Podcast appearances and mentions of tim berners lee

Social media gets a lot of flak. Its critics accuse platforms of causing massive negative externalities on society – everything from crumbling democracies to mental health crises gets blamed on social media.And “social media” as a term has even become so toxic that social media companies themselves prefer to call themselves anything but “social media”. The tagline to Snapchat's marketing campaign last year was: “Less social media. More Snapchat.” TikTok calls itself an entertainment platform.But does social media need to be this way? Perhaps not.WeAre8 is a challenger platform that wants to prove social media can have a positive social impact. The platform has a unique opt-in advertising experience that enables users to be paid to watch ads, with proceeds optionally donated to charities of their choosing.The startup calls itself “The People's Platform” – but does it have the requisite scale to attract advertisers looking for strong business results and not just a morally driven goal of spending with supposedly nicer players?Laura Chase, WeAre8's UK managing director, joins host Jack Benjamin to explain the app's features, commercial model and how it is working to attract investment from brands."We can fix big problems by watching ads," she says.During the interview, Chase also reveals that WeAre8 is launching a voice note ad product in time for less healthy food ad restrictions.Highlights:5:12: WeAre8's mission to "bring the best of social" while removing "the bad bits"9:34: Scale, product development and brand-safety efforts15:12: WeAre8's opt-in ad model: control, effectiveness and charitable benefits28:44: Supporting publishers and partnering The Independent on Bulletin38:09: Moving beyond algorithmic feedsRelated articles:‘This is for everyone': Tim Berners-Lee is continuing his search for a benign online world‘Positive' platforms improve purchase intent, Pinterest saysThe Fishbowl: Laura Chase, WeAre8---Thanks to our production partners Trisonic for editing this episode.--> Discover how Trisonic can elevate your brand and expand your business by connecting with your ideal audienceVisit The Media Leader for the most authoritative news analysis and comment on what's happening in commercial media. LinkedIn: The Media LeaderYouTube: The Media Leader

En este primer episodio de la quinta temporada de Esto es lo que AI, nos atrevemos a hacer apuestas sobre el futuro de la IA. ¿Será capaz de entender el argumento de una película y responder preguntas complejas sin errores? ¿Podrá escribir un guión digno de un Oscar o desarrollar descubrimientos científicos revolucionarios? Nuestra nueva tertuliana, Patricia Charro, se une a la conversación con una visión fresca sobre el impacto de la IA en los próximos años. Además del debate habitual con Adolfo Corujo, Luis Martín, Miguel Lucas, Julio Gonzalo y Roberto Carreras, este episodio incluye una entrevista especial con José Raúl González, CEO de Progreso, sobre Clara, la primera embajadora de sostenibilidad basada en IA en la industria del cemento en Centroamérica. Un ejemplo real de cómo la IA puede servir al propósito, la transparencia y el impacto social. También viajamos al origen de la web con Tim Berners-Lee, de la mano de Margorieth Tejeira, y descubrimos usos inesperados de la IA con Ángela Ortega en una nueva sección. Inspirados en el desafío lanzado por Gary Marcus, analizamos hasta qué punto la IA podrá alcanzar hitos que hoy parecen ciencia ficción. ¿Nos sorprenderá con avances inesperados o seguirá atrapada en la burbuja del hype?

Mark Weinstein is a pioneering tech entrepreneur, privacy advocate, and one of the original inventors of social networking. His 25-year journey includes founding three award-winning social media platforms, such as SuperFamily and SuperFriends, both recognized in PC Magazine's Top 100 Sites. As a leading privacy expert, Mark delivered the landmark TED Talk “The Rise of Surveillance Capitalism” and authored Restoring Our Sanity Online: A Revolutionary Social Framework, which presents a bold vision for transforming social media. His work has earned endorsements from industry leaders like Sir Tim Berners-Lee and Steve Wozniak, reflecting his commitment to ethical technology and user empowerment. In this episode… The internet was once seen as a tool for connection, but today, it often feels like it's controlling us. From social media algorithms that manipulate our thoughts to privacy invasions that track our every move, the online world has shifted in ways few anticipated. So, how can we reclaim our digital autonomy and create a healthier relationship with technology? Mark Weinstein, a social media pioneer and privacy expert, offers insights into the hidden dangers of surveillance capitalism and how users can protect themselves. He explains how algorithms are designed to exploit human psychology, keeping people hooked while collecting vast amounts of personal data. He shares actionable steps, such as limiting screen time, avoiding AI-driven recommendations, and choosing privacy-focused platforms. Mark also stresses the importance of critical thinking, teaching children to discern fact from manipulation, and advocating for ethical tech policies to reshape the future of online interactions. In this episode of the Inspired Insider Podcast, Dr. Jeremy Weisz interviews Mark Weinstein, author of Restoring Our Sanity Online, about the urgent need for ethical social media and enhanced digital privacy. Mark discusses the evolution of social media, the rise of surveillance capitalism, and the impact of AI-driven algorithms on user behavior. He also shares practical strategies for protecting personal data, reducing social media addiction, and fostering critical thinking in the digital age.

I hope that the man who invented the World Wide Web, Tim Berners-Lee, with all of his brilliance, appreciates Donald J. Trump. Berners-Lee, who shares my birthday of June 8,

On this episode of the Crazy Wisdom Podcast, host Stewart Alsop welcomes Jessica Talisman, a senior information architect deeply immersed in the worlds of taxonomy, ontology, and knowledge management. The conversation spans the evolution of libraries, the shifting nature of public and private access to knowledge, and the role of institutions like the Internet Archive in preserving digital history. They also explore the fragility of information in the digital age, the ongoing battle over access to knowledge, and how AI is shaping—and being shaped by—structured data and knowledge graphs. To connect with Jessica Talisman, you can reach her via LinkedIn.  Check out this GPT we trained on the conversation!Timestamps00:05 – Libraries, Democracy, Public vs. Private Knowledge Jessica explains how libraries have historically shifted between public and private control, shaping access to knowledge and democracy.00:10 – Internet Archive, Cyberattacks, Digital Preservation Stewart describes visiting the Internet Archive post-cyberattack, sparking a discussion on threats to digital preservation and free information.00:15 – AI, Structured Data, Ontologies, NIH, PubMed Jessica breaks down how AI trains on structured data from sources like NIH and PubMed but often lacks alignment with authoritative knowledge.00:20 – Linked Data, Knowledge Graphs, Semantic Web, Tim Berners-Lee They explore how linked data enables machines to understand connections between knowledge, referencing the vision behind the semantic web.00:25 – Entity Management, Cataloging, Provenance, Authority Jessica explains how libraries are transitioning from cataloging books to managing entities, ensuring provenance and verifiable knowledge.00:30 – Digital Dark Ages, Knowledge Loss, Corporate Control Stewart compares today's deletion of digital content to historical knowledge loss, warning about the fragility of digital memory.00:35 – War on Truth, Book Bans, Algorithmic Bias, Censorship They discuss how knowledge suppression—from book bans to algorithmic censorship—threatens free access to information.00:40 – AI, Search Engines, Metadata, Schema.org, RDF Jessica highlights how AI and search engines depend on structured metadata but often fail to prioritize authoritative sources.00:45 – Power Over Knowledge, Open vs. Closed Systems, AI Ethics They debate the battle between corporations, governments, and open-source efforts to control how knowledge is structured and accessed.00:50 – Librarians, AI Misinformation, Knowledge Organization Jessica emphasizes that librarians and structured knowledge systems are essential in combating misinformation in AI.00:55 – Future of Digital Memory, AI, Ethics, Information Access They reflect on whether AI and linked data will expand knowledge access or accelerate digital decay and misinformation.Key InsightsThe Evolution of Libraries Reflects Power Struggles Over Knowledge: Libraries have historically oscillated between being public and private institutions, reflecting broader societal shifts in who controls access to knowledge. Jessica Talisman highlights how figures like Andrew Carnegie helped establish the modern public library system, reinforcing libraries as democratic spaces where information is accessible to all. However, she also notes that as knowledge becomes digitized, new battles emerge over who owns and controls digital information​​.The Internet Archive Faces Systematic Attacks on Knowledge: Stewart Alsop shares his firsthand experience visiting the Internet Archive just after it had suffered a major cyberattack. This incident is part of a larger trend in which libraries and knowledge repositories worldwide, including those in Canada, have been targeted. The conversation raises concerns that these attacks are not random but part of a broader, well-funded effort to undermine access to information​​.AI and Knowledge Graphs Are Deeply Intertwined: AI systems, particularly large language models (LLMs), rely on structured data sources such as knowledge graphs, ontologies, and linked data. Talisman explains how institutions like the NIH and PubMed provide openly available, structured knowledge that AI systems train on. Yet, she points out a critical gap—AI often lacks alignment with real-world, authoritative sources, which leads to inaccuracies in machine-generated knowledge​​.Libraries Are Moving From Cataloging to Entity Management: Traditional library systems were built around cataloging books and documents, but modern libraries are transitioning toward entity management, which organizes knowledge in a way that allows for more dynamic connections. Linked data and knowledge graphs enable this shift, making it easier to navigate vast repositories of information while maintaining provenance and authority​​.The War on Truth and Information Is Accelerating: The episode touches on the increasing threats to truth and reliable information, from book bans to algorithmic suppression of knowledge. Talisman underscores the crucial role librarians play in preserving access to primary sources and maintaining records of historical truth. As AI becomes more prominent in knowledge dissemination, the need for robust, verifiable sources becomes even more urgent​​.Linked Data is the Foundation of Digital Knowledge: The conversation explores how linked data protocols, such as those championed by Tim Berners-Lee, allow machines and AI to interpret and connect information across the web. Talisman explains that institutions like NIH publish their taxonomies in RDF format, making them accessible as structured, authoritative sources. However, many organizations fail to leverage this interconnected data, leading to inefficiencies in knowledge management​​.Preserving Digital Memory is a Civilization-Defining Challenge: In the digital age, the loss of information is more severe than ever. Alsop compares the current state of digital impermanence to the Dark Ages, where crucial knowledge risks disappearing due to corporate decisions, cyberattacks, and lack of preservation infrastructure. Talisman agrees, emphasizing that digital archives like the Internet Archive, WorldCat, and Wikimedia are foundational to maintaining a collective human memory​​.

Középszerűvé válhat az Apple? ITBusiness     2025-03-14 05:15:15     Infotech Apple WWDC Az Apple múlt pénteken jelentette be, hogy az Apple Intelligence "személyre szabott Siri" funkciói – amelyek eredetileg még a júniusi WWDC előtt érkeztek volna – csak a következő évben jelennek meg. Meglepő volt, mégis teljesen kiszámítható lehetett volna, ha figyelmesebbek vagyunk. Emelkedik és reng a föld a Nápolyi-öböl partvidékén Telex     2025-03-14 10:34:37     Tudomány Olaszország Vulkán Több százezren élnek itt egy hatalmas, ősi vulkán kráterének peremén, ami 500 éve nem tört ki, de most egyre aktívabb. Jól vizsgáztak a Marsnál a BME kutatói által kalibrált kamerák Helló Sajtó!     2025-03-14 08:05:00     Tudomány Világűr Kamera Mars BME Az Európai Űrügynökség (ESA) Hera űrszondája március 12-én mintegy 5000 kilométerre megközelítette a Marsot és hintamanővert hajtott végre. A fő cél az űrszonda felgyorsítása volt, de az ESA csapata kihasználta a bolygó közelségét az optikai kamerák tesztelésére és pár fotó készítésére is. Lenyomta az iPhone-t, felért a csúcsra: ez most a világ legjobb okostelefonja Startlap Vásárlás     2025-03-14 11:49:47     Mobiltech Spanyolország Telefon Kiállítás Apple Okostelefon Barcelona iPhone Hamarosan véget ér a barcelonai Mobile World Congress kiállítás: az esemény során az év legnagyobb technológiai újításait díjazták. Rejtélyes rádiójelek érkeznek a világűr egy eddig ismeretlen részéről ICT Global     2025-03-14 05:03:04     Infotech Világűr Egy évtizede, két óránként rejtélyes rádiójelek érkeznek egy ismeretlen forrásból a Nagy Göncölszekér irányából. A kutatók ennyi év után, most nagy áttörésről számolhatnak be. Összefogott a Schneider Electric és az Atmen a legjobb zöld minősítési folyamatok érdekében Digital Hungary     2025-03-14 13:41:00     Infotech Üzemanyag Tankolás Schneider Electric Minden eddiginél gyorsabban és egyszerűbben szerezhetik meg a zöld tanúsítványokat a hidrogén- és e-üzemanyagok gyártói a Schneider Electric és az Atmen együttműködésének köszönhetően. A két vállalat egy szabványosított megoldást dolgoz ki a PtX iparágak fenntarthatósági megfelelésének támogatása érdekében. Darabjaira hullott a magyar társadalom Qubit     2025-03-14 08:52:13     Tudomány Társadalomkutatás Szociológia Kovách Imre szociológus és kutatótársai csütörtökön bemutatott, nagyszabású munkájából olyan ország képe bontakozik ki, ahol egyes csoportok elégedetten, polgárosodva élik az életüket, míg más nagy méretű csoportok leszakadtak és elmagányosodtak. A politika ezeket az egyenlőtlenségeket kihasználja és konzerválja, hiszen a polarizáció fenntartása és Első látásra beleszerettünk az Asus új gépébe – aztán megismertük Index     2025-03-14 15:24:00     Gaming Infotech Tajvan Asus Az élet értelmét is könnyebb megmagyarázni, mint azt, miért létezik a tajvaniak új masinája. Teszten a ROG Flow Z13. Már nem extra az új autóknál a mobilkapcsolat HWSW     2025-03-14 09:42:35     Infotech A tavaly eladott új autók háromnegyedében volt mobilkommunikációs modul - a technológia főleg az elektromos autóknál népszerű. Száguld a robotika, AI-modellekkel száll be a Google IT café     2025-03-14 10:04:00     Infotech Google Robot Kilőtt a robotikai szektor, a Google pedig két új AI-modellel szolgálná ki az ágazatot. A világháló atyja tudni akarja, "kinek dolgozik a mesterséges intelligencia" Blikk     2025-03-14 05:51:00     Infotech Mesterséges intelligencia Tim Berners-Lee, a World Wide Web, azaz az internet megálmodója szerint a vállalatok évtizedekkel ezelőtt együttműködtek a nyílt internet létrehozásában. Ez a generatív mesterséges intelligencia esetében viszont nem történik meg. Akkor pedig kinek a hasznára és érdekében dolgozik az AI? Ezt a kérdést sürgősen tisztázni kell! A NASA Spherex űrtávcsöve elindítja tudományos küldetését 10perc.hu     2025-03-14 11:45:00     Infotech Világűr NASA A NASA SPHEREx űrtávcsöve megkezdi tudományos munkáját, hogy feltárja az univerzum keletkezését és az ősrobbanás utáni eseményeket. Növelni kell az ellenállóképességet a kiberbűnözés ellen Növekedés     2025-03-14 14:17:00     Gazdaság Interjú Kiberbiztonság Hacker Kibertámadás Wittinghof Tamás A sikeres kibertámadást elszenvedő kis- és közepes vállalkozások hatvan százaléka a támadást követő hat hónapon belül befejezi a tevékenységét. A Mastercard néhány héten belül egy hiánypótló elemzést publikál a kiberbiztonság lokális helyzetéről. Interjú Wittinghoff Dániellel, a Mastercard kiberbiztonsági termékekért felelős üzletfejlesztési igazga A további adásainkat keresd a podcast.hirstart.hu oldalunkon.

Középszerűvé válhat az Apple? ITBusiness     2025-03-14 05:15:15     Infotech Apple WWDC Az Apple múlt pénteken jelentette be, hogy az Apple Intelligence "személyre szabott Siri" funkciói – amelyek eredetileg még a júniusi WWDC előtt érkeztek volna – csak a következő évben jelennek meg. Meglepő volt, mégis teljesen kiszámítható lehetett volna, ha figyelmesebbek vagyunk. Emelkedik és reng a föld a Nápolyi-öböl partvidékén Telex     2025-03-14 10:34:37     Tudomány Olaszország Vulkán Több százezren élnek itt egy hatalmas, ősi vulkán kráterének peremén, ami 500 éve nem tört ki, de most egyre aktívabb. Jól vizsgáztak a Marsnál a BME kutatói által kalibrált kamerák Helló Sajtó!     2025-03-14 08:05:00     Tudomány Világűr Kamera Mars BME Az Európai Űrügynökség (ESA) Hera űrszondája március 12-én mintegy 5000 kilométerre megközelítette a Marsot és hintamanővert hajtott végre. A fő cél az űrszonda felgyorsítása volt, de az ESA csapata kihasználta a bolygó közelségét az optikai kamerák tesztelésére és pár fotó készítésére is. Lenyomta az iPhone-t, felért a csúcsra: ez most a világ legjobb okostelefonja Startlap Vásárlás     2025-03-14 11:49:47     Mobiltech Spanyolország Telefon Kiállítás Apple Okostelefon Barcelona iPhone Hamarosan véget ér a barcelonai Mobile World Congress kiállítás: az esemény során az év legnagyobb technológiai újításait díjazták. Rejtélyes rádiójelek érkeznek a világűr egy eddig ismeretlen részéről ICT Global     2025-03-14 05:03:04     Infotech Világűr Egy évtizede, két óránként rejtélyes rádiójelek érkeznek egy ismeretlen forrásból a Nagy Göncölszekér irányából. A kutatók ennyi év után, most nagy áttörésről számolhatnak be. Összefogott a Schneider Electric és az Atmen a legjobb zöld minősítési folyamatok érdekében Digital Hungary     2025-03-14 13:41:00     Infotech Üzemanyag Tankolás Schneider Electric Minden eddiginél gyorsabban és egyszerűbben szerezhetik meg a zöld tanúsítványokat a hidrogén- és e-üzemanyagok gyártói a Schneider Electric és az Atmen együttműködésének köszönhetően. A két vállalat egy szabványosított megoldást dolgoz ki a PtX iparágak fenntarthatósági megfelelésének támogatása érdekében. Darabjaira hullott a magyar társadalom Qubit     2025-03-14 08:52:13     Tudomány Társadalomkutatás Szociológia Kovách Imre szociológus és kutatótársai csütörtökön bemutatott, nagyszabású munkájából olyan ország képe bontakozik ki, ahol egyes csoportok elégedetten, polgárosodva élik az életüket, míg más nagy méretű csoportok leszakadtak és elmagányosodtak. A politika ezeket az egyenlőtlenségeket kihasználja és konzerválja, hiszen a polarizáció fenntartása és Első látásra beleszerettünk az Asus új gépébe – aztán megismertük Index     2025-03-14 15:24:00     Gaming Infotech Tajvan Asus Az élet értelmét is könnyebb megmagyarázni, mint azt, miért létezik a tajvaniak új masinája. Teszten a ROG Flow Z13. Már nem extra az új autóknál a mobilkapcsolat HWSW     2025-03-14 09:42:35     Infotech A tavaly eladott új autók háromnegyedében volt mobilkommunikációs modul - a technológia főleg az elektromos autóknál népszerű. Száguld a robotika, AI-modellekkel száll be a Google IT café     2025-03-14 10:04:00     Infotech Google Robot Kilőtt a robotikai szektor, a Google pedig két új AI-modellel szolgálná ki az ágazatot. A világháló atyja tudni akarja, "kinek dolgozik a mesterséges intelligencia" Blikk     2025-03-14 05:51:00     Infotech Mesterséges intelligencia Tim Berners-Lee, a World Wide Web, azaz az internet megálmodója szerint a vállalatok évtizedekkel ezelőtt együttműködtek a nyílt internet létrehozásában. Ez a generatív mesterséges intelligencia esetében viszont nem történik meg. Akkor pedig kinek a hasznára és érdekében dolgozik az AI? Ezt a kérdést sürgősen tisztázni kell! A NASA Spherex űrtávcsöve elindítja tudományos küldetését 10perc.hu     2025-03-14 11:45:00     Infotech Világűr NASA A NASA SPHEREx űrtávcsöve megkezdi tudományos munkáját, hogy feltárja az univerzum keletkezését és az ősrobbanás utáni eseményeket. Növelni kell az ellenállóképességet a kiberbűnözés ellen Növekedés     2025-03-14 14:17:00     Gazdaság Interjú Kiberbiztonság Hacker Kibertámadás Wittinghof Tamás A sikeres kibertámadást elszenvedő kis- és közepes vállalkozások hatvan százaléka a támadást követő hat hónapon belül befejezi a tevékenységét. A Mastercard néhány héten belül egy hiánypótló elemzést publikál a kiberbiztonság lokális helyzetéről. Interjú Wittinghoff Dániellel, a Mastercard kiberbiztonsági termékekért felelős üzletfejlesztési igazga A további adásainkat keresd a podcast.hirstart.hu oldalunkon.

Mark Weinstein, a pioneer in social media, shares his journey from creating one of the first social networks to leading the fight for ethical tech. In this eye-opening conversation, he discusses privacy, leadership, and the importance of human connection in the digital age.00:11- About Mark WeinsteinMark Weinstein is a world-renowned tech entrepreneur, contemporary thought leader, privacy expert, and one of the visionary inventors of social networking.He's the author of "Restoring Our Sanity Online", endorsed by Steve Wozniak (Woz) and Sir Tim Berners-Lee. 

Tällä historiallisella päivämäärällä vuonna 1935 Robert Watson-Watt esitteli ensimmäisen kerran julkisesti tutkan ja vuonna 1991 Tim Berners-Lee esitteli WWW:n

Have you ever felt like success, love, or happiness was just out of your reach? Do you feel like there's something bigger waiting for you, but you're not sure how to grasp it? On our Love University podcast, we explored what it means to step into your Invincible Self—and achieve your dreams—not by forcing change overnight, but by making small, meaningful shifts that open doors you never knew existed. Here are 8 powerful ways to unlock your unstoppable success in 2025: The Thing You Seek Is Seeking You What if your biggest desires—love, success, purpose—are also looking for you? Consider Sara Blakely, the founder of Spanx. With only $5,000, she noticed a problem (uncomfortable shapewear) and realized the solution was calling her just as much as she was searching for it. The same happened with Tim Berners-Lee, who invented the World Wide Web—his vision for a connected world was something humanity was already yearning for. The Dark Room: Desire Versus Resignation Imagine standing in a pitch-black room filled with everything you need, but you can't see it. You fumble for a light switch but come up empty. Frustrated, you think, maybe I should just accept the darkness. Then a thought hits you: What if the switch isn't on the wall? You feel around, find a button on the floor, press it—and suddenly, light floods the room.  You see everything you need. Do You Want It as Much as a Dying Person Wants Life? True desire is intense. Imagine someone fighting to survive—they don't hesitate, doubt, or give up. They fight with everything they have. That's the level of passion you need for your goals. Be the Thing You Long For If you want love, be loving. If you want success, act as if you're already successful. The moment you embody what you seek, the world starts reflecting it back to you. Lift Your Mind Above Effort and Resistance Many people struggle because they fight against life instead of flowing with it. Imagine trying to swim upstream—it's exhausting and gets you nowhere. Now, picture letting go and allowing the current to carry you. When you do this, love, happiness, and success will surely flow to you. Attract High-Value Relationships Your relationships are a direct reflection of your energy. If you radiate confidence, kindness, and self-worth, you'll attract people who have the same qualities. Now your relationships become your golden treasure. Search for Worthier Prizes Sometimes, failure is just a redirection to something better. Consider Lady Gaga who was dropped by her first record label after only three months. Devastated, but determined, she refined her artistry and soon became one of the biggest pop stars in the world. Reverse the Desire Not every desire is meant for you—and that's okay. Sometimes, the greatest act of self-love is letting go. Holding on to something that isn't aligned with your true path—whether it's a relationship, career, or outdated dream—only blocks the right opportunities from finding you. When you release what no longer serves you, you create space for something far greater to take its place. Remember this: What you seek is also seeking you. Align your energy with your desires, and opportunities will follow. Even when life feels like a Dark Room, keep searching—the light switch is there. Success, love, and happiness require full commitment. Sometimes setbacks are actually redirections toward something better, but you must be willing to let go of what no longer serves you. The moment you fully embrace your worth, act with purpose, and let go of what doesn't belong to you, you will naturally attract the success, love, and joy that were always meant for you. Here's to your Invincible Year.

Bilgisayar... Tüm dünyayı baştan aşağı değiştiren bir icat. Belki de tarihin en önemli kesiflerinde biri. Fakat bu devrim bir anda olmadı elbette. Basit bir hesap yapma aracından, yapay zekaya kadar uzanan bu serüven, insanlığın kendini aşma çabasının da hikayesiydi aslında. Hiçbir Şey Tesadüf Değil'de bu teknolojik devrimin arka planına odaklanıyoruz. İki bölümden oluşacak mini bu mini serinin ilk ayağındaysa, hayatımızı değiştiren bu teknolojiyi en ilkel günlerinden itibaren incelemeye çalışıyoruz.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

ICYMI (there were problems with the site mid-week), check out my forecasts for 2025, always one of my more popular pieces of the year.He has invented an entirely new digital system of money with the potential to change the world as we know it. He has watched it grow to a market cap of over two trillion dollars, with as many as 100 million users worldwide, including actual nations, and the US President promising a strategic bitcoin reserve in his 2024 election campaign. He has half the internet nosing about and trying to figure out who he is. His own coins are worth about $100 billion, making him one of the richest people on earth.Yet he has managed to stay completely unknown and anonymous. It is almost unbelievable.Never mind Big Foot, the Mary Rose or the Loch Ness Monster, the mystery of ‘Who is Satoshi Nakamoto?' is perhaps the greatest mystery the world has ever known - or not known.There have been thousands of investigative attempts, articles, blog posts and discussion groups involving probably millions of man hours dedicated to pinning down this man, with names bandied about from Elon Musk to little known computer scientists. They have all failed. Satoshi's identity is as bulletproof as his code.For my 2014 book, Bitcoin: the Future of Money?, from which today's piece is taken, I ventured on the same doomed journey. I spent many months poring over the 80,000 words Satoshi wrote in the three years he was active online, looking for clues. What unusual words did he use? Does he make any spelling mistakes? Does he have any quirky grammatical habits? I analysed it in such detail I can tell you where he places brackets, how he uses hyphens, even how many spaces he uses after a full stop and how that changed – all in the hope of finding idiosyncrasies that appear in the writing of other Cypherpunks - clues which might lead me to him.Profiling a genius – some broad brushstrokes‘I've had the good fortune to know many brilliant people over the course of my life, so I recognize the signs.' Hal FinneySatoshi reached such high levels of expertise in so many different fields that many believe he can't possibly be one person. He is a polymath. It is not just the breadth and depth of his knowledge, but, more importantly, its specificity that makes him unique.In order to first conceive a new system of electronic cash, one would have to have thought extensively about the nature of money and its history. Money is a subject that has found more interest in the last few years with the emergence of bitcoin, the 2000s bull market in gold, the financial crisis and the growth of libertarianism, but, in 2007–8, when bitcoin was conceived and first introduced, books and academic papers on the subject were few and far between. The subject did not have broad appeal.How many of those who cared actually had the ability to design a system like this? It is one thing declaring what needs to be done; it is another putting it into practice.Satoshi must have had expertise in computer coding, mathematics, databases, accounting, peer-to-peer systems, digital ownership, law, smart contracts, cryptography and monetary history.He had to have had experience in academia. The act of submitting a white paper, its presentation, the impeccable referencing – it all denotes academia, even government.It's also easy to infer from the way bitcoin was launched that Satoshi had experience in open-source tech start-ups.The resilience of the code suggests he had computer hacking experience. Moreover, his ability to keep his identity hidden, despite the fact that half the internet is trying to figure out who he is, suggests significant practical experience in staying anonymous. It also means he has the trust of those who know him, if anyone did, to keep his secret.Then there's the matter of his prose. It is consistent and of such a high standard it seems he must have had experience as a writer – perhaps he was a blogger, an academic or an author. He was also quite humble and dismissive of his ability in this regard. ‘I'm better with code than with words', he said.It's clear from his posts that he had the awareness to see shortcomings in his system, and the patience not to try to do too much too quickly. He had the foresight to perceive problems before they arose and the meticulousness to prepare for them. He appears to have remained calm and measured in the face of difficulty, but also of his own success. He treated those two imposters just the same. Signs of arrogance are hard to find.Then there's the way that bitcoin was introduced to the world. PR, like economics, is not an exact science. Sometimes something gains traction, sometimes it doesn't – and there's no explaining why. Bitcoin has been a PR masterstroke. The coverage it has received has been enormous. It gets more publicity than gold, which is the oldest form of money there is. Satoshi cannot take all of the credit for this, but he has to take some of it. He understood when to make his ideas known, at what point to release his creation into the open-source world and he had the self-efacement to let go of it for others to develop. He promoted his idea with huge under-statement – but the scheduled creation of bitcoins meant there would be no shortage of bitcoin-holders to do the promoting for him.So we can add an understanding of both PR and psychology to his list of qualities. His knowledge of how people on the internet, in the open source world and in large institutions work, allowed him to progress his creation.Finally, he has a certain honesty. Despite Bitcoin's similarities to a pyramid or Ponzi scheme, he never pumped-and- dumped his creation. Tempting though it must have been, he never sold the bitcoins he mined. That also suggests he already had money.There are not many people like this.From mathematics to computer programming to economics and monetary history to politics to PR and psychology to cryptography to business acumen and vision to plain old written English – in all of these fields he excelled. To cap it all, he's probably good-looking too.It's early in history to be drawing this sort of comparison, I know, but there are many parallels between Satoshi and Isaac Newton. Newton was a brilliant scientist and mathematician, of course, and an alchemist. But he was also Master of the Royal Mint. He redesigned England's monetary system, putting us onto the gold standard on which Britain's colossal progress during the next 200 years was built.If you haven't already, take a look at my buddy Charlie Morris's monthly gold report, Atlas Pulse. It is, in my view, the best gold newsletter out there, and, best of all, it's free. Sign up here.First instinctMany believe that Satoshi was Hal Finney, the veteran programmer, who invented reusable proof of works, one of the models on which bitcoin was based. This was my first instinct. Often such “first instincts”, for reasons I cannot begin to explain, prove correct. When Satoshi first announced bitcoin on the cryptography mailing list, nobody replied. The message was ignored for two days. In the short-attention-span land of the web, two days is a long time to wait for some feedback on something you've spent 18 months working on. Two days is a long time to wait when you might have nailed something Cypherpunks had been dreaming about for 20 years.The first reply came from Finney. Was he replying to himself in order to generate some interest and discussion – to bump his thread? Replying to your own posts, known as ‘sock-puppeting', is not uncommon. Let us pursue this line of thinking a little further.Finney was born in 1956 – in that same two-year golden window as so many computer-scientist geniuses that would change the world (from Bill Gates to Tim Berners-Lee to Steve Jobs) were born – and spent his life working on cryptographic systems. He was number two to Phil Zimmerman, the pioneer in the field, for many years at the Pretty Good Privacy (PGP) Corporation, where they developed the most widely used email encryption software in the world.Such were his beliefs in privacy, freedom, and Cypherpunk, Finney was known to spend many nights writing and developing code for free, just because he believed in the work.In 1993, he published the paper, ‘Detecting Double-Spending'. Solving the double-spending problem (ensuring the same money cannot be used twice) was, of course, the key problem with digital cash. It was what Satoshi was so excited about when he proposed Bitcoin. In 2004, Finney developed the ‘reusable proof-of-work' (RPOW) system, which coders regarded as a brilliant step forward – but his system never saw any economic use until b itcoin.Finney is one of the few people to have the background and expertise to have developed bitcoin – but he is also an obvious person to take an immediate interest.In his very first reply to Satoshi's announcement, he wrote:“As an amusing thought experiment, imagine that Bitcoin is successful and becomes the dominant payment system in use throughout the world. Then the total value of the currency should be equal to the total value of all the wealth in the world. Current estimates of total worldwide household wealth that I have found range from $100 trillion to $300 trillion. With 20 million coins, that gives each coin a value of about $10 million.”The comment shows extraordinary insight. Many now see this “amusing thought experiment” as inevitable. But could it also be somebody trying to get others excited? Very possibly.(By the way, ‘thought experiment' is an expression Satoshi himself uses – though it is not uncommon in coding circles).Of the many names touted as Satoshi, Finney's writing style is one of the few that match. The major difference is Satoshi used British spelling and Finney does not. There is a similar calm, understated tone, similar use of language, similar punctuation habits: two spaces after a full stop. In stylometrics tests carried out by John Noecker Jr., chief scientific officer at text analysis experts Juola & Associates, Finney consistently scored high. (However, veteran cypherpunk blogger, Nick Szabo, scored higher). Then I noticed both Finney and Satoshi had ‘@gmx.com' email addresses. (GMX is a free email provider based in Germany. Many Germans use GMX, while Americans and British tend to gravitate towards Gmail, Hotmail, or Yahoo. Today they would probably gravitate towards P rotonmail). Was this just coincidence – or was it a clue?Why did Satoshi disappear?In December 2010, Satoshi made his final post and then disappeared from the internet.Why?Perhaps to protect his anonymity in the face of rising interest from the media and, more significantly, the authorities: to protect his own safety as the WikiLeaks panic began to erupt. (After Wikileaks was shut out of the financial system, many began sending it bitcoin. The effect, ironically, was thus to make it an extraordinarily wealthy organisation).But there is also the possibility that he disappeared because he was ill.In 2009, Finney was diagnosed with Lou Gehrig's disease – amyotrophic lateral sclerosis – the same disease from which Stephen Hawking suffered. It is, for the most part, fatal and claims its victims within two to five years. ‘My symptoms were mild at first,' he says, ‘and I continued to work, but fatigue and voice problems forced me to retire in early 2011. Since then the disease has continued its inexorable progression.' Finney, eventually died in August 2014.In March 2013 he said, ‘Today, I am essentially paralyzed. I am fed through a tube, and my breathing is assisted through another tube. I operate the computer using a commercial eye-tracker system. It also has a speech synthesizer, so this is my voice now. I spend all day in my power wheelchair. I worked up an interface using an Arduino so that I can adjust my wheelchair's position using my eyes. It has been an adjustment, but my life is not too bad. I can still read, listen to music, and watch TV and movies. I recently discovered that I can even write code. It's very slow, probably 50 times slower than I was before. But I still love programming and it gives me goals.'Could a terrible illness be the reason Satoshi withdrew?Finney was one of the first to mine bitcoins. What did he do with them?I mined several blocks over the next days. But I turned it off because it made my computer run hot, and the fan noise bothered me. In retrospect, I wish I had kept it up longer, but on the other hand, I was extraordinarily lucky to be there at the beginning. It's one of those glass half full, half empty things.The next I heard of Bitcoin was late 2010, when I was surprised to find that it was not only still going, bitcoins actually had monetary value. I dusted off my old wallet, and was relieved to discover that my bitcoins were still there. As the price climbed up to real money, I transferred the coins into an offline wallet, where hopefully they'll be worth something to my heirs. Those discussions about inheriting your bitcoins are of more than academic interest. My bitcoins are stored in our safe deposit box, and my son and daughter are tech-savvy. I think they're safe enough. I'm comfortable with my legacy.Finney sold many of his bitcoins in order to pay for medical care, many at around $100. Satoshi never moved his.If you are buying gold to protect yourself in these uncertain times, I recommend The Pure Gold Company. Pricing is competitive, quality of service is high. They deliver to the UK, the US, Canada and Europe or you can store your gold with them. More here.We are all SatoshiFinney was a key player in the development of Bitcoin, no doubt. He was one of the first to ask real questions. He managed to understand from the start the inner workings of the Bitcoin protocol and its potential. He explored the weaknesses in the Bitcoin code – one of them is even named 'the Finney Attack'. He had many exchanges with Satoshi on the Bitcoin forums as they progressed the code and developed new versions. He asked question after question. But these very exchanges show there were two people talking. On January 10th, 2009, for example, Finney publicly complained to Satoshi that Bitcoin had crashed when he tried to receive a transaction. If it was his own code, and he was transacting with himself, he would surely have quietly fixed it himself.Moreover, coders all agree that Finney's coding style – and the style of the comments written in the code – is different from Satoshi's. Also, Finney preferred to code in the language C, whereas Bitcoin is coded in C++. This is something Finney himself confirms: 'I've done some changes to the Bitcoin code, and my style is completely different from Satoshi's. I program in C, which is compatible with C++, but I don't understand the tricks that Satoshi used.'Shortly before the publication of this book, the Forbes journalist Andy Greenberg published an interview with Hal Finney. Finney was now too ill to even speak – he could only raise his eyebrows to say yes. His son showed Greenberg fifteen email exchanges between Satoshi and Finney from January 2009. They mainly focused on bugs Finney had found in the code, to which Satoshi replied with fixes - and notes of thanks. Greenberg was also shown Finney's bitcoin wallet – with the transfers between Satoshi and Finney made back in 2009. As Greenberg notes, the wallet evidence and the Gmail timestamps in the emails would have been hard to forge. To cap it all, there is the fact that in 2009, at precisely the same moment Satoshi sent time-stamped e-mails, Finney, a keen runner, was photographed in the middle of a ten-mile race. Nobody, not even Satoshi Nakamoto, can be in two places at once.Bitcoin could not have happened without the work of Finney.If Satoshi Nakamoto was several people, Finney might have been one of them. But if Satoshi is an individual, Hal Finney was not him. This is an extract from my 2014 book, Bitcoin: the Future of Money? I hear the audiobook's excellent. ;)If you missed them (there were problems with the site midweek), check out my forecasts for 2025. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.theflyingfrisby.com/subscribe

ICYMI (there were problems with the site mid-week), check out my forecasts for 2025, always one of my more popular pieces of the year.He has invented an entirely new digital system of money with the potential to change the world as we know it. He has watched it grow to a market cap of over two trillion dollars, with as many as 100 million users worldwide, including actual nations, and the US President promising a strategic bitcoin reserve in his 2024 election campaign. He has half the internet nosing about and trying to figure out who he is. His own coins are worth about $100 billion, making him one of the richest people on earth.Yet he has managed to stay completely unknown and anonymous. It is almost unbelievable.Never mind Big Foot, the Mary Rose or the Loch Ness Monster, the mystery of ‘Who is Satoshi Nakamoto?' is perhaps the greatest mystery the world has ever known - or not known.There have been thousands of investigative attempts, articles, blog posts and discussion groups involving probably millions of man hours dedicated to pinning down this man, with names bandied about from Elon Musk to little known computer scientists. They have all failed. Satoshi's identity is as bulletproof as his code.For my 2014 book, Bitcoin: the Future of Money?, from which today's piece is taken, I ventured on the same doomed journey. I spent many months poring over the 80,000 words Satoshi wrote in the three years he was active online, looking for clues. What unusual words did he use? Does he make any spelling mistakes? Does he have any quirky grammatical habits? I analysed it in such detail I can tell you where he places brackets, how he uses hyphens, even how many spaces he uses after a full stop and how that changed – all in the hope of finding idiosyncrasies that appear in the writing of other Cypherpunks - clues which might lead me to him.Profiling a genius – some broad brushstrokes‘I've had the good fortune to know many brilliant people over the course of my life, so I recognize the signs.' Hal FinneySatoshi reached such high levels of expertise in so many different fields that many believe he can't possibly be one person. He is a polymath. It is not just the breadth and depth of his knowledge, but, more importantly, its specificity that makes him unique.In order to first conceive a new system of electronic cash, one would have to have thought extensively about the nature of money and its history. Money is a subject that has found more interest in the last few years with the emergence of bitcoin, the 2000s bull market in gold, the financial crisis and the growth of libertarianism, but, in 2007–8, when bitcoin was conceived and first introduced, books and academic papers on the subject were few and far between. The subject did not have broad appeal.How many of those who cared actually had the ability to design a system like this? It is one thing declaring what needs to be done; it is another putting it into practice.Satoshi must have had expertise in computer coding, mathematics, databases, accounting, peer-to-peer systems, digital ownership, law, smart contracts, cryptography and monetary history.He had to have had experience in academia. The act of submitting a white paper, its presentation, the impeccable referencing – it all denotes academia, even government.It's also easy to infer from the way bitcoin was launched that Satoshi had experience in open-source tech start-ups.The resilience of the code suggests he had computer hacking experience. Moreover, his ability to keep his identity hidden, despite the fact that half the internet is trying to figure out who he is, suggests significant practical experience in staying anonymous. It also means he has the trust of those who know him, if anyone did, to keep his secret.Then there's the matter of his prose. It is consistent and of such a high standard it seems he must have had experience as a writer – perhaps he was a blogger, an academic or an author. He was also quite humble and dismissive of his ability in this regard. ‘I'm better with code than with words', he said.It's clear from his posts that he had the awareness to see shortcomings in his system, and the patience not to try to do too much too quickly. He had the foresight to perceive problems before they arose and the meticulousness to prepare for them. He appears to have remained calm and measured in the face of difficulty, but also of his own success. He treated those two imposters just the same. Signs of arrogance are hard to find.Then there's the way that bitcoin was introduced to the world. PR, like economics, is not an exact science. Sometimes something gains traction, sometimes it doesn't – and there's no explaining why. Bitcoin has been a PR masterstroke. The coverage it has received has been enormous. It gets more publicity than gold, which is the oldest form of money there is. Satoshi cannot take all of the credit for this, but he has to take some of it. He understood when to make his ideas known, at what point to release his creation into the open-source world and he had the self-efacement to let go of it for others to develop. He promoted his idea with huge under-statement – but the scheduled creation of bitcoins meant there would be no shortage of bitcoin-holders to do the promoting for him.So we can add an understanding of both PR and psychology to his list of qualities. His knowledge of how people on the internet, in the open source world and in large institutions work, allowed him to progress his creation.Finally, he has a certain honesty. Despite Bitcoin's similarities to a pyramid or Ponzi scheme, he never pumped-and- dumped his creation. Tempting though it must have been, he never sold the bitcoins he mined. That also suggests he already had money.There are not many people like this.From mathematics to computer programming to economics and monetary history to politics to PR and psychology to cryptography to business acumen and vision to plain old written English – in all of these fields he excelled. To cap it all, he's probably good-looking too.It's early in history to be drawing this sort of comparison, I know, but there are many parallels between Satoshi and Isaac Newton. Newton was a brilliant scientist and mathematician, of course, and an alchemist. But he was also Master of the Royal Mint. He redesigned England's monetary system, putting us onto the gold standard on which Britain's colossal progress during the next 200 years was built.If you haven't already, take a look at my buddy Charlie Morris's monthly gold report, Atlas Pulse. It is, in my view, the best gold newsletter out there, and, best of all, it's free. Sign up here.First instinctMany believe that Satoshi was Hal Finney, the veteran programmer, who invented reusable proof of works, one of the models on which bitcoin was based. This was my first instinct. Often such “first instincts”, for reasons I cannot begin to explain, prove correct. When Satoshi first announced bitcoin on the cryptography mailing list, nobody replied. The message was ignored for two days. In the short-attention-span land of the web, two days is a long time to wait for some feedback on something you've spent 18 months working on. Two days is a long time to wait when you might have nailed something Cypherpunks had been dreaming about for 20 years.The first reply came from Finney. Was he replying to himself in order to generate some interest and discussion – to bump his thread? Replying to your own posts, known as ‘sock-puppeting', is not uncommon. Let us pursue this line of thinking a little further.Finney was born in 1956 – in that same two-year golden window as so many computer-scientist geniuses that would change the world (from Bill Gates to Tim Berners-Lee to Steve Jobs) were born – and spent his life working on cryptographic systems. He was number two to Phil Zimmerman, the pioneer in the field, for many years at the Pretty Good Privacy (PGP) Corporation, where they developed the most widely used email encryption software in the world.Such were his beliefs in privacy, freedom, and Cypherpunk, Finney was known to spend many nights writing and developing code for free, just because he believed in the work.In 1993, he published the paper, ‘Detecting Double-Spending'. Solving the double-spending problem (ensuring the same money cannot be used twice) was, of course, the key problem with digital cash. It was what Satoshi was so excited about when he proposed Bitcoin. In 2004, Finney developed the ‘reusable proof-of-work' (RPOW) system, which coders regarded as a brilliant step forward – but his system never saw any economic use until b itcoin.Finney is one of the few people to have the background and expertise to have developed bitcoin – but he is also an obvious person to take an immediate interest.In his very first reply to Satoshi's announcement, he wrote:“As an amusing thought experiment, imagine that Bitcoin is successful and becomes the dominant payment system in use throughout the world. Then the total value of the currency should be equal to the total value of all the wealth in the world. Current estimates of total worldwide household wealth that I have found range from $100 trillion to $300 trillion. With 20 million coins, that gives each coin a value of about $10 million.”The comment shows extraordinary insight. Many now see this “amusing thought experiment” as inevitable. But could it also be somebody trying to get others excited? Very possibly.(By the way, ‘thought experiment' is an expression Satoshi himself uses – though it is not uncommon in coding circles).Of the many names touted as Satoshi, Finney's writing style is one of the few that match. The major difference is Satoshi used British spelling and Finney does not. There is a similar calm, understated tone, similar use of language, similar punctuation habits: two spaces after a full stop. In stylometrics tests carried out by John Noecker Jr., chief scientific officer at text analysis experts Juola & Associates, Finney consistently scored high. (However, veteran cypherpunk blogger, Nick Szabo, scored higher). Then I noticed both Finney and Satoshi had ‘@gmx.com' email addresses. (GMX is a free email provider based in Germany. Many Germans use GMX, while Americans and British tend to gravitate towards Gmail, Hotmail, or Yahoo. Today they would probably gravitate towards P rotonmail). Was this just coincidence – or was it a clue?Why did Satoshi disappear?In December 2010, Satoshi made his final post and then disappeared from the internet.Why?Perhaps to protect his anonymity in the face of rising interest from the media and, more significantly, the authorities: to protect his own safety as the WikiLeaks panic began to erupt. (After Wikileaks was shut out of the financial system, many began sending it bitcoin. The effect, ironically, was thus to make it an extraordinarily wealthy organisation).But there is also the possibility that he disappeared because he was ill.In 2009, Finney was diagnosed with Lou Gehrig's disease – amyotrophic lateral sclerosis – the same disease from which Stephen Hawking suffered. It is, for the most part, fatal and claims its victims within two to five years. ‘My symptoms were mild at first,' he says, ‘and I continued to work, but fatigue and voice problems forced me to retire in early 2011. Since then the disease has continued its inexorable progression.' Finney, eventually died in August 2014.In March 2013 he said, ‘Today, I am essentially paralyzed. I am fed through a tube, and my breathing is assisted through another tube. I operate the computer using a commercial eye-tracker system. It also has a speech synthesizer, so this is my voice now. I spend all day in my power wheelchair. I worked up an interface using an Arduino so that I can adjust my wheelchair's position using my eyes. It has been an adjustment, but my life is not too bad. I can still read, listen to music, and watch TV and movies. I recently discovered that I can even write code. It's very slow, probably 50 times slower than I was before. But I still love programming and it gives me goals.'Could a terrible illness be the reason Satoshi withdrew?Finney was one of the first to mine bitcoins. What did he do with them?I mined several blocks over the next days. But I turned it off because it made my computer run hot, and the fan noise bothered me. In retrospect, I wish I had kept it up longer, but on the other hand, I was extraordinarily lucky to be there at the beginning. It's one of those glass half full, half empty things.The next I heard of Bitcoin was late 2010, when I was surprised to find that it was not only still going, bitcoins actually had monetary value. I dusted off my old wallet, and was relieved to discover that my bitcoins were still there. As the price climbed up to real money, I transferred the coins into an offline wallet, where hopefully they'll be worth something to my heirs. Those discussions about inheriting your bitcoins are of more than academic interest. My bitcoins are stored in our safe deposit box, and my son and daughter are tech-savvy. I think they're safe enough. I'm comfortable with my legacy.Finney sold many of his bitcoins in order to pay for medical care, many at around $100. Satoshi never moved his.If you are buying gold to protect yourself in these uncertain times, I recommend The Pure Gold Company. Pricing is competitive, quality of service is high. They deliver to the UK, the US, Canada and Europe or you can store your gold with them. More here.We are all SatoshiFinney was a key player in the development of Bitcoin, no doubt. He was one of the first to ask real questions. He managed to understand from the start the inner workings of the Bitcoin protocol and its potential. He explored the weaknesses in the Bitcoin code – one of them is even named 'the Finney Attack'. He had many exchanges with Satoshi on the Bitcoin forums as they progressed the code and developed new versions. He asked question after question. But these very exchanges show there were two people talking. On January 10th, 2009, for example, Finney publicly complained to Satoshi that Bitcoin had crashed when he tried to receive a transaction. If it was his own code, and he was transacting with himself, he would surely have quietly fixed it himself.Moreover, coders all agree that Finney's coding style – and the style of the comments written in the code – is different from Satoshi's. Also, Finney preferred to code in the language C, whereas Bitcoin is coded in C++. This is something Finney himself confirms: 'I've done some changes to the Bitcoin code, and my style is completely different from Satoshi's. I program in C, which is compatible with C++, but I don't understand the tricks that Satoshi used.'Shortly before the publication of this book, the Forbes journalist Andy Greenberg published an interview with Hal Finney. Finney was now too ill to even speak – he could only raise his eyebrows to say yes. His son showed Greenberg fifteen email exchanges between Satoshi and Finney from January 2009. They mainly focused on bugs Finney had found in the code, to which Satoshi replied with fixes - and notes of thanks. Greenberg was also shown Finney's bitcoin wallet – with the transfers between Satoshi and Finney made back in 2009. As Greenberg notes, the wallet evidence and the Gmail timestamps in the emails would have been hard to forge. To cap it all, there is the fact that in 2009, at precisely the same moment Satoshi sent time-stamped e-mails, Finney, a keen runner, was photographed in the middle of a ten-mile race. Nobody, not even Satoshi Nakamoto, can be in two places at once.Bitcoin could not have happened without the work of Finney.If Satoshi Nakamoto was several people, Finney might have been one of them. But if Satoshi is an individual, Hal Finney was not him. This is an extract from my 2014 book, Bitcoin: the Future of Money? I hear the audiobook's excellent. ;)If you missed them (there were problems with the site midweek), check out my forecasts for 2025. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.theflyingfrisby.com/subscribe

Time stamps: Introducing Mike Belshe (00:00:42) Mike Belshe's Background (00:01:58) Self-Custody vs. Institutional Custody (00:02:05) Multi-Signature Technology (00:03:56) Understanding Multi-Party Computation (00:04:51) Advancements in Cryptography (00:05:53) BitGo's Role in Tokenizing Bitcoin (00:08:26) Defining DeFi's Importance (00:09:09) Mike's Technology Background (00:12:12) Inspiration from Tim Berners-Lee (00:14:57) Bitcoin's Zero Click Payments (00:17:11) Bitcoin Custodianship Issues (00:17:36) Challenges of Bitcoin Payments (00:18:25) Scaling Bitcoin and Lightning Network (00:19:20) Bitcoin's Role in Digital Money (00:20:13) Layer Two Solutions and Drivechains (00:21:15) Scaling Discussions in Bitcoin's History (00:22:31) Sidechains and Their Limitations (00:23:16) Innovation vs. Immutability (00:24:29) Importance of Real Applications (00:25:32) Privacy and Fungibility in Bitcoin (00:28:42) Lessons from TCP/IP and Blockchain Privacy (00:30:51) Regulatory Concerns and Privacy Solutions (00:32:53) Understanding the Static of Security (00:34:01) SideShift (00:34:59) Bitcoin's Civil War: Block Size Wars (00:35:54) Human Decisions in Bitcoin (00:36:16) Historical Proposals and Interpretations (00:37:10) Challenges of Block Space and Fees (00:37:58) Bitcoin Consensus (00:38:48) SegWit and Its Implications (00:39:41) Gavin Andresen's Role in Bitcoin (00:42:00) Bitcoin's Resilience Against Adversaries (00:42:13) Need for Enhanced Security (00:43:05) Strategic Bitcoin Reserve in the USA (00:44:30) El Salvador's Currency Strategy (00:45:19) Self-Custody Concerns (00:49:13) Security Measures for Self-Custody (00:50:17) Privacy as a Solution (00:50:43) Self-Custody Options (00:51:14) Family Legacy and Custody Challenges (00:52:24) Public Key Cryptography Innovation (00:52:28) HODLING.ch (00:53:29) Protecting Against Government Confiscation (00:54:15) Multi-Custodial Model Explanation (00:54:21) Hardware Wallets Discussion (00:56:03) Safety Deposit Box Concerns (00:58:03) Trade-offs in Security Solutions (00:58:56) Onboarding New Users (01:00:09) Edge Wallet Features (01:01:01) BitGo's Wallet Recovery Wizard (01:03:02) BitGo vs. Casa (01:05:08) Multi-Signature Security (01:05:46) Early Adoption of Multi-Sig (01:09:10) Building a New Monetary System (01:11:54) Regulatory Changes in the US (01:13:49) Impact of MiCA in Europe (01:15:32) War on Cash (01:16:17) Global Financial Systems (01:18:03) Zero Knowledge Proofs (01:19:48) Zcash Discussion (01:20:04) Privacy Technologies in Bitcoin (01:21:18) Challenges of On-chain Traceability (01:22:26) Philosophy on Transaction Privacy (01:23:19) Concerns About Privacy Adoption (01:24:51) Historical Context of TCP/IP Security (01:25:34) Bitcoin as Digital Gold (01:27:24) Ethereum's Role in DeFi (01:29:01) Benefits of Smart Contracts (01:32:01) Reflections on Bitcoin's Journey (01:33:25) Future of Bitcoin (01:34:30) Lightning Network Fees (01:36:12) Trade-offs in Payment Systems (01:38:01) Adoption of Bitcoin and Early Adoption Costs (01:42:01) Long-term Viability of Bitcoin Mining (01:44:38) The Future of Bitcoin and Layer Solutions (01:47:17) Community Response to Bitcoin Vulnerabilities (01:49:01) Satoshi's Vision for Mining (01:51:11) Satoshi's Intentions (01:52:35) Empathy for Satoshi (01:54:16) 0 to 1 Concept (01:54:24) Bitcoin's Anniversary (01:55:53) Centralization in Crisis (01:56:33) Zero Knowledge Proof Bug (01:57:45) Following Mike Belshe's Work (01:58:45)

We're back with our fortnightly episodes after a well-earned Christmas break! This latest episode (Episode 63) was recorded at The Hill Street Theatre in the Edinburgh Fringe on 6th August 2024. The panellists were Luis Alcada, Caitriona Dowden and Paul Connolly, and the host was Richard Pulsford. We covered a few On This Day topics from the twentieth century but also went as far back as the 15th Century, including when: - Pope Calixtus III died, on 6th August 1458 - Ben Jonson died, on 6th August 1637 - Alfred, Lord Tennyson was born, on 6th August 1809 - Barbara Windsor was born, on 6th August 1937 - Gherman Titov became the second man in space, on 6th August 1961 - Tim Berners-Lee released documents describing the World Wide Web, on 6th August 1991

====================================================SUSCRIBETEhttps://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNpffyr-7_zP1x1lS89ByaQ?sub_confirmation=1==================================================== DEVOCIÓN MATUTINA PARA JÓVENES 2025“HOY ES TENDENCIA”Narrado por: Daniel RamosDesde: Connecticut, USAUna cortesía de DR'Ministries y Canaan Seventh-Day Adventist Church ===================|| www.drministries.org ||===================01 DE ENEROUNA BARRA EN BLANCO «Busquen al Señor mientras puedan encontrarlo, llámenlo mientras está cercano». Isaías 55: 6Todo comenzó un día como hoy, el 1 de enero de 1990, cuando Tim Berners-Lee transformo el mundo de manera irreversible al presentar la world wide web, comúnmente abreviada como www. Este sistema es el que nos permite acceder a la información alojada en internet.Hoy en día, internet se ha vuelto indispensable para la mayoría de nosotros, facilitándonos el acceso a noticias, estudios, comunicación, compras, ventas e incluso el enamoramiento. Cuando Tim Berners-Lee creó el primer "buscador", era imperativo agregar el prefijo "www" antes del nombre de la página. En la actualidad, esta práctica ha quedado obsoleta, pero al ingresar a Internet, aún debemos especificar el tipo de contenido que buscamos.No importa si utilizas Chrome, Firefox o Safari; al abrir tu navegador, te enfrentas a una barra en blanco cuyos resultados dependen de lo que ingreses en ella. Con solo unas pocas palabras, puedes acceder a un portal de noticias, a una universidad en línea, a una plataforma de videos o incluso a sitios de entretenimiento adulto o juegos de azar. Lo que escribas en esa "barra en blanco" marcará la diferencia y determinará si decides dedicarte a una carrera universitaria o pasas cinco horas viendo memes o reels, si optas por aprender un nuevo idioma o si te involucras en actividades cibernéticas ilegales.El comienzo de un nuevo año es equiparable a iniciar una nueva búsqueda en Internet. Hoy, como si Dios te proporcionara un "navegador" nuevo con 365 "pestañas", cada una de ellas presenta una "barra de búsqueda" completamente en blanco. ¿Qué escribirás en ellas? ¿Qué contenido buscarás? Tu éxito o fracaso este año dependerá de lo que vayas ingresando en cada barra a medida que avance el tiempo.Al iniciar cada nuevo año, se nos brinda la oportunidad de decidir qué es lo que buscaremos: una profesión, empleo, pareja, salud, éxito, riquezas, poder, influencia, fama... Las opciones son variadas, pero la primera frase que deberíamos ingresar en esta nueva barra de nuestra vida es aquella que repiten los antiguos profetas hebreos: «Busquen al Señor» (Isaías 55: 6). ¿Y qué pasará si buscamos a Dios cada día de este año que hoy comienza? Dios dice: «Los que me buscan, me encontrarán» (Proverbios 8: 17, NTV). Hoy te puedo asegurar que cuando lo encontramos a él, encontramos la vida (Amós 5:6). 

Text messages on our phones are so easy to use and so common that it's all too easy to forget how useful they are to scammers. Every text message should be treated with suspicion. In Short Circuits: Recently I needed to format a 64GB thumb drive using FAT32, one of the older formatting types. The Windows formatting tool won't allow it, so maybe you think the FAT32 limit is 32GB. It's not and formatting the large drive turned out to be refreshingly easy. • Sometimes I wonder if Tim Berners-Lee or Marc Andreessen had any idea, in the late 1980s and early 1990s, that the browsers they were developing to view simple text files would expand and virtually take over the world.

The full schedule for Latent Space LIVE! at NeurIPS has been announced, featuring Best of 2024 overview talks for the AI Startup Landscape, Computer Vision, Open Models, Transformers Killers, Synthetic Data, Agents, and Scaling, and speakers from Sarah Guo of Conviction, Roboflow, AI2/Meta, Recursal/Together, HuggingFace, OpenHands and SemiAnalysis. Join us for the IRL event/Livestream! Alessio will also be holding a meetup at AWS Re:Invent in Las Vegas this Wednesday. See our new Events page for dates of AI Engineer Summit, Singapore, and World's Fair in 2025. LAST CALL for questions for our big 2024 recap episode! Submit questions and messages on Speakpipe here for a chance to appear on the show!When we first observed that GPT Wrappers are Good, Actually, we did not even have Bolt on our radar. Since we recorded our Anthropic episode discussing building Agents with the new Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Bolt.new (by Stackblitz) has easily cleared the $8m ARR bar, repeating and accelerating its initial $4m feat.There are very many AI code generators and VS Code forks out there, but Bolt probably broke through initially because of its incredible zero shot low effort app generation:But as we explain in the pod, Bolt also emphasized deploy (Netlify)/ backend (Supabase)/ fullstack capabilities on top of Stackblitz's existing WebContainer full-WASM-powered-developer-environment-in-the-browser tech. Since then, the team has been shipping like mad (with weekly office hours), with bugfixing, full screen, multi-device, long context, diff based edits (using speculative decoding like we covered in Inference, Fast and Slow).All of this has captured the imagination of low/no code builders like Greg Isenberg and many others on YouTube/TikTok/Reddit/X/Linkedin etc:Just as with Fireworks, our relationship with Bolt/Stackblitz goes a bit deeper than normal - swyx advised the launch and got a front row seat to this epic journey, as well as demoed it with Realtime Voice at the recent OpenAI Dev Day. So we are very proud to be the first/closest to tell the full open story of Bolt/Stackblitz!Flow Engineering + Qodo/AlphaCodium UpdateIn year 2 of the pod we have been on a roll getting former guests to return as guest cohosts (Harrison Chase, Aman Sanger, Jon Frankle), and it was a pleasure to catch Itamar Friedman back on the pod, giving us an update on all things Qodo and Testing Agents from our last catchup a year and a half ago:Qodo (they renamed in September) went viral in early January this year with AlphaCodium (paper here, code here) beating DeepMind's AlphaCode with high efficiency:With a simple problem solving code agent:* The first step is to have the model reason about the problem. They describe it using bullet points and focus on the goal, inputs, outputs, rules, constraints, and any other relevant details.* Then, they make the model reason about the public tests and come up with an explanation of why the input leads to that particular output. * The model generates two to three potential solutions in text and ranks them in terms of correctness, simplicity, and robustness. * Then, it generates more diverse tests for the problem, covering cases not part of the original public tests. * Iteratively, pick a solution, generate the code, and run it on a few test cases. * If the tests fail, improve the code and repeat the process until the code passes every test.swyx has previously written similar thoughts on types vs tests for putting bounds on program behavior, but AlphaCodium extends this to AI generated tests and code.More recently, Itamar has also shown that AlphaCodium's techniques also extend well to the o1 models:Making Flow Engineering a useful technique to improve code model performance on every model. This is something we see AI Engineers uniquely well positioned to do compared to ML Engineers/Researchers.Full Video PodcastLike and subscribe!Show Notes* Itamar* Qodo* First episode* Eric* Bolt* StackBlitz* Thinkster* AlphaCodium* WebContainersChapters* 00:00:00 Introductions & Updates* 00:06:01 Generic vs. Specific AI Agents* 00:07:40 Maintaining vs Creating with AI* 00:17:46 Human vs Agent Computer Interfaces* 00:20:15 Why Docker doesn't work for Bolt* 00:24:23 Creating Testing and Code Review Loops* 00:28:07 Bolt's Task Breakdown Flow* 00:31:04 AI in Complex Enterprise Environments* 00:41:43 AlphaCodium* 00:44:39 Strategies for Breaking Down Complex Tasks* 00:45:22 Building in Open Source* 00:50:35 Choosing a product as a founder* 00:59:03 Reflections on Bolt Success* 01:06:07 Building a B2C GTM* 01:18:11 AI Capabilities and Pricing Tiers* 01:20:28 What makes Bolt unique* 01:23:07 Future Growth and Product Development* 01:29:06 Competitive Landscape in AI Engineering* 01:30:01 Advice to Founders and Embracing AI* 01:32:20 Having a baby and completing an Iron ManTranscriptAlessio [00:00:00]: Hey everyone, welcome to the Latent Space Podcast. This is Alessio, partner and CTO at Decibel Partners, and I'm joined by my co-host Swyx, founder of Smol.ai.Swyx [00:00:12]: Hey, and today we're still in our sort of makeshift in-between studio, but we're very delighted to have a former returning guest host, Itamar. Welcome back.Itamar [00:00:21]: Great to be here after a year or more. Yeah, a year and a half.Swyx [00:00:24]: You're one of our earliest guests on Agents. Now you're CEO co-founder of Kodo. Right. Which has just been renamed. You also raised a $40 million Series A, and we can get caught up on everything, but we're also delighted to have our new guest, Eric. Welcome.Eric [00:00:42]: Thank you. Excited to be here. Should I say Bolt or StackBlitz?Swyx [00:00:45]: Like, is it like its own company now or?Eric [00:00:47]: Yeah. Bolt's definitely bolt.new. That's the thing that we're probably the most known for, I imagine, at this point.Swyx [00:00:54]: Which is ridiculous to say because you were working at StackBlitz for so long.Eric [00:00:57]: Yeah. I mean, within a week, we were doing like double the amount of traffic. And StackBlitz had been online for seven years, and we were like, what? But anyways, yeah. So we're StackBlitz, the company behind bolt.new. If you've heard of bolt.new, that's our stuff. Yeah.Swyx [00:01:12]: Yeah.Itamar [00:01:13]: Excellent. I see, by the way, that the founder mode, you need to know to capture opportunities. So kudos on doing that, right? You're working on some technology, and then suddenly you can exploit that to a new world. Yeah.Eric [00:01:24]: Totally. And I think, well, not to jump, but 100%, I mean, a couple of months ago, we had the idea for Bolt earlier this year, but we haven't really shared this too much publicly. But we actually had tried to build it with some of those state-of-the-art models back in January, February, you can kind of imagine which, and they just weren't good enough to actually do the code generation where the code was accurate and it was fast and whatever have you without a ton of like rag, but then there was like issues with that. So we put it on the shelf and then we got kind of a sneak peek of some of the new models that have come out in the past couple of months now. And so once we saw that, once we actually saw the code gen from it, we were like, oh my God, like, okay, we can build a product around this. And so that was really the impetus of us building the thing. But with that, it was StackBlitz, the core StackBlitz product the past seven years has been an IDE for developers. So the entire user experience flow we've built up just didn't make sense. And so when we kind of went out to build Bolt, we just thought, you know, if we were inventing our product today, what would the interface look like given what is now possible with the AI code gen? And so there's definitely a lot of conversations we had internally, but you know, just kind of when we logically laid it out, we were like, yeah, I think it makes sense to just greenfield a new thing and let's see what happens. If it works great, then we'll figure it out. If it doesn't work great, then it'll get deleted at some point. So that's kind of how it actually came to be.Swyx [00:02:49]: I'll mention your background a little bit. You were also founder of Thinkster before you started StackBlitz. So both of you are second time founders. Both of you have sort of re-founded your company recently. Yours was more of a rename. I think a slightly different direction as well. And then we can talk about both. Maybe just chronologically, should we get caught up on where Kodo is first and then you know, just like what people should know since the last pod? Sure.Itamar [00:03:12]: The last pod was two months after we launched and we basically had the vision that we talked about. The idea that software development is about specification, test and code, etc. We are more on the testing part as in essence, we think that if you solve testing, you solve software development. The beautiful chart that we'll put up on screen. And testing is a really big field, like there are many dimensions, unit testing, the level of the component, how big it is, how large it is. And then there is like different type of testing, is it regression or smoke or whatever. So back then we only had like one ID extension with unit tests as in focus. One and a half year later, first ID extension supports more type of testing as context aware. We index local, local repos, but also 10,000s of repos for Fortune 500 companies. We have another agent, another tool that is called, the pure agent is the open source and the commercial one is CodoMerge. And then we have another open source called CoverAgent, which is not yet a commercial product coming very soon. It's very impressive. It could be that already people are approving automated pull requests that they don't even aware in really big open sources. So once we have enough of these, we will also launch another agent. So for the first one and a half year, what we did is grew in our offering and mostly on the side of, does this code actually works, testing, code review, et cetera. And we believe that's the critical milestone that needs to be achieved to actually have the AI engineer for enterprise software. And then like for the first year was everything bottom up, getting to 1 million installation. 2024, that was 2023, 2024 was starting to monetize, to feel like how it is to make the first buck. So we did the teams offering, it went well with a thousand of teams, et cetera. And then we started like just a few months ago to do enterprise with everything you need, which is a lot of things that discussed in the last post that was just released by Codelm. So that's how we call it at Codelm. Just opening the brackets, our company name was Codelm AI, and we renamed to Codo and we call our models Codelm. So back to my point, so we started Enterprise Motion and already have multiple Fortune 100 companies. And then with that, we raised a series of $40 million. And what's exciting about it is that enables us to develop more agents. That's our focus. I think it's very different. We're not coming very soon with an ID or something like that.Swyx [00:06:01]: You don't want to fork this code?Itamar [00:06:03]: Maybe we'll fork JetBrains or something just to be different.Swyx [00:06:08]: I noticed that, you know, I think the promise of general purpose agents has kind of died. Like everyone is doing kind of what you're doing. There's Codogen, Codomerge, and then there's a third one. What's the name of it?Itamar [00:06:17]: Yeah. Codocover. Cover. Which is like a commercial version of a cover agent. It's coming soon.Swyx [00:06:23]: Yeah. It's very similar with factory AI, also doing like droids. They all have special purpose doing things, but people don't really want general purpose agents. Right. The last time you were here, we talked about AutoGBT, the biggest thing of 2023. This year, not really relevant anymore. And I think it's mostly just because when you give me a general purpose agent, I don't know what to do with it.Eric [00:06:42]: Yeah.Itamar [00:06:43]: I totally agree with that. We're seeing it for a while and I think it will stay like that despite the computer use, et cetera, that supposedly can just replace us. You can just like prompt it to be, hey, now be a QA or be a QA person or a developer. I still think that there's a few reasons why you see like a dedicated agent. Again, I'm a bit more focused, like my head is more on complex software for big teams and enterprise, et cetera. And even think about permissions and what are the data sources and just the same way you manage permissions for users. Developers, you probably want to have dedicated guardrails and dedicated approvals for agents. I intentionally like touched a point on not many people think about. And of course, then what you can think of, like maybe there's different tools, tool use, et cetera. But just the first point by itself is a good reason why you want to have different agents.Alessio [00:07:40]: Just to compare that with Bot.new, you're almost focused on like the application is very complex and now you need better tools to kind of manage it and build on top of it. On Bot.new, it's almost like I was using it the other day. There's basically like, hey, look, I'm just trying to get started. You know, I'm not very opinionated on like how you're going to implement this. Like this is what I want to do. And you build a beautiful app with it. What people ask as the next step, you know, going back to like the general versus like specific, have you had people say, hey, you know, this is great to start, but then I want a specific Bot.new dot whatever else to do a more vertical integration and kind of like development or what's the, what do people say?Eric [00:08:18]: Yeah. I think, I think you kind of hit the, hit it head on, which is, you know, kind of the way that we've, we've kind of talked about internally is it's like people are using Bolt to go from like 0.0 to 1.0, like that's like kind of the biggest unlock that Bolt has versus most other things out there. I mean, I think that's kind of what's, what's very unique about Bolt. I think the, you know, the working on like existing enterprise applications is, I mean, it's crazy important because, you know, there's a, you look, when you look at the fortune 500, I mean, these code bases, some of these have been around for 20, 30 plus years. And so it's important to be going from, you know, 101.3 to 101.4, et cetera. I think for us, so what's been actually pretty interesting is we see there's kind of two different users for us that are coming in and it's very distinct. It's like people that are developers already. And then there's people that have never really written software and more if they have, it's been very, very minimal. And so in the first camp, what these developers are doing, like to go from zero to one, they're coming to Bolt and then they're ejecting the thing to get up or just downloading it and, you know, opening cursor, like whatever to, to, you know, keep iterating on the thing. And sometimes they'll bring it back to Bolt to like add in a huge piece of functionality or something. Right. But for the people that don't know how to code, they're actually just, they, they live in this thing. And that was one of the weird things when we launched is, you know, within a day of us being online, one of the most popular YouTube videos, and there's been a ton since, which was, you know, there's like, oh, Bolt is the cursor killer. And I originally saw the headlines and I was like, thanks for the views. I mean, I don't know. This doesn't make sense to me. That's not, that's not what we kind of thought.Swyx [00:09:44]: It's how YouTubers talk to each other. Well, everything kills everything else.Eric [00:09:47]: Totally. But what blew my mind was that there was any comparison because it's like cursor is a, is a local IDE product. But when, when we actually kind of dug into it and we, and we have people that are using our product saying this, I'm not using cursor. And I was like, what? And it turns out there are hundreds of thousands of people that we have seen that we're using cursor and we're trying to build apps with that where they're not traditional software does, but we're heavily leaning on the AI. And as you can imagine, it is very complicated, right? To do that with cursor. So when Bolt came out, they're like, wow, this thing's amazing because it kind of inverts the complexity where it's like, you know, it's not an IDE, it's, it's a, it's a chat-based sort of interface that we have. So that's kind of the split, which is rather interesting. We've had like the first startups now launch off of Bolt entirely where this, you know, tomorrow I'm doing a live stream with this guy named Paul, who he's built an entire CRM using this thing and you know, with backend, et cetera. And people have made their first money on the internet period, you know, launching this with Stripe or whatever have you. So that's, that's kind of the two main, the two main categories of folks that we see using Bolt though.Itamar [00:10:51]: I agree that I don't understand the comparison. It doesn't make sense to me. I think like we have like two type of families of tools. One is like we re-imagine the software development. I think Bolt is there and I think like a cursor is more like a evolution of what we already have. It's like taking the IDE and it's, it's amazing and it's okay, let's, let's adapt the IDE to an era where LLMs can do a lot for us. And Bolt is more like, okay, let's rethink everything totally. And I think we see a few tools there, like maybe Vercel, Veo and maybe Repl.it in that area. And then in the area of let's expedite, let's change, let's, let's progress with what we already have. You can see Cursor and Kodo, but we're different between ourselves, Cursor and Kodo, but definitely I think that comparison doesn't make sense.Alessio [00:11:42]: And just to set the context, this is not a Twitter demo. You've made 4 million of revenue in four weeks. So this is, this is actually working, you know, it's not a, what, what do you think that is? Like, there's been so many people demoing coding agents on Twitter and then it doesn't really work. And then you guys were just like, here you go, it's live, go use it, pay us for it. You know, is there anything in the development that was like interesting and maybe how that compares to building your own agents?Eric [00:12:08]: We had no idea, honestly, like we, we, we've been pretty blown away and, and things have just kind of continued to grow faster since then. We're like, oh, today is week six. So I, I kind of came back to the point you just made, right, where it's, you, you kind of outlined, it's like, there's kind of this new market of like kind of rethinking the software development and then there's heavily augmenting existing developers. I think that, you know, both of which are, you know, AI code gen being extremely good, it's allowed existing developers, it's allowing existing developers to camera out software far faster than they could have ever before, right? It's like the ultimate power tool for an existing developer. But this code gen stuff is now so good. And then, and we saw this over the past, you know, from the beginning of the year when we tried to first build, it's actually lowered the barrier to people that, that aren't traditionally software engineers. But the kind of the key thing is if you kind of think about it from, imagine you've never written software before, right? My co-founder and I, he and I grew up down the street from each other in Chicago. We learned how to code when we were 13 together and we've been building stuff ever since. And this is back in like the mid 2000s or whatever, you know, there was nothing for free to learn from online on the internet and how to code. For our 13th birthdays, we asked our parents for, you know, O'Reilly books cause you couldn't get this at the library, right? And so instead of like an Xbox, we got, you know, programming books. But the hardest part for everyone learning to code is getting an environment set up locally, you know? And so when we built StackBlitz, like kind of the key thesis, like seven years ago, the insight we had was that, Hey, it seems like the browser has a lot of new APIs like WebAssembly and service workers, et cetera, where you could actually write an operating system that ran inside the browser that could boot in milliseconds. And you, you know, basically there's this missing capability of the web. Like the web should be able to build apps for the web, right? You should be able to build the web on the web. Every other platform has that, Visual Studio for Windows, Xcode for Mac. The web has no built in primitive for this. And so just like our built in kind of like nerd instinct on this was like, that seems like a huge hole and it's, you know, it will be very valuable or like, you know, very valuable problem to solve. So if you want to set up that environments, you know, this is what we spent the past seven years doing. And the reality is existing developers have running locally. They already know how to set up that environment. So the problem isn't as acute for them. When we put Bolt online, we took that technology called WebContainer and married it with these, you know, state of the art frontier models. And the people that have the most pain with getting stuff set up locally is people that don't code. I think that's been, you know, really the big explosive reason is no one else has been trying to make dev environments work inside of a browser tab, you know, for the past if since ever, other than basically our company, largely because there wasn't an immediate demand or need. So I think we kind of find ourselves at the right place at the right time. And again, for this market of people that don't know how to write software, you would kind of expect that you should be able to do this without downloading something to your computer in the same way that, hey, I don't have to download Photoshop now to make designs because there's Figma. I don't have to download Word because there's, you know, Google Docs. They're kind of looking at this as that sort of thing, right? Which was kind of the, you know, our impetus and kind of vision from the get-go. But you know, the code gen, the AI code gen stuff that's come out has just been, you know, an order of magnitude multiplier on how magic that is, right? So that's kind of my best distillation of like, what is going on here, you know?Alessio [00:15:21]: And you can deploy too, right?Eric [00:15:22]: Yeah.Alessio [00:15:23]: Yeah.Eric [00:15:24]: And so that's, what's really cool is it's, you know, we have deployment built in with Netlify and this is actually, I think, Sean, you actually built this at Netlify when you were there. Yeah. It's one of the most brilliant integrations actually, because, you know, effectively the API that Sean built, maybe you can speak to it, but like as a provider, we can just effectively give files to Netlify without the user even logging in and they have a live website. And if they want to keep, hold onto it, they can click a link and claim it to their Netlify account. But it basically is just this really magic experience because when you come to Bolt, you say, I want a website. Like my mom, 70, 71 years old, made her first website, you know, on the internet two weeks ago, right? It was about her nursing days.Swyx [00:16:03]: Oh, that's fantastic though. It wouldn't have been made.Eric [00:16:06]: A hundred percent. Cause even in, you know, when we've had a lot of people building personal, like deeply personal stuff, like in the first week we launched this, the sales guy from the East Coast, you know, replied to a tweet of mine and he said, thank you so much for building this to your team. His daughter has a medical condition and so for her to travel, she has to like line up donors or something, you know, so ahead of time. And so he actually used Bolt to make a website to do that, to actually go and send it to folks in the region she was going to travel to ahead of time. I was really touched by it, but I also thought like, why, you know, why didn't he use like Wix or Squarespace? Right? I mean, this is, this is a solved problem, quote unquote, right? And then when I thought, I actually use Squarespace for my, for my, uh, the wedding website for my wife and I, like back in 2021, so I'm familiar, you know, it was, it was faster. I know how to code. I was like, this is faster. Right. And I thought back and I was like, there's a whole interface you have to learn how to use. And it's actually not that simple. There's like a million things you can configure in that thing. When you come to Bolt, there's a, there's a text box. You just say, I need a, I need a wedding website. Here's the date. Here's where it is. And here's a photo of me and my wife, put it somewhere relevant. It's actually the simplest way. And that's what my, when my mom came, she said, uh, I'm Pat Simons. I was a nurse in the seventies, you know, and like, here's the things I did and a website came out. So coming back to why is this such a, I think, why are we seeing this sort of growth? It's, this is the simplest interface I think maybe ever created to actually build it, a deploy a website. And then that website, my mom made, she's like, okay, this looks great. And there's, there's one button, you just click it, deploy, and it's live and you can buy a domain name, attach it to it. And you know, it's as simple as it gets, it's getting even simpler with some of the stuff we're working on. But anyways, so that's, it's, it's, uh, it's been really interesting to see some of the usage like that.Swyx [00:17:46]: I can offer my perspective. So I, you know, I probably should have disclosed a little bit that, uh, I'm a, uh, stack list investor.Alessio [00:17:53]: Canceled the episode. I know, I know. Don't play it now. Pause.Eric actually reached out to ShowMeBolt before the launch. And we, you know, we talked a lot about, like, the framing of, of what we're going to talk about how we marketed the thing, but also, like, what we're So that's what Bolt was going to need, like a whole sort of infrastructure.swyx: Netlify, I was a maintainer but I won't take claim for the anonymous upload. That's actually the origin story of Netlify. We can have Matt Billman talk about it, but that was [00:18:00] how Netlify started. You could drag and drop your zip file or folder from your desktop onto a website, it would have a live URL with no sign in.swyx: And so that was the origin story of Netlify. And it just persists to today. And it's just like it's really nice, interesting that both Bolt and CognitionDevIn and a bunch of other sort of agent type startups, they all use Netlify to deploy because of this one feature. They don't really care about the other features.swyx: But, but just because it's easy for computers to use and talk to it, like if you build an interface for computers specifically, that it's easy for them to Navigate, then they will be used in agents. And I think that's a learning that a lot of developer tools companies are having. That's my bolt launch story and now if I say all that stuff.swyx: And I just wanted to come back to, like, the Webcontainers things, right? Like, I think you put a lot of weight on the technical modes. I think you also are just like, very good at product. So you've, you've like, built a better agent than a lot of people, the rest of us, including myself, who have tried to build these things, and we didn't get as far as you did.swyx: Don't shortchange yourself on products. But I think specifically [00:19:00] on, on infra, on like the sandboxing, like this is a thing that people really want. Alessio has Bax E2B, which we'll have on at some point, talking about like the sort of the server full side. But yours is, you know, inside of the browser, serverless.swyx: It doesn't cost you anything to serve one person versus a million people. It doesn't, doesn't cost you anything. I think that's interesting. I think in theory, we should be able to like run tests because you can run the full backend. Like, you can run Git, you can run Node, you can run maybe Python someday.swyx: We talked about this. But ideally, you should be able to have a fully gentic loop, running code, seeing the errors, correcting code, and just kind of self healing, right? Like, I mean, isn't that the dream?Eric: Totally.swyx: Yeah,Eric: totally. At least in bold, we've got, we've got a good amount of that today. I mean, there's a lot more for us to do, but one of the nice things, because like in web container, you know, there's a lot of kind of stuff you go Google like, you know, turn docker container into wasm.Eric: You'll find a lot of stuff out there that will do that. The problem is it's very big, it's slow, and that ruins the experience. And so what we ended up doing is just writing an operating system from [00:20:00] scratch that was just purpose built to, you know, run in a browser tab. And the reason being is, you know, Docker 2 awesome things will give you an image that's like out 60 to 100 megabits, you know, maybe more, you know, and our, our OS, you know, kind of clocks in, I think, I think we're in like a, maybe, maybe a megabyte or less or something like that.Eric: I mean, it's, it's, you know, really, really, you know, stripped down.swyx: This is basically the task involved is I understand that it's. Mapping every single, single Linux call to some kind of web, web assembly implementation,Eric: but more or less, and, and then there's a lot of things actually, like when you're looking at a dev environment, there's a lot of things that you don't need that a traditional OS is gonna have, right?Eric: Like, you know audio drivers or you like, there's just like, there's just tons of things. Oh, yeah. Right. Yeah. That goes . Yeah. You can just kind, you can, you can kind of tos them. Or alternatively, what you can do is you can actually be the nice thing. And this is, this kind of comes back to the origins of browsers, which is, you know, they're, they're at the beginning of the web and, you know, the late nineties, there was two very different kind of visions for the web where Alan Kay vehemently [00:21:00] disagree with the idea that should be document based, which is, you know, Tim Berners Lee, you know, that, and that's kind of what ended up winning, winning was this document based kind of browsing documents on the web thing.Eric: Alan Kay, he's got this like very famous quote where he said, you know, you want web browsers to be mini operating systems. They should download little mini binaries and execute with like a little mini virtualized operating system in there. And what's kind of interesting about the history, not to geek out on this aspect, what's kind of interesting about the history is both of those folks ended up being right.Eric: Documents were actually the pragmatic way that the web worked. Was, you know, became the most ubiquitous platform in the world to the degree now that this is why WebAssembly has been invented is that we're doing, we need to do more low level things in a browser, same thing with WebGPU, et cetera. And so all these APIs, you know, to build an operating system came to the browser.Eric: And that was actually the realization we had in 2017 was, holy heck, like you can actually, you know, service workers, which were designed for allowing your app to work offline. That was the kind of the key one where it was like, wait a second, you can actually now run. Web servers within a [00:22:00] browser, like you can run a server that you open up.Eric: That's wild. Like full Node. js. Full Node. js. Like that capability. Like, I can have a URL that's programmatically controlled. By a web application itself, boom. Like the web can build the web. The primitive is there. Everyone at the time, like we talked to people that like worked on, you know Chrome and V8 and they were like, uhhhh.Eric: You know, like I don't know. But it's one of those things you just kind of have to go do it to find out. So we spent a couple of years, you know, working on it and yeah. And, and, and got to work in back in 2021 is when we kind of put the first like data of web container online. Butswyx: in partnership with Google, right?swyx: Like Google actually had to help you get over the finish line with stuff.Eric: A hundred percent, because well, you know, over the years of when we were doing the R and D on the thing. Kind of the biggest challenge, the two ways that you can kind of test how powerful and capable a platform are, the two types of applications are one, video games, right, because they're just very compute intensive, a lot of calculations that have to happen, right?Eric: The second one are IDEs, because you're talking about actually virtualizing the actual [00:23:00] runtime environment you are in to actually build apps on top of it, which requires sophisticated capabilities, a lot of access to data. You know, a good amount of compute power, right, to effectively, you know, building app in app sort of thing.Eric: So those, those are the stress tests. So if your platform is missing stuff, those are the things where you find out. Those are, those are the people building games and IDEs. They're the ones filing bugs on operating system level stuff. And for us, browser level stuff.Eric [00:23:47]: yeah, what ended up happening is we were just hammering, you know, the Chromium bug tracker, and they're like, who are these guys? Yeah. And, and they were amazing because I mean, just making Chrome DevTools be able to debug, I mean, it's, it's not, it wasn't originally built right for debugging an operating system, right? They've been phenomenal working with us and just kind of really pushing the limits, but that it's a rising tide that's kind of lifted all boats because now there's a lot of different types of applications that you can debug with Chrome Dev Tools that are running a browser that runs more reliably because just the stress testing that, that we and, you know, games that are coming to the web are kind of pushing as well, but.Itamar [00:24:23]: That's awesome. About the testing, I think like most, let's say coding assistant from different kinds will need this loop of testing. And even I would add code review to some, to some extent that you mentioned. How is testing different from code review? Code review could be, for example, PR review, like a code review that is done at the point of when you want to merge branches. But I would say that code review, for example, checks best practices, maintainability, and so on. It's not just like CI, but more than CI. And testing is like a more like checking functionality, et cetera. So it's different. We call, by the way, all of these together code integrity, but that's a different story. Just to go back to the, to the testing and specifically. Yeah. It's, it's, it's since the first slide. Yeah. We're consistent. So if we go back to the testing, I think like, it's not surprising that for us testing is important and for Bolt it's testing important, but I want to shed some light on a different perspective of it. Like let's think about autonomous driving. Those startups that are doing autonomous driving for highway and autonomous driving for the city. And I think like we saw the autonomous of the highway much faster and reaching to a level, I don't know, four or so much faster than those in the city. Now, in both cases, you need testing and quote unquote testing, you know, verifying validation that you're doing the right thing on the road and you're reading and et cetera. But it's probably like so different in the city that it could be like actually different technology. And I claim that we're seeing something similar here. So when you're building the next Wix, and if I was them, I was like looking at you and being a bit scared. That's what you're disrupting, what you just said. Then basically, I would say that, for example, the UX UI is freaking important. And because you're you're more aiming for the end user. In this case, maybe it's an end user that doesn't know how to develop for developers. It's also important. But let alone those that do not know to develop, they need a slick UI UX. And I think like that's one reason, for example, I think Cursor have like really good technology. I don't know the underlying what's under the hood, but at least what they're saying. But I think also their UX UI is great. It's a lot because they did their own ID. While if you're aiming for the city AI, suddenly like there's a lot of testing and code review technology that it's not necessarily like that important. For example, let's talk about integration tests. Probably like a lot of what you're building involved at the moment is isolated applications. Maybe the vision or the end game is maybe like having one solution for everything. It could be that eventually the highway companies will go into the city and the other way around. But at the beginning, there is a difference. And integration tests are a good example. I guess they're a bit less important. And when you think about enterprise software, they're really important. So to recap, like I think like the idea of looping and verifying your test and verifying your code in different ways, testing or code review, et cetera, seems to be important in the highway AI and the city AI, but in different ways and different like critical for the city, even more and more variety. Actually, I was looking to ask you like what kind of loops you guys are doing. For example, when I'm using Bolt and I'm enjoying it a lot, then I do see like sometimes you're trying to catch the errors and fix them. And also, I noticed that you're breaking down tasks into smaller ones and then et cetera, which is already a common notion for a year ago. But it seems like you're doing it really well. So if you're willing to share anything about it.Eric [00:28:07]: Yeah, yeah. I realized I never actually hit the punchline of what I was saying before. I mentioned the point about us kind of writing an operating system from scratch because what ended up being important about that is that to your point, it's actually a very, like compared to like a, you know, if you're like running cursor on anyone's machine, you kind of don't know what you're dealing with, with the OS you're running on. There could be an error happens. It could be like a million different things, right? There could be some config. There could be, it could be God knows what, right? The thing with WebConnect is because we wrote the entire thing from scratch. It's actually a unified image basically. And we can instrument it at any level that we think is going to be useful, which is exactly what we did when we started building Bolt is we instrumented stuff at like the process level, at the runtime level, you know, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. Stuff that would just be not impossible to do on local, but to do that in a way that works across any operating system, whatever is, I mean, would just be insanely, you know, insanely difficult to do right and reliably. And that's what you saw when you've used Bolt is that when an error actually will occur, whether it's in the build process or the actual web application itself is failing or anything kind of in between, you can actually capture those errors. And today it's a very primitive way of how we've implemented it largely because the product just didn't exist 90 days ago. So we're like, we got some work ahead of us and we got to hire some more a little bit, but basically we present and we say, Hey, this is, here's kind of the things that went wrong. There's a fix it button and then a ignore button, and then you can just hit fix it. And then we take all that telemetry through our agent, you run it through our agent and say, kind of, here's the state of the application. Here's kind of the errors that we got from Node.js or the browser or whatever, and like dah, dah, dah, dah. And it can take a crack at actually solving it. And it's actually pretty darn good at being able to do that. That's kind of been a, you know, closing the loop and having it be a reliable kind of base has seemed to be a pretty big upgrade over doing stuff locally, just because I think that's a pretty key ingredient of it. And yeah, I think breaking things down into smaller tasks, like that's, that's kind of a key part of our agent. I think like Claude did a really good job with artifacts. I think, you know, us and kind of everyone else has, has kind of taken their approach of like actually breaking out certain tasks in a certain order into, you know, kind of a concrete way. And, and so actually the core of Bolt, I know we actually made open source. So you can actually go and check out like the system prompts and et cetera, and you can run it locally and whatever have you. So anyone that's interested in this stuff, I'd highly recommend taking a look at. There's not a lot of like stuff that's like open source in this realm. It's, that was one of the fun things that we've we thought would be cool to do. And people, people seem to like it. I mean, there's a lot of forks and people adding different models and stuff. So it's been cool to see.Swyx [00:30:41]: Yeah. I'm happy to add, I added real-time voice for my opening day demo and it was really fun to hack with. So thank you for doing that. Yeah. Thank you. I'm going to steal your code.Eric [00:30:52]: Because I want that.Swyx [00:30:52]: It's funny because I built on top of the fork of Bolt.new that already has the multi LLM thing. And so you just told me you're going to merge that in. So then you're going to merge two layers of forks down into this thing. So it'll be fun.Eric [00:31:03]: Heck yeah.Alessio [00:31:04]: Just to touch on like the environment, Itamar, you maybe go into the most complicated environments that even the people that work there don't know how to run. How much of an impact does that have on your performance? Like, you know, it's most of the work you're doing actually figuring out environment and like the libraries, because I'm sure they're using outdated version of languages, they're using outdated libraries, they're using forks that have not been on the public internet before. How much of the work that you're doing is like there versus like at the LLM level?Itamar [00:31:32]: One of the reasons I was asking about, you know, what are the steps to break things down, because it really matters. Like, what's the tech stack? How complicated the software is? It's hard to figure it out when you're dealing with the real world, any environment of enterprise as a city, when I'm like, while maybe sometimes like, I think you do enable like in Bolt, like to install stuff, but it's quite a like controlled environment. And that's a good thing to do, because then you narrow down and it's easier to make things work. So definitely, there are two dimensions, I think, actually spaces. One is the fact just like installing our software without yet like doing anything, making it work, just installing it because we work with enterprise and Fortune 500, etc. Many of them want on prem solution.Swyx [00:32:22]: So you have how many deployment options?Itamar [00:32:24]: Basically, we had, we did a metric metrics, say 96 options, because, you know, they're different dimensions. Like, for example, one dimension, we connect to your code management system to your Git. So are you having like GitHub, GitLab? Subversion? Is it like on cloud or deployed on prem? Just an example. Which model agree to use its APIs or ours? Like we have our Is it TestGPT? Yeah, when we started with TestGPT, it was a huge mistake name. It was cool back then, but I don't think it's a good idea to name a model after someone else's model. Anyway, that's my opinion. So we gotSwyx [00:33:02]: I'm interested in these learnings, like things that you change your mind on.Itamar [00:33:06]: Eventually, when you're building a company, you're building a brand and you want to create your own brand. By the way, when I thought about Bolt.new, I also thought about if it's not a problem, because when I think about Bolt, I do think about like a couple of companies that are already called this way.Swyx [00:33:19]: Curse companies. You could call it Codium just to...Itamar [00:33:24]: Okay, thank you. Touche. Touche.Eric [00:33:27]: Yeah, you got to imagine the board meeting before we launched Bolt, one of our investors, you can imagine they're like, are you sure? Because from the investment side, it's kind of a famous, very notorious Bolt. And they're like, are you sure you want to go with that name? Oh, yeah. Yeah, absolutely.Itamar [00:33:43]: At this point, we have actually four models. There is a model for autocomplete. There's a model for the chat. There is a model dedicated for more for code review. And there is a model that is for code embedding. Actually, you might notice that there isn't a good code embedding model out there. Can you name one? Like dedicated for code?Swyx [00:34:04]: There's code indexing, and then you can do sort of like the hide for code. And then you can embed the descriptions of the code.Itamar [00:34:12]: Yeah, but you do see a lot of type of models that are dedicated for embedding and for different spaces, different fields, etc. And I'm not aware. And I know that if you go to the bedrock, try to find like there's a few code embedding models, but none of them are specialized for code.Swyx [00:34:31]: Is there a benchmark that you would tell us to pay attention to?Itamar [00:34:34]: Yeah, so it's coming. Wait for that. Anyway, we have our models. And just to go back to the 96 option of deployment. So I'm closing the brackets for us. So one is like dimensional, like what Git deployment you have, like what models do you agree to use? Dotter could be like if it's air-gapped completely, or you want VPC, and then you have Azure, GCP, and AWS, which is different. Do you use Kubernetes or do not? Because we want to exploit that. There are companies that do not do that, etc. I guess you know what I mean. So that's one thing. And considering that we are dealing with one of all four enterprises, we needed to deal with that. So you asked me about how complicated it is to solve that complex code. I said, it's just a deployment part. And then now to the software, we see a lot of different challenges. For example, some companies, they did actually a good job to build a lot of microservices. Let's not get to if it's good or not, but let's first assume that it is a good thing. A lot of microservices, each one of them has their own repo. And now you have tens of thousands of repos. And you as a developer want to develop something. And I remember me coming to a corporate for the first time. I don't know where to look at, like where to find things. So just doing a good indexing for that is like a challenge. And moreover, the regular indexing, the one that you can find, we wrote a few blogs on that. By the way, we also have some open source, different than yours, but actually three and growing. Then it doesn't work. You need to let the tech leads and the companies influence your indexing. For example, Mark with different repos with different colors. This is a high quality repo. This is a lower quality repo. This is a repo that we want to deprecate. This is a repo we want to grow, etc. And let that be part of your indexing. And only then things actually work for enterprise and they don't get to a fatigue of, oh, this is awesome. Oh, but I'm starting, it's annoying me. I think Copilot is an amazing tool, but I'm quoting others, meaning GitHub Copilot, that they see not so good retention of GitHub Copilot and enterprise. Ooh, spicy. Yeah. I saw snapshots of people and we have customers that are Copilot users as well. And also I saw research, some of them is public by the way, between 38 to 50% retention for users using Copilot and enterprise. So it's not so good. By the way, I don't think it's that bad, but it's not so good. So I think that's a reason because, yeah, it helps you auto-complete, but then, and especially if you're working on your repo alone, but if it's need that context of remote repos that you're code-based, that's hard. So to make things work, there's a lot of work on that, like giving the controllability for the tech leads, for the developer platform or developer experience department in the organization to influence how things are working. A short example, because if you have like really old legacy code, probably some of it is not so good anymore. If you just fine tune on these code base, then there is a bias to repeat those mistakes or old practices, etc. So you need, for example, as I mentioned, to influence that. For example, in Coda, you can have a markdown of best practices by the tech leads and Coda will include that and relate to that and will not offer suggestions that are not according to the best practices, just as an example. So that's just a short list of things that you need to do in order to deal with, like you mentioned, the 100.1 to 100.2 version of software. I just want to say what you're doing is extremelyEric [00:38:32]: impressive because it's very difficult. I mean, the business of Stackplus, kind of before bulk came online, we sold a version of our IDE that went on-prem. So I understand what you're saying about the difficulty of getting stuff just working on-prem. Holy heck. I mean, that is extremely hard. I guess the question I have for you is, I mean, we were just doing that with kind of Kubernetes-based stuff, but the spread of Fortune 500 companies that you're working with, how are they doing the inference for this? Are you kind of plugging into Azure's OpenAI stuff and AWS's Bedrock, you know, Cloud stuff? Or are they just like running stuff on GPUs? Like, what is that? How are these folks approaching that? Because, man, what we saw on the enterprise side, I mean, I got to imagine that that's a huge challenge. Everything you said and more, like,Itamar [00:39:15]: for example, like someone could be, and I don't think any of these is bad. Like, they made their decision. Like, for example, some people, they're, I want only AWS and VPC on AWS, no matter what. And then they, some of them, like there is a subset, I will say, I'm willing to take models only for from Bedrock and not ours. And we have a problem because there is no good code embedding model on Bedrock. And that's part of what we're doing now with AWS to solve that. We solve it in a different way. But if you are willing to run on AWS VPC, but run your run models on GPUs or inferentia, like the new version of the more coming out, then our models can run on that. But everything you said is right. Like, we see like on-prem deployment where they have their own GPUs. We see Azure where you're using OpenAI Azure. We see cases where you're running on GCP and they want OpenAI. Like this cross, like a case, although there is Gemini or even Sonnet, I think is available on GCP, just an example. So all the options, that's part of the challenge. I admit that we thought about it, but it was even more complicated. And it took us a few months to actually, that metrics that I mentioned, to start clicking each one of the blocks there. A few months is impressive. I mean,Eric [00:40:35]: honestly, just that's okay. Every one of these enterprises is, their networking is different. Just everything's different. Every single one is different. I see you understand. Yeah. So that just cannot be understated. That it is, that's extremely impressive. Hats off.Itamar [00:40:50]: It could be, by the way, like, for example, oh, we're only AWS, but our GitHub enterprise is on-prem. Oh, we forgot. So we need like a private link or whatever, like every time like that. It's not, and you do need to think about it if you want to work with an enterprise. And it's important. Like I understand like their, I respect their point of view.Swyx [00:41:10]: And this primarily impacts your architecture, your tech choices. Like you have to, you can't choose some vendors because...Itamar [00:41:15]: Yeah, definitely. To be frank, it makes us hard for a startup because it means that we want, we want everyone to enjoy all the variety of models. By the way, it was hard for us with our technology. I want to open a bracket, like a window. I guess you're familiar with our Alpha Codium, which is an open source.Eric [00:41:33]: We got to go over that. Yeah. So I'll do that quickly.Itamar [00:41:36]: Yeah. A pin in that. Yeah. Actually, we didn't have it in the last episode. So, so, okay.Swyx [00:41:41]: Okay. We'll come back to that later, but let's talk about...Itamar [00:41:43]: Yeah. So, so just like shortly, and then we can double click on Alpha Codium. But Alpha Codium is a open source tool. You can go and try it and lets you compete on CodeForce. This is a website and a competition and actually reach a master level level, like 95% with a click of a button. You don't need to do anything. And part of what we did there is taking a problem and breaking it to different, like smaller blocks. And then the models are doing a much better job. Like we all know it by now that taking small tasks and solving them, by the way, even O1, which is supposed to be able to do system two thinking like Greg from OpenAI like hinted, is doing better on these kinds of problems. But still, it's very useful to break it down for O1, despite O1 being able to think by itself. And that's what we presented like just a month ago, OpenAI released that now they are doing 93 percentile with O1 IOI left and International Olympiad of Formation. Sorry, I forgot. Exactly. I told you I forgot. And we took their O1 preview with Alpha Codium and did better. Like it just shows like, and there is a big difference between the preview and the IOI. It shows like that these models are not still system two thinkers, and there is a big difference. So maybe they're not complete system two. Yeah, they need some guidance. I call them system 1.5. We can, we can have it. I thought about it. Like, you know, I care about this philosophy stuff. And I think like we didn't see it even close to a system two thinking. I can elaborate later. But closing the brackets, like we take Alpha Codium and as our principle of thinking, we take tasks and break them down to smaller tasks. And then we want to exploit the best model to solve them. So I want to enable anyone to enjoy O1 and SONET and Gemini 1.5, etc. But at the same time, I need to develop my own models as well, because some of the Fortune 500 want to have all air gapped or whatever. So that's a challenge. Now you need to support so many models. And to some extent, I would say that the flow engineering, the breaking down to two different blocks is a necessity for us. Why? Because when you take a big block, a big problem, you need a very different prompt for each one of the models to actually work. But when you take a big problem and break it into small tasks, we can talk how we do that, then the prompt matters less. What I want to say, like all this, like as a startup trying to do different deployment, getting all the juice that you can get from models, etc. is a big problem. And one need to think about it. And one of our mitigation is that process of taking tasks and breaking them down. That's why I'm really interested to know how you guys are doing it. And part of what we do is also open source. So you can see.Swyx [00:44:39]: There's a lot in there. But yeah, flow over prompt. I do believe that that does make sense. I feel like there's a lot that both of you can sort of exchange notes on breaking down problems. And I just want you guys to just go for it. This is fun to watch.Eric [00:44:55]: Yeah. I mean, what's super interesting is the context you're working in is, because for us too with Bolt, we've started thinking because our kind of existing business line was going behind the firewall, right? We were like, how do we do this? Adding the inference aspect on, we're like, okay, how does... Because I mean, there's not a lot of prior art, right? I mean, this is all new. This is all new. So I definitely am going to have a lot of questions for you.Itamar [00:45:17]: I'm here. We're very open, by the way. We have a paper on a blog or like whatever.Swyx [00:45:22]: The Alphacodeum, GitHub, and we'll put all this in the show notes.Itamar [00:45:25]: Yeah. And even the new results of O1, we published it.Eric [00:45:29]: I love that. And I also just, I think spiritually, I like your approach of being transparent. Because I think there's a lot of hype-ium around AI stuff. And a lot of it is, it's just like, you have these companies that are just kind of keep their stuff closed source and then just max hype it, but then it's kind of nothing. And I think it kind of gives a bad rep to the incredible stuff that's actually happening here. And so I think it's stuff like what you're doing where, I mean, true merit and you're cracking open actual code for others to learn from and use. That strikes me as the right approach. And it's great to hear that you're making such incredible progress.Itamar [00:46:02]: I have something to share about the open source. Most of our tools are, we have an open source version and then a premium pro version. But it's not an easy decision to do that. I actually wanted to ask you about your strategy, but I think in your case, there is, in my opinion, relatively a good strategy where a lot of parts of open source, but then you have the deployment and the environment, which is not right if I get it correctly. And then there's a clear, almost hugging face model. Yeah, you can do that, but why should you try to deploy it yourself, deploy it with us? But in our case, and I'm not sure you're not going to hit also some competitors, and I guess you are. I wanted to ask you, for example, on some of them. In our case, one day we looked on one of our competitors that is doing code review. We're a platform. We have the code review, the testing, et cetera, spread over the ID to get. And in each agent, we have a few startups or a big incumbents that are doing only that. So we noticed one of our competitors having not only a very similar UI of our open source, but actually even our typo. And you sit there and you're kind of like, yeah, we're not that good. We don't use enough Grammarly or whatever. And we had a couple of these and we saw it there. And then it's a challenge. And I want to ask you, Bald is doing so well, and then you open source it. So I think I know what my answer was. I gave it before, but still interestingEric [00:47:29]: to hear what you think. GeoHot said back, I don't know who he was up to at this exact moment, but I think on comma AI, all that stuff's open source. And someone had asked him, why is this open source? And he's like, if you're not actually confident that you can go and crush it and build the best thing, then yeah, you should probably keep your stuff closed source. He said something akin to that. I'm probably kind of butchering it, but I thought it was kind of a really good point. And that's not to say that you should just open source everything, because for obvious reasons, there's kind of strategic things you have to kind of take in mind. But I actually think a pretty liberal approach, as liberal as you kind of can be, it can really make a lot of sense. Because that is so validating that one of your competitors is taking your stuff and they're like, yeah, let's just kind of tweak the styles. I mean, clearly, right? I think it's kind of healthy because it keeps, I'm sure back at HQ that day when you saw that, you're like, oh, all right, well, we have to grind even harder to make sure we stay ahead. And so I think it's actually a very useful, motivating thing for the teams. Because you might feel this period of comfort. I think a lot of companies will have this period of comfort where they're not feeling the competition and one day they get disrupted. So kind of putting stuff out there and letting people push it forces you to face reality soon, right? And actually feel that incrementally so you can kind of adjust course. And that's for us, the open source version of Bolt has had a lot of features people have been begging us for, like persisting chat messages and checkpoints and stuff. Within the first week, that stuff was landed in the open source versions. And they're like, why can't you ship this? It's in the open, so people have forked it. And we're like, we're trying to keep our servers and GPUs online. But it's been great because the folks in the community did a great job, kept us on our toes. And we've got to know most of these folks too at this point that have been building these things. And so it actually was very instructive. Like, okay, well, if we're going to go kind of land this, there's some UX patterns we can kind of look at and the code is open source to this stuff. What's great about these, what's not. So anyways, NetNet, I think it's awesome. I think from a competitive point of view for us, I think in particular, what's interesting is the core technology of WebContainer going. And I think that right now, there's really nothing that's kind of on par with that. And we also, we have a business of, because WebContainer runs in your browser, but to make it work, you have to install stuff from NPM. You have to make cores bypass requests, like connected databases, which all require server-side proxying or acceleration. And so we actually sell WebContainer as a service. One of the core reasons we open-sourced kind of the core components of Bolt when we launched was that we think that there's going to be a lot more of these AI, in-your-browser AI co-gen experiences, kind of like what Anthropic did with Artifacts and Clod. By the way, Artifacts uses WebContainers. Not yet. No, yeah. Should I strike that? I think that they've got their own thing at the moment, but there's been a lot of interest in WebContainers from folks doing things in that sort of realm and in the AI labs and startups and everything in between. So I think there'll be, I imagine, over the coming months, there'll be lots of things being announced to folks kind of adopting it. But yeah, I think effectively...Swyx [00:50:35]: Okay, I'll say this. If you're a large model lab and you want to build sandbox environments inside of your chat app, you should call Eric.Itamar [00:50:43]: But wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. I have a question about that. I think OpenAI, they felt that people are not using their model as they would want to. So they built ChatGPT. But I would say that ChatGPT now defines OpenAI. I know they're doing a lot of business from their APIs, but still, is this how you think? Isn't Bolt.new your business now? Why don't you focus on that instead of the...Swyx [00:51:16]: What's your advice as a founder?Eric [00:51:18]: You're right. And so going into it, we, candidly, we were like, Bolt.new, this thing is super cool. We think people are stoked. We think people will be stoked. But we were like, maybe that's allowed. Best case scenario, after month one, we'd be mind blown if we added a couple hundred K of error or something. And we were like, but we think there's probably going to be an immediate huge business. Because there was some early poll on folks wanting to put WebContainer into their product offerings, kind of similar to what Bolt is doing or whatever. We were actually prepared for the inverse outcome here. But I mean, well, I guess we've seen poll on both. But I mean, what's happened with Bolt, and you're right, it's actually the same strategy as like OpenAI or Anthropic, where we have our ChatGPT to OpenAI's APIs is Bolt to WebContainer. And so we've kind of taken that same approach. And we're seeing, I guess, some of the similar results, except right now, the revenue side is extremely lopsided to Bolt.Itamar [00:52:16]: I think if you ask me what's my advice, I think you have three options. One is to focus on Bolt. The other is to focus on the WebContainer. The third is to raise one billion dollars and do them both. I'm serious. I think otherwise, you need to choose. And if you raise enough money, and I think it's big bucks, because you're going to be chased by competitors. And I think it will be challenging to do both. And maybe you can. I don't know. We do see these numbers right now, raising above $100 million, even without havingEric [00:52:49]: a product. You can see these. It's excellent advice. And I think what's been amazing, but also kind of challenging is we're trying to forecast, okay, well, where are these things going? I mean, in the initial weeks, I think us and all the investors in the company that we're sharing this with, it was like, this is cool. Okay, we added 500k. Wow, that's crazy. Wow, we're at a million now. Most things, you have this kind of the tech crunch launch of initiation and then the thing of sorrow. And if there's going to be a downtrend, it's just not coming yet. Now that we're kind of looking ahead, we're six weeks in. So now we're getting enough confidence in our convictions to go, okay, this se

How did PEZ candy come to be? Why are Mexicans so into anime? Does every costume deserve candy on Halloween? If you had a time machine would you kill Hitler or something more productive? Where was the internet invented? Kyle and Jheisson answer these questions and more as they dive into the history of PEZ, the Crocs marathon world record, the Flintstones, and the history of the Internet!The students at Wiki U have been drinking Magic Mind every morning to jumpstart their day and get their brains firing on all cylinders! We love Magic Mind because it's filled with all natural ingredients that help you focus on the things you need to get done and the things you WANT to get done. The first thing you should cross off your list today is getting a subscription to Magic Mind. For a limited time Wiki U listeners can get 20% off a one time purchase or subscription by using the promo code Wikiuni20 at checkout at the link below!https://magicmind.com/WIKIUNI20 TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@wikiuniversity YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmPDDjcbBJfR0s_xJfYCUvwInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/wikiuniversity/Music provided by Davey and the Chains  TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@wikiuniversity YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmPDDjcbBJfR0s_xJfYCUvwInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/wikiuniversity/Music provided by Davey and the Chains

Cet épisode est relativement pauvre en IA, ouaissssssss ! Mais il nous reste plein de Spring, plein de failles, plein d'OpenTelemetry, un peu de versionnage sémantique, une astuce Git et bien d'autres choses encore. Enregistré le 8 novembre 2024 Téléchargement de l'épisode LesCastCodeurs-Episode–318.mp3 News Langages Le createur de Fernflower in decompilateur qui a relancé l'outillage autour de Java 8 est mort, un hommage d'IntelliJ IDEA https://blog.jetbrains.com/idea/2024/11/in-memory-of-stiver/ les decompilateurs s'appuyaient sur des patterns reconnus et étaient fragiles et incomplets surtout quand Java 8 a changé le pattern try catch et ajouté des concepts comme les annotations le champ était moribond quand Stiver s'est lancé dommage l'article n'explique pas comment le control-flow graph est genere a partir du bytecode pour ameliorer la decompilation Librairies On peut maintenant utiliser Jakarta Data Repository dans Quarkus https://in.relation.to/2024/11/04/data-in-quarkus/ petit article avec un projet example aussi un lien sur la presentation de Jakarta Data par Gavin à Devoxx Belgique Quarkus 3.16 https://quarkus.io/guides/opentelemetry-logging logs distribués avec OpenTelemetry (preview) deserialiseurs Jackson sans reflection des améliorations dans la stack de sécurité TLS registry a ratjouté graphql client et keycloak admin client LEs logs des container devservice et des access http sont visible dans la DevUI Les extensions peuvent maintenant ecrire leur doc en markdown (c'etait juste asciidoc avant) Un artcile sur comment débuter en Spring Batch https://www.sfeir.dev/back/planifier-des-taches-avec-spring-batch/ Le support OAuth2 pour RestClient arrive dans Security 6.4 / Boot 3.4. Plus de hack de WebClient dans vos applications Spring-Web ! https://spring.io/blog/2024/10/28/restclient-support-for-oauth2-in-spring-security–6–4 RestClient a été ajouté dans Spring Framework 6.1 API Fluide Spring Security 6.4 simplifie la configuration OAuth2 avec le nouveau client HTTP synchrone RestClient. RestClient permet des requêtes de ressources sans dépendances réactives, alignant la configuration entre applications servlet et réactives. La mise à jour facilite la migration depuis RestTemplate et ouvre la voie à des scénarios avancés. Marre des microservices ? Revenez au monoliths avec Spring Modulith 1.3RC1, 1.2.5 et 1.1.10 https://spring.io/blog/2024/10/28/spring-modulith–1–3-rc1–1–2–5-and–1–1–10-released Spring Modulith 1.3 RC1, 1.2.5, and 1.1.10 sont disponibles. La version 1.3 RC1 inclut des nouvelles fonctionnalités : archiving event publication completion mode compatibilité avec MariaDB et Oracle avec JDBC-based event publication registry Possibilité d'externaliser des événements dans des MessageChannels de Spring. Expressions SpEL dans @Externalized validation d'architecture technique jMolecules. Les versions 1.2.5 et 1.1.10 apportent des correctifs et mises à jour de dépendances. Spring gRPC 0.1 est sorti https://github.com/spring-projects-experimental/spring-grpc c'est tout nouveau et explorationel si c'est un probleme qui vous gratte, ca vaut le coup de jeter un coup d'oeil et participer. Spring Boot 3.3 Integrer Spring avec Open Telemetry (OTLP protocole) https://spring.io/blog/2024/10/28/lets-use-opentelemetry-with-spring rappel de la valeur de ce standard Open Telemetry comment l'utiliser dans vos projets Spring Comment utiliser ollama avec Spring AI https://spring.io/blog/2024/10/22/leverage-the-power-of–45k-free-hugging-face-models-with-spring-ai-and-ollama permet d'acceter aux 45k modeles de Hugging faces qui supportent le deploiement sur ollama il y a un spring boot starter c'est vraiment pour debuter Cloud Google Cloud Frankfort a subit 12h d'interruption https://t.co/VueiQjhCA3 Google Cloud a subi une panne de 12 heures dans la région europe-west3 (Francfort) le 24 octobre 2024. La panne, causée par une défaillance d'alimentation et de refroidissement, a affecté plusieurs services, y compris Compute Engine et Kubernetes Engine. Les utilisateurs ont rencontré des problèmes de création de VM, des échecs d'opérations et des retards de traitement. Google a conseillé de migrer les charges de travail vers d'autres zones. il y a eu une autre zone Europeenne pas mal affectée l'année dernière et des clients ont perdu des données :sweat: Web La fin de la World Wild Web Foundation https://www.theregister.com/2024/09/30/world_wide_web_foundation_closes/ la Fondation World Wide Web ferme ses portes. Les cofondateurs estiment que les problèmes auxquels est confronté le Web ont changé et que d'autres groupes de défense peuvent désormais prendre le relais. Ils estiment également que la priorité absolue doit être donnée à la passion de Tim Berners-Lee pour redonner aux individus le pouvoir et le contrôle de leurs données et pour construire activement des systèmes de collaboration puissants (Solid Protocol - https://solidproject.org/). Release du https://www.patternfly.org/ 6 Fw opensource pour faire de UI, sponsor RH Interessant à regarder Data et Intelligence Artificielle TSMC arrête des ventes à un client chinois qui aurait revenu un processeur à Huawei et utilise dans sa puce IA https://www.reuters.com/technology/tsmc-suspended-shipments-china-firm-after-chip-found-huawei-processor-sources–2024–10–26/ Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) a suspendu ses livraisons à Sophgo, un concepteur de puces chinois, après la découverte d'une puce fabriquée par TSMC dans un processeur AI de Huawei (Ascend 910B). Cette découverte soulève des préoccupations concernant des violations potentielles des contrôles d'exportation des États-Unis, qui restreignent Huawei depuis 2020. Sophgo, lié à Bitmain, a nié toute connexion avec Huawei et affirme se conformer aux lois applicables. Toutefois, l'incident a conduit à une enquête approfondie de TSMC et des autorités américaines et taïwanaises Open AI et Microsoft, de l'amour à la guerre https://www.computerworld.com/article/3593206/microsoft-and-openai-good-by-bromance-hel[…]m_source=Adestra&huid=4349eeff–5b8b–493d–9e61–9abf8be5293b on a bien suivi les chants d'amour entre Sam Altman et Satia Nadella ca c'est tendu ces derniers temps deja avec le coup chez openAI où MS avait sifflé la fin de la récré “on a le code, les données, l'IP et la capacité, on peut tout recrée” OpenAi a un competiteur de Copilot et essaie de courtises ses clients les apétits d'investissements d'OpenAI et une dispute sur la valeur de la aprt de MS qui a donné des crédits cloud semble etre aui coeur de la dispute du moment Debezium 3 est sorti https://debezium.io/blog/2024/10/02/debezium–3–0-final-released/ Java 17 minimum pour les connecteurs et 21 pour le serveur, l'extension quarkus outbox et pour l'operateur nettoyage des depreciations metriques par table maintenant support for mysql 9 y compris vector data type oracle, default mining strategie changée ehcache off-heap ajouté amelioarations diverses Oracle (offline RAC node flush, max string size for Extended PostgreSQL PGVector etc (Spanner, vitess, …) NotebookLlama: une version Open Source de NotebookLM https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-recipes/tree/main/recipes/quickstart/NotebookLlama Si vous avez été impressionné par les démo de Gemini Notebook, en créant des podcasts à partir de différentes resources, testez la version llama Tutoriel étape par étape pour transformer un PDF en podcast. Outillage Vous aimez Maven? Bien évidemment! Vous aimez asciidoctor? Absolument! Alors la version 3.1.0 du plugin asciidoctor pour maven est pour vous !! https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoctor-maven-plugin Le plugin permet soit de convertir des documents asciidoc de manière autonome, soit de les gérer via le site maven GitHub Universe: de l'IA, de l'IA et encore de l'IA https://github.blog/news-insights/product-news/universe–2024-previews-releases/ GitHub Universe 2024 présente les nouveautés de l'année, notamment la possibilité de choisir parmi plusieurs modèles d'IA pour GitHub Copilot (Claude 3.5, Gemini 1.5 Pro, OpenAI o1). Nouvelles fonctionnalités : GitHub Spark pour créer des micro-applications, révisions de code assistées par Copilot, sécurité renforcée avec Copilot Autofix. Simplification des workflows avec les extensions GitHub Copilot Facilitation de la création d'applications IA génératives avec GitHub Models Méthodologies Les blogs de developpeurs experts Java recommandés par IntelliJ https://blog.jetbrains.com/idea/2024/11/top-java-blogs-for-experienced-programmers/ pas forcement d'accord avec toute la liste mais elle donne de bonnes options si vous voulez lire plus de blogs Java Keycloak revient au semantic versioning après avoir suivi le versionage à la Google Chrome https://www.keycloak.org/2024/10/release-updates ne pas savoir si une mise a jour était retrocompatible était problématique pour les utilisateurs aussi les librairies clientes seront délivrées séparément et supporteront toutes les versions serveur de keycloak supportés Sécurité Un exemple d'attaque de secure supply chain théorique identifiée dans le quarkiverse et les détails de la résolution https://quarkus.io/blog/quarkiverse-and-smallrye-new-release-process/ dans le quarkiverse, les choses sont automatisées pour simplifier la vie des contributeurs d'extension occasionels mais il y avait un défaut, les secrets de signature et d'accès à maven central étaient des secrets d'organisation ce qui veut dire qu'un editeur d'extension malicieux pouvait ecrire un pluging ou un test qiu lisait ses secrets et pouvait livrer de faux artifacts la solution est de séparer la construction des artifacts de l'etape de signature et de release sur maven central comme cela les cles ne sont plus accessible Avec Okta pus besoin de mot de passe quand tu as un identifiant long :face_with_hand_over_mouth: https://trust.okta.com/security-advisories/okta-ad-ldap-delegated-authentication-username/ LOL Une vulnérabilité a été découverte dans la génération de la clé de cache pour l'authentification déléguée AD/LDAP. Les conditions: MFA non utilisé Nom d'utilisateur de 52 caractères ou plus Utilisateur authentifié précédemment, créant un cache d'authentification Le cache a été utilisé en premier, ce qui peut se produire si l'agent AD/LDAP était hors service ou inaccessible, par exemple en raison d'un trafic réseau élevé L'authentification s'est produite entre le 23 juillet 2024 et le 30 octobre 2024 Fixé le 30 octobre, 2024 La revanche des imprimantes !! Linux ne les aime pas, et elles lui rendent bien. https://www.theregister.com/2024/09/26/cups_linux_rce_disclosed/ Après quelques heures / jours de rumeurs sur une faille 9.9/10 CVSS il s'avère que cela concerne que les système avec le système d'impression CUPS et cups-browsed Désactivez et/ou supprimez le service cups-browsed. Mettez à jour votre installation CUPS pour appliquer les mises à jour de sécurité lorsqu'elles sont disponibles. Envisagez de bloquer l'accès au port UDP 631 et également de désactiver le DNS-SD. Cela concerne la plupart des distributions Linux, certaines BSD, possiblement Google ChromeOS, Solaris d'Oracle et potentiellement d'autres systèmes, car CUPS est intégré à diverses distributions pour fournir la fonctionnalité d'impression. Pour exploiter cette vulnérabilité via internet ou le réseau local (LAN), un attaquant doit pouvoir accéder à votre service CUPS sur le port UDP 631. Idéalement, aucun de vous ne devrait exposer ce port sur l'internet public. L'attaquant doit également attendre que vous lanciez une tâche d'impression. Si le port 631 n'est pas directement accessible, un attaquant pourrait être en mesure de falsifier des annonces zeroconf, mDNS ou DNS-SD pour exploiter cette vulnérabilité sur un LAN. Loi, société et organisation La version 1.0 de la definition de l'IA l'Open Source est sortie https://siliconangle.com/2024/10/28/osi-clarifies-makes-ai-systems-open-source-open-models-fall-short/ L'Open Source Initiative (OSI) a clarifié les critères pour qu'un modèle d'IA soit considéré comme open-source : accès complet aux données de formation, au code source et aux paramètres d'entraînement. La plupart des modèles dits “open” comme ceux de Meta (Llama) et Stability AI (Stable Diffusion) ne respectent pas ces critères, car ils imposent des restrictions sur l'utilisation commerciale et ne rendent pas publiques les données de formation c'est au details de données de formation (donc pas forcement les données elle meme. “In particular, this must include: (1) the complete description of all data used for training, including (if used) of unshareable data, disclosing the provenance of the data, its scope and characteristics, how the data was obtained and selected, the labeling procedures, and data processing and filtering methodologies; (2) a listing of all publicly available training data and where to obtain it; and (3) a listing of all training data obtainable from third parties and where to obtain it, including for fee.” C'est en echo a la version d'open source AI de la linux fondation En parlant de cela un article sur l'open source washing dans les modèles https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/25/opinion_open_washing/ L'open washing désigne la pratique où des entreprises prétendent que leurs produits ou modèles sont open-source, bien qu'ils ne respectent pas les critères réels d'ouverture (transparence, accessibilité, partage des connaissances). De grandes entreprises comme Meta, Google et Microsoft sont souvent accusées d'utiliser cette stratégie, ce qui soulève des préoccupations concernant la clarté des définitions légales et commerciales de l'open source, surtout avec l'essor de l'IA. Rubrique débutant Un petit article fondamental sur REST https://www.sfeir.dev/rest-definition/ there de Roy Fielding en reaction aux protocoles lourds comme SOAP 5 verbes (GET PUT, POST. DELETE, PATCH) JSON mais pas que (XML et autre pas d'etat inter requete Ask Me Anything Morgan de Montréal Comment faire cohabiter plusieurs dépôts Git ? Je m'explique : dans mon entreprise, nous utilisons notre dépôt Git (Bitbucket) configuré pour notre dépôt d'entreprise. Lorsque je souhaite contribuer à un projet open source, je suis obligé de modifier ma configuration globale Git (nom d'utilisateur, email) pour correspondre à mon compte GitHub. Il arrive souvent que, lorsque je reviens pour effectuer un commit sur le dépôt d'entreprise, j'oublie que je suis en mode “open source”, ce qui entraîne l'enregistrement de mes configurations “open source” dans l'historique de Bitbucket… Comment gérez-vous ce genre de situation ? Comment gérer différents profiles git https://medium.com/@mrjink/using-includeif-to-manage-your-git-identities-bcc99447b04b Conférences La liste des conférences provenant de Developers Conferences Agenda/List par Aurélie Vache et contributeurs : 8 novembre 2024 : BDX I/O - Bordeaux (France) 13–14 novembre 2024 : Agile Tour Rennes 2024 - Rennes (France) 16–17 novembre 2024 : Capitole Du Libre - Toulouse (France) 20–22 novembre 2024 : Agile Grenoble 2024 - Grenoble (France) 21 novembre 2024 : DevFest Strasbourg - Strasbourg (France) 21 novembre 2024 : Codeurs en Seine - Rouen (France) 21 novembre 2024 : Agile Game Toulouse - Toulouse (France) 27–28 novembre 2024 : Cloud Expo Europe - Paris (France) 28 novembre 2024 : OVHcloud Summit - Paris (France) 28 novembre 2024 : Who Run The Tech ? - Rennes (France) 2–3 décembre 2024 : Tech Rocks Summit - Paris (France) 3 décembre 2024 : Generation AI - Paris (France) 3–5 décembre 2024 : APIdays Paris - Paris (France) 4–5 décembre 2024 : DevOpsRex - Paris (France) 4–5 décembre 2024 : Open Source Experience - Paris (France) 5 décembre 2024 : GraphQL Day Europe - Paris (France) 6 décembre 2024 : DevFest Dijon - Dijon (France) 19 décembre 2024 : Normandie.ai 2024 - Rouen (France) 22–25 janvier 2025 : SnowCamp 2025 - Grenoble (France) 30 janvier 2025 : DevOps D-Day #9 - Marseille (France) 6–7 février 2025 : Touraine Tech - Tours (France) 28 février 2025 : Paris TS La Conf - Paris (France) 20 mars 2025 : PGDay Paris - Paris (France) 25 mars 2025 : ParisTestConf - Paris (France) 3 avril 2025 : DotJS - Paris (France) 10–12 avril 2025 : Devoxx Greece - Athens (Greece) 16–18 avril 2025 : Devoxx France - Paris (France) 7–9 mai 2025 : Devoxx UK - London (UK) 16 mai 2025 : AFUP Day 2025 Lille - Lille (France) 16 mai 2025 : AFUP Day 2025 Lyon - Lyon (France) 16 mai 2025 : AFUP Day 2025 Poitiers - Poitiers (France) 11–13 juin 2025 : Devoxx Poland - Krakow (Poland) 12–13 juin 2025 : DevLille - Lille (France) 24 juin 2025 : WAX 2025 - Aix-en-Provence (France) 26–27 juin 2025 : Sunny Tech - Montpellier (France) 1–4 juillet 2025 : Open edX Conference - 2025 - Palaiseau (France) 18–19 septembre 2025 : API Platform Conference - Lille (France) & Online 6–10 octobre 2025 : Devoxx Belgium - Antwerp (Belgium) 9–10 octobre 2025 : Volcamp - Clermont-Ferrand (France) 16–17 octobre 2025 : DevFest Nantes - Nantes (France) 23–25 avril 2026 : Devoxx Greece - Athens (Greece) 17 juin 2026 : Devoxx Poland - Krakow (Poland) Nous contacter Pour réagir à cet épisode, venez discuter sur le groupe Google https://groups.google.com/group/lescastcodeurs Contactez-nous via twitter https://twitter.com/lescastcodeurs Faire un crowdcast ou une crowdquestion Soutenez Les Cast Codeurs sur Patreon https://www.patreon.com/LesCastCodeurs Tous les épisodes et toutes les infos sur https://lescastcodeurs.com/

In this episode, host Marc Aflalo sits down with Mark Weinstein, a tech entrepreneur and one of the pioneers of social media, to discuss the past, present, and future of online privacy and social media. Mark Weinstein shares insights from his new book, Restoring Our Sanity Online, which has been endorsed by industry giants like Steve Wozniak and Sir Tim Berners-Lee. The conversation dives into the origins of social media and how the initial vision of connecting people turned into what Weinstein calls the “data ecosystem” we experience today. He describes the transition from early social media platforms like MySpace and Facebook to the current state, where privacy concerns, bots, and targeted ads dominate. Weinstein reflects on how the promise of social media shifted into something more manipulative, saying, “It's time to take back control from a world where surveillance capitalism is the norm.” Marc and Mark explore whether it's possible to restore privacy and trust in the online space. They discuss the role of government and corporations in this challenge, with Weinstein emphasizing the importance of “data portability” and stronger user identification systems to protect future generations. He explains, “It's not too late for our kids… We can fix this, but it requires strong tools and the right regulations to create real change.” Weinstein also touches on the role of monopolies in shaping the internet, highlighting the challenges companies like Google and Meta pose to a fair and open market. Marc poses tough questions about the motivations behind big tech, privacy promises, and the genuine actions needed to make a difference. With practical solutions and a focus on the future, Weinstein presents an urgent call to action, saying, “We are at a pivotal moment… It's time for an epic reboot, and we've got this if we work together.” Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

You might be surprised to learn that the famous “www” in website addresses didn't originate in Silicon Valley or New York, but at the European Organisation for Nuclear Research, known as CERN for short, which is situated on the French-Swiss border close to Geneva.  It was 1989 when British computer scientist Tim Berners-Lee came up with the idea for a hypertext system. Essentially, it was a way to connect different pieces of data through links, creating something like a giant web that would work via the internet. Aren't internet and web the same thing?  What about the other parts of a web address then, like https or “.com” at the end? In under 3 minutes, we answer your questions! To listen to the last episodes, you can click here: How to protect your art from AI exploitation? What is the internet of senses? What is Web 3.0? A podcast written and realised by Joseph Chance. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

All links and images for this episode can be found on CISO Series. Check out this post for the discussion that is the basis of our conversation on this week's episode co-hosted by me, David Spark (@dspark), the producer of CISO Series, and Geoff Belknap (@geoffbelknap). Joining us is Davi Ottenheimer, vp, trust and digital ethics, Inrupt. Sir Tim Berners-Lee co-founded Inrupt to provide enterprise-grade software and services for the Solid Protocol. You can find their open positions here. In this episode: LLMs lack integrity controls A valid criticism Doubts in self-policing AI New tech, familiar problems  Thanks to our podcast sponsor, Concentric AI Concentric AI's DSPM solution automates data security, protecting sensitive data in real-time. Our AI-driven solution identifies, classifies, and secures on-premises and cloud data to reduce risk across your enterprise. Seamlessly integrated with tools like Microsoft Copilot, Concentric AI empowers your team to innovate securely and maintain compliance all while eliminating manual data protection tasks. Ready to put RegEx and trainable classifiers in the rear view mirror? Contact Concentric AI today!

Early social media pioneer Mark Weinstein is deeply disturbed by the current state of social media. He's not alone of course, but in his new book, Restoring Our Sanity Online, Weinstein lays out what he boasts is a “revolutionary social framework” to clean up social media. The book comes with blurbs from tech royalty like Sir Tim Berners-Lee and Steve Wozniak, but I wonder if Weinstein, in his attempt to right social media through a more decentralized Web3 style architecture , is trying a fix yesterday's problem. In tech, timing is everything and the future of online sanity, as Gary Marcus noted a couple of days ago on this show, will be determined by our ability to harness AI. Rather than social media, that's what we now need a revolutionary framework to protect us from. MARK WEINSTEIN is a world-renowned tech entrepreneur, contemporary thought leader, privacy expert, and one of the visionary inventors of social networking. His adventure in social media has lasted over 25 years through three award-winning personal social media platforms enjoyed by millions of members worldwide. Mark is frequently interviewed and published in major media including the Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Fox, CNN, BBC, PBS, Newsweek, Los Angeles Times, The Hill, and many more worldwide. He covers topics including social media, privacy, AI, free speech, antitrust, and protecting kids online. During his social media years, Mark's advisors have included Sir Tim Berners-Lee, the inventor of the Web; Steve “Woz” Wozniak, co-founder of Apple; Sherry Turkle, MIT academic and tech ethics leader; Raj Sisodia, co-founder of the Conscious Capitalism movement; and many others. A leading privacy advocate, Mark's landmark 2020 TED Talk, “The Rise of Surveillance Capitalism,” exposed the many infractions and manipulations by Big Tech, and called for a privacy revolution. Mark has also been listed as one of the “Top 8 Minds in Online Privacy” and named “Privacy by Design Ambassador” by the Canadian government.Named as one of the "100 most connected men" by GQ magazine, Andrew Keen is amongst the world's best known broadcasters and commentators. In addition to presenting KEEN ON, he is the host of the long-running How To Fix Democracy show. He is also the author of four prescient books about digital technology: CULT OF THE AMATEUR, DIGITAL VERTIGO, THE INTERNET IS NOT THE ANSWER and HOW TO FIX THE FUTURE. Andrew lives in San Francisco, is married to Cassandra Knight, Google's VP of Litigation & Discovery, and has two grown children.Keen On is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit keenon.substack.com/subscribe

As SBC Summit Lisbon draws even closer, attention now turns to the greatest show in gaming.On the latest episode of the iGaming Daily's limited series Path to Lisbon, we will be looking back at a keynote speech from the former NFL quarterback Dan Marino at June's SBC Summit North America in New Jersey.During the session, the Miami Dolphins superstar talked with Dylan Slaney, the CEO of Light & Wonder about his charitable foundation, work with the NFL, and partnership with Pixiu Gaming.Marino is just a taster for some of the exciting keynote speakers lined up for SBC Summit Lisbon. Headlining the Super Stage on day one of the conference will be Sir Tim Berners Lee, the inventor of the World Wide Web. In the fireside discussion, Sir Tim will focus on how his vision of a globally connected network of computers has revolutionised the way we share information.Also slated to speak is the skateboarding pioneer Tony Hawk who will be looking back on his career as well as providing insights into his approach to sustaining success and innovation over the years.Remember to check out Optimove at https://hubs.la/Q02gLC5L0 or go to Optimove.com/sbc to get your first month free when buying the industry's leading customer-loyalty service.

Plongeons ensemble dans les coulisses de l'invention du World Wide Web, un événement qui a profondément marqué l'histoire de l'informatique et des technologies de l'information.

August 6, 1991. British computer programmer Tim Berners-Lee launches a digital information revolution when he uploads the first site to the World Wide Web.Support the show! Join Into History for ad-free listening and more.History Daily is a co-production of Airship and Noiser.Go to HistoryDaily.com for more history, daily.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode of the WP Builds Podcast, Nathan Wrigley and David Waumsley discuss the significant and evolving role of AI on the web, focusing on the World Wide Web Consortium's (W3C) new report titled "AI and the Web, Understanding and Managing the Impact of Machine Learning Models on the Web". The episode delves into AI's dual challenges: data quality and environmental impact. We explore ethical and societal implications, such as privacy, transparency, and the potential for AI to undermine human creativity and entry-level jobs. We also address the importance of standards, regulatory frameworks, and Tim Berners-Lee's optimistic vision of AI, emphasising the need for collaborative and ethical AI development. Go listen...

1991 was a year unlike any other. KFC changed their name to avoid paying royalties to the “trademarked” commonwealth for which they were named (whereas K-Y Jelly could not be reached for comment), Terminator 2:  Judgment Day was blowing up the box office as the number one movie in America, the first ever “world wide web” website was introduced to the world by Tim Berners-Lee, and just 6 days after that, on August 12th, 1991, Coroner's fourth album (Mental Vortex) AND Metallica's self-titled fifth album were BOLTH released on the EXACT same day.    It's time to get in the time machine and get ready to start “shooting ropes & painting walls” with our “squeezies” as we reveal the name of the band many have notoriously deemed “the hawk-tuah of metal”, as well as the frontman who resembled “a hot Canadian chick” (back in the day) before touring with Pantera, because we're going back to a time when high school was everything and the idea of retiring to the swingingest, most syphilis-infested subdivision in The Sunshine State was some abstract, fantastical, utopian concept that stretched far beyond the comprehension of our young, teenage, “brain snagged” minds.   “AwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwMannnnnnn” it's time to learn the key ingredients of “vampire jerky” and remember that “you can still rock with a high voice” (even if you've got on your “gloves of shame”). Find out where you DO NOT want to get “heartworms”, be sure to establish firm boundaries so you'll know exactly where “the aftermarket stuff stops with the ladies”, prepare to enjoy some “tangy flan” (courtesy of the outro-reel super-mix) and JOIN US as we reflect on all the fantastic metal released on August 12th, 1991 and the other 364 days of that year as we travel back in time to THE YEAR OF OUR RIFF LORD: 1991.   Visit www.metalnerdery.com/podcast for more on this episode Help Support Metal Nerdery https://www.patreon.com/metalnerderypodcast Leave us a Voicemail to be played on a future episode: 980-666-8182   Metal Nerdery Tees and Hoodies – metalnerdery.com/merch and kindly leave us a review and/or rating on the iTunes/Apple Podcasts - Spotify or your favorite Podcast app Listen on iTunes, Spotify, Podbean, or wherever you get your Podcasts. Follow us on the Socials: Facebook - Instagram - Twitter Email: metalnerdery@gmail.com   Can't be LOUD Enough Playlist on Spotify Metal Nerdery Munchies on YouTube @metalnerderypodcast   Show Notes: (00:01): #herewego (“The button's red…”) / #vampirejerky / “It's something new…”/ #DryJuly (“Wait…no lube?”) / #oldsmokey #rootbeermoonshine #thisepisodesclinkyoftheepisode / ***WARNING: #listenerdiscretionisadvised ***/ #theverdict / “At the tip…but the back end…”/ “It doesn't have #bubbles …”/ ***WELCOME BACK TO THE METAL NERDERY PODCAST!!!*** / “Wait, do it one more time…”/ #recordscratch / “It's called #discipline …”/ “Just six?”/ “Next money shot was like #PeterNorth …”/ #thisepisodesbeeroftheepisode #CreatureComfort #AthensGeorgia #Tropicalia #sixpointsixpercentABV    (05:58): #RussellsReflectionsASMR regarding the #NickelbackDocumentary on #Netflix / “Their influences totally make sense…”/ #stripclubcore / #billboardtopten / “That's probably why they're hated…”/ “Look at #KISS …”/ #songwriting / “You've got #OneLifeToLive …”/ “That's like a neighborhood…”/ “That's a metal label…”/ The #hawktuah of metal…/ #PATREONSHOUTOUT (Come and #JoinUs on the Patreon at patreon.com/metalnerdery ) / “Have a good June…”/ “He's so nice he joined us twice…”/ “Speaking of…we owe him a shirt.”    (13:47): If you want to send us some correspondence you can email us at metalnerdery@gmail.com or hit us up on #YouTube or #Instagram or #Facebook OR you can GIVE US A CALL AND LEAVE US A VOICEMAIL AT 980-666-8182!!! / #TripSix #WaxAudio (CONFIRM THE NAME) #MuttLange / #isitgay? / “I beg to disagree…”/ #clonesex / “Do they push too far?” / “Does he fuck an octopus?” / #octopushandy vs #peanutbutter / “It's only gross if you…”/ #youreworse #hogstoryparttwo / “I need a shower…”   (19:12): #TheDocket / “What were YOU guys doing in #1991?” / METAL NERDERY PODCAST PRESENTS:  1991 – YEAR IN METAL / ***check out our 1994 episode and our 3-part 1990 episode (30 years in metal) ***/ “Everybody knows what came out in '91…”/ NOTE:  That was March 1992, not 1991. / “Loads everywhere when they came to Atlanta…” / “They had to appeal to all the cooze out there first…”/ “Start off soft and get harder…” / #naturalprogression / #SkidRow SLAVE TO THE GRIND / “I just had a realization…”/ #OzzyOsbourne (MS? “Something happened in '91…”) #allegedly (“I think you just like saying tinker…”) / “They should map over their #cokelines from prior releases…”/ MR. TINKERTRAIN (“Now it does.”) / “Squeezies?” / “Settle your ass…” / #blackdog   (30:12): “We should play something thrashy…”/ “Stop with the yawns, dude…”/ “We're gonna move to that #Florida #SwingingNeighborhood …”/ #roastbeefjerky / #TheVillages / “Isn't that an old school #STD?” / “If the sores aren't there, you're good to go…”/ “AIDS part 2?” / #Athiest MOTHER MAN and some #GhostStory #tangentionalality / #Entombed LIVING DEAD / “It works for them…”/ “The drum mix reminds me of #TheMasquerade …”/ “Let's change things up a little…” / #Primus TOMMY THE CAT (“That's '91 all day long…”) / “And I say unto thee…”/ “They get MY Nickelback hate…”/ #ArmoredSaint (“I'm sorry, who's bush?”) / “Where does the #aftermarket stuff stop with the ladies?” / REIGN OF FIRE #powermetal / “This is a #soundtrack song…” / “He sounds like a younger #JohnBush / “It just seems weird for '91…” / “Things got progressively lighter…” / “Radio kills every star…” / “The song about the dead girlfriend?” / #readthoselyrics   (43:58): #Death SUICIDE MACHINE / “Everything's busy…”/ “I think we did that before we started calling it #InsideTheMetal …”/ “What would be a deep cut, if you had to pick one?” / #Sepultura ALTERED STATE / “It reminds me of #CrashBandicoot and #PlayStationOne …”/ “This almost sounds like a soundtrack tune…”/ #TypeONegative UNSUCCESSFULLY COPING WITH THE NATURAL BEAUTY OF INFIDELITY #IKnowYoureFuckingSomeoneElse (“Slam on the brakes!”) / #AwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwMannnnnn (“What a break down…”) / #justafriend / “That's straight up doom right there…”/ “Hey don't think I don't know what you're doing, you stupid twat!” / #HalloweenVibesASMR / Reflecting on the first time we ever saw #TypeONegative live at #TheInternationalBallroom / #MonsterMagnet (“'94, you were way off!”) MEDICINE #usethoseheadphones    (57:57): #TheAccused had an album in '91, right? / “No, it's not funny, but what's hysterical is…”/ “They all sound like that?” / NO HOPE FOR RELIEF (“That's the #weedlywoo of drums…”) & SATURDAY NIGHT SPECIAL / “Vocals by TAZ…”/ “Where do we wanna go next?” / “I feel like Bill likes #TheBlackAlbum as much as he likes #KISS…”/ #Coroner METAMORPHOSIS (NOTE:  #TBA and #MentalVortex #bolth came out on August 12, 1991) / “A dude named Stacey?”/ #HallowsEve / “What in the world?” / “Can you imagine #FDR introducing #WinstonChurchill as #AdolfHitler?” / “Have you seen the dick on that motherfucker?” / #Venom TRIBES (“That's not #Cronos …”)   (1:11:00): “Just for fun…” / #FatesWarning (“They're part of the Big 3 or 4 of #progressivemetal I think…”) / POINT OF VIEW (“That's kinda rockin'…”) / “Get ready for the #highsinging …” / #glovesofshame (“It sounds like #OperationMindcrime …”) / “Nobody said I was a singer…”/ “What's your favorite?” / THERAPY / “Can we hear the very intro of MONSTER SKANK?” / “We've got a lot to go here…”/ “You've gotta play #COC …”/ #CorrosionOfConformity WHITE NOISE (“This is probably their only real thrash album…”) / “That's European American privilege noise…”/ “Number 1 #Billboard single, 1991…” / #itsnotmetal / “Y'all bang to that?” / “Those were all the metal bands that made it…”/ “Is that what happens when…cut themselves?” / #sackful #Krystals / “Really good bad…”/ “You see all the people getting shot ordering food in the drive thru these days?” / “Oh boy…all the pressure…”/ #Metallica OF WOLF AND MAN / “No shape shift or nothin', huh?” / #Overkill BARE BONES (“It's #Halloween …it's not but it makes you think of it.”) / “You may be right, and I may be crazy…”/ NOTE:  see also #KingDiamond #Them OUT FROM THE ASYLUM / “And for fun…the Halloween theme?” / “Is that a #threesome…does it count?” / “It's coming right before #theendoftheworld …”/ “Y'all are too white to say that…”/ #markthetime please…/ “Once we get bigger than Rogan…” / “Oh yeah, he ripped off #BillHicks persona, set, etc…he stole everything from Bill Hicks…”/ “#DietBillHicks is what you saw…”/ “How are we looking on those #OperationOrangeTits shirts…”/ #3DCheetos / ***THANK YOU ALL FOR JOINING US AND THANK YOU TO OUR PATREONS FOR YOUR SUPPORT!!!*** / #GrungeNerderyPodcast / ***COME ON DOWN TO THE #BUNKERPOONGIFTSHOPPE AND PICK UP SOME #METALNERDERYPODCAST MERCH AT metalnerdery.com/merch *** / #outroreel #supermix #pissandpennies  

Ever wondered how the digital revolution came to be? Was it the work of lone geniuses, or was there something more at play? In this episode, we delve into Walter Isaacson's "The Innovators," uncovering the collaborative efforts and key principles that have shaped our technological landscape.In the world of investing and entrepreneurship, building a multidisciplinary mental model is key to success. "The Innovators" reveals that diverse, collaborative teams have historically been the driving force behind groundbreaking solutions.In my martial arts days, a coach taught me to study exceptional role models – a strategy akin to the famous Harvard Business Cases. Analyze success, discover core principles, then adapt them to your own unique path. After all, as Bruce Lee said, "Absorb what is useful, reject what is useless, and add what is essentially your own."That's the lens I bring to biographies – extracting valuable lessons amidst the complexities of each individual story.This episode dissects 10 crucial tools for fostering innovation, drawing on stories from the book and my own experiences as an entrepreneur and investor. From visionary thinking and customer-centricity to the power of persistence and collaboration, we'll explore the strategies that can help you identify winning teams and create an environment where innovation thrives.Book on Amazon[Link to Amazon]Problems This Solves:Overwhelmed by history books? This concise summary delivers the most relevant insights for entrepreneurs and investors.Unsure how to apply innovation principles? We'll provide actionable takeaways and reflection questions.Curious about the minds behind the digital age? Gain insights into the collaborative spirit that drives technological progress.Why Listen:Discover the 10 tools for innovation: Uncover the strategies that have fueled successful collaborations and groundbreaking technologies.Learn from real-world examples: Hear stories from the book and my own experiences that illustrate these principles in action.Apply the lessons to your own ventures: Reflect on how you can foster innovation and build winning teams in your own organization.Quotes:"Creativity is a collaborative process. Innovation comes from teams more often than from the lightbulb moments of lone geniuses." - Walter Isaacson"The best way to predict the future is to invent it." - Alan Kay (as quoted in "The Innovators")Timestamps:(00:00) Intro(04:18) Walter Isaacson(08:21) Overview of the Book(12:28) Tool #1: Ada Lovelace and the Power of Visionary Thinking(18:01) Tool #2: Collaborative Teamwork(23:13) Tool #3: Craftsmanship(29:00) Tool #4: The Entrepreneurial Spirit and Culture of Innovation(35:32) Tool #5: Leadership that Breeds Innovation(42:13) Tool #6: Persistent Innovation(47:19) Tool #7: Public Awareness and Advocacy(53:48) Tool #8: Customer Centricity(58:51) Tool #9: Technicians Collaborating with Business People(01:03:20) Tool #10: Building Collaborative Ecosystems(01:07:55) Key Takeaways(01:14:00) Tl;dr Episode SummarySend us a Text Message.Support the Show.Join the Podcast Newsletter: Link

National Name your poison day.  Entertainment from 1969.  Bill of Rights proposed to US Constitution, Vacuum cleaner invented, Worlds 1st auto theft.  Todays birthdays - Jerry Stiller, Joan Rivers, Nancy Sinatra, Chuck Negron, Boz Skaggs, Bonnie Tyler, Tim Berners-Lee, Keenen Ivory Wayans, Rob Pilatus, Julianna Margulies, kanye West.  Andrew Jackson died.Intro - Pour some sugar on me - Def Leppard   http://defleppard.com/Name your poison - Ted NugentBet back - The BeatlesRunning bear - Sonny JamesBirthdays - In da club - 50 Cent    http://50cent.com/These boots were made for walkin - Nancy SinatraJoy to the world - Three Dog NightLook what you've done to me - Boz SkaggsTotal eclipse of the heart - Bonnie tylerIn Living Color TV themeGirl you know its true - Millie VanilliStronger - Kenye WestExit - Its not love - Dokken     http://dokken.net/Follow Jeff Stampka on Facebook or cooolmedia.com

Today I'm speaking with Dr. James Hendler, the Director and professor at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and a pioneer of the Semantic Web. For those in the tech and academic circles, Jim Hendler is a name synonymous with transformative changes in how we interact with and understand the web.This is a truly enlightening conversation with Jim! He brings a rich tapestry of experiences, having worked at places like DARPA and on foundational projects that have shaped the internet and artificial intelligence as we know them today. During our conversation, Jim talks about his early interests in technology and growing up in New York, his extensive professional journey through the early days of AI and working on the Semantic Web with the likes of Tim Berners-Lee, and his insightful views on emerging technologies like web3.Jim shines a light on a lot of aspects of technology development and application, reflecting on the evolution from early AI research to today's state of the field. We'll explore his significant contributions to the field, including his work on the Semantic Web, his time at DARPA, the early days of AI, and his thoughts on the future of the internet.Show Notes and TranscriptsThe GRTiQ Podcast takes listeners inside web3 and The Graph (GRT) by interviewing members of the ecosystem.  Please help support this project and build the community by subscribing and leaving a review.Twitter: GRT_iQwww.GRTiQ.com 

Welcome to the Instant Trivia podcast episode 1207, where we ask the best trivia on the Internet. Round 1. Category: 1990--25 Years Ago 1: This city, capital of the same-named country, was overrun by Iraqi forces. Kuwait. 2: After 11 years in the job, this U.K. prime minister resigned. (Margaret) Thatcher. 3: For the first time Pavarotti, Carreras and Domingo performed together as this supergroup. the Three Tenors. 4: Winnie (Churchill) got a ticker-tape parade on March 15, 1946; this Winnie was in one with her husband on June 20, 1990. (Winnie) Mandela. 5: This Brit created the first prototype web pages. (Tim) Berners-Lee. Round 2. Category: Middle G. With G in quotes 1: Hear the howls and clanking chains from this dark underground chamber used to hold prisoners. a dungeon. 2: Merv Griffin used to play this word game with his sister and "Wheel of Fortune" is the result. hangman. 3: Fancy name for a list of movies a particular actor or director has made. a filmography. 4: The largest tree-dwelling mammal in the world, this ape from Sumatra and Borneo can weigh 220 pounds. an orangutan. 5: When vaulting, gymnasts use this flexible device. the springboard. Round 3. Category: Gibson Girls And Guys 1: Cowboy star Edmund Gibson got this nickname as a boy either because he hunted owls or delivered for the Owl Drug Company. Hoot. 2: Tyrese Gibson has appeared as Roman Pearce, known for his banter and his driving, in this action film franchise. The Fast and the Furious. 3: "I need your love like a flame needs a fire", sang this '80s teen queen who also gave us "Only In My Dreams". Debbie Gibson. 4: He pitched for the Cardinals for 17 seasons and even briefly played with the Harlem Globetrotters. Bob Gibson. 5: In 1985 his "Neuromancer" won a Nebula and a Hugo. William Gibson. Round 4. Category: Potent History 1: Sugar cane molasses was distilled into this liquor, a significant part of the "triangular trade" that promoted slavery. rum. 2: In 1729 and 1751 Britain passed acts aimed at curbing the consumption of this alcohol that originated in the Netherlands. gin. 3: Vodka was involved in 1994 as this white-haired Russian leader was found on a D.C. street in his underwear hailing cabs to go get pizza. Yeltsin. 4: The Whiskey Rebellion culminated in 1794 among farmers of the Monongahela Valley in this state. Pennsylvania. 5: In 1923 a beer hall called the Burgerbraukeller in this German city was the starting point of a failed putsch. Munich. Round 5. Category: The 5Th Beatle 1: This Beatles producer started out making comedy records with Peter Sellers. (Sir) George Martin. 2: After being replaced by Ringo Starr in 1962, this man got a job in a bakery and then became a civil servant. Pete Best. 3: In "Backbeat" Stephen Dorff played this alliterative bassist who died of a cerebral hemorrhage in 1962. (Stuart) Sutcliffe. 4: This manager who died in 1967 was referred to as the "Fifth Beatle". Brian Epstein. 5: This keyboardist, who died in 2006, sat in with the Beatles often and also wrote Joe Cocker's hit "You Are So Beautiful". Billy Preston. Thanks for listening! Come back tomorrow for more exciting trivia!Special thanks to https://blog.feedspot.com/trivia_podcasts/ AI Voices used

Voyager 1 update The Web turned 35 and Dad is disappointed Automakers sharing driving data with insurance companies A flaw in Passkey thinking Passkeys vs 2fa Sharing accounts with Passkeys Passkyes vs. Passwords/MFA Workaround to sites that block anonymous email addresses Open Bounty programs on HackerOne Steve on Twitter Ways to disclose bugs publicly Security by obscurity Something you have/know/are vs Passkeys Passkeys vs TOTP Inspecting Chrome extensions Passkey transportability Morris the Second Show Notes - https://www.grc.com/sn/SN-966-Notes.pdf Hosts: Steve Gibson and Mikah Sargent Download or subscribe to this show at https://twit.tv/shows/security-now. Get episodes ad-free with Club TWiT at https://twit.tv/clubtwit You can submit a question to Security Now at the GRC Feedback Page. For 16kbps versions, transcripts, and notes (including fixes), visit Steve's site: grc.com, also the home of the best disk maintenance and recovery utility ever written Spinrite 6. Sponsors: robinhood.com/boost GO.ACILEARNING.COM/TWIT joindeleteme.com/twit promo code TWIT vanta.com/SECURITYNOW

Voyager 1 update The Web turned 35 and Dad is disappointed Automakers sharing driving data with insurance companies A flaw in Passkey thinking Passkeys vs 2fa Sharing accounts with Passkeys Passkyes vs. Passwords/MFA Workaround to sites that block anonymous email addresses Open Bounty programs on HackerOne Steve on Twitter Ways to disclose bugs publicly Security by obscurity Something you have/know/are vs Passkeys Passkeys vs TOTP Inspecting Chrome extensions Passkey transportability Morris the Second Show Notes - https://www.grc.com/sn/SN-966-Notes.pdf Hosts: Steve Gibson and Mikah Sargent Download or subscribe to this show at https://twit.tv/shows/security-now. Get episodes ad-free with Club TWiT at https://twit.tv/clubtwit You can submit a question to Security Now at the GRC Feedback Page. For 16kbps versions, transcripts, and notes (including fixes), visit Steve's site: grc.com, also the home of the best disk maintenance and recovery utility ever written Spinrite 6. Sponsors: robinhood.com/boost GO.ACILEARNING.COM/TWIT joindeleteme.com/twit promo code TWIT vanta.com/SECURITYNOW

Voyager 1 update The Web turned 35 and Dad is disappointed Automakers sharing driving data with insurance companies A flaw in Passkey thinking Passkeys vs 2fa Sharing accounts with Passkeys Passkyes vs. Passwords/MFA Workaround to sites that block anonymous email addresses Open Bounty programs on HackerOne Steve on Twitter Ways to disclose bugs publicly Security by obscurity Something you have/know/are vs Passkeys Passkeys vs TOTP Inspecting Chrome extensions Passkey transportability Morris the Second Show Notes - https://www.grc.com/sn/SN-966-Notes.pdf Hosts: Steve Gibson and Mikah Sargent Download or subscribe to this show at https://twit.tv/shows/security-now. Get episodes ad-free with Club TWiT at https://twit.tv/clubtwit You can submit a question to Security Now at the GRC Feedback Page. For 16kbps versions, transcripts, and notes (including fixes), visit Steve's site: grc.com, also the home of the best disk maintenance and recovery utility ever written Spinrite 6. Sponsors: robinhood.com/boost GO.ACILEARNING.COM/TWIT joindeleteme.com/twit promo code TWIT vanta.com/SECURITYNOW

Voyager 1 update The Web turned 35 and Dad is disappointed Automakers sharing driving data with insurance companies A flaw in Passkey thinking Passkeys vs 2fa Sharing accounts with Passkeys Passkyes vs. Passwords/MFA Workaround to sites that block anonymous email addresses Open Bounty programs on HackerOne Steve on Twitter Ways to disclose bugs publicly Security by obscurity Something you have/know/are vs Passkeys Passkeys vs TOTP Inspecting Chrome extensions Passkey transportability Morris the Second Show Notes - https://www.grc.com/sn/SN-966-Notes.pdf Hosts: Steve Gibson and Mikah Sargent Download or subscribe to this show at https://twit.tv/shows/security-now. Get episodes ad-free with Club TWiT at https://twit.tv/clubtwit You can submit a question to Security Now at the GRC Feedback Page. For 16kbps versions, transcripts, and notes (including fixes), visit Steve's site: grc.com, also the home of the best disk maintenance and recovery utility ever written Spinrite 6. Sponsors: robinhood.com/boost GO.ACILEARNING.COM/TWIT joindeleteme.com/twit promo code TWIT vanta.com/SECURITYNOW

Voyager 1 update The Web turned 35 and Dad is disappointed Automakers sharing driving data with insurance companies A flaw in Passkey thinking Passkeys vs 2fa Sharing accounts with Passkeys Passkyes vs. Passwords/MFA Workaround to sites that block anonymous email addresses Open Bounty programs on HackerOne Steve on Twitter Ways to disclose bugs publicly Security by obscurity Something you have/know/are vs Passkeys Passkeys vs TOTP Inspecting Chrome extensions Passkey transportability Morris the Second Show Notes - https://www.grc.com/sn/SN-966-Notes.pdf Hosts: Steve Gibson and Mikah Sargent Download or subscribe to this show at https://twit.tv/shows/security-now. Get episodes ad-free with Club TWiT at https://twit.tv/clubtwit You can submit a question to Security Now at the GRC Feedback Page. For 16kbps versions, transcripts, and notes (including fixes), visit Steve's site: grc.com, also the home of the best disk maintenance and recovery utility ever written Spinrite 6. Sponsors: robinhood.com/boost GO.ACILEARNING.COM/TWIT joindeleteme.com/twit promo code TWIT vanta.com/SECURITYNOW

Voyager 1 update The Web turned 35 and Dad is disappointed Automakers sharing driving data with insurance companies A flaw in Passkey thinking Passkeys vs 2fa Sharing accounts with Passkeys Passkyes vs. Passwords/MFA Workaround to sites that block anonymous email addresses Open Bounty programs on HackerOne Steve on Twitter Ways to disclose bugs publicly Security by obscurity Something you have/know/are vs Passkeys Passkeys vs TOTP Inspecting Chrome extensions Passkey transportability Morris the Second Show Notes - https://www.grc.com/sn/SN-966-Notes.pdf Hosts: Steve Gibson and Mikah Sargent Download or subscribe to this show at https://twit.tv/shows/security-now. Get episodes ad-free with Club TWiT at https://twit.tv/clubtwit You can submit a question to Security Now at the GRC Feedback Page. For 16kbps versions, transcripts, and notes (including fixes), visit Steve's site: grc.com, also the home of the best disk maintenance and recovery utility ever written Spinrite 6. Sponsors: robinhood.com/boost GO.ACILEARNING.COM/TWIT joindeleteme.com/twit promo code TWIT vanta.com/SECURITYNOW

180 - Spoilers for Colin Ruminate joins MacStories then some follow up on the AI/Arc discussion, Tim Berners-Lee's open letter, Robb explains Colin the Caterpillar, and John dives into Southern food. Ruminate is now part of MacStories Ruminate Joins MacStories  Pizza Hut's 2,880-calorie monster: a taste of a burgeoning global food crisis AI Follow Up: I Just Want a Nice Browser! | Havn The Browser Company feels gross to me right now

Entertaining drama from award-winning writer Matthew Broughton exploring probably the biggest turning point in recent history: the creation of the World Wide Web, and its impact on one family in the decades that follow.In August 1991, the first website goes live. At exactly the same time, a baby is born...Julie....Claudie Blakley Vic....Dana Haqjoo Young Lucy...Astrid le Fleming Lucy....Katie Redford Young Ben....Bertie Creswell Ben....Luke Nunn Narrator....Peter Marinker With the voices of Josh Bryant-Jones, Jessica Enemokwu, Laura Power, Maxim Reston.Technical producers...Keith Graham, Andy Garratt, Peter Ringrose Production co-ordinator...Jonathan PowellWritten by Matthew Broughton Directed by Abigail le FlemingA BBC Audio Production for BBC Radio 4Extract from 2012 Olympics opening ceremony, BBC audio, © International Olympic Committee. Extracts of Sir Tim Berners-Lee from an interview with CNBC, and The Richard Dimbleby Lecture: The World Wide Web - A Mid-Course Correction, BBC

The team discusses Apple's plans to lower the fences on its walled garden, Airbnb's ban on surveillance cameras and Tim Berners-Lee's future tech predictions. Our Hot Hardware candidate is the Synology BeeStation, a simple, low-cost NAS appliance designed to replace Google Drive and other cloud storage services.

När internet började spridas utanför akademiska kretsar utlovades vi ett helt nytt samarbetsinriktat, interaktivt och fritt nätsamhälle där kunskap och idéer skulle flöda fritt. Men den kommersiella delen av internet kom att ta över tjänster och funktioner. Med tiden blev det några få amerikanska bolag som kom att dominera nätet.Ursprunget till internets föregångare Arpanet var militärt. Den amerikanska militären såg ett behov att kunna upprätthålla kommunikationer vid ett kärnvapenkrig. Och när Sverige via den tekniska högskolan Chalmers kopplades på internet 1984 var det ingen som brydde sig förutom några få dataforskare.I denna nymixade repris av podcasten Historia Nu samtalar programledare Urban Lindstedt med Peter Bennesved som doktor i idéhistoria och har intresserad sig för teknikutveckling. Han arbetar för närvarande på en studie om it-kommissionen.Idén till Arpanet kläcktes 1962 då psykologen och dataforskaren Joseph Licklider skickade runt PM om ett ”intergalaktiskt nätverk”. Och det första meddelandet skickade skickades på Arpanet den 29 oktober 1969. Men idén om ett data nätverk går att spåra betydligt längre tillbaka i historien.Ett viktigt steg i utvecklingen var när konceptet med world wide web utvecklades 1989 med länkar och webbadresser av Tim Berners-Lee på forskningscentret CERN i Schweiz. Fyra år senare var 1,7 procent av svenskarna uppkopplade, men redan vid millennieskiftet var hälften av svenskarna uppkopplade.Den nya kommunikationsteknologin kom med ett löfte om ett nytt samhälle och ett nytt effektivare näringsliv. Riskkapital strömmade till allt galnare internetföretag, men i mars år 2000 sprack internetbubblan när nätbutiken Boo.com gick i konkurs.Lyssna också på Från furstars brevövervakning till demokratisk massövervakning.Bild: The Opt Project – en visualisering av internet från år 2005: Creative Commons.Musik: Technology Music av Bobby Cole, Soundblock Audio.  Vill du stödja podden och samtidigt höra ännu mer av Historia Nu? Gå med i vårt gille genom att klicka här: https://plus.acast.com/s/historianu-med-urban-lindstedt. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week, we talk to Carl Malamud, heralded as "The Father of Internet Radio". We trace Carl's journey from the early buzz of bulletin board systems to setting up the first-ever Internet radio station back in 1992. Carl shares tales from the creation of his flagship show "Geek of The Week," where Internet legends like Tim Berners-Lee took the mic, to orchestrating the monumental Internet 1996 World Exposition, a digital World's Fair that connected millions globally. Internet Talk Radio Archives: https://archive.org/details/RT-FM Public.Resource.Org: https://public.resource.org/ Bangalore Literature Festival: https://archive.org/details/bangalore.literature.festival.2023 Internet Talk Radio on Computer Chronicles: https://youtu.be/U_o8gerare0?si=IciilvN84v4DpYqY&t=1027  Contents: 00:00 - The Week's Retro News Stories 49:05 - Carl Malamud Interview Please visit our amazing sponsors and help to support the show: Bitmap Books https://www.bitmapbooks.com/ We need your help to ensure the future of the podcast, if you'd like to help us with running costs, equipment and hosting, please consider supporting us on Patreon: https://theretrohour.com/support/ https://www.patreon.com/retrohour Get your Retro Hour merchandise: https://bit.ly/33OWBKd Join our Discord channel: https://discord.gg/GQw8qp8 Website: http://theretrohour.com Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/theretrohour/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/retrohouruk Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/retrohouruk/ Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/theretrohour Show notes: Amstrad's Return Under Lord Alan Sugar: https://tinyurl.com/2kerma83 Atari 2600 Movie Experience: https://tinyurl.com/2vna892p Indie Game Thunder Helix Pays Homage to Classics: https://tinyurl.com/2s4jdjz6 Jeff Minter's Interactive Documentary Preview: https://tinyurl.com/4wxrrybm Unearthed Time Splitters 4 Prototype: https://tinyurl.com/3ustfvwh

Episode #327 of The VentureFizz Podcast features Reed Sturtevant, General Partner at Engine Ventures. This is exciting! Why? Because this episode is longer than my normal interviews, as Reed and I cover his career that spans multiple decades across major technological platform shifts. This means that based on his career, he has so many great stories to share. It is like a historical walkthrough of the Boston tech scene. We even had to do two sessions, so if you are watching this video from our YouTube channel then you'll notice the different sweaters that Reed is wearing. Today, Reed is a General Partner at Engine Ventures, a “tough tech” venture capital firm launched by MIT and trust me on this one, as you'll want to stay tuned throughout the whole episode! Here is an outline of what we cover: * Reed's background story, including graduating from high school at 15 years old, his experience as a factory worker and his studies at MIT. * Developing a program called Freelance Graphics at a startup that was acquired by Lotus and his experience there, which was twice the size of Microsoft at the time. * Co-Founding Radnet, which raised the largest venture round of its time in Boston. * Running company development in Boston for IdeaLab, Bill Gross' internet incubator which spun out companies like Compete, Picasa and others. * Meeting Katie Rae at EONS, a startup founded by Jeff Taylor, and then running Microsoft Startup Labs. * Launching Project 11 Ventures with Katie and then running Techstar Boston together which included many successful companies like GrabCAD, PillPack, and others. * Founder conflict and how it can destroy a startup. * The details of Engine Ventures and what Reed is targeting for investments, plus portfolio company examples. * What it was like leading a course at MIT with Sir Tim Berners-Lee. * And so much more.

A Morning News Update That Takes Into Account The News Stories You Deem 'Highly Conversational' Today's Sponsor: Sports Integrityhttp://thisistheconversationproject.com/sportsintegrity Today's Rundown:Shane Gillis returns to Saturday Night Live and bombs opening monologuehttps://www.npr.org/2024/02/25/1233584316/shane-gillis-struggles-in-a-saturday-night-live-monologue-which-avoids-the-obvio MLB players miffed at sport's new see-through pants, relaying concerns to leaguehttps://arizonasports.com/story/3543407/mlb-players-miffed-at-sports-new-see-through-pants-relaying-concerns-to-league/#:~:text=Now%20some%20of%20the%20rampant,which%20are%20somewhat%20see%2Dthrough. Biden's approval rating falls to 38% in Gallup pollhttps://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/02/23/bidens-approval-rating-gallup/72711290007/ John Cena Says Agency Told Him to Reject Barbie Cameo: 'Beneath You'https://variety.com/2024/film/news/john-cena-agency-reject-barbie-cameo-beneath-you-1235920672/ Kevin Costner & Jewel May Not Be on the Same Page With Their Relationship, Sources Claimhttps://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/kevin-costner-jewel-may-not-180400307.html Al Pacino, 83, and Noor Alfallah, 30, go on first date night in months since settling custody battlehttps://pagesix.com/2024/02/24/entertainment/al-pacino-83-and-noor-alfallah-30-go-on-first-date-night-in-months-since-settling-custody-battle/ 'Fairly OddParents' Sequel Series Ordered at Nickelodeonhttps://variety.com/2024/tv/news/fairly-oddparents-sequel-series-nickelodeon-original-voice-actors-1235920460/Moon lander tipped sideways on lunar surface but ‘alive and well'https://www.nbcnews.com/science/space/moon-lander-tipped-sideways-lunar-surface-alive-well-rcna140302 Man lights self on fire outside Israeli Embassy in Washingtonhttps://abcnews.go.com/US/man-critical-condition-after-setting-fire-israeli-embassy/story?id=107531773 Vigils held nationwide for nonbinary Oklahoma teenager who died following school bathroom fighthttps://apnews.com/article/nonbinary-student-death-nex-owasso-oklahoma-vigils-fd7695afb780d09c00b823fa0618e79f Website: http://thisistheconversationproject.com Facebook: http://facebook.com/thisistheconversationproject Twitter: http://twitter.com/th_conversation TikTok: http://tiktok.com/@theconversationproject YouTube: http://thisistheconversationproject.com/youtube Podcast: http://thisistheconversationproject.com/podcasts #yournewssidepiece #coffeechat #morningnews ONE DAY OLDER ON FEBRUARY 26:Bill Duke (81)Michael Bolton (71)Greg Germann (66) WHAT HAPPENED TODAY:1991: Tim Berners-Lee introduced WorldWideWeb, the first web browser.1996: A 38-year-old Muncie, Indiana, woman tried to remove a callus from her foot by shooting it off with .410-gauge shotgun. She told police later at the hospital she had been drinking heavily and it seemed like a good idea.2017: At the Academy Awards the Best Picture Oscar was mistakenly given to La La Land — then awarded to Moonlight. PLUS, TODAY WE CELEBRATE: Thermos Bottle Dayhttps://www.wikidates.org/holiday/thermos-bottle-day_612.html

Det är sött, det är gulligt och det är över allt. Varför svämmar världens digitala flöden över av gulligheter i form av mjuka djur, söta serietidningsfigurer, färgen rosa och förstås kattungar? Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radio Play. 2014 fick mannen som anses vara den som skapade The World Wide Web, Tim Berners-Lee, svara på frågor om internets utveckling. På frågan om denna världsomspännande teknik användes till något han inte alls hade förväntat sig, hade han ett kort och kärnfullt svar: kattungar. Och antalet bilder av kattungar, eller katter rent generellt, som postas och delas och tittas på, har inte minskat sedan dess. I stället håller världens digitala flöden på att svämma över av gulligheter i form av små djur med mjuka pälsar och stora ögon, söta seriefigurer, ännu sötare bakverk och rosaklädda Barbies. Frågan är förstås, varför vi blivit så besatta av det barnsligt gulliga och söta.Redan för drygt åttio år sedan lanserade den österrikiske zoologen Konrad Lorenz idén att vissa sorters små djur med stora runda ansikten med klotrunda ögon och små munnar triggar igång känslor av ”åhhhhh, så sött” och får oss att vilja ta hand om och beskydda dem, på liknande vis som små hjälplösa barn kan göra. Men det förklarar inte varför vuxna människor idag leker med filter som får dem att se ut som leksakskaniner, använder söta emojis i stället för bokstäver eller springer benen av sig för att se en film om en Barbiedocka. Eller varför 2023 var året då ordet ”girl” kom att bli ett vanligt förekommande prefix, som i ”girl dinner” och ”girl math”. Eller varför utställningen ”Bubble Planet”, som uppmanar besökare att ”släppa loss sitt inre barn” genom att kasta loss i bubblor av olika slag har blivit en sådan framgång i både USA och Europa.Handlar intresset om det gulliga om en allmän infantilisering, tröst i dystra tider eller om nostalgi? I veckans avsnitt pratar vi med Hello Kitty-fanet Jessica Lindberg, ringer upp Claire Catterall som är curator för den nyöppnade utställningen Cute på Somerset House i London, samt diskuterar somer och söta kakor med cookie-experten Kaja Hengstenberg och redaktören Johanna Boström.Veckans gäst är Lisa Ehlin, doktor i digital kultur.

On l'utilise à cœur de jour sans y penser, il fait partie de nos vies un peu comme une vieille pantoufle. Il a bien fallu que quelqu'un l'invente. Le world wide web a  30 ans cette année. Retour sur sa naissance, avec son inventeur, Tim Berners-Lee.  Avec Véronique Morin  et Charles Trahan Une production QUB Janvier 2024Pour de l'information concernant l'utilisation de vos données personnelles - https://omnystudio.com/policies/listener/fr

Every year, The Spectator travels the country in search of the best and boldest new companies that are disrupting their respective industries. In a series of five podcasts, we will tell you about the finalists for 2023's Innovator of the Year Awards, sponsored by Investec. The awards winners will be announced in a prize ceremony in November. Listeners will have heard businesses in all sorts of fields – from consumer goods to health technology, from sustainability to the cutting edge of British engineering. But what about the companies that make these businesses work? The behind-the-scenes, boiler room people who offer services to businesses themselves. These days, with advancement in artificial intelligence, their work has been made more effective than ever before. Britain, after all, brought us Alan Turing and Tim Berners-Lee. Martin Vander Weyer, The Spectator's business editor, judges the awards and hosts this podcast along with three other judges: Melissa Readman, partner and investor director at ESM Investments, a fund which invests in early stage companies; Caroline Theobald CBE, an entrepreneur and co-owner of FIRST, which provides enterprise training to young people and business leaders; and Michelle White, co-head of Investec's private office. The finalists in this category are: Igloo Vision, which creates immersive spaces using virtual reality for companies and organisations. Synthesia, an AI video creation platform that produces videos quickly and cheaply. ComplyAdvantage, which uses AI and machine learning to carry out financial due diligence for corporate clients. SoPost, which uses a digital platform to help streamline supply chains for retailers. Good-Loop, which converts clicks on online ads into revenue for partnership charities. Yoti, which provides digital IDs for identity verification. Exclaimer, which provides email signature solutions for the marketing and other needs of businesses. LegalVision, which provides legal advice on an affordable, subscription basis. Finboot, which uses blockchain to help businesses track the environmental impact of their supply chains. Huboo Technologies Ltd, which takes care of the storage and shipping needs of e-commerce businesses that don't have their own warehouses.

The Hypertext Transfer Protocol, or HTTP, is used to load webpages using hypertext links, and it's the foundation of the web. Tim Berners-Lee famously created HTTP version 0.9 in 1989, and defined the essential behavior of a client and a server. Version 1.0 was eventually finalized in 1996, and its secure variant called HTTPS is The post The Future of HTTP with Nick Shadrin and Roman Arutyunyan appeared first on Software Engineering Daily.