Change in position of an object over time
POPULARITY
Categories
Welcome to Mysteries to Die For.I am TG Wolff and am here with Jack, my piano player and producer. This is a podcast where we combine storytelling with original music to put you in the heart of a mystery. All stories are structured to challenge you to beat the detective to the solution. Jack and I perform these live, front to back, no breaks, no fakes, no retakes.In the world's most dangerous working environments it can seem like everything is out to kill you. The equipment you use. The materials you work with. The very air you breathe. Stored energy is a coiled viper waiting for the right moment to lash out. Owners, manufacturers, contractors, and beyond have developed safety protocols to combat STCKY, that is, Stuff That Can Kill You. Gravity, Motion, Mechanical, Electrical, Pressure, Sound, Radiation, Biological, Chemical, Temperature. This season is all about the means of murder as authors put our STCKY detective skills to the test. This is Season 9, Stuff That Can Kill You.This is Episode 14, where heat, pressure, chemical, and mechanical are our STCKY means of death. This is The Rendering of Truth by Chuck BrownmanDELIBERATIONAlone, neither Lena nor Mercer have what it takes to crack the case. But together, and with our help, we can figure out what happened to Eddie Weller and Dale Curtis. Here's the suspect list, in the order we met them:Junior Lattimore, rendering techJohn Reese, plant managerTanya Lowell, accounting clerk and office mateFrank Jackson, rendering foremanDale Curtis, plant foremanHere are the facts that Lena and Mercer have uncovered:• Eddie Weller, newly promoted to Operations Reviewer, went into the rendering pit. The pit was activated and Eddie died from a lethal combination of heat, oxygen deprivation, and mechanical grinding.Eddie was formerly an operating tech and, in his new role, signed off on the maintenance documentation. He knew the paperwork or safety protections he knew was needed to enter the confined space.No one offered an explanation of why Eddie would have entered the pit.Junior Lattimore did not look into the pit before he turned it on. He had no reason to think anyone was in it.A search of Eddie's desk found evidence of falsified invoices for filters. The invoices were signed by Reese. He added a note to check with DC, interpreted as Dale Curtis.Tanya prepares the invoices for Reese's signature. She said he directed her to process the invoices for his approval, saying they were a rush job from a new vendor.Reese said he signs the invoices Tanya prepares, implying he did not scrutinize or even read the documents.A torn piece of bank statement found in the trash in the office Eddie and Tanya shared had a sizable balance but no nameCurtis later heard Eddie in his office talking to someone about stealing, but couldn't see who as the door was closed.Mercer recognized Steam Line #4 was tampered with. The line then failed catastrophically killing Dale Curtis. He was found with a pipe wrench in the vicinity.A drawing of the plant found in Eddie's apartment also highlighted Steam Line #4 as out of compliance on maintenance inspection.Lena and Mercer speculate the person or persons behind the “accidents” had to have an understanding of the plant to orchestrate both deaths.Tanya had knowledge and access to the invoice, but does not have knowledge of the plant. Tanya and Eddie shared an office and were friends. Eddie spent time with her son.Junior had knowledge of the rendering area, but did not have access to accounting. Junior lost out on the promotion to Eddie and was bitter.Junior had no apparent problem with Dale Curtis.Jackson had knowledge of the rendering area. Recently separated, he and Tanya were dating. He often when to her office, and even helped straighten Tanya's desk for her. He was there in the office when Eddie died.Reese claims his knowledge of the plant isn't detailed. He signed off on plant expenditures.Whose greed was paid for with the lives of Eddie Weller and Dale Curtis?MEMBERSHIPS!Mysteries to Die For now has memberships! Three tiers – The Grave Digger's Union (free), The Cadaver Collective ($4 / month) and The Preservationist Society ($8 / month). We are starting memberships to help pay for our real live human authors, to keep the software working and the power flowing, and avoid the dreaded use of ads. If you want to show you love but aren't ready for a commitment, you can now tip us and leave a witting, punny note for us. Links are in the show notes and on our website M2D4podcast.com.ABOUT Chuck BrownmanA mostly-retired (and hopefully recovering) attorney, Chuck Brownman now enjoys writing noir fiction, concentrating on short fiction. His work has been published in several anthologies and on multiple websites, including those listed at the top of this episode. He has also served various times as a judge for the Mystery Writers of America Edgar Awards. When not writing fiction, Chuck continues to advise some of the country's most entrepreneurial energy and natural resource companies. He is also an Adjunct Professor of Law, and has spoken at legal seminars for many years. He lives with his wife in Colorado, the peaceful vistas offering a counterbalance to his suspenseful and often bloody crime fiction. A full list of his published fiction can be found at his website, www.chuckbrownman.comWRAP UPThat wraps this episode of Mysteries to Die For. Support our show by subscribing, telling a mystery lover about us, or joining a membership. Check out our website m2d4podcast.com for links to this season's authors and membership options.Mysteries to Die For is hosted by TG Wolff and Jack Wolff. The Rendering of Truth was written by Chuck Brownman. Music and production are by Jack Wolff. Episode art is by TG Wolff. Join us next week for a Toe Tag, which is the first chapter from a fresh release in the mystery, crime, or thriller genre. Then come back in two weeks for our next original story where chemical is our STCKY means of murder. It's Gen X by Melinda Di Lorenzo
Proletarian writers | 24 June 2026 Despite having no legal standing, in the last ten years this ‘definition' has come to be regarded as an overriding and sacrosanct principle of the British state. Note to trade unionists: The following text has been compiled to help you frame a motion on this topic to your union branch or annual congress. Feel free to take as much or as little as you deem suitable, depending on the rules operating in your organisation, and to choose from or adapt the final demands depending on the sector in which you work. Remember that any points you leave out of the motion itself can always be brought into your speech in support of the motion. ------------------------------------------ Subscribe! Donate! Join us in building a bright future for humanity! www.thecommunists.org www.lalkar.org www.redyouth.org Telegram: t.me/thecommunists Twitter: twitter.com/cpgbml Soundcloud: @proletarianradio Rumble: rumble.com/c/theCommunists Odysee: odysee.com/@proletariantv:2 Facebook: www.facebook.com/cpgbml Online Shop: https://shop.thecommunists.org/ Education Program: https://thecommunists.org/education-programme/ Each one teach one! www.londonworker.org/education-programme/ Join the struggle www.thecommunists.org/join/ Donate: www.thecommunists.org/donate/
We conclude our pregame coverage of this year's Broadway Bound Theatre Festival. This time around we welcomed on three more works and the four artists behind them. This was such a lively and fascinating conversation that just like these shows should not be missed. So hit play and get your tickets today!Broadway Bound Theatre Festival July 23rd- August 16th@ The AMT TheatreTickets and more information are available at broadwayboundfest.comAnd be sure to follow our guests to stay up to date on all their upcoming projects and productions: Say My Name written and produced by Jeff Perlman July 23rd-26thjeffperlmanstudios.com@jeffperlman1Jugular directed by Glory Kadigan and written and produced by Daniel O'Brian July 29th-August 1st@gloryluckMan in Motion written and produced by Alan Brooks August 12th-15thhollowlegtheater.com@alanthebrooks
ゲスト:motion records 浦野さん LONG PARTY RECORDS 佐久間さん
ゲスト:motion records 浦野さん LONG PARTY RECORDS 佐久間さん
Fluent Fiction - Norwegian: Art in Motion: An Unexpected Bond at Vigelandsparken Find the full episode transcript, vocabulary words, and more:fluentfiction.com/no/episode/2026-07-18-07-38-20-no Story Transcript:No: Vigelandsparken badet i sommersol.En: Vigelandsparken bathed in summer sun.No: Et mylder av mennesker beveget seg langs de gruslagte stiene, mens de beundret de mange skulpturene som prydet parken.En: A crowd of people moved along the gravel paths, admiring the many sculptures that adorned the park.No: Fuglesang fylte luften, og lett bris kilte kinnene til besøkende.En: Birdsong filled the air, and a light breeze tickled the cheeks of the visitors.No: Eirik satt på en benk med skisseblokken på fanget.En: Eirik sat on a bench with his sketchbook on his lap.No: Han studerte menneskene rundt seg, forsøkte å fange bevegelsene deres i raske pennestrøk.En: He studied the people around him, trying to capture their movements in quick strokes of his pen.No: Eirik var kunstner, en lokal en, på jakt etter inspirasjon.En: Eirik was an artist, a local one, searching for inspiration.No: Søken etter det perfekte motivet førte ham hit, til denne skulpturparken, hvor livets syklus var meiselkunst i sten.En: The quest for the perfect motif had led him here, to this sculpture park, where the cycle of life was carved in stone.No: Mens Eirik jobbet med sine skisser, så Magnus, hans beste venn, på med en oppmuntrende nikk.En: While Eirik worked on his sketches, Magnus, his best friend, watched with an encouraging nod.No: “Kanskje du skulle prøve å snakke med noen,” foreslo Magnus.En: "Maybe you should try talking to someone," suggested Magnus.No: Eirik rynket på nesen, uvillig til å bryte sin kunstneriske boble.En: Eirik wrinkled his nose, reluctant to break his artistic bubble.No: Han foretrakk stillheten, uttrykt gjennom linjene på papiret.En: He preferred the silence, expressed through the lines on the paper.No: Sunniva, en nysgjerrig journalist, var også i parken.En: Sunniva, a curious journalist, was also in the park.No: Hun så etter historier, noe som kunne gjøre hennes artikkel om Oslos kulturelle landemerker enestående.En: She was searching for stories, something that could make her article on Oslo's cultural landmarks stand out.No: Hennes notatbok var fylt med beskrivelser av skulpturene, men hun manglet den personlige vinklingen.En: Her notebook was filled with descriptions of the sculptures, but she lacked the personal angle.No: Hun lot blikket gli over parken, i håp om å finne noe - eller noen - som kunne gi hennes historie liv.En: She let her gaze roam over the park, hoping to find something—or someone—that could bring her story to life.No: Plutselig fanget hun et glimt av Eiriks skisser i sollyset.En: Suddenly, she caught a glimpse of Eirik's sketches in the sunlight.No: Linjene hans virket levende, nesten som om de var i bevegelse.En: His lines seemed alive, almost as if they were in motion.No: Det vekket hennes interesse.En: It piqued her interest.No: Forsiktig nærmet hun seg.En: Cautiously, she approached.No: “Hei,” sa hun vennlig, “er det greit om jeg ser?En: "Hi," she said kindly, "is it okay if I take a look?"No: ”Eirik så opp, litt overrasket, men nikket.En: Eirik looked up, a bit surprised, but nodded.No: Her var en fremmed som for en gangs skyld ikke forstyrret ham, men viste ærlig interesse.En: Here was a stranger who, for once, didn't disturb him but showed genuine interest.No: De snakket om tegningene, skulpturene og byen rundt dem.En: They talked about the drawings, the sculptures, and the city around them.No: Eirik merket hvordan samtalen, energisk og full av Sunnivas nysgjerrighet, startet en ild i ham.En: Eirik noticed how the conversation, energetic and full of Sunniva's curiosity, ignited a fire within him.No: “Jeg heter Sunniva,” presenterte hun seg omsider med et bredt smil.En: "My name is Sunniva," she eventually introduced herself with a broad smile.No: “Og du?En: "And you?"No: ”"Eirik," svarte han, “det er hyggelig å treffe deg.En: "Eirik," he replied, "it's nice to meet you."No: ” Det var kanskje ikke hans vanlig måte å treffe folk på, men noe ved Sunniva gjorde det enkelt.En: It may not have been his usual way of meeting people, but something about Sunniva made it easy.No: Sunniva delte med Eirik om hvordan hun ville skrive om Oslos kultur for å vise leserne den ekte sjarmen.En: Sunniva shared with Eirik how she wanted to write about Oslo's culture to show readers its true charm.No: Eirik begynte å se parken, og alle de forbipasserende menneskene, gjennom hennes øyne.En: Eirik began to see the park, and all the passing people, through her eyes.No: Det var som om en ny verden åpnet seg.En: It was as if a new world had opened up.No: Som dagen gikk, ble Eirik og Sunniva stadig mer inspirert av hverandre.En: As the day passed, Eirik and Sunniva became increasingly inspired by each other.No: Eirik oppdaget at han kunne uttrykke følelser han aldri før hadde satt på papir.En: Eirik discovered that he could express emotions he had never before put on paper.No: Sunniva bestemte at artikkelen hennes også skulle inkludere Eiriks særegne syn på kunst.En: Sunniva decided that her article would also include Eirik's unique perspective on art.No: Når solen sank bak trærne, sa Sunniva: “Jeg har funnet historien min.En: When the sun set behind the trees, Sunniva said, "I've found my story."No: ” Eirik smilte tilbake.En: Eirik smiled back.No: “Og jeg har funnet mitt neste prosjekt.En: "And I've found my next project."No: ”Fra den dagen av møttes Eirik og Sunniva ofte i parken, en uventet vennskap og partnerskap hadde formet seg.En: From that day on, Eirik and Sunniva often met in the park, an unexpected friendship and partnership had taken shape.No: Eirik deltok mer i livets vibrasjoner omkring ham, mens Sunniva lærte at de beste historiene ofte kom til dem som lyttet tålmodig.En: Eirik engaged more with the vibrancy of life around him, while Sunniva learned that the best stories often came to those who listened patiently.No: Sammen, under Vigelandsparkens skygger, i hjertet av Oslo, formet Eirik og Sunniva ikke bare kunst og historier, men også en dyp forbindelse.En: Together, under the shadows of Vigelandsparken, in the heart of Oslo, Eirik and Sunniva shaped not just art and stories, but also a deep connection.No: En som lovet mye mer enn de først hadde forventet.En: One that promised much more than they initially expected. Vocabulary Words:bathed: badetgravel paths: gruslagte stieneadorned: prydetbreeze: brischeeks: kinnenesketchbook: skisseblokkenlap: fangetquest: søkenmotif: motivetcarved: meiselkunstbubble: boblereluctant: uvilligjournalist: journalistlandmarks: landemerkerroam: gliglimpse: glimtapproached: nærmetgaze: blikketignite: startet en ildperspective: synunique: særegneinspired: inspirertemotions: følelserinitially: førstvibrancy: vibrasjonerpatiently: tålmodigshaped: formetunexpected: uventetconnection: forbindelsepromised: lovet
Would you choose one of the least expensive vehicles in the country for a road trip to Las Vegas? Host Jack Nerad did just that, taking the $25,000 small SUV on a 600-mile out-and-back in weather topping 100 degrees. What — is he nuts? Meanwhile, Co-Host Chris Teague gave himself a more reasonable assignment, reviewing the off-road-ready 2026 Subaru Outback Wilderness. Jack and Chris also discuss Europe's new mandatory driver-monitoring systems, progress on solid-state batteries, and Tesla's new (longer) three-row Model Y. Labor strife also hits the news in the form of Hyundai worker strikes and Volkswagen's restructuring setback. Plus, Britain's Goodwood car festival announces an American version.
durée : 00:59:56 - Le grand podcast de voyage - par : Caroline Broué - Interprète du cycle de lieder de Robert Schumann "L'Amour et la vie d'une femme" au festival Radio France Occitanie Montpellier 2026, la mezzo soprano Marianne Crebassa revient sur son parcours, ses choix artistiques, les rôles qui l'ont marquée et la façon dont elle aborde le travail de la voix. - équipe : Henri Le Blanc, Peire Legras, Aurélie Marsset - invités : Marianne Crebassa Mezzo-soprano Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France
It is almost that time of the year for the 2026 Twin Cities Marathon and before we even hit October - the Twin Cities Marathon is already sold out and we also chatted with Dean Orton, President of Twin Cities in Motion about how runners are preparing amid not just the hot temperatures but now the intense smoke accumilation to go along with it!
On Friday's edition of SaskAgToday with Ryan Young: Canada's Ag Ministers wrap up meetings in Halifax, Nova Scotia; previewing next week's Ag in Motion, and more.
JOIN US AT THE 2026 DUCKS UNLIMITED EXPO! July 31 - August 2 at the RENASANT CONVENTION CENTER in Memphis, TN The best hunting gear starts with real hunters solving real problems.In this episode of the DUX Series, host Jimbo Robinson and co-host David Schuessler sit down with Brooke Richard of Higdon Outdoors to talk decoys, motion, product development, and what's driving innovation in modern waterfowl hunting.The conversation explores Higdon's history, from the original motion decoys that helped define the brand to the newest products making their debut at DUX. Brooke shares how feedback from hunters influences every stage of development and why the company continues to push improvements in realism, durability, and usability.Whether you're a gear enthusiast, serious waterfowler, or simply curious about what goes into designing products hunters rely on every season, this episode offers a behind-the-scenes look at one of the most recognized names in waterfowl hunting.Topics CoveredThe story behind Higdon Outdoors and its evolutionWhy motion remains one of the biggest innovations in decoyingNew product launches debuting at DUXHow hunter feedback shapes product developmentFavorite waterfowl destinations across North AmericaMentorship, calling culture, and the next generation of huntersListen now: www.ducks.org/DUPodcastSend feedback: DUPodcast@ducks.orgSPONSORS:Bird Dog Whiskey and Cocktails:Whether you're winding down with your best friend, or celebrating with your favorite crew, Bird Dog brings award-winning flavor to every moment. Enjoy responsibly.
00:00 Docket 00:59 Intro 02:52 Defense Seeks New Trial for Karmelo Anthony 10:55 R. Kelly Formally Petitions President Trump for Commutation 14:16 70-Year-Old Arrested in 1987 Cold Case Murder 16:51 'Just Unlucky': Sentenced to Life for 12th DWI Conviction 21:13 NJ Babysitter Blames Toddler 23:47 Las Vegas Man Sentenced for Stabbing Girlfriend 26:08 Legal History 27:37 Quote of the Day 28:32 Questions from Subscribers 30:11 Dumb Criminal of the Day Karmelo Anthony wants a new trial after his murder conviction. His defense says an off-the-record deal, courtroom access limits, and alleged judicial bias tainted the process. Prosecutors say the trial was fair and the verdict should stand. Scott breaks down whether this is a real legal issue—or just a long-shot post-trial swing. Watch, comment, and stay to the end. #KarmeloAnthony, #AustinMetcalf, #TrueCrime, #LegalAnalysis, #CrimeTalk, #NewTrial
Did the Aztecs have a concept of virtue? In this episode, we dive into a lively scholarly debate over the Nawatl phrase kwalli and yektli ("good" and "right") and whether it can properly be translated as "virtue." Examining colonial dictionaries, the Florentine Codex, the Wewetlahtolli, and the work of scholars from the sixteenth century to today, we explore the evidence for a distinctly Nawa ethical tradition. Along the way, we discuss the challenges of translating Indigenous philosophies and why understanding concepts, not just individual words, is essential to appreciating Nawatl thought.Sources:Anderson, Arthur J. O., and Charles E. Dibble, eds. and trans. Florentine Codex: General History of the Things of New Spain. 13 vols. Santa Fe: School of American Research and University of Utah, 1950–1982.Berdan, Frances F. "Concepts of Ethnicity and Class in Aztec-Period Mexico." In Ethnic Identity in Nahua Mesoamerica: The View from Archaeology, Art History, Ethnohistory, and Contemporary Ethnography, by Frances F. Berdan, John K. Chance, Alan R. Sandstrom, Barbara L. Stark, James M. Taggart, and Emily Umberger, 105–132. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 2008.Carochi, Horacio. Arte de la Lengua Mexicana con la Declaración de los Adverbios Della. Mexico City: Juan Ruyz, 1645.Clavijero, Francisco Javier. Arte de la Lengua Mexicana. Puebla: Imprenta del Real Seminario Palafoxiano, 1754.González González, Osiris. Tlamatiliztli: La sabiduría del pueblo nahua. Filosofía intercultural y derecho a la tierra (México). Archaeological Studies Leiden University. Leiden: Leiden University Press, 2024.Maffie, James. Aztec Philosophy: Understanding a World in Motion. Boulder: University Press of Colorado, 2014.Madajczak, Julia. Review of Discourses of the Elders: The Aztec Huehuetlatolli: A First English Translation, by Sebastian Purcell. Inter-American Journal of Philosophy 15, no. 1 (2024): 42–48. Molina, Alonso de. Vocabulario en Lengua Castellana y Mexicana y Mexicana y Castellana. Mexico City: Antonio de Spinosa, 1571.Purcell, Sebastian. Discourses of the Elders: The Aztec Huehuetlahtolli, a First English Translation. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2025.Sahagún, Bernardino de. Primeros Memoriales. Edited and translated by Thelma D. Sullivan. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1997.Siméon, Rémi. Diccionario de la lengua náhuatl o mexicana. 13th ed. Mexico City: Siglo XXI Editores, 1997.Townsend, Camilla. Review of Discourses of the Elders: The Aztec Huehuetlahtolli, a First English Translation, by Sebastian Purcell. Ethnohistory 72, no. 1 (2025): 181–183.listener comments? Feedback? Shoot us a text!Use the promo code “KURLY” in the "How did you hear about this adventure?" field when you sign up for a $200 discount.Visit skeptoid.com/adventures to learn more and reserve your spot. I hope you'll join me this December as we explore the mysteries of the Maya together. This December, I'll be joining Skeptoid Adventures as your guide for The Mysteries of the Maya, where we'll travel through the Yucatán exploring remarkable archaeological sites, uncovering the real history behind the Maya civilization, and separating fact from fiction along the way. To reserve your spot, all you need is a fully refundable $500 deposit. Your deposit is refundable through August 1, so you can reserve your place with confidence. After Au Support the showOrder "NEVER WILL IT BE LOST" and get $5 off!Support Lignum: A Cultural Haven in MéridaYour Hosts:Kurly Tlapoyawa is an archaeologist, ethnohistorian, and filmmaker. His research covers Mesoamerica, the American Southwest, and the historical connections between the two regions. He is the author of numerous books and has presented lectures at the University of New Mexico, Harvard University, Yale University, San Diego State University, and numerous others. He most recently released his documentary short film "Guardians of the Purple Kingdom," and is a cultural consultant for Nickelodeon Animation Studios.@kurlytlapoyawaRuben Arellano Tlakatekatl is a scholar, activist, and professor of history. His research explores Chicana/Chicano indigeneity, Mexican indigenist nationalism, and Coahuiltecan identity resurgence. Other areas of research include Aztlan (US Southwest), Anawak (Mesoamerica), and Native North America. He has presented and published widely on these topics and has taught courses at various institutions. He currently teaches history at Dallas College – Mountain View Campus. Find us: Bluesky...
Dr. Andrea Hudy - Director of Women's Basketball at UCONN - joins us for the 159th episode of MTN. On today's episode of the podcast, we discuss some of the positive and negative cycles that Coach Hudy has seen over the last three decades of performance, we dive into her PhD work, and we talk through some training within the UCONN program. Coach Hudy is one of the legends in the field of performance and we were grateful to get her on the podcast todayFollow Coach Hudy on social media @a_hudyFind and follow us on social @mtn_perform and check back each Wednesday for a new episodeHuge shoutout to our newest partner: Hytro. Hytro is the answer for performance BFR in our space and we are thrilled to have them partner with MTN. Find out more about Hytro and everything they have to offer right here: https://hytro.com/?utm_source=podcast&utm_medium=paid-media&utm_campaign=partner&utm_content=podcast&utm_term=foundationalA huge Thank You to our sponsor, Hawkin Dynamics: Hawkin is the world leader in force measuring, and continues to put forth the tools for high-performance practitioners to be exactly that, high performers. If you haven't yet checked out Hawkins - head over to their website at: https://www.hawkindynamics.com/ and check out everything they have to offerMake sure to check out our sponsor, Samson Equipment: Samson is a leader in manufacturing elite weight room equipment (and have been for nearly 50 years). Founded by Dave and Linda Schroeder, Samson is weight room equipment made by coaches for coaches. Check them out at samsonequipment.com for more informationShoutout to our sponsor, 1080 Motion. The 1080 Sprint is the single best piece of training equipment in the world & has continually changed the game for training speed, strength, and power. Go to 1080motion.com to learn more.
Tim and Carrie are back behind the microphones to recap an incredible stretch on the road, covering three of the biggest automotive events of the summer—the Goodguys Heartland Nationals in Des Moines, the Carlisle Chrysler Nationals in Pennsylvania, and the Goodguys Summit Racing Nationals in Columbus. These events are among the major July gatherings on the 2026 hot rod and Mopar calendar. From incredible builds and unforgettable people to behind-the-scenes stories, long days, travel adventures, and the moments you don't always see on social media, this episode gives you an inside look at what it's really like working and living on the road in the automotive world.Join Tim and Carrie as they discuss:Highlights from all three events:Amazing cars and standout buildsThe people who make this hobby so specialBehind-the-scenes stories from event lifeFunny travel moments and unexpected surprisesWhat made each event uniqueWhether you attended one of these events or followed along from home, this episode celebrates the passion, friendships, and experiences that make the automotive community unlike any other.Subscribe, like, and share to help us continue bringing you the stories behind the people who keep this industry moving.The Strange Motion Way — It's not just about the cars... it's about the people, the passion, and the journey.
On Wednesday's edition of SaskAgToday with Ryan Young: Canada's Ag Ministers gather in Halifax for meetings, Kevin Hursh participating in a crop tour in Alberta, and a preview of Ag in Motion.
When a child grows up with a sibling with a disability, what defines their childhood? Author Brian Trapp reflects on life with his twin brother with cerebral palsy. Brian shares how his childhood was a source of unexpected gifts, deep connection, and lifelong formation. He joins Amy Julia Becker to consider:Limits of labels like “glass child” and “mental age”Family and flourishing togetherThe complexity of identitySibling and caregiving relationshipsRange of Motion by Brian TrappS10 E9: 00:00 The Bond of Brotherhood: Growing Up with Disability 08:55 Glass Child Syndrome and Sibling Experiences 18:23 Analogies for Family Life with Disability 23:27 The Complexity of Identity within Relationships and Caregiving 32:07 Fiction vs. Memoir: Exploring Personal Narratives 35:31 Understanding Mental Age and Its Implications 40:23 Reimagining Disability: A House of LaughterMENTIONED IN THIS EPISODE:Cognoscenti essay by Brian Trapp: My twin brother was disabled, but I don't consider myself a 'glass child'Julia Miele Rodas' essay: “Limited Visibility; Or Confessions of a Satellite”Range of Motion: A Novel by Brian Trapp_SUBSCRIBE to Amy Julia's Substack: amyjuliabecker.substack.comWATCH this conversation on YouTube: Amy Julia Becker on YouTubeJOIN the conversation on Instagram: @amyjuliabeckerLISTEN to more episodes: amyjuliabecker.com/shows/_ABOUT OUR GUEST:Brian Trapp is the author of Range of Motion. He is director of Disability Studies at the University of Oregon, where he also teaches creative writing and edits the Northwest Review. His essay about being a sibling to his twin brother Danny was featured on NPR's Here and Now. Find out more at: https://briantrappwriter.com/__We want to hear your thoughts. Send us a text!Connect with me:InstagramFacebookYouTubeWebsiteThanks for listening!
Are you constantly looking for one more podcast, book, course, or AI prompt before you finally take action? In this episode, Ambrosia Carey explores the Information Trap...how learning can quietly become a form of procrastination. Discover why confidence is built through action, not certainty, and how trusting yourself with what you already know can unlock the momentum you've been waiting for. If you missed the previous episode about Cerrtainty Join our FREE 10 Day Business Challenge. Enjoy 50% off GlossGenius Premium Plans with Code SUCCESSFUL 1. Learning is valuable, but it becomes a problem when it replaces taking action. 2. Consuming more information often creates the illusion of productivity without producing real results. 3. Many entrepreneurs aren't looking for more knowledge, they're looking for certainty. 4. Confidence isn't built by researching; it's built by taking imperfect action. 5. The fastest way to gain real-world knowledge is through experience, not endless preparation. 6. Your own experiments will teach you more than copying someone else's blueprint. 7. The 5% Method reduces pressure by focusing on one small experiment instead of chasing perfection. 8. Overplanning often becomes another way to avoid the discomfort of creating. 9. Information inspires, but implementation transforms your business and your life. 10. The "illusion of explanatory depth" reminds us that understanding something isn't the same as being able to do it. 11. Consuming content delivers quick dopamine, but lasting progress comes from consistent execution. 12. Taking classes, saving tutorials, and buying courses only matter if you practice what you learn. 13. Learning has become a socially acceptable form of procrastination for many creative entrepreneurs. 14. The real fear usually isn't failure, it's being seen and receiving feedback. 15. Asking yourself, "What am I avoiding by learning this?" can reveal what's truly holding you back. 16. A healthy goal is to spend significantly more time creating than consuming information. 17. Motion feels productive, but only action produces measurable outcomes. 18. Your next breakthrough is likely waiting on the other side of the project you've been avoiding. 19. Trust yourself with the knowledge you already have instead of waiting until you feel ready. 20. The life and business you want won't come from more information, it will come from proving to yourself that you're willing to act. Take 15% off our favorite skincare line, Pharmagel with code SSA15 If you prefer video, we are on YouTube
In this episode of Life in Motion, Jeremy talks with Dean Knuth of Arizona River Runners about what it's actually like to experience the Grand Canyon from the river. Dean shares how he went from never having rafted before to spending more than a decade helping others take on one of the most memorable trips of their lives. They talk about the different ways to explore the canyon, why the trip is more approachable than many people think, and what happens when you trade your normal routine for a week on the water. Dean also shares a few unforgettable guest stories, including a 90-year-old finally checking off a lifelong dream and a reluctant camper who left the canyon with a poem in hand. It's a fun look at why this trip sticks with people long after they return home.Life in Motion is brought to you by Actual Outdoors. They help build beautiful brands that highlight the approachable and authentic parts of outdoor recreation. Said simply - they “keep it real”. Find them online at actualoutdoors.com or on Instagram at @actualoutdoors.Tweet us and let us know what you think of this episode! @illuminecollectFind more episodes at www.illuminecollect.com/blogs/life-in-motion-podcastSince 2017 Illumine has donated over $54,362 to outdoor nonprofits and shared over 268 stories on the Life in Motion Podcast.
Continuing our series through the Gospel of Mark, Engaged Member David Perdue teaches the revolution of the cross and how we can respond daily as believers.
Ussher in the mix with a bunch of newly procured second hand vinyl purchases.1. Hysterix - Must be the music (Sasha's full music master)2. Jaya - Excursion (Funk Function remix)3. Aphasia - Acapulco (Original mix)4. kings of Tomorrow - I want you for myself (Homes Ives)5. Austin Leeds - Moondiver 6. Alcatraz - Give me Luv (Deep Dish “Nobody's got this” remix)7. Southdrummers - Cruz Del Sur (London 909 remix)8. Degrees of Motion feat Biti and Kit West - Soul Freedom (Free your soul) (Powerline mix)9. Degrees of Motion ft . Biti - Do you want it right now (King street edit)10. Todd Terry ft. Martha Wash & Jocelyn Brown - Keep on Jumpin' (Tee's JM mix)11. Loni Clark - Rushing (Cj's Club mix)12. e.v.e (Ebony vibe everlasting)- Groove of love (Groove of House mix)13. The Absolute Ft. Suzanne Palmer - I believe (Lift you up Vocal)14. Ministers De - La - Funk ft. Jocelyn Brown - Believe15. Spankox - To the club16. Maxz Volume - Get it up (The Rooster Bangin Vox mix)17. Kid Massive - It'll be alright (Club mix)18. Rockwood - Chee
The Steve Harvey Morning Show for Monday July 13th, 2026: Steve Harvey's Morning Inspiration | Show Open - Intros | ThePastors | Ask The CLO | Trending & Entertainment News | Cyclospora Outbreak | Sista O'Dell | Nephew Tommy's Prank - "Your New Boss" | Strawberry Letter - "The Motion Of The Ocean" Pt. 1-2 | Junior's Sports Talk | Social Media Advice | Binge Watching | Would You Rather | Steve Harvey's Closing RemarksSupport the show: https://www.steveharveyfm.com/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
The Strawberry Letter heard on The Steve Harvey Morning Show, Monday, July 13th, 2026. Subject: "The Motion Of The Ocean"See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Strawberry Letter - The Motion Of The Ocean full 775 Mon, 13 Jul 2026 14:00:00 +0000 IKWjB2h3JeKRJPbV5RXPzBV9AlwDHqG0 comedy SHMS Shenanigans! comedy Strawberry Letter - The Motion Of The Ocean Catch up on what you missed on The Steve Harvey Morning Show. 2024 © 2021 Audacy, Inc. Comedy https://player.amperwavepodcasting.com?feed-link=ht
Pastor Stephen continued in our Faith in Motion series, preaching from James chapter 4. To learn more, visit thebridgebiblechurch.com
While some say go big or go home, others will tell you great things come in small packages. This week on America on the Road, we test both theories as Jack Nerad and Chris Teague review two family-friendly SUVs. On the Go Big side of the ledger Chris puts the luxurious 2026 Ford Expedition Platinum through its paces. Thinking smaller, Jack pilots the efficient 2026 Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid to a Fourth of July celebration — at Dodger Stadium, no less. The pair also discuss Lucid's leadership shakeup and missed targets, Rivian's building momentum, Volkswagen's potential massive job cuts, Subaru's new Trailseeker EV, Kia's refreshed Niro Hybrid, and Hennessey's wild new manual-transmission hypercar. Do you have a spare $2.65 million burning a hole in your designer jeans?
Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D. Baker YouTube channel: https://youtu.be/a2-nRldN-jo This Case Brief involves a civil lawsuit filed by Alex Murdaugh against former clerk of court Rebecca Hill, alleging that her jury tampering during his first murder trial violated his constitutional right to a fair trial. Hill has filed a motion to dismiss, asserting that Murdaugh has failed to state a claim for which relief can be granted because he cannot prove her actions caused the $600,000 in legal fees he seeks to recover, while also claiming multiple forms of legal immunity. Murdaugh's response argues that the motion should be denied because nominal and punitive damages are available under federal law for constitutional violations even if actual damages cannot be proven. While Hill contends his requested damages are not redressable or ripe for adjudication, Murdaugh insists Hill's actions rendered the value of his initial defense expenditure worthless, creating a live case and controversy that warrants proceeding to discovery. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
How many times have you noticed an expert witness for deposition, only to be told you've got to pay their fee in advance, failing which, they say, they aren't coming. As Jim Garrity explains, it doesn't have to be that way. Listen in and learn why prepayment isn't required and how to properly avoid advance payment. After all, those prepayment demands are often excessive, don't explain how the fee was determined, and of course don't guarantee the expert will even qualify as such, much less offer admissible testimony. And we've got a wealth of research for you in the show notes.SHOW NOTESEvans v. Home Depot USA, Inc., Case no. 2:25-CV-451-SPC-KRH, 2026 WL 1837154 (M. D. Florida June 25, 2026) (plaintiff's treating doctor, a non-retained expert, was set for one hour deposition, and demanded prepayment of $3,000 for the deposition; held, prepayment is generally not required, “so lack of prepaid fees would not justify refusing to attend the deposition after proper service of a valid subpoena;” further outlining the process to address a treating physician's potential nonappearance at a deposition, asking whether the deposition was subject to the courts subpoena power, and if so, whether the defendant had issued and served the subpoena, noting that the court then need not intervene until (a) the physician seeks to quash the subpoena or fails to appear, and (b) the defendant moves to hold him in contempt for failing to appear to deposition)Johnson v. Spirit Airlines, Inc., No. CV 07-1874FBJO, 2008 WL 1995117, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. May 6, 2008) (“The pertinent rule thus teaches that once Dr. Seldes has actually “spent” time responding to Spirit's questions at the deposition, he may then bill Spirit for a “reasonable” fee for that amount of “time.” Dr. Seldes therefore may not insist on advance payment, and may not set a flat fee before he knows what he will be called upon to do; he may instead charge only a reasonable hourly fee. I will not predict in advance what reasonable hourly fee Dr. Seldes may choose to request, but should a dispute arise, I will of course defer to the persuasive authority of cases such as the Garnier decision cited above and the precedent on which it in turn relied. See id. at *3-*4 (describing a range of reasonable hourly rates below $500))Conte v. Newsday, Inc., No. CV 06-4859 JFB ETB, 2011 WL 3511071, at *3 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 10, 2011) (“The rule and the case law makes it clear that the parties seeking court intervention to determine a reasonable fee for an expert deposition should do so retrospectively—that is, after the deposition has taken place. The rule clearly contemplates that a court order will be issued subsequent to the deposition, as it requires a court to order payment of a “reasonable fee for time spent in responding to discovery”)Tennant v. Handi-House Mfg. Co., Case No. 3:16-cv-1276-J-25MCR, 2017 WL 11105252 (M. D. Fla. Nov. 20, 2017) (Defendant moved for, among other things, order deferring payment for deposition of plaintiff's treating physician, who canceled the deposition because he did not receive the $3,300 payment he demanded for his two-hour deposition; held, Defendant's request to defer deposition fees of the treating physician granted, with the court “finding that prepayment of expert witness deposition fees is inappropriate under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;” noting that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(4)(E) “does not require the prepayment of expert deposition fees; further noting that the parties agreed that the issues presented are governed by the expert fee rules, implying that a treating physician may qualify as an expert under the circumstances); Court also noted that Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4)(E)(i) says that unless manifest injustice would result, the court must require that the party seeking discovery pay the expert a reasonable fee for “time spent” in responding to discovery; court noted that the deposition had not yet taken place, and so seemed to emphasize that it was premature to determine the reasonableness of payment because the provision talks about “time spent” and the doctor had not yet been deposed”)Regions Bank, etc. v. Kaplan, No. 8:12-CV-1837-T-17MAP, 2015 WL 4935694 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 18, 2025) (Bank filed Motion to Defer Payments to Experts or to Determine Reasonableness of Expert Charges, where defendants demanded that the bank pay an invoice from TASA Group in the amount of $10,325.29 in advance of the banking expert's testimony, failing which the witness would not appear; bank argued that the court should defer reimbursement obligation pending the outcome of the case, in pending submission of supporting data, arguing that the Committee Notes to the 1970 amendments to Rule 26 say that the court may issue an order to pay fees as a condition of discovery, or it may delay the order until after discovery is completed.; Court noted that “other courts have denied request for advance payment because Rule 26 (small B) (4) (E) does not require it,” citing cases from Wisconsin and California for the proposition that, unlike ordinary witness fees, no rule requires that an opposing expert deposition fees be tendered to the witness in advance)Regions' Motion to Defer on Payment of Experts, or alternatively, to Determine Reasonableness of Kaplan Parties' Expert Charges and Supporting Memorandum of Law (CM/ECF Doc. 435) Regions Bank, etc. v. Kaplan, No. 8:12-CV-1837-T-17MAP, 2015 WL 4935694 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 18, 2025)Defendant Marvin I. Kaplan's Motion for Approval of Expert Witness Fees and Expenses (CM/ECF Doc. 436), Regions Bank, etc. v. Kaplan, No. 8:12-CV-1837-T-17MAP, 2015 WL 4935694 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 18, 2025)Parkland Venture, LLC v. City of Muskego, No. 09-C-0972, 2010 WL 4723411 (E. D. Wisconsin November 15, 2010) denying plaintiff's motion requiring the defendants to pay reasonable fees to the plaintiff's experts in advance of taking their depositions; court noted that while rule 26(b)(4)(C) provides in relevant part that in less manifest justice would result, the court shall require that the party seeking discovery pay the expert a reasonable fee for time spent responding to discovery, rule does not say that experts fees must be paid in advance of the deposition absent agreement to do so, and pointing out that unlike ordinary witness fees, no rule requires that an opposing expert's deposition fees be tendered to the witness in advance)Kramer et al. v. Hartford Insurance Co. of the Midwest, Case No. 8:12-cv-01824-T-17AEP, 2013 WL 12155927 (M. D. Florida April 30, 2013) (court granted Defendant's Motion to Compel Deposition Testimony of Dennis James, an expert, finding “that prepayment of expert witness fees, including Mr. James' expert witness in this action, is inappropriate under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The court noted that while Rule 26(b)(4)(E)(i) says that in less manifest injustice would result, the court must require that a party seeking discovery pay the expert a reasonable fee for “time spent” [emphasis added], the Advisory Committee Notes (1970 Amendment) to Rule 26(b)(4) authorize a court to require the payment of fees and expenses as a condition of discovery, and also to delay the order until after discovery is completed. Thus, the court ordered the deposition to proceed but set a payment deadline for his fees within 50 days of the date of his deposition. The court emphasized that - while rule 26(b)(4)(E)(i) “is silent as to exactly when an expert will be paid after responding to discovery, the Court finds that a degree of reasonableness is inherent in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In the circumstances of this case, a payment deadline of 50 days was reasonable.)Harris v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 226 F.R.D. 675, 676–77 (S.D. Cal. 2005) (plaintiff's counsel abruptly terminated defense deposition of plaintiff's expert because Defendant would not pay expert witness fee at that time; court, rejecting the manner of termination is improper, said of Rule Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(4)(C) that while experts must be paid absent manifest injustice, “The rule does not state, however, that the expert's fees must be paid in advance of the deposition absent agreement to do so. To the contrary, “[u]nlike ordinary witness fees, no rule requires that an opposing expert's deposition fees be tendered to the witness in advance… Because there is no rule allowing a party to terminate a deposition for the failure to pay opposing expert witness fees in advance, Plaintiff's counsel was wrong in doing so in the instant case)Conte v. Newsday, Inc., No. CV 06–4859 (JFB) (ETB), 2011 WL 3511071, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 10, 2011) (ruling that a motion seeking prepayment for an expert's deposition was premature because the Rule “clearly contemplates that a court order will be issued subsequent to the deposition;” further saying “Nor, as discussed above, does the rule entitle plaintiff to payment in advance, citing Rule 26(b)(4)(E), which entitles an expert to a reasonable fee for “time spent” responding to discovery); citing Johnson v. Spirit Airlines, Inc., No. CV 07-1874FBJO, 2008 WL 1995117, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. May 6, 2008) (“[The expert] therefore may not insist on advance payment ....”). Rather, if the parties cannot agree to reasonable reimbursement for plaintiff's experts following their depositions, either party may apply to the Court for such a determination;” “Dr. Seldes therefore may not insist on advance payment, and may not set a flat fee before he knows what he will be called upon to do; he may instead charge only a reasonable hourly fee.”)Conte v. Newsday, Inc., No. CV 06-4859 JFB ETB, 2011 WL 3511071, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 10, 2011) (citing Broushet v. Target Corp., ––– F.R.D. ––––, 2011 WL 1750753, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Mar.3, 2011), and saying “Courts consider the following factors in determining whether a requested expert fee is reasonable: (1) the witness' area of expertise; (2) the education and training that is required to provide the expert insight that is sought; (3) the prevailing rates for other comparably respected available experts; (4) the nature, quality and complexity of the discovery responses provided; (5) the cost of living in the particular geographic area; (6) any other factor likely to be of assistance to the court in balancing the interests implicated by Rule 26; (7) the fee actually being charged to the party who retained him; and (8) fees traditionally charged by the expert on related matters”)Ratliff v. Baan Co., N.V., No. 1:99–CV–2455–WBH, 2003 WL 25774909, at *1 (N.D. Ga. Nov. 5, 2003) (concluding that after the expert's deposition, the expert can submit a bill to be paid for the deposition)Woodward v. Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co., No. Civ. A. 97–2062, 1998 WL 158744, at *3 (E.D. La. Mar. 30, 1998) (denying the motion to set an expert's fee because the motion requests a flat fee to be paid in advance of the deposition without reference to “time spent” as enunciated in the Rule)Burdette v. Steadfast Commons II, LLC, No. 2:11–980– RSM, 2012 WL 3762515, at *4–*6 (W.D. Wash. Aug. 29, 2013) (allowing prepayment of expert fees because the parties apparently did not dispute paying the fee in advance)Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(4)(E) (payment to experts)Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) (protective orders to avoid undue burden or expense)
What You Say is Not What They Hear What is the Difference Between Your Intended and Unintend Message? Episode 313 (Solo show featuring George Torok) In this episode we explore: why your whole message includes more than the words you intend to send four reasons your intended message might not get through why clarity in your head does not guarantee clarity for the listener how beliefs and past experiences filter what people hear how emotional state changes the meaning people receive why setting and delivery method influence interpretation how recent events can reshape audience receptiveness why unintended messages act like static around your main point how vocabulary and grammar influence credibility how body language can contradict spoken words how pace, pitch and inflection alter meaning why missing information can distract listeners how audience engagement strengthens communication how to reduce unintended messages before they sabotage your intended message ----- Your Host, George Torok: Is known as the Speech Coach for Executives because he's been coaching executive leaders to convey their messages with more confidence and success for 30 years. For 19 years, he hosted the radio show, Business in Motion, interviewing over 600 business and community leaders. As host of the podcast, Your Intended Message, he has interviewed communication specialists from 16 countries. George is co-author of the national bestseller, Secrets of Power Marketing, and contributed to 12 other books. His articles have been featured in magazines around the world, and he's written over 2,000 blog posts. An adventurer, he's visited over 30 countries on five continents and has run 12 marathons. ----- Key Lessons from this episode: Your whole message includes both the message you intend to send and the unintended messages that travel with it. Clarify your message before you speak. A message that feels clear in your head might become confusing when converted into words. Your intended message can fail because people were not listening, did not understand you or did not believe you. Communication requires several translations: from the thoughts in your head, into words, through the listener's filters and finally into meaning in their mind. Your audience filters your message through beliefs, past experiences, emotional state, setting, perspective and recent events. Recent experiences can influence how people receive your next message. An unresolved issue might block acceptance of a new idea. Unintended messages create communication static that can blur, weaken or contradict what you meant to convey. Vocabulary and grammar send messages about clarity, credibility and professionalism beyond the literal meaning of your words. Body language and voice can support your intended message or create doubt when they conflict with your words. The method of delivery matters. Email, phone, video, coffee conversation and boardroom discussion each shape how a message is received. Missing information can distract listeners when you raise a question but fail to answer it. Audience engagement strengthens the message. Reading slides or text can weaken connection and reduce attention. Distractions exist in the room, on the screen and inside the listener's mind. Effective communicators pay attention not only to what they intend to say, but also to the unintended messages attached to their delivery. ----- ----more---- Your Intended Message is the podcast about how you can boost your career and business success by honing your communication skills. We'll examine the aspects of how we communicate one-to-one, one to few and one to many – plus that important conversation, one to self. In these interviews we will explore presentation skills, public speaking, conversation, persuasion, negotiation, sales conversations, marketing, team meetings, social media, branding, self talk and more. Your host is George Torok George is a specialist in communication skills. Especially presentation. He's fascinated by the links between communication and influencing behaviors. He delivers training and coaching programs to help leaders and promising professionals deliver the intended message for greater success. Connect with George www.SpeechCoachforExecutives.com https://superiorpresentations.net/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/georgetorokpresentations/ https://www.youtube.com/user/presentationskill
Phil Egan is back with Thursday's World Cup Daily, with reaction to the FAI EGM as the motion to fulfil Ireland's Nations League fixtures against Israel passes by 75 votes to 32. Ben Symes joins Off The Ball Breakfast to outline the financial and political pressure on the association, and why the debate isn't as black-and-white as many would like.There's also a European night ahead for Bohemians and Derry City, with Bohs hosting St Joseph's at Dalymount and Derry are away to CSKA Sofia.Plus: Carla Ward on Katie McCabe's Chelsea move, France v Morocco in Boston, and Louisa Thomas on World Cup ticket prices.World Cup Daily on Off The Ball, brought to you by Lynx, “A Proud Sponsor of the FIFA World Cup 2026”. Smell Your Best When You Look Your Worst.Become a member and sign up at offtheball.com/join
Aujourd'hui, Abel Boyi, éducateur, Bérénice Levet, philosophe, et Sandrine Pégand, avocate, débattent de l'actualité autour d'Alain Marschall et Olivier Truchot.
Use code EDB at https://jonesroadbeauty.com to get a Free Gift with your first purchase! #JonesRoadBeauty #ad Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D. Baker YouTube channel: https://youtu.be/A7xAL2w3AU0 Kouri Richins' defense team has filed a motion for a new trial, citing judicial bias, the excessive admission of "prior bad acts" evidence related to financial crimes, and cumulative error. The defense alleges that the court repeatedly disparaged their counsel in front of the jury while assisting the prosecution. In response to these claims, Judge M has certified the matter to an associate presiding judge to determine if disqualification is warranted, effectively pausing the case until a decision is reached. However, the motion may be procedurally insufficient for disqualification as it lacks the required supporting affidavit. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Visit www.joniradio.org for more inspiration and encouragement! --------Thank you for listening! Your support of Joni and Friends helps make this show possible. Joni and Friends envisions a world where every person with a disability finds hope, dignity, and their place in the body of Christ. Become part of the global movement today at www.joniandfriends.org. Find more encouragement on Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, and YouTube.
Recorded 2026-07-08 20:05:07
Marc Lewis - Performance Scientist & Co-Founder of the Sport Science Network - joins us for the 158th episode of MTN. On today's show, we dive into Marc's co-endeavor with Adam Virgile with the Sport Science Network, we look into some of the processes that they used with the Texans, and we dig into conversation around AI usage within the field. Marc has an incredible knowledge within the realm and we were excited to be able to get him on and dive in today.Follow Marc on social media @marctlewisFind and follow us on social media @mtn_perform and check back each Wednesday for a new episodeHuge shoutout to our newest partner: Hytro. Hytro is the answer for performance BFR in our space and we are thrilled to have them partner with MTN. Find out more about Hytro and everything they have to offer right here: https://hytro.com/?utm_source=podcast&utm_medium=paid-media&utm_campaign=partner&utm_content=podcast&utm_term=foundationalA huge Thank You to our sponsor, Hawkin Dynamics: Hawkin is the world leader in force measuring, and continues to put forth the tools for high-performance practitioners to be exactly that, high performers. If you haven't yet checked out Hawkins - head over to their website at: https://www.hawkindynamics.com/ and check out everything they have to offerMake sure to check out our sponsor, Samson Equipment: Samson is a leader in manufacturing elite weight room equipment (and have been for nearly 50 years). Founded by Dave and Linda Schroeder, Samson is weight room equipment made by coaches for coaches. Check them out at samsonequipment.com for more informationShoutout to our sponsor, 1080 Motion. The 1080 Sprint is the single best piece of training equipment in the world & has continually changed the game for training speed, strength, and power. Go to 1080motion.com to learn more.
Off-road racing is one of the toughest forms of motorsports on the planet, and this week we're joined by one of the sport's brightest stars, Christopher Polvoorde.From his early days in short-course racing to competing at the highest levels of Trophy Truck competition, Christopher shares what it takes to survive—and win—in the brutal world of desert racing. We dive into the preparation, the sponsorships, the incredible teamwork behind every race, and the mindset required to compete at events like the Baja 1000 and King of the Hammers.Christopher also talks about his journey through the sport, life behind the wheel of a 1,000+ horsepower Trophy Truck, and what the future holds as his career continues to climb.Whether you're an off-road enthusiast, motorsports fan, or just love hearing incredible stories from passionate people, this is an episode you won't want to miss.
Jack Power the Europe Correspondent with the Irish Times has the latest.
Aujourd'hui, Bruno Poncet, cheminot, Barbara Lefebvre, professeur d'histoire-géographie, et Charles Consigny, avocat, débattent de l'actualité autour d'Alain Marschall et Olivier Truchot.
Graduation is in sight, boards are on the horizon, and one of the biggest decisions of your career is quickly approaching: choosing your first CRNA job. With demand at an all-time high and opportunities across the country, it's easy to focus on salary alone, but the best career decisions involve much more than compensation. In this episode of Grade 1 View, hosts Kelsey and Levi welcome Mackenzie Munoz, Director of Partner Success at MedGeo and Tonya Hamlin, Regional Vice President of Recruiting at Jackson Physician Search to discuss how SRNAs/RRNAs can confidently navigate the job search process. Both of these companies partner with the AANA to run the MOTION platform so they'll be able to provide invaluable insight into the many factors SRNAs will evaluate when picking that first CRNA job. Join us for the chance to discover how to effectively navigate your job search and make informed decisions that align with your career aspirations. Here's some of what we discuss in this episode:
Jesus the Prophet, King and Priest: Belief in Motion | Hebrews 11:1, 39-40 | Jared Osselaer | July 5, 2026
Continuing our series through the Gospel of Mark, Pastor Davide Colletta seeks to awaken passion through changed expectations.
In early 2016, Virginia Giuffre, through her counsel, filed a motion seeking to compel Ghislaine Maxwell to produce documents that had been withheld based on objections and privilege claims deemed improper by the plaintiff. Giuffre's motion challenged Maxwell's broad assertions of attorney‑client privilege, work‑product doctrine, vagueness, overbreadth, and undue burden. The motion was accompanied by detailed declarations—most notably by attorney Sigrid S. McCawley—which laid out why many of Maxwell's objections appeared unjustified and why the requested materials were relevant and necessary for Giuffre's case.The court reviewed both the motion and Maxwell's opposition, which included memoranda of law and declarations defending her objections and maintaining that providing certain documents would violate privacy rights or exceed the scope of discovery. Ultimately, in a partially favorable ruling for Giuffre, the court granted the motion in part and denied it in part, indicating that while some objections were valid, Maxwell was required to produce additional documents where privilege claims were not properly supported.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Giuffre v. Maxwell | MOTION to Compel Ghislaine Maxwell to Produce Documents Subject To Improper Objections . Document | Casetext
In early 2016, Virginia Giuffre, through her counsel, filed a motion seeking to compel Ghislaine Maxwell to produce documents that had been withheld based on objections and privilege claims deemed improper by the plaintiff. Giuffre's motion challenged Maxwell's broad assertions of attorney‑client privilege, work‑product doctrine, vagueness, overbreadth, and undue burden. The motion was accompanied by detailed declarations—most notably by attorney Sigrid S. McCawley—which laid out why many of Maxwell's objections appeared unjustified and why the requested materials were relevant and necessary for Giuffre's case.The court reviewed both the motion and Maxwell's opposition, which included memoranda of law and declarations defending her objections and maintaining that providing certain documents would violate privacy rights or exceed the scope of discovery. Ultimately, in a partially favorable ruling for Giuffre, the court granted the motion in part and denied it in part, indicating that while some objections were valid, Maxwell was required to produce additional documents where privilege claims were not properly supported.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Giuffre v. Maxwell | MOTION to Compel Ghislaine Maxwell to Produce Documents Subject To Improper Objections . Document | Casetext
Kouri Richins files for a new trial citing Judge Mrazik being biased and name drops Alex Murdaugh saying her financial crimes should not have come inBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/pretty-lies-and-alibis--4447192/support.ALL MERCH 10% off with code Sherlock10 at checkout - NEW STYLES Donate: (Thank you for your support! Couldn't do what I love without all y'all) PayPal - paypal.com/paypalme/prettyliesandalibisVenmo - @prettyliesalibisBuy Me A Coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/prettyliesrCash App- PrettyliesandalibisAll links: https://linktr.ee/prettyliesandalibisMerch: prettyliesandalibis.myshopify.comPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/PrettyLiesAndAlibis(Weekly lives and private message board)
Kirsten Krull joins JHS ahead of NHL Free Agency beginning to preview what could be in store for the team, who they'll need to replace, and if a signing or trade will be needed to fill those holes. Another Dylan conversation as that saga continues, will Guerin be forced to move a fan favorite to make the deal happen? Plus more on the latest JHS!See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Alex Murdaugh's attorneys have filed several motions including:DNA samples they hope to send to Othram regarding the unknown and unrelated male DNA found under Maggie's fingernailsA motion for a change of venueA motion to allow Alex to have a laptop to review case files Motion to wear street clothes in courtBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/pretty-lies-and-alibis--4447192/support.ALL MERCH 10% off with code Sherlock10 at checkout - NEW STYLES Donate: (Thank you for your support! Couldn't do what I love without all y'all) PayPal - paypal.com/paypalme/prettyliesandalibisVenmo - @prettyliesalibisBuy Me A Coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/prettyliesrCash App- PrettyliesandalibisAll links: https://linktr.ee/prettyliesandalibisMerch: prettyliesandalibis.myshopify.comPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/PrettyLiesAndAlibis(Weekly lives and private message board)