Podcasts about mohammed morsi

Have you ever considered the miraculous power of the Gospel message as it transcends borders, languages, and opposition? In this episode, we talk about the profound influence of Christian media in the Arab-speaking world through the compelling experiences of Farid Garas, the Senior Director of THE KINGDOM SAT satellite television and internet channel – a media outreach of Leading The Way with Dr. Michael Youssef.Farid's narrative is not just about spreading the Gospel; it's a journey of overcoming adversity, embracing his identity in Christ, and changing lives in a region where broadcasting Christian content can defy expectations and alter eternity.Embark on a captivating journey with Farid, a man who once questioned Christianity but now plays a pivotal role in shaping Christian media in a region where such content has often faced significant obstacles. His encounters with authorities, far from deterring him, only reinforced his commitment to his faith and mission, making his story a testament to the power of unwavering faith in Christ.Through this conversation, Farid highlights the strategic use of drama, film, and satellite television to spread the Christian message, reaching out to believers and those searching for Truth in tumultuous times. He discusses the growth of THE KINGDOM SAT, its impact, and the continuous efforts to foster a connection with the audience through live broadcasts and digital platforms.This episode not only delves into Farid's personal and professional life but also provides a deeper understanding of the challenges and opportunities in media and ministry. Through their resilience and dedication, Farid and THE KINGDOM SAT team offer hope to millions in the Middle East, demonstrating the transformative potential of faith-based media in the face of adversity.To ask Jonathan a question or connect with the Candid community, visit https://LTW.org/CandidFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/candidpodInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/candidpodTwitter: https://twitter.com/thecandidpodTRANSCRIPT:This transcript recounts Candid Conversations with Jonathan Youssef Episode 251: Broadcasting Hope: Farid Garas.[01:28] JONATHAN: Today we have a special guest, an in-house guest here at Leading The Way. Farid Garas is the senior director of the Kingdom Sat. The Kingdom Sat is our 24/7 satellite channel for the Arab-speaking world, taking biblical teaching and different types of programming through satellite television and internet to the Arab-speaking population. He has become a good friend and I am so honored to have him joining us on Candid Conversations. Farid, thank you for joining us.[02:06] Farid: Thank you, Jonathan, and I would say congratulations. This is the first podcast after being Dr. Jonathan Youssef. So congratulations. It's an honor to be with you.[02:16] JONATHAN: Well, it's an honor to be with you. And you are doing some doctoral work yourself. And we can get into that a little bit later for those who are listening, you're from Egypt. Tell us a little bit about growing up and your life story and then we can transition into how you got into broadcast ministry. [02:39] Farid: Yeah. I feel I am a minority of the minority, an evangelical Christian in Egypt. And that was a great blessing. I didn't like it in the beginning, feeling that minority I'm not like everyone else, but it was great. My father was a scientist. He studied science, and he didn't like all the Christian religious ideas at that time, talking mainly about the traditional Coptic traditions or Christian traditions. And he always thought that those Christians are cheesy and he didn't like that. So his two sisters invited him to a Christian conference, and he said, “Okay, I'll go. But after the first day I will not like it and I will go back home.” So he tried to flee from the conference three times, and those good Christians would go after him and bring him back.[03:42] JONATHAN: Kicking and screaming.[03:44] Farid: Yeah. So God grabbed his attention through Bible study, and also because of the witness of those Christians that went after him. He discovered that those Christians are really good people. They are professionals. They are not cheesy. They are very intellectual, they are funny, they are successful. So he was attracted to God by the witness and the Bible study. The following year, after studying the Bible for one year, he became very excited about this paradigm shift that God allowed him to go through just by knowing the Lord, and he led the conference the following year. He invited eighteen people from his family, young people, and long story short, they all became Christians. They confessed … they gave their lives to the Lord.[04:36] JONATHAN: Were they from a Coptic background? [04:41] Farid: Yeah, they are nominal Christians, mainly. And many of them are leaders in the Christian ministry now. And he played a great role in my life, not just by the Christian teaching, but by his example to me. And he showed me it was a balance between unconditional love and discipline. And it's like your father played a great role in your life, and that prepared me to know the Lord more and to be ready for ministry.[05:14] JONATHAN: Yeah, yeah. So tell us a little bit about your upbringing. Your father's obviously grown into leadership roles within the Christian community, the evangelical community. You're grown up in a covenant home, where you've heard the Word taught. Tell us a little bit about your faith journey.[05:37] Farid: Yeah. So my father and mother brought us in a church setting and in a covenant environment, and they prepared us to hear the word of the Lord in house and also in church. But as a teenager, even a kid in an evangelical church, you get to hear the salvation message more than one time. But one time I remember, and the teacher has related with me, it was a play about the end of days. And the last line in the play, the main character talks to the audience and says, “What if Jesus came today? Are you going to be here or there?”And of course, it was so dramatic. And so I went home and couldn't sleep. I was thinking of all the events of that day. Is my life really Christian? Am I up to the standard that God accepts? And do I enjoy His redemption just because I want to get released of the … get out of … get out of hell?[06:50] JONATHAN: Yeah, sure. Get out of hell.[06:53] Farid: If only that reason, not relationship. So I couldn't sleep, thinking about all these things, and I had to go to the school the following day. I was so tired. So I came back after the school, had a nap, woke up, found I'm home alone; nobody's home. So I thought, “Uh, oh.”[07:14] JONATHAN: It's happened.[07:16] Farid: Yeah. So this was one of the times that God not only grabbed my attention I think He was preparing me for how media ministry could be a tool in evangelism and in Christian life.[07:34] JONATHAN: So the impact of that performance left a mark on you that you wanted to continue to build upon that.[07:44] Farid: Yes. After that, I was becoming like a dedicated Christian. Okay, I need to study the word. I need to practice all these things. And as a result for that, I was invited by the Christian religion teacher, in the middle school, to talk. We have those Christian classes. They separate Muslims and Christians, each group in one class, and there is a curriculum, but he would finish the curriculum and then ask me, “Okay, Farid, tell us what you think about this.”Mainly, I'm the only evangelical. He wanted to know what those evangelicals say, so I would share. And then mostly it went all right, apart from one of my colleagues who was very rigid, very extreme, and he would say all those things, “Oh, you evangelicals say this.” “Oh, you say that.” And long story, but it ended up that we became best friends and he gave his life to the Lord. We used to study every night together and so on. And after he became Christian, he has these leadership qualities and he became also excited. And together we started this evangelistic drama team. This drama team grew very fast because it was very effective. We wrote our own plays, we performed in churches, in youth meetings. Even we started our like independent Christian theater festivals. Like we would do three plays in three nights, and it was very well received. Like most of the nights we find that we have double the number of audience, so we need to perform twice and so on. And we even came here to Atlanta in 1996, during the Olympics, to help in evangelistic campaigns for the Arabic speakers.[09:59] JONATHAN: Wow. I don't know what to call it. The drama bug had been captured and you're seeing this as a tool for evangelism, for outreach even internationally., I think you start to recognize that this is only a small stage. Explain to us how the doors opened up to having a bigger reach and a bigger audience.[10:30] Farid: Yeah, the drama bug is only like a tool in evangelism. And in the Christian media I've been for many years, you would find like two extremes. One extreme you would find some very interesting, exciting but shallow content. On the other side you can find very good, deep teaching, very sophisticated, spiritual, biblical but sometimes boring. [10:57] JONATHAN: This is through television medium.[10:59] Farid: Yeah. And the theater and radio. So, I mean what was special about this team that God showed us how He could use the good content, because the gospel is the core. And when we started presenting the gospel in the drama tool that would communicate to people in our age, we found that it needs to be like this formula. We cannot let one play to be just popular because it's funny. And we found that God is growing the work.So it started with theater, then we started to do some radio with TransWorld Radio, like doing drama on radio and so on. And we went to television. You know in Egypt in those years, early, until early 90s, there's no Christian content available for public audience, even Christians. We are 10 to 15 percent. But the national television would allow a Christian Mass only on Christmas, so it's like one hour per year.So we said, okay, how can we break into television? And it was hard. There was no way. So we tried to read books, practice, and we started like drama schools. We don't know anything, but we start inviting people to teach us. And I wanted to study more about media like in a professional way, so I saved money, worked for eight years, then came here to the States, studied digital filmmaking school, did some internship. Then went back to Egypt, completed more studies, did the diploma in film production and directing in the American university.[13:00] JONATHAN: So your heart was always to go back to Egypt. Yeah.[13:03] Farid: Yes. I mean, it was very good over here. I studied in Hawaii, then internship in San Diego. The goal is to do ministry, so I went back to Egypt and completed this study, which allowed me to be part of the cinema syndicate and also to have my own production house. So it all started from just the first play that introduced me to the Lord, and then it continued to do more. Now I have to do more work for the mainstream media and the Christian. And this production house was very successful. God gave me favor in my vendors and producers and it went fast because mainly I learned here in America a different style than the Egyptian national television. Minimum crew doing quality work in a different way. Of course, technology and so on. And I got the hands-on experience. So I had still the main goal was to do ministry using media, but I was able to fund the Christian work from the secular work I used to do—mainly corporate videos, advertisements and documentaries and so on. So they complemented each other. And it grew like for 2003 to 2009 like for six years.[14:44] JONATHAN: Wow. Wow. Sort of paint a picture for us. What does it look like, up to that point, before there's television broadcasts, evangelistic broadcasts being allowed in the country? What did sort of radio and drama team, what does that kind of penetration into the population look like? [15:07] Farid: I mean, you could easily say there is none official media for Christians. They would allow some official magazine or newspaper from the Coptic Church and some from the evangelical, but mainly they would be accepted only in a church setting. So there is no mass media, no radio. So we had Christian radio, TransWorld Radio, that was being broadcast from—[15:40] JONATHAN: South of France, yeah. Monaco.[15:41] Farid: So you could only receive it at like 10:30 PM to 11:30 PM, and you have to be in an area where there's not a lot of buildings and so on. It was a great blessing. Many people knew the Lord from it. But it didn't serve the mass, those true seekers—Muslims, Christians, nominal Christians. So that was the case until '96 when Christian satellite was there as a technology. The government didn't allow it, but it was there.[16:16] JONATHAN: So that's kind of your introduction into the television world in terms of Christianity.[16:24] Farid: Yes. I mean, it's now available. Can we break into that? After the study and this production house, I was able to share in lots of production. And before that, God had prepared me with working in dubbing Christian media, like Jesus Film, VeggieTales, Super Book, as an actor. And it was a great experience.[16:55] JONATHAN: And where were those being broadcast?[16:58] Farid: In one of the production houses that actually it's like a Christian place but also recognized as a production house. So I got some training in that, and when the satellite started, I was one of the first ones that were ready to do a part.[17:19] JONATHAN: So let's kind of move the timeline forward as Christian media is now being produced. And at what point does the government allow satellite broadcasting?[17:35] Farid: You know they didn't allow it because satellite is broadcasted from abroad. So in order to stop it, they had to stop all the bouquet of channels, so they couldn't do that. So it first started on one of the satellites that was Europe-based, but if you have a big satellite dish and receiver, you could receive it at home. And it's different than here in America. I mean, satellite in the Middle East is free to own. So you just spend maybe $15 or so to have a device recorder and you receive about two thousand channels. So among them are one Christian channel, so if the government wants to stop, they have to stop everything, so they couldn't. [18:31] JONATHAN: Right. There'd be too much backlash. [18:48] So let's fast-forward. It's 2009. You're very busy. Tell us a little bit about what's going on in that year.[18:57] Farid: Yeah. It was a very important year. At that time, I was busy doing production with different now-Christian satellites. They are more than one now and I already started as a part time in one of the satellite ministries out there and at the same time I was having my production house. And I read a book in one of my visits to Europe and America about Muslim testimonies. You never read those in Egypt, so I thought maybe I should film some. I was naïve. I didn't know everything is like under surveillance. So I had this studio in my production house. I was doing lots of projects, but this one I said, okay, I need to be careful just in case, so I'll do it in a secret environment.But it wasn't. So I filmed those testimonies and the following day I started to get visits from the national security. And the way it was done, it wasn't like—they didn't come and say, “We are the national security. WE want to investigate those Christian projects.” No. First they would send like one department of some kind of police, checking the social security or checking the telephone or electricity.[20:40] JONATHAN: They were spying on you.[20:42] Farid: They were—I mean, in Egypt, I mean, not all the businesses would have all the papers right. So the plan was to find something wrong to make a case against this office without saying it's religious, just to keep the face for the media in the West. So they didn't find anything wrong. It took like five weeks, several visits. So the last one they said, “Okay, there is a censorship case against you.” Usually, those are copyrights or not using original software, which is very common in Egypt. But my software was original. I had no violations. But the case was still there. And then the national security officer called me in his office. I mean, before all that happened, God prepared me. I had this shooting day with kids at 9:00 AM. [21:45] JONATHAN: Filming, yeah.[21:46] Farid: Yeah, it was prepared and everything is in place and I had a dream or vision that I woke up early, like 5:00 AM, very alert with this impression that an officer or someone from the security will come and ask about me. And I knew this was from the Lord because it came with a sense of peace. It should be scary because I know what could happen.[22:17] JONATHAN: Yeah, right. And you've got a wife and kids and—[22:20] Farid: Yeah. It's … So I started praying, like reading the Bible and committing the day to the Lord, and I met my friend and production manager at 7:00 AM. I said I had this dream, so I smiled and he said, “What do you want to do? Do you want to cancel shooting today?” I said, “No, no. But if the officer came, please call me outside not to scare the kids.”And we started at 9:00 AM filming. Everything went all right until 3:00 PM I got the visit. They mainly told me “There is a warrant against you. Come to the national security office at 11:00 PM” at night. That's like usual part of the environment you're put in. And at that meeting, the officer confronted me. “Why are you filming those infidels?” according to the apostate law, they were Muslims, now they are Christians, they are supposed to be under this apostasy law. Apostasy law in Islam if someone left Islam he's supposed to be executed. It's not applied in Egypt, but the concept is there, so it's not allowed by the families or by the regime or—[23:45] JONATHAN: Right. It's an intimidation factor, yeah.[23:47] Farid: Yeah, for the what they call the public peace and so on. And he said, “Why did you do that?” I said, “I'm a professional director and filming what they have to say.” And he said, “Yeah, but tell me how much would you take, I see you produce a lot of Christian content.” I said, “Yes.” He said, “Okay, this Christian music video,” it's all like a lot of content from my production house. “How much do you take like to produce one?”I said, “Yeah, like one thousand pounds.”“Okay, what if you do like a music video, secular, mainstream one?” He said, “How much would you take?”I said, “I will be like about fifteen.” “Fifteen thousand to one thousand. So why would you choose to do the Christian work?”I said, “I'd like you to watch one of those music videos, secular ones. Would you be happy to show them to your family, to your kids? I want my family to be proud about what I present.”And he said, “Okay, why did you film those testimonies or stories. For them it's like disaster.”I said, “They … I mean, according to the constitution, we have freedom of speech, right?”“Oh yeah, okay.” And he said, “Okay, do you have license for the production?”I said, “Yes.” And he started asking questions, and we ended up having a case of censorship. And I asked the lawyer at that time, “Okay, why is it censorship. I had nothing wrong.”He said, “Yeah, because it's national security, it's classified. They cannot declare it.” And this lawyer was a Muslim. He said, “We're going to win this.”So God placed that lawyer after like four different lawyers, and that lawyer took maybe five months to one year, I think, until the case was resolved. And it was what was so-called Arab Spring, the revolution.[26:00] JONATHAN: Yeah, the people will remember watching that footage back at 2011 and the revolution in the streets and the overthrow of Mubarak and then somewhat of an election that took place afterwards, yeah.[26:18] Farid: Yes. And during that time, the case was released. And actually they had confiscated two of my editing machines. One of them had my first Christian evangelistic feature film footage and the other one had the backup, so it was unfortunate. I have many other agents witness, but then God really gave us favor in getting those back after all the police stations were burned and somehow God kept those editing suites and the footage, and this film was released and it was even screened here in America. It's an evangelistic movie about an immigrant who thinks that he's persecuted because he's Christian. He doesn't know that his problem is he doesn't have this relationship with God. So he comes here to America and finds that there is another set of challenges, and then he gets to know the Lord and then his life starts to take a positive turn and that film was here in cinemas in I think 2012 and it was shown in five states who have heavy Arabic-speakers population. [27:46] JONATHAN: Well, this wasn't your only run-in with the Egyptian authorities. You continue to produce content and then you find yourself in a similar situation—a worse situation. [28:02] Farid: Yes. Now I have a file. [28:06] JONATHAN: That's right.[28:22] Farid: Yeah, during those years, God made a great awakening in Egypt after the revolution. It was both religious, ritual, biblical and also political for young people especially. And there was not a lot of control at that time, so a lot of ministries were able to go out and do more. One of them was this Christian satellite that I was part of, and God gave us a chance to do things we never were able to do before, like this prayer night, twelve-hours prayer gathering, around 35 thousand. That's like first time in Egypt. And they were gathered at the Cave Church, praying from night to morning, because police were not there. Usually, police does not allow this in the name of security and also—[29:25] JONATHAN: I mean, just for context, this is after the election of—remind me his name.[29:34] Farid: Sisi?[29:35] JONATHAN: No. Before Sisi. Morsi. So this is after the election of Mohammed Morsi.[29:41] Farid: No, this was in 2011.[29:42] JONATHAN: In between. Okay, so this is after Mubarak has been sort of deposed.[29:52] Farid: Yeah. I mean, the army was in control at that time, but there was no president, so there was some more freedom.[29:59] JONATHAN: So there's these all-night prayer meetings taking place in this Cave Church.[30:04] Farid: Yeah. This was 11/11/2011, and it was a great night because it was from all non-official Christian leaders gathering together. And a lot of people, a lot Christians—and Muslims—gathered. Because of all what was happening, people were praying, “God, we need you in this country.”And the satellite ministry I was in broadcasted that live. We experienced a lot of trials for interruption, but God miraculously allowed us to be alive. And a lot of the mainstream media were shocked to see what was happening with the number of people, the prayers for peace, including Al-Jazeera channel. So they called me and said, “Can we have your feed?” And I said, “Sure, of course.” [31:01] JONATHAN: You said 35 thousand people gathered.[31:03] Farid: Yes. [31:04] JONATHAN: I mean, that's just hard to imagine.[31:07] Farid: So a lot of these events took place, a lot of production, a lot of live programs on satellite, and people were all the time looking at news and they really were looking for hope. They lost trust in the government, they lose trust sometimes in their religious leaders, and they were looking for Jesus. And we presented the hope of Jesus Christ through satellite ministry. So the regime came back in 2014 and another case was—I mean, the same scenario happened again. They came to the satellite ministry office, confiscated the machines, like a lot of people, I think there were eleven, twelve people, and they were looking for me. It was the weekend and I wasn't there, so they called me. I went there and then direct to jail, to a case of five charges, very serious charges.[32:12] JONATHAN: Each of them carried the penalty of fifteen to twenty-five years.[32:15] Farid: The minimum. The minimum one of them. And of course, they were false accusations, but in those cases, it doesn't matter.[32:29] JONATHAN: Justice may not prevail.[32:30] Farid: Yeah, it was serious, but the team members started praying, and actually many prayers around the world started because this time it was this Christian ministry, so it was well known. When this happened in 2009 in my office, nobody knew because it's like my private thing. But now many people started to pray. But it wasn't the only case at that time. I mean, the regime started to be back and there was a message through different things. Okay, the regime is back, everything needs to be back now in law and order according to our system. So those who took more freedom politically, they need to go back to their borders, to their limit. Christians who have been talking and doing a lot of ministry, no, they need to stop.[33:25] JONATHAN: Restricted freedoms, yeah.[33:28] Farid: Islamists need to do the same. So they closed a lot of Muslim channels and they had many cases against activists and the revolutionists. And this was the biggest satellite ministry, so this was like a statement that no one needs … everyone needs to go back to the original setup. You should know your limits. Don't evangelize Muslims, don't get too involved in politics and so on. So this case was very serious, and I got very scared. Just I remember in jail that night just thinking. I read the law, and it seemed like I'll not go out. And just thinking of my three kids and my wife and said, “Lord, what is going to happen?” I got really … it's like a panic attack what would happen.And the other prisoner that was in the same cell had smuggled a cell phone, so he said, “Yeah, do you want to talk to your family?” I said, “Yes.” “Okay, I'll give you a call. Let them transfer $15 for each minute.”So I called my wife, and she said, “We're praying for you.” And my eleven-years daughter said, “We're praying for you and I want to share with you the verse from Joshua, ‘Be courageous and be strong.'” And it communicated to my spirit.In the first case, my wife was afraid. She used to walk in the streets with the kids, holding her passports in her case because it was so scary with all those visits. But this time, I was scared, she was confident, and she encouraged me. And my daughter, my kids, at that time they were very young, but somehow God gave them peace, although I was in jail.And miraculously, God resolved this case. And you won't believe this, Jonathan, but all the cases that were initiated at that time are not resolved till today.[36:02] JONATHAN: Except for yours.[36:03] Farid: Yeah. It was a miracle. I can tell you details, but it was a miracle by the hand of God. And yeah, so I—Actually, it was a very special testimony for me during those times. I was released from jail, but the case was still there, so I had a conversation with God. And I said, “God, I am scared. I think it's time to flee the country.”And I felt in my spirit God is saying no. I said, “Why, God? There are biblical escapes. Joseph and Mary and the baby. Could this be one?”[36:46] JONATHAN: Peter, Paul.[36:47] Farid: Yeah. Can you let me go? How do I face those charges? There was no way this case is going to be resolved. And God asked me one question. He said, “Do you believe what you present on screen, or this is separate from you actually?”[37:08] JONATHAN: Is your faith in the thing that you stand behind as a broadcast, yeah, yeah.[37:13] Farid: “Is it only for commercial or is it real? Do you believe I can resolve this no matter what laws are there, no matter what situation?”And I met with my mentors, I prayed with my wife, and I spent time with the Lord the same night, and I ended up saying, “God, I'm yours and I have peace to stay and I am not afraid but I trust you will take care of this, whatever happens.”And I returned the flight ticket I had booked. Actually, my wife said, when I said that, she felt like I'm under a lot of pressure. She said, “Yeah, you can buy a ticket and we have twenty-four hours to return it for free.” And I returned the ticket and it took those five months of investigations, visiting court and all that, but it was resolved. And I spent a few more months in the same ministry and I felt it's time to move on and I felt, okay, I need now some time to pray and see what is next. I had confidence through prayer and through checking with my leaders that it is time for me to move on. But I stayed until God said yes and got the blessing of the leaders and family and all that. And I became independent now, not knowing what to do, and spent some time to pray and ask God what's next.[39:02] JONATHAN: And what was next? You had a special introduction, you read a book, you read another book.[39:12] Farid: Yeah! You know I was in a trip in 2014 while being very busy with my production house and our satellite ministry, so in that trip to Lebanon, I had some free time at night. I finished meetings and I selected a book from the library, and it was Dr. Youssef's book, Trust and Obey. And I couldn't stop reading it until I finished it, because I could resonate with him. And now I know Dr. Youssef from satellite, I know his faithfulness to the Word of God, but I don't know him as a person. I mean, I know him as a minister, as a speaker. So his testimony in Trust and Obey was very fascinating for me. I could visualize what he was telling in his book about his upbringing and all his stages he went through, because of course, my journey was much shorter, different, but I could understand a lot of what he was saying from being there in this culture that he was brought in.And I said this book should be filmed sometime, I mean this testimony. But I have no way of doing that. And so it took two years, and now I am free after 2016. I now have no job. I went to Germany, where my wife's family are having ministry there, and we stayed there a few months to pray and seek God, and then I got an invitation from Joshua Youssef. “Why don't you come to help us at the Kingdom Sat?”I said, “I just moved from Egypt to Germany. I'm not sure what's coming.”He said, “Yeah, pray about it and maybe you can start on a contractor basis, as a consultant.”So I said, yes, that seems good. I prayed about it, of course, and I started coming here to the Kingdom Sat, Leading The Way, and started coming every month for one week or so. And after six months, I had total peace about it and I said, “Yes, Joshua, if you still feel there is a place for me.”He said yes. I met with Dr. Youssef, of course, and they took around one more year to do the visa work and so on, and then I came and joined Kingdom Sat. That was in 2017.[41:46] JONATHAN: Tell us about Kingdom Sat. For our listeners who maybe aren't familiar, broadcasting started in 2009, you joined the team in 2017. Who does it reach? Where does it go? What's the fruit that's being borne from it?[42:07] Farid: Yeah, the Kingdom Sat is a vision of Dr. Youssef. God gave him the vision in 2004, and it took five years in the making because he wanted to have a solid, biblical channel that broadcast the best of the east and the best of the west in terms of Bible teaching. And God used Maged Atalla, my colleague, to start this. He's an engineer. He made a great foundation following the vision of Dr. Youssef and a lot of partners who came together with Dr. Youssef to present their content on the Kingdom Sat that's being translated into Arabic. So this was a big part of what's being broadcasted on the Kingdom Sat, along with selected Bible teachers from the Middle East as well.So it was a great foundation. So I came on a great foundation on a time where social media was coming, live broadcast was being introduced more and more, and when I joined, Joshua asked me, “What proposal do you have for the Kingdom Sat? What do you think?”And I presented a proposal and mainline I met with him and Dr. Youssef and said, “This is what I think. I think Kingdom Sat is a great channel, but it's more like radio. If you turn the screen off and only listen, you don't lose anything. We have a great tool. We can present visuals. We can do more. So I think it's great, but one of the things that we need to do is doing more formats, more genres. We need to reach more people—especially those who are underprivileged like women, kids, young people in the Middle East. And we need to reach out to the non-Christians. He said, “Yeah, this is our vision.” And actually Dr. Youssef said, “Yeah, actually we made a survey and this is what we reached.” And he quoted one of the friends in Egypt. He told them “the Kingdom Sat is like a big, huge, elegant department store, but you enter and you found only navy blue suits, size 42.”And he laughed at that and they said, “Yes, we want to do more.”And I started working on that, like different lines like having broadcasting live, like have live broadcasts, especially from Church of the Apostles. And this was a continuation for the people in the Middle East to know what's this vision. Who is Dr. Youssef? Who is Jonathan? Who are those singers in the Church of the Apostles? And I think that made a great connection, especially with those who don't have churches, like in Nigeria or those places—[45:25] JONATHAN: Where you're isolated and—[45:27] Farid: And they write on Facebook when we broadcast live. For example, when you're preaching they would say, “Oh Jonathan, God bless you and God bless your father. God bless the church,” as if they are there in the church. And in the communion time, they will talk “We don't have a church, so we're taking communion with you now. We're praying.”And the first time in Easter 2018 it was the first time to do live, God encouraged us by two Arabic speakers in the Middle East giving their lives to the Lord. So it was encouragement so we started that once a month, then during the COVID time, we started to do it on a regular basis. So it's a great blessing to have these live broadcasts. And we started to introduce a lot of digital platforms, like Apple TV, Roku, Smartphone application. We updated the website and streaming. So we started to add more genres, add more partners from the west and east, so a lot of things happened.And today the Kingdom Sat reaches 260 million households in the Middle East, and they receive this ministry for free. And anyone with an internet connection can receive the content of the Kingdom Sat.[46:47] JONATHAN: And let's talk a little bit about the follow-up process, because you have people that are standing by phones to answer calls. What are some of the questions and feedback that you get from the broadcast?[47:03] Farid: A lot of viewers are very true seekers, even those from Muslim background, and they are faithful. They really seek God. So they send questions, sometimes in a provoking way, sometimes attacking, but they keep watching. They will attack one time, and then the field team would respond to them in a graceful way and helping them, so they would come back, watch again, and raise another question. And we have great testimonies of those viewers that only watched by chance the Kingdom Sat, they watch some program, and they would keep interacting with us until they become Christians, they commit their lives to the Lord, and they get baptized. Then they join an online study group for discipleship or we would connect them with a local church. So this is one type of persons, those true seekers. And as I said, it changes from very extreme attackers to true seekers that are ready to accept Christ.And the second persona we serve is the new believers. Some people knew the Lord through the Kingdom Sat or online or somewhere else but they don't have a place to grow.[48:37] JONATHAN: They need discipleship, yeah.[48:39] Farid: Yeah, and not to compare, but the Kingdom Sat is very distinct about presenting biblical teaching, solid. Other ministries would present this shallow content that we spoke about. So that's the second persona, like new believers. Third persona is mature believers who are in ministry, for example, and they want to grow, they want to learn. And some of those viewers would write, for example, in YouTube, “I am watching the series so-and-so for Dr. Youssef. Where is episode number 15? I want to finish it tonight!”[49:19] JONATHAN: We're on top of you. That's right.[49:21] Farid: So they are the three main personas. There are subcategories, but we have a great field team that is dealing 24/7 with any viewer who has a question or he wants a prayer request or they ask even other, general questions.[49:39] JONATHAN: And what's the risk for those people that are on the ground, field team workers? I mean, you're working in a hostile environment. It's not like you're in Oklahoma fielding calls. You're in the thick of it.[49:54] Farid: That have the same risk I faced. And yeah, I mean, but again what I experienced. They are also in the protection of God. But they could be charged, they could be persecuted, detained, or all this could happen in an indirect way by the community, by their families. But this doesn't stop them. Most of those in the field team are coming from a Muslim background, have theology degree, so that's their life goal, their vision.[50:39] JONATHAN: Well Farid, your story is just … it's fascinating to me the beginning with the drama, you coming to the West, coming to America, then going back, facing the adversities, then coming back here and now you're presenting on a global stage the very thing that led you to the Lord. And we're just so thankful for the work that you do and the work of the Kingdom Sat. And we're so grateful that you took the time to sit with us and share your story here on Candid Conversations. Thank you for being with us.[51:13] Farid: Thank you, Jonathan. It's an honor to be here, and it's great to be in the kitchen how things are done here. And I see the hand of the Lord every day in this, in your family, in the ministry of the Church of the Apostles, Leading The Way, and it's God work and I'm very grateful to be here.[51:35] JONATHAN: Well, we're grateful for you. Thank you, Farid.[51:36] Farid: Thank you.

Shownotes and Transcript Tera Dahl has just returned from 3 weeks in Israel where she was reporting for Real America's Voice and Bannon's WarRoom.  Tera returns to Hearts of Oak to share her time travelling throughout the country.  She spent time with soldiers from the IDF, with civilians who are regularly having to use their shelters for protection and with those living in Gaza.  Tera has seen the war up close and her experiences are fresh and raw. Tera Dahl served as Senior Advisor in the Conflict, Prevention and Stabilization Bureau (CPS) at USAID as a political appointee during the Trump Administration. She also served as Deputy Chief of Staff at the National Security Council (NSC) working in the White House under the Trump Administration. She has advised members of congress, staff, and policymakers on complex national security and foreign policy issues. She served as a national security senior advisor to Congresswoman and former Presidential candidate Michele Bachmann. She has travelled extensively overseas to areas of conflict and war, raising awareness and reporting from an on-the-ground and frontline perspective, giving a voice to the voiceless. She has helped produce several documentaries going into dangerous situations to uncover the truth and shine a light on darkness. She has spent time camping out on the frontlines embedded with the Peshmerga forces in Northern Iraq during the war against ISIS, on the frontlines with the IDF on the Gaza border, backpacking through the jungles of Burma with fleeing and persecuted Burmese ethnics, and has embedded with U.S. Marines in Helmand Province, Afghanistan. She has travelled to Afghanistan, Iraq, Nigeria and throughout the Middle East providing humanitarian and medical assistance. She volunteered with the American Red Cross to serve and support U.S. troops overseas during the Global War on Terrorism. Follow Tera on Instagram   https://www.instagram.com/tera_dahl/ Interview recorded 11.12.23 Connect with Hearts of Oak... WEBSITE            https://heartsofoak.org/ PODCASTS        https://heartsofoak.podbean.com/ SOCIAL MEDIA  https://heartsofoak.org/connect/ Support Hearts of Oak by purchasing one of our fancy T-Shirts....  SHOP                  https://heartsofoak.org/shop/ *Special thanks to Bosch Fawstin for recording our intro/outro on this podcast. Check out his art https://theboschfawstinstore.blogspot.com/ and follow him on GETTR https://gettr.com/user/BoschFawstin and X https://twitter.com/TheBoschFawstin?s=20  Transcript (Hearts of Oak) Tera Dahl, it's wonderful to have you back with us. Thanks so much for joining us today. (Tera Dahl) Thank you, Peter, for having me.  Always good to have you. Of course, people can catch you on somewhere where I never delve, which is Instagram, https://www.instagram.com/tera_dahl/ That I think is the best place to find you, Tera. Yes, it is. Yeah.  Apart from on War Room regularly and Real America's Voice. Real America's Voice.  Obviously, all of that. And I know that many of the viewers will have seen your couple of weeks actually long postings from Israel and I'm really delighted that you made the time today to come on and to share some of those experiences because I think you talked to a lot of commentators, military experts, politicians, but actually to talk to someone who's been there on the ground is fairly rare, I think. So, I'm looking forward to finding out, but to tell us how do you get there? I guess you don't just get a, there are lots of flights cancelled. So I guess it's not just a case of going and booking a ticket with any regular airline, is it? You can get there. I went to Greece and then from Athens, then I flew into Israel, but the airlines are limited now. Definitely the US airlines are limited, they do not fly out of Israel. There's options to fly There's a lot of flights still that are coming in and out, but the airport in Tel Aviv was very quiet, but there was more, I think more people and more flights than I anticipated. Okay, what was the conversation? Cause you're, you're no stranger to going to, to war zones. when I was last over after my WarRoom slot, Steve was regaling me with stories of him talking to you in far flung places. So I guess most people would think, oh, it sounds a bit iffy, but for you, it's part of the job, I guess. Yeah, I was in Israel. I have been. I was in Israel in 2014 to cover the Gaza conflict, the war between Israel and Hamas in 2014 for Breitbart News. And that's when I really saw like I had been traveling around the Middle East during the Arab Spring. I had been to Afghanistan and Iraq, really, you know, on the ground with the war on terrorism, but especially especially during the Arab Spring prior to going to Israel in 2014. And really, I just kind of fell into that because I was on the ground in Egypt during the counter revolution when you had the 30 million Egyptians go to the street to call for Mohammed Morsi's ouster, the Muslim Brotherhood's ouster in Egypt. And I saw the way that the media was portraying that situation and how the media was impacting our policy. And I saw that it was impacting the Pentagon. It was impacting Congress because that's how they viewed it. That was their lens on the situation. And so that's how I started to really understand the need for accurate reporting on the ground. Because unless you're on the ground and you really understand the dynamics, you just read what the headlines are. And then you follow the headlines and then you base your decisions upon the headlines. So when you look at Israel, you look at the headlines, you look at the mainstream media. And it always has been going back to 2014 and going back to the Arab Spring and just the coverage from the mainstream media has been pro-Islamist. And that's what I noticed. I noticed that back in 2012, 2013, they were very much pro-Muslim brotherhood. And so when you look at Israel, you look at the war with Hamas, obviously Hamas is the military arm of the Muslim Brotherhood. That is the mainstream media and the angle of it has been very pro-Hamas and anti-Israel, restraining Israel. And so it was so important when I was there in 2014 because I saw that how the mainstream media and a lot of times they report from Gaza. So you have the mainstream media reporters that are actually in Gaza. Well, if you're reporting from Gaza and you're surrounded by Hamas, you're not going to be very pro-Israel. It's going to impact your reporting because you're afraid for your life for one thing. But you also have, it's just the angle of the mainstream media. And so going on the ground for this war, I knew because I had already covered the Middle East conflicts in the war that it's so important to get that perspective, because of you can't just follow the headlines and you're seeing how tainted it is for an example at the hospitals. You know how Hamas uses hospitals and then when Israel hits back at the hospital. Then it's Israel's fault and they get charged with war crimes. Well, actually Hamas uses hospitals and schools for their military headquarters and they launched their rocket attacks from the hospitals, from the schools, and they used the children. And so, Peter, when I went there, I knew it's so important to be able to get on the ground and to be able to write accurately of what's happening. And that's exactly what I saw. And that definitely was worthwhile because it changes your perspective. Can I just ask you, just before getting on to what it was like there, I'm sure the viewers would be curious in how you prep for that, because you're not going into a normal environment. It's not just a tourist or a journalist going to report on an event. It's into a very dangerous situation. How do you prepare? Was it that you had contacts before? Is it Real America's voice making those contacts? Because obviously you don't want to land on the ground and then begin to spend your time building up those contacts and knowing who to speak to. So how do you kind of go about preparing for that? I think with any time that I've travelled overseas in the Middle East, you know contacts, you reach out to them, you reach out to your mutual friends that have contacts in Israel, and then you just kind of start with who you know, and then you build off of that. And that's exactly what, too, on this trip. You have your contacts that I've had through my friends here, and then you let people know that you're coming over, I've been there before, and then you just build on that. And when you're on the ground, it just opens up opportunities because you just build your contacts, your networking on the ground. And one of the important parts of that was going up into the north. I was able to go up into the northern part of Israel with the Christian community. So I wasn't only, I was able to see, spend time with the Arab Muslims that are joining the IDF. I spoke with them. I spoke with the Christian community that also served in the IDF. And of course, the majority of the Jewish community, but I was able to get all those different perspectives. So when we talk about building those contacts, it's important that you meet with all sides. And I've always done that. Like when I went to Syria, as well, I met with the opposition first, who were trying to overthrow Assad, and then I went into Damascus and saw the other side. So that's kind of just how I've always done it is and I depend on the locals, I mean, for someone, I guess, as a woman, going by myself. I definitely, you know, you just have to have your faith in God, and then you just trust people, and you just build contacts and you just build relationships. And what were you kind of expecting when you went out? Because this current situation is simply because Israel have not dealt with the problem previously. And this time Netanyahu I think feels and probably has to actually deal with Hamas living on their border. But what were you kind of expecting when you went over? Because I guess every war situation is different. The relationships with the countries around, the population. The sleeper cells they have, there are so many moving parts to the situation. And what kind of were you expecting before you headed out? I think I knew what to anticipate because I had been there to cover it previously, so I knew what to expect. But as far as when we talk about preparing for this, like going into Israel, you would think there's so many people that were traveling there. I think one of the highest tourism times before everything got cancelled, it was just they were packed with tours. And one thing that is always, since I went there before a couple times, and then now this trip, is that Israel is constantly living under siege. So as, you know, like for me going to visit during a war time, this is the normal for them, Peter. This is how they live. They live under siege. They live every single house, every building, since you land in the airport, has a shelter. No matter where you are, every single place you're at, whether it's a restaurant, whether it's a home, if it's a school, if it's a playground, they all have shelters. And just think about how abnormal that is, is that they get hit. Since Hamas launched the attack on October 7th, they've been hit with 10,000 rockets from Hamas. 10,000 rockets. But it is the normal life for them. And the Iron Dome intercepts the majority of them. But when the Iron Dome does not intercept them, the shrapnel kills people. If that rocket hits, that can take out like a huge, that could kill so many people, those rockets, and they take, you know, you take it for granted because of the Iron Dome. But there's multiple times, even like when I was there for my limited time, that if it wasn't for the Iron Dome, you know, you would have probably, you would have been hit by that, you would have been impacted by the shrapnel. But it's that's not normal. So what they consider normal is not normal. So they constantly so like for me to say, you go over there and it looks like, wow, you're going into a war zone. That's how they live. You know, that's how they live every day of their lives. Their children have to play in playgrounds that are actually shelters because they want the kids to make it, you know, they don't want kids to feel like they're constantly under war and to live in fear. So what they do is they build their playgrounds as shelters. So when the kids are playing in the tunnels, it's actually a shelter for the kids. And so they only have a few seconds when they hear those sirens go off to be able to go into their shelters But that's normal for them So that's something that like it never surprises me just to see how they live their normal their daily lives going to school. Going to their synagogues. Just living their lives going to work and but yet they're constantly under rocket attack, constantly. And even the day after that I left, there was a terrorist attack right in Jerusalem. And that's just, that's how they live. Well, in Israel, there are different parts of the society which engage in this situation differently. You have the military. Maybe you want to just give us some of your thoughts or experiences you were talking to the military, because they are actually on the front line. They're the ones that are trying to remove this, which has been a continual threat against Israel, Hamas. And I saw some of the interviews you had with different individuals in the military. Tell us about those conversations with the military. Well, I think the military is they're very much focused and they're determined and they're resolute on eliminating Hamas. And they're not only on eliminating Hamas, but also Hezbollah. You have to keep in mind too that Hezbollah there's 60 000 Israeli citizens that were evacuated out of the north and another 70 000 that were evacuated out of the south and they're all living in the hotels right now. So you have tens of thousands over, almost 200,000 Israeli citizens that are evacuated right now because of the threat from Hamas and because of the threat from Hezbollah. And so, but their perspective, what they were saying is that they're first focusing on Hamas and they're going to eliminate Hamas because just like in 2014, when they were resolute on eliminating Hamas, and then because of the international pressure, a lot because of the Obama administration. They pulled back and they stopped. Well, look what's happened now, look at what has happened because they didn't finish Hamas back in 2014 or 2021 again and then look at how they use that ceasefire from 2021 basically Hamas was in a ceasefire since 2021 and instead of honouring that ceasefire they used it to rebuild rearm and and plan October 7 and so that's what happens when they say a ceasefire They're rebuilding and rearming and then that's what happened. So you have no option. The military has no option. Israel has no option but to eliminate Hamas and they also have the threat from Hezbollah. So we just to keep in mind to that Hezbollah had, so Hamas used Hezbollah's plan that they have had for over 10 years to invade northern Israel and take hundreds of Israelis hostage, which would put pressure then on the Western countries. That was their plan. And they did drills. They did, planned, like they did the planned training. Previously, back in May 2023, there's video of Hezbollah doing these mock trainings, where it was the same attack that Hamas did on October 7th. And so Hezbollah is a greater threat than Hamas. But the threat right now, the immediate threat, from what my understanding is, is Hamas. They have to eliminate Hamas first, but they will have to deal with Hezbollah. And they'll have to go back to the UN 1701, where Hezbollah is north of Israel. So they're not on the Israeli border and it has to be enforced by the UN but they're gonna have to deal with the threat from Hezbollah because they have the same plan and those, Thousands of Israelis will not move back home until the threat from Hezbollah is completely eliminated as well. So they are getting attacked on all fronts and not to mention the attacks that are coming from the West Bank as well. And that's what I've heard too is that you know, people are asking why how did they miss it the intelligence failure? And it was the biggest intelligence failure. They're saying since 1973. Well, they were focused so much on the West Bank. They were focused so much on the threat from Hezbollah. And they were also allowing thousands and thousands of the Gazan civilians to come in every single day on work visas. And those Gazans that were coming in on work visas turned against Israel. And a lot of them were the ones that were mapping out the exact locations for Hamas's attack on October 7th. So that's what I learned talking to people. Probably one of the most things that I took away was that they realized how wrong they were for this two-state solution, and living in peace side by side because they totally use what they were given to the Gazan civilians because the Gazan civilians, 70% of them support Hamas, and they use that against Israel. And they use that opportunity where they were coming in on work visas, getting money, and they were the ones to turn against Israel and with all of the maps and the locations and commit that atrocious attack. So that is another takeaway, but I have a lot to say on the Gazan civilians too. Well, let me touch on, there's just one other thing you talked about, the military and the country, I guess, was living in a false sense of security because the borders have been fairly peaceful. You've got economic relationships warming up between countries around. And you haven't actually, it's been a long time since I remember hearing of a suicide bomber in Israel on buses or trains which used to hear of fairly often. That seems to be have been eradicated and with the borders more secure than before. Was it simply just a false sense of security? Israel thinking actually we've got economic benefits. And that's going to trump any in-built religious hatred which exists. Yeah, I think it was a false sense of security. And I think a lot too was that they were allowing those, the Gazans to come in on those work visas. And they just didn't think that they would do something, you know, to turn against them when they were allowing so thousands and thousands of them to come in. And one of the, what really stuck out to me was the kibbutz's that were the most attacks, the worst attack that took place, the majority of them were the kind of thinking they call them the liberal, the leftist, because they were, they were the ones reaching out, you know, to the Gazan civilians, to Hamas. Some of them, one example was a lady who used, not only one lady, but there were other women as well, that would, for years, would bring in the civilians to the hospitals and take care of the children in Gaza, and they murdered her. And they murdered a lot of the people at the kibbutz who were the ones that believed that you could live side by side, the ones that believed that you could have that peace. And that is something that even people that believed for years and years and had been involved in some of the peace agreements. They said that was their biggest eye-opener, is how wrong they were, how wrong they were that you could have that two-state solution, and live side-by-side because they want to wipe Israel off the face of the earth. And that was a big wake-up call. And that's why I think the perspective is so different. And I heard that there has never been more of a unity within Israel to annihilate and eliminate Hamas than there is now. They said over 99% of Israel is all unified, that you have to eliminate Hamas. So not only Hamas, but Hezbollah in the north as well. Let me come back to you on Israeli failing. You mentioned you've got a lot to say on the actual people living in Gaza. I don't even want to call them Palestinians, but I will not even delve down that rabbit hole. But those living in Gaza, they seem to, well, the world seems to want to blame Israel for the problems happening in Gaza under Hamas and the world doesn't seem to actually have any issues with Hamas being the government and democracy not functioning all of that and and it seems as though the people there certainly the media tell us that all their ire and anger is against Israel for their problems and not against Hamas. Tell us about kind of what the conversations, what you learned about actually those people living in Gaza. That was something that I learned right away when we were at the kibbutz. They were talking about how people aren't mentioning, and they weren't talking about the 3,000 Gazan civilians that broke in and breached the wall after Hamas made the initial breach. There were thousands of Gazan civilians, Palestinians, that came in and they stole trucks from the kibbutz's, and they stole and they looted within. They took TVs and they stole things and those were the civilians. And so you see all these pro-Palestinian protests and they're not pro-Palestinian. If they were pro-Palestinian, why doesn't Jordan take them in? Why doesn't Egypt take them in? Why don't these Arab countries take in these Palestinians that they seem to care so much about? Why? They don't want them. Nobody wants the Palestinians because they're 70% pro-Hamas and they're indoctrinated since they're children, which I'd love to touch on the UNHCR funding too, the UN funding where this indoctrination is happening at the schools and it's being funded by the US, by the EU, by the European countries, right? By the Western world for this indoctrination in these schools that is bringing up these little kids to kill Israelis. So the Arab countries, they don't want them, But yet, in the whole world, everybody, it seems to be pro-Palestinian, but they're not pro-Palestinian. They're pro-Hamas and they're anti-Israel. That's what that is. So I don't even call them pro-Palestinian rallies or protests. That's not what they are. They're not pro-Palestinian. They're anti-Israel and they're pro-Hamas. Yeah, we've seen that here. The people there, because the media can tell us that it's sad that the people in Gaza, and obviously you have many civilians caught up in this, civilians on both sides and no one wants a war situation. It's not good for any country but Israel didn't choose this. But you look at the people in Gaza and on one side it's the poor people there, they're living under a difficult government but you've been to Arab Spring, different demonstrations. I know I've had many conversations with those who had lived behind the Iron Curtain in Eastern Europe. You have uprisings, you have people uprising to overthrow those above them. And that may not be easy. And maybe me speaking as a Brit, it's easy for me to say that, but that's how history works. And surely the same thing should work in Gaza. If the people are unhappy with those above them, then they should overthrow them. Yeah. And I think actually you're seeing more of that right now. You're seeing where these Hamas members are surrendering in the masses. And I think you're seeing more of the people starting to turn against Hamas. But even like when you look at the statistics and the polling, you have 73% of the people that live in Gaza, the Palestinians, they support Hamas. They're Hamas sympathizers. And a lot of that has to do with the indoctrination and the schooling since they're kids. You see the videos of these children who have, you know, machine guns and they're taught and they're raised to just hate Israelis and they're honoured if they murder Israelis and that's their indoctrination. So you've got to break that ideology. You know, you can definitely eliminate Hamas as an organization, but it's an ideology that you really have to come against, which we've done in the past. You know, look at what we did with Germany and Japan. So you can come against an ideology and that's what you have to do. And so that is, yeah, that is a whole different conversation. Looking at how the people live, that is all, as you pointed out, it's all funded by the West. That perpetual hatred, that perpetual tension, when we have politicians talk about they want peace, but at the same time they're funding a terror organisation and keeping that pocket of evil right on the edge ready to kick off. You're right it does seem to be that the West are guilty of what has happened. The UN is funding it. The UN is funding that ideology. The Western world is funding it. The United States is funding it and under the Trump administration they cut that funding to UNRWA. They cut the hundreds of millions of dollars to UNHCR and Biden immediately restarted that funding again. And that funding goes directly to Hamas and it goes directly to funding that ideology and that's taking place in that school. So if you want to start with one thing to cut, which we could do right now, is eliminate UNHCR, completely eliminate UNHCR, and cut that funding that's going to UNHCR. But right now they're launching, UNHCR has literally launched a Hamas campaign. That's what they're doing. They are the spokespeople for Hamas and when you look them up and you look at the campaign that they're doing right now. You will see how they are basically launching a campaign and it's with US funding and it's with UN funding. So just think of that. We're funding Hamas's campaign. UNHCR, tell us what that stands for.  UN Refugee Program Agency. Okay, that does explain a lot. You mentioned about the Israeli people and a unity behind the government and the military. That hasn't always been the case, and certainly I've seen a lot of self-hatred, maybe mostly from Israelis and Jews who live abroad and look back. But with that unity, then that possibly does mean the job can be done. May tell us about that, your conversations with people. About the unity that's happening in Israel right now? That is something they said, They're 99% unified and Israel too, they were having, they were so divided pre, and this other people will say, well, because the country was so divided before the Hamas attack over the judicial reforms. That was the big focus in Israel. That was really dividing the country. But after this Hamas attack, everyone has been saying they have never seen more unity. And when you get to Israel, that's what you see. You see the Israeli flags all over the country, every building, all the roads. I mean, every car has an Israeli flag. It's that, like you're unified. It was like, it reminded me of September 11th, you know, after September 11th, every single American flag was sold out. Everybody was unified. They were against terrorism and they were unified as a nation and a world. The whole global community was unified. And that's where I don't understand why you're not seeing that now with Hamas attack. Hamas is ISIS. Hamas is ISIS. It's the same funding, it's the same ideology, it's the same groups, the same kind of the countries that are behind it, the terrorist organization, the tactics, the beliefs, the ideology, all of it's the same. So Hamas is ISIS. And the attacks that they did against the Israeli citizens when they killed babies, when they cut open pregnant women, when they raped women multiple times and then burn their bodies, they beheaded people. I mean, that's ISIS. You can't even fathom having anyone that would even think that they could support Hamas right now or support ISIS. Just think of that if you had ISIS supporters, think of the difference in the perspective that you would see if you had all of these students protesting for ISIS, you wouldn't see that. And if you held ISIS beliefs, you would be prosecuted, right? The FBI is going to be hunting at your door if you showed any kind of sympathy with ISIS. But why are they not doing that with Hamas? Hamas is ISIS. Hamas is a designated terrorist organization. They come from the same sources. There's no difference in them, but yet we're allowing this like pro-Hamas. Even in our campuses, sentiment. I mean, you should have the FBI at the door, even having that, just like it was with ISIS. You should have that same mentality towards Hamas. There's no reason in the 21st century to have a terrorist organization that commits those kind of barbaric, inhumane acts. I mean, there's just no, there's no space for that. There should be zero tolerance for that. And the world should be united as we were all united with the United States on 9-11 when we all came together, you know, for the war on global terrorism. That's what we're dealing with. This is a global war on terrorism. That's what we're fighting right now. And there should be no divide in that. And yet you're seeing it all over, especially in the UK. Oh yeah, in the UK. I want to pick up on some of the military in the north and Hezbollah and surrounding, but let me ask you about that world support or pressure, how the media have responded. Europe have always had a very uneasy relationship with Israel. Europe have traditionally sided with Arab nations against Israel. America is quite different and America has generally been a bastion of support for Israel right from the beginning, from the modern day state. But what is that like because you have in campuses, as you see here I guess in the States, a lot of pro-Hamas, pro-Palestinian, because people don't know any better. But generally the media, up until, they're still generally holding to be more pro-Israel, although you see that beginning to slip. And with the BBC, it maybe lasted a few days before it slipped, but I think in the US, it's lasted a lot longer. Tell us about that, because not only is there a military war but there's a PR and media war as well. Yeah, and that was where I think it's starting to shift. I think right away there was all of that pressure and people saw that. I think the social media, China was behind a lot of that on TikTok. They were fomenting a lot of that anti-Israel. I think China was a lot behind that, especially on TikTok social media. But I think you're seeing it start to swing now. And I think because people, when they see the videos and when they see it themselves, I think you can't defend it like it was so barbaric and inhumane what they did. No one can defend it so I think that's the difference that you're seeing and that's why it's starting to shift is because It is ISIS and when you when you see what how just that's why, when Hamas did this like 2014 when they launched the rockets and the war in 2014 it was very different because you just look at what, they targeted civilians, they targeted babies, they targeted women, and then they kidnapped them, they kidnapped babies, they kidnapped young little kids. And so that I think people are seeing that anyone that is a human being, right, that has any kind of understanding or emotion, common sense, you have to condemn it. There's just zero tolerance for that. And I think people are starting to see that. And that's why it's important for the actual videos and the reporting to happen, because Hamas is launching this massive information campaign, massive information war, which they've always done. You know, they've always done. And that's why you're seeing even pushback on the mainstream media. You know, when just for a perfect example, I think several weeks ago when you had, Shiva hospital and it was and they were saying that it was Israel that hit it right and it was Hamas but yet look at the condemnation because of the false reporting and they had to push back and to be able to report the truth and you have members of Congress. Rashid Talib, you know who was still not even believing Israel when all the evidence was there, even when the Biden administration themselves, you know came out and said no it wasn't Israel. It was Hamas you know, you still had a member of Congress who was coming out there and spewing these lies against Israel because she's, you know, she's part of that false campaign against Israel. And so I think you can't dispute the evidence. You just can't. No matter what, you just cannot dispute the evidence. And I think that's the information war that Israel is, they still have to battle it. They absolutely have to battle it. And that's why it was important to go on the ground too, because you have to see it yourself. You've got to report it first-hand. And if people were to see what I saw in the kibbutz's and what I heard, that's what will change your perspective. That's what will make you see. And that's why it is so important for the media to report it accurately. Tera, you touched on the opposition in the left in politics, in the media, and we see that as well in Europe and the UK and our media is dominated by those on the left and politics that are on the left. But we're all seeing another curious, I guess, voice come up and that's the voices that have appeared over the last kind of three, three and a half years on the COVID tyranny, demanding freedoms, angry at the restrictions we faced. And there's a lot of anger amongst that group, certainly against Israel, because of how it locked down more than anyone else before. It only allowed one vaccine to be used, the Pfizer vaccine. You didn't have any right to have anything else. It seemed to be a test bed, an experiment. And I think a lot of that anger against Israel, what's happened the last three, four years under that tyranny, has boiled over into hatred of Israel and Jewish haters. And I've realised a lot of those groups are maybe more in the left and they've traditionally had that hatred of Israel. And you see it popping up time and time again, groups that I would be surprised at. I don't know where, are you having that in the US or is the opposition traditionally from the left on the politics and the media? The left and the politics and the media. I think you have, the United States, you have such strong support for Israel. The evangelical church supports Israel. Democrats, Republicans, it's really dividing the Democratic Party. You've got very staunch pro-Israel Democrats, and the Republican Party has always been very pro-Israel. And so I think you do see it on the left. I think you do see it in that more of the Muslim Brotherhood, I think, influence the college campuses is probably the loudest where it's coming from. But again, that's where you have to look at the sources of that. I don't think it comes from the COVID lockdowns. If you're pro-Israel, you know, you just, for me, it's my faith, you know, God will bless Israel. Those that bless Israel be blessed. Those that curse Israel be cursed. And so you support Israel. And it's not because of who the politicians are, it's not who's in office at the time, it's because God blesses those that bless Israel, and you stand with Israel. And it's a biblical mandate. And I know that's where my position stems from, is I'm going to honour God, and I'm going to stand with Israel. And it's not because of the politicians or who's in power or what their policies are. I agree, that's 100% of where I come from, happily call myself a Christian Zionist because of what the Bible teaches. But then you talk to a non-Christian and you say, well, do you pick Hamas or Israel? Take your choice and don't tell me you want to live in Israel because of freedoms, but really want to hate Israel. And that's, yeah, wanting the freedoms, but yet hating it. It's like wanting a pride parade through Gaza. Well, go for it. You could be the first, and I want to be there to film it and see what happens. You have tolerance and freedom in one country across the board, and yet across the border, not only across the border into Gaza, but in West Bank, in many of the surrounding countries, you have little freedoms. Yeah, yeah, you do, you do. But they're a young country, 75 years old. And so they're still growing and like when you look at Israel, it's a miracle, right? Like it's an absolute miracle everything about Israel is miraculous. It was a desert and it's turned into a green land and is you know rivers and streams and lush and green trees and even just being there and you just see how beautiful Israel is and it's the hand of God and it's miraculous and there's no way that anything that Israel could have existed if it wasn't for God's providence in that country and his hand in doing it. 100%. You touched on, just coming near the end, you touched on the north and obviously the Gaza Strip is southwest. You've got the West Bank to the east and you've got up there in the northern border, Lebanon and Syria. You've got two countries which are failed states in effect and with Hezbollah. I mean for a country and a military to be fighting war on one side, but yet they must be ready and prepared at a moment's notice to open up that on a second front. It's horrendous, horrendous pressure and so far it has held off on the North, but as you say, they will have to deal with that. But the Israeli military have shown time and time again that they are able to fight on many fronts, in 48 and in 73, to attack, to fight on every single front and to be able to push that back. But that kind of, maybe touch on that, that constant state of readiness that has to be there. Everything can't just go to Gaza, it has to be prepared, not only in the North Hezbollah, but also on the West Bank border as well. And they are, you know, when I was there too, the IDF was, Hezbollah would launch rockets at Israel and Israel would respond. So they're well positioned to be able to respond to Hezbollah, to be able to eliminate the threat from Hezbollah. Just from what, you know, like, what I was told is that they're going to focus on the closest threat, the immediate threat, and that's eliminating Hamas, because, and that's also a quicker operation than Hezbollah. Hezbollah has about 150,000 rockets. They are a much, much stronger, well-equipped, dangerous force than Hamas. Obviously, they're backed by Iran. But the one thing I think that Israel has right now is like the U.S. Warships have been deployed, and they're not doing, actually, they're not doing the deterrence that they should do. Obviously, our troops in the region have been attacked now, over 70 times every day they're adding to the attacks that are going on right now. So the US needs to do much more deterrence to hold Iran at bay and to prevent Hezbollah from joining the war fully. But I think what's the number one thing right now that is preventing Hezbollah is that Lebanon and the civilians in Lebanon do not want Hezbollah to join the war because they're the ones that will be eliminated. And just like Hamas uses the schools and the civilians and the homes as their headquarters, as their military headquarters, and they hold their rockets and that's where they launch all their attacks and use it as their headquarters, that's exactly what Hezbollah does in Lebanon. And they do it as well in the Christian communities in Lebanon. Then they use the schools and they hold the civilians hostage and they use the civilians as their hostages just like they do. You don't hear about it as much, but that's exactly what's going on in Lebanon. And that's what Hezbollah is doing. They're hiding their rockets in these schools, in the hospitals. So, Lebanon does not want Hezbollah to join this war. And the civilians don't, because when the IDF, then Hezbollah will launch an attack from a Christian community, a village, or an area. And that happened when I was there. They launched it from a Christian area, and then the IDF will respond. And then it makes it look like the IDF is hitting a church. Well, no. Hezbollah was using that church as their headquarters at their launching pad to launch these rocket attacks. So of course, the IDF is going to respond to eliminate the threat, they have to. But that's the tactics that they use. And so I think if you put pressure on Lebanon, and obviously, the Hezbollah has, you know, power and control in Lebanon, but I think that's where you could really deter Hezbollah. And the UN could deter Hezbollah as well, like they already passed in 2006, the UN Resolution 1701 to be able to push Hezbollah up past the Latani River, so they're not on the Israeli border, but it's not being enforced. Hezbollah attacks the UN forces because there's not enough, they attack them. I've seen the videos of them attacking their trucks. So Hezbollah dominates in that area, and they're not even supposed to be in that area. So there are things already that exist that just are not being enforced that could really prevent from Israel having, or from that the Northern Front, really being an all-out war? Just finish off on, where Israel goes the future, because Israel has to come out of this stronger. It has to come out of this having defeated Hamas, and whatever that means for Gaza, that will have to be for others to decide. But militarily and security-wise, has to come out the stronger. And then politically, how do you see that happening? Because Israeli politics has always been fractured. And what Benjamin Netanyahu, who's the great survivor, being what PM, differences a third or fourth time now since 96. And obviously that has to pass over at some point, kind of how did you pick up on that political, obviously there's support for him, what he's doing, he needs to come out of this with a strong legacy, and I guess someone else has to also come up and continue his, I guess his boldness and determination to fight for Israel's security. So let me just touch on that, that political side, what did you feel coming away from your trip on that? I think Israel will come out stronger. I think that you will see something different in Gaza, Hamas will be eliminated and what that is, I didn't get the sense that Israel wants to take over Gaza. I think they don't want to do that. I think you'll have the sovereignty of Israel, you'll have the sovereignty of Israel involved but will that include security will that include Arab countries, you know, you hear talks about maybe Saudi Arabia the UAE. One country that that I don't think should have any Impact at all is Qatar. Qatar should have absolutely no influence in Gaza because Qatar is the Muslim Brotherhood. They are the problem and they should be sanctioned, you know the international community should be sanctioning Qatar but if you have like an Arab force, if you have a UN peacekeeping force, some kind of security, but it's Israel's sovereignty. Israel should control, it's their country, and they should have the decisions and it should be in their control to decide. It's their civilians, it's their people, it's their responsibility to keep the civilians of Israel safe and defend their country. And so the US, I mean, the pressure from the Biden administration in any kind of way against Israel to have that sovereignty, you know, that needs to be pushed back on and that you need to allow Israel to be able to have that sovereignty. And also I think the sovereignty as well over Judea and Samaria, you know, the Palestinian Authority, it's not okay for Israel to live under siege. That's not normal. And they shouldn't have to live that way. They should be able to eliminate the attacks. I mean, just think if we were in Texas and someone in Mexico, or not someone, cartels were launching attacks with rockets every day at Texan citizens. And they couldn't eliminate the threat, but instead they just had to build around it to protect themselves, right? They just had to build an Iron Dome or a defence system to be able to protect from the rockets. Instead of taking out the cartels who's launching the rockets. It makes no sense, you know, take out the threat. And so that's something that we need to get behind Israel and allow them to do that and to support them in doing that. But I think you will see a safer Israel, you'll see more sovereignty, and they should. And that's where I think the international community, I don't understand their position in pressuring for a two-state solution, because there is no two-state solution. It just doesn't exist because the Palestinian Authority is not, there is no structure. It doesn't even, it doesn't make any sense. A, it's unbiblical, right? It's against God. You don't divide God's land. Again, those that bless Israel, like America's policy, I think, is directly impacted by our decisions to bless Israel. But there is just no common sense, viable option with the Palestinian Authority. They just don't have the financial structure right now, and they want to eliminate Israel as well. Tera, really appreciate you coming along and sharing your thoughts on your trip there. So thank you so much for joining us and sharing the stories you had from your trip. Thanks. Thank you, Peter. It's so good to be with you. Thank you.

Arab Digest editor William Law is joined by regular AD newsletter and podcast contributor Maged Mandour. His book Egypt under El-Sisi: a Nation on the Edge will be published by I.B. Tauris 25 January and is the subject of today's conversation. Maged tracks Sisi's trajectory since orchestrating the 2013 coup that overthrew Mohammed Morsi and he argues that the Egyptian president is a dictator unlike any that have come before him. Sign up NOW at ArabDigest.org for free to join the club and start receiving our daily newsletter & weekly podcasts.

This week marked a painful anniversary for Egyptians - 10 years since the violence at Rabaa Square and Nahda Square. In August 2013, supporters of the ousted President Mohammed Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood had been staging protests and sit ins for almost 50 days. Hundreds of people, mostly civilians, were killed within just a few hours when Egyptian forces violently dispersed the crowds. And many more of those who witnessed the violence have faced arrests, prison terms or have fled the country in the years since. So, what has life been like for them over the past decade? #AfricaDaily

Egypt's Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry has paid an official visit to Ankara where he met his Turkish counterpart Mevlut Cavusoglu. The two ministers said they are taking concrete steps in reappointing ambassadors and will enhance cooperation to ensure stability in Libya. The meeting comes just weeks after Cavusoglu made a landmark visit to Cairo, the first of its kind in a decade. Shoukry's visit to Turkiye is his second since March when he toured the country's south in a show of solidarity following the February 6th earthquakes. Diplomatic ties between the two countries had been cut off after a 2013 coup in Egypt overthrew then-president Mohammed Morsi. But the recent meetings have raised expectations that full diplomatic relations will be restored soon. Their rapproachment follows others in the region, including Iran, which recently reopened its embassy in Saudi Arabia. Bahrain and Qatar also announced restoration of diplomatic ties, ending a years-long dispute. Guests: Jane Kinninmont Policy and Impact Director at European Leadership Network Cengiz Tomar Professor at Marmara University

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan spoke by phone with the de facto ruler of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Abu Dhabi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan. Turkey and the United Arab Emirates leaders held a phone discussion to discuss bilateral ties and regional developments, signalling further cooperative efforts to restore the years-long and damaged relations. Through their intelligence services, Turkey and the UAE were in talks to narrow their differences on several bilateral and regional issues, including the Libya crisis. After the UAE criticised Turkey's robust reaction to Abdel Fattah al- sisi, which resulted in the fall of Egypt's first elected President, Mohammed Morsi, in mid-2013, relations between the two nations had deteriorated. Radio Islam International interviewed Hassan Abdullah, TRT Journalist live from Turkey

I 2011 startet den arabiske våren. Særlig oppmerksomhet fikk revolusjonen i Egypt, hvor Det muslimske brorskap vant parlamentsvalget i 2011 og presidentvalget i 2012 ved Mohammed Morsi. Til tross for at brorskapet vant det demokratiske valget, ble bevegelsen beskyldt for å innføre et islamsk diktatur, hvoretter president Morsi ble avsatt i et militærkupp i juli 2013. Hvorfor mislyktes den egyptiske revolusjonen? Og hvordan er mulighetene for en demokratisk fremtid i Egypt? Gjest: Amal Wahab, journalist i Klassekampen.

Renaud vous emmène en Egypte, à la découverte de la musique qui fait vibrer la jeunesse du pays : le mahraganat. Né dans les quartiers pauvres du Caire, ce genre musical facilement reconnaissable : voix autotunée, mix sur-saturé et grosses percussions, fait parler de lui. C'est simple, cette musique symbole de la révolution est aujourd'hui interdite. Alors, on a laissé traîner nos oreilles dans les moindres coins de rue pour comprendre ce phénomène. Le mahraganat, une musique illégale mais avant tout inarrêtable. Faya, le podcast du global dancefloorUne émission de Renaud Brizard pour Nique – La radioRéalisation : Malo WilliamsProduction : Christophe PayetTracklist :« Ya Habibi » - Mohamed Ramadan & Gims « Mahragan El Salam » - DJ Figo & Alaa Fifty « Mahragan Es7ab Jeb Warah » - Sadat El 3almy, 50, MC & Ameen« Tearaf » - Hysa & Halabessa« Hab W Dab » - Oka & Ortega « Bent El Sultan » Ahmed Adaweyah« Hitta Minni » Hysa, Halabessa & Sweasy « El gemeza » - Marwan Pablo « Bint al-Giran » Hassan Shakosh & Omar Kamal « Alf Leila We Leila » - Oum Kalthoum« Dawla » - 3enba « Laa » - El Sawareekh « Blessed » - DJ Haram & NustaligaInvités : Molotof, Phil Battiekh et Mahmoud RefaatRéférences : Mohamed Ramadan, Gims, quartiers de Matariyya et de Medinat Al Salam, DJ Figo, Alaa Fifty, logiciel Fruity Loops, tuktuks, Hosni Moubarak, Okka & Ortega, shaabi, Ahmad Adawiyya, percussions égyptiennes (tabla, daff, riqq, sajat), boîte à rythme Roland TR-808, trap, Marwan Pablo, Wegz, Hassan Shakosh, « Bint al-Giran », maréchal Al Sissi, Mohammed Morsi, Frères musulmans, Oum Khaltoum, Mahmoud Refat, label 100copies, Phil Battiekh, Cairo Concepts, Nustaliga, DJ Plead, DJ Haram. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

On January 6, 2021, supporters of President Trump violently stormed the Capitol after attending a rally on the National Mall where Trump furiously defended his belief that the election had been "stolen" from him. Five people died. Many saw it as inevitable, a cumulation of four years of President Trump and his administration testing the invisible boundaries of American democracy. Others called it a failed coup attempt. Regardless, the violence shocked the world, with many global leaders publicly expressing their anger and sadness while maintaining their belief in the strength of American democratic institutions.rnrnBut coups are not uncommon worldwide. According to the Pew Research Center, more than 75 countries (including a few that no longer exist - Czechoslovakia, North and South Yemen, and South Vietnam) have experienced at least one successful coup since World War II. Overall, while military and self-coups are on the decline, they still occur in the modern era: in 2013, Egyptian General Abdel Fattah el-Sisi stormed the presidential palace riding his tank, toppling the first democratically civilian-elected President, Mohammed Morsi. In 2017, Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe was removed as president and party leader of ZANU-PF.rnrnIn the United States, Americans have struggled to define and comprehend what happened. Was it a riot? An uprising? A coup? And, perhaps more importantly, could it happen again? It's unfamiliar territory for a nation committed to a peaceful transfer of power.rnrnJoin us as experts discuss the what it takes to overthrow a democracy, and offer some perspectives on what happened in the United States on January 6.

durée : 00:12:45 - Le Village global - par : Frédéric Martel - Ecrivain et observateur politique, Alaa Al-Aswany s'est opposé aux Frères Musulmans de Mohammed Morsi puis au régime autoritaire d'Al-Sissi. Il est aujourd'hui en exil à New-York, alors que le président égyptien est en France pour une visite d'Etat. Entretien. - invités : Alaa Al-Aswany Écrivain

La tension gronde sur les rives du Nil où la prochaine mise à l’eau du méga barrage hydro-électrique construit par l’Éthiopie est plus contestée que jamais par l’Égypte et le Soudan. La question est examinée ce mardi lors d’une réunion de la Ligue arabe, à la demande du Caire. Chacun des pays riverains considère que sa survie dépend de cet ouvrage. En bien ou en mal ! Le Nil est vital pour l’Égypte, il lui fournit 97% de ses besoins en eau ; c’est aussi une source majeure pour le voisin soudanais. Pour ces deux pays de l’aval, le barrage c’est donc le mal, c'est pourquoi ils guerroient depuis dix ans avec l'Ethiopie pour garantir leur accès à l'eau, un bien inestimable dans cette région du globe. En revanche l’ouvrage baptisé «Renaissance» par les Ethiopiens constitue un fabuleux gisement de développement pour le pays où le fleuve prend sa source. L’Éthiopie qui s’apprête donc à commencer le remplissage des réservoirs à la saison des pluies, en juillet alors qu'il n'y a toujours pas d'accord sur la gestion des eaux. Son objectif : commencer à produire de l’électricité dès l’an prochain. À terme ce barrage fournira l’équivalent d’une fois et demie la production électrique actuelle de l’Ethiopie. De quoi couvrir la demande domestique, un foyer sur 2 est encore privé de courant, d’accompagner la prodigieuse croissance économique du pays et même de quoi exporter vers les voisins, Soudan compris. Grâce à l’hydroélectricité, l’Éthiopie deviendrait une grande puissance régionale Et ses voisins lui reprochent déjà de se comporter en pouvoir hégémonique en refusant de se soumettre à un engagement sur le passage d’un volume minimum d’eau en cas de sécheresse sévère. Avec le réchauffement climatique ce genre d’évènement va survenir de plus en plus fréquemment, une vraie calamité pour des pays aussi populeux. Les trois abritent 272 millions d’habitants et leur nombre va quasiment doubler d’ici trente ans. Cette bombe démographique rend les gouvernants égyptiens particulièrement nerveux. Les dernières discussions menées cet hiver sous l’égide de Donald Trump ont échoué. À la demande du Caire le Conseil de sécurité des Nations unies s'est saisi du dossier et hier, lundi, son porte-parole a appelé les trois pays à travailler ensemble pour résoudre pacifiquement leur différend. Va-t-on vers une guerre de l’eau ? C’est ce qu’affirme le milliardaire égyptien Naguib Sawiris. C’est un vrai risque selon Franck Galland. Cet expert des questions de sécurité lié à l’eau rappelle que lorsque Mohammed Morsi était président, une vidéo avait fuité sur YouTube, évoquant le recours à l’aviation égyptienne de combat, voire un soutien aux minorités pour alimenter les tensions en Ethiopie. Pour éviter le conflit, il faut trouver une solution financière pour aider l'Egypte. Car ce dont a urgemment besoin ce pays, suggère Franck Galland, c'est d'un plan Marshall pour limiter le recours aux eaux du Nil. Un plan pour soutenir une agriculture moins intensive, moins dépensière en eau et pour construire des stations de dessalement. Donald Trump qui avait surpris la communauté internationale en voulant jouer les médiateurs, à la demande de l’Egypte, avait inscrit sa démarche dans une perspective économique en confiant le dossier non pas au secrétaire d’Etat mais à Steven Mnuchin, chargé du Trésor. Le président américain a associé la Banque mondiale dans les négociations dans l’espoir d’aboutir à un accord avec des compensations financières pour l’Egypte. En vain, ce processus est aujourd’hui rompu. Etonnamment l'autre grande puissance très concernée par le dossier, la Chine reste très discrète. Le premier partenaire commercial de l’Ethiopie, son principal créancier bilatéral également, cherche sans doute à ménager l’Egypte dont elle s’est rapprochée depuis l’arrivée au pouvoir du général Sissi. ►En bref Aux États-Unis, Donald Trump referme la porte de l'immigration Au nom de la lutte contre le chômage les cartes vertes et certains visas de travail sont gelés jusqu'en 2021. Les cartes vertes avaient déjà été suspendues pour deux mois. Plus de 500 000 emplois qui auraient pu être accordés à des étrangers seront réservés aux Américains selon la Maison Blanche. Une décision motivée par la crise mais aussi par l'approche de l'élection présidentielle. États-Unis toujours: l'accord commercial avec la Chine est toujours d'actualité assure Donald Trump Une déclaration faite pour rassurée les marchés plombés par la petite phrase de Peter Navarro, le conseiller au Commerce international émettant des doutes sur la solidité de cet accord dit de phase 1.

As the trial of Eddie Gallagher moves forward, we decided to talk war crimes a bit.  We also discuss the arrest and prosecution of whistleblower Daniel Hale and Danny brings us into the reality surrounding the death of former Egypt president Mohammed Morsi. Enjoy the show?!  Please leave us a review right here. Contact us direct by email at fortressonahill@gmail.com Check out our t-shirt store on Spreadshirt.com Leave us a voicemail at 860-598-0570. Not a contributor on Patreon? You're missing out on amazing bonus content! Sign up to be one of our contributors today! - www.patreon.com/fortressonahill A special thanks to our honorary producers - Will Ahrens, Gage Counts, Fahim Shirazee, Henry Szamota, James Higgins, James O’Barr, Adam Bellows, Eric Phillips, Paul Appell, Julie Dupris, Kevin Fathi, and the Statist Quo Podcast.  Without you guys, we couldn't continue our work.  Thank you so much!!! Not up for something recurring like Patreon, but want to give a couple bucks?!  Visit Paypal.me/fortressonahill to contribute!! FOH is hosted and written by Chris 'Henri' Henrikson, Danny Sjursen, and Keagan Miller. FOH is produced by Chris 'Henri' Henrikson, Danny Sjursen, Keagan Miller, and Nate Bethea. Intro / outro music "Fortress on a hill" written and performed by Clifton Hicks.  Clifton's Bandcamp page; Clifton's Patreon page Cover and website art designed by Brian K. Wyatt Jr. of B-EZ Graphix Multimedia Marketing Agency in Tallehassee, FL Note: The views expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts alone, expressed in an unofficial capacity, and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, Department of Defense, or the U.S. government.

Juma hili lilishuhudia kufariki dunia kwa aliyekuwa rais wa Misri, Mohammed Morsi kiongozi aliyechaguliwa kidemokrasia akiwa mahakamani akiisikiliza kesi yake, huko DRC naibu mwenyekiti wa tume ya uchaguzi Norbert Basengezi alitangaza kujiuzulu, rais wa Marekani Donald Trump aituhumu Iran kwa kudungua ndege yake isiyo na rubani katika anga ya mashariki ya kati.   

This week Dr Jasser discusses how from “Concentration camps” to “Islamophobia”, the Red-Green axis of the Left and Islamist lobby tries to manipulate the public lexicon to control speech and prevent blasphemy even in the West. With the death of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood’s, Mohammed Morsi, we can learn a great deal from the eulogies and press releases of American Islamists. Last, Zuhdi makes some sense out of  the latest brinksmanship between the Trump administration and Iran’s theocrats. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The death of Mohammed Morsi throws into sharp relief the challenges facing modern day Egypt, and the bigger struggle to embrace democracy. Kevin Connolly reflects back on the defining moments of his presidency. Colin Freeman visits a town in the heart of Boko Haram territory in Nigeria's north-east, and learns about a new faction which has formally declared allegiance to so-called Islamic State - and adopted a new strategy. 20 years after Nato peacekeepers entered Kosovo, James Coomarasamy meets the war widows who are challenging local norms by working for a successful pickling company. Germany is grappling with the possibility a man with far-right extremist links was responsible for the shooting of one of Angela's Merkel's pro-refugee allies. Reha Kansara meets a woman who spends hours each day tackling online hate speech in the country. The warm-blooded manatee makes its way each winter to the USA's Sunshine State, but its steadily rising population was recently blighted by one of the worst cases of Red Tide - a form of toxic algae. Phoebe Smith took to the waters to encounter Florida's most loved wildlife attraction.

It was a moment that defined online activism. When tens of thousands of people came out to Cairo’s Tahrir Square to demand the end of the rule of Hosni Mubarak in January 2011, they weren’t responding to a political party or a leafleting campaign – but instead to a Facebook page. It was called “We are all Khaled Said” - in honour of a 28-year-old man who was tortured to death by Egyptian police. It was the moment when the world woke up to the true political power of social media. Wael Ghonim was one of the founders of that Facebook page - but the revolution did not go according to plan. The Muslim Brotherhood candidate Mohammed Morsi was elected president, and was then overthrown by the army. He recently died while on trial. A wave of terror attacks, a shaky security situation, a faltering economy, and increasing political repression have rocked Egypt. Earlier this year, Trending visited Wael Ghonim in one of his favourite cafes in San Francisco to talk about technology, politics, and revolution. Have the events in Egypt changed his perspective on technology and politics? Presenter: Mike Wendling (Photo Caption: Wael Ghonim / Photo Credit: BBC)

Egypt's former President, Mohammed Morsi [[MAW-see]], who was ousted by the military in 2013, has collapsed in a courtroom and died. Mr Morsi was a top official in the now-banned Islamist movement, the Muslim Brotherhood. Please listen to the full report in Pashto. - د مصر پخوانی ولسمشر محمد مرسي په کال ۲۰۱۲ کې د ياد هيواد تاريخ کې لومړي ځل لپاره ديموکراتيک ډول ولسمشر وټاکل شوه.محمد مرسي يواځې يو کال لپاره ولسمشر وه او بيا په ۲۰۱۳ کال کې له واکه لرې شو. محمد مرسي د اخوان المسلمين لوړ پوړی چارواکی وه ولې د نوموړي له زنداني کيدو وروسته د ياد تحريک فعاليت په مصر کې ځنډيدلی او پرې بنديز لګيدلی.محمد مرسي په محکمه کې ومړ.تاسو ته بشپړ رپوټ لرو چې دلته يې اوريدلی شئ.

De Egyptische oud-president Mohammed Morsi overleden - Van guerrillastrijder tot natuurbeschermer - Hoeveel loyaliteit aan de VS is verstandig?

Hoje, dia 17 de junho, um dos nomes mais importantes da história recente do Egito morreu de forma insólita: Mohammed Morsi teve um mal súbito durante um julgamento e faleceu no tribunal. As condições de sua morte ainda vão reverberar bastante, mas o episódio de hoje vem trazer contexto. Quem era Mohammed Morsi e qual foi o seu papel na última década da história egípcia? Essa é a coluna de hoje do Tanguy Baghdadi Visite o petitjournal.com.br e, no site, veja como ser nosso apoiador!

Friday, January 25, 2019 Venezuela's military says it's backing President Maduro, and it's still two minutes to Doomsday. This is TRT World’s Daily News Brief for Friday, January 25th. Stand-off in Venezuela continues The stand-off in Venezuela is continuing as the military says it's supporting President Nicolas Maduro. Opposition leader Juan Guaido triggered the crisis when he declared himself interim president on Wednesday. Protests since then by both sides have left at least 26 people dead. The UN Security Council is expected to discuss Venezuela on Saturday. UN chief urges more action on climate change The UN says we're losing the fight against climate change. Speaking to political and business leader at Davos, UN chief Antonio Guterres also said climate change was the defining issue of our time. Tshisekedi sworn in as DRC's president Felix Tshisekedi has been sworn in as president of the Democratic Republic of Congo. It was the country's first peaceful transfer of power since independence from Belgium nearly 60 years ago. The new president promised tolerance and respect for human rights in his inaugural speech. Egypt marks seventh anniversary of Mubarak's ouster Eight years ago today, Egyptians took to the streets. Two weeks later President Hosni Mubarak stepped down after thirty years in power. After Mubarak, Egyptians elected Mohammed Morsi as president. But in 2013, Abdel Fattah el Sisi ousted Morsi in a military coup and put him in jail. Since then, rights activists say that President Sisi has presided over the worst crackdown on freedoms in Egypt's modern history. 'Doomsday Clock' stays at two minutes to midnight And finally, The scientists who set the Doomsday Clock are keeping it at two minutes to midnight for this year, calling it the "new abnormal." They said the two biggest threats to the planet are climate change and nuclear weapons, made worse by political lies and information warfare. And that’s your daily news brief from TRT World... For more, head to TRTWORLD.com

Courtney Freer‘s new book Rentier Islamism: The Influence of the Muslim Brotherhood in Gulf Monarchies (Oxford University Press, 2018) contributes significantly to an understanding of one of the most controversial political groups in Middle East politics. Widely viewed as a player that cannot be excluded from the political process in the region, the Muslim Brotherhood is at the crux of political conflict, particularly in Egypt, where its president, Mohammed Morsi, was toppled in a military coup in 2013, and in the Gulf where it is at the crux of a dispute that has pitted Qatar against an alliance led by the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia.

Courtney Freer‘s new book Rentier Islamism: The Influence of the Muslim Brotherhood in Gulf Monarchies (Oxford University Press, 2018) contributes significantly to an understanding of one of the most controversial political groups in Middle East politics. Widely viewed as a player that cannot be excluded from the political process in the region, the Muslim Brotherhood is at the crux of political conflict, particularly in Egypt, where its president, Mohammed Morsi, was toppled in a military coup in 2013, and in the Gulf where it is at the crux of a dispute that has pitted Qatar against an alliance led by the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia. Courtney Freer’s study of the Brotherhood in the Gulf portrays the development of an opposition group in an autocratic environment. It also is a study of a group that operates in an environment in which one of its key appeals, the provision of social services like healthcare, is of little use because the oil-rich Gulf states introduced welfare states that offered their citizenry cradle-to-grave social security as part of the social contract. Similarly, the Brotherhood’s role as a provider of a religiously couched identity had to compete in societies with strong tribal allegiances and governments that co-opted Islam as part of their legitimization. Nonetheless, the Brotherhood played a key role in state building in the Gulf where highly educated members of the group fleeing persecution in countries like Egypt and Syria found employment, particularly in education and the judiciary. By tracing the different trajectories of the Brotherhood in the Gulf ranging from Kuwait, where an institutionalized parliamentary system allowed it to ease into mainstream politics, to the UAE, where it came go be seen as an existential threat alongside all expressions of political Islam, Freer fills a vital gap in the literature about a region that is in throes of volatile, often brutal transition. James M. Dorsey is a senior fellow at Singapore’s S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Courtney Freer‘s new book Rentier Islamism: The Influence of the Muslim Brotherhood in Gulf Monarchies (Oxford University Press, 2018) contributes significantly to an understanding of one of the most controversial political groups in Middle East politics. Widely viewed as a player that cannot be excluded from the political process in the region, the Muslim Brotherhood is at the crux of political conflict, particularly in Egypt, where its president, Mohammed Morsi, was toppled in a military coup in 2013, and in the Gulf where it is at the crux of a dispute that has pitted Qatar against an alliance led by the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia. Courtney Freer’s study of the Brotherhood in the Gulf portrays the development of an opposition group in an autocratic environment. It also is a study of a group that operates in an environment in which one of its key appeals, the provision of social services like healthcare, is of little use because the oil-rich Gulf states introduced welfare states that offered their citizenry cradle-to-grave social security as part of the social contract. Similarly, the Brotherhood’s role as a provider of a religiously couched identity had to compete in societies with strong tribal allegiances and governments that co-opted Islam as part of their legitimization. Nonetheless, the Brotherhood played a key role in state building in the Gulf where highly educated members of the group fleeing persecution in countries like Egypt and Syria found employment, particularly in education and the judiciary. By tracing the different trajectories of the Brotherhood in the Gulf ranging from Kuwait, where an institutionalized parliamentary system allowed it to ease into mainstream politics, to the UAE, where it came go be seen as an existential threat alongside all expressions of political Islam, Freer fills a vital gap in the literature about a region that is in throes of volatile, often brutal transition. James M. Dorsey is a senior fellow at Singapore’s S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Courtney Freer‘s new book Rentier Islamism: The Influence of the Muslim Brotherhood in Gulf Monarchies (Oxford University Press, 2018) contributes significantly to an understanding of one of the most controversial political groups in Middle East politics. Widely viewed as a player that cannot be excluded from the political process in the region, the Muslim Brotherhood is at the crux of political conflict, particularly in Egypt, where its president, Mohammed Morsi, was toppled in a military coup in 2013, and in the Gulf where it is at the crux of a dispute that has pitted Qatar against an alliance led by the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia. Courtney Freer’s study of the Brotherhood in the Gulf portrays the development of an opposition group in an autocratic environment. It also is a study of a group that operates in an environment in which one of its key appeals, the provision of social services like healthcare, is of little use because the oil-rich Gulf states introduced welfare states that offered their citizenry cradle-to-grave social security as part of the social contract. Similarly, the Brotherhood’s role as a provider of a religiously couched identity had to compete in societies with strong tribal allegiances and governments that co-opted Islam as part of their legitimization. Nonetheless, the Brotherhood played a key role in state building in the Gulf where highly educated members of the group fleeing persecution in countries like Egypt and Syria found employment, particularly in education and the judiciary. By tracing the different trajectories of the Brotherhood in the Gulf ranging from Kuwait, where an institutionalized parliamentary system allowed it to ease into mainstream politics, to the UAE, where it came go be seen as an existential threat alongside all expressions of political Islam, Freer fills a vital gap in the literature about a region that is in throes of volatile, often brutal transition. James M. Dorsey is a senior fellow at Singapore’s S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Courtney Freer‘s new book Rentier Islamism: The Influence of the Muslim Brotherhood in Gulf Monarchies (Oxford University Press, 2018) contributes significantly to an understanding of one of the most controversial political groups in Middle East politics. Widely viewed as a player that cannot be excluded from the political process in the region, the Muslim Brotherhood is at the crux of political conflict, particularly in Egypt, where its president, Mohammed Morsi, was toppled in a military coup in 2013, and in the Gulf where it is at the crux of a dispute that has pitted Qatar against an alliance led by the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia. Courtney Freer’s study of the Brotherhood in the Gulf portrays the development of an opposition group in an autocratic environment. It also is a study of a group that operates in an environment in which one of its key appeals, the provision of social services like healthcare, is of little use because the oil-rich Gulf states introduced welfare states that offered their citizenry cradle-to-grave social security as part of the social contract. Similarly, the Brotherhood’s role as a provider of a religiously couched identity had to compete in societies with strong tribal allegiances and governments that co-opted Islam as part of their legitimization. Nonetheless, the Brotherhood played a key role in state building in the Gulf where highly educated members of the group fleeing persecution in countries like Egypt and Syria found employment, particularly in education and the judiciary. By tracing the different trajectories of the Brotherhood in the Gulf ranging from Kuwait, where an institutionalized parliamentary system allowed it to ease into mainstream politics, to the UAE, where it came go be seen as an existential threat alongside all expressions of political Islam, Freer fills a vital gap in the literature about a region that is in throes of volatile, often brutal transition. James M. Dorsey is a senior fellow at Singapore’s S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Courtney Freer‘s new book Rentier Islamism: The Influence of the Muslim Brotherhood in Gulf Monarchies (Oxford University Press, 2018) contributes significantly to an understanding of one of the most controversial political groups in Middle East politics. Widely viewed as a player that cannot be excluded from the political process in the region, the Muslim Brotherhood is at the crux of political conflict, particularly in Egypt, where its president, Mohammed Morsi, was toppled in a military coup in 2013, and in the Gulf where it is at the crux of a dispute that has pitted Qatar against an alliance led by the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia. Courtney Freer’s study of the Brotherhood in the Gulf portrays the development of an opposition group in an autocratic environment. It also is a study of a group that operates in an environment in which one of its key appeals, the provision of social services like healthcare, is of little use because the oil-rich Gulf states introduced welfare states that offered their citizenry cradle-to-grave social security as part of the social contract. Similarly, the Brotherhood’s role as a provider of a religiously couched identity had to compete in societies with strong tribal allegiances and governments that co-opted Islam as part of their legitimization. Nonetheless, the Brotherhood played a key role in state building in the Gulf where highly educated members of the group fleeing persecution in countries like Egypt and Syria found employment, particularly in education and the judiciary. By tracing the different trajectories of the Brotherhood in the Gulf ranging from Kuwait, where an institutionalized parliamentary system allowed it to ease into mainstream politics, to the UAE, where it came go be seen as an existential threat alongside all expressions of political Islam, Freer fills a vital gap in the literature about a region that is in throes of volatile, often brutal transition. James M. Dorsey is a senior fellow at Singapore’s S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

More than two years after the overthrow of elected president Mohammed Morsi, Egyptians are going to the polls in the final stage of a promised return to parliamentary democracy. Morsi, whose government was backed by the Muslim Brotherhood, remains in jail; President Sisi, who led the overthrow of Morsi’s government, has been accused of treating his opponents harshly - and press freedoms have been severely curtailed. So, is this democratic process meaningful, or merely a veil for control by the military establishment? Join Owen Bennett Jones and his guests as they discuss Egypt’s democratic path. (Photo: Egyptian protesters. Credit: AFP/Getty Images)

Descripción: “Uno de los peores aspectos de estas teorías es que no requieren pruebas, sólo tontas "deducciones” dice un artículo publicado en la revista Daviq del Estado Islámico. “no creo que esto haya sido planificado, no sufro de manía de conspiración…” Gadafi. Tags: cospiranoico, paranoia, misterio. Ahlu-s-Sunnati wa-l-Jam??ah, shi'a del Imám Ali, escuelas y ramas del Islam, Al-Qur-ân, Sunna, Rasûl, sharia, Ilm, Din, sunnah ,dawah ,jannah ,hadith ,quaran ,god ,akhira ,prophetmuhmmad ,religion ,allahhuakbar ,paradise ,jannahismyultimategoal ,islamreminders ,muhammadsaw ,beard ,poor ,power ,freedom ,money ,instalove ,sad ,weak ,follow ,instadaily ,quoteoftheday ,islamicquotes ,quote ,instafollow ,instalike ,instamuslim, ,islamicstory ,muslim ,jinnstory ,allah ,allahuakbar ,deen ,islamic ,haqq ,ummah ,islam ,dunya ,jinn ,alhamdulillah ,subhanallah ,muslimah ,truth ,islamicpost ,astaghfirullah ,trip ,photogrid ,muhmmad ,allahswt ,instaislam ,sufficient ,islamicreminders ,muhammad ,prayer ,nikah ,hijab ,muhmmadsaw ????, ????, ?????????, ????????, Simon Elliot, Elliot Shimon, Ibrahim ibn Awad, Ibn Ibrahim Al AlBadri Arradoui Hoseini, Universidad de Bagdad, Ibrahim Awad Ali Al Badri Al Samarrai. Bagdadi, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, Califa Ibrahim, estudiantes, predicadores, ulemas. Islamic State News, Islamic State Report, Al Hayat Media Center decided, tawhid, manhaj, hijrah, jihad, and jama’ah, nasarahullah, fuqaha, Amirul-Mu’minin Abu ‘Umar al-Husayni al-Baghdadi, Ummah, leones del Estado islámico, Abu Mus'abaz-Zarqawi, imperialism, World's Second Biggest Streaming Music Service, Now Infested By Jihadis Sharing Al-Qaeda And Islamic State (ISIS), Al-Awlaki, Bin Laden Audio, Sermons To Al-Baghdadi, Nasheeds Espousing, Jihad And Martyrdom, Sound Cloud, son cloud, nasheed, Al Hayat Media Center Ibn Batutah, ceremonia, Hil-lah, Hil-la, Persia, caravanas, babilonia, golfo pérsico, mar rojo, qadisaya, sasanita, Yezdeguird, tchang-ngan, iranios, Alí ben Abu Taleb, shiismo, chiismo, imanato, Abu el Mutalib, hosein, kerbela, Nínive, saosciant, mahamud, mesías, origen. Yihadismo, aniversario, caída de Gadafi, Fuerza Aérea de Egipto, Fuerza Aérea de Libia, bombardeos, objetivos del Estado Islámico, Derna, Sirte, Ben Jawad, mediterráneo. Estado Israelobámico, Bengasi, Muammar Gaddafi, petróleo internacional, Abdel Fatah Al-Sisi, Europe 1, Matteo Renzi, Italia, ONU, rebeldes, París, Reuters, cristianos coptos, Tawadros II, secretario de Estado, Santa Sede, cardenal Pietro Parolin, Radio Vaticano, Tratado de Letrán, Paolo Gentiloni, Roberta Pinotti, François Hollande, Muammar Khadafy, Mohammed Morsi, Sameh Chukri, Badr Abdelaty, Federica Mogherini, hermanos musulmanes. Jihadi John, verdugo, célula terrorista "The Beatles, George y Ringo, soldado, sirio, James Foley, FBI, el MI5, y Scotland Yard, EIL, terrorismo, terroristas, yihadistas, manipulación mediática, paz, objetivo, desinformación, intoxicación, verdad, explosión, bomba, suicida. Benin, Camerún, Chad y Níger, la célula Ansaru, Estado islámico en Nigeria, Emir Abubakar Shekau, sekau, Mohammed Yusuf. Estadounidenses, futurología, korea del sur, norcoreanos, geopolítica, el mundo en 2025, escudo disuasor, atómico- nucleares, ATALLY, Attaly, bombas, fin del mundo, fin del imperio, francmasonería. La próxima guerra con Japón, La Inteligencia Edge, La Filosofía Política de la Escuela de Frankfurt, El futuro de la guerra: Poder, la Tecnología y la dominación mundial de Estados Unidos en el siglo XXI, con Meredith Friedman (1996), La Inteligencia Edge: Cómo beneficiarse de la era de la información con Meredith Friedman, Colin Chapman y John Baker (1997), La guerra secreta de Estados Unidos: En el interior de la Lucha Oculta todo el mundo entre los Estados Unidos y sus enemigos (2004), Los próximos 100 años: un pronóstico para el siglo 21 (2009), La próxima década: el mundo de aquí a 2010, 1.1 Segunda Guerra Fría, 1.2 fragmentación ruso y chino, 1.3 Nuevos Poderes Arise, 1.4 tensiones se acumulan, 1.5 Cambio demográfico, 1.6 Tercera Guerra Mundial, 1.7 Posguerra Conflicto, 1.8 Estados Unidos y México, 1.9 predicciones tecnológicas. Rescate, víctimas, intervención, Lampedusa, Libia, Sicilia, Inmigrantes, Italia, Magreb, inmigración irregular, emergencias, África, Política migración, Consejo de Seguridad de la ONU. Hinduismo, cristianismo, judaísmo, chamanismo, ateísmo, “todo vale”, islam, nueva era. Criterio, ala, coran, azalá, azaque, sura, escritura, faraón, haman, hamán, hanif, Iblis, infiel, judíos, peregrinación, sakina, tora, evangelio, presencia divina, umra, yihad, Sura. Zecharia Sitchin The Euro-Arab Axis, BatYe'or, Ati-europeísmo, Eurabia, endofobia, europeización, Oriana Fallaci, Rotterdam, Amos Del Mundo, anti-estadounidense, anti-israelita. katar, bielorusia, arabia seudita, roma, kroasia, estados undidos, ginea, iraq, juda, kurdistan, islas tortugas, paraísos fiscales, kuway, quiay, manaos, tibet, desierto, mongoles, aztecas, mayas, londristan, panamá hats, bolonia, Mesopotamia, babilonia, diamantes, nambija, extractivismo, sienego, cenego, pantano, pirámides, jungla, selva, alimentos, guerras, tribus, etnias, charrúas, estrella solitaria, religión, economía, cultura, vida, corrupción, comunismo, capitalismo. Afganistán, Albania, Alemania, Andorra, Angola, Antigua y Barbuda, Arabia Saudita, Argelia, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaiyán, Bahamas, Bangladés, Barbados, Baréin, Bélgica, Belice, Benín, Bielorrusia, Birmania, Bolivia, Bosnia y Herzegovina, Botsuana, Brasil, Brunéi, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Bután, Cabo Verde, Camboya, Camerún, Canadá, Catar, Chad, Chile, China, Chipre, Ciudad del Vaticano, Colombia, Comoras, Corea del Norte, Corea del Sur, Costa de Marfil, Costa Rica, Croacia, Cuba, Dinamarca, Dominica, Ecuador, Egipto, El Salvador, Emiratos Árabes Unidos, Eritrea, Eslovaquia, Eslovenia, España, Estados Unidos, Estonia, Etiopía, Filipinas, Finlandia, Fiyi, Francia, Gabón, Gambia, Georgia, Ghana, Granada, Grecia, Guatemala, Guyana, Guinea, Guinea ecuatorial, Guinea-Bisáu, Haití, Honduras, Hungría, India, Indonesia, Irak, Irán, Irlanda, Islandia, Islas Marshall, Islas Salomón, Israel, Italia, Jamaica, Japón, Jordania, Kazajistán, Kenia, Kirguistán, Kiribati, Kuwait, Laos, Lesoto, Letonia, Líbano, Liberia, Libia, Liechtenstein, Lituania, Luxemburgo, Madagascar, Malasia, Malaui, Maldivas, Malí, Malta, Marruecos, Mauricio, Mauritania, México, Micronesia, Moldavia, Mónaco, Mongolia, Montenegro, Mozambique, Namibia, Nauru, Nepal, Nicaragua, Níger, Nigeria, Noruega, Nueva Zelanda, Omán, Países Bajos, Pakistán, Palaos, Panamá, Papúa Nueva Guinea, Paraguay, Perú, Polonia, Portugal, Reino Unido, República Centroafricana, República Checa, República de Macedonia, República del Congo, República Democrática del Congo, República Dominicana, República Sudafricana, Ruanda, Rumanía, Rusia, Samoa, San Cristóbal y Nieves, San Marino, San Vicente y las Granadinas, Santa Lucía, Santo Tomé y Príncipe, Senegal, Serbia, Seychelles, Sierra Leona, Singapur, Siria, Somalia, Sri Lanka, Suazilandia, Sudán, Sudán del Sur, Suecia, Suiza, Surinam, Tailandia, Tanzania, Tayikistán, Timor Oriental, Togo, Tonga, Trinidad y Tobago, Túnez, Turkmenistán, Turquía, Tuvalu, Ucrania, Uganda, Uruguay, Uzbekistán, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Vietnam, Yemen, Yibuti, Zambia, Zimbabue. Socialismo del siglo 21, buen vivir, vivir bien, Unión de las Naciones Sudamericanas, Simón Bolívar, Cuba, Imperialismo, Panamericanismo, contrarrevolución, oposición. CSN, Mercosur, Comunidad Andina, Carta Democrática Interamericana, Asociación de Naciones del Sureste Asiático, ASEAN, CER, Closer Economic Relations, integrado por Australia y Nueva Zelanda, Área de Libre Comercio de las Américas, ALCA, Asociación Latinoamericana de Integración, ALADI, Juan Fernández, isla de Pascua, Galápagos, archipiélago de Fernando de Noronha, Malvinas, Falkland, fiordos, desierto de Atacama, quechua, aymara, guaraní, Gran Colombia , Alianza para el Progreso, Organización de Estados Americanos, OEA, Unión Europea, CAN. antarcticus, ??????????? antarktikós, Antártica en Chile, Polo Sur, Tratado Antártico. Atendiendo islas Georgias del Sur, Sandwich del Sur, la isla Bouvet, el archipiélago de Kerguelen y las islas Heard y McDonald, sexto continente, macizo Vinson, monte Erebus, isla de Ross, indlandsis, Cuenca Astrolabio de la Tierra Adelia, bahías del Océano Glaciar Antártico, barrera de hielo de Ross, Ronne, Filchner y la Barrera de hielo Larsen; "Larsen C", Mar de Weddell, delfines y delfinas, Leopoldo López, Argentina, Europa, vieja Europa, hamas, hezbola. Libro blanco, libro verde, socialista islámico, Muammar Muhammad Abd as-Salam Abu Minyar al-Gaddafi, Sirte, gaddafa, Movimiento de Oficiales Unionistas Libres, bereber, Idris I, tercera teoría universal, Organización para la Liberación de Palestina, OLP, IRA, Ejército Republicano Irlandés, Misurata, Aozú Organización para la Unidad Africana, OUA, Declaración del Establecimiento de la Autoridad del Pueblo, Jamahiriyya, 'Estado de masas, Congreso Popular General, CPG, parlamento, Aziziyaln, hermano guía de la gran revolución, Lockerbie, Escocia, Yasir Arafat, Panafricanismo, Estados Unidos Federales de África, Unión Africana, UA, Silvio Berlusconi, Romano Prodi Pierre Nkurunziza, Buyumbura, Bumerec , Unión Africana en Somalia (Amisom), CNDD-FDD, Vital Nshimirimana, Godefroid Niyombare. Gervais Abayeho, Universidad de Buyumbura, jefe del Consejo Nacional de las fuerzas democráticas de defensa de la democracia, chairman, IRIN, Ngozi,Kitenga , Kinyarwanda, Kirundi, Francés, Bantú, Tutsi, bantúes Jam?l Ma’r?f4, Ab? ‘?s?, ar-Raqqah5, and ‘Abdul-Jabb?r al-‘Ak?d?6 Ab? Sa’?d al-Khudr? Jabhat an-Nusrah, Pkk, Kurdistán, Turquía, drusos,

Descripción: EN LE FRENTE DE ESTADO ISLÁMICO- CRÓNICA DE GUERRA- EN LE FRENTE DE ESTADO ISLÁMICO- CRÓNICA DE GUERRA- EN LE FRENTE DE ESTADO ISLÁMICO- CRÓNICA DE GUERRA- EN LE FRENTE DE ESTADO ISLÁMICO- CRÓNICA DE GUERRA- TAGS: Kurdistán, Turquía, drusos, Ahlu-s-Sunnati wa-l-Jam??ah, shi'a del Imám Ali, escuelas y ramas del Islam, Al-Qur-ân, Sunna, Rasûl, sharia, Ilm, Din, sunnah ,dawah ,jannah ,hadith ,quaran ,god ,akhira ,prophetmuhmmad ,religion ,allahhuakbar ,paradise ,jannahismyultimategoal ,islamreminders ,muhammadsaw ,beard ,poor ,power ,freedom ,money ,instalove ,sad ,weak ,follow ,instadaily ,quoteoftheday ,islamicquotes ,quote ,instafollow ,instalike ,instamuslim, ,islamicstory ,muslim ,jinnstory ,allah ,allahuakbar ,deen ,islamic ,haqq ,ummah ,islam ,dunya ,jinn ,alhamdulillah ,subhanallah ,muslimah ,truth ,islamicpost ,astaghfirullah ,trip ,photogrid ,muhmmad ,allahswt ,instaislam ,sufficient ,islamicreminders ,muhammad ,prayer ,nikah ,hijab ,muhmmadsaw ????, ????, ?????????, ????????, Simon Elliot, Elliot Shimon, Ibrahim ibn Awad, Ibn Ibrahim Al AlBadri Arradoui Hoseini, Universidad de Bagdad, Ibrahim Awad Ali Al Badri Al Samarrai. Bagdadi, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, Califa Ibrahim, estudiantes, predicadores, ulemas. Islamic State News, Islamic State Report, Al Hayat Media Center decided, tawhid, manhaj, hijrah, jihad, and jama’ah, nasarahullah, fuqaha, Amirul-Mu’minin Abu ‘Umar al-Husayni al-Baghdadi, Ummah, leones del Estado islámico, Abu Mus'abaz-Zarqawi, imperialism, World's Second Biggest Streaming Music Service, Now Infested By Jihadis Sharing Al-Qaeda And Islamic State (ISIS), Al-Awlaki, Bin Laden Audio, Sermons To Al-Baghdadi, Nasheeds Espousing, Jihad And Martyrdom, Sound Cloud, son cloud, nasheed, Al Hayat Media Center Ibn Batutah, ceremonia, Hil-lah, Hil-la, Persia, caravanas, babilonia, golfo pérsico, mar rojo, qadisaya, sasanita, Yezdeguird, tchang-ngan, iranios, Alí ben Abu Taleb, shiismo, chiismo, imanato, Abu el Mutalib, hosein, kerbela, Nínive, saosciant, mahamud, mesías, origen. Yihadismo, aniversario, caída de Gadafi, Fuerza Aérea de Egipto, Fuerza Aérea de Libia, bombardeos, objetivos del Estado Islámico, Derna, Sirte, Ben Jawad, mediterráneo. Estado Israelobámico, Bengasi, Muammar Gaddafi, petróleo internacional, Abdel Fatah Al-Sisi, Europe 1, Matteo Renzi, Italia, ONU, rebeldes, París, Reuters, cristianos coptos, Tawadros II, secretario de Estado, Santa Sede, cardenal Pietro Parolin, Radio Vaticano, Tratado de Letrán, Paolo Gentiloni, Roberta Pinotti, François Hollande, Muammar Khadafy, Mohammed Morsi, Sameh Chukri, Badr Abdelaty, Federica Mogherini, hermanos musulmanes. Jihadi John, verdugo, célula terrorista "The Beatles, George y Ringo, soldado, sirio, James Foley, FBI, el MI5, y Scotland Yard, EIL, terrorismo, terroristas, yihadistas, manipulación mediática, paz, objetivo, desinformación, intoxicación, verdad, explosión, bomba, suicida. Benin, Camerún, Chad y Níger, la célula Ansaru, Estado islámico en Nigeria, Emir Abubakar Shekau, sekau, Mohammed Yusuf. Estadounidenses, futurología, korea del sur, norcoreanos, geopolítica, el mundo en 2025, escudo disuasor, atómico- nucleares, ATALLY, Attaly, bombas, fin del mundo, fin del imperio, francmasonería. La próxima guerra con Japón, La Inteligencia Edge, La Filosofía Política de la Escuela de Frankfurt, El futuro de la guerra: Poder, la Tecnología y la dominación mundial de Estados Unidos en el siglo XXI, con Meredith Friedman (1996), La Inteligencia Edge: Cómo beneficiarse de la era de la información con Meredith Friedman, Colin Chapman y John Baker (1997), La guerra secreta de Estados Unidos: En el interior de la Lucha Oculta todo el mundo entre los Estados Unidos y sus enemigos (2004), Los próximos 100 años: un pronóstico para el siglo 21 (2009), La próxima década: el mundo de aquí a 2010, 1.1 Segunda Guerra Fría, 1.2 fragmentación ruso y chino, 1.3 Nuevos Poderes Arise, 1.4 tensiones se acumulan, 1.5 Cambio demográfico, 1.6 Tercera Guerra Mundial, 1.7 Posguerra Conflicto, 1.8 Estados Unidos y México, 1.9 predicciones tecnológicas. Rescate, víctimas, intervención, Lampedusa, Libia, Sicilia, Inmigrantes, Italia, Magreb, inmigración irregular, emergencias, África, Política migración, Consejo de Seguridad de la ONU. Hinduismo, cristianismo, judaísmo, chamanismo, ateísmo, “todo vale”, islam, nueva era. Criterio, ala, coran, azalá, azaque, sura, escritura, faraón, haman, hamán, hanif, Iblis, infiel, judíos, peregrinación, sakina, tora, evangelio, presencia divina, umra, yihad, Sura. Zecharia Sitchin The Euro-Arab Axis, BatYe'or, Ati-europeísmo, Eurabia, endofobia, europeización, Oriana Fallaci, Rotterdam, Amos Del Mundo, anti-estadounidense, anti-israelita. katar, bielorusia, arabia seudita, roma, kroasia, estados undidos, ginea, iraq, juda, kurdistan, islas tortugas, paraísos fiscales, kuway, quiay, manaos, tibet, desierto, mongoles, aztecas, mayas, londristan, panamá hats, bolonia, Mesopotamia, babilonia, diamantes, nambija, extractivismo, sienego, cenego, pantano, pirámides, jungla, selva, alimentos, guerras, tribus, etnias, charrúas, estrella solitaria, religión, economía, cultura, vida, corrupción, comunismo, capitalismo. Afganistán, Albania, Alemania, Andorra, Angola, Antigua y Barbuda, Arabia Saudita, Argelia, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaiyán, Bahamas, Bangladés, Barbados, Baréin, Bélgica, Belice, Benín, Bielorrusia, Birmania, Bolivia, Bosnia y Herzegovina, Botsuana, Brasil, Brunéi, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Bután, Cabo Verde, Camboya, Camerún, Canadá, Catar, Chad, Chile, China, Chipre, Ciudad del Vaticano, Colombia, Comoras, Corea del Norte, Corea del Sur, Costa de Marfil, Costa Rica, Croacia, Cuba, Dinamarca, Dominica, Ecuador, Egipto, El Salvador, Emiratos Árabes Unidos, Eritrea, Eslovaquia, Eslovenia, España, Estados Unidos, Estonia, Etiopía, Filipinas, Finlandia, Fiyi, Francia, Gabón, Gambia, Georgia, Ghana, Granada, Grecia, Guatemala, Guyana, Guinea, Guinea ecuatorial, Guinea-Bisáu, Haití, Honduras, Hungría, India, Indonesia, Irak, Irán, Irlanda, Islandia, Islas Marshall, Islas Salomón, Israel, Italia, Jamaica, Japón, Jordania, Kazajistán, Kenia, Kirguistán, Kiribati, Kuwait, Laos, Lesoto, Letonia, Líbano, Liberia, Libia, Liechtenstein, Lituania, Luxemburgo, Madagascar, Malasia, Malaui, Maldivas, Malí, Malta, Marruecos, Mauricio, Mauritania, México, Micronesia, Moldavia, Mónaco, Mongolia, Montenegro, Mozambique, Namibia, Nauru, Nepal, Nicaragua, Níger, Nigeria, Noruega, Nueva Zelanda, Omán, Países Bajos, Pakistán, Palaos, Panamá, Papúa Nueva Guinea, Paraguay, Perú, Polonia, Portugal, Reino Unido, República Centroafricana, República Checa, República de Macedonia, República del Congo, República Democrática del Congo, República Dominicana, República Sudafricana, Ruanda, Rumanía, Rusia, Samoa, San Cristóbal y Nieves, San Marino, San Vicente y las Granadinas, Santa Lucía, Santo Tomé y Príncipe, Senegal, Serbia, Seychelles, Sierra Leona, Singapur, Siria, Somalia, Sri Lanka, Suazilandia, Sudán, Sudán del Sur, Suecia, Suiza, Surinam, Tailandia, Tanzania, Tayikistán, Timor Oriental, Togo, Tonga, Trinidad y Tobago, Túnez, Turkmenistán, Turquía, Tuvalu, Ucrania, Uganda, Uruguay, Uzbekistán, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Vietnam, Yemen, Yibuti, Zambia, Zimbabue. Socialismo del siglo 21, buen vivir, vivir bien, Unión de las Naciones Sudamericanas, Simón Bolívar, Cuba, Imperialismo, Panamericanismo, contrarrevolución, oposición. CSN, Mercosur, Comunidad Andina, Carta Democrática Interamericana, Asociación de Naciones del Sureste Asiático, ASEAN, CER, Closer Economic Relations, integrado por Australia y Nueva Zelanda, Área de Libre Comercio de las Américas, ALCA, Asociación Latinoamericana de Integración, ALADI, Juan Fernández, isla de Pascua, Galápagos, archipiélago de Fernando de Noronha, Malvinas, Falkland, fiordos, desierto de Atacama, quechua, aymara, guaraní, Gran Colombia , Alianza para el Progreso, Organización de Estados Americanos, OEA, Unión Europea, CAN. antarcticus, ??????????? antarktikós, Antártica en Chile, Polo Sur, Tratado Antártico. Atendiendo islas Georgias del Sur, Sandwich del Sur, la isla Bouvet, el archipiélago de Kerguelen y las islas Heard y McDonald, sexto continente, macizo Vinson, monte Erebus, isla de Ross, indlandsis, Cuenca Astrolabio de la Tierra Adelia, bahías del Océano Glaciar Antártico, barrera de hielo de Ross, Ronne, Filchner y la Barrera de hielo Larsen; "Larsen C", Mar de Weddell, delfines y delfinas, Leopoldo López, Argentina, Europa, vieja Europa, hamas, hezbola. Libro blanco, libro verde, socialista islámico, Muammar Muhammad Abd as-Salam Abu Minyar al-Gaddafi, Sirte, gaddafa, Movimiento de Oficiales Unionistas Libres, bereber, Idris I, tercera teoría universal, Organización para la Liberación de Palestina, OLP, IRA, Ejército Republicano Irlandés, Misurata, Aozú Organización para la Unidad Africana, OUA, Declaración del Establecimiento de la Autoridad del Pueblo, Jamahiriyya, 'Estado de masas, Congreso Popular General, CPG, parlamento, Aziziyaln, hermano guía de la gran revolución, Lockerbie, Escocia, Yasir Arafat, Panafricanismo, Estados Unidos Federales de África, Unión Africana, UA, Silvio Berlusconi, Romano Prodi Pierre Nkurunziza, Buyumbura, Bumerec , Unión Africana en Somalia (Amisom), CNDD-FDD, Vital Nshimirimana, Godefroid Niyombare. Gervais Abayeho, Universidad de Buyumbura, jefe del Consejo Nacional de las fuerzas democráticas de defensa de la democracia, chairman, IRIN, Ngozi,Kitenga , Kinyarwanda, Kirundi, Francés, Bantú, Tutsi, bantúes

"Quizás este escenario es exagerado pero tiene la suma de todos los miedos de agencias de inteligencia occidentales y es infinitamente más posible hoy que hace apenas un año." "Let me throw a hypothetical operation onto the table. The Islamic State has billions of dollars in the bank, so they call on their wil?yah in Pakistan to purchase a nuclear device through weapons dealers with links to corrupt officials in the region. The weapon is then transported overland until it makes it to Libya, where the mujahidin move it south to Nigeria. Drug shipments from Columbia bound for Europe pass through West Africa, so moving other types of contraband from East to West is just as possible. The nuke and accompanying muj?hid?n arrive on the shorelines of South America and are transported through the porous borders of Central America before arriving in Mexico and up to the border with the United States. From there it’s just a quick hop through a smuggling tunnel and hey presto, they’re mingling with another 12 million “illegal” aliens in America with a nuclear bomb in the trunk of their car." Dabiq-9, Page 77 : http://media.clarionproject.org/files/islamic-state/isis-isil-islamic-state-magazine-issue%2B9-they-plot-and-allah-plots-sex-slavery.pdf Tags Dabiq-9-They-Plot-and-Allah-Plots-compressed, the perfect storm – John Cantlie, daviq, davik, davick. Ahlu-s-Sunnati wa-l-Jam??ah, shi'a del Imám Ali, escuelas y ramas del Islam, Al-Qur-ân, Sunna, Rasûl, sharia, Ilm, Din, sunnah ,dawah ,jannah ,hadith ,quaran ,god ,akhira ,prophetmuhmmad ,religion ,allahhuakbar ,paradise ,jannahismyultimategoal ,islamreminders ,muhammadsaw ,beard ,poor ,power ,freedom ,money ,instalove ,sad ,weak ,follow ,instadaily ,quoteoftheday ,islamicquotes ,quote ,instafollow ,instalike ,instamuslim, ,islamicstory ,muslim ,jinnstory ,allah ,allahuakbar ,deen ,islamic ,haqq ,ummah ,islam ,dunya ,jinn ,alhamdulillah ,subhanallah ,muslimah ,truth ,islamicpost ,astaghfirullah ,trip ,photogrid ,muhmmad ,allahswt ,instaislam ,sufficient ,islamicreminders ,muhammad ,prayer ,nikah ,hijab ,muhmmadsaw ????, ????, ?????????, ????????, Simon Elliot, Elliot Shimon, Ibrahim ibn Awad, Ibn Ibrahim Al AlBadri Arradoui Hoseini, Universidad de Bagdad, Ibrahim Awad Ali Al Badri Al Samarrai. Bagdadi, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, Califa Ibrahim, estudiantes, predicadores, ulemas. Islamic State News, Islamic State Report, Al Hayat Media Center decided, tawhid, manhaj, hijrah, jihad, and jama’ah, nasarahullah, fuqaha, Amirul-Mu’minin Abu ‘Umar al-Husayni al-Baghdadi, Ummah, leones del Estado islámico, Abu Mus'abaz-Zarqawi, imperialism, World's Second Biggest Streaming Music Service, Now Infested By Jihadis Sharing Al-Qaeda And Islamic State (ISIS), Al-Awlaki, Bin Laden Audio, Sermons To Al-Baghdadi, Nasheeds Espousing, Jihad And Martyrdom, Sound Cloud, son cloud, nasheed, Al Hayat Media Center Ibn Batutah, ceremonia, Hil-lah, Hil-la, Persia, caravanas, babilonia, golfo pérsico, mar rojo, qadisaya, sasanita, Yezdeguird, tchang-ngan, iranios, Alí ben Abu Taleb, shiismo, chiismo, imanato, Abu el Mutalib, hosein, kerbela, Nínive, saosciant, mahamud, mesías, origen. Yihadismo, aniversario, caída de Gadafi, Fuerza Aérea de Egipto, Fuerza Aérea de Libia, bombardeos, objetivos del Estado Islámico, Derna, Sirte, Ben Jawad, mediterráneo. Estado Israelobámico, Bengasi, Muammar Gaddafi, petróleo internacional, Abdel Fatah Al-Sisi, Europe 1, Matteo Renzi, Italia, ONU, rebeldes, París, Reuters, cristianos coptos, Tawadros II, secretario de Estado, Santa Sede, cardenal Pietro Parolin, Radio Vaticano, Tratado de Letrán, Paolo Gentiloni, Roberta Pinotti, François Hollande, Muammar Khadafy, Mohammed Morsi, Sameh Chukri, Badr Abdelaty, Federica Mogherini, hermanos musulmanes. Jihadi John, verdugo, célula terrorista "The Beatles, George y Ringo, soldado, sirio, James Foley, FBI, el MI5, y Scotland Yard, EIL, terrorismo, terroristas, yihadistas, manipulación mediática, paz, objetivo, desinformación, intoxicación, verdad, explosión, bomba, suicida. Benin, Camerún, Chad y Níger, la célula Ansaru, Estado islámico en Nigeria, Emir Abubakar Shekau, sekau, Mohammed Yusuf. Estadounidenses, futurología, korea del sur, norcoreanos, geopolítica, el mundo en 2025, escudo disuasor, atómico- nucleares, ATALLY, Attaly, bombas, fin del mundo, fin del imperio, francmasonería. La próxima guerra con Japón, La Inteligencia Edge, La Filosofía Política de la Escuela de Frankfurt, El futuro de la guerra: Poder, la Tecnología y la dominación mundial de Estados Unidos en el siglo XXI, con Meredith Friedman (1996), La Inteligencia Edge: Cómo beneficiarse de la era de la información con Meredith Friedman, Colin Chapman y John Baker (1997), La guerra secreta de Estados Unidos: En el interior de la Lucha Oculta todo el mundo entre los Estados Unidos y sus enemigos (2004), Los próximos 100 años: un pronóstico para el siglo 21 (2009), La próxima década: el mundo de aquí a 2010, 1.1 Segunda Guerra Fría, 1.2 fragmentación ruso y chino, 1.3 Nuevos Poderes Arise, 1.4 tensiones se acumulan, 1.5 Cambio demográfico, 1.6 Tercera Guerra Mundial, 1.7 Posguerra Conflicto, 1.8 Estados Unidos y México, 1.9 predicciones tecnológicas. Rescate, víctimas, intervención, Lampedusa, Libia, Sicilia, Inmigrantes, Italia, Magreb, inmigración irregular, emergencias, África, Política migración, Consejo de Seguridad de la ONU. Hinduismo, cristianismo, judaísmo, chamanismo, ateísmo, “todo vale”, islam, nueva era. Criterio, ala, coran, azalá, azaque, sura, escritura, faraón, haman, hamán, hanif, Iblis, infiel, judíos, peregrinación, sakina, tora, evangelio, presencia divina, umra, yihad, Sura. Zecharia Sitchin The Euro-Arab Axis, BatYe'or, Ati-europeísmo, Eurabia, endofobia, europeización, Oriana Fallaci, Rotterdam, Amos Del Mundo, anti-estadounidense, anti-israelita. katar, bielorusia, arabia seudita, roma, kroasia, estados undidos, ginea, iraq, juda, kurdistan, islas tortugas, paraísos fiscales, kuway, quiay, manaos, tibet, desierto, mongoles, aztecas, mayas, londristan, panamá hats, bolonia, Mesopotamia, babilonia, diamantes, nambija, extractivismo, sienego, cenego, pantano, pirámides, jungla, selva, alimentos, guerras, tribus, etnias, charrúas, estrella solitaria, religión, economía, cultura, vida, corrupción, comunismo, capitalismo. Afganistán, Albania, Alemania, Andorra, Angola, Antigua y Barbuda, Arabia Saudita, Argelia, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaiyán, Bahamas, Bangladés, Barbados, Baréin, Bélgica, Belice, Benín, Bielorrusia, Birmania, Bolivia, Bosnia y Herzegovina, Botsuana, Brasil, Brunéi, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Bután, Cabo Verde, Camboya, Camerún, Canadá, Catar, Chad, Chile, China, Chipre, Ciudad del Vaticano, Colombia, Comoras, Corea del Norte, Corea del Sur, Costa de Marfil, Costa Rica, Croacia, Cuba, Dinamarca, Dominica, Ecuador, Egipto, El Salvador, Emiratos Árabes Unidos, Eritrea, Eslovaquia, Eslovenia, España, Estados Unidos, Estonia, Etiopía, Filipinas, Finlandia, Fiyi, Francia, Gabón, Gambia, Georgia, Ghana, Granada, Grecia, Guatemala, Guyana, Guinea, Guinea ecuatorial, Guinea-Bisáu, Haití, Honduras, Hungría, India, Indonesia, Irak, Irán, Irlanda, Islandia, Islas Marshall, Islas Salomón, Israel, Italia, Jamaica, Japón, Jordania, Kazajistán, Kenia, Kirguistán, Kiribati, Kuwait, Laos, Lesoto, Letonia, Líbano, Liberia, Libia, Liechtenstein, Lituania, Luxemburgo, Madagascar, Malasia, Malaui, Maldivas, Malí, Malta, Marruecos, Mauricio, Mauritania, México, Micronesia, Moldavia, Mónaco, Mongolia, Montenegro, Mozambique, Namibia, Nauru, Nepal, Nicaragua, Níger, Nigeria, Noruega, Nueva Zelanda, Omán, Países Bajos, Pakistán, Palaos, Panamá, Papúa Nueva Guinea, Paraguay, Perú, Polonia, Portugal, Reino Unido, República Centroafricana, República Checa, República de Macedonia, República del Congo, República Democrática del Congo, República Dominicana, República Sudafricana, Ruanda, Rumanía, Rusia, Samoa, San Cristóbal y Nieves, San Marino, San Vicente y las Granadinas, Santa Lucía, Santo Tomé y Príncipe, Senegal, Serbia, Seychelles, Sierra Leona, Singapur, Siria, Somalia, Sri Lanka, Suazilandia, Sudán, Sudán del Sur, Suecia, Suiza, Surinam, Tailandia, Tanzania, Tayikistán, Timor Oriental, Togo, Tonga, Trinidad y Tobago, Túnez, Turkmenistán, Turquía, Tuvalu, Ucrania, Uganda, Uruguay, Uzbekistán, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Vietnam, Yemen, Yibuti, Zambia, Zimbabue. Socialismo del siglo 21, buen vivir, vivir bien, Unión de las Naciones Sudamericanas, Simón Bolívar, Cuba, Imperialismo, Panamericanismo, contrarrevolución, oposición. CSN, Mercosur, Comunidad Andina, Carta Democrática Interamericana, Asociación de Naciones del Sureste Asiático, ASEAN, CER, Closer Economic Relations, integrado por Australia y Nueva Zelanda, Área de Libre Comercio de las Américas, ALCA, Asociación Latinoamericana de Integración, ALADI, Juan Fernández, isla de Pascua, Galápagos, archipiélago de Fernando de Noronha, Malvinas, Falkland, fiordos, desierto de Atacama, quechua, aymara, guaraní, Gran Colombia , Alianza para el Progreso, Organización de Estados Americanos, OEA, Unión Europea, CAN. antarcticus, ??????????? antarktikós, Antártica en Chile, Polo Sur, Tratado Antártico. Atendiendo islas Georgias del Sur, Sandwich del Sur, la isla Bouvet, el archipiélago de Kerguelen y las islas Heard y McDonald, sexto continente, macizo Vinson, monte Erebus, isla de Ross, indlandsis, Cuenca Astrolabio de la Tierra Adelia, bahías del Océano Glaciar Antártico, barrera de hielo de Ross, Ronne, Filchner y la Barrera de hielo Larsen; "Larsen C", Mar de Weddell, delfines y delfinas, Leopoldo López, Argentina, Europa, vieja Europa, hamas, hezbola, albayan. Libro blanco, libro verde, socialista islámico, Muammar Muhammad Abd as-Salam Abu Minyar al-Gaddafi, Sirte, gaddafa, Movimiento de Oficiales Unionistas Libres, bereber, Idris I, tercera teoría universal, Organización para la Liberación de Palestina, OLP, IRA, Ejército Republicano Irlandés, Misurata, Aozú Organización para la Unidad Africana, OUA, Declaración del Establecimiento de la Autoridad del Pueblo, Jamahiriyya, 'Estado de masas, Congreso Popular General, CPG, parlamento, Aziziyaln, hermano guía de la gran revolución, Lockerbie, Escocia, Yasir Arafat, Panafricanismo, Estados Unidos Federales de África, Unión Africana, UA, Silvio Berlusconi, Romano Prodi Pierre Nkurunziza, Buyumbura, Bumerec , Unión Africana en Somalia (Amisom), CNDD-FDD, Vital Nshimirimana, Godefroid Niyombare. Gervais Abayeho, Universidad de Buyumbura, jefe del Consejo Nacional de las fuerzas democráticas de defensa de la democracia, chairman, IRIN, Ngozi,Kitenga , Kinyarwanda, Kirundi, Francés, Bantú, Tutsi, bantúes

Egypte voert de repressie tegen de Moslimbroeders verder op met massa-arrestaties en draconische straffen. Inmiddels zitten 16.000 activisten vast en vorige week werd de afgezette president Mohammed Morsi veroordeeld tot de doodstraf. Wat gaan de Moslimbroeders doen en wat is de reactie van het westen op de repressie? We spreken hierover met arabiste Petra Stienen.

-Aplique esta teoría al mundo musulmán y saque sus propias conclusiones. “…el pasado revela situaciones comparables a las de nuestro tiempo y no deja de ser interesante ver cómo las cosas evolucionarnos otrora.” (Celerier, 94) Fuente: CELERIER, Pierre, Geopolítica y Geoestratégia, editorial Pleamar, segunda edición, Argentina, 1975. Tags: Casa de España, Prusia, imperio alemán, nazismo, Carlos V, Luis XIV. Yihadismo, caída de Gadafi, Fuerza Aérea de Egipto, Fuerza Aérea de Libia, bombardeos, objetivos del Estado Islámico, Derna, Sirte, Ben Jawad, mediterráneo. Estado Israelobámico, Bengasi, Muammar Gaddafi, petróleo internacional, Abdel Fatah Al-Sisi, Europe 1, Matteo Renzi, Italia, ONU, rebeldes, París, Reuters, cristianos coptos, Tawadros II, secretario de Estado, Santa Sede, cardenal Pietro Parolin, Radio Vaticano, Tratado de Letrán, Paolo Gentiloni, Roberta Pinotti, François Hollande, Muammar Khadafy, Mohammed Morsi, Sameh Chukri, Badr Abdelaty, Federica Mogherini, hermanos musulmanes.

-Primera parte y fragmento la tercera parte ATTALI, Jacques, Breve historia del futuro, Ediciones Paidós, España, 2006. “Por último, la historia enseña por analogía, no por identidad. La experiencia histórica no consiste en quedarse en el presente y volver la vista al pasado, sino en regresar al pasado y volver después al presente con una más amplia y profunda conciencia de las restricciones de que adolecía nuestro anterior punto de vista.” Daniel Estulin Tags: Estadounidenses, futurología, korea del sur, norcoreanos, geopolítica, el mundo en 2025, escudo disuasor, atómico- nucleares, ATALLY, Attaly, bombas, fin del mundo, fin del imperio, francmasonería, tercera guerra mundial. Breve historia del futuro. La guerra secreta de Estados Unidos, La próxima guerra con Japón, La Inteligencia Edge, La Filosofía Política de la Escuela de Frankfurt, El futuro de la guerra: Poder, la Tecnología y la dominación mundial de Estados Unidos en el siglo XXI, con Meredith Friedman (1996). La Inteligencia Edge: Cómo beneficiarse de la era de la información con Meredith Friedman, Colin Chapman y John Baker (1997). La guerra secreta de Estados Unidos : En el interior de la Lucha Oculta todo el mundo entre los Estados Unidos y sus enemigos (2004). Los próximos 100 años : un pronóstico para el siglo 21 (2009) . La próxima década : el mundo de aquí a 2010. 1.1 Segunda Guerra Fría 1.2 fragmentación ruso y chino 1.3 Nuevos Poderes Arise 1.4 tensiones se acumulan 1.5 Cambio demográfico 1.6 Tercera Guerra Mundial 1.7 Posguerra Conflicto 1.8 Estados Unidos y México 1.9 predicciones tecnológicas ? Rescate, víctimas, intervención, Lampedusa, Libia, Sicilia, Inmigrantes, Italia, Magreb, Inmigración irregular, Emergencias, África, Política migración,El Consejo de Seguridad de la ONU,intervención. Yihadismo, aniversario, caída de Gadafi, Fuerza Aérea de Egipto, Fuerza Aérea de Libia, bombardeos, objetivos del Estado Islámico, Derna, Sirte, Ben Jawad, mediterráneo. Estado Israelobámico, Bengasi, Muammar Gaddafi, Petróleo internacional, Abdel Fatah Al-Sisi, Europe 1, MatteoRenzi, Italia,ONU, rebeldes, París, Reuters, cristianos coptos, Tawadros II, secretario de Estado, Santa Sede, cardenal Pietro Parolin, Radio Vaticano, Tratado de Letrán, Paolo Gentiloni, Roberta Pinotti, François Hollande, Muammar Khadafy, Mohammed Morsi, SamehChukri, Badr Abdelaty, Federica Mogherini, hermanos musulmanes. Ibn Batutah, ceremonia, Hil-lah, Hil-la, Persia, caravanas, babilonia, golfo pérsico, mar rojo, qadisaya, sasanita, Yezdeguird, tchang-ngan, iranios, Alí ben Abu Taleb, shiismo, chiismo, imanato, Abu el Mutalib, hosein, kerbela, Nínive, saosciant, mahamud, mesías, origen. Ahlu-s-Sunnati wa-l-Jam??ah , shi'a del Imám Ali, escuelas y ramas del Islam, Al-Qur-ân, Sunna, Rasûl, sharia, Ilm, Din. sunnah ,dawah ,jannah ,hadith ,quaran ,god ,akhira ,prophetmuhmmad ,religion ,allahhuakbar ,paradise ,jannahismyultimategoal ,islamreminders ,muhammadsaw ,beard ,poor ,power ,freedom ,money ,instalove ,sad ,weak ,follow ,instadaily ,quoteoftheday ,islamicquotes ,quote ,instafollow ,instalike ,instamuslim ,islamicstory ,muslim ,jinnstory ,allah ,allahuakbar ,deen ,islamic ,haqq ,ummah ,islam ,dunya ,jinn ,alhamdulillah ,subhanallah ,muslimah ,truth ,islamicpost ,astaghfirullah ,trip ,photogrid ,muhmmad ,allahswt ,instaislam ,sufficient ,islamicreminders ,muhammad ,prayer ,nikah ,hijab ,muhmmadsaw ????, ????, ?????????, ????????, Jihadi John, verdugo, célula terrorista "The Beatles, George y Ringo, soldado, sirio, James Foley, FBI, el MI5, y Scotland Yard, EIL, terrorismo, terroristas, yihadistas, manipulación mediática, paz, objetivo, desinformación, intoxicación, verdad, explosión, bomba, suicida. Islamic StateNews, Islamic State Report, Al Hayat Media Center decided, tawhid, manhaj, hijrah, jihad, and jama’ah, nasarahullah, fuqaha, Amirul-Mu’minin Abu ‘Umar al-Husayni al-Baghdadi, Ummah, leones de el Estado islámico, Abu Mus'abaz-Zarqawi. Estadounidenses, futurología, korea del sur, norcoreanos, geopolítica, el mundo en 2025, escudo disuasor, atómico- nucleares, imperialismo, World's Second Biggest Streaming Music Service, Now Infested By Jihadis Sharing Al-Qaeda And Islamic State (ISIS), Al-Awlaki, Bin Laden Audio, Sermons To Al-Baghdadi, Nasheeds Espousing, Jihad And Martyrdom, Sound Cloud, son cloud, jihadi, nasheed, Al Hayat Media Center Simon Elliot, Elliot Shimon, Ibrahim ibn Awad, Ibn Ibrahim Al AlBadri Arradoui Hoseini, Universidad de Bagdad, Ibrahim Awad Ali Al Badri Al Samarrai. Bagdadi, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, Califa Ibrahim, estudiantes, predicadores, ulemas. Benin, Camerún, Chad y Níger, La célula Ansaru, Estado islámico en Nigeria, Emir Abubakar Shekau, sekau, Mohammed Yusuf, Arabia Saudita, Singapur, Israel. Hinduismo, cristianismo, judaísmo, chamanismo, ateísmo, “todo vale”, islam. Zecharia Sitchin The Euro-Arab Axis, BatYe'or, Ati-europeísmo, Eurabia, endofobia, europeización, Oriana Fallaci, Rotterdam, Amos Del Mundo, anti-estadounidense, anti-israelita. katar, bielorusia, arabia seudita, roma, kroasia, estados undidos, ginea, iraq, juda, kurdistan, islas tortugas, paraísos fiscales, kuway, quiay, manaos, tibet, desierto, mongoles, aztecas, mayas, londristan, panamá hats, bolonia, Mesopotamia, babilonia, diamantes, nambija, extractivismo, sienego, cenego, pantano, pirámides, jungla, selva, alimentos, guerras, tribus, etnias, charrúas, estrella solitaria, religión, economía, cultura, vida, corrupción, comunismo, capitalismo. Afganistán, Albania, Alemania, Andorra, Angola, Antigua y Barbuda, Arabia Saudita, Argelia, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaiyán, Bahamas, Bangladés, Barbados, Baréin, Bélgica, Belice, Benín, Bielorrusia, Birmania, Bolivia, Bosnia y Herzegovina, Botsuana, Brasil, Brunéi, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Bután, Cabo Verde, Camboya, Camerún, Canadá, Catar, Chad, Chile, China, Chipre, Ciudad del Vaticano, Colombia, Comoras, Corea del Norte, Corea del Sur, Costa de Marfil, Costa Rica, Croacia, Cuba, Dinamarca, Dominica, Ecuador, Egipto, El Salvador, Emiratos Árabes Unidos, Eritrea, Eslovaquia, Eslovenia, España, Estados Unidos, Estonia, Etiopía, Filipinas, Finlandia, Fiyi, Francia, Gabón, Gambia, Georgia, Ghana, Granada, Grecia, Guatemala, Guyana, Guinea, Guinea ecuatorial, Guinea-Bisáu, Haití, Honduras, Hungría, India, Indonesia, Irak, Irán, Irlanda, Islandia, Islas Marshall, Islas Salomón, Israel, Italia, Jamaica, Japón, Jordania, Kazajistán, Kenia, Kirguistán, Kiribati, Kuwait, Laos, Lesoto, Letonia, Líbano, Liberia, Libia, Liechtenstein, Lituania, Luxemburgo, Madagascar, Malasia, Malaui, Maldivas, Malí, Malta, Marruecos, Mauricio, Mauritania, México, Micronesia, Moldavia, Mónaco, Mongolia, Montenegro, Mozambique, Namibia, Nauru, Nepal, Nicaragua, Níger, Nigeria, Noruega, Nueva Zelanda, Omán, Países Bajos, Pakistán, Palaos, Panamá, Papúa Nueva Guinea, Paraguay, Perú, Polonia, Portugal, Reino Unido, República Centroafricana, República Checa, República de Macedonia, República del Congo, República Democrática del Congo, República Dominicana, República Sudafricana, Ruanda, Rumanía, Rusia, Samoa, San Cristóbal y Nieves, San Marino, San Vicente y las Granadinas, Santa Lucía, Santo Tomé y Príncipe, Senegal, Serbia, Seychelles, Sierra Leona, Singapur, Siria, Somalia, Sri Lanka, Suazilandia, Sudán, Sudán del Sur, Suecia Suiza, Surinam, Tailandia, Tanzania, Tayikistán, Timor Oriental, Togo, Tonga, Trinidad y Tobago, Túnez, Turkmenistán, Turquía, Tuvalu, Ucrania, Uganda, Uruguay, Uzbekistán, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Vietnam, Yemen, Yibuti, Zambia, Zimbabue. Aunque estos hechos estan bastante recientes en el tiempo,no debemos olvidar que han influido en la situacion actual del mundo de una forma determinante,y Bruno nos espone las contradicciones y mentiras directamente de la versionoficial,par que no caigamos en la amnesia y llamemos a las cosas por su nombre.Las operaciones de bandera falsa son actividades encubiertas conducidas por gobiernos, corporaciones y otras organizaciones, diseñadas para aparecer como si fueran llevadas a cabo por otras entidades. El nombre se deriva del concepto militar de izar colores falsos; esto quiere decir la bandera de un país diferente al propio. El atentado a las Torres Gemelas, ocurrido el 11 de septiembre de 2001 fue una masacre fríamente planificada por el Gran Gobierno Mundial para apropiarse de las incalculables riquezas que existen en el subsuelo de Afganistán e Irak. La gran mentira del ataque extranjero a Nueva York y el Pentágono posibilitó que los norteamericanos crearan la organización titulada "Académicos por la verdad del 11/9", donde miles de personas investigan y acusan directamente al vicepresidente Dick Cheney de ser el cerebro de la matanza y que la versión del gobierno acerca del atentado es falsa. Gracias a ellos, se sabe que toda la documentación confidencial de las Torres había sido trasladada fuera de ellas varios días antes. Un puñado de pilotos aficionados jamás podrían burlar a los 14 servicios de inteligencia de distintas reparticiones que posee Estados Unidos. Incluso eludieron al sistema Echelon, que vigila las comunicaciones telefónicas, de fax, de télex y de correo electrónico. Cuya pasmosa capacidad permite interceptar más de 200 millones de comunicaciones diarias. Los 120 satélites y las 12 bases de la red Echelon también fueron evitados por estos "árabes" que, para maravilla de todos, nueve de los supuestos pilotos terroristas que murieron en el atentado según la "historia oficial", están bien vivos en sus países de origen. KurtSonnenfeld, el camarógrafo oficial del 11-S, actualmente refugiado en la Argentina, afirma en su libro "El Perseguido", editado en junio de 2009, que en la semana previa al ataque del WorldTrade Center, todo el suministro eléctrico fue cortado por 36 horas, incluyendo cámaras de seguridad y los sistemas de control. Fue en el marco de una operación de mantenimiento altamente irregular. Quien dio la orden fue Marvin Bush, el hermano menor del presidente, encargado de la seguridad en las Torres y en las aerolíneas donde se secuestraron los aviones. Además, entre los escombros se encontraron restos de nanothermite, un poderoso explosivo utilizado en demoliciones. Tal vez George W. Bush, o alguno de sus asesores, algún día hablen de más y nos cuenten cómo planearon matar a miles de inocentes para satisfacer intereses abyectos y deleznables a espaldas de toda la humanidad. Basta observar cuáles naciones se beneficiaron geopolíticamente en estos años y quiénes hicieron un gran negocio con esta guerra. Hoy sólo los necios y estúpidos siguen afirmando que los autores fueron unos pobres árabes suicidas. Alberto Seoane El 11-9 está rodeado de misterios e incógnitas sin resolver. Por primera vez en la historia edificios con estructuras de acero colapsaron a causa del fuego. La FEMA (Agencia Federal para el Manejo de Emergencias) fue la responsable de investigar los acontecimientos y presentar un informe. Sus investigaciones son penosas para una agencia que dispone de muchos medios y recursos, no explica el por qué de los colapsos, sólo se basa en suposiciones sin fundamentos. Según arquitectos, bomberos e ingenieros, el impacto y el daño de los aviones no puede explicar los colapsos, aun menos el del edificio siete donde ningún avión chocó. Por ley está prohibido destruir las pruebas de un delito, tampoco es permitido deshacerse de los escombros de un edificio colapsado mayor de diez plantas para así poder estudiar las causas del desplome. Horas después del atentado ya se estaban retirando los escombros y en pocos meses todas las pruebas del delito fueron destruidas. Collen Rowley, agente del FBI encargada de investigar el terrorismo, en el congreso de USA declaró que sus superiores le dificultaban proseguir sus investigaciones antiterroristas. Otro miembro de la misma agencia trabajando en el departamento de contraterrorismo, Robert Wright, al quejarse de que sus superiores y el departamento de justicia americana le ponían trabas para investigar la red de Al Qaeda, recibió represalias y amenazas. Al Qaeda fue considerada una organización terrorista desde 1993. En 1995 un coche bomba fue colocado en un parking del WTC supuestamente por esta red terrorista, solo murieron cinco personas. Si más de trece personas hubiesen fallecido, el congreso habría dado su consentimiento para aplicar una ley antiterrorista que solo sirve para recortar la libertad. Dos años más tarde en Oklahoma explotó una bomba en un edificio donde la primera planta era una guardería y el resto eran oficinas del FBI, curiosamente ningún oficial de la agencia se encontraba en el atentado. Gracias al sospechoso ataque esta ley antiterrorista “TerrorismAct” fue promulgada. David Shayler trabajó para la agencia de inteligencia británica, el MI 6. Cuando tubo acceso a documentación secreta descubrió que la propia MI 6 mantenía tratos con Al Qaeda y Bin Laden, en uno de ellos pagó a un miembro de la organización para atentar contra Gaddafi, jefe del estado de Libia. El atentado del 11-9 parece moverse por intereses. Los accionistas mayoritarios de CarlileGroup, actualmente la mayor contratista de defensa, son las familia Bush y la Bin Laden. Antes del atentado la compañía estaba en la quinta posición en la industria armamentística, gracias a la guerra de Afganistán y a los tratos especiales de Bush ha llegado a ocupar la primera posición. En general toda la industria armamentística ha sacado grandes beneficios del conflicto con el mundo islámico. En la zona del mar Caspio hay importantes reservorios de petróleo y gas pero para extraerlos se necesitaba un conducto que pasase por Afganistán. Con los talibanes al poder era imposible pensar en la creación de un conducto, se requería un gobierno unificado y único. Al invadir Afganistán el Banco Mundial en abril de 2002 anunció la financiación del conducto petrolífero. Bien se sabe que la principal fuente de ingresos de las agencias de inteligencia para los proyectos negros, que no pasan por el congreso, es el tráfico de drogas. Con la expulsión de los talibanes la producción de opio en Afganistán se ha incrementado hasta suministrar un tercio del opio consumido en todo el mundo. Debido a estos intereses y a muchos otros, los benefactores del atentado terrorista seguramente están implicados en el ataque, en tal caso serían culpables de asesinato y terrorismo. Hay evidencias suficientes para pensar que el 9-11 fue una farsa, que Bin Laden no estuvo implicado, tal como lo dijo en su primer video, y, dadas las restricciones de libertad a cambio de seguridad, es un gran paso hacia el Nuevo Orden Mundial. El Pentágono Once de septiembre a las 8:10 am el Boeing 757 del vuelo 77 despega del aeropuerto de Washington. Al cabo de cincuenta minutos es secuestrado por islamistas radicales armados con trinchetas, en este momento el avión volando encima de Ohio se desvanece de los radares. Alrededor de las 9:40 es localizado por los radares dirigiéndose hacia el pentágono, se observa que da un giro de 270 º para chocar contra la cara norte del edificio militar. Pasados veinte minutos la cara frontal norte de la zona impactada colapsa, quedando un hueco de aproximadamente 20 metros por 22. El Pentágono consta de cinco anillos pentagonales cada uno dentro del otro. Cada edificio tiene las dos paredes de acero reforzadas con hormigón, con un grosor de casi medio metro. En el ataque el Boeing perforó tres anillos, es decir, tres metros de acero reforzado con hormigón y sin contar las columnas ni los suelos. Un avión no está pensado para perforar, sólo un misil puede tener tal potencia. La versión oficial del ataque al Pentágono no tiene fundamento, básicamente por cinco razones: La primera razón es la zona del impacto, ésta estaba siendo reformada para poder soportar mejor un ataque. Las pocas víctimas fueron empleados, algunos de ellos haciendo las construcciones. Lo más obvio habría sido estrellar el avión en medio del Pentágono para disminuir el riesgo de fallo, aun más para pilotos sin experiencia, en cambio, el avión tubo que girar 270º para impactar en la cara norte en vez de ir en línea recta. La segunda razón es el tamaño de la perforación antes del colapso por que no es suficientemente ancho para entrar un Boeing 757 ya que este mide de ancho 7’3 metros, de ala a ala 38 metros, su altura es de 13’6 metros y de lado mide 47’3 metros. En la foto del costado puede verse el agujero, las zonas donde el avión tendría que haber impactado se mantienen intactas, incluso los cristales de las ventanas donde la cola habría golpeado no están rotos. La tercera razón es la falta de pruebas. Estos aviones pesan cerca de 40 toneladas más 3 toneladas de pasajeros y equipaje. En caso de un avión impactado, algunos trozos como las alas, turbinas o la cola habrían quedado en el exterior, no obstante, ninguna imagen del evento muestra alguna pieza de un Boeing; tampoco aparece en el interior. Es cierto que se encontraron piezas de un avión, unas de ellas una turbina con un diámetro menor a un metro, a pesar de que las turbinas de un Boeing miden tres metros de diámetro; el fuselaje o placas de aluminio, pertenecientes a un avión pero tan ligeras que los agentes podían levantarlas con una sola mano, estas placas no pertenecen a un Boeing por ser muy frágiles y finas. La cuarta razón que demuestra la incongruencia de la versión oficial es la altura del avión en el momento del choque. La parte superior de la zona del atentado no estaba dañada, solo la parte inferior mostraba signos de un impacto. Para explicar el fenómeno oficialmente, el avión voló a pocos centímetros del suelo. Pero para impactar en la zona del atentado el avión tendría que estar inclinado hacia abajo porque si no sus turbinas tocarían el suelo. A 700 kilómetros por hora es prácticamente imposible y teniendo en cuenta que los aviones vuelan ligeramente inclinados hacia arriba. Debido a la poca maniobrabilidad de un Boeing para volar horizontalmente se necesitaría unos centenares de metros sin obstáculos pero en esta zona los árboles, postes y luces abundan. Poco después del once de septiembre el francés Thierry Meyssan publicó “La Gran Impostura” donde demostraba que ningún Boeing se estrelló en el Pentágono. Los militares hasta el momento negaban la posesión de cualquier video del atentado, a pesar de que solo en la cara norte hay seis cámaras de seguridad. En esta zona hay una estación de gas cuyas cámaras apuntaban directamente a la cara norte. Pocos minutos después del atentado el FBI llegó y confiscó las grabaciones. Todos los videos de las cámaras de vigilancia que grabaron el atentado también fueron confiscados, no obstante, las grabaciones de los atentados en las Torres no fueron confiscados, al contrario, se mostraron día y noche en las noticias juntamente con fotos de Bin Laden. La quinta razón son los cinco fotogramas cedidos por el Pentágono en un intento de frenar las crecientes acusaciones como las de Meyssan. En el primer fotograma, un aparato cuadrado enfrente de la cámara tapa el supuesto avión pero muestra una cola de humo. Un avión a pocos metros de altura no produce ningún vapor solo a kilómetros de altura y en condiciones atmosféricas muy precisas. En caso de un incendio en las turbinas el humo es negro, por lo tanto la cola de humo que muestra el fotograma es de un misil por que su combustible contiene hidrocarbonos y oxígeno y al no utilizar el aire atmosférico la concentración de vapor es mucho mayor debido a que el aire contiene nitrógeno, el cual reduce la formación de vapor. En el segundo fotograma se puede observar una bola de fuego muy brillante por lo que demuestra que la combustión disponía de mucho oxígeno, a diferencia del hidrocarbono, que el fuego es muy oscuro por la rápida combustión del oxígeno. Estas evidencias demuestran el encubrimiento del ataque al Pentágono. Quizás los islamistas lanzaron un misil y se intentó encubrirlo para no crear una alarma de inseguridad nacional, el único fallo de ésa suposición es que los cadáveres de los pasajeros fueron encontrados. Los fallecidos en el Pentágono fueron a Belvoir, Virginia, para volver a ser trasladados a Dover, Dellaware, donde gracias a los análisis de ADN y de los dientes se identificaron a los tripulantes. Teniendo en cuenta que el Boeing 757 se desvaneció de los radares en Ohio donde hay una base militar, probablemente el Pentágono está involucrado en estas muertes. Sí los islamistas se hubieran apropiado del avión y aterrizado en la base de Ohio con la tripulación de rehenes o sí en el momento del secuestro la ventilación hubiese soltado gas nervioso, o un gas de la misma índole, matando al personal y por control remoto el avión hubiese aterrizado en la base, durante la hora que el supuesto avión se esfumó de los radares y el traslado de los difuntos, habría dado tiempo para manipular los cadáveres, colocándolos en una habitación y haciendo explotar una bomba junto a ellos y así aparentar un choque de avión. Las fotografías demuestran que algún tipo de avión se estrelló en el Pentágono, pero gracias a los cinco fotogramas se puede afirmar que el causante del ataque fue un misil que impactó en la cara norte. Algunos investigadores del 11-9 especulan que un avión militar parecido a un PredatorDrone o un Global Hawk fue el responsable de sustituir la ruta del Boeing, ya que, a diferencia del avión comercial, es capaz de dar giros de 270º en un radio pequeño, y frente al Pentágono lanzó el misil. Seguramente, si fue algún tipo de avión, en su interior un explosivo estaba programado para detonar por que es evidente que el avión se destruyó. Otra posibilidad es la de un misil alado y con turbina. Estas especulaciones son más coherentes que la versión oficial, explica por qué no murió ningún militar de grado, el tamaño de la perforación, las pocas piezas el avión, ya que aviones de la índole de un Global Hawk o un PredatorDrone solo pesan cuatro toneladas y gran parte de su estructura es de fibra de carbono o de vidrio por lo que se reduciría a cenizas, y por último, explica por qué el Pentágono solo cedió 5 fotogramas. WorldTrade Center El WorldTrade Center estaba constituido de siete edificios. Los dos primeros se los conocía con el sobrenombre de Torres Gemelas, el tercero era un hotel y el cuarto, quinto, sexto y séptimo eran oficinas. El principal propietario era Silverstein Inc. cuyo presidente era el mismo Larry Abraham Silverstein. La Torres gemelas y el edificio siete colapsaron en el día del atentado, en el edificio seis a causa de los escombros cedió una gran parte formando un agujero perfectamente vertical. Gracias al ataque terrorista Silverstein fue reembolsado por las compañías de seguros con más de 900 millones de dólares. WorldTrade Center 7 El WorldTrade Center 7 constaba de 47 plantas, hasta el piso siete habían generadores eléctricos con tanques de gasolina a prueba de incendios. Las otras plantas servían de oficinas, en la veinticinco los arrendatarios era la CIA, el Departamento de Defensa y otras agencias. En el piso 23 había la Oficina de Manejo de Emergencia, esta planta fue convertida en una especie en búnker con las ventanas a prueba de bomba, generadores eléctricos, un sistema de filtrado de aire y agua reservada para protegerse en caso de un ataque bacteriológico. Este búnker es inútil, en todo caso debería de estar en la primera planta o en el sótano y aun así su localización es absurda. Entre las 9 y 10, después del primer atentado en la torre norte, los empleados fueron evacuados. En los derrumbamientos de las torres algunos escombros impactaron en el edificio pero el daño fue ínfimo ya que estaba alejado de las torres, en esta hora los primeros incendios aparecieron. Los fuegos eran pequeños, lo suficiente para ser apagados, o por lo menos controlados, por el sistema antiincendios. Oficialmente se da a entender que el edificio estaba sumido en inmensas llamas, pero solo en algunas plantas se podía ver un poco de fuego. Según la Agencia Federal para el Manejo de Emergencias, el edificio colapsó debido al fuego, pero por primera vez en la historia un edificio con columnas de acero colapsa a causa de un incendio. Después de que en un reportaje la Agencia Federal para el Manejo de Emergencias explicara exhaustivamente cada detalle de la estructura del edificio 7, termina reconociendo que se debería llevar otra investigación para acabar de esclarecer los hechos. Desdichadamente, cuando publicaron su penoso estudio los escombros ya habían sido destruidos, por lo que se imposibilitó cualquier futura investigación. Las grabaciones en el momento de colapso muestran que la última planta, la zona respiradero, “colapsa” antes que las demás; muy sospechoso teniendo en cuenta que los fuegos estaban a muchas plantas abajo. El edificio cayó perfectamente vertical y sus escombros quedaron reducidos a poco volumen, en un colapso normal la construcción tiende a caer horizontalmente o colapsar en ciertas zonas mientras que otras permanecen intactas, también sus escombros son muy voluptuosos ya que sus piezas son grandes por no ser detonadas. Larry Silverstein declaró: “recuerdo haber recibido una llamada del comandante del departamento de fuego diciéndome que no estaban seguros de poder contener el fuego, yo dije: Hemos tenido estas terribles pérdidas de vida que quizás lo mejor sería demolerlo. Ellos tomaron esta decisión y nosotros nos quedamos mirando el colapso del edificio”. Contrariamente a la Agencia Federal para el Manejo de Emergencias, Silverstein reconoce que el WTC 7 fue demolido, sólo el estudio de la estructura de la edificación para colocar los explosivos demora semanas y si realmente el fuego era tan grande que no podían controlarlo cómo fueron capaces de subir hasta la última planta para colocar los explosivos. Esta demolición solamente hubiera sido posible si ya se sabía de antemano que el WTC iba a ser atacado por terroristas, entendiendo como terrorismo “sucesión de actos de violencia ejecutados para infundir terror”. Las Torres Gemelas A las 8 horas el Boeing del vuelo 11 despegó de Boston, después de un cuarto de hora el avión del vuelo 77 partió de Washington. El primer Boeing impacta en la torre Norte a las 8:45, pasados quince minutos el otro choca en la Torre Sur. A las diez el WTC 2 colapsa y el WTC 1 le sigue en media hora. Sus rutas se cruzaron en el aeropuerto de Stewart, en el radar las dos señales se mezclaron y los operadores no pudieron distinguir quien era quien. El primer avión solo fue grabado por un videoaficionado con una resolución baja, pero en el segundo atentado se hicieron centenares de fotos y grabaciones. El 26 de Marzo del 2003 el periódico La Vanguardia financió un estudio a la Universidad Politécnica de Mataró para analizar las imágenes del segundo avión. Los resultados fueron publicados el 13 de julio de 2003 por el mismo periódico. El estudio consistió en analizar tres fotos del avión con distintos grados, en cada una de las tres fotos analizadas se utilizaron tres sistemas de algoritmos estándares de procesado digital para ser finalmente comparadas con un Boeing 767. Las fotografías demuestran que en el fuselaje del avión hay objetos cilíndricos no pertenecientes a este tipo de aeronave. Las conclusiones a las que se llegaron fueron: Los objetos cilíndricos detectados en las imágenes del 11 de Septiembre no son comunes a un Boeing 767-300. Estos objetos tampoco pueden ser sombras provocadas por el ángulo de incidencia del sol sobre el avión, porque siempre aparecen con la misma forma y tamaño, aunque sí con distinta luminosidad. Los objetos detectados tienen a su alrededor distinta luminiscencia por tener relieve (esta es la única explicación posible). Los objetos detectados se distinguen perfectamente del tren de aterrizaje. Según los numerosos testigos que presenciaron los hechos, “el avión no era de las líneas americanas, no era un avión comercial, y casi no tenía ventanas laterales. Existe la posibilidad de que los aviones que chocaron las torres fuesen E-10, aviones militares computarizados de reconocimiento y vigilancia, o algún modelo similar ya que tienen un fuselaje muy parecido a un Boeing 767, excepto por la ausencia de ventanas laterales. Si los aviones realmente eran militares, entonces el único momento para sustituirlos por los Boeing sería en el aeropuerto de Stewart donde sus rutas se cruzaron y hay un antiguo edifico de la CIA. Cada Torre tenía 47 columnas centrales de 90 por 36 cm. cuyo centro era hueco. En el exterior había 236 columnas separadas por menos de un metro, en las esquinas 4 columnas hacían de soporte. En la base del edificio el grosor de las paredes de las columnas era de 10 cm y a medida que la altura aumentaba el grosor disminuía hasta que en la cima media 6 mm. En la Torre Sur las columnas centrales fueron muy poco dañadas porque el avión estaba en proceso de giro y su cuerpo colisionó en los laterales, el choque afectó desde el piso 78 al 84; en la Torre Norte, 45 columnas exteriores de las plantas 94 a la 98 fueron rotas. Un avión del tamaño de un Boeing puede llegar a almacenar miles de litros de combustible, en el momento del ataque se formaron inmensas bolas de fuego, quemando mucho combustible. Después los pisos empezaron a arder. Oficialmente el calor fue tal que derritió las columnas, ya debilitadas, causando el colapso completo. Esto es imposible, ya que para derretir el acero se necesitan temperaturas de 1500º y los hidrocarburos sólo pueden llegar a los 1000º si hay una proporción óptima de oxígeno. Las imágenes muestran que el humo era negro, lo que significa falta de oxígeno. Si la temperatura hubiese sido muy elevada los cristales se habrían fundido, aún así, las columnas exteriores se mantenían frías. Curiosamente las imágenes muestran que el fuego estaba disminuyendo, hasta décimas de segundo antes del colapso. Este fenómeno posiblemente es debido a las 40 toneladas de material no combustible del avión y de toneladas de hormigón y otros materiales, que aparte de ahogarlo, absorbían el calor haciendo que las columnas no se calentasen tanto. Algunos profesores de universidades redactaron sus teorías sobre la causa del colapso. Una de ellas es la expansión termal que indica que por falta de espacio y flexibilidad la estructura se rompió, pero las estructuras de las torres estaban diseñadas para soportar tormentas y vientos descomunales gracias a su flexibilidad estructural. El edificio Windsor estaba violentamente inmerso en llamas y, a pesar de tener una estructura mucho más débil que las dos torres, no colapsó. El desmoronamiento creó grandes nubes de polvo que al sedimentar cubrió las calles. Tras un análisis del polvo, los resultados mostraron que las partículas eran de hormigón y yeso. Dado que el hormigón difícilmente se pulveriza, a no ser que se utilicen explosivos, un colapso convencional no puede ser el causante de esa desintegración. Además, todas las columnas centrales se quebraron en las junturas, en vez de estar rotas por la mitad a causa del brutal peso. A excepción de pequeños trozos de hormigón, ningún material sobrevivió intacto. El colapso quedó registrado en los polígrafos sísmicos. Según los datos sísmicos del Grupo Sismológico de la Universidad de Columbia, el tiempo del derrumbamiento de la Torre Norte fue de aproximadamente 8 segundos. Si se lanzara un objeto de una altura de 400m (la altura de las Torres) a la aceleración gravitacional terrestre, el objeto en caída libre demoraría 8 segundos en llegar al suelo, por lo tanto, la Torre Norte se derrumbó sin encontrar casi ningún obstáculo, es decir, los pisos desplomándose prácticamente no tocaron las plantas inferiores que teóricamente deberían mantenerse intactas. La Torre Sur demoró 10 segundos, probablemente a causa de la inclinación de 20º verticales que sufrió la parte superior del edificio a raíz del choque. Todas las evidencias del colapso apuntan unánimemente a una demolición. En la Torre Sur, la parte superior inclinada debería de haber caído entera, o al menos la parte saliente, no obstante, en medio de la nube de polvo las 20 plantas desaparecieron. Otra evidencia de una demolición es la expulsión de polvo, en las plantas cuyas estructuras parecen mantenerse intactas al ser explosionadas el polvo es expulsado equitativamente en cada lado y de manera horizontal; si hubiese sido un derrumbe convencional, el polvo no habría salido ni equitativamente ni horizontalmente por la falta de presión. En la cadena Fox un periodista en medio del caos y el polvo entrevistó a varios testigos. Uno de ellos era un policía que había presenciado todo lo ocurrido, el periodista le pregunta: “¿Sabe si fue una explosión o un colapso?”, el policía convencido responde “A mí me sonó a una explosión”. Este mismo reportero siguió grabando y preguntando. Otro testigo postuló: “Fue una enorme explosión...yo creo que fue una explosión en las dos torres” En la NBC, el reportero se informa: “la zona de las torres ha sido evacuada por que puede que haya otra explosión. La primera torre ya fue derrumbada”. En la CNN se informó en vivo a las 9:54: “Ha sido una enorme explosión”. “Ha habido una enorme y sonora explosión”. En Fox se dijo en directo: “es una enorme explosión que todos hemos oído”... Con testimonios de este tipo se podrían escribir páginas y páginas, pero los más veraces son los de bomberos. En una grabación, un grupo de bomberos que actuaron en medio del caos concuerdan en que una cadena de explosiones demolieron las Torres, tal como uno de ellos dice: “contamos más de diez explosiones”. “Estábamos subiendo cuando escuchamos unas bombas explotar, creemos que había un grupo de bombas en el edificio”. Para poder llevar a cabo este falso atentado los responsables tenían que estar viendo los acontecimientos para tomar decisiones. Las cadenas de explosivos seguramente funcionaban con radiofrecuencia y las señales eran emitidas por una computadora. Los técnicos se encargaron de decidir cuando demoler los edificios. El lugar más idóneo y seguro era un búnker ubicado en el edificio 7. Posiblemente los aviones se guiaban por “Homeingsignal”, sistema que guía el avión en dirección a una señal. El transmisor debía, por lo tanto, estar cerca de las Torres para que las aeronaves impactasen contra los edificios. Al finalizar la operación, para destruir toda prueba, demolieron el edificio 7. Eso explica por qué la administración estadounidense quebrantó la ley destruyendo los escombros antes de ser analizados y puso énfasis en obstruir las investigaciones y censurar material ya publicado. Una posible tercera guerra mundial Una guerra mundial es creada, en principio, en la psiquis de la humanidad y luego se manifiesta físicamente. Ciertas familias de gran poder, también conocidas como los Iluminati, representan la sombra de la psiquis colectiva y, hoy en día, son los responsables de crear la chispa que inicia las guerras mundiales. El atentado a las Torres Gemelas fue el inicio de un conflicto mucho mayor. El atentado en última instancia fue promovido por las familias más poderosas del mundo, las cuales se reúnen en comités para crear distintas estrategias con el fin de implantar un Nuevo Orden Mundial. Algunos comités son el Bilderberg, la Mesa Redonda compuesta por el Real Instituto de Relaciones Internacionales, su versión americana, el Concejo de Relaciones Internacionales, la Comisión Trilateral y el Comité de los 300. Una de las maneras de implantar un Nuevo Orden Mundial se basa en el principio “problema-reacción-solución”, es decir, se crea un conflicto, el pueblo reclama una solución y entonces se le ofrece una solución que antes no habría sido aceptada: “ataque-inseguridad y recorte libertad”. Tanto la primera como la segunda guerra mundial se basaron en estos principios. Hay indicios de que los dirigentes de la Mano Negra, sociedad de la cual uno de sus miembros asesinó al heredero de la corona austro-húngara, se reunieron con masones del Gran Oriente en el hotel St. Jerome en Toulouse, Francia. Incluso según los historiadores modernos, la sociedad de la Mano Negra, cuya cabeza principal era el jefe del Servicio de Inteligencia del Estado Mayor Servio, pertenecía a la agencia de Inteligencia serbia. El tratado de Versalles sirvió para que el pueblo alemán aceptase la solución propuesta por Hitler. En el tratado la mayoría de representantes y consejeros pertenecían a los comités antes nombrados o mantenían estrechas relaciones con las familias más poderosas del mundo. En la mesa de Versalles el representante de Estados Unidos fue Woodrow Wilson y algunos de sus consejeros fueron el Coronel Mandelhouse y Bernard Bauch, del Comité de los 300; Lloyd George era representante de Gran Bretaña, aconsejado por Alfred Milner, del Comité de los 300 y representante de la Mesa Redonda y Sir Philip Sazón, descendiente de Mayer Rothschild, jefe de una de las familias judías más poderosas del mundo; por último, Francia era representada por Georges Clemenceau y el primer ministro de interior, Georges Mandel, quien mantenía estrechas relaciones con la familia Rothschild. Además, en la comisión americana para negociar la paz estaban los hermanos Dullas, Alan Dullas fue el director de la CIA que encargó cien toneladas de LCD para el proyecto de control mental MK Ultra; Paul Warburg, heredero del imperio bancario Abraham; Robert Lasin, secretario de estado y tío de los Dullas; y Walter Lippman, fundador de la rama americana la Sociedad Fabiana. En la delegación alemana uno de sus representantes era Max Warburg, hermano del Paul que representaba a Estados Unidos. El anfitrión fue el Barón Edmun de Rothschild, líder de la creación del estado Israelí. Tanto los Warburg, familia de banqueros, como los Rothschild, representantes del maltratado pueblo judío, fueron los banqueros de Hitler. Las multinacionales americanas abrieron subsidiarias en Alemania para financiar a Hitler. Harriman, Prescott Bush, abuelo de George W. Bush y otros crearon entidades como el Trust Alemán del Acero que ayudó a Hitler a producir el 35% de los explosivos, 36% de las placas pesadas y el 22% del cable alemán. La I.G. Farben fue creada a partir de los préstamos de Wall Street. La principal desventaja de los Nazis era la escasees de combustible, la empresa petrolífera StandarOil, de los Rockefellers, una de las familias más poderosas cuyo miembro Nelson Rockefeller fue gobernador de Nueva York y Vice-presidente norteamericano, proporcionó al cartel químico la información para generar gasolina sintética, es decir, hidrogenada. La historia ser repite. Como si de una chispa se tratase, el autoatentado terrorista a las Torres Gemelas ha creado una reacción en cadena cuyas consecuencias iniciales han sido las invasiones a Afganistán e Irak y el hecho de involucrar a otros países en este conflicto. Hay indicios de una posible tercera guerra mundial, dados principalmente por las correspondencias de Albert Pike, la antigua profecía Hopi y los contactos de Billy Meyer. Albert Pike, líder de la masonería satanista del rito York, mantenía correspondencia con Giuseppe Mazzini, masón del 33º antiguo y aceptado rito satanista escocés. En una carta de Pike del 15 de agosto de 1871 para Mazzini, conservada en el Museo Británico de Londres, explica la planificación de las tres guerras mundiales del siguiente siglo. En la primera -comunica Pike en su carta- el objetivo será derrocar los zares rusos para implantar el comunismo ateo. Las diferencias entre el gobierno Británico y Alemán tenían que ser utilizadas para fomentar la lucha. La segunda guerra mundial sería fomentada por las disputas del nacional socialismo y el sionismo político con la finalidad de crear un estado judío. Hasta el momento las dos guerras han ocurrido tal como Albert Pike planificó. La carta prosigue con la tercera guerra mundial, la cual -según Pike- será fomentada por los conflictos entre el mundo islámico y el sionismo político que quedarán destruidos, a la vez que otras naciones, forzadas a luchar entre si, acabarán agotadas en todos los niveles. La carta finaliza diciendo: “quienes pretendan la completa dominación mundial, después de la 3ª guerra, provocarán el mayor cataclismo jamás conocido en el mundo”. Thomas Banyacya fue uno de los elegidos por los ancianos chamanes Hopi, situados en Arizona, para transmitir la Gran Profecía a la sociedad blanca. Esta profecía está representada en una de las lapidas de piedra de la tribu nativoamericana. Algunas profecías ya cumplidas fueron la llegada de los blancos y el invento de carruajes, que fueron transmitidas de generación a generación. En los tiempos en que la Gran Profecía se cumpla la humanidad andará dividida en dos: una seguirá en contacto con la naturaleza, en equilibrio, la otra estará alejada de ella, se extraviará hacia el materialismo. La profecía dice: “Cuando haya telarañas y casas en el cielo, la segunda línea de la humanidad perecerá”. Esto tiene mucho sentido si se mira al cielo, a menudo se observan aviones soltando una especie de humo que persiste en el cielo durante horas hasta que se entremezcla con el aire, incluso hay días que todo el cielo queda recubierto de estas sustancias y los rayos solares al traspasarlos crean un arco iris de colores químicos, pero lo más frecuente es que las estelas químicas dejadas por los aviones se entrecrucen en el cielo formando lo que parece una telaraña. Estos rastros, que serían la fuente de serias enfermedades, formarían parte de proyectos militares que tienen por finalidad implantar el Nuevo Orden Mundial. La expresión “casas en el cielo”, seguramente hace referencia a los aviones. Para que la segunda línea de la humanidad perezca es necesario una purificación, una destrucción, y una tercera guerra podría crear los cambios que la profecía advierte. Billy Mayer es un suizo que asegura contactar con extraterrestres cara a cara. Durante muchos años fue tachado de farsante, pero ganó más credibilidad cuando la CFI-West, organización dedicada a reproducir fotografías, falló en el intento de duplicar cualquiera de sus nítidas fotos o videos de platillos voladores, que según la organización eran falsificados. En algunos contactos, los extraterrestres provenientes de las Pléyades, le revelaron los acontecimientos por venir e información aun no descubierta. Para dejar constancia de la fecha, Meyer las registraba con copyright. A lo largo de su vida ha padecido 19 atentados, en uno de ellos, en India, perdió su brazo izquierdo. En su contacto 29, del 7 de julio de 1975, le dieron información de Venus sobre la composición atmosférica, sus gases, la temperatura de la superficie, la profundidad de las nubes, la velocidad de los vientos y otros datos que en 1981 fueron confirmados por los científicos. En otros encuentros le predijeron la erupción de ciertos volcanes, terremotos, la invasión china del norte de Vietnam, la masacre de Jonestown, el desastre nuclear de Rusia y otros hechos que no hacen más que demostrar su veracidad. La principal finalidad de estas profecías es avisar a la humanidad de una inevitable tercera guerra mundial pero si el inconciente colectivo cambia para mejor no toda la catastrófica profecía se cumplirá. En el contacto 215 de 1987, avisó de un ataque terrorista en el WTC y del inicio de guerras que Estados Unidos ha lanzado contra los países islámicos. Según la profecía del contactado Billy Mayer, la peor etapa durará 888 días. El terrorismo, las guerras, el hambre y las enfermedades causarán miles de millones de muertes, en algunas zonas 1 de cada 3 personas morirán, en otras un cuarto de la población perecerá. En estos tiempos no se podrá vender ni comprar, las provisiones serán racionadas y aquel que intente robar un poco de comida lo pagará con la vida. La gran catástrofe difícilmente podrá ser evitada porque la humanidad en vez de dirigirse hacia los valores nobles, el amor, la paz y la libertad se dirige hacia los valores materiales, el placer, la riqueza y el poder. Acontecerán grandes desastres naturales [algunos ya están ocurriendo] a causa de las explosiones nucleares, la contaminación y la extracción de petróleo, al extraerlo las inmensas cavernas quedan vacías y juntamente al peso de las grandes ciudades y las inmensas presas, crean un desajuste que afecta los movimientos internos terrestres, en consecuencia, originan movimientos antinaturales en las placas tectónicas que causan terremotos y erupción de volcanes, los cuales generan cambios climáticos de gran magnitud. Estados Unidos y otros países desarrollados lucharán contra los países del este y con la excusa de implantar la paz los invadirán, actualmente Estados Unidos ya ha invadido Afganistán e Irak. Francia y España entrarán en conflicto armado, incluso es posible que acontezca antes de la 3ª guerra mundial; Rusia y Suecia también entrarán en combate. En un verano Rusia atacará Escandinava con eso se iniciará un conflicto en toda Europa, que unos meses antes habrá sufrido el paso de un tornado. Más tarde, Rusia, con su afán de poder, invadirá Irán, Turquía y algunos países del medio oriente. También mantendrá una disputa con China por Mongolia. China amenazará a India y la atacará a la vez que incitará a Pakistán para que se alíe con ella. Europa será sometida a un régimen militar, Francia la utilizarán como cuartel general pero antes ya habrá sido invadida por sus inmigrantes musulmanes, que serán la fuerza del trabajo [ya se han producido algunos enfrentamientos de árabes franceses]; después, las invasiones seguirán por España e Inglaterra la cual estará en condiciones parecidas a una guerra civil con Irlanda del Norte. El odio a los extranjeros y a personas de otra religión crecerá y el neo-nazismo, terrorismo y la extrema derecha aumentará. Los militares intentarán fundar una fuerza policial mundial. La profecía de Billy Mayer también indica que los científicos, mediante la manipulación genética engendrarán ejércitos de clones con ADN humano mezclado con el de cerdo [en algunas bases militares ya se está experimentando en este sentido]. Estos clones estarán desprovistos de sentimientos y su único objetivo será el destruir, pero existe la posibilidad de que las armas computarizadas y los clones se vuelvan independientes por lo que sus creadores perderían el control sobre ellas. Por último, según la profecía que surge del contacto de Billy Mayer de 1987, los países del Este se levantaran contra los del Oeste. Los países tercermundistas también se sublevarán contra sus explotadores. Al final las grandes ciudades americanas quedarán completamente destruidas a causa de las armas de destrucción masiva utilizadas en sus guerras civiles y con otras naciones. Europa en cambio quedará muy dañada pero sobrevivirá. Todo esto puede llegar a ocurrir exactamente si los pensamientos, sentimientos y acciones de la humanidad no cambian. En caso de que mejore, este gran sufrimiento se verá aliviado pero lo más importante será después de la guerra porque entonces se decidirá definitivamente cual de los dos bandos gana: la Élite y su Nuevo Orden Mundial o la humanidad y su libertad. Pasará lo que deba pasar. Sea lo que sea del futuro no nos debemos dejar engañar. Los autoatentados o atentados de falsa bandera, como el da las Torres Gemelas, tienen como objetivo principal hallar el pretexto justo para comenzar una escalada de violencia, muerte y destrucción a nivel mundial que se traducirá en inimaginables beneficios financieros para unos pocos que se enseñorean desde hace ya bastante tiempo como los dueños del Mundo.

WHO IS THIS GUY? Let me ask a serious question, that may sound over the top and provocative, but is meant in all sincerity: Is there a difference between consciously traitorous actions versus incompetency or naivete when the results are the same for both? Other than consciousness of motive, is there really any difference. Iran is about to get a nuclear weapon, folks.  And Obama is going to let them get it, too.  Iran holds regular mass rallies where they chant, "Death to America."  It's not a euphemism.  They mean it.  Iran, more than any other nation, has funded terrorism, and is responsible for the death of more Americans than any other country.  Iran has sworn to destroy Israel, our closest ally.  Well, our closest ally, at least until Obama came to town.  Now, who knows where they stand with him? We've had a sense of Obama's anti-Israel sentiments for years now.  He scarcely conceals his hostility toward the Israeli leadership.  His pro-Iranian sentiments aren't new either.  There have been hints of it now for a long time. In 2009, during the Green Revolution in Iran, the regime of the mullahs was teetering on the brink of collapse amidst a wave of popular sentiment for democratic reform.  One good push and there was real hope for a democratic Iran.  The protesters looked to America, not for arms or material support, but for moral support.  They watched and waited for a single word of encouragement from the new President and the so called "leader of the free world."  Obama was silent.  Oddly silent.  The revolution for democracy in Iran was crushed and thousands jailed or executed very soon afterward. Why was Obama silent?  This President has gone out of his way to weigh in with his opinion on plenty of issues where his opinion was not warranted or solicited.  He's offered his opinion when offering it was guaranteed to be unproductive and even problematic.  Yet, when his opinion could have made a difference, when it could have altered the destructive trajectory of world event, even changed history, Obama had nothing to say. Didn't he favor democracy in Iran? Impulsively, we might think, 'yes', giving Obama the benefit of the doubt offered to all of his predecessors  But what evidence do we have that Obama favors real democratic reforms anywhere?  When has Obama ever given a speech encouraging democratic reforms?  He seems almost too embarrassed to do so. Why couldn't he just speak up for democracy in the world generally, without specifically mentioning Iran?  It seems almost impossible to fathom, without considering the possibility that Obama was at a minimum agnostic about the Iranian regime.  What other possibilities exist that wouldn't cast doubt on Obama's loyalty to America? Until this President and his administration, Americans presumed, and rightly so, that despite sometimes major differences in policy, all Presidents placed the safety and well-being of the nation above their own selfish motivations.  Even when Jimmy Carter badly botched Iran policy in the late 1970s, nobody questioned where his loyalties lay.  Carter lacked sober judgment, was shockingly naive, and overly committed to a peace with an enemy that had no desire or intention for peace.  But was Carter disloyal?  No. This doesn't appear to be the case with Obama.  He's conducted himself on Iran policy and elsewhere in a manner that is, well quite frankly, startling.  Jarring enough to make the unthinkable thinkable:  Does this President have the safety and security of the nation as his top priority.  Sadly, it seems the answer to this question isn't just 'no', but 'hell no!' Does that go too far?   Should we not consider whether Obama's most deeply held feelings about America are antithetical to the feelings of well over 90% of Americans? Do a President's loyalties stand above and beyond reproach when his behavior through action or lack of it, urge us to question those loyalties? Why should a President remain unaccountable on something so fundamentally tied to the well being and security of an entire nation? These and other questions have haunted many Americans over the last six years. During his time in office, Obama has shown us that he's the master of the "slow roll."  He's done it over and over again and he's doing it here again with Iran's nuclear program.  Let's take a walk down memory lane.  When he first ran in 2008, Obama was unequivocally for traditional marriage.  He staked out a position that allowed for civil unions for gays, but never hinted at any softening of his position.  Only later, when his campaign contributions from gay rights groups were threatened, did he "evolve" on the issue.  But anyone who had examined Obama's political history knew he was pro-gay marriage all along.  He slow rolled the nation on that issue.    Similarly, he slow rolled the country on the Affordable Care Act.  Dozens of times, Obama confidently assured the nation that his new health care law would leave them unaffected.  Without any reservation, caveat, condition or qualification, Obama slow rolled the entire country into believing the Affordable Care Act would only help the needy and leave their own plans and their own doctors unaffected.  His re-election in 2012 was based on this outright lie among others.  Obama defrauded his way back into office for a second term and while a mostly supine media protested for a time, this too was swept away by other events, diverting the focus of an already friendly media. Obama slow rolled the country on the renewed threat by ISIS.  He referred to them as "the JV team."  That is, the 'junior varsity' of al-Qaeda. When one city after another fell to the ISIS barbarians, as they conducted a campaign of savagery through Iraq, it wasn't until ISIS was standing at the gates of Baghdad itself before Obama had to sheepishly admit ISIS was no "JV team."  What purpose did slow rolling the renewed danger in Iraq serve?  What American interest?  Isis announced its intentions to attack America and Americans anywhere in the world they could be found.  Several lost their lives as a result.  Obama's response?  A token air campaign against these subhuman ISIS animals. Still, Obama found motivation enough to support a popular movement in Egypt to oust Hosni Mubarak when it suited him.  The same kind of democratic uprising Obama failed to support to oust mortal enemies in Iran, was now enthusiastically supported to oust a faithful, albeit authoritarian ally in Egypt.  But why did it suit him to help oust Mubarak?  Perhaps the fact that the Muslim Brotherhood was pushing for Mubarak's ouster under the fig leaf of using a democratic election?  It wouldn't be the first time radical totalitarians rose to power on the strategy of 'one man, one vote, one time.' So, Mubarak was ousted and the Muslim Brotherhood under Mohammed Morsi controlled Egypt.  That is, until Morsi attempted to deconstruct the civil society, and transform it into a Sharia controlled Islamist state.  Morsi was a wolf in sheep's clothing and an unprecedented uprising of millions of Egyptians unseated Morsi.  Did Obama support those democratic protesters?  No.  Why not?  Perhaps having no less than six senior national security advisers who are part of the Muslim Brotherhood can offer a hint as to why.  But this was now the second time sided against a democratic movement against a radical Islamist government.  A pattern has emerged. Let's not forget who the Muslim Brotherhood is.  The Muslim Brotherhood is the parent organization of al-Qaeda.  They are also the group claiming responsibility for the assassination of Egyptian President, Anwar Sadat.  The top al-Qaeda leader, Ayman al-Zawahiri is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood.  The Muslim Brotherhood was also involved in the Holy Land Foundation trial of Sami al-Aryan.  In that trial, the strategy document of the Muslim Brotherhood was entered into evidence.  It clearly stated that it was the intention of that group to destroy western Christian civilization.  At least six men from this group are advising Obama. There may be complex and justifiable reasons Obama seems to curry favor with our mortal enemies, while alienating our allies.  If those reasons do exist, they certainly aren't obvious from the man who promised "the most transparent administration in history."  It has been far from that.  In fact, it's been opposite of that.  As America enters the final act of the Obama drama, the world in more dangerous.  Our enemies are energized.  Our allies deflated.  And our President seems unconcerned.  It really should cause all of us to ask one simple question: Who is Barack Obama? Link to North American Strategy Paper of the Muslim Brotherhood

Egypt's ex Army Chief Abdel Fatah al Sisi won election this week (with an astounding 96% of the vote!) The ascent of this Mubarak-era military functionary speaks to the profound failure of Egypt's 2011 Arab Spring revolution.  Who is al-Sisi? Why did the Muslim Brotherhood and Mohammed Morsi fail so spectacularly? And what can prevent Egypt from lurching from one political crisis to the next? Here to provide the context for Morsi's fall, al Sisi's rise and What It All Means is Issandr al Amrani of the International Crisis Group. If you have 20 minutes and what to understand what's going on in Egypt, have a listen.   

The Muslim Brotherhood is an Egyptian Islamist organisation with branches throughout the world - including Britain, where it has had a presence for several decades. During this time, the organisation has courted little attention and has at times been viewed by British authorities as a force for good in the fight against extremism. So why has David Cameron called for an investigation into their activities now? In this edition of The Report, Peter Marshall hears claims that this review is less about national security, and more about appeasing the rulers of the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia, who are ideologically opposed to the Brotherhood. The UAE and Saudi Arabia also happen to have lucrative contracts with British businesses. The programme also reveals how senior members of the Conservative party have been raising concerns about the Muslim Brotherhood for several years - in particular the Brotherhood's ties to Hamas - and so the new investigation is perhaps not a complete surprise. However, this is the same organisation which received the backing of the British government when Mohammed Morsi was elected president of Egypt, and so is the government now guilty of hypocrisy? Critics of the Brotherhood say much has changed in the Middle East over the past year - especially in Egypt - and there are concerns that rogue elements of the Muslim Brotherhood will seek refuge in Britain. Already, members of the Brotherhood and its political wing, The Freedom and Justice Party, have come to London to seek asylum. The Report speaks to them about the on-going investigation into their activities and asks them why they have come to the UK and what does the Muslim Brotherhood really stand for? CONTRIBUTORS: Anas Altikriti - The Muslim Association of Britain & The Cordoba Foundation Mohamed Soudan - The Freedom and Justice Party Olivier Guitta - The Henry Jackson Society Dr Robert Lambert - University of St Andrews & former head of the Muslim Contact Unit, Metropolitan Police Special Branch Baroness Falkner - Liberal Democrat lead spokesperson on foreign affairs in the House of Lords Alistair Burt - Conservative MP & former Foreign Office minister for the Middle East Reporter: Peter Marshall Producer: Richard Fenton-Smith Researcher: James Melley.

In the programme today: - Egypt's deposed President Mohammed Morsi goes on trial today - The Congolese army has driven the M23 rebels out of the eastern part of the DRC - South Sudan's controversial opposition leader Lam Akol has returned home

Barely a year after Egypt's post-revolution elections were held, millions of protestors took to the streets to demand the resignation of President Mohammed Morsi. After a short stand-off with army leaders, he was removed from power in what many describe as a coup d'etat. The subsequent clashes between Mr Morsi's Muslim Brotherhood supporters and security forces have proved violent and bloody and the country is once again being governed by the military - but what were the events which closed this short chapter in the fledgling Egyptian democracy? Christopher de Bellaigue speaks to insiders from across Egypt's political spectrum to reveal the mistakes and power-plays which led to the downfall of the country's first democratically elected president. Contributors: Dr Abdul Mawgoud Dardery, former Freedom and Justice Party MP for Luxor. Dr Hisham Hellyer, associate fellow at the Royal United Services Institute (London) and the Brookings Institution (Washington). Dr Omar Ashour, senior lecturer in Middle East Politics and Security Studies, University of Exeter. Angy Ghannam, Head of BBC Monitoring, Cairo. Dr Wael Haddara, former communications adviser to President Mohammed Morsi. Dr Abdel Moneim Aboul Fotouh, founder of the Strong Egypt party. Producer: Richard Fenton-Smith Editor: Innes Bowen

Cairo has been a virtual war zone since this morning, when security forces attacked the encamped supporters of ousted President Mohammed Morsi. We have an update.

According to a BBC report from July 16, “a new interim Egyptian government has been sworn in, with army chief Gen Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, who led the ousting of Mohammed Morsi, becoming deputy PM as well as defence minister. ... The swearing in followed another night of violence between security forces and Morsi supporters that left seven dead. A spokesman for Mr Morsi's Muslim Brotherhood called the interim government ‘illegitimate'. Mr Morsi was ousted on 3 July in what many have said was a military coup.The army said it was fulfilling the demands of the people after mass anti-Morsi protests.”

Blogger and organizer Shimaa Helmy, who was involved in the January 25 revolution in Egypt from Day One, shares her concerns about the military overthrow of Mohammed Morsi and the epidemic of sexual violence against women protesters.  Then we sit down with long-time lesbian and social justice activist Patricia Jackson to discuss her new memoir, Takes an Uprising.  And we talk with Leslie Simon of the Women's Studies Department at San Francisco City College, about the plan to revoke the college's accreditation and how we can stop it. The post Women's Magazine – July 8, 2013 appeared first on KPFA.

News of the Week Update July 8, 2013 July 8, 2013 ATS News of the Week Commentary with Keith Preston. Topics include: The overthrow of Egypt’s president Mohammed Morsi and why the introduction of Western liberal democracy in Middle Eastern nations ironically tends to fuel the creation of Islamic states. The ongoing saga of Edward Snowden and why there must be public campaigns on behalf of whistleblowers on the model of the “Free Mumia” movement. The ongoing atrocities perpetrated by the American police state on innocent civilians and the need for a militant anti-police insurgency More…

Two days after Egypt's military removed President Mohammed Morsi and replaced him with the country's Supreme Constitutional Court Chief Justice, Suzette Grillot and Joshua Landis talk with incoming University of Oklahoma Middle East scholar and Muslim Brotherhood expert Samer Shehata about what's next for the country.

What happens to Egypt following the overthrow of the government of President Mohammed Morsi, and how should the world react? Borzou Daragahi in Cairo and David Gardner, FT senior commentator based in the Middle East, join Gideon Rachman. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

It's hard to do a show two days after a national tragedy, but we did it. The crew finds a way to keep calm, carry on, and make the best of a tough few days. Holy Goalie, who's in the Boston area, is joined by Nick Dinicola and Edie Sellers while they get very raw and real about all the crazy emotions going through them at the moment and wondering how to they talk about something so trivial as video games when a horrible event such as the Boston Marathon bombing is so fresh and raw. Since this recording, the two bombers have been caught and killed, and while we still have a lot of questions unanswered, the answer to "what do we do now" is to not let the tragedy stop our lives... or our podcast. ALERT: GameHounds won't have a show next week due to Edie going out of town. Need something to tide you over? Try our two episodes of GameHounds: Happy Endings on . This . This . . In the week's episode, the somber GameHounds gang discusses: Reviews of Euro Truck Simulator (PC), Bioshock Infinite (Xbox 360), and Abyss: Wraiths of Eden (PC). Rumors about new Xbox are still coming, as well as rumors Microsoft may back away from the . Wii U's spring update with faster load times, background and standby-downloading, virtual console, and Wii U Panorama. 2K Marin's Xcom—the shooter version—may now be , The Bureau. Dishonored's "Knife of Dunwall" DLC Little Inferno is . No excuses. Get it. Minecraft's Notch behind Egyptian president Mohammed Morsi. Enjoy,

Millions of Zimbabweans vote on a new constitution - Andrew Harding, in Harare, quotes one government minister saying the document is the 'midwife' to a brand new future for the country. Jonathan Head talks of Burma's most famous resident, the Nobel prizewinner Aung San Suu Kyi. Once revered as an icon, now she's having to get used to being heckled as she goes about her work as a politician. Louisa Loveluck talks of the crumbling Egyptian railway system and how it is starting to tarnish the reputation of the new government led by Mohammed Morsi. More than a billion Indians are about to get brand new state of the art identity cards. Peter Day says it's a bold move by the government -- but will it be a successful one? People in Jerusalem are awaiting the imminent arrival of Barack Obama. Kevin Connolly speculates on what may emerge from the trip and wonders if, afterwards, streets will be named in honour of the American president! The programme is produced by Tony Grant.

Gawker editor-in-chief A.J. Daulerio talks about his recent trip to Cairo, where he reported on the escalating conflict between the opposition and the ruling Islamist party.

On Thursday, the United Nations voted overwhelmingly to recognize a Palestinian state. The resolution upgrading the Palestinians' status to a nonmember observer state at the United Nations was approved by a more than two-thirds majority of the 193-member world body. The vote was 138-9, with 41 abstaining. Both the United States and Israel voted against the recognition. Comparative politics expert Rebecca Cruise said previous attempts by the Palestinians to receive official statehood status a member of the U.N. were blocked by the Security Council, specifically the United States. "The state word is incredibly important here," Cruise said. "So, having the word 'state' in that definition of an ‘observer state’ is symbolic. No, they're not a member of the U.N. No, they're not a state, per se, but it is significant." Suzette Grillot, the interim dean of the University of Oklahoma's College of International Studies, says some analysts believe this move by the Palestinians to come into statehood through a so-called "back door" method. "Israel's argument has been there's no such thing as a Palestinian nation, or a Palestinian," said Joshua Landis, the Director of the Center for Middle East Studies at the University of Oklahoma. "That's the argument the Palestinians are trying to overturn. And that's where getting this written into international law gives them purchase then, to engage [in] what Israelis have called 'lawfare' - a legal form of warfare to try to get a hunk of Palestine for their national home." Anger against Egypt's Islamist president was once again on display in the streets of Cairo this week, where huge crowds have been denouncing a draft constitution approved overnight by allies of President Mohammed Morsi. Fatema Shokr is a visiting lecture in OU’s Arabic Flagship Program, and participated in Egypt’s Arab Spring revolution in 2011 from her home in Alexandria. “I believe we can reach democracy,” Shokr said. “But if we feel disappointed and start to decide no, it's not going to work. We're not going to see democracy there; I think we will lose our revolution.” In addition to protesting on the streets, Shokr’s role in the revolution involved sharing information through various social media sites. “Facebook in Egypt, I believe, is very different than Facebook here, or any other place,” Shokr said. “Facebook has been, and still is, a main way of communication, and describing or giving your opinion about politics, and religion, and what's happening. “ Although she spent this semester in Norman, Shokr remains engaged and informed about events taking place in her home country.