Podcasts about Human Rights Watch

How has the media distorted Israel's response to the October 7 Hamas attacks? In this powerful conversation from AJC Global Forum 2025, award-winning journalist and former AP correspondent Matti Friedman breaks down the media bias, misinformation, and double standards shaping global coverage of Israel. Moderated by AJC Chief Communications and Strategy Officer Belle Etra Yoeli, this episode explores how skewed narratives have taken hold in the media, in a climate of activist journalism. A must-listen for anyone concerned with truth in journalism, Israel advocacy, and combating disinformation in today's media landscape. Take Action: Take 15 seconds and urge your elected leaders to send a clear, united message: We stand with Israel. Take action now. Resources: Global Forum 2025 session with Matti Friedman:: Watch the full video. Listen – AJC Podcasts: The Forgotten Exodus: Untold stories of Jews who left or were driven from Arab nations and Iran People of the Pod:  Latest Episodes:  John Spencer's Key Takeaways After the 12-Day War: Air Supremacy, Intelligence, and Deterrence Iran's Secret Nuclear Program and What Comes Next in the Iranian Regime vs. Israel War Why Israel Had No Choice: Inside the Defensive Strike That Shook Iran's Nuclear Program Follow People of the Pod on your favorite podcast app, and learn more at AJC.org/PeopleofthePod You can reach us at: peopleofthepod@ajc.org If you've appreciated this episode, please be sure to tell your friends, and rate and review us on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. Transcript of the Interview: Manya Brachear Pashman: I've had the privilege of interviewing journalism colleague Matti Friedman: twice on this podcast. In 2022, Matti took listeners behind the scenes of Jerusalem's AP bureau where he had worked between 2006 and 2011 and shared some insight on what happens when news outlets try to oversimplify the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Then in 2023, I got to sit down with Matti in Jerusalem to talk about his latest book on Leonard Cohen and how the 1973 Yom Kippur War was a turning point both for the singer and for Israel.  Earlier this year, Matti came to New York for AJC Global Forum 2025, and sat down with Belle Yoeli, AJC Chief Strategy and Communications Officer. They rehashed some of what we discussed before, but against an entirely different backdrop: post-October 7. For this week's episode, we bring you a portion of that conversation.  Belle Yoeli:   Hi, everyone. Great to see all of you. Thank you so much for being here. Matti, thank you for being here.  Matti Friedman:   Thanks for having me.  Belle Yoeli:   As you can tell by zero empty seats in this room, you have a lot of fans, and unless you want to open with anything, I'm going to jump right in. Okay, great.  So for those of you who don't know, in September 2024 Matti wrote a piece in The Free Press that is a really great foundation for today's discussion. In When We Started to Lie, Matti, you reflect on two pieces that you had written in 2015 about issues of media coverage of Israel during Operation Protective Edge in 2014. And this piece basically talked about the conclusions you drew and how they've evolved since October 7. We're gonna get to those conclusions, but first, I'm hoping you can describe for everyone what were the issues of media coverage of Israel that you first identified based on the experience in 2014? Matti Friedman:   First of all, thanks so much for having me here, and thanks for all of the amazing work that you guys are doing. So it's a real honor for me. I was a reporter for the AP, between 2006 and the very end of 2011, in Jerusalem. I was a reporter and editor. The AP, of course, as you know, is the American news agency. It's the world's largest news organization, according to the AP, according to Reuters, it's Reuters. One of them is probably right, but it's a big deal in the news world.  And I had an inside view inside one of the biggest AP bureaus. In fact, the AP's biggest International Bureau, which was in Jerusalem. So I can try to sketch the problems that I saw as a reporter there. It would take me seven or eight hours, and apparently we only have four or five hours for this lunch, so I have to keep it short. But I would say there are two main problems. We often get very involved. When we talk about problems with coverage of Israel. We get involved with very micro issues like, you call it a settlement. I call it a neighborhood. Rockets, you know, the Nakba, issues of terminology. But in fact, there are two major problems that are much bigger, and because they're bigger, they're often harder to see. One of the things that I noticed at the Bureau was the scale of coverage of Israel. So at the time that I was at the AP, again, between 2006 and the very end of 2011 we had about 40 full time staffers covering Israel. That's print reporters like me, stills photographers, TV crews. Israel, as most of you probably know, is a very small country. As a percentage of the world's surface, Israel is 1/100 of 1% of the surface of the world, and as a percentage of the land mass of the Arab world, Israel is 1/5 of 1%. 0.2%.  And we had 40 people covering it.  And just as a point of comparison, that was dramatically more people than we had at the time covering China. There are about 10 million people today in Israel proper, in China, there are 1.3 billion. We had more people in Israel than we had in China. We had more people in Israel than we had in India, which is another country of about 1.3 billion people. We had more people in Israel than we had in all of the countries of Sub-Saharan Africa. That's 50 something countries. So we had more people in Israel than we had in all of those countries combined. And sometimes I say that to Jews, I say we covered Israel more than we covered China, and people just stare at me blankly, because it's Israel. So of course, that makes perfect sense.  I happen to think Israel is the most important country in the world because I live there. But if the news is meant to be a rational analysis of events on planet Earth, you cannot cover Israel more than you cover the continent of Africa. It just doesn't make any sense. So one of the things that first jumped out at me– actually, that's making me sound smarter than I am. It didn't jump out at me at first. It took a couple of years. And I just started realizing that it was very strange that the world's largest organization had its largest international bureau in the State of Israel, which is a very small country, very small conflict in numeric terms. And yet there was this intense global focus on it that made people think that it was the most important story in the world. And it definitely occupies a place in the American political imagination that is not comparable to any other international conflict.  So that's one part of the problem. That was the scope, the other part was the context. And it took me a while to figure this out, but the coverage of Israel is framed as an Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The conflict is defined in those terms, the Israeli Palestinian conflict, and everyone in this room has heard it discussed in those terms. Sometimes we discuss it in those terms, and that is because the news folks have framed the conflict in those terms. So at the AP bureau in Jerusalem, every single day, we had to write a story that was called, in the jargon of the Bureau, Is-Pals, Israelis, Palestinians. And it was the daily wrap of the Israeli Palestinian conflict. So what Netanyahu said, what Abbas said, rockets, settlers, Hamas, you know, whatever, the problem is that there isn't an Israeli=Palestinian conflict. And I know that sounds crazy, because everyone thinks there is.  And of course, we're seeing conflicts play out in the most tragic way right now in Gaza. But most of Israel's wars have not been fought against Palestinians. Israel has unfortunately fought wars against Egyptians and Jordanians and Lebanese and Iraqis. And Israel's most important enemy at the moment, is Iran, right? The Iranians are not Palestinian. The Iranians are not Arab. They're Muslim, but they're not Arab. So clearly, there is a broader regional conflict that's going on that is not an Israeli Palestinian conflict, and we've seen it in the past year. If we had a satellite in space looking down and just following the paths of ballistic missiles and rockets fired at Israel. Like a photograph of these red trails of rockets fired at Israel. You'd see rockets being fired from Iraq and from Yemen and from Lebanon and from Gaza and from Iran. You'd see the contours of a regional conflict.  And if you understand it's a regional conflict, then you understand the way Israelis see it. There are in the Arab world, 300 million people, almost all of them Muslim. And in one corner of that world, there are 7 million Jews, who are Israelis. And if we zoom out even farther to the level of the Islamic world, we'll see that there are 2 billion people in the Islamic world. There's some argument about the numbers, but it's roughly a quarter of the world's population. And in one corner of that world there, there are 7 million Israeli Jews. The entire Jewish population on planet Earth is a lot smaller than the population of Cairo.  So the idea that this is an Israeli-Palestinian conflict, where Israelis are the stronger side, where Israelis are the dominant actor, and where Israelis are, let's face it, the bad guy in the story, that's a fictional presentation of a story that actually works in a completely different way. So if you take a small story and make it seem big. If you take a complicated regional story and you make it seem like a very small local story involving only Israelis and Palestinians, then you get the highly simplified but very emotive narrative that everyone is being subjected to now. And you get this portrayal of a villainous country called Israel that really looms in the liberal imagination of the West as an embodiment of the worst possible qualities of the age. Belle Yoeli:   Wow. So already you were seeing these issues when you were reporter, earlier on. But like this, some of this was before and since, since productive edge. This is over 10 years ago, and here we are. So October 7 happens. You already know these issues exist. You've identified them. How would you describe because obviously we have a lot of feelings about this, but like, strictly as a journalist, how would you describe the coverage that you've seen since during October 7, in its aftermath? Is it just these issues? Have they? Have they expanded? Are there new issues in play? What's your analysis? Matti Friedman:   The coverage has been great. I really have very I have no criticism of it. I think it's very accurate. I think that I, in a way, I was lucky to have been through what I went through 10 or 15 years ago, and I wasn't blindsided on October 7, as many people were, many people, quite naturally, don't pay close attention to this. And even people who are sympathetic to Israel, I think, were not necessarily convinced that my argument about the press was right. And I think many people thought it was overstated.  And you can read those articles from 2014 one was in tablet and one was in the Atlantic, but it's basically the two chapters of the same argument. And unfortunately, I think that those the essays, they stand up. In fact, if you don't really look at the date of the essays, they kind of seem that they could have been written in the past year and a half. And I'm not happy about that. I think that's and I certainly wrote them in hopes that they would somehow make things better. But the issues that I saw in the press 15 years ago have only been exacerbated since then. And October seven didn't invent the wheel. The issues were pre existing, but it took everything that I saw and kind of supercharged it.  So if I talked about ideological conformity in the bureaus that has been that has become much more extreme. A guy like me, I was hired in 2006 at the AP. I'm an Israeli of center left political leanings. Hiring me was not a problem in 22,006 by the time I left the AP, at the end of 2011 I'm pretty sure someone like me would not have been hired because my views, which are again, very centrist Israeli views, were really beyond the pale by the time that I left the AP, and certainly, and certainly today, the thing has really moved what I saw happening at the AP. And I hate picking on the AP because they were just unfortunate enough to hire me. That was their only error, but what I'm saying about them is true of a whole new. Was heard. It's true of the Times and CNN and the BBC, the news industry really works kind of as a it has a herd mentality. What happened was that news decisions were increasingly being made by people who are not interested in explanatory journalism. They were activists. Activists had moved into the key positions in the Bureau, and they had a very different idea of what press coverage was supposed to do. I would say, and I tried to explain it in that article for the free press, when I approach a news story, when I approach the profession of journalism, the question that I'm asking is, what's going on? That's the question I think you're supposed to ask, what's going on? How can I explain it in a way that's as accurate as as possible? The question that was increasingly being asked was not what's going on. The question was, who does this serve? That's an activist question. So when you look at a story, you don't ask, is it true, or is it not true? You ask, who's it going to help? Is it going to help the good guys, or is it going to help the bad guys?  So if Israel in the story is the villain, then a story that makes Israel seem reasonable, reasonable or rational or sympathetic needs to be played down to the extent possible or made to disappear. And I can give you an example from my own experience.  At the very end of 2008 two reporters in my bureau, people who I know, learned of a very dramatic peace offer that Prime Minister Ehud Olmert had made to the Palestinians. So Olmert, who was the prime minister at the time, had made a very far reaching offer that was supposed to see a Palestinian state in all of Gaza, most of the West Bank, with land swaps for territory that Israel was going to retain, and a very far reaching international consortium agreement to run the Old City of Jerusalem. Was a very dramatic. It was so far reaching, I think that Israelis probably wouldn't have supported it. But it was offered to the Palestinian side, and the Palestinians rejected it as insufficient. And two of our reporters knew about this, and they'd seen a map of the offer. And this was obviously a pretty big story for a bureau that had as the thrust of its coverage the peace process.  The two reporters who had the story were ordered to drop it, they were not allowed to cover the story. And there were different explanations. And they didn't, by the way, AP did not publish the story at the time, even though we were the first to have it. Eventually, it kind of came out and in other ways, through other news organizations. But we knew at first. Why were we not allowed to cover it? Because it would have made the Israelis who we were trying to villainize and demonize, it would have made Israel seem like it was trying to solve the conflict on kind of reasonable lines, which, of course, was true at that time. So that story would have upended the thrust of our news coverage. So it had to be made to go away, even though it was true, it would have helped the wrong people. And that question of who does this serve has destroyed, I want to say all, but much, of what used to be mainstream news coverage, and it's not just where Israel is concerned.  You can look at a story like the mental health of President Biden, right. Something's going on with Biden at the end of his term. It's a huge global news story, and the press, by and large, won't touch it, because why? I mean, it's true, right? We're all seeing that it's true, but why can't you touch it? Because it would help the wrong people. It would help the Republicans who in the press are the people who you are not supposed to help.  The origins of COVID, right? We heard one story about that. The true story seems to be a different story. And there are many other examples of stories that are reported because they help the right people, or not reported because they would help the wrong people. And I saw this thinking really come into action in Israel 10 or 15 years ago, and unfortunately, it's really spread to include the whole mainstream press scene and really kill it.  I mean, essentially, anyone interested in trying to get a solid sense of what's going on, we have very few options. There's not a lot, there's not a lot out there. So that's the broader conclusion that I drew from what I thought at the time was just a very small malfunction involving Israel coverage. But Israel coverage ends up being a symptom of something much bigger, as Jews often are the symptom of something much bigger that's going on.  So my problems in the AP bureau 15 years ago were really a kind of maybe a canary in the coal mine, or a whiff of something much bigger that we were all going to see happen, which is the transformation of the important liberal institutions of the west into kind of activist arms of a very radical ideology that has as its goal the transformation of the west into something else. And that's true of the press, and it's true of NGO world, places like Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International, which were one thing 30 years ago and are something very different today. And it's also true of big parts of the academy. It's true of places like Columbia and places like Harvard, they still have the logo, they still have the name, but they serve a different purpose, and I just happen to be on the ground floor of it as a reporter. Belle Yoeli:   So obviously, this concept of who does this serve, and this activist journalism is deeply concerning, and you actually mentioned a couple other areas, academia, obviously we're in that a lot right now in terms of what's going on campus. So I guess a couple of questions on that. First of all, think about this very practically, tachlis, in the day to day.  I'm a journalist, and I go to write about what's happening in Gaza. What would you say is, if you had to throw out a percentage, are all of them aware of this activist journalist tendency? Or you think it's like, like intentional for many of them, or it's sort of they've been educated that way, and it's their worldview in such a way that they don't even know that they're not reporting the news in a very biased way. Does that make sense? Matti Friedman:   Totally. I think that many people in the journalism world today view their job as not as explaining a complicated situation, but as swaying people toward the correct political conclusion. Journalism is power, and the power has to be wielded in support of justice. Now, justice is very slippery, and, you know, choosing who's in the right is very, very slippery, and that's how journalism gets into a lot of trouble. Instead of just trying to explain what's going on and then leave, you're supposed to leave the politics and the activism to other people. Politics and activism are very important.  But unless everyone can agree on what is going on, it's impossible to choose the kind of act, the kind of activism that would be useful. So when the journalists become activists, then no one can understand what's what's going on, because the story itself is fake, and there are many, many examples of it. But you know, returning to what you asked about, about October 7, and reporting post October 7, you can really see it happen. The massacres of October 7 were very problematic for the ideological strain that now controls a lot of the press, because it's counterintuitive. You're not supposed to sympathize with Israelis.  And yet, there were a few weeks after October 7 when they were forced to because the nature of the atrocities were so heinous that they could not be ignored. So you had the press covering what happened on October 7, but you could feel it. As someone who knows that scene, you could feel there was a lot of discomfort. There was a lot of discomfort. It wasn't their comfort zone, and you knew that within a few weeks, maybe a month, it was gonna snap back at the first opportunity.  When did it snap back? In the story of the Al Ahli hospital strike. If you remember that a few weeks in, there's a massive global story that Israel has rocketed Hospital in Gaza and killed about 500 people and and then you can see the kind of the comfort the comfort zone return, because the story that the press is primed to cover is a story about villainous Israelis victimizing innocent Palestinians, and now, now we're back. Okay. Now Israel's rocketing hospital. The problem was that it hadn't happened, and it was that a lot of stories don't happen, and they're allowed to stand.  But this story was so far from the truth that even the people involved couldn't make it work, and it had to be retracted, but it was basically too late. And then as soon as the Israeli ground offensive got into swing in Gaza, then the story really becomes the same old story, which is a story of Israel victimizing Palestinians for no reason. And you'll never see Hamas militants in uniform in Gaza. You just see dead civilians, and you'll see the aftermath of a rocket strike when the, you know, when an Israeli F16 takes out the launcher, but you will never see the strike. Which is the way it's worked in Gaza since the very end of 2008 which is when the first really bad round of violence in Gaza happens, which is when I'm at the AP.  As far as I know, I was the first staffer to erase information from the story, because we were threatened by Hamas, which happened at the very end of 2008. We had a great reporter in Gaza, a Palestinian who had always been really an excellent reporter. We had a detail in a story. The detail was a crucial one. It was that Hamas fighters were dressed as civilians and were being counted as civilians in the death toll, an important thing to know, that went out in an AP story. The reporter called me a few hours later. It was clear that someone had spoken to him, and he told me, I was on the desk in Jerusalem, so I was kind of writing the story from the main bureau in Jerusalem. And he said, Matti, you have to take that detail out of the story. And it was clear that someone had threatened him. I took the detail out of the story. I suggested to our editors that we note in an Editor's Note that we were now complying with Hamas censorship. I was overruled, and from that point in time, the AP, like all of its sister organizations, collaborates with Hamas censorship in Gaza.  What does that mean? You'll see a lot of dead civilians, and you won't see dead militants. You won't have a clear idea of what the Hamas military strategy is. And this is the kicker, the center of the coverage will be a number, a casualty number, that is provided to the press by something called the Gaza health ministry, which is Hamas. And we've been doing that since 2008, and it's a way of basically settling the story before you get into any other information. Because when you put, you know, when you say 50 Palestinians were killed, and one Israeli on a given day, it doesn't matter what else you say. The numbers kind of tell their own story, and it's a way of settling the story with something that sounds like a concrete statistic. And the statistic is being, you know, given to us by one of the combatant sides. But because the reporters sympathize with that side, they're happy to play along. So since 2008, certainly since 2014 when we had another serious war in Gaza, the press has not been covering Gaza, the press has been essentially an amplifier for one of the most poisonous ideologies on Earth. Hamas has figured out how to make the press amplify its messaging rather than covering Hamas. There are no Western reporters in Gaza. All of the reporters in Gaza are Palestinians, and those people fall into three categories. Some of them identify with Hamas. Some of them are intimidated by Hamas and won't cross Hamas, which makes a lot of sense. I wouldn't want to cross Hamas either. So either. And the third category is people who actually belong to Hamas. That's where the information from Gaza is coming from. And if you're credulous, then of course, you're going to get a story that makes Israel look pretty bad. Belle Yoeli:   So this is very depressing. That's okay. It's very helpful, very depressing. But on that note, I would ask you so whether, because you spoke about this problem in terms, of, of course, the coverage of Israel, but that it's it's also more widespread you talk, you spoke about President Biden in your article, you name other examples of how this sort of activist journalism is affecting everything we read. So what should everyone in this room be reading, truly, from your opinion. This is Matti's opinion. But if you want to you want to get information from our news and not activist journalism, obviously The Free Press, perhaps. But are there other sites or outlets that you think are getting this more down the line, or at least better than some, some better than others?  Matti Friedman:   No, it's just The Free Press. No. I mean, it's a question that I also wrestle with. I haven't given up on everyone, and even in publications that have, I think, largely lost the plot, you'll still find good stuff on occasion. So I try to keep my eye on certain reporters whose name I know. I often ask not just on Israel, but on anything, does this reporter speak the language of the country that they're covering? You'd be shocked at how rare that is for Americans. A lot of the people covering Ukraine have no idea what language they speak in Ukraine, and just as someone who covers Israel, I'm aware of the low level of knowledge that many of the Western reporters have. You'll find really good stuff still in the Atlantic. The Atlantic has managed, against steep odds, to maintain its equilibrium amid all this. The New Yorker, unfortunately, less so, but you'll still see, on occasion, things that are good. And there are certain reporters who are, you know, you can trust. Isabel Kirchner, who writes for The New York Times, is an old colleague of mine from the Jerusalem report. She's excellent, and they're just people who are doing their job. But by and large, you have to be very, very suspicious of absolutely everything that you read and see. And I'm not saying that as someone who I'm not happy to say that, and I certainly don't identify with, you know, the term fake news, as it has been pushed by President Trump.  I think that fake news is, you know, for those guys, is an attempt to avoid scrutiny. They're trying to, you know, neuter the watchdog so that they can get away with whatever they want. I don't think that crowd is interested in good press coverage. Unfortunately, the term fake news sticks because it's true. That's why it has worked. And the press, instead of helping people navigate the blizzard of disinformation that we're all in, they've joined it. People who are confused about what's going on, should be able to open up the New York Times or go to the AP and figure out what's going on, but because, and I saw it happen, instead of covering the circus, the reporters became dancing bears in the circus. So no one can make heads or tails of anything. So we need to be very careful.  Most headlines that are out there are out there to generate outrage, because that's the most predictable generator of clicks, which is the, we're in a click economy. So I actually think that the less time you spend following headlines and daily news, the better off you'll be. Because you can follow the daily news for a year, and by the end of the year, you'll just be deranged. You'll just be crazy and very angry.  If you take that time and use it to read books about, you know, bitten by people who are knowledgeable, or read longer form essays that are, you know, that are obviously less likely to be very simplistic, although not, you know, it's not completely impossible that they will be. I think that's time, that's time better spent. Unfortunately, much of the industry is kind of gone. And we're in an interesting kind of interim moment where it's clear that the old news industry is basically dead and that something new has to happen. And those new things are happening. I mean, The Free Press is part of a new thing that's happening. It's not big enough to really move the needle in a dramatic way yet, but it might be, and I think we all have to hope that new institutions emerge to fill the vacuum.  The old institutions, and I say this with sorrow, and I think that this also might be true of a lot of the academic institutions. They can't be saved. They can't be saved. So if people think that writing an editor, a letter to the editor of the New York Times is going to help. It's not going to help. Sometimes people say, Why don't we just get the top people in the news industry and bring them to Israel and show them the truth? Doesn't help. It's not about knowing or not knowing. They define the profession differently.  So it's not about a lack of information. The institutions have changed, and it's kind of irrevocable at this point, and we need new institutions, and one of them is The Free Press, and it's a great model of what to do when faced with fading institutions. By the way, the greatest model of all time in that regard is Zionism. That's what Zionism is. There's a guy in Vienna in 1890 something, and his moment is incredibly contemporary. There's an amazing biography of Herzl called Herzl by Amos Elon. It's an amazing book. If you haven't read it, you should read it, because his moment in cosmopolitan Vienna sounds exactly like now. It's shockingly current. He's in this friendly city. He's a reporter for the New York Times, basically of the Austro Hungarian empire, and he's assimilated, and he's got a Christmas tree in his house, and his son isn't circumcised, and he thinks everything is basically great. And then the light changes.  He notices that something has changed in Vienna, and the discourse about Jews changes, and like in a Hollywood movie, the light changes. And he doesn't try to he doesn't start a campaign against antisemitism. He doesn't get on social media and kind of rail against unfair coverage. He sits down in a hotel room in Paris and he writes this pamphlet called the Jewish state, and I literally flew from that state yesterday. So there's a Zionist model where you look at a failing world and you think about radical solutions that involve creation. And I think we're there. And I think Herzl's model is a good one at a dark time you need real creativity. Belle Yoeli:   Thank God you found the inspiration there, because I was really, I was really starting to worry. No, in all seriousness, Matti, the saying that these institutions can't be saved. I mean the consequences of this, not just for us as pro-Israel, pro-Jewish advocates, but for our country, for the world, the countries that we come from are tremendous.  And the way we've been dealing with this issue and thinking about how, how can you change hearts and minds of individuals about Israel, about the Jewish people, if everything that they're reading is so damaging and most of what they're reading is so damaging and basically saying there's very little that we can do about that. So I am going to push you to dream big with us. We're an advocacy organization. AJC is an advocacy organization. So if you had unlimited resources, right, if you really wanted to make change in this area, to me, it sounds like you're saying we basically need 15 Free Presses or the new institutions to really take on this way. What would you do? What would you do to try to make it so that news media were more like the old days? Matti Friedman:   Anyone who wants unlimited resources should not go into journalism. I have found that my resources remain limited. I'll give you an answer that is probably not what you're expecting or not what you want here. I think that the fight can't be won. I think that antisemitism can't be defeated. And I think that resources that are poured into it are resources wasted. And of course, I think that people need legal protection, and they need, you know, lawyers who can protect people from discrimination and from defamation. That's very important. But I know that when people are presented with a problem like antisemitism, which is so disturbing and it's really rocking the world of everyone in this room, and certainly, you know, children and grandchildren, you have a problem and you want to address it, right? You have a really bad rash on your arm. You want the rash to go away, and you're willing to do almost anything to make it go away. This has always been with us. It's always been with us.  And you know, we recently celebrated the Seder, and we read in the Seder, in the Haggadah, l'chol dor vador, omdim aleinu l'chaloteinu. Which is, in every generation, they come at us to destroy us. And it's an incredibly depressing worldview. Okay, it's not the way I wanted to see the world when I grew up in Toronto in the 1990s. But in our tradition, we have this idea that this is always gonna be around. And the question is, what do you do? Do you let other people define you? Do you make your identity the fight against the people who hate you? And I think that's a dead end.  This crisis is hitting the Jewish people at a moment when many of us don't know who we are, and I think that's why it's hitting so hard. For my grandfather, who was a standard New York Jew, garment industry, Lower East Side, poor union guy. This would not have shaken him, because he just assumed that this was the world like this. The term Jewish identity was not one he ever heard, because it wasn't an issue or something that had to be taught. So if I had unlimited resources, what I would do is I would make sure that young Jewish people have access to the riches of Jewish civilization, I would, you know, institute a program that would allow any young Jewish person to be fluent in Hebrew by the time they finish college. Why is that so important? Why is that such an amazing key?  Because if you're fluent in Hebrew, you can open a Tanakh, or you can open a prayer book if you want. Or you can watch Fauda or you can get on a plane to Israel and hit on Israeli guys. Hebrew is the key to Jewish life, and if you have it, a whole world will open up. And it's not one that antisemites can interfere with. It does not depend on the goodwill of our neighbors. It's all about us and what we're doing with ourselves. And I think that if you're rooted in Jewish tradition, and I'm not saying becoming religious, I'm just saying, diving into the riches of Jewish tradition, whether it's history or gemara or Israel, or whatever, if you're if you're deep in there enough, then the other stuff doesn't go away, but it becomes less important.  It won't be solved because it can't be solved, but it will fade into the background. And if we make the center of identity the fight against antisemitism, they've won. Why should they be the center of our identity? For a young person who's looking for some way of living or some deep kind of guide to life, the fight against antisemitism is not going to do it, and philanthropy is not going to do it. We come from the wisest and one of the oldest civilizations in the world, and many of us don't know how to open the door to that civilization, and that's in our hands. And if we're not doing it, it's not the fault of the antisemites. It's our own fault. So if I had unlimited resources, which, again, it's not, it's not going to happen unless I make a career change, that's where I would be putting my effort. Internally and not externally.  Belle Yoeli:   You did find the inspiration, though, again, by pushing Jewish identity, and we appreciate that. It's come up a lot in this conversation, this question about how we fight antisemitism, investing in Jewish identity and who we are, and at the same time, what do we do about it? And I think all of you heard Ted in a different context last night, say, we can hold two things, two thoughts at the same time, right? Two things can be true at the same time. And I think for me, what I took out of this, in addition to your excellent insights, is that that's exactly what we have to be doing.  At AJC, we have to be engaging in this advocacy to stand up for the Jewish people and the State of Israel. But that's not the only piece of the puzzle. Of course, we have to be investing in Jewish identity. That's why we bring so many young people to this conference. Of course, we need to be investing in Jewish education. That's not necessarily what AJC is doing, the bulk of our work, but it's a lot of what the Jewish community is doing, and these pieces have to go together. And I want to thank you for raising that up for us, and again, for everything that you said. Thank you all so much for being here. Thank you. Manya Brachear Pashman: If you missed last week's episode, be sure to tune in as John Spencer, Chair of Urban Warfare Studies at West Point, breaks down Israel's high-stakes strike on Iran's nuclear infrastructure and the U.S. decision to enter the fight. 

Civil organisations in Mozambique say at least 120 children have been kidnapped by insurgents in the north of the country. The Human Rights Watch group warn of a rise in abductions in the country's troubled nothern province of Cabo Delgado. The children are reportedly being used by Al-Shabab, an insurgent group linked to the so-called Islamic State, to transport looted goods, cheap labour and in some cases as child soldiers. We'll hear from someone closely monitoring the kidnappings.Also, are there increased US bombings against targets in Somalia since Donald Trump became president?And we meet Cathy Dreyer, the first female ranger to head up the team at the Kruger National Park in South Africa!Presenter: Audrey Brown Producers: Alfonso Daniels and Nyasha Michelle Technical Producer: Jack Graysmark Senior Journalist: Karnie Sharp Editors: Alice Muthengi and Andre Lombard

An EU summit in Brussels calls for a ceasefire in Gaza but not for sanctions against Israel. Germany has led states blocking action throughout the war, while others express anger. So, what's driving the EU's position on Israel and Gaza? In this episode: Claudio Francavilla, Associate EU Director, Human Rights Watch. Lynn Boylan, Sinn Féin Member of the European Parliament. Giorgia Gusciglio, Europe Coordinator, Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions. Host: Adrian Finighan Connect with us:@AJEPodcasts on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook

The ABC unlawfully dismissed journalist Antoinette Lattouf by cutting short her week-long radio hosting role, the federal court has ruled. Lattouf was sacked after sharing a Human Rights Watch post on social media in December 2023. She accused the public broadcaster of unfairly dismissing her for holding a political opinion – an argument the ABC rejected, but the court upheld.In today’s deep dive, we’ll take you through the Lattouf ruling and what it means for Australian media. Hosts: Harry Sekulich and Sam KoslowskiProducer: Elliot Lawry Want to support The Daily Aus? That's so kind! The best way to do that is to click ‘follow’ on Spotify or Apple and to leave us a five-star review. We would be so grateful.The Daily Aus is a media company focused on delivering accessible and digestible news to young people. We are completely independent. Want more from TDA?Subscribe to The Daily Aus newsletterSubscribe to The Daily Aus’ YouTube Channel Have feedback for us?We’re always looking for new ways to improve what we do. If you’ve got feedback, we’re all ears. Tell us here.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

What started as five casual radio presenter shifts has turned into one of the most closely watched court battles in Australian media. In 2023, Antoinette Lattouf was removed as a fill-in host of an ABC radio program after she shared a Human Rights Watch post on the Israel-Gaza conflict on her social media that stated Israel had used starvation as a ‘weapon of war'. Lattouf sued the national broadcaster for wrongful termination and – after a costly legal fight – a verdict has finally been delivered. Media correspondent Amanda Meade and senior reporter Kate Lyons tell Matilda Boseley what this verdict means for Lattouf, the ABC and the Australian media

A ‘victory for free speech’ and a sizable compensation payout. Media Editor James Madden unpacks how the national broadcaster got here. Find out more about The Front podcast here. You can read about this story and more on The Australian's website or on The Australian’s app. This episode of The Front is presented by Claire Harvey, produced by Kristen Amiet and edited by Joshua Burton. Our team includes Lia Tsamoglou, Tiffany Dimmack, Stephanie Coombes and Jasper Leak, who also composed our music. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

En RD Congo, l'AFC/M23 - groupe armé soutenu par le Rwanda - est accusé d'avoir transféré de force plus de 1 500 personnes de l'est du pays vers le Rwanda. Le groupe armé affirme qu'il s'agissait de citoyens rwandais. Mais Human Rights Watch évoque des retours involontaires constituant une violation du droit international.

It's Wednesday, June 18th, A.D. 2025. This is The Worldview in 5 Minutes heard on 140 radio stations and at www.TheWorldview.com.  I'm Adam McManus. (Adam@TheWorldview.com) By Jonathan Clark and Adam McManus Pakistani Muslims level false accusations against Christians Muslims in Pakistan are using the country's blasphemy laws to target religious minorities. Human Rights Watch released a report on the issue, entitled, “A Conspiracy to Grab the Land: Exploiting Pakistan's Blasphemy Laws for Blackmail and Profit.” For example, Christians experience false accusations of blasphemy against Islam. Locals then weaponize the accusations by inciting mob violence against Christians and seizing their property.  Sadly, the government does little to nothing about such attacks. Pakistan is ranked eighth on the Open Doors' World Watch List of the most difficult places to be a Christian.  Psalm 14:4 asks, “Have all the workers of iniquity no knowledge, who eat up My people as they eat bread, and do not call on the LORD?” Trump warns Iranian civilians to evacuate Tehran U.S. President Donald Trump called for Iranian civilians to evacuate their capital city of Tehran this week as fighting between Israel and Iran escalates.  And yesterday, he wrote on Truth Social, “We know exactly where the so-called ‘Supreme Leader' is hiding.  ... We are not going to take him out. ... at least not for now. But we don't want missiles shot at civilians, or American soldiers. Our patience is wearing thin.” A senior White House official told Fox News that U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities are on the table.  Supreme Court: Religious groups cannot be compelled to fund abortion On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed a lower court ruling that had previously forced religious groups to fund abortions. The state of New York required groups, including churches, to cover abortions in their health insurance plans for employees. Religious groups have been challenging the policy for years. Attorney Noel Francisco commented on the case. He said, “Religious groups in the Empire State should not be forced to provide insurance coverage that violates their deeply held religious beliefs. We are confident that New York will finally get the message and stop discriminating against religious objectors.” House voted to cut $9 billion in foreign aid and public broadcasting The U.S. House of representatives narrowly passed a measure to cut $9 billion in funding for foreign aid and public broadcasting.  The House approved the legislation by a vote of 214-212 last Thursday.  House Speaker Mike Johnson commented, “It is just one of the ways Republicans are codifying DOGE's findings and putting taxpayer dollars to better use.” The bill faces an uncertain future in the U.S. Senate. Children's Hospital in Los Angeles closes its transgender center The Children's Hospital in Los Angeles recently announced it will close its so-called “Center for Transyouth Health and Development” next month.  The center performed sex mutilating surgeries and offered puberty-blocking drugs to children.  The announcement follows an executive order from President Trump that bans federal funding for transgender operations for minors. Alabama has most people with Biblical worldview; Rhode Island the least Dr. George Barna released a new report on the worldview of Americans ranked by state. The report notes that only 4% of U.S. adults hold to a Biblical worldview. However, that number varies by state. The states with the highest proportion of adults with a Biblical worldview are Alabama at 12.6%, Mississippi at 12.5%, South Carolina at 9.8%, and Arkansas at 9%. States with the least proportion of adults with a Biblical worldview are Rhode Island at 0.25%, Maine at 1.1%, Nebraska at 1.5% and Massachusetts at 1.8%.  Even though states like Alabama and Mississippi have a higher incidence of adults with a Biblical worldview, Dr. Barna noted, “In absolute terms, every state in the union is failing miserably at developing the biblical worldview among its residents.” Isaiah 55:7 says, “Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts; let him return to the LORD, and He will have mercy on him; and to our God, for He will abundantly pardon.” Worldview listeners in Wisconsin, Oklahoma, and Kentucky share their hearts I invited Worldview listeners to share what they enjoy about the newscast in 2-6 sentences by email.  You can share your thoughts — along with your full name, city and state — and send it to adam@TheWorldview.com Barabara Resheske in Lake Nebagamon, Wisconsin wrote, “I read every word of The Worldview transcript because it confirms my belief that the world is in turmoil, but Christ is in control. I pray when you request prayers for the persecuted. I thank you for telling us what the mass media doesn't.  Indeed, I thank you for truth, honesty, and transparency.” Ruth Stapp in Edmond, Oklahoma wrote, “I love The Worldview and look forward to seeing it every day. Your information is exactly what I need. I do not enjoy watching the news on TV because of the bias and lies. Plus, your newscast gives me an opportunity to delve further into any of the stories that spark my interest through the links you provide.”  And Daniel Wojnicki in Louisville, Kentucky. wrote,  “I enjoy that The Worldview gives facts and news insights all in one short newscast. Because it's a Christian news source, there is no distortion of the truth.  Being informed about the truth is very rare these days, especially in an age ruled by corrupted news anchors.” 8 Worldview listeners gave $3,022 to fund our annual budget And finally, toward our $92,625 goal by this Friday, June 20th  to fund three-quarters of The Worldview newscast's annual budget for our 6-member team, 8  listeners stepped up to the plate as of 4:00pm Central yesterday afternoon. Our thanks to Margaret in Raleigh, North Carolina who gave $25 and Jessica in Delmar, Maryland who gave $50. We're grateful to God for Mandy in Walpole, New Hampshire and Max in Macon, Georgia – both of whom gave $200 as well as Rose in Everson, Washington who gave $247. And we were touched by the generosity of Carlee in Keswick Ridge, New Brunswick, Canada who pledged $25/month for 12 months for a gift of $300, Susan in San Antonio, Texas who gave $1,000, and Scooter in Naples, Florida who gave $1,000 to match Susan's gift. Those 8 Worldview listeners gave a total of $3,022. Ready for our new grand total? Drum roll please.  (Drum roll sound effect) $46,896.70 (People clapping and cheering sound effect)   Toward this Friday, June 20th's goal of $92,625, we need to raise $45,728.30. Remember, if you are one of the final 2 people who will give a one-time gift of $1,000, Scooter in Naples, Florida will match you with a corresponding $1,000 gift of his own.  I am wondering if there are two businesspeople in our listening audience  – two -- who would consider a generous $10,000 matching gift if 5 other listeners gave a one-time gift of $2,000. If you are one of those 2 businesspeople, please email me at adam@TheWorldview.com and include your phone number so we can chat. I need to find 20 Worldview listeners who will pledge $50/month for 12 months for a gift of $600. And another 40 listeners to pledge $25/month for 12 months for a gift of $300. Go to TheWorldview.com and click on Give on the top right. Your gift will help us fund the 6-member Worldview newscast team for another fiscal year. Close And that's The Worldview on this Wednesday, June 18th, in the year of our Lord 2025.  Follow us on X or subscribe for free by Spotify, Amazon Music, or by iTunes or email to our unique Christian newscast at www.TheWorldview.com.  Plus, you can get the Generations app through Google Play or The App Store. I'm Adam McManus (Adam@TheWorldview.com). Seize the day for Jesus Christ.

Former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte took office with a vow to eliminate illegal drugs. His “war on drugs” resulted in the brutal killing of between 12,000 and 30,000 people. Despite the international outcry and extensive media coverage of the deaths and their impact, Duterte remained popular—and untouchable – until recently. In March, he was arrested on an International Criminal Court warrant for crimes against humanity and is now sitting in a jail cell in The Hague. Nobel Peace Prize winner Maria Ressa, whose fearless reporting helped expose Duterte's brutal drug war, was targeted by Duterte – accused of everything from tax evasion to libel. In this episode of Rights & Wrongs, host Ngofeen Mputubwele speaks with Ressa and Human Rights Watch researchers about Duterte's bloody legacy, the importance of standing up to dictators, and what his arrest means for other leaders indicted by the ICC. Maria Ressa: CEO of Rappler and Nobel Peace Prize winner Carlos Conde: Senior researcher at the Asia division of Human Rights Watch Maria Elena Vignoli: Senior counsel in the International Justice Program of Human Rights Watch

Panamá está envuelto en una gran tormenta. Trump busca recuperar el control del Canal y desplazar a China, varios migrantes deportados desde Estados Unidos vagan sin rumbo en el país, y existen masivas protestas desde hace casi dos meses. En este episodio de El Mundo en Crisis ponemos la lupa sobre ese país centroamericano clave, con entrevistas a Jorge Eduardo Ritter, ex canciller para el Canal, y Martina Rapido, de Human Rights Watch. Con la conducción de Lucía Cholakian Herrera y Marco Teruggi, y la edición de Alejandro Demasi.

Internal medicine and pediatric physician Charles LeBaron discusses his article "How the CDC's opioid rules created a crisis for chronic pain patients." Charles discusses the 2016 CDC opioid guideline, initially framed as a solution to over-prescription and overdose deaths, and critically examines its actual impact. He reveals how the guideline, despite being based on "low quality of evidence," led to widespread restrictions on opioid prescriptions by states, federal agencies, insurance companies, and pharmacies. Charles highlights the severe, unintended consequences for chronic pain patients, including increased pain, worsened quality of life, and a rise in suicides and overdoses among those whose opioid dosages were reduced or discontinued. He also touches on the devastating impact on cancer patients experiencing undertreated pain and discusses criticisms from pain specialists and the damning report by Human Rights Watch, which characterized the de facto denial of pain relief as a potential human rights violation. Our presenting sponsor is Microsoft Dragon Copilot. Microsoft Dragon Copilot, your AI assistant for clinical workflow, is transforming how clinicians work. Now you can streamline and customize documentation, surface information right at the point of care, and automate tasks with just a click. Part of Microsoft Cloud for Healthcare, Dragon Copilot offers an extensible AI workspace and a single, integrated platform to help unlock new levels of efficiency. Plus, it's backed by a proven track record and decades of clinical expertise—and it's built on a foundation of trust. It's time to ease your administrative burdens and stay focused on what matters most with Dragon Copilot, your AI assistant for clinical workflow. VISIT SPONSOR → https://aka.ms/kevinmd SUBSCRIBE TO THE PODCAST → https://www.kevinmd.com/podcast RECOMMENDED BY KEVINMD → https://www.kevinmd.com/recommended

C dans l'air du 9 juin 2025 - La Californie se rebelle...Trump envoie la Garde nationaleQue se passe-t-il à Los Angeles ? Depuis vendredi, des habitants manifestent dans la mégapole californienne contre la politique migratoire de l'administration Trump, à la suite d'opérations musclées menées par les agents fédéraux de l'immigration (ICE). L'envoi, samedi, de la Garde nationale sur ordre du président américain, contre l'avis du gouverneur démocrate de l'État, est loin d'avoir calmé les esprits. Pour le troisième jour consécutif, des heurts ont opposé les forces de sécurité à des manifestants qui protestent contre la politique d'expulsion massive et dénoncent l'envoi des premiers soldats par Washington — une manière, selon eux, d'instrumentaliser la situation.Donald Trump exploite-t-il les incidents à Los Angeles ? C'est en tout cas l'avis de la maire démocrate de la cité californienne, qui affirme contrôler la situation. "Ce que nous voyons à Los Angeles, c'est un chaos provoqué par l'administration. Le déploiement des troupes fédérales est une escalade dangereuse."En Californie, les fractures de l'Amérique éclatent au grand jour : d'un côté, les démocrates accusés de laxisme sur la politique migratoire ; de l'autre, les républicains de Donald Trump, déterminés à appliquer les mesures et à faire un exemple dans le fief de l'un de leurs principaux opposants, au risque de plonger un peu plus le pays dans une crise institutionnelle."C'est une atteinte grave à la souveraineté de l'État", a dénoncé le gouverneur démocrate de Californie, Gavin Newsom. "Nous n'avions pas de problème jusqu'à ce que Trump s'en mêle", a-t-il accusé sur X. Les gouverneurs des États démocrates ont fustigé un "abus de pouvoir alarmant", rappelant que la Garde nationale est traditionnellement mobilisée lors de catastrophes naturelles, et non pour réprimer des mouvements sociaux. Il s'agirait du premier déploiement unilatéral de la Garde nationale par un président sans l'accord d'un gouverneur depuis 1965, selon Kenneth Roth, ancien directeur de Human Rights Watch.Cette décision inédite du président Trump marque une nouvelle étape dans sa confrontation avec les États et les villes démocrates sur la question migratoire. À l'heure où il est en échec sur d'autres volets de sa politique (économie, inflation, guerres commerciales, diplomatie) et qu'il vient de rompre de façon fracassante avec Elon Musk, le républicain durcit encore sa politique anti-immigration, pour montrer à ses électeurs déboussolés qu'il tient ses promesses. Ainsi, l'interdiction d'entrée aux États-Unis pour les ressortissants de douze pays, édictée la semaine dernière, est entrée en vigueur ce lundi, selon un nouveau décret présidentiel. Sont concernés les ressortissants d'Afghanistan, de Birmanie, du Tchad, du Congo-Brazzaville, de Guinée équatoriale, d'Érythrée, d'Haïti, d'Iran, de Libye, de Somalie, du Soudan et du Yémen.La Maison-Blanche a également décidé, ces derniers jours, la suspension du traitement des visas pour les étudiants étrangers, le temps pour l'administration Trump de mettre en place une procédure permettant d'examiner le contenu de leurs réseaux sociaux. Parallèlement, des vagues d'arrestations et d'expulsions sont mises en scène afin de frapper les opinions publiques.Quelle est la situation en Californie ? Pourquoi l'envoi de la Garde nationale fait craindre une dérive autoritaire de Donald Trump ? Qu'est-ce que le "travel ban" ? Jusqu'où ira son bras de fer avec les universités ? LES EXPERTS :- Nicole BACHARAN - Historienne et politologue, spécialiste des États-Unis, éditorialiste à Ouest France- Gallagher FENWICK - Grand reporter, spécialiste des questions internationales, ancien correspondant à Washington, auteur de Volodymyr Zelensky : l'Ukraine dans le sang, publié aux éditions du Rocher- Anne DEYSINE - Juriste et politologue, spécialiste des États-Unis- Corentin SELLIN - Professeur agrégé d'histoire, spécialiste des États-Unis, chroniqueur sur la politique américaine pour les Jours.fr- Piotr SMOLAR - Correspondant aux Etats-Unis pour le journal Le Monde

Israel is escalating its genocide in Gaza. Entire families are being wiped out, famine is spreading, and airstrikes are targeting shelters and schools. In the West Bank, killings and settler violence are surging as Israel tightens its grip on the territory. Yet despite these atrocities, international media coverage has diminished. While a handful of European governments have begun to question their complicity, meaningful action is still missing.  In this livestream, Palestinian writer and organiser Mohammed El-Kurd joins Yanis Varoufakis to cut through the noise: What's really happening on the ground? Why has the West been so slow, or unwilling, to act? And what can we, as citizens, do about it? Hosted by Mehran Khalili. 

Le président américain Donald Trump a décidé d'interdire aux ressortissants de 12 pays d'entrer aux États-Unis afin de « protéger » le pays de « terroristes étrangers », et imposé des restrictions contre 7 autres États. Décision annoncée, a-t-il précisé, après l'attaque du Colorado qui a visé les participants d'une marche de soutien aux otages israéliens à Gaza. Parmi la liste des pays dont les ressortissants seront interdits d'entrer sur le territoire à partir du 9 juin 2025, se trouve Haïti. Pour le moment, il y a de la confusion en Haïti, constate le rédacteur en chef du Nouvelliste, Frantz Duval. On essaie de comprendre s'il y a des exceptions. Le gouvernement haïtien est resté silencieux. C'est le deuxième pays à interdire son territoire aux Haïtiens, avant les États-Unis, la République Dominicaine avait pris une mesure similaire. Le Venezuela met en garde ses citoyensLe Venezuela et Cuba se trouvent eux sur la liste des 7 pays qui sont soumis à des restrictions plutôt qu'à une interdiction totale. Le président américain juge que ces derniers ont des vérifications d'antécédents criminels déficients, explique TalCual. Le média vénézuélien tente d'expliquer à ses lecteurs qui sera impacté ou non. Toute personne titulaire d'un visa de tourisme, de travail, ou d'étudiant se trouvant hors des États-Unis verra son visa annulé.Il n'y a que quelques exceptions concernant, par exemple, les sportifs de haut niveau ou les diplomates.En réaction, Caracas a prévenu ses ressortissants que voyager aux États-Unis représentait «un grand risque».  Nouvelles mesures contre les universités américainesParallèlement, El Nacional vénézuélien choisi de rappeler aujourd'hui le cas particulier de l'Université américaine d'Harvard. Aucun étudiant étranger participant au programme d'échange avec Harvard ne sera autorisé à entrer sur le territoire. Ceux déjà présents sur le territoire feront l'objet d'un examen, et pourraient voir leur visa révoqué.L'administration Trump poursuit en effet son offensive contre les grandes universités américaines, qu'il qualifie de «foyer du libéralisme et du «wokisme»». En plus de restreindre l'accès d'Harvard aux étudiants étrangers, il a également retiré près de 3 milliards de dollars de subventions fédérales à la grande université. La prestigieuse université de New York, Columbia est également visée. La ministre américaine de l'Éducation l'a annoncé hier dans un communiqué. Selon Linda McMahon, «depuis le 7 octobre 2023, Columbia fait preuve d'indifférence face au harcèlement des étudiants juifs, l'université viole les lois fédérales contre la discrimination et pourrait perdre son accréditation». Une suppression qui entrainerait une perte de toutes les subventions fédérales de l'Université. Depuis plus d'un an, Columbia est l'épicentre des manifestations pro-palestiniennes aux États-Unis. En mars, Mahmoud Khalil, figure du mouvement et étudiant de l'Université new-yorkaise, a d'ailleurs été placé dans un centre de détention fédéral en Louisiane. Il risque l'expulsion.Si Columbia a annoncé qu'elle allait collaborer avec le gouvernement fédéral, la direction d'Harvard, elle, a choisi une autre stratégie. Elle dénonce une nouvelle mesure de rétorsion illégale. Et déclare qu'elle continuera à protéger ses étudiants internationaux. Lula à la recherche d'un accord de Libre-échange à ParisLe président brésilien Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva en visite d'État à Paris a exhorté ce jeudi son homologue français à « conclure » l'accord de libre-échange entre le Mercosur et l'Union européenne.L'accord de libre-échange entre l'UE et le Mercosur est la meilleure réponse dans un monde incertain marqué par le retour de l'unilatéralisme a estimé le chef d'État brésilien, une référence aux droits de douane et à la guerre commerciale déclenchée par Donald Trump ces derniers mois.Emmanuel Macron a écouté ce plaidoyer avec le sourire, rapporte notre envoyé spécial à l'Elysée Théo Conscience, mais est resté ferme sur ses positions : la France est en faveur d'un commerce libre, et équitable. Le président français a pointé du doigt des différences de normes sanitaires et environnementales entre les deux blocs, et plaidé pour l'introduction de clauses miroir ou de mesures de sauvegardes. Au Salvador, l'avocate des droits humains Ruth Lopez refuse de plier face aux autorités«On ne me fera pas taire», a crié la directrice de l'Unité anticorruption et juste de l'ONG Cristosal en se rendant à son audience à huis clos. C'est le seul moment où les médias ont pu enregistrer sa voix à la volée.Elle réclame d'ailleurs un procès public.Arrêtée il y a trois semaines, son affaire a été placée par la justice sous un statut de confidentialité. Elle a été officiellement accusée de détournement de fonds publics mais son avocat dénonce une volonté de la faire taire. Ruth Lopez est connue comme une grande voix critique des autorités au Salvador, explique CNN Latinoamérica qui propose un portrait de la militante. Elle s'est rapidement opposée au régime d'exception mis en place par Nayib Bukele officiellement pour lutter contre les gangs. «Il n'y a aucune justification constitutionnelle ni légale pour maintenir ce régime d'exception», plaidait-elle déjà en 2022.  «Nous ne défendons pas les gangs, nous défendons les personnes arrêtées injustement et dans des conditions arbitraires.»Ces derniers temps, Ruth Lopez s'était concentrée sur la défense des 252 migrants vénézuéliens emprisonnés au Salvador après leur expulsion des États-Unis. Les deux pays les accusent de faire partie de gangs et les ont soumis à des disparitions forcées, selon Human Rights Watch.L'arrestation a d'ailleurs mobilisé de nombreuses organisations de défense des droits humains nationale et internationale.Mercredi (4 juin 2025), sa détention a été prolongée pour 6 mois, rapporte El Mundo du Salvador. L'accusation est passée de détournement de fonds publics à enrichissement illicite. En sortant de l'audience, Ruth Lopez a crié qu'elle était une prisonnière politique et qu'aucune institution judiciaire n'était indépendante au Salvador.La Prensa Grafica résume l'analyse de plusieurs avocats pénaliste sur cette affaire. Ils dénoncent notamment l'illégalité du changement de qualification de l'accusation contre Ruth Lopez. L'enrichissement illicite demanderait moins de preuve que l'accusation de détournement de fonds publics.  L'avocat de la militante lui affirme que les autorités tentent simplement de faire taire une voix qui les effraie. 

The aid crisis in Gaza is deepening. This morning, Israeli soldiers opened fire near crowds of Palestinians approaching a new food distribution site in southern Gaza, the Israeli military confirmed. At least 27 people were killed and dozens more wounded, according to the Gaza Health Ministry. This comes just days after a similar incident left 31 dead and nearly 200 injured, an event for which Israel has denied responsibility.As famine looms and disease spreads through the devastated territory, civilians are caught in an increasingly desperate struggle for survival. Aid is scarce, humanitarian convoys are often attacked or held indefinitely at the Gaza border, and the infrastructure needed to deliver essential supplies has collapsed.In this episode of The Fourcast, Krishnan Guru-Murthy is in Jerusalem, speaking to Milena Ansari, a Palestinian lawyer and researcher with Human Rights Watch, and Zvika Klein, editor-in-chief of The Jerusalem Post. They discuss how the crisis is unfolding, why so little aid is getting through, and who is being held accountable.

00:02:34;18 - 00:05:33;00Colorado's Gender Identity Policy for Youth CampsColorado mandates youth camps, including Christian Camp Idra Hagee, to allow facility use based on self-declared gender identity, sparking controversy. The camp's failed lawsuit for a religious exemption underscores tensions between state policy and religious freedom, with critics arguing it prioritizes feelings over safety. 00:20:38;15 - 00:24:54;16UN Treaty on AI-Generated Child PornographyA proposed UN treaty may permit AI-generated child sexual abuse imagery as “harm reduction” for pedophiles. Critics condemn it as morally reprehensible, arguing it fuels demand and strains law enforcement, contrasting with U.S. laws in 38 states targeting such material. 01:15:45;25 - 01:22:44;06Trump Administration and Digital Control Grid ConcernsFears grow that the Trump administration is building a digital control grid using AI, digital IDs, and stablecoins, centralizing financial control and enabling mass surveillance. Missing $21 trillion in government funds and crypto-friendly policies heighten concerns of a technocratic super-surveillance state. 01:26:13;18 - 01:28:13;08German Pensioner's Speech Crime ConvictionA 73-year-old German pensioner faces 75 days in prison for repeating the banned phrase “Alles für Deutschland,” linked to National Socialist slogans. His inability to pay a €4,500 fine highlights Germany's strict speech crime laws and their chilling effect on free expression. 01:35:03;06 - 01:38:43;14Georgia Mother Arrested for Leaving Kids Home AloneAlexandra Woodward faces five years in prison for briefly leaving her 8- and 10-year-old sons alone in Georgia. Despite their safety, the father's 911 call led to her arrest, exposing state overreach and inconsistent laws on child autonomy versus gender decisions. 02:09:55;23 - 02:14:27;16Escalation Toward World War IIIGerald Celente warns of World War III risks, citing Germany's $1 trillion defense budget, troop deployments near Russia, and missile supplies to Ukraine. He criticizes the military-industrial complex for enriching elites while economies stagnate, ignoring consumer-driven growth. 02:17:45;28 - 02:19:57;07Gaza Conflict and Lack of OutrageOver 100,000 deaths in Gaza, including 50,000 children, per Lancet, draw little celebrity or media outrage, unlike Vietnam War protests. Celente condemns U.S. backing of Israel's actions, including West Bank settlements, as war crimes ignored by the West. 02:33:25;28 - 02:38:42;19Commercial Real Estate and AI Bubble CollapseCelente predicts a commercial real estate crash due to 54% office occupancy and expiring leases, risking bank failures like 2023's Silicon Valley Bank. He also foresees an AI bubble burst, akin to the 2000 dot-com crash, potentially collapsing equity markets and boosting gold prices. 02:54:31;20 - 02:58:16;21Israel's Samson Option and Middle East TensionsCelente highlights Israel's “Samson Option,” a nuclear strategy to destroy enemies if threatened, escalating Middle East tensions. He labels Israel an apartheid state, per Human Rights Watch, and criticizes U.S. support for its Gaza actions and potential Iran conflict, risking global catastrophe. Follow the show on Kick and watch live every weekday 9:00am EST – 12:00pm EST https://kick.com/davidknightshow Money should have intrinsic value AND transactional privacy: Go to https://davidknight.gold/ for great deals on physical gold/silver For 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to https://trendsjournal.com/ and enter the code KNIGHT Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @DavidKnightShow@protonmail.comCash App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

00:02:34;18 - 00:05:33;00Colorado's Gender Identity Policy for Youth CampsColorado mandates youth camps, including Christian Camp Idra Hagee, to allow facility use based on self-declared gender identity, sparking controversy. The camp's failed lawsuit for a religious exemption underscores tensions between state policy and religious freedom, with critics arguing it prioritizes feelings over safety. 00:20:38;15 - 00:24:54;16UN Treaty on AI-Generated Child PornographyA proposed UN treaty may permit AI-generated child sexual abuse imagery as “harm reduction” for pedophiles. Critics condemn it as morally reprehensible, arguing it fuels demand and strains law enforcement, contrasting with U.S. laws in 38 states targeting such material. 01:15:45;25 - 01:22:44;06Trump Administration and Digital Control Grid ConcernsFears grow that the Trump administration is building a digital control grid using AI, digital IDs, and stablecoins, centralizing financial control and enabling mass surveillance. Missing $21 trillion in government funds and crypto-friendly policies heighten concerns of a technocratic super-surveillance state. 01:26:13;18 - 01:28:13;08German Pensioner's Speech Crime ConvictionA 73-year-old German pensioner faces 75 days in prison for repeating the banned phrase “Alles für Deutschland,” linked to National Socialist slogans. His inability to pay a €4,500 fine highlights Germany's strict speech crime laws and their chilling effect on free expression. 01:35:03;06 - 01:38:43;14Georgia Mother Arrested for Leaving Kids Home AloneAlexandra Woodward faces five years in prison for briefly leaving her 8- and 10-year-old sons alone in Georgia. Despite their safety, the father's 911 call led to her arrest, exposing state overreach and inconsistent laws on child autonomy versus gender decisions. 02:09:55;23 - 02:14:27;16Escalation Toward World War IIIGerald Celente warns of World War III risks, citing Germany's $1 trillion defense budget, troop deployments near Russia, and missile supplies to Ukraine. He criticizes the military-industrial complex for enriching elites while economies stagnate, ignoring consumer-driven growth. 02:17:45;28 - 02:19:57;07Gaza Conflict and Lack of OutrageOver 100,000 deaths in Gaza, including 50,000 children, per Lancet, draw little celebrity or media outrage, unlike Vietnam War protests. Celente condemns U.S. backing of Israel's actions, including West Bank settlements, as war crimes ignored by the West. 02:33:25;28 - 02:38:42;19Commercial Real Estate and AI Bubble CollapseCelente predicts a commercial real estate crash due to 54% office occupancy and expiring leases, risking bank failures like 2023's Silicon Valley Bank. He also foresees an AI bubble burst, akin to the 2000 dot-com crash, potentially collapsing equity markets and boosting gold prices. 02:54:31;20 - 02:58:16;21Israel's Samson Option and Middle East TensionsCelente highlights Israel's “Samson Option,” a nuclear strategy to destroy enemies if threatened, escalating Middle East tensions. He labels Israel an apartheid state, per Human Rights Watch, and criticizes U.S. support for its Gaza actions and potential Iran conflict, risking global catastrophe. Follow the show on Kick and watch live every weekday 9:00am EST – 12:00pm EST https://kick.com/davidknightshow Money should have intrinsic value AND transactional privacy: Go to https://davidknight.gold/ for great deals on physical gold/silver For 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to https://trendsjournal.com/ and enter the code KNIGHT Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @DavidKnightShow@protonmail.comCash App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-real-david-knight-show--5282736/support.

El Parlamento de El Salvador, dominado por el partido del presidente Nayib Bukele, aprobó la Ley de Agentes Extranjeros, que establece un impuesto del 30 % a las donaciones de ONG. Después de una protesta social en frente de su casa, Bukele anunció que presentaría ese proyecto. El Gobierno afirma que busca garantizar transparencia, pero organismos internacionales y críticos denuncian una "escalada autoritaria". La aprobación de una ley de agentes extranjeros en El Salvador ha disparado la preocupación de organismos no gubernamentales y de Derechos Humanos.Según lo defendido por el oficialismo, la ley pretende limitar la influencia extranjera y la corrupción.Pero, organismos como Human Rights Watch (HRW) advierten que con esa normativa, que grava con un impuesto del 30 % a las donaciones de organizaciones no gubernamentales, El Salvador "da un paso más en la dirección de Nicaragua".La directora de la División de las Américas de la organización, Juanita Goebertus, agregó que la ley "está dirigida a impedir el trabajo de la sociedad civil y medios independientes" y alertó que "la deriva autoritaria avanza a pasos agigantados".El 21 de mayo, otras 70 organizaciones humanitarias de El Salvador y del extranjero rechazaron la ley al considerar que "habilita la criminalización arbitraria" y es parte de una "escalada autoritaria".Leer tambiénEl Salvador aprueba una polémica ley de agentes extranjeros que impone un impuesto del 30% a las ONG¿Cuáles son los alcances de la Ley de Agentes Extranjeros en El Salvador? Para analizar el tema, participan en El Debate dos invitados.- Sergio Arauz, presidente de la Asociación de Periodistas de El Salvador y subjefe de redacción de 'El Faro'- En San Salvador, está René Martínez Pineda, sociólogo y escritor.Para esta edición, se invitó a diputados del partido oficialista, pero declinaron participar o no respondieron.

Human Rights Watch upozorio zapadne zemlje na opasnost slanja migranata u pritvore u BiH. Epidemija leptospiroze u Sarajevu otvorila pitanje nemara i tendera. Petar iz Podgorice dijeli svoju priču o tome kako je živjeti sa alkoholizmom.

La ONG HRW denuncia que Estados Unidos expulsó 'injustamente' a 200 personas de diversos países, incluidos menores de edad, tras retenerlos 'en condiciones de detención abusivas' antes de trasladarlos al Centro de Atención Temporal para Migrantes (CATEM) en el sur de Costa Rica. La ONG estima que 'la complicidad' de Costa Rica con las expulsiones abusivas de EE.UU. daña su buena reputación como país de acogida para personas refugiadas'. Entrevistas: Mariana Rivera. Presentación: Ana María Ospina.  En febrero pasado, aterrizaron en Costa Rica dos vuelos provenientes de los Estados Unidos con 200 personas migrantes expulsadas por el gobierno de Donald Trump. Human Rights Watch denuncia en un informe "violaciones claras de los derechos humanos por parte de Estados Unidos" y "una negligencia alta" por parte de Costa Rica al aceptar a estas personas sin las condiciones que garanticen sus derechos y necesidades.La mayoría de las personas deportadas son originarias de países en conflicto como Afganistán, la República Democrática del Congo, Irán, Rusia o Turquía, y solicitantes de asilo, aseguró el asesor jurídico principal de la División de Derechos del Niño de la organización, Michael García Bochenek, y principal autor del reporte.El informe documenta las expulsiones de Estados Unidos y denuncia condiciones de detención abusivas, negación de derechos al debido proceso y a solicitar asilo. También detalla que las autoridades de Costa Rica detuvieron durante dos meses a las personas expulsadas y retuvieron sus pasaportes, sin base legal. Además, les transmitieron mensajes contradictorios sobre su condición."Lo que hemos visto desde el principio ha sido una mezcla de mensajes por parte de Costa Rica. Primero, las autoridades de ese país hablaron solamente de regresarlos a sus países de origen. Pero esto nunca fue una posibilidad para la mayoría de estas personas. Estamos hablando de gente que ha sufrido persecución y que está huyendo de la guerra", señaló García Bochenek.A tres meses de su ingreso al país centroamericano, 97 de los migrantes expulsados de Estados Unidos aceptaron volver a sus países presionados por la situación, otros dejaron el Centro de Atención Temporal para Migrantes (CATEM), luego de que les devolvieran sus pasaportes.Aproximadamente 50 personas, entre ellas menores de edad, aún se encuentran en un limbo legal, y con la incertidumbre de saber si obtendrán un permiso humanitario especial de 90 días para solicitar asilo en Costa Rica o si deben regresar a su país."A fines de marzo estaban hablando de la posibilidad de ir a un tercer país, pero sin suministrar más detalles. Luego, hablaron de la posibilidad de solicitar asilo en Costa Rica. En este punto es en el que estamos ahora. Pero la gente no tiene el apoyo concreto que necesitan para convertir esto en una realidad", afirmó el asesor legal.Costa Rica, reputación en juegoMientras las autoridades costarricenses han defendido el papel del país como un "puente humanitario", para HRW, en cambio, "la complicidad de Costa Rica con las expulsiones abusivas de Estados Unidos daña su buena reputación como país de acogida para personas refugiadas"."En el sentido de que aceptaron a 200 personas sin plan para su futuro, sin una preparación adecuada para recibir a estas personas durante el tiempo que realmente iban a estar en Costa Rica. Ya van tres meses. Esto incluye falta de educación para los niños y falta de apoyo adecuado para los que no han aceptado regresar a sus países de origen", alegó Michael García Bochenek.Costa Rica aún está a tiempo de recuperar sus compromisos asumidos por décadas, dice Human Rights Watch: "El gobierno costarricense también debería—como remedio parcial por el daño que causó con dos meses de detención arbitraria y en reconocimiento de su responsabilidad por haber aceptado que se enviará a personas a Costa Rica contra su voluntad—proporcionar de inmediato autorización de trabajo, ayuda para la vivienda y, según sea necesario, formación laboral, clases de idioma y ayuda para encontrar trabajo a aquellos que deseen solicitar asilo en Costa Rica".Informe:https://www.hrw.org/es/report/2025/05/22/la-estrategia-es-doblegarnos/expulsion-de-ciudadanos-de-terceros-paises-desde

La ONG HRW denuncia que Estados Unidos expulsó 'injustamente' a 200 personas de diversos países, incluidos menores de edad, tras retenerlos 'en condiciones de detención abusivas' antes de trasladarlos al Centro de Atención Temporal para Migrantes (CATEM) en el sur de Costa Rica. La ONG estima que 'la complicidad' de Costa Rica con las expulsiones abusivas de EE.UU. daña su buena reputación como país de acogida para personas refugiadas'. Entrevistas: Mariana Rivera. Presentación: Ana María Ospina.  En febrero pasado, aterrizaron en Costa Rica dos vuelos provenientes de los Estados Unidos con 200 personas migrantes expulsadas por el gobierno de Donald Trump. Human Rights Watch denuncia en un informe "violaciones claras de los derechos humanos por parte de Estados Unidos" y "una negligencia alta" por parte de Costa Rica al aceptar a estas personas sin las condiciones que garanticen sus derechos y necesidades.La mayoría de las personas deportadas son originarias de países en conflicto como Afganistán, la República Democrática del Congo, Irán, Rusia o Turquía, y solicitantes de asilo, aseguró el asesor jurídico principal de la División de Derechos del Niño de la organización, Michael García Bochenek, y principal autor del reporte.El informe documenta las expulsiones de Estados Unidos y denuncia condiciones de detención abusivas, negación de derechos al debido proceso y a solicitar asilo. También detalla que las autoridades de Costa Rica detuvieron durante dos meses a las personas expulsadas y retuvieron sus pasaportes, sin base legal. Además, les transmitieron mensajes contradictorios sobre su condición."Lo que hemos visto desde el principio ha sido una mezcla de mensajes por parte de Costa Rica. Primero, las autoridades de ese país hablaron solamente de regresarlos a sus países de origen. Pero esto nunca fue una posibilidad para la mayoría de estas personas. Estamos hablando de gente que ha sufrido persecución y que está huyendo de la guerra", señaló García Bochenek.A tres meses de su ingreso al país centroamericano, 97 de los migrantes expulsados de Estados Unidos aceptaron volver a sus países presionados por la situación, otros dejaron el Centro de Atención Temporal para Migrantes (CATEM), luego de que les devolvieran sus pasaportes.Aproximadamente 50 personas, entre ellas menores de edad, aún se encuentran en un limbo legal, y con la incertidumbre de saber si obtendrán un permiso humanitario especial de 90 días para solicitar asilo en Costa Rica o si deben regresar a su país."A fines de marzo estaban hablando de la posibilidad de ir a un tercer país, pero sin suministrar más detalles. Luego, hablaron de la posibilidad de solicitar asilo en Costa Rica. En este punto es en el que estamos ahora. Pero la gente no tiene el apoyo concreto que necesitan para convertir esto en una realidad", afirmó el asesor legal.Costa Rica, reputación en juegoMientras las autoridades costarricenses han defendido el papel del país como un "puente humanitario", para HRW, en cambio, "la complicidad de Costa Rica con las expulsiones abusivas de Estados Unidos daña su buena reputación como país de acogida para personas refugiadas"."En el sentido de que aceptaron a 200 personas sin plan para su futuro, sin una preparación adecuada para recibir a estas personas durante el tiempo que realmente iban a estar en Costa Rica. Ya van tres meses. Esto incluye falta de educación para los niños y falta de apoyo adecuado para los que no han aceptado regresar a sus países de origen", alegó Michael García Bochenek.Costa Rica aún está a tiempo de recuperar sus compromisos asumidos por décadas, dice Human Rights Watch: "El gobierno costarricense también debería—como remedio parcial por el daño que causó con dos meses de detención arbitraria y en reconocimiento de su responsabilidad por haber aceptado que se enviará a personas a Costa Rica contra su voluntad—proporcionar de inmediato autorización de trabajo, ayuda para la vivienda y, según sea necesario, formación laboral, clases de idioma y ayuda para encontrar trabajo a aquellos que deseen solicitar asilo en Costa Rica".Informe:https://www.hrw.org/es/report/2025/05/22/la-estrategia-es-doblegarnos/expulsion-de-ciudadanos-de-terceros-paises-desde

Desde que Israel retomara su ofensiva contra Hamas en Gaza hace ya unos dos meses y rompiera el alto el fuego, las condiciones humanitarias en la Franja se han deterioridado de forma alarmante, debido a la presión israelí, que no permite que entre ayuda humanitaria acusando a Hamas de robarla.Federico Borello es director ejecutivo interino de Human Rights Watch.Escuchar audio

Roger and his partner Daniela arrived in the U.S. in January, conditionally approved as refugees by a US State Department-run program called the Safe Mobility Initiative. Hours later, she was deported. He was detained and then, he vanished. In this episode of Rights & Wrongs, host Ngofeen Mputubwele looks at what happened to Roger—and also examines the fate of 137 Venezuelans swept up under the Alien Enemies Act, a rarely used 18th-century law has only ever been used in times of war. What began with border agents at the Houston airport questioning Roger about his tattoos turned into ICE detention and a secret transfer to a maximum-security prison in El Salvador. Roger, who has no criminal record, hasn't been heard from since. Human Rights Watch's Akshaya Kumar explains how an obscure law once used to detain Germans during both World Wars is now being deployed in peacetime for mass deportations. And Roger's uncle, desperate for answers, shares how he watched helplessly as his nephew disappeared into a system where due process has collapsed—and fear has taken its place. Akshaya Kumar: Director of Crisis Advocacy at Human Rights Watch  Noel Guape: Uncle of Roger Eduardo Molina Acevedo  Juan Pappier: Deputy Director of Americas at Human Rights Watch 

From September 26, 2023: On August 21, the Human Rights Watch released a report detailing systematic abuses of Ethiopian migrants and asylum seekers at the Saudi Arabia-Yemen border. Researchers interviewed dozens of Ethiopian migrants and asylum seekers and found that Saudi border guards had used explosive weapons on them and shot migrants at close range.Lawfare's Associate Editor of Communications Anna Hickey sat down with Joey Shea, a researcher in the Middle East and North Africa Division of Human Rights Watch who investigates human rights abuses in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. They discussed the Human Rights Watch recent report, how the international community has responded so far, and the human rights record of Prince Mohammed bin Salman since he ascended the throne in 2015. To receive ad-free podcasts, become a Lawfare Material Supporter at www.patreon.com/lawfare. You can also support Lawfare by making a one-time donation at https://givebutter.com/lawfare-institute.Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Panama: chiude il Centro di accoglienza temporanea per immigrati Lajas Blancas. Che sia effetto Trump?Libia: tregua a Tripoli mentre la Corte penale internazionale (Cpi) chiede l'arresto del generale Al-MasriGaza: per Human Rights Watch il blocco degli aiuti è uno strumento di sterminioTurchia: Ucraina e Russia pronte ai colloqui con la mediazione di Ankara e WashingtonMessico: una giovane influencer uccisa in diretta socialAscolta il notiziario #MONDO di Radio Bullets con Raffaella Quadri.

Dr. Feroze Sidhwa discusses Gaza with Clint Borgen. Dr. Sidhaw is a Trauma Surgeon, based in California, with experience in Gaza, Ukraine, the West Bank, Zimbabwe, Haiti, Dominican Republic, and Burkina Faso. He received his Masters in Public Health from Harvard and his Medical Degree from the University of Texas Medical School.Take Action: Urge Congress to meet with American doctors who served in Gaza.Mentioned: Read the letter U.S. doctors sent to Congress.Official podcast of The Borgen Project, an international organization that works at the political level to improve living conditions for people impacted by war, famine and poverty.borgenproject.orgGuest BioDr. Feroze Sidhwa is a general, trauma, and critical care surgeon in California. He is triple-board certified in general surgery, trauma/surgical critical care, and neurocritical care, and is a Fellow of the American College of Surgeons and of the International College of Surgeons.Feroze is also a humanitarian surgeon. He has worked most extensively in Palestine, but has also worked in Ukraine three times with the International Medical Corps and Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, and in Zimbabwe, Haiti, Dominican Republic, and Burkina Faso. He has helped edit books on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict published by University of California Press (Berkeley, CA), O/R Books (London, UK), and the Institute for Palestine Studies (Washington, DC). He is widely published in the medical literature, including in The Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Annals of Surgery, World Journal of Surgery, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Surgical Infections, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, JAMA Pediatrics, Journal of Pediatric Surgery, and Journal of Laproendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques, among others. Feroze has spoken on humanitarian relief work and its political implications at the Harvard FXB Center for Health and Human Rights, the University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, as the keynote speaker of the Stanford 31st Annual Trauma Critical Care Symposium, at UChicago Medicine Trauma Grand Rounds, at the University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago Law School, Johns Hopkins University and School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, MIT, Kings County Hospital in Brooklyn, SUNY Downstate College of Medicine, NYU, the Hawaii Medical Association, and the University of Hawaii A. John Burns School of Medicine. He has also spoken widely in the community, mostly in the San Francisco Bay Area but also with Jewish Voice for Peace Phoenix and Tucson, Massachusetts Peace Action, the 2024 Democratic National Convention, and elsewhere.Lay publications about Feroze's humanitarian surgical work and its political implications include:New York Times, October 9, 2024. “65 Doctors, Nurses and Paramedics: What We Saw in Gaza”Haaretz (Israel), October 17, 2024. “65 אנשי רפואה לניו יורק טיימס: אלה המחזות שראינו בעזה”Politico, July 19, 2024. “We Volunteered at a Gaza Hospital. What We Saw Was Unspeakable.”CommonDreams.org, May 23, 2024. “The Atlantic's Sloppy Reporting on UN Gaza Statistics Jeopardizes Its Credibility”CommonDreams.org, April 11, 2024. “As Surgeons, We Have Never Seen Cruelty Like Israel's Genocide in Gaza”Columbia Daily Spectator, January 29, 2025. “In Gaza, a ‘political' ethical problem is still an ethical problem.”Feroze is the primary author of two open letters to the Biden-Harris administration regarding the United States' role in the Israeli assault on Gaza that followed the October 7, 2023 attacks on Israel, as well as the appendices accompanying those letters. These letters were updated and sent to the Trump transition team on November 15, 2024.Feroze has appeared on CNN's Amanpour, PBS, MSNBC's Ayman Mohyeldin Reports, Democracy Now!, CNN international, the Australia Broadcasting Corporation, DropSite News, NPR, and the BBC World News, as well as a variety of radio programs and podcasts. He has been quoted widely in mainstream and alternative media, including on CBS Sunday Morning News, ABC News, Reuters, the Washington Post, Mother Jones, the New Republic, Mainchi Newspaper (Japan), Local Call (Israel), the Huffington Post, the New Statesman, NRK (Norway), the Guardian, the Independent, Pass Blue, and Democracy Now! Dr. Sidhwa serves as a peer reviewer for the Journal of the American College of Surgeons on global surgical topics and as an external expert reviewer for Human Rights Watch.Feroze was born in Houston, TX to Parsi parents who left Pakistan to find a better life. They moved to the UK and then in the United States. Feroze grew up in Flint, MI. After graduating from Johns Hopkins University in 2004 with a bachelor's degree in public health he lived in Haifa, Israel for one year, working with a Palestinian-Jewish cooperative in the city. He then taught middle school in east Baltimore for one year before starting medical school at the University of Texas School of Medicine at San Antonio. During his time in medical school he also obtained a Master of Public Health from the Harvard School of Public Health.After finishing medical school, Feroze joined the general surgery residency program at Boston Medical Center. During his residency he completed a surgical research fellowship at Boston Children's Hospital. During that time Feroze treated victims of the Boston Marathon Bombing. After finishing residency in 2018 he began his one-year trauma/surgical critical care fellowship at Cooper University Healthcare in Camden, NJ. After completing his fellowship, he moved to California where he now practices as a trauma surgeon at a county hospital and as a general surgeon in the Veterans Affairs Northern California Health Care System.Dr. Sidhwa critiques the United States' role in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through a unique lens. He is a secular American with no ethnic or religious ties to the Middle East. He has a broad knowledge of Israeli and American academic work on the conflict, and closely follows the technical humanitarian, human rights, medical, political, economic, and environmental research done on the topic by Israeli, Palestinian, and international agencies. His public health degrees afford him a broad understanding of how these different areas affect the people of the region. He has no interest in any particular political solution to the conflict. And, most importantly to him, he has seen the conflict in person, seen what it is doing to Palestinians and to Israelis, and has treated its victims with his own hands.

Nearly 60 white South Africans were admitted into the U.S. as part of President Trump’s resettlement program. Afrikaners, largely descendants of Dutch and French colonial settlers, led the apartheid government until it ended. The White House claims a new South African law is racist and the white minority is being persecuted. Amna Nawaz discussed more with Bill Frelick of Human Rights Watch. PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders

Nearly 60 white South Africans were admitted into the U.S. as part of President Trump’s resettlement program. Afrikaners, largely descendants of Dutch and French colonial settlers, led the apartheid government until it ended. The White House claims a new South African law is racist and the white minority is being persecuted. Amna Nawaz discussed more with Bill Frelick of Human Rights Watch. PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders

Juanita Gubertus, Directora de Human Rights Watch para las Américas, habla sobre la posible intención de actuar legalmente contra periodistas del medio salvadoreño El Faro, luego de publicar entrevistas con presuntos exlíderes pandilleros del Barrio 18 Revolucionarios en las que aseguran que pactaron con el entorno político del presidente Nayib Bukele para apoyarlo a que ganara las elecciones.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Join us for a special guest sermon with Danny Thongsy! Danny is a community advocate, who has worked on a statewide effort for immigrant rights and to end mass incarceration. He mentors and supports directly impacted community members through advocacy and their reintegration. He graduated from UC Berkeley with a Sociology degree and had studied biblical/religious studies through the Golden Gate Baptist Theological Seminary. Danny is the Campaign Manager for the Interfaith Movement for Human Integrity, an immigrant rights group in Oakland. He is passionate about community work and had advocated with the Human Rights Watch in passing Assembly Bill 1308 Youth Offender Parole Hearing Up to the age of 25. As a child of refugees from Laos, Danny loves to celebrate the richness of his culture and roots by cooking traditional Lao/Thai food. He loves the outdoors, drawing, and teaching origami folding.

They're chained to trees. Locked in sheds. Confined and forgotten — because they have a mental health condition. Across the globe, people with mental health conditions are shackled — hidden away, dehumanized, and neglected in overcrowded, filthy rooms, sheds, cages, even animal shelters. This week, host Ngofeen Mputubwele talks to Human Rights Watch researchers who are fighting to end this cruel practice — and to survivors who show that with the right support, healing and dignity are possible. Elizabeth Kamundia: Director,Disability Rights Division at Human Rights Watch Kriti Sharma: Associate Director, Disability Rights Division

Hablamos en Washington D.C. con Michael Shifter, profesor de la Universidad de Georgetown; en Lima con el presidente de Red de Sobrevivientes Perú, José Enrique Escardó, y también en Washington con Juan Pappier de Human Rights Watch

Human Rights Watch ha publicado un informe que documenta violaciones de los derechos humanos cometidas por el gobierno venezolano y sus instrumentos de represión desde las pasadas elecciones presidenciales de julio de 2024. Hablamos sobre ello con Juanita Goebertus, Directora para las Américas de HRWEscuchar audio

The brothers welcome Sarah Leah Whitson,  the Executive Director of Democracy for the Arab World Now (DAWN) and former director of the Middle East and North Africa division of Human Rights Watch, to discuss the role of human rights advocacy amidst the ongoing genocide, the initiative to hold Blinken, Biden, and Lloyd Austin legally accountable,  the failure of the ICC, and how Gaza has proven to be the "graveyard" of the "rules-based order." Watch the video edition on our YouTube channel Date of recording: April 8, 2025. Follow us on our socials: X: @MakdisiStreet YouTube: @MakdisiStreet Insta: @Makdisist TikTok: @Makdisistreet Music by Hadiiiiii *Sign up at Patreon.com/MakdisiStreet to access all the bonus content, including the latest one*

AP correspondent Karen Chammas reports on an appeal to the US by Human Rights Watch about Venezuela.

Today the leaders of Israel, Russia, and Hamas all stand accused of war crimes. Yet it seems doubtful that these men will ever face justice – so what's the point of international law? For 30 years, Kenneth Roth was the director of Human Rights Watch. In that time, his organisation exposed hundreds of human rights […]

Kenneth Roth, former executive director of Human Rights Watch, has spent over three decades at the forefront of the global human rights movement, challenging abusive governments and fighting for justice. In this episode of Full Disclosure, James O'Brien sits down with Kenneth to discuss his extraordinary career, from his early years learning his father's refugee story, to his pivotal role in shaping international human rights advocacy.Kenneth reflects on the strategies he employed to push oppressive regimes into compliance, from leveraging international pressure to navigating the complex geopolitics of the world's most powerful autocrats. He offers a candid look at the personal and professional challenges he faced while battling dictators like Putin, Xi Jinping, and Assad, and the lessons he's learned along the way.Insightful and unflinching, Kenneth shares stories of victories and setbacks, the evolution of the human rights movement, and how he remains motivated by the belief that positive change, however incremental, is always possible. This episode explores the sacrifices, triumphs, and complexities of a career dedicated to exposing injustice and holding the powerful accountable. Righting Wrongs: Three Descased on the Front Lines Battling Abusive Governments, by Kenneth Roth. Available to order now.

Timestamp to skip the intro and get straight to the case: (10:11) According to Human Rights Watch, it's estimated that about 90 per cent of crimes in Mexico are never reported, while a third of reported crimes are never investigated. About 2,600 foreigners have gone missing in Mexico in the past 15 years. In this episode of the True Crime Society Podcast, we discuss two separate cases of foreigners who have gone missing in Mexico. Canadian man Malcom Madsen was a snowbird who enjoyed traveling to Mexico every year.  Malcolm purchased a home near Puerto Vallarta for his girlfriend Marcela Acosta.  In 2018, the couple were seen on CCTV enjoying a night out at a local bar.   Marcela could be seen putting a substance into Malcom's drink.  Minutes later, they left the bar and Malcom was unsteady on his feet.   He has not been seen since.  Marcela and two accomplices have been sentenced to over 50 years in prison in relation to Malcom's disappearance. Australian woman Tahnee Shanks had been living in Mexico for years in 2022.   She and her husband Jorge had been having marriage problems, and she planned to return to Australia with their daughter Adelynn.  The family decided to take one last vacation together.  In May 2022, Adelynn was found wandering alone and barefoot outside a church in Cancun.   Now, almost three years later, both Tahnee and Jorge remain missing.  Is Jorge on the run after killing Tahnee or could they both have been murdered by the Mexican cartel? Read our blog for these cases Be sure to follow us on Instagram for the latest crime news Join us on Patreon for exclusive, ad-free content This episode is sponsored by: IQBAR is offering our special podcast listeners twenty percent off all IQBAR products, plus get FREE shipping. To get your twenty percent off, text CRIME to sixty-four thousand.  Sign up now and join the over 14 million all-time customers who have already saved and invested over $25 billion dollars with Acorns. Head to acorns.com/tcs or download the Acorns app to get started. 

Maria McFarland Sánchez-Moreno joins The Great Battlefield podcast to talk about her career, being a leader at Human Rights Watch, her award winning book "There Are No Dead Here" (about human rights in Columbia) and her role at RepresentUS, where they're working to fight corruption and defend democracy.

The international architecture that underpins universal human rights is under attack. What does this mean for responsible business? IHRB's Salil Tripathi, speaks to Kenneth Roth, author, attorney and the former head of international organisation, Human Rights Watch. Ken and Salil discuss progress in corporate responsibility and accountability in recent decades, and what this might mean for the future of business and human rights.

As Sudan's civil war enters its third year, the humanitarian catastrophe continues to spiral, with more than 12.7 million people displaced and little hope of resolution in sight. Jehanne Henry, MEI Associate Fellow and former Africa Director at Human Rights Watch, joins hosts Alistair Taylor and Matthew Czekaj to assess the latest developments on the ground. She outlines the scale of devastation, the regional spillover effects, and the war economy fueling the fighting. Their conversation explores the fragmentation of civilian political forces, the lack of international coordination, and the role that external powers — including the United States — could play in helping bring the conflict to an end. What will it take to chart a path toward peace? Recorded on Monday, April 15, 2025 Read Jehanne's accompanying article: Two years into Sudan's war, a resolution seems further than ever — can U.S. involvement help bring peace? Look out for new episodes of Middle East Focus every Thursday, wherever you get your podcasts.

From "Bloody Sunday" to Modern Activism: Civil Rights Leaders Reflect on LegacyThis show is made possible thanks our members! To become a sustaining member go to https://LauraFlanders.org/donate   Thank you for your continued support!Description: 60 years ago in Selma, Alabama, state troopers beat peaceful protesters bloody on the Edmund Pettus Bridge as they marched for civil rights. The horror of “Bloody Sunday” and the resilience of the Civil Rights Movement ultimately led to the passage of the 1965 Voting Rights Act and many of the landmark achievements that are now directly under attack. As civil rights activists look to history to understand — and prepare for — the present, Laura walks the Bridge and talks with, among others, Sheyann Webb Christburg, who marched at the age of eight, Black Voters Matter co-founders LaTosha Brown and Clifford Albright; law professor and author Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw and Maya Wiley, President and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. What does people power look like today? Plus, a commentary from Laura on name calling then and now.“We're not going to phone bank our way out of this. We're not going to text our way out of this. And in truth, we're not even going to vote our way out of this . . . It's going to take revisiting some of the same strategies that we saw here in Selma, in terms of nonviolent civil disobedience and direct action.” - Clifford Albright“When we see and hear and think about fascism, we think about anti-democratic movements in Europe. We think about the Holocaust . . . But for Black people, as Langston Hughes said, you don't have to explain to us what fascism is. We experienced it. That is what we were fighting, for the 60, 70 years after Reconstruction was overthrown.” - Kimberlé CrenshawGuests:• Clifford Albright: Co-Founder & Executive Director, Black Voters Matter• Willard and Kiba Armstead: Veteran & Spouse• Trayvon Bossa: Sigma Chapter Member, Miles College Phi Beta Sigma Fraternity• LaTosha Brown: Co-Founder, Black Voters Matter• Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw: Co-Founder & Executive Director, African American Policy Forum; Host of the Intersectionality Matters! Podcast• Noelle Damico: Director of Social Justice, The Workers Circle• Melinda Hicks: Military Family• Jaribu Hill: Executive Director & Founder, Mississippi Workers' Center for Human Rights• Myla Person: Jack and Jill Club, Columbus, Georgia• Ann Toback: CEO, The Workers Circle• Sheyann Webb-Christburg: Youngest Participant,1965 Bloody Sunday March• Maya Wiley: President & CEO, Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights Watch the broadcast episode cut for time at our YouTube channel and airing on PBS stations across the country Subscribe to episode notes via Patreon Music Credit:  "Tremole" "Jagged" "Thrum of Soil" & "Dawn Summit" by Blue Dot Sessions from the album Empty Outpost.  "Steppin" by Podington Bear. And original sound production and design by Jeannie Hopper.Podcast Endorsement:  Intersectionality Matters! Podcast Related Laura Flanders Show Episodes:•  Rep. John Lewis on Making Justice from Selma to the Present, Watch•  Kimberlé Crenshaw & Soledad O'Brien Call Out the Media on Critical Race Theory, Watch / Listen / Download Podcast•  Reporting on Policing at the Polls & BIPOC Voter Suppression in 2024, Watch / Listen/Download Podcast:  Full Uncut Conversation and Episode• Deciding the Fate of Democracy in North Carolina, Watch / Download Podcast •  The Georgia Way:  Strategies that Work for Winning Elections, Watch / Listen/Download Podcast:  Full Uncut Conversation and Episode Related Articles and Resources:•  Anniversary of ‘Bloody Sunday' Marks Continued Fight for Voting Rights, by Temi Adeoye, March 24, 2025, ACLU•  U.S. Civil Rights Trail, Learn More• United State of Amnesia, The Real History of Critical Race Theory, Hosted by Kimberlé Crenshaw Podcast Mini Series•  Documentary Trailer:  “Love, Joy, and Power: Tools for Liberation” follows Cliff Albright and LaTosha Brown as they reshape American democracy. As founders of Black Voters Matter Fund, they didn't just flip Georgia in 2020 - they sparked a movement that's still growing. April 8, 2025, Watch Laura Flanders and Friends Crew: Laura Flanders, along with Sabrina Artel, Jeremiah Cothren, Veronica Delgado, Janet Hernandez, Jeannie Hopper, Sarah Miller, Nat Needham, David Neuman, and Rory O'Conner. FOLLOW Laura Flanders and FriendsInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/lauraflandersandfriends/Blueky: https://bsky.app/profile/lfandfriends.bsky.socialFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/LauraFlandersAndFriends/Tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lauraflandersandfriendsYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCFLRxVeYcB1H7DbuYZQG-lgLinkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/company/lauraflandersandfriendsPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/lauraflandersandfriendsACCESSIBILITY - The broadcast edition of this episode is available with closed captioned by clicking here for our YouTube Channel

The lawyer Philippe Sands weaves together a story of historical crimes, impunity and the law in his latest book, 38 Londres Street. He uncovers the links between a Nazi hiding in plain sight in Patagonia and the military dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet, and the failed attempts to bring either to justice. Kenneth Roth has led Human Rights Watch for the last three decades, overseeing investigations into violence and oppression in countries all over the world. In Righting Wrongs he tells the stories of the wins and the losses, and the ongoing fight to uncover, and prosecute, abuses.The BBC's former Syria correspondent Lina Sinjab was forced into exile more than a decade ago after threats from President Bashar al-Assad's government. She could only watch as death and destruction ripped through her country, and those in power appeared to act with impunity. She looks at how Syria is faring since the fall of al-Assad's brutal regime.Producer: Katy Hickman

« Au Cameroun, à six mois de la présidentielle, le régime se durcit contre les défenseurs des droits de l'homme », déplore Maximilienne Ngo Mbé, la directrice exécutive du REDHAC, le Réseau des Défenseurs des Droits Humains en Afrique Centrale. Aujourd'hui, le REDHAC lui-même est dans le viseur du pouvoir, qui l'a suspendu en décembre dernier et qui poursuit à présent ses dirigeantes devant la justice. « Ce sont des décisions scandaleuses », affirme Human Rights Watch. Quelles sont les situations les plus préoccupantes ? RFI : Le 3 avril dernier, le Parlement européen a voté une résolution demandant aux autorités camerounaises de libérer cinq journalistes. Il s'agit des collègues anglophones Tsi Conrad, Mancho Bibixy, Kingsley Fomunyuy Njoka et Thomas Awa Junior, qui ont rendu compte du conflit armé dans les régions anglophones. Il s'agit également d'Amadou Vamoulké, l'ancien directeur général de la radiotélévision publique camerounaise, la CRTV. Votre réaction ?Maximilienne Ngo Mbé : C'est une petite joie pour nous, parce que les cinq journalistes que vous avez cités, le Redhac a été à leurs côtés. Nous avons mené des actions de plaidoyer depuis plus de cinq à sept ans. C'est donc avec beaucoup de joie que nous recevons cette décision. Nous osons croire qu'elle ne restera pas uniquement sur le papier et que l'Union européenne mettra tout en œuvre pour que leur libération soit effective.Quelles sont les autres personnalités actuellement emprisonnées au Cameroun pour leurs opinions politiques ou simplement pour leurs désaccords avec le pouvoir en place ?Nos pensées vont vers le professeur Alain Fogué, militant du Mouvement pour la Renaissance du Cameroun (MRC). Lui a été arrêté alors qu'il allait simplement rendre visite à son président, le professeur Maurice Kamto. Il y a aussi le porte-parole de M. Maurice Kamto, Bibou Nissack, qui a été arrêté chez lui, devant ses enfants et sa femme. Il n'était pas dehors pour manifester, cela ressemble à du kidnapping. Il y a aussi leurs camarades, ils sont 32 aujourd'hui, à rester en prison simplement parce qu'ils ont donné leurs opinions. Il y a aussi le cas de Marafa Hamidou Yaya, dont l'état de santé est très fragile.Marafa Hamidou Yaya a été secrétaire général de la présidence, il est tombé en disgrâce et en prison depuis 2012. Il souffre d'une grave maladie des yeux. Il y a un an, François Hollande a écrit à Paul Biya pour demander de le libérer pour raisons de santé, mais le président camerounais ne bouge pas. Pourquoi cette dureté contre ce prisonnier ?Je ne sais pas si c'est le président qui ne bouge pas ou si c'est la bureaucratie du président qui ne bouge pas. J'ai toujours eu à dire que depuis que je milite — cela fait quand même deux ou trois décennies – lorsque le président Paul Biya a été au courant d'une situation grave il a été prompt à réagir. Depuis un moment, on sait bien qu'il est un peu affaibli par l'âge. Est-ce que son entourage lui fait part de tout ? Je ne peux ni l'affirmer ni l'infirmer. En tout cas, M. Marafa, même pour raisons de santé, humainement, on peut dire qu'il a payé. […] Il devrait au moins pouvoir se faire soigner.Dans six mois, c'est l'élection présidentielle, prévue en octobre. Le parti au pouvoir, le RDPC, demande à Paul Biya, aujourd'hui âgé de 92 ans, de se présenter pour un nouveau mandat de sept ans. Est-ce que cette période est favorable à plus de clémence ou, au contraire, à plus de dureté ?J'avoue que, depuis un moment, on assiste à beaucoup de dureté de la part du gouvernement et du parti au pouvoir. Il ne lésine sur aucun moyen. Maintenant, c'est la même chose pour la justice, la police, l'armée. Vous êtes filé tout le temps, et vous êtes convoqué devant des juridictions. Le ministère de l'Administration territoriale promet la prison à tout le monde. Il empêche même un député de se mouvoir pour présenter son programme politique. Ce même ministère adopte une posture de durcissement de l'espace civique, au détriment de tout ce qu'on entend derrière sur le fait qu'il nous faut des élections pacifiques. Il y a un décalage entre le langage et les faits sur le terrain.Et ce durcissement, vous craignez qu'il s'intensifie à mesure qu'on va se rapprocher de la date du mois d'octobre prochain ?Bien sûr, il n'y a aucun doute là-dessus, si rien n'est fait.Pourquoi ?Parce que le président Paul Biya n'a toujours pas annoncé s'il sera candidat, jusqu'à aujourd'hui, personne ne le sait. Mais on pense que ceux qui sont restés longtemps à ses côtés au pouvoir veulent absolument qu'il continue, car cela leur permet de ne pas rendre de comptes. Ceux qui sont au pouvoir ont bénéficié de tous les privilèges et ont spolié les populations, ils sont à la manœuvre pour ne pas laisser le président, peut-être, aller se reposer et ils vont durcir de plus en plus l'espace. On attire l'attention des pays amis du Cameroun pour que cela ne se fasse pas. Il est donc grand temps que la France joue son rôle, aujourd'hui plus que jamais, pour que cela cesse.

“It has made nearly every person, every mother, to have their child contaminated, because the lead levels are so rampant,” says Cornelius Katiti, a father from Kabwe, Zambia, whose three children are affected by lead poisoning. For decades, the town has struggled with remediating 6.4 million tonnes of toxic lead waste left behind by a former mine. A Human Rights Watch report shows 95% of children in Kabwe have dangerously high lead levels. Cornelius, along with many others in the community, is left asking: who is responsible for the clean-up? In today's episode, Alan Kasujja explores the ongoing environmental and health impacts of mining with Cornelius, an environmental chemist , and an environmental consultant.

For human rights organizations dealing with oppressive governments, sometimes humiliating them on the world stage actually gets things done. Kenneth Roth, former executive director of Human Rights Watch, joins host Krys Boyd to discuss his organization's tactic of “naming and shaming” countries that violate human rights and why Americans are sometimes blind to the lessening of freedoms and dignity around the world. His book is “Righting Wrongs: Three Decades on the Front Lines Battling Abusive Governments.” Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

In this episode of International Horizons, Kenneth Roth, former longtime executive director of Human Rights Watch, joins RBI director John Torpey to discuss Roth's recent book, Righting Wrongs: Three Decades on the Front Lines Battling Abuse of Governments (Knopf, 2025), which reflects on strategies for defending civil, political, economic, and social rights in an increasingly complex international landscape. Roth explores the implications of Trump's dismantling of USAID, the evolving challenges posed by authoritarian regimes like China, and the critical role social media plays in both exposing and enabling human rights abuses globally. Tune in to hear how Roth maintains optimism about the human rights movement and its continued fight against human rights abuses. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said "Conditions for Palestinians in Gaza are appalling and apocalyptic. What we are seeing may well amount to the gravest international crimes." Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, said, "We are fighting human animals and we are acting accordingly." Prominent Israeli scholars such as Omer Bartov, Raz Segal, Ilan Pappe, Lee Mordechai and Amos Goldberg, have all said Israel's actions in Gaza amount to genocide. Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Jewish Voice for Peace, and other organizations have also reached the same conclusion. Apart from the U.S., Canada, and a few European countries Israel is largely isolated internationally. Arrest warrants for Prime Minister Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant have been issued by the International Criminal Court. Israel's goal in Gaza has been made explicitly clear by Netanyahu on down: eliminate the Palestinians. Recorded at the University of Wisconsin.

La directora de la División de las Américas de Human Rights Watch, Juanita Goebertus, explicó en Conclusiones qué puede hacer una familia si identifica que uno de sus integrantes fue deportado de Estados Unidos y enviado a una cárcel de El Salvador. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Russia and China are no fans of his. Egypt wouldn't even let him in the country. As the executive director of Human Rights Watch, Kenneth Roth spent 30 years investigating and standing up to the world's most ruthless oppressors. During that time, he exposed war crimes, confronted authoritarian regimes and, on more than one occasion, found himself in the crosshairs. Reset checks in with Roth about his new book Righting Wrongs: Three Decades on the Front Lines Battling Abusive Governments, and how he found shame to be a useful tool in holding governments accountable. For a full archive of Reset interviews, head over to wbez.org/reset.