Podcast appearances and mentions of Luc Montagnier

durée : 00:09:15 - L'invité de 7h50 du week-end - À l'occasion du week-end du Sidaction, Françoise Barré-Sinoussi, virologue et prix Nobel de médecine pour avoir codécouvert le virus du sida en 1983, s'alarme des conséquences des coupes budgétaires de l'administration Trump sur les malades du sida et la recherche. - invités : Françoise BARRE SINOUSSI - Françoise Barré-Sinoussi : Rétrovirologue, prix Nobel de médecine en 2008 pour la découverte du virus du sida, avec Luc Montagnier, et présidente de l'association Sidaction depuis novembre 2017.

Mary Holland is the Chief Executive Officer for the Children's Health Defense, founded by Bobby Kennedy Jr. Earlier she directed the Graduate Lawyering Program at New York University Law School and lectured on international human rights at Columbia University.  Mary has been an advocate for vaccine choice and health freedom for over two decades. She also has a son who regressed into autism following the MMR vaccine. Mary holds a degree in Russian studies from Harvard, and graduate degrees in international relations and a JD from Columbia University. She also co-founded two non-profits: the Elizabeth Birt Center for Autism Law and Advocacy and the Center for Personal Rights. Mary is the co-author of “Vaccine Epidemic" about corporate greed and bad science behind the vaccine industry.  Her later book "The HPV Vaccine Trial: Seeking Justice for A Generation Betrayed" -- is perhaps the most concise book behind the history and adverse effects of HPV vaccines such as Gardasil, with a preface by the Nobel Prize Winner in medicine Dr. Luc Montagnier.  Mary also co-hosts's the weekly news review podcast "This Week with Mary and Polly" on CHD.TV.  The website for the Children's Health Defense is ChildrensHealthDefense.org  

Dr. Gary Null provides a commentary on "Universal  Healthcare"       Universal Healthcare is the Solution to a Broken Medical System Gary Null, PhD Progressive Radio Network, March 3, 2025 For over 50 years, there has been no concerted or successful effort to bring down medical costs in the American healthcare system. Nor are the federal health agencies making disease prevention a priority. Regardless whether the political left or right sponsors proposals for reform, such measures are repeatedly defeated by both parties in Congress. As a result, the nation's healthcare system remains one of the most expensive and least efficient in the developed world. For the past 30 years, medical bills contributing to personal debt regularly rank among the top three causes of personal bankruptcy. This is a reality that reflects not only the financial strain on ordinary Americans but the systemic failure of the healthcare system itself. The urgent question is: If President Trump and his administration are truly seeking to reduce the nation's $36 trillion deficit, why is there no serious effort to reform the most bloated and corrupt sector of the economy? A key obstacle is the widespread misinformation campaign that falsely claims universal health care would cost an additional $2 trillion annually and further balloon the national debt. However, a more honest assessment reveals the opposite. If the US adopted a universal single-payer system, the nation could actually save up to $20 trillion over the next 10 years rather than add to the deficit. Even with the most ambitious efforts by people like Elon Musk to rein in federal spending or optimize government efficiency, the estimated savings would only amount to $500 billion. This is only a fraction of what could be achieved through comprehensive healthcare reform alone. Healthcare is the largest single expenditure of the federal budget. A careful examination of where the $5 trillion spent annually on healthcare actually goes reveals massive systemic fraud and inefficiency. Aside from emergency medicine, which accounts for only 10-12 percent of total healthcare expenditures, the bulk of this spending does not deliver better health outcomes nor reduce trends in physical and mental illness. Applying Ockham's Razor, the principle that the simplest solution is often the best, the obvious conclusion is that America's astronomical healthcare costs are the direct result of price gouging on an unimaginable scale. For example, in most small businesses, profit margins range between 1.6 and 2.5 percent, such as in grocery retail. Yet the pharmaceutical industrial complex routinely operates on markup rates as high as 150,000 percent for many prescription drugs. The chart below highlights the astronomical gap between the retail price of some top-selling patented pharmaceutical medications and their generic equivalents. Drug Condition Patent Price (per unit) Generic Price Estimated Manufacture Cost Markup Source Insulin (Humalog) Diabetes $300 $30 $3 10,000% Rand (2021) EpiPen Allergic reactions $600 $30 $10 6,000% BMJ (2022) Daraprim Toxoplasmosis $750/pill $2 $0.50 150,000% JAMA (2019) Harvoni Hepatitis C $94,500 (12 weeks) $30,000 $200 47,000% WHO Report (2018) Lipitor Cholesterol $150 $10 $0.50 29,900% Health Affairs (2020) Xarelto Blood Thinner $450 $25 $1.50 30,000% NEJM (2020) Abilify Schizophrenia $800 (30 tablets) $15 $2 39,900% AJMC (2019) Revlimid Cancer $16,000/mo $450 $150 10,500% Kaiser Health News (2021) Humira Arthritis $2,984/dose $400 $50 5,868% Rand (2021) Sovaldi Hepatitis C $1,000/pill $10 $2 49,900% JAMA (2021) Xolair Asthma $2,400/dose $300 $50 4,800% NEJM (2020) Gleevec Leukemia $10,000/mo $350 $200 4,900% Harvard Public Health Review (2020) OxyContin Pain Relief $600 (30 tablets) $15 $0.50 119,900% BMJ (2022) Remdesivir Covid-19 $3,120 (5 doses) N/A $10 31,100% The Lancet (2020) The corruption extends far beyond price gouging. Many pharmaceutical companies convince federal health agencies to fund their basic research and drug development with taxpayer dollars. Yet when these companies bring successful products to market, the profits are kept entirely by the corporations or shared with the agencies or groups of government scientists. On the other hand, the public, who funded the research, receives no financial return. This amounts to a systemic betrayal of the public trust on a scale of hundreds of billions of dollars annually. Another significant contributor to rising healthcare costs is the widespread practice of defensive medicine that is driven by the constant threat of litigation. Over the past 40 years, defensive medicine has become a cottage industry. Physicians order excessive diagnostic tests and unnecessary treatments simply to protect themselves from lawsuits. Study after study has shown that these over-performed procedures not only inflate costs but lead to iatrogenesis or medical injury and death caused by the medical  system and practices itself. The solution is simple: adopting no-fault healthcare coverage for everyone where patients receive care without needing to sue and thereby freeing doctors from the burden of excessive malpractice insurance. A single-payer universal healthcare system could fundamentally transform the entire industry by capping profits at every level — from drug manufacturers to hospitals to medical equipment suppliers. The Department of Health and Human Services would have the authority to set profit margins for medical procedures. This would ensure that healthcare is determined by outcomes, not profits. Additionally, the growing influence of private equity firms and vulture capitalists buying up hospitals and medical clinics across America must be reined in. These equity firms prioritize profit extraction over improving the quality of care. They often slash staff, raise prices, and dictate medical procedures based on what will yield the highest returns. Another vital reform would be to provide free medical education for doctors and nurses in exchange for five years of service under the universal system. Medical professionals would earn a realistic salary cap to prevent them from being lured into equity partnerships or charging exorbitant rates. The biggest single expense in the current system, however, is the private health insurance industry, which consumes 33 percent of the $5 trillion healthcare budget. Health insurance CEOs consistently rank among the highest-paid executives in the country. Their companies, who are nothing more than bean counters, decide what procedures and drugs will be covered, partially covered, or denied altogether. This entire industry is designed to place profits above patients' lives. If the US dismantled its existing insurance-based system and replaced it with a fully reformed national healthcare model, the country could save $2.7 trillion annually while simultaneously improving health outcomes. Over the course of 10 years, those savings would amount to $27 trillion. This could wipe out nearly the entire national debt in a short time. This solution has been available for decades but has been systematically blocked by corporate lobbying and bipartisan corruption in Washington. The path forward is clear but only if American citizens demand a system where healthcare is valued as a public service and not a commodity. The national healthcare crisis is not just a fiscal issue. It is a crucial moral failure of the highest order. With the right reforms, the nation could simultaneously restore its financial health and deliver the kind of healthcare system its citizens have long deserved. American Healthcare: Corrupt, Broken and Lethal Richard Gale and Gary Null Progressive Radio Network, March 3, 2025 For a nation that prides itself on being the world's wealthiest, most innovative and technologically advanced, the US' healthcare system is nothing less than a disaster and disgrace. Not only are Americans the least healthy among the most developed nations, but the US' health system ranks dead last among high-income countries. Despite rising costs and our unshakeable faith in American medical exceptionalism, average life expectancy in the US has remained lower than other OECD nations for many years and continues to decline. The United Nations recognizes healthcare as a human right. In 2018, former UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon denounced the American healthcare system as "politically and morally wrong." During the pandemic it is estimated that two to three years was lost on average life expectancy. On the other hand, before the Covid-19 pandemic, countries with universal healthcare coverage found their average life expectancy stable or slowly increasing. The fundamental problem in the U.S. is that politics have been far too beholden to the pharmaceutical, HMO and private insurance industries. Neither party has made any concerted effort to reign in the corruption of corporate campaign funding and do what is sensible, financially feasible and morally correct to improve Americans' quality of health and well-being.   The fact that our healthcare system is horribly broken is proof that moneyed interests have become so powerful to keep single-payer debate out of the media spotlight and censored. Poll after poll shows that the American public favors the expansion of public health coverage. Other incremental proposals, including Medicare and Medicaid buy-in plans, are also widely preferred to the Affordable Care Act or Obamacare mess we are currently stuck with.   It is not difficult to understand how the dismal state of American medicine is the result of a system that has been sold out to the free-market and the bottom line interests of drug makers and an inflated private insurance industry. How advanced and ethically sound can a healthcare system be if tens of millions of people have no access to medical care because it is financially out of their reach?  The figures speak for themselves. The U.S. is burdened with a $41 trillion Medicare liability. The number of uninsured has declined during the past several years but still lingers around 25 million. An additional 30-35 million are underinsured. There are currently 65 million Medicare enrollees and 89 million Medicaid recipients. This is an extremely unhealthy snapshot of the country's ability to provide affordable healthcare and it is certainly unsustainable. The system is a public economic failure, benefiting no one except the large and increasingly consolidated insurance and pharmaceutical firms at the top that supervise the racket.   Our political parties have wrestled with single-payer or universal healthcare for decades. Obama ran his first 2008 presidential campaign on a single-payer platform. Since 1985, his campaign health adviser, the late Dr. Quentin Young from the University of Illinois Medical School, was one of the nation's leading voices calling for universal health coverage.  During a private conversation with Dr. Young shortly before his passing in 2016, he conveyed his sense of betrayal at the hands of the Obama administration. Dr. Young was in his 80s when he joined the Obama campaign team to help lead the young Senator to victory on a promise that America would finally catch up with other nations. The doctor sounded defeated. He shared how he was manipulated, and that Obama held no sincere intention to make universal healthcare a part of his administration's agenda. During the closed-door negotiations, which spawned the weak and compromised Affordable Care Act, Dr. Young was neither consulted nor invited to participate. In fact, he told us that he never heard from Obama again after his White House victory.   Past efforts to even raise the issue have been viciously attacked. A huge army of private interests is determined to keep the public enslaved to private insurers and high medical costs. The failure of our healthcare is in no small measure due to it being a fully for-profit operation. Last year, private health insurance accounted for 65 percent of coverage. Consider that there are over 900 private insurance companies in the US. National Health Expenditures (NHE) grew to $4.5 trillion in 2022, which was 17.3 percent of GDP. Older corporate rank-and-file Democrats and Republicans argue that a single-payer or socialized medical program is unaffordable. However, not only is single-payer affordable, it will end bankruptcies due to unpayable medical debt. In addition, universal healthcare, structured on a preventative model, will reduce disease rates at the outset.    Corporate Democrats argue that Obama's Affordable Care Act (ACA) was a positive step inching the country towards complete public coverage. However, aside from providing coverage to the poorest of Americans, Obamacare turned into another financial anchor around the necks of millions more. According to the health policy research group KFF, the average annual health insurance premium for single coverage is $8,400 and almost $24,000 for a family. In addition, patient out-of-pocket costs continue to increase, a 6.6% increase to $471 billion in 2022. Rather than healthcare spending falling, it has exploded, and the Trump and Biden administrations made matters worse.    Clearly, a universal healthcare program will require flipping the script on the entire private insurance industry, which employed over half a million people last year.  Obviously, the most volatile debate concerning a national universal healthcare system concerns cost. Although there is already a socialized healthcare system in place -- every federal legislator, bureaucrat, government employee and veteran benefits from it -- fiscal Republican conservatives and groups such as the Koch Brothers network are single-mindedly dedicated to preventing the expansion of Medicare and Medicaid. A Koch-funded Mercatus analysis made the outrageous claim that a single-payer system would increase federal health spending by $32 trillion in ten years. However, analyses and reviews by the Congressional Budget Office in the early 1990s concluded that such a system would only increase spending at the start; enormous savings would quickly offset it as the years pass. In one analysis, "the savings in administrative costs [10 percent of health spending] would be more than enough to offset the expense of universal coverage."    Defenders of those advocating for funding a National Health Program argue this can primarily be accomplished by raising taxes to levels comparable to other developed nations. This was a platform Senator Bernie Sanders and some of the younger progressive Democrats in the House campaigned on. The strategy was to tax the highest multimillion-dollar earners 60-70 percent. Despite the outrage of its critics, including old rank-and-file multi-millionaire Democrats like Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, this is still far less than in the past. During the Korean War, the top tax rate was 91 percent; it declined to 70 percent in the late 1960s. Throughout most of the 1970s, those in the lowest income bracket were taxed at 14 percent. We are not advocating for this strategy because it ignores where the funding is going, and the corruption in the system that is contributing to exorbitant waste.    But Democratic supporters of the ACA who oppose a universal healthcare plan ignore the additional taxes Obama levied to pay for the program. These included surtaxes on investment income, Medicare taxes from those earning over $200,000, taxes on tanning services, an excise tax on medical equipment, and a 40 percent tax on health coverage for costs over the designated cap that applied to flexible savings and health savings accounts. The entire ACA was reckless, sloppy and unnecessarily complicated from the start.    The fact that Obamacare further strengthened the distinctions between two parallel systems -- federal and private -- with entirely different economic structures created a labyrinth of red tape, rules, and wasteful bureaucracy. Since the ACA went into effect, over 150 new boards, agencies and programs have had to be established to monitor its 2,700 pages of gibberish. A federal single-payer system would easily eliminate this bureaucracy and waste.    A medical New Deal to establish universal healthcare coverage is a decisive step in the correct direction. But we must look at the crisis holistically and in a systematic way. Simply shuffling private insurance into a federal Medicare-for-all or buy-in program, funded by taxing the wealthiest of citizens, would only temporarily reduce costs. It will neither curtail nor slash escalating disease rates e. Any effective healthcare reform must also tackle the underlying reasons for Americans' poor state of health. We cannot shy away from examining the social illnesses infecting our entire free-market capitalist culture and its addiction to deregulation. A viable healthcare model would have to structurally transform how the medical economy operates. Finally, a successful medical New Deal must honestly evaluate the best and most reliable scientific evidence in order to effectively redirect public health spending.    For example, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, a former Obama healthcare adviser, observed that AIDS-HIV measures consume the most public health spending, even though the disease "ranked 75th on the list of diseases by personal health expenditures." On the other hand, according to the American Medical Association, a large percentage of the nation's $3.4 trillion healthcare spending goes towards treating preventable diseases, notably diabetes, common forms of heart disease, and back and neck pain conditions. In 2016, these three conditions were the most costly and accounted for approximately $277 billion in spending. Last year, the CDC announced the autism rate is now 1 in 36 children compared to 1 in 44 two years ago. A retracted study by Mark Blaxill, an autism activist at the Holland Center and a friend of the authors, estimates that ASD costs will reach $589 billion annually by 2030. There are no signs that this alarming trend will reverse and decline; and yet, our entire federal health system has failed to conscientiously investigate the underlying causes of this epidemic. All explanations that might interfere with the pharmaceutical industry's unchecked growth, such as over-vaccination, are ignored and viciously discredited without any sound scientific evidence. Therefore, a proper medical New Deal will require a systemic overhaul and reform of our federal health agencies, especially the HHS, CDC and FDA. Only the Robert Kennedy Jr presidential campaign is even addressing the crisis and has an inexpensive and comprehensive plan to deal with it. For any medical revolution to succeed in advancing universal healthcare, the plan must prioritize spending in a manner that serves public health and not private interests. It will also require reshuffling private corporate interests and their lobbyists to the sidelines, away from any strategic planning, in order to break up the private interests' control over federal agencies and its revolving door policies. Aside from those who benefit from this medical corruption, the overwhelming majority of Americans would agree with this criticism. However, there is a complete lack of national trust that our legislators, including the so-called progressives, would be willing to undertake such actions.    In addition, America's healthcare system ignores the single most critical initiative to reduce costs - that is, preventative efforts and programs instead of deregulation and closing loopholes designed to protect the drug and insurance industries' bottom line. Prevention can begin with banning toxic chemicals that are proven health hazards associated with current disease epidemics, and it can begin by removing a 1,000-plus toxins already banned in Europe. This should be a no-brainer for any legislator who cares for public health. For example, Stacy Malkan, co-founder of the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics, notes that "the policy approach in the US and Europe is dramatically different" when it comes to chemical allowances in cosmetic products. Whereas the EU has banned 1,328 toxic substances from the cosmetic industry alone, the US has banned only 11. The US continues to allow carcinogenic formaldehyde, petroleum, forever chemicals, many parabens (an estrogen mimicker and endocrine hormone destroyer), the highly allergenic p-phenylenediamine or PBD, triclosan, which has been associated with the rise in antibiotic resistant bacteria, avobenzone, and many others to be used in cosmetics, sunscreens, shampoo and hair dyes.   Next, the food Americans consume can be reevaluated for its health benefits. There should be no hesitation to tax the unhealthiest foods, such as commercial junk food, sodas and candy relying on high fructose corn syrup, products that contain ingredients proven to be toxic, and meat products laden with dangerous chemicals including growth hormones and antibiotics. The scientific evidence that the average American diet is contributing to rising disease trends is indisputable. We could also implement additional taxes on the public advertising of these demonstrably unhealthy products. All such tax revenue would accrue to a national universal health program to offset medical expenditures associated with the very illnesses linked to these products. Although such tax measures would help pay for a new medical New Deal, it may be combined with programs to educate the public about healthy nutrition if it is to produce a reduction in the most common preventable diseases. In fact, comprehensive nutrition courses in medical schools should be mandatory because the average physician receives no education in this crucial subject.  In addition, preventative health education should be mandatory throughout public school systems.   Private insurers force hospitals, clinics and private physicians into financial corners, and this is contributing to prodigious waste in money and resources. Annually, healthcare spending towards medical liability insurance costs tens of billions of dollars. In particular, this economic burden has taxed small clinics and physicians. It is well past the time that physician liability insurance is replaced with no-fault options. Today's doctors are spending an inordinate amount of money to protect themselves. Legions of liability and trial lawyers seek big paydays for themselves stemming from physician error. This has created a culture of fear among doctors and hospitals, resulting in the overly cautious practice of defensive medicine, driving up costs and insurance premiums just to avoid lawsuits. Doctors are forced to order unnecessary tests and prescribe more medications and medical procedures just to cover their backsides. No-fault insurance is a common-sense plan that enables physicians to pursue their profession in a manner that will reduce iatrogenic injuries and costs. Individual cases requiring additional medical intervention and loss of income would still be compensated. This would generate huge savings.    No other nation suffers from the scourge of excessive drug price gouging like the US. After many years of haggling to lower prices and increase access to generic drugs, only a minute amount of progress has been made in recent years. A 60 Minutes feature about the Affordable Care Act reported an "orgy of lobbying and backroom deals in which just about everyone with a stake in the $3-trillion-a-year health industry came out ahead—except the taxpayers.” For example, Life Extension magazine reported that an antiviral cream (acyclovir), which had lost its patent protection, "was being sold to pharmacies for 7,500% over the active ingredient cost. The active ingredient (acyclovir) costs only 8 pennies, yet pharmacies are paying a generic maker $600 for this drug and selling it to consumers for around $700." Other examples include the antibiotic Doxycycline. The price per pill averages 7 cents to $3.36 but has a 5,300 percent markup when it reaches the consumer. The antidepressant Clomipramine is marked up 3,780 percent, and the anti-hypertensive drug Captopril's mark-up is 2,850 percent. And these are generic drugs!    Medication costs need to be dramatically cut to allow drug manufacturers a reasonable but not obscene profit margin. By capping profits approximately 100 percent above all costs, we would save our system hundreds of billions of dollars. Such a measure would also extirpate the growing corporate misdemeanors of pricing fraud, which forces patients to pay out-of-pocket in order to make up for the costs insurers are unwilling to pay.    Finally, we can acknowledge that our healthcare is fundamentally a despotic rationing system based upon high insurance costs vis-a-vis a toss of the dice to determine where a person sits on the economic ladder. For the past three decades it has contributed to inequality. The present insurance-based economic metrics cast millions of Americans out of coverage because private insurance costs are beyond their means. Uwe Reinhardt, a Princeton University political economist, has called our system "brutal" because it "rations [people] out of the system." He defined rationing as "withholding something from someone that is beneficial." Discriminatory healthcare rationing now affects upwards to 60 million people who have been either priced out of the system or under insured. They make too much to qualify for Medicare under Obamacare, yet earn far too little to afford private insurance costs and premiums. In the final analysis, the entire system is discriminatory and predatory.    However, we must be realistic. Almost every member of Congress has benefited from Big Pharma and private insurance lobbyists. The only way to begin to bring our healthcare program up to the level of a truly developed nation is to remove the drug industry's rampant and unnecessary profiteering from the equation.     How did Fauci memory-hole a cure for AIDS and get away with it?   By Helen Buyniski   Over 700,000 Americans have died of AIDS since 1981, with the disease claiming some 42.3 million victims worldwide. While an HIV diagnosis is no longer considered a certain death sentence, the disease looms large in the public imagination and in public health funding, with contemporary treatments running into thousands of dollars per patient annually.   But was there a cure for AIDS all this time - an affordable and safe treatment that was ruthlessly suppressed and attacked by the US public health bureaucracy and its agents? Could this have saved millions of lives and billions of dollars spent on AZT, ddI and failed HIV vaccine trials? What could possibly justify the decision to disappear a safe and effective approach down the memory hole?   The inventor of the cure, Gary Null, already had several decades of experience creating healing protocols for physicians to help patients not responding well to conventional treatments by the time AIDS was officially defined in 1981. Null, a registered dietitian and board-certified nutritionist with a PhD in human nutrition and public health science, was a senior research fellow and Director of Anti-Aging Medicine at the Institute of Applied Biology for 36 years and has published over 950 papers, conducting groundbreaking experiments in reversing biological aging as confirmed with DNA methylation testing. Additionally, Null is a multi-award-winning documentary filmmaker, bestselling author, and investigative journalist whose work exposing crimes against humanity over the last 50 years has highlighted abuses by Big Pharma, the military-industrial complex, the financial industry, and the permanent government stay-behind networks that have come to be known as the Deep State.   Null was contacted in 1974 by Dr. Stephen Caiazza, a physician working with a subculture of gay men in New York living the so-called “fast track” lifestyle, an extreme manifestation of the gay liberation movement that began with the Stonewall riots. Defined by rampant sexual promiscuity and copious use of illegal and prescription drugs, including heavy antibiotic use for a cornucopia of sexually-transmitted diseases, the fast-track never included more than about two percent of gay men, though these dominated many of the bathhouses and clubs that defined gay nightlife in the era. These patients had become seriously ill as a result of their indulgence, generally arriving at the clinic with multiple STDs including cytomegalovirus and several types of herpes and hepatitis, along with candida overgrowth, nutritional deficiencies, gut issues, and recurring pneumonia. Every week for the next 10 years, Null would counsel two or three of these men - a total of 800 patients - on how to detoxify their bodies and de-stress their lives, tracking their progress with Caiazza and the other providers at weekly feedback meetings that he credits with allowing the team to quickly evaluate which treatments were most effective. He observed that it only took about two years on the “fast track” for a healthy young person to begin seeing muscle loss and the recurrent, lingering opportunistic infections that would later come to be associated with AIDS - while those willing to commit to a healthier lifestyle could regain their health in about a year.    It was with this background that Null established the Tri-State Healing Center in Manhattan in 1980, staffing the facility with what would eventually run to 22 certified health professionals to offer safe, natural, and effective low- and no-cost treatments to thousands of patients with HIV and AIDS-defining conditions. Null and his staff used variations of the protocols he had perfected with Caiazza's patients, a multifactorial patient-tailored approach that included high-dose vitamin C drips, intravenous ozone therapy, juicing and nutritional improvements and supplementation, aspects of homeopathy and naturopathy with some Traditional Chinese Medicine and Ayurvedic practices. Additional services offered on-site included acupuncture and holistic dentistry, while peer support groups were also held at the facility so that patients could find community and a positive environment, healing their minds and spirits while they healed their bodies.   “Instead of trying to kill the virus with antiretroviral pharmaceuticals designed to stop viral replication before it kills patients, we focused on what benefits could be gained by building up the patients' natural immunity and restoring biochemical integrity so the body could fight for itself,” Null wrote in a 2014 article describing the philosophy behind the Center's approach, which was wholly at odds with the pharmaceutical model.1   Patients were comprehensively tested every week, with any “recovery” defined solely by the labs, which documented AIDS patient after patient - 1,200 of them - returning to good health and reversing their debilitating conditions. Null claims to have never lost an AIDS patient in the Center's care, even as the death toll for the disease - and its pharmaceutical standard of care AZT - reached an all-time high in the early 1990s. Eight patients who had opted for a more intensive course of treatment - visiting the Center six days a week rather than one - actually sero-deconverted, with repeated subsequent testing showing no trace of HIV in their bodies.   As an experienced clinical researcher himself, Null recognized that any claims made by the Center would be massively scrutinized, challenging as they did the prevailing scientific consensus that AIDS was an incurable, terminal illness. He freely gave his protocols to any medical practitioner who asked, understanding that his own work could be considered scientifically valid only if others could replicate it under the same conditions. After weeks of daily observational visits to the Center, Dr. Robert Cathcart took the protocols back to San Francisco, where he excitedly reported that patients were no longer dying in his care.    Null's own colleague at the Institute of Applied Biology, senior research fellow Elana Avram, set up IV drip rooms at the Institute and used his intensive protocols to sero-deconvert 10 patients over a two-year period. While the experiment had been conducted in secret, as the Institute had been funded by Big Pharma since its inception half a century earlier, Avram had hoped she would be able to publish a journal article to further publicize Null's protocols and potentially help AIDS patients, who were still dying at incredibly high rates thanks to Burroughs Wellcome's noxious but profitable AZT. But as she would later explain in a 2019 letter to Null, their groundbreaking research never made it into print - despite meticulous documentation of their successes - because the Institute's director and board feared their pharmaceutical benefactors would withdraw the funding on which they depended, given that Null's protocols did not involve any patentable or otherwise profitable drugs. When Avram approached them about publication, the board vetoed the idea, arguing that it would “draw negative attention because [the work] was contrary to standard drug treatments.” With no real point in continuing experiments along those lines without institutional support and no hope of obtaining funding from elsewhere, the department she had created specifically for these experiments shut down after a two-year followup with her test subjects - all of whom remained alive and healthy - was completed.2   While the Center was receiving regular visits by this time from medical professionals and, increasingly, black celebrities like Stokely Carmichael and Isaac Hayes, who would occasionally perform for the patients, the news was spreading by word of mouth alone - not a single media outlet had dared to document the clinic that was curing AIDS patients for free. Instead, they gave airtime to Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, who had for years been spreading baseless, hysteria-fueling claims about HIV and AIDS to any news outlet that would put him on. His claim that children could contract the virus from “ordinary household conduct” with an infected relative proved so outrageous he had to walk it back,3 and he never really stopped insisting the deadly plague associated with gays and drug users was about to explode like a nuclear bomb among the law-abiding heterosexual population. Fauci by this time controlled all government science funding through NIAID, and his zero-tolerance approach to dissent on the HIV/AIDS front had already seen prominent scientists like virologist Peter Duesberg stripped of the resources they needed for their work because they had dared to question his commandment: There is no cause of AIDS but HIV, and AZT is its treatment. Even the AIDS activist groups, which by then had been coopted by Big Pharma and essentially reduced to astroturfing for the toxic failed chemotherapy drug AZT backed by the institutional might of Fauci's NIAID,4 didn't seem to want to hear that there was a cure. Unconcerned with the irrationality of denouncing the man touting his free AIDS cure as an  “AIDS denier,” they warned journalists that platforming Null or anyone else rejecting the mainstream medical line would be met with organized demands for their firing.    Determined to breach the institutional iron curtain and get his message to the masses, Null and his team staged a press conference in New York, inviting scientists and doctors from around the world to share their research on alternative approaches to HIV and AIDS in 1993. To emphasize the sound scientific basis of the Center's protocols and encourage guests to adopt them into their own practices, Null printed out thousands of abstracts in support of each nutrient and treatment being used. However, despite over 7,000 invitations sent three times to major media, government figures, scientists, and activists, almost none of the intended audience members showed up. Over 100 AIDS patients and their doctors, whose charts exhaustively documented their improvements using natural and nontoxic modalities over the preceding 12 months, gave filmed testimonials, declaring that the feared disease was no longer a death sentence, but the conference had effectively been silenced. Bill Tatum, publisher of the Amsterdam News, suggested Null and his patients would find a more welcoming audience in his home neighborhood of Harlem - specifically, its iconic Apollo Theatre. For three nights, the theater was packed to capacity. Hit especially hard by the epidemic and distrustful of a medical system that had only recently stopped being openly racist (the Tuskegee syphilis experiment only ended in 1972), black Americans, at least, did not seem to care what Anthony Fauci would do if he found out they were investigating alternatives to AZT and death.    PBS journalist Tony Brown, having obtained a copy of the video of patient testimonials from the failed press conference, was among a handful of black journalists who began visiting the Center to investigate the legitimacy of Null's claims. Satisfied they had something significant to offer his audience, Brown invited eight patients - along with Null himself - onto his program over the course of several episodes to discuss the work. It was the first time these protocols had received any attention in the media, despite Null having released nearly two dozen articles and multiple documentaries on the subject by that time. A typical patient on one program, Al, a recovered IV drug user who was diagnosed with AIDS at age 32, described how he “panicked,” saw a doctor and started taking AZT despite his misgivings - only to be forced to discontinue the drug after just a few weeks due to his condition deteriorating rapidly. Researching alternatives brought him to Null, and after six months of “detoxing [his] lifestyle,” he observed his initial symptoms - swollen lymph nodes and weight loss - begin to reverse, culminating with sero-deconversion. On Bill McCreary's Channel 5 program, a married couple diagnosed with HIV described how they watched their T-cell counts increase as they cut out sugar, caffeine, smoking, and drinking and began eating a healthy diet. They also saw the virus leave their bodies.   For HIV-positive viewers surrounded by fear and negativity, watching healthy-looking, cheerful “AIDS patients” detail their recovery while Null backed up their claims with charts must have been balm for the soul. But the TV programs were also a form of outreach to the medical community, with patients' charts always on hand to convince skeptics the cure was scientifically valid. Null brought patients' charts to every program, urging them to keep an open mind: “Other physicians and public health officials should know that there's good science in the alternative perspective. It may not be a therapy that they're familiar with, because they're just not trained in it, but if the results are positive, and you can document them…” He challenged doubters to send in charts from their own sero-deconverted patients on AZT, and volunteered to debate proponents of the orthodox treatment paradigm - though the NIH and WHO both refused to participate in such a debate on Tony Brown's Journal, following Fauci's directive prohibiting engagement with forbidden ideas.    Aside from those few TV programs and Null's own films, suppression of Null's AIDS cure beyond word of mouth was total. The 2021 documentary The Cost of Denial, produced by the Society for Independent Journalists, tells the story of the Tri-State Healing Center and the medical paradigm that sought to destroy it, lamenting the loss of the lives that might have been saved in a more enlightened society. Nurse practitioner Luanne Pennesi, who treated many of the AIDS patients at the Center, speculated in the film that the refusal by the scientific establishment and AIDS activists to accept their successes was financially motivated. “It was as if they didn't want this information to get out. Understand that our healthcare system as we know it is a corporation, it's a corporate model, and it's about generating revenue. My concern was that maybe they couldn't generate enough revenue from these natural approaches.”5   Funding was certainly the main disciplinary tool Fauci's NIAID used to keep the scientific community in line. Despite the massive community interest in the work being done at the Center, no foundation or institution would defy Fauci and risk getting itself blacklisted, leaving Null to continue funding the operation out of his pocket with the profits from book sales. After 15 years, he left the Center in 1995, convinced the mainstream model had so thoroughly been institutionalized that there was no chance of overthrowing it. He has continued to counsel patients and advocate for a reappraisal of the HIV=AIDS hypothesis and its pharmaceutical treatments, highlighting the deeply flawed science underpinning the model of the disease espoused by the scientific establishment in 39 articles, six documentaries and a 700-page textbook on AIDS, but the Center's achievements have been effectively memory-holed by Fauci's multi-billion-dollar propaganda apparatus.     FRUIT OF THE POISONOUS TREE   To understand just how much of a threat Null's work was to the HIV/AIDS establishment, it is instructive to revisit the 1984 paper, published by Dr. Robert Gallo of the National Cancer Institute, that established HIV as the sole cause of AIDS. The CDC's official recognition of AIDS in 1981 had done little to quell the mounting public panic over the mysterious illness afflicting gay men in the US, as the agency had effectively admitted it had no idea what was causing them to sicken and die. As years passed with no progress determining the causative agent of the plague, activist groups like Gay Men's Health Crisis disrupted public events and threatened further mass civil disobedience as they excoriated the NIH for its sluggish allocation of government science funding to uncovering the cause of the “gay cancer.”6 When Gallo published his paper declaring that the retrovirus we now know as HIV was the sole “probable” cause of AIDS, its simple, single-factor hypothesis was the answer to the scientific establishment's prayers. This was particularly true for Fauci, as the NIAID chief was able to claim the hot new disease as his agency's own domain in what has been described as a “dramatic confrontation” with his rival Sam Broder at the National Cancer Institute. After all, Fauci pointed out, Gallo's findings - presented by Health and Human Services Secretary Margaret Heckler as if they were gospel truth before any other scientists had had a chance to inspect them, never mind conduct a full peer review - clearly classified AIDS as an infectious disease, and not a cancer like the Kaposi's sarcoma which was at the time its most visible manifestation. Money and media attention began pouring in, even as funding for the investigation of other potential causes of AIDS dried up. Having already patented a diagnostic test for “his” retrovirus before introducing it to the world, Gallo was poised for a financial windfall, while Fauci was busily leveraging the discovery into full bureaucratic empire of the US scientific apparatus.   While it would serve as the sole basis for all US government-backed AIDS research to follow - quickly turning Gallo into the most-cited scientist in the world during the 1980s,7 Gallo's “discovery” of HIV was deeply problematic. The sample that yielded the momentous discovery actually belonged to Prof. Luc Montagnier of the French Institut Pasteur, a fact Gallo finally admitted in 1991, four years after a lawsuit from the French government challenged his patent on the HIV antibody test, forcing the US government to negotiate a hasty profit-sharing agreement between Gallo's and Montagnier's labs. That lawsuit triggered a cascade of official investigations into scientific misconduct by Gallo, and evidence submitted during one of these probes, unearthed in 2008 by journalist Janine Roberts, revealed a much deeper problem with the seminal “discovery.” While Gallo's co-author, Mikulas Popovic, had concluded after numerous experiments with the French samples that the virus they contained was not the cause of AIDS, Gallo had drastically altered the paper's conclusion, scribbling his notes in the margins, and submitted it for publication to the journal Science without informing his co-author.   After Roberts shared her discovery with contacts in the scientific community, 37 scientific experts wrote to the journal demanding that Gallo's career-defining HIV paper be retracted from Science for lacking scientific integrity.8 Their call, backed by an endorsement from the 2,600-member scientific organization Rethinking AIDS, was ignored by the publication and by the rest of mainstream science despite - or perhaps because of - its profound implications.   That 2008 letter, addressed to Science editor-in-chief Bruce Alberts and copied to American Association for the Advancement of Science CEO Alan Leshner, is worth reproducing here in its entirety, as it utterly dismantles Gallo's hypothesis - and with them the entire HIV is the sole cause of AIDS dogma upon which the contemporary medical model of the disease rests:   On May 4, 1984 your journal published four papers by a group led by Dr. Robert Gallo. We are writing to express our serious concerns with regard to the integrity and veracity of the lead paper among these four of which Dr. Mikulas Popovic is the lead author.[1] The other three are also of concern because they rely upon the conclusions of the lead paper .[2][3][4]  In the early 1990s, several highly critical reports on the research underlying these papers were produced as a result of governmental inquiries working under the supervision of scientists nominated by the National Academy of Sciences and the Institute of Medicine. The Office of Research Integrity of the US Department of Health and Human Services concluded that the lead paper was “fraught with false and erroneous statements,” and that the “ORI believes that the careless and unacceptable keeping of research records...reflects irresponsible laboratory management that has permanently impaired the ability to retrace the important steps taken.”[5] Further, a Congressional Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations led by US Representative John D. Dingell of Michigan produced a staff report on the papers which contains scathing criticisms of their integrity.[6]  Despite the publically available record of challenges to their veracity, these papers have remained uncorrected and continue to be part of the scientific record.  What prompts our communication today is the recent revelation of an astonishing number of previously unreported deletions and unjustified alterations made by Gallo to the lead paper. There are several documents originating from Gallo's laboratory that, while available for some time, have only recently been fully analyzed. These include a draft of the lead paper typewritten by Popovic which contains handwritten changes made to it by Gallo.[7] This draft was the key evidence used in the above described inquiries to establish that Gallo had concealed his laboratory's use of a cell culture sample (known as LAV) which it received from the Institut Pasteur.  These earlier inquiries verified that the typed manuscript draft was produced by Popovic who had carried out the recorded experiment while his laboratory chief, Gallo, was in Europe and that, upon his return, Gallo changed the document by hand a few days before it was submitted to Science on March 30, 1984. According to the ORI investigation, “Dr. Gallo systematically rewrote the manuscript for what would become a renowned LTCB [Gallo's laboratory at the National Cancer Institute] paper.”[5]  This document provided the important evidence that established the basis for awarding Dr. Luc Montagnier and Dr. Francoise Barré-Sinoussi the 2008 Nobel Prize in Medicine for the discovery of the AIDS virus by proving it was their samples of LAV that Popovic used in his key experiment. The draft reveals that Popovic had forthrightly admitted using the French samples of LAV renamed as Gallo's virus, HTLV-III, and that Gallo had deleted this admission, concealing their use of LAV.  However, it has not been previously reported that on page three of this same document Gallo had also deleted Popovic's unambiguous statement that, "Despite intensive research efforts, the causative agent of AIDS has not yet been identified,” replacing it in the published paper with a statement that said practically the opposite, namely, “That a retrovirus of the HTLV family might be an etiologic agent of AIDS was suggested by the findings.”  It is clear that the rest of Popovic's typed paper is entirely consistent with his statement that the cause of AIDS had not been found, despite his use of the French LAV. Popovic's final conclusion was that the culture he produced “provides the possibility” for detailed studies. He claimed to have achieved nothing more. At no point in his paper did Popovic attempt to prove that any virus caused AIDS, and it is evident that Gallo concealed these key elements in Popovic's experimental findings.  It is astonishing now to discover these unreported changes to such a seminal document. We can only assume that Gallo's alterations of Popovic's conclusions were not highlighted by earlier inquiries because the focus at the time was on establishing that the sample used by Gallo's lab came from Montagnier and was not independently collected by Gallo. In fact, the only attention paid to the deletions made by Gallo pertains to his effort to hide the identity of the sample. The questions of whether Gallo and Popovic's research proved that LAV or any other virus was the cause of AIDS were clearly not considered.  Related to these questions are other long overlooked documents that merit your attention. One of these is a letter from Dr. Matthew A. Gonda, then Head of the Electron Microscopy Laboratory at the National Cancer Institute, which is addressed to Popovic, copied to Gallo and dated just four days prior to Gallo's submission to Science.[8] In this letter, Gonda remarks on samples he had been sent for imaging because “Dr Gallo wanted these micrographs for publication because they contain HTLV.” He states, “I do not believe any of the particles photographed are of HTLV-I, II or III.” According to Gonda, one sample contained cellular debris, while another had no particles near the size of a retrovirus. Despite Gonda's clearly worded statement, Science published on May 4, 1984 papers attributed to Gallo et al with micrographs attributed to Gonda and described unequivocally as HTLV-III.  In another letter by Gallo, dated one day before he submitted his papers to Science, Gallo states, “It's extremely rare to find fresh cells [from AIDS patients] expressing the virus... cell culture seems to be necessary to induce virus,” a statement which raises the possibility he was working with a laboratory artifact. [9]  Included here are copies of these documents and links to the same. The very serious flaws they reveal in the preparation of the lead paper published in your journal in 1984 prompts our request that this paper be withdrawn. It appears that key experimental findings have been concealed. We further request that the three associated papers published on the same date also be withdrawn as they depend on the accuracy of this paper.  For the scientific record to be reliable, it is vital that papers shown to be flawed, or falsified be retracted. Because a very public record now exists showing that the Gallo papers drew unjustified conclusions, their withdrawal from Science is all the more important to maintain integrity. Future researchers must also understand they cannot rely on the 1984 Gallo papers for statements about HIV and AIDS, and all authors of papers that previously relied on this set of four papers should have the opportunity to consider whether their own conclusions are weakened by these revelations.      Gallo's handwritten revision, submitted without his colleague's knowledge despite multiple experiments that failed to support the new conclusion, was the sole foundation for the HIV=AIDS hypothesis. Had Science published the manuscript the way Popovic had typed it, there would be no AIDS “pandemic” - merely small clusters of people with AIDS. Without a viral hypothesis backing the development of expensive and deadly pharmaceuticals, would Fauci have allowed these patients to learn about the cure that existed all along?   Faced with a potential rebellion, Fauci marshaled the full resources under his control to squelch the publication of the investigations into Gallo and restrict any discussion of competing hypotheses in the scientific and mainstream press, which had been running virus-scare stories full-time since 1984. The effect was total, according to biochemist Dr. Kary Mullis, inventor of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) procedure. In a 2009 interview, Mullis recalled his own shock when he attempted to unearth the experimental basis for the HIV=AIDS hypothesis. Despite his extensive inquiry into the literature, “there wasn't a scientific reference…[that] said ‘here's how come we know that HIV is the probable cause of AIDS.' There was nothing out there like that.”9 This yawning void at the core of HIV/AIDS “science" turned him into a strident critic of AIDS dogma - and those views made him persona non grata where the scientific press was concerned, suddenly unable to publish a single paper despite having won the Nobel Prize for his invention of the PCR test just weeks before.  10   DISSENT BECOMES “DENIAL”   While many of those who dissent from the orthodox HIV=AIDS view believe HIV plays a role in the development of AIDS, they point to lifestyle and other co-factors as being equally if not more important. Individuals who test positive for HIV can live for decades in perfect health - so long as they don't take AZT or the other toxic antivirals fast-tracked by Fauci's NIAID - but those who developed full-blown AIDS generally engaged in highly risky behaviors like extreme promiscuity and prodigious drug abuse, contracting STDs they took large quantities of antibiotics to treat, further running down their immune systems. While AIDS was largely portrayed as a “gay disease,” it was only the “fast track” gays, hooking up with dozens of partners nightly in sex marathons fueled by “poppers” (nitrate inhalants notorious for their own devastating effects on the immune system), who became sick. Kaposi's sarcoma, one of the original AIDS-defining conditions, was widespread among poppers-using gay men, but never appeared among IV drug users or hemophiliacs, the other two main risk groups during the early years of the epidemic. Even Robert Gallo himself, at a 1994 conference on poppers held by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, would admit that the previously-rare form of skin cancer surging among gay men was not primarily caused by HIV - and that it was immune stimulation, rather than suppression, that was likely responsible.11 Similarly, IV drug users are often riddled with opportunistic infections as their habit depresses the immune system and their focus on maintaining their addiction means that healthier habits - like good nutrition and even basic hygiene - fall by the wayside.    Supporting the call for revising the HIV=AIDS hypothesis to include co-factors is the fact that the mass heterosexual outbreaks long predicted by Fauci and his ilk in seemingly every country on Earth have failed to materialize, except - supposedly - in Africa, where the diagnostic standard for AIDS differs dramatically from those of the West. Given the prohibitively high cost of HIV testing for poor African nations, the WHO in 1985 crafted a diagnostic loophole that became known as the “Bangui definition,” allowing medical professionals to diagnose AIDS in the absence of a test using just clinical symptoms: high fever, persistent cough, at least 30 days of diarrhea, and the loss of 10% of one's body weight within two months. Often suffering from malnutrition and without access to clean drinking water, many of the inhabitants of sub-Saharan Africa fit the bill, especially when the WHO added tuberculosis to the list of AIDS-defining illnesses in 1993 - a move which may be responsible for as many as one half of African “AIDS” cases, according to journalist Christine Johnson. The WHO's former Chief of Global HIV Surveillance, James Chin, acknowledged their manipulation of statistics, but stressed that it was the entire AIDS industry - not just his organization - perpetrating the fraud. “There's the saying that, if you knew what sausages are made of, most people would hesitate to sort of eat them, because they wouldn't like what's in it. And if you knew how HIV/AIDS numbers are cooked, or made up, you would use them with extreme caution,” Chin told an interviewer in 2009.12   With infected numbers stubbornly remaining constant in the US despite Fauci's fearmongering projections of the looming heterosexually-transmitted plague, the CDC in 1993 broadened its definition of AIDS to include asymptomatic (that is, healthy) HIV-positive people with low T-cell counts - an absurd criteria given that an individual's T-cell count can fluctuate by hundreds within a single day. As a result, the number of “AIDS cases” in the US immediately doubled. Supervised by Fauci, the NIAID had been quietly piling on diseases into the “AIDS-related” category for years, bloating the list from just two conditions - pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and Kaposi's sarcoma - to 30 so fast it raised eyebrows among some of science's leading lights. Deeming the entire process “bizarre” and unprecedented, Kary Mullis wondered aloud why no one had called the AIDS establishment out: “There's something wrong here. And it's got to be financial.”13   Indeed, an early CDC public relations campaign was exposed by the Wall Street Journal in 1987 as having deliberately mischaracterized AIDS as a threat to the entire population so as to garner increased public and private funding for what was very much a niche issue, with the risk to average heterosexuals from a single act of sex “smaller than the risk of ever getting hit by lightning.” Ironically, the ads, which sought to humanize AIDS patients in an era when few Americans knew anyone with the disease and more than half the adult population thought infected people should be forced to carry cards warning of their status, could be seen as a reaction to the fear tactics deployed by Fauci early on.14   It's hard to tell where fraud ends and incompetence begins with Gallo's HIV antibody test. Much like Covid-19 would become a “pandemic of testing,” with murder victims and motorcycle crashes lumped into “Covid deaths” thanks to over-sensitized PCR tests that yielded as many as 90% false positives,15 HIV testing is fraught with false positives - and unlike with Covid-19, most people who hear they are HIV-positive still believe they are receiving a death sentence. Due to the difficulty of isolating HIV itself from human samples, the most common diagnostic tests, ELISA and the Western Blot, are designed to detect not the virus but antibodies to it, upending the traditional medical understanding that the presence of antibodies indicates only exposure - and often that the body has actually vanquished the pathogen. Patients are known to test positive for HIV antibodies in the absence of the virus due to at least 70 other conditions, including hepatitis, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, syphilis, recent vaccination or even pregnancy. (https://www.chcfl.org/diseases-that-can-cause-a-false-positive-hiv-test/) Positive results are often followed up with a PCR “viral load” test, even though the inventor of the PCR technique Kary Mullis famously condemned its misuse as a tool for diagnosing infection. Packaging inserts for all three tests warn the user that they cannot be reliably used to diagnose HIV.16 The ELISA HIV antibody test explicitly states: “At present there is no recognized standard for establishing the presence and absence of HIV antibody in human blood.”17   That the public remains largely unaware of these and other massive holes in the supposedly airtight HIV=AIDS=DEATH paradigm is a testament to Fauci's multi-layered control of the press. Like the writers of the Great Barrington Declaration and other Covid-19 dissidents, scientists who question HIV/AIDS dogma have been brutally punished for their heresy, no matter how prestigious their prior standing in the field and no matter how much evidence they have for their own claims. In 1987, the year the FDA's approval of AZT made AIDS the most profitable epidemic yet (a dubious designation Covid-19 has since surpassed), Fauci made it clearer than ever that scientific inquiry and debate - the basis of the scientific method - would no longer be welcome in the American public health sector, eliminating retrovirologist Peter Duesberg, then one of the most prominent opponents of the HIV=AIDS hypothesis, from the scientific conversation with a professional disemboweling that would make a cartel hitman blush. Duesberg had just eviscerated Gallo's 1984 HIV paper with an article of his own in the journal Cancer Research, pointing out that retroviruses had never before been found to cause a single disease in humans - let alone 30 AIDS-defining diseases. Rather than allow Gallo or any of the other scientists in his camp to respond to the challenge, Fauci waged a scorched-earth campaign against Duesberg, who had until then been one of the most highly regarded researchers in his field. Every research grant he requested was denied; every media appearance was canceled or preempted. The University of California at Berkeley, unable to fully fire him due to tenure, took away his lab, his graduate students, and the rest of his funding. The few colleagues who dared speak up for him in public were also attacked, while enemies and opportunists were encouraged to slander Duesberg at the conferences he was barred from attending and in the journals that would no longer publish his replies. When Duesberg was summoned to the White House later that year by then-President Ronald Reagan to debate Fauci on the origins of AIDS, Fauci convinced the president to cancel, allegedly pulling rank on the Commander-in-Chief with an accusation that the “White House was interfering in scientific matters that belonged to the NIH and the Office of Science and Technology Assessment.” After seven years of this treatment, Duesberg was contacted by NIH official Stephen O'Brien and offered an escape from professional purgatory. He could have “everything back,” he was told, and shown a manuscript of a scientific paper - apparently commissioned by the editor of the journal Nature - “HIV Causes AIDS: Koch's Postulates Fulfilled” with his own name listed alongside O'Brien's as an author.18 His refusal to take the bribe effectively guaranteed the epithet “AIDS denier” will appear on his tombstone. The character assassination of Duesberg became a template that would be deployed to great effectiveness wherever Fauci encountered dissent - never debate, only demonize, deplatform and destroy.    Even Luc Montagnier, the real discoverer of HIV, soon found himself on the wrong side of the Fauci machine. With his 1990 declaration that “the HIV virus [by itself] is harmless and passive, a benign virus,” Montagnier began distancing himself from Gallo's fraud, effectively placing a target on his own back. In a 1995 interview, he elaborated: “four factors that have come together to account for the sudden epidemic [of AIDS]: HIV presence, immune hyper-activation, increased sexually transmitted disease incidence, sexual behavior changes and other behavioral changes” such as drug use, poor nutrition and stress - all of which he said had to occur “essentially simultaneously” for HIV to be transmitted, creating the modern epidemic. Like the professionals at the Tri-State Healing Center, Montagnier advocated for the use of antioxidants like vitamin C and N-acetyl cysteine, naming oxidative stress as a critical factor in the progression from HIV to AIDS.19 When Montagnier died in 2022, Fauci's media mouthpieces sneered that the scientist (who was awarded the Nobel Prize in 2008 for his discovery of HIV, despite his flagging faith in that discovery's significance) “started espousing views devoid of a scientific basis” in the late 2000s, leading him to be “shunned by the scientific community.”20 In a particularly egregious jab, the Washington Post's obit sings the praises of Robert Gallo, implying it was the American scientist who really should have won the Nobel for HIV, while dismissing as “

Join us for an enlightening journey into the fascinating world of water memory and its probable impact on health and well-being! Michael Hobson will be your guide, drawing from the groundbreaking research of esteemed scientists like Jacques Benveniste, Luc Montagnier, and Bernd Kröplin. In this episode of Light Warrior Radio, we discover the incredible ability of water to store and transmit information, influenced by both external frequencies and human consciousness. From Dr. Masaru Emoto's work with water crystals to Veda Austin's crystallographic studies, we'll explore how water responds to intention and thought. These insights reveal how we can positively impact our health and the world by programming water with intention. By understanding this, we can potentially improve the quality of the water we consume, including the water within our bodies, leading to better health and longevity. Join me and mathematician, econometrics professor, and water expert, Michael Hobson as we delve into captivating topics: The link between water memory, consciousness, and the interconnectedness of all life.How our emotions and thoughts affect the structure of water.The lingering frequencies of toxins in water even after physical removal.How water interprets our emotions, feelings, and consciousness.The creation of water by the Earth's crust and our bodies.The role of Exclusion Zone (EZ) structured water in our bodies.   We'll also explore future research directions and potential breakthroughs in harnessing water's power for holistic well-being. Take advantage of our Discount Code: lightwarrior10 for your first order at Aquene Springs!

In 1983, scientists at the Pasteur Institute in Paris became the first to identify the HIV virus. It was a vital step in fighting one of the worst epidemics in modern history, AIDS. The Pasteur had been asked to investigate after reports of a mystery disease that was spreading rapidly, particularly among the gay community. Two weeks later, scientist Françoise Barré-Sinoussi detected the virus while working on a biopsy sample in the laboratory. She and the team leader, Luc Montagnier were later awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine. But the discovery could easily have been missed, as she tells Jane Wilkinson. (Photo: French virologists Jean-Claude Chermann, Francoise Barre-Sinoussi and Luc Montagnier. Credit: Michel Philippot/Sygma/Sygma via Getty Images)

Marvin Haberland ist Ingenieur und beschäftigt sich seit Jahren mit wissenschaftlichen Methoden und wissenschaftlicher Heuristik. So ist er im Bereich der Molekularbiologie auf das Virenphänomen gestoßen und war verblüfft, dass innerhalb der Virenforschung keine wissenschaftlichen Methoden angewendet werden, die nach den eigenen Standards der Virologie arbeiten.Die Virentheorie beruht auf einen Konsens, auf Behauptungen und Scheinnachweisen, die en gros in der wissenschaftlichen Virologie einfach übernommen werden und von so gut wie allen Generationen dort als Selbstverständlichkeit gilt.Prüft man jedoch mit exakter wissenschaftlicher Methodik und unternimmt dabei den Versuch, auch nur irgendein Virus nachzuweisen, stößt man dabei auf das, was John Ioannidis, einer der bekanntesten und der gefürchtetsten Wissenschaftler der Welt, nachgewiesen hat: Die meisten klinischen Studien, weltweit, sind falsch.Verfolgt man die Heuristiken der Virologie der letzten 200 Jahren, wird man den Verirrungen der Virenwissenschaft gewahr. Aus einem Gift, das durch die Umwelt Übertragungen schafft, wird in der Mitte des letzten Jahrhunderts auf einen Schlag eine Gensequenz, ein RNA-Agens. Die Virologen selbst waren es, die nachwiesen, dass die Krankheitsübertragungstheorie bei Viren völlig falsch ist. Man war geneigt, die Virologie ganz aufzulösen.Alle Versuche, ein krankmachendes Virus zu übertragen, schlugen fehl! Bis jemand aus einem Umweltgift ein RNA-Agens erschuf und dafür den Nobelpreis für die Rettung einer krankmachenden Virentheorie bekam. Dass es Krankheiten gibt, dürfte klar sein, auch dann, wenn man nicht an Viren glaubt, oder zunächst verstanden hat, dass es für kein krankmachendes Virus einen Nachweis gibt.Dr. Stefan Lanka ist einer der Pioniere auf dem Gebiet. Er selbst ist Virologe und hat Bakteriophagen entdeckt. Auch er war Anhänger der Virentheorie und überzeugt davon, dass es Viren gibt.Bis sein Professor ihn fragte, woher er denn so genau wüsste, dass es das HIV-Virus gibt. "Ja, weil es doch alle sagen", war Lankas Antwort. Daraufhin erwiderte sein Professor, dass er nicht alle gefragt habe, sondern ihn, Stefan Lanka.Was dann für Dr. Stefan Lanka folgte, war eine Odyssee durch die Welt der Viren- und der Krankheitstheorie. Lanka wollte etwas nachweisen und kam dadurch darauf, dass es keinen einzigen exakten Virennachweis, weltweit, gibt.Immer mehr Wissenschaftler, auch namhafte Nobelpreisträger, geben Lanka recht: Beweisen können auch sie kein einziges krankmachendes Virus, bisher. Marvin Haberland hat viele Institute und zahlreiche Virologen um einen Virennachweis nachgefragt.Nicht ein einziger, darunter auch die Ikone der Pandemie-Aufklärung, Sucharit Bhakdi, oder der Nobelpreisträger und angebliche „Entdecker des HIV-Virus“, Luc Montagnier, oder die durch den Corona-Ausschuss bekannte und namhafte Biologin Apl. Prof. Dr. rer. hum. biol. Ulrike Kämmerer, haben bis heute einen Nachweis nach wissenschaftlichen Standards über krankmachende Viren erbracht.Die Tragweite dessen, falls die krankmachende Virentheorie nur heiße Luft sein sollte, wäre immens. Es wäre eine schulmedizinische Superkatastrophe, ein Tsunami weltweiten Ausmaßes und eine Erschütterung ins Vertrauensverhältnis von Milliarden Patienten zu ihren Ärzten, weltweit. Darf auch in diesem Fall nicht sein, was nicht sein darf? Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The first of the 7 Hermetic Principles asserts that all is mind; the universe is mental. For anything to exist, a thought had to first exist, which then formed a physical reality or manifestation. “The lips of wisdom are closed, except to the ears of Understanding.” – The Kybalion. ------ Following up from my blog post: Subtle influence – a test of presence. If not my thought, Who goes there? Hearing voices that others don't is a challenge. I hear spirit guides, and that experience is positive. The not so positive aspect is hearing voices that express an intent to harm.   The difficult part is finding the language to explain their presence and offering tips on how to determine intent. Some voices are helpful. Others are not. Easiest way to identify a contrary voice/entity that is not on your side is to ask the question: Does the voice advocate/suggest self harm or harm to others? A recent trip to the gas station was more of an adventure than expected. And it provided me with the perfect example of [a negative voice] an interaction with a contrary entity/being intent on creating turmoil. When in doubt about the origin of a voice - Pause. Reflect. Focus. Do no harm. Other topics covered in this conversation: Schizophrenia, Visions, Shamanic Encounter, Portals, EVPs...    Additional information --  Link to the Video - Margie Kay's investigation of an active portal in Weldon Spring, Missouri.  Water memory: "For Prof. Luc Montagnier, water has the ability to reproduce the properties of any substance it once contained. Water would have the ability to retain a memory of the properties of the molecules." Video. Butterfly memory: "So while a moth or butterfly may not remember being a caterpillar, it can remember experiences it learned as a caterpillar." Link.  EVP: Assessing Electronic Voice Phenomena through Speech Science  Link. Support --   Spiritual emergence is a process of positive change involving spiritually-transformative experiences. Link. Shamans as Expert Voice Hearers. Pdf Link. Understanding Voices. Shamanism. Link.   Reference Blog Post: https://talkingtonightlights.wordpress.com/2023/07/07/subtle-influence-a-test-of-presence-if-not-my-thought-who-goes-there/ My EVP interview with Tom Butler Link.

Cách nay đúng 40 năm, 3 nhà nghiên cứu người Pháp của Viện Pasteur, Paris, đã phát hiện ra LAV - virus mới tấn công hệ miễn dịch - sau này được gọi là HIV và được xác định là virus gây AIDS/SIDA, căn bệnh mà cho tới nay đã có tới gần 40 triệu người phải sống chung. Công bố của nhóm nhà nghiên cứu Pháp là bước khởi đầu cho cuộc đua với thời gian kéo dài 4 thập niên. Hiện nay, cho dù chưa có được vac-xin phòng bệnh nhưng đã có phương thức điều trị SIDA. Cuộc ganh đua Pháp - Mỹ và giải Nobel Y học cho nhóm nhà khoa học PhápCó lẽ không nhiều người biết rằng Pháp và Mỹ đã trải qua nhiều năm ganh đua để giành danh hiệu ai là người đã xác định được virus gây bệnh SIDA. Phải đến năm 2008, chiến thắng chính thức mới được công bố : giải Nobel Y học được trao « danh chính ngôn thuận » cho 2 nghiên cứu gia người Pháp, Montagnier và Barré-Sinoussi « vì đã khám phá ra » virus HIV. Ngược dòng lịch sử, theo AFP, việc « phân lập » loại virus mới được công bố vào ngày 20/05/1983 trong một bài báo đăng trên tạp chí khoa học Science của Mỹ. Ba tác giả, Françoise Barré-Sinoussi, Jean-Claude Chermann và Luc Montagnier là các nhà khoa học của Viện Pasteur, Paris, đã thận trọng viết rằng virus mà họ mới phát hiện ra « có thể liên quan đến một số hội chứng bệnh lý, trong đó có SIDA », một căn bệnh bí hiểm mới được báo động lần đầu tại Mỹ trước đó 2 năm, hồi năm 1981. Công bố của ba nhà khoa học Pháp đã vấp phải thái độ dè chừng, kể cả từ các đồng nghiệp Mỹ. Ba năm sau đó, các nhà khoa học Mỹ công bố tìm ra virus HTLV-3 và xem đó có thể là nguyên nhân gây bệnh SIDA. Nhưng ít lâu sau, hai nhóm nhà khoa học Pháp - Mỹ đã công nhận LAV và HTLV-3 thực ra là cùng một loại virus. Dù vậy, hai nước bên hai bờ Đại Tây Dương tiếp tục có nhiều tranh cãi về việc ai là tác giả của phát hiện về virus HIV, bởi đó không chỉ là danh tiếng khoa học mà còn liên quan đến nguồn lợi tài chính từ việc thực hiện các xét nghiệm tầm soát dựa trên các phát hiện về virus. Phải đến năm 1987, đôi bên mới ký thỏa thuận về việc công nhận là các nhà khoa học của cả hai nước đã đồng phát hiện ra virus gây bệnh SIDA (từ năm 1986 được gọi là virus HIV (theo tiếng Anh) và VIH (theo tiếng Pháp).40 năm : Từ « căn bệnh 4 chữ H » đến những thuyết âm mưuBan đầu, bệnh chưa được gọi là AIDS/SIDA, tên chính thức này chỉ có từ năm 1982, chỉ hội chứng suy giảm hệ miễn dịch. Hai người đầu tiên được ghi nhận mắc bệnh mới tại Mỹ hồi năm 1981 là hai thanh niên đồng giới, vì thế tại Mỹ căn bệnh này thời đó bị gọi là « dịch bệnh của những người đồng tính (homosexuel) và sử dụng chất gây nghiện (héroinomane) » Sau đó, do phát hiện ra nhiều người dân Haiti cũng bị bệnh, người ta lại gọi đây là bệnh 3H. Và chữ H thứ tư được thêm vào để nói về việc những người này bị chứng chứng máu khó đông (hémophile). Ngày nay, theo tiến sĩ Djebbar, được AFP trích dẫn, « vấn đề chính nằm ở chỗ thiếu hiểu biết về virus, nhất là ở giới trẻ », trong bối cảnh Nhà nước giảm tài trợ cho các chương trình nâng cao hiểu biết về SIDA cho giới học sinh sinh viên cũng như sự phát triển của tôn giáo. Ông lấy làm tiếc về việc một số người vẫn nghĩ rằng chỉ cần ôm hôn đồng nghiệp cũng có nguy cơ bị lây bệnh, trái lại một số khác lại tin rằng họ miễn nhiễm vì không phải người đồng tính. Chính những định kiến trên đã làm chậm việc xét nghiệm tầm soát. Tổ chức Sida Info Service cho biết hiện nay có đến 1/3 số người nhiễm bệnh không được xét nghiệm tầm soát. Trong 40 năm qua, không chỉ bị gắn liền với những định kiến về người nghiện hút, có quan hệ tính dục đồng giới, bị gọi là « bệnh ung thư đồng tính », SIDA còn gắn với nhiều thuyết âm mưu phản khoa học. Theo AFP ngày 18/05, ngay cả đến Giáo hoàng Benedicto 16 hồi năm 2009 cũng từng khẳng định chính việc phân phát bao cao su đã làm vấn đề SIDA thêm nghiêm trọng. Các đồn đoán, thuyết âm mưu về nguồn gốc bệnh SIDA đặc biệt lan truyền mạnh. Ngay từ năm 1983, vào thời Chiến Tranh Lạnh, Ủy ban An ninh Quốc gia (KGB), cơ quan tình báo của Liên Xô, đã tung ra chiến dịch « Infektion », nhằm làm mọi người tin rằng SIDA được phát triển từ một phòng thí nghiệm bí mật ở Mỹ. Thuyết âm mưu này đã lan truyền trên cả thế giới trong vòng 10 năm sau đó. Một số khác thì cho rằng đó là căn bệnh của các nước giàu tung ra để diệt trừ người nghèo, hay là chính các hãng dược phẩm đã phát tán virus để rồi kiếm tiền. Châu Phi, bị dịch bệnh ảnh hưởng nặng nề, cũng nằm ở tuyến đầu mặt trận phát tán thông tin sai lệch về SIDA, kể cả ở thượng tầng lãnh đạo. Đơn cử là trường hợp cựu tổng thống Nam Phi Thabo Mbeki : khẳng định bệnh này không liên quan đến virus HIV mà do đói nghèo gây ra, vị tổng thống này đã trì hoãn nhiều năm việc người dân Nam Phi được tiếp cận các phương pháp điều trị SIDA. Đôi khi những người tung tin sai lệch cũng là người bán thứ mà họ quảng bá là phương thuốc hiệu nghiệm hơn thuốc của các tập đoàn dược phẩm lớn « Big Pharma » mà họ tố là thuốc « giết người ». Một chuyên gia trị liệu tự nhiên khẳng định bệnh có thể được chữa khỏi bằng các loại hạt, rau sống hay trái cây. Đáng nói hơn là chính Luc Montagnier, 1 trong hai nhà khoa học Pháp đồng đoạt giải Noel Y Khoa 2008 vì đã tìm ra virus HIV, cũng từng khẳng định nước đu đủ lên men là phương thuốc kỳ diệu để chữa bệnh SIDA. Bên cạnh những thuyết âm mưu là cuộc chạy đua tìm phương thuốc Bác sĩ Françoise Barré-Sinoussi, 1 trong 3 bác sĩ đã khám phá ra virus HIV hồi năm 1983 và đến năm 2008 được trao giải Nobel về Y học cùng đồng nghiệp Luc Montagnier (1932-2022), hồi tưởng với AFP là sau khi virus HIV được phát hiện, các nhà nghiên cứu có rất nhiều việc phải làm, bởi vì trước mắt họ là một loại virus chưa từng được biết đến. Vì thế, các nhà khoa học phải tìm hiểu mọi thứ về loại virus này, từ các protein cấu thành nên virus, cấu trúc bộ gien của virus, loại tế bào mà virus lây nhiễm vào, các hậu quả của việc bị lây nhiễm ...Ngoài ra, các nhà khoa học phải khẩn trương phát triển các xét nghiệm huyết thanh, cả để phục vụ việc chẩn đoán và thực hiện các cuộc điều tra quy mô lớn nhằm chứng minh rằng virus HIV chỉ gây bệnh SIDA chứ không phải các bệnh khác. Rồi sau đó là nghiên cứu các chiến lược để ngăn chặn dịch bệnh. Công việc nghiên cứu về virus HIV cần đến nhiều nhóm nhà chuyên môn khác nhau, từ các nhà miễn dịch học, sinh học phân tử, bác sĩ lâm sàng và cả bệnh nhân. Nói tóm lại, đó là một cuộc chạy đua với thời gian vì các nhà nghiên cứu đã phát hiện ra rằng virus lây truyền cả qua đường máu, quan hệ tình dục và lây từ mẹ sang con.   Năm 1994, SIDA là nguyên nhân gây tử vong hàng đầu ở nhóm người Mỹ trong độ tuổi 25-44 tuổi. Trả lời BFMTV, nhà nghiên cứu Pháp Françoise Barré-Sinoussi gợi nhắc lại tình cảnh « người bệnh bị kỳ thị, bị gia đình, bạn bè, đôi khi bị cả các chuyên gia y tế bỏ rơi. Một số bị mất nhà cửa, mất việc làm ». Việc bắt đầukết hợp 3 nhóm thuốc kháng virus vào năm 1996 đã đánh dấu một bước ngoặt đáng kể : tại Hoa Kỳ, lần đầu tiên số nạn nhân đã giảm. Bốn năm sau đó, chương trình phòng chống SIDA của Liên Hiệp Quốc và 5 hãng dược phẩm lớn đã ký thỏa thuận phân phối thuốc điều trị với giá phù hợp với khả năng tài chính của các nước nghèo. Một thỏa thuận khác đã được ký kết vào năm 2001, lần này cho phép các nước đang phát triển sản xuất các loại thuốc có cùng gốc (thuốc générique) điều trị SIDA. Vào ngày 16/07/2012, phương pháp điều trị dự phòng trước phơi nhiễm HIV đầu tiên đã được cấp phép tại Hoa Kỳ. Năm 2017, lần đầu tiên hơn một nửa số người nhiễm HIV trên toàn thế giới được điều trị bằng thuốc kháng virus. Theo ước tính mới nhất của Chương trình phòng chống SIDA của Liên Hiệp Quốc, vào năm 2021, tỷ lệ này là khoảng 75% : hơn 28 triệu người trong số 38,4 triệu người nhiễm bệnh được điều trị. Chặng đường phía trướcTuy nhiên, cuộc chiến chống SIDA có lẽ vẫn còn chặng đường dài ở phía trước. Trên đài RFI Pháp ngữ ngày 24/03/2023, bác sĩ Françoise Barré-Sinoussi nhận định : « Tất nhiên là như vậy, cuộc chiến vẫn chưa kết thúc : hiện nay trên thế giới vẫn còn hơn 38 triệu người đang phải sống chung với virus HIV và 25% những người này vẫn chưa được tiếp cận với các liệu pháp điều trị. Ngoài ra, còn có sự chậm trễ trong việc thực hiện các xét nghiệm tầm soát, điều này cũng khiến việc điều trị của họ bị chậm hơn. Như vậy là vẫn còn rất nhiều việc phải được ưu tiên tiến hành, nhìn từ quan điểm nghiên cứu, bởi vì chúng ta vẫn chưa có được vac-xin và dù là phương pháp điều trị hiện nay đã rất tốt, nhưng bệnh vẫn là chưa thể chữa khỏi ». (…) Không phải chúng ta không dành phương tiện cho việc đó, nhưng mà đúng là cũng cần có phương tiện và nhân lực. Chúng ta cần có thêm các nhà nghiên cứu trẻ để nghiên cứu về đề tài này. Nhưng cũng đúng là chúng ta đang phải đối phó với một loại virus phức tạp, nhất là vì sự tấn công của virus HIV nhắm vào các bộ phận khác nhau trong cơ thể con người là đặc biệt phức tạp.  Chúng ta đang phải đối phó với một loại virus tấn công vào chính các tế bào miễn dịch trong cơ thể con người. Và đó chính là vấn đề, bởi vì virus không chỉ tấn công vào đó, không chỉ khiến hệ thống miễn dịch không vận hành được bình thường, mà nó còn có thể ẩn náu trong hệ thống miễn dịch, gây ra hàng loạt bất thường trong cơ thể con người và kể cả khi người bệnh đang trong quá trình được điều trị, kể cả khi họ dùng thuốc kháng virus, thì chúng tôi biết rằng vẫn có những bất thường trong cơ thể người bệnh, vẫn có những ổ viêm nhiễm ngay cả khi người bệnh đang được điều trị và vẫn cảm thấy khỏe mạnh. Như vậy là vẫn rất còn nhiều điều chúng ta cần phải hiểu về loại virus này, về sự tương tác của virus với cơ thể. Theo tôi thì những hiểu biết đó sẽ có thể cho phép chúng ta hiểu rõ về nhiều điều khác, về những căn bệnh khác có liên quan đến sự viêm nhiễm, Covid là một ví dụ nhưng không phải là trường hợp duy nhất ».Điều mà có lẽ giờ đây giới chuyên môn mong chờ nhất, có lẽ là việc tìm ra vac-xin phòng bệnh. Bác sĩ Françoise Barré-Sinoussi cho biết thêm :« Có rất nhiều bệnh mà con người vẫn chưa có vac-xin, chẳng hạn đối với các bệnh sốt rét, viêm gan C, chúng ta đã có cách điều trị nhưng vẫn chưa có vac-xin. Có nhiều bệnh như vậy. Nghiên cứu về các cơ chế phản ứng của một loại vac-xin tạo ra cho cơ thể để đối phó với virus HIV đồng thời cũng có thể được áp dụng vào nghiên cứu các loại virus khác. Chúng tôi nghiên cứu để phục vụ cả cộng đồng nói chung để có thể hiểu rõ hơn về mọi điều, nhằm phát triển những chiến lược tiêm chủng mới trong tương lai ».

Em 1983, os investigadores franceses Luc Montagnier e Françoise Barré –Sinoussi descobriam o vírus da SIDA, um feito que viria a ser recompensado em 2008 com o prémio Nobel da Medicina. Quarenta anos depois são alguns os avanços conquistados na luta contra o VIH SIDA, doença que em 2021 provocou a morte a 650 mil pessoas. Em Moçambique, as autoridades reconhecem os ganhos obtidos nos útimos anos, com o país a registar uma quebra de 37% nas mortes provocadas pelo vírus da SIDA. A coordenadora da Unidade de Planificação e Coordenação do Conselho Nacional de Combate à SIDA , Ema Chuva, explicou que Moçambique, o segundo país, depois da África do Sul, com mais casos de pessoas infectadas no mundo, registou ainda uma redução de 41% nas vovas infecções. RFI: Quais foram os avanços conquistados ao longo destes últimos quarenta anos?Ema Chuva, coordenadora da Unidade de Planificação e Coordenação no Conselho Nacional de Combate à Sida em Moçambique: Em relação ao nosso país, nós fizemos alguns avanços nesta componente. Claramente, quando falamos disso, olhamos para a questão não só da prevenção, mas também para a questão do tratamento. De forma geral, temos estado a verificar uma redução do número de novas infecções, de cerca 41%, entre 2010 e 2022.  Isto representa um grande avanço, uma vez que o objectivo das autoridades é reduzir as infecções por VIH-SIDA.Em 2022, quantas pessoas morreram devido ao vírus da sida em Moçambique? Nós usamos estimativas e a informação que temos, neste momento, permite-nos avançar que 48 mil moçambicanos perderam a vida por causa do vírus da SIDA. Mas convém referir que, ao longo destes anos, temos estado a assistir a uma redução das mortes em cerca de 37% e a uma diminuição da taxa de transmissão vertical que chega aos de 70%. A taxa de transmissão vertical situa-se, neste momento, nos 10%.Quero recordar que Moçambique registou no passado uma taxa que rondava os 30%. Ou seja, a taxa de 10% representa um grande ganho em relação à resposta ao VIH-SIDA.O que é que contribuiu para esta redução?Um dos aspectos está ligado à cobertura do nosso tratamento anti-retroviral. Moçambique tem, neste momento, 1.9 milhão de pessoas em tratamento anti-retroviral e, como sabe, o tratamento é uma das ferramentas para a prevenção. Quando olhamos para os níveis de supressão viral, temos níveis consideráveis e isso ajuda, de alguma forma, a melhorar a prevenção.Por outro lado, embora a resposta ao VIH-SIDA seja dependente do financiamento internacional, temos verificado uma grande contribuição dos nossos parceiros internacionais na componente da prevenção. Eles [os parceiros] têm estado a aumentar o financiamento e isto permite que os grupos mais vulneráveis, com destaque para as mulheres e os jovens, tenham acesso às intervenções que vão reduzir o risco de infecção por VIH-SIDA.Considera que ao longo destes quarenta anos houve uma evolução no acesso aos tratamentos anti-retrovirais? Em Moçambique o tratamento antiretro-viral é gratuito. O nosso sistema de saúde é um sistema em que o tratamento do VIH SIDA e de outras doenças é gratuito. Portanto, todas as pessoas que vivem com VIH-SIDA podem ter acesso ao tratamento antiretro-viral. Aliado a esta questão da gratuitidade, temos uma cobertura de 96%, nas nossas unidades centrais de saúde do país para disponibilizar este tratamento. Onde quer que a pessoa esteja, ela tem possibilidade de ter acesso ao tratamento antiretro-viral, uma vez que quase todas as unidades já estão a disponibilizar este tratamento. Os atrasos na despistagem continuam a ser uma constante em Moçambique? Estamos a fazer uma série de intervenções para garantir que as pessoas chegam o mais rapidamente possível às unidades sanitárias, permitindo-lhes o diagnóstico e o tratamento. O país está também, desde o ano passado, a introduzir o auto-teste. Uma das causas que faz com que as pessoas não se aproximem é o medo de serem estigmatizadas. Com o auto-teste queremos que essas pessoas sejam diagnosticadas e que tenham acesso rápido ao tratamento.Que papel têm desempenhado as comunidades na luta contra o vírus da Sida?A comunidade tem um papel importante uma vez que permite informar as pessoas sobre a existência do tratamento e quais são as unidades sanitárias que disponibilizam o tratamento antiretro-viral. [O papel da comunidadade] foi fundamental para se alcançar o nível de cobertura que temos actualmente.A questão da educação sexual tem tido alguma na diminuição dos contágios?Sem dúvida nenhuma. A educação sexual abrangente, olhando para o grupo das raparigas e dos jovens, é uma arma crucial, que temos estado a capitalizar, para garantir que, este grupo específico, tenha acesso à informação e possa tomar decisões mais seguras, relativamente ao VIH.Este é um ganho que o país tem estado a verificar. Nas nossas escolas, já há esta possibilidade de passar informação sobre as medidas de prevenção de transmissão do VIH, reduzindo o risco de infecção. Quarenta anos depois a discriminação ainda é uma realidade?A discriminação, infelizmente, é uma realidade. Moçambique considera que a discriminação é uma barreira, fazendo com que muitas pessoas não tenham acesso aos serviços de prevenção e aos tratamentos. Por outro lado, a discriminação faz com que algumas pessoas, que até já estão connosco nas unidades sanitárias, acabem por abandonar o tratamento por receio de serem apontadas e discriminadas.No entanto, há já alguns anos, o país está a fazer um trabalho para garantir que esta situação seja combatida e que as pessoas se sintam livres para ter acesso aos nossos serviços.Essas actividades são feitas não só ao nível das comunidades, através de campanhas de redução de estigma, mas também no próprio sector público. Onde os profissionais de saúde, os actores de justiça e a própria polícia são capacitados para perceberem a relação entre VIH e direitos humanos, de forma a que as pessoas não se sintam estigmatizadas, na altura em que têm acesso aos diferentes serviços.  Actualmente uma pessoa seropositiva que recebe tratamento tem uma esperança de vida próxima da população em geral. Todavia em 2021, o  vírus da SIDA provocou a morte a 650 mil pessoas. Existe um tratamento, mas que não cura. Porque é que ainda não foi possível chegar a uma vacina? Eu não me posso debruçar muito sobre esta questão da vacina, uma vez que não é a minha área. Sei que há um trabalho global que está a ser feito para tentarmos chegar a uma vacina e que possa ser usada como forma de prevenção do VIH. Seria um ganho para nós [Moçambique], um ganho para África, um dos continentes mais afectados.Faço votos para que esta vacina chegue o mais rápido possível para que possamos usá-la nos nossos países, minimizando esta questão do HIV SIDA que tanto nos preocupa.

En 1983, le virus du Sida est identifié par des chercheurs français : les professeurs Luc Montagnier (1932-2022) et Françoise Barré-Sinoussi, ce qui leur vaudra d'être récompensés par le Prix Nobel de Médecine en 2008. Si aujourd'hui, une personne séropositive traitée a une espérance de vie proche de la population générale, le Sida a encore provoqué 650 000 décès dans le monde en 2021, alors que 38,4 millions de personnes sont porteuses du VIH. La lutte contre le Sida est ainsi toujours d'actualité. Comment l'ancienne et la nouvelle génération travaillent-elles ensemble ? Comment les enjeux de la lutte contre le Sida ont-ils évolué ? Pr Françoise Barré-Sinoussi, médecin virologue, chercheuse, codécouvreuse du VIH, Prix Nobel de médecine 2008, membre de l'Académie des Sciences, présidente de Sidaction, présidente d'honneur du Réseau international des instituts Pasteur Lucie Étienne, chercheure au Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie à Lyon. Chargée de recherche au CNRS, membre du Comité scientifique de Sidaction Dr Nadine Etoundi, médecin spécialiste en Maladies infectieuses et tropicales au Cameroun Andrea Mestre, militante de la lutte contre le Sida. Présidente de l'association « Mouvement contre la sérophobie ». ► Aller plus loin : « Ensemble ! 40 ans de lutte contre le Sida », une série de podcasts de Sidaction Priorité Santé - Les apports de la médiation en santé dans la lutte contre le Sida Priorité Santé - Lutte contre le Sida: les projets de recherche de l'ANRS à l'international Priorité Santé - Les jeunes mobilisés contre le Sida.  

En 1983, le virus du Sida est identifié par des chercheurs français : les professeurs Luc Montagnier (1932-2022) et Françoise Barré-Sinoussi, ce qui leur vaudra d'être récompensés par le Prix Nobel de Médecine en 2008. Si aujourd'hui, une personne séropositive traitée a une espérance de vie proche de la population générale, le Sida a encore provoqué 650 000 décès dans le monde en 2021, alors que 38,4 millions de personnes sont porteuses du VIH. La lutte contre le Sida est ainsi toujours d'actualité. Comment l'ancienne et la nouvelle génération travaillent-elles ensemble ? Comment les enjeux de la lutte contre le Sida ont-ils évolué ? Pr Françoise Barré-Sinoussi, médecin virologue, chercheuse, codécouvreuse du VIH, Prix Nobel de médecine 2008, membre de l'Académie des Sciences, présidente de Sidaction, présidente d'honneur du Réseau international des instituts Pasteur Lucie Étienne, chercheure au Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie à Lyon. Chargée de recherche au CNRS, membre du Comité scientifique de Sidaction Dr Nadine Etoundi, médecin spécialiste en Maladies infectieuses et tropicales au Cameroun Andrea Mestre, militante de la lutte contre le Sida. Présidente de l'association « Mouvement contre la sérophobie ». ► Aller plus loin : « Ensemble ! 40 ans de lutte contre le Sida », une série de podcasts de Sidaction Priorité Santé - Les apports de la médiation en santé dans la lutte contre le Sida Priorité Santé - Lutte contre le Sida: les projets de recherche de l'ANRS à l'international Priorité Santé - Les jeunes mobilisés contre le Sida.  

Nuno Barbosa Morais é um biólogo computacional. É licenciado em Engenharia Física Tecnológica pelo Instituto Superior Técnico e doutorado em Ciências Biomédicas pela Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, tendo feito investigação internacional durante uma década nas universidades de Cambridge e de Toronto. Lidera, desde 2015, o laboratório de Transcritómica de Doença no Instituto de Medicina Molecular e lecciona cursos de Biologia Computacional a vários mestrados da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa.  -> Apoie este projecto e faça parte da comunidade de mecenas do 45 Graus em: 45grauspodcast.com _______________ Índice (com timestamps): (6:50) INÍCIO DA CONVERSA: Crise da Replicação | Vieses cognitivos e as limitações das técnicas de inferência estatística. P-value | Karl Popper | Gregor Mendel | Ronald Fisher (história do chá) | Jacob Bernoulli (23:08) De onde surgiu esta a Crise na Ciência? | Artigo  Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (John Ioannidis) | Artigo de Florian Markowetz 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility | Five selfish reasons to work reproducibly | Fraude em Alzheimer: Blots on a field? | Artigos de investigadores japoneses na Nature (um, dois) | HARKing  (42:05) Big data e complexificação das metodologias. | Artigo João P. Magalhães «Every gene can (and possibly will) be associated with cancer» | Overfitting | As bombas alemãs em Londres e a ‘clustering illusion' | Riscos de usar programas bioinformáticos como caixas negras |  Inteligência artificial (1:06:16) Será que a ciência já esgotou o “low hanging fruit” das descobertas? Estudo: Rate of scientific breakthroughs slowing over time | Perigos da hiperespecialização. | C. P. Snow (1:17:00) Incentivos perversos do sistema de publicação | Robert Merton e o Matthew effect | Luc Montagnier e as teorias da conspiração Covid (1:29:26) Outras ideias para melhorar a Ciência. | Talent Identification at the limits of Peer Review: an analysis of the EMBO Postdoctoral Fellowships Selection Process | Revisão por pares prévia à publicação |  Algoritmos de revisão com AI: statcheck e grim Livros recomendados: The Drunkard's Walk, de Leonard Mlodinow | Pensar, Depressa e Devagar. de Daniel Kahneman | Science Fictions, de Stuart Ritchie | Calling Bullshit, de Carl Bergstrom e Jevin D. West _______________ Na conversa que vão ouvir, o Nuno identifica uma série de desafios / obstáculos à boa ciência, que eu diria que se podem dividir em dois tipos: os de sempre e aqueles que se tornaram mais agudos nas últimas décadas, devido a algumas mudanças, quer nas técnicas, quer institucionais que afectam o modo como se faz hoje ciência Os primeiros desafios (os de sempre) têm que ver com a grande dificuldade da Ciência enquanto actividade: conseguir compreender o mundo (identificar “leis” na natureza) sendo os dados de que dispomos sempre parcelares e imperfeitos,e contando apenas com a mente dos cientistas -- humana e, por isso, cheia de limitações e vieses.  Para contrariar as nossas limitações cognitivas (e os nossos próprios defeitos morais) criou-se ao longo do tempo uma arquitectura institucional com uma série de válvulas de segurança. Por exemplo, os trabalhos só são publicados depois de serem revistos por outros cientistas, e a ciência é feita de forma aberta, de modo a que estejamos sempre sujeitos à que as nossas conclusões sejam invalidadas por outros investigadores.  E para decidir o que conta e o que não conta como descoberta científica a partir dos tais dados limitados, foi preciso criar um método e um referencial de significância aceite por todos. Instituíram-se, então, testes de inferência estatística, os chamados testes de hipóteses, o mais conhecido dos quais o célebre p value (de que falamos na conversa).  Só que estes testes são apenas uma via indirecta de inferir conclusões (como não é possível nunca ter a certeza em relação à nossa hipótese para explicar determinado fenómeno, o máximo que estes testes fazem é… rejeitar a hipótese de não haver fenómeno nenhum nos dados…). E depois há outro problema, mais grave. É que uma vez estabelecendo-se um referencial para determinar o que conta e não conta como descoberta científica, criam-se incentivos, como o Nuno explica, para que ele seja aldrabado (intencionalmente ou não) pelos cientistas.  Pelas limitações da nossa mente e destes métodos estatísticos, a Ciência foi sempre  uma actividade…complexa. E nas últimas décadas algumas mudanças vieram tornar estes obstáculos ainda maiores. Por um lado, o sistema de publicação de artigos científicos tornou-se cada vez mais competitivo, gerando incentivos para publicar resultados vistosos, mesmo que para isso seja necessário ser menos rigoroso. Por outro lado, a ciência (em particular na área do convidado, as ciências biomédicas) tornou-se mais complexa e informatizada devido à ascensão do chamado big data e o aumento  da utilização de programas “bioinformáticos”. Isto criou desafios adicionais a quem utiliza estas ferramentas sem por vezes as compreender bem.  Estes obstáculos (e outros, de que falamos durante a conversa) desembocaram naquilo que se tem chamado a Crise da Replicação, em que várias conclusões aparentemente sólidas, sobretudo na biomedicina e na psicologia, têm sido invalidadas por estudos posteriores. Esta crise tem feito correr muita tinta nos últimos anos, com já vários livros publicados sobre o assunto.  E foi precisamente por aí que começámos a nossa conversa -- na qual percorremos as causas e consequências deste estado de coisas. No final, pedi ao Nuno para apontar soluções para resolver estes desafios (os antigos e os novos). Como vão ver, ele tem muitas ideias.  _______________ Obrigado aos mecenas do podcast: Francisco Hermenegildo, Ricardo Evangelista, Henrique Pais João Baltazar, Salvador Cunha, Abilio Silva, Tiago Leite, Carlos Martins, Galaró family, Corto Lemos, Miguel Marques, Nuno Costa, Nuno e Ana, João Ribeiro, Helder Miranda, Pedro Lima Ferreira, Cesar Carpinteiro, Luis Fernambuco, Fernando Nunes, Manuel Canelas, Tiago Gonçalves, Carlos Pires, João Domingues, Hélio Bragança da Silva, Sandra Ferreira , Paulo Encarnação , BFDC, António Mexia Santos, Luís Guido, Bruno Heleno Tomás Costa, João Saro, Daniel Correia, Rita Mateus, António Padilha, Tiago Queiroz, Carmen Camacho, João Nelas, Francisco Fonseca, Rafael Santos, Andreia Esteves, Ana Teresa Mota, ARUNE BHURALAL, Mário Lourenço, RB, Maria Pimentel, Luis, Geoffrey Marcelino, Alberto Alcalde, António Rocha Pinto, Ruben de Bragança, João Vieira dos Santos, David Teixeira Alves, Armindo Martins , Carlos Nobre, Bernardo Vidal Pimentel, António Oliveira, Paulo Barros, Nuno Brites, Lígia Violas, Tiago Sequeira, Zé da Radio, João Morais, André Gamito, Diogo Costa, Pedro Ribeiro, Bernardo Cortez Vasco Sá Pinto, David , Tiago Pires, Mafalda Pratas, Joana Margarida Alves Martins, Luis Marques, João Raimundo, Francisco Arantes, Mariana Barosa, Nuno Gonçalves, Pedro Rebelo, Miguel Palhas, Ricardo Duarte, Duarte , Tomás Félix, Vasco Lima, Francisco Vasconcelos, Telmo , José Oliveira Pratas, Jose Pedroso, João Diogo Silva, Joao Diogo, José Proença, João Crispim, João Pinho , Afonso Martins, Robertt Valente, João Barbosa, Renato Mendes, Maria Francisca Couto, Antonio Albuquerque, Ana Sousa Amorim, Francisco Santos, Lara Luís, Manuel Martins, Macaco Quitado, Paulo Ferreira, Diogo Rombo, Francisco Manuel Reis, Bruno Lamas, Daniel Almeida, Patrícia Esquível , Diogo Silva, Luis Gomes, Cesar Correia, Cristiano Tavares, Pedro Gaspar, Gil Batista Marinho, Maria Oliveira, João Pereira, Rui Vilao, João Ferreira, Wedge, José Losa, Hélder Moreira, André Abrantes, Henrique Vieira, João Farinha, Manuel Botelho da Silva, João Diamantino, Ana Rita Laureano, Pedro L, Nuno Malvar, Joel, Rui Antunes7, Tomás Saraiva, Cloé Leal de Magalhães, Joao Barbosa, paulo matos, Fábio Monteiro, Tiago Stock, Beatriz Bagulho, Pedro Bravo, Antonio Loureiro, Hugo Ramos, Inês Inocêncio, Telmo Gomes, Sérgio Nunes, Tiago Pedroso, Teresa Pimentel, Rita Noronha, miguel farracho, José Fangueiro, Zé, Margarida Correia-Neves, Bruno Pinto Vitorino, João Lopes, Joana Pereirinha, Gonçalo Baptista, Dario Rodrigues, tati lima, Pedro On The Road, Catarina Fonseca, JC Pacheco, Sofia Ferreira, Inês Ribeiro, Miguel Jacinto, Tiago Agostinho, Margarida Costa Almeida, Helena Pinheiro, Rui Martins, Fábio Videira Santos, Tomás Lucena, João Freitas, Ricardo Sousa, RJ, Francisco Seabra Guimarães, Carlos Branco, David Palhota, Carlos Castro, Alexandre Alves, Cláudia Gomes Batista, Ana Leal, Ricardo Trindade, Luís Machado, Andrzej Stuart-Thompson, Diego Goulart, Filipa Portela, Paulo Rafael, Paloma Nunes, Marta Mendonca, Teresa Painho, Duarte Cameirão, Rodrigo Silva, José Alberto Gomes, Joao Gama, Cristina Loureiro, Tiago Gama, Tiago Rodrigues, Miguel Duarte, Ana Cantanhede, Artur Castro Freire, Rui Passos Rocha, Pedro Costa Antunes, Sofia Almeida, Ricardo Andrade Guimarães, Daniel Pais, Miguel Bastos, Luís Santos _______________ Esta conversa foi editada por: Hugo Oliveira _______________ Bio: Nuno Barbosa Morais é um biólogo computacional. É licenciado em Engenharia Física Tecnológica pelo Instituto Superior Técnico e doutorado em Ciências Biomédicas pela Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, tendo feito investigação internacional durante uma década nas universidades de Cambridge e de Toronto. Lidera, desde 2015, o laboratório de Transcritómica de Doença no Instituto de Medicina Molecular e lecciona cursos de Biologia Computacional a vários mestrados da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa. A sua investigação recorre a análises de grandes dados moleculares no estudo das alterações na regulação da actividade dos genes em tecidos humanos que os tornam mais susceptíveis a doenças, nomeadamente as associadas ao envelhecimento. No processo, a equipa desenvolve ferramentas bioinformáticas que visam tornar acessíveis e inteligíveis aquelas análises a colegas sem formação informática. Procura contribuir para uma maior reprodutibilidade da prática científica, através da promoção da investigação inter-disciplinar, da formação quantitativa de biólogos e do uso de ferramentas de análises de grandes dados como sistemas de apoio à decisão, por oposição a “caixas negras”.

VIDEO: Descrizione in minuscolo ➜ https://rumble.com/embed/vq2l0hTESTO DELL'ARTICOLO ➜ www.bastabugie.it/it/articoli.php?id=7325MONTAGNIER, UNO DEI PIU' GRANDI VIROLOGI DEL XX SECOLO di Paolo GulisanoUn anno fa, l'8 febbraio 2022, si spegneva Luc Montagnier, uno dei più grandi virologi del XX secolo. Diresse il Centre national de la recherche scientifique, e l'Unità di Oncologia Virale dell'Istituto Pasteur di Parigi dove nel 1983 assieme a Françoise Barré scoprì il virus HIV: tale traguardo scientifico valse ai due il Premio Nobel per la medicina del 2008. Oltre a questo, produsse migliaia di pubblicazioni scientifiche.Nonostante questa straordinaria carriera, nel corso degli ultimi due anni lo scienziato francese venne pesantemente e spesso volgarmente colpito per aver espresso dubbi di carattere scientifico sulla gestione politica della pandemia. Venne trattato dai media mainstream come un povero vecchio che proponeva teorie complottiste. In realtà, il professore fin dagli inizi della crisi pandemica da Covid-19 studiò con attenzione vari suoi aspetti, tra cui i possibili effetti collaterali dei vaccini, la predominanza degli aspetti economici e di marketing su quelli sanitari, e la disponibilità di cure alternative più efficaci e meno costose.Nonostante i media gli avessero attaccato l'etichetta di "no vax", etichetta quantomeno ridicola perché per decenni si era dedicato alla ricerca di un vaccino per l'AIDS, e forse proprio per aver condotto a lungo questo tipo di ricerca, si era insospettito per la facilità con cui in 5-6 mesi erano stati prodotti questi farmaci genici. Nel corso di decenni, invece né Montagnier né altri valenti scienziati sono mai riusciti a realizzare un vaccino per quella che era stata definita "la peste del XX secolo". Ciò non è strano, dal momento che non sempre si riesce a realizzare un vaccino per una determinata malattia: altri esempi di fallimenti sono l'Epatite C o la tubercolosi.NON SONO VERI VACCINIAlla luce delle evidenze scientifiche Montagnier aveva messo in discussione le modalità con cui si era arrivati a questi prodotti, e inoltre contestò l'obbligatorietà del trattamento, sulla base della dichiarata mancanza di studi sperimentali che ne potessero garantire efficacia e sicurezza.Ebbe modo, inoltre di sottolineare - tra i primi - che non si era in presenza di veri vaccini, ma di «montaggi complicati di biologia molecolare, che possono arrivare anche ad essere pericolosi, oltre che inefficaci».Questo suo scetticismo nei confronti di quella che era la narrazione ufficiale sui vaccini, visti come l'unica soluzione al problema della pandemia, gli veniva dal suo essere uno scienziato autentico. Lo aveva applicato anche alle sue stesse scoperte: ebbe la volontà di rimetterle sempre in discussione, quando sarebbe stato molto più facile e gratificante cavalcare l'onda dell'industria farmaceutica e delle grandi autorità governative che volevano prendersene il merito, il credito per aver risolto il problema dell'AIDS vendendo farmaci specifici per l'HIV.Montagnier continuò per anni a studiare questa malattia, che non è mai stata risolta definitivamente. Ed è significativo il fatto che molte perplessità sul Covid siano state espresse proprio dai grandi scienziati che si sono dedicati in precedenza all'AIDS: Montagnier, Robert Gallo e Angus Dalgleish. Il virologo francese nella sua vita e nel suo lavoro sembra aver seguito un metodo di ricerca reso celebre da un suo famoso collega dell'inizio del secolo scorso, anch'egli Premio Nobel, Alexis Carrell, che aveva affermato che «molto ragionamento e poca osservazione portano all'errore; molta osservazione e poco ragionamento conducono alla verità».UNA GRANDE EREDITÀ INTELLETTUALELa verità fu la preoccupazione di tutta la sua vita, per questo rimetteva in discussione le sue scoperte dicendo «questa è una scoperta molto importante, ma facciamo in modo di sviscerarne tutti gli aspetti, senza cedere a grandi dichiarazioni e semplificazioni». Proprio perché continuò ad esercitare il suo scetticismo, per integrità personale, diventò motivo di imbarazzo per coloro che incassavano i profitti e la fama delle sue scoperte.Pochi giorni prima di morire, tenne un incontro pubblico in Italia, e lanciò un appello ai colleghi medici perché facessero fino in fondo il loro dovere: informarsi e ricercare, e scoprire che erano già disponibili dei farmaci attivi, in grado di portare a guarigione il malato Covid se utilizzati all'inizio dell'infezione. Parlò di «metodi alternativi per curare questa infezione che sono meno rischiosi e anche meno costosi per il sistema sanitario, e che permetterebbero di liberarci di questo virus».Lo scienziato francese non si occupò solo del virus, ma anche e soprattutto delle strategie che a livello internazionale erano state adottate per fronteggiarlo, strategie - a detta di Montagnier - del tutto inadeguate. Cercò di spiegare che non era il vaccino che poteva fermare l'epidemia, ma una combinazione di cure. Parlò anche dell'emergere di dati che documentavano degli effetti collaterali di tipo vascolare e neurologico molto importanti. Di lì a pochi giorni l'anziano scienziato si spense, lasciando una testimonianza che a distanza di un anno non può non apparire come profetica, e lasciando una grande eredità intellettuale che deve essere raccolta e sviluppata.

Vom HIV-Entdecker zum mRNA-Warner: „Zweifel sind wissenschaftlich. Es gibt in der Wissenschaft kein Dogma.“ Web: https://www.epochtimes.de Probeabo der Epoch Times Wochenzeitung: https://bit.ly/EpochProbeabo Twitter: https://twitter.com/EpochTimesDE YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC81ACRSbWNgmnVSK6M1p_Ug Telegram: https://t.me/epochtimesde Gettr: https://gettr.com/user/epochtimesde Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/EpochTimesWelt/ Unseren Podcast finden Sie unter anderem auch hier: iTunes: https://podcasts.apple.com/at/podcast/etdpodcast/id1496589910 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/277zmVduHgYooQyFIxPH97 Unterstützen Sie unabhängigen Journalismus: Per Paypal: http://bit.ly/SpendenEpochTimesDeutsch Per Banküberweisung (Epoch Times Europe GmbH, IBAN: DE 2110 0700 2405 2550 5400, BIC/SWIFT: DEUTDEDBBER, Verwendungszweck: Spenden) Vielen Dank! (c) 2022 Epoch Times

En ce jeudi 5 janvier, les médecins libéraux sont en grève. Les généralistes descendent dans la rue pour demander notamment l'augmentation du prix de la consultation. L'occasion de revenir sur un prix Nobel de médecine mythique : celui venu récompenser deux professeurs français en 2008. Le premier cas de sida date de 1981, la découverte du virus responsable de la maladie date du 20 mai 1983. Le Nobel est donc attribué 25 ans plus tard aux deux chercheurs, Luc Montagnier, figure de l'Institut Pasteur et la virologue Françoise Barré-Sinoussi.

En ce jeudi 5 janvier, les médecins libéraux sont en grève. Les généralistes descendent dans la rue pour demander notamment l'augmentation du prix de la consultation. L'occasion de revenir sur un prix Nobel de médecine mythique : celui venu récompenser deux professeurs français en 2008. Le premier cas de sida date de 1981, la découverte du virus responsable de la maladie date du 20 mai 1983. Le Nobel est donc attribué 25 ans plus tard aux deux chercheurs, Luc Montagnier, figure de l'Institut Pasteur et la virologue Françoise Barré-Sinoussi.

Dr. Robert Gaynes, distinguished physician and professor of infectious diseases at Emory University, joins Meet the Microbiologist for a unique episode, in which we share the story of Françoise Barré-Sinoussi, the French, female scientist who discovered HIV and found herself at the heart of one of the most bitter scientific disputes in recent history. Subscribe (free) on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts, Android, RSS or by email. Ashley's Biggest Takeaways The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report first reported on a cluster of unusual infections in June of 1981, which would become known as AIDS. Evidence suggested that the disease was sexually transmitted and could be transferred via contaminated blood supply and products, as well as contaminated needles, and could be passed from mother to child. All hemophiliacs of this generation acquired AIDS (15,000 in the U.S. alone). The fact that the microbe was small enough to evade filters used to screen the clotting factor given to hemophiliacs indicated that the etiologic agent was a virus. AIDS patients had low counts of T-lymphocytes called CD4 cells. By 1993, the most likely virus candidates included, a relative of hepatitis B virus, some kind of herpes virus or a retrovirus. Howard Temin discovered reverse transcriptase, working with Rous sarcoma in the 50s and 60s. His work upset the Central Dogma of Genetics, and at first people not only did not believe him, but also ridiculed him for this claim. Research conducted by David Baltimore validated Temin's work, and Temin, Baltimore and Renato Dulbecco shared the Nobel Prize for the discovery in 1975. Robert Gallo of the U.S. National Institute of Health (NIH), discovered the first example of a human retrovirus—human T-cell lymphotropic virus (HTLV-1). Françoise Barré-Sinoussi worked on murine retroviruses in a laboratory unit run by Luc Montagnier, where she became very good at isolating retroviruses from culture. In 1982, doctors gave lab Montagnier's lab a sample taken from a with generalized adenopathy, a syndrome that was a precursor to AIDS. Barré-Sinoussi began to detect evidence of reverse transcriptase in cell culture 2 days after the samples were brought to her lab. Barré-Sinoussi and Luc Montagnier were recognized for the discovery of HIV with the 2008 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. Links for the Episode: From the ancient worlds of Hippocrates and Avicenna to the early 20th century hospitals of Paul Ehrlich and Lillian Wald to the modern-day laboratories of François Barré-Sinoussi and Barry Marshall, Germ Theory brings to life the inspiring stories of medical pioneers whose work helped change the very fabric of our understanding of how we think about and treat infectious diseases. Germ Theory: Medical Pioneers in Infectious Diseases The second edition of Germ Theory, which will include chapters on Françoise Barré-Sinoussi, Barry Marshall and Tony Fauci, will publish in Spring 2023.

We're diving in the deep end of one of my absolute favorite subjects today, folks, with the esteemed Dr. Gerald Pollack. Dr. Pollack's expertise in water, specifically, what he's called “fourth phase” water, is absolutely mind blowing stuff – and changes how we might think about this critically important and ever-present natural substance. Dr. Pollack is firm in his standing as what some might determine as a traditional scientist. So, while he is kind to entertain some of my more adventurous theories, his perspective is really strongly rooted in scientific method, testing, and repeatability – an important POV to be sure. Still, what he presents in this conversation is truly paradigm breaking stuff. Given his stance as a by-the-book scientist, his EZ water takeaways carry even more weight and urge even more curiosity. Enjoy the expansion; and let me know what you think in my Instagram comment section.    00:05:11 — Stretching the Limits of Traditional Science Exploring the work of Sir Andrew Huxley The Fourth Phase of Water by Dr. Gerald Pollack Looking for simplicity in truth Exploring the work of Boris Derjaguin (poly water) Exploring the work of Jacques Benveniste (water memory) Annual Conference on the Physics, Chemistry, and Biology of Water 00:33:00 — Mysteries of Water The gel-like water in our cells (introduction) Anomalies of water  How do sandcastles stand up? What creates clouds? Dr. Pollack on the shape of the earth 00:55:42 — Exclusion Zone (EZ) Water Exploring the work of Gilbert Ling Learning about fourth phase water Exploring the work of Dr. Viktor Schauberger (living water) Structured water: similarities and differences Unpacking the folklore of healing waters around the world The story of Hunza Water  Exploring the work of Veda Austin The Secret Intelligence of Water as The Liquid Language of God w/ Veda Austin #410 Exploring the work of Dr. Masaru Emoto Exploring the work of Dr. Luc Montagnier 01:39:14 — Making EZ Water Using Hot, Cold, & Light Therapy Metabolic science behind hot and cold practices Luke's red light and ice bath routine NanoVi by eng3 What makes water droplets spherical in shape? Directly exposing drinking  water to red light Support the Pollack Lab with a tax-deductible donation Exploring the work of Albert Szent-Györgyi   More about this episode. Watch on YouTube.   THIS SHOW IS BROUGHT TO YOU BY: INSIDE TRACKER. When you do what you love – like running, like racing, like enjoying the great outdoors – you want to do it for life. InsideTracker can help. InsideTracker was founded in 2009 by leading scientists in aging, genetics, and biometrics. Using their patented algorithm, InsideTracker analyzes your body's data to provide you with a clear picture of what's going on inside you and to offer you science-backed recommendations for positive diet and lifestyle changes. Then InsideTracker tracks your progress every day, every step of the way toward reaching your performance goals and living a longer, healthier life. You can get 25% off the entire InsideTracker store for a limited time by going to: insidetracker.com/luke. AND... BRANCH BASICS. A full spectrum of cleaning products for your home, free of fragrances and harmful preservatives. Branch Basics is plant & mineral based, biodegradable, non-GMO, gluten and tree nut free, and not tested on animals. Head to links.branchbasics.com/lukestorey and use code LUKE for 15% off all Starter Kits (excepting a Trial Kit). AND… NED. CBD for sleep, stress relief, recovery, and focus. Ned products are chock full of premium CBD and a full spectrum of active cannabinoids, terpenes, flavonoids, and trichomes. Their full spectrum hemp oil nourishes the body, and is cold-extracted from the world's purest USDA certified organic hemp. Go to helloned.com/luke and use code LUKE for 15% off. AND… NOOTOPIA. How often do you wake up in the morning and instantly wish you had just another hour of sleep? Imagine having control over how you feel and being able to turn ON your brain within 10 minutes of waking up, without the caffeine. Nootopia is the most advanced brain support and cognitive enhancement system that I've ever tried. Go to nootopia.com/luke and enter coupon code LUKE10 for an extra 10% off.   Resources Pollack Lab at UW: pollacklab.org Support the Pollack Lab with a tax-deductible donation Are you ready to block harmful blue light, and look great at the same time? Check out Gilded By Luke Storey. Where fashion meets function: gildedbylukestorey.com Join me on Telegram for the uncensored content big tech won't allow me to post. It's free speech and free content: www.lukestorey.com/telegram   Related Episodes The Water Wars Trilogy, Part One: Unlocking The Mysteries Of Nature's Greatest Gift w/ Daniel Vitalis #129 The Water Wars Trilogy, Part Two: Unlocking The Mysteries Of Nature's Greatest Gift w/ Seth Leaf Pruzansky #130 The Water Wars Trilogy, Part Three: Unlocking The Mysteries Of Nature's Greatest Gift w/ Mukhunde Singh #131 The Ultimate Water Show! Filter + Alkaline Myths, & The Miracle Sea Water Solution Of The Century w/ Robert Slovak #313 The Best & Worst Drinking Water, Filtration & the Magic of Structured Water (Solocast) #396

Le Pr Marc Henry est ex-directeur de recherche en laboratoire de chimie moléculaire du CNRS, ingénieur chimiste, professeur d'université, historien des sciences, épistémologue et philosophe. Le Pr Marc Henri a travaillé avec le professeur Luc Montagnier sur la mémoire de l'eau. IMPORTANT ! ABONNEZ-VOUS A LA CHAÎNE MAINTENANT! Important, suivez nous sur Telegram: https://t.me/franceliberte Inscrivez-vous aux notifications de nouveaux épisodes: https://franceliberte.tv/inscription/ SOUTENEZ FINANCIÈREMENT FRANCE LIBERTÉ, FAITES UN DON MAINTENANT! Soutenir par carte bancaire en cliquant sur le lien ci-dessous : https://www.paypal.com/donate/?business=47CN5TZDNWSR4&no_recurring=0&item_name=Podcast+France+Libert%C3%A9¤cy_code=EUR Pour faire un virement, contactez-nous : info@franceliberte.tv Merci pour votre soutien aux frais de développement et de post-production! France Liberté, le podcast qui inspire la transformation. Notre valeur cardinale est la recherche de la VERITÉ. Nous présentons des connaissances, des expériences, des perspectives différentes. Vous vous faîtes votre propre opinion. Transformez-vous avec France Liberté. Site: https://franceliberte.tv/

**Extrait 1 sur 9** : la position du Pr Luc Montagnier sur le Covid Le Pr Marc Henry est ex-directeur de recherche en laboratoire biomoléculaire du CNRS, ingénieur chimiste, professeur d'université, historien des sciences, épistémologue et philosophe. Série de 9 extraits "L'eau: la médecine du futur, la conscience et la physique quantique" L'interview intégral sera diffusé en fin de série. Le Pr Marc Henri a travaillé avec le professeur Luc Montagnier sur la mémoire de l'eau. IMPORTANT ! ABONNEZ-VOUS A LA CHAÎNE MAINTENANT! Important, suivez nous sur Telegram: https://t.me/franceliberte Inscrivez-vous aux notifications de nouveaux épisodes: https://franceliberte.tv/inscription/ SOUTENEZ FINANCIÈREMENT FRANCE LIBERTÉ, FAITES UN DON MAINTENANT! Soutenir par carte bancaire en cliquant sur le lien ci-dessous : https://www.paypal.com/donate/?busine... Pour faire un virement, contactez-nous : info@franceliberte.tv Merci pour votre soutien aux frais de développement et de post-production! France Liberté, le podcast qui inspire la transformation. Notre valeur cardinale est la recherche de la VERITÉ. Nous présentons des connaissances, des expériences, des perspectives différentes. Vous vous faîtes votre propre opinion. Transformez-vous avec France Liberté. Les interviews sensibles et qui dérangent sont sur le site: https://franceliberte.tv/

In this episode of Truthiverse I jumped into the snake venom controversy (initiated by Dr Bryan Ardis) with Dawn Lester, co-author of What Really Makes You Ill? Dawn and I ask: Is Remdesevir made of snake venom? Does it contain it? Would it matter if snake venom been dumped in the public water supply? Does any of this have anything to do with symptoms grouped under the “covid” banner? Is Ardis on the right track or not? Is the whole thing a distraction? This turned into a sweeping conversation that went far beyond the snake venom conjecture. We also discussed the depopulation lobby's attack on the people of Africa, the WHO's interest in spruiking antivenom in Africa, the bogus HIV theory of Robert Gallo and his lack of evidence (Luc Montagnier too), AZT, common childhood “diseases,” the fallacy of infectious viruses, living conditions in the role of disease, the broken peer review system in medicine, snake symbolism, the covid illusion, and more. In researching for their monumental book over 10 years, wherever Dawn and her co-author David Parker looked for evidence to support Germ Theory and Establishment fear-mongering around "pandemics", they found only the opposite: nothing was as we have been led to believe. Perhaps more than anyone else, it is doctors and medical personnel in general who need to hear conversations like this so we can provide appropriate health interventions based on a more accurate understanding of what causes symptoms in the first place...because it clearly isn't “viruses.” Special Guest: Dawn Lester.

View on Odysee: https://odysee.com/EvoLens119:cfd6bcb4c935ec43547b282b60c78902c33073ae View on Spotify (With video):  ***** In this 119th in a series of live discussions with Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying (both PhDs in Biology), we discuss the state of the world through an evolutionary lens. This week, we discuss science, sophistry, mis- dis- and mal- information, and making sure that people on the fringe remain there. We discuss corruption, and the lab leak hypothesis for the origin of SARS-CoV2. We briefly discuss Hunter Biden's laptop, before talking about Lia Thomas, the trans swimmer who competes successfully as a woman, after having competed unsuccessfully as a man. We talk about last names, and naming conventions in culture. And we talk about inclusion. ***** Today's show is sponsored by: Blinkist: Learn big ideas fast from best-selling non-fiction. Get a 7-day free trial & 25% off a Premium membership at https://Blinkist.com/DARKHORSE BrightMove is Modern Recruiting Software, aka an Applicant Tracking System, that has features not found in any of its competitors.. Visit http://brightmove.com/darkhorse  to schedule a software demonstration today.  Sole: Beautiful shoes and carefully designed footbeds for healthy feet. Go to https://yoursole.com/darkhorse , and first-time customers get 50% off, plus they have a 90-day money back guarantee. ***** Our book, A Hunter-Gatherer's Guide to the 21st Century, is available everywhere books are sold, and signed copies are available here: https://darvillsbookstore.indielite.org Check out our store! Epic tabby, digital book burning, saddle up the dire wolves, and more: https://store.darkhorsepodcast.org Heather's newsletter, Natural Selections (subscribe to get free weekly essays in your inbox): https://naturalselections.substack.com Find more from us on Bret's website (https://bretweinstein.net) or Heather's website (http://heatherheying.com). Become a member of the DarkHorse LiveStreams, and get access to an additional Q&A livestream every month. Join at Heather's Patreon. Like this content? Subscribe to the channel, like this video, follow us on twitter (@BretWeinstein, @HeatherEHeying), and consider helping us out by contributing to either of our Patreons or Bret's Paypal. Looking for clips from #DarkHorseLivestreams? Check out our other channel:  https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAWCKUrmvK5F_ynBY_CMlIA Theme Music: Thank you to Martin Molin of Wintergatan for providing us the rights to use their excellent music. ***** Q&A Link: https://youtu.be/mam_-YpUg-g Mentioned in this episode: Obituary of Luc Montagnier in Science: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abo7630 Weinstein and Ciszek 2002. The reserve-capacity hypothesis: evolutionary origins and modern implications of the trade-off between tumor-suppression and tissue-repair. Experimental gerontology, 37(5): 615-627: http://176.9.41.242/docs/longevity/2002-weinstein.pdf Forbes article from 3-14-22: Covid-19 Might Not Have Leaked From A Lab. It's Still A Problem For China: https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevensalzberg/2022/03/14/covid-19-may-not-have-leaked-from-a-lab-its-still-a-problem-for-china/?sh=6b2b1fdb702c Andersen et al 2020.  The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 Nature Medicine 26: 450–452. https://www.nature.com/articles/S41591-020-0820-9 Lia Thomas wins an N.C.A.A. swimming title. New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/17/sports/lia-Support the show (https://www.patreon.com/bretweinstein)

The Dialectic Bulletin reviews the latest news that you need to know.

There's loads of gossip currently online about COVID vaccines and HIV, so I delved into the hellhole of Twitter to find out WTF is going on so you don't have to. In other news, first ever woman has been cured of HIV apparently. And the discoverer of HIV has died aged 89. 

O elevado número de prémios, galardões e medalhas atribuídos a Luc Montagnier é igual ao número das perigosas idiotices que propagandeava: que as vacinas causam autismo, que o ADN pode ser transmitido por via eletromagnética, que João Paulo II tratasse a sua doença de Parkinson com papaia fermentada, entre muitas outras ideias absolutamente assustadoras. Morreu o homem mas as ideias criminosas, infelizmente, ficaram.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Dans la première partie de notre émission, nous commenterons quelques nouvelles qui ont fait la une des journaux cette semaine. Tout d'abord, nous parlerons du premier grand meeting de la candidate à la présidentielle française Valérie Pécresse qui s'est tenu dimanche. Ensuite, nous passerons en revue quelques chiffres de l'indice mondial de la démocratie pour 2021, qui a été publié le 9 février par l'Economist Intelligence Unit. Puis, dans la partie scientifique de notre émission, nous aborderons une récente étude publiée dans la revue Plos Genetics qui confirme qu'il existe un lien entre les troubles du sommeil et la maladie d'Alzheimer. Enfin, nous discuterons de la finale du SuperBowl de 2022 qui a eu lieu dimanche au stade SoFI à Inglewood, en Californie.    Poursuivons maintenant avec l'annonce du programme de la deuxième partie de notre émission, « Trending in France ». Cette semaine, nous parlerons de la mort de Luc Montagnier, prix Nobel de médecine en 2008. Nous discuterons pour finir d'un constat alarmant fait par une agence de santé nationale : 95 % des Français n'ont pas assez d'activité physique pour rester en bonne santé. - La candidate de droite à la présidentielle française évoque une théorie du complot de l'extrême-droite - L'indice mondial de la démocratie est en forte baisse - La perturbation de l'horloge biologique pourrait être à l'origine de la maladie d'Alzheimer - Le spectacle de la mi-temps du Super Bowl met enfin à l'honneur des stars du hip-hop - Le prix Nobel de médecine Luc Montagnier est mort - 95 % des Français n'ont pas assez d'activité physique

Fue uno de los responsables de descubrir el VIH. Ganó el premio Nobel de Medicina. Fue un antivacunas y perdió buena parte de su prestigio. Todo eso fue Luc Montagnier. El virólogo francés falleció el 8 de febrero pasado, a la edad de 89 años. Admirado e incluso retratado en cine en la película Y la banda siguió tocando, de 1993, que cuenta la historia de cómo se descubrió el virus del Sida, Montagnier fue repudiado por muchos de sus colegas franceses en el último período de su vida. Incluso llegó a apoyar medicinas alternativas: por ejemplo, recomendaba comer papaya como remedio contra el párkinson. Durante la pandemia de covid-19, Montagnier alzó su voz contraria a las vacunas para esta enfermedad, y también supo alentar la teoría de que el virus SARS-CoV-2 fue creado por humanos en un laboratorio. Hoy en La Mesa de Científicos tomamos su compleja figura para conocerlo mejor, sus aportes a la ciencia y también las críticas que recibió. Nos acompañaron para eso como siempre el doctor en Ciencias Biológicas Héctor Musto; Gonzalo Moratorio, profesor agregado de Virología en la Facultad de Ciencias de la Udelar, investigador responsable del Laboratorio de Evolución Experimental de Virus del Instituto Pasteur (IP) Montevideo; y el hematólogo Guillermo Dighiero, quien supo ser el primer director del IP Montevideo, pero que además fue investigador en el IP de París, donde trabajó con Luc Montagnier.

De Prix Nobel à paria de la communauté scientifique : le professeur Luc Montagnier est mort à 89 ans la semaine dernière. L'annonce de son décès a même créé une polémique. On vous explique !

Acompaña a Ricardo Cartas en una emisión más de la revista cultural De eso se trata, espacio de ciencia, de cultura, de gastronomía, de libros y más, de lunes a viernes de 08:30 a 10:00 horas. En El cambiante mundo de las infecciones, la Dra. Indiana Torres Escobar, académica de la Facultad de Medicina, dialoga acerca del codescubridor del VIH, el virólogo francés Luc Montagnier, y sus controversias.

1- Relaciones en internet Vs Relaciones en persona 2- Sopita de murciélago: -Cómo nos ha cambiado la plandemia las relaciones amorosas -Luc Montagnier muere en tiempos donde se advierte el VIH 2.0 3- Divagaciones varias

FLASHBACK - Interview with Luc Montagnier at AustismOne May 2020 Download the transcript here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/njlktuaqpdaguim/Luc_Montagnier_interview_AutismOne_May_2020_edited.pdf?dl=0

Le Professeur Luc Montagnier est décédé cette semaine. Luc Montagnier avait reçu pour ses travaux sur le sida le Prix Nobel de Médecine. Retour sur son parcours avec des archives de l'INA et des extraits de France Télévisions

Dans cette émission, on vous parle de la mort du chercheur Luc Montagnier, d'un nouveau féminicide en Iran, du mercato politique à l'aube de la présidentielle, du regain du nucléaire et du port du voile dans le sport. A la fin de cet épisode, vous retrouverez notre quizz, spécialement conçu pour vous ! Bonne écoute.

L'annonce de la mort de Luc Montagnier, le co-découvreur du virus du Sida et prix Nobel de médecine, a mis 24 heures à être prise au sérieux après sa publication par FranceSoir. « Penser contre soi-même », on connaît la fameuse phrase de Péguy, chère à Edwy Plenel, fondateur du site Mediapart. Penser ou plutôt compenser par un travail de vérification et de croisement des sources ses propres préjugés, parfois totalement fondés, mais qui peuvent nous faire passer à côté de la vérité : c'est sans doute ce qu'il faudra méditer dans les écoles de journalisme à partir de l'annonce de ce décès du professeur Luc Montagnier par le site FranceSoir. Certes, FranceSoir n'a plus grand-chose à voir avec l'illustre quotidien fondé par Pierre Lazareff. Il a été souvent mis en cause pour son implication dans des théories complotistes. Il a servi par exemple de rampe de lancement au documentaire Hold-up, où témoignait justement le professeur Montagnier aux côtés de Didier Raoult et Christian Péronne pour expliquer que le Covid était une grande manipulation. Un thème qui a ensuite été repris à l'envi par les antivax et qui débouche d'une certaine façon sur le convoi de la liberté ces jours-ci. Un temps de vérification nécessaire Une information provenant d'un site douteux est donc par nature douteuse. Mérite-t-elle pour autant d'être vérifiée ? Oui bien sûr, et l'on peut s'étonner du temps qu'il a fallu pour ce faire, même si la famille, l'hôpital de Neuilly et la sphère d'influence des antivax n'ont pas beaucoup aidé à cela. Libération raconte même que des voix écoutées chez les antivax, comme Richard Boutry, affirmaient mercredi sur Twitter que « le professeur Montagnier n'est pas mort », quand l'avocat Fabrice Di Vizio constatait que cette annonce n'a « fait l'objet d'aucun démenti ». La vérification n'était certes pas simple, mais elle était nécessaire si l'on voulait éviter ne serait-ce que 24 heures le piège dans lequel de nombreux médias dits mainstream sont tombés en ignorant la vérité. Si l'on voulait démontrer l'enfermement d'une caste journalistique dans ses propres croyances et soutenir que seuls des médias anti-système disent le vrai, on ne pouvait s'y prendre autrement. D'autant que le directeur de FranceSoir, Xavier Azalbert, est venu le jeudi matin pour témoigner sur Sud Radio. Au fond, la mort de Luc Montagnier est un peu l'envers de l'annonce erronée de la mort de Martin Bouygues par l'AFP en 2015. Comme c'était l'AFP, la totalité des médias, y compris LCI détenu par Bouygues, a repris la dépêche sur cette fausse mort sans chercher à la vérifier. Là, personne ne reprend l'info de FranceSoir parce que c'est FranceSoir et que Luc Montagnier peut lui-même induire en erreur avec ses théories farfelues sur le Covid. Pourtant, c'est bien parce que FranceSoir et le prix Nobel étaient en lien qu'il y avait une chance que ce soit vrai.

Today on the Naturally Inspired Daily Tammy Talks About: Senator Ron Johnson Demands Answers, Professor Luc Montagnier Dies, VAIDS And Elana Freeman

#NoVax #Modena #FreedomConvoy #Canada #LucMontagnier #RassegnaStampa

In questo episodio vedremo insieme come procede la campagna vaccinale contro la Covid-19 per i bambini nella fascia d'età 5-11 anni, quali sono le differenze tra Regioni e come ne esce l'Italia dal confronto con i principali Paesi europei. Restando in tema, è poi vero, come sostiene Giorgia Meloni (Fratelli d'Italia), che per un giovane è più facile morire colpito da un fulmine che per la Covid-19? Il secondo argomento che affronteremo insieme è l'acquisizione della cittadinanza italiana: che cosa dice la legge oggi in vigore, che cosa sono lo ius soli e lo ius culturae di cui periodicamente si parla nel dibattito politico nazionale, e quali tentativi di riforma sono in discussione in Parlamento. Apriremo poi una finestra sulla disinformazione riguardante la crisi in Ucraina: vedremo insieme in quali Paesi europei stanno circolando che notizie false, e qual è il ruolo della Russia.La rubrica curata da Facta si occupa questa settimana dell'origine della variante Omicron, non senza avervi prima raccontato quali bufale sono state diffuse a scapito del virologo Luc Montagnier, recentemente scomparso. Scriveteci all'indirizzo podcast@pagellapolitica.it e partecipate al sondaggio su Instagram per scegliere l'argomento del prossimo episodio: la questione foibe/shoah oppure l'obbligo vaccinale in Europa?Seguiteci sui nostri siti https://pagellapolitica.it/ e https://facta.news/ sui nostri profili Facebook, Instagram e Twitter.Host: Tommaso CanettaEpisodio scritto da Tommaso Canetta, Laura Loguercio e Camilla VagnozziProducer: Jessica Mariana MasucciLINK UTILISondaggio https://instagram.com/stories/pagellapolitica/2771357693711366330?utm_medium=copy_linkAudio Giorgia Meloni https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LyG2fGPCmY https://pagellapolitica.it/blog/show/1432/le-vaccinazioni-nei-bambini-vanno-a-rilentohttps://pagellapolitica.it/dichiarazioni/9030/fulmini-e-covid-19-cosa-non-torna-nei-dati-di-meloni https://pagellapolitica.it/blog/show/1433/la-legge-sulla-cittadinanza-compie-trentanni-cosa-%C3%A8-cambiato https://facta.news/notizia-falsa/2022/02/07/luc-montagnier-non-ha-sostenuto-che-la-terza-dose-di-vaccino-causi-laids/​​https://facta.news/storie/2022/02/10/lorigine-di-omicron-potrebbe-essere-la-chiave-per-il-futuro-della-pandemia/CREDIT BRANI“Arpent”, “Comic Game Loop - Mischief” di Kevin MacLeod; “Hypocampus Jump” di *imp*; “Distant Star” di Thundermine hanno una licenza Public Domain https://freepd.comCREDIT IMMAGINE: ANSA

The British prime minister Boris Johnson said that Europe faced its biggest security crisis in decades. Also: the head of the London Metropolitan police Cressida Dick resigns after a series of damaging controversies, and Luc Montagnier -- co-discoverer of HIV, dies aged 89.

Uno el premio novel Luc Montagnier a los 89 años en compañia de su familia. Su ultima intervención pública se puede ver en el sitio Thebigresetmovie.com --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/alternativa3/message

Il premio Nobel per la chimica Luc Montagnier sostiene che il COVID-19 non sia una malattia di origine virale, ma batterica. È davvero così? --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/paziente-zero/message

L'intervento a Milano del premio nobel LUC MONTAGNIER (15-01-2022)

Erst vor 40 Jahren ist HIV und die durch den Virus ausgelöste Erkrankung Aids entdeckt worden. 2008 gabe es dafür den Medizin-Nobelpreis: Françoise Barré-Sinoussi und Luc Montagnier aus Frankreis haben die Auszeichnung für ihre Forschung in den 1980er Jahren erhalten. Dank Medikamenten können HIV-Positive in Europa mittlerweile gut leben. Doch das ist nicht überall auf der Welt der Fall, wie Ulrich Noethen in dieser Podcastfolge erzählt.

Vi kender det fra tandpasta eller vaskepulverreklamer. Autoritære kilder i kitler, der præsenterer produkter som store nyskabelser inden for videnskaben. Med nettets udbredelse er der kommet endnu flere såkaldte ”eksperter”, hvoraf nogle af dem bevidst spreder misinformation. Og der er god grund til at se kritisk på dem. Det gør Torben Sangild og Morten Elsøe i dette nye og tiende afsnit af 'Et åbent sind'.Her kaster de sig blandt andet over FLICC-modellen, der kortlægger nogle af de mest brugte teknikker til at fornægte videnskab og forplumre debatten med misinformation. Og de krydrer det med kuriøse eksempler som fx en ekspert, der altid iklæder sig hvid titel og stetoskop, selvom hans branche hverken kræver det ene eller det andet. Der er også et andet sigende eksempel med en uddannet børnelæge, der mener, at COVID-19-vaccinerne indeholder alien-DNA. Et tredje, der handler om en erklæring, hvor mere end 31.000 “videnskabsfolk” skrev under på, at der ikke findes klimaforandringer - heriblandt falske eksperter som Charles Darwin og en lang række Star Wars-karakterer.Udover hovedtemaet om falske eksperter når vi en omgang korte nyheder og lidt indslag fra feedet, der alt sammen tager udgangspunkt i kongeriet. For det viser sig, at en af de helt store konspirationsteorier måske stammer fra en lejlighed på Amager, at en TV2-opgørelse over corona-indlæggelser måske ikke er helt retvisende, og så har der været røre over nogle stole på Lyngby Apotek, der var reserveret til vaccinerede mennesker. Vi runder selvfølgelig af med en omgang ‘Fup eller fakta'.Husk, at du kan skrive til Torben og Morten med ris, ros og ideer på: sind@heartbeats.dkShow notes: - Den videnskabelige artikel om effekten af misinformation i overskrifter: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2014-44652-001- Den nyeste konsensusartikel om klimaforandringer: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ac2966 - Wikipedia-side om Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Architects_%26_Engineers_for_9/11_Truth- Artikel om årsagen til kollapset af World Trade Center fra American Society of Civil Engineers: https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%290733-9399%282008%29134%3A10%28892%29- Reuters-artikel om Kary Mullis' udtalelser om PCR-testen: https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-pcr-idUSKBN24420X- TjekDet-artikel om Geert vanden Bossche: https://www.tjekdet.dk/faktatjek/massevaccination-kan-skabe-et-ubetvingeligt-coronamonster-lyder-opraab-fra-dyrlaege-og- Artikel om Luc Montagnier fra det prisbelønnede uafhængige indiske nyheds-site, The Wire: https://science.thewire.in/the-sciences/luc-montagniers-views-on-covid-vaccines-are-latest-of-his-wrong-vexing-ideas/- Wikipedia-artikel om ”Nobelsyge”: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_disease- Oversigtsartiklen fra 1984, baseret på 33 studier udi at ændre sine svar i en objektiv test: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/009862838401100303- Artiklen fra 2005 om at ændre svar og første inskydelse-fejlslutningen: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15898871/- FLICC: https://skepticalscience.com/history-FLICC-5-techniques-science-denial.html- Oregon-erklæringens underskriftindsamling med 31.000 'eksperter': http://www.oism.org/pproject/- Bill Gates-konspirationsteorien har et udspring i en dansk blog: https://www.zetland.dk/historie/segJ4JyJ-ae2KvJdE-26d5d- TV2-artiklen med corona-statistikker (nu revideret): https://nyheder.tv2.dk/samfund/2021-10-18-storstedelen-af-coronaindlagte-er-faerdigvaccinerede-alligevel-viser-data-klart

J. Douglas Kenyon. Topics include decay of stars, crystals, Kurt Vonnegut, Neanderthals, Colin Wilson, Stan Gooch, the Carpathian Sphinx, Dr. Robert Schoch, Romanian and central European esoterica, Atlantis and the historical Jesus, parallels between Christianity and ancient Egyptian religion, Atlantis as a global socio-political order, Plato, Minoan civilization, end of the last ice age, Rose and Rand Flem-Ath, Charles Hapgood, ancient maps, Antarctica, alignment of ancient temples, pole shifts, Scott Creighton, live organisms in Antarctica ice cores, the Caribbean, Edgar Cayce, Dr. Greg and Lora Little, the Bimini Road, Pauline Zalitzki, ocean floor formations off of Cuba, sunken ruins near India and Indonesia, alleged "Bosnian Pyramids", Japanese "Yonaguni" structures, Graham Hancock, extremely ancient petrified wheel ruts, Dr. Alexander Koltypin, Malta, Gobekli Tepe, multi-level underground structures in Turkey, Incan monuments and older civilizations, structures on Mars, Richard C. Hoagland, Dr. John Brandenburg, nuclear war on Mars, possible destroyed planet between Mars and Jupitor, cosmic catastrophism, Shoemaker-Levy 9 comet impact, Dr. Avi Loeb and Oumuamua object, crop circles, Australian "saucer nests", fakery and media, Andrew Colllins, academic/scientific peer review and its problems, bias on Wikipedia, Dr. Rupert Sheldrake, Dr. Luc Montagnier, homeopathy, holy water, morphic resonance, "Eye of Africa" formation, cyclical climate of the Sahara, Jimmy Bright, Edgar Cayce's hall(s) of records, alternative Egyptology, reincarnation, Association for Research and Enlightenment, the "Forbidden" series of books, and more.

Seriah interviews author, researcher, and long-time "Atlantis Rising" publisher J. Douglas Kenyon. Topics include decay of stars, crystals, Kurt Vonnegut, Neanderthals, Colin Wilson, Stan Gooch, the Carpathian Sphinx, Dr. Robert Schoch, Romanian and central European esoterica, Atlantis and the historical Jesus, parallels between Christianity and ancient Egyptian religion, Atlantis as a global socio-political order, Plato, Minoan civilization, end of the last ice age, Rose and Rand Flem-Ath, Charles Hapgood, ancient maps, Antarctica, alignment of ancient temples, pole shifts, Scott Creighton, live organisms in Antarctica ice cores, the Caribbean, Edgar Cayce, Dr. Greg and Lora Little, the Bimini Road, Pauline Zalitzki, ocean floor formations off of Cuba, sunken ruins near India and Indonesia, alleged "Bosnian Pyramids", Japanese "Yonaguni" structures, Graham Hancock, extremely ancient petrified wheel ruts, Dr. Alexander Koltypin, Malta, Gobekli Tepe, multi-level underground structures in Turkey, Incan monuments and older civilizations, structures on Mars, Richard C. Hoagland, Dr. John Brandenburg, nuclear war on Mars, possible destroyed planet between Mars and Jupitor, cosmic catastrophism, Shoemaker-Levy 9 comet impact, Dr. Avi Loeb and Oumuamua object, crop circles, Australian "saucer nests", fakery and media, Andrew Colllins, academic/scientific peer review and its problems, bias on Wikipedia, Dr. Rupert Sheldrake, Dr. Luc Montagnier, homeopathy, holy water, morphic resonance, "Eye of Africa" formation, cyclical climate of the Sahara, Jimmy Bright, Edgar Cayce's hall(s) of records, alternative Egyptology, reincarnation, Association for Research and Enlightenment, the "Forbidden" series of books, and more. This is entrancing discussion that connects to so many subjects! - Recap by Vincent Treewell Outro Music is War by High Council Donwload  

Die Nobelpreise sind eine der höchsten wissenschaftlichen Auszeichnungen. Die Gefahr: Wenn ein Nobelpreisträger eine Meinung hat, egal wozu, ist ihm die Aufmerksamkeit sicher. Auch wenn später so manch einer krude Ansichten vertritt.

Two Top Virologists' Frightening Warnings About COVID Injections: Ignored by Government and Big Media By Joel S. Hirschhorn NOQ Report, August 21 2021     When two great minds come to similar conclusions about the current global push to vaccinate everyone with the COVID experimental vaccines, we should pay close attention.  Both highly experienced scientists have a totally negative view of the vaccination effort.  Worse than being ineffective, they point to negative health outcomes for the global population.  These two truth-telling acclaimed medical researchers make Fauci look as inept, deceitful and dangerous as he is. The point made in this article is not only has Fauci pushed the wrong potentially disastrous pandemic solution, he has blocked the right one. Much of what the two virologists say is very technical in nature.  This article simplifies their controversial messages without losing their essential meanings.  The public needs to understand their warnings that refute all the propaganda pushing vaccines from government and public health agencies as well as big media. Warning: Keep reading and you may become depressed. * Dr. Luc Montagnier First considered is the thinking of Dr. Luc Montagnier, a French virologist and recipient of the 2008 Nobel Prize in Medicine for his discovery of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).  He has a doctorate in medicine.  But there is a lot more to conclude he is a great expert: He has received more than 20 major awards, including the French National Order of Merit and the Légion d'honneur.  He is a recipient of the Lasker Award, the Scheele Award, the Louis-Jeantet Prize for medicine , the Gairdner Award  the Golden Plate Award of the American Academy of Achievement, King Faisal International Prize (known as the Arab Nobel Prize), and the Prince of Asturias Award. He has worked hard to expose the dangers of the COVID-19 vaccines, still experimental but sadly may soon be fully approved.  The vaccines don't stop the virus, argues the prominent virologist, they do the opposite — they “feed the virus,” and facilitate its development into stronger and more transmittable variants.  These new virus variants will be more resistant to vaccination and may cause more health implications than their “original” versions. Montagnier refers to the mass vaccine program as an “unacceptable mistake” and are a “scientific error as well as a medical error.”  His assertion is that “The history books will show that…it is the vaccination that is creating the variants.”  In other words: “There are antibodies, created by the vaccine,” forcing the virus to “find another solution” or die.  “This is where the variants are created.  It is the variants that “are a production and result from the vaccination.”  Stop and think about these thoughts.  Have you heard a better explanation of variant creation?  I doubt it. He is talking about the mutation and strengthening of the virus from a phenomenon known as Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE).  ADE is a mechanism that increases the ability of a virus to enter cells and cause a worsening of the disease. Data from around the world confirms ADE occurs in SARS-CoV-2, which causes COVID-19, says Montagnier. “You see it in each country, it's the same: the curve of vaccination is followed by the curve of deaths.”  Sounds like what we are now hearing more about, namely escalating breakthrough infections that kill some people.  And this spiral into disaster may have no end. In a November 2020 documentary he emphasized harmful and irrational mask mandates as well as lockdowns, quarantines, abuses of government overreach, and supported use of effective COVID treatments such as hydroxychloroquine.  The film was banned by YouTube and most other mainstream outlets.  At that time Fauci had succeeded in blocking wide use of the cheap generic based treatments for COVID and pursued the wait for the vaccine strategy. Montagnier has been a vocal critic of the mass vaccination campaign.  In a letter to the President and Judges of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel, which unrolled the world's speediest and the most massive vaccination campaign, Montagnier argued for its suspension.  He said: “I would like to summarize the potential dangers of these vaccines in a mass vaccination policy.”  Here they are: 1. Short-term side effects: these are not the normal local reactions found for any vaccination, but serious reactions involve the life of the recipient such as anaphylactic shock linked to a component of the vaccine mixture, or severe allergies or an autoimmune reaction up to cell aplasia.  In this group we should include a number of lethal blood problems involving clots and loss of platelets that cause strokes, brain bleeds and other impacts. Lack of vaccine protection: 2.1 In induced antibodies do not neutralize a viral infection, but on the contrary facilitate it depending on the recipient.  The latter may have already been exposed to the virus asymptomatically.  Naturally induced antibodies may compete with the antibodies induced by the vaccine. 2.2 The production of antibodies induced by vaccination in a population highly exposed to the virus will lead to the selection of variants resistant to these antibodies.  These variants can be more virulent or more transmissible.  This is what we are seeing now.  An endless virus-vaccine race that will always turn to the advantage for the virus. Long-term effects: Contrary to the claims of the manufacturers of messenger RNA vaccines, there is a risk of integration of viral RNA into the human genome. Our cells have the ability to reverse transcriptase from RNA into DNA. Although this is a rare event, its passage through the DNA of germ cells and its transmission to future generations cannot be excluded. His bottom line: “Faced with an unpredictable future, it is better to abstain.”  But most people will find it extremely difficult to resist all the coercion and vaccine mandates. Back in April 2020, before all the talk of variants and before the rollout of the experimental vaccines, Montagnier urged people to refuse vaccines against COVID-19 when they become available.  His main point should always be remembered: “instead of preventing the infection, they [would] accelerate infection.”  Today, the newly occurring variants of SARS-CoV-2 that affect vaccinated people prove his thesis.  With his scientific thinking, mass vaccination may cause a new, more deadly wave of pandemic infection. As to the much talked about and hope for herd immunity, he has said: “the vaccines Pfizer, Moderna, Astra Zeneca do not prevent the transmission of the virus person-to-person and the vaccinated are just as transmissive as the unvaccinated.  Therefore the hope of a ‘collective immunity' by an increase in the number of vaccinated is totally futile.” On the positive side, he advocated this: “The early treatment of infection with ivermectin and bacterial antibiotic because there is a bacterial cofactor that amplifies the effects of the virus. “ Dr. Vanden Bossche The stark views of Montagnier have been shared by the esteemed Belgium virologist Dr. Vanden Bossche.  He too has considerable credentials that make his views worth consideration.  He has PhD degree in Virology from the University of Hohenheim, Germany.  He held faculty appointments at universities in Belgium and Germany.  He was at the German Center for Infection Research in Cologne as Head of the Vaccine Development Office.  He has been in the private sector at several vaccine companies (GSK Biologicals, Novartis Vaccines, Solvay Biologicals) where he worked on vaccine R&D as well as vaccine development.  He also worked with the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) in Geneva as Senior Ebola Program Manager. His views have been analyzed in a recent article.  He too has loudly called for a halt to mass-vaccination programs.  He believes that if the jabs are not halted, they could lead to the evolution of stronger and stronger variants of the virus until a “supervirus” takes hold and wipes out huge numbers of people. This is his bold view: “Given the huge amount of immune escape that will be provoked by mass vaccination campaigns and flanking containment measures, it is difficult to imagine how human interventions would not cause the COVID-19 pandemic to turn into an incredible disaster for global and individual health.” Here is an essential element of his thinking.  Pretty much everything being done in the pandemic doesn't guarantee elimination of the virus.  What is happening is selective viral ‘immune escape' where viruses continue to be shed from those who are infected [both vaccinated and nonvaccinated] because neutralizing antibodies fail to prevent replication and elimination of the virus. The evolutionary selection pressure on the virus through ‘immune escape,' creates ever more virulent strains of the virus that have a competitive advantage over other variants and will increasingly have the potential to break through the antibody defenses.  Defenses provided by the vaccine induced immune system.  This is ‘vaccine resistance.'  What happens is that vaccine makers keep trying to outsmart variants, but fail.  So, they keep pushing boosters and yearly vaccine shots.  This is the more is better approach.  This is aided by suppression of many negative facts about the vaccines by big media. A frightening forecast by Bossche is that the worst of the pandemic is still to come.  Hard to believe considering all the bad news propaganda about cases, hospitalizations and deaths.  But he thinks we are now experiencing the calm before the ultimate storm.  Imagine a new wave of infection far worse than anything we've seen so far is how Bossche thinks. How does this happen?  There will be more mutants or variants to which the adaptive immune system from vaccine shots provides little resistance.  At the same time there will be decreased innate or natural immune effectiveness.  Unless people take a number of steps to boost their natural immunity. Bossche consistently points to a lack of evidence that the existing global, mass vaccination program that has been mounted while there is still significant infection around, is unprecedented and there is no scientific evidence that this will work.  This is why he is largely ignored. He stresses that historic vaccination programs have always emphasized the importance of vaccinating populations prophylactically in the absence of infection pressure. He also argues that if different types of vaccine were used that provided sterilizing immunity i.e., that prevented immune escape and killed all viruses in those vaccinated, the situation would be entirely different.  Most people do not understand that the current experimental vaccines do not actually kill the virus; and that both the vaccinated and nonvaccinated shed the virus.  These vaccines do not stop viral transmission.  And all the contagion control measures simply to not work effectively enough to stop wide spread of the virus in its various forms. Here is his big picture view: “There is only one single thing at stake right now and that is the survival of our human race, frankly speaking.” But there are more strong words recently said by Bossche to pay attention to: “every person out there who is ‘partially' or ‘fully' vaccinated is a walking disease incubation system that puts everyone else at risk of contracting a deadly, vaccine-caused ‘variant' that could kill them.  The ‘vaccinated' are walking murderers spreading disease to others.  Getting injected for the Fauci Flu is not only foolish; it is also a form of murder in that unvaccinated people are now at risk of contracting the deadly diseases being manufactured inside the bodies of the vaccinated.  If Trump had never introduced the vaccine in the first place, the pandemic would have long ago fizzled out.  Since his vaccines continue to be pushed … however, the ‘Delta' variant is spreading like wildfire, soon to be followed by other ‘variants' as we enter the fall season.” This too is a very strong view.  The “mass vaccination program is…unable to generate herd immunity.”  If true, there is little hope of seeing the COVID pandemic ending. What is the solution?  Bossche has identified the needed alternative to the current massive vaccine effort.  It is this; “This first critical step can only be achieved by calling an immediate halt to the mass vaccination program and replacing it by widespread use of antiviral chemoprophylactics while dedicating massive public health resources to scaling early multidrug treatments of Covid-19 disease.”  This is referring to the early home/outpatient treatment protocols based on cheap, safe and fully approved generics like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine; these also work as preventatives.  Pandemic Blunder provides much data and advice on using this treatment approach.  So, both virologists support use of what Fauci has blocked. These action recommendations were also made by Bossche “Provide – at no cost – early multidrug treatment to all patients in need.  Roll out campaigns to promote healthy diets and lifestyle.”  In other words, people need to take actions to boost their natural immunity, this should include vitamins and supplements, including this cocktail: vitamin C, vitamin D, zine and quercetin. Conclusions Take a moment to consider that Patrick Wood on the Bannon show on August 21 concluded that all the available data from the US and Europe shows some 100,000 people have died from the COVID experimental vaccines.  I agree with that assessment.  And by the time you read this FDA may have given full approval to the Pfizer vaccine. After considering what these two experts have said it is appropriate to criticize what current government officials say, namely blame the unvaccinated for the surges in COVID cases, hospitalizations and deaths.  The major alternative to this thinking is that it is the vaccinated people who are creating pandemic problems, including the variants.  The strong conclusion is that the current vaccines are ineffective, nonprotective and dangerous. What is needed is an entirely new approach to COVID vaccines. Perhaps there are companies working on this.  This would threaten the trillion-dollar business of the current vaccine makers. If the people, agencies and institutions with all the power listening to these two very smart people they would devote all their energies to using alternatives to the current vaccines.  We have them.  Notably, the treatment protocols that so many great doctors have created and used to help their patients. Many other physicians and medical researchers have called for a halt to the current vaccine bonanza for big drug companies.  In the meantime, on a daily basis for all those willing to look at the facts, it is clearer and clearer that the experimental vaccines are not effective.  It is insanity to keep doing or expanding what is not working.  That is the insane world we are now experiencing even as more and people die from breakthrough infections, blood problems and other bad vaccine health impacts. Perhaps the ugly truth about the vaccines will be widely revealed only when there are massive, widespread deaths despite all the shots and jabs.  That will be too late to change pandemic management from money-driven stupidity to life-saving, medically moral actions. * Dr. Joel S. Hirschhorn, author of Pandemic Blunder and many articles on the pandemic, worked on health issues for decades.  As a full professor at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, he directed a medical research program between the colleges of engineering and medicine.  As a senior official at the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment and the National Governors Association, he directed major studies on health-related subjects; he testified at over 50 U.S. Senate and House hearings and authored hundreds of articles and op-ed articles in major newspapers.  He has served as an executive volunteer at a major hospital for more than 10 years.  He is a member of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons and America's Frontline Doctors and has been a long-time contributor to the sites of Kettle Moraine.

In this episode we first plug the upcoming Skeptics in the Pub Online about 9/11, Luc Montagnier is the topic This Week in Skepticism and the Pope gets poked for nepotism and corruption. Then we dig into the news: - Grandma directed healthcare fraud through Black Magic - Sixth IPCC report on climate change – we're screwed - July warmest month on record – ever - Increasing covid cases in Iceland despite high vaccination rates - Covid test scams - Society of Homeopaths withdraws from the Accredited Registers programme of the Professional Standards Authority The recent Swedish Tantra Festival was a Really Wrong idea! Enjoy! Segments: Intro; Greetings; This Week In Skepticism; Pontus Pokes The Pope; News; Really Wrong; Quote And Farewell; Outro; Out-Takes

Como afirma el virólogo Luc Montagnier en un video que circula en internet.

This is part 2 of the last episode. Watch the FULL video & get the links to the suppressed papers here: https://www.brighteon.com/43d84665-1d4d-4fa7-867b-457941eeeb7b https://rumble.com/vkf14f-parallels-of-mrna-vax-in-animal-trials-human-trials-and-eua.html https://www.bitchute.com/video/L9PMKRAsjd8C/ Welcome to another episode of Merkaba Chakras. Today, your host, Buddhist author, Von Galt is going to show you the 2002 Pfizer patent of spike proteins, the actual Pfizer animal trial published research papers, the USA clinical trials publication, censored doctors findings with their vaxxed patients in the hospitals, and the UK's public sector contract request for a unusually high volume of blood clot medications for its country. If you're brave enough to actually watch the scientific evidence, then click on any of the links above to watch the full presentation. Cognitive dissonance and tribal identity politics in America is a obstacle to why this censorship and tyranny is allowed to develop. Follow the internet trail of links below: https://patents.google.com/patent/US6372224B1/en https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04368728?term=study+describe+vaccine+candidates+against+covid https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf https://odysee.com/@Jadu200:7/INTERVIEW-OF-DR.-PETER-MCCULLOUGH-ON-MINISTRY-NOW-_-DAYSTAR.TV:7 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351441506_Expert_evaluation_on_adverse_effects_of_the_Pfizer-COVID-19_vaccination https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Herve-Seligmann https://www.clalit.co.il/he/your_health/family/Pages/corona_in_israel.aspx https://covid19.healthdata.org/global?view=cumulative-deaths& https://youtu.be/MA6KVewIFhg https://komonews.com/news/local/first-coronavirus-patient-in-washington-considered-fully-recovered https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871v2 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PlX-itGR1fw https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luc_Montagnier https://odysee.com/@True_World:f/Vaccinated-ppl-will-die---spot-by-Laureate-Nobel-price-Luc-Montagnier---Ockovani-lide-zemrou-podle-Luc-Montagniera:3 https://bidstats.uk/tenders/2021/W29/755302712 https://scholar.google.com/ #Covid19VaccineAdverseReaction --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/merkabachakras/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/merkabachakras/support

Não há nenhuma evidência de que a vacinação contra a covid-19 tenha levado ao surgimento das novas variantes

00:00 - Approaching nutrition in an open anti-authoritarian way 01:30 - What is the problem with authoritarianism in nutrition? 03:09 - How do you approach the subject of nutrition? "In context" suggestions 05:20 - Ray Peat on the silliness of "The Ray Peat Diet" 06:35 - Are most people beyond dietary intervention? The human diet almost always contained thyroid 08:41 - Why don't some people feel comfortable with thyroid? 12:18 - Is the look of obesity due to the accumulation of mucopolysaccharides? 13:25 - "If your thyroid is working efficiently, your pituitary doesn't have much to do and you're not likely to get a pituitary tumor, your adrenals don't have much to do, and your ovaries don't get over stimulated. The other glands have an easy job when your thyroid is working right. If your thyroid gets interfered with, you have to rev up your adrenals and your pituitary becomes commander in chief and tells everyone what to do.” Ray Peat (2017) 15:02 - W.D. Denckla 16:13 - What does Ray think about his video interviews hitting YouTube? 17:26 - Final points on anti-authoritarian nutrition 19:44 - What if someone's orienting reflex is "broken"? 22:51 - Ray's motivation for his new newsletter 25:37 - Potential of human society hasn't been explored, Kropotkin 26:24 - Cilium as a sensing organlle 28:58 - Georgi arrives, critical aspects of Ray's new newsletter 32:26 - Combining consciousness of organisms 34:16 - Cosmic Clocks by Michel Gauquelin, vibration 41:45 - How was remote viewing research applied? 42:43 - Fake alien invasion 43:05 - 'Progesterone is useful for any health problem' 44:57 - 'Hormones are useful in our horrific environment' 46:16 - 'Real society would include our animal friends' 47:39 - 'Is there anything that thyroid does that progesterone doesn't?' 49:57 - Question: Is the source of all knowledge experience? 52:21 - Question: Are some principles worth dying for? Pituitary, death, growth hormone, hypoxia 59:32 - Question: Why was Artistotle a good scientist? 01:01:06 - Question: How does metabolic stress begin? 01:02:31 - Question: How does Ray organize his research? 01:06:53 - Question: Can Ray go over his week of eating? 01:09:23 - Question: How does our metabolism affect our thoughts and feelings? 01:13:13 - Question: Why are some people so submissive to authority? 01:13:54 - Question: Ray's thoughts on Chernobyl reactivating 01:15:29 - Question: How to reduce body hair? 01:17:35 - Question: Is there a way to remineralize teeth and heal cavities? 01:21:35 - Unz article about germ warfare, ACE2, China, Luc Montagnier, exosomes, mRNA vaccines, variants 01:35:11 - Ray's thoughts on Israel and Palestine, Netanyahu 01:39:15 - Bill Gates being thrown under the bus 01:41:47 - Danny thinks the real olive oil on the carrot or mushrooms is a revelation 01:42:46 - Orange peel wax

In this episode of The Silent War:Facebook busted censoring Vax truth and horror stories, terrible side effects and death. A world leading virologist says that All vaccinated people will die within 2 years. Nobel laureate Luc Montagnier has confirmed that there is no chance of survival for people who have received any form of the vaccine. In the shocking interview, the world’s leading virologist stated bluntly: “There is no hope and no possible treatment for those who have already been vaccinated. We must be prepared to cremate the bodies.” The scientific genius backed up the claims of other eminent virologists after studying the ingredients of the vaccine. “They will all die from antibody-dependent enhancement. That is all that can be said.”Also, Corrupt New York Democrats are planning to arrest President Trump!And much more.Sharing is caring.Click here for the best way to keep up with the news and other updates in the face of the censorship:  www.NemosNewsNetwork.com/NewsNOTE: any action by youtube.com (or other media or internet firms) to negatively impact the production of this video will be interpreted as a violation of 18 USC 242 and 42 USC 1983, 84, 85, and we reserve the right to file civil and criminal legal action against youtube.com and its affiliates for attempting to suppress this "free speech"; and will also be construed as "conspiracy to aide the crimes listed herein".If you found this content to be of value, please consider supporting my work with any of the options below! - Single AND Recurring Donation Options 

Een tweet van Talkradio over Brother Watch bespreekt de nieuwe NHS-app in de UK. Wat gebeurt daar? Samen met Frans praat ik over de wet Testbewijzen, het verlengen van de noodwet en het paspoort. Waarom maken jongeren zich daar niet druk over? Zoek ook even op YouTube een recent filmpje van Luc Montagnier. Dat gaat over de komende tijd en zijn verwachtingen. Alles in een model passend legt Frans uit wat er gebeurt. Onteigening van zekerheden, autonoom denken, autonoom besluiten en eigen keuzes maken, ook van zelfbeschikking en huis en haard, ja zelfs van de culturele identiteit.

Today on TRUNEWS, host Edward Szall provides the latest in the global response to the COVID plandemic, including bribing kids with free ice cream if they take the vaccine. The team also looks at a recent interview w Nobel Prize winner AIDS pioneer Luc Montagnier, who passionately argues that the RNA vaccine is creating mutant variants meant to produce extreme symptoms and death. Edward Szall, Doc Burkhart. Airdate 5/24/21.

Saatekülalised Rein Munter ja Mai-Liis Napa. Saatejuht Hardo Pajula. Saade veest. "Pandora laeka avas Prantsuse immunoloog Jacques Benveniste (1935—2004), kes tuli 1980-ndatel aastatel välja väitega, et veel on mälu, s.t omadus salvestada teatud ajaks välismõjutuste tagajärjel struktuuris tekkinud muutusi. Täpsemalt väljendudes võib vee mäluks nimetada talle omistatud võimet "mäletada" vees lahustunud aineid isegi pärast lõpmatut lahjendamist," kirjutab TTÜ emeriitprofessor Rein Munter möödunud aastal ajakirjas Akadeemia (nr 11) ilmunud artiklis "Kas vesi võib mäletada?".Benvenistele endale sai laeka kaane kergitamine saatuslikuks. Tema 1988. aastal ajakirjas Nature ilmunud artikkel kutsus esile establishment'i vastulöögi mille tagajärjeks oli see et üks Prantsusmaa tolleaegseid tippimmunolooge kaotas oma labori rahastuse ja reputatsiooni (võib-olla mitte just selles järjekorras). Ortodoksia vasturünnakut juhtis Nature peatoimetaja John Maddox keda mõned aastad varem Benveniste saatust jaganud Rupert Sheldrake on iseloomustanud kui "tulihingelist ateisti ja dogmaatilist materialisti" [1].Ometi ei ole vee mälu teema teadusest vahepeal kuhugi kadunud. Reinu artiklist võib lugeda et viimastel aastatel on sellest ühes või teises vormis rääkinud mitmed väljapaistvad õpetlased sealhulgas Nobeli auhinna laueraadid Kurt Wüthrich Luc Montagnier ja Brian Josephson.Tänane saade ongi pühendatud vee mälule Benveniste afäärile ja kõigele sellele mis Pandora kujundlikus karbis veel peidus võib olla [2].Rein pakkus teise vestluskaaslasena välja oma tütre Mai-Liis Napa kes on eesti keelde tõlkinud üle 20 raamatu kaasa arvatud Jaapani kirjamehe Masaru Emoto New York Timesi bestselleriks tõusnud raamatu "Vee sõnumid" [3].Ootan seda vestlust suure põnevusega. Hardo ———————————— [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aiX9LI7M-Zs&list=PLhpEK-_b7mfGsQNoc9wM4EEZJyxb8U7cd&index=38 [2] https://charleseisenstein.org/essays/the-waters-of-heterodoxy-g-pollacks-the-fourth-phase-of-water/ [3] https://www.apollo.ee/vee-sonumid.html

Saatekülalised Rein Munter ja Mai-Liis Napa. Saatejuht Hardo Pajula. Saade veest. "Pandora laeka avas Prantsuse immunoloog Jacques Benveniste (1935—2004), kes tuli 1980-ndatel aastatel välja väitega, et veel on mälu, s.t omadus salvestada teatud ajaks välismõjutuste tagajärjel struktuuris tekkinud muutusi. Täpsemalt väljendudes võib vee mäluks nimetada talle omistatud võimet "mäletada" vees lahustunud aineid isegi pärast lõpmatut lahjendamist," kirjutab TTÜ emeriitprofessor Rein Munter möödunud aastal ajakirjas Akadeemia (nr 11) ilmunud artiklis "Kas vesi võib mäletada?".Benvenistele endale sai laeka kaane kergitamine saatuslikuks. Tema 1988. aastal ajakirjas Nature ilmunud artikkel kutsus esile establishment'i vastulöögi mille tagajärjeks oli see et üks Prantsusmaa tolleaegseid tippimmunolooge kaotas oma labori rahastuse ja reputatsiooni (võib-olla mitte just selles järjekorras). Ortodoksia vasturünnakut juhtis Nature peatoimetaja John Maddox keda mõned aastad varem Benveniste saatust jaganud Rupert Sheldrake on iseloomustanud kui "tulihingelist ateisti ja dogmaatilist materialisti" [1].Ometi ei ole vee mälu teema teadusest vahepeal kuhugi kadunud. Reinu artiklist võib lugeda et viimastel aastatel on sellest ühes või teises vormis rääkinud mitmed väljapaistvad õpetlased sealhulgas Nobeli auhinna laueraadid Kurt Wüthrich Luc Montagnier ja Brian Josephson.Tänane saade ongi pühendatud vee mälule Benveniste afäärile ja kõigele sellele mis Pandora kujundlikus karbis veel peidus võib olla [2].Rein pakkus teise vestluskaaslasena välja oma tütre Mai-Liis Napa kes on eesti keelde tõlkinud üle 20 raamatu kaasa arvatud Jaapani kirjamehe Masaru Emoto New York Timesi bestselleriks tõusnud raamatu "Vee sõnumid" [3].Ootan seda vestlust suure põnevusega. Hardo ———————————— [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aiX9LI7M-Zs&list=PLhpEK-_b7mfGsQNoc9wM4EEZJyxb8U7cd&index=38 [2] https://charleseisenstein.org/essays/the-waters-of-heterodoxy-g-pollacks-the-fourth-phase-of-water/ [3] https://www.apollo.ee/vee-sonumid.html

"Pandora laeka avas Prantsuse immunoloog Jacques Benveniste (1935—2004), kes tuli 1980-ndatel aastatel välja väitega, et veel on mälu, s.t omadus salvestada teatud ajaks välismõjutuste tagajärjel struktuuris tekkinud muutusi. Täpsemalt väljendudes võib vee mäluks nimetada talle omistatud võimet "mäletada" vees lahustunud aineid isegi pärast lõpmatut lahjendamist," kirjutab TTÜ emeriitprofessor Rein Munter möödunud aastal ajakirjas Akadeemia (nr 11) ilmunud artiklis "Kas vesi võib mäletada?".Benvenistele endale sai laeka kaane kergitamine saatuslikuks. Tema 1988. aastal ajakirjas Nature ilmunud artikkel kutsus esile establishment'i vastulöögi, mille tagajärjeks oli see, et üks Prantsusmaa tolleaegseid tippimmunolooge kaotas oma labori, rahastuse ja reputatsiooni (võib-olla mitte just selles järjekorras). Ortodoksia vasturünnakut juhtis Nature peatoimetaja John Maddox, keda mõned aastad varem Benveniste saatust jaganud Rupert Sheldrake on iseloomustanud kui "tulihingelist ateisti ja dogmaatilist materialisti" [1].Ometi ei ole vee mälu teema teadusest vahepeal kuhugi kadunud. Reinu artiklist võib lugeda, et viimastel aastatel on sellest ühes või teises vormis rääkinud mitmed väljapaistvad õpetlased, sealhulgas Nobeli auhinna laueraadid Kurt Wüthrich, Luc Montagnier ja Brian Josephson.Tänane saade ongi pühendatud vee mälule, Benveniste afäärile ja kõigele sellele, mis Pandora kujundlikus karbis veel peidus võib olla [2].Rein pakkus teise vestluskaaslasena välja oma tütre Mai-Liis Napa, kes on eesti keelde tõlkinud üle 20 raamatu, kaasa arvatud Jaapani kirjamehe Masaru Emoto New York Timesi bestselleriks tõusnud raamatu "Vee sõnumid" [3].Ootan seda vestlust suure põnevusega.Hardo————————————[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aiX9LI7M-Zs&list=PLhpEK-_b7mfGsQNoc9wM4EEZJyxb8U7cd&index=38[2] https://charleseisenstein.org/essays/the-waters-of-heterodoxy-g-pollacks-the-fourth-phase-of-water/[3] https://www.apollo.ee/vee-sonumid.html See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

00:00 - Skip setup music 00:51 - Where is the most critical place to start the conversation? 02:35 - Are people dying the mRNA or the polyethylene glycol lipid? 07:22 - Pfizer vaccine, HIV, Luc Montagnier, Peter Duesberg 04:27 - PCR test cycles, creating evidence for an "epidemic" 07:30 - People as "public health threats," COVID camps, censorship, domestic terrorist 09:06 - Trump's legacy, QAnon as a psychological operation to identify dissenters and eventually turn them into patsies for "domestic terrorism" 12:36 - Rothschilds, Rockefellers, WASPS, Zionists, Kabbalah, Jesuits, Numerology, Noam Chomsky, Language 20:03 - Rothschilds, Talmud, Kabbalah 21:27 - What was the relationship between the Rothschilds and Rockefellers? 23:20 - What is essentialism? 25:33 - Where do Bill Gates and other elites live if they're spending so much toxifying the environment? 29:54 - Why does capitalism lead to war and destruction? 34:54 - Ray's thoughts on surviving the great reset, foods to stock 38:36 - Nutrition labels can't be trusted 41:55 - Question: How to stop the aging process? 51:35 - Question: Ray's views on the history of philosophy? Immanuel Kant 59:20 - Question: How to shift vellus hairs to terminal? DHEA, estrogen, cortisol, prolactin, aldosterone, frontal fibrosing alopecia, PTH 01:11:06 - Why is there so much focus on estradiol? 01:08:06 - Question: How to stop Crohn's disease flair-ups? Estrogen, redox balance, vitamin D 01:17:27 - Is vitamin D an anti-estrogen? 01:21:32 - Question: How to approach a stubborn endotoxin problems? Biosporin, florassist, megasporebiotic, antisceptic fibers, erythromycin, penicillin VK, tetracycline, charcoal 01:28:35 - Send $28 to raypeatsnewsletter@gmail.com for a digital subscription to Ray's Newsletter or to purchase his books 01:29:05 - What is Ray working on right now? 01:33:15 - What's mainly responsible for the hardening of the cell? 01:35:17 - Question: Are there benefits from activating the vagus nerve? 01:37:31 - Question: What would happen if the earth released more CO2? 01:41:23 - Question: Who's behind the UFO agenda? 01:45:19 - Question: Does MDMA increase serotonin? What does Ray think of Chinese medicine? 01:49:49 - Question: Can Ray expand on the feeling of euphoria and how not experiencing it represents the degenerative effects of aging and stress? 01:54:50 - Carbon dioxide, euphoria, how exactly Ray uses carbon dioxide

Danny Sheehan is one of our nation’s most important and influential Constitutional and public interest lawyers.  During the past 45 years he has handled such public interest cases as the Pentagon Papers, the Watergate Break In, Iran Contra and the Silkwood murder case.  He has represented victims of he Three Mile Island nuclear disaster and fought against the American Nazi Party on hate crimes. He has been a lead attorney on behalf of the Native nations at Standing Rock and handling the dismissal of a federal case against Chase Iron Eyes for inciting a riot and felony trespassing. Danny is the founder of the Romero Institute, a nonprofit public policy center in Santa Cruz California. And more recently he founded the New Paradigm Institute which explores new pathways to world peace. He holds a law degree and divinity degrees from Harvard University.  Danny is the author of “The People’s Advocate: The Life and Legal History of America’s Most Fearless Public Defence Lawyer,”   And his websites are DanielPSheehan.com   AND   RomeroInstitute.org   Mary Holland is the General Counsel and Vice Chair of the Board for the Children's Health Defense, founded by Bobby Kennedy Jr, and a former law scholar at a New York area law school specializing in international human rights, public law and vaccine safety law and injury compensation. She also has a son who regressed into autism following the MMR vaccine. Mary holds a degree in Russian studies from Harvard, and graduate degrees in international relations and a JD from Columbia University. She also co-founded two non-profits: the Elizabeth Birt CEnter for Autism Law and Advocacy and the Center for Personal Rights. Mary is the co-author of “Vaccine Epidemic" about corporate greed and bad science behind the vaccine industry.  And her most recent book is "The HPV Vaccine Trial: Seeking Justice for A Generation Betrayed" -- the most concise book behind the history and adverse effects of HPV vaccines such as Gardasil, with a preface by the Nobel Prize Winner in medicine Dr. Luc Montagnier.  The website for the Childrens Health Defense is ChildrensHealthDefense.org

Mary Holland is the General Counsel and Vice Chair of the Board for the Children's Health Defense, founded by Bobby Kennedy Jr, and a former law scholar at a New York area law school specializing in international human rights, public law and vaccine safety law and injury compensation. She also has a son who regressed into autism following the MMR vaccine. Mary holds a degree in Russian studies from Harvard, and graduate degrees in international relations and a JD from Columbia University. She also co-founded two non-profits: the Elizabeth Birt CEnter for Autism Law and Advocacy and the Center for Personal Rights. Mary is the co-author of “Vaccine Epidemic" about corporate greed and bad science behind the vaccine industry.  And her most recent book is "The HPV Vaccine Trial: Seeking Justice for A Generation Betrayed" -- the most concise book behind the history and adverse effects of HPV vaccines such as Gardasil, with a preface by the Nobel Prize Winner in medicine Dr. Luc Montagnier.  The website for the Childrens Health Defense is ChildrensHealthDefense.org

Dr. Weiping Yu is back with another segment of Science and U. The physicist offers his insights on LHCb's discovery of a new class of particles. If every elementary particle has already been discovered, why are we still trying to discover new particles? Dr. Yu asks. How many types of particles are there? Plus, what does Dr. Yu think about Luc Montagnier's idea of DNA teleportation? Jeff Deist calls in to comment on the news surrounding the pandemic and the constant shifting in the opinions of health experts. The president of the Mises Institute also comments on the news that 32% of American households missed their July housing payments. Why are people largely indifferent to economic tampering that's been going on? Is there a false sense of security? Listen to the full episode for exciting conversations on science, politics, economics, and more. Follow Jeff Deist on Twitter @jeffdeist Email A Neighbor's Choice with a guest suggestion, story tip or question at hello@aneighborschoice.com Find David Gornoski on YouTube Visit the A Neighbor's Choice website at aneighborschoice.com

Marco Pizzuti"Dossier 5G"Inchiesta non autorizzata sulla rivoluzione tecnologica destinata a cambiare la nostra esistenzaMondadori Editorehttps://www.librimondadori.it/La nuova connessione di telefonia mobile, chiamata 5G in quanto giunta alla sua quinta generazione, correrà a velocità impensabili solo fino a qualche anno fa e soprattutto stabilirà una stretta relazione fra gli oggetti “smart” e l'intelligenza artificiale, facendoci compiere il salto evolutivo nella nuova era dell'”Internet delle cose”.Saremo sicuramente più assistiti, ma anche più controllati; saremo più profilati, ma anche più bombardati da raffinate strategie di marketing; verremo catapultati in un ecosistema artificiale quasi totalmente interattivo e le nostre informazioni più intime saranno sempre e immediatamente note a tutti coloro che vi avranno accesso. Il 5G in buona sostanza è la tecnologia che può garantire il controllo individuale e collettivo sull'intera popolazione, trasformandosi nella versione contemporanea del Grande Fratello di George Orwell.La rivoluzione tecnologica porta con sé anche altri dilemmi che riguardano la nostra salute: da una parte il 5G permetterà, per esempio, di farci operare in remoto senza far spostare fisicamente il chirurgo; dall'altra molti scienziati denunciano la trasmissione delle onde del 5G come un grave pericolo per il nostro organismo e l'intero ecosistema. E a questo proposito il premio Nobel per la medicina Luc Montagnier ha persino avanzato il sospetto che l'epidemia di Coronavirus sia esplosa a Wuhan proprio perché si tratta della “smart city” 5G per eccellenza, con oltre 60.000 antenne a onde millimetriche già attive: secondo la sua controversa tesi, l'esposizione al 5G può avere indebolito le difese immunitarie della popolazione rendendo più gravi gli effetti patogeni del virus.Dossier 5G affronta anche le questioni di sicurezza e di carattere militare: come fa uno Stato ad assicurarsi che i big data generati dal 5G dei suoi cittadini non finiscano in mano a potenze straniere o, peggio ancora, a formazioni di stampo terroristico?In questo eccezionale libro inchiesta Marco Pizzuti fa il punto della situazione su ciò che sappiamo per certo riguardo alla rivoluzione tecnologica in arrivo, rivelandoci come un progresso promettente e “scintillante” possa nascondere anche degli aspetti inquietanti.Marco Pizzuti (Roma, 1971) è un autore bestseller specializzato in controinformazione. I suoi libri hanno venduto più di 200.000 copie solo in Italia e sono stati pubblicati in 19 paesi del mondo. Con Mondadori ha pubblicato Biografia non autorizzata della Seconda guerra mondiale.IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEascoltare fa pensarehttps://ilpostodelleparole.it/

00:05:21 - Skip setup music 00:06:27 - Ray's thoughts on Luc Montagnier, AIDS, HIV, Duesberg 00:10:59 - Electromagnetic waves, water structure, Schumann resonance, sickness 00:19:38 - The "TSA-ification" of daily life 00:23:11 - Ray's experience with racism 00:26:45 - Are the protests achieving anything? 00:29:47 - Stoking racial tension to divert away from class warfare 00:34:11 - Will forcing people into destitution cause an uprising? 00:38:07 - Is there a biological imperative to be racist? 00:39:49 - Is the purpose of coronavirus to streamline the empire to compete with China? 00:44:57 - Are things collapsing despite the elite? 00:48:09 - "Every corner we've turned in the field of global health, we've found that the Rockefellers were already there and had been there for years. When we committed to childhood immunization we found ourselves building on efforts the Rockefeller Foundation had helped launch and fund in the 1980s... And we learned that such goals are not prizes claimed by the short-winded. The Rockefellers stay with tough problems for generations." William H. Gates. Showing Up for Life (pp. 158-159) 00:49:57 - The elite, occultism, satanism, quantized reality, randomness 00:55:53 - Turning a person into a machine 00:58:08 - William Blake and language 01:03:37 - Serotonin, LSD, hallucinations, visual perception 01:11:24 - Overdosing on LSD, distortion of perception, consciousness 01:14:21 - Metabolism and bodily feelings 01:18:51 - Rupert Sheldrake, Horace Dudley, resonance, neutrino sea 01:23:54 - A 'real society' would include animals 01:28:50 - 'PUFA is harmful right from the start' 01:31:52 - Is it difficult to exchange PUFA for SFA in the tissues? 01:34:07 - Vitamin E, PUFA, 98% of science is fraudulent 01:37:07 - NAD+/NADH, the ketone body ratio, fasting, carnivore, ketosis, low-carb 01:40:38 - The benefits of ketosis? 01:41:18 - Calcium, phosphorous, parathyroid hormone, meal-timing, angiotensin, aldosterone 01:42:56 - Is supplemental vitamin D harmful? 01:46:09 - "Cortisol is made from progesterone, but increasing the supply of progesterone reliably lowers cortisol synthesis, acting on the brain, pituitary, and adrenal glands." Ray Peat 01:47:08 - Do progesterone and DHEA always need to be used in a specific ratio? 01:52:55 - How to get rid of lipofuscin? 01:55:47 - What does Ray think of the steroidal aromatase inhibitors? 01:57:30 - What is Ray working on?

How Huxley’s X-Club Created Nature Magazine and Sabotaged Science for 150 Years Amidst the storm of controversy raised by the lab-origin theory of COVID-19 extolled by such figures as Nobel prize winning virologist Luc Montagnier, researcher Judy Mikowits, bioweapons expert Francis Boyle, Sri Lankan Cardinal Malcolm Ranjith and the head of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard, an elaborate project was undertaken under the nominal helm of NATURE Magazine in order to refute the claim once and for all under the report ‘The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2’. This project was led by a team of evolutionary virologists using a line of reasoning that “random mutation can account for anything” and was parroted loudly and repeatedly by Fauci, WHO officials and Bill Gates in order to shut down all uncomfortable discussion of the possible laboratory origins of COVID-19 while also pushing for a global vaccine campaign. On April 18, Dr. Fauci (whose close ties with Bill Gates, and Big Pharma have much to do with his control of hundreds of billions of dollars of research money), stated: “There was a study recently that we can make available to you, where a group of highly qualified evolutionary virologists looked at the sequences there and the sequences in bats as they evolve. And the mutations that it took to get to the point where it is now is totally consistent with a jump of a species from an animal to a human.” I think at this moment, rife as it is with speculative arguments, confusion and under-defined data, it is useful to remove oneself from the present and look for higher reference points from which we can re-evaluate events now unfolding on the world stage. In order to do this, let us begin by asking a new series of questions: What is Nature Magazine exactly? Is it truly an “objective” platform for pure scientific research untainted by the filth of political agendas? Is this standard-bearer of “proper method”, which can make or break the career of any scientist, truly the scientific journal it claims to be or is there something darker to be discovered? As I presented a part of this story in my previous instalment in this series The Rise of Optical Biophysics and Clash of the Two Sciences, a very old battle has been waged around political systems but also what sort of scientific paradigms will shape our future. (continue reading) Matthew is a journalist and co-founder of the Rising Tide Foundation and Canadian Patriot Review. He has published scientific articles with 21st Century Science and Technology, and is a regular author on several political/cultural websites including Los Angeles Review of Books: China Channel, Strategic Culture, Off Guardian and The Duran. He has also authored three books from the series the Untold History of Canada.

André Bercoff décrypte l'actualité: Retour à l'école, pour ou contre? avec le Dr Fabienne Kochert, Pédiatre et présidente de l'AFPA (Association Française de Pédiatrie Ambulatoire). Son invité est le Pr Luc Montagnier, Biologiste virologue français, Lauréat du Prix Nobel de physiologie ou médecine de 2008, pour la découverte, en 1983, du virus de l'immunodéficience humaine (VIH). Retour sur l'origine du virus COVID-19.

Ngày 16/4 vừa qua, tờ Gilmore Health đưa tin, khác với luận điểm đang được thúc đẩy bởi giới khoa học dòng chính rằng COVID-19 là một biến thể tự nhiên của virus corona được truyền từ động vật sang người, giáo sư Luc Montagnier, người từng nhận giải Nobel Y học vì tìm ra virus HIV (cùng 2 nhà khoa học khác) vào năm 2008, đã nói rằng COVID-19 đến từ phòng thí nghiệm.Xem bài viết tại: https://trithucvn.net/the-gioi/nha-khoa-hoc-nhan-giai-nobel-vi-tim-ra-hiv-covid-19-den-tu-phong-thi-nghiem.html

This week Deborah Hyde joins us to bring you news and interesting topics to cover with us. We start by mentioning how VoF (Sweden), the GWUP (Germany), ComCept (Portugal) and ARP-SAPC (Spain) make efforts to provide their readers with accurate and reliable information in the times of COVID-19. Then Deborah gives us a brief overview of the history of quarantines, before we turn into discussing Cardinal Pell's Right-Wing conspiracy coockoo and the Pope being useless. A separate segment of COVID-19 update is followed by the news that include a UK holistic doctor recommending homeopathy against the novel coronavirus, a somewhat questionable study that claims to show the prevalence of TCM in different countries in the fight against the pandemic, how the Spanish Science Network Programme 2020 goes completely online, Danish researchers finding no benefit from treating asthma patients with homeopathy and reflexology alongside conventional treatments, how Facebook aims to warn users about coronavirus hoaxes, Swedish doctors and scientists selling stuff after preliminary results and naming it 'Anoroc', John Ioannidis comparing 100 best selling books on nutritional health with no surprising results, Natalie Grams going back to practiting medicine and doing less of educational work in the future, the Spanish prize offered for theatrical works criticising pseudotherapies and CICAP Live being launched on YouTube bringing Italian audiences a whole lot of science and critical thinking. Nobel laureate Luc Montagnier gets this week's Really Wrong prize for claiming that SARS-CoV-2 was manufactured from HIV and thus feeding conspiracy theories. Enjoy!

As of April 20, 220, Global COVID-19 infected cases have risen to 2,529,150 and fatalities reached 174,578. The US had 803,018 cases and 43,558 deaths due to the coronavirus. While Israel had 13,883 and 181 deaths There are disputes as to whether the social distancing mitigation has reached the point where gradual phased releases from confinement may shortly be feasible given the drop in new cases indicating plateauing may have been achieved in the major US infected states and hot spots. Some public health experts say ending confinement may be dependent on continual testing and contact tracing. Then there is the matter of the timeline for development of promising therapies and vaccines and, yet to complete human trials. However, there are conspiracy theories of whether the release of the coronavirus was part of a nefarious plan in a bio-war effort by Chinese virology institutes engaged in studies of SARS-COVID 2 from Bat and other animal studies. Or whether these coronaviruses were man – made as suggested by French Nobel laureate Luc Montagnier or arose naturally and may have been transmitted from animals in the Wuhan ‘wet market’ located near the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). There is the matter of criticism of the World Health Organization leadership to cross-check these occurrences, as well as initially going along with the XI- Chinese government initial reports that nothing was awry. Beyond the Matrix 22APRIL2020 - PODCAST

Luc Montagnier, a French virologist and co-recipient of the 2008 Nobel prize in medicine has publicly declared his belief that COVID-19 not only came from the level IV bio containment lab in Wuhan China but was also created there. 

247 News Podcast 247 News – 247 News Podcast – Nobel Scientist Dr Luc Montagnier Coronavirus Man Made in China Lab   247News.net The Alternative News Were Everything the Major ...

Après la bombe lâchée par le professeur Montagnier (prix Nobel de médecine)…je devais faire un podcast. Dans ce podcast de 17mn je reviens sur ▪️ la gestion catastrophique de cette crise ▪️ les raisons pour lesquelles ce gouvernement a volontairement géré cette crise de cette manière ▪️ la manière dont les médias utilisent les personnages comme le Pr Luc Montagnier ▪️ les propos du Pr Luc Montagnier ▪️ tout le bruit médiatique que va créer ces propos pour focaliser notre énergie ▪️ l'information choc qui nous fait avancer dans leur grand plan ▪️ une partie de leur grand plan

https://youtu.be/P0ZkaqWRE10   AIDS Forgotten Cure  AIDS Forgotten Cure   Why is the American public being told there is no  cure for … when there is?   How a proven cure for AIDS — discovered more than 40 years ago by a young PhD medical researcher – is being denied and suppressed by the medical/pharmaceutical establishment in order to maximize profits   By Stephen Brown February 13, 2020   Today, AIDS is still a major epidemic, killing more than 17,000 Americans every year. So if a proven  cure really exists (and it does!) why isn’t it big news? Why are the pharmaceutical industry, the American Medical Association, the federal government, and mainstream media all conspiring to deny that such a cure exists?   A cynical person might say it is because treating AIDS patients (i.e., mitigating their symptoms, but not curing the disease itself)  is very profitable, whereas curing patients so they no longer need treatment, is not profitable – because it eliminates a huge revenue stream.  How huge is  that revenue stream?  At an average yearly cost of $39,000 per patient for drugs, treating the 1.2 million Americans who currently suffer from AIDS adds up to $40 billion a year for the pharmaceutical industry. And that doesn’t even include doctor fees and hospital costs, which could double that amount.   So perhaps it is not surprising that those who profit from treating AIDS would not welcome a cure that might deplete their bank accounts by as much as $80 billion a year. Which is why 17,000 Americans will be dead within the next 12 months, even though  many could be  totally cured – and 100% HIV-free —  paying $39,000 a year for AIDS drugs. And without risking the life-threatening reactions that  those dangerous antiviral drug treatments can impose on AIDS sufferers.   Who is the man who discovered a cure for AIDS – and what happened when he brought his cure to the attention of the medical profession?   The story of a young medical researcher, a PhD graduate named Gary Null, who discovered the cure for AIDS more than 40 years ago – only to see his life-saving discovery denied and suppressed by the medical and pharmaceutical establishment — is a shameful episode in medical history, which has resulted in needless agony and death for more than 675,000 Americans who did not have to die.   Isn’t it finally time to rescue America’s more than one million AIDS sufferers from the threat of slow and painful debilitation and death that they must confront each and every day of their lives.?   How AIDS exploded into an epidemic that killed 675,000 Americans who did not have to die   During the end of the 1970’s, when the Center for Disease Control reported that San Francisco resident Ken Horne was identified as the first confirmed patient with AIDS, large numbers in  the Gay community were already exhibiting symptoms that would later be attributed to AIDS and an HIV infection. During the early and mid-1970s, hard partying with recreational drugs and unprotected sex became a way of nightly entertainment for a very small segment of the gay communityas well as a small percentage of the heterosexual community known as “swingers”. This stressful lifestyle became known as fast-tracking, and was accompanied by  a precipitous rise in serious immune-compromised illnesses.  Gay men would consume large quantities of alcohol, experiment with a wide variety of drugs, including the over-the-counter  ampules of amyl nitrite (popularly known as “poppers”) and  might have sex with multiple partners in a single night. These sessions  could  last into the wee hours of the morning, and many men were seriously sleep-deprived and malnourished. Following a day’s work at a job, this nightly routine would then start over again.   It was among this segment of the population, whose immune systems had been compromised by continuous drug-and alcohol abuse, sleep-deprivation and debilitating lifestyle choices, that HIV infection was able to spread and progress to AIDS through multiple sex partners. And as thousands began to die from this mysterious epidemic, the panic spread – because there was no known treatment or cure.   Then, one day, people began telling each other about a remarkable clinic on Manhattan’s Upper West Side … where AIDS patients were not dying!   Between 1988 and 1995, a small, yet nevertheless remarkable project was underway at the Tri-State Healing Center on Manhattan’s upper West Side to treat HIV-positive and AIDS patients. AZT had recently been launched and overnight became the first line of defense and treatment for AIDS.  At the same time, horrid images of dying patients and large public gatherings to honor the dead were appearing over television screens.  As one of the tri-state area’s most listened-to radio broadcasters and experts on  emerging alternative medical therapies, Dr. Gary Null, with a PhD in nutritional health, had over the years developed a large network of relationships with physicians and health practitioners who regularly listened to his program. Before mass public fear over AIDS took hold of the nation, Null had already become deeply aware of the unusual symptoms  afflicting a growing number of gay men and “swinging” men and women who were seeking private physicians for medical attention and treatment.   One of the more common symptoms was  a life-threatening,  opportunistic lung infection called pneumocystis carinii pneumonia or PCP that was attributed to individuals with weakened immune symptoms. PCP is extremely rare for people with normal immune functioning. The illness is usually associated with patients on chemotherapy or other drugs known to depress immune function, as well as dangerous street drugs such as crack cocaine, which started to appear on the streets of Los Angeles, Miami and New York in 1981. Often the illness appears in children undergoing cancer treatment for leukemia. Therefore, when PCP was being reported among otherwise healthy adults, a red flag was raised that something was awry.   During the late 1980s and early 1990s – the worst years of the AIDS epidemic, the highest rate of deaths — Dr. Null treated 1200 individuals with AIDS defining symptoms through the Tri-State Healing Center that Null had founded on Manhattan’s Upper West Side. As public awareness about the therapeutic value of alternative approaches to health and wellness increased, a growing number of individual doctors and groups within the scientific community were calling attention to the benefits of an integrative approach to AIDS. The alternative AIDS health scene was being born at the Tri-State Center.   Dr. Null’s natural protocols for treating and curing AIDS were and still are in total opposition to the  drug-based HIV treatments that hold dominance today – yet  his successful results cannot be  denied. Regardless of whether the private medical industry and the federal health agencies refuse to recognize a drug-free therapy or not, if such a treatment is shown to produce positive results, it should not be explained away as a placebo effect — or worse, stigmatized  as pseudoscience and quackery. Yet opposition and disdain from the medical and pharmaceutical establishment were the responses  to Null and other physicians who deployed  alternative therapies to treat early AIDS patients.   Certainly, the AIDS epidemic in the 1980s and 1990s launched an enormous scientific research and discovery effort to identify how the body’s immune system operates when challenged by a serious and largely unknown viral infection. As a result, today we have a far greater understanding about the immune system.  Unfortunately, the pharmaceutical approach to treating viral infections, notably HIV, has been single-minded and has adhered to a one-size-fits-all course of treatment. In the case of early HIV antivirals, it was additionally a race as to whether the virus could be defeated before the drug killed the patient.   When the first signs of what would eventually be termed AIDS were appearing in physicians’ offices, patients also frequently had other co-infections aside from weakened immune systems, including hepatitis B, non-A non-B hepatitis (which Dr. Bill Rutter at UCSF would eventually sequence and identify as hepatitis C in the early 1980s), cytomegalovirus, Epstein Barr, coxsackie virus, mycoplasma and yeast infections, herpes, syphilis and gonorrhea. But before the arrival of the first antiretroviral drug AZT in 1987, physicians and health practitioners were forced to prescribe only the treatments in their medical tool boxes. Orthodox doctors were the least successful. Antibiotics, steroids, and other medications were prescribed like candy on top of the culture’s widespread recreational drugs use. It was largely an effort performed in the dark. Were the debilitating conditions of these patients due to a new virulent strain of one of these other infections or was it something altogether new and novel?  Nobody knew for certain before the French Nobel laureate Luc Montagnier at the Institute Pasteur identified a virus that was named lymphadenopathy-associated virus or LAV (later renamed HIV) as the likely causative culprit for AIDS in 1983.   Although heralded as a hero in his discovery of HIV, Luc Montagnier would eventually become a pariah for breaking away from the politically-correct interpretation of HIV infection. He argued that far too much attention was focused on the HIV virus rather than investigating other cofactors such as other viruses, bacteria and especially mycoplasmas that may be amplifying HIV’s adverse effects. After tracking a group of HIV-positive and AIDS-free patients for 10 years, Montagnier stated, “We can no longer say that HIV infection is always a death sentence.” He concluded that a person could be HIV-positive his entire life and not develop AIDS because the virus does not act alone. He also suggested that these mycoplasmas, often smaller than other bacteria and often harmless, may become virulent from the overuse of antibiotics, which create “killer mycoplasmas.”   During an interview for Whole Foods Magazine, Montagnier noted four factors that contribute to HIV’s AIDS-like symptoms when they are pooled together:  the presence of the virus, hyper activation of the body’s T-cell receptor immune response, the presence of other sexually transmitted diseases such as syphilis, gonorrhea and cancroid, and behavioral patterns acting as cofactors that may include poor nutrition, over consumption of alcohol and recreational drugs and physical and emotional stress.  One important cofactor is oxidative stress, which Montagnier observed in “higher free radical production in stage II of HIV infection.   Although Montagnier supported the antiretroviral drug regimen, he also felt antioxidant supplementation was essential. His later research included evaluating complementary natural protocols alongside retroviral drugs, including the use of N-acetyl cysteine, beta carotene, Vitamins C and E, superoxide dismutase (SOD), metallothionein and various plant extracts. He is also on record for emphasizing the enormous role healthy nutrition plays for warding off AIDS-like symptoms while being HIV-positive. When asked by filmmaker Brent Leung in his documentary House of Numbers whether HIV could be treated naturally, Montagnier replied, “I would think so… It’s important knowledge that is completely neglected. People always think of drugs and vaccines.”   Pharmaceutical vs Natural Treatments for HIV/AIDS   Long before Montagnier came around to question the AZT strategy as the only effective treatment, Dr. Null and his colleagues had been utilizing antioxidant therapies, notably intravenous glutathione and Vitamin C, as a primary defense in treating AIDS symptoms.   And their successes were notable despite opposition by “official” medical voices, and the many hostile articles they paid to appear in mainstream media.   Conventional medicine then and now has remained largely in denial over the benefits of treatments that don’t require a pill or scalpel. The only difference between practitioners of natural medical therapies and conventional physicians is that the former make efforts to treat patients by drug-free, non-toxic methods. Practically every drug on the market has its adverse effects, and this was especially true for AZT, which was  one of the most toxic drugs ever developed by the pharmaceutical industry. At the time of its invention, it was observed to be so toxic – so  lethal to humans — that it had to be abandoned and shelved. Dr. Jerome Horowitz who developed the compound would later state “it was a terrible disappointment… we dumped it on the junk pile. I didn’t keep the notebooks.” In fact, it was not even worth patenting.   Wikipedia notes that AZT or azidothymidine is “the most effective and safe medicine needed in a health system.” The World Health Organization lists it as one of the “essential medicines” of our time. But does AZT really deserve this praise?  Based upon the manufacturer’s list of warnings, AZT is anything but safe and its efficacy remains questionable, unless one was to completely redefine the meaning of “safety.” The list of the drug’s adverse effects includes:   Hematologic toxicity to bone marrow reserve Aplastic and hemolytic anemia and neutropenia Rapid reduction of hemoglobin Pancytopenia or reduction in red and white blood cells and platelets Myopathy and myositis with pathological changes Lymphadenopathy, an inflammatory disease of lymph nodes Lactic acidosis and severe hepatomegaly with steatosis (abnormal retention of lipids that affect the liver), including fatal cases Impairment of body’s ability to eliminate triglyceride fat Pancreatitis Increased Creatine Phosphokinase (CPK) that can lead to heart attacks Cardiomyopathy Hepatic decompensation — the development of jaundice, ascites, variceal hemorrhage, or hepatic encephalopathy Immune Reconstitution Syndrome – a paradoxical clinical worsening of a known condition or the appearance of a new condition after initiating antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients Rhabdomyolysis – a severe syndrome resulting in the degeneration of muscle fibers that can lead to renal failure and death Stevens-Johnson syndrome – serious skin disorder associated with a drug reaction that has flu-like symptoms and blistering of the skin and requires hospitalization.   Other less life-threatening side effects include asthenia, fevers and headaches, malaise, loss of mental acuity, seizures, anorexia, mascular edema, constipation or diarrhea, coughing, rhinitis and sinusitis, skin rashes, hearing loss, photophobia or an intolerance to light, nausea and vomiting.   The manufacturer admits on its package insert that AZT causes AIDS:   “It was often difficult to distinguish adverse events, possibility associated with the administration of Retrovir [AZT] from underlying signs of HIV disease or intercurrent illnesses.”   AZT was clearly not the only recourse for treatment. Death rates skyrocketed during the years immediately after its release. The British newspaper The Independent reported on the personal experience of a gay Englishman, Michael Cottrell, who was among the first patients to take AZT in 1987. AZT offered hope, albeit largely illusory, with a slight promise that HIV-positive people could live a bit longer. However the drug made Cottrell far worse than before. The newspaper reported,   “Cottrell still has boxes of AZT capsules at home. He gave up on it after several months, because he couldn’t stand how ill he was feeling on the drug; he felt as though his immune system was being damaged rather than strengthened; he believed he had never encountered a drug as toxic as AZT.”   Cottrell’s story is not an isolated event. Numerous patients had been reporting similar experiences. Many couldn’t continue the drug and had to stop taking it. Unfortunately these accounts were almost completely ignored by the medical establishment and especially the pharmaceutical industrial complex which had a colossal revenue opportunity as the epidemic worsened.   Studies were published that challenged the CDC’s and the British health ministry’s commitment to AZT therapy. The British-French Concorde study was perhaps the largest AZT clinical trial ever conducted at that time and enrolled 1,749 patients over a three-year period. Rather than focus on patients displaying serious AIDS symptoms, it included patients testing positive for HIV but who had yet to display symptoms. The participants were roughly divided equally to receive either AZT or a placebo. The results were significant. Among the AZT group there were 169 AIDS-related deaths but only 3 deaths in the placebo group. The AZT group also showed a lot more adverse effects. Although T-cell counts improved among those receiving the drug for a short period time, it eventually reduced CD4 cell counts below levels before starting the regimen. The study concluded that AZT was a waste of time.   Medical journalist Celia Farber later reached out to the chief scientist behind the Concorde trial, Dr. Ian Weller, who expressed his exasperation as follows: “We’ve carried out this study against incredible adversity,” and much of this came from the executives at Burroughs Wellcome, the British pharmaceutical giant that created AZT, and whose anticipated profits from its sale (patients had to pay as much as $8,000 per year for the drug!) were estimated at many billions of dollars. In fact, the day that AZT received approval to treat AIDS, Wellcome PLC stock jumped 32 per cent on the London Stock Exchange.   Much has been written and can still be written about the dismal early failures of retroviral treatment with a drug that had so little scientific support to validate its efficacy and safety. Another problem was that rising death rates being recorded and directly associated with the disease were not being distinguished from AZT toxicity, notably renal and liver failure. It was already known that the drug could produce AIDS-type symptoms. With AZT being overly prescribed, mortality rates leaped from 4,885 in 1988, a year after the drug was being launched, to 14,500 in 1989. Rates continued to climb steadily as new nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor drugs entered the market. The mortality statistics reached their peak in 1995 at over 48,000 deaths in the US alone.   The more important point is that the medical community was both at loggerheads and impatient to find a way to treat the growing number of patients coming down with AIDS-related symptoms. Dr. Null and his colleagues, notably Dr. Stephen Caiazza, a gay New York City physician who had been struggling to treat persons with severe AIDS symptoms since the late 1970s, were employing whatever means they could. During the peak years of mortality in the early and mid-1990s, Dr. Null was treating over 1,200 AIDS patients. As with the conventional drug establishment, alternative physicians’ work was also largely experimental because nobody, even within the federal health agencies or the American Medical Association, had any idea of what they were up against. Therefore the Tri-State Healing Center should be commended for the enormous pioneering efforts it made to treat AIDS patients naturally and often free of charge or at cost.   Not all of the patients coming through the Tri-State Healing Center tested positive for HIV; nevertheless they presented severe AIDS-defining symptoms. Null shared a HIV-AIDS hypothesis held by Dr. Chris Calapai, a New York board certified physician who adopted natural therapies and went on to become a medical consultant for the New York Rangers hockey team. Calapai held the view that HIV triggers “a self-destructive immune response, for which appropriate models may be found in graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), certain autoimmune disorders, and some animal viral infections.”  In other words the HIV virus provoked an immune response to destroy part of the immune system thereby lessening the body’s ability to fight other infections. This view confirms Null’s observations in many of the Center’s patients who had symptoms of full-blown AIDS as well as a long history of other bacterial and viral infections, most being sexually transmitted.   The Center’s protocols included botanical and medicinal herbs, naturopathic remedies, intravenous drips of the antioxidants glutathione and Vitamin C in addition to oral supplementation, oxygen and ozone therapies, detoxification regimens, stress reduction and behavior modification techniques, and most were following a plant-based diet. Unlike the conventional philosophy for treatment at that time, Dr. Null and his colleagues were not simply trying to stage a war against a virus with pharmaceutical drugs; instead their approach was to restore and increase patients’ natural immunity in order to strengthen the body’s own defense mechanisms to fight the infection. Moreover, by 1993, it was already certain, without any reasonable doubt, that the antiretroviral drugs were linked with a long list of serious adverse effects, including severe anemia, acute liver toxicity, renal failure and death. To support the medical efficacy of these natural interventions, the peer-reviewed medical literature was also collated and on-hand during the press gathering for easy reference.   Luanne Penesi was a senior nurse administrator for adult medical units in geriatrics, hematology, neurology and oncology at one of New York’s leading medical hospital centers. She started to visit the Center for her own poor health conditions, which included hepatitis, chronic fatigue, systemic yeast infections and pre-cancerous breast cells. As a Center patient she had many opportunities to witness what was occurring with treatingh AIDS patients. During a radio broadcast, she shared her experience and her personal awakening from the gross failures of the dominant drug-based medical model she had committed herself to throughout her early career.   “After several months I saw people completely serdeconverting and reversing AIDS. In conventional medicine when a person is diagnosed with AIDS or cancer, we want you to be afraid so you will do whatever we say. But these people [at the Center] were all managing their diets, all were on plant-based diets. They were taking herbs to detox their liver, taking immune enhancing herbs, and supplements. And they were all very excited and very optimistic and hopeful. It was a completely different picture for me of people with AIDS. I watched these people’s lab counts improve significantly over time. Then I saw them do bio-oxidative therapy. Viruses cannot live in a high oxygen environment. So when you flood the body with oxygen like bio-oxidative therapy, you are killing off viruses in large proportions. It was a completely new ball game for me. If I had not seen the lab results with my own eyes, I probably would never have believed something like this was possible. And during my time there I saw no less than 8 people completely reverse AIDS. I had never seen this in the medical community in the hospital. Not only did I see people with AIDS serodeconvert, but I also saw people with many viruses — hepatitis, herpes, Epstein Barr, coxsackie virus, mycoplasma. I saw all these people serodeconverting and getting happier and healthier. It was an empowerment model.”   The late Dr. Elena Avram, a former fellow in the AIDS and Cancer department at the Institute of Applied Biology, worked closely with Null at the Center when it was inundated with AIDS cases. Dr. Avram witnessed and reviewed the records of HIV patients who Null serodeconverted to negative. In a letter sent to Dr. Null before her passing in 2019, she reminisced that for the group of patients who turned sero-negative, “all the infections disappeared and they were HIV and AIDS free. I briefly met one of those patients recently and she was still healthy today.”  From Dr. Avram’s experiences in Zimbabwe and observing the results of antiretroviral drugs such AZT on AIDS patients the results made her conclude that “there were a lot of people who first had good results but after that they collapsed. Because not only were [the drugs] not controlling the virus but it was also depleting the last of the immune system that was left in them.” Suffice to say, if such results were reported for retroviral drug treatment, it would have made major headline news.   It would be disingenuous to not note that during the past 34 years since retroviral medications were started for the treatment of AIDS, there have been instances of patients sero-deconverting to HIV-negative. A paper published by Thailand’s Ministry of Public Health, “Serodeconversion of HIV Antibody-Positive AIDS Patients Following Treatment with V-1 Immunitor,” and published in a 2008 issue of the Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechology, reported serodeconversion. Only more recent years were reports of two patients, on with acute HIV infection and one in an early stage, who serodeconverted. Another study involving Chinese herbal preparations revealed serodeconversion of 8 AIDS patients, and the earliest report in the peer-reviewed medical literature involved administration of low dose oral intereron that serodeconverted 18 of 204 patients. However, years before these achievements were made, incidences of serodeconversion were witnessed at the Tri-State Center.   Dr. Avram was fully aware of the controversy such results would bring to the Institute’s future funding. She wrote, “I remember when I met with the director and the Institute board members one evening to request that these successes be made more public. They decided to remain silent because it might jeopardize funding. This work was not based on patentable drugs and the advisory board said it would only draw negative attention because it was contrary to standard drug treatments.” Shortly thereafter, Null was awarded the honor of becoming an Institute Research Fellow, the youngest person to have received the honor.   David is still alive today after having been diagnosed with AIDS in 1988. After treatment at The Center, he converted to sero-negative. Ever since there has been no trace of HIV in his blood exams. In his testimonial, David begins with the hope that “people will listen to my story and start to reject the dominant paradigm which says that the only way to deal with HIV infection is with tons of toxic drugs for the rest of your life.”  Originally he was on the front-line with the AIDS activist organization ACT UP, which was fighting for more funding to research conventional pharmaceutical drugs.   David was a particularly serious case. In addition to being HIV-positive he had histoplasmosis, idiopathic CD4 lymphocytopenia, anemia, Kaposi sarcoma, malabsorption syndrome and co-infections of cytomegalovirus, herpes, Epstein Barr, toxoplasmosis and pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. Seven of his 21 other diagnoses were each potentially fatal. His mother was a regular listener of Dr. Null’s radio broadcasts and convinced her son to go to The Center to begin intravenous Vitamin C drips and ozone therapy. There, Dr. Null created a protocol implemented by the medical staff.  David also became a vegan, started juicing daily, and joined Null’s running and walking club. He later ran in the New York City Marathon.   After his experience at the Center, David noted that in the early days of the AIDS epidemic “everyone who went on the drugs died. They didn’t die from HIV; they didn’t die from AIDS; they died from AZT toxicity.”   The Center’s policy was that anyone from the medical community was welcome to visit and observe the facilities and the treatments offered. Among them was Doug Henderson, an African American attorney and journalist Henderson first visited the Center to receive intravenous Vitamin C treatments for his personal health. He had been visiting a couple times a week to privately investigate the validity of the remarkable claims coming out of the Center. He recalls,   “AIDS back then meant death but not today. Since 1977 I had been listening to Gary Null and he started talking about AIDS in the mid-1980s… He had on his program people whom he said had serodeconverted, meaning they were HIV positive and went negative, or they had full blown AIDS and subsequent blood tests revealed there was no trace of HIV or any of the other 29 co-factors that at that time compromised AIDS. I found that hard to believe… I went to his Center really on a reconnaissance mission. I wanted to find out if what Gary said was really true because there are a lot of hustlers out there. I needed hard proof. Then one man said he had had the HIV virus but didn’t have it any more. I found that a little hard to believe. As time went by 5 or 6 people told me the same thing…. [Later] Gary took me into his office and showed me 5 or 6 medical records and I could see that according to the records they had no trace of HIV in their system… It was remarkable the work they were doing at the Tri State Healing Center.”   The Center also served as a very informal training ground, as it were, for medical physicians to visit and observe for themselves the natural treatments being used and to speak with patients about their experiences. Among them was the late San Francisco Bay physician Dr. Robert Cathcart, an orthopedic instructor at Stanford University and pioneer in orthomolecular medicine. Cathcart adopted Null’s protocol, including high dose intravenous infusions of Vitamin C and the free radical scavenging antioxidant glutathione.  Cathcart later claimed to have never lost an HIV-positive patient with this treatment.   A Natural Cure that Mainstream Media first ignored, then tried to bury   As patients began to make major improvements, one spoke up to explain that in addition to his own progress in combating AIDS naturally, he knew of other individuals who were using more natural and holistic modalities all across the country and that the world was utterly deaf to this. The world only knew the official AIDS treatment: AZT. He and other people being treated at the Center all feared the mainstream treatment because they had seen how their friends and partners had died or become extremely sick using these aggressive drugs. And yet, the natural modalities had been effectively shunned from public discourse on AIDS. So it was at their urging that a comprehensive press conference be held to invite as many journalists from the mainstream and independent media outlets to learn about the remarkable progress to treat individuals who were HIV-positive and/or afflicted with AIDS conditions. Preparation for the conference took almost a year of research, networking, and promotion.   What should have been an historical press conference was announced to the public on three separate occasions. A leading public relations firm was hired to help turn it into a momentous event.  Over 100 AIDS patients convened with their private medical doctors and medical records in New York City. The majority of the physicians were not directly connected with Null’s Tri-State Healing Center. Doctors came from France, Japan and the UK. Among the many patients who were being treated for AIDS conditions with natural protocols, these 100 men were chosen because of the extraordinary results observed over a 12-month period with their blood exam results, viral load, and CD4 and CD8 cell counts.   In each of the hundred cases, the patient showed steady improvement without signs of relapse. Moreover, none were on the conventional AZT drug regimen or other drug cocktails that were being regularly prescribed.  Instead they were being treated with a variety of different non-drug alternative treatment protocols based upon their personal medical histories and lifestyles.   There was a great deal of experimentation taking place at Null’s Center. It can best be thought of as a patient laboratory because there was no single medical protocol that was used for all patients. On the other hand, some treatments were standard for those showing the most severe symptoms and the worst cell counts. This included weekly intravenous infusions of high-dose vitamin C and glutathione. Other essential treatments included radical dietary changes and incorporating stress reduction practices in patients’ daily routine.   To the surprise of Dr. Null, the Center’s AIDS patients and their personal physicians barely a person showed up for the press conference from the 7,000 invitations sent to the press, medical associations, university medical departments, state and city health officials, nonprofit organizations and AIDS groups. The invitations had been sent on three separate occasions because Null and his colleagues, as well as the patients, believed this could mark an historical breakthrough for treating HIV-positive patients. According to Null and other event organizers, it seemed evident that a concerted effort had been made to boycott the presentation in order to marginalize its significance.  And significant it was — not only for giving scientific evidence that AIDS can be treated by natural and non-toxic medical protocols, but also for the important role and respect non-conventional medicine should have in our society.   Unfortunately federal, state and city health officials had already made a firm decision that the only effective strategy to combat the AIDS epidemic was the pharmaceutical route. AZT had already been designated as the treatment of first-line defense. Therefore it was incumbent upon government officials, the National Cancer Institute and the medical establishment to marginalize all competitors offering safer and more effective methods. Oddly President Reagan, who had been mute about the epidemic up until the public announcement of AZT, made his first public speech calling AIDS “public enemy number one.” And the mainstream media was completely on board with perpetuating this fallacy.   As a result, the press conference was largely unattended. The mainstream and even the alternative press were absent. Patients spent the entire afternoon orally presenting their own testimonials, showing their records and having their physicians speak about the remarkable improvements they observed; but the data and results largely remained a secret from the rest of the medical community and public. A panel was created that included then State Senator David Patterson, who would later serve as New York’s governor. Patterson stated there should be other approaches for treating AIDS. Fortunately the testimonials and conversations of the event were recorded and preserved.   This story would be sorely lacking without mentioning a few media personalities, especially within the Black American community, who exhibited journalistic integrity and an open, inquisitive mind that is absolutely critical for accurate, balanced, and unbiased reporting of events, discoveries, and news that have helped shape the nation since its founding. Today’s mainstream media is a ghostly perversion of the entire profession of reliable journalism.   HIV/AIDS and the Black American Experience   What is missing from the historical narrative of the AIDS story is the open-mindedness of Black physicians and community leaders who sought and found alternative treatment outside the toxic drug paradigm of the medical establishment. As the HIV infection spread, infecting more people, the African American community was especially hard hit. However, this went widely unreported in the mainstream media, which otherwise characterized AIDS as a “gay cancer” that later spread into the larger heterosexual population. There are likely many reasons for this silence and the failure of government health officials to take appropriate action to address the seriousness of the AIDS epidemic that ravaged the Black community. Even today, the CDC’s HIV Surveillance Report of 2018, notes the enormous discrepancies in HIV infections based upon race. In 2017, there were over 1.1 million Americans living with HIV, however 43 percent or approximately 468,800 individuals, were Black. This rate is 8 times higher than that of Whites, despite Black Americans accounting for only 12 percent of the US population. The rate for Black men was even higher at 77.6 percent, and Black women had the highest rate among women, at 24.9 percent. Although rates have been steadily declining for all racial groups, Black men and women, according to a Kaiser Family Foundation review, continue to rank “higher than for their respective counterparts in any other racial/ethnic group.”   Besides the fact that Black Americans had been hit especially hard by the AIDS epidemic and increasing rates of infection, this was largely being ignored by health officials, the media and AIDS activist groups, such as ACT UP, in the gay community. They too were seeking answers and treatments. But unlike the gay activist organizations, who would eventually receive support and funding from AZT’s manufacturer Burroughs Wellcome to channel infected gay men towards drug treatment, similar concern and care does not seem to have been directed towards Blacks.   HIV infection had been increasing dramatically in the African American community. Since Black Americans gradually took on the burden of representing an increasing percentage of HIV-positive cases, Null’s Tri-State Healing Center eventually became a lively gathering spot for HIV infected Black Americans who were undergoing treatment, received counseling and meeting in health support groups. When the Center first opened its doors, only a handful of Black AIDS patients would visit. The Center had a seven-day a week open door policy and remained open until midnight. Patients were consulted by a staff of doctors, nurses, dietitians, other alternative health practitioners and counselors. There were no restraints on cost for treatment. Null always had a large African American listenership during his radio broadcasts. It started when medical doctors in Harlem began to refer the Center to their patients. The first few HIV-positive Black men eventually returned to robust health. Five years later approximately half of the Center’s patients were Black. The Center was frequented by soul singer Isaac Hayes and social activist Stokley Carmichael who lent their presence to provide additional support to patients.

Podcast LGC TV Les ondes électromagnétiques pour agir sur la cellule Jean-Pierre CHAMODOT. Les ondes électromagnétiques pour agir sur la cellule - Jean-Pierre CHAMODOT et Gwennoline Avec quel signal Œuvrer ? Pourquoi renoncer à la réaction chimique ?Pourquoi renoncer au signal chimique ? Pourquoi choisir l'onde électromagnétique ?Les thérapies énergétiques utilisent des oem de toutes fréquences : Thérapies par résonance, et thérapies dites « quantiques » : Limites et inconvénients de la chimie.Le choix de l'onde électromagnétique repose sur des preuves scientifiques : Preuves d'une nouvelle médecine : Jacques Benveniste 1935-2004 (Onde électromagnétique, Mémoire de l'eau et l'action informationnelle de l'homéopathie). Le professeur Luc Montagnier prix Nobel de médecine (Expérience de Transduction d'ADN : reconstitution chimique d'une molécule d'ADN pilotée par des ondes électromagnétiques).Interprétation du Pr Marc Henry (physique quantique : eau métamorphique piège les ondes électromagnétiques). Preuves de l'épigénétique (Bruce Lipton), de la nouvelle biochimie biologie moléculaire et biophysique (Dr Tian Yow Tsong). L'onde électromagnétique, qu'est-ce que c'est ?L'onde n'est pas une sinusoïde mais un vortex (Nassim Haramein). La thérapie par résonance George Lakhovsky (1869-1942) (cellules reconnaissent et résonnent dans leur propre fréquence). Royal Rife (1888 – 1971) élimine les virus par la résonance. Thérapies « quantiques » : Découvertes de l'aérospatiale Russe, Banques de données de fréquences. Le principe de ces machines. Utilisation du terme « quantique » souvent abusive