Podcasts about ribbentrop

Founding the Fellowship: Amateur Spies and the Quest for Peace: Colleague Charles Spicer introduces Ernest Tennant, a British WWI veteran deeply traumatized by the loss of his peers, who established a connection with Joachim von Ribbentrop, then an Anglophile, to bridge the gap between London and Berlin, leading to the creation of the Anglo-German Fellowship; key figures include the scholar Philip Conwell-Evans and Lord Lothian, with the Travelers Club in London serving as the operational hub where these "amateur spies" sought to civilize the Nazis through diplomacy. 1933

Ribbentrop in London: Gaffes and Alienation: Colleague Charles Spicer describes Ribbentrop's arrival in London as Ambassador with a cynical mandate from Hitler to neutralize Britain diplomatically, characterizing his tenure as a social disaster marked by gaffes such as giving the Nazi salute to the King; his wife Anneliese is depicted as thin-skinned and unable to handle the British press's mockery, while Sir Neville Henderson, the British Ambassador to Berlin, whose desire to accommodate Hitler was exacerbated by his secret battle with terminal cancer, influenced disastrous appeasement policies. 1933

The Oster Conspiracy and the Resilience of the Fellowship: Colleague Charles Spicer discusses the 1938 crisis, focusing on the "Oster Conspiracy," a credible German plot to arrest Hitler that was undermined by Prime Minister Chamberlain's appeasement visits; despite the shock of Kristallnacht, the Anglo-German Fellowship remained a crucial channel for intelligence, with reports from Conwell-Evans regarding Ribbentrop discussed in the British Cabinet, proving that high-quality intelligence was reaching decision-makers, though the British government prioritized diplomatic engagement over supporting internal regime change, missing a significant opportunity to stop the dictator. 1938

1939: Diplomatic Disasters and Soviet Infiltration: Colleague Charles Spicer explains that by early 1939, relations deteriorated as Ribbentrop, now Foreign Minister, turned violently anti-British following his social failures in London, characterizing British Ambassador Neville Henderson as a disastrous "arch-appeaser" who refused to upset the Nazi regime; meanwhile, Conwell-Evans continued to gather intelligence while enduring threatening luncheons with Ribbentrop, and the Soviets infiltrated the narrative through the book Tory MP, which attacked the Fellowship and was written by authors recruited by Soviet intelligence. 1938

The Tennant Mission and the Failure of Alliances: Colleague Charles Spicer recounts that in the summer of 1939, Ernest Tennant undertook a final secret mission to Ribbentrop's Austrian castle, confirming that Hitler intended to attack Poland and wage a long war; while London believed this intelligence and pursued a pact with Poland, Chamberlain's deep antipathy toward the Soviets delayed an alliance with Stalin, and Soviet spies leaked these diplomatic moves to Germany, accelerating the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, emphasizing that despite accurate intelligence from the amateur spies, British leadership failed to exploit opportunities. 1938

Judgment at Nuremberg and Post-War Denial: Colleague Charles Spicer recounts that at the Nuremberg trials, a broken Ribbentrop attempted to call Conwell-Evans and Tennant as witnesses to prove his pre-war peace efforts, while Göring remained defiant and Hess exhibited erratic behavior; discussing the "Ministries Trial" and the post-war tendency of British officials including Vansittart to deny their connections to the amateur spies, this denial stemmed from embarrassment over their chaotic engagement with the Nazis and the uncomfortable realization that the war might have been preventable. 1938

Good Sunday to you,A bit of admin before we come to today's thought piece.First, in case you missed it, here is this week's commentary, mostly ranting about the budget, the UK's inept leadership and what actions you, as an investor, should take:And this week I also appeared on comedian Geoff Norcott's podcast, What Most People Think. Here are the links to the show on Apple and Spotify, if of interest.But for your thought piece today, we have another great little World War Two gold story which didn't make the cut. The farcical journey of Albanian and Italian gold (NB: a tonne of gold is about a medium-sized suitcase full).As the Nazis took both Austria and Czechoslovakia with ease, Italian Prime Minister Benito Mussolini grew anxious to flex his own muscles.Albania would be his target. Geographically, culturally and historically, it made sense: Albania had been part of the Roman Empire even before northern Italy.In April 1939, Italy invaded with a force that contained 400 planes, 300 small tanks, 12 warships, and 22,000 men. But some untrained Albanian locals with the help of a few soldiers managed to drive them back into the sea. Such was 20th century Italian warfare.The Italians made it on the second attempt, however, and the capital, Tirana, fell.The Albanian King Zog gave an impassioned speech on the radio, urging resistance, but nobody heard it because Albania at the time had fewer than 2,000 radios, and the Italians soon managed to jam the airwaves anyway. Shortly after giving the speech, like the true patriot he was, he fled the country, taking enough gold with him to lead a long life of luxury in exile, eventually ending up in Egypt as a guest of King Farouk, to whom he had to pay $20 million for refuge.Albania's founders believed in gold, and their currency, the lek, was based on it. Inflation, as a result, had been nonexistent. The central bank was established in the summer of 1925, and it had worked hard to build up its gold holdings. At home, it had encouraged citizens to swap their jewellery for paper money. That private gold was then added to the nation's gold holdings. Whenever possible, the country increased its gold holdings in London.But by the time of the invasion in 1939, most of Albania's 2.3 tonnes was in Italy anyway, where it had been sent for safekeeping. The Italians managed to confiscate quite a bit more in coins and jewellery from citizens.We fast forward four years.The Italian dilemma: give their gold to the Nazis or the Allies? In 1943, Allied forces moved north from Africa into Sicily and then Italy: the invasion of the soft underbelly of Europe had begun.Hectic days followed the ousting of Mussolini in July. The Italian Fascists were still nominally in charge. They declared Rome an open city in the hope of avoiding Allied air attacks. But by September 1943, the Nazis had control of the capital and central Italy, and they wanted Italy's gold moved to Berlin, while they still had control of the area.They began confiscating the gold of Italian citizens in Rome, especially Italian Jews. The amounts demanded were unrealistic, but Roman Jews reached into their family treasures, their synagogues and institutions to turn in what they had. The Pope, Pius XII, heard about the demands and authorised Catholic churches to lend Jews gold so they could reach the quota.But the big prize was in the Italian Central Bank, and several Nazi organisations had their eyes on it: Himmler's SS, Göring's Four Year Plan, von Ribbentrop's Foreign Office, and Funk's Reichsbank. Even the Bank of International Settlements (BIS), which was worried about its investments in Italy, started making demands that Italy send it gold. Initially, the governor of the Italian bank, Vincenzo Azzolini, made out that he was offended by the idea, but he soon realised the BIS was a better option than Berlin, whichever Nazi department received it.The Italians did not know what to do. On the one hand, they did not want the Nazis to have their gold, but nor did they want the invading Allies to have it either. They thought of sending it to Sardinia, they thought of sending it to the Swiss border. They sent small amounts of gold to branch offices around Italy, but the Bologna gold went missing, as did much of the Milan gold - now supposedly in Turin, but actually hidden in a well. They even sent some to colonial outposts in Benghazi, Rhodes and Addis Ababa.The Albanian gold Italy had stolen was still sitting in the Italian bank's vault, so, under pressure from the Nazis, they sent that up to the Reichsbank in Berlin, while they tried to come up with a solution.The following day, Niccolò Introna, the Italian bank's deputy general manager, had his plan: to build a false wall in the bank's underground vaults. He would then backdate documents to show the gold had been moved to Potenza, a town in the Italian south that was about to fall into Allied hands, but hide the gold behind the wall.Bank governor Azzolini approved the plan, but then ruled that only half the gold should be hidden. The next day the wall was built. The day after that, the official order to ship the gold to Berlin came in from the German ambassador. If the bank did not agree, the Germans would simply seize it. At this point, Azzolini learned that the Germans had seized government records, from which they would know the size and location of the country's gold. Azzolini lost his nerve and had the wall torn down.The next day, the German military unit arrived at the bank with orders to move the gold north by air. Azzolini stalled them, saying it would be safer by train. The Germans sent 5 tonnes by air, the rest - 119 tonnes - was sent by train to Milan. From there, it was shipped to Fortezza, Bolzano, close to the border with Germany and under their control, where it stayed for several months. The now-ousted Mussolini even signed his approval that it be sent there.The following spring, Azzolini, who above all wanted to stop the gold going to Berlin, struck a deal with Swiss and German representatives that would see 26 tonnes sent to Switzerland, some to the BIS and some to the Swiss National Bank.Göring, however, insisted he needed money and suggested giving Italy Reichsmarks for its gold. The deal was signed without the Bank of Italy knowing about it. 50 tonnes left Fortezza, which included 8 tonnes Italy had stolen from Yugoslavia earlier in the war in "restitution" (that's another story). The delivery arrived in Berlin a tonne light. As almost always by this point in the war, someone had their hands in the till.The process of shipping the next batch of Italian gold - some 22 tonnes - went on for months, as some (but not all) Italian officials tried to stall. But eventually, that too was dispatched. That too arrived in Berlin a tonne light.When American forces eventually liberated Fortezza, they found 25 tonnes. It was handed over to the Bank of Italy.What a mess.Stories like this fill the pages of The Secret History of Gold (although this one didn't actually make the cut).The Secret History of Gold is available at Amazon, Waterstones and all good bookshops. I hear the audiobook, read by me, is excellent. And it would make a wonderful Christmas present! This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.theflyingfrisby.com/subscribe

Good Sunday to you,A bit of admin before we come to today's thought piece.First, in case you missed it, here is this week's commentary, mostly ranting about the budget, the UK's inept leadership and what actions you, as an investor, should take:And this week I also appeared on comedian Geoff Norcott's podcast, What Most People Think. Here are the links to the show on Apple and Spotify, if of interest.But for your thought piece today, we have another great little World War Two gold story which didn't make the cut. The farcical journey of Albanian and Italian gold (NB: a tonne of gold is about a medium-sized suitcase full).As the Nazis took both Austria and Czechoslovakia with ease, Italian Prime Minister Benito Mussolini grew anxious to flex his own muscles.Albania would be his target. Geographically, culturally and historically, it made sense: Albania had been part of the Roman Empire even before northern Italy.In April 1939, Italy invaded with a force that contained 400 planes, 300 small tanks, 12 warships, and 22,000 men. But some untrained Albanian locals with the help of a few soldiers managed to drive them back into the sea. Such was 20th century Italian warfare.The Italians made it on the second attempt, however, and the capital, Tirana, fell.The Albanian King Zog gave an impassioned speech on the radio, urging resistance, but nobody heard it because Albania at the time had fewer than 2,000 radios, and the Italians soon managed to jam the airwaves anyway. Shortly after giving the speech, like the true patriot he was, he fled the country, taking enough gold with him to lead a long life of luxury in exile, eventually ending up in Egypt as a guest of King Farouk, to whom he had to pay $20 million for refuge.Albania's founders believed in gold, and their currency, the lek, was based on it. Inflation, as a result, had been nonexistent. The central bank was established in the summer of 1925, and it had worked hard to build up its gold holdings. At home, it had encouraged citizens to swap their jewellery for paper money. That private gold was then added to the nation's gold holdings. Whenever possible, the country increased its gold holdings in London.But by the time of the invasion in 1939, most of Albania's 2.3 tonnes was in Italy anyway, where it had been sent for safekeeping. The Italians managed to confiscate quite a bit more in coins and jewellery from citizens.We fast forward four years.The Italian dilemma: give their gold to the Nazis or the Allies? In 1943, Allied forces moved north from Africa into Sicily and then Italy: the invasion of the soft underbelly of Europe had begun.Hectic days followed the ousting of Mussolini in July. The Italian Fascists were still nominally in charge. They declared Rome an open city in the hope of avoiding Allied air attacks. But by September 1943, the Nazis had control of the capital and central Italy, and they wanted Italy's gold moved to Berlin, while they still had control of the area.They began confiscating the gold of Italian citizens in Rome, especially Italian Jews. The amounts demanded were unrealistic, but Roman Jews reached into their family treasures, their synagogues and institutions to turn in what they had. The Pope, Pius XII, heard about the demands and authorised Catholic churches to lend Jews gold so they could reach the quota.But the big prize was in the Italian Central Bank, and several Nazi organisations had their eyes on it: Himmler's SS, Göring's Four Year Plan, von Ribbentrop's Foreign Office, and Funk's Reichsbank. Even the Bank of International Settlements (BIS), which was worried about its investments in Italy, started making demands that Italy send it gold. Initially, the governor of the Italian bank, Vincenzo Azzolini, made out that he was offended by the idea, but he soon realised the BIS was a better option than Berlin, whichever Nazi department received it.The Italians did not know what to do. On the one hand, they did not want the Nazis to have their gold, but nor did they want the invading Allies to have it either. They thought of sending it to Sardinia, they thought of sending it to the Swiss border. They sent small amounts of gold to branch offices around Italy, but the Bologna gold went missing, as did much of the Milan gold - now supposedly in Turin, but actually hidden in a well. They even sent some to colonial outposts in Benghazi, Rhodes and Addis Ababa.The Albanian gold Italy had stolen was still sitting in the Italian bank's vault, so, under pressure from the Nazis, they sent that up to the Reichsbank in Berlin, while they tried to come up with a solution.The following day, Niccolò Introna, the Italian bank's deputy general manager, had his plan: to build a false wall in the bank's underground vaults. He would then backdate documents to show the gold had been moved to Potenza, a town in the Italian south that was about to fall into Allied hands, but hide the gold behind the wall.Bank governor Azzolini approved the plan, but then ruled that only half the gold should be hidden. The next day the wall was built. The day after that, the official order to ship the gold to Berlin came in from the German ambassador. If the bank did not agree, the Germans would simply seize it. At this point, Azzolini learned that the Germans had seized government records, from which they would know the size and location of the country's gold. Azzolini lost his nerve and had the wall torn down.The next day, the German military unit arrived at the bank with orders to move the gold north by air. Azzolini stalled them, saying it would be safer by train. The Germans sent 5 tonnes by air, the rest - 119 tonnes - was sent by train to Milan. From there, it was shipped to Fortezza, Bolzano, close to the border with Germany and under their control, where it stayed for several months. The now-ousted Mussolini even signed his approval that it be sent there.The following spring, Azzolini, who above all wanted to stop the gold going to Berlin, struck a deal with Swiss and German representatives that would see 26 tonnes sent to Switzerland, some to the BIS and some to the Swiss National Bank.Göring, however, insisted he needed money and suggested giving Italy Reichsmarks for its gold. The deal was signed without the Bank of Italy knowing about it. 50 tonnes left Fortezza, which included 8 tonnes Italy had stolen from Yugoslavia earlier in the war in "restitution" (that's another story). The delivery arrived in Berlin a tonne light. As almost always by this point in the war, someone had their hands in the till.The process of shipping the next batch of Italian gold - some 22 tonnes - went on for months, as some (but not all) Italian officials tried to stall. But eventually, that too was dispatched. That too arrived in Berlin a tonne light.When American forces eventually liberated Fortezza, they found 25 tonnes. It was handed over to the Bank of Italy.What a mess.Stories like this fill the pages of The Secret History of Gold (although this one didn't actually make the cut).The Secret History of Gold is available at Amazon, Waterstones and all good bookshops. I hear the audiobook, read by me, is excellent. And it would make a wonderful Christmas present! This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.theflyingfrisby.com/subscribe

20 listopada 1945 roku w Norymberdze rozpoczyna się jeden z najsłynniejszych procesów w historii. Przed międzynarodowym trybunałem złożonym z sędziów z Wielkiej Brytanii, Francji, Stanów Zjednoczonych i Związku Radzieckiego, stają byli nazistowscy dygnitarze. Na ławie oskarżonych zasiada 21 osób, w tym Hermann Göring, Albert Speer czy Joachim von Ribbentrop. Przez następne kilka miesięcy na sali rozpraw zostanie przesłuchanych wielu świadków a oskarżyciele zaprezentują dowody, ukazujące skalę zbrodni popełnionych przez nazistowskie Niemcy. Jak wyglądały przygotowania do procesu? Dlaczego zdecydowano, że odbędzie się on w Norymberdze? Jakie były kulisy politycznych sporów między aliantami? Odpowiedzi na te pytania poznacie w tym odcinku Misji specjalnej.

Paramilitari, avvocati, direttori ministeriali, esponenti politici: a Wannsee il 20 gennaio 1942 c'era un affresco completo dell'universo nazista. Compreso l'incaricato del Ministero degli Esteri. Un uomo che portava lo stesso nome del grande riformatore protestante, Martin Luther. Ma questo Luther era ben distante per formazione e pratica dal suo omonimo: calcolatore e profittatore, aveva sfruttato l'intima amicizia con von Ribbentrop per scalare la gerarchia degli Esteri divenendo punto di contatto tra il partito, le SS, il governo e gli Stati dell'Asse. Con un solo obiettivo: lavorare alla soluzione finale, di cui avrebbe lasciato dietro di sé una prova documentale agghiacciante.

Den 20 november 1945 fördes Hermann Göring, Joachim von Ribbentrop, Wilhelm Keitel och Karl Dönitz och arton andra högt uppsatta ledare inom Tredje riket in i rättssalen i Nürnberg. De åtalade hade varit arkitekterna bakom ett av historiens mest brutala krig och folkmord.Aldrig tidigare hade en hel nations ledarskap ställts till svars för brott utan motstycke i mänsklighetens historia. Nürnbergrättegångarna blev inte bara en uppgörelse med nazismens oerhörda brott – de reformerade också internationell rätt i grunden. Här föddes folkrätten.I detta ett premiumavsnitt av podden Historia Nu, som enbart är tillgänglig i sin helhet för dem som prenumerar på Historia Nu Premium, diskuterar programledaren Urban Lindstedt med Ulf Zander, professor i historia vid Lunds universitet om hur Nürnbergrättegångarna organiserades, genomfördes och vilka konsekvenser de fick.Ni kan stödja Historia Nu För 75 kr/mån (vid lanseringen 60 kr/mån i tre månader) eller 750 kr/år för att försäkra poddens framtid samt få två extra avsnitt varje månad och alla vanliga avsnitt reklamfria.Bli premiummedlem på www.historia.nu/premium Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The Empire of Japan's decision to break with liberal democracies in favor of rising fascist powers was driven, in part, by the successes enjoyed by said fascist powers throughout the 1930s. In this episode, we discuss how their leaders managed to consolidate that power in the first place.Support the show My latest novel, "Califia's Crusade," is now available at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, Kobo, Apple Books, Bookshop.org, and many other online platforms!

This Day in Legal History: Nuremberg ExecutionsOn October 16, 1946, ten prominent Nazi war criminals were executed by hanging in the aftermath of the landmark Nuremberg Trials, held to prosecute key figures of the Third Reich for crimes against humanity, war crimes, and crimes against peace. The executions marked the culmination of months of legal proceedings conducted by an international military tribunal composed of judges from the Allied powers: the United States, the United Kingdom, the Soviet Union, and France. Among those hanged was Joachim von Ribbentrop, Hitler's former Foreign Minister, convicted for his role in orchestrating Nazi foreign policy and enabling the Holocaust.The trials had concluded in late September 1946, with 12 of the 22 main defendants receiving death sentences. However, Hermann Göring, one of the most high-profile defendants and head of the Luftwaffe, committed suicide by cyanide just hours before his scheduled execution. The hangings took place inside the gymnasium of the Nuremberg Palace of Justice, where the tribunal had convened, and were carried out in the early morning hours.The executions were overseen by U.S. Army personnel, and steps were taken to document them for historical record. The event was viewed by many as a pivotal moment in the establishment of international criminal law, affirming that individuals—even heads of state and high-ranking officials—could be held personally accountable for war atrocities. These proceedings laid the groundwork for future tribunals, including those for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda.Some criticized the process as “victor's justice,” pointing to perceived inconsistencies in sentencing and legal procedures. Nevertheless, the trials represented a significant shift from the post-World War I approach, which had failed to adequately prosecute war crimes. The executions on October 16 symbolized not only the end of an era of unchecked totalitarian violence but also the beginning of a new international legal order based on accountability and the rule of law.A federal judge in California has temporarily blocked the Trump administration's latest wave of federal layoffs, calling the move likely “illegal and in excess of authority.” In a sharply worded order, U.S. District Judge Susan Illston halted terminations that began last week, siding with a coalition of federal worker unions. Illston criticized the administration's approach as “ready, fire, aim” and warned that the human cost of such abrupt cuts is unacceptable.The layoffs—over 4,100 in total—targeted several federal agencies, with the Departments of Health and Human Services and Treasury seeing the bulk of cuts. Judge Illston's order requires the administration to report all completed and planned layoffs by Friday and set a hearing for a preliminary injunction on October 28. She also rejected the Department of Justice's attempt to steer the case toward procedural issues, stating that the legal merits were too concerning to ignore.President Trump has framed the cuts as politically motivated, stating they were aimed at eliminating programs he called “egregious socialist, semi-communist.” He added that Republican-backed programs would be spared. The administration recently lifted a long-standing hiring freeze but is now requiring agencies to submit staffing plans for approval.Union plaintiffs argue that the layoffs violate the Antideficiency Act and the Administrative Procedure Act, citing the administration's use of the government shutdown as an arbitrary justification. This case, AFGE v. OMB, marks another legal confrontation over workforce reductions, following an earlier freeze issued by Judge Illston that was ultimately overturned by the Supreme Court.Trump's Shutdown-Linked Layoffs Paused by California Judge (4)The 2026 U.S. law school admissions cycle is off to an intense start, with applications up 33% compared to this time last year, according to new data from the Law School Admission Council. This surge follows last year's admissions boom and signals another highly competitive year for aspiring law students. Admissions consultant Mike Spivey noted he's never seen such a sharp early increase in over two decades of reviewing application data, predicting a likely total rise of around 20% once the cycle concludes.Several factors are driving the spike, including a tough job market for recent college graduates—whose unemployment rate now surpasses that of the broader labor force—and growing political instability. Law School Admission Council President Sudha Setty also cited concerns about the impact of AI and broader economic uncertainty as motivators for many applicants. Additionally, more people are taking the LSAT this year, up nearly 22% over 2025 levels.A recent Kaplan survey found 56% of law school admissions officers pointed to politics as a major factor behind last year's surge, with 90% expecting this cycle to be just as competitive, if not more so. Some applicants are likely reapplying after being rejected last year, or returning after delaying applications due to last year's high volume. While law schools will benefit from a deeper pool of candidates, Spivey warned the sharp increase means tougher odds for acceptance across the board.US law school applicants increase 33%, boosting competition | ReutersPresident Donald Trump's decision to fund military pay during the ongoing government shutdown is only a short-term solution, according to House Speaker Mike Johnson. On Wednesday, Johnson confirmed that 1.3 million active-duty service members, along with tens of thousands of National Guard and reservists, were paid using $6.5 billion in unused military research and development funds. However, he warned that unless Democrats act to reopen the government, troops are unlikely to receive their next paycheck on October 31.The White House has not explained its legal rationale for this funding maneuver, and it hasn't requested the required congressional approvals to shift funds between accounts. Federal law caps such transfers at $8 billion annually and only allows them if the funds are used for their legally designated purposes. Without further funding authority, it's unclear how the administration could cover future military pay. While many lawmakers support a standalone bill to guarantee troop pay, Republican leaders—including Johnson and Senate Majority Whip John Thune—are resisting that option. They argue that doing so would reduce pressure to end the shutdown overall.Some Republicans, like Sen. Lisa Murkowski, say the move has reduced urgency in Congress while leaving other federal workers unpaid. The political optics are further complicated by Trump's claim that only Democrat-backed programs are being cut, as he seeks to frame the issue as partisan. Internally, GOP leaders worry that passing targeted funding bills could open the door to broader demands for agency-by-agency funding relief, weakening their leverage in shutdown negotiations.By way of brief background, the move likely violates the Antideficiency Act (ADA), which bars federal officials from spending money before or beyond congressional appropriations. Trump reportedly ordered the Department of Defense to divert funds from the RDT&E account—meant for weapons research—to cover military payroll. That account is not legally authorized for such use, and the funds may have also exceeded their availability period.This raises two major legal issues. First, under the Appropriations Clause (Article I, § 9, cl. 7), only Congress may authorize government spending. The president cannot repurpose funds without specific legislative approval. Second, the ADA prohibits both misappropriation of purpose (spending money on unauthorized functions) and misappropriation of timing (using expired funds). If proven willful, such violations can carry criminal penalties, though prosecutions are rare.Beyond the legal breach, this act could set a dangerous precedent. If courts decline to intervene, it could signal that future presidents—regardless of party—can redirect federal funds without congressional consent. This would erode legislative power and potentially turn the presidency into a de facto appropriations authority, undermining the Constitution's separation of powers.Special thanks to Bobby Kogan, the Senior Director of Federal Budget Policy for the Center for American Progress, for his instructive Bluesky post explaining the deficiency issue in a way much clearer and more succinctly than I otherwise would have been able to.Trump's troop pay move is a ‘temporary fix,' Johnson says - Live Updates - POLITICOPost by @did:plc:drfb2pdjlnsqkfgsoellcahm — BlueskyA piece I wrote for Forbes this week looks at how Norway is showing the rest of the world how to end EV subsidies without wrecking the market. The country announced in its latest budget that it will phase out its long-standing value-added tax (VAT) exemption for electric vehicles—partially in 2026, and fully by 2027. This might seem like a policy retreat, but the timing is deliberate: EVs now make up 95–98% of new car sales in Norway. The market has matured, and the subsidy is no longer essential.I argue that this is what smart policy looks like—temporary support that steps aside when it's no longer needed. The U.S., by contrast, killed its federal EV tax credit abruptly and politically, without phasing it out or adapting it for current market conditions. In doing so, it treated the credit as a political symbol rather than a market tool. Norway, on the other hand, used the exemption strategically, aligning it with broader policy goals and allowing it to sunset once those goals were met.The piece highlights how the U.S. often fears both removing and maintaining subsidies, caught in a cycle where incentives become political footballs. Norway's approach offers a model for how to responsibly end subsidies: gradually, rationally, and only once the market no longer needs them. This isn't anti-EV or anti-climate policy—it's a sign that the original policy worked.Norway Shows How To End EV Subsidies Without Killing The Market This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

At the EUVC Summit 2025, the stage belonged to a voice shaped by geopolitics, defense, and the future of industrial innovation: Sebastian von Ribbentrop, Managing Partner at Join Capital.Sebastian took us on a journey—one that started in Berlin in 2017 with a cornerstone commitment from Eiser Capital, and has since expanded to NATO, Ukraine, and beyond.Not Just Startups. Not Just Capital.Join was born when European engineers left corporates like Siemens and Airbus to build their own ventures—but weren't getting funded.Sebastian and his team stepped in. Today, with 148 LPs (90% from across Europe's industrial heartlands), Join has become a backbone for the builders reimagining enterprise and defense.The paradigm shift became undeniable in 2023, when the NATO Innovation Fund wrote its largest ticket into Join Fund II. It wasn't just capital—it was a mandate to help reshape defense and industrialization.A New Industrial MomentFrom Washington's NATO anniversary to trips into Ukraine, Sebastian's message was clear: the defense supply chain has transformed.It is now:FastTargetedSmartAnd while Europe faces inefficiencies (43 different tanks vs. one Abrams in the U.S.), it also faces a massive market opportunity.Billions at PlayThe scale is unprecedented:€200 billion from Ursula von der Leyen into defense & infrastructure€500+ billion from Germany's new chancellor, Matz$500 billion floated by Trump over the next five yearsThese aren't subsidies—they're revenues. Offset programs that give companies the ability to build products, not just pitch ideas.DARPA, Dual Use & the Technology RaceSebastian reminded the room: shocks create breakthroughs. Sputnik birthed DARPA, which still deploys $4 billion annually into challenges.Now, the race is on—dual-use technology, export restrictions, inexpensive smart radar systems taking down next-gen jets.Europe, he argued, must catch up. But it has the chance to lead.“Geopolitics,” he quoted Kissinger, “is 100% personal.” And Europe must take responsibility—urgently.Leadership With TeethSebastian's talk wasn't about abstractions. It was about:How wars reshape supply chains overnightHow NATO's backing changes venture capitalHow Europe can seize its industrial and defense momentBecause leadership in this decade won't be written in press releases. It will be written in supply chains, radar systems, and the speed of capital deployment.Congratulations to Sebastian von Ribbentrop and Join Capital—for reminding the ecosystem that industrial innovation isn't just defense spending. It's Europe's opportunity to lead in a world being reshaped, fast.

März 1935: Nur Tage nach der Enttarnung der Luftwaffe durch Hermann Göring beschließt Adolf Hitler, die NS-Aufrüstung in die heiße Phase zu führen. Die Einführung der Wehrpflicht im Dritten Reich überrascht Reichswehr, Regierung und Ausland gleichermaßen. Melde dich und unterstütz mich doch auf Patreon oder mit Paypal: https://linktr.ee/deutschland33_45pod Erwähnte Folgen: 33.6: Joachim von Ribbentrop als Vermittler zwischen Hindenburg, Hitler und Papen Ausgewählte Literatur: Wilhelm Deist u.a.: Ursachen und Voraussetzungen der deutschen Kriegspolitik, Stuttgart 1979 (= Das Deutsche Reich und der Zweite Weltkrieg, Bd. 1). Max Domarus, Hitler. Reden und Proklamationen 1932–1945. Kommentiert von einem deutschen Zeitgenossen, 1973. Friedrich Hoßbach, Zwischen Wehrmacht und Hitler, Wolfenbüttel 1949. Peter Longerich: Goebbels. Biographie, München 2010. Kirsten Schäfer: Werner von Blomberg. Hitlers erster Feldmarschall. Eine Biographie, Paderborn u.a. 2006. Intro-Musik arrangiert und vertont von Max, Auszüge aus Reden von Hermann Goering – Verkündung der Nürnberger Gesetze und Adolf Hitler – Reichstagsrede – Einführung der allgemeinen Wehrpflicht, via www.archive.org Outro: leider bis auf Weiteres keine Musik mehr, weil die Plattformen selbst bei urheberrechtsfreien Titel Probleme machen Episodenbild: Hitler und seine Generäle bei einem Manöver, Herbst 1935, aus meinem Exemplar von "Adolf Hitler. Bilder aus dem Leben des Führers, hrsg. v. Cigaretten Bilderdienst Altona/Bahrenfeld, Leipzig 1936." Tags: #Neuere_und_neueste_Geschichte #Deutschland

rWotD Episode 3014: General Government administration Welcome to random Wiki of the Day, your journey through Wikipedia's vast and varied content, one random article at a time.The random article for Monday, 4 August 2025, is General Government administration.The General Government administration (German: Generalgouvernement für die besetzten polnischen Gebiete, lit. 'General Government for the occupied Polish areas'), a government and administration of the General Government set up on part of that area of the Second Republic of Poland under Nazi German rule, operated during World War II between 1939 and early 1945. The Third Reich formed the General Government in October 1939 in the wake of the German and Soviet claim that the Polish state had totally collapsed following the invasion of Poland in September–October 1939. The German Wehrmacht had attacked Poland with strong air-power and with massive numbers of troops and tanks on 1 September 1939. The Germans' initial intent was to clear the western part of Poland, the Reichsgau Wartheland, and to bring it into the "Greater German Reich". However, those plans quickly stalled. On 23 August 1939, German foreign-minister Joachim von Ribbentrop and his Soviet counterpart had agreed to a non-aggression pact and had demarcated their respective countries' "spheres of influence" in Poland.This recording reflects the Wikipedia text as of 00:44 UTC on Monday, 4 August 2025.For the full current version of the article, see General Government administration on Wikipedia.This podcast uses content from Wikipedia under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.Visit our archives at wikioftheday.com and subscribe to stay updated on new episodes.Follow us on Mastodon at @wikioftheday@masto.ai.Also check out Curmudgeon's Corner, a current events podcast.Until next time, I'm generative Olivia.

In this episode, Andreas Munk Holm, Dr. Daniel Carew, and Sebastian von Ribbentrop discuss the critical importance of defense and strategic technologies in Europe. They explore Join Capital's investment thesis, the complexities of dual-use technology, and the intersection of technology, defense, and geopolitics. The conversation also touches on the impact of the Ukraine conflict on European defense strategies and the evolving landscape of venture capital investment in this sector.Here's what's covered:18:55 The Evolution of Join Capital's Investment Thesis24:01 Understanding Dual-Use Technology in Defense28:49 Navigating the Commercial and Defense Markets34:01 The Role of Geopolitics in Defense Investments38:09 Geopolitics and Personal Connections41:29 Complexity of European Defense and Innovation45:10 The Shift in Global Power Dynamics48:06 Defense Washing vs. Genuine Innovation52:55 Investment Strategies in a Changing Landscape59:47 The Future of Defense Post-Ukraine Conflict

PREVIEW: Charles Spicer, "Coffee with Hitler: The Untold Story of the Amateur Spies Who Tried to Civilize Hitler," comments on the strange Anglophile Joachim von Ribbentrop who wined and dined the British elite as German ambassador but then became Hitler's loudest Anglophobe. More later. 1936 LONDON, FAIRBNKS AND SWANSON.

durée : 00:48:10 - Affaires sensibles - par : Fabrice Drouelle, Franck COGNARD - Aujourd'hui dans Affaires Sensibles, le pacte germano-soviétique. Dans la nuit du 23 au 24 août 1939, les ministres des Affaires étrangères de l'Allemagne nazie et de la Russie soviétique, Joachim von Ribbentrop et Viatcheslav Molotov, signent un accord de non-agression entre les deux pays. - réalisé par : David Leprince

Roberto Casiraghi"The Phair"thephair.com/VI edizione della fiera dedicata alla fotografiada venerdì 9 a domenica 11 maggio 202550 gallerie e il nuovo Talks Program – The Phair OGR Torino(Corso Castelfidardo, 22 - Torino) Torna The Phair | Photo Art Fair, la prestigiosa fiera internazionale dedicata alla fotografia, a Torino per la VI edizione da venerdì 9 a domenica 11 maggio 2025. L'evento si svolgerà nuovamente alle OGR Torino, centro di cultura e innovazione unico in Europa, e riunirà gallerie d'arte e fotografia internazionali, offrendo ai visitatori un'esperienza immersiva tra esposizioni di artisti affermati e talenti emergenti. Ad arricchire il programma di questa edizione arriva il nuovo Talks Program – The Phair, un ciclo di incontri focalizzati sul tema del collezionismo, per cercare un confronto diretto con gli esperti del settore. Per promuovere il patrimonio fotografico nazionale e rafforzare i rapporti con le realtà museali torinesi, The Phair ha avviato una collaborazione con la GAM – Galleria Civica di Arte Moderna e Contemporanea scegliendo di utilizzare come immagine guida di questa edizione Torino, giostra Zeppelin in movimento (1934) di Mario Gabinio, custodita dall'Archivio Fotografico dei Musei Civici. Talks Program – The PhairPer la sua VI edizione, The Phair arricchisce il programma con un ciclo di incontri e approfondimenti dedicati al collezionismo, offrendo al pubblico un'occasione unica di confronto con collezionisti, art advisor, direttori di musei e fondazioni. Da venerdì 9 a domenica 11 maggio, infatti, prenderà vita il Talks Program – The Phair, un percorso che approfondisce il collezionismo privato, corporate e istituzionale. Venerdì 9 maggio Durante il primo giorno di The Phair, alle ore 12:30 si terrà l'incontro Truth in Photography con uno dei più rispettati ed eclettici studiosi di fotografia al mondo Joan Fontcuberta e Denis Curti, direttore artistico di Le Stanze della Fotografia e fondatore della galleria STIL. Alle ore 15:30 si terrà l'incontro The role of Italian photography in the wider, global context. Protagonisti saranno Lucia Bonanni, fondatrice del progetto BDC – Bonanni Del Rio Catalog, l'artista Silvio Wolf, e Carrie Scott, curatrice d'arte e consulente. A moderare sarà Francesca Filippino Pinto, curatrice d'arte e consulente.Alle ore 17:00 si terrà A conversation between an artist and a collector che vedrà protagonisti il fotografo Olivo Barbieri e Antonio Carloni, vicedirettore delle Gallerie d'Italia e curatore del Cortona Photography Festival, e a moderare Denis Curti. Chiuderà la giornata Building a Legacy Collection alle ore 18:30, con Marie-Laure de Clermont-Tonnerre, fondatrice di Spirit Now London, e Sebastian Lux, CEO e curatore della Collezione / Fondazione FC Gundlach, che parleranno insieme con Christian House, giornalista del Financial Times. Sabato 10 maggio Sabato 10 maggio alle ore 12:30 si terrà Building and Supporting a Museum Collection, con Massimo Prelz Oltramonti, collezionista d'arte e mecenate, Marta Weiss, curatrice di fotografia al Victoria and Albert Museum, Luigi Cerutti, Segretario Generale della Fondazione per l'Arte Moderna e Contemporanea CRT, e a moderare Christian House. Alle ore 16:00 si proseguirà con Corporate Photography Collections, che vedrà intervenire Katarzyna Piskorz della Collezione ING in Polonia e l'architetto e collezionista Mario Cucinella. A moderare sarà Simen Yöruk, fondatore di Elipsis Projects e Exhibition Director del Qatar Museum. La giornata si concluderà alle ore 18:00 con il talk Art Photography and the Commercial Market, con il fotografo Bastiaan Woudt, Matthias Harder, direttore e curatore della Helmut Newton Foundation, Tommy Rönngren, Executive Director Hoyningen Huene Estate Archive, e a moderare la consulente d'arte Caterina Mestrovich. Domenica 11 maggio L'ultimo giorno di The Phair vedrà alle ore 12:30, l'incontro Curating a Photography Collection and Prize con la partecipazione di Isabelle von Ribbentrop, direttore esecutivo del Prix Pictet, Ettore Molinario, economista e storico dell'arte, e a moderare Simen Yöruk. Il programma si chiuderà alle ore 16:00 con Private Collections, un confronto tra i collezionisti Robert Popper, Emilio Bordoli, Giorgio Fasol e Clemente Zorzetto, moderati da Brandei Estes, specialista in fotografie, curatrice e consulente. Le gallerie presenti a The Phair 2025Durante i tre giorni di fiera, saranno 50 le gallerie di arte contemporanea e di fotografia presenti, selezionate per garantire un elevato livello qualitativo e una proposta organica, provenienti dall'Italia ma anche da Belgio, Germania, Gran Bretagna e Svizzera. Ogni galleria presenterà progetti artistici incentrati sull'idea di immagine, per rendere Torino un polo di riferimento e di confronto sul tema. Tra le tante, Alberto Damian Gallery parteciperà proponendo un dialogo tra le fotografe Lori Sammartino e Marialba Russo che, pur avendo operato in periodi diversi, condividono affinità stilistiche. A The Phair la selezione delle opere di Lori Sammartino sarà curata personalmente da Marialba Russo che cercherà così un confronto artistico con la Sammartino. A.MORE Gallery parteciperà con un percorso espositivo in cui si intrecciano le visioni di Aldo Salucci e Gianni Melotti, dando vita a un dialogo tra memoria, immaginazione e natura.La galleria Erica Ravenna porterà un percorso espositivo di quattro artisti di diverse generazioni, uniti dall'uso innovativo della fotografia per indagare la natura e i suoi significati profondi: Vincenzo Agnetti, Tomaso Binga, Dominique Lacloche, Begoña Zubero.Alla scoperta di un altro mondo sarà dedicato il progetto espositivo della Galerie P, Un'altra realtà / Another Reality, incentrato sulla fotografia scenografica, tramite le visioni di tre artisti internazionali: Julia Fullerton-Batten, Frédéric Fontenoy e Bart Ramakers. Presente anche la galleria Jaeger Art con le opere di tre artisti di rilievo internazionale, ognuno con un approccio unico alla fotografia: Gregor Törzs,  Bastiaan Woudt, George Hoyningen-Huene. Sarà presente anche la galleria Kuckei + Kuckei con opere di Barbara Probst, Miguel Rothschild e Lilly Lulay, tre artisti che esplorano il linguaggio fotografico con approcci inediti. Fake Reality è il titolo del progetto di MC2 Gallery, che metterà in dialogo le pratiche post-fotografiche di Dune Varela e Pietro Catarinella, due artisti uniti dalla volontà di oltrepassare i confini dell'immagine. Persons Projects dedicherà il proprio spazio alla fotografia concettuale della Helsinki School, il movimento nato a fine anni ‘90 presso l'Università di Aalto, esponendo le opere di tre protagonisti: Santeri Tuori, Mikko Rikala e Milja Laurila. La galleria Tallulah Studio Art presenterà un progetto espositivo che mette in dialogo quattro artisti internazionali – Glen Wexler, Phillip Toledano, Keila Guilarte e Donatella Izzo – ognuno dei quali esplora, attraverso la fotografia, le molteplici sfumature della realtà e della percezioneLa galleria Tucci Russo - Studio per l'Arte Contemporanea porterà una selezione di opere di Jan Vercruysse appartenenti al ciclo Camera Oscura (2001-2002). Poeta fino agli anni '70, Vercruysse ha poi dedicato la sua ricerca all'arte visiva, esplorando il ruolo dell'artista e il significato stesso della rappresentazione. Focus Giovani Artisti The Phair, insieme con l'artista torinese Eva Frapiccini, inaugura un progetto speciale dedicato agli artisti under 40, sia italiani che internazionali. L'iniziativa si propone di individuare e valorizzare 10 voci emergenti più rilevanti della scena contemporanea, esplorando linguaggi innovativi e traiettorie artistiche in evoluzione.I premi di The Phair 2025The Phair incrementa la presenza di premi per artisti e gallerie grazie alla collaborazione con aziende e partner: Premio Fondazione per l'Arte Moderna e Contemporanea CRT, Premio in collaborazione con Just The Woman I Am, Residenza d'Artista Mario Cucinella Architects e Residenza Artistica “Scisti e Vinisti”. IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEascoltare fa pensarewww.ilpostodelleparole.itDiventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/il-posto-delle-parole--1487855/support.

PREVIEW: Author Charles Spicer, "Coffee with Hitler," presents the puzzle of Joachim von Ribbentrop, who joined the NSDAP as a prosperous merchant claiming he could charm London, but turned violently anti-English after being mocked by London society. More later. 1939 Ribbentrop arrives in Moscow

#RUSSIA: EU cannot forgo Russian energy. Michael Bernstam, Hoover.  1939 Ribbentrop arrives in Moscow

La Segunda Guerra Mundial comenzó el 1 de septiembre de 1939 con la invasión alemana de Polonia, pero eso fue posible gracias a un acuerdo que nazis y soviéticos habían alcanzado una semana antes, el pacto Molotov-Ribbentrop, también conocido como Tratado de No Agresión Germano-Soviético. Firmado el 23 de agosto de 1939 entre la Alemania nazi y la Unión Soviética este documento lleva los nombres de los ministros de Asuntos Exteriores de ambos países, Joachim von Ribbentrop y Vyacheslav Molotov, de ahí que se le conozca por ese nombre. Su impacto fue determinante en el estallido de la guerra y estuvo en vigor casi dos años, hasta que Hitler puso en marcha la Operación Barbarroja en 1941. El pacto vino precedido por años de tensiones ideológicas y desconfianza mutua entre los dos regímenes. Uno se decía anticomunista y el otro antifascista, pero las circunstancias geopolíticas de finales de la década de los 30 empujaron a Adolf Hitler y a Iósif Stalin a considerar una alianza de carácter pragmático. Para Hitler el pacto aseguraba que Alemania no tendría que librar una guerra en dos frentes como les había sucedido en la Primera Guerra Mundial, mientras que Stalin veía la oportunidad de ganar tiempo para fortalecer la defensa soviética y recuperar lo perdido tras la revolución de octubre sin tener que vérselas con la oposición alemana. Lo más notorio del Pacto Molotov-Ribbentrop fue el Protocolo Secreto, que no se hizo público hasta después de la guerra. Este protocolo dividía Europa del Este en esferas de influencia. Polonia sería repartida entre Alemania y la URSS; los estados bálticos de Estonia, Letonia y Lituania, junto con Finlandia, caerían en la esfera soviética. Además, se legitimaba la anexión soviética de Besarabia, la actual Moldavia, que entonces formaba parte de Rumanía. Esta partición secreta fue un preludio a las invasiones y anexiones que seguirían, alterando drásticamente el mapa político de Europa. La firma del pacto sorprendió a las potencias occidentales que esperaban que la Unión Soviética se uniera a una alianza contra Hitler. La reacción inmediata fue una mezcla de incredulidad y consternación, especialmente entre los comunistas occidentales que veían en este acuerdo una traición a su ideología. La Comintern les ordenó que culpasen de la guerra al imperialismo y que dejasen de combatir a los nazis y los fascistas. En Alemania, el pacto sirvió para invadir Polonia y rehacer el este de Europa a su antojo. La URSS, entretanto, ocupó la mitad oriental de Polonia, anexionó las repúblicas bálticas e invadió Finlandia. Todo le salió a pedir de boca salvo la campaña finlandesa. Para celebrarlo unidades militares alemanas y soviéticas desfilaron juntas en Polonia. Al pacto de agosto de 1939 se añadieron nuevas disposiciones y protocolos así como un ambicioso acuerdo comercial por el que la Unión Soviética se comprometía a suministrar materias primas a Alemania a cambio de armas y maquinaria. Durante el año 1940 la relación entre nazis y soviéticos fue inmejorable hasta el punto de que se barajó incluso la idea de que la URSS se integrase en el Eje junto a japoneses e italianos. El idilio acabó abruptamente el 22 de junio de 1941 cuando los alemanes invadieron la Unión Soviética con un ataque sorpresa y sin declaración de guerra previa. La URSS se convirtió en uno de los aliados y el el Pacto Molotov-Ribbentrop fue olvidado durante el resto de la guerra. En 1948 los estadounidenses, ya metidos en plena guerra fría, publicaron el protocolo secreto de este pacto para avergonzar a los soviéticos, que de puertas adentro prohibieron hablar de él. La existencia misma del protocolo secreto fue negada por los Gobiernos soviéticos durante décadas hasta que en 1989 ya con la Perestroika en marcha, lo admitieron. En El ContraSello: 0:00 Introducción 4:09 El pacto nazi-soviético 1:14:52 Roma: de la República al Imperio 1:21:28 ¿Cómo financió Inglaterra la guerra de independencia de EEUU? Bibliografía: - “La Segunda Guerra Mundial” de Antony Beevor - https://amzn.to/4gNPN4K - “La segunda guerra mundial contada para escépticos” de Juan Eslava Galán - https://amzn.to/4gLPo2t - “Stalin. Una biografia” de Robert Service - https://amzn.to/4fuoATe - “Causes of the Second World War” de Andrew Crozier - https://amzn.to/4iFumVb · Canal de Telegram: https://t.me/lacontracronica · “Contra la Revolución Francesa”… https://amzn.to/4aF0LpZ · “Hispanos. Breve historia de los pueblos de habla hispana”… https://amzn.to/428js1G · “La ContraHistoria de España. Auge, caída y vuelta a empezar de un país en 28 episodios”… https://amzn.to/3kXcZ6i · “Lutero, Calvino y Trento, la Reforma que no fue”… https://amzn.to/3shKOlK · “La ContraHistoria del comunismo”… https://amzn.to/39QP2KE Apoya La Contra en: · Patreon... https://www.patreon.com/diazvillanueva · iVoox... https://www.ivoox.com/podcast-contracronica_sq_f1267769_1.html · Paypal... https://www.paypal.me/diazvillanueva Sígueme en: · Web... https://diazvillanueva.com · Twitter... https://twitter.com/diazvillanueva · Facebook... https://www.facebook.com/fernandodiazvillanueva1/ · Instagram... https://www.instagram.com/diazvillanueva · Linkedin… https://www.linkedin.com/in/fernando-d%C3%ADaz-villanueva-7303865/ · Flickr... https://www.flickr.com/photos/147276463@N05/?/ · Pinterest... https://www.pinterest.com/fernandodiazvillanueva Encuentra mis libros en: · Amazon... https://www.amazon.es/Fernando-Diaz-Villanueva/e/B00J2ASBXM #FernandoDiazVillanueva #stalin #segundaguerramundial Escucha el episodio completo en la app de iVoox, o descubre todo el catálogo de iVoox Originals

La Segunda Guerra Mundial comenzó el 1 de septiembre de 1939 con la invasión alemana de Polonia, pero eso fue posible gracias a un acuerdo que nazis y soviéticos habían alcanzado una semana antes, el pacto Molotov-Ribbentrop, también conocido como Tratado de No Agresión Germano-Soviético. Firmado el 23 de agosto de 1939 entre la Alemania nazi y la Unión Soviética este documento lleva los nombres de los ministros de Asuntos Exteriores de ambos países, Joachim von Ribbentrop y Vyacheslav Molotov, de ahí que se le conozca por ese nombre. Su impacto fue determinante en el estallido de la guerra y estuvo en vigor casi dos años, hasta que Hitler puso en marcha la Operación Barbarroja en 1941. El pacto vino precedido por años de tensiones ideológicas y desconfianza mutua entre los dos regímenes. Uno se decía anticomunista y el otro antifascista, pero las circunstancias geopolíticas de finales de la década de los 30 empujaron a Adolf Hitler y a Iósif Stalin a considerar una alianza de carácter pragmático. Para Hitler el pacto aseguraba que Alemania no tendría que librar una guerra en dos frentes como les había sucedido en la Primera Guerra Mundial, mientras que Stalin veía la oportunidad de ganar tiempo para fortalecer la defensa soviética y recuperar lo perdido tras la revolución de octubre sin tener que vérselas con la oposición alemana. Lo más notorio del Pacto Molotov-Ribbentrop fue el Protocolo Secreto, que no se hizo público hasta después de la guerra. Este protocolo dividía Europa del Este en esferas de influencia. Polonia sería repartida entre Alemania y la URSS; los estados bálticos de Estonia, Letonia y Lituania, junto con Finlandia, caerían en la esfera soviética. Además, se legitimaba la anexión soviética de Besarabia, la actual Moldavia, que entonces formaba parte de Rumanía. Esta partición secreta fue un preludio a las invasiones y anexiones que seguirían, alterando drásticamente el mapa político de Europa. La firma del pacto sorprendió a las potencias occidentales que esperaban que la Unión Soviética se uniera a una alianza contra Hitler. La reacción inmediata fue una mezcla de incredulidad y consternación, especialmente entre los comunistas occidentales que veían en este acuerdo una traición a su ideología. La Comintern les ordenó que culpasen de la guerra al imperialismo y que dejasen de combatir a los nazis y los fascistas. En Alemania, el pacto sirvió para invadir Polonia y rehacer el este de Europa a su antojo. La URSS, entretanto, ocupó la mitad oriental de Polonia, anexionó las repúblicas bálticas e invadió Finlandia. Todo le salió a pedir de boca salvo la campaña finlandesa. Para celebrarlo unidades militares alemanas y soviéticas desfilaron juntas en Polonia. Al pacto de agosto de 1939 se añadieron nuevas disposiciones y protocolos así como un ambicioso acuerdo comercial por el que la Unión Soviética se comprometía a suministrar materias primas a Alemania a cambio de armas y maquinaria. Durante el año 1940 la relación entre nazis y soviéticos fue inmejorable hasta el punto de que se barajó incluso la idea de que la URSS se integrase en el Eje junto a japoneses e italianos. El idilio acabó abruptamente el 22 de junio de 1941 cuando los alemanes invadieron la Unión Soviética con un ataque sorpresa y sin declaración de guerra previa. La URSS se convirtió en uno de los aliados y el el Pacto Molotov-Ribbentrop fue olvidado durante el resto de la guerra. En 1948 los estadounidenses, ya metidos en plena guerra fría, publicaron el protocolo secreto de este pacto para avergonzar a los soviéticos, que de puertas adentro prohibieron hablar de él. La existencia misma del protocolo secreto fue negada por los Gobiernos soviéticos durante décadas hasta que en 1989 ya con la Perestroika en marcha, lo admitieron. En El ContraSello: 0:00 Introducción 4:09 El pacto nazi-soviético 1:14:52 Roma: de la República al Imperio 1:21:28 ¿Cómo financió Inglaterra la guerra de independencia de EEUU? Bibliografía: - “La Segunda Guerra Mundial” de Antony Beevor - https://amzn.to/4gNPN4K - “La segunda guerra mundial contada para escépticos” de Juan Eslava Galán - https://amzn.to/4gLPo2t - “Stalin. Una biografia” de Robert Service - https://amzn.to/4fuoATe - “Causes of the Second World War” de Andrew Crozier - https://amzn.to/4iFumVb · Canal de Telegram: https://t.me/lacontracronica · “Contra la Revolución Francesa”… https://amzn.to/4aF0LpZ · “Hispanos. Breve historia de los pueblos de habla hispana”… https://amzn.to/428js1G · “La ContraHistoria de España. Auge, caída y vuelta a empezar de un país en 28 episodios”… https://amzn.to/3kXcZ6i · “Lutero, Calvino y Trento, la Reforma que no fue”… https://amzn.to/3shKOlK · “La ContraHistoria del comunismo”… https://amzn.to/39QP2KE Apoya La Contra en: · Patreon... https://www.patreon.com/diazvillanueva · iVoox... https://www.ivoox.com/podcast-contracronica_sq_f1267769_1.html · Paypal... https://www.paypal.me/diazvillanueva Sígueme en: · Web... https://diazvillanueva.com · Twitter... https://twitter.com/diazvillanueva · Facebook... https://www.facebook.com/fernandodiazvillanueva1/ · Instagram... https://www.instagram.com/diazvillanueva · Linkedin… https://www.linkedin.com/in/fernando-d%C3%ADaz-villanueva-7303865/ · Flickr... https://www.flickr.com/photos/147276463@N05/?/ · Pinterest... https://www.pinterest.com/fernandodiazvillanueva Encuentra mis libros en: · Amazon... https://www.amazon.es/Fernando-Diaz-Villanueva/e/B00J2ASBXM #FernandoDiazVillanueva #stalin #segundaguerramundial

por Yaiza Santos La indecencia ha ganado en Francia. ¡Un pacto Ribbentrop-Mólotov redivivo!, lo llamó. Y ¿cómo piensan gobernar Le Pen y Mélenchon y con quién? ¿Acaso juntos? No, no tiene la culpa Macron, como clama la prensa socialdemócrata, y si él fuera el presidente francés, impondría un primer ministro por decreto cada 15 días, ¡hasta que aprendan! Lo pasa muy bien con Gepetto y así lo demuestra en su columna de este jueves. No cree –lo dice algún estudio– que haya una inteligencia creada de izquierdas y una de derechas, pero sí está convencido de que recoge las idées reçues. ¡Qué prodigio –se admiró– que ChatGPT muestre el alma andaluza como lo haría un búlgaro! De la amenaza de Vox a los pactos regionales con el PP solo le interesa la respuesta del PP. Y una vez más, tuvo que reconvenir de nuevo. Feijóo, dijo, es un hombre para gobernar con el PNV y Convergencia, ¡pero ese mundo ya no existe! Lo dirá una y mil veces: si quiere ser un día presidente del Gobierno no le queda más remedio que pactar con Vox y dejar esas reacciones al baño maría. No le extraña el desastre en los resultados educativos de España porque primero es el desastre de Cataluña. No se debe a la inmersión, opinó, sino a los pedagogos y, por supuesto, al ambiente general de decadencia. Rindió homenaje, por cierto, al juez Manuel Marchena, que se despide de la presidencia de la Sala II de la Audiencia Nacional y que fue, en el momento más dramático de este país desde el golpe de Estado del 81, el mejor y más carismático director de aquella orquesta de razón y verdad que fue el juicio al proceso. Comentó un estimulante burning paper que demuestra la superioridad de los que piensan en el futuro, celebró las reflexiones de Mark Lilla sobre no querer saber y sentenció de Joselito –más allá de Pigget y patrocinios–: es lo mejor de España. Y fue así que Espada yiró.   Bibliografía: Mark Lilla, Pensadores temerarios Jordi Pérez Colomé, Newsletter de Tecnología «Pasando del pasado», Personality and Social Psychology Review, 30 de noviembre de 2024 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Le procès de Nuremberg, ouvert le 20 novembre 1945, est le premier tribunal international chargé de juger les crimes de guerre nazis après la Seconde Guerre mondiale. Dans la salle d'audience de Nuremberg, 21 hauts dignitaires du régime d'Hitler, tels que Göring et Ribbentrop, sont accusés de crimes contre la paix, crimes de guerre et crimes contre l'humanité. Dirigé par le procureur américain Robert Jackson, le procès dévoile l'horreur des camps de concentration et le génocide perpétré par les nazis. Face à des preuves accablantes, les accusés se déclarent tous non coupables, tentant de minimiser leur rôle. En octobre 1946, 12 condamnations à mort sont prononcées, et le procès devient un moment fondateur du droit international, symbolisant la victoire de la justice sur la barbarie. Merci pour votre écoute Vous aimez l'Heure H, mais connaissez-vous La Mini Heure H https://audmns.com/YagLLiK , une version pour toute la famille.Retrouvez l'ensemble des épisodes de l'Heure H sur notre plateforme Auvio.be :https://auvio.rtbf.be/emission/22750 Intéressés par l'histoire ? Vous pourriez également aimer nos autres podcasts : Un jour dans l'Histoire : https://audmns.com/gXJWXoQL'Histoire Continue: https://audmns.com/kSbpELwAinsi que nos séries historiques :Chili, le Pays de mes Histoires : https://audmns.com/XHbnevhD-Day : https://audmns.com/JWRdPYIJoséphine Baker : https://audmns.com/wCfhoEwLa folle histoire de l'aviation : https://audmns.com/xAWjyWCLes Jeux Olympiques, l'étonnant miroir de notre Histoire : https://audmns.com/ZEIihzZMarguerite, la Voix d'une Résistante : https://audmns.com/zFDehnENapoléon, le crépuscule de l'Aigle : https://audmns.com/DcdnIUnUn Jour dans le Sport : https://audmns.com/xXlkHMHSous le sable des Pyramides : https://audmns.com/rXfVppvVous aimez les histoires racontées par Jean-Louis Lahaye ? Connaissez-vous ces podcast?Sous le sable des Pyramides : https://audmns.com/rXfVppv36 Quai des orfèvres : https://audmns.com/eUxNxyFHistoire Criminelle, les enquêtes de Scotland Yard : https://audmns.com/ZuEwXVOUn Crime, une Histoire https://audmns.com/NIhhXpYN'oubliez pas de vous y abonner pour ne rien manquer.Et si vous avez apprécié ce podcast, n'hésitez pas à nous donner des étoiles ou des commentaires, cela nous aide à le faire connaître plus largement.

This Day in Legal History: Nazi War Criminals HangedOn October 16, 1946, ten high-ranking Nazi war criminals were executed by hanging after being convicted by the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg. This landmark trial held key figures of Adolf Hitler's regime accountable for crimes against humanity, war crimes, and genocide committed during World War II. Among those executed was Joachim von Ribbentrop, the former German Foreign Minister, who had played a significant role in Nazi diplomacy, including the negotiation of the non-aggression pact with the Soviet Union. Others included Wilhelm Keitel, head of the German Armed Forces, and Alfred Jodl, a top military strategist.The Nuremberg trials were a historic moment in international law, establishing the precedent that individuals—even heads of state and military leaders—could be held criminally responsible for war crimes. The tribunal addressed the atrocities of the Holocaust, the invasion of neighboring countries, and the brutal treatment of civilians and prisoners of war. The executions followed months of legal proceedings and were seen as a step toward justice for millions of victims. Two of the condemned, Hermann Göring and Martin Bormann, avoided the gallows—Göring by committing suicide the night before the executions, and Bormann being sentenced in absentia, as he was never captured. These trials helped shape modern principles of international law, including the concepts of crimes against humanity and the rule of law in war. Meta Platforms Inc. must face claims by 34 state attorneys general accusing the company of contributing to a youth mental health crisis by getting children hooked on Facebook and Instagram. A federal judge in California ruled that some claims in the lawsuit could proceed, while others were dismissed under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which shields internet companies from liability over user-generated content. The states allege Meta's platforms cause mental health issues, like depression, in young users and that the company unlawfully collected data from children under 13. The lawsuit is part of a broader legal push against social media companies like TikTok, YouTube, and Snap, all of which are accused of profiting from the addiction of young users. Meta's spokesperson defended the company's actions, pointing to tools for parental controls and recent changes to Instagram's teen accounts. However, the judge noted that Meta's alleged “public campaign of deception” about the dangers of social media addiction could violate state and federal laws. The ruling also allows claims challenging features like “appearance-altering filters” but limits challenges to infinite scroll and likes. The decision comes alongside similar lawsuits by public school districts alleging social media companies create a public nuisance.Meta Can't Escape States' Claims It Hooked Kids on Platforms (4)The US Supreme Court declined to revive a challenge by Uber and Postmates to California's employment classification law, AB 5, leaving in place a Ninth Circuit ruling. AB 5 requires most workers to be classified as employees, giving them broader protections and benefits compared to independent contractors. Although Uber and other app-based companies are exempt from AB 5 under Proposition 22, which voters approved in 2020, they faced penalties for alleged violations before Prop 22 took effect.Uber and Postmates argued that AB 5 unfairly targeted their industries, claiming the law violated their equal protection rights by exempting other sectors. However, the Ninth Circuit ruled that lawmakers had rational reasons for distinguishing between industries, suggesting that ride-hailing companies were perceived as larger contributors to worker misclassification. The companies petitioned the Supreme Court, but the justices allowed the lower court's decision to stand, effectively ending their constitutional challenge to the law.Supreme Court Stymies Uber's Challenge to California Labor LawCourts in key battleground states are implementing procedures to expedite election-related lawsuits ahead of the November 2024 election to avoid delays in finalizing results. Arizona's Supreme Court recently ordered trial courts to prioritize election disputes, ensuring any challenges, such as those concerning recounts or presidential electors, are resolved quickly. This comes as both Republicans and Democrats have filed numerous lawsuits ahead of the election, and experts predict more legal battles on Election Day over vote counting and certification.Similar measures have been adopted in other battleground states, including Pennsylvania, which shortened the timeframe for appeals to three days, and Michigan, which introduced protocols for handling emergency election-related rulings. These actions are seen as a proactive response to the legal chaos of the 2020 election, when former President Donald Trump and his allies unsuccessfully challenged results with claims of widespread voter fraud. Courts are also preparing for potential security risks, with warnings of increased threats to judges during periods of national tension. Legal experts praise these steps as a way to ensure smooth and timely election litigation.Courts in US battleground states move to swiftly decide election cases | ReutersMy column for Bloomberg this week discusses how the IRS can solve the issue of stolen tax-refund checks, increasingly a major issue, by embracing technology. Despite the availability of direct deposit, many taxpayers still rely on paper checks, which are vulnerable to theft. I argue that the IRS should offer secure digital refund cards, similar to the electronic benefits transfer (EBT) cards used in welfare programs, for taxpayers without bank accounts. These cards can be mailed securely, with separate deliveries for the card and its PIN, reducing theft risks.For those who prefer physical checks, I suggest allowing taxpayers to pick them up at secure locations like post offices, where the checks could be activated upon identity verification. This method would work like a software kill switch for smartphones, rendering checks useless if stolen before activation. Additionally, an optional mobile app could provide tracking, security, and refund management features for tech-savvy taxpayers.These solutions would enhance refund security while ensuring flexibility and accessibility. The IRS should also collaborate with local organizations to help taxpayers navigate these new systems, ensuring no one is left behind in the transition to a more secure refund process.Secure Digital Tax Refund System Can Solve Stolen Check Problem This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

This Day in Legal History: Nazi Leaders Convicted at NurembergOn September 30, 1946, the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg delivered its final verdicts, marking a pivotal moment in legal history. The tribunal, established by the Allied powers after World War II, tried 24 high-ranking Nazi officials for crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. Of those tried, 22 were found guilty. These included prominent Nazi figures such as Hermann Göring, Rudolf Hess, and Joachim von Ribbentrop. The Nuremberg Trials were the first of their kind to hold government officials individually accountable for atrocities committed under state authority, laying the groundwork for modern international criminal law.The court sentenced 12 of the defendants to death by hanging, while others received long prison sentences. Three were acquitted. These proceedings also set legal precedents, defining acts like genocide and war crimes more clearly in the context of international law. Nuremberg solidified the principle that following orders is not a defense for committing atrocities, a key doctrine in future human rights cases. The trials emphasized accountability, no matter how high the official's rank, and underscored the need for justice following war and genocide.Ahead of the 2024 presidential election, Republicans have launched a wide-ranging legal campaign to challenge voting processes, with particular focus on states like Arizona, where the race between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris is extremely tight. A lawsuit by the America First Legal Foundation, founded by Trump advisor Stephen Miller, seeks to empower courts to nullify election results due to procedural errors by local officials and order new rounds of voting. This case, which legal experts view as a long shot, reflects a broader Republican strategy to sow doubts about the election's legitimacy before votes are cast. The Republican National Committee is involved in over 120 lawsuits across 26 states, aiming to impose stricter voting rules, which they argue will restore faith in election integrity.Republicans, still asserting widespread fraud in the 2020 election despite court rejections, are pursuing these challenges earlier than in 2020, attempting to preemptively influence election outcomes. Legal experts warn that these lawsuits could cause chaos and confusion, potentially opening doors for political intervention in election results. Democrats argue the efforts are designed to undermine trust in the election system in case of Republican losses, while both sides are gearing up for further legal battles over voting restrictions and access.Republicans lay legal groundwork for election challenges | ReutersEpic Games has accused Google and Samsung of conspiring to limit competition in the app market, filing a lawsuit in U.S. federal court. The suit centers around Samsung's Auto Blocker, a mobile security feature that Epic claims discourages users from downloading apps outside of Google's Play Store and Samsung's Galaxy Store. Epic argues this reduces consumer choice and violates U.S. antitrust laws by making it harder for users to access potentially cheaper apps from rival sources. Epic CEO Tim Sweeney said Google falsely positions itself as protecting users by blocking apps from “unknown sources,” despite previously distributing "Fortnite" itself.Samsung, which introduced Auto Blocker in late 2023 as a security measure, denies the allegations and claims the feature is designed for user safety. The company stated that users can disable Auto Blocker if desired. Epic believes the feature undermines a U.S. court ruling in December 2023, which was expected to increase app availability from third-party sources. Epic plans to raise these concerns with EU regulators, citing Google's long-standing scrutiny over anticompetitive practices. This follows Epic's earlier legal battles with Google and Apple over high app store commissions, which led to "Fortnite" being temporarily banned from both platforms.Epic Games accuses Samsung, Google of scheme to block app rivals | ReutersJudge Colm F. Connolly recently criticized lawyers in a patent-funding investigation, suggesting they were not truly representing their client, Lori LaPray, a Texas paralegal who owns Backertop Licensing LLC. LaPray owes a $53,000 contempt fine for failing to appear in court, linked to Connolly's probe into patent-monetization firm IP Edge LLC. The judge maintained the fine but implied LaPray was a pawn in a larger scheme orchestrated by IP Edge and advised her to seek independent legal counsel. Connolly's actions are rare, with legal experts noting that questioning an attorney's loyalty to a client in open court could lead to wider scrutiny of their conduct. The investigation focuses on whether IP Edge and related entities, like Mavexar LLC, have violated court disclosure requirements designed to ensure transparency about who benefits from patent litigation. Connolly has already sanctioned multiple attorneys involved in IP Edge cases and warned that reducing LaPray's fine would signal tolerance for deception. The judge has referred several cases to the Justice Department, reflecting his broader effort to address misconduct in patent litigation, which critics say often obscures the real parties behind lawsuits. Connolly's approach contrasts with other judges who may not prioritize uncovering the true interests in litigation, despite concerns over transparency.Judge's Rare Rebuke of Lawyers Shakes Up Patent-Funding Probe This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Programa en vídeo en You Tube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BqBUTsnNnT4 Canal de Telegram para No perderte Nada! https://t.me/segundaguerramundialtelegram Canal de Whatsapp https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaSmnrC0QeatgWe2Lm27 ¿Cuáles fueron los mayores duelos blindados de la Segunda Guerra Mundial? ¿Qué ases panzer combatieron en ellos? ¿Cómo fue cada una de estas hazañas individuales? ¿Quién de ellos estuvo más cerca de caer abatido? ¿Qué carros de combate fueron los que más acciones individuales protagonizaron? ¿Quiénes fueron los ases más famosos de la Wehrmacht? A continuación, en este programa, os traemos una recopilación de 5 duelos blindados intrigantes de la Segunda Guerra Mundial.

Join Alina and Rogr Moorhouse as they talk about the pact between Nazi Germany and Stalinist Russia and find out why Roger calls Molotov a man with an ego but not very intelligent... Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

85 ANOS DO PACTO RIBBENTROP-MOLOTOV, 1939: O POLÊMICO ACORDO DE STALIN COM HITLER - ANÁLISE DE BRENO ALTMANO jornalista e fundador de Opera Mundi, Breno Altman, apresenta o programa 20 MINUTOS ANÁLISE nesta sexta-feira (23/08) com o tema "85 anos do Pacto Ribbentrop-Molotov", acordo assinado em 1939 entre Stalin e Hitler. Não perca! Ao vivo, a partir das 11h, aqui em Opera Mundi!

Faites un don et recevez un cadeau : http://don.storiavoce.com/ Symbole de la capitulation des démocraties françaises et anglaises face au totalitarisme allemand, les accords de Munich du mois de septembre 1938, qui interviennent quelques semaines après l'Anschluss, précipitent l'Europe dans l'abîme. Dans un livre magistral, Maurizio Serra revient d'abord sur les conséquences politiques de la Grande Guerre. Il s'attarde ensuite sur les différents acteurs de ce drame, dont la Tchécoslovaquie est la victime expiatoire. Qui était Chamberlain ? Est-il le seul père de la politique dite d'apaisement avec l'Allemagne ? Quel rôle joue la France de Daladier, et comment Mussolini va savoir tirer profit de l'événement, au point d'en faire son dernier succès diplomatique ? Comment Hitler va abandonner le plan extrémiste de Ribbentrop, afin de mieux poursuivre ses desseins machiavéliques ? L'invité : Maurizio Serra de l'Académie française, diplomate de profession, est aussi historien. Avec Le Mystère Mussolini (Perrin, 500 pages, 25 €), il a complété sa fresque magistrale publiée chez Grasset de grands auteurs italiens du XXe siècle, commencée avec Malaparte, vie et légendes (couronné en 2011 par le Goncourt de la biographie et le prix Casanova), poursuivie avec Italo Svevo ou l'antivie et D'Annunzio le Magnifique (Prix Chateaubriand 2018 et Prix du Livre incorrect 2018), ouvrages qui ont remporté l'adhésion de la critique et du public, déjà traduits en plusieurs langues. Son dernier livre s'intitule Munich 1938. La paix impossible (Perrin, 389 p., 24€). *** Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/HistoireEtCivilisationsMag Instagram : https://www.instagram.com/histoireetcivilisations/ Twitter : https://twitter.com/Storiavoce

PREVIEW: #HITLER: Conversation with author Sean McMeekin about his book "STALIN's WAR: A New History of World War II," which discusses how Stalin signaled to Hitler in the Spring of 1939 that he was ready for an alliance. This alliance would allow Stalin to gain part of Poland and to compel England and France to go to war with Germany, leading to their mutual destruction. More details to follow later. Stalin's War: A New History of World War II, Sean McMeekin, with Kevin Stillwell as narrator. Published by Basic Books.  Audible Audiobook – Unabridged https://www.amazon.com/Stalins-War-New-History-World/dp/B08XW52WNY/ref=sr_1_1?crid=15RCHF0X357CE&keywords=mcmeekin+stalins+war&qid=1644188471&s=books&sprefix=mcmeekin+stalins+war%2Cstripbooks%2C67&sr=1-1 Motovo, Ribbentrop, Stalin, August 1939

Los juicios de Núremberg fueron el primer proceso penal desarrollado en cuatro idiomas. Corresponsales de todo el mundo acudieron a la tribuna de prensa para relatar las causas contra Rudolf Hess, Joachim von Ribbentrop y otros altos cargos del nazismo. Y todos esos escritores y periodistas se alojaron en un mismo castillo: el castillo de Faber-Castle. El historiador Uwe Neumahr se cuela en cada cámara del castillo en su nuevo ensayo, publicado por Taurus. Además, los culturetas charlan sobre "Manhunt", una ficción histórica con tintes de thriller.

Los juicios de Núremberg fueron el primer proceso penal desarrollado en cuatro idiomas. Corresponsales de todo el mundo acudieron a la tribuna de prensa para relatar las causas contra Rudolf Hess, Joachim von Ribbentrop y otros altos cargos del nazismo. Y todos esos escritores y periodistas se alojaron en un mismo castillo: el castillo de Faber-Castle. El historiador Uwe Neumahr se cuela en cada cámara del castillo en su nuevo ensayo, publicado por Taurus. Además, los culturetas charlan sobre "Manhunt", una ficción histórica con tintes de thriller.

So in this episode Laura, Krys and Dean discuss Valentines Day, mostly in Krysta's corner before we dig into the life of Harry Oakes. We discuss his life, how he discovered his fortune, how he met his young wife and became a British Citizen and earned the title of Baronet as he settled in the Bahamas. The Bahamas was governed by the Duke of Windsor, the former King of England Edward the VIII and his American wife the Duchess of Windsor. We learn about his murder, how someone attempted to set the body on fire using insecticide and then we discuss suspects, the bungling of the investigation and so much more in this man-history-can-be-weird episode of the Family Plot Podcast!!

PREVIEW: From conversation with Charles Spicer, autor of COFFEE WITH HITLER, about how Ambassador (and later Foreign Minister)Joachim von Ribbentrop, having mainained to Hitler that he could charm the British to accept German ascendancy in Europe, turned against London and became a loud voice for war. Coffee With Hitler: The Untold Story of the Amateur Spies Who Tried to Civilize the Nazis by  Charles Spicer  (Author) https://www.amazon.com/Coffee-Hitler-Untold-Amateur-Civilize/dp/1639362266 1939 Ribbentrop arrives in Moscow

OFFERTA DI NATALE NORDVPN Non perderla: vai su https://nordvpn.com/dentrolastoria Sconto esclusivo + 4 mesi extra sui piani biennali di NordVPN! Prova il piano Plus per ottenere NordVPN + NordPass ad un prezzo speciale.Amicizie potenti o semplicemente utili, un titolo nobiliare ereditato da una vecchia zia, un passato da venditore di vini ed una rete di contatti in mezza Europa. Ma chi era davvero Joachim von Ribbentrop? Diplomatico, uomo degli intrighi, abile tessitore di legami, la sua firma è apposta su tanti eventi chiave del periodo nazista: la crisi britannica sotto Edoardo VIII e la regina mancata Wallis Simpson, gli accordi di Monaco, il patto del diavolo con l'URSS per la spartizione della Polonia sono alcuni dei suoi capolavori. Sino alla fine ingloriosa e quasi grottesca, da grigio e balbettante condannato a morte.Il nostro canale Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1vziHBEp0gc9gAhR740fCwSostieni DENTRO LA STORIA su Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/dentrolastoriaAbbonati al canale: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1vziHBEp0gc9gAhR740fCw/joinSostienici su PayPal: https://paypal.me/infinitybeatDentro La Storia lo trovi anche qui: https://linktr.ee/dentrolastoriaDiventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/racconti-di-storia-podcast--5561307/support.

Today we have Klementina Österberg from GU Ventures & Ted Persson from EQT Ventures with us

Det stod klart för de flesta att Nazityskland skulle förlora kriget efter slaget om Stalingrad i februari 1943. Men den svenska samlingsregeringen var långsamma att utnyttja det förhandlingsutrymme som de tyska krigsmotgångarna skapade.Den tyska permittenttrafiken genom Sverige pågick ända fram till i augusti 1943. Och arresteringen av 1200 protesterande norska studenter och deportationerna av de norska judarna väckte bara lama protester från den svenska regeringen. Och avstegen från neutralitetspolitiken gentemot de allierade var försiktigt motvillig.I detta avsnitt av podden Historia Nu samtalar programledaren Urban Lindstedt med historikern Henrik Berggren som är aktuell med boken Landet utanför – Sverige och kriget 1943-1945. Del tre i en trilogi om Sverige under andra världskriget.Historikern Alf W. Johansson har beskrivit regeringens protest mot arresteringen av de norska studenterna den 1 december 1943 som ”en av historiens vändpunkter då historien vägrade vända". Tysklands utrikesminister von Ribbentrop reagerade med ilska på att Sverige lades sig i de ”norsk-tyska relationerna”. Och regeringen gick aldrig från protester till handling gentemot Tyskland.Samtidigt arbetade hela statsmakten för att underlätta de danska judarnas flykt till Sverige i oktober 1943. Förintelsens fasor hade med tiden kommit allt närmare, när grannlandets judar skulle deporteras.Bild: Flyktingar. Folke Bernadottes expedition med de Vita bussarna. Ankomst till Sverige via Helsingborg och Malmö, Foto: KW Gullers, Nordiska Museet, Digitala Museet, Erkännande-IckeKommersiell-IngaBearbetningar (CC BY-NC-ND)Musik: Manhattan Fog av New Library Sounds, Storyblocks Audio.Lyssna också på Sveriges balansakt mellan Sovjet och Nazityskland.Klippare: Emanuel Lehtonen Vill du stödja podden och samtidigt höra ännu mer av Historia Nu? Gå med i vårt gille genom att klicka här: https://plus.acast.com/s/historianu-med-urban-lindstedt. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Nuremberg. L'antre du nazisme, le siège de l'horreur. Pendant plus de 10 ans, cette ville s'est construite autour d'une idéologie nauséabonde, qui coûta la vie à des millions de personnes innocentes. Leur crime était d'être différents et surtout, d'avoir été désignés par un certain Adolf Hitler comme les boucs-émissaires de toutes les difficultés rencontrées par les Allemands. Oui mais voilà, l'issue de la Deuxième Guerre Mondiale était arrivée et Berlin était tombée aux mains des soldats de l'Armée Rouge le 8 mai 1945. Hitler, à cette date, était déjà mort et tout un régime s'était effondré avec lui. Des mois plus tard, tout près de l'immense stade édifié à la gloire des Nazis, une cour de justice des plus spéciales est réunie. Elle est composée de juges issus des nations qui ont mis à bas Hitler et les siens. Et face à eux se trouveront d'ici quelques minutes les pires crapules que le monde ait pu enfanter. Parmi eux, Goering, Van Papen, Keitel, Ribbentrop, Speer… Ces noms, à l'époque dans laquelle nous nous apprêtons à nous transporter, sont synonymes de l'horreur et de la terreur. Nous sommes le 20 novembre 1945, l'atmosphère est lourde, pesante, au milieu d'un tribunal qui n'a rien d'ordinaire. Il est 10 heures, et c'est l'heure H de mon histoire. Merci pour votre écoute Retrouvez l'ensemble des épisodes de l'Heure H sur notre plateforme Auvio.be : https://auvio.rtbf.be/emission/22750 Et si vous avez apprécié ce podcast, n'hésitez pas à nous donner des étoiles ou des commentaires, cela nous aide à le faire connaître plus largement.

Nuremberg. L'antre du nazisme, le siège de l'horreur. Pendant plus de 10 ans, cette ville s'est construite autour d'une idéologie nauséabonde, qui coûta la vie à des millions de personnes innocentes. Leur crime était d'être différents et surtout, d'avoir été désignés par un certain Adolf Hitler comme les boucs-émissaires de toutes les difficultés rencontrées par les Allemands. Oui mais voilà, l'issue de la Deuxième Guerre Mondiale était arrivée et Berlin était tombée aux mains des soldats de l'Armée Rouge le 8 mai 1945. Hitler, à cette date, était déjà mort et tout un régime s'était effondré avec lui. Des mois plus tard, tout près de l'immense stade édifié à la gloire des Nazis, une cour de justice des plus spéciales est réunie. Elle est composée de juges issus des nations qui ont mis à bas Hitler et les siens. Et face à eux se trouveront d'ici quelques minutes les pires crapules que le monde ait pu enfanter. Parmi eux, Goering, Van Papen, Keitel, Ribbentrop, Speer… Ces noms, à l'époque dans laquelle nous nous apprêtons à nous transporter, sont synonymes de l'horreur et de la terreur. Nous sommes le 20 novembre 1945, l'atmosphère est lourde, pesante, au milieu d'un tribunal qui n'a rien d'ordinaire. Il est 10 heures, et c'est l'heure H de mon histoire. Merci pour votre écoute Retrouvez l'ensemble des épisodes de l'Heure H sur notre plateforme Auvio.be : https://auvio.rtbf.be/emission/22750 Et si vous avez apprécié ce podcast, n'hésitez pas à nous donner des étoiles ou des commentaires, cela nous aide à le faire connaître plus largement.

Alex Ribbentrop joins the Allies in Recovery hosts to discuss intergenerational trauma, substance use, the importance of family, and finding connection. Alex is a Licensed Clinical Social Worker, Qualified Supervisor, EMDR Trained Clinician, and Certified Family Trauma Professional, practicing in Virginia, Maryland, and Florida.

On this day in legal history in 1946 the Nuremberg executions were carried out, following the trials of ten high level officials of the Third Reich.On October 16, 1946, a somber chapter in the aftermath of World War II closed with the Nuremberg executions. Ten prominent members of the Nazi regime were hanged, marking the end of the historic Nuremberg trials that sought justice for crimes against humanity, war crimes, and genocide. The executed men included Hans Frank, Wilhelm Frick, Alfred Jodl, Ernst Kaltenbrunner, Wilhelm Keitel, Joachim von Ribbentrop, Alfred Rosenberg, Fritz Sauckel, Arthur Seyss-Inquart, and Julius Streicher. Hermann Göring, another top Nazi official scheduled to be executed, evaded the noose by committing suicide the night before.These executions took place in the gymnasium of Nuremberg Prison and were carried out by the United States Army. Master Sergeant John C. Woods and his assistant, military policeman Joseph Malta, were the executioners. They used the standard drop method instead of the long drop, which led to considerable controversy as some of the men did not die quickly from a broken neck, but slowly strangled to death. Reports indicated that some hangings took from 14 to 28 minutes, leading to claims of botched executions, which the Army later denied.The order of the executions began at 1:11 a.m. with von Ribbentrop and spanned just about two hours. The condemned men were allowed final statements, many of which expressed a mix of nationalistic sentiments, pleas for peace, and even denial of guilt. For instance, Ribbentrop's final words were a wish for understanding between East and West, and for peace in the world. On the other hand, Fritz Sauckel claimed his innocence and asked God to make Germany great again.Kingsbury Smith of the International News Service provided an eyewitness account, complete with photographs, that later appeared in newspapers. The initial belief was that the bodies were taken to Dachau for cremation. However, they were actually incinerated in a crematorium in Munich, and the ashes were scattered over the river Isar.The Nuremberg executions and the trials that preceded them remain landmarks in the evolution of international law and human rights. While they meted out justice to some of the perpetrators of the Holocaust and other wartime atrocities, they also ignited debates on judicial ethics and the very nature of evil. Thus, October 16 serves not just as a grim remembrance of the punishment meted out to some of history's worst criminals, but also as a milestone in the ongoing global dialogue about justice and accountability.Judge David R. Jones, a top U.S. Bankruptcy Judge for the Southern District of Texas, has resigned amid an ethics investigation. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a formal misconduct complaint against him for not disclosing his live-in relationship with Elizabeth Freeman, an attorney at Jackson Walker LLP, a prominent bankruptcy firm. In a statement, Jones said he had become a "distraction" to the court's work and resigned to refocus attention on the court. His departure may trigger further scrutiny of the high-profile Chapter 11 cases he had overseen, including those involving Neiman Marcus, JCPenney, Seadrill Ltd., and Chesapeake Energy.The misconduct complaint was lodged by Chief Judge Priscilla Richman of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which has jurisdiction over federal courts in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas. Freeman and Jones have lived together since 2017, and Jones approved attorney fees for Jackson Walker and even recommended Freeman for professional positions without disclosing their relationship. Richman stated there was "probable cause to believe that Judge Jones has engaged in misconduct."Jackson Walker learned of the relationship allegation in March 2021 and instructed Freeman to stop working on cases overseen by Jones. The firm claims to have acted responsibly, including conducting a full inquiry and consulting external ethics counsel. Freeman left the firm in late 2022. Jones was sworn in as a bankruptcy judge in 2011 and was instrumental in making the Southern District of Texas a popular venue for large corporate Chapter 11 cases.Jones defended his actions by stating he and Freeman were not married and that he had no economic interest in her cases. However, Richman cited instances where Jones violated the code of conduct for U.S. judges, including not recusing himself where impartiality could be questioned. The Department of Justice's bankruptcy watchdog also questioned a bankruptcy plan mediated by Jones involving a party represented by Freeman.As of now, it is unclear whether the federal appeals court investigation into Jones will continue post-resignation. Legal experts suggest the case could have long-term ripple effects, raising questions about what other judges or firms may have known about the relationship. Calls for larger reforms in bankruptcy practice have also been ignited, emphasizing the need for expanded disclosures and better regulation.Texas Bankruptcy Judge Resigns After His Ethics Questioned (2)Top US bankruptcy judge resigns amid ethics inquiry | ReutersCalifornia Governor Gavin Newsom has signed into law a bill to regulate the state's cryptocurrency industry, which hosts nearly a quarter of all blockchain companies in North America. The legislation comes in the wake of issues like last year's collapse of the FTX exchange and aims to establish a basic regulatory framework. Newsom, who is a proponent of blockchain innovation, had previously vetoed similar legislation but suggests that the current measure may still require further refinement for clarity.The law, known as AB 39, is paired with another bill, SB 401, which targets cryptocurrency kiosks, ATM-like machines where cryptocurrencies can be bought or exchanged. Both bills were signed by the governor. AB 39 seeks to replicate New York's licensing system for cryptocurrency businesses, requiring various safety protocols, documentation, and fees. Businesses will also need to disclose if their services are insured and must maintain a customer phone line. Enforcement actions, including revoking licenses and imposing civil penalties of up to $20,000 per day, will be handled by the state Department of Financial Protection and Innovation.SB 401 imposes restrictions on crypto kiosks, capping transactions at $1,000 per day and limiting charges to a maximum of $5 or 15% of the transaction value. Documentation requirements have also been stipulated for greater accountability. Consumer advocates believe that these laws are essential for curbing fraud in the cryptocurrency sector. However, industry groups like the Crypto Council for Innovation, representing companies such as Coinbase and Gemini, have opposed both bills. They argue that the laws need more exemptions for smaller companies and more clarity around the licensing process, while also claiming that the kiosk restrictions could effectively put such businesses out of operation.Gov. Newsom Signs Crypto Licensing Bill in CaliforniaSen. Robert Menendez of New Jersey has been indicted for allegedly acting as a foreign agent for Egypt, which has led to renewed scrutiny of his role in blocking reforms to the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA). Menendez, a Democrat, had substantial influence over FARA-related legislation in his capacity as chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, a position he stepped down from following a previous corruption indictment. He has been identified as a significant obstacle to legislative efforts to modernize FARA, a law dating back to 1938 that requires disclosure for those acting on behalf of foreign interests.Bipartisan calls for reforming FARA have been growing, especially as the Department of Justice has increased its investigations under the law since 2016. However, comprehensive updates have failed to gain traction. Menendez had publicly blocked an expedited vote on FARA reform in 2020 and also worked behind the scenes to thwart changes to the foreign lobbying disclosure law. His indictment has now raised questions about whether his actions were motivated by a desire to cover his own activities related to Egypt.Menendez explained his 2020 decision to block a FARA package by urging a more comprehensive look at the proposed changes. A spokesperson for Sen. Charles Grassley, who backed the FARA reform, stated that Menendez has not been cooperative on FARA reform since the 2020 defeat of the proposal. Menendez, who is not charged under FARA but under a different statute pertaining to public officials, has denied any wrongdoing.The indictment against Menendez has reinvigorated discussions about the need for FARA reform. Legal experts suggest that his case could be a catalyst for legislative action, much like past scandals have precipitated changes in lobbying laws. The removal of Menendez from his committee position could also remove a significant barrier to FARA reform.The Justice Department alleges that Menendez conspired with officials who should have been registered under FARA, raising the stakes for reforms to the law, which has multiple ambiguities and outdated language. If Menendez is proven to have acted on Egypt's behalf, it could make it difficult for Congress to ignore calls for reform, especially given that Menendez had been urging the DOJ to investigate a Republican politician under FARA.Menendez Indicted as Foreign Agent After Thwarting Related BillU.S. prosecutors are expected to request a judge to restrict former President Donald Trump's public comments about a federal case that accuses him of attempting to overturn his loss in the 2020 election. The hearing is planned by U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan and aims to consider Special Counsel Jack Smith's bid to prevent Trump from discussing potential witnesses and making disparaging remarks about prosecutors, court staff, and potential jurors. Smith has pointed to Trump's "inflammatory public statements," including social media attacks, arguing that they could undermine public confidence in the legal process and possibly sway jurors.Trump, who is not expected to attend the hearing, has strongly opposed this request, describing it as an attempt to limit his free speech while he is running for the Republican presidential nomination in 2024. The issue has become an early contentious point, approximately five months ahead of Trump's scheduled trial. The former president is charged with conspiracy to interfere in the vote counting and blocking the certification of the 2020 election, which he lost to Joe Biden.Trump has pleaded not guilty and accuses the prosecutors of interfering with his campaign. This is one of four criminal cases brought against him by federal and state prosecutors this year. Earlier this month, a New York judge issued a gag order against Trump in a civil fraud trial, prohibiting him from speaking about court staff.In a court filing, prosecutors cited comments Trump made on his Truth Social site about potential witnesses, including former Vice President Mike Pence and former top U.S. general Mark Milley. They argue that Trump's remarks are consistent with threatening behavior he exhibited after the 2020 election, which led to threats from his supporters against election officials.Trump's legal team has responded by saying there is no evidence to suggest that his social media posts have adversely affected the case. They accuse prosecutors of trying to impose broad restrictions on Trump's ability to criticize the government. Trump's lawyers argue that the proposed gag order is an attempt by the Biden administration to unlawfully silence its major political opponent.Special Counsel Jack Smith was appointed to provide the investigation a degree of independence from the political leadership of the U.S. Justice Department. Prosecutors have previously refuted allegations of political interference.Prosecutors aim to persuade judge to rein in Trump comments on election case | ReutersMicrosoft has successfully completed its $69 billion acquisition of Activision Blizzard, making franchises like Call of Duty officially part of Xbox. The deal makes Microsoft the second-largest gaming company in the world, surpassing Sony. It also greatly expands the catalog for Microsoft's Xbox Game Pass subscription service, with Activision Blizzard titles like Overwatch 2, Diablo IV, and World of Warcraft, while boosting Microsoft's presence in mobile gaming through titles like Candy Crush and Call of Duty Mobile. Microsoft has signed a 10-year agreement to keep Call of Duty on PlayStation but may make other Activision Blizzard franchises exclusive to Xbox.The acquisition expands Microsoft's gaming business by roughly 10,000 employees. Activision Blizzard CEO Bobby Kotick will remain with the company through the end of 2023, reporting to Microsoft Gaming CEO Phil Spencer. Microsoft has agreed to union neutrality, and Activision Blizzard employees will have the opportunity to recognize a union through a simple card check process starting 60 days from now.The deal was initially announced in January 2022 after Activision Blizzard faced a drop in stock price due to major game delays and reports of sexual harassment within the company. Contrary to previous expectations that Kotick would resign after the deal, he is set to stay on and stands to make nearly $400 million from the sale via his stock holdings.Legal battles almost derailed the merger, with the Federal Trade Commission attempting to block it, resulting in a week-long trial. However, Microsoft managed to clear the regulatory hurdles, including agreeing to sell cloud gaming rights for Activision Blizzard games in the UK to Ubisoft to satisfy the UK's Competition and Markets Authority.Going forward, Microsoft faces the challenge of integrating Activision Blizzard into its existing gaming operations, a process that is expected to take years. This acquisition significantly amplifies Microsoft's gaming business, coming after its 2020 purchase of Bethesda Softworks' parent company ZeniMax, and sets the stage for future industry consolidation.Microsoft Finally Closes Massive Activision Blizzard Deal, Making Call Of Duty Officially Part Of Xbox Now Get full access to Minimum Competence - Daily Legal News Podcast at www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Programa completo en vídeo en nuestro canal de You Tube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pwD7aQxiFo ¿Te apetece hacer un viaje con nosotros a Normandía o las Ardenas? - Escríbenos a viajeshistoriasbelicas@gmail.com ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ Redes sociales y Telegram Canal de Telegram para recibir notificaciones y otra información: https://t.me/segundaguerramundialtelegram Twitter: https://twitter.com/BelicasQue https://www.instagram.com/historiasbelicasoficial/ ¿Cómo fue el brutal ataque de los blindados soviéticos al sur de Prokhorovka? ¿Qué pasó con la unidad de Ribbentrop que se encontraba justo en medio de ese ataque? ¿Cómo fue su reacción? ¿Cuáles eran sus fuerzas y contra cuántos blindados soviéticos tuvo que enfrentarse? ¿Qué ocurrió con la zanja antitanque? ¿Cuál fue el resultado final de dicha batalla? A continuación en este programa, analizamos todas las claves de este enfrentamiento desesperado.

On the surface the pact guaranteed that neither side would fight against the other in war. However a ‘secret protocol' also outlined how Eastern Europe would be divided between the two countries in the ...

We've all been there. Networking at a smart party. Presenting to a crowded room. Few of us can naturally project confidence and authority in an intimidating situation; many of us are simply lost for words. Thankfully while being confident at work isn't something we are born with, it is something that can be taught and learned—and without sacrificing our authenticity. In this episode, Pictet's Global Head of Branding Isabelle von Ribbentrop meets Viv Groskop -- a women who has conquered the worlds of journalism, comedy, writing, and broadcasting. She draws on what's she learned about being confident both herself and from others in her book and podcast series How to Own the Room, and now in a new book call Happy High Status. In this conversation, Viv shares her story and her tips for being confident while still being yourself.   Listen more Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Pour vous abonner à nos 300 émissions hebdomadaires d'une heure sans publicité pour seulement 2€ par mois, avec une nouvelle émission chaque jeudi rien de plus simple, cliquez ici : https://m.audiomeans.fr/s/S-tavkjvmo Pour Xpresso, lors du Salon du Livre d'Histoire de Versailles, Frédéric Mitterrand nous parle de son ouvrage . 1938, c'est la veille de la guerre, les Français espèrent encore. Après le « lâche soulagement » des accords de Munich, Hitler envoie son ministre des Affaires étrangères, Joachim von Ribbentrop, à Paris, le 6 décembre, pour signer une déclaration de bon voisinage. Il est reçu avec tous les honneurs de la République. S'agit-il d'une nouvelle ruse du Führer ? Faut-il continuer à réarmer la France à marches forcées ? Pourtant, le pogrom de la Nuit de Cristal, quelques semaines plus tôt, le déchaînement des persécutions antijuives dans toute l'Allemagne… Frédéric Mitterrand retrace avec verve cet épisode méconnu d'une histoire qui s'avérera tragique. Et dont l'écho résonne encore fortement dans la France d'aujourd'hui.

Tredje rikets utrikespolitik präglades av viljan att göra upp med den förnedrande Versaillefreden efter första världskriget och att skaffa sig livsutrymme österut. Här hittar vi själva kärnan i Adolf Hitlers maktambitioner.Storbritanniens ovilja att gå i krig, Frankrikes interna problem och det fascistiska Italiens sidbyte från Västmakterna till Nazityskland gjorde det möjligt för Tredje riket att ansluta Österrike och lägga Tjeckoslovakien under sig utan någon att skjuta ett skott. Men med anfallet mot Polen gick Hitlertyskland ett steg för långt.I denna nymixade repris av avsnitt 137 av podden Historia Nu samtalar programledaren Urban Lindstedt med Martin Hårdstedt, professor i historia vid Umeå universitet, om Tredje Riket. Det är del fem i en serie om Tredje riket som baserar sig på Richard J Evens trilogi om Tredje riket. Den brittiska premiärministern Neville Chamberlains tal om ”fred i vår tid” efter att Storbritannien och Frankrike sålt ut den lilla demokratin Tjeckoslovakien till det aggressiva Tredje riket blev upptakten till det förödande Andra världskriget.Adolf Hitler behöll sina bohemiska vanor som diktator med en flexibel arbetstid vilket lämnade utrymme för hans medarbetare att utöva makten under hård intern konkurrens. Han höll sig borta från att detaljstyra ekonomisk politik eller arbetsmarknadspolitik utan drog upp de övergripande riktlinjerna där medarbetarna fick fylla i det finstilta. Men Hitler hade två fokusområden där han utövade ett personligt maktutövande -raspolitiken (avsnitt 132) som präglades av en extrem antisemitism och utrikespolitiken som syftade till att göra upp med det förnedrande Versaillefreden och att skaffa Tyskland lebensraum i öst. När nazisterna tog makten efter riksdagsbranden 1933 och systematiskt krossat alla andra partier påbörjades arbetet med att omforma Tyskland efter den nazistiska ideologin. Allting nazisterna gör vid makten är en förberedelse inför det eftersträvade kriget. Bild:Münchenöverenskommelsen: Neville Chamberlain, Édouard Daladier, Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini och Galeazzo Ciano. Bakom dem syns bland andra Joachim von Ribbentrop och Ernst von Weizsäcker. Bundesarchiv, Bild 183-R69173 / CC-BY-SA 3.0 Musik: Richard Wagner's opera Götterdämmerung: Siegfriedsbegravningsmarsch avthe UnitedStates Marine Corps Band, creative commons; Wiki Media. Läs: Richard J Evens – Third Reich at Power. Vill du stödja podden och samtidigt höra ännu mer av Historia Nu? Gå med i vårt gille genom att klicka här: https://plus.acast.com/s/historianu-med-urban-lindstedt. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

As the newly appointed king, but not yet crowned, Edward VIII secretly told the Nazis he admired, that he was going ‘to concentrate the business of government in himself…. Who is king here? Baldwin or I?' Did Prime Minister Baldwin get rid of the King because he was too pro-Nazi, as Hitler's ambassador to Britain, von Ribbentrop, maintained? Or was there another reason?