POPULARITY
Nivå: A2-B1 I det här avsnittet pratar vi om den viktiga övergången från studerande till användare av språket. Är du intresserad av att bli medlem på Language Gym där du kan träna din svenska varje dag? Kolla här! Om du är nyfiken på artikeln som inspirerade mig till det här avsnittet, läs den här. För att stödja podden och få transkript till avsnitten - bli patron för bara 5€ per månad – klicka här! ------------------- Instagram: swedish.linguist YouTube: Swedish Linguist Website: www.swedishlinguist.com Language Lock-in: https://www.languagelockin.com/ ------------------- Ett smakprov (sample) på transkriptet: Hallå där! Välkommen till Simple Swedish Podcast. Jag är tillbaka här i Spanien, i Valencia, efter två månader i Sverige faktiskt. Det har varit väldigt varmt här de senaste dagarna, men nu har det regnat och det har svalkat ner sig lite grann. Så nu är det faktiskt väldigt skönt här i Valencia. Jag kollade på vädret i Sverige också. Det verkar som att det är ganska varmt i Sverige också. Så ja, grattis till er som är i Sverige, att ni har fortfarande bra väder också i september. Jag ber om ursäkt lite grann att det inte har kommit ut så många avsnitt den senaste tiden. Det är för att jag har varit ganska upptagen med både resor och jobb. Jag har ju gjort det här Language Lock In Boot Camp i Dalarna. Jag kom tillbaka därifrån för ungefär en vecka sedan. Så det var jättekul men också väldigt mycket jobb. Men ja, nu är jag tillbaka i vardagen kan man säga. Och i det här avsnittet ska jag prata om resan från att lära sig till att tala flytande. Eller kanske snarare resan från att vara en studerande i språket till att vara en användare. Så det behöver inte vara att tala flytande. Men att man börjar bli en användare av språket, och inte bara en studerande av språket. Väldigt viktigt, och väldigt viktigt om man vill bli flytande en dag. Jag blev lite inspirerad av en artikel av Luca Lampariello. Han är en av mina språk-gurus som jag har följt jättelänge. Så om man är intresserad av att lära sig språk så är han en väldigt bra person att följa. Luca Lampariello. Och så har vi nya patrons. Ganska många för att jag har inte gjort ett nytt avsnitt på länge. Så det är Vic, Aleksandra, Andrew, Alan, Maharaghni, Kristina, Szilvia, Viktoriya, Max, Li, Roberto, Bernice, Russell, Bahareh, Gary M och Jonathan. Tack till er för att ni stödjer den här podden! Och ja, om man vill bli patron och stödja den här podden, kostar bara 5 euro per månad, gå till www.patreon.com/swedishlinguist. Så hur går man från en studerande av språket till en användare av språket? ....för att läsa hela transkriptet till detta och alla andra avsnitt, klicka här!
E395 Gary M. Bettman tells the story of his father-in-law, Danny Miller, who was a guard during the Nuremberg trials and had a unique interaction with those on trial. Gary's a film and tv producer and executive producer. His hit show Northbound is currently on Seeka tv, and some of his previous film productions include; […]
Gary was born and raised on Long Island and struggled with alcoholism since his early teens which took him to places he never wants to go again. Arrested at 16 for assaulting a police officer, multiple arrests over the following several years, was few blocks north of the WTC on 9/11, AWOL from his first real job on Wall Street in 2002, rebab and back out and until he was given the gift of sobriety. Determined to break free from the cycle of self-destruction, he embarked on a remarkable journey of recovery. Today, Gary is an active and grateful member of Alcoholics Anonymous in New York, married to the love of his life and father of two amazing children of which he owes all to his sobriety. Gary is now launching his own podcast, The Begin Again Podcast . Reco12 is an organization with the mission of learning and sharing the similarities of addiction of all kinds and gaining and sharing tools and hope from others who are walking a similar path. We come together from all places, faiths and backgrounds to gain tools and hope from others who are walking a similar path. Resources from today's meeting:Alcoholics AnonymousBig Book of AAAdult Children of AlcoholicsThe Begin Again PodcastTo contact Gary M. Reco12 appreciates your help in keeping us working our 12th Step with these great resources and services for the addict and loved ones. We gratefully accept contributions to help cover the costs of the Zoom platform, podcast platform, web hosting, and administrative costs. To become a Reco12 Spearhead you can quickly and easily become a monthly donor here: https://www.reco12.com/support or you can do one-time donations through PayPal (https://www.paypal.me/reco12) or Venmo: @Reco-Twelve . Thanks for your support! "Outro music is "Just Can't Do this On My Own" written by James, Carrington, Thomas Barkmeijer and Paul Freeman and performed by James Carrington and used with full permission of James Carrington. To learn more about this music and performer, please visit https://www.jamescarrington.net/ and https://m.facebook.com/jamescarringtonmusic ." Support the showPrivate Facebook GroupInstagram PageBecome a Reco12 Spearhead (Monthly Supporter)PatreonPayPalVenmo: @Reco-TwelveYouTube ChannelReco12 WebsiteEmail: reco12pod@gmail.com to join WhatsApp GroupReco12 Shares PodcastReco12 Shares Record a Share LinkReco12 Noodle It Out with Nikki M PodcastReco12 Big Book Roundtable Podcast
Today we are talking about Gary Heidnick who was a preacher turned serial rapist and kidnapper. Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/mozzy4242 Insta: https://www.instagram.com/themothpod/ --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/oz2/support
Episode 23 of Season 6 was a fantastic affair. It went out live on Rebel Rock Radio on 8 June 2023 at precisely 7pm. The airwaves were treated to the power and majesty of Judas Priest with 'Screaming For Vengeance'. From there it was a flurry of Deep Purple, Tesla, Airbourne and .......... see Artists Featured below for the list. This show was special because we had a worldwide exclusive launch of the second track off the forthcoming Philistine album Seranim, this one's called 'Leviticus' and it's seriously great. We also had the launch of a new feature called Mystery Song. This is a track sent to me by Metal Jaco, I agreed not to listen to it up front so was totally in the dark as to what we are going to hear. Anyway if I tell you what Mystery Track was it will spoil the podcast. It was classified by a listener as 'Linda Take Walk' Music but it went down well. The Immortals this week was a bit different, and we listened to Frank Zappa's masterpiece ‘Titties and Beer'. The Ultimate Challenge as usual got people talking, once the music started shit got real, Megadeth took it with Machine Head and Bush after that. For what its worth my pick was Machine Head. As menetioned TSORR had exclusive rights to be the first to play Philistines second release off their forthcoming album Sensium. I had a great 5 min interview which quickly went to 8 min and could easily have gone an hour. I am thinking of interviewing them again when the album launches and doing a Rock Review style one hour special when its released. Let me know if you like that idea. For the rest it was a pretty heavy show albeit with a slower taper off at the end. I hope you enjoy it. Check out the website and Facebook pages for all tings TSORR. If you want a copy of the book The Story of Rock and Roll get in touch. Artists featured: Judas Priest, Deep Purple, Tesla, Airbourne, WASP, Buckcherry, Rose Tattoo, The Screaming Jets, Accept, Doomsday Outlaw, Texas Hippie Coalition, Junkyard, Seether, Gary Moore, Molly Hatchet, The Color Blew, Halestorm, Joan Jett, Alice In Chains, Soundgarden, Orbit Culture, Shinedown, My Chemical Romance, Iron maiden, Ayron Jones, Frank Zappa, Bush, Megadeth, Machine Head, Pantera, Philistine, Pink Floyd, Dave Hause, Cold Chisel, Marvelous 3 The Story of Rock and Roll. TSORR - Your one-stop shop for Rock
Gary M (x6) joins us to talk about the revitalization of the playtest guild. hopefully you to can create greatness.
Gary Restaino and John Modlin join Mike to discuss migration at Arizona's southern border. John Modlin: Chief Patrol Agent, Tucson Sector, U.S. Border Patrol Gary M. Restaino, United States Attorney, District of ArizonaSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
General Gary M. Brito assumed duties as the 18th Commanding General, United States Army TRADOC, on September 8, 2022. He is responsible for building and sustaining a highly trained, disciplined, and fit Army by acquiring the best people, training the most lethal Soldiers, developing the most professional leaders, guiding the Army’s culture, and shaping the future force. In today’s podcast, General Brito discusses synchronizing modernization across the Army, critical aspects of modernization that are crucial to shaping the fighting force , and how changes in the Operational Environment affect this process. The following bullet points highlight key insights from our discussion with General Brito: TRADOCis “that first layer of bricks” in building readiness for the Army. In building this foundation, TRADOC acquires the very best people, trains the most lethal Soldiers, and develops the most professional Leaders. TRADOC also provides that connective tissue that guides Army culture and shapes the future force. Modernization ismore than materiel and the Soldier is the centerpiece. Technology does not replace them, but rather is enabled by them. This scales to the squad, platoon, company, battalion, and beyond, to give the Army the overmatch needed to contest our adversaries. Integration and synchronization across the entireDOTMLPF-P (Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership and education, Personnel, Facilities, and Policy) spectrum of capabilities is one of TRADOC’s major responsibilities. Identifying the doctrine associated with a future tank or next generation aircraft has to occur at the earliest stages of acquisition, in coordination with other organizations like the Army Staff, Army Futures Command, FORSCOM, the Joint Force, and others. It’s vital that TRADOC takes the lessons learnedfrom current conflicts in Eastern Europe and elsewhere and feed them into how we train our Soldiers. It is also important to measure the impacts of new technology and materiel in a multi-domain operation. All of this new knowledge needs to be infused into the accessions process and Professional Military Education. Balancing training, readiness, personnel, and modernization is a delicate and difficult balance in which all components need to be synchronized. It&rs
Dans cet épisode, on fait le point sur ce qu'est le vieillissement et comment ce processus peut devenir pathologique. On dit alors que les animaux souffrent d'un "syndrome de dysfonctionnement cognitif" et les symptômes de ce syndrome sont comportementaux : désorientation, anxiété, changement du rythme de sommeil, vocalisations etc. Bibliographie Bellows, Jan, et al. "Aging in cats: common physical and functional changes." Journal of Feline medicine and surgery 18.7 (2016): 533-550. Gunn-Moore, Danièlle A. "Cognitive dysfunction in cats: clinical assessment and management." Topics in companion animal medicine 26.1 (2011): 17-24. Bellows, Jan, et al. "Evaluating aging in cats: How to determine what is healthy and what is disease." Journal of Feline medicine and surgery 18.7 (2016): 551-570. Harvey, Naomi D. "How old Is my dog? identification of rational age groupings in pet dogs based upon normative age-linked processes." Frontiers in Veterinary Science 8 (2021): 643085. Sordo, Lorena, and Danièlle A. Gunn‐Moore. "Cognitive dysfunction in cats: Update on neuropathological and behavioural changes plus clinical management." Veterinary Record 188.1 (2021): e3. Landsberg, Gary M., Theresa DePorter, and Joseph A. Araujo. "Clinical signs and management of anxiety, sleeplessness, and cognitive dysfunction in the senior pet." Veterinary Clinics: Small Animal Practice 41.3 (2011): 565-590. Landsberg, Gary M., Jeff Nichol, and Joseph A. Araujo. "Cognitive dysfunction syndrome: a disease of canine and feline brain aging." Veterinary Clinics: Small Animal Practice 42.4 (2012): 749-768.
Although featured nationally on 48 Hours, Dateline, and the Oxygen Network, the detailed, complete, and totally unbelievable story of the case of DAVID CAMM has never been fully revealed as police, prosecutors, forensic scientists, and judges either sought or facilitated the convictions of an innocent man while ignoring a mountain of exculpatory evidence.While David was being pursued, persecuted, and incarcerated, Kim, Brad, and Jill Camm's true killer, a devil-worshiping, sexually obsessed, 11-time convicted violent psychopath was left free to roam the streets of metropolitan Louisville, Kentucky. Once identified by his DNA, but only through the efforts of David's uncle and defense team, that same cold-blooded murderer was treated, incredibly, first as a victim and then shockingly as an accomplice of David.Their Bloody Lies & Persecution of DAVID CAMM is a chilling, reprehensible, yet very tragic and true American crime story, leaving readers demanding, “How did this case happen and why was this travesty allowed to continue?”Sam Lockhart knew, absolutely knew, his nephew couldn't have killed his wife and children, for he was with David and ten other people at the time of the murders. For 13 years and at an enormous personal and financial cost, Sam, his family, and business suffered the disdain of those in the local community, but Sam never lost focus of his ultimate goal: the exoneration of David and justice for Kim, Brad, and Jill.Gary M. Dunn was a 27-year veteran Agent with the FBI in Miami, Chicago, Gary, Indiana, and Southern Indiana, with a wide array of experience investigating corruption, terrorism, white collar, and violent crimes while often dealing with true psychopaths. After becoming the private investigator for David's second defense team, he was stunned by the incompetent, biased investigations; lack of a fair, impartial justice system; and those who claimed to be forensic scientists. Follow his and the defense team's investigative path in a case you won't soon forget. THEIR BLOODY LIES AND PERSECUTION OF DAVID CAMM: Part 1-Gary M. Dunn
Gary M. Safady joins Joshua 'The World's Mayor' to discuss responsible development that will set a new standard for green building and that will be on full display with the Bulgari Resort Los Angeles. This eco-friendly sanctuary in Los Angeles, located in the majestic Santa Monica Mountains will feature a 58-room resort and eight homes that will be nestled amongst 33 acres of a stunning hillside park, natural wildlife and remarkable views with a community dog park. Other examples of how this resort will prove to be responsible and a sustainable development....... Nearly ¾ of the site is open space Net Zero Greenhouse Gases (GHG) Increased safety measures and fire safety infrastructure Community project Significant job creation Modest 58 rooms and eight homes Equal opportunity employer Wildlife and Habitat Stewardship Uncompromising contemporary design Project Labor Agreement - Union Friendly LEED Gold Certified Learn more about this amazing new property by visiting www.enhanceourcanyon.org. Mr. Safady founded the national real estate firm O&S Holdings, LLC 25 years ago and successfully developed projects (mixed-use, hospitality, etc.) of over 5 million square feet throughout the United States. He has been recognized by national real estate journals and many as an expert in private-public partnerships and creative developments. Since selling his real estate portfolio, he has focused on luxury eco-friendly resorts and is currently developing an eco-friendly Bulgari Resort and Estates in Los Angeles. The Bulgari Resort is a luxury branded hotel and residence development, the first of its kind in the market. An avid traveler, Mr. Safady is also expanding internationally with several luxury eco-friendly resorts planned in the near future. Mr. Safady is the founder of Safady Entertainment, which produced faith-based Machine Gun Preacher starring Gerard Butler. In addition, he is a partner and served on the Board of Directors for Virgin Produced, a company of Sir Richard Branson's Virgin Group. Under Virgin's umbrella, over 12 movies, several TV shows, and live music festivals were accomplished. Mr. Safady, of Lebanese origins, is currently developing a 1970's true story based on the book Cobra 405 that tells the story of British SAS agents who heisted the Bank of the Middle East in Beirut, Lebanon. Mr. Safady's passion for entertainment did not stop there; in 2007, he created Monaco Pictures, a luxury movie theatre experience that sold in 2014 to Cinemark. Over the past several years, he has become an active investor in the sustainable technology sector and digital currencies. His investments include a Direct Carbon Fuel Cell technology, a start-up, a sustainable fertilizer company derived from ocean water, sustainable forestry products, and Axitan, which uses microalgae and produces edible vaccines and peptides for the animal health industry. Mr. Safady holds a B.A. in Business Finance from Loyola Marymount University. He is also a member of the Producers Guild of America, a frequent guest speaker on creative sustainability measures at universities and conferences worldwide, and a frequent speaker at International Shopping Center Conventions. Thank you for being a part of "Responsible Development featuring Gary M. Safady" on the Live Mana Network, brought to you by the Live Mana Worldwide Foundation. The Live Mana Network is broadcast all over the world on your favorite streaming audio and video platforms like Apple TV, ROKU, Amazon Fire, and iTunes. You can also find us on Google News, and other print mediums. Be blessed, Joshua T Berglan
Gary M. Safady joins Joshua 'The World's Mayor' to discuss responsible development that will set a new standard for green building and that will be on full display with the Bulgari Resort Los Angeles. This eco-friendly sanctuary in Los Angeles, located in the majestic Santa Monica Mountains will feature a 58-room resort and eight homes that will be nestled amongst 33 acres of a stunning hillside park, natural wildlife and remarkable views with a community dog park. Other examples of how this resort will prove to be responsible and a sustainable development....... Nearly ¾ of the site is open space Net Zero Greenhouse Gases (GHG) Increased safety measures and fire safety infrastructure Community project Significant job creation Modest 58 rooms and eight homes Equal opportunity employer Wildlife and Habitat Stewardship Uncompromising contemporary design Project Labor Agreement - Union Friendly LEED Gold Certified Learn more about this amazing new property by visiting www.enhanceourcanyon.org. Mr. Safady founded the national real estate firm O&S Holdings, LLC 25 years ago and successfully developed projects (mixed-use, hospitality, etc.) of over 5 million square feet throughout the United States. He has been recognized by national real estate journals and many as an expert in private-public partnerships and creative developments. Since selling his real estate portfolio, he has focused on luxury eco-friendly resorts and is currently developing an eco-friendly Bulgari Resort and Estates in Los Angeles. The Bulgari Resort is a luxury branded hotel and residence development, the first of its kind in the market. An avid traveler, Mr. Safady is also expanding internationally with several luxury eco-friendly resorts planned in the near future. Mr. Safady is the founder of Safady Entertainment, which produced faith-based Machine Gun Preacher starring Gerard Butler. In addition, he is a partner and served on the Board of Directors for Virgin Produced, a company of Sir Richard Branson's Virgin Group. Under Virgin's umbrella, over 12 movies, several TV shows, and live music festivals were accomplished. Mr. Safady, of Lebanese origins, is currently developing a 1970's true story based on the book Cobra 405 that tells the story of British SAS agents who heisted the Bank of the Middle East in Beirut, Lebanon. Mr. Safady's passion for entertainment did not stop there; in 2007, he created Monaco Pictures, a luxury movie theatre experience that sold in 2014 to Cinemark. Over the past several years, he has become an active investor in the sustainable technology sector and digital currencies. His investments include a Direct Carbon Fuel Cell technology, a start-up, a sustainable fertilizer company derived from ocean water, sustainable forestry products, and Axitan, which uses microalgae and produces edible vaccines and peptides for the animal health industry. Mr. Safady holds a B.A. in Business Finance from Loyola Marymount University. He is also a member of the Producers Guild of America, a frequent guest speaker on creative sustainability measures at universities and conferences worldwide, and a frequent speaker at International Shopping Center Conventions. Thank you for being a part of "Responsible Development featuring Gary M. Safady" on the Live Mana Network, brought to you by the Live Mana Worldwide Foundation. The Live Mana Network is broadcast all over the world on your favorite streaming audio and video platforms like Apple TV, ROKU, Amazon Fire, and iTunes. You can also find us on Google News, and other print mediums. Be blessed, Joshua T Berglan
Gary M. Safady joins Joshua 'The World's Mayor' to discuss responsible development that will set a new standard for green building and that will be on full display with the Bulgari Resort Los Angeles. This eco-friendly sanctuary in Los Angeles, located in the majestic Santa Monica Mountains will feature a 58-room resort and eight homes that will be nestled amongst 33 acres of a stunning hillside park, natural wildlife and remarkable views with a community dog park. Other examples of how this resort will prove to be responsible and a sustainable development....... Nearly ¾ of the site is open space Net Zero Greenhouse Gases (GHG) Increased safety measures and fire safety infrastructure Community project Significant job creation Modest 58 rooms and eight homes Equal opportunity employer Wildlife and Habitat Stewardship Uncompromising contemporary design Project Labor Agreement - Union Friendly LEED Gold Certified Learn more about this amazing new property by visiting www.enhanceourcanyon.org. Mr. Safady founded the national real estate firm O&S Holdings, LLC 25 years ago and successfully developed projects (mixed-use, hospitality, etc.) of over 5 million square feet throughout the United States. He has been recognized by national real estate journals and many as an expert in private-public partnerships and creative developments. Since selling his real estate portfolio, he has focused on luxury eco-friendly resorts and is currently developing an eco-friendly Bulgari Resort and Estates in Los Angeles. The Bulgari Resort is a luxury branded hotel and residence development, the first of its kind in the market. An avid traveler, Mr. Safady is also expanding internationally with several luxury eco-friendly resorts planned in the near future. Mr. Safady is the founder of Safady Entertainment, which produced faith-based Machine Gun Preacher starring Gerard Butler. In addition, he is a partner and served on the Board of Directors for Virgin Produced, a company of Sir Richard Branson's Virgin Group. Under Virgin's umbrella, over 12 movies, several TV shows, and live music festivals were accomplished. Mr. Safady, of Lebanese origins, is currently developing a 1970's true story based on the book Cobra 405 that tells the story of British SAS agents who heisted the Bank of the Middle East in Beirut, Lebanon. Mr. Safady's passion for entertainment did not stop there; in 2007, he created Monaco Pictures, a luxury movie theatre experience that sold in 2014 to Cinemark. Over the past several years, he has become an active investor in the sustainable technology sector and digital currencies. His investments include a Direct Carbon Fuel Cell technology, a start-up, a sustainable fertilizer company derived from ocean water, sustainable forestry products, and Axitan, which uses microalgae and produces edible vaccines and peptides for the animal health industry. Mr. Safady holds a B.A. in Business Finance from Loyola Marymount University. He is also a member of the Producers Guild of America, a frequent guest speaker on creative sustainability measures at universities and conferences worldwide, and a frequent speaker at International Shopping Center Conventions. Thank you for being a part of "Responsible Development featuring Gary M. Safady" on the Live Mana Network, brought to you by the Live Mana Worldwide Foundation. The Live Mana Network is broadcast all over the world on your favorite streaming audio and video platforms like Apple TV, ROKU, Amazon Fire, and iTunes. You can also find us on Google News, and other print mediums. Be blessed, Joshua T Berglan
Gary M. Safady joins Joshua 'The World's Mayor' to discuss responsible development that will set a new standard for green building and that will be on full display with the Bulgari Resort Los Angeles. This eco-friendly sanctuary in Los Angeles, located in the majestic Santa Monica Mountains will feature a 58-room resort and eight homes that will be nestled amongst 33 acres of a stunning hillside park, natural wildlife and remarkable views with a community dog park. Other examples of how this resort will prove to be responsible and a sustainable development....... Nearly ¾ of the site is open space Net Zero Greenhouse Gases (GHG) Increased safety measures and fire safety infrastructure Community project Significant job creation Modest 58 rooms and eight homes Equal opportunity employer Wildlife and Habitat Stewardship Uncompromising contemporary design Project Labor Agreement - Union Friendly LEED Gold Certified Learn more about this amazing new property by visiting www.enhanceourcanyon.org. Mr. Safady founded the national real estate firm O&S Holdings, LLC 25 years ago and successfully developed projects (mixed-use, hospitality, etc.) of over 5 million square feet throughout the United States. He has been recognized by national real estate journals and many as an expert in private-public partnerships and creative developments. Since selling his real estate portfolio, he has focused on luxury eco-friendly resorts and is currently developing an eco-friendly Bulgari Resort and Estates in Los Angeles. The Bulgari Resort is a luxury branded hotel and residence development, the first of its kind in the market. An avid traveler, Mr. Safady is also expanding internationally with several luxury eco-friendly resorts planned in the near future. Mr. Safady is the founder of Safady Entertainment, which produced faith-based Machine Gun Preacher starring Gerard Butler. In addition, he is a partner and served on the Board of Directors for Virgin Produced, a company of Sir Richard Branson's Virgin Group. Under Virgin's umbrella, over 12 movies, several TV shows, and live music festivals were accomplished. Mr. Safady, of Lebanese origins, is currently developing a 1970's true story based on the book Cobra 405 that tells the story of British SAS agents who heisted the Bank of the Middle East in Beirut, Lebanon. Mr. Safady's passion for entertainment did not stop there; in 2007, he created Monaco Pictures, a luxury movie theatre experience that sold in 2014 to Cinemark. Over the past several years, he has become an active investor in the sustainable technology sector and digital currencies. His investments include a Direct Carbon Fuel Cell technology, a start-up, a sustainable fertilizer company derived from ocean water, sustainable forestry products, and Axitan, which uses microalgae and produces edible vaccines and peptides for the animal health industry. Mr. Safady holds a B.A. in Business Finance from Loyola Marymount University. He is also a member of the Producers Guild of America, a frequent guest speaker on creative sustainability measures at universities and conferences worldwide, and a frequent speaker at International Shopping Center Conventions. Thank you for being a part of "Responsible Development featuring Gary M. Safady" on the Live Mana Network, brought to you by the Live Mana Worldwide Foundation. The Live Mana Network is broadcast all over the world on your favorite streaming audio and video platforms like Apple TV, ROKU, Amazon Fire, and iTunes. You can also find us on Google News, and other print mediums. Be blessed, Joshua T Berglan
Gary M. Goldfarb is Chief Strategy Officer of Interport Group of Companies, a leading Supply Chain Management providing Foreign Trade Zones & Customs bonded warehousing, inventory control, Transportation, Distribution services and fulfillment and Duty Drawback expertise. With Interport, Gary has developed several key business units including "Compra Fora" Brasil Customs Clearance Center in Miami, GPS […]
In the final hour, Laurence Holmes was joined by award-winning author Gary M. Pomerantz to discuss NBA legend Wilt Chamberlain's 100-point game and to share stories about him. Pomerantz is the author of "Wilt, 1962: The Night of 100 Points and the Dawn of a New Era."
In this episode, we chat with Gary M. Heri, DMD. An internationally recognized expert in orofacial pain and temporomandibular disorders. He is the director of the Center for Temporomandibular Disorders and Orofacial Pain in the Department of Diagnostic Sciences at Rutgers
In this episode, we chat with Gary M. Heri, DMD. An internationally recognized expert in orofacial pain and temporomandibular disorders. He is the director of the Center for Temporomandibular Disorders and Orofacial Pain in the Department of Diagnostic Sciences at Rutgers School of Dental Medicine, which performs research and teaches this advanced field of dentistry focusing on the assessment, diagnosis and treatment of complex chronic orofacial pain disorders. Gary Heir has recently been appointed to the Robert and Susan Carmel Chair in Algesiology at the Rutgers School of Dental Medicine. Over the past decade, Heir played a significant role alongside a committee of national orofacial pain program directors and the American Academy of Orofacial Pain to get orofacial pain recognized as the 12th specialty in dentistry by the American Dental Association in March 2020. He is also the signatory on the application to the National Commission on Recognition of Dental Specialties and Certifying Boards for recognition of the American Board of Orofacial Pain as the official certifying board for the specialty. Currently, Heir directs the center at the dental school, one of only 12 postgraduate orofacial pain programs in the country accredited by the Commission on Dental Accreditation (CODA). He stressed the need for more accredited programs, citing the millions of patients who require treatment but have difficulty finding specialists. In addition to his work at Rutgers, Heir is a highly sought-after lecturer, having delivered nearly 300 presentations on orofacial pain and related subjects in the region, in the country and throughout the world. He has served on the boards of many professional organizations, including as the president of the American Academy of Orofacial Pain and the American Board of Orofacial Pain and as a member of CODA and the Council on Dental Education and Licensure. He was appointed by three of New Jersey's governors for three consecutive terms as a member of New Jersey Governor's Lyme Disease Commission. Heir has published more than 100 peer-reviewed articles, chapters and abstracts on orofacial pain and TMJ disorders. He also serves as the section editor for Orofacial Pain Neuroscience of The Journal of the American Dental Association. (Bio credit, Rutgers.edu) Highlights of this podcast include: Orofacial Pain Musculoskeletal pain Neuropathic pain Neuralgia and palsy Nerve damage and neuropathy Trigeminal neuralgia Migraines Categories of Pain Fear and Pain - psychogenic Placebo and nocebo effects Pain Management / Control Emotional component of pain Diagnosis And So Much More! To learn more about Dr. Heir, please visit rutgershealth.org. This episode is brought to you by Therasage. Use code: STOPCHASINGPAIN at checkout.
https://patronite.pl/8podcast -Jeśli masz chęć wesprzeć moje podcastowanie;) #8podcast #GaryHeidnik#Fulda #daily I tak w końcu docieramy do ostatniego odcinka grudniowego daily- historii opowiadanych przez mnie dzień po dniu.
This week on Privacy Please, we are joined by two very good friends and business partners helping fight against financial crime, Dr. Gary M. Shiffman – Economist and CEO of Giant Oak and Consilient and Juan C. Zarate – co-founder of Consilient. -We hope you enjoy this fun and interesting conversation! Backstory: Dr. Gary M. Shiffman is an economist and CEO of two machine learning companies, Giant Oak and Consilient. Together, he and Juan C. Zarate co-founded Consilient. They both have really impressive backgrounds as Gary was a former Chief of Staff at U.S. Customs and Border Protection and Juan was also a former national security advisor for combating terrorism. The two have now joined forces to combat financial crime with data privacy-preserving technology. Topics: The importance of data privacy within financial institutions and how banks can work together to combat financial crime. Shout out to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. Please go donate if you get this chance - https://www.missingkids.org/HOME
The Deep Places: A Memoir of Illness and Discovery by: Ross Douthat Nightmare Scenario: Inside the Trump Administration's Response to the Pandemic That Changed History by: Yasmeen Abutaleb and Damien Paletta The Premonition: A Pandemic Story by: Michael Lewis Morning Star by: Pierce Brown Star Trek: The City on the Edge of Forever Teleplay by: Harlan Ellison The Economics of Violence by: Gary M. M. Shiffman The Hobbit, or There and Back Again by: J. R. R. Tolkien Chorazin: (The Weird of Hali #1) by: John Michael Greer The Great Game: The Struggle for Empire in Central Asia by: Peter Hopkirk
In this episode, we sit down with author and journalist Gary M. Pomerantz to celebrate the 25th anniversary of the publication of his book, Where Peachtree Meets Sweet Auburn: A Saga of Race and Family, a landmark history of Atlanta. After he finished the book, Pomerantz donated his research files and interviews to the Rose Library. Join us for an inside look at the making of Where Peachtree Meets Sweet Auburn.Gary M. Pomerantz joined The Washington Post as a sports reporter in 1982. He moved to Atlanta and The Atlanta Journal-Constitution in 1988. Pomerantz is the author of nonfiction books on topics ranging from history to sports to civil rights. His most recent book, The Last Pass, a New York Times bestseller, centers on Boston Celtics legends Bob Cousy and Bill Russell. To learn more about Pomerantz and his writing, check out his website here. Discover his papers, which are held at Rose Library.
We talk to three experts in data management about data management and what is new as it relates to commodity technology. Kindly sponsored by Enuit. We spoke with Richard Quigley, CEO and founder of Ventriks, Chris Hembrecht, Director of Product Management at Morningstar and Mark Earthey, Non-Executive Director for Matrica. Patrick Reames and Gary M. Vasey of ComTech then discuss what they had learned. To sponsor an episode, contact us....
“Booker T. Washington would surely have seen through the false flag effort to demonize the Virginia Governor candidate offering the best hope for blacks, as a racist. Virginia voters, as well as the rest of us, would benefit by being as observant on that score as Washington was.” ~ Gary M. Galles
Gary M. Daddario and Jennifer L. Barnett of Marcus, Errico, Emmer & Brooks, PC discuss how condo boards can minimize their liability through proper property management in this podcast, excerpted from MCLE's 8/10/2021 webcast, Condo Boards: Fiduciary Responsibility & Potential Liability.The full program is available as an on demand webcast or an MP3 here. Get 24/7 instant access to hundreds of eLectures like this one—and more—with a subscription to the MCLE OnlinePass. Learn more at www.mcle.org/onlinepass.
This week I'm covering the story of Gary Heidnik. In the mid to late 80's, he kidnapped, tortured and raped 6 women that he kept locked away in his basement. Victims: Josephina Rivera, Sandra Lindsey, Lisa Thomas, Deborah Dudley, Jacqueline Askins, Agnes Adams.https://linktr.ee/KillerStoriessources:https://murderpedia.org/male.H/h1/heidnik-gary.htmhttps://www.phillymag.com/news/2007/07/23/inside-the-house-of-heidnik/https://www.oxygen.com/monster-preacher/crime-news/monster-preacher-where-are-gary-heidniks-victims-todayhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_M._Heidnikhttps://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/gary-heidnik-attorney-house-of-horrors-buffalo-bill-true-crime-dochttps://criminalminds.fandom.com/wiki/Serial_Killerhttps://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/schizophrenia/
Episode 192 is all about moving beyond the motor speech drills and empowering patients through advocacy, support groups, and movement. The post 192 – More than Motor Speech Drills: Meaningful Therapy for Parkinson's Disease – Valeria “Libbie” Gary M.A., CCC-SLP appeared first on Swallow Your Pride Podcast.
Episode 192 is all about moving beyond the motor speech drills and empowering patients through advocacy, support groups, and movement. The post 192 – More than Motor Speech Drills: Meaningful Therapy for Parkinson's Disease – Valeria “Libbie” Gary M.A., CCC-SLP appeared first on Swallow Your Pride Podcast.
Independence Day has come (and gone) once again and with it, the opportunity to reflect on what exactly we celebrate. Leonard E. Read's classic essay "The Essence of Americanism" is a great way to recount the remarkable shift that came about as a result of American independence. It's also a great antidote to the poisonous revamping of American history that is currently fashionable. What's the biggest thing that separates authoritarians from supporters of freedom? Gary M. Galles draws upon another Leonard Read essay to provide a clear and compelling distinction. The damage done by Covid could more accurately be described as damage done by the official response to Covid. Brandon Smith has an explanation of the economic damage done and where it's leading us. With the intense heat wave we've been under lately, the thought of working in the garden isn't as appealing at the moment. Even so, Annie Holmquist has a terrific essay about the importance of not only gardening but teaching our children how to weather life's storms by rooting them in a garden. www.thebryanhydeshow.com --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/loving-liberty/support
I enjoy interviewing elected officials for many reasons, but more so because I think it's a good way to inform people about what is going on. But I really enjoy interviewing candidates, because not only can I get people informed, but it helps to get people involved and motivated to vote. My enthusiasm for this process is noticeable, because I want people to be more connected. I think this interview will help everyone notice the qualifications and characteristics that Representative Gary M. Carter Jr. District 102 has to run for State Senator. In this interview I get to interview both an already elected official, and someone running for office. If you want to see the video on the river please see my Facebook page at "William Wallis For America And see "Gary M. Carter Jr" on Facebook too
When it comes to touchy subjects, nothing comes close to the reaction a person gets by weighing in on Israel and Palestine. Jacob Hornberger offers some needed clarity on the fact that opposing the actions of the Israeli government is not necessarily anti-Semitic. He also makes a strong case for ending all foreign aid for everyone. With a potentially landmark case involving the Second Amendment coming before the Supreme Court, now is a good time to pose a timely question or two. Stephen Holbrook asks: Does the Bill of Rights protect you outside your home? A curious thing about unleashing the dogs of war is that no one can ever predict accurately what the unintended consequences might bring. WWI is a perfect example of this. But what about the “other” wars like the war on drugs, the war on poverty? James R. Harrigan and Antony Davies have a fascinating article on the war on retirement. It’s definitely worth a read. We all owe a great debt to those who can summarize essential principles in easy to understand ways. If you’ve never heard of Karl Hess, you’ve still likely heard some of his observations. Gary M. Galles shares some of Hess’ best quotes on liberty. Whatever else we may be lacking these days, there’s certainly no shortage of scandals. Annie Holmquist shares her thoughts on the latest big one involving photoshopped modesty in a high school yearbook. www.thebryanhydeshow.com --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/loving-liberty/support
With 12 books in print, G. Michael Vasey is an established author with notable contributions in poetry, metaphysics, and business. His first novel - The Last Observer (Roundfire 2013) - was published last year and is a thrilling cornucopia of mayhem, magic and murder. A yorkshireman who has spent most of his adult life exiled to Texas and now the Czech republic, G. Michael Vasey writes for a living as a leading analyst in the commodity trading and risk management industry. On the side, he writes poems, blogs, books on metaphysics and novels all with a theme of life and the nature of reality. Much of his inspiration comes from meditation and music. He is currently working on The Lord of the Elements - the prequel to The Last Observer - and another on the concept of the Fool in magic. - www.garymvasey.comFor Your Listening Pleasure for these Lockdown / Stay-At-Home COVID and Variants Times - For all the radio shows available on The 'X' Zone Broadcast Network visit - https://www.spreaker.com/user/xzoneradiotv.Our radio shows archives and programming include: A Different Perspective with Kevin Randle; Alien Cosmic Expo Lecture Series; Alien Worlds Radio Show; America's Soul Doctor with Ken Unger; Back in Control Radio Show with Dr. David Hanscom, MD; Connecting with Coincidence with Dr. Bernard Beitman, MD; Dick Tracy; Dimension X; Exploring Tomorrow Radio Show; Flash Gordon; Imagine More Success Radio Show with Syndee Hendricks and Thomas Hydes; Jet Jungle Radio Show; Journey Into Space; Know the Name with Sharon Lynn Wyeth; Lux Radio Theatre - Classic Old Time Radio; Mission Evolution with Gwilda Wiyaka; Paranormal StakeOut with Larry Lawson; Ray Bradbury - Tales Of The Bizarre; Sci Fi Radio Show; Seek Reality with Roberta Grimes; Space Patrol; Stairway to Heaven with Gwilda Wiyaka; The 'X' Zone Radio Show with Rob McConnell; Two Good To Be True with Justina Marsh and Peter Marsh; and many other!That's The ‘X' Zone Broadcast Network Shows and Archives - https://www.spreaker.com/user/xzoneradiotv
Philadelphia in den 80ern. Während das Leben an der Oberfläche seinen gewohnten Lauf nimmt, finden sich 6 junge Frauen in einer albtraumhaften Wirklichkeit wieder. Hunger, Folter und Missbrauch gehören hier zur Normalität. Wer in dieser Welt überleben will, muss sich anpassen. // Hier wird Dir geholfen: // Telefonseelsorge: 0800 111 0 111 // https://www.telefonseelsorge.de ***Werbung*** Mit BOOKBEAT so viele Hörbücher im Monat hören, wie Du willst! Für einen kostenlosen Probemonat einfach unter bookbeat.de/stimmenimkopf oder mit dem Rabattcode stimmenimkopf registrieren. // Kontakt: // E-Mail: podcast.stimmenimkopf@gmail.com Instagram: podcast.stimmenimkopf // Quellen: // "Kälter als die Nacht" - Josefina Rivera https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHctVr-SuJE https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_M._Heidnik https://www.icd-code.de/icd/code/F20.-.html https://www.icd-code.de/icd/code/F60.1.html https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hochbegabung // Musik: // https://www.youtube.com/user/myuuji
This is Bed Crime Stories - a weekly True Crime Podcast where Nikki & Charlie pour themselves a drink and take turns telling one another the stories that keep them up at night! In this episode, Nikki tells us the story of the real-life Buffalo Bill, Gary M. Heidnick, and his victims. Nikki and Charlie add humor to alleviate some of the heaviness in the stories they tell - stories involving varying kinds of true crime. Neither Nikki nor Charlie are experts, just lifelong fans of all-things true crime. Music credit Industrial Music Box by Kevin MacLeod Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/3910-industrial-music-box License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
In this weeks episode, Shelby and Charlie cover the most gruesome subject they've ever encountered: Gary Heidnik. Heidnik, who was one of several people used as the inspiration for the character Buffalo Bill, was nothing short of absolutely psychotic. He would abduct women, shackle them in his basement, and subject them to the most horrific forms of torture. This episode is not for the faint of heart. Opening music licensed from Peder B. Helland Song: Strange Wind Album: It's Halloween Sources: Cellar of Horror: The Story of Gary Heidnik https://allthatsinteresting.com/gary-heidnik https://apnews.com/article/3c9f4ee4e2419d6c7d5b1061595803d5 https://apnews.com/article/3c9f4ee4e2419d6c7d5b1061595803d5 https://criminalminds.fandom.com/wiki/Gary_Heidnik https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_M._Heidnik https://murderpedia.org/male.H/h1/heidnik-gary.htm https://www.phillymag.com/news/2007/07/23/inside-the-house-of-heidnik/ https://www.phillymag.com/news/2007/07/23/inside-the-house-of-heidnik/ https://www.ranker.com/list/facts-about-gary-m-heidnik/amandasedlakhevener The Basement: The True Crime Serial Killer Gary Heidnik
Imagine a haunted hotel and a struggling marriage. Now, think less about The Shining and more about Alfred Hitchcock. Add some unsettling Los Angeles noir and you've got The Night - a spooky international co-production and the first American movie given legal screening rights in Iran since their 1979 revolution. Motion Picture Terror Scale: 4 (Marcus) / 3 (Melissa) / 2 (Grady). Quality: 5 / 4 / 4. Enjoyment: 5 / 2 / 2 Articles mentioned in this episode: "Why horror flick "The Night" is the first American film to be released in Iran in four decades," by Gary M. Kramer in Salon "‘The Night’ Review: Farsi-Language Horror Thriller Set in an L.A. Hotel Delivers Classy Scares," by Richard Kuipers in Variety "Reviews: The Night" by Matt Zoller Seitz in RogerEbert.com "'A silent act of resistance': the hidden tattoo studios of Tehran," by Renate van der Zee in The Guardian "The Horribly Slow Murderer with the Extremely Inefficient Weapon," by Richard Gale on YouTube "They can take our electricity but they can never take our nachos," on TikTok
What would a truly principled candidate say in an inaugural address? Leonard E. Read had a good idea of what they might say. There is a ton of timeless wisdom in his words. You're not imagining things. There is a very open centralization of power taking place and the concept of federalism is being discarded. Gary M. Galles has an excellent take on why it's happening. How serious are you about making a difference? Here are 6 questions that proven difference-makers must ask themselves. --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/loving-liberty/support
This week, Stacey tells us about Gary Heidnick, an American man who raped, abducted, and tortured 6 women in the late 1980's. Gary was responsible for one of the most grotesque series of crimes ever to occur in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Sources:https://www.phillymag.com/news/2007/07/23/inside-the-house-of-heidnik/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_M._Heidnikhttps://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1987/03/27/neighbors-tell-of-suspect-luring-impaired-women/3a035bad-1614-4870-8e2f-73625515e18d/Support the show (https://www.patreon.com/ISGDpodcast)
One of the great measures of the free market is how it improves our lives in ways that we may not immediately recognize. Richard N. Lorenc explains how the massive improvement of Halloween costumes over the years is proof of this. Few people have enunciated the principles of authentic liberty like Leonard E. Read. Gary M. Galles shares a Read essay about the principle of violence and how those who wish to be free must be willing to walk away from it. If there's one thing we know about liberty, it's that most people don't tend to appreciate it until it's either taken from them or on the verge of being taken. Christine Smith points out how Covid-19 has provided us with just such a learning opportunity. Just how important are private property rights? We're poised to learn that they're more important than we think. Brad Polumbo shares the details of a new survey that finds 65% of college students surveyed say that rioting and looting is justified. --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/loving-liberty/support
Gary M Vasey - The Last Observer
MAX & Friends with Max Tucci The Power of MusicS12/E10Guests: International Nova @internationalnova+ Gary M. Houston @garymhoustonTopic:The Power of Music#talent #music #songs #interview #artists #podcsst #talkshow #tunein #WhitneyHouston #CommunicatorAwards #smegsavvymarketing #thepowerofmusic #internationalnova #garymhuston #hiphop #entertainment #therealdionnew #cissyhouston #lehmancenter #NewYork #maxtucci #radio #talkradio #conversation #celebrities #grateful #Tupac #daddyyankee #fatjoe #diddy #TheBronx #LATalkRadio #podbean #applepodcasts #googlepodcasts #iheartradio #nickiminaj #vanessabling
Time Stamps:01:58 Introduction06:08 Themes06:35 Section 1 Loyalty vs. Disloyalty to the Gospel20:56 Section 2 Four Patterns of Endurance and perseverance43:15 Section 3 The Word of God and His faithfulness are not Bound58:42 Looking forward to Week 5Daisy references the following Scripture in Session One:2 Timothy 1:15-2:13Philippians 1:9-11Acts 1:8Ephesians 6:8Ephesians 6:12Ephesians 6:12-171 Corinthians 9:24-27James 5:7-8Isaiah 53: 3,10Hebrews 2:17-18Isaiah 40:8Isaiah 55:10-11Genesis 12:2-3Luke 22:31-341 Thessalonians 5:24Revelation 2:7-3:21Psalm 23:5Daisy references the following resources in this teaching:Paul for Everyone: The Pastoral Letters (The New Testament for Everyone), by N.T. WrightBlue Letter BibleHelp Me Teach The Bible, Episode 92: Nancy Guthrie with John CurrieReading Timothy and Titus with John Stott, by John R. W. StottThe Baker Illustrated Bible Commentary, by Gary M. BurgeReading Timothy and Titus, by John StottThe Missionary Journeys of Paul from the Jesus Film ProjectThe Amplified BibleThe Roman Military in the New Testament, by Bible.orgESV Study Bible
On this weeks episode, Phil and Miles talk to esteemed Hollywood Casting Director Gary M. Zuckerbrod about his work assembling one of celluloids greatest ever ensemble casts with Quentin Tarantino's Pulp Fiction (among many other well known projects), casting Uma Thurman in her first ever role and also shares his experience, advice and tips with our listeners interested in getting their start in the film industry. In the reviews section we discuss Amazon Prime's new Joseph Gordon-Levitt movie ‘7500' and new Blumhouse produced horror, ‘You Should Have Left' starring Kevin Bacon and Amanda Seyfried. We finish the show by looking back at Pulp Fiction in our regular section ‘Video Store Corner'.
Episode 33 - The Real Buffalo Bill: Gary Michael Heidnik For more information please visit: www.itwasntmetruecrime.com and www.patreon.com/itwasntmepod Music by: Jonathan Biddle Sources: Please visit www.itwasntmetruecrime.com https://murderpedia.org/male.H/h1/heidnik-gary.htm https://allthatsinteresting.com/gary-heidnik https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_M._Heidnik https://www.hooch.net/last-meals-executed-inmates/10/?chrome=1 --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/itwasntme/support
Award-winning ghostwriter, bestselling author, literary agent, editor, consultant, blogger, novelist, screenwriter, and former publisher Gary M. Krebs has published numerous print and e-book bestsellers and brings over three decades of trade book industry experience to the table on every assignment. Having run Publishing Boards at major book publishing houses, Gary knows what publishers are looking for and can tailor any proposal for commercial viability. As a Publisher, Gary was most recently Associate Publisher at Brilliance Publishing (a division of Amazon Publishing), where he oversaw the audio acquisitions program. He also acquired and edited the flagship bestselling books in the Grand Harbor Press imprint (We Will Survive, by Gloria Gaynor; and Happy This Year!, by Will Bowen). His most recent novel, Little Miss of Darke County: The Origins of Annie Oakley, is available now on Amazon. Gary's Website - https://www.gmkwritingandediting.com/ Gary's New Novel - https://www.littlemissofdarkecounty.com/ Thanks for listening! Leave us a 5-star review on Apple Podcasts and let us know what you thought of this episode! Brady Morgan's Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/bradymorgan_/ Budgetrek's Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/budgetrek/ Budgetrek's Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/budgetrek/?modal=admin_todo_tour Budgetrek's Website - https://www.budgetrek.com/
Bienvenidos a Juego De Asesinos Podcast! Hoy les traemos la historia de Heidnik, un asesino con gustos peculiares, quédate con nosotras para conocer su historia! . No olvides seguirnos en nuestras redes sociales! Instagram y Facebook: @juegodeasesinos_podcast . fuentes: https://didyouknowfacts.com/philadelphias-house-horrors/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_M._Heidnik https://www.ranker.com/list/facts-about-gary-m-heidnik/amandasedlakhevener https://apnews.com/b069890f6e40ce3f2c3337926f3c0f21 https://murderpedia.org/male.H/h1/heidnik-gary.htm https://allthatsinteresting.com/gary-heidnik https://criminalminds.fandom.com/wiki/Gary_Heidnik https://6abc.com/philadelphia-crime-mass-murder-serial-killer/3429565/ https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3260762/ https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/real-mindhunter-john-douglas-recalls-the-most-shocking-murderer musica: sneaky snitch
Bienvenidos a Juego De Asesinos Podcast! Hoy les traemos la historia de Heidnik, un asesino con gustos peculiares, quédate con nosotras para conocer su historia! . No olvides seguirnos en nuestras redes sociales! Instagram y Facebook: @juegodeasesinos_podcast . fuentes: https://didyouknowfacts.com/philadelphias-house-horrors/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_M._Heidnik https://www.ranker.com/list/facts-about-gary-m-heidnik/amandasedlakhevener https://apnews.com/b069890f6e40ce3f2c3337926f3c0f21 https://murderpedia.org/male.H/h1/heidnik-gary.htm https://allthatsinteresting.com/gary-heidnik https://criminalminds.fandom.com/wiki/Gary_Heidnik https://6abc.com/philadelphia-crime-mass-murder-serial-killer/3429565/ https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3260762/ https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/real-mindhunter-john-douglas-recalls-the-most-shocking-murderer musica: sneaky snitch
Happy Shelter in Place Day, Friends! I find myself living in the part of Central California right now that has been essentially shut down for the next 22 days, and our Shelter in Place order just went into effect about an hour ago. These are strange, strange times! So – sometimes people ask me how it’s going doing a daily podcast. I can tell you that each episode takes just a little under 3 hours from start to finish, which includes writing the episode, recording it, editing it in Audacity, and entering all of the pertinent information into a WordPress and Libsyn post. Longer episodes take longer, shorter episodes can be around 2 hours of time. Last night was one of the later nights for the show. One of my daughters wanted to watch a show with me, and I’ll take just about any excuse I can to spend time with them, so we watched a show together, which began after midnight. Then I wrote a fairly long pastoral email to the congregation of the church I pastor about the coronavirus pandemic. When I say fairly long, I mean over 1800 words, so about 6 pages worth. We’re in California, and on a virtual lock-down, so hopefully they had a little extra time to read. One of the problems being in a church that is pastored by somebody who fancies himself as a writer is that you can get very long emails from time to time. If you are a leader at the church I pastor, you got a 2100 word email from me AND an 1800 word email from me within the space of 4 days. I should repent in sackcloth and ashes for that, I suppose, but these are trying times we live in right now, filled with dangers like novel viruses, lack of toilet paper, and novel-length emails from pastors. ANYWAY, the point of what I was trying to say earlier before I rambled was that I didn’t start WRITING the podcast until around 3AM. Fortunately, I had some great material from pastor David Platt to use, so I didn’t have to write a ton of original material myself. It was, however, one of the few times since I began this daily podcast in January that I kind of just wanted to go to bed, and not spend 2 hours or so on a podcast. HOWEVER – when I got to the point of recording it, and I got to the part where I was just reading the Scriptures into the microphone, that’s when I noticed something that happens practically every time I do the podcast: THE WORD OF GOD ENCOURAGED ME. It gave me HOPE. It built me up. It elevated my mood. Almost every time I record this show, I come away encouraged. Not because I like recording and editing a podcast – that can get a little tedious…but because the WORD of God is powerful, and supernatural, and it just builds me up in faith, because faith comes by HEARING THE WORD OF GOD. I just wanted to share that with you as a benefit. You can get that same benefit – without the 2-3 hours of writing, recording and editing by simply READING (or listening!) to the WORD OF GOD! If you haven’t done so yet, allow me to encourage you to listen to the other half of today’s episode – episode #78 – I split today’s show into two parts so it wouldn’t be too long. In today’s reading, we encounter the story of the woman caught in adultery, known to scholars as the Pericope Adulterae. Many scholars, including many evangelical ones, consider this passage to be a later edition to the New Testament, and in most modern Bibles, this part of John is set apart to show doubt about the passage. So – what’s going on here, and was this story original to John’s Gospel, or was it a later edition? The Pericope Adulterae, found in John 7:53-8:11, is surrounded by more controversy and conjecture than any other New Testament Passage with the possible exception of the ending of Mark. The authorship and placement of this pericope has been hotly debated at least since the fifth century, and there are still scholars lined up on opposite sides of the issues surrounding this passage. Attempting to extract meaning and application from this passage is almost meaningless without first wrestling with the genuineness of the text and the mass of evidence for and against it. The issue is simple to grasp – if this pericope is a genuine and accurate happening in the life of Jesus, then it carries just as much weight as the rest of the New Testament. Conversely, if the passage is a later edition with no basis in fact (i.e. it never happened) then the passage is notable only for its historical value and the question of how it became inserted into many manuscripts of the New Testament. Though it will be argued that there is no way to be certain of the historicity of this passage, the preponderance of the evidence points to it being a genuine happening in the life of Jesus, and as such it does have application in the modern church and it can inform how we live and interact with each other. Summary of the Passage 7:53-8:2 The Pericope Adulterae begins with a somewhat awkward[1] transition from the previous narrative. The stage is set here; Jesus has spent the night at the Mount of Olives and dawn finds Him mingling with the crowd near the temple courts. His very presence attracts a crowd and notably (for the fourth Gospel)[2] Jesus sits down to teach them. 8:3-8:6a As Jesus is teaching the people, The scribes and Pharisees bring in a woman and stand her in front of the crowd. They explain to Jesus that the woman was caught in the act of committing adultery, and (on the surface) they present her to Jesus for judgment. The question is, should the woman be stoned in accordance with the law of Moses? The text informs us that this question is a trap for Jesus, a classic catch 22, there is no clear way that Jesus can give a verdict here without opening Himself up to some basis for accusation, either in the eyes of the Roman authorities, or the people. 8:6b-8:9 Perplexingly, Jesus doesn’t answer their questions immediately, indeed, He never gives them the verdict. Instead, He leans over and writes on the ground. The accusers persist in their questioning, and Jesus finally responds with His classic retort, challenging any one of the accusers without sin to be the one that casts the first stone. Though we don’t know how much time passed after Jesus’ challenge, one can almost be assured of an awkward silence, punctuated by occasional stones hitting the soft earth as they fall from the hands of the accusers. Beginning with the eldest among them, the scribes and Pharisees melt away into the crowd. 8:10-8:11 Jesus and the accused woman are left as the center of attention. He initiates dialogue her, asking the obvious questions – where is everybody? Is no one left to condemn? Upon her acknowledgment that they have all left, Jesus also refuses to condemn the woman, but warns her to leave behind her life of sin. Controversy and Canonicity: Contra Johannine This Pericope is a wonderful piece of literature; very moving and dramatic. Jesus cleverly meets the challenge of the scribes and Pharisees without compromising and without falling into a trap, and the woman caught in sin is given a second chance to repent. It’s a powerful story, but is it genuine? Did it really happen? If it did really happen, why is there so much evidence against it being an original part of the gospel of John? A survey of the evidence for and against genuineness is presented below. The majority of New Testament scholars are fairly adamant that the Pericope Adulterae is non-Johannine in origin. The ancient manuscript evidence is indeed stacked against this Pericope. Bruce Metzger points out that all major early Greek manuscripts omit the Pericope, including our oldest and most respected early manuscripts, Codex Sinaiticus, Codex Vaticanus, p66 and p75.[3] Though some Old Latin manuscripts include the Pericope, many omit it as well, and the early Syriac, and Coptic manuscripts do not contain the passage[4]. Codex Bezae is the only major Greek manuscript prior to the 8th century that this pericope appears in, and Bezae is known for its many interpolations. In fact, Metzger states, “No other manuscript has so many and such remarkable variations from what is usually taken to be the New Testament Text. Codex Bezae’s special characteristic is the free addition (and occasional omission) of words, sentences and even incidences.”[5] Further manuscript evidence against the Johannine nature of the Pericope is the variety of places it is attached in some of the manuscripts that do contain it. In some manuscripts, it appears after John 7:36, in some after John 7:44, some as an addition at the end of John’s gospel, some after Luke 21:28, and some even after Luke 24:53.[6] Though the number of manuscripts that displace this pericope is not overwhelming, the mere fact of its varied appearance in even a few manuscripts tends to cast doubt on the concreteness of its location after John 7:52. The final bit of manuscript evidence is the unusually high number of textual variants found in the manuscripts that do contain the pericope. Gary Burge points out that line per line, these twelve verses contain more textual variants across the manuscript tradition than almost any other passage of scripture. [7] There is also much patristic evidence, especially in the east, stacked against the passage. This pericope is not mentioned by any Greek Father until Euthymius Zigabenus in the 12th century and isn’t found in the writings of the early Fathers in the west either. Thus, it is omitted by Origen, Clement, Cyprian, Irenaeus, Tertullian, Cyril and Chrysostom,[8] even in writings where it would seem to be an appropriate resource for them to use. While Zane Hodges tries to make the case that the absence of the Pericope in these church fathers constitutes an argument from silence, and thus proves nothing[9], the fact of the matter is that this is more empirical evidence stacked against the pericope, and it adds weight to the non-Johannine argument. While the manuscript evidence would seem to be the greatest evidence against the Pericope, there are also suspicious grammatical and contextual features of the text. Statistical analysis of the text has claimed to show several features which “prove” its non Johannine nature. Vern Poythress has examined the grammatical use of the conjunctions “de”, “oun”, “kai”, and “asyndeton” in the Gospel of John, and developed some general rules that John appears to follow. Upon examination of the adulteress pericope, it would appear that there are enough variations in its use of conjunctions (compared with the rest of John) to allow Poythress to conclude that this Pericope is not written by John.[10] Further grammatical evidence focuses on the words that are used in the passage. Bryant and Krause point out that approximately nine percent, or 15 of the words used in this pericope do not occur elsewhere in the gospel, the highest percentage for a passage of this size in John[11]. The Mount of Olives, The scribes, and the phrase “early morning” are not found anywhere else in the gospel of John, but all are somewhat common in the synoptic gospels. In addition, only here in John is Jesus addressed as teacher. While some of these unique words can be explained by the nature of the story, as well as the semi-technical judicial language employed, there are still a high frequency of unique words and constructs here compared with the rest of John. Finally, there is contextual evidence that seems to indicate this pericope is out of place. Borchert[12] and many others believe that the text disrupts the flow of the Feast of Tabernacles narrative. Many point out its similarity in time and setting to Luke 21:37-38, and (as mentioned above) some manuscripts place the passage right after verse 38 because it seems to be a better fit. It is also true that the flow of the text from 7:52 to 8:12 is smooth and uninterrupted when this passage is removed, but of course, that could be said of many passages! Controversy and Canonicity: Pro Johannine Most scholars believe the evidence against the Pericope Adulterae is overwhelming, but there is much positive evidence for the ancientness of this event, and even some evidence that would seem to indicate the text is Johannine and not at all out of place. The strongest evidence for the veracity and Johannine nature of the Pericope comes from the manuscripts and church fathers of the west. Several Old Latin manuscripts do in fact contain the Pericope. Hodges argues valiantly that the absence of the passage in our earliest and most reliable manuscripts (Sinaiticus, Vaticanus, p66 and p75) is due to those manuscripts being of a proto-Alexandrian origin, and thus likely coming from the same (ancient) exemplar, one which had the passage intentionally excised.[13] He posits that the Pericope was removed from some texts very early (before 200), but that the passage was quite possibly in the original autograph. The Patristic evidence for the Pericope is surprisingly strong in the west. Several church fathers in the fourth and fifth century mention the text, beginning with Pacian of Barcelona, and including Ambrose, Ambrosiaster, Jerome and Augustine. Jerome and Augustine in particular add much to the pro Johannine side of the argument, providing significant ancient evidence and speculation on the passage. Jerome includes the Pericope Adulterae in his Latin Vulgate translation of the scriptures, thus cementing its future acceptance among the Catholic church. In his Dialogue against the Pelagians, Jerome makes a very intriguing reference to this passage, “In the Gospel according to John in many manuscripts, both Greek and Latin, is found the story of the adulterous woman who was accused before the Lord.”[14] This comment is very significant in considering the Pericope Adulterae, and would seem to stand as the strongest pro-Johannine evidence available. As Hodges points out[15], Jerome was well traveled, and would have had a wide exposure to both Greek and Latin texts, many of which were older than any that has survived to this day. Jerome’s statement should carry much more weight with modern New Testament textual scholars than it appears it does. Augustine goes even further than Jerome does in his commentary on the passage, acknowledging the already existing controversy over the passage and offering a reason for it’s removal from some manuscripts, “Certain persons of little faith, or rather enemies of true faith, fearing, I suppose, lest their wives should be given impunity in sinning, removed from their manuscripts the Lord’s act of forgiveness toward the adulteress, as if He who said ‘sin no more’ had granted permission to sin.” [16] While Augustine’s hermeneutical approach to the passage contains a common mistake (Jesus did not specifically forgive the adulterous woman), his observation is very relevant and offers an intriguing possible explanation for the manuscript problems (and textual variances) associated with this passage. Hodges further quotes Ambrose who makes a similar suggestion to Augustine’s – that the passage is a stumbling block. The contextual argument against this pericope is perhaps the easiest to answer. While many commentators have pointed out the “disruption” of the Feast of Tabernacles narrative that this pericope seems to effect, Allison Trites convincingly argues the opposite; the entire passage fits into the overall theme of controversy in John 1-12.[17] Other contextual clues could be seen to indicate the proper placement of this passage. For one, it would seem that the story is a great illustration of John 3:17, “For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.” (John 3:17, NIV) The Pericope can also be seen in a literary sense as a response to the question posed in John 7:26, “Here he is, speaking publicly, and they are not saying a word to him. Have the authorities really concluded that he is the Christ?” (John 7:26, NIV) While much has been made of the grammatical analysis of this pericope, specifically focusing on what is considered non Johannine grammar, there has been some grammatical work on the passage that offers different conclusions. Alan Johnson has used some of the existent grammatical statistical methods on other, non disputed passages of John, and concluded that some of those would be considered non Johannine based on the very same methodology used on the Pericope Adulterae. In addition, he also points out several grammatical features in this passage that are consistent with the rest of John, including the use of “de”, “touto” and “legein” [18] My own grammatical analysis of the passage has produced some interesting results, further casting doubt on the ability of statistical grammatical analysis to effectively determine canonicity and authorship questions. The phrase “meketi amartane” (no longer sin, or stop sinning) only occurs here in the pericope and in John 5:14, where Jesus likewise instructs the paralytic to stop sinning. “ina ecosin” (that they might) is a phrase found only in verse six, and John 17:13. “Kai palin” (and again) in verse 8 is found six other times in John but only once in Luke. Finally, the phrase “eis ten gen” (in the earth) from verse 6 is found 23 times in the New Testament, 5 are in John, and 12 are in Revelation – so of the 23 times that phrase is used, 17 times it is Johannine. That analysis might be used to impress upon some a level of certainty that John did write this passage, but in fact, in the final analysis it doesn’t add much to the argument one way or the other – except to possibly refute those who use statistical grammatical analysis to “prove” that this Pericope is non-Johannine. A thorough survey of the evidence reveals one thing quite clearly: the authorship and position of the Pericope Adulterae is not an easy issue to decide. It is perplexing and frustrating to see the certainty that is exhibited by many scholars on both sides of this issue. Bruce Metzger, Phillip Comfort, Kurt Aland, Raymond Brown, George Beasley-Murray, Leon Morris and many others all make absolute statements on the Pericope and point to overwhelming evidence that it is either non-canonical or non Johannine. Beasley-Murray goes so far as to write, “It is universally agreed by textual critics of the Greek NT that this passage was not part of the Fourth Gospel in its original form.”[19] What an outrageous and misleading statement! On the other hand, there are a few scholars (Elmer Towns, some scholars in the King James only camp, and several Dallas Theological Seminary professors) who are equally adamant that this passage is certainly genuine, and right where it belongs in the New Testament. The fact is that the best and most irrefutable evidence against the Johannine nature of the Pericope Adulterae is its lack of attestation in many of our earliest and best surviving manuscripts. When this manuscript evidence is considered in light of Jerome’s quote above on all of the Greek and Old Latin manuscripts he saw that contained the Pericope (and likely were older than most that we have now) we have a clear conundrum, one that cannot be fairly answered without new evidence coming to light. Thankfully, one thing is agreed upon by most N.T. scholars – this pericope is very old[20] and very likely to be an accurate event in the life of Jesus. Thus Metzger writes that John 7:53-8:11, “has all the earmarks of historical veracity”[21], and Raymond Brown writes, “There is nothing in the story itself, or its language that would forbid us to think of it as an early story concerning Jesus.”[22] If this Pericope is in fact a genuine event in the ministry of Jesus – how is it that it is absent in so many early Biblical texts? To put the issue another way, Phillip W. Comfort offers a list of suspect passages in the Textus Receptus, including the Pericope Adulterae. He challenges those who would argue for the inclusion of these questionable passages to, “come up with good arguments as to why scribes (in the early centuries) would have purposely excised these passages.”[23] Gary Burge proposes an interesting, though improvable suggestion that answers both questions: the Pericope Adulterae text was excised from some early manuscripts for theological reasons. Burge points to the unbiblical Doctrine of Penance, as articulated by early church fathers like Tertullian, Clement and Cyprian. Sexual sins in the eyes of many of the early church fathers were very grave, and in some cases unforgivable.[24] In light of that, it is conceivable that this passage was removed, under the impression that it was or too light on a sin, or in fear (As Augustine suggests above) that it would give others license to sin without fear of reprisal. It is also a possibility that the text is a real happening in the life of Jesus that never was put into the gospels because of the fear listed above (or for another reason – as John says, if everything Jesus did was written down, the world couldn’t contain the books!) A Deeper Look at the Text We now turn our attention back to the text itself, and from the perspective that it is a genuine happening, and is placed in the appropriate place in the text. Examining this passage in its literary context, we see that Jesus’ ministry, previously marked by amazing miracles and healings at the time of the adulterous pericope had become quite controversial. Jesus’ teachings were very challenging, and He even lost some disciples because of them. In the events leading up to the encounter, Jesus brothers urge Him to go the Feast of Tabernacles, and he temporarily declined, only to come later and begin to interact with the people. As He teaches, many people believe in Him, and many don’t – causing arguments and strife. The temple guards are sent to arrest Jesus, but they themselves become arrested by His words and fail to complete their job. The Pharisees and other religious leaders meet in anger, considering what to do and finding no solution. It is directly after this that the incident with the adulterous woman happens. The Old Testament, in Deuteronomy 22 states, “If a man is found sleeping with another man’s wife, both the man who slept with her and the woman must die.” (Deuteronomy 22:24, NIV) Leviticus 20 states similarly, “If a man commits adultery with another man’s wife—with the wife of his neighbor—both the adulterer and the adulteress must be put to death.” (Leviticus 20:10, NIV) These were the laws of Moses referred to in vs. 5 of this passage. Curiously, there is no mention of the man that was with the woman – this has led many to conclude that the situation was a set up from the beginning, (i.e. the woman was also “trapped”) The scribes and Pharisees, therefore, were wanting Jesus to rule on a case that was flawed from the beginning – they were asking Him to incompletely apply the law of Moses to this situation. This was merely another attempt by the religious leaders to put Jesus in a position where there is no good way out. A similar incident occurs in Matthew 22 (and the other Synoptics): Jesus is asked whether it is right to pay taxes to Caesar, if He answers yes, then the crowds would get angry with Him, if He answers no, then He risks making enemies of the Roman leaders. Also, Jesus uses the same technique against the religious leaders in Matthew 21 when asked who gave Him his authority, His return question, was John’s Baptism from heaven or not, could not be answered in such a way as to not cause the leaders problems. In this particular instance, if Jesus were to “rule” that the woman should be stoned, He would run afoul of Roman laws against mob violence[25] and if He let the woman off the hook, then He would be countermanding the Law of Moses. The response of Jesus to this dilemma, certainly knowing the religious leader’s hearts and motives, is very interesting: He merely stoops down and writes on the ground. Much ink has been wasted trying to determine what exactly it was that Jesus wrote in the ground. Beasley-Murray offers a good list of past suggestions: Was He writing out His decision in the case before verbally announcing it? Was he writing out a passage from Exodus that warns against supporting a wicked man as a malicious witness? Was He writing in the dust to remind the scribes of Jeremiah’s words, “Those who turn away from you will be written in the dust, because they have forsaken the Lord, the spring of living water.” (Jeremiah 17:13, NIV).[26] I prefer Raymond Brown’s proposal; that Jesus was merely doodling[27], possibly to consider how to handle the situation wisely, possibly in prayer. The fact is that what Jesus wrote has not been recorded, so it clearly was only an important issue for the exact time the incident took place, if even then. By suggesting that the one who is without sin cast the first stone, Jesus brilliantly defuses the situation. It’s very possible He could be referring to Deuteronomy 17, which prescribes that nobody should be put to death on the testimony of just one witness, and that the witnesses should be the first one to cast the stone. Is Jesus pointing to the possibility of the corruption of the witnesses here – understanding that the woman, though guilty, was caught in an elaborate set up, and thus invalidating the “prosecution’s” case against her, or is He articulating a more basic principle – if you are sinless you can participate in her stoning? This is a difficult question to answer; Stephen James argues somewhat convincingly that what Jesus means by “without sin” in this context is that their case must be presented without evil motives, and in accordance with the law of Moses (how many witnesses to the act were there, more than one? What of the man?) The religious leaders knew their motives weren’t correct, and therefore left the scene.[28] It is also important to point out here that in defusing the scene the way He did, Jesus did not abrogate the Law of Moses, nor did He completely uphold it – He chose a third, an option that leaves open the question of whether those laws were still applicable in His mind. The incident ends with Jesus challenging the woman to go and leave her life of sin. Modern and ancient preachers and commentators alike have written or preached that Jesus actually forgave the woman – this is not the case – Jesus did not explicitly forgive her as recorded in the text, He simply chose not to condemn her, and exhorted her to also stop sinning. Application If we accept the hypothesis that this Pericope is an accurate and genuine happening, then how does it apply today? Did it abolish the death penalty, as many have argued? Did it usher in an age of more leniency on sin? What sort of standard is Jesus setting for those who would be in a position to judge or pronounce punishment over another? While it is very important to not draw doctrine out of a narrative that doesn’t explicitly indicate doctrinal things, this text can still go beyond being a beautiful story of the mercy and wisdom of Jesus and find application in our modern setting. The first application to consider is what this story says about the death penalty, if anything. As Stephen James points out, many (including John Howard Yoder, Dwight Erricson, Lewis Smedes, G.H. Clark, Charles H. Milligan etc) have used this passage to argue for the abolishment of the death penalty.[29] A careful reading of the text will clearly show that Jesus does not abolish the death penalty, indeed, He doesn’t even address the issue. Thus, both opponents and proponents of capital punishment will need to look in other places to justify their beliefs. I believe the real modern application of this passage is found in Jesus’ challenge to the religious leaders, “If any one of you is without sin, let him be the first to throw a stone at her.” (John 8:7 NIV) There seems to be a profound connection to this principle and the plank-eye principle that Jesus articulates in Luke 6 – in order to help remove the speck from your brother’s eye, you must first remove the plank from your own. The principle is this, that we should judge and purify ourselves, worrying less about the bad things we see in other people – until our own issues are dealt with – then we will see clearly to help others out. The principle is not advocating merely minding your own business – it is advocating personal holiness that can lead to corporate holiness when we help and challenge each other in right heart and attitude. The Pharisees and scribes were not at all interested in the principle behind the Mosaic laws they were urging Jesus to rule on (i.e. purge the evil from among you), they were just interested in accomplishing their own agendas. The church today cries out for those who would walk in holiness and near the heart of God to the point where we can see clearly enough to help our brothers out with the specks in their eyes, and we can pass judgments rightly. Conclusion An objective look at the Pericope Adulterae, its context, its grammar and its manuscript history leads one to the conclusion that this passage has been rightly seen as controversial through the ages. There is not the kind of overwhelming evidence that is needed for dogmatic statements regarding the authorship and canonicity of John 7:53-8:11 either for or against. There is substantial evidence, however, to demonstrate that this text represents a genuine and accurate event in the life of Jesus, and as such it can inform the modern believer about the nature of Jesus and the importance of holiness in the realm of judgment. [1] Somewhat awkward, but not completely out of place – see below. [2] Some scholars point out that Jesus sitting and teaching is a common feature of the Synoptic Gospels, and cite it as further proof of the Non-Johannine authorship of the Pericope – see John 6:3, however for another instance of Jesus sitting down among the people. Borchert, Gerald The New American Commentary Volume 25A: John 1-11. (electronic edition) Logos LibrarySystem (Nashville: Broadman Press, 1996) [3] For a full list of the major Greek manuscripts that omit this pericope, see: Metzger, Bruce M. A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament, Second Ed. (New York: Oxford, 1992.), 219-220 [4] Brown, Raymond E. John 1-11. Anchor Bible 29. Garden City: Doubleday, 1982, 335 [5] Metzger, Bruce M. The Text of the New Testament – Its Transmission, Corruption and Restoration, Third Ed. (New York: Oxford, 1992.), 50 [6] The Text of the New Testament – Its Transmission, Corruption and Restoration p. xxix [7] Burge, Gary M. “A Specific Problem In The New Testament Text And Canon: The Woman Caught In Adultery (John 7:53-8:11)” (Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 27 no.2), 144 [8] “A Specific Problem In The New Testament Text And Canon: The Woman Caught In Adultery (John 7:53-8:11)” 142 [9] Hodges, Zane C. “Problem Passages in the Gospel of John Part 8: The Woman Taken in Adultery (John 7:53-8:11)” (Bibliotheca Sacra 136 no. 544 (October, 1979), 329 [10] Poythress, Vern S. “Testing for Johannine Authorship by Examining the Use of Conjunctions” (Westminster Theological Journal 46, no. 2 Fall 1984), 362 [11] Bryant, Beauford H. and Krause, Mark S. John. The College Press NIV Commentary. (Joplin: College Press, 1998) [12] Borchert, Gerald – John 1-11 The New American Commentary. (Nashville: Broadman Press, 1996) [13] “Problem Passages in the Gospel of John Part 8: The Woman Taken in Adultery (John 7:53-8:11)” 323 [14] As quoted in “Problem Passages in the Gospel of John Part 8: The Woman Taken in Adultery (John 7:53-8:11)” 330 [15] “Problem Passages in the Gospel of John Part 8: The Woman Taken in Adultery (John 7:53-8:11)” 330 [16] As quoted in “Problem Passages in the Gospel of John Part 8: The Woman Taken in Adultery (John 7:53-8:11)” 331 [17] Trites, Allison A. “The Woman Taken in Adultery” (Bibliotheca Sacra 131 no. 522 April, 1974) 138-144 [18] Johnson, Alan F. “A Stylistic Trait of the Fourth Gospel in the Pericope Adulterae” Bulletin of the Evangelical Theological Society (IX Spring, 1966) 91-96 [19] Beasley-Murray, George R. The Gospel according to John The Word Biblical Commentary. (Dallas: Word Incorporated, 1999.) [20] Raymond Brown quotes Eusebius, who in turn quotes Papias writing near the time of the Apostles about a woman who was brought before Jesus accused of many sins. Brown also mentions the 3rd century Syrian Didascalia Apostolorum, which gives clear reference to the events of the Pericope Adulterae which indicates that 2nd century Syria knew of the narrative. John 1-11, p. 335 [21] Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament, p. 220 [22] John 1-11, p. 335 [23] Comfort, Phillip W. Encountering the Manuscripts (Nashville: Broadman and Holman, 2005) p.99 [24] “A Specific Problem In The New Testament Text And Canon: The Woman Caught In Adultery (John 7:53-8:11)” pages 146-148 [25] John 1-11 The New American Commentary [26] The Gospel according to John The Word Biblical Commentary [27] John 1-11. Anchor Bible 29 p. 334 [28] James, Stephen A. “The Adulteress And The Death Penalty.” (Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 22 no. 1 March, 1979) pages 49-50. [29] “The Adulteress And The Death Penalty.” Pages 45-46
Happy Shelter in Place Day, Friends! I find myself living in the part of Central California right now that has been essentially shut down for the next 22 days, and our Shelter in Place order just went into effect about an hour ago. These are strange, strange times! So – sometimes people ask me how it’s going doing a daily podcast. I can tell you that each episode takes just a little under 3 hours from start to finish, which includes writing the episode, recording it, editing it in Audacity, and entering all of the pertinent information into a WordPress and Libsyn post. Longer episodes take longer, shorter episodes can be around 2 hours of time. Last night was one of the later nights for the show. One of my daughters wanted to watch a show with me, and I’ll take just about any excuse I can to spend time with them, so we watched a show together, which began after midnight. Then I wrote a fairly long pastoral email to the congregation of the church I pastor about the coronavirus pandemic. When I say fairly long, I mean over 1800 words, so about 6 pages worth. We’re in California, and on a virtual lock-down, so hopefully they had a little extra time to read. One of the problems being in a church that is pastored by somebody who fancies himself as a writer is that you can get very long emails from time to time. If you are a leader at the church I pastor, you got a 2100 word email from me AND an 1800 word email from me within the space of 4 days. I should repent in sackcloth and ashes for that, I suppose, but these are trying times we live in right now, filled with dangers like novel viruses, lack of toilet paper, and novel-length emails from pastors. ANYWAY, the point of what I was trying to say earlier before I rambled was that I didn’t start WRITING the podcast until around 3AM. Fortunately, I had some great material from pastor David Platt to use, so I didn’t have to write a ton of original material myself. It was, however, one of the few times since I began this daily podcast in January that I kind of just wanted to go to bed, and not spend 2 hours or so on a podcast. HOWEVER – when I got to the point of recording it, and I got to the part where I was just reading the Scriptures into the microphone, that’s when I noticed something that happens practically every time I do the podcast: THE WORD OF GOD ENCOURAGED ME. It gave me HOPE. It built me up. It elevated my mood. Almost every time I record this show, I come away encouraged. Not because I like recording and editing a podcast – that can get a little tedious…but because the WORD of God is powerful, and supernatural, and it just builds me up in faith, because faith comes by HEARING THE WORD OF GOD. I just wanted to share that with you as a benefit. You can get that same benefit – without the 2-3 hours of writing, recording and editing by simply READING (or listening!) to the WORD OF GOD! If you haven’t done so yet, allow me to encourage you to listen to the other half of today’s episode – episode #78 – I split today’s show into two parts so it wouldn’t be too long. In today’s reading, we encounter the story of the woman caught in adultery, known to scholars as the Pericope Adulterae. Many scholars, including many evangelical ones, consider this passage to be a later edition to the New Testament, and in most modern Bibles, this part of John is set apart to show doubt about the passage. So – what’s going on here, and was this story original to John’s Gospel, or was it a later edition? The Pericope Adulterae, found in John 7:53-8:11, is surrounded by more controversy and conjecture than any other New Testament Passage with the possible exception of the ending of Mark. The authorship and placement of this pericope has been hotly debated at least since the fifth century, and there are still scholars lined up on opposite sides of the issues surrounding this passage. Attempting to extract meaning and application from this passage is almost meaningless without first wrestling with the genuineness of the text and the mass of evidence for and against it. The issue is simple to grasp – if this pericope is a genuine and accurate happening in the life of Jesus, then it carries just as much weight as the rest of the New Testament. Conversely, if the passage is a later edition with no basis in fact (i.e. it never happened) then the passage is notable only for its historical value and the question of how it became inserted into many manuscripts of the New Testament. Though it will be argued that there is no way to be certain of the historicity of this passage, the preponderance of the evidence points to it being a genuine happening in the life of Jesus, and as such it does have application in the modern church and it can inform how we live and interact with each other. Summary of the Passage 7:53-8:2 The Pericope Adulterae begins with a somewhat awkward[1] transition from the previous narrative. The stage is set here; Jesus has spent the night at the Mount of Olives and dawn finds Him mingling with the crowd near the temple courts. His very presence attracts a crowd and notably (for the fourth Gospel)[2] Jesus sits down to teach them. 8:3-8:6a As Jesus is teaching the people, The scribes and Pharisees bring in a woman and stand her in front of the crowd. They explain to Jesus that the woman was caught in the act of committing adultery, and (on the surface) they present her to Jesus for judgment. The question is, should the woman be stoned in accordance with the law of Moses? The text informs us that this question is a trap for Jesus, a classic catch 22, there is no clear way that Jesus can give a verdict here without opening Himself up to some basis for accusation, either in the eyes of the Roman authorities, or the people. 8:6b-8:9 Perplexingly, Jesus doesn’t answer their questions immediately, indeed, He never gives them the verdict. Instead, He leans over and writes on the ground. The accusers persist in their questioning, and Jesus finally responds with His classic retort, challenging any one of the accusers without sin to be the one that casts the first stone. Though we don’t know how much time passed after Jesus’ challenge, one can almost be assured of an awkward silence, punctuated by occasional stones hitting the soft earth as they fall from the hands of the accusers. Beginning with the eldest among them, the scribes and Pharisees melt away into the crowd. 8:10-8:11 Jesus and the accused woman are left as the center of attention. He initiates dialogue her, asking the obvious questions – where is everybody? Is no one left to condemn? Upon her acknowledgment that they have all left, Jesus also refuses to condemn the woman, but warns her to leave behind her life of sin. Controversy and Canonicity: Contra Johannine This Pericope is a wonderful piece of literature; very moving and dramatic. Jesus cleverly meets the challenge of the scribes and Pharisees without compromising and without falling into a trap, and the woman caught in sin is given a second chance to repent. It’s a powerful story, but is it genuine? Did it really happen? If it did really happen, why is there so much evidence against it being an original part of the gospel of John? A survey of the evidence for and against genuineness is presented below. The majority of New Testament scholars are fairly adamant that the Pericope Adulterae is non-Johannine in origin. The ancient manuscript evidence is indeed stacked against this Pericope. Bruce Metzger points out that all major early Greek manuscripts omit the Pericope, including our oldest and most respected early manuscripts, Codex Sinaiticus, Codex Vaticanus, p66 and p75.[3] Though some Old Latin manuscripts include the Pericope, many omit it as well, and the early Syriac, and Coptic manuscripts do not contain the passage[4]. Codex Bezae is the only major Greek manuscript prior to the 8th century that this pericope appears in, and Bezae is known for its many interpolations. In fact, Metzger states, “No other manuscript has so many and such remarkable variations from what is usually taken to be the New Testament Text. Codex Bezae’s special characteristic is the free addition (and occasional omission) of words, sentences and even incidences.”[5] Further manuscript evidence against the Johannine nature of the Pericope is the variety of places it is attached in some of the manuscripts that do contain it. In some manuscripts, it appears after John 7:36, in some after John 7:44, some as an addition at the end of John’s gospel, some after Luke 21:28, and some even after Luke 24:53.[6] Though the number of manuscripts that displace this pericope is not overwhelming, the mere fact of its varied appearance in even a few manuscripts tends to cast doubt on the concreteness of its location after John 7:52. The final bit of manuscript evidence is the unusually high number of textual variants found in the manuscripts that do contain the pericope. Gary Burge points out that line per line, these twelve verses contain more textual variants across the manuscript tradition than almost any other passage of scripture. [7] There is also much patristic evidence, especially in the east, stacked against the passage. This pericope is not mentioned by any Greek Father until Euthymius Zigabenus in the 12th century and isn’t found in the writings of the early Fathers in the west either. Thus, it is omitted by Origen, Clement, Cyprian, Irenaeus, Tertullian, Cyril and Chrysostom,[8] even in writings where it would seem to be an appropriate resource for them to use. While Zane Hodges tries to make the case that the absence of the Pericope in these church fathers constitutes an argument from silence, and thus proves nothing[9], the fact of the matter is that this is more empirical evidence stacked against the pericope, and it adds weight to the non-Johannine argument. While the manuscript evidence would seem to be the greatest evidence against the Pericope, there are also suspicious grammatical and contextual features of the text. Statistical analysis of the text has claimed to show several features which “prove” its non Johannine nature. Vern Poythress has examined the grammatical use of the conjunctions “de”, “oun”, “kai”, and “asyndeton” in the Gospel of John, and developed some general rules that John appears to follow. Upon examination of the adulteress pericope, it would appear that there are enough variations in its use of conjunctions (compared with the rest of John) to allow Poythress to conclude that this Pericope is not written by John.[10] Further grammatical evidence focuses on the words that are used in the passage. Bryant and Krause point out that approximately nine percent, or 15 of the words used in this pericope do not occur elsewhere in the gospel, the highest percentage for a passage of this size in John[11]. The Mount of Olives, The scribes, and the phrase “early morning” are not found anywhere else in the gospel of John, but all are somewhat common in the synoptic gospels. In addition, only here in John is Jesus addressed as teacher. While some of these unique words can be explained by the nature of the story, as well as the semi-technical judicial language employed, there are still a high frequency of unique words and constructs here compared with the rest of John. Finally, there is contextual evidence that seems to indicate this pericope is out of place. Borchert[12] and many others believe that the text disrupts the flow of the Feast of Tabernacles narrative. Many point out its similarity in time and setting to Luke 21:37-38, and (as mentioned above) some manuscripts place the passage right after verse 38 because it seems to be a better fit. It is also true that the flow of the text from 7:52 to 8:12 is smooth and uninterrupted when this passage is removed, but of course, that could be said of many passages! Controversy and Canonicity: Pro Johannine Most scholars believe the evidence against the Pericope Adulterae is overwhelming, but there is much positive evidence for the ancientness of this event, and even some evidence that would seem to indicate the text is Johannine and not at all out of place. The strongest evidence for the veracity and Johannine nature of the Pericope comes from the manuscripts and church fathers of the west. Several Old Latin manuscripts do in fact contain the Pericope. Hodges argues valiantly that the absence of the passage in our earliest and most reliable manuscripts (Sinaiticus, Vaticanus, p66 and p75) is due to those manuscripts being of a proto-Alexandrian origin, and thus likely coming from the same (ancient) exemplar, one which had the passage intentionally excised.[13] He posits that the Pericope was removed from some texts very early (before 200), but that the passage was quite possibly in the original autograph. The Patristic evidence for the Pericope is surprisingly strong in the west. Several church fathers in the fourth and fifth century mention the text, beginning with Pacian of Barcelona, and including Ambrose, Ambrosiaster, Jerome and Augustine. Jerome and Augustine in particular add much to the pro Johannine side of the argument, providing significant ancient evidence and speculation on the passage. Jerome includes the Pericope Adulterae in his Latin Vulgate translation of the scriptures, thus cementing its future acceptance among the Catholic church. In his Dialogue against the Pelagians, Jerome makes a very intriguing reference to this passage, “In the Gospel according to John in many manuscripts, both Greek and Latin, is found the story of the adulterous woman who was accused before the Lord.”[14] This comment is very significant in considering the Pericope Adulterae, and would seem to stand as the strongest pro-Johannine evidence available. As Hodges points out[15], Jerome was well traveled, and would have had a wide exposure to both Greek and Latin texts, many of which were older than any that has survived to this day. Jerome’s statement should carry much more weight with modern New Testament textual scholars than it appears it does. Augustine goes even further than Jerome does in his commentary on the passage, acknowledging the already existing controversy over the passage and offering a reason for it’s removal from some manuscripts, “Certain persons of little faith, or rather enemies of true faith, fearing, I suppose, lest their wives should be given impunity in sinning, removed from their manuscripts the Lord’s act of forgiveness toward the adulteress, as if He who said ‘sin no more’ had granted permission to sin.” [16] While Augustine’s hermeneutical approach to the passage contains a common mistake (Jesus did not specifically forgive the adulterous woman), his observation is very relevant and offers an intriguing possible explanation for the manuscript problems (and textual variances) associated with this passage. Hodges further quotes Ambrose who makes a similar suggestion to Augustine’s – that the passage is a stumbling block. The contextual argument against this pericope is perhaps the easiest to answer. While many commentators have pointed out the “disruption” of the Feast of Tabernacles narrative that this pericope seems to effect, Allison Trites convincingly argues the opposite; the entire passage fits into the overall theme of controversy in John 1-12.[17] Other contextual clues could be seen to indicate the proper placement of this passage. For one, it would seem that the story is a great illustration of John 3:17, “For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.” (John 3:17, NIV) The Pericope can also be seen in a literary sense as a response to the question posed in John 7:26, “Here he is, speaking publicly, and they are not saying a word to him. Have the authorities really concluded that he is the Christ?” (John 7:26, NIV) While much has been made of the grammatical analysis of this pericope, specifically focusing on what is considered non Johannine grammar, there has been some grammatical work on the passage that offers different conclusions. Alan Johnson has used some of the existent grammatical statistical methods on other, non disputed passages of John, and concluded that some of those would be considered non Johannine based on the very same methodology used on the Pericope Adulterae. In addition, he also points out several grammatical features in this passage that are consistent with the rest of John, including the use of “de”, “touto” and “legein” [18] My own grammatical analysis of the passage has produced some interesting results, further casting doubt on the ability of statistical grammatical analysis to effectively determine canonicity and authorship questions. The phrase “meketi amartane” (no longer sin, or stop sinning) only occurs here in the pericope and in John 5:14, where Jesus likewise instructs the paralytic to stop sinning. “ina ecosin” (that they might) is a phrase found only in verse six, and John 17:13. “Kai palin” (and again) in verse 8 is found six other times in John but only once in Luke. Finally, the phrase “eis ten gen” (in the earth) from verse 6 is found 23 times in the New Testament, 5 are in John, and 12 are in Revelation – so of the 23 times that phrase is used, 17 times it is Johannine. That analysis might be used to impress upon some a level of certainty that John did write this passage, but in fact, in the final analysis it doesn’t add much to the argument one way or the other – except to possibly refute those who use statistical grammatical analysis to “prove” that this Pericope is non-Johannine. A thorough survey of the evidence reveals one thing quite clearly: the authorship and position of the Pericope Adulterae is not an easy issue to decide. It is perplexing and frustrating to see the certainty that is exhibited by many scholars on both sides of this issue. Bruce Metzger, Phillip Comfort, Kurt Aland, Raymond Brown, George Beasley-Murray, Leon Morris and many others all make absolute statements on the Pericope and point to overwhelming evidence that it is either non-canonical or non Johannine. Beasley-Murray goes so far as to write, “It is universally agreed by textual critics of the Greek NT that this passage was not part of the Fourth Gospel in its original form.”[19] What an outrageous and misleading statement! On the other hand, there are a few scholars (Elmer Towns, some scholars in the King James only camp, and several Dallas Theological Seminary professors) who are equally adamant that this passage is certainly genuine, and right where it belongs in the New Testament. The fact is that the best and most irrefutable evidence against the Johannine nature of the Pericope Adulterae is its lack of attestation in many of our earliest and best surviving manuscripts. When this manuscript evidence is considered in light of Jerome’s quote above on all of the Greek and Old Latin manuscripts he saw that contained the Pericope (and likely were older than most that we have now) we have a clear conundrum, one that cannot be fairly answered without new evidence coming to light. Thankfully, one thing is agreed upon by most N.T. scholars – this pericope is very old[20] and very likely to be an accurate event in the life of Jesus. Thus Metzger writes that John 7:53-8:11, “has all the earmarks of historical veracity”[21], and Raymond Brown writes, “There is nothing in the story itself, or its language that would forbid us to think of it as an early story concerning Jesus.”[22] If this Pericope is in fact a genuine event in the ministry of Jesus – how is it that it is absent in so many early Biblical texts? To put the issue another way, Phillip W. Comfort offers a list of suspect passages in the Textus Receptus, including the Pericope Adulterae. He challenges those who would argue for the inclusion of these questionable passages to, “come up with good arguments as to why scribes (in the early centuries) would have purposely excised these passages.”[23] Gary Burge proposes an interesting, though improvable suggestion that answers both questions: the Pericope Adulterae text was excised from some early manuscripts for theological reasons. Burge points to the unbiblical Doctrine of Penance, as articulated by early church fathers like Tertullian, Clement and Cyprian. Sexual sins in the eyes of many of the early church fathers were very grave, and in some cases unforgivable.[24] In light of that, it is conceivable that this passage was removed, under the impression that it was or too light on a sin, or in fear (As Augustine suggests above) that it would give others license to sin without fear of reprisal. It is also a possibility that the text is a real happening in the life of Jesus that never was put into the gospels because of the fear listed above (or for another reason – as John says, if everything Jesus did was written down, the world couldn’t contain the books!) A Deeper Look at the Text We now turn our attention back to the text itself, and from the perspective that it is a genuine happening, and is placed in the appropriate place in the text. Examining this passage in its literary context, we see that Jesus’ ministry, previously marked by amazing miracles and healings at the time of the adulterous pericope had become quite controversial. Jesus’ teachings were very challenging, and He even lost some disciples because of them. In the events leading up to the encounter, Jesus brothers urge Him to go the Feast of Tabernacles, and he temporarily declined, only to come later and begin to interact with the people. As He teaches, many people believe in Him, and many don’t – causing arguments and strife. The temple guards are sent to arrest Jesus, but they themselves become arrested by His words and fail to complete their job. The Pharisees and other religious leaders meet in anger, considering what to do and finding no solution. It is directly after this that the incident with the adulterous woman happens. The Old Testament, in Deuteronomy 22 states, “If a man is found sleeping with another man’s wife, both the man who slept with her and the woman must die.” (Deuteronomy 22:24, NIV) Leviticus 20 states similarly, “If a man commits adultery with another man’s wife—with the wife of his neighbor—both the adulterer and the adulteress must be put to death.” (Leviticus 20:10, NIV) These were the laws of Moses referred to in vs. 5 of this passage. Curiously, there is no mention of the man that was with the woman – this has led many to conclude that the situation was a set up from the beginning, (i.e. the woman was also “trapped”) The scribes and Pharisees, therefore, were wanting Jesus to rule on a case that was flawed from the beginning – they were asking Him to incompletely apply the law of Moses to this situation. This was merely another attempt by the religious leaders to put Jesus in a position where there is no good way out. A similar incident occurs in Matthew 22 (and the other Synoptics): Jesus is asked whether it is right to pay taxes to Caesar, if He answers yes, then the crowds would get angry with Him, if He answers no, then He risks making enemies of the Roman leaders. Also, Jesus uses the same technique against the religious leaders in Matthew 21 when asked who gave Him his authority, His return question, was John’s Baptism from heaven or not, could not be answered in such a way as to not cause the leaders problems. In this particular instance, if Jesus were to “rule” that the woman should be stoned, He would run afoul of Roman laws against mob violence[25] and if He let the woman off the hook, then He would be countermanding the Law of Moses. The response of Jesus to this dilemma, certainly knowing the religious leader’s hearts and motives, is very interesting: He merely stoops down and writes on the ground. Much ink has been wasted trying to determine what exactly it was that Jesus wrote in the ground. Beasley-Murray offers a good list of past suggestions: Was He writing out His decision in the case before verbally announcing it? Was he writing out a passage from Exodus that warns against supporting a wicked man as a malicious witness? Was He writing in the dust to remind the scribes of Jeremiah’s words, “Those who turn away from you will be written in the dust, because they have forsaken the Lord, the spring of living water.” (Jeremiah 17:13, NIV).[26] I prefer Raymond Brown’s proposal; that Jesus was merely doodling[27], possibly to consider how to handle the situation wisely, possibly in prayer. The fact is that what Jesus wrote has not been recorded, so it clearly was only an important issue for the exact time the incident took place, if even then. By suggesting that the one who is without sin cast the first stone, Jesus brilliantly defuses the situation. It’s very possible He could be referring to Deuteronomy 17, which prescribes that nobody should be put to death on the testimony of just one witness, and that the witnesses should be the first one to cast the stone. Is Jesus pointing to the possibility of the corruption of the witnesses here – understanding that the woman, though guilty, was caught in an elaborate set up, and thus invalidating the “prosecution’s” case against her, or is He articulating a more basic principle – if you are sinless you can participate in her stoning? This is a difficult question to answer; Stephen James argues somewhat convincingly that what Jesus means by “without sin” in this context is that their case must be presented without evil motives, and in accordance with the law of Moses (how many witnesses to the act were there, more than one? What of the man?) The religious leaders knew their motives weren’t correct, and therefore left the scene.[28] It is also important to point out here that in defusing the scene the way He did, Jesus did not abrogate the Law of Moses, nor did He completely uphold it – He chose a third, an option that leaves open the question of whether those laws were still applicable in His mind. The incident ends with Jesus challenging the woman to go and leave her life of sin. Modern and ancient preachers and commentators alike have written or preached that Jesus actually forgave the woman – this is not the case – Jesus did not explicitly forgive her as recorded in the text, He simply chose not to condemn her, and exhorted her to also stop sinning. Application If we accept the hypothesis that this Pericope is an accurate and genuine happening, then how does it apply today? Did it abolish the death penalty, as many have argued? Did it usher in an age of more leniency on sin? What sort of standard is Jesus setting for those who would be in a position to judge or pronounce punishment over another? While it is very important to not draw doctrine out of a narrative that doesn’t explicitly indicate doctrinal things, this text can still go beyond being a beautiful story of the mercy and wisdom of Jesus and find application in our modern setting. The first application to consider is what this story says about the death penalty, if anything. As Stephen James points out, many (including John Howard Yoder, Dwight Erricson, Lewis Smedes, G.H. Clark, Charles H. Milligan etc) have used this passage to argue for the abolishment of the death penalty.[29] A careful reading of the text will clearly show that Jesus does not abolish the death penalty, indeed, He doesn’t even address the issue. Thus, both opponents and proponents of capital punishment will need to look in other places to justify their beliefs. I believe the real modern application of this passage is found in Jesus’ challenge to the religious leaders, “If any one of you is without sin, let him be the first to throw a stone at her.” (John 8:7 NIV) There seems to be a profound connection to this principle and the plank-eye principle that Jesus articulates in Luke 6 – in order to help remove the speck from your brother’s eye, you must first remove the plank from your own. The principle is this, that we should judge and purify ourselves, worrying less about the bad things we see in other people – until our own issues are dealt with – then we will see clearly to help others out. The principle is not advocating merely minding your own business – it is advocating personal holiness that can lead to corporate holiness when we help and challenge each other in right heart and attitude. The Pharisees and scribes were not at all interested in the principle behind the Mosaic laws they were urging Jesus to rule on (i.e. purge the evil from among you), they were just interested in accomplishing their own agendas. The church today cries out for those who would walk in holiness and near the heart of God to the point where we can see clearly enough to help our brothers out with the specks in their eyes, and we can pass judgments rightly. Conclusion An objective look at the Pericope Adulterae, its context, its grammar and its manuscript history leads one to the conclusion that this passage has been rightly seen as controversial through the ages. There is not the kind of overwhelming evidence that is needed for dogmatic statements regarding the authorship and canonicity of John 7:53-8:11 either for or against. There is substantial evidence, however, to demonstrate that this text represents a genuine and accurate event in the life of Jesus, and as such it can inform the modern believer about the nature of Jesus and the importance of holiness in the realm of judgment. [1] Somewhat awkward, but not completely out of place – see below. [2] Some scholars point out that Jesus sitting and teaching is a common feature of the Synoptic Gospels, and cite it as further proof of the Non-Johannine authorship of the Pericope – see John 6:3, however for another instance of Jesus sitting down among the people. Borchert, Gerald The New American Commentary Volume 25A: John 1-11. (electronic edition) Logos LibrarySystem (Nashville: Broadman Press, 1996) [3] For a full list of the major Greek manuscripts that omit this pericope, see: Metzger, Bruce M. A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament, Second Ed. (New York: Oxford, 1992.), 219-220 [4] Brown, Raymond E. John 1-11. Anchor Bible 29. Garden City: Doubleday, 1982, 335 [5] Metzger, Bruce M. The Text of the New Testament – Its Transmission, Corruption and Restoration, Third Ed. (New York: Oxford, 1992.), 50 [6] The Text of the New Testament – Its Transmission, Corruption and Restoration p. xxix [7] Burge, Gary M. “A Specific Problem In The New Testament Text And Canon: The Woman Caught In Adultery (John 7:53-8:11)” (Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 27 no.2), 144 [8] “A Specific Problem In The New Testament Text And Canon: The Woman Caught In Adultery (John 7:53-8:11)” 142 [9] Hodges, Zane C. “Problem Passages in the Gospel of John Part 8: The Woman Taken in Adultery (John 7:53-8:11)” (Bibliotheca Sacra 136 no. 544 (October, 1979), 329 [10] Poythress, Vern S. “Testing for Johannine Authorship by Examining the Use of Conjunctions” (Westminster Theological Journal 46, no. 2 Fall 1984), 362 [11] Bryant, Beauford H. and Krause, Mark S. John. The College Press NIV Commentary. (Joplin: College Press, 1998) [12] Borchert, Gerald – John 1-11 The New American Commentary. (Nashville: Broadman Press, 1996) [13] “Problem Passages in the Gospel of John Part 8: The Woman Taken in Adultery (John 7:53-8:11)” 323 [14] As quoted in “Problem Passages in the Gospel of John Part 8: The Woman Taken in Adultery (John 7:53-8:11)” 330 [15] “Problem Passages in the Gospel of John Part 8: The Woman Taken in Adultery (John 7:53-8:11)” 330 [16] As quoted in “Problem Passages in the Gospel of John Part 8: The Woman Taken in Adultery (John 7:53-8:11)” 331 [17] Trites, Allison A. “The Woman Taken in Adultery” (Bibliotheca Sacra 131 no. 522 April, 1974) 138-144 [18] Johnson, Alan F. “A Stylistic Trait of the Fourth Gospel in the Pericope Adulterae” Bulletin of the Evangelical Theological Society (IX Spring, 1966) 91-96 [19] Beasley-Murray, George R. The Gospel according to John The Word Biblical Commentary. (Dallas: Word Incorporated, 1999.) [20] Raymond Brown quotes Eusebius, who in turn quotes Papias writing near the time of the Apostles about a woman who was brought before Jesus accused of many sins. Brown also mentions the 3rd century Syrian Didascalia Apostolorum, which gives clear reference to the events of the Pericope Adulterae which indicates that 2nd century Syria knew of the narrative. John 1-11, p. 335 [21] Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament, p. 220 [22] John 1-11, p. 335 [23] Comfort, Phillip W. Encountering the Manuscripts (Nashville: Broadman and Holman, 2005) p.99 [24] “A Specific Problem In The New Testament Text And Canon: The Woman Caught In Adultery (John 7:53-8:11)” pages 146-148 [25] John 1-11 The New American Commentary [26] The Gospel according to John The Word Biblical Commentary [27] John 1-11. Anchor Bible 29 p. 334 [28] James, Stephen A. “The Adulteress And The Death Penalty.” (Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 22 no. 1 March, 1979) pages 49-50. [29] “The Adulteress And The Death Penalty.” Pages 45-46
Gary Michael Heidnik was an American murderer who kidnapped, tortured, and raped six women, killing two of them, while holding them prisoner in a pit in his basement in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Heidnik was sentenced to death and executed by lethal injection in July 1999. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_M._Heidnik https://allthatsinteresting.com/gary-heidnik --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/ivis/message
It's heavy hitters month! We continue with the guy that dreamed of having a dungeon of sex slaves. And half achieved it. All because he fell on his head. Or was it? Maja's pointless recommendation of the week, if you're up for chasing what Florida men are up to: www.esquire.com/news-politics/a26…n-headlines-2019/ If you’re into the visuals, plus watching me eat last meals : https://youtu.be/Ths3p6a4XZ4 Follow me on Twitter and check out the Patreon page for bonus content - 2 February episodes are already out: twitter.com/thatbamnpod www.patreon.com/thatbamnpod Hit me up with your thoughts and motives behind famous crimes : podbamn@gmail.com Intro and background music by https://www.fesliyanstudios.com Sources: The Ohio connection podcast https://anchor.fm/ohioconnection/episodes/The-Dungeon-Master-e9b6nm Redhanded podcast https://play.acast.com/s/redhanded/99095c8b-22e3-47c0-846a-6cb6a65758bd Allthatsinteresting https://allthatsinteresting.com/gary-heidnik The inquirer https://www.inquirer.com/philly/blogs/entertainment/Philly-woman-recalls-her-terrifying-Silence-of-the-Lambs-past-for-the-first-time.html Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_M._Heidnik Murderpedia https://murderpedia.org/male.H/h1/heidnik-gary.htm
In this episode, Brian and Emma look more into Kenneth McDuff the 'Broomstick Killer'. This unrepentant killer was born and raised bad, so let's see what it lead him to do to at least three teenagers and possibly many more. Want to get in touch with us? For work related inquires and suggestions for the show: murdermirthmonsters@gmail.com Twitter: @MirthAndMurder Sources for this episode: https://www.texasmonthly.com/articles/free-to-kill-2/ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_McDuff Lavergne, Gary M. Bad Boy from Rosebud: the Murderous Life of Kenneth Allen McDuff. University of North Texas Press, 2013.
Austin, TX - On August 1, 1966 a lone man with a rifle held an entire city hostage for 96 minutes. We tell the story of our nation's first mass shooting, ponder nature vs nurture, and hash out the legal what-if's. Then we, I dunno, hug some puppies or something, cuz lawd this one is dark.----more----Sources:Lavergne, Gary M. "A Sniper In The Tower: the Charles Whitman Murders"Denton, TX 1997Colloff, Pamela. "96 Minutes", Texas Monthly, August 2006Rosenwald, Michael. "'He was looking straight at me': The brave officer who helped stop Charles Whitman", Washington Post, August 1, 2016KTBC FOX 7 Austin. "UT Tower Shooting Video | Austin, TX 1966" Youtube. August 1, 2016
A roundtable of panelists from the 2019 AUA Residents Forum discuss career paths and opportunities in urology outside of academic or hospital-based practice. Speakers on this panel include: Joseph N. Macaluso, Jr., MD, FACS, Gary M. Kirsh, MD and Aseem R. Shukla, MD.
Gary M. DuBoff says he’s very big on paying quarterly tax estimates on time. For many years, he kept a spreadsheet of everything that he spent money on, including coffee. After a year, he says, you may discover that you spend $1,200 on coffee. When it comes to retirement savings, DuBoff, a certified public accountant and a principal at Morrison, Brown, Argiz & Farra in its New York City office, says if you have an employer, be sure to know about all the benefits offered and take advantage of them. In this episode of Asked and Answered, Stephanie Francis Ward talks to DuBoff about how to live within your means, how to figure out your set costs, and how to budget with what’s left over. Special thanks to our sponsor, LawPay.
Gary M. DuBoff says he’s very big on paying quarterly tax estimates on time. For many years, he kept a spreadsheet of everything that he spent money on, including coffee. After a year, he says, you may discover that you spend $1,200 on coffee. When it comes to retirement savings, DuBoff, a certified public accountant and a principal at Morrison, Brown, Argiz & Farra in its New York City office, says if you have an employer, be sure to know about all the benefits offered and take advantage of them. In this episode of Asked and Answered, Stephanie Francis Ward talks to DuBoff about how to live within your means, how to figure out your set costs, and how to budget with what’s left over. Special thanks to our sponsor, LawPay.
Dr. Sabrina interviews Sir Steven Wilkinson founder of Good and Prosper, and co-founder of the Small Giants Community. Sir Steven believes there is a role that is hidden on our organizational charts, and taking a 4 Week Vacation is the first step to revealing that role. Sir Steven applies his love of poetry and literature to helping entrepreneurs become curious about the story their balance sheet is telling. He has developed a system for calculating the share price of a small business, which in turn becomes a tool the owner can use to drive the value of the business. Sir Steven concludes the interview revealing the startling distinction of small businesses outperforming their industry peers. Sir Steven Wilkinson is the VIP Speaker at the 2020 Breakthroughs on the Bayou 4 Week Vacation™ Legacy Retreat. On today’s episode, he gives a preview of what he will be teaching Retreat participants. Tune in now, to find out more about becoming an investor in your own business. Sir Steven Wilkinson started early to deal with corporate finance issues: he comes from a middle-class English entrepreneurial family. Through the IPO of the family business in the 60s, his investment training with Merrill Lynch and the years of work in one of the most prestigious asset managers in Germany, he has extensive knowledge of the world of high finance - both theoretically sound, as well as practically tested - appropriated. But that is only one side of the coin: due to his humanistic image of mankind and his strong value orientation, he made his interest in a good corporate governance ("servant leadership") his second passion many years ago. Steven Wilkinson co-founded the network of Small Giants companies as the only European. He has been involved with the Ashoka organization for the successful development of social enterprises for more than 15 years and gives his knowledge e.g. through lectures and blog articles. He is the moderator of the podcasts "Good & Prosper" and founder of the Internet publishing house of the same name, which prepares and makes accessible knowledge about Servant Leadership for entrepreneurs. His very rare combination of insider knowledge from the world of high finance and the passion for value-oriented corporate management of small and medium-sized companies (SMEs), coupled with a decided ability to communicate complex knowledge easily and entertainingly, gives his students and clients a new perspective on the development of your company and thus contributes to a better culture in the company and a more self-determined life and prosperity for the entrepreneur itself. Show Highlights: Sir Steven talks about the two podcast interviews that have inspired him lately. One was the Profit by Design interview with John Bates and the other was Oprah, with Elizabeth Gilbert. There are very few people who know precisely what their passion is, and telling people that they have to have one when they don't is forcing them into a sense of inadequacy. How Elizabeth Gilbert has reframed her entire message around passion to one of curiosity. This resonated very deeply with Sir Steven. Sir Stephen explains his view of passion. How curiosity, as a mindset, helps business owners. Nurturing curiosity is really so important for our development. Sir Stephens curiosity is about how to help business owners fall in love with their balance sheets. Individual financial accounts are the manifestation of habits, according to Jack Stack, author of The Great Game of Business. These habits become the character traits of the businesses. Money is just energy, so the way we deal with is unique to everyone. Sir Steven's experiences led him to develop what he is most curious about now. Sir Steven reframes finances to make them make sense in each individual's context. Sir Steven talks about the magic that happens when he teaches people how to calculate a share price for their business. What Warren Buffet has to say about the value of a business. The discipline of focusing on your strategically managing your balance sheet. What the intrinsic value of a business means. Making the first step to becoming an investor in your own business. Why you have to transition out of your doing role, in order to sell your business. Sir Steven unpacks his chart, which shows us that some small businesses out-perform their industry peers by factors of seven to ten. Sir Stephen explains why small business owners really need a four-week vacation. Resources: Profit by Design Facebook group Email: sabrinaandmike@profitbydesignpodast.com www.howtohirethebest.com is Dr. Sabrina’s free masterclass Previous episode referenced in this interview: Strapping Your Monkey Mind in to Bring Out Your Awesomeness with John K. Bates Profit by Design Podcast, Ep 32 www.ProfitByDesignPodcast.com/32 Would you like to join a community of entrepreneurs setting our businesses up to support our lives and not the other way around? Check out Breakthroughs on The Bayou 4 Week Vacation™ Legacy Retreat at www.4WeekVacation.com For the month of June only, we are offering you a special savings. All you have to do is to say, “I want a vacation!” when you submit your application and you will get into the retreat for $5997. If you're interested in being a part of the retreat, all of the information is available at www.4weekvacation.com. Apply soon, as space is limited! Get Dr. Sabrina's free 4 Week Vacation™ Jump Start Guide: www.4weekvacation.com To contact Sir Steven and to get on the list to help him pilot his ten-week course, go to : steven@goodandprosper.com or www.goodandprosper.com Twitter: @goodandprosper Books mentioned: The Great Game of Business by Jack Stack and Bo Burlingham Money Is Not The Problem, You Are by Gary M. Douglas and Dr. Dain Heer
A Argentina tinha sido humilhada pela Inglaterra na Guerra das Malvinas, um pequeno arquipélago no sul do oceano Atlântico. Os "Hermanos" estavam com a auto estima em frangalhos e sobrou apenas o futebol para resgatar o brio dos argentinos. E Maradona, na voz do uruguaio, Victor Hugo Moralas, pelas ondas da Rádio Mitre resgatou o orgulho portenho naquele que é considerando o gol mais bonito das Copas. 19.06.1986 Argentina 2 x 1 Inglaterra Fase: Oitavas -de-final Local:estádio Azteca, na Cidade do México Árbitro:Ali Bennaceur (TUN) Auxiliares:Berny Morera (COS) e Bogdan Dotchev (BUL) Cartões Amarelos:Batista (ARG); Fenwick (ING) Público:114.580 Gols:Maradona (ARG), aos 6min e aos 9min, e Lineker (ING), aos 35min do segundo tempo Argentina Pumpido; Cuciuffo, Brown, Ruggeri e Olarticoechea; Batista, Giusti, Burruchaga (Tapia) e Enrique; Valdano e Maradona. Técnico Carlos Bilardo Inglaterra Shilton; Gary M. Stevens, Butcher, Fenwick e Sansom; Hoddle, Steven (Barnes), Reid (Waddle) e Hodge; Lineker e Beardsley. Técnico Bobby Robson
On episode two hundred and seven, the story of Gary M Rose is told. All stories in June will be from various conflicts with recent recipients. Be sure to visit our website for more information as the show goes on at: www.talesofhonorpodcast.com. Thanks for listening and be sure to share with friends and family!
The BEST Indie Music Artists & Singers from around the world: EDM, Indie Rock, Indie Pop, Hip Hop, R & B, Rap, Reggae, Jazz, Country, Folk, & more...Hosted by DTongAdvertising & Sponsorship: http://goo.gl/ioP6HwGuaranteed Song Play & Promotion: http://goo.gl/4aD98wBROUGHT TO YOU BY:https://www.CordRestored.comhttp://strategictechcoaching.comTACTBIT® 3D Magnetic light blockshttp://bit.ly/2Vwi8r6Weight Loss Psychology for Womenhttps://amzn.to/2Lw6GXNWe All Want Love by Anjia Monethttps://amzn.to/2Yg9WIi On A Path To Love by Gary M. Brotmanhttps://amzn.to/30bgPwfFather w/ 3 Jobs A Day podcasthttps://apple.co/2LCEDpLhttp://www.thejamaicantalkshowhost.comPowerful Car Vacuum by thesunvibeshttp://bit.ly/2JcXaFZAlso New Music from:Stephanie Harris 'Get It In'Optimistic Composer 'Rocking Peebles'Veek w/ a Back2BackBrandon Greer 'Im Your Man'Ayaz Anis 'Dont feel all alone'Iskar D'Abrel 'Ruins Of You'Tony Manley 'New York City'Garry Moore 'Fire In My Bones'The San Antones w/ a back2backKefa 'She Got Me Like'Telo712 'Bundle Like Brittany'De Addiction w/ a back2backGeorge Milo 'Lights and Sangrias'MrMarco 'Move & Let Loose'Its My Microphone 'Fight With Me'Trumpet 'Tonights The Night'Room De Dark 'Plastic Bones'Nomad Kulture 'Ride With Me'Kid Kodein 'Bestfriend'A'dani prod 'Changes'Amour Glamour 'What A Delight'Catch the show on iTunes, Spotify, iHeartRadio, PlayerFM, Periscope, Google Play, TuneIn, Stitcher, Soundcloud, & www.DTongRadio.com
The BEST Indie Music Artists & Singers from around the world: EDM, Indie Rock, Indie Pop, Hip Hop,R & B, Rap, Reggae, Jazz, Country, Folk, & more...Hosted by DTongAdvertising & Sponsorship: http://goo.gl/ioP6HwGuaranteed Song Play & Promotion: http://goo.gl/4aD98wBROUGHT TO YOU BY:http://strategictechcoaching.comTACTBIT® 3D Magnetic light blockshttp://bit.ly/2Vwi8r6Weight Loss Psychology for Womenhttps://amzn.to/2Lw6GXNWe All Want Love by Anjia Monethttps://amzn.to/2Yg9WIi On A Path To Love by Gary M. Brotmanhttps://amzn.to/30bgPwfFather w/ 3 Jobs A Day podcasthttps://apple.co/2LCEDpLWho Is Celinda Grey: Book 1http://bit.ly/2vNx5peAlso New Music from:Stephanie Harris 'Get It In'Optimistic Composer 'Rocking Peebles'Veek w/ a Back2BackBrandon Greer 'Im Your Man'Here Lies 'Take You Home'Milo On Third w/ a Back2BackTony Manley 'New York City'Kefa 'She Got Me Like'Telo712 'Bundle Like Brittany'George Milo 'Lights and Sangrias'MrMarco 'Move & Let Loose'Its My Microphone 'Fight With Me'Trumpet 'Tonights The Night'Room De Dark 'Plastic Bones'Nomad Kulture 'Ride With Me'Kid Kodein 'Bestfriend'Bab M ft Dicko Fils 'A Jaaraama'A'dani prod 'Changes'Amour Glamour 'What A Delight'Catch the show on iTunes, Spotify, iHeartRadio, PlayerFM, Periscope, Google Play, TuneIn, Stitcher, Soundcloud, & www.DTongRadio.com
Authors on the Air host Pam Stack welcomes Dr. Gary Jackson to the studio to discuss his new book "Surviving Mass Victim Attacks". About Dr. Jackson: Dr. Gary M. Jackson is a behavioral psychologist with specialties in artificial intelligence and automated assessment. Dr. Jackson has designed and developed scores of advanced applications across both corporate and U.S. Government settings. Dr. Jackson’s career has spanned academia as a professor, director of R&D and treatment development in various clinical settings, research psychologist within the U.S. Secret Service Intelligence Division, Intelligence Officer and Chief of three advanced technology branches within the Central Intelligence Agency, vice president and director of research and development for a major psychological test development company, Director of the Center for the Advancement of Intelligent Systems (CAIS) for the American Institutes for Research and, the founding president and CEO of Psynapse Technologies in Washington DC. Until recently, Dr. Jackson was a Chief Scientist within the National Security Sector at SAIC and Leidos. He has extensive R&D and operational field experience in counterterrorism, counterintelligence, counternarcotics, and asymmetric warfare prediction, tracking, and locating. He holds B.A. and Ph.D. degrees from Southern Illinois University-Carbondale and an M.A. degree from University of Illinois-Springfield. He has completed additional postdoctoral training in neurophysiology at the University of South Florida Medical School. Dr. Jackson is the inventor of the patented automated behavior assessment Checkmate network intrusion protection system, Inmate network misuse detection system for insider threat, and Automated Behavior Analysis (AuBA) and tools. This podcast is sponsored by Anbeco LLC and is copyrighted to Authors on the Air.
Gary M. Segura, Ph.D., is Co-founder and Senior Partner of the polling and research firm Latino Decisions which he co-founded with Matt Barreto in 2007, and currently a Professor of American Politics at Stanford University. His work focuses on issues of political representation, and the politics to America’s growing Latino minority. Among his most recent publications are "The Future is Ours:" Minority Politics, Political Behavior, and the Multiracial Era of American Politics, (Congressional Quarterly, 2011) and Latinos in the New Millennium: An Almanac of Opinion, Behavior, and Policy Preferences (Cambridge University Press, 2012). Over the last 18 years, he has directed polling research that has completed over 80,000 interviews of Americans of all backgrounds on matters of political importance. He has briefed members of both the House and Senate as well as senior administration officials and appeared on National Public Radio, the News Hour, Frontline, the CBS Evening News, MSNBC, --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/joseph-dobzynski-sr/support
By the early 1930’s, Nell Donnelly had it all. Women everywhere loved Nell Donnelly’s stylish, well-made, and inexpensive dresses. But she didn’t just make great dresses. She made a great work environment, too. Unlike a lot of factory owners at the time, Nell paid well. She offered her employees medical care and a pension plan. She even paid for them to go to school. Nell’s hard work paid off. Fortune Magazine called her possibly the most successful businesswoman in America. She was rich, stylish and classy. But she was also a target. On December 16, 1931, Nell and her chauffeur, George, were kidnapped and driven to a nasty old cabin. The eventual trials of Nell’s kidnappers captured the nation’s attention and involved some of Kansas City’s most prominent citizens. Then Brandi frustrates the hell out of us with the story of Lisa Techel’s murder. When Lisa was discovered shot to death in her Iowa home, everyone knew exactly who’d done it — her neighbor. The man had a bad history with Lisa and her husband Seth. Police were sure they had their guy. But when they went to question him, he wasn’t quite the cold-blooded murderer they expected him to be. Hold on tight, folks. This one has so many twists and turns that it could be a two-hour episode of Dateline. Oh, wait. It is. And now for a note about our process. For each episode, Kristin reads a bunch of articles, then spits them back out in her very limited vocabulary. Brandi copies and pastes from the best sources on the web. And sometimes Wikipedia. (No shade, Wikipedia. We love you.) We owe a huge debt of gratitude to the real experts who covered these cases. In this episode, Kristin pulled from: The book, “James A. Reed: Legendary Lawyer; Marplot in the United States Senate,” by Michael Cronan The book, “Called to Courage: Four Women in Missouri History,” by Heather Roberson and Margot McMillen The book, “The Devil’s Tickets: A Vengeful Wife, a Fatal Hand, and a New American Age,” by Gary M. Pomerantz “Strange bedfellows,” KChistory.org “Nell Donnelly Reed, 102, Pioneer In Manufacture of Women’s Attire,” New York Times In this episode, Brandi pulled from: “Before Dawn” Dateline ep. “Techel Trial: Opening Arguments Heard” by Stephanie Moore, whotv.com “Court upholds man’s conviction in slaying of pregnant wife” by Ryan J. Foley, Associated Press
Commodity Technology Advisory LLC investigate the concept of CTRM in the Cloud in the latest issue of CTRMRadio. What is it? What questions should buyers ask? Is it properly defined? CTRMRadio hosts , Gary M. Vasey and Patrick Reames are joined by guests Dr. Markus Seiser, COO, FIS Energy, Mark Hill, CEO of ValueCreed, Samir Soleja, Founder and CEO of Molecule Software, Jose Tumkaya of Commoditech Ventures and Steve Hughes, CEO of Aspect in discovering more about CTRM in the Cloud. CTRMRadio introduction provided by Marlar House Productions and voiced by Darren Marlar. Our thanks to all of this month’s participants.
We talk to Blair Fix, a graduate student at York University in Canada, about his fascinating research examining energy and hierarchy and the relationship between hierarchy and personal income. I sound tired in the intro because I was, but the interview was recorded on a different day, so I don't sound so much like a lazy slug in the rest of the episode. Reading mentioned or referenced: Capital as Power by Shimshon Bichler & Jonathan Nitzan A Power Theory of Personal Income Distribution by Blair Fix Energy and Institution Size by Blair Fix Growing through Sabotage: Energizing Hierarchical Power by Bichler & Nitzan Debunking Economics by Steve Keen The Invention of Capitalism by Michael Perelman When Corporations Rule the World by David Korten A Critical History of Economic Thought by E.K. Hunt Debt by David Graeber Rethinking Economic Growth Theory From a Biophysical Perspective by Blair Fix Uneven and Combined Confusion: On the Geopolitical Origins of Capitalism and the Rise of the West by Tim Di Muzio Against the Grain by James Scott Pathways to Power: New Perspectives on the Emergence of Social Inequality by T. Douglas Price, Gary M. Feinman Abolish Human Rentals: The Fundamental Myth by David Ellerman
Gary M. Cianci is interviewed by Judy Pierce at the Fort Hamilton Library on March 27th, 2017.
Gary M. Rothenberg, DPM, CDE, CWS. Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine Series: "UCSF Vascular Surgery Symposium" [Health and Medicine] [Education] [Professional Medical Education] [Show ID: 32295]
Gary M. Rothenberg, DPM, CDE, CWS. Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine Series: "UCSF Vascular Surgery Symposium" [Health and Medicine] [Education] [Professional Medical Education] [Show ID: 32295]
Gary M. Rothenberg, DPM, CDE, CWS. Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine. Series: "UCSF Vascular Surgery Symposium" [Health and Medicine] [Education] [Professional Medical Education] [Show ID: 32300]
Gary M. Rothenberg, DPM, CDE, CWS. Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine. Series: "UCSF Vascular Surgery Symposium" [Health and Medicine] [Education] [Professional Medical Education] [Show ID: 32300]
Diversity in Events is the topic of the day and we are really looking forward to getting into it! Our ICONIC guest panelists include Audrey Gallien, Marketing Director of Catalyst, and Carson Edwards, Jr., Global Sales Account Executive of Marriott International. What is diversity? Why is diversity in events so important? Not only will we be tackling this challenging topic head-on, but our guests will be lending their experience, and sharing their insight, on how we can all incorporate diversity into our businesses and events. We couldn’t be more excited about this week’s guests and this very important topic. You don’t want to miss this! You’re watching this recording of our episode here on our blog, but wouldn’t you rather watch live and participate? Subscribe now to watch live! (We’ll remind you of upcoming episodes.) We would love for you to join us LIVE and bring your questions for our icons. We do this for you! Follow our iconic guests on Twitter: Audrey Gallien Carson Edwards, Jr. Will Curran Epic resources mentioned: Catalyst Mindfulness in Plain English by Henepola Gunaratana Saga by Brian Vaughan Marketing to People Not Like You Brand Warfare by David D’Alessandro Career Warfare by David D’Alessandro Minority Rules by Kenneth Arroyo Roldan and Gary M. Stern
Diversity in Events is the topic of the day and we are really looking forward to getting into it! Our ICONIC guest panelists include Audrey Gallien, Marketing Director of Catalyst, and Carson Edwards, Jr., Global Sales Account Executive of Marriott International. What is diversity? Why is diversity in events so important? Not only will we be tackling this challenging topic head-on, but our guests will be lending their experience, and sharing their insight, on how we can all incorporate diversity into our businesses and events. We couldn’t be more excited about this week’s guests and this very important topic. You don’t want to miss this! You’re watching this recording of our episode here on our blog, but wouldn’t you rather watch live and participate? Subscribe now to watch live! (We’ll remind you of upcoming episodes.) We would love for you to join us LIVE and bring your questions for our icons. We do this for you! Follow our iconic guests on Twitter: Audrey Gallien Carson Edwards, Jr. Will Curran Epic resources mentioned: Catalyst Mindfulness in Plain English by Henepola Gunaratana Saga by Brian Vaughan Marketing to People Not Like You Brand Warfare by David D’Alessandro Career Warfare by David D’Alessandro Minority Rules by Kenneth Arroyo Roldan and Gary M. Stern
Are Great Athletic Coaches Great Speakers? Rick Sheridan www.ricksheridan.com Recommended reading from Rick: Beyond Winning: The Timeless Wisdom of Great Philosopher Coaches, by Gary M. Walton. Human Kinetics Publishers, 1991. Sport Psychology: Concepts and Applications, by Richard Cox. McGraw-Hill Education, 2011. Gridiron Generals- memories of the game's greatest players and coaches. DVD produced by the History Channel, 2010. Thanks for listening to “Speaking with TJ Walker.” Please subscribe to the show here https://itunes.apple.com/podcast/id1072936158?mt=2&ls=1 The show about public speaking, media training, presentation skills, crisis communications, and presentation training. Please send any speaking-related questions you have directly to TJ at tj@mediatrainingworldwide.com and he will answer them in future episodes. Please connect with us at Media Training Worldwide and post your questions here http://www.mediatrainingworldwide.com/blog/ On Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/tjwalkerinteractive Twitter: https://twitter.com/tjwalker Linkedin: T.J. Walker Youtube https://www.youtube.com/user/MediaTraining iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/podcast/id1072936158?mt=2&ls=1 Receive Free online Public Speaking or Media Training Course today http://www.mediatrainingworldwide.com/give-away.html Call +1.212.764.4955 now to discuss a customized media training or presentation training program for you or your organization. For keynote speech and media inquiries, call +1.212.764.4955 Online media and presentation training at http://www.mediatrainingworldwide.com/online-training.html Media Training Worldwide teaches people how to speak effectively to the media and to live audiences. We train people on all aspects of media training, public speaking, PowerPoint Presentations, crisis communications and presentation training.
Hugh Rockoff is a professor of economics at Rutgers University and has done extensive work in U.S. monetary history. He joins the show to discuss the criteria for an ideal monetary union and argues that the U.S. didn’t really become an optimal currency area until the 1930s. David and Hugh then discuss whether a present-day example, the Eurozone, fits these criteria. They also talk about interesting chapters in U.S. monetary history, including the Civil War, the Free Banking Era, and the bimetallism debate of the late 1800s. [To learn more about the upcoming conference, Monetary Rules for a Post-Crisis World, co-hosted by the Mercatus Center and the Cato Institute, and register, please click the link below. You can also watch the conference online by clicking the link.] http://mercatus.org/monetaryconference?utm_source=MacroMusingsPodcast&utm_medium=link&utm_campaign=MonetaryRules David’s blog: http://macromarketmusings.blogspot.com/ Hugh Rockoff’s homepage: http://econweb.rutgers.edu/rockoff/ David’s Twitter: @davidbeckworth Related links History of the American Economy by Hugh Rockoff and Gary M. Walton https://www.amazon.com/History-American-Economy-Economics-Titles/dp/1111822921 “How Long Did It Take the United States to Become an Optimal Currency Area?” (National Bureau of Economic Research) http://www.nber.org/papers/h0124 “The Wizard of Oz as a Monetary Allegory” (The Journal of Political Economy) https://www.unc.edu/~salemi/Econ006/Rockoff.pdf The Free Banking Era: A Re-Examination (Dissertations in American Economic History) https://www.amazon.com/Free-Banking-Era-Re-Examination-Dissertations/dp/0405072155
Gary M. Segura, Ph.D., is Co-founder and Senior Partner of the polling and research firm Latino Decisions which he co-founded with Matt Barreto in 2007, and currently a Professor of American Politics at Stanford University. His work focuses on issues of political representation, and the politics to America’s growing Latino minority. Among his most recent publications are "The Future is Ours:" Minority Politics, Political Behavior, and the Multiracial Era of American Politics, (Congressional Quarterly, 2011) and Latinos in the New Millennium: An Almanac of Opinion, Behavior, and Policy Preferences (Cambridge University Press, 2012). Over the last 18 years, he has directed polling research that has completed over 80,000 interviews of Americans of all backgrounds on matters of political importance. He has briefed members of both the House and Senate as well as senior administration officials and appeared on National Public Radio, the News Hour, Frontline, the CBS Evening News, MSNBC, and numerous other outlets.
Gary M. Segura, Ph.D., is Co-founder and Senior Partner of the polling and research firm Latino Decisions which he co-founded with Matt Barreto in 2007, and currently a Professor of American Politics at Stanford University. His work focuses on issues of political representation, and the politics to America's growing Latino minority. Among his most recent publications are "The Future is Ours:" Minority Politics, Political Behavior, and the Multiracial Era of American Politics, (Congressional Quarterly, 2011) and Latinos in the New Millennium: An Almanac of Opinion, Behavior, and Policy Preferences (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Over the last 18 years, he has directed polling research that has completed over 80,000 interviews of Americans of all backgrounds on matters of political importance. He has briefed members of both the House and Senate as well as senior administration officials and appeared on National Public Radio, the News Hour, Frontline, the CBS Evening News, MSNBC, and numerous other outlets.
Episode 96: Today's episode of the Social Work Podcast is on family therapy for depressed and suicidal youth. I speak with two of the three developers of Attachment-based Family Therapy (ABFT), Guy S. Diamond, Ph.D. and Suzanne Levy, Ph.D. The third developer Gary M. Diamond (no relation to Guy Diamond) lives in Israel and was unavailable for the interview. ABFT is the only family-based psychotherapy with empirical support for reducing suicidal ideation in youth. In today's interview, Dr. Diamond and Dr. Levy discuss the theory and practice of Attachment-Based Family Therapy. Dr. Diamond mostly covers theory and concepts, and Dr. Levy addresses the question of "what does the therapist actually do in the therapy room." If you're interested in learning more about ABFT, you can buy the treatment manual Attachment Based Family Therapy for Depressed Adolescents, watch a free webinar http://youtu.be/KcwHznzq-S4, or attend a 3-day workshop April 22-24 in Philadelphia. More information and registration can be found here: https://www.drexel.edu/cnhp/academics/continuing-education/Health-Professions-CE-Programs/ABFT/. You can connect with other social workers at the Social Work Podcast Facebook page, http://www.facebook.com/swpodcast, or follow the Twitter feed http://www.twitter.com/socworkpodcast. You can listen to the Social Work Podcast from socialworkpodcast.com, by downloading the episodes through iTunes or any number of other apps, or you can stream the 10 most recent episodes right from your mobile device using the Stitcher Radio mobile app http://www.stitcher.com/podcast/social-work-podcast/the-social-work-podcast.
Episode 96: Today's episode of the Social Work Podcast is on family therapy for depressed and suicidal youth. I speak with two of the three developers of Attachment-based Family Therapy (ABFT), Guy S. Diamond, Ph.D. and Suzanne Levy, Ph.D. The third developer Gary M. Diamond (no relation to Guy Diamond) lives in Israel and was unavailable for the interview. ABFT is the only family-based psychotherapy with empirical support for reducing suicidal ideation in youth. In today's interview, Dr. Diamond and Dr. Levy discuss the theory and practice of Attachment-Based Family Therapy. Dr. Diamond mostly covers theory and concepts, and Dr. Levy addresses the question of "what does the therapist actually do in the therapy room." If you're interested in learning more about ABFT, you can buy the treatment manual Attachment Based Family Therapy for Depressed Adolescents, watch a free webinar http://youtu.be/KcwHznzq-S4, or attend a 3-day workshop April 22-24 in Philadelphia. More information and registration can be found here: https://www.drexel.edu/cnhp/academics/continuing-education/Health-Professions-CE-Programs/ABFT/. You can connect with other social workers at the Social Work Podcast Facebook page, http://www.facebook.com/swpodcast, or follow the Twitter feed http://www.twitter.com/socworkpodcast. You can listen to the Social Work Podcast from socialworkpodcast.com, by downloading the episodes through iTunes or any number of other apps, or you can stream the 10 most recent episodes right from your mobile device using the Stitcher Radio mobile app http://www.stitcher.com/podcast/social-work-podcast/the-social-work-podcast.
Tue, 30 Apr 2013 12:00:00 +0100 http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/rsi/84/4/10.1063/1.4803003 https://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/17382/1/Hennig_17382.pdf Stepp, Herbert; Vogeser, Michael; Kniebühler, Gesa; Sroka, Ronald; Brittenham, Gary M.; Hennig, Georg
This week's news includes: Ancestry.com has renamed its self-publishing tool from AncestryPress to MyCanvas, and has also doubled its yearbook collection; ItsOurTree.com announced that its site (http://www.itsourtree.com/) can help predict male baldness through members' postings of family photographs; FamilyRelatives.com (http://familyrelatives.com/), a subscription website, has one of the largest collections of Irish records on the Internet, and they announced that they plan to add more than 10 million new records by the end of the year; Footnote.com (http://www.footnote.com) has begun to publish digitized and indexed Civil War Widows' Pension Files; the University of Michigan has announced that it has digitized and indexed 428 titles in its Michigan County Histories and Atlases Digitization Project, and the search template is available at http://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/micounty/; and Geni.com (http://www.geni.com/) has announced enhanced search facilities and improved privacy at its website. Finally, the Wall Street Journal published an article on 22 October 2008 about University of Texas El Paso, librarian Claudia Rivers, who has formed an aggressive program to identify 50,000 photographs taken bythe closed Cassola photography studio. Check the WSJ site for an article published on that date titled, "In Old El Paso, This Detective Story Is Written in Pictures."George announces that Ancestry.com has just received copies of his new book, the new second edition of The Official Guide to Ancestry.com in its warehouse the end of this past week. Ancestry.com's online store will be listing the book and advertising it for sale very soon.George interviews Gary M. Smith and Diana Crissman Smith, two of his fellow speakers on the recent RootsMagic Cruise.Listener email this week includes: a thank you and report from Pat (Ms. DNA Manners) about communicating with people with potential genetic genealogy matches; a question from Pattie concerning obtaining SS-5 applications for deceased relatives whose deaths predate the SSDI database; Drew responds to Ann about the Harvey Girls, and provides a link to the Harvey Girl Historical Society (http://www.oerm.org/pages/Harveygirls.html); Robert Reeve of VideoJug has contacted us to say that their website has more than 43,000 free videos, including a number concerning genealogy (located at http://www.videojug.com/tag/genealogy); Michael tells us about his Dutch genealogical research, and asks about the benefits of seeking genealogical certification; and Sandra asked for advice about how to organize the many family letters and other documents she has in her possession.