Podcasts about policy recommendations

In this episode of One in Ten, host Teresa Huizar talks with researcher Kotomi Yokokura about the critical issue of educator sexual misconduct and the role of electronic communication in these offenses. Yokokura shares her personal motivation and findings from her study, which reveals the alarming prevalence of misconduct, including frequent use of social media and messaging apps for grooming. They discuss the need for clearer policies, better informed consent from parents, and the implications of increased technology use in education post-pandemic. They also highlight the challenges and potential solutions in protecting students both online and offline.  Time Stamps:00:00  Introduction and Episode Overview 01:33  Meet Kotomi Yokokura: Personal Journey and Research 02:58  Understanding Educator Sexual Misconduct 05:07  The Role of Electronic Communication in Misconduct 05:42  Data and Findings from Disciplinary Records 08:54  Characteristics of Offending Educators 14:05  Impact on Students and Parental Awareness 21:31  Policy Recommendations and Future Research 34:50  Conclusion and Final ThoughtsResources:Educator Sexual Misconduct: A Description of Electronic Communication Use; Journal of Child Sexual Abuse; January 2025Support the showDid you like this episode? Please leave us a review on Apple Podcasts.

The recent AI 2027 report sparked widespread discussion with its stark warnings about the near-term risks of unaligned AI.Authors @Daniel Kokotajlo (former OpenAI researcher now focused full-time on alignment through his nonprofit, @AI Futures, and one of TIME's 100 most influential people in AI) and @Thomas Larsen joined the show to unpack their findings.We talk through the key takeaways from the report, its policy implications, and what they believe it will take to build safer, more aligned models. (0:00) Intro(1:15) Overview of AI 2027(2:32) AI Development Timeline(4:10) Race and Slowdown Branches(12:52) US vs China(18:09) Potential AI Misalignment(31:06) Getting Serious About the Threat of AI(47:23) Predictions for AI Development by 2027(48:33) Public and Government Reactions to AI Concerns(49:27) Policy Recommendations for AI Safety(52:22) Diverging Views on AI Alignment Timelines(1:01:30) The Role of Public Awareness in AI Safety(1:02:38) Reflections on Insider vs. Outsider Strategies(1:10:53) Future Research and Scenario Planning(1:14:01) Best and Worst Case Outcomes for AI(1:17:02) Final Thoughts and Hopes for the Future With your co-hosts: @jacobeffron - Partner at Redpoint, Former PM Flatiron Health @patrickachase - Partner at Redpoint, Former ML Engineer LinkedIn @ericabrescia - Former COO Github, Founder Bitnami (acq'd by VMWare) @jordan_segall - Partner at Redpoint

Host Teresa Huizar speaks with Dr. Emily Putnam-Hornstein and Dr. Sarah Font, co-principal investigators of Lives Cut Short, about the persistent issue of child abuse fatalities and why progress in reducing these deaths has stalled. The episode delves into the emotional impact of child abuse cases, the challenges of accurate data collection, the reluctance to discuss child safety, and the need for systemic changes. They also highlight the importance of transparency and evidence-based interventions, and recommend practical steps that policymakers can take to better protect vulnerable children.Editor's note: Dr. Font's connection during the interview was inconsistent due to a storm in her area, leading to some glitches in her audio that we worked to troubleshoot. We apologize for the lower quality. Please see transcript for clarity in Dr. Font's answers.Time and Topic00:00 Introduction and Episode Overview00:30 Personal Story: The Case That Stuck02:35 Interview with Dr. Emily Putnam-Hornstein and Dr. Sarah Font04:14 Challenges in Child Abuse Fatality Data08:10 State-Level Data and Reporting Issues25:10 Policy Recommendations and Future Directions47:44 Conclusion and Final ThoughtsResources:Drs. Emily Putnam-Hornstein and Sarah Font are co-principal investigators of Lives Cut Short, a join project of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the American Enterprise Institute.Maryland recorded an alarming rise in child deaths from abuse and neglect. No one noticed; Jessica Calefati, The Baltimore Banner; February 3, 2025One in Ten; Prediction as Prevention, with Dr. Emily Putnam-Hornstein; Season 1, Episode 7, August 5, 2019Support the showDid you like this episode? Please leave us a review on Apple Podcasts.

Get it all and get it ad-free at wickedproblems.earthThe electricity grid is more fragile and more vulnerable than it needs to be for what we're asking the basically 120-yr-old tech to do in 2025. Last week's outage after an explosion at the substation nearest Heathrow, London's busiest airport, was a reminder of that.Before founding grid tech rising star ENODA, Paul Domjan advised the US defence dept, NATO and plenty of others on energy security. Paul sheds light on how the incident highlights the grid's vulnerabilities and the necessity for a more resilient and flexible electricity system. The amazing thing, Paul says, is that we've been this lucky for this long.A group very respectful of luck was the IRA, which after nearly killing Margaret Thatcher in Brighton in 1984 quipped: “we only need to be lucky once, you must be lucky always.” And last week's incident, while foul play isn't in evidence, reminded Paul of a 1996 IRA plot to disrupt London's power supply, stopped at the last moment by MI5 in Operation AIRLINES. He cautions against complacency given the evolving threats to energy infrastructure from geopolitical tensions.The conversation underscores the need for systemic changes in utilities' approach, investments in renewable energy, and the adoption of innovative solutions to ensure grid reliability and stability.01:15 Historical Context: IRA Plot03:54 Energy Infrastructure Vulnerabilities06:32 Interview with Paul Damian: Background and Insights07:28 Paul's Career and NATO Involvement10:23 The Fragility of the Power Grid12:13 Technological Solutions for Grid Stability26:39 Policy Recommendations for Energy Security32:28 Conclusion and Future Conversations Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Register free at https://brightu.com to watch the full Feel Good, Gut Health Course stream - Global Civil War and Patriot Revolt (0:10) - Strategies of the Deep State (3:06) - Impact on Europe and Globalist Control (9:23) - Cyber Attacks and Protests (15:43) - Murder of Jamie White and Globalist Terrorism (24:07) - Preparedness and Self-Reliance (41:34) - Interview with Dr. Bashima Williams on Gut Health (48:51) - Challenges of Gluten and Inflammatory Foods (1:19:38) - Gut Lining and Digestion Challenges (1:21:29) - Digestion Simulator and Microbiome Role (1:25:11) - Short Chain Fatty Acids and Microbiome Health (1:27:13) - Ozempic and Long-Term Consequences (1:31:09) - Smart Goal Setting and Lifestyle Changes (1:33:14) - Food Labels and Processing (1:39:24) - Longevity and Anti-Aging (1:51:03) - Policy Recommendations and Education (1:57:03) - Bonus Materials in the Course (2:04:38) For more updates, visit: http://www.brighteon.com/channel/hrreport NaturalNews videos would not be possible without you, as always we remain passionately dedicated to our mission of educating people all over the world on the subject of natural healing remedies and personal liberty (food freedom, medical freedom, the freedom of speech, etc.). Together, we're helping create a better world, with more honest food labeling, reduced chemical contamination, the avoidance of toxic heavy metals and vastly increased scientific transparency. ▶️ Every dollar you spend at the Health Ranger Store goes toward helping us achieve important science and content goals for humanity: https://www.healthrangerstore.com/ ▶️ Sign Up For Our Newsletter: https://www.naturalnews.com/Readerregistration.html ▶️ Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport ▶️ Join Our Social Network: https://brighteon.social/@HealthRanger ▶️ Check In Stock Products at: https://PrepWithMike.com

In February 2025, the Government of Jamaica made publicly available the National Artificial Intelligence Policy Recommendations prepared by the National Artificial Intelligence Task Force. We are joined by the Chairman of the Task Force, Christopher Reckord, to discuss the policy recommendations made, including:   *  the unique, Jamaica-specific considerations that shaped the recommendations;   *  the priority action items Chris hopes will be executed; and   *  why other Caribbean countries should go through the trouble of creating a national AI policy.   The episode, show notes and links to some of the things mentioned during the episode can be found on the ICT Pulse Podcast Page (www.ict-pulse.com/category/podcast/)       Enjoyed the episode?  Do rate the show and leave us a review!       Also, connect with us on: Facebook – https://www.facebook.com/ICTPulse/   Instagram –  https://www.instagram.com/ictpulse/   Twitter –  https://twitter.com/ICTPulse   LinkedIn –  https://www.linkedin.com/company/3745954/admin/   Join our mailing list: http://eepurl.com/qnUtj    Music credit: The Last Word (Oui Ma Chérie), by Andy Narrell Podcast editing support:  Mayra Bonilla Lopez ----------------

A discussion of Ben's Stratechery article AI Promises and Chip Precariousness, including basic geography and evolving geopolitical considerations informing today's Taiwan tensions, the recent history of US policy surrounding chips, considerations for US policies going forward, and various concerns with lifting the chip ban and implementing stricter controls on chipmaking equipment.

On this week's episode, Israel Policy Forum Policy Advisor and Tel Aviv-based journalist Neri Zilber hosts Aziz Alghashian, Director of Research at ORF Middle East. They discuss how the past 16 months have looked from Riyadh and the Gulf, the prospects of Israel-Saudi normalization, the demand for a viable pathway towards Palestinian statehood, how Benjamin Netanyahu has misled the Israeli public, the Trump effect on Middle East diplomacy, and more. Policy Recommendations for the Trump Administration and the 119th CongressSupport the showFollow us on Instagram, Twitter/X, and Bluesky, and subscribe to our email list here.

On this week's episode, Israel Policy Forum Policy Advisor and Tel Aviv-based journalist Neri Zilber hosts Chief Policy Officer Michael Koplow and Diane and Guilford Glazer Foundation Senior Director of Policy Research Shira Efron. The trio discuss the release of the first three female hostages from Hamas captivity, the surprising (for some) Gaza ceasefire-hostage deal, the re-emergence of Hamas fighters and the lack of a day after plan for the strip, the prospects of the ceasefire being continued into a second stage, what Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu have planned for the Middle East and each other, and more.Policy Recommendations for the Trump Administration and the 119th CongressSupport the showFollow us on Instagram, Twitter/X, and Bluesky, and subscribe to our email list here.

In this edition of Wilson Center NOW, we are joined by Lila Abed, Director of the Wilson Center's Mexico Institute.  She highlights a new publication, “The Next President of the United States: Challenges and Recommendations for the US-Mexico Relationship.” The comprehensive booklet is, “a practical roadmap for the incoming administration and offers actionable recommendations across six priority areas: migration, security, USMCA, energy, water, and democracy.”

In this episode of 'One in Ten,' host Teresa Huizar interviews Dr. Jane Silovsky, Director of the Center of Child Abuse and Neglect at the University of Oklahoma, Health Sciences Center. They discuss the often-overlooked issue of sibling sexual abuse and preschool-aged children, examining risk factors, prevalence, and the challenges in addressing this sensitive topic. Key points include the difference in behaviors between preschoolers and older children, the role of maltreatment, and the impact of exposure to sexual content online. Dr. Silovsky emphasizes hope through effective treatment and offers practical advice for child abuse professionals on handling these cases with empathy and understanding.Timestamps00:00 Introduction to the Episode 01:29 Welcoming Dr. Jane Silovsky 01:59 Research on Preschoolers with Problematic Sexual Behavior 04:00 Defining Problematic Sexual Behavior in Young Children 05:50 Understanding Sibling Sexual Abuse 09:30 Impact of Family Dynamics and Exposure 11:54 Influence of Online Content and Technology 14:16 Details of the Study and Key Findings 21:31 Implications for Child Abuse Professionals 28:14 Prevention and Policy Recommendations 35:31 Concluding Thoughts and Acknowledgements  LinksJane Silovsky, Ph.D., is a professor of pediatrics at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center. She serves as the CMRI/Jean Gumerson Endowed Chair, director of the Center on Child Abuse and Neglect, and director of the National Center on the Sexual Behavior of Youth.Nicole Barton, Cierra Henson, Kimberly Lopez, Emma Lambert, Jordan Simmons, Erin Taylor, Jane Silovsky,Characteristics of preschool-age children who engage in problematic sexual behaviors with siblings,Child Abuse & Neglect, 2024“Sexual Behavior in Youth: What's Normal? What's Not? And What Can We Do About It?” (Season 3, Episode 15, November 5, 2021)Support the showDid you like this episode? Please leave us a review on Apple Podcasts.

At this year's TechCrunch Disrupt in San Francisco,  President and CEO of the Aerospace Corporation Steve Isakowitz and Agency Chief Technologist at NASA A.C. Charanya Charania took the stage to discuss a literal moonshot: how to build a thriving lunar ecosystem. Today on Equity, we're taking you behind the scenes of TechCrunch Disrupt once again, this time with Devin Coldewey at the helm. For those keeping track, Devin's kept the Equity podcast crew up to date on space startups over the past few months, including Starfish Space's $29 million round and, more recently, SpaceX's second commercial deal for the Starship lunar lander with Lunar Outpost.Listen to the full conversation to hear Devin and Steve Isakowitz discuss: What the path ahead looks like for space startupsThe shift away from government-dominated space programs to a more commercial landscapeAnd what's in store for Aerospace Corporation in 2025.Happy Thanksgiving to those who celebrate, and we'll be back on Friday for a special episode from our sister podcast, Found.Equity is TechCrunch's flagship podcast, produced by Theresa Loconsolo, and posts every Wednesday and Friday. Subscribe to us on Apple Podcasts, Overcast, Spotify and all the casts. You also can follow Equity on X and Threads, at @EquityPod. For the full episode transcript, for those who prefer reading over listening, check out our full archive of episodes over at Simplecast. Credits: Equity is produced by Theresa Loconsolo with editing by Kell. Bryce Durbin is our Illustrator. We'd also like to thank the audience development team and Henry Pickavet, who manages TechCrunch audio products.

Turbocharged by the internet and mobile technology, legalized gambling has exploded across the globe, leaving behind ruined lives, broken families and financial hardships, and should now be classified as a major public health concern. A four-year study by a public health commission on gambling convened by The Lancet, the respected British journal of medicine, found that net global losses by gamblers could exceed $700 billion by the year 2028, and that 80% of countries now allow some form of legal gambling. But HKS Professor Malcolm Sparrow, a leading scholar on regulating societal harms, says that in reality the percentage of countries where gambling is practiced is closer to 100% because internet- and mobile-based gambling—often using cryptocurrencies—can easily circumvent borders. Among the commission's more concerning findings is that a significant portion of virtual gamblers are teenagers, and that more than 1 in 4 teens are at risk of becoming compulsive or problem gamblers. Sparrow tells PolicyCast host Ralph Ranalli that the harms are also widespread, since the suffering from each problem gambler also affects on average six to eight people around them—ranging from spouses to relatives to friends to employers and co-workers. Sparrow says the commission has identified a number of policy solutions to mitigate the growing fallout from gambling expansion, ranging from limiting the speed and intensity of virtual gambling products to prohibiting gambling with credit cards and banning gaming companies from offering loans. Policy Recommendations from The Lancet Public Health Commission on Gambling:Push governments to define gambling as primarily a public health issue, and prioritize health and wellbeing over economic gains when crafting gambling policies.Adopt effective regulation in all countries—regardless of whether or not they have legalized gambling—including limiting promotion and marketing, providing accessible support for betting-related harms, and denormalizing gambling through public awareness campaigns.Create independent regulators in jurisdictions where gambling is legal to enforce protections including safeguards for young people, consumer protections, and mandatory limits on gambling activities.Shield development of gambling policies, research, and treatment from industry influence through a shift to independent funding sources.At the international level, require UN entities and intergovernmental organizations to address gambling harms as part of broader health and wellbeing strategies.Create an international alliance of stakeholders to lead advocacy, research, and collaboration on gambling-related issues.Adopt a resolution recognizing the public health impacts of gambling at the World Health Assembly.Episode Notes:Malcolm K. Sparrow is professor of the practice of public management at Harvard's John F. Kennedy School of Government.  He is faculty chair of the school's executive education program on strategic management of regulatory and enforcement agencies. He is the offer of several books, including “The Regulatory Craft: Controlling Risks, Solving Problems, and Managing Compliance,” and “License to Steal: How Fraud Bleeds America's Health Care System.” An expert in regulatory management, his research interests include regulatory and enforcement strategy, fraud control, corruption control, and operational risk management. Before coming to HKS, he served 10 years with the British Police Service, where he rose to the rank of detective chief inspector and conducted internal affairs investigations, commanded a tactical firearms unit, and gained extensive experience with criminal investigation. A mathematician and patent-holding inventor in the area of computerized fingerprint analysis, he earned an MA in mathematics from Cambridge University, an MPA from the Kennedy School, and a PhD in Applied Mathematics from the University of Kent.Ralph Ranalli of the HKS Office of Communications and Public Affairs is the host, producer, and editor of HKS PolicyCast. A former journalist, public television producer, and entrepreneur, he holds an AB in Political Science from UCLA and an MS in Journalism from Columbia University.Design and graphics support is provided by Laura King, Lydia Rosenberg, Delane Meadows and the OCPA Design Team. Social media promotion and support is provided by Natalie Montaner and the OCPA Digital Team. Editorial support is provided by Nora Delaney and Robert O'Neill of the OCPA Editorial Team. Administrative support is provided by Lilian Wainaina. 

Elizabeth Mary Namakula, a lecturer at NYU Shanghai and a prominent figure in Uganda's education sector. Explors how adopting a self-sustaining mindset, embracing technology in education, and vocationalizing higher education can drive Uganda towards a middle-class economy by 2040.  Learn about the exciting changes in education with AI, digital humanities, and more; 00:00 Introduction to Self-Sustaining Mindset 01:59 Current Landscape of Education in Uganda 03:05 Comparing Education Systems: Uganda vs. China 06:15 Trends and Evolution in Higher Education 10:57 Understanding Digital Humanities 12:54 Challenges and Opportunities in Education 19:57 Modern Teaching Methods and AI Integration 23:27 Policy Recommendations for Education 30:13 Achieving a Middle-Class Economy by 2040 #mindsetchange #middleclasseconomy #digitalhumanities #educationpolicy #technology #educationinUganda Follow up with her on LinkedIn. Share your feedback and inquiries at onugandapodcast@gmail.com or call/WhatsApp +25678537996. PODCAST DISCLAIMER. The views and opinions expressed in the episode are those of the guests. They do not represent or reflect the official position of the ON Uganda Podcast, so we do not take responsibility for any ideas expressed by guests during the Podcast episode.  You are smart enough to take out what works for you.  As of 02.07.24.

Our special guest, Rodney Akongel Mukula, founded Asante, Uganda's first waste management company with a Material Recovery Facility.  Rodney details the challenges and triumphs of expanding Asante across East Africa, including Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania, and DRC. Learn about Asante's groundbreaking recycling infrastructure built using ESG principles and the Kaizen model, their impactful collaboration with Coca-Cola, and their mission to empower women in Africa.  Discover how intentional leadership, strategic planning, and visionary insights can drive Uganda towards a middle-class economy. For those inspired to turn waste into valuable resources and build a sustainable future, this is a must-listen/watch!  00:36 Meet Rodney Akongel Mukula 01:55 Rodney's Journey into Waste Management 03:52 The Eureka Moment 07:50 Founding Asante Waste Management 10:52 Achievements and Partnerships 12:02 Understanding ESG Principles 15:11 Challenges and Early Days of Asante 18:49 Expanding Operations Across East Africa 19:39 Challenges in Waste Management 20:43 Innovations in Waste Segregation 22:41 Policy Recommendations for Waste Management 27:44 The Importance of Social Capital 30:25 Opportunities in Waste Management 33:46 Achieving a Middle-Class Economy 36:31 Final Thoughts and Call to Action Follow up with him on LinkedIn. #Wastmanagement #Sustainability #Leadership #EastAfrica #ESG #Cleanfuture Share your feedback and inquiries at onugandapodcast@gmail.com or call/WhatsApp +25678537996. PODCAST DISCLAIMER. The views and opinions expressed in the episode are those of the guests. They do not represent or reflect the official position of the ON Uganda Podcast, so we do not take responsibility for any ideas expressed by guests during the Podcast episode.  You are smart enough to take out what works for you.  As of 28.06.24.

We are joined by Albert Arnold Musinguzi, Chief Technology Officer at the University of Makerere under the Walter Reed Project. Albert, a leading biomedical researcher in Uganda with over 20 years of experience, delves into the topics of health and risk management, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.  He elucidates the preparedness of Uganda's health sector against pandemic threats such as Ebola and HIV, emphasizing the critical role of data and analytics in managing infectious diseases. Albert also discusses his ambition to bridge the gap between technology and diverse sectors, highlighting the importance of integrating tech into the boardroom.  He provides insights into the evolution of technology, the impact of specialization in tech careers, and the challenges and opportunities within Uganda's health and tech sectors.  The conversation rounds off with reflections on policy implementation, entrepreneurial resilience, and the broader goal of achieving a middle-class economy in Uganda. 00:00 Introduction and Guest Welcome 01:06 Health Sector Risk Management in Uganda 04:08 Albert's Journey and Tech Integration 10:57 Evolution of Technology and Specialization 16:45 Challenges and Opportunities in Uganda 25:05 Policy Recommendations for Uganda 31:05 Achieving a Middle-Class Economy 37:55 Continuous Learning and Personal Growth Follow up with her on LinkedIn. Share your feedback and inquiries at onugandapodcast@gmail.com or call/WhatsApp +25678537996. PODCAST DISCLAIMER. The views and opinions expressed in the episode are those of the guests. They do not represent or reflect the official position of the ON Uganda Podcast, so we do not take responsibility for any ideas expressed by guests during the Podcast episode.  You are smart enough to take out what works for you.  As of 18.06.24.

The Prairie Farmer and Rancher Forum eventually agreed — by consensus — on 36 policy recommendations it wants to see put forward. But that doesn’t mean that all the attendees of the forum agreed with each other at the outset. Instead, the forum worked hard to find areas of common interest and support to create... Read More

In this episode of Trust Issues, Daniel Schwartzer, CyberArk's Chief Product Technologist and leader of the company's Artificial Intelligence (AI) Center of Excellence, joins host David Puner for a conversation that explores AI's transformative impact on identity and access management (IAM). Schwartzer discusses how CyberArk's AI Center of Excellence is equipping the R&D team to innovate continuously and stay ahead of AI-enabled threats. Learn about the future of AI in IAM, the role of AI in shaping new business models and the importance of an experimentation culture in driving user experience (UX) improvements. Gain insights into the methodical, data-driven approaches to monetization strategies and the significance of learning from on-the-job experiences. This episode is a must-listen for anyone interested in the intersection of AI and IAM, and the opportunities it presents for leading the transition in the industry. Tune in to uncover what's coming down the AI pike and how it will influence the future of IAM.For more from Daniel on this subject, check out his recent blog, "Predicting the Future of AI in Identity and Access Management." 

In early 2020 a group of behavioral scientists from around the world came up with about 20 science-based recommendations for public policymakers regarding COVID-19. Ellen Peters, the director of the University of Oregon’s Center for Science Communication Research, was among them. Those recommendations were published in the April 2020 issue of Nature and included messaging recommendations from social distancing to how to work with individual communities.  Now, nearly four years later, those same researchers — and an independent panel of scientists not involved in the original research — looked back at the real world data to see how accurate those recommendations were. Both groups found that about 84% of the original recommendations were accurate. Their findings have just been published in the December 2023 issue of Nature. We talk with Peters about some of the recommendations and what the results say about the scientific process and public’s confidence in science. 

On the occasion of National Influenza Vaccination Week, former Senate Majority Leader Thomas Daschle, chair of the Coalition to Stop Flu, joins us to discuss the Coalition's mission and composition, its recent compelling report, ‘The 2022-2023 Influenza Season: Outcomes and Policy Recommendations,' and the comprehensive legislation it has had a hand in crafting and advancing, The Influenza Act (S. 3219, H.R. 5846 – 118th Congress 2023-2024). Senator Daschle is alarmed by the decline in vaccination levels – a national security threat – combined with the spread of mis and disinformation and the urgent imperative to forge new communications capabilities to rebuild trust and confidence. Trusted messengers, new public-private partnerships, determined and collaborative leadership, additional resources, and hard work: these are essential elements for turning things around. Health equity must also be elevated as a top priority, with a special focus on the elderly, pregnant women, children, and racial and ethnic minorities. Much more work is needed to improve testing capacity and develop new antivirals for flu. 

Malathi Renati (Head of Takshashila's Policy School) and Sowmya Nandan (Head of Corporate Affairs at Takshashila ) are in conversation with Gowthami Saraf who shares her first-hand experience of homeschooling, the benefits and challenges, and how government policies, markets and society can support this emerging but niche education segment. Join OpenTakshashila, an initiative by the Takshashila Institution, to creat a global and open community with a strong and unwavering commitment towards meaningful and thoughtful policy discussions. Do check out Takshashila's public policy courses: https://school.takshashila.org.in/courses We are @‌IVMPodcasts on Facebook, Twitter, & Instagram. https://twitter.com/IVMPodcasts https://www.instagram.com/ivmpodcasts/?hl=en https://www.facebook.com/ivmpodcasts/ You can check out our website at https://shows.ivmpodcasts.com/featured Follow the show across platforms: Spotify, Google Podcasts, Apple Podcasts, JioSaavn, Gaana, Amazon Music Do share the word with your folksSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

People who live in major cities in the US and abroad tend to benefit from better cancer care due to having access to more doctors, facilities and equipment. In contrast, those who live in rural areas face many challenges accessing consistent and quality care.  In Part One of this ASCO Education Podcast Dr. Jack Hensold, a hematologist/oncologist in Bozeman, Montana and Chair of the ASCO Rural Cancer Care Task Force, Dr. Chris Prakash, Medical Oncologist in Paris, Texas and Medical Director of Texas Oncology and President of the Texas Society of Clinical Oncology, and Professor Sabe Sabesan, a Medical Oncologist in Townsville, Australia and the President-Elect of the Clinical Oncology Society of Australia will examine the realties practicing oncology in rural areas.  They discuss the difficulties of having to travel long distances for treatment (5:30), the effectiveness of telehealth (8:07) and solutions to recruiting a supportive care workforce in rural areas  and facilitating access to imaging facilities and specialized treatment (18:12). Speaker Disclosures Sabe Sabesan: Speakers Bureau - Merck Sucharu Prakash: Speakers Bureau - Myriad Genetics   Jack Hensold:  Consulting or Advisory Role Company - Vibliome Therapeutics Resources  Policy Recommendations for Improving Rural Cancer Services in the United States  If you liked this episode, please follow the show. To explore other educational content, including courses, visit education.asco.org. Contact us at education@asco.org. TRANSCRIPT Disclosures for this podcast are listed on the podcast page.  Dr. Jack Hensold: Hello and welcome to this two-part episode of the ASCO Education Podcast. Today we will explore some real-time and real-world issues that oncologists face while practicing in rural areas in the US and abroad. Cities tend to benefit from having more doctors, facilities, and equipment to address the health needs of the population. In contrast, people who live in rural areas – estimated to be about 25% of the US population – face various challenges to obtaining consistent health care, including scarce medical personnel and infrastructure. Transportation of that care may involve considerable time and financial expense.  I'm Dr. Jack Hensold, the Hematologist/Oncologist in Bozeman, Montana, and Chair of the ASCO Rural Cancer Care Task Force. I also serve as Medical Director of Regional Outreach at Bozeman Health. Joining me is Chris Prakash, Oncologist and Medical Director of Texas Oncology and President of the Texas Society of Clinical Oncology. Chris is also the Director of Quality Services for the statewide group and leads Texas Oncologist's Precision Medicine Initiative.  Also joining me is Professor Sabe Sabesan, a Medical Oncologist in regional Australia. He is the President-Elect of the Clinical Oncology Society of Australia and Clinical Director of the Australian Teledyne Health Program, led by the Queensland State Department of Health. Professor Sabesan is an internationally recognized expert in the area of tele-oncology. He has developed and evaluated various oncology models to deliver cancer care closer to home.  Providing healthcare is a very involved career, more so in rural areas. Dr. Prakash, you finished your oncology training in Detroit, yet you practice primarily in rural Texas. Can you detail the factors that led to your decision in practicing oncology in a rural setting?  Dr. Chris Prakash: Thank you, Jack, for having me as part of this podcast. I finished my fellowship at Wayne State in Detroit, Michigan, and we were looking for a place to raise our kids and family and to find a good practice for myself. My daughter was two years old at that time. We were looking for a quiet, safe place with a laidback lifestyle, but at the same time a dynamic oncology practice. That's how I found East Texas, which is primarily a rural area. The small community here, good schools, and nice, accepting people really appealed to us. So we decided to give it a chance. We are still here almost 23 years later. My daughter has grown up and is in medical school. My son, who was born in Paris, Texas, is planning to go to med school next year.  Over the last couple of decades, I've found that practicing oncology in a rural setting is indeed very rewarding. You can make a difference in people's lives here. People are simple. They have faith and respect and follow doctors' advice. Practicing here, I've had a real chance to make a difference in not only people's lives but also in the overall healthcare system and in health policy. As you know, Jack, about 18% to 20% of the population lives in rural areas in the US. But only 3% of oncologists are available to provide care for them. So I'm not only fulfilling a need but also satisfying a desire to contribute.  Dr. Jack Hensold: Chris, could you clarify the nature of your practice? Are you a solo oncologist within a much larger group spread out over the state, or is there more than one oncologist on your site? Dr. Chris Prakash: Yeah, so I'm part of Texas Oncology, which is a statewide large group with multiple sites of service. In my location, there are three medical oncologists and one radiation oncologist. So we serve the catchment area of Northeast Texas and Southeast Oklahoma. But within Texas Oncology, we have locations spread out all over the state. Dr. Jack Hensold: Thank you for that clarity. Professor Sabesan, you started in Sri Lanka and are now in a rural area of Australia. How did that happen?  Professor Sabe Sabesan: I grew up in northern Sri Lanka in a village but moved to Australia because of the war in Sri Lanka in ‘90. So I did my med school in Adelaide, Australia. During my med school, we had to do a lot of rural clinical placements. And also as a result of that, I did my internship in a central Australian town called Alice Springs. Throughout that journey, I saw firsthand the difficulties these communities face in accessing healthcare, basic healthcare. So when I finished my training in medical oncology, I was looking for a place where I could contribute to minimizing these difficulties, but also taking an academic angle to this. So I chose a regional center called Townsville in North Queensland as our home that actually serves a large rural and indigenous population, but also it is an academic hub for rural medicine. So it kind of served my clinical and academic needs, and we've been there last 20 years now. Dr. Jack Hensold: A significant hurdle for patients in rural areas is transportation. Patients sometimes travel an entire day or stay overnight near the clinic, where they will be examined or treated. What resources have been developed to assist with transportation to help patients come back for test results, appointments, and treatments? Chris?  Dr. Chris Prakash: Transportation, that's a big hurdle for many patients across the country, but mainly for the rural population. So, as I just said, my practice is in Paris, Texas, but the draw is about a quarter of a million. So patients come to see us here to receive their medical care from all over Northeast Texas as well as Southeast Oklahoma, and there is no public transportation in many of these areas. The average time to commute for many of my patients is in excess of an hour and a half each way. Patients do travel sometimes an entire day. They sometimes have to stay overnight to receive their treatments the next day.  I recall a patient with tonsillar cancer last year who was receiving concurrent chemotherapy and radiation. So he lived almost three hours away. This was too cost prohibitive for him to travel back and forth on a daily basis for radiation therapy. So what he did was set up his camper right behind the cancer center, which certainly made it a lot easier for him to get his treatments that way. I would not recommend that as a routine practice for everybody, but it did work out for him   Close by there is a community of Choctaw Indians here in Southeast Oklahoma also, and they do have some options for transportation for just their citizens. And locally, some local church groups and volunteer organizations provide assistance with transportation for some patients as well. But that is a problem. Transportation is a big access issue for my population. Dr. Jack Hensold: Thank you. And just to make a comment, there's actually a fair amount of literature regarding what we refer to as financial toxicity associated with the need to travel. Sabe, do you have some transportation problems in your area? I would assume… Professor Sabe Sabesan: This is similar to what Chris and you are describing, Jack. Our area is 2000 by 1000 kilometers with about 650,000 population. There are scattered rural hospitals, but really there's no consistent public transport. But the government does pay for transport and accommodation. I heard that it doesn't fully cover it. But one of the disappointing things is that if you're traveling for clinical trials, that subsidy is not there for them. So that's probably one of the reasons why the governments have gone for the telehealth investment.   Dr. Jack Hensold: Thank you. Telehealth is a critical tool for providing healthcare in many areas, including rural areas. How do you manage the health literacy problems of ethnically, educationally, and socioeconomically diverse populations using telehealth? Chris? Dr. Chris Prakash: Telehealth has been around for a long time, but during the pandemic, that's when we needed to keep our patients safe and away in their homes and still continue to give healthcare to them. So we conducted many visits through telemedicine at that time. Telehealth is especially used for many patients in rural areas because they have problems with access. But there are many challenges. As you know there is a broadband divide in the US. About 1 in 4 Americans do not have a good broadband connection so it is very difficult for them to perform a video telehealth visit. Audio works out okay a lot of times, but to do a good video telehealth visit, that's a difficulty.   Also, as you know, many of the flexibilities that we were afforded during the pandemic regarding telemedicine, they are slowly going away. So that's making telemedicine even more difficult to do. But telemedicine is a boon for many of the patients who live in rural areas. I remember just the other day I saw an elderly couple, the man had just been diagnosed with advanced lung cancer. In the room, he requested that his children join the conversation via FaceTime on his phone so that they can listen in to what I had to say and what I had to tell them. This was indeed very helpful for them. I was able to explain to the patient, his wife, as well as his children who joined via FaceTime about the diagnosis, which was new, the treatment plan, expectations moving forward, and all of that.   So even though this was not a true televisit, it really demonstrates how technology can help us deliver good communication and good oncology care in many situations. But still, I would say that for many patients, telemedicine is not ideal. It's especially true given the devastating diagnosis of cancer. Patients want to see their doctors face-to-face. As a doctor, I want to examine them. And also, body language is very important. It is important for my patients to trust me as a physician, and that's hard to do sometimes via video chat.  So right now my nurse practitioners do a lot of chemo teaching through telemedicine. Now that is really helpful for them because this can be done over multiple teaching sessions, it makes it a lot easier for the patient. Because rather than coming into the clinic for all these visits, they can learn from the comfort of their homes before they really start the toxic chemotherapy.  Dr. Jack Hensold: Chris, thank you for that. I think that you make a very valid point and one that I've made, which is that telehealth is a great tool for overcoming geographic barriers in rural areas. But I think we just simply have to accept the fact that it's not as good as a face-to-face visit. So how we blend the use of telehealth with face-to-face visits I think is going to be a challenge moving forward. Dr. Chris Prakash: Yeah, I totally agree. I think toxicity management is great. I mean, it's a great tool to call and see how patients are doing after treatment. But that initial visit, there's something to be said about establishing a rapport and faith and trust in your doctor when you're treating cancer. Dr. Jack Hensold: I completely agree. Sabe, you sound like you're one of the experts in Australia regarding telehealth. I wonder if you have some comments about your experience. Professor Sabe Sabesan: Yeah, I would say it's an evolving experience which has evolved over 15 years. So in terms of the health literacy needs, my observation is actually the same whether it's in person or in telehealth. What we observed is that we just need to tailor to the patient's needs. When we first developed the telemedicine, we had the same issues, developing rapport and seeing first consultations in person. But what we did, we started doing a lot of shared care models and tele supervision models with rural facilities rather than directly into homes. So what that meant, we had patients' families can attend, especially the primary care physicians, and the rural nurses were able to sit in with the patients. So that means if there were any communication issues or any translation aspects, language-wise or explaining medical lingo, there was a system in place in the rural sector that is close to home that was provided by the primary care physicians and the families.  And also then from that experience, we did some research and the patients actually said they were happy to continue initial consultations on the telehealth consultation, provided there were families involved, the primary care physicians were in there, and also the aboriginal health workers. So for some regions now we do the initial consultation purely on telehealth because what also what telehealth does for the first consultation, if we need to then bring them to our center, then we would be able to coordinate the whole trip rather than coming back and forth. So that's actually probably the difference in a couple of the larger centers. But the other main benefit I actually found for indigenous patients is that we can involve the whole family in the patient care and normally that means they are able to ensure compliance and compliance with clinic visits. So it's been evolving but really it is what our models, some of them are tele-oncology replacing face-to-face, some of them are hybrid, some of them are treatment-related. So it's really based on the needs of that little communities. That's what we've been doing. Dr. Chris Prakash: If I can ask you a question Sabe, on that, do you experience barriers to practice across state boundaries in Australia? Because I know in the US that's a big issue, that's a hurdle. Licensing is an issue across state boundaries and also broadband issue because a lot of my patients, they simply don't have the broadband width to get on a video chat. Do you experience that in Australia as well? Professor Sabe Sabesan: So we definitely have the broadband divide in Australia, but luckily the state governments have actually invested heavily on fiber. So all the health facilities, whether they are small or large, they are all connected on fiber. So if you do video calls or telehealth within that system, it is pretty good. But as soon as you go outside to a primary care facility that is not part of a state facility or home, you run into trouble with broadband. But in terms of the state boundaries, I think it is a bit loose. I don't know whether there's actually a strict monitoring of the systems, but because the whole Australian system is funded by Medicare, it really doesn't matter where the patient lives as long as you bill the patient based on the consultation. Dr. Jack Hensold: And I'd like to just respond to something you said, Sabe, too, which is the involvement of primary care doctors and local healthcare workers in the care of patients, is something I will return to later in this conversation. But I think it's important that we consider when we're keeping patients out of our larger centers and treating them in their own home areas, that we are relying on supportive care by those primary care providers. Any other comments regarding the telehealth issue?   Professor Sabe Sabesan: In terms of the primary care shared care models and collaborations, that is actually one of the important aspects of telehealth because we have in the rural sector, the turnover of the staff is pretty high. So then what happens if we want to provide consistent medical service on telehealth? Something needs to be consistent so we become the consistent aspect of the partnership. So then that gives us bit more safety that there's a shared care model, but also what we found now that in terms of educating on oncology topics, the shared care models actually give you an opportunity for case-based discussion. I think there is a benefit for workforce development as well, as well as connecting the rural workforce with a network of workforce. Dr. Chris Prakash: Involving primary care physicians in the total care of the patient is vital, especially in rural areas because they really depend upon their PCPs and often these are APPs providing their primary care. You've got to manage their diabetes and hypertension and go through all their medications, antiemetics pain medications, work with the local pharmacy. There are so many issues that go into treating a patient with cancer and as an oncologist sitting 100 miles away, I'm not going to be able to take care of every detailed aspect of their care. So what I do is involve their primary physician from the very beginning. So when the patient first comes to me, it could be via telemedicine or not, I'm calling them back and saying, “Hey, I saw so and so. This is my diagnosis, this is my plan. I'm going to do all the treatments here at my center. But whatever's possible you can do locally, I would appreciate that.” If there's labs that can be drawn, imaging that can be done locally, any testing that can be done locally, patients really value that because they don't want to travel 2 hours just for a CT scan if they can avoid it. That's my practice.   Dr. Jack Hensold: Thank you. You mentioned something that we're going to touch on next, which is that in rural areas it is often difficult to access labs, imaging facilities, and other specialized treatments, certainly CAR T therapy and other highly technical therapies. There are other services that may be limited in a rural area such as mental health, fertility preservation, palliative care, access to social workers. Do you have solutions to address that really supportive care and those needs? Dr. Chris Prakash: Yeah, I think, Jack, you touched on a very, very critical challenge right now. It's a workforce issue. It's very hard to hire and keep good support staff not only in rural areas but all over the country right now. So you mentioned social workers, nurses, nutrition specialists, mental health providers, even fertility services. They're very hard to find in rural areas. There's a big workforce problem, right, all over the country. But the pandemic really exacerbated that. I mean, it's hard to find good staff anywhere and there's no easy solution to fix this problem. So what we need to look for is maybe provide incentives such as loan forgiveness programs or tuition payment programs, or repayment. Really anything that keeps professionals in rural settings. And we need to find people who like working in these areas because that's a very difficult problem as well.  And as you know, many specialized treatments, stem cell transplants, CAR T cell therapy, specialized neurosurgeries or cardiothoracic surgeries, or many oncologic surgeries, they can only be done at big tertiary centers in big cities often. So patients have got to travel a few hours to go there. So what we can do to make it easier on them is provide the first consultations with those specialists via telemedicine. And if they're thought to be good candidates for the procedures, then they can make a trip that's necessary to the city, let's say. But also you mentioned consistency, that is the key. It's very important to be consistent if you want to provide quality cancer care. It could be imaging, it could be diagnostics, molecular testing, or any kind of therapy that you deliver. They should all be consistent no matter where a patient is being treated. So that brings into question provider education. Many oncologists in rural areas, they're generalists, they treat all cancers. They do not specialize in one area. It's really hard to keep up with all the latest information that's coming out. So it's important that we provide all educational tools possible to keep them up to date.  I just moderated a meeting called Oncology Congress. So this is geared towards cancer care providers in rural areas. It's a free CME webcast, various topics on cancer, excellent faculty, and the main thing is that the discussion is geared towards improving multidisciplinary care in those rural settings. So I think another thing that we could think of as a solution to this problem is virtual tumor boards. I mean, they're very helpful where somebody can get on and get an opinion regarding a difficult case. But I think most helpful is if you have a network of doctors or specialists that you can rely on, you can call somebody, a quick consult or say, “Hey, I have a problem, a challenging case, what would you recommend?” Because sometimes we just don't have time to wait for that tumor board or wait for an official consultation. So, yeah, it's a difficult challenge. Dr. Jack Hensold: Yes. And again, a point that you made that I'd like to respond to is the virtual tumor boards and basically shared education with maybe a larger group. As we've kind of in Montana looked at a development of hub and spoke models, we've realized it may make sense to consider a hub and spoke communicating with a spoke and hub. In other words, a larger center with what becomes the hub for a smaller community, and then that reaches out. So there's a series of educational connections that need to be made. Dr. Chris Prakash: Yeah, I think you almost need multiple hubs. One central big hub in this day and age is probably not going to help solve that problem. So you got to have a big hub and then maybe a series of regional hubs where patients can easily access and doctors can access information. Dr. Jack Hensold: Yes, I think that's absolutely correct. The education piece, too, is, I think, something that keeps oncology practitioners out of smaller communities where they may be practicing by themselves. Because it's difficult, as you know, as an oncologist, to feel like you're staying current with everything you need to stay up to date with, and therefore practicing in a larger group where you can turn to someone else for some immediate education.  Dr. Chris Prakash: That's very true. And if you really look at what these CME programs or educational programs are geared to, none of them are geared towards rural practice. They talk about big clinical trials. And those populations are really not my patient population, for sure. So you really need a program where people who know rural medicine, who have experienced it firsthand, like you, me, and Sabe, and say, “Okay, this is what really happens. You cannot give CAR T therapy to every Lymphoma that walks in.” I think those are the kind of educations we are talking about. There's so many educational programs that are available, but not many for rural practitioners. Dr. Jack Hensold: Right. And it does speak to whether or not we need to be thinking about developing some type of education that's easily accessible to those very busy practitioners who may be a solo practitioner with no one around for hundreds of miles, I guess.  Dr. Chris Prakash: And not to throw in a plug for my conference, but the Oncology Congress that I do twice a year, that's the sole purpose. We will have faculty from big centers. But I make sure that the conversation moves towards rural settings where we do not have all the latest technologies and the therapies available. And we had a really good turnout this past weekend, so I'm happy to share information if anybody's interested.  Dr. Jack Hensold: Yes, that would be great. Again, I think this conversation has been terrific because I've really become focused on the issue of the inadequate education we have not only for our oncologists who are out in practice in smaller areas but also for the primary care providers who need a better understanding of what's required for supportive care of oncology patients. And there's very limited material that focuses on that as well.  Dr. Chris Prakash: Totally agree. Just one last point I want to make is with the checkpoint inhibitors. That's a perfect example. Many of these toxicities are multi-organ, and the patients in the community, the docs in the community sometimes are not aware of the skin rash or lung symptoms, or pneumonia is really related to the therapy. So very important to involve the whole team in their care. Dr. Jack Hensold: Completely agree. Sabe, what about your experience in this regard? Professor Sabe Sabesan: Exactly the similar experience Chris has been describing. Another group of rural people, there are actually smaller rural communities. Sometimes they are like 500 or 1000 population maximum. So those kinds of places, they completely miss out because they are too small even for standard general medicine specialties. What we've been observing over time or focusing on is really how do we build those capabilities at rural sites because if they keep doing the same stuff, then they are not going to grow or build. So what we've been doing is let's build some rural capabilities and let's also focus on expanding the scope of practice. So to do that, we actually have to start shifting specialist services like chemotherapy administration or rheumatology infusions back to those smaller towns. And then we have to utilize tele-supervision and share care models with allied health and the rural health workforce. So when that happens, we need more staff because there are more activities happening.  And what we found in the western Queensland town of Mount Isa before 2007, maybe a few chemotherapy patients had to travel for everything. Over time we shifted all the chemotherapy and biotherapy to that 20,000 population town. That meant that over that ten years they had more resources from the government, more staff like registrars and residents, and also needed infrastructure. So that gave us some confidence that maybe we have to leverage the telemedicine technologies to build rural systems, not just seeing patients.  Dr. Jack Hensold: Thank you Dr. Prakash, for your insight into this topic and also to Professor Sabesan for his perspective from his practice in Australia. In part two of this podcast, we will explore how the difference between American and Australian healthcare systems impact care for rural patients, the need for advocacy from doctors in a pilot project in Montana I'm working on with ASCO.  I'm Dr. Hensold and I would like to thank all of our listeners of the Cancer Topics ASCO Education Podcast. This is where we explore topics ranging from implementing new cancer treatments and improving patient care to oncologist well-being and professional development. If you have an idea for a topic or guest you'd like to hear on the show, please email us at education@asco.org. To stay up to date with the latest episodes and explore other educational content, visit education.asco.org. The purpose of this podcast is to educate and to inform. This is not a substitute for professional medical care and is not intended for use in the diagnosis or treatment of individual conditions.   Guests on this podcast express their own opinions, experience, and conclusions. Guest statements on the podcast do not express the opinions of ASCO. The mention of any product, service, organization, activity, or therapy should not be construed as an ASCO endorsement.        

The US has outlawed lead paint, and severely curtailed tobacco marketing and sales. Similar policies can be used for fossil fuels, according to a new report.

How can we be more effective at enhancing and becoming more conscious of our mental health? How can we come together to ensure everyone has the best mental health possible, regardless of how it manifests itself?   According to the World Health Organization, Half of all mental health conditions start by the age of 14. Mental health issues such as anxiety, depression, and substance abuse are common among young people. Advocating for young people's mental health is crucial since it can significantly impact their well-being, academic and social functioning, and long-term outcomes.   Mental health is an essential aspect of overall health and well-being, and individuals need access to resources and support to help them manage their mental health. However, mental health education is not always a formal part of traditional education. Thus, educational institutions and organizations must recognize the importance of mental health education and take steps to integrate it into their curriculums.   In this episode, we want to help individuals recognize the significance of reinforcing discussions about a particular issue most people are uncomfortable with mental health. And also to spread awareness on how to be compassionate, empathetic, and kind to people experiencing mental health challenges. Join us as we learn about the importance of mental health education in improving the lives of teenage students' lives, assisting teachers in incorporating discussions about mental health into their classes, and providing resources and support for students struggling with mental health issues.   Today, we're joined by Seth Nilsen, the student organization "Mental Health Mankato" founder in college who founded CultureChange after Mental Health Mankato was awarded "Student Organization of the Year" in 2020 by Minnesota State University, Mankato.   CultureChange began by advising university student leaders on how to successfully advocate for legislative advancements and sending volunteer teachers to teach their mental health curriculum (K–12). The Mankato Clinic Foundation sponsored their curriculum.   Seth has developed the curriculum to align with the National Health Education Standards and has designed the lessons to be activity-based. Through CultureChange, he has also been able to advise university mental health policy. Thus, CultureChange has formally passed and implemented a bill at Minnesota State University-Mankato and is working with multiple other schools to adopt similar bills.   "The best thing about teaching mental health is that it teaches kids compassion and empathy. Nothing is more important than learning the importance of being kind at a young age. And there's no better way to learn how to be kind than to practice supporting people and understanding them who may be facing challenges that you are not facing." Seth Nilsen   Show Highlights:   (00:00:00) Episode disclaimer, highlight, and introduction (00:02:05) Half of all mental health illnesses appear before age 14. (00:03:29) Welcoming today's guest, Seth Nilsen (00:04:30) A mental health advocate: Who is Seth Nilsen? (00:06:08) What makes Seth passionate about being a mental health advocate? (00:08:04) Being motivated by the inspiring journeys of people overcoming their mental health battles (00:09:15) Mental health hasn't been a part of traditional education. (00:10:43) How can we help and encourage students dealing with mental health challenges? (00:13:21) A careful teaching method: destigmatizing mental health through mindful conversations. (00:15:14) Self-awareness: Empowering students with self-awareness about mental health (00:16:02) Why is teaching mental health education in the K–12 curriculum crucial? (00:17:15) The Individual Stress Response Tracking Chart (00:18:34) You don't have to be an expert to be able to help. (00:21:15) Learning the importance of kindness through mental health education (00:23:14) This episode is powered by Speaks to Inspire, the mental health solution for young adults suffering in silence. Speaks 2 Inspire works with colleges and universities to create and implement safe, comprehensive programs for campuses nationwide. (00:24:00) The School Mental Health Framework: What does it entail? (00:27:15) What does mental health mean to Seth Nilsen? (00:28:00) Find ways to live your happiest life. (00:29:59) CultureChange: School Mental Health Framework (Curriculum, Screening Tool Recommendations, Policy Recommendations) (00:32:16) Where to find Seth to connect and learn from him? (00:34:02) We can end the mental health crisis through proper education. (00:35:12) What is dual programming? (00:37:37) If you need that support for your mental health, contact the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline by calling 9-8-8 now. For local and national resources, go to http://www.speaks2inspire.com/resources. Join the Unlearn the Lies About Mental Health Facebook group: https://bit.ly/UTLcommunity. (00:38:49) There is no shame in having a mental health condition.   Key Takeaways:   "One thing I find with those who become advocates in mental health is that it hits close to home, whether it's a personal experience that we've had or a loved one that was affected by mental illness or any mental health condition." – Abraham Sculley   "I knew that I wasn't going to be able to be successful and just live the life that I wanted to live if I didn't address my social anxiety." – Seth Nilsen   "I don't remember ever taking a class or learning anything about mental health in school, nothing about anxiety, depression, or managing stress. It wasn't a part of the education that we received." – Abraham Sculley   "Let your students know you're a person they can go to. It's something that can be really meaningful to someone, whether it's a kindergarten kid or, in my case, a college student." – Seth Nilsen   "Being conscientious about the methods of teaching is the most important thing because it's all about practicing an open conversation about mental health and destigmatizing mental health through that." – Seth Nilsen   "Being able to identify your emotions is the first step in learning how to handle your emotions." – Seth Nilsen   "A stress response tracking chart gives the students a way to practice the concepts that the teachers are teaching, and it works in the best teaching practices as opposed to just a worksheet and lecture." – Seth Nilsen   "There is often a hesitation to talk about mental health or bring it up in conversation because many people believe that you have to be an expert to help." – Abraham Sculley   "We may not all have a mental health disorder, but we all have mental health, which is simply a state of well-being. It's how we think, how we feel, how we behave, how we interact in the world, how we overcome stressors and challenges, and how we interact with others." – Abraham Sculley   "The first step in solving our mental health crisis is creating the best possible social-emotional learning environment. It means incorporating comprehensive mental health education and educator's professional development courses." – Seth Nilsen   "It's important to be kind because being kind allows oneself to be happy. It also creates a community that is happy to be around each other." – Seth Nilsen   "We can end the mental health crisis through education and getting to a solution-oriented impact." – Abraham Sculley   "There is no shame in having mental health conditions or talking about mental health." – Abraham Sculley   Connect with Seth via the following:   Website: https://culturechangecc.org/  Email: culturechangecc@gmail.com  Facebook: CultureChange | Facebook LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/seth-nilsen-689500183  Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/culturechangecc/?hl=en   Unlearn the Lies About Mental Health is Hosted by Abraham Sculley.   Contact Speaks 2 Inspire to learn about S2I programs: https://speaks2inspire.com/services/. Mental health resources for students: https://speaks2inspire.com/resources/. Connect with Abraham on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/abrahamsculley/. Order a copy of Unlearn the Lies at https://amzn.to/32B2jRh. Join the Unlearn the Lies About Mental Health Facebook group: https://bit.ly/UTLcommunity.   This episode is powered by Speaks 2 Inspire, the mental health solution for young adults suffering in silence. Speaks 2 Inspire works with colleges and universities to create and implement safe, comprehensive programs for campuses across the nation. If you or someone you know is experiencing a mental health crisis, don't hesitate to get in touch with the Crisis Text Line by texting "Home" to 741741 or the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline by calling 1-800-273-8255.      

Matt Amidon , Director of Veterans and Military Families at the George W Bush Institute in Texas, talks about policy recommendations for electeds in State Houses and Federal Government. These 8 policy recommendations are straight forward and important. These would help veterans and their families.  He talks with host Jim Fausone about how the average person can help get these ideas to their elected officials.

2-23-23 AJ DailyCattle Contract Library Pilot Kicks OffAdapted from an article by Paul Dykstra, Certified Angus Beef FACA Releases Farm Bill Policy Recommendations to Support Economic Opportunities and Address Climate Change Adapted from a release by the Food and Agriculture Climate Alliance Celebrate National FFA Week Feb. 18-25, 2023 Adapted from a release by FFA Compiled by Paige Nelson, field editor, Angus Journal.  For more Angus news, visit angusjournal.net. 

The criminalization of people of color and the prevalence of anti-Blackness in this country have deep roots. Listen as Aaron and Damien discuss a report called “Criminalizing Blackness: An analysis of the impacts of the 1994 Crime Bill and 1996 Immigration Bill on Black people and Policy Recommendations to Address the Harms Caused” produced by the Movement for Black Lives alongside UndocuBlack, the Black Alliance for Just Immigration, and Law for Black Lives. This report explores how these laws have impacted the criminal punishment and immigration systems in this country, and what we can do to confront and dismantle their harms in our continued work for social justice and collective liberation. Follow us on social media and visit our website! Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, Website, Leave us a voice message, Merch store

Para que servem os impostos? Quando surgiu a ideia de criar os Impostos? Existirão sistemas tributários perfeitos?‘A segunda profissão mais antiga do mundo deve ser a de cobrador de impostos', diz Hugo van der Ding. E a economista Joana Pais vai aproveitar para falar da História dos Impostos ao longos dos tempos. Acredite ou não, essa viagem passa por lareiras, janelas e problemas de saúde à conta disso; e depois, a Joana faz uma viragem em direção àqueles que ‘até' gostam de pagar impostos por causa da confiança que têm em quem os rodeia (não apenas nos governantes), às diferentes complexidades dos sistemas tributários chegando, imagine só, aos impostos mais ‘bonzinhos' como os que taxam o vício. Um episódio divertido sobre Impostos? É possível. Para o comprovar, venha ouvir.REFERÊNCIAS E LINKS ÚTEIS:Dados sobre carga fiscal e outras medidas:Taxing Wages 2022 Impact of COVID-19 on the Tax Wage in OECD Countries (2022). OCDE.Taxing High Incomes. A comparison of 41 countries (2019). European Policy Information Center (Epicenter).European Values Survey Efeitos dos impostos:Oates, Wallace E., and Robert M. Schwab (2015). The Window Tax: A Case Study in Excess Burden. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29 (1): 163-80.Diamond P e E Saez (2011). The Case for a Progressive Tax: From Basic Research to Policy Recommendations. Journal of Economic Perspectives 25(4): 165-90.Mankiw, N. Gregory, Matthew Charles Weinzierl, and Danny Ferris Yagan (2009). Optimal taxation in theory and practice. Journal of Economic Perspectives 23(4): 147-174. Impostos na Escandinávia:Kleven, Henrik Jacobsen. 2014. How Can Scandinavians Tax So Much? Journal of Economic Perspectives,28 (4): 77-98.Europa vs. EUA:A Alesina , E Glaeser e B Sacerdote (2001).  Why Doesn't the United States Have a European-Style Welfare State? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2001, No. 2.Benabou, Roland and Tirole, Jean (2005).Belief in a Just World and Redistributive Politics, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 11208.Complexidade:People systematically overlook subtractive changes (2021). Adams, G. S., Converse, B. A., Hales, A. H. & Klotz, L. E. Nature 592, 258–261 (2021).Impostos sobre o açúcar:Christopher Conlon Nirupama L. Rao Yinan Wang (2021). WHO PAYS SIN TAXES? UNDERSTANDING THE OVERLAPPING BURDENS OF CORRECTIVE TAXES. NBERGonçalves, J., & Pereira dos Santos, J. (2020). Brown sugar, how come you taste so good? The impact of a soda tax on prices and consumption. Social Science & Medicine, 264, [113332]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113332 Questões comportamentais:Cait Lamberton, Jan-Emmanuel De Neve, and Michael I. Norton (2014). Eliciting Taxpayer Preferences Increases Tax Compliance. Harvard Business School. Working Paper 14-106.Li, Sherry Xin and Eckel, Catherine C. and Grossman, Philip J. and Larson, Tara (2013). Who's in Charge? Donor Targeting Enhances Voluntary Giving to Government. BIOS JOANA PAISJoana Pais é professora de Economia no ISEG da Universidade de Lisboa. Obteve o seu Ph.D. em Economia na Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona em 2005. Atualmente é coordenadora do programa de Mestrado em Economia e do programa de Doutoramento em Economia, ambos do ISEG, e membro da direção da unidade de investigação REM - Research in Economics and Mathematics. É ainda coordenadora do 

Katherine is joined by Jeffrey L. Sturchio, Senior Associate (Non-Resident) with the CSIS Global Health Policy Center and co-author of the new report, The Ending the HIV Epidemic in the U.S. Initiative: An Interim Assessment and Policy Recommendations. The EHE initiative began in 2019 with a goal of reducing new HIV infections by 75% by 2025 and 90% by 2030. However, thanks to limited funding and the diversion of resources during the Covid-19 pandemic, it is not currently on track to meet those ambitious targets. Jeff explains the various factors that could prevent EHE from achieving the 2025 and 2030 goals and shares examples of innovative, person-centered programs in San Francisco, CA and East Baton Rouge, LA that “meet people where they are” and create incentives for people to seek testing and stay on treatment. Jeff and Katherine discuss the importance of adapting lessons from global HIV programs, including PEPFAR, to the domestic epidemic and the opportunity to educate a new cohort of elected officials about EHE as the new Congress takes office in 2023.   Jeffrey L. Sturchio a Senior Associate (Non-Resident) with the CSIS Global Health Policy Center, leading the work on the HIV portfolio. He is chairman and former CEO at Rabin Martin, a global health strategy consulting firm, and former president and CEO of the Global Health Council. Before joining the council in 2009, Dr. Sturchio was vice president of corporate responsibility at Merck & Co. Inc. and president of the Merck Company Foundation. He received a BA in history from Princeton University and a PhD in the history and sociology of science from the University of Pennsylvania. 

Ethan Ilzetzki is an associate professor of economics at the London School of Economics and a research fellow with the Center for Economic Policy Research. Ethan is also a returning guest to the show, and he rejoins David on Macro Musings to talk about the international implications of Fed Policy and the strong dollars as well as Ethan's thoughts on business cycle theory in light of the recent inflation surge. David and Ethan also discuss Ethan's takeaways from the UK crisis, how to evaluate and contextualize monetary policy shocks, the contemporary applications of the fiscal theory of the price level, and more.   Transcript for the episode can be found here.   Check out our new Macro Musings merch here, and use the promo code NGDP for 10% off!   Ethan's Twitter: @ilzetzki Ethan's website Ethan's LSE profile   David's Twitter: @DavidBeckworth Follow us on Twitter: @Macro_Musings Click here for the latest Macro Musings episodes sent straight to your inbox!   Related Links:   *UK Financial Crisis of 2022: Retrospective Diagnosis and Policy Recommendations* by Ethan Ilzetzki   *Exchange Arrangements Entering the Twenty-First Century: Which Anchor Will Hold?* by Ethan Ilzetzki, Carmen Reinhart, and Kenneth Rogoff   *Inflation as a Fiscal Limit* by Francesco Bianchi and Leonardo Melosi   *The Global Financial Cycle* by Helene Rey and Silvia Miranda-Agrippino

Dawn Berkowitz, Chair of the Tobacco Control Network Executive Committee, discusses a new policy recommendations guide released by the group; Liz Hendrix, the Policy Control Officer for the Tobacco Control Network Executive Committee details what she sees as the two most important recommendations from the guide; Ellen Pliska, ASTHO's Family and Child Health Senior Director, details the importance of Maternal Mortality Review Committees; and ASTHO Chief Medical Officer Dr. Marcus Plescia says he hopes the new COVID-19 vaccine for young children will put parents and caregivers at ease. Tobacco Control Network Webpage: 2022 Policy Recommendations Guide ASTHO Brief: Using Medicaid Datasets to Measure Tobacco Use – A Review ASTHO News Release: ASTHO Chief Medical Officer Marcus Plescia, MD, MPH, Comments on COVID-19 Vaccine Approval for Children Ages Six Months to Five Years

Welcome to Healthcare Change Makers, a podcast produced by HIROC. I'm Ellen Gardner with Michelle Holden and Philip de Souza. Today we're talking with Zayna Khayat and Will Falk. Zayna is Vice President, Client Success and Growth at Teladoc Health. Will is a Senior Fellow at the CD Howe Institute and has an appointment at the University of Toronto as an Executive-in-Residence at Rotman. Zayna and Will have collaborated in many different ways over the years and delight in wading into the messy problems in healthcare. They don't always agree, but Zayna and Will are united in their desire to use technology to move care forward. That task, they readily admit is hard work. As they call it, the clash of the static and the dynamic – when the industrial age and technological age collide with not always pleasant results. The real satisfaction comes from breaking down the barriers to thinking big and getting stuff done. The tools they're using and approach they're advocating doesn't just improve access to care, it delivers culturally appropriate care to communities that have been isolated in the past. It's all about hanging out with the future, something Zayna and Will agree is a highly privileged place to be. Quotables “The thing that really gets me going these days is working with young founder teams who are dealing with tough problems.” - WF “One of the great things about having to teach MBA students and other learners is having to explain yourself in front of really smart people.” – WF “As soon as I see the doubt, the skepticism, hear ‘it's impossible', then I think time to double down, that's the lock and I got the key!” – ZK “In talking to people, many of whom were on the frontlines during the pandemic, I was blown away by how hard people worked in spite of the technological choices that are available.” – WF “A study done by Dr. Eric Topol and the NHS in the UK concluded that 90% of all jobs will change because of what's happening now and coming in tech. That's a massive reskilling, retooling of the current workforce, let alone how you breed and train the next generation.” – ZK “As soon as our tools can de-couple time and place from care, you've got a real gamechanger for access.” – ZK “If you think economically about the fact that a public visit to a free provider costs the average Canadian $99 – that's a big barrier for a lot of people.”– WF “I'm not conceding the compassion high ground to anyone who's advocating physical care over virtual care because it is not at all clear to me that the compassionate answer for most people is to insist that they show up in your office when other alternatives exist.” – WF “No matter where you are – student, administrator, clinician, department chair – I always say, at least 10% of your capacity, 1/2 a day a week has to be blowing up the past and putting it together for the future.” – ZK Mentioned in this Episode: Teladoc Health Verto Health Chris O'Connor - FirstHx Rotman School of Management Computer Sciences Corporation Robert Wachter – The Digital Doctor Why Doctors hate their computers by Atul Gawande John Nosta – The Emerging Role of TQ Matthew Mendelsohn – Mowat Centre Dr. Eric Topol Scripps Canada Health Infoway The State of Virtual Care in Canada as of Wave Three of the COVID 19 Pandemic: An early Diagnostique and Policy Recommendations by Will Falk Revera   Access More Interviews with Healthcare Leaders at HIROC.com/podcast Follow us on Twitter, and listen on iTunes. Email us at Communications@HIROC.com.

Stan Houston, Edmonton Zone Medical Staff Association, Opioid Poisoning Committee

This episode of Queering Community Health is about the process of searching for colleges as an LGBTQ+/queer person, as well as the facilities and policies currently put in place at various colleges. Four guests by the name of Ava, Zoey Haines, MC, and t. aaron hans are interviewed, each having a different perspective on this topic.Ava (she/her) is a current LGBTQ+ high school senior who is pursuing higher education. Zoey Haines (she/her) is the College and Career Readiness Coordinator at Central Highschool through a non-profit organization by the name of AchieveMPLS, which is a Minneapolis based organization that focuses on community support and equitable access to different types of post secondary education and career opportunities.  MC (she/they) is another current LGBTQ+ high school senior who is pursuing higher education.t. aaron hans (he/him/ze/hir) is the Sexualities & Gender Diversity Programs Director and Deputy Title IX Coordinator at Hamline University, but also has prior experience within LGBTQ+ spaces as a leader and advocate. RESOURCES:-        AchieveMPLS-        Hamline University's Sexuality and Gender Diversity Programs-        Campus Pride Index-        Niche.com-        Trans and Non-binary Student Resource Guide-        Trans Student Education Resources (TSER)-        Consortium of Higher Education - LGBT Resource Professionals-        My Life My QuitFURTHER READINGS-        LGBTQ Students on Campus - Higher Education Today-        Why LGBTQ inclusivity still matters in higher education - The Conversation-        Policy Recommendations to Support LGBTQ Students - GLSEN-        Transitions Into, and Through, Higher Education: The Lived Experiences of Students Who Identify as LGBTQ+ - Glazzard, Jindal-Snape, StonesCREDITSIntro/Outro music was made by Rebecca Swing @cowboybecky on InstagramCover art and other background music was made by Ruben Hendricks or @spooktrook on Instagram

The threats from hurricanes, the losses to floods, and the lack of disaster preparedness all impact on people's decisions in the Northern Triangle to migrate to the United States. Margarita R. Seminario sits down with Dr. Betilde Muñoz-Pogossian, Director of the Department of Social Inclusion at the Organization of American States to discuss her recent publication “Environmental Explanations of Central American Migration: Challenges and Policy Recommendations". This report underscores how exposed Guatemala, El Salvador, and Honduras are to climate events and how, compounded with lack of economic opportunities and security vulnerabilities, climate change impacts their decision to migrate to the United States. Furthermore, it provides specific policy recommendations on a whole-of-government and whole-of-nation approach to respond to climate-related drivers of migration.

By Farhang Jahanpour This episode is also available as a blog post: https://transnational.live/2021/08/16/top-nine-policy-recommendations-for-the-u-s-in-the-wake-of-afghanistan-debacle/ --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/transnational-foundation/message

The International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 (IRFA) mandates USCIRF to make policy recommendations to the President, the Secretary of State, and Congress. In addition to making recommendations, USCIRF's mandate was recently amended to include tracking the U.S. government's implementation of our recommendations as well as to review the effectiveness of such implemented recommendations in advancing religious freedom internationally. Joining us today is USCIRF Commissioner Fred Davie to share with us some of these key recommendations that have been implemented by the administration and Congress over the last year or so. Read more on page 91 of the 2021 USCIRF Annual Report. Featuring:Dwight Bashir, Director of Outreach and Policy, USCIRFFrederick A. Davie, Commissioner, USCIRF

Donna and Orlando welcome Deputy Director for Prosperity and Equity and Inclusion Officer for the state of Michigan's Labor and Economic Opportunity Department. Kim also serves on Governor Whitmer's Poverty Task Force. The Michigan Poverty Task Force recently released their report with 35 recommendations to increase the household income of all Michiganders and to restore the safety net in the state. The Taskforce worked with 14 state departments to come up those policy recommendations under a lens of racial equity. The report can be found here. Stories we covered.COMMUNITY ACTIVISTS: A SAFER DETROIT BEGINS WITH THE PEOPLEMICHGAN PAUSES J&J VACCINE, PROMPTING SCRAMBLE IN THE STATE'S ROLLOUT

How do we make sense of Turkey's recent turn against the West – after decades of Turkish cooperation and desire to be integrated into the European and wider Western community in terms of foreign policy? Dr. Oya Dursun-Özkanca's new book Turkey-West Relations: The Politics of Intra-alliance Opposition (Cambridge UP, 2019) interrogates the dynamics of the relationship between Turkey and the West, particularly the EU, NATO, and the United States. The compelling book develops a framework of intra-alliance opposition to explain this shift from Turkey's engagement with the West as a desirable ally to Turkey's increasingly hostility to the West after 2010. Moving beyond the power and personality of Erdogan, Dursun-Özkanca develops an analytical framework of the politics of intra-alliance opposition and provides a comprehensive and nuanced account of how and why Turkish foreign policy has changed within the transatlantic alliance. She offers three categories of intra-alliance opposition behavior: boundary testing; boundary challenging; boundary breaking. She deploys these categories to differentiate between the motivations behind the use of each tool – providing an analysis of Turkey that can also be exported to other cases. This extensively researched book depends upon extensive fieldwork and more than 200 semi-structured elite interviews conducted with government officials, diplomats, academics, officials, and journalists in Turkey, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cyprus, the UK, Germany, and the U.S. The book provides 6 case studies (Turkey's pragmatic foreign policy in the Western Balkans, the Turkish vote over the EU-NATO security exchange, the EU-Turkey deal on the refugee crisis, Turkey's energy policies, Turkish rapprochement with Russia in security and defense and Turkish foreign policy on Syria and Iraqi) that demonstrate the 3 categories. The book concludes three possible alternative futures for Turkey's relations with the West and the podcast includes an analysis of what the change in U.S. leadership (Biden-Blinken) might mean for Turkish-Western relations. Dr. Dursun-Özkanca is the Endowed Chair of International Studies and Professor of Political Science at Elizabethtown College. She has edited two books – The European Union as an Actor in Security Sector Reform (Routledge, 2014) and External Interventions in Civil Wars (co-edited with Stefan Wolff, Routledge, 2014) – and has a forthcoming book entitled The Nexus Between Security Sector Reform/Governance and Sustainable Development Goal-16: An Examination of Conceptual Linkages and Policy Recommendations, forthcoming by Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance (DCAF) (London: Ubiquity Press). Susan Liebell is an associate professor of political science at Saint Joseph's University in Philadelphia. Why Diehard Originalists Aren't Really Originalists recently appeared in the Washington Post's Monkey Cage and “Retreat from the Rule of Law: Locke and the Perils of Stand Your Ground” was published in the Journal of Politics (July 2020). Email her comments at sliebell@sju.edu or tweet to @SusanLiebell. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

How do we make sense of Turkey's recent turn against the West – after decades of Turkish cooperation and desire to be integrated into the European and wider Western community in terms of foreign policy? Dr. Oya Dursun-Özkanca's new book Turkey-West Relations: The Politics of Intra-alliance Opposition (Cambridge UP, 2019) interrogates the dynamics of the relationship between Turkey and the West, particularly the EU, NATO, and the United States. The compelling book develops a framework of intra-alliance opposition to explain this shift from Turkey's engagement with the West as a desirable ally to Turkey's increasingly hostility to the West after 2010. Moving beyond the power and personality of Erdogan, Dursun-Özkanca develops an analytical framework of the politics of intra-alliance opposition and provides a comprehensive and nuanced account of how and why Turkish foreign policy has changed within the transatlantic alliance. She offers three categories of intra-alliance opposition behavior: boundary testing; boundary challenging; boundary breaking. She deploys these categories to differentiate between the motivations behind the use of each tool – providing an analysis of Turkey that can also be exported to other cases. This extensively researched book depends upon extensive fieldwork and more than 200 semi-structured elite interviews conducted with government officials, diplomats, academics, officials, and journalists in Turkey, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cyprus, the UK, Germany, and the U.S. The book provides 6 case studies (Turkey's pragmatic foreign policy in the Western Balkans, the Turkish vote over the EU-NATO security exchange, the EU-Turkey deal on the refugee crisis, Turkey's energy policies, Turkish rapprochement with Russia in security and defense and Turkish foreign policy on Syria and Iraqi) that demonstrate the 3 categories. The book concludes three possible alternative futures for Turkey's relations with the West and the podcast includes an analysis of what the change in U.S. leadership (Biden-Blinken) might mean for Turkish-Western relations. Dr. Dursun-Özkanca is the Endowed Chair of International Studies and Professor of Political Science at Elizabethtown College. She has edited two books – The European Union as an Actor in Security Sector Reform (Routledge, 2014) and External Interventions in Civil Wars (co-edited with Stefan Wolff, Routledge, 2014) – and has a forthcoming book entitled The Nexus Between Security Sector Reform/Governance and Sustainable Development Goal-16: An Examination of Conceptual Linkages and Policy Recommendations, forthcoming by Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance (DCAF) (London: Ubiquity Press). Susan Liebell is an associate professor of political science at Saint Joseph's University in Philadelphia. Why Diehard Originalists Aren't Really Originalists recently appeared in the Washington Post's Monkey Cage and “Retreat from the Rule of Law: Locke and the Perils of Stand Your Ground” was published in the Journal of Politics (July 2020). Email her comments at sliebell@sju.edu or tweet to @SusanLiebell.

How do we make sense of Turkey's recent turn against the West – after decades of Turkish cooperation and desire to be integrated into the European and wider Western community in terms of foreign policy? Dr. Oya Dursun-Özkanca's new book Turkey-West Relations: The Politics of Intra-alliance Opposition (Cambridge UP, 2019) interrogates the dynamics of the relationship between Turkey and the West, particularly the EU, NATO, and the United States. The compelling book develops a framework of intra-alliance opposition to explain this shift from Turkey's engagement with the West as a desirable ally to Turkey's increasingly hostility to the West after 2010. Moving beyond the power and personality of Erdogan, Dursun-Özkanca develops an analytical framework of the politics of intra-alliance opposition and provides a comprehensive and nuanced account of how and why Turkish foreign policy has changed within the transatlantic alliance. She offers three categories of intra-alliance opposition behavior: boundary testing; boundary challenging; boundary breaking. She deploys these categories to differentiate between the motivations behind the use of each tool – providing an analysis of Turkey that can also be exported to other cases. This extensively researched book depends upon extensive fieldwork and more than 200 semi-structured elite interviews conducted with government officials, diplomats, academics, officials, and journalists in Turkey, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cyprus, the UK, Germany, and the U.S. The book provides 6 case studies (Turkey's pragmatic foreign policy in the Western Balkans, the Turkish vote over the EU-NATO security exchange, the EU-Turkey deal on the refugee crisis, Turkey's energy policies, Turkish rapprochement with Russia in security and defense and Turkish foreign policy on Syria and Iraqi) that demonstrate the 3 categories. The book concludes three possible alternative futures for Turkey's relations with the West and the podcast includes an analysis of what the change in U.S. leadership (Biden-Blinken) might mean for Turkish-Western relations. Dr. Dursun-Özkanca is the Endowed Chair of International Studies and Professor of Political Science at Elizabethtown College. She has edited two books – The European Union as an Actor in Security Sector Reform (Routledge, 2014) and External Interventions in Civil Wars (co-edited with Stefan Wolff, Routledge, 2014) – and has a forthcoming book entitled The Nexus Between Security Sector Reform/Governance and Sustainable Development Goal-16: An Examination of Conceptual Linkages and Policy Recommendations, forthcoming by Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance (DCAF) (London: Ubiquity Press). Susan Liebell is an associate professor of political science at Saint Joseph's University in Philadelphia. Why Diehard Originalists Aren't Really Originalists recently appeared in the Washington Post's Monkey Cage and “Retreat from the Rule of Law: Locke and the Perils of Stand Your Ground” was published in the Journal of Politics (July 2020). Email her comments at sliebell@sju.edu or tweet to @SusanLiebell. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

How do we make sense of Turkey’s recent turn against the West – after decades of Turkish cooperation and desire to be integrated into the European and wider Western community in terms of foreign policy? Dr. Oya Dursun-Özkanca’s new book Turkey-West Relations: The Politics of Intra-alliance Opposition (Cambridge UP, 2019) interrogates the dynamics of the relationship between Turkey and the West, particularly the EU, NATO, and the United States. The compelling book develops a framework of intra-alliance opposition to explain this shift from Turkey’s engagement with the West as a desirable ally to Turkey’s increasingly hostility to the West after 2010. Moving beyond the power and personality of Erdogan, Dursun-Özkanca develops an analytical framework of the politics of intra-alliance opposition and provides a comprehensive and nuanced account of how and why Turkish foreign policy has changed within the transatlantic alliance. She offers three categories of intra-alliance opposition behavior: boundary testing; boundary challenging; boundary breaking. She deploys these categories to differentiate between the motivations behind the use of each tool – providing an analysis of Turkey that can also be exported to other cases. This extensively researched book depends upon extensive fieldwork and more than 200 semi-structured elite interviews conducted with government officials, diplomats, academics, officials, and journalists in Turkey, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cyprus, the UK, Germany, and the U.S. The book provides 6 case studies (Turkey’s pragmatic foreign policy in the Western Balkans, the Turkish vote over the EU-NATO security exchange, the EU-Turkey deal on the refugee crisis, Turkey’s energy policies, Turkish rapprochement with Russia in security and defense and Turkish foreign policy on Syria and Iraqi) that demonstrate the 3 categories. The book concludes three possible alternative futures for Turkey’s relations with the West and the podcast includes an analysis of what the change in U.S. leadership (Biden-Blinken) might mean for Turkish-Western relations. Dr. Dursun-Özkanca is the Endowed Chair of International Studies and Professor of Political Science at Elizabethtown College. She has edited two books – The European Union as an Actor in Security Sector Reform (Routledge, 2014) and External Interventions in Civil Wars (co-edited with Stefan Wolff, Routledge, 2014) – and has a forthcoming book entitled The Nexus Between Security Sector Reform/Governance and Sustainable Development Goal-16: An Examination of Conceptual Linkages and Policy Recommendations, forthcoming by Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance (DCAF) (London: Ubiquity Press). Susan Liebell is an associate professor of political science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia. Why Diehard Originalists Aren’t Really Originalists recently appeared in the Washington Post’s Monkey Cage and “Retreat from the Rule of Law: Locke and the Perils of Stand Your Ground” was published in the Journal of Politics (July 2020). Email her comments at sliebell@sju.edu or tweet to @SusanLiebell. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

How do we make sense of Turkey’s recent turn against the West – after decades of Turkish cooperation and desire to be integrated into the European and wider Western community in terms of foreign policy? Dr. Oya Dursun-Özkanca’s new book Turkey-West Relations: The Politics of Intra-alliance Opposition (Cambridge UP, 2019) interrogates the dynamics of the relationship between Turkey and the West, particularly the EU, NATO, and the United States. The compelling book develops a framework of intra-alliance opposition to explain this shift from Turkey’s engagement with the West as a desirable ally to Turkey’s increasingly hostility to the West after 2010. Moving beyond the power and personality of Erdogan, Dursun-Özkanca develops an analytical framework of the politics of intra-alliance opposition and provides a comprehensive and nuanced account of how and why Turkish foreign policy has changed within the transatlantic alliance. She offers three categories of intra-alliance opposition behavior: boundary testing; boundary challenging; boundary breaking. She deploys these categories to differentiate between the motivations behind the use of each tool – providing an analysis of Turkey that can also be exported to other cases. This extensively researched book depends upon extensive fieldwork and more than 200 semi-structured elite interviews conducted with government officials, diplomats, academics, officials, and journalists in Turkey, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cyprus, the UK, Germany, and the U.S. The book provides 6 case studies (Turkey’s pragmatic foreign policy in the Western Balkans, the Turkish vote over the EU-NATO security exchange, the EU-Turkey deal on the refugee crisis, Turkey’s energy policies, Turkish rapprochement with Russia in security and defense and Turkish foreign policy on Syria and Iraqi) that demonstrate the 3 categories. The book concludes three possible alternative futures for Turkey’s relations with the West and the podcast includes an analysis of what the change in U.S. leadership (Biden-Blinken) might mean for Turkish-Western relations. Dr. Dursun-Özkanca is the Endowed Chair of International Studies and Professor of Political Science at Elizabethtown College. She has edited two books – The European Union as an Actor in Security Sector Reform (Routledge, 2014) and External Interventions in Civil Wars (co-edited with Stefan Wolff, Routledge, 2014) – and has a forthcoming book entitled The Nexus Between Security Sector Reform/Governance and Sustainable Development Goal-16: An Examination of Conceptual Linkages and Policy Recommendations, forthcoming by Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance (DCAF) (London: Ubiquity Press). Susan Liebell is an associate professor of political science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia. Why Diehard Originalists Aren’t Really Originalists recently appeared in the Washington Post’s Monkey Cage and “Retreat from the Rule of Law: Locke and the Perils of Stand Your Ground” was published in the Journal of Politics (July 2020). Email her comments at sliebell@sju.edu or tweet to @SusanLiebell. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science

How do we make sense of Turkey’s recent turn against the West – after decades of Turkish cooperation and desire to be integrated into the European and wider Western community in terms of foreign policy? Dr. Oya Dursun-Özkanca’s new book Turkey-West Relations: The Politics of Intra-alliance Opposition (Cambridge UP, 2019) interrogates the dynamics of the relationship between Turkey and the West, particularly the EU, NATO, and the United States. The compelling book develops a framework of intra-alliance opposition to explain this shift from Turkey’s engagement with the West as a desirable ally to Turkey’s increasingly hostility to the West after 2010. Moving beyond the power and personality of Erdogan, Dursun-Özkanca develops an analytical framework of the politics of intra-alliance opposition and provides a comprehensive and nuanced account of how and why Turkish foreign policy has changed within the transatlantic alliance. She offers three categories of intra-alliance opposition behavior: boundary testing; boundary challenging; boundary breaking. She deploys these categories to differentiate between the motivations behind the use of each tool – providing an analysis of Turkey that can also be exported to other cases. This extensively researched book depends upon extensive fieldwork and more than 200 semi-structured elite interviews conducted with government officials, diplomats, academics, officials, and journalists in Turkey, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cyprus, the UK, Germany, and the U.S. The book provides 6 case studies (Turkey’s pragmatic foreign policy in the Western Balkans, the Turkish vote over the EU-NATO security exchange, the EU-Turkey deal on the refugee crisis, Turkey’s energy policies, Turkish rapprochement with Russia in security and defense and Turkish foreign policy on Syria and Iraqi) that demonstrate the 3 categories. The book concludes three possible alternative futures for Turkey’s relations with the West and the podcast includes an analysis of what the change in U.S. leadership (Biden-Blinken) might mean for Turkish-Western relations. Dr. Dursun-Özkanca is the Endowed Chair of International Studies and Professor of Political Science at Elizabethtown College. She has edited two books – The European Union as an Actor in Security Sector Reform (Routledge, 2014) and External Interventions in Civil Wars (co-edited with Stefan Wolff, Routledge, 2014) – and has a forthcoming book entitled The Nexus Between Security Sector Reform/Governance and Sustainable Development Goal-16: An Examination of Conceptual Linkages and Policy Recommendations, forthcoming by Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance (DCAF) (London: Ubiquity Press). Susan Liebell is an associate professor of political science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia. Why Diehard Originalists Aren’t Really Originalists recently appeared in the Washington Post’s Monkey Cage and “Retreat from the Rule of Law: Locke and the Perils of Stand Your Ground” was published in the Journal of Politics (July 2020). Email her comments at sliebell@sju.edu or tweet to @SusanLiebell. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/national-security

How do we make sense of Turkey’s recent turn against the West – after decades of Turkish cooperation and desire to be integrated into the European and wider Western community in terms of foreign policy? Dr. Oya Dursun-Özkanca’s new book Turkey-West Relations: The Politics of Intra-alliance Opposition (Cambridge UP, 2019) interrogates the dynamics of the relationship between Turkey and the West, particularly the EU, NATO, and the United States. The compelling book develops a framework of intra-alliance opposition to explain this shift from Turkey’s engagement with the West as a desirable ally to Turkey’s increasingly hostility to the West after 2010. Moving beyond the power and personality of Erdogan, Dursun-Özkanca develops an analytical framework of the politics of intra-alliance opposition and provides a comprehensive and nuanced account of how and why Turkish foreign policy has changed within the transatlantic alliance. She offers three categories of intra-alliance opposition behavior: boundary testing; boundary challenging; boundary breaking. She deploys these categories to differentiate between the motivations behind the use of each tool – providing an analysis of Turkey that can also be exported to other cases. This extensively researched book depends upon extensive fieldwork and more than 200 semi-structured elite interviews conducted with government officials, diplomats, academics, officials, and journalists in Turkey, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cyprus, the UK, Germany, and the U.S. The book provides 6 case studies (Turkey’s pragmatic foreign policy in the Western Balkans, the Turkish vote over the EU-NATO security exchange, the EU-Turkey deal on the refugee crisis, Turkey’s energy policies, Turkish rapprochement with Russia in security and defense and Turkish foreign policy on Syria and Iraqi) that demonstrate the 3 categories. The book concludes three possible alternative futures for Turkey’s relations with the West and the podcast includes an analysis of what the change in U.S. leadership (Biden-Blinken) might mean for Turkish-Western relations. Dr. Dursun-Özkanca is the Endowed Chair of International Studies and Professor of Political Science at Elizabethtown College. She has edited two books – The European Union as an Actor in Security Sector Reform (Routledge, 2014) and External Interventions in Civil Wars (co-edited with Stefan Wolff, Routledge, 2014) – and has a forthcoming book entitled The Nexus Between Security Sector Reform/Governance and Sustainable Development Goal-16: An Examination of Conceptual Linkages and Policy Recommendations, forthcoming by Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance (DCAF) (London: Ubiquity Press). Susan Liebell is an associate professor of political science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia. Why Diehard Originalists Aren’t Really Originalists recently appeared in the Washington Post’s Monkey Cage and “Retreat from the Rule of Law: Locke and the Perils of Stand Your Ground” was published in the Journal of Politics (July 2020). Email her comments at sliebell@sju.edu or tweet to @SusanLiebell. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/european-studies

How do we make sense of Turkey’s recent turn against the West – after decades of Turkish cooperation and desire to be integrated into the European and wider Western community in terms of foreign policy? Dr. Oya Dursun-Özkanca’s new book Turkey-West Relations: The Politics of Intra-alliance Opposition (Cambridge UP, 2019) interrogates the dynamics of the relationship between Turkey and the West, particularly the EU, NATO, and the United States. The compelling book develops a framework of intra-alliance opposition to explain this shift from Turkey’s engagement with the West as a desirable ally to Turkey’s increasingly hostility to the West after 2010. Moving beyond the power and personality of Erdogan, Dursun-Özkanca develops an analytical framework of the politics of intra-alliance opposition and provides a comprehensive and nuanced account of how and why Turkish foreign policy has changed within the transatlantic alliance. She offers three categories of intra-alliance opposition behavior: boundary testing; boundary challenging; boundary breaking. She deploys these categories to differentiate between the motivations behind the use of each tool – providing an analysis of Turkey that can also be exported to other cases. This extensively researched book depends upon extensive fieldwork and more than 200 semi-structured elite interviews conducted with government officials, diplomats, academics, officials, and journalists in Turkey, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cyprus, the UK, Germany, and the U.S. The book provides 6 case studies (Turkey’s pragmatic foreign policy in the Western Balkans, the Turkish vote over the EU-NATO security exchange, the EU-Turkey deal on the refugee crisis, Turkey’s energy policies, Turkish rapprochement with Russia in security and defense and Turkish foreign policy on Syria and Iraqi) that demonstrate the 3 categories. The book concludes three possible alternative futures for Turkey’s relations with the West and the podcast includes an analysis of what the change in U.S. leadership (Biden-Blinken) might mean for Turkish-Western relations. Dr. Dursun-Özkanca is the Endowed Chair of International Studies and Professor of Political Science at Elizabethtown College. She has edited two books – The European Union as an Actor in Security Sector Reform (Routledge, 2014) and External Interventions in Civil Wars (co-edited with Stefan Wolff, Routledge, 2014) – and has a forthcoming book entitled The Nexus Between Security Sector Reform/Governance and Sustainable Development Goal-16: An Examination of Conceptual Linkages and Policy Recommendations, forthcoming by Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance (DCAF) (London: Ubiquity Press). Susan Liebell is an associate professor of political science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia. Why Diehard Originalists Aren’t Really Originalists recently appeared in the Washington Post’s Monkey Cage and “Retreat from the Rule of Law: Locke and the Perils of Stand Your Ground” was published in the Journal of Politics (July 2020). Email her comments at sliebell@sju.edu or tweet to @SusanLiebell. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/eastern-european-studies

How do we make sense of Turkey’s recent turn against the West – after decades of Turkish cooperation and desire to be integrated into the European and wider Western community in terms of foreign policy? Dr. Oya Dursun-Özkanca’s new book Turkey-West Relations: The Politics of Intra-alliance Opposition (Cambridge UP, 2019) interrogates the dynamics of the relationship between Turkey and the West, particularly the EU, NATO, and the United States. The compelling book develops a framework of intra-alliance opposition to explain this shift from Turkey’s engagement with the West as a desirable ally to Turkey’s increasingly hostility to the West after 2010. Moving beyond the power and personality of Erdogan, Dursun-Özkanca develops an analytical framework of the politics of intra-alliance opposition and provides a comprehensive and nuanced account of how and why Turkish foreign policy has changed within the transatlantic alliance. She offers three categories of intra-alliance opposition behavior: boundary testing; boundary challenging; boundary breaking. She deploys these categories to differentiate between the motivations behind the use of each tool – providing an analysis of Turkey that can also be exported to other cases. This extensively researched book depends upon extensive fieldwork and more than 200 semi-structured elite interviews conducted with government officials, diplomats, academics, officials, and journalists in Turkey, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cyprus, the UK, Germany, and the U.S. The book provides 6 case studies (Turkey’s pragmatic foreign policy in the Western Balkans, the Turkish vote over the EU-NATO security exchange, the EU-Turkey deal on the refugee crisis, Turkey’s energy policies, Turkish rapprochement with Russia in security and defense and Turkish foreign policy on Syria and Iraqi) that demonstrate the 3 categories. The book concludes three possible alternative futures for Turkey’s relations with the West and the podcast includes an analysis of what the change in U.S. leadership (Biden-Blinken) might mean for Turkish-Western relations. Dr. Dursun-Özkanca is the Endowed Chair of International Studies and Professor of Political Science at Elizabethtown College. She has edited two books – The European Union as an Actor in Security Sector Reform (Routledge, 2014) and External Interventions in Civil Wars (co-edited with Stefan Wolff, Routledge, 2014) – and has a forthcoming book entitled The Nexus Between Security Sector Reform/Governance and Sustainable Development Goal-16: An Examination of Conceptual Linkages and Policy Recommendations, forthcoming by Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance (DCAF) (London: Ubiquity Press). Susan Liebell is an associate professor of political science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia. Why Diehard Originalists Aren’t Really Originalists recently appeared in the Washington Post’s Monkey Cage and “Retreat from the Rule of Law: Locke and the Perils of Stand Your Ground” was published in the Journal of Politics (July 2020). Email her comments at sliebell@sju.edu or tweet to @SusanLiebell. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/middle-eastern-studies

Small and medium-sized enterprises – SMEs – account for most businesses and employment in Asia and the Pacific's developing economies. Reigniting the region's SME growth via trade will be key to advancing inclusive economic recovery and resilience in the face of COVID-19 challenges. In this podcast, Waseda University professor emeritus and ADBI visiting fellow, Shujiro Urata, examines the importance of boosting SME trade for developing Asia and the Pacific at this juncture. He describes opportunities and challenges to increasing SME engagement in cross-border production and supply chains, also known as global supply chains, how SMEs could help to meet demand for facial masks, and related policy keys moving forward. The discussion draws upon his new book, Enhancing SME Participation in Global Value Chains: Determinants, Challenges, and Policy Recommendations. Read the transcript https://bit.ly/30jYdLM Related link Enhancing SME Participation in Global Value Chains: Determinants, Challenges, and Policy Recommendations https://bit.ly/3qrrpen

An excerpt from "World Class" from the Freeman Spogli Institute: "Foreign Policy Recommendations for the Biden Administration and Iran" More details at fsi.stanford.edu

This week on our Advocate Virtual Forum, we discuss the intersection of incarceration, substance abuse, and parenting--including new data about mothers who are incarcerated and state policy changes that would allow parents to be held accountable while remaining connected to their child. Panelists included Jennifer Hancock, president and CEO of Volunteers of America Mid-States, and Chaly Downs, graduate of VOA's Freedom House Women's Addiction Recovery Program. Check out the new Blueprint for Kentucky’s Children issue brief released today by Kentucky Youth Advocates, Data Trends and Policy Recommendations to Address the Impact of Maternal Incarceration on Kentucky’s Children, which shows that the number of women incarcerated has grown at an alarming pace in Kentucky in recent decades and that women incarcerated are more likely to be a parent and to be incarcerated for a drug offense. Thank you to Aetna Better Health of Kentucky for supporting the Making Kids Count podcast. Visit AetnaMedicaidKY.com/choose to learn more about their health care benefits and programs designed with your family’s wellbeing in mind.

Despite well documented problems and challenges, Ireland is in the privileged position of having public services and social infrastructure to rely on at a time of crisis.   This is due to the social contract that underpins our social infrastructure.  The social contract as a concept has evolved to encompass a situation whereby citizens contribute to the common good – whether economically, socially or culturally – on the assumption that the State will provide a minimum standard of living, essential social services and infrastructure, and the protection of their basic rights.In this episode, following the launch of Social Justice Ireland's 81 Policy Recommendations for a new Social Contract, Colette Bennett and Eamon Murphy discuss this vision and how it could shape a better future for all.

This episode features Brian O’Callaghan, PhD candidate in economics from the Smith School for Enterprise and the Environment at the University of Oxford presenting findings and recommendations on policies that could help countries obtain a green economic recovery based on a recent study he co-authored, Will COVID-19 fiscal recovery packages accelerate or retard progress on climate change. Mr. O’Callaghan shares a set of recovery policies that perform well on both economic and climate metrics, and explains how these climate policies can lead to many environmental, social, health, and political co-benefits. He lastly brings attention to the key considerations for implementing climate policies in the Latin America region specifically.This presentation was recorded during the virtual meeting, Build Back Better: A Green and Sustainable Economic Recovery on July 10, 2020.

In this episode, Suzanne Spradley and Chase Cannon review policy recommendations to Congress relating to employer sponsored coverage, emphasizing ideas that would help employers get back to work during the COVID-19 pandemic. Suzanne leads off discussing COBRA subsidies for those who lost or will lose employer coverage due to a furlough or layoff. Suzanne and Chase then turn their attention to direct primary care, on-site clinics and telehealth, all of which could use policy changes to help with ease of access and cost. Suzanne then dives into changes to health and dependent care FSAs and surprise medical bills that could be memorialized by Congress. The podcast closes with a discussion on coverage for COVID-19 testing and treatment, as well as recent guidance on antibody tests as a requirement for employees to return to work.

ITI’s Guido Lobrano, VP of Policy for Europe at ITI, joins Jason Oxman on the Download On Tech podcast to talk about ITI’s European Policy Recommendations and the importance of having a presence in Brussels.

Show Me Institute Director of Government Accountability Patrick Ishmael Joins KZIM/KSIM to discuss Show-Me's 2019 Policy recommendations for Missouri. http://www.kzimksim.com/ Learn more: https://showmeinstitute.org/

CID Student Ambassador Alexandra Gonzalez interviews Miguel Angel Santos, Adjunct Professor in Public Policy, Harvard Kennedy School and Senior Research Fellow, Center for International Development at Harvard University. Miguel Angel talks about CID's research initiative aimed at exploring export diversification opportunities and understanding the potential binding constraints that Panama can run into in the process of shifting gears towards a sustainable economic growth. More info available on: --> www.cid.harvard.edu --> www,growthlab.cid.harvard.edu/panama About Miguel Angel Santos: Miguel Angel Santos is an Adjunct Professor in Public Policy at Harvard Kennedy School of Government, and a Senior Research Fellow at the Center for International Development (CID) at Harvard University. At CID, he has been involved in various research projects aimed at helping governments to rethink their development strategies, both at the national and sub-national levels. Since he joined CID in August 2014, he has been involved in projects at the national level in Mexico, Panama, and Venezuela, and at the sub-national level in Mexico in the states of Chiapas, Baja California, Tabasco and Campeche; and the city of Hermosillo at Sonora state. He has also performed as project manager in the projects leading to the build-up of the Mexican Atlas of Economic Complexity, and the Peruvian Atlas of Economic Complexity. Before joining the field of international development, Miguel worked for ten years in corporate finance and business development in Latin America, performing as Director of Finance for the Cisneros Group of Companies (1997-2003), Head of Corporate Finance for Mercantil Servicios Financieros (2005-2007), and Business Vice-President for Sony Pictures and Entertainment Latin America (2008-2009). At that point, he decided to switch tracks and get involved in development economics. He holds two Master of Science degrees in International Finance and Trade (2011) and Economics (2012) from Universitat Pompeu Fabra, a Master in Public Administration from Harvard University (2014), and a Ph.D. in Economics at Universidad de Barcelona (2016). He was the head of the Macroeconomic Policy Team for presidential candidate Henrique Capriles Radonski in the Venezuelan elections of 2012.

Learn more about the Growth Lab's work in Panama: growthlab.cid.harvard.edu/panama.

PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS 1. All emergency departments should implement ALTO programs and provide opioid-free pain treatment pathways for the following conditions: a. Acute on chronic opioid-tolerant radicular lower back pain b. Opioid-naive musculoskeletal pain c. Migraine or recurrent primary headache d. Extremity fracture or joint dislocation e. Gastroparesis-associated or chronic functional abdominal pain f. Renal colic 2. Emergency departments should integrate ALTO into their computerized physician order entry systems to facilitate a seamless adoption by clinicians. 3. Low-dose, subdissociative ketamine (0.1-0.3 mg/kg) is an effective analgesic that can be opioid-sparing for many acute pain syndromes. Institutional guidelines and policies should be in place to enable clinicians and nurses who administer this agent for pain. 4. For musculoskeletal pain, consider a multimodal treatment approach using acetaminophen, NSAIDs, steroids, topical medications, trigger-point injections, and (for severe pain) ketamine. 5. For headache and migraine, consider a multimodal treatment approach that includes the administration of antiemetic agents, NSAIDs, steroids, valproic acid, magnesium, and triptans. Strongly consider cervical trigger-point injection. 6. For pain with a neuropathic component, consider gabapentin. 7. For pain with a tension component, consider a muscle relaxant. 8. For pain caused by renal colic, consider an NSAID, lidocaine infusion, and desmopressin nasal spray. 9. For chronic abdominal pain, consider low doses of haloperidol, diphenhydramine, and lidocaine infusion. 10. For extremity fracture or joint dislocation, consider the immediate use of nitrous oxide and low-dose ketamine while setting up for ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. 11. For arthritic or tendinitis pain, consider an intra-articular steroid/anesthetic injection. POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Hospitals should update institutional guidelines and put policies in place that enable clinicians to order and nurses to administer dose-dependent ketamine and IV lidocaine in non-ICU areas. 2. Emergency departments are encouraged to assemble an interdisciplinary pain management team that includes clinicians, nurses, pharmacists, physical therapists, social workers, and case managers. 3. Reimbursement should be available for any service directly correlated to pain management, the reduction of opioid use, and treatment of drug-addicted patients.

PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Patients who abuse opioids should be managed without judgement; addiction is a medical condition and not a moral failing. Caregivers should endeavor to meet patients “where they are,” infusing empathy and understanding into the patient/medical provider relationship. 2. Every emergency clinician should be well-versed in the safe injection of heroin and other intravenous (IV) drugs, and understand the practical steps for minimizing the dangers of overdose, infection, and other complications. When treating patients with complications of IV drug use, injection habits should be discussed and instruction should be given about safe practices. 3. Emergency department patients who inject drugs should be referred to local syringe access programs, where they can obtain sterile injection materials and support services such as counseling, HIV/hepatitis testing, and referrals. 4. Emergency departments should provide naloxone to high-risk patients at discharge. If the drug is unavailable at the time of release, patients should receive a prescription and be informed about the over-the-counter availability of the drug in most Colorado pharmacies. 5. Emergency clinicians should be familiar with Colorado’s regulations pertaining to naloxone. State laws eliminate liability risk for prescribing the drug, encourage good samaritan reporting of overdose, and make naloxone legal and readily available over the counter in most pharmacies. 6. Emergency department patients who receive prescriptions for opioids should be educated on their risks, safe storage methods, and the proper disposal of leftover medications. POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Harm reduction agencies and community programs that provide resources for people who inject drugs (PWID) should be made readily available. 2. When local programs are unavailable for PWID, emergency departments should establish their own programs to provide services such as safe syringe exchanges.

Two China policy veterans: Prof. Susan Shirk and Amb. Winston Lord are members of a high-level bipartisan task force that launched a report on US Policy Toward China, with detailed policy recommendations for the Trump administration. They offer an overview of the comprehensive list of issues covered in the report, and discuss the priorities that 45th President must address in his first year, such as the North Korean nuclear threat, climate change leadership, Asia Pacific alliances, and trade and civil society reciprocity. The task force comprises a group of 20 prominent China specialists that include policymakers, scholars, and trade representatives, many of whom served under both political parties and every U.S. president since Nixon. Watch the panel discussion with task force co-chair Orville Schell of Asia Society and read the full report on china.ucsd.edu This episode was recorded at UC San Diego Studio Ten300 Host: Samuel Tsoi Editors: Mike Fausner, Anthony King Production Support: Lei Guang, Susan Shirk, Amy Robinson, Sarah Pfledderer, Michelle Fredricks Music: Dave Liang/Shanghai Restoration Project Episode photo credit: Michelle Fredricks

This week, I had the opportunity to talk to Joris Pekel, Community Coordinator for Cultural Heritage at Europeana. On top of talking about their wider work of making artworks and cultural piece from all over Europe accessible to the public online. During the interview, we also talked about the Europeana Sounds Conference 2016, their Policy Recommendations for improving online access to audio and audio-related heritage in Europe and their brand new page on Soundcloud. On a side note, White Market Podcast is becoming a fortnight event. Our slots on Soundart Radio and Spark Sunderland remain the same, though. The next episode will be online on December 18th and regular broadcasts can be expected every fortnight from that date onwards. LUKA$ – PCH (feat. BUSE) [Bandcamp] // CC BY-NC-ND The Impossebulls – A Roller Skating Jam Called Saturday Nite [blocSonic] // CC BY-NC-SA Conscious Thoughts – Daydreamer (feat. Le Real) [Club Coral] // CC BY-NC-ND *Light-foot – Reckless Elect [Soundcloud] // CC BY George Bizet – L’amour est un oiseau rebelle (Habanera) [LNB/NLL via Europeana] // CC BY-SA Mattias Westlund – Winters Call [Auboutdufil] // CC BY Ruido Selecto – Talismán [Monofonicos] // CC BY-NC-SA All the tracks used as background music during the interview are taken from Jon Luc Hefferman’s album “Elian Mor“. These tracks are available under a CC BY-NC licence. *Starfrosch Hot Track of the Week

As the economy moves online, it becomes more difficult for national tax authorities to collect revenue. How great is the impact, and what should corporate taxation look like in the digital age? You can find more information on this event here: http://bruegel.org/events/internet-taxation-challenges-and-policy-recommendations/

Host: Maurice Pickard, MD Gun violence continues to be a major health care issue. What can physicians and other health care providers do to reduce firearms-related violence? Host Dr. Maurice Pickard welcomes Dr. David Fleming, the 2014-2015 President of the American College of Physicians (ACP), the nation's largest medical specialty organization. Dr Fleming discusses the ACP's new policy paper, Reducing Firearm-Related Injuries and Deaths in the United States, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine. This paper offers strategies to address the societal, health care, and regulatory barriers to reducing firearms-related violence, injuries, and deaths in the United States. Dr. Fleming is Professor of Medicine at the University of Missouri School of Medicine, where he also serves as Chairman of the Department of Medicine and Director of the MU Center for Health Ethics.

This lecture was given at the "Get Smart About Antibiotics" lecture series given as part of the UCLA Antimicrobial Stewardship Program.

http://facultyofthemace.com In this episode, the Faculty of The Mace looks at two, free-market policy recommendations regarding accreditation shopping that protect both the public interest and the post-secondary education community. Eugene Murray, Lead Moderator, Faculty of The Mace.

http://facultyofthemace.com In this episode, the Faculty of The Mace looks at two, free-market policy recommendations regarding accreditation shopping that protect both the public interest and the post-secondary education community. Eugene Murray, Lead Moderator, Faculty of The Mace.