sake of the children. Just being together is actually not better for kids. The kids who look really bad are the kids whose parents are engaged in repetitive and nasty and awful conflict. And they're not getting good models for how to solve problems in their own relationships. They're not getting good models for what to expect from marriage. They're not getting good models for what that marriage relationship is supposed to be.”Even four-year-olds notice when parents are in conflict.Marriage as a secure emotional base for children.Parenting together as stewardship and sacred responsibility“In your relationship, you should glorify God better together than you would separately.”“There's a very important connection between how it is that children see their parents and how it is they typically see God.”Conditional love can produce an earning mindset in a child, not just with respect to the parent, but to God.Don't be a Karen-parent who thinks their child can do no wrong.“That's the interesting thing about people, even when they're doing terrible things, they often are doing them for good reasons, right? In therapy you can hear couples say incredibly hurtful and awful things to each other.”The relational image of GodStudy of Infants in Orphanages during World War I and World War II: Infants with physical needs taken care of still wasted away and even died without human contact.God as Trinity, Jesus as IncarnationalRelating rightly to our neighborsImpact of spousal treatment on how children treat parents and others.Wire Monkey vs Soft and Cuddly MonkeyA close emotional bond must take place early in life in order to provide the relational stability relational creatures need.Definition of adulthoodBabies can do amazing things.Still Face ExperimentIntellectual vs Relational definitions of the Imago DeiIntellectual disabilityBringing psychology into the service of theologyProduction NotesThis podcast featured Mari ClementsEdited and Produced by Evan RosaHosted by Evan RosaProduction Assistance by Macie Bridge and Kaylen YunA Production of the Yale Center for Faith & Culture at Yale Divinity School https://faith.yale.edu/aboutSupport For the Life of the World podcast by giving to the Yale Center for Faith & Culture: https://faith.yale.edu/giveThis episode was made possible in part by the generous support of Blueprint 1543. For more information, visit Blueprint1543.org.

CW: harm to animals On this week's minisode, I talk about the fake mother experiment that Harry Harlow did with infant rhesus monkeys. His work was foundational for demonstrating that babies and parents bond for comfort/warmth and not just for survival. The experiment is rough, so listen with caution! ⁠Sources⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ NAMI HelpLine: 1-800-950-NAMI (6264) or info@nami.org ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.nami.org/help⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ NEW mental health crisis number: 988 Trans Lifeline: US (877) 565-8860 ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://translifeline.org/hotline/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Follow me on Twitter ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@PsychMindedPod⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Follow me on Instagram ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@_psychologically_minded_⁠⁠⁠

C.J. and Kent discuss the research of Harry Harlow at the University of Wisconsin. Harlow was the founder of the Primate Research Center at UW Madison, and it was there he conducted psychological experiments that can only be described as animal abuse. These experiments included one called the pit of despair. News: Medical cannabis, road salt pollution, and Door Country gift shop blizzarded.

Julie Gottman, Ph.D. & John Gottman, Ph.D.: “Touch is as essential to our well-being as food, water, and exercise.”  The Gottmans, renowned psychologists, co-founders of the Gottman Institute, and the world's leading experts in the study of relationships, join mbg co-CEO, Jason Wachob, to discuss little things you can do to secure a long-term relationship, plus: - New challenges many couples face (~01:08) - The power of touch for overall well-being (~03:18) - Little things to do on a daily basis to connect with your partner (~06:38) - Why compliments are crucial for successful relationships (~12:09) - How family trauma impacts your ability to find love (~18:58) - The most common mistakes people make in relationships (~24:11) - Essential ingredients for long-lasting relationships (~27:22) - The importance of weekly date nights (~29:22) - How to have meaningful conversations with your partner (~31:17) - How to have a discussion about your sex life (~35:28) - What role sex actually plays in a relationship (~38:09) - Why some people have affairs (~43:41) - What you can do today to ensure everlasting love (~46:34) Referenced in the episode: - The Gottmans' book, The Love Prescription. - Check out the Gottman Institute. - mbg Podcast episode #320, with the Gottmans. - Harry Harlow monkey study. - The Gottmans' study on newlyweds and bids for connection. - Check out Robert Levinson's research. - A study showing couples underestimate positive experiences 50% of the time. - Check out the Gottmans' Open-Ended Card Decks. - The Normal Bar. - Not "Just Friends". Take 20% off our holiday collection with code HOLIDAY20. Cannot combine with gift cards or other discount codes. Apply code at checkout. We hope you enjoy this episode, and feel free to watch the full video on YouTube! Whether it's an article or podcast, we want to know what we can do to help here at mindbodygreen. Let us know at: podcast@mindbodygreen.com.

Strange and thought provoking episode today! In the 1940s, 50s, and early 60s, animal behavior researcher John B Calhoun ran a number of experiments on rodents regarding how their behavior would be affected by increased urbanization if all their basic needs were made. The results were terrifying. Crowded rats and mice became increasingly violent and lost their reproductive instincts to the point that eventually, the utopia went extinct after enduring a final phase full of random violent attacks, apathy, cannibalism and more. Could the increased urbanization of humanity also lead to our species' extinction as Calhoun warned?  Or are we humans too different from rodents to presume that what happens to mice and rat would also happen to humans? I found today's episode one of the most thought provoking we've done in quite  some time. Hope you do too! Bad Magic Productions Monthly Patreon Donation: We donated $15,228 to the United Heroes League, who provide free sports equipment, game tickets, cash grants, skill development camps, and special experiences to military families across the US & Canada. To find out more, please visit unitedheroesleague.orgGet tour tickets at dancummins.tv Watch the Suck on YouTube: https://youtu.be/0bX8VraVxP4Merch: https://www.badmagicmerch.comDiscord! https://discord.gg/tqzH89vWant to join the Cult of the Curious private Facebook Group? Go directly to Facebook and search for "Cult of the Curious" in order to locate whatever happens to be our most current page :)For all merch related questions/problems: store@badmagicproductions.com (copy and paste)Please rate and subscribe on iTunes and elsewhere and follow the suck on social media!! @timesuckpodcast on IG and http://www.facebook.com/timesuckpodcastWanna become a Space Lizard?  Click here: https://www.patreon.com/timesuckpodcastSign up through Patreon and for $5 a month you get to listen to the Secret Suck, which will drop Thursdays at Noon, PST. You'll also get 20% off of all regular Timesuck merch PLUS access to exclusive Space Lizard merch. You get to vote on two Monday topics each month via the app. And you get the download link for my new comedy album, Feel the Heat. Check the Patreon posts to find out how to download the new album and take advantage of other benefits.

En la década de 1920, la teoría conductista planteaba que en la infancia sólo eran necesarios asuntos como el alimento y la limpieza; el cariño no. De hecho, dejar a un niño sin amor forjaba su carácter. El psicólogo Harry Harlow pensaba de otra manera, y estaba determinado a demostrar que el amor y el cariño son aún más importantes que todo lo demás. Irónicamente, para probarlo, tuvo que realizar una serie de experimentos que consistían en eliminar toda fuente de cariño de sus sujetos experimentales. Y sin amor, ¿qué somos y en qué nos convertimos? “Experimentos retorcidos” es una serie de PORTAL SONORO en la que conocerás el lado oscuro de la ciencia y lo retorcido que puede llegar a ser el ser humano. Síguenos en @sonoropodcast en todas las redes sociales.  Guión: Alejandro Joseph. Voces: Alejandro Joseph, Francisco de Pablo. Producción: Fernando Santamaría, Israel Pérez. Postproducción y diseño de audio: Karina Riveroll. Diseño de audio, mezcla y edición: Israel Pére Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Joy Lab Podcast (episode 25) In this episode, we're turning to our fifth lesson of loving well, which is about the power of belonging. This lesson may be the easiest to sell. We all want to belong, and we always have. Even the introverts and self-proclaimed lone wolves, we want a pack of other introverts and lone wolves to call on, even if just to complain about extroverts or social butterflies.   Key Takeaways: We may lose brain cells as we age, but that's not the end of the story. Neurogenesis is on our side and we can support that process of new cell growth.  New cells need connections to grow. Humans need connections as well.  Harry Harlow's unethical experiments... demonstrating that humans NEED connection and support for development. No matter how old you are, social connections and support are essential for more optimal resilience and mental health.  How many "close friends" does research suggest you need for optimal wellbeing? Just 3-5. Significant others count here, close family members... essentially, 3-5 people who you feel you could lean on in a crisis.  In line with that ideal number of close friends, there are max loads for friendships beyond that small circle of close friends (don't let social media trick you into thinking more is better). Build your house of belonging, your circle of close friends, as carefully as you would build your dream house.   Links Mentioned: Joy Lab Podcast episode #6 (5 Lessons of Loving Well) Joy Lab Podcast episode #21 (Love Yourself First)  Joy Lab Podcast episode #22 (See the Innocence in Others) Joy Lab Podcast episode #23 (Be More Permeable) Joy Lab Podcast episode #24 (Listen Deeply) Joy Lab Program David Whyte's website Harlow, H., et. al (1965). Total social isolation in monkeys. More on Dunbar's numbers (from the Atlantic). Hall, J. (2018). How many hours does it take to make a friend? Full transcript available at: https://www.naturalmentalhealth.com/blog/learning-to-love-well-create-a-house-of-belonging

Dr. John P. Gluck was honored with PETA's Trailblazing Advocacy Award in 2021 for being a shining example of ethics in science. In this conversation with Emil Guillermo, the one-time animal experimenter, who studied with the infamous Harry Harlow, describes his own transformation from an animal experimenter to a compassionate bioethicist committed to a cruelty-free science. Gluck's book, "Voracious Science and Vulnerable Animals" has become a guide for scientists, especially of a new generation, seeking to practice a science aligned with their ethical identity. It hasn't been easy. Gluck admits he remains haunted by the faces of the animals he experimented on. For more go to PETA.org You may also contact us at PETA.org The PETA Podcast PETA, the world's largest animal rights organization, is 6.5 million strong and growing. This is the place to find out why. Hear from insiders, thought leaders, activists, investigators, politicians, and others why animals need more than kindness—they have the right not to be abused or exploited in any way. Hosted by Emil Guillermo. Powered by PETA activism. Contact us at PETA.org Listen to the very first PETA podcast with Ingrid Newkirk Music provided by CarbonWorks. Go to Apple podcasts and subscribe. Contact and follow host Emil Guillermo on Twitter @emilamok Or at www.amok.com Please subscribe, rate and review wherever you get your podcasts. Thanks for listening to THE PETA PODCAST! (Originally published Oct.28, 2020; Republished Sept.15, 2021, July 6, 2022). Copyright ©2022

Como se dá a relação entre uma mãe e seu bebê, segundo a ciência?E quais os problemas éticos dos experimentos de Harry Harlow?Confira no papo entre o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.> OUÇA (56min 47s)*Naruhodo! é o podcast pra quem tem fome de aprender. Ciência, senso comum, curiosidades, desafios e muito mais. Com o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.Edição: Reginaldo Cursino.http://naruhodo.b9.com.br*PARCERIA: ALURAA Alura tem mais de 1.000 cursos de diversas áreas e é a maior plataforma de cursos online do Brasil -- e você tem acesso a todos com uma única assinatura.E no link especial de Black Friday você tem o maior desconto da história da Alura: 25% de desconto para quem se matricular do dia 22 até o dia 26 de novembro.bit.ly/blackfriday-alura-naruhodoAproveite: é a sua chance de estudar na Alura com um preço incrível!*REFERÊNCIASTHE NATURE OF LOVEhttps://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/1960-02805-001.pdfBehavior of Nonhuman Primateshttps://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9781483228211/behavior-of-nonhuman-primatesSocial Recovery by Isolation-Reared Monkeyshttps://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/68/7/1534.full.pdfAffectional Responses in the Infant Monkeyhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1758036?casa_token=RRtNdZLMKK4AAAAA%3AXJldrLhV5aIIvStn1RQjiEdkteBLPn3yBo9WeP8SCU-vfYOgl4Lx88_c454urjPmZyKtyKSGxtxYkPvox2WUimVdTl-nliz09vJBkJLqyKLqwC8I9bY&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contentsTHE FORMATION OF LEARNING SETShttps://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/1949-03097-001.pdfClassical Harlow Study Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OrNBEhzjg8I Long-term effects of social rehabilitation in rhesus monkeyshttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02381565Attachment Theory in Infants Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRejV6f-Y3c A 10-Year Perspective of Motherless-MotherMonkey Behaviorhttps://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/1976-27365-001.pdfInduced depression in monkeyshttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0091677374914758“When Strangers Meet”: John Bowlby and Harry Harlow on Attachment Behaviorhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12124-008-9079-2Loneliness in Infancy: Harry Harlow, John Bowlby and Issues of Separationhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12124-008-9071-xPsychogenic Disease in Infancyhttps://archive.org/details/PsychogenicDHospitalism; an inquiry into the genesis of psychiatric conditions in early childhoodhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21004303/John Bowlby and ethology: An annotated interview with Robert Hindehttps://www.tandfonline.com.sci-hub.se/doi/abs/10.1080/14616730601149809THE ORIGINS OF ATTACHMENT THEORY: JOHN BOWLBY AND MARY AINSWORTHhttp://www.psychology.sunysb.edu/attachment/online/inge_origins.pdfHarry F. Harlow and Animal Research: Reflection on the Ethical Paradoxhttps://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1112&context=acwp_arteLONELINESS IN INFANTShttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/article-abstract/1179366Postnatal Touch Stimulation Acutely Alters Corticosterone Levels and Glucocorticoid Receptor Gene Expression in the Neonatal Rathttps://www.karger.com/Article/Abstract/71465Specific antibody levels in free-ranging rhesus monkeys: Relationships to plasma hormones, cardiac parameters, and early behaviorhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dev.420260704From Thought to Therapy: Lessons from a Primate Laboratoryhttps://www.hrstud.unizg.hr/_download/repository/From_thought_to_therapy_-_lessons_from_a_primate_laboratory.pdfRigorous Experiments on Monkey Love: An Account of Harry F. Harlow's Role in the History of Attachment Theoryhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12124-008-9072-9.pdfNaruhodo 252 - A pirâmide de Maslow faz sentido?https://www.b9.com.br/shows/naruhodo/naruhodo-252-a-piramide-de-maslow-faz-sentido/Naruhodo 137 - O experimento da prisão de Stanford é uma fraude?https://www.b9.com.br/shows/naruhodo/naruhodo-137-o-experimento-da-prisao-de-stanford-e-uma-fraude/Naruhodo 242 - O experimento do Parque dos Ratos ainda é válido?https://www.b9.com.br/shows/naruhodo/naruhodo-242-o-experimento-do-parque-dos-ratos-ainda-e-valido/Podcasts das #Minas: SE FOSSE FÁCIL ERA EXATAS#MulheresPodcastershttps://open.spotify.com/show/6sLbz7FHQGD5S54h9TluIj*APOIE O NARUHODO!Você sabia que pode ajudar a manter o Naruhodo no ar?Ao contribuir, você pode ter acesso ao grupo fechado no Telegram, receber conteúdos exclusivos e ter vantagens especiais.Assine o apoio mensal pelo PicPay: https://picpay.me/naruhodopodcast

Dr. John P. Gluck is being honored with PETA's Trailblazing Advocacy Award for being a shining example of ethics in science. The one-time animal experimenter, who studied with the infamous Harry Harlow, describes his own transformation from animal experimenter to a compassionate bioethicist committed to a cruelty-free science. In conversation with Emil Guillermo, Gluck talks about his childhood, his studies in college, and his professional life. As a young boy, John Gluck was kind to animals. But as a scientist, he was mentored by the notorious vivisector Dr.Harry Harlow at the University of Wisconsin. Then something clicked. He began to see the animals as patients, not tools of science. Gluck's book, "Voracious Science and Vulnerable Animals" has become a guide for scientists, especially of a new generation, seeking to practice a science aligned with their ethical identity. Gluck talks with Emil Guillermo about the ethical journey he's taken and admits he remains haunted by the faces of the animals he experimented on. For more go to PETA.org You may also contact us at PETA.org The PETA Podcast PETA, the world's largest animal rights organization, is 6.5 million strong and growing. This is the place to find out why. Hear from insiders, thought leaders, activists, investigators, politicians, and others why animals need more than kindness—they have the right not to be abused or exploited in any way. Hosted by Emil Guillermo. Powered by PETA activism. Contact us at PETA.org Listen to the very first PETA podcast with Ingrid Newkirk Music provided by CarbonWorks. Go to Apple podcasts and subscribe. Contact and follow host Emil Guillermo on Twitter @emilamok Or at www.amok.com Please subscribe, rate and review wherever you get your podcasts. Help us grow the podcast by taking this short survey. Thanks for listening to THE PETA PODCAST! (Originally published Oct.28, 2020; Republished Sept.15, 2021)

Bouncing in and out of their bitchy bubble, Megan and Michelle discuss the need for human touch, cuddle parties, proactive consent, love hormones, puppy piles, attachment parenting, and water balloons.Resources:The Power of Touch: Physical Affection is Important in Relationships, but Some People Need More Than OthersHarlow's Classic Study Revealed the Importance of Maternal ContactWhat Does It Mean To Be Touch Starved?Why Some People Hate To Be Hugged, According to ScienceWant to support Prosecco Theory?Check out our merch, available on teepublic.com!Follow/Subscribe wherever you listen!Rate, review, and tell your friends!Follow us on Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook!****************Have you ever thought about starting your own podcast? From day one, Buzzsprout gave us all the tools we needed get Prosecco Theory off the ground. What are you waiting for? Follow this link to let them know we sent you. Cheers!!

Den vollständigen Standpunkte-Text (inkl ggf. Quellenhinweisen und Links) findet ihr hier:https://kenfm.de/das-kaspar-hauser-jahr-corona-massnahmen-und-menschlichkeit-von-dagmar-henn Seit über einem Jahr leben wir nun mit Masken und in “sozialer Distanz”. Manche Folgeschäden sind bereits sichtbar. Diese Maßnahmen greifen tief ein in Verhaltensweisen und Bedürfnisse, die uns als Menschen ausmachen. Auf Dauer stellen sie die Menschlichkeit selbst infrage. Ein Standpunkt von Dagmar Henn. Als am 26. Mai 1828 in Nürnberg ein Jugendlicher auftauchte, der sich Kaspar Hauser (1) nannte und erzählte, er sei über Jahre hinweg isoliert aufgewachsen, war das der Auslöser für Debatten, welchen Anteil Sprache und Kontakt an der menschlichen Natur hätten. Seine Geschichte diente, auch wenn viele Details darin fraglich sind, noch im vergangenen Jahrhundert als Anlass, den geistigen und emotionalen Verfall isolierter Kinder, den Hospitalismus, als Kaspar-Hauser-Syndrom zu benennen. Hospitalismus (2) wurde, das lässt sich schon am Namen erkennen, zuerst in Krankenhäusern beobachtet. Kinder, die längere Zeit dort verbrachten, ohne Kontakt, Zuwendung und Nähe zu erfahren, werden apathisch, entwickeln sich zurück, werden aber auch deutlich anfälliger für Krankheiten aller Art. Eine Zeit lang wurde Hospitalismus, als man die Bedeutung der Hygiene gerade erst entdeckt hatte, regelrecht gefördert – die Regeln in manchen Waisenhäusern untersagten jegliche Berührung (3), und die Kinder, die unter diesem Regime aufwuchsen, überlebten es meist nicht, obwohl sie nach damaliger Überzeugung bestens vor Infektionen geschützt wurden. So wie das Erscheinen Kaspar Hausers zu einer Beschäftigung mit der Rolle der sprachlichen Kommunikation führte, sorgte das Phänomen des Hospitalismus, als es dann erkannt wurde, für ein Nachdenken über die Rolle körperlicher Zuwendung. Berühmt wurden die Experimente von Harry Harlow, der Rhesusaffenbabys vor die Wahl zwischen einem milchspendenden Drahtkörper und einem milchlosen Fellkörper stellte, wobei sich zeigte, dass die Affenbabys den Drahtkörper nur zum Trinken aufsuchten. Im Gefolge dieser Erkenntnisse wurde es unter anderem Müttern ermöglicht, bei ihren kranken Kindern zu bleiben, wenn diese in die Klinik mussten, und Neugeborene wurden nicht mehr systematisch von ihren Müttern getrennt…weiterlesen hier: https://kenfm.de/das-kaspar-hauser-jahr-corona-massnahmen-und-menschlichkeit-von-dagmar-henn +++ KenFM jetzt auch als kostenlose App für Android- und iOS-Geräte verfügbar! Über unsere Homepage kommt Ihr zu den Stores von Apple und Google. Hier der Link: https://kenfm.de/kenfm-app/ +++ Abonniere jetzt den KenFM-Newsletter: https://kenfm.de/newsletter/ +++ jetzt kannst Du uns auch mit Bitcoins unterstützen. Bitcoin-Account: https://commerce.coinbase.com/checkout/1edba334-ba63-4a88-bfc3-d6a3071efcc8 +++ Dir gefällt unser Programm? Informationen zu weiteren Unterstützungsmöglichkeiten findest Du hier: https://kenfm.de/support/kenfm-unterstuetzen/ Website und Social Media:https://www.kenfm.de https://www.twitter.com/TeamKenFM https://www.instagram.com/kenfm.de/ https://soundcloud.com/ken-fm https://t.me/s/KenFM See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Zaczynamy od razu od zielonej strefy w praktyce - zaskoczyły nas nowe ustawienia lajwów na Facebooku i będąc już na wizji, uczymy się ich z dużym spokojem. A potem rozmawiamy o tym, jak to jest być w zielonej strefie, czym się ona charakteryzuje i co się w niej dzieje: kontakty międzyludzkie są raczej łatwe; mamy poczucie bezpieczeństwa; niejasności i nowości traktujemy jako wyzwanie, okazje do rozwoju; różnice traktujemy jako różnorodność i zasób; łatwiej jest prosić o pomoc, gdy napotyka się na przeszkody; towarzyszy nam w niej opowieść o obfitości; ciekawość historii drugiego człowieka bardziej niż walka na rację; jest większa dostępność do oglądu sytuacji z metapoziomu - lotu ptaka, z szerszej perspektywy; jesteśmy “tu i teraz”; jest większa świadomość tego, co czuję i zdolności nazwania tego; bierzemy pod uwagę siebie i bierzemy pod uwagę innych ludzi. W Pogadance pojawiają się nazwiska, tytuły, terminy: Campy - Rodzinne wyjazdy, w których od lat uczestniczymy - www.pasikonie.pl; pytanie pomocne w wielu sytuacjach wyzwań - co najgorszego mogłoby się stać?; okno tolerancji (Peter Levine i Bessel van der Kolka); kucie żelaza póki zimne - za Jesperem Juulem; Deb Dana i jej sposób opisywania stref; connecting knowing - pojęciu zaczerpnięte od sióstr Nagoski; narzędzie przeramowania - dodawania nowej ramy do sytuacji; (jak zwykle :) - Kasia Urbaniak - tym razem w kontekście ćwiczeń pełnych zabawy; książka/broszura “Motivational Forces Underlining learning” Harry Harlow; książka “Drive” Dan Pink; książka “Wypalenie” E.Nagoski; książka “Sex for one” - Betty Dodson; Hanna Olechnowicz - w kontekście bodźców wizualnych, słuchowych i dotykowych; “koło zgody” Betty Martin.

In this week's episode, Dr. Dan discusses the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health. Specifically, what impact does prolonged isolation have on our well-being. He references the ground breaking but controversial research by Harry Harlow and monkeys in helping us to understand our need for connection. Connect with Dr. Dan at www.drpallesen.com and on Facebook, LinkedIn, and Instagram.

Continuing her four interview, eight-part miniseries on the roots and history of attachment theory, Karen welcomes science journalist and author Deborah Blum to the show to discuss her 2002 book Love At Goon Park: Harry Harlow and the Science of Affection.

Launching a four interview, eight-part miniseries on the roots and history of attachment theory, Karen welcomes science journalist and author Deborah Blum to the show to discuss her 2002 book Love At Goon Park: Harry Harlow and the Science of Affection. Part two will be released on Tuesday, May 11th.

Becky Berry and Diana Bader talk about how prolonged isolation doesn’t work for anyone. Diana begins this episode by talking about Harry Harlow’s experiments with monkeys that proved everyone needs comfort, and without human contact, we fail to thrive.  They also discuss the problem with texting: it’s just not the same as talking voice to voice. Becky shares her strange birthday in the 8th week of quarantine, and talks about how she missed the human connection.  Becky also confesses to being a good energy vampire (she magnifies the energy instead of taking it) because she needs people around her so she can recharge and connect. Diana admits that, even as an introvert, she is also sick of being isolated. Together they discuss the need for hugs and real face-to-face time. Becky has a hard time recharging without people while Diana becomes overcharged and very talkative when she finally does see people. There’s no balance - and no way to achieve it! They both notice how it’s hard to feel like yourself when you are alone all of the time, and feel that interactions with people can become awkward.  We all react differently to being alone all the time, but whether you get your people energy from Zoom meetings or texting, that soul connection that happens in face-to-face interactions is missing. Zoom does help a little because we can at least see people’s faces and hear their voices.  Funerals and weddings have also become difficult because we can neither console or celebrate face-to-face.  Becky and Diana also discuss what happens to the people who are thriving under these new conditions, like working from home, wondering how they’ll adapt when (or if) they return to the office.  They both wonder what the future will hold. And what will the future hold? Will there be fear concerning reconnecting with each other? When we are able to see each other again on a regular basis, what will that look and feel like? Spoiler Alert: Nobody knows. Recorded 5/5/2020

ep39: Favorite childhood toys or the aesthetics of toys Chris and Randall discuss the aesthetics of toys through the lens of their favorite childhood toys. MIT paper on toy design which incorporates Piaget's stages of development http://web.mit.edu/barryk/Public/Toys/PlayPyramid.pdf Wikipedia's toy article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toy *** Randall's aesthetic toy categories: Physics toys: Balls, construction sets, blocks. These toys allow kids to understand the properties of the physical world. Arts/crafts: Drawing, sculpture. These toys help kids understand themselves better and allow them to communicate with the outside world. The adult artist creates for similar reasons as the child artist. When a child has poor access to language, arts and crafts become more important. Games/puzzles: These toys allow children to explore abstract concepts and invisible rules and forces. They allow children and adults a level of social interaction that is otherwise unobtainable. Problem solving is involved as well, social skills, negotiation, communication. Dolls: This includes any scale models, figures, toy cars, action figures, etc. Children are trying to learn about the world by modelling and simulating it. What is a child doing when playing with a doll or toy car? They are creating a simulation of the universe. They are probing it from different angles, seeing what happens when they perform different actions. Kids who play with dolls activate their social brain. Just like a scientist creates a simulation to understand the weather, a child creates a simulation to understand the world. World building is frequently the ultimate activity of childhood play. Costumes: self-explanatory *** Topics discussed: Piaget's Stages of Development as they relate to toys blocks Legos Construx Fisher-Price Chatter Telephone cloth books books stuffed animals Gund Steiff Toy Story (1995) Harry Harlow's experiments Lincoln Logs Tinkertoy Construction Set Giant Tinkertoys FAO Schwarz Toys "R" Us Battleship cheating video games Dungeons & Dragons Recon Risk water guns BB guns paintball Laser tag Rock 'Em Sock 'Em Robots Robot combat Randall's aesthetic categories (see above) Train sets Chris' giant train set remote control boat, plane, rocket kites Nerf pool Bop Bop 'n Rebop pinball Ping Pong Foosball fireworks Bang snaps Cherry bombs smoke bombs Black snake cap guns Etch A Sketch Crayola Crayons Lite-Brite Magic: The Gathering Checkers jigsaw puzzles Puzzle Zoo Ravensburger Monopoly action figures Strawberry Shortcake Barbie Dressy Bessie Dapper Dan G.I. Joe Action Jackson Six Million Dollar Man Toy soldiers Star Wars (movies) Planet of the Apes (movies) Diener Inc. KRYGO 5 Hot Wheels Matchbox Corgi toys Rudolf Steiner Waldorf toys M.U.S.C.L.E. Figures costumes Halloween Pith helmet spacesuit monster masks cowboys Knott's Berry Farm soldier vs princess Frozen (2013) Pirates toys as brain hack recorded October 5, 2020 Visit us at https://chrisandrandall.com/

Episode three of the modern psychology series and another episode of What I’m Obsessed With Now. This episode leaves the feuding Freud and Jung, as we look at behavioural psychology. We will talk a look at Pavlov and his dogs, James B. Watson the father of the field, Harry Harlow the monster and my personal favourite BF Skinner. These theories are interesting and resonate with the world I see around me, I think you’ll find it just as interesting. A fascinating field, and a great way to end our look at modern psychology.

What if more vivisectors and animal researchers came to their ethical senses and stopped abusing and exploiting their test subjects--the animals? Thousands of animals' lives could be saved and millions of your tax-dollars would no longer be wasted. It could happen if more scientists followed the path of John Gluck. As a young boy, Gluck was kind to animals. But as a scientist, he was mentored by the notorious vivisector Dr.Harry Harlow at the University of Wisconsin. Then something clicked. He began to see the animals as patients, not tools of science. Gluck's book, "Voracious Science and Vulnerable Animals" has become a guide for scientists, especially of a new generation, seeking to practice a science aligned with their ethical identity. Gluck talks with Emil Guillermo about his ethical journey and admits he remains haunted by the faces of the animals, his test subjects. For more go to PETA.org The PETA Podcast PETA, the world's largest animal rights organization, is 6.5 million strong and growing. This is the place to find out why. Hear from insiders, thought leaders, activists, investigators, politicians, and others why animals need more than kindness—they have the right not to be abused or exploited in any way. Hosted by Emil Guillermo. Powered by PETA activism. Contact us at PETA.org Listen to the very first PETA podcast with Ingrid Newkirk Music provided by CarbonWorks. Go to Apple podcasts and subscribe. Contact and follow host Emil Guillermo on Twitter @emilamok Or at www.amok.com Please subscribe, rate and review wherever you get your podcasts. Help us grow the podcast by taking this short survey. Thanks for listening to THE PETA PODCAST! (Originally published Oct.28, 2020) Reprised Dec. 30, 2020

Meet counselor Keri Cooper, MA in the 2nd part of her interview. Systemic chronic trauma affects the development of a child's brain. Although trauma is common, its effects don't have to be.Keri received her master's degree in counseling from Webster University in St. Louis, Missouri and has been licensed for 25 years.➤RESOURCESSpirit Reins: https://www.spiritreins.org/Free Worksheet: https://www.YourTruthRevealed.com➤SUMMARYHow does trauma affect the development of a child's brain?* Knowledge of psychoeducation and brain development has grown a lot in the last in the last years.* The brain of a 3-year old is 80% formed; they aren't blank slates.* With trauma, the worst experiences are usually very brief. No matter what, there's an opportunity for things to be better.* A lot of behavior has a biological link. Having more compassion, it's not just a behavioral choice. The basics are they are hungry, tired, and safe.* In a lot of orphanages, the babies weren't held.* There was a study conducted by psychologist Harry Harlow with rhesus monkeys in 1950s and 60s. Infants were taken away from their mothers and raised in isolation. There's evidence for the importance of maternal touch in infant development.You've done a lot of work with adoption. What are some key things you've encountered?* People deciding if they want to adopt a foster child, or private adoption.* Suggest attending the adoption collaborative of Texas (ACT). There's a coalition of Child Protective Services and nonprofit child placing agencies whose mission is to find families for children in the foster care system.* For parents, be blatantly honest. Sometimes that's where families go awry. Do they want to adopt through foster care for financial reasons? These child populations are different.* Private adoption, parents change minds, babies are born with health issues. May not be an easy path. Even biological siblings can be night and day from each other.You've also done a lot of work with teens. Is this the primary demographic you see at Spirit Reins?* Working with teens with trauma and who are at risk for suicide.* There's a difference between an okay coping skill verses what isn't, like if a teen is self-harming.* Private practice - the amount of stress for teens is across the board at school, they can't win.* Most kids are not at the developmental level to determine their life path in high school, there's an expectation to choose the college path.What are specific methods you use to help children and adolescents impacted by trauma?* Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) and perception bias. Looking through everything that happened to a child, looking through the lens of trauma.* How we think is powerful. It can make a difference with our connection with others.* The way we think about our situation, our job, our families, friendships, is through a lens. Sometimes the lens works wonderfully and sometimes not so well. Making sure that we have the best perception about how things are.* If I spilled coffee, I'm so clumsy. Then the rest of the day I tripped over a step, I really am clumsy. I'm assuming the worst. The same exact behavior without the same perception.* Looking for ways to confirm, bias perception. We tuned into negative perceptions. When we tune into positive perceptions, the circumstances are better.* Relook at the same circumstance. Is this really true? Reality checking.How important are relationships and connections in healing from trauma?* Pair kids up with equine specialist and licensed therapist.* Loving connections is essential that includes the parent's relationship with their child. It goes beyond the treatment center.

This is the 2nd part of an interview with counselor Keri Cooper, MA. Systemic chronic trauma affects the development of a child's brain. Although trauma is common, its effects don't have to be. Keri received her master's degree in counseling from Webster University in St. Louis, Missouri and has been licensed for 25 years. ➤RESOURCES Spirit Reins: https://www.spiritreins.org/ Free Worksheet: https://www.YourTruthRevealed.com ➤SUMMARY How does trauma affect the development of a child’s brain? * Knowledge of psychoeducation and brain development has grown a lot in the last in the last years. * The brain of a 3-year old is 80% formed; they aren't blank slates. * With trauma, the worst experiences are usually very brief. No matter what, there's an opportunity for things to be better. * A lot of behavior has a biological link. Having more compassion, it's not just a behavioral choice. The basics are they are hungry, tired, and safe. * In a lot of orphanages, the babies weren’t held. * There was a study conducted by psychologist Harry Harlow with rhesus monkeys in 1950s and 60s. Infants were taken away from their mothers and raised in isolation. There's evidence for the importance of maternal touch in infant development. You’ve done a lot of work with adoption. What are some key things you’ve encountered? * People deciding if they want to adopt a foster child, or private adoption. * Suggest attending the adoption collaborative of Texas (ACT). There's a coalition of Child Protective Services and nonprofit child placing agencies whose mission is to find families for children in the foster care system. * For parents, be blatantly honest. Sometimes that's where families go awry. Do they want to adopt through foster care for financial reasons? These child populations are different. * Private adoption, parents change minds, babies are born with health issues. May not be an easy path. Even biological siblings can be night and day from each other. You’ve also done a lot of work with teens. Is this the primary demographic you see at Spirit Reins? * Working with teens with trauma and who are at risk for suicide. * There’s a difference between an okay coping skill verses what isn’t, like if a teen is self-harming. * Private practice - the amount of stress for teens is across the board at school, they can't win. * Most kids are not at the developmental level to determine their life path in high school, there’s an expectation to choose the college path. What are specific methods you use to help children and adolescents impacted by trauma? * Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) and perception bias. Looking through everything that happened to a child, looking through the lens of trauma. * How we think is powerful. It can make a difference with our connection with others. * The way we think about our situation, our job, our families, friendships, is through a lens. Sometimes the lens works wonderfully and sometimes not so well. Making sure that we have the best perception about how things are. * If I spilled coffee, I'm so clumsy. Then the rest of the day I tripped over a step, I really am clumsy. I'm assuming the worst. The same exact behavior without the same perception. * Looking for ways to confirm, bias perception. We tuned into negative perceptions. When we tune into positive perceptions, the circumstances are better. * Relook at the same circumstance. Is this really true? Reality checking. How important are relationships and connections in healing from trauma? * Pair kids up with equine specialist and licensed therapist. * Loving connections is essential that includes the parent's relationship with their child. It goes beyond the treatment center. * It's important to have all the healthcare specialists on the same team. Nearly half of our nation's children are impacted by adverse childhood experiences (ACE), and 64% of adults acknowledge experiencing at least one in their l...

Meet counselor Keri Cooper, MA in the 1st part of her interview. Systemic chronic trauma affects the development of a child's brain. Although trauma is common, its effects don't have to be.Keri received her master's degree in counseling from Webster University in St. Louis, Missouri and has been licensed for 25 years.➤RESOURCESSpirit Reins: https://www.spiritreins.org/Free Worksheet: https://www.YourTruthRevealed.com➤SUMMARYHow does trauma affect the development of a child's brain?* Knowledge of psychoeducation and brain development has grown a lot in the last in the last years.* The brain of a 3-year old is 80% formed; they aren't blank slates.* With trauma, the worst experiences are usually very brief. No matter what, there's an opportunity for things to be better.* A lot of behavior has a biological link. Having more compassion, it's not just a behavioral choice. The basics are they are hungry, tired, and safe.* In a lot of orphanages, the babies weren't held.* There was a study conducted by psychologist Harry Harlow with rhesus monkeys in 1950s and 60s. Infants were taken away from their mothers and raised in isolation. There's evidence for the importance of maternal touch in infant development.You've done a lot of work with adoption. What are some key things you've encountered?* People deciding if they want to adopt a foster child, or private adoption.* Suggest attending the adoption collaborative of Texas (ACT). There's a coalition of Child Protective Services and nonprofit child placing agencies whose mission is to find families for children in the foster care system.* For parents, be blatantly honest. Sometimes that's where families go awry. Do they want to adopt through foster care for financial reasons? These child populations are different.* Private adoption, parents change minds, babies are born with health issues. May not be an easy path. Even biological siblings can be night and day from each other.You've also done a lot of work with teens. Is this the primary demographic you see at Spirit Reins?* Working with teens with trauma and who are at risk for suicide.* There's a difference between an okay coping skill verses what isn't, like if a teen is self-harming.* Private practice - the amount of stress for teens is across the board at school, they can't win.* Most kids are not at the developmental level to determine their life path in high school, there's an expectation to choose the college path.What are specific methods you use to help children and adolescents impacted by trauma?* Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) and perception bias. Looking through everything that happened to a child, looking through the lens of trauma.* How we think is powerful. It can make a difference with our connection with others.* The way we think about our situation, our job, our families, friendships, is through a lens. Sometimes the lens works wonderfully and sometimes not so well. Making sure that we have the best perception about how things are.* If I spilled coffee, I'm so clumsy. Then the rest of the day I tripped over a step, I really am clumsy. I'm assuming the worst. The same exact behavior without the same perception.* Looking for ways to confirm, bias perception. We tuned into negative perceptions. When we tune into positive perceptions, the circumstances are better.* Relook at the same circumstance. Is this really true? Reality checking.How important are relationships and connections in healing from trauma?* Pair kids up with equine specialist and licensed therapist.* Loving connections is essential that includes the parent's relationship with their child. It goes beyond the treatment center.

This is the 1st part of an interview with counselor Keri Cooper, MA. Systemic chronic trauma affects the development of a child's brain. Although trauma is common, its effects don't have to be. Keri received her master's degree in counseling from Webster University in St. Louis, Missouri and has been licensed for 25 years. ➤RESOURCES Spirit Reins: https://www.spiritreins.org/ Free Worksheet: https://www.YourTruthRevealed.com ➤SUMMARY How does trauma affect the development of a child’s brain? * Knowledge of psychoeducation and brain development has grown a lot in the last in the last years. * The brain of a 3-year old is 80% formed; they aren't blank slates. * With trauma, the worst experiences are usually very brief. No matter what, there's an opportunity for things to be better. * A lot of behavior has a biological link. Having more compassion, it's not just a behavioral choice. The basics are they are hungry, tired, and safe. * In a lot of orphanages, the babies weren’t held. * There was a study conducted by psychologist Harry Harlow with rhesus monkeys in 1950s and 60s. Infants were taken away from their mothers and raised in isolation. There's evidence for the importance of maternal touch in infant development. You’ve done a lot of work with adoption. What are some key things you’ve encountered? * People deciding if they want to adopt a foster child, or private adoption. * Suggest attending the adoption collaborative of Texas (ACT). There's a coalition of Child Protective Services and nonprofit child placing agencies whose mission is to find families for children in the foster care system. * For parents, be blatantly honest. Sometimes that's where families go awry. Do they want to adopt through foster care for financial reasons? These child populations are different. * Private adoption, parents change minds, babies are born with health issues. May not be an easy path. Even biological siblings can be night and day from each other. You’ve also done a lot of work with teens. Is this the primary demographic you see at Spirit Reins? * Working with teens with trauma and who are at risk for suicide. * There’s a difference between an okay coping skill verses what isn’t, like if a teen is self-harming. * Private practice - the amount of stress for teens is across the board at school, they can't win. * Most kids are not at the developmental level to determine their life path in high school, there’s an expectation to choose the college path. What are specific methods you use to help children and adolescents impacted by trauma? * Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) and perception bias. Looking through everything that happened to a child, looking through the lens of trauma. * How we think is powerful. It can make a difference with our connection with others. * The way we think about our situation, our job, our families, friendships, is through a lens. Sometimes the lens works wonderfully and sometimes not so well. Making sure that we have the best perception about how things are. * If I spilled coffee, I'm so clumsy. Then the rest of the day I tripped over a step, I really am clumsy. I'm assuming the worst. The same exact behavior without the same perception. * Looking for ways to confirm, bias perception. We tuned into negative perceptions. When we tune into positive perceptions, the circumstances are better. * Relook at the same circumstance. Is this really true? Reality checking. How important are relationships and connections in healing from trauma? * Pair kids up with equine specialist and licensed therapist. * Loving connections is essential that includes the parent's relationship with their child. It goes beyond the treatment center. * It's important to have all the healthcare specialists on the same team. Nearly half of our nation's children are impacted by adverse childhood experiences (ACE), and 64% of adults acknowledge experiencing at least one in their l...

As a young boy, John Gluck was kind to animals. But as a scientist, he was mentored by the notorious vivisector Dr.Harry Harlow at the University of Wisconsin. Then something clicked. He began to see the animals as patients, not tools of science. Gluck's book, "Voracious Science and Vulnerable Animals" has become a guide for scientists, especially of a new generation, seeking to practice a science aligned with their ethical identity. Gluck talks with Emil Guillermo about the ethical journey he's taken and admits he remains haunted by the faces of the animals he experimented on. For more go to PETA.org You may also contact us at PETA.org The PETA Podcast PETA, the world's largest animal rights organization, is 6.5 million strong and growing. This is the place to find out why. Hear from insiders, thought leaders, activists, investigators, politicians, and others why animals need more than kindness—they have the right not to be abused or exploited in any way. Hosted by Emil Guillermo. Powered by PETA activism. Contact us at PETA.org Listen to the very first PETA podcast with Ingrid Newkirk Music provided by CarbonWorks. Go to Apple podcasts and subscribe. Contact and follow host Emil Guillermo on Twitter @emilamok Or at www.amok.com Please subscribe, rate and review wherever you get your podcasts. Help us grow the podcast by taking this short survey. Thanks for listening to THE PETA PODCAST! (Originally published Oct.28, 2020)

It's SpoOoOoky October and we're talking about Mad Scientists! Sarah starts us off with Dr. Marion Sims, then, Caitlin tells us about Dr. Harry Harlow.If you haven't left us a review yet, it would make our day if you did :)The Documentary Sarah mentions is called A Walk to Beautiful - A powerful story of healing and hope for women in Ethiopia devastated by childbirth injuries.Get access to bonus episodes! HEREInstagram: @luminolpodTwitter: @luminolpodCheck out our website: www.luminolpod.comSend us a message luminolpod@gmail.com

TESTO DELL'ARTICOLO ➜http://www.bastabugie.it/it/articoli.php?id=6289A SCUOLA IL DIVIETO DI CONTATTO FISICO PER IL CORONAVIRUS HA CONSEGUENZE DRAMMATICHE di Roberto MarchesiniRiparte la scuola con le nuove disposizioni anti covid-19: mascherine, distanza, disinfezione, misurazione a distanza della febbre, niente canti né giochi di gruppo...Ok, prendiamola larga. Fra Salimbene de Adam da Parma (1221-1288) fu un cronista dell'ordine dei frati minori; la sua Cronica copre circa 120 anni, dal 1168 al 1287. Da essa possiamo trarre molte informazioni su Federico II di Svevia (1194-1250), lo stupor mundi. Sappiamo, ad esempio, che un bel giorno l'imperatore volle scoprire quale fosse la lingua originariamente parlata dall'uomo, senza che qualcuno gliene insegnasse una: il greco? Il latino? L'aramaico? Il dialetto bergamasco? Così prese dei neonati, li chiuse in un'alta torre e li fece allevare da balie che, pur accudendoli nel migliore dei modi, non potevano parlare, né coccolarli, né cantare canzoni. Quei bambini, seppur nutriti, puliti e accuditi, senza un contatto umano, morirono tutti.ESPERIMENTI MODERNIVabbè, obietterà qualcuno, si tratta di una cronica medievale. Saranno racconti di pura fantasia, degni complementi a bestiari e libri agiografici. Bene, parliamo allora del dottor Luther Emmett Holt (1855-1924), eminente pediatra statunitense, fondatore e per due volte presidente dell'American pediatric Society, membro del Rockefeller Institute, eugenetista convinto.Preoccupati per il rammollimento delle nuove generazioni di «americani», il dottor Holt prescriveva di non giocare con i bambni, di non coccolarli né tenerli in braccio. Al massimo, una virile stretta di mano, quando era artefice di un lavoro eccezionalmente ben fatto. Nel giro di pochi anni - così si legge - i pediatri notarono un aumento delle morti infantili, nonostante i bambini fossero soddisfatti nei loro bisogni biologici.E poi ci sono gli esperimenti del dottor Harry Harlow (1905-1981), psicologo statunitense. Alcune povere scimmiette Rhesus vennero separate prematuramente dalla mamma; vennero messe a loro disposizione due madri finte, diverse per alcuni particolari: la prima era ricoperta da un panno morbido; la seconda aveva un biberon che secerneva latte. Harlow osservò che le scimmiette passavano con la mamma-nutrice il tempo strettamente necessario per suggere il latte; e passavano avvinghiate alla mamma morbida il resto del tempo.NESSUNO CONOSCE GLI EFFETTI DELLE DISPOSIZIONI ANTI COVID-19È chiaro dove voglio arrivare, no? Non abbiamo alcuna idea degli effetti delle disposizioni anti covid-19 sui bambini che stanno iniziando a frequentare la scuola: nessuno ha finanziato alcuna ricerca e nessuno sembra realmente interessato a verificarlo. Tuttavia, questi pochi, semplici esempi che abbiamo citato non ci tranquillizzano. A quanto pare, ai bambini non basta essere protetti dai virus e non avere la febbre: hanno bisogno del contatto umano, dell'intimità fisica, di relazioni accoglienti e protettive. Tutte cose che, ai nostri bambini, saranno negate.Questo ci fa capire quale sia l'idea che il governo ha dei bambini; e anche di noi adulti. Non persone, costituite da relazioni; animali sociali aristotelici. Bensì oggetti biologici, che hanno una vita esclusivamente materiale, da proteggere dalle malattie. Una «nuda vita», come l'ha definita il filosofo Agamben. La stessa antropologia espressa dai fautori della «sostituzione»: «Ma apriamo gli occhi: noi con questa decrescita e denatalità che abbiamo, abbiamo bisogno di immigrazione». Non abbiamo bisogno di fermare gli aborti, di dare agli sposi un minimo di serenità e fiducia nel futuro, magari qualche aiuto alle famiglie. No: abbiamo bisogno di immigrati. Perché un italiano non nato è perfettamente sostituibile da un nigeriano, da un pachistano, da un tunisino: entrambi sono oggetti biologici, no? Entrambi - come ha spiegato Scalfari - «non hanno bisogni secondari», che non siano mere necessità biologiche. È ovvio che, se siamo solo oggetti biologici, la «nuda vita» è tutto ciò che abbiamo. E, infatti, è tutto ciò che avremo. Almeno per un po'.Pafrasando Churchill (1874-1965), potevamo scegliere tra la «nuda vita» e la morte: abbiamo scelto la «nuda vita» e, se fra Salimbene ha detto la verità, avremo la morte. Riparte la scuola con le nuove disposizioni anti covid-19: mascherine, distanza, disinfezione, misurazione a distanza della febbre, niente canti né giochi di gruppo...Nota di BastaBugie: per leggere gli articoli del nostro dossier sull'educazione parentale (14 articoli), clicca qui!Se ti interessa approfondire il tema della scuola, clicca sul link di uno dei seguenti articoli:LIBERATE I VOSTRI FIGLI DALLE GRINFIE DELLA AZZOLINA: FATEGLI SCUOLA VOI A CASA!Informate il dirigente scolastico che avete intenzione di fare homeschooling (sempre più genitori in Italia scelgono una scuola parentale, non parificata)di Silvana De Marihttp://www.bastabugie.it/it/articoli.php?id=6284ISTRUZIONI PER APRIRE UNA SCUOLA PARENTALEUna scuola parentale può nascere quando famiglie amiche si mettono d'accordo per creare un ambiente educativo comunitario per i loro figli (queste ''regole'' valgono anche per chi intende fare homeschooling)di Maria Bonarettihttp://www.bastabugie.it/it/articoli.php?id=5663 Titolo originale: Scuola anti-Covid? Senza contatti i bambini muoionoFonte: La Nuova Bussola Quotidiana, 12-09-2020Pubblicato su BastaBugie n. 683

Alright this is the first official episode of the Relationships and Relationshits podcast.  I mean there is a trailer talking about my background but now we are really getting into it.  So first thank you for listening.  Now if you haven’t listened to the trailer I highly recommend it so you can know how I ended up teaching about Attachment Styles and what led me to starting this podcast.  And also like I said in the trailer, the first several episodes will dive deep into Attachment Styles.  Once we get through that we will figure out the next step.  Maybe I’ll start bringing on some mental health experts at that point.  There are definitely a few counselors, therapists and psychologists from TikTok that I’d love to have on this podcast.  Alright let’s get into today’s episode so you can learn Attachment Styles which is a great start to understanding yourself, your partner, or future partner to give you a better chance at success.     On today’s episode we are going to talk about the history of Attachment Styles.  I feel like it’s always a good thing to know where the knowledge came from or developed.  Especially if you are skeptical that your life experiences in the first several years of life can have a lifelong effect on you in your relationships.  Trust me they can.  I see comments daily on my TikTok account about this.  So let’s get started on the history of Attachment Styles. Psychiatrist John Bowlby is the man who started Attachment Styles.  Back then it was called Attachment Theory.  In the 1930’s he worked at a child guidance clinic in London.  He treated  many emotionally challenged children there.  These experiences shaped his belief that the longer a child was with their mother the better they were in the categories of social, emotional, and cognitive development.  And basically they would have a better adult life the longer they were with their mother as children.  Over the years Bowlby observed and studied his Attachment Theory.  He believed that the child would form only one primary attachment and that would be the child’s security.  He also said the first 5 years were very critical for their development of an attachment.     Another psychiatrist named Harry Harlow did several experiments from the late 1950’s to 60’s.  His studies involved monkeys and a warning it is sad.  The first experiment he took newborn monkeys from their mothers immediately and isolated them for 3-12 months.  He then put them back with other monkeys but not their mother.  The monkeys reacted by clutching their own bodies and rocking back and forth, they became aggressive towards the other monkeys, they had trouble communicating and socializing, they got bullied, they self-mutilated by scratching and tearing their own hair out.  Basically Harlow screwed up these monkeys while showing the importance of having a mother.     One of Harlow’s other studies took eight newborn monkeys from their mother and then replaced mom with two surrogate mothers.  One was made of cloth and one was made of wire.  Four of the monkeys could get milk from the wire mother and four of them from the cloth mother.  The monkeys were studied for 165 days.  Both groups of monkeys spent more time with the cloth surrogate even if she had no milk.  The monkeys would only go to the wire surrogate for milk.  Then return to the cloth surrogate.  If a frightening object was placed in their cages they sought security with the cloth surrogate.  The monkeys would also explore more when the cloth surrogate was there.  Harlow then compared these monkeys with monkeys that grew up with their mother.  The monkeys without their mother were more timid, they didn’t know how to act around other monkeys, they were easily bullied, they had difficulty with mating, and the females were inadequate mothers.  These monkeys were the monkeys left with the surrogate for more than 90 days.  The monkeys that had surrogates for less than 90 days were able to reverse most of this trauma when put back in a normal environment.  So Harlow’s experiments were cruel but did show the effects of not having your caretaker at a young age.  Or a non-responsive caretaker.     Alright let’s get back to humans and less terrifying tests.  Bowlby had another psychologist that worked with him by the name of Mary Ainsworth.  Ainsworth took Bowlby’s studies and took it a step further.  Ainsworth devised a study called the Strange Situation Classification.  Also known as the Strange Situation Test.  This test was based after Ainsworth’s work in Uganda and Baltimore.  In the 1970’s she took 12-18 month old infants, their mothers, and the experimenter into a room.  Several things happened in about three minute intervals.  The experimenter left the room.  Then a stranger joins mother and the infant.  Then the mother leaves the baby alone with the stranger.  Then the mother returns and the stranger leaves.  Then the mother leaves, leaving the child all alone.  Then the stranger returns.  And finally the mother returns and the stranger leaves.  Ainsworth and her team then put these infants into three groups based on several factors but mainly their reactions to each event.  In another episode I’ll go into more detail but for now I’ll keep it simple.  If an infant cried when the mother left but was easily comforted when the mother returned then this was a Secure infant.  If the infant did not soothe easily when the mother returned and almost punished the mother for leaving this was a Preoccupied Anxious infant.  If the infant appeared to not care when the mother left or returned this was an Avoidant Infant.  And that was the beginning of the three major classifications.  About a decade later a fourth was added called Disorganized thanks to psychologist Mary Main, who worked for Ainsworth at one point.  Disorganized infants seemed scared when the mother returned.  Disorganized is a small population that is usually made up of physical and/or sexual abuse and possibly adopted children.     In the mid-80’s Main and her colleagues developed the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI) which uses adults’ memories of their experiences with their parents as children to categorize them into one of four attachment styles.  She found that adults that were securely attached had securely attached children.  And parents that had were insecurely attached, had insecurely attached children.  In another study, pregnant women were given the AAI.  Their children were tested for their attachment style at 12 months.  The study demonstrated that the children had the same attachment as their mothers.     And from that point on tons of studies have been done.  I will say that some studies show a connection from childhood to adulthood and some say there is a weak link.  One study showed that you had a 70% chance of being the Attachment Style that you were as a kid.  I know from my experience talking to friends, family and those on social media that you can usually tell if someone is secure or insecure once you learn about their caretakers.  But nothing is ever 100%.  One other thing to point out is that it is a spectrum.  You are not 100% one thing.  You could be mostly Secure with some Anxiety and a little Avoidant.  We will go through that in more detail in the next several episodes.  So this is just the basic history in a shortened version.  I won’t go through everything because it would take hours.  I just wanted to share with you how Attachment Styles came to be before we dive into Attachment Styles.  In the next episode we are going to get into more detail of the Attachment Styles and help you figure out yours, your partner, or anyone you want to figure out.

Some people seem destined for their future......Blum's  most influential work was a series on ethical issues in primate research, called The Monkey Wars, which won the 1992 Pulitzer Prize.The series became the starting point for a book, also called The Monkey Wars, published by Oxford University Press in 1994. By then, she’d learned to value the way a book allows a writer to delve deeper into complicated questions. She started work on a second book, an exploration of gender differences, called Sex on the Brain, published by Viking in 1997.  At her newspaper goodbye party, her editors said they couldn’t believe how many stories about “insects, chickens, and monkeys” she’d managed to get into the newspaper.As a book reviewer noted in the Los Angeles Times, although her subjects may change, her writing focuses consistently on the often-tempestuous intersection between science and society.The first such book, Love at Goon Park; Harry Harlow and the Science of Affection, was published by Perseus Books in 2002 and was a finalist for the Los Angeles Times Book Prize.Her next, Ghost Hunters: William James and the Search for Scientific Proof of Life After Death, published in 2006, looked at a band of brilliant 19th century scientists who were willing to risk their careers/We will also be airing about a person who is doing a business to help women with their busineses and has a brand of yoga...Welcome Robyn Parets, founder of Pretzel Kids, to toe show as well....We will also be joined by King Wojack, a Rapper from the state of Washington who will talk about Early Hip Hop and the industry of Hip Hop ...he will also be talking about his experience with Sir Mix A Lot...  And lastlly but not least, we will be joined by Samantha Inman.....she is a a actress in training and a force of nature and soon to be reckoning! published author!

Some people seem destined for their future......Blum's  most influential work was a series on ethical issues in primate research, called The Monkey Wars, which won the 1992 Pulitzer Prize.The series became the starting point for a book, also called The Monkey Wars, published by Oxford University Press in 1994. By then, she’d learned to value the way a book allows a writer to delve deeper into complicated questions. She started work on a second book, an exploration of gender differences, called Sex on the Brain, published by Viking in 1997.  At her newspaper goodbye party, her editors said they couldn’t believe how many stories about “insects, chickens, and monkeys” she’d managed to get into the newspaper.As a book reviewer noted in the Los Angeles Times, although her subjects may change, her writing focuses consistently on the often-tempestuous intersection between science and society.The first such book, Love at Goon Park; Harry Harlow and the Science of Affection, was published by Perseus Books in 2002 and was a finalist for the Los Angeles Times Book Prize.Her next, Ghost Hunters: William James and the Search for Scientific Proof of Life After Death, published in 2006, looked at a band of brilliant 19th century scientists who were willing to risk their careers/We will also be airing about a person who is doing a business to help women with their busineses and has a brand of yoga...Welcome Robyn Parets, founder of Pretzel Kids, to toe show as well....We will also be joined by King Wojack, a Rapper from the state of Washington who will talk about Early Hip Hop and the industry of Hip Hop ...he will also be talking about his experience with Sir Mix A Lot...  And lastlly but not least, we will be joined by Samantha Inman.....she is a a actress in training and a force of nature and soon to be reckoning! published author!

Confira os destaques do caderno Na Quarentena desta quarta-feira (06/05/20)See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

How does early attachment play a role in the connection we have with our kids? Cristi shares the research on early attachment. Show notes: Sponsor: https://readingreimagined.com/ Use code: PLAYFUL to get 10% off your play box! Check out more on Instagram about these play boxes! Music: http://www.pleasantpicturesmusic.com/ Other mentions: John Bowlby  Harry Harlow's experiment Dr. Laura Markham Dr. Dan Siegel  

Hola que tal, bienvenidos a otro episodio de su podcast “de lo cotidiano” un podcast en donde hablamos de salud mental en el día a día. Esta vez nos toca continuar hablando del vínculo y del desarrollo de la teoría del apego. En el episodio anterior hablamos un poco de como se fue organizando la teoría del apego. Hablamos de sus autores John Bowlby y Mary Ainsworth; así como de las investigaciones que influyeron en el desarrollo y evolución de esta teoría. En particular de las investigaciones de Harry Harlow estudio sobre el apego y la socialización en la relación madre-cría con macacos. También hablamos de La realización de un documental por parte del psicoanalista James Robertson en 1952: "Uno de dos años va al Hospital", una grabación sobre niños con separaciones tempranas. El documental ilustra el impacto de pérdida y sufrimiento experimentado por niños separados de sus primarios cuidadores. De que va este episodio En este episodio hablamos de como se desarrolla el apego en los niños, y como de alguna manera este apego persiste a través de la vida. En particular la relación relevante que realiza el cuidador principal al satisfacer las necesidades del niño (en los primeros meses de vida), lo que va moldeando los Modelos Operativos Internos, que de alguna manera definirá la visión y el comportamiento del individuo. Revisamos los diferentes tipos de apego como lo es el apego seguro y el apego inseguro el cual a su vez se divide en Evitativo y Dependiente. Y en forma breve tocamos los sistemas motivacionales en donde se debe de equilibrar tanto el apego como la exploración. Sin más nos despedimos hasta la próxima semana ¡Hasta luego! Visita: https://consique.com.mx/

In this episode we explore the controversial attachment research conducted by Harry Harlow

I forrige episode hørte vi om Edvard Deci som tok det Harry Harlow fant ut om apekatter og konstruerte et nytt eksperiment med mennesker. Der fant han den overraskende negative effekten på motivasjon når man bruker eksterne belønninger. Deci ville … Les videre →

On this week’s Horror Podclass we are jumping back into one of our favorite subgenres: the ZOMBIE APOCALYPSE!  Specifically, we are discussing the rather subdued movie, The Night Eats the World.  It's French.  It lacks machine guns.  Not too much gore.  But don't let that hold you back, as we have found Night Eats the World is a wonderful character study and a really complex exploration of loneliness.  If you haven't seen it yet make sure you check it out on Amazon Prime Video, where a rental can be had pretty cheap.  Watch out for the spoiler bell part way through the episode, this really is a fantastic movie and we would hate to take anything away from a first watch. Connect with us at: The Horror Pod Class Facebook Group Signal Horizon on Facebook and Twitter Big Shoutouts to Brian Kirk's new book Will Haunt You, IO, Strange Weather , and True Detective.  Mike talks about John Darnielle's book Wolf in White Van and if you want to read the sample chapter that got him hooked click on this link to VICE. Helpful Links: "Why Some Anxious People Find Comfort in Horror Movies" from Broadly. Psychology Today article about why we need each other. Harry Harlow's monkey studies. The episode of The Outer Limits that Mike references is not, in fact, The Outer Limits but rather from the 1980's reboot of the Twilight Zone.  The episode is named Shelter Skelter, which is a pretty damn cool name. Next Week:  Special Guest Phil Gelatt  

Hello and welcome to fifteenth episode of Fanboy Nation’s Toon-In-Talk, your rendezvous for animation interviews. During research for her book on Lotte Reiniger, Whitney was using the British Film Institute’s website for information. She came across some great animation information, not just about Reiniger, but also about British animation. Jez Stewart in the BFI’s Animation Animation Curator and during this interview he discusses British animation history, the BFI’s animation holdings, and other fun facts about working in a renowned film archive. Show Notes Jez Stewart is the Animation Curator at the British Film Institute (BFI) and he has worked there for fourteen years. He started as an acquisitions assistant and slowly his worked his way up to his current position. Jez describes his work at a mixture of “spreadsheets and boxes of delights.” He works with all the old goodies, including some of the earliest animated films ever made. Jez explains the decomposition of old film stock and how they must store some films at very cold temperatures. The BFI is the UK’s lead body of film, created in 1933, and its purpose is to ensure that all moving images are preserved, shared with people, and exhibit British culture. The BFI’s collection scope if very large. They have work from studios that closed down, wanted to clean out their closets, and more. A large portion of the work is commercial, but they also include material from feature films and other entertainment venues. Housed in the archive is Bob Godfrey’s work, WWI films that make fun of the Kaiser, public information films, the Halas and Batchelor films (they made Animal Farm). Jez explains some of the ways the BFI preserves the films and how the BFI decides to share the material. One of the worst roadblocks is copyright. British animation has gone up and down in the amount of popularity. It was very big in the 1950s when TV was new, then the funding dried up. Channel 4 money helped animation flourish again in the 1980s-1990s, but then it dried up again. Aardman Studios, which made the Wallace and Gromit series and Shaun the Sheep, is the most well-known British animator. Jez is also a fan of Michael Please, Harry Harlow, and others. A lot of British animation exported to the US are children’s shows. Whitney and Jez discuss how foreign feature films are viewed in the US and the UK. They also discuss how sometimes restoration can ruin a film’s integrity and how sometimes there is no school like the old school. The BFI is trying to put more content on the Internet and share more animation film packages to share with audiences, and Jez wants to write a history of British animation. Whitney and Jez both want to see more animation from British animators, especially a feature film.

Welcome to Dark N Creepy Things with Frank N Scout. Join this queer AF couple who try to freak each other out with unbelievable articles. This episode is read from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Candace_Newmaker AND https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Harlow with music & sounds from https://archive.org/ under CC licensing. Thank you to our patrons - bitternbythebug, Francis, and Maia! You too can be our patron here: https://patron.podbean.com/franknscout and suggest future episode topics, and more. Don't forget to like our facebook page and be a Creeper: https://www.facebook.com/alrightypodcasts 

We should make products useful, no doubt. But what if we could also make them addictive — so that the customers keep coming back? Our guest today is Jeff Davidson, a solo product designer and writer. You'll learn key psychological principles behind popular apps, why making a product addictive should never be a goal by itself, and how to design product features that satisfy the user's seeking system. Podcast feed: subscribe to http://simplecast.fm/podcasts/1441/rss in your favorite podcast app, and follow us on iTunes, Stitcher, or Google Play Music. Show Notes How to Design an Addictive Product — Jeff's article Ivan Pavlov, Sigmund Freud, Harry Harlow, Abraham Maslow — some of the famous psychologists Jeff mentions Thinking, Fast and Slow — a book by Daniel Kahneman Intrinsic motivation, Maslow's hierarchy of needs — Wikipedia definitions The Power of Habit — a book by Charles Duhigg Reddit, Product Hunt, Hacker News, Designer News — popular websites with a content voting system Jeff's consulting website Follow Jeff on Medium Follow Jeff on Twitter: @jeffdavidsond Today's Sponsor This episode is brought to you by Userlist.io. This new tool helps SaaS founders get a better understanding of each individual user journey, and send users relevant behavior-based email. To learn more, join the waiting list at userlist.io. Interested in sponsoring an episode? Learn more here. Leave a Review Reviews are hugely important because they help new people discover this podcast. If you enjoyed listening to this episode, please leave a review on iTunes. Here's how.

Good News Everyone!Baby Beard watch 'Love & Rocket' and dive deep into a horrific world of 'Wuv', anthropomorphic ships, and disgusting conversation hearts. No really, those candies are actually the worst.Sean discovers he has repressed part of this episode, Ellen worships at the altar of Weaver, Josh drops some horrible Harry Harlow history, and Phil agrees with Futurama's assessment of Friends. Tell us how 'Wuv' makes you feel here, or on Twitter (@babybeardmedia). Drop us a like or leave a review to earn yourself a Shining Sean of Approval. All our stuff is on Spreaker, Stitcher and iTunes.

Good News Everyone!Baby Beard watch 'Love & Rocket' and dive deep into a horrific world of 'Wuv', anthropomorphic ships, and disgusting conversation hearts. No really, those candies are actually the worst.Sean discovers he has repressed part of this episode, Ellen worships at the altar of Weaver, Josh drops some horrible Harry Harlow history, and Phil agrees with Futurama's assessment of Friends. Tell us how 'Wuv' makes you feel here, or on Twitter (@babybeardmedia). Drop us a like or leave a review to earn yourself a Shining Sean of Approval. All our stuff is on Spreaker, Stitcher and iTunes.

Thousands of studies in psychology rely on data from North American undergraduates. Can we really conclude anything about the "human" mind from such a limited sample-- especially since Westerners are probably more different from the rest of the world's population than any other group?  We talk about Joseph Henrich and colleagues' critique of the behavioral sciences in their paper "The WEIRDEST People in the World."    David offers a defense of psychology, arguing that it's usually not the goal of lab studies to generalize findings to all humans in the first place.  Also, Tamler  gives a brief, heartfelt, completely non-awkward rant about monkey torturer Harry Harlow and David defends the practice of electrocuting baby monkeys for no reason. LinksThe Gods Must Be Crazy [IMDB.com]Bushmen [wikipedia.org]Homo Economicus [wikipedia.org]The Ultimatum Game [wikipedia.org]Müller-Lyer illusion [wikipedia.org]We aren't the world [psmag.com]Harlow studies [wikipedia.org]Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010).The weirdest people in the world. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61-83.Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., & McElreath, R. (2001). In search of homo economicus: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. American Economic Review, 73-78.Mook, D.G. (1983). In Defense of External Invalidity. American Psychologist, 38,379-387. 

A quick overview of an excellent book by the same name -- a description of the career of Harry Harlow and his studies of the science of affection, with special attention to the conflict between Harlow and the then-prevailing view of the subject. Whether you love Harlow or hate him, the animal studies that he and his students conducted resulted in dramatic changes in science's views of affection and the life-long impacts of children's home environments. It's a good example of paradigm shifts in science, and of how (to use Harlow's expression) sometimes science has to catch up with common sense. Listen to this episode, then go give your mom a big hug.