Podcasts about Kary Mullis

Dr. Gary Null provides a commentary on "Universal  Healthcare"       Universal Healthcare is the Solution to a Broken Medical System Gary Null, PhD Progressive Radio Network, March 3, 2025 For over 50 years, there has been no concerted or successful effort to bring down medical costs in the American healthcare system. Nor are the federal health agencies making disease prevention a priority. Regardless whether the political left or right sponsors proposals for reform, such measures are repeatedly defeated by both parties in Congress. As a result, the nation's healthcare system remains one of the most expensive and least efficient in the developed world. For the past 30 years, medical bills contributing to personal debt regularly rank among the top three causes of personal bankruptcy. This is a reality that reflects not only the financial strain on ordinary Americans but the systemic failure of the healthcare system itself. The urgent question is: If President Trump and his administration are truly seeking to reduce the nation's $36 trillion deficit, why is there no serious effort to reform the most bloated and corrupt sector of the economy? A key obstacle is the widespread misinformation campaign that falsely claims universal health care would cost an additional $2 trillion annually and further balloon the national debt. However, a more honest assessment reveals the opposite. If the US adopted a universal single-payer system, the nation could actually save up to $20 trillion over the next 10 years rather than add to the deficit. Even with the most ambitious efforts by people like Elon Musk to rein in federal spending or optimize government efficiency, the estimated savings would only amount to $500 billion. This is only a fraction of what could be achieved through comprehensive healthcare reform alone. Healthcare is the largest single expenditure of the federal budget. A careful examination of where the $5 trillion spent annually on healthcare actually goes reveals massive systemic fraud and inefficiency. Aside from emergency medicine, which accounts for only 10-12 percent of total healthcare expenditures, the bulk of this spending does not deliver better health outcomes nor reduce trends in physical and mental illness. Applying Ockham's Razor, the principle that the simplest solution is often the best, the obvious conclusion is that America's astronomical healthcare costs are the direct result of price gouging on an unimaginable scale. For example, in most small businesses, profit margins range between 1.6 and 2.5 percent, such as in grocery retail. Yet the pharmaceutical industrial complex routinely operates on markup rates as high as 150,000 percent for many prescription drugs. The chart below highlights the astronomical gap between the retail price of some top-selling patented pharmaceutical medications and their generic equivalents. Drug Condition Patent Price (per unit) Generic Price Estimated Manufacture Cost Markup Source Insulin (Humalog) Diabetes $300 $30 $3 10,000% Rand (2021) EpiPen Allergic reactions $600 $30 $10 6,000% BMJ (2022) Daraprim Toxoplasmosis $750/pill $2 $0.50 150,000% JAMA (2019) Harvoni Hepatitis C $94,500 (12 weeks) $30,000 $200 47,000% WHO Report (2018) Lipitor Cholesterol $150 $10 $0.50 29,900% Health Affairs (2020) Xarelto Blood Thinner $450 $25 $1.50 30,000% NEJM (2020) Abilify Schizophrenia $800 (30 tablets) $15 $2 39,900% AJMC (2019) Revlimid Cancer $16,000/mo $450 $150 10,500% Kaiser Health News (2021) Humira Arthritis $2,984/dose $400 $50 5,868% Rand (2021) Sovaldi Hepatitis C $1,000/pill $10 $2 49,900% JAMA (2021) Xolair Asthma $2,400/dose $300 $50 4,800% NEJM (2020) Gleevec Leukemia $10,000/mo $350 $200 4,900% Harvard Public Health Review (2020) OxyContin Pain Relief $600 (30 tablets) $15 $0.50 119,900% BMJ (2022) Remdesivir Covid-19 $3,120 (5 doses) N/A $10 31,100% The Lancet (2020) The corruption extends far beyond price gouging. Many pharmaceutical companies convince federal health agencies to fund their basic research and drug development with taxpayer dollars. Yet when these companies bring successful products to market, the profits are kept entirely by the corporations or shared with the agencies or groups of government scientists. On the other hand, the public, who funded the research, receives no financial return. This amounts to a systemic betrayal of the public trust on a scale of hundreds of billions of dollars annually. Another significant contributor to rising healthcare costs is the widespread practice of defensive medicine that is driven by the constant threat of litigation. Over the past 40 years, defensive medicine has become a cottage industry. Physicians order excessive diagnostic tests and unnecessary treatments simply to protect themselves from lawsuits. Study after study has shown that these over-performed procedures not only inflate costs but lead to iatrogenesis or medical injury and death caused by the medical  system and practices itself. The solution is simple: adopting no-fault healthcare coverage for everyone where patients receive care without needing to sue and thereby freeing doctors from the burden of excessive malpractice insurance. A single-payer universal healthcare system could fundamentally transform the entire industry by capping profits at every level — from drug manufacturers to hospitals to medical equipment suppliers. The Department of Health and Human Services would have the authority to set profit margins for medical procedures. This would ensure that healthcare is determined by outcomes, not profits. Additionally, the growing influence of private equity firms and vulture capitalists buying up hospitals and medical clinics across America must be reined in. These equity firms prioritize profit extraction over improving the quality of care. They often slash staff, raise prices, and dictate medical procedures based on what will yield the highest returns. Another vital reform would be to provide free medical education for doctors and nurses in exchange for five years of service under the universal system. Medical professionals would earn a realistic salary cap to prevent them from being lured into equity partnerships or charging exorbitant rates. The biggest single expense in the current system, however, is the private health insurance industry, which consumes 33 percent of the $5 trillion healthcare budget. Health insurance CEOs consistently rank among the highest-paid executives in the country. Their companies, who are nothing more than bean counters, decide what procedures and drugs will be covered, partially covered, or denied altogether. This entire industry is designed to place profits above patients' lives. If the US dismantled its existing insurance-based system and replaced it with a fully reformed national healthcare model, the country could save $2.7 trillion annually while simultaneously improving health outcomes. Over the course of 10 years, those savings would amount to $27 trillion. This could wipe out nearly the entire national debt in a short time. This solution has been available for decades but has been systematically blocked by corporate lobbying and bipartisan corruption in Washington. The path forward is clear but only if American citizens demand a system where healthcare is valued as a public service and not a commodity. The national healthcare crisis is not just a fiscal issue. It is a crucial moral failure of the highest order. With the right reforms, the nation could simultaneously restore its financial health and deliver the kind of healthcare system its citizens have long deserved. American Healthcare: Corrupt, Broken and Lethal Richard Gale and Gary Null Progressive Radio Network, March 3, 2025 For a nation that prides itself on being the world's wealthiest, most innovative and technologically advanced, the US' healthcare system is nothing less than a disaster and disgrace. Not only are Americans the least healthy among the most developed nations, but the US' health system ranks dead last among high-income countries. Despite rising costs and our unshakeable faith in American medical exceptionalism, average life expectancy in the US has remained lower than other OECD nations for many years and continues to decline. The United Nations recognizes healthcare as a human right. In 2018, former UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon denounced the American healthcare system as "politically and morally wrong." During the pandemic it is estimated that two to three years was lost on average life expectancy. On the other hand, before the Covid-19 pandemic, countries with universal healthcare coverage found their average life expectancy stable or slowly increasing. The fundamental problem in the U.S. is that politics have been far too beholden to the pharmaceutical, HMO and private insurance industries. Neither party has made any concerted effort to reign in the corruption of corporate campaign funding and do what is sensible, financially feasible and morally correct to improve Americans' quality of health and well-being.   The fact that our healthcare system is horribly broken is proof that moneyed interests have become so powerful to keep single-payer debate out of the media spotlight and censored. Poll after poll shows that the American public favors the expansion of public health coverage. Other incremental proposals, including Medicare and Medicaid buy-in plans, are also widely preferred to the Affordable Care Act or Obamacare mess we are currently stuck with.   It is not difficult to understand how the dismal state of American medicine is the result of a system that has been sold out to the free-market and the bottom line interests of drug makers and an inflated private insurance industry. How advanced and ethically sound can a healthcare system be if tens of millions of people have no access to medical care because it is financially out of their reach?  The figures speak for themselves. The U.S. is burdened with a $41 trillion Medicare liability. The number of uninsured has declined during the past several years but still lingers around 25 million. An additional 30-35 million are underinsured. There are currently 65 million Medicare enrollees and 89 million Medicaid recipients. This is an extremely unhealthy snapshot of the country's ability to provide affordable healthcare and it is certainly unsustainable. The system is a public economic failure, benefiting no one except the large and increasingly consolidated insurance and pharmaceutical firms at the top that supervise the racket.   Our political parties have wrestled with single-payer or universal healthcare for decades. Obama ran his first 2008 presidential campaign on a single-payer platform. Since 1985, his campaign health adviser, the late Dr. Quentin Young from the University of Illinois Medical School, was one of the nation's leading voices calling for universal health coverage.  During a private conversation with Dr. Young shortly before his passing in 2016, he conveyed his sense of betrayal at the hands of the Obama administration. Dr. Young was in his 80s when he joined the Obama campaign team to help lead the young Senator to victory on a promise that America would finally catch up with other nations. The doctor sounded defeated. He shared how he was manipulated, and that Obama held no sincere intention to make universal healthcare a part of his administration's agenda. During the closed-door negotiations, which spawned the weak and compromised Affordable Care Act, Dr. Young was neither consulted nor invited to participate. In fact, he told us that he never heard from Obama again after his White House victory.   Past efforts to even raise the issue have been viciously attacked. A huge army of private interests is determined to keep the public enslaved to private insurers and high medical costs. The failure of our healthcare is in no small measure due to it being a fully for-profit operation. Last year, private health insurance accounted for 65 percent of coverage. Consider that there are over 900 private insurance companies in the US. National Health Expenditures (NHE) grew to $4.5 trillion in 2022, which was 17.3 percent of GDP. Older corporate rank-and-file Democrats and Republicans argue that a single-payer or socialized medical program is unaffordable. However, not only is single-payer affordable, it will end bankruptcies due to unpayable medical debt. In addition, universal healthcare, structured on a preventative model, will reduce disease rates at the outset.    Corporate Democrats argue that Obama's Affordable Care Act (ACA) was a positive step inching the country towards complete public coverage. However, aside from providing coverage to the poorest of Americans, Obamacare turned into another financial anchor around the necks of millions more. According to the health policy research group KFF, the average annual health insurance premium for single coverage is $8,400 and almost $24,000 for a family. In addition, patient out-of-pocket costs continue to increase, a 6.6% increase to $471 billion in 2022. Rather than healthcare spending falling, it has exploded, and the Trump and Biden administrations made matters worse.    Clearly, a universal healthcare program will require flipping the script on the entire private insurance industry, which employed over half a million people last year.  Obviously, the most volatile debate concerning a national universal healthcare system concerns cost. Although there is already a socialized healthcare system in place -- every federal legislator, bureaucrat, government employee and veteran benefits from it -- fiscal Republican conservatives and groups such as the Koch Brothers network are single-mindedly dedicated to preventing the expansion of Medicare and Medicaid. A Koch-funded Mercatus analysis made the outrageous claim that a single-payer system would increase federal health spending by $32 trillion in ten years. However, analyses and reviews by the Congressional Budget Office in the early 1990s concluded that such a system would only increase spending at the start; enormous savings would quickly offset it as the years pass. In one analysis, "the savings in administrative costs [10 percent of health spending] would be more than enough to offset the expense of universal coverage."    Defenders of those advocating for funding a National Health Program argue this can primarily be accomplished by raising taxes to levels comparable to other developed nations. This was a platform Senator Bernie Sanders and some of the younger progressive Democrats in the House campaigned on. The strategy was to tax the highest multimillion-dollar earners 60-70 percent. Despite the outrage of its critics, including old rank-and-file multi-millionaire Democrats like Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, this is still far less than in the past. During the Korean War, the top tax rate was 91 percent; it declined to 70 percent in the late 1960s. Throughout most of the 1970s, those in the lowest income bracket were taxed at 14 percent. We are not advocating for this strategy because it ignores where the funding is going, and the corruption in the system that is contributing to exorbitant waste.    But Democratic supporters of the ACA who oppose a universal healthcare plan ignore the additional taxes Obama levied to pay for the program. These included surtaxes on investment income, Medicare taxes from those earning over $200,000, taxes on tanning services, an excise tax on medical equipment, and a 40 percent tax on health coverage for costs over the designated cap that applied to flexible savings and health savings accounts. The entire ACA was reckless, sloppy and unnecessarily complicated from the start.    The fact that Obamacare further strengthened the distinctions between two parallel systems -- federal and private -- with entirely different economic structures created a labyrinth of red tape, rules, and wasteful bureaucracy. Since the ACA went into effect, over 150 new boards, agencies and programs have had to be established to monitor its 2,700 pages of gibberish. A federal single-payer system would easily eliminate this bureaucracy and waste.    A medical New Deal to establish universal healthcare coverage is a decisive step in the correct direction. But we must look at the crisis holistically and in a systematic way. Simply shuffling private insurance into a federal Medicare-for-all or buy-in program, funded by taxing the wealthiest of citizens, would only temporarily reduce costs. It will neither curtail nor slash escalating disease rates e. Any effective healthcare reform must also tackle the underlying reasons for Americans' poor state of health. We cannot shy away from examining the social illnesses infecting our entire free-market capitalist culture and its addiction to deregulation. A viable healthcare model would have to structurally transform how the medical economy operates. Finally, a successful medical New Deal must honestly evaluate the best and most reliable scientific evidence in order to effectively redirect public health spending.    For example, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, a former Obama healthcare adviser, observed that AIDS-HIV measures consume the most public health spending, even though the disease "ranked 75th on the list of diseases by personal health expenditures." On the other hand, according to the American Medical Association, a large percentage of the nation's $3.4 trillion healthcare spending goes towards treating preventable diseases, notably diabetes, common forms of heart disease, and back and neck pain conditions. In 2016, these three conditions were the most costly and accounted for approximately $277 billion in spending. Last year, the CDC announced the autism rate is now 1 in 36 children compared to 1 in 44 two years ago. A retracted study by Mark Blaxill, an autism activist at the Holland Center and a friend of the authors, estimates that ASD costs will reach $589 billion annually by 2030. There are no signs that this alarming trend will reverse and decline; and yet, our entire federal health system has failed to conscientiously investigate the underlying causes of this epidemic. All explanations that might interfere with the pharmaceutical industry's unchecked growth, such as over-vaccination, are ignored and viciously discredited without any sound scientific evidence. Therefore, a proper medical New Deal will require a systemic overhaul and reform of our federal health agencies, especially the HHS, CDC and FDA. Only the Robert Kennedy Jr presidential campaign is even addressing the crisis and has an inexpensive and comprehensive plan to deal with it. For any medical revolution to succeed in advancing universal healthcare, the plan must prioritize spending in a manner that serves public health and not private interests. It will also require reshuffling private corporate interests and their lobbyists to the sidelines, away from any strategic planning, in order to break up the private interests' control over federal agencies and its revolving door policies. Aside from those who benefit from this medical corruption, the overwhelming majority of Americans would agree with this criticism. However, there is a complete lack of national trust that our legislators, including the so-called progressives, would be willing to undertake such actions.    In addition, America's healthcare system ignores the single most critical initiative to reduce costs - that is, preventative efforts and programs instead of deregulation and closing loopholes designed to protect the drug and insurance industries' bottom line. Prevention can begin with banning toxic chemicals that are proven health hazards associated with current disease epidemics, and it can begin by removing a 1,000-plus toxins already banned in Europe. This should be a no-brainer for any legislator who cares for public health. For example, Stacy Malkan, co-founder of the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics, notes that "the policy approach in the US and Europe is dramatically different" when it comes to chemical allowances in cosmetic products. Whereas the EU has banned 1,328 toxic substances from the cosmetic industry alone, the US has banned only 11. The US continues to allow carcinogenic formaldehyde, petroleum, forever chemicals, many parabens (an estrogen mimicker and endocrine hormone destroyer), the highly allergenic p-phenylenediamine or PBD, triclosan, which has been associated with the rise in antibiotic resistant bacteria, avobenzone, and many others to be used in cosmetics, sunscreens, shampoo and hair dyes.   Next, the food Americans consume can be reevaluated for its health benefits. There should be no hesitation to tax the unhealthiest foods, such as commercial junk food, sodas and candy relying on high fructose corn syrup, products that contain ingredients proven to be toxic, and meat products laden with dangerous chemicals including growth hormones and antibiotics. The scientific evidence that the average American diet is contributing to rising disease trends is indisputable. We could also implement additional taxes on the public advertising of these demonstrably unhealthy products. All such tax revenue would accrue to a national universal health program to offset medical expenditures associated with the very illnesses linked to these products. Although such tax measures would help pay for a new medical New Deal, it may be combined with programs to educate the public about healthy nutrition if it is to produce a reduction in the most common preventable diseases. In fact, comprehensive nutrition courses in medical schools should be mandatory because the average physician receives no education in this crucial subject.  In addition, preventative health education should be mandatory throughout public school systems.   Private insurers force hospitals, clinics and private physicians into financial corners, and this is contributing to prodigious waste in money and resources. Annually, healthcare spending towards medical liability insurance costs tens of billions of dollars. In particular, this economic burden has taxed small clinics and physicians. It is well past the time that physician liability insurance is replaced with no-fault options. Today's doctors are spending an inordinate amount of money to protect themselves. Legions of liability and trial lawyers seek big paydays for themselves stemming from physician error. This has created a culture of fear among doctors and hospitals, resulting in the overly cautious practice of defensive medicine, driving up costs and insurance premiums just to avoid lawsuits. Doctors are forced to order unnecessary tests and prescribe more medications and medical procedures just to cover their backsides. No-fault insurance is a common-sense plan that enables physicians to pursue their profession in a manner that will reduce iatrogenic injuries and costs. Individual cases requiring additional medical intervention and loss of income would still be compensated. This would generate huge savings.    No other nation suffers from the scourge of excessive drug price gouging like the US. After many years of haggling to lower prices and increase access to generic drugs, only a minute amount of progress has been made in recent years. A 60 Minutes feature about the Affordable Care Act reported an "orgy of lobbying and backroom deals in which just about everyone with a stake in the $3-trillion-a-year health industry came out ahead—except the taxpayers.” For example, Life Extension magazine reported that an antiviral cream (acyclovir), which had lost its patent protection, "was being sold to pharmacies for 7,500% over the active ingredient cost. The active ingredient (acyclovir) costs only 8 pennies, yet pharmacies are paying a generic maker $600 for this drug and selling it to consumers for around $700." Other examples include the antibiotic Doxycycline. The price per pill averages 7 cents to $3.36 but has a 5,300 percent markup when it reaches the consumer. The antidepressant Clomipramine is marked up 3,780 percent, and the anti-hypertensive drug Captopril's mark-up is 2,850 percent. And these are generic drugs!    Medication costs need to be dramatically cut to allow drug manufacturers a reasonable but not obscene profit margin. By capping profits approximately 100 percent above all costs, we would save our system hundreds of billions of dollars. Such a measure would also extirpate the growing corporate misdemeanors of pricing fraud, which forces patients to pay out-of-pocket in order to make up for the costs insurers are unwilling to pay.    Finally, we can acknowledge that our healthcare is fundamentally a despotic rationing system based upon high insurance costs vis-a-vis a toss of the dice to determine where a person sits on the economic ladder. For the past three decades it has contributed to inequality. The present insurance-based economic metrics cast millions of Americans out of coverage because private insurance costs are beyond their means. Uwe Reinhardt, a Princeton University political economist, has called our system "brutal" because it "rations [people] out of the system." He defined rationing as "withholding something from someone that is beneficial." Discriminatory healthcare rationing now affects upwards to 60 million people who have been either priced out of the system or under insured. They make too much to qualify for Medicare under Obamacare, yet earn far too little to afford private insurance costs and premiums. In the final analysis, the entire system is discriminatory and predatory.    However, we must be realistic. Almost every member of Congress has benefited from Big Pharma and private insurance lobbyists. The only way to begin to bring our healthcare program up to the level of a truly developed nation is to remove the drug industry's rampant and unnecessary profiteering from the equation.     How did Fauci memory-hole a cure for AIDS and get away with it?   By Helen Buyniski   Over 700,000 Americans have died of AIDS since 1981, with the disease claiming some 42.3 million victims worldwide. While an HIV diagnosis is no longer considered a certain death sentence, the disease looms large in the public imagination and in public health funding, with contemporary treatments running into thousands of dollars per patient annually.   But was there a cure for AIDS all this time - an affordable and safe treatment that was ruthlessly suppressed and attacked by the US public health bureaucracy and its agents? Could this have saved millions of lives and billions of dollars spent on AZT, ddI and failed HIV vaccine trials? What could possibly justify the decision to disappear a safe and effective approach down the memory hole?   The inventor of the cure, Gary Null, already had several decades of experience creating healing protocols for physicians to help patients not responding well to conventional treatments by the time AIDS was officially defined in 1981. Null, a registered dietitian and board-certified nutritionist with a PhD in human nutrition and public health science, was a senior research fellow and Director of Anti-Aging Medicine at the Institute of Applied Biology for 36 years and has published over 950 papers, conducting groundbreaking experiments in reversing biological aging as confirmed with DNA methylation testing. Additionally, Null is a multi-award-winning documentary filmmaker, bestselling author, and investigative journalist whose work exposing crimes against humanity over the last 50 years has highlighted abuses by Big Pharma, the military-industrial complex, the financial industry, and the permanent government stay-behind networks that have come to be known as the Deep State.   Null was contacted in 1974 by Dr. Stephen Caiazza, a physician working with a subculture of gay men in New York living the so-called “fast track” lifestyle, an extreme manifestation of the gay liberation movement that began with the Stonewall riots. Defined by rampant sexual promiscuity and copious use of illegal and prescription drugs, including heavy antibiotic use for a cornucopia of sexually-transmitted diseases, the fast-track never included more than about two percent of gay men, though these dominated many of the bathhouses and clubs that defined gay nightlife in the era. These patients had become seriously ill as a result of their indulgence, generally arriving at the clinic with multiple STDs including cytomegalovirus and several types of herpes and hepatitis, along with candida overgrowth, nutritional deficiencies, gut issues, and recurring pneumonia. Every week for the next 10 years, Null would counsel two or three of these men - a total of 800 patients - on how to detoxify their bodies and de-stress their lives, tracking their progress with Caiazza and the other providers at weekly feedback meetings that he credits with allowing the team to quickly evaluate which treatments were most effective. He observed that it only took about two years on the “fast track” for a healthy young person to begin seeing muscle loss and the recurrent, lingering opportunistic infections that would later come to be associated with AIDS - while those willing to commit to a healthier lifestyle could regain their health in about a year.    It was with this background that Null established the Tri-State Healing Center in Manhattan in 1980, staffing the facility with what would eventually run to 22 certified health professionals to offer safe, natural, and effective low- and no-cost treatments to thousands of patients with HIV and AIDS-defining conditions. Null and his staff used variations of the protocols he had perfected with Caiazza's patients, a multifactorial patient-tailored approach that included high-dose vitamin C drips, intravenous ozone therapy, juicing and nutritional improvements and supplementation, aspects of homeopathy and naturopathy with some Traditional Chinese Medicine and Ayurvedic practices. Additional services offered on-site included acupuncture and holistic dentistry, while peer support groups were also held at the facility so that patients could find community and a positive environment, healing their minds and spirits while they healed their bodies.   “Instead of trying to kill the virus with antiretroviral pharmaceuticals designed to stop viral replication before it kills patients, we focused on what benefits could be gained by building up the patients' natural immunity and restoring biochemical integrity so the body could fight for itself,” Null wrote in a 2014 article describing the philosophy behind the Center's approach, which was wholly at odds with the pharmaceutical model.1   Patients were comprehensively tested every week, with any “recovery” defined solely by the labs, which documented AIDS patient after patient - 1,200 of them - returning to good health and reversing their debilitating conditions. Null claims to have never lost an AIDS patient in the Center's care, even as the death toll for the disease - and its pharmaceutical standard of care AZT - reached an all-time high in the early 1990s. Eight patients who had opted for a more intensive course of treatment - visiting the Center six days a week rather than one - actually sero-deconverted, with repeated subsequent testing showing no trace of HIV in their bodies.   As an experienced clinical researcher himself, Null recognized that any claims made by the Center would be massively scrutinized, challenging as they did the prevailing scientific consensus that AIDS was an incurable, terminal illness. He freely gave his protocols to any medical practitioner who asked, understanding that his own work could be considered scientifically valid only if others could replicate it under the same conditions. After weeks of daily observational visits to the Center, Dr. Robert Cathcart took the protocols back to San Francisco, where he excitedly reported that patients were no longer dying in his care.    Null's own colleague at the Institute of Applied Biology, senior research fellow Elana Avram, set up IV drip rooms at the Institute and used his intensive protocols to sero-deconvert 10 patients over a two-year period. While the experiment had been conducted in secret, as the Institute had been funded by Big Pharma since its inception half a century earlier, Avram had hoped she would be able to publish a journal article to further publicize Null's protocols and potentially help AIDS patients, who were still dying at incredibly high rates thanks to Burroughs Wellcome's noxious but profitable AZT. But as she would later explain in a 2019 letter to Null, their groundbreaking research never made it into print - despite meticulous documentation of their successes - because the Institute's director and board feared their pharmaceutical benefactors would withdraw the funding on which they depended, given that Null's protocols did not involve any patentable or otherwise profitable drugs. When Avram approached them about publication, the board vetoed the idea, arguing that it would “draw negative attention because [the work] was contrary to standard drug treatments.” With no real point in continuing experiments along those lines without institutional support and no hope of obtaining funding from elsewhere, the department she had created specifically for these experiments shut down after a two-year followup with her test subjects - all of whom remained alive and healthy - was completed.2   While the Center was receiving regular visits by this time from medical professionals and, increasingly, black celebrities like Stokely Carmichael and Isaac Hayes, who would occasionally perform for the patients, the news was spreading by word of mouth alone - not a single media outlet had dared to document the clinic that was curing AIDS patients for free. Instead, they gave airtime to Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, who had for years been spreading baseless, hysteria-fueling claims about HIV and AIDS to any news outlet that would put him on. His claim that children could contract the virus from “ordinary household conduct” with an infected relative proved so outrageous he had to walk it back,3 and he never really stopped insisting the deadly plague associated with gays and drug users was about to explode like a nuclear bomb among the law-abiding heterosexual population. Fauci by this time controlled all government science funding through NIAID, and his zero-tolerance approach to dissent on the HIV/AIDS front had already seen prominent scientists like virologist Peter Duesberg stripped of the resources they needed for their work because they had dared to question his commandment: There is no cause of AIDS but HIV, and AZT is its treatment. Even the AIDS activist groups, which by then had been coopted by Big Pharma and essentially reduced to astroturfing for the toxic failed chemotherapy drug AZT backed by the institutional might of Fauci's NIAID,4 didn't seem to want to hear that there was a cure. Unconcerned with the irrationality of denouncing the man touting his free AIDS cure as an  “AIDS denier,” they warned journalists that platforming Null or anyone else rejecting the mainstream medical line would be met with organized demands for their firing.    Determined to breach the institutional iron curtain and get his message to the masses, Null and his team staged a press conference in New York, inviting scientists and doctors from around the world to share their research on alternative approaches to HIV and AIDS in 1993. To emphasize the sound scientific basis of the Center's protocols and encourage guests to adopt them into their own practices, Null printed out thousands of abstracts in support of each nutrient and treatment being used. However, despite over 7,000 invitations sent three times to major media, government figures, scientists, and activists, almost none of the intended audience members showed up. Over 100 AIDS patients and their doctors, whose charts exhaustively documented their improvements using natural and nontoxic modalities over the preceding 12 months, gave filmed testimonials, declaring that the feared disease was no longer a death sentence, but the conference had effectively been silenced. Bill Tatum, publisher of the Amsterdam News, suggested Null and his patients would find a more welcoming audience in his home neighborhood of Harlem - specifically, its iconic Apollo Theatre. For three nights, the theater was packed to capacity. Hit especially hard by the epidemic and distrustful of a medical system that had only recently stopped being openly racist (the Tuskegee syphilis experiment only ended in 1972), black Americans, at least, did not seem to care what Anthony Fauci would do if he found out they were investigating alternatives to AZT and death.    PBS journalist Tony Brown, having obtained a copy of the video of patient testimonials from the failed press conference, was among a handful of black journalists who began visiting the Center to investigate the legitimacy of Null's claims. Satisfied they had something significant to offer his audience, Brown invited eight patients - along with Null himself - onto his program over the course of several episodes to discuss the work. It was the first time these protocols had received any attention in the media, despite Null having released nearly two dozen articles and multiple documentaries on the subject by that time. A typical patient on one program, Al, a recovered IV drug user who was diagnosed with AIDS at age 32, described how he “panicked,” saw a doctor and started taking AZT despite his misgivings - only to be forced to discontinue the drug after just a few weeks due to his condition deteriorating rapidly. Researching alternatives brought him to Null, and after six months of “detoxing [his] lifestyle,” he observed his initial symptoms - swollen lymph nodes and weight loss - begin to reverse, culminating with sero-deconversion. On Bill McCreary's Channel 5 program, a married couple diagnosed with HIV described how they watched their T-cell counts increase as they cut out sugar, caffeine, smoking, and drinking and began eating a healthy diet. They also saw the virus leave their bodies.   For HIV-positive viewers surrounded by fear and negativity, watching healthy-looking, cheerful “AIDS patients” detail their recovery while Null backed up their claims with charts must have been balm for the soul. But the TV programs were also a form of outreach to the medical community, with patients' charts always on hand to convince skeptics the cure was scientifically valid. Null brought patients' charts to every program, urging them to keep an open mind: “Other physicians and public health officials should know that there's good science in the alternative perspective. It may not be a therapy that they're familiar with, because they're just not trained in it, but if the results are positive, and you can document them…” He challenged doubters to send in charts from their own sero-deconverted patients on AZT, and volunteered to debate proponents of the orthodox treatment paradigm - though the NIH and WHO both refused to participate in such a debate on Tony Brown's Journal, following Fauci's directive prohibiting engagement with forbidden ideas.    Aside from those few TV programs and Null's own films, suppression of Null's AIDS cure beyond word of mouth was total. The 2021 documentary The Cost of Denial, produced by the Society for Independent Journalists, tells the story of the Tri-State Healing Center and the medical paradigm that sought to destroy it, lamenting the loss of the lives that might have been saved in a more enlightened society. Nurse practitioner Luanne Pennesi, who treated many of the AIDS patients at the Center, speculated in the film that the refusal by the scientific establishment and AIDS activists to accept their successes was financially motivated. “It was as if they didn't want this information to get out. Understand that our healthcare system as we know it is a corporation, it's a corporate model, and it's about generating revenue. My concern was that maybe they couldn't generate enough revenue from these natural approaches.”5   Funding was certainly the main disciplinary tool Fauci's NIAID used to keep the scientific community in line. Despite the massive community interest in the work being done at the Center, no foundation or institution would defy Fauci and risk getting itself blacklisted, leaving Null to continue funding the operation out of his pocket with the profits from book sales. After 15 years, he left the Center in 1995, convinced the mainstream model had so thoroughly been institutionalized that there was no chance of overthrowing it. He has continued to counsel patients and advocate for a reappraisal of the HIV=AIDS hypothesis and its pharmaceutical treatments, highlighting the deeply flawed science underpinning the model of the disease espoused by the scientific establishment in 39 articles, six documentaries and a 700-page textbook on AIDS, but the Center's achievements have been effectively memory-holed by Fauci's multi-billion-dollar propaganda apparatus.     FRUIT OF THE POISONOUS TREE   To understand just how much of a threat Null's work was to the HIV/AIDS establishment, it is instructive to revisit the 1984 paper, published by Dr. Robert Gallo of the National Cancer Institute, that established HIV as the sole cause of AIDS. The CDC's official recognition of AIDS in 1981 had done little to quell the mounting public panic over the mysterious illness afflicting gay men in the US, as the agency had effectively admitted it had no idea what was causing them to sicken and die. As years passed with no progress determining the causative agent of the plague, activist groups like Gay Men's Health Crisis disrupted public events and threatened further mass civil disobedience as they excoriated the NIH for its sluggish allocation of government science funding to uncovering the cause of the “gay cancer.”6 When Gallo published his paper declaring that the retrovirus we now know as HIV was the sole “probable” cause of AIDS, its simple, single-factor hypothesis was the answer to the scientific establishment's prayers. This was particularly true for Fauci, as the NIAID chief was able to claim the hot new disease as his agency's own domain in what has been described as a “dramatic confrontation” with his rival Sam Broder at the National Cancer Institute. After all, Fauci pointed out, Gallo's findings - presented by Health and Human Services Secretary Margaret Heckler as if they were gospel truth before any other scientists had had a chance to inspect them, never mind conduct a full peer review - clearly classified AIDS as an infectious disease, and not a cancer like the Kaposi's sarcoma which was at the time its most visible manifestation. Money and media attention began pouring in, even as funding for the investigation of other potential causes of AIDS dried up. Having already patented a diagnostic test for “his” retrovirus before introducing it to the world, Gallo was poised for a financial windfall, while Fauci was busily leveraging the discovery into full bureaucratic empire of the US scientific apparatus.   While it would serve as the sole basis for all US government-backed AIDS research to follow - quickly turning Gallo into the most-cited scientist in the world during the 1980s,7 Gallo's “discovery” of HIV was deeply problematic. The sample that yielded the momentous discovery actually belonged to Prof. Luc Montagnier of the French Institut Pasteur, a fact Gallo finally admitted in 1991, four years after a lawsuit from the French government challenged his patent on the HIV antibody test, forcing the US government to negotiate a hasty profit-sharing agreement between Gallo's and Montagnier's labs. That lawsuit triggered a cascade of official investigations into scientific misconduct by Gallo, and evidence submitted during one of these probes, unearthed in 2008 by journalist Janine Roberts, revealed a much deeper problem with the seminal “discovery.” While Gallo's co-author, Mikulas Popovic, had concluded after numerous experiments with the French samples that the virus they contained was not the cause of AIDS, Gallo had drastically altered the paper's conclusion, scribbling his notes in the margins, and submitted it for publication to the journal Science without informing his co-author.   After Roberts shared her discovery with contacts in the scientific community, 37 scientific experts wrote to the journal demanding that Gallo's career-defining HIV paper be retracted from Science for lacking scientific integrity.8 Their call, backed by an endorsement from the 2,600-member scientific organization Rethinking AIDS, was ignored by the publication and by the rest of mainstream science despite - or perhaps because of - its profound implications.   That 2008 letter, addressed to Science editor-in-chief Bruce Alberts and copied to American Association for the Advancement of Science CEO Alan Leshner, is worth reproducing here in its entirety, as it utterly dismantles Gallo's hypothesis - and with them the entire HIV is the sole cause of AIDS dogma upon which the contemporary medical model of the disease rests:   On May 4, 1984 your journal published four papers by a group led by Dr. Robert Gallo. We are writing to express our serious concerns with regard to the integrity and veracity of the lead paper among these four of which Dr. Mikulas Popovic is the lead author.[1] The other three are also of concern because they rely upon the conclusions of the lead paper .[2][3][4]  In the early 1990s, several highly critical reports on the research underlying these papers were produced as a result of governmental inquiries working under the supervision of scientists nominated by the National Academy of Sciences and the Institute of Medicine. The Office of Research Integrity of the US Department of Health and Human Services concluded that the lead paper was “fraught with false and erroneous statements,” and that the “ORI believes that the careless and unacceptable keeping of research records...reflects irresponsible laboratory management that has permanently impaired the ability to retrace the important steps taken.”[5] Further, a Congressional Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations led by US Representative John D. Dingell of Michigan produced a staff report on the papers which contains scathing criticisms of their integrity.[6]  Despite the publically available record of challenges to their veracity, these papers have remained uncorrected and continue to be part of the scientific record.  What prompts our communication today is the recent revelation of an astonishing number of previously unreported deletions and unjustified alterations made by Gallo to the lead paper. There are several documents originating from Gallo's laboratory that, while available for some time, have only recently been fully analyzed. These include a draft of the lead paper typewritten by Popovic which contains handwritten changes made to it by Gallo.[7] This draft was the key evidence used in the above described inquiries to establish that Gallo had concealed his laboratory's use of a cell culture sample (known as LAV) which it received from the Institut Pasteur.  These earlier inquiries verified that the typed manuscript draft was produced by Popovic who had carried out the recorded experiment while his laboratory chief, Gallo, was in Europe and that, upon his return, Gallo changed the document by hand a few days before it was submitted to Science on March 30, 1984. According to the ORI investigation, “Dr. Gallo systematically rewrote the manuscript for what would become a renowned LTCB [Gallo's laboratory at the National Cancer Institute] paper.”[5]  This document provided the important evidence that established the basis for awarding Dr. Luc Montagnier and Dr. Francoise Barré-Sinoussi the 2008 Nobel Prize in Medicine for the discovery of the AIDS virus by proving it was their samples of LAV that Popovic used in his key experiment. The draft reveals that Popovic had forthrightly admitted using the French samples of LAV renamed as Gallo's virus, HTLV-III, and that Gallo had deleted this admission, concealing their use of LAV.  However, it has not been previously reported that on page three of this same document Gallo had also deleted Popovic's unambiguous statement that, "Despite intensive research efforts, the causative agent of AIDS has not yet been identified,” replacing it in the published paper with a statement that said practically the opposite, namely, “That a retrovirus of the HTLV family might be an etiologic agent of AIDS was suggested by the findings.”  It is clear that the rest of Popovic's typed paper is entirely consistent with his statement that the cause of AIDS had not been found, despite his use of the French LAV. Popovic's final conclusion was that the culture he produced “provides the possibility” for detailed studies. He claimed to have achieved nothing more. At no point in his paper did Popovic attempt to prove that any virus caused AIDS, and it is evident that Gallo concealed these key elements in Popovic's experimental findings.  It is astonishing now to discover these unreported changes to such a seminal document. We can only assume that Gallo's alterations of Popovic's conclusions were not highlighted by earlier inquiries because the focus at the time was on establishing that the sample used by Gallo's lab came from Montagnier and was not independently collected by Gallo. In fact, the only attention paid to the deletions made by Gallo pertains to his effort to hide the identity of the sample. The questions of whether Gallo and Popovic's research proved that LAV or any other virus was the cause of AIDS were clearly not considered.  Related to these questions are other long overlooked documents that merit your attention. One of these is a letter from Dr. Matthew A. Gonda, then Head of the Electron Microscopy Laboratory at the National Cancer Institute, which is addressed to Popovic, copied to Gallo and dated just four days prior to Gallo's submission to Science.[8] In this letter, Gonda remarks on samples he had been sent for imaging because “Dr Gallo wanted these micrographs for publication because they contain HTLV.” He states, “I do not believe any of the particles photographed are of HTLV-I, II or III.” According to Gonda, one sample contained cellular debris, while another had no particles near the size of a retrovirus. Despite Gonda's clearly worded statement, Science published on May 4, 1984 papers attributed to Gallo et al with micrographs attributed to Gonda and described unequivocally as HTLV-III.  In another letter by Gallo, dated one day before he submitted his papers to Science, Gallo states, “It's extremely rare to find fresh cells [from AIDS patients] expressing the virus... cell culture seems to be necessary to induce virus,” a statement which raises the possibility he was working with a laboratory artifact. [9]  Included here are copies of these documents and links to the same. The very serious flaws they reveal in the preparation of the lead paper published in your journal in 1984 prompts our request that this paper be withdrawn. It appears that key experimental findings have been concealed. We further request that the three associated papers published on the same date also be withdrawn as they depend on the accuracy of this paper.  For the scientific record to be reliable, it is vital that papers shown to be flawed, or falsified be retracted. Because a very public record now exists showing that the Gallo papers drew unjustified conclusions, their withdrawal from Science is all the more important to maintain integrity. Future researchers must also understand they cannot rely on the 1984 Gallo papers for statements about HIV and AIDS, and all authors of papers that previously relied on this set of four papers should have the opportunity to consider whether their own conclusions are weakened by these revelations.      Gallo's handwritten revision, submitted without his colleague's knowledge despite multiple experiments that failed to support the new conclusion, was the sole foundation for the HIV=AIDS hypothesis. Had Science published the manuscript the way Popovic had typed it, there would be no AIDS “pandemic” - merely small clusters of people with AIDS. Without a viral hypothesis backing the development of expensive and deadly pharmaceuticals, would Fauci have allowed these patients to learn about the cure that existed all along?   Faced with a potential rebellion, Fauci marshaled the full resources under his control to squelch the publication of the investigations into Gallo and restrict any discussion of competing hypotheses in the scientific and mainstream press, which had been running virus-scare stories full-time since 1984. The effect was total, according to biochemist Dr. Kary Mullis, inventor of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) procedure. In a 2009 interview, Mullis recalled his own shock when he attempted to unearth the experimental basis for the HIV=AIDS hypothesis. Despite his extensive inquiry into the literature, “there wasn't a scientific reference…[that] said ‘here's how come we know that HIV is the probable cause of AIDS.' There was nothing out there like that.”9 This yawning void at the core of HIV/AIDS “science" turned him into a strident critic of AIDS dogma - and those views made him persona non grata where the scientific press was concerned, suddenly unable to publish a single paper despite having won the Nobel Prize for his invention of the PCR test just weeks before.  10   DISSENT BECOMES “DENIAL”   While many of those who dissent from the orthodox HIV=AIDS view believe HIV plays a role in the development of AIDS, they point to lifestyle and other co-factors as being equally if not more important. Individuals who test positive for HIV can live for decades in perfect health - so long as they don't take AZT or the other toxic antivirals fast-tracked by Fauci's NIAID - but those who developed full-blown AIDS generally engaged in highly risky behaviors like extreme promiscuity and prodigious drug abuse, contracting STDs they took large quantities of antibiotics to treat, further running down their immune systems. While AIDS was largely portrayed as a “gay disease,” it was only the “fast track” gays, hooking up with dozens of partners nightly in sex marathons fueled by “poppers” (nitrate inhalants notorious for their own devastating effects on the immune system), who became sick. Kaposi's sarcoma, one of the original AIDS-defining conditions, was widespread among poppers-using gay men, but never appeared among IV drug users or hemophiliacs, the other two main risk groups during the early years of the epidemic. Even Robert Gallo himself, at a 1994 conference on poppers held by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, would admit that the previously-rare form of skin cancer surging among gay men was not primarily caused by HIV - and that it was immune stimulation, rather than suppression, that was likely responsible.11 Similarly, IV drug users are often riddled with opportunistic infections as their habit depresses the immune system and their focus on maintaining their addiction means that healthier habits - like good nutrition and even basic hygiene - fall by the wayside.    Supporting the call for revising the HIV=AIDS hypothesis to include co-factors is the fact that the mass heterosexual outbreaks long predicted by Fauci and his ilk in seemingly every country on Earth have failed to materialize, except - supposedly - in Africa, where the diagnostic standard for AIDS differs dramatically from those of the West. Given the prohibitively high cost of HIV testing for poor African nations, the WHO in 1985 crafted a diagnostic loophole that became known as the “Bangui definition,” allowing medical professionals to diagnose AIDS in the absence of a test using just clinical symptoms: high fever, persistent cough, at least 30 days of diarrhea, and the loss of 10% of one's body weight within two months. Often suffering from malnutrition and without access to clean drinking water, many of the inhabitants of sub-Saharan Africa fit the bill, especially when the WHO added tuberculosis to the list of AIDS-defining illnesses in 1993 - a move which may be responsible for as many as one half of African “AIDS” cases, according to journalist Christine Johnson. The WHO's former Chief of Global HIV Surveillance, James Chin, acknowledged their manipulation of statistics, but stressed that it was the entire AIDS industry - not just his organization - perpetrating the fraud. “There's the saying that, if you knew what sausages are made of, most people would hesitate to sort of eat them, because they wouldn't like what's in it. And if you knew how HIV/AIDS numbers are cooked, or made up, you would use them with extreme caution,” Chin told an interviewer in 2009.12   With infected numbers stubbornly remaining constant in the US despite Fauci's fearmongering projections of the looming heterosexually-transmitted plague, the CDC in 1993 broadened its definition of AIDS to include asymptomatic (that is, healthy) HIV-positive people with low T-cell counts - an absurd criteria given that an individual's T-cell count can fluctuate by hundreds within a single day. As a result, the number of “AIDS cases” in the US immediately doubled. Supervised by Fauci, the NIAID had been quietly piling on diseases into the “AIDS-related” category for years, bloating the list from just two conditions - pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and Kaposi's sarcoma - to 30 so fast it raised eyebrows among some of science's leading lights. Deeming the entire process “bizarre” and unprecedented, Kary Mullis wondered aloud why no one had called the AIDS establishment out: “There's something wrong here. And it's got to be financial.”13   Indeed, an early CDC public relations campaign was exposed by the Wall Street Journal in 1987 as having deliberately mischaracterized AIDS as a threat to the entire population so as to garner increased public and private funding for what was very much a niche issue, with the risk to average heterosexuals from a single act of sex “smaller than the risk of ever getting hit by lightning.” Ironically, the ads, which sought to humanize AIDS patients in an era when few Americans knew anyone with the disease and more than half the adult population thought infected people should be forced to carry cards warning of their status, could be seen as a reaction to the fear tactics deployed by Fauci early on.14   It's hard to tell where fraud ends and incompetence begins with Gallo's HIV antibody test. Much like Covid-19 would become a “pandemic of testing,” with murder victims and motorcycle crashes lumped into “Covid deaths” thanks to over-sensitized PCR tests that yielded as many as 90% false positives,15 HIV testing is fraught with false positives - and unlike with Covid-19, most people who hear they are HIV-positive still believe they are receiving a death sentence. Due to the difficulty of isolating HIV itself from human samples, the most common diagnostic tests, ELISA and the Western Blot, are designed to detect not the virus but antibodies to it, upending the traditional medical understanding that the presence of antibodies indicates only exposure - and often that the body has actually vanquished the pathogen. Patients are known to test positive for HIV antibodies in the absence of the virus due to at least 70 other conditions, including hepatitis, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, syphilis, recent vaccination or even pregnancy. (https://www.chcfl.org/diseases-that-can-cause-a-false-positive-hiv-test/) Positive results are often followed up with a PCR “viral load” test, even though the inventor of the PCR technique Kary Mullis famously condemned its misuse as a tool for diagnosing infection. Packaging inserts for all three tests warn the user that they cannot be reliably used to diagnose HIV.16 The ELISA HIV antibody test explicitly states: “At present there is no recognized standard for establishing the presence and absence of HIV antibody in human blood.”17   That the public remains largely unaware of these and other massive holes in the supposedly airtight HIV=AIDS=DEATH paradigm is a testament to Fauci's multi-layered control of the press. Like the writers of the Great Barrington Declaration and other Covid-19 dissidents, scientists who question HIV/AIDS dogma have been brutally punished for their heresy, no matter how prestigious their prior standing in the field and no matter how much evidence they have for their own claims. In 1987, the year the FDA's approval of AZT made AIDS the most profitable epidemic yet (a dubious designation Covid-19 has since surpassed), Fauci made it clearer than ever that scientific inquiry and debate - the basis of the scientific method - would no longer be welcome in the American public health sector, eliminating retrovirologist Peter Duesberg, then one of the most prominent opponents of the HIV=AIDS hypothesis, from the scientific conversation with a professional disemboweling that would make a cartel hitman blush. Duesberg had just eviscerated Gallo's 1984 HIV paper with an article of his own in the journal Cancer Research, pointing out that retroviruses had never before been found to cause a single disease in humans - let alone 30 AIDS-defining diseases. Rather than allow Gallo or any of the other scientists in his camp to respond to the challenge, Fauci waged a scorched-earth campaign against Duesberg, who had until then been one of the most highly regarded researchers in his field. Every research grant he requested was denied; every media appearance was canceled or preempted. The University of California at Berkeley, unable to fully fire him due to tenure, took away his lab, his graduate students, and the rest of his funding. The few colleagues who dared speak up for him in public were also attacked, while enemies and opportunists were encouraged to slander Duesberg at the conferences he was barred from attending and in the journals that would no longer publish his replies. When Duesberg was summoned to the White House later that year by then-President Ronald Reagan to debate Fauci on the origins of AIDS, Fauci convinced the president to cancel, allegedly pulling rank on the Commander-in-Chief with an accusation that the “White House was interfering in scientific matters that belonged to the NIH and the Office of Science and Technology Assessment.” After seven years of this treatment, Duesberg was contacted by NIH official Stephen O'Brien and offered an escape from professional purgatory. He could have “everything back,” he was told, and shown a manuscript of a scientific paper - apparently commissioned by the editor of the journal Nature - “HIV Causes AIDS: Koch's Postulates Fulfilled” with his own name listed alongside O'Brien's as an author.18 His refusal to take the bribe effectively guaranteed the epithet “AIDS denier” will appear on his tombstone. The character assassination of Duesberg became a template that would be deployed to great effectiveness wherever Fauci encountered dissent - never debate, only demonize, deplatform and destroy.    Even Luc Montagnier, the real discoverer of HIV, soon found himself on the wrong side of the Fauci machine. With his 1990 declaration that “the HIV virus [by itself] is harmless and passive, a benign virus,” Montagnier began distancing himself from Gallo's fraud, effectively placing a target on his own back. In a 1995 interview, he elaborated: “four factors that have come together to account for the sudden epidemic [of AIDS]: HIV presence, immune hyper-activation, increased sexually transmitted disease incidence, sexual behavior changes and other behavioral changes” such as drug use, poor nutrition and stress - all of which he said had to occur “essentially simultaneously” for HIV to be transmitted, creating the modern epidemic. Like the professionals at the Tri-State Healing Center, Montagnier advocated for the use of antioxidants like vitamin C and N-acetyl cysteine, naming oxidative stress as a critical factor in the progression from HIV to AIDS.19 When Montagnier died in 2022, Fauci's media mouthpieces sneered that the scientist (who was awarded the Nobel Prize in 2008 for his discovery of HIV, despite his flagging faith in that discovery's significance) “started espousing views devoid of a scientific basis” in the late 2000s, leading him to be “shunned by the scientific community.”20 In a particularly egregious jab, the Washington Post's obit sings the praises of Robert Gallo, implying it was the American scientist who really should have won the Nobel for HIV, while dismissing as “

In unserem Feiertagsspecial lassen wir das Jahr 2024 gemeinsam ausklingen. Eva, Elka und Jana sprechen über einige der faszinierendsten Wissenschaftler:innen, die wir für ihre vielleicht übermenschlich erscheinenden Leistungen und Entdeckungen kennen. Aber dahinter stecken auch nur Menschen mit Stärken und Schwächen. Wir erzählen von Wolfgang Pauli, der angeblich technische Geräte zum Versagen brachte, von Werner Heisenberg, der fast durch die Doktorprüfung fiel, und von leuchtenden Waschbären. Außerdem haben wir Buchempfehlungen für die Feiertage mitgebracht und Elka wirft für uns einen Blick in die Zukunft. Ihr könnt uns gerne bei [Steady](https://steadyhq.com/de/cosmiclatte/), [Patreon] (https://patreon.com/CosmiclattePodcast), [Paypal](https://paypal.me/cosmiclattepod) unterstützen!

Enjoy this episode? Please share it with at least ONE friend who you think needs to hear it! In this episode, we dive deep into the history and controversies surrounding HIV/AIDS with filmmaker and researcher Michael Wallach. Michael is the director of the documentary series The Viral Delusion, which critically examines the narratives surrounding viruses and challenges conventional virology. Episode Highlights: Re-examining the Foundation: Michael discusses the importance of questioning the foundational assumptions of virology rather than just critiquing the built-up narratives around viruses like HIV and COVID-19. Journey to Terrain Theory: He shares the path that led him to explore terrain theory, a concept that shifts the focus from viruses as the cause of illness to the overall environment and health of the body. Creating The Viral Delusion: Learn about Michael's process in assembling the documentary series, including the influences from the AIDS dissidence movement and his thoughts on the COVID-19 response and historical vaccine narratives. HIV/AIDS Narrative: Michael dives into the controversial claim that HIV does not cause AIDS, presenting arguments and insights from leading thinkers who have challenged the mainstream story. The Reality of AZT: The conversation explores the history of AZT, a drug once marketed as the primary treatment for HIV/AIDS, and how it was pushed despite its toxic effects. Michael highlights the existence of alternative treatments that were overshadowed by AZT. Unreleased Insights: Michael shares additional findings and insights that didn't make it into his documentary, providing a more complete picture of the perspectives on HIV/AIDS. The Expanding Symptom Lists: Discussion around how the symptoms associated with various so-called viruses continue to grow, raising questions about the criteria used for diagnosis and classifications in virology. About Michael Wallach: Michael Wallach is the director of the acclaimed five-part documentary series, The Viral Delusion, which can be watched at theviraldelusion.com. Described as “groundbreaking” and “immensely important” by leading medical voices like Tom Cowan, Dr. John Bevan-Smith, and Dr. Sam Bailey, the series challenges long-standing assumptions about viruses. Michael is a husband, father, screenwriter, and holds degrees in Philosophy from Cornell and an MA from Columbia University. For more insights, visit Michael's Substack The Way Forward podcast is sponsored by: NEW BIOLOGY CLINIC: Experience individually tailored terrain-based health services with virtual consults, practitioner livestreams, movement classes, and more. The New Biology Clinic's motivation is to make you healthy and keep you that way. Visit https://NewBiologyClinic.com and enter code TheWayForward for $50 off your activation fee. Members of The Way Forward get the full activation fee waived. Become a member of The Way Forward here: https://thewayfwrd.com/membership-sign-up/ ————————— Visit our online marketplace for discounts on a variety of the best holistic health brands and products: https://thewayfwrd.com/store/ For all of our links, and to watch or listen to The Way Forward on other platforms, visit: https://www.flowcode.com/page/thewayforward Join The Way Forward to connect with like minded men and women near you, businesses near you, and more! The best part? You pay whatever you want!: https://thewayfwrd.com/membership-sign-up/ Are you a natural health practitioner? Join our private, natural-health practitioner database here: https://thewayfwrd.com/directory-form/ ————————— This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or in part without expressed written permission from The Way Forward, LLC. The purpose of this presentation is to convey information. It is not intended to diagnose, treat or cure a condition; nor is it to be considered medical or legal advice, opinion or recommendation. This information is presented in the spirit of service for all.   0:00 - Story-time: HIV/AIDS, The True History & The Viral Delusion 0:37 - Introduction 1:55 - Getting Started as a Screenwriter in Hollywood 6:22 - Seeing Through the Absurdity 10:55 - The Flawed Foundation  17:14 - Path to Terrain Ideology 27:56 - Putting the Whole Story Onto Film  31:50 - Great Minds Speaking Out  Against the AIDS Narrative 44:46 - The Viral Delusion 59:53 - Kary Mullis and HIV & AIDS 1:05:58 - Looking at All Angles  1:15:25 - Leemon McHenry  1:21:12 - What is AZT? 1:31:01 - How to Test Positive for HIV? 1:33:58 - Psychosomatic Effects of Being Told You're Positive for HIV 1:42:07 - Collapsing a Paradigm That's Too Big to Fail 1:49:28 - HIV Never Being Demonstrated as the Cause of AIDS 1:55:46 - Closing Thoughts  

Kary Mullis var en vigtig mand. Han opfandt nemlig PCR: en af verdenens største innovationer, der har muliggjort stort set al moderne molekylær biologi lige fra kriminalefterforskningens DNA-prøver til corona-tests. Men som altid er gal og genial to sider af samme mønt, og i dette tilfælde betyder det at Kary Mullis var en nobelprisvindende surfer på LSD der så lysende vaskebjørne og bollede med astralprojekterende damer. Afsnittet er optaget live på Teater Katapult i AarhusKilder: Hvis du vil være med til at optage live med os på Discord kan dustøtte os på 10er og blive en af vores kernelyttere https://vudfordret.10er.app Du kan også tjekke vores webshop: bit.ly/vushop. Der er enhønsetrøje! Send os vanvittig videnskab eller stil et spørgsmål på facebook,Instagram eller vudfordret@gmail.com Tak til Christian Eiming for disclaimer.Tak til Barometer-Bjarke for Gak-O-meteret. Husk at være dumme

Andrew For America talks about the Trump assassination attempt, the future of America, the pandemic, Operation Mockingbird, the divide and conquer agenda, the food and pharmaceutical industries, and how Americans were "pledged" as collateral on our debt owed to the European banking cartels starting around 1933. Andrew plays clips from Bret Weinstein, GG33, Andrew Bustamante, Dr. Phil, and creator of the PCR test, Kary Mullis to help illustrate his points. The song selection is the song, "I Like The Nightlife Baby" by the band Suicide File. Visit allegedlyrecords.com and check out all of the amazing punk rock artists! Visit soundcloud.com/andrewforamerica1984 to check out Andrew's music! Like and Follow The Politics & Punk Rock Podcast PLAYLIST on Spotify!!! Check it out here: https://open.spotify.com/playlist/1Y4rumioeqvHfaUgRnRxsy... politicsandpunkrockpodcast.com https://linktr.ee/andrewforamerica Watch and learn about these awesome offers for your survival needs from former Afghanistan war veteran, police officer, and citizen journalist, Mr. Teddy Daniels: Operation Blackout Survival Guide: ⁠⁠⁠⁠https://internalblackout.com/?a=683&c=434&s1=⁠⁠⁠⁠ Famine Fighter Survival Food Supply: ⁠⁠⁠⁠https://foodforthesoul.co/?a=683&c=407&s1=⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Final Famine Survival Food Growing Book: ⁠⁠⁠⁠https://finalfoodprepper.com/?a=683&c=433&s1=⁠⁠⁠⁠ Devils Dollar Currency Survival Book: ⁠⁠⁠⁠https://dbhtrkg.com/?a=683&c=468&s1=⁠ --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/andrew-foramerica/support

What if Anthony Fauci isn't the hero the media portrays him to be? In our latest episode of Paratruther, we tackle the controversial rise of Fauci during the COVID-19 pandemic, likening his sudden prominence to a horror movie villain coming into the limelight. Through an eye-opening conversation with Mr. Anderson, we peel back the layers of Fauci's extensive career at the NIH and NIAID, spotlighting his involvement in significant, yet contentious events such as the 1986 act shielding pharmaceutical companies and the controversies of the AIDS crisis. We don't shy away from critiquing mainstream narratives, drawing parallels between Fauci's ascent and other political figures, and questioning the media's role in shaping public perception.Gain-of-function research, Fauci's alleged deceit, and the ethical implications of risky scientific endeavors are at the heart of our discussion. We dissect Fauci's public statements and private communications during the COVID-19 pandemic, scrutinizing inconsistencies and the potential cover-ups surrounding the virus's origins. From Operation Paperclip to the weaponization of diseases like Lyme disease, our critical analysis seeks to uncover the hidden motives and broader implications of Fauci's decisions on public health policies. This chapter is sure to leave you questioning the integrity of those in power and their true agendas.We wrap up with reflections on influential figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Kary Mullis, examining their criticisms and the broader societal impact of the pandemic response. The discussion touches on everything from early COVID-19 predictions and the mysterious vaping illnesses of 2019 to the more conspiratorial aspects like cryptocurrency patents and 5G technology. With a blend of skepticism, humor, and critical inquiry, we challenge you to rethink the narratives and consider the deeper, often unsettling truths shaping our world today. Tune in for a thought-provoking and engaging exploration of one of the most significant health crises of our time.

Kary Mullis vinse il Premio Nobel per l'invenzione della PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction), un metodo eccezionale, semplice ed economico per produrre infinite copie di qualsiasi tratto di DNA. Oggi la PCR è fondamentale ovunque sia indispensabile leggere il DNA. In ambito forense, grazie alla PCR, si ottiene il DNA necessario per identificare una vittima o un assassino oppure scagionare un innocente. Ma la raccolta e la conservazione del materiale biologico rinvenuto sulla scena di un crimine devono rispettare standard di efficienza e qualità: pena l'invalidazione di una prova. La storia giudiziaria degli ultimi anni racconta un noto caso emblematico. Con il contributo di Maurizio Casiraghi e Cecilia Dutto! Puoi votare DiscoScienza per il premio del pubblico qui IlPod AmazonMusic Grazie! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Through the 1960s up to the 1990s scientists learned how to read DNA's sequence of bases, first by handfuls, then faster and faster. Ray Wu learned to determine the order of a dozen or so bases in the late 1960s. The mid-70's brought Fred Sanger and Alan Coulson's "plus and minus" method, and the first viral DNA sequenced. We then talk of Maxam and Gilbert's method, Kary Mullis' polymerase chain reaction, and Alex Jeffrey's discovery of repetitive sequences. Semi-automatic sequencing arrived in the mid-1980s, and then the Human Genome Project was planned and begun by 1990.Support the show Support my podcast at https://www.patreon.com/thehistoryofchemistry Tell me how your life relates to chemistry! E-mail me at steve@historyofchem.com Get my book, O Mg! How Chemistry Came to Be, from World Scientific Publishing, https://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/12670#t=aboutBook

Der heutige Gesprächspartner ist wieder Jan David Zimmermann, was mich sehr freut! Jan ist Autor, Journalist und Wissenschaftsforscher, hat auch gerade ein neues und äußerst empfehlenswertes Buch herausgebracht — Lethe, Vom Vergessen des Totalitären. Außerdem ist er Redakteur beim Stichpunkt-Magazin. Das heutige Thema ist »(Epistemische) Krisen?«.  Eine Anmerkung vorweg: wir haben die Episode vor dem Hamas-Terroranschlag  aufgenommen. Wir beide sind von der darauf folgenden Welle des Antisemitismus in Europa, den USA und Australien zutiefst schockiert. Besonders erschreckend ist daran natürlich die Tatsache, dass zahlreiche antisemitische und unfassbar inhumane Äußerungen von Personen, die zuvor als Intellektuelle bezeichnet wurden, stammen — Personen, die an Unis unterrichten, in Medien arbeiten, oder in politischen Funktionen tätig sind. Hier findet sich leider wir ein Thema bestätigt, das ich in vergangenen Episoden angesprochen habe und auch in zukünftigen Episoden thematisieren werde: einen bedrückenden Verlust an intellektueller Redlichkeit und Qualität in wesentlichen gesellschaftlichen Institutionen wie etwa Universitäten.  Aber selbst wenn wir später aufgenommen hätten, hätte ich dieses Thema ohnedies noch nicht im Podcast aufgreifen wollen. Auch wenn die Eckpunkte dieses Konfliktes sehr klar sind, viele Details und Folgen sind es nicht. Den Grund habe ich in früheren Episoden schon mal erklärt: dieser Podcast beschäftigt sich ganz bewusst nicht mit aktuellen Themen. Ich möchte hier nicht im medialen Rennen um die knalligste Spekulation beteiligen. In der heutigen Medienlandschaft dominiert das Rauschen  und erst, wenn der Lärm leiser geworden ist,  oft nach einigen Jahren, kann man anfangen, solche Themen vernünftig und in der Tiefe aufzuarbeiten.  Daher habe ich auch erst in diesem Jahr begonnen, Covid als Thema langsam aufzugreifen und weitere Folgen sind in Vorbereitung. Aber zurück zu dieser Episode: Was ist eine (epistemische) Krise? Mit welchen Transformationen haben wir seit 2020 zu tun? Fallen wir von einer Krise in die nächste, oder doch nicht? Warum ist der Krisenbegriff selbst schwierig? Wer definiert eigentlich, was eine Krise ist und wie groß sich diese darstellt, denken wir an die stete Aufrüstung der Worte um noch Gehör zu finden: zur gleichen Zeit, wie die IPCC-Szenarien mit dem letzten Bericht optimistischer werden, wird die Sprache aufgerüstet, aus dem Klimawandel wird die Klimakrise und nun die Klimakatastrophe. Was folgt als Nächstes? Und die Krisen machen vor sich selbst nicht halt, denn diejenigen, die die Krisen ausrufen, unsere Institutionen und Universitäten, stecken selbst in einer schweren Krise. Wir erleben also vermeintlich multilple Krisen, und trotzdem fällt es der Gesellschaft schwer sich auf gemeinsame Momente zu einigen! Ein Kristallisationpunkt des Diskurses ist das Intenet? Aber welche Rolle spielt es: ist es totalitär und radikal, verdummend oder eher das Gegenteil?  Wird gar die Komplexität der Welt heute besser gespiegelt als je zuvor, nur gefällt dies manchen nicht, die sich zuvor in der Deutungshoheit gesehen haben? Wie kann man der Gesellschaft komplexe Verhältnisse vermitteln? “If you're not confuse you're not paying attention”, Tom Peters Oder ist die Komplexität vielleicht nur ein Auswuchs, eine Täuschung der Verwirrungen des postmodernen Relativismus? Wer kann urteilen, oder besser: wem trauen wir Urteilskraft zu? Intellektuelle Bescheidenheit und Umgang mit Fehlern und Fehleinschätzungen scheinen immer wesentlicher zu werden und sind dennoch selten zu finden. »Das ist das Prinzip der dauernden Fehlerkorrektur: die Methode, dauernd nach Fehlern zu suchen und frühzeitig kleine und beginnende Fehler zu korrigieren. Diese Methode der rechtzeitigen Fehlerkorrektur zu verfolgen ist nicht nur eine Weisheitsregel, sondern geradezu eine moralische Pflicht: Es ist die Pflicht zur dauernden Selbstkritik, zum dauernden Lernen, zu dauernden kleinen Verbesserungen unserer Einstellung, unserer Urteile – auch der moralischen – und unserer Theorien. Hier wird das Können zum Sollen: wir können aus unseren Fehlern lernen; darum ist es unsere Pflicht, aus unseren Fehlern zu lernen.«, Karl Raimund Popper Kann Selbstkritik als moralische Pflicht gelten? Wie sieht es mit Heinz von Foersters Beobachtung zweiter Ordnung aus, und welche Rolle spielt das ständige Reframen eigentlich klarer Sachverhalte?  Müssen wir die Krise überwinden oder führt sie ohnedies zu neuen Bedingungen, die besser sind als zuvor? Wie sieht es mit der sozialen Regulierung von Wissensformen aus, anders gesagt, was können wir von Seiten der wissensoziologischen Diskussion lernen? Gibt es so etwas wie illegitimes Wissen? Wie ist das Verhältnis zwischen Experten/Wissenschaftern und Politik? Wir gehen dann noch etwas weiter ins 20. Jahrhundert zurück und kommen (metaphorisch) zu Thomas Kuhns Paradigmenwechsel und stellen die Frage: Wenn der Schleier gefallen ist, möchte man wieder in den Nebel zurück? Was ist von Wissenschaftsskepsis zu halten? Ist dies ein Problem oder eine große Chance für unsere Gesellschaft? Aller vermeintlicher Inklusivitätsbemühungen zum Trotz scheint das Gegenteil zu passieren und wir werden immer ambiguitätsintolerater. Aus »anything goes« wird »nothing goes«. Komplexe Menschen, die wichtige Beiträge für unsere Gesellschaft leisten, können in anderen Aspekte völlig irren, man denke an Wissenschafter wie Isaac Newton oder Kary Mullis. Was können wir noch von Ernst von Glasersfeld, und Heinz von Foerster, den radikaler Konstruktivsten, lernen? Dann kommen wir auf die Frage, ob die Geisteswissenschaften sich an den Naturwissenschaften orientieren sollen? Wir vertagen diese Frage aber auf eine andere Episode. Wie kommt es eigentlich in der Wissenschaft zur Meinungsbildung, welche Rolle spielen Epistemic Communities, und was ist von Gruppenbildung in der Wissenschaft zu halten? Pierre Bourdieu spricht vom Homo Academicus, Ludwig Fleck von Denkkollektiven. In welchem Zusammenhang steht das zu den moderneren Formulierungen wie »Trust the Science« oder gar »Follow the Science«? Was ist die Triple Helix von Wissenschaft, Wirtschaft und Politik? Wie stehen diese Überlegungen zu der Tatsache, dass Fortschritt nur mit heterodoxem und orthodoxem Denken gemeinsam zu bekommen ist? Was bedeutet dies für Diversität in Wissenschaft und Eliten in Theorie und Praxis? Welchen Schaden richtet dabei das heute überall zu erlebende Pseudo-Qualitätsmanagement an? »Nicht mehr die Wahrheit hat hier eine Macht, sondern was Macht über uns hat legitimieren wir theoretisch als das Wahre.«, Hans Blumenberg Wie kann es gelingen, Fehlerkultur guter (!) Wissenschaft in die Politik mitnehmen? Dabei aber gleichzeitig nicht den Fehler von über-Rationalisierung zu begehen, also Wissenschaft als rationales Schild für Politik und Management zu missbrauchen? »Viele Menschen lächeln über altmodische Wahrsager. Doch sobald die Hellseher mit Computern arbeiten, nehmen wir ihre Vorhersagen ernst und sind bereit, für sie zu zahlen.«, Gerd Gigerenzer Dabei stelle ich wieder einmal die fundamentale Frage: wollen Menschen belogen, oder würde Wahrheit politisch belohnt werden? Ich glaube zweiteres, aber was ist Jans Meinung? Zuletzt stellt sich die ernüchternde Frage, ob wir die Dimension eines großen Umbruches während des Umbruches überhaupt verstehen kann? Wer die erste Episode mit Jan noch nicht gehört hat, unbedingt Nachhören! Referenzen Andere Episoden Episode 80: Wissen, Expertise und Prognose, eine Reflexion Episode 79: Escape from Model Land, a Conversation with Dr. Erica Thompson Episode 74: Apocalype Always Episode 72: Scheitern an komplexen Problemen? Wissenschaft, Sprache und Gesellschaft — Ein Gespräch mit Jan David Zimmermann Episode 47: Große Worte Episode 45: Mit »Reboot« oder Rebellion aus der Krise? Episode 39: Follow the Science? Episode 38: Eliten, ein Gespräch mit Prof. Michael Hartmann Episode 37: Probleme und Lösungen Episode 27: Wicked Problems Episode 25: Entscheiden unter Unsicherheit Jan David Zimmermann Homepage von Jan Jan David Zimmermann, LETHE. Vom Vergessen des Totalitären, als vobiscum (2023) Stichpunkt Magazin Facebook: Jan D. Zimmermann Instagram:  j._zimmermann Fachliche Referenzen Karl Popper: Das Elend des Historizismus. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2003, S. XI [Vorwort zur deutschen Ausgabe] Reason TV, The Truth about Sweden's COVID Policy (2023) Uwe Pörsken: Plastikwörter. Die Sprache einer internationalen Diktatur. Klett-Cotta 2011 (ursprünglich erschienen: 1988) Mai'a K. Davis Cross, Rethinking epistemic communities twenty years later (2012) Ludwik Fleck, Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache. Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv, Suhrkamp (1980) Peter M. Haas, Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination, International Organization, Vol. 46, No. 1, Knowledge, Power, and International PolicyCoordination (Winter, 1992), pp. 1-35 Hyrum Lewis & Verlan Lewis, The Myth of Left and Right: How the Political Spectrum Misleads and Harms America, Oxford University Press (2022) Mitchell G . Ash, Wissenschaft und Politik als Ressourcen füreinander (2002) Hans Blumenberg: Paradigmen zu einer Metaphorologie. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M .1960, S.22. Gerd Gigerenzer, Risiko – Wie man die richtigen Entscheidungen trifft, Pantheon (2020)

We're sure you've heard of the Nobel Prize although it's hard to make the case Beth has since she mispronounces it quite a bit in this episode. But have you heard of Nobel Disease? It's when people are labeled geniuses and go on to embrace some whackadoodle pseudoscience. In today's Strange Country episode, Beth and Kelly discuss Kary Mullis, the only Nobel winner to be referred to as “generally barking mad.” He discovered the polymerase chain reaction, which we all regularly employed when we wanted to make dang certain it wasn't covid. Theme music: Big White Lie by A Cast of Thousands Cite your sources: “First DNA Exoneration, Center on Wrongful Convictions: Northwestern Pritzker School of Law.” Northwestern Law, https://www.law.northwestern.edu/legalclinic/wrongfulconvictions/exonerations/il/gary-dotson.html. Accessed 9 October 2023.   Guo, Jerry. “A Little Off the Top for History.” The New York Times, 13 July 2008, https://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/13/fashion/13hair.html. Accessed 9 October 2023.   Jarry, Jonathan. “The Man Who Photocopied DNA and Also Saw a Talking Fluorescent Raccoon.” McGill University, 15 August 2019, https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/technology-history/man-who-photocopied-dna-and-also-saw-talking-fluorescent-raccoon. Accessed 9 October 2023.   Joseph, Pat. “Intolerable Genius: Berkeley's Most Controversial Nobel Laureate.” Cal Alumni Association, 12 December 2019, https://alumni.berkeley.edu/california-magazine/winter-2019/intolerable-genius-berkeleys-most-controversial-nobel-laureate/. Accessed 8 October 2023.   Loeb, Dylan. “Kary B. Mullis, 74, Dies; Found a Way to Analyze DNA and Won Nobel (Published 2019).” The New York Times, 15 August 2019, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/15/science/kary-b-mullis-dead.html?searchResultPosition=1. Accessed 9 October 2023.   Markel, Howard. “How the talented Oscar Levant broke taboos by talking about mental health.” PBS, 14 August 2021, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/how-the-talented-oscar-levant-broke-taboos-by-talking-about-mental-health. Accessed 9 October 2023.   “Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Fact Sheet.” National Human Genome Research Institute, 17 August 2020, https://www.genome.gov/about-genomics/fact-sheets/Polymerase-Chain-Reaction-Fact-Sheet. Accessed 9 October 2023.   Schreiber, Dan. The Theory of Everything Else: A Voyage Into the World of the Weird. HarperCollins Publishers, 2023.   Thielking, Megan. “How Linus Pauling duped America into believing vitamin C cures colds.” Vox, 27 February 2015, https://www.vox.com/2015/1/15/7547741/vitamin-c-myth-pauling. Accessed 9 October 2023.   Warden, Rob. “Kary B. Mullis: A lament for the loss of a life that saved many.” Injustice Watch, 18 August 2019, https://www.injusticewatch.org/commentary/2019/requiem-for-kary-b-mullis-a-lament-for-a-life-that-saved-many/. Accessed 9 October 2023.

  Article: WHO Pandemic Treaty: What It Is, Why It Matters and How to Stop It Article: International Health Regulations Amendments Will Give WHO Unprecedented Power to Override National Sovereignty, Expert Warns Fauci funded gain of function research via Peter Daszak of the EcoHealth Alliance Ivor Cummins' YouTube channel and Twitter (X) handle Video: Jon Stewart Embraces Lab Leak Theory As Colbert FREAKS OUT! (The Jimmy Dore Show) Video: Woody Harrelson Tells Truth About COVID On SNL! (The Jimmy Dore Show) Video: Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. interviewed by Joe Rogan The US govt is spending 1 million USD every month on Fauci's security Video: Fauci Accused Of Lying To Congress About Virus Research (The Jimmy Dore Show) Video: Brought to you by Pfizer! (The Jimmy Dore Show) "I do not attack Democrats because I agree with the Republicans. I attack Democrats because they agree with the Republicans" - Jimmy Dore Video: Judge Orders Pfizer Vaxx Data Released In 8 Months - NOT 75 Years! (The Jimmy Dore Show) Video: Damning Video of Media Lying About Ivermectin (The Jimmy Dore Show) The agreement between Israel and Pfizer was signed before the EUA was obtained Video: AP’s Colossal Joe Rogan Fact Check Fail (The Jimmy Dore Show) Video: PCR Test Founder Kary Mullis Speaks Out Against the Misinterpretation of the PCR Test Video: Dr. Kary Mullis on Anthony Fauci "Independent fact-checkers" on social media sites Part B: Jeff Meek; beginning at 1:00:44 New book by Jeff Meek titled The JFK Files: Pieces of the Assassination Puzzle (Paperback) Article: The JFK Files: Pieces of the Assassination Puzzle by Jim DiEugenio Video: Robert Groden and the first public broadcast of the Zapruder Film on Geraldo Rivera's show Good Night America Book: A Lone Gunman? by Jeffrey L. Meek: Paperback Book: Manipulation of Lee Harvey Oswald: And the Cover-Up That Followed by Jeffrey L. Meek: Paperback Book: Harvey and Lee (2003) (.pdf) by John Armstrong Video: The intelligence community has six ways to Sunday to get back at you (Senator Schumer) Jim Gochenaur and Elmer Moore FREE Download Ebook: Forgive My Grief by Penn Jones, Jr.: Vol 1, Vol 2, Vol 3, Vol 4 Hot Springs Village Voice website: www.hsvvoice.com  

El presente episodio es de vital importancia para comprender, al igual que evidenciar, cómo los acontecimientos que han tenido lugar especialmente desde finales del año 2019 (Operación COVID-19) fueron algo absolutamente programado de antemano. Tendremos ocasión de escuchar un misterioso comunicado enviado a una empresa consultora financiera ubicada en Florida. Una extraña misiva cuya procedencia es desconocida, pero que merece la pena tener en consideración, especialmente en estos tiempos. Presentaremos hasta 14 evidencias específicas que demuestran que los acontecimientos vividos durante estos últimos años forman parte de una agenda y un plan perfectamente diseñado: 1 – 1995: El Doctor Pierre Gilbert a través de una conferencia denuncia que a través de vacunas obligatorias pretenden llevar a cabo un plan de control poblacional. 2 – 2003: Michael C. Rupert, ex oficial de policía de Los Ángeles (Estados Unidos), emite un informe mediante el cual denuncia un futuro plan de despoblación mediante armas biológicas, mencionando el SARS. 3 – 2005: Bill Ryan comparte públicamente una información transmitida por un confidente francmasón, quien en el año 2005 estuvo presente en una reunión de igualmente francmasones en la cual se indicaban los futuros planes a desarrollar. Dicha información fue emitida por primera vez en el año 2010 y se exponía cómo China literalmente “cogería un resfriado” que pudiera expandirse por el resto del mundo. 4 – 2009: La Doctora Rima Laibow advirtió que “se está preparando una pandemia a nivel mundial y pronto nos enfrentaremos a la vacunación obligatoria forzosa bajo términos engañosos”. 5 – 2010: Aparece el informe “Scenarios for the future of technology and international development pdf” con la “Operación Lockstep” de la Fundación Rockefeller y Global Business Network, en el que se habla de una pandemia exactamente igual a la de COVID-19. 6 – 2014: El periodista de investigación Harry Vox avisa de que nos tienen preparada una pandemia mundial con vacunas obligatorias forzosas. Concretamente hace referencia al documento de la fundación Rockefeller – Operación Lockstep. 7 – 2017: Posiblemente una de las evidencias más aplastantes y es que Anthony Fauci (el principal especialista en enfermedades infecciosas del gobierno de Estados Unidos) fue documentado en la Universidad de Georgetown diciendo que habrá una pandemia a la que se enfrentará esta presidencia (en aquel momento la de Donald Trump). Según sus propias palabras “No hay duda de que habrá un desafío para la próxima administración en el ámbito de las enfermedades infecciosas”, dijo que se produciría un “brote sorpresa” durante la administración de Trump. 8 – 2019: Se produce el ejercicio de planificación Crimson Contagion realizado por el Departamento de Salud y Servicios Humanos de Estados Unidos, el cual involucró a 12 estados y al menos una docena de Agencias Federales. El escenario del ejercicio funcional Crimson Contagion 2019 se basó en un nuevo virus de influenza A (H7N9) que se origina en China. 9 – 2019: El 7 de agosto del 2019 muere Kary Mullis, premio Nobel e inventor de la prueba RT/PCR (la que utiliza la OMS para el Covid-19). Denunció que su prueba no servía para determinar enfermedad infecciosa alguna y era un gran detractor de personajes como Anthony Fauci. 10 – 2019: Tan pronto como el 12 de septiembre de 2019, la Comisión Europea estaba organizando la primera Cumbre Mundial sobre Vacunación, en asociación con la OMS y la industria de las vacunas, de la cual la Fundación Bill y Melinda Gates es un pilar. Esto fue tres meses antes del inicio de una epidemia que ha sido un formidable acelerador de ganancias para toda una industria. 11 – 2019: En octubre la Fundación Bill y Melinda Gates organiza el Evento 201, en el que se simula una pandemia, casualmente, por un derivado de coronavirus y que casualmente también se inicia en China y se extiende por todo el mundo. 12 – 2019: El 17 de noviembre aparece el primer caso del que se tiene registro de un hombre de 55 años con Covid-19 en la provincia de Hubei, China. La enfermedad se propagó a nivel mundial en enero de 2020 supuestamente debido a un murciélago infectado en la provincia de Wuhan, China. 13 – 2019: El 23 de noviembre de 2019, Milken Institute publicó un video de casi una hora de duración con un panel de expertos en salud (Anthony Fauci y otros) que discutieron los nuevos esfuerzos para crear vacunas universales contra la influenza y destapan lo que tenían preparado para el 2020. 14 – 2019: Diciembre. El Congreso de los Estados Unidos redefinió la palabra “vacuna” para incluir inyecciones de ARNm. Hasta entonces, la definición oficial del gobierno para la palabra “vacuna” no incluía la tecnología de ARN mensajero. Esta serie de evidencias, las cuales contemplaremos en detalle, son suficientes para disipar cualquier duda en torno a la programación e intencionalidad de los eventos. También analizaremos un de nuevo conflicto que por desgracia está asolando Oriente Medio, cobrando inocentes vidas en Israel y Palestina, el cual parece haber sido reactivado mediante una operación de falsa bandera. LA MISIÓN ANGLOSAJONA - BILL RYAN (PROJECT CAMELOT): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uB_LSoC5akQ DOCUMENTO FUNDACIÓN ROCKEFELLER - LOCKSTEP (2010): https://libertynow.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Operation-Lockstep-Rockefeller-Foundation.pdf EL SORPRENDENTE "AUGURIO" DE THE ECONOMIST EN 2012 SOBRE HAMÁS E ISRAEL: https://www.periodicodeibiza.es/noticias/enlared/2023/10/16/2031495/portada-economist-sobre-hamas-israel-hace-diez-anos.html CONTACTO: eliniciado@yahoo.com Este programa no tiene ánimo de lucro ni será monetizado, por el contrario el único afán es la máxima difusión de cuestiones que nos atañen a todos.

This podcast is a commentary and does not contain any copyrighted material of the reference source. We strongly recommend accessing/buying the reference source at the same time. ■Reference Source https://www.ted.com/talks/kary_mullis_a_next_gen_cure_for_killer_infections ■Post on this topic (You can get FREE learning materials!) https://englist.me/50-academic-words-reference-from-kary-mullis-a-next-gen-cure-for-killer-infections-ted-talk/ ■Youtube Video https://youtu.be/eYIPCCVZzns (All Words) https://youtu.be/rYUBZpyfP-g (Advanced Words) https://youtu.be/HyoxfWOQ3ac (Quick Look) ■Top Page for Further Materials https://englist.me/ ■SNS (Please follow!)

This podcast is a commentary and does not contain any copyrighted material of the reference source. We strongly recommend accessing/buying the reference source at the same time. ■Reference Source https://www.ted.com/talks/kary_mullis_play_experiment_discover ■Post on this topic (You can get FREE learning materials!) https://englist.me/238-academic-words-reference-from-kary-mullis-play-experiment-discover-ted-talk/ ■Youtube Video https://youtu.be/JKUFFnjmgVY (All Words) https://youtu.be/Ti_ixcdd0F0 (Advanced Words) https://youtu.be/aPjT9OqGSVM (Quick Look) ■Top Page for Further Materials https://englist.me/ ■SNS (Please follow!)

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was discovered in 1983 by Kary Mullis and Michael Smith, who were jointly awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1993. Since then, PCR has been a cornerstone method that has been a pillar of discovery and applied science. The various types of PCR are sometimes confusing, and the relative pros and cons of each method are not always clear, which is why it's so great to have this episode's guest explain them all in a simple and clear-cut way. Dave Bauer, PhD, is an Application Scientist at Thermo Fisher Scientific that specializes in real time PCR (qPCR) and digital PCR (dPCR).  He has an educational background in physics, mathematics, and biology, but what's more important is that Dave loves to help others learn and to break down a topic's complexities to make it more understandable and approachable.  In this episode we hear Dave explain the difference between qPCR and dPCR, the importance of Poisson statistics to dPCR, dead volume, reaction chamber volume consistency, and more.  We learn how qPCR and dPCR complement each other and how they relate to sequencing methods for applications like single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) detection.  As you've come to expect from Absolute Gene-ius, you also get a good sense of who Dave is and how he got to his current role. We learn about how he knew right away that academia wasn't for him, how he ended up unexpectedly working in forensics after his PhD, and how he eventually landed in his current Application Scientist role. Dave shares some great insights and advice, including how students should care less about their degree's name and more about what techniques they're learning and using in their studies. Visit the Absolute Gene-ius page to learn more about the guest, the hosts, and the Applied Biosystems QuantStudio Absolute Q Digital PCR System.This episode includes the following sound effects from freesound.org, licensed under CC BY-ND 4.0:“Sax Jazz,” by alonart“Balloon Pop / Christmas cracker / Confetti Cannon,” by Breviceps“Crowd Cheering,” by SoundsExciting

In this week's episode, we begin a look at the issue of HIV/AIDS, starting with a look at two important scientific figures involved in the debate about the relationship between HIV and AIDS, Kary Mullis and Peter Duesberg. We'll consider the issues of "denialism" and the strange malady of "Nobelitis," and why these issues are important in our own context.

First Rutgers and now some small college in Atlanta, all requiring students to mask up and provide proof of vaccinations. As we head into Virgo season, it seems as though they're ready to dust off the pandemic operation as Ukraine fades. Throw in a flame topper with climate change claims and the Fall is looking more and more like a replay of 2020.

A bioweapon like none other fakeotube.com/video/6122/a-bio… Controlled opposition Kary Mullis and the PCR fraud | Fakeologist.com fakeologist.com/blog/2023/07/1… Excess deaths with Senator Rennick – YouTube www.youtube.com/watch?v=UR1X9O… Saturday Emergency Broadcast: Dr. Rima Laibow Exposes Next Phase fakeotube.com/video/6116/satur… What is a Woman: Wrong Answers Only fakeotube.com/video/6117/what-… Matt Walsh What Is A Woman? Documentary (Reloaded) [June 2, 2023] rumble.com/v2rrobo-matt-walsh-… […]

Kary Banks Mullis (December 28, 1944 – August 7, 2019) was an American biochemist. In recognition of his role in the invention of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique, he shared the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry with Michael Smith and was awarded the Japan Prize in the same year. PCR became a central technique in biochemistry and molecular biology, described by The New York Times as "highly original and significant, virtually dividing biology into the two epochs of before PCR and after PCR." Original video ⁠here⁠⁠ Full Wikipedia entry ⁠here⁠ Kary Mullis' books ⁠here --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/theunadulteratedintellect/support

Celia Farber is a journalist who started her career covering the AIDS epidemic for Spin Magazine in the 80s. She quickly earned a name for herself by interviewing people like Peter Duesberg and giving a voice to those who dared to counter the accepted HIV-causes-AIDS mainstream narrative or question the safety or efficacy of AZT, the most widely prescribed AIDS drug. In this conversation with Celia we discuss:Her early coverage of the AIDS epidemicThat famous interview with Peter DuesbergCovering the “underground” of the AIDS sceneThe parallels between AIDS and COVIDWhy she thinks we're dealing with a Death CultThe reissuing of her book “Serious Adverse Events”…and more!Learn more about Celia at her Substack and order her book Serious Adverse Events today.Terrain Theory episodes are not to be taken as medical advice. You are your own primary healthcare provider.If you have a Terrain Transformation story you would like to share, email us at ben@terraintheory.net.Learn more at www.terraintheory.net.Music by Chris Merenda

Below are the questions covered in today's episode (with their timestamps). Get your questions answered by Cal! Here's the link: bit.ly/3U3sTvoVideo from today's episode:  youtube.com/calnewportmediaDEEP DIVE: How well are you living? [11:14]- How do you track deep life habits? [28:07]- How do I become more social? (Bonus: How does Cal avoid being killed by Jocko?) [34:15]- How do I distill essential ideas from complex topics? [46:13]- How does Cal research his articles? [53:49]- Should I get a Deep Life tattoo? [59:41]THREE INTERESTING THINGS: - Guillermo Del Toro Bought a Second House to Boost his Creativity [1:13:33]kpcc.org/show/the-frame/2016-07-22/bleak-house-a-tour-inside-guillermo-del-toros-creative-man-cave- Kary Mullis's Nobel-Winning Moment of Insight [1:19:56]nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/1993/mullis/lecture/ - Charles Dickens Wrote “A Christmas Carol” on Foot [1:22:38]Thanks to our Sponsors:stamps.com/deepgrammarly.com/deephensonshaving.com/calmybodytutor.comThanks to Jesse Miller for production, Jay Kerstens for the intro music, and Mark Miles for mastering.

In dieser Episode führe ich ein äußerst interessates Gespräch mich mit Prof. Stephan Schleim. Er ist deutscher Philosoph und Psychologe, Professor für Theorie und Geschichte der Psychologie Universität Groningen. Seine Spezialgebiete sind die Theorie und praktische Anwendungen der Psychologie und Neurowissenschaften.  In seiner Forschung zur Wissenschaftskommunikation untersucht er, wie Darstellungen der Hirnforschung akademische und gesellschaftliche Debatten beeinflussen (z. B. in der Neuroethik oder dem Neurorecht). Seit 15 Jahren ist er mit seinem Blog Menschen-Bilder bei den SciLogs vertreten, dem Portal für Wissenschaftsblogs des Spektrum-Verlags. Außerdem ist er Autor mehrerer Bücher.  Ich beschäftige mich ja schon länger mit der Frage, ob unser Wissenschaftsbetrieb nicht an einigen Stellen falsch abgebogen ist und was wir tun könnten, ja müssten um diese Situation zu verbessern. Warum ist es für uns wir als Gesellschaft wichtig, diese Problemlage zu verstehen? Denn wesentliche politische Entscheidungen hängen ja von wissenschaftlichen und technischen Aussagen und Möglichkeiten ab. Wir beginnen unser Gespräch mit der Frage, ob sich die Erwartungen, die in der aus der Gesellschaft aber meist auch aus der Wissenschaft heraus an die Wissenschaft formuliert werden erfüllen? Schreitet Wissenschaft immer schneller voran? Führt dies stetig zu neuen und bahnbrechenden technischen Fortschritten? Zahlreiche Untersuchungen legen eher das Gegenteil nahe. Wie sieht es nun mit Fortschritt und Qualität wissenschaftlicher Erkenntnis aus? Welche Anreizsysteme herrschen aktuell vor, nach welchen Indikatoren werden Wissenschafter gemessen, welche Definitionen von Produktivität gibt es in der Wissenschaft und was bedeutet dies für Erkenntnis und Innovation? »Lässt man Kants akademischen Werdegang kurz Revue passieren, muss man zu dem Befund kommen, dass ein Denker wie Kant im gegenwärtigen Wissenschaftsbetrieb keine Chance gehabt hätte. Im Gegenteil: Er verkörpert geradezu alles das, was dem Eifer der Universitätsreformer ein Dorn im Auge ist.«, Konrad Paul Liessmann Es gibt nur noch selten in der modernen Wissenschaft solche positiven Beispiele, etwa den 3D-Atlas des Gehirns, wo das Ergebnis jahrzehntelanger, qualitativ hochwertiger Grundlagenforschung dargestellt werden. »Die Wissenschaft befindet sich großteils in einem hermeneutisch abgeriegelten, selbstreferentiellen System.« Was sind Beispiele für die Probleme, die wir beschreiben? Die 90er Jahre waren in den USA die Dekade des Gehirns. Auch Europa hat mit dem Human Brain Project nachgezogen — unter anderem mit dem Ziel, ein Gehirn im Computer zu simulieren. Was ist das Ergebnis dieser Dekade? Wir diskutieren Erwartungen und Versprechungen vom Gedankenlesen bis zum  Lügendetektor; was waren die Folgen für die Diskussion des »freien Willen«, für Recht und Medizin? In den letzten Jahrzehnten waren auch die »bunten Bilder« des Gehirns, die aus statistischen Auswertungen von Kernspintomographen entstehen, ein Hit in wissenschaftlichen Artikeln aber auch in populärwissenschaftlichen Berichten. Man konnte fast sagen: keine Psychologie ohne »Hirnbilder«! Sind die Ergebnisse, die man mit der Kernspintomographie erhalten hat aber überhaupt vertrauenswürdig und korrekt? Beziehungsweise unter welchen Versuchsbedingungen kann man mit seriösen Ergebnissen rechnen und wurden diese in der Regel erziehlt? Also bleibt letztlich die Frage: können diese Hirnscanner, die richtig viel Geld kosten, überhaupt das Kriterium der Reproduzierbarkeit — als Mindeststandard wissenschaftlicher Qualität — erfüllen? War der Hype gerechtfertigt? »Es gibt einige gute Studien, aber in der großen Masse sind viele dieser Studien, glaube ich,  nicht vertrauenswürdig. […]  Diesen Schluss muss man ziehen.« Aber auch in zahlreichen anderen Bereichen der Psychologie und Psychiatrie erleben wir im Rückblick durchwachsene Ergebnisse, so etwa bei den wenig beeindruckenden Erfolgen der Antidepressiva in der Psychiatrie. Ich spreche dann auch andere Hype-Themen der Vergangenheit an, und frage, warum wir aus diesen relativen Fehlschlägen so wenig lernen, z.B. Richard Nixon und den Krieg gegen den Krebs, Erik Topol und seine Kritik des Human Genome Projects sowie die mangelhafte Leistung von KI-Systemen in der Covid-Behandlung. Wir diskutieren dann die Konsequenzen dieser Hypes, denn diese sind nicht einfach nur kurzfristige Irrtümer, sondern in ihnen stecken zum Teil enorme Opportunitätskosten und Kollateralschäden. Wenn wir über die aktuelle Situation hinausschauen: »Wissenschaft die auch taugt« — was könnten wir die Standards sein? Prof. Schleim bezieht sich auf einen Artikel von Thomas Kuhn: Hartnäckigkeit und Dogmatismus ist manchmal auch ein wesentliches Mittel zum Erfolg in der Wissenschaft.  Die Behandlung von Aids kann als als Erfolgs-Beispiel gelten, auch die Entdeckung der PCR durch Kary Mullis, die psychiatrische Forschung mit Verengung auf Neuro-Wissenschaft allerdings als negatives. Überhaupt ist Kary Mullis ein gutes Beispiel für einen ultra-harnäckigen Wissenschafter gewesen, der in einem engen Bereich hohe Leistung gebracht hat, darüber hinaus aber eher für fragwürdige Ideen bekannt wurde. Nun stellt sich aber die Frage: was für das Individuum des Wissenschafters gilt, gilt das auch für die Wissenschaft als Ganzes? Und wo hört die Hartnäckigkeit auf und wird zum (sanften) Betrug? Fake it till you make it — ein wissenschaftliches Erfolgsmodell? Welchen Effekt haben New Public Management, Messen, Optimieren in der Wissenschaft(sverwaltung), Zitationsfaktoren, Impact-Faktor, usw? »There is no cost to getting things wrong. The cost is not to getting them published.«, Prof. Brian Nosek Wir erleben aktuell in vielen Bereichen einen Hyperwettbewerb und Bewertung von Forschung — wenn man in kurzen Zeiträumen »Durchbrüche« darstellen muss, um überhaupt überleben zu können — was wird das für Konseqzenzen für Richtung und Qualität und Vermarktung der Forschung haben? Die Probleme, über die wir sprechen, sind bei weitem keine, die nur in den Interna der Wissenschaft Folgen haben, sondern breiten sich über Wissenschaftskommunikation und Expertenwesen in Gesellschaft und Politik aus? Hier ist auch der Aspekt zu sehen, dass die Verantwortung für diese Hypes auch an den Konsumenten liegt — eine Folge der Konkurrenz um Aufmerksamkeit. Was ist überhaupt von Wissenschafts-News zu halten? Denn die Taktung wird immer höher — ist das sinnvoll oder sogar schädlich? Wissenschaft ist selten eindeutig, vor allem nicht in komplexen Fragestellungen. Führt das nicht eher zu Verwirrung statt Information bei der Bevölkerung? Kann mehr Transparenz in den wissenschaftlichen Prozess die Situation verbessern? Können wir vom Rechtswesen lernen — was sind Folgen für wissenschaftliche Freiheit, politische Freiheit und Demokratie? Was können wir aus den Erfahrungen erfolgreicher Wissenschafter lernen? Ohne die Freiheit, "Sachen zu machen die nicht Mainstream waren", sei seine Forschungsarbeit nicht möglich gewesen, Anton Zeilinger Max Perutz, der österr. Wissenschafter, der von den Nazis nach England fliehen musste, hatte in seinem Labor neun Nobelpreisträger! Auf die Frage, wie man so erfolgreich wird antwortet er: »Keine Politik, keine Gremien, keine Berichte, keine Gutachter, keine Interviews, nur begabte, hoch-motivierte junge Menschen, ausgewählt von wenigen Männern mit gutem Blick.« Und was machen wir im heutigen Wissenschaftsbetrieb? Einer der Ursachen für die Probleme im aktuellen Wissenschaftsbetrieb ist das Publikations(un)wesen: welche Rolle spielen kommerzielle Verlage, Open Access, Preprint, sind Daten und Prozesse transparent? Welche Rolle spielt der Antrags-Irrsinn und die damit verbundene Bürokratie? Die bekannte amerikanische Tiefsee-Forscherin Edith Widder bringt den Konflikt zwischen innovativer Forschung und Finanzierung auf den Punkt:  »Die Sache ist die: In der Wissenschaft muss man den Förderstellen erklären, was man entdecken wird, bevor sie einem Geld geben. Und ich wusste nicht was ich entdecken werde. Somit bekam ich keine Unterstützung.« Wo und in welchem Umfang macht Antragswesen Sinn, in welcher Form, und wo ist es ein Hindernis für gute Wissenschaft und verhindert vor allem auch, dass gute Wissenschafter Karrieren machen. Welcher innovative und kreative Wissenschafter ist Willens 30-40% seines Alltags mit stumpfer Bürokratie und Antragschreiben zu verbringen? Welche Folgen hat dies daher für die Selektion an Universitäten?  Erik Weinstein nennt dies passend: »snap-to-grid intellectualism« Führen diese Prozesse zu kontroproduktiven Anpassungsprozessen an Indikatoren, Bürokratie, Regeln usw. Lenken wir also die verbleibende Intelligenz der Forscher weg von der Forschung hin zum Übergehen und Ausnutzen von Regeln und Bürokratie? Einfache Versprechungen und Aussagen treffen in der Realität sehr schnell an ihre Grenzen und so ist es auch nicht einfach Schritte aus der Krise zu finden. Ein erster Ansatzpunkt findet sich etwa in der Magna Charta Univesitatum. Referenzen Andere Podcast Episode 53 und Episode 54: Data Science und Machine Learning, Hype und Realität Episode 47: Große Worte Episode 44: Was ist Fortschritt? Ein Gespräch mit Philipp Blom Episode 39: Follow the Science? Episode 28: Jochen Hörisch: Für eine (denk)anstössige Universität! Episode 19 und Episode 20: Offene Systeme Episode 18: Gespräch mit Andreas Windisch: Physik, Fortschritt oder Stagnation Stephan Schleim Homepage von Stephan Schleim Stephan Schleim auf Twitter Menschen-Bilder Blog Stephan Schleim an der Universität Groningen Universität Groningen Die Neurogesellschaft: Wie die Hirnforschung Recht und Moral herausfordert, Heise (2010) Psyche & psychische Gesundheit: Philosophen, Psychologen und Psychiater im Gespräch, Heise (2020) Wissenschaft und Willensfreiheit: Was Max Planck und andere Forschende herausfanden, Springer (2023) Stephan Schleim, Sind Hirnscans nur Kaffeesatzleserei? Fachliche Referenzen Nicholas Bloom, Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find? (2020) How should medical science change, Lancet (2014) Economist: How Science goes wrong  Trouble at the lab | The Economist  Rettet die Wissenschaft,Die Zeit (2014)  Konrad Paul Liessmann, Kant — Dienst ohne Vorschrift, Der Standard (2004) Eric Topol, Human genomics vs Clinical genomics — Expectation vs. Facts  Thomas Kuhn, The Function of Dogma in Scientific Research, 1963  John P. A. Ioannidis, Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)  Warum KI-Werkzeuge gegen COVID-19 bislang versagt haben, Heise (2021)  Physik Nobelpreis für österr. Quantenphysiker Anton Zeilinger (2022) Zitat Max Perutz aus Geoffrey West, Scale: The Universal Laws of Life and Death in Organisms, Cities and Companies, W&N (2018) Edith Widder, Glowing life in an underwater world, TED-Talk  Magna Charta Univesitatum 

A look at new scientific discoveries about SARS-COV2 and a listen to Kary Mullis on Climate Change. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/joel-allen71/message

Generations of applicants have turned to the same metrics and authorities time and again to compare institutions of higher education. Should they? Amy and Mike invited professor Jed Macosko to explore which college rankings you can trust. What are five things you will learn in this episode? Why are college rankings so influential? What do traditional college rankings purport to tell us? What do the traditional rankings often tell us instead? Should applicants trust college rankings? How should applicants use rankings to evaluate schools? MEET OUR GUEST Jed Macosko is a Professor of Physics at Wake Forest University. In the past twenty years, he has focused his research on the biophysics of cancer, drug discovery, the mechanical properties of cells, and cellular transport. Macosko's Ph.D. work at UC Berkeley was in the structure and function of the synaptic SNARE complex, influenza hemagglutinin, and HIV's Rev response element. He performed post-doctoral research under Drs. Carlos Bustamante the action of polymerases at the single-molecule level.  Macosko hails from Minneapolis, Minnesota, and has spent time living in Minsk, Tashkent, Copenhagen, Strasbourg, and other international cities. He graduated with a B.S. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and worked with Nobel laureate Kary Mullis at a biotech start-up in Southern California. His lab has received millions of dollars in outside funding, and he is a contributing author of several books. His work has been cited thousands of times, and his patents have been developed in the biotech sector. One of his most fulfilling intellectual projects so far has been to improve academic rankings with the team at AcademicInfluence.com. Find Jed Macosko at jed@wfu.edu. LINKS Academic Influence RELATED EPISODES US NEWS & WORLD REPORT COLLEGE RANKINGS FINDING YOUR COLLEGE FIT RED FLAGS IN COLLEGE SELECTION OVERLOOKED ASPECTS OF CAMPUS LIFE  ABOUT THIS PODCAST Tests and the Rest is THE college admissions industry podcast. Explore all of our episodes on the show page. ABOUT YOUR HOSTS Mike Bergin is the president of Chariot Learning and founder of TestBright. Amy Seeley is the president of Seeley Test Pros. If you're interested in working with Mike and/or Amy for test preparation, training, or consulting, feel free to get in touch through our contact page.

ORN Dawn Lester and David Parker show notes 10/18/22 Part one Their book: The Nature of Reality; It's Stranger Than You Think How to determine what is or isn't fake news regarding health? Looked at original papers, books in libraries, multiple sources, rather than the censored internet. Dr. Stefan Lanka trained as a virologist. Perfect candidate to tear virology apart. Tenet of Lester/Parker book that there no viruses is accepted by well-respected researchers. Must read the methodology to understand the validity of research papers. Sources coming up with more charades to hide that there is no virus. Want to keep people in fear. There never was a COVID disease. No one died from COVID. Symptoms and illness were given a false label. What are they ill from? Not germs. Toxic substances, poor nutrition? Historically, corporations and US Army caught spraying toxic stuff on the populace. Dr. Kary Mullis, inventor of PCR test, said it shouldn't be used to prove an illness. British government banned autopsies on people who supposedly died from COVID. No excess deaths during the “pandemic”. UK April 2020 2 week death peak explained by use of ventilators and high dose hydroxychloroquine. Propaganda that hospitals were full and overrun. Fear can also manifest as a disease. Quantum physicist said: There's no out there out there. You can create a reality and interact with it, e.g. when you're dreaming, that's solid and separate to you. Are dreams just the day's debris? Or their own reality? Are we here to learn who we are and what our reality is? Energy attributed as the basis of all creation. But we don't know what energy really is. E = MC2 is telling you how much energy is required to give the appearance of matter. People don't understand the nature of reality until they realize matter, energy, and consciousness are the same thing. Reality is an expression of consciousness. Healing is changing your consciousness. Demonstrated with placebo and nocebo effects.

I hope you are not prone to regrets.  The next time you make the wrong decision, I want you to look back and remember that it seemed like a good idea at the time. You were given incomplete information. The future was unknowable. What is there to regret? Nevertheless, the dull ache of regret came upon me when Kary Mullis died without warning.  I loved Kary for his sense of humor and his wit, and I will always cherish what he wrote in my copy of his book, Dancing Naked in the Mind Field.  And then Loren Lewis died without giving me a heads-up.  Loren was never a father-figure; he was my outrageous older brother. He was bombastic and vain and he taught me how to get things done when I didn't have any money, and he would have taken a bullet for me. And then Perry McKee walked over the horizon without a wink or a wave good-bye.  Perry was extraverted and impulsive and he made everyone laugh. When we were 14, Perry decided the day had finally arrived that he should light a fart and become the world's first jet-propelled human. He wanted me to hold the match for him but I vigorously declined, so Ernie Henry held the match as the rest of us stood anxiously outside the closed door of Perry's windowless bathroom. It was Brother McKee's deep conviction that the miracle of jet-propulsion should be observed in total darkness. When Perry bellowed like a bull and tumbled out the doorway, we knew that Ernie had held the match too close. Ernie Henry is gone now, too.  The immortals from my past are disappearing.The last time I spoke to Kary Mullis, Loren Lewis, Perry McKee and Ernie Henry, I didn't know that it would be the last time I spoke to them. My only regrets are the things I left unsaid. Please don't read too much into these musings. I'm fine. Pennie is fine. No one is dying. It's just that time of year.  The green of the grass is soaking back into the earth and the leaves are turning red and orange. Children are gathering into rooms again where an adult tells them not to talk. Men are chasing a tapered leather ball as escaped convicts blow whistles and toss their handkerchiefs into the air. I look for Andy Griffith to ask if he wants to get a Big Orange drink, but Andy is nowhere to be found.  It won't be long before my lawn pulls a white blanket up to its chin, just outside my front door. The squirrel in his cap and the plants in burlap will all settle down for a long winter's nap.  And then Springtime will pierce the pale heart of winter with a shout of green and a blade of grass, and we will dress in bright colors for Easter. Kary Mullis opened the door of genetic research when he invented Polymerase Chain Reaction. Loren Lewis opened the future of a 15-year-old boy when he showed him how to be unafraid. Perry McKee and Ernie Henry had no regrets. It seemed like a good idea at the time. Roy H. Williams Steve Curtin is ranked as one of the top 30 customer service experts in the world. His clients include Carnival Cruise Line, NAPA Auto Parts, and TJ Maxx. Steve believes every owner and every manager needs to have “the conversation” with every employee about why their job matters, and why their company matters. “The NASA janitor wasn't mopping floors; he was helping to send a man to the moon.” Imagine what would happen if your employees felt the same way about the greater purpose of the work they do in your company! Steve Curtin and roving reporter Rotbart talk about it at MondayMorningRadio.com.

A Trip Lab Thought Experiment: We will dive into an alternate reality where psychedelics can be used by anyone to explore their consciousness and place in the world (without having a mental health disorder like depression to make it legal). Find out how psychedelics can help you understand the complex topics of quantum physics, string theory, the illusion of time and parallel universes. We will also discuss exciting new research papers looking into how psychedelics have been proven to increase creativity both in an artistic and scientific discovery setting. Last, we will see how psychedelics have shaped religions throughout the world and time-- from Christianity to Witchcraft. Mentions:- Psychedelics as potential catalysts of scientific creativity and insight- Spontaneous and deliberative creative cognition during and after psilocybin exposure- 'Dancing Naked in the Mind Field' by Kary Mullis- 'Seven Brief Lessons on Physics' by Carlo Rovelli- 'Reality Is Not What It Seems' by Carlo Rovelli- 'The Order of Time' by Carlo RovelliEmail me at: thetriplabpodcast@gmail.comFollow The Trip Lab on Instagram @thetriplabpodcast 

In this episode, Tess and Jon continue to bring talk about the microbiome. They go back in time, speaking about some of the important science that contributed to what is now the field of microbiome research and bioinformatics. From Robert Hook to Kary Mullis, take a listen now. Visit our website at microbigals.com where we are updating with new content, including blog posts, regularly. Also, if you would like to donate to our show, we have started a kofi page. you can donate on our website or visit https://ko-fi.com/microbigals.

This week we wrap up season 6 and episode #60.  And we go out with a bang with our interview of the producing partners of Mike Wallach and DJ Leslie, who have had a successful launch of their documentary film series known as "The Viral Delusion".  This 5-part, 7-hour series brings doctors and other medical and research professionals together to talk about the problems with the virus paradigm and how science is willfully ignorant about fixing things.  This film series has faced challenges in getting publicity and we really enjoyed being able to spend some time with the film makers in order to get more eyes on their project.     Mike Wallach's Bio - Mike is the founder of Paradigm Shift Pictures and is the director, and co-producer with Diarra(DJ) Leslie, of its film series, The Viral Delusion, which has received extraordinary early reviews. Dr. John Bevan-Smith called the series “Immensely important and beautifully made.” Dr. Vinnie Costa said it's “Amazing. Should be translated into every language in the world,” and Dr. Sam Bailey explains The Viral Delusion is “incredibly important and absolutely incredible. A Masterpiece!” Mike is a graduate of Cornell University who holds a Master's Degree in International Affairs from Columbia University. Mike went on to become a Presidential Management Fellow with the State Department as a Middle East Analyst. His reports were delivered directly to the White House, the Pentagon and the National Security Council. Frustrated with the constant misuse of his work, he left the government to pursue his dream of filmmaking.  His first feature film “The Bay” was helmed by Oscar-winning director Barry Levinson (Wag The Dog, Good Morning Vietnam) and distributed globally by Lionsgate Pictures. The Viral Delusion is his first documentary.    Diarra (DJ) Leslie's Bio - DJ is a 31 year old Forager, Researcher and Farmer Follow us on Telegram at: https://t.me/tcrpodcast You can also view the interview portion of this podcast on video at Rumble here: TCRP - Episode 60 - Discussing The Viral Delusion with Mike Wallach and DJ Leslie (rumble.com) Resources from this episode... The Viral Delusion Documentary Series: http://www.theviraldelusion.com Mike Wallach's Film, "The Bay" Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctkkn1qSYKw Inventing the AIDS Virus by Peter Duesberg, Forward by Kary Mullis: https://www.amazon.com/Inventing-AIDS-Virus-Peter-Duesberg/dp/0895264706      

* Polio Panic? Why is MSM pushing polio and why now? Kary Mullis, PCR inventor, explains how they abuse his tests* China requiring PCR tests for children to even go to the parkTrump's WarpSpeed shots are better at abortion than abortion pills with the added "bonus" of accumulation in reproductive organs* DeSantis, Florida and Publix back away from infant shots. Movement builds in Tennessee to do the same* First they came for the menthol, then for the nicotine — even non-smokers should be concerned about FDA authoritarian usurpations* WaPo horrified that pregnant 18 yr old gave birth to twins and got married instead of aborting the children* AMA, American Medical Association, demands abortions. Says it interjects government into doctor/patient relationship after supporting all Fauci's mandates and prohibitions* First "Red Flag", next ammo regulationFind out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughZelle: @DavidKnightShow@protonmail.comCash App at:  $davidknightshowBTC to:  bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764

* Polio Panic? Why is MSM pushing polio and why now? Kary Mullis, PCR inventor, explains how they abuse his tests* Trump's WarpSpeed shots are better at abortion than abortion pills with the added "bonus" of accumulation in reproductive organs* DeSantis, Florida and Publix back away from infant shots. Movement builds in Tennessee to do the same* First they came for the menthol, then for the nicotine — even non-smokers should be concerned about FDA authoritarian usurpations* China requiring PCR tests for children to even go to the park* WaPo horrified that pregnant 18 yr old gave birth to twins and got married instead of aborting the children* AMA, American Medical Association, demands abortions. Says it interjects government into doctor/patient relationship after supporting all Fauci's mandates and prohibitions* First "Red Flag", next ammo regulation* INTERVIEW: What's Next for Gold, Bitcoin, CBDC? Tony Arterburn, DavidKnight .goldFind out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughZelle: @DavidKnightShow@protonmail.comCash App at:  $davidknightshowBTC to:  bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764

Originally from Minneapolis, Professor Jed Macosko has lived in Minsk, Princeton, Belfast, Tashkent, Chicago, Copenhagen, Moscow, Albuquerque, and Strasbourg. He graduated with a Bachelor of Science from MIT and earned his doctorate at UC Berkeley. After a postdoctoral research stint with Howard Hughes Medical Investigator Carlos J. Bustamante, he worked with Nobel laureate Kary Mullis at a start-up in Irvine, California than with Professor David Keller at the University of New Mexico. Currently, Jed is a professor of Physics at Wake Forest University. He continues his two decades of research on the mechanics of cells and molecular motors while teaching undergraduates the basics of big data and virtual reality. His lab has received millions of dollars in outside funding, and he is a contributing author of several books. His work has been cited thousands of times, and his parents have been developed in the biotech sector. One of his most fulfilling intellectual projects so far has been at AcademicInfluence.com where he serves as Research Director and Chief Public Liaison.  This episode is brought to you by N2N's Illuminate App, The iPaaS for Higher Education. Learn more at https://illuminateapp.com/web/higher-education/Subscribe and listen to more episodes at IlluminateHigherEducation.comContact Jed Macosko: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jed-macosko-a037854Learn more about Academic Influence: https://academicinfluence.com/Twitter: https://twitter.com/AcademicInfluxInstagram:https://www.instagram.com/academicinfluence/Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/AcademicInfluencePinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/academicinfluence/Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/domain/academicinfluence.com/  

What's up to my demagogic drum fish and disputatious dunkers!   Welcome back to the BNP everyone and thank you for joining! To my patrons, you all are the spiral arms of my galaxy and the selenium in my brazil nuts- you are appreciated! Well friends, hold onto your butts, because this one's a doozy. In addition to the audio tidbits you know and love, I dive into some heady and provocative topics this week. In weeks past I've discussed a concept I refer to as "The Adversary," or the spirit of negative disruption and darkness that causes unnecessary suffering here on Earth. This week I was moved to dive into one particular aspect of this Adversary: the International Biomedical Cartel. Science only operates cleanly when there is room for dissenting opinions and troublesome hypotheses. When you are no longer allowed to question certain scientific dogmas, then it becomes a kind of religion. Hence we see the rise of Scientism and its attendant high priests' rule by fiat, selective funding and intimidation of dissent to preserve the hegemony of the establishment plunderbund.Featured in this week's episode is an interview with Kary Mullis, published in Spin magazine in July of 1994 and conducted by Celia Farber. Mullis won a Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1993 for the invention of the PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) test. He became a controversial figure for refusing to stop asking pesky questions of Fauci, Gallo, and the medical establishment. Finally, I explore the potential links between the meteoric rise of peanut allergies and the use of peanut oil as an "excipient," (or adjuvant) in inoculations. Adjuvants are ingredients added to shots which compel a more intense immune response by the body. Aluminum is another commonly utilized adjuvant. Help keep the BNP on the air by becoming a patron at www.patreon.com/noetics. For as little as $1/month, you become a partner in the BNP. Help make the magic happen (and help me to afford groceries!) You also receive a dream interpretation and an original haiku when you sign up.  Let's elevate the human spirit y'all!You can also make a small one-time donation at: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/noeticsThank you so much for the support! Thank you for spreading the word and telling a friend about the BNP! Follow the BNP on IG @barbarian_noeticsEmail: barbarian.noetics@gmail.comUntil next week everyone, Be excellent to one another,and kind and loving towards yourself. One Love,Little Raven kaaaawwwwTRACKLIST FOR THIS EPISODE CSPAN Washington Journal Theme MusicRemix Maniacs - Presidential Theme Song (Trap Remix)Dykotomi - Corvid CrunkNoir Deco - Future NoirKainbeats - Atlantis (Lo Fi Mix)Soulection Radio #548 (Hi-Tek & Talib Kwali Edit)Suicide Boys x Pouya - Runnin Thru The 7th With My WoadiesKainbeats - Finding Beauty (Lo Fi Mix)idunnomane - anyways 3001Max Romeo - War Ina BabylonDillon Witherow - Before Sunrise (Lo Fi Mix)Show Dem Camp feat. Buju - Do Me Nice Edvard Grieg - Hall Of The Mountain King (Deficio Remix)The Village People - Macho Man, In The NavyLINKSInterview with Kary Mullis (Spin Magazine, July 1994)https://thedoctorwithin.com/vaccines-and-the-peanut-allergy-epidemic/ Support the show

Kelly and Matt talk about how to red-pill your friends, how to hook your toilet to your power meter, and how to differentiate between good turns of history and total socialist domination of the world.  Also, we clarify what exactly is white supremacy (according to Wikipedia). Check out the full interview with Kary Mullis talking about AIDS the inventor of the PCR test https://youtu.be/W1FXbxDrDrY As always check out our website for the best schwas and coffee mugs your money can still buy at libertytreelifestyle.com

Drugs, explosions, heart break, and nudity - this episode had it all! (Don't worry, it's still clean.) Today we discuss Polymerase Chain Reaction - PCR - and the people behind this technology. Join us as we talk about Thomas Brock's serendipitous discovery in Yellowstone National Park, and Kary Mullis's midnight revelation (while he may or may not have been trippin') that led to a Nobel Prize.

Twenty-three years ago, roving reporter Rotbart said to me,“You are three different people. 1. There is the person you see when you look in the mirror. 2. There is the person other people see when they look at you. 3. There is the real you, the person no one can see but God.” Objective reality exists. I do not dispute it. Rotbart's argument – and mine – is that you and he and I are not equipped to experience it. I live in a perceptual reality; a world that I perceive. You live in a perceptual reality; a world that you perceive. You see your own actions in the forgiving light of your motives, intentions, and regrets, while the “you” that is seen by others is shaped and shaded by their preferences, prejudices, and perspectives. John Steinbeck speaks of this in his preface to East of Eden, “The reader will take from my book what he brings to it. The dull witted will get dullness and the brilliant may find things in my book I didn't know were there.” Steinbeck knew that we tend to see what is already within us. On May 1, 1831, an unspecified writer for The Atlas in London wrote, “We cannot see things as they are, for we are compelled by a necessity of nature to see things as we are. We can never get rid of ourselves.” Twenty years ago, my friend Kary Mullis challenged my musings about perceptual reality in front of a roomful of people. He said that his belief, as a scientist, was that “real” things can be measured, tested, and weighed. “Real things exist,” he said. “If it is not physical, it is imaginary.” I said, “Are emotions and opinions and beliefs real?” Kary described scientific method and Koch's postulates, (the four criteria designed to establish a causative relationship between a microbe and a disease,) while I dragged a barstool to the front of the room. Holding up a copy of his book, Dancing Naked in the Mind Field, I said, “Kary, would you be willing to sit on this barstool and read the dedication page to us?” As Kary read the page he wrote to his wife, Nancy, his voice tightened and he stopped speaking as tears rolled down his cheeks. I said, “Keep reading, Kary. It's all imaginary, remember?” When he could speak again, he admitted I was right, and that a whole world of reality exists beyond the reach of physical science. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/1993/mullis/lecture/ (Kary Mullis was a highly confident genius) who was willing to change his mind. Persons like Kary Mullis are exactly the people Desmond Ford was talking about when he said, “A wise man changes his mind sometimes, but a fool never. To change your mind is the best evidence you have one.” Kary is gone now and I miss him deeply. The world of 2022 needs more people like him, and quickly. Roy H. Williams “Many people hear voices when no one is there. Some of them are called mad and are shut up in rooms where they stare at the walls all day. Others are called writers and they do pretty much the same thing.” – Meg Chittenden “Ever realised how surreal reading a book actually is? You stare at marked slices of tree for hours on end, hallucinating vividly.” – Katie Oldham, Sept 12, 2014, retweeted 3,837 times, favorited 3,728 times

Please subscribe to our You tube @joshmondaymusic and Podcast We have an awesome show for you guys featuring Chris Roberts. Chris has been on Tin Foil hat podcast and is a returning guest. He is great at breaking down deceptions. We get into some of the modern deceptions we are dealing with right now. We go over some of the stocks of the Vaccine manufactures and interesting dates Biontech started. We go into the FDA, CDC and CDC foundation. We go into the Dr. Fauci and the Aids epidemic. We go into some of the unethical practices that were performed on kids during the testing of Aids medication. We go over what we should be doing to be healthy. We go into the PCR test inventor Kary Mullis and what he said about the tests. We go into the amount hospitals are receiving to place people on ventilators. We go into Monsanto and the Carcinogens that we are being exposed in our foods. We go over fasting and the benefits of fasting. All in all this is a great show guys please leave a 5 star review on apple and a comment of you love the podcast. If you need prayer please hit me up on instagram @joshmondaymusic --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/josh-monday/support

Vi kender det fra tandpasta eller vaskepulverreklamer. Autoritære kilder i kitler, der præsenterer produkter som store nyskabelser inden for videnskaben. Med nettets udbredelse er der kommet endnu flere såkaldte ”eksperter”, hvoraf nogle af dem bevidst spreder misinformation. Og der er god grund til at se kritisk på dem. Det gør Torben Sangild og Morten Elsøe i dette nye og tiende afsnit af 'Et åbent sind'.Her kaster de sig blandt andet over FLICC-modellen, der kortlægger nogle af de mest brugte teknikker til at fornægte videnskab og forplumre debatten med misinformation. Og de krydrer det med kuriøse eksempler som fx en ekspert, der altid iklæder sig hvid titel og stetoskop, selvom hans branche hverken kræver det ene eller det andet. Der er også et andet sigende eksempel med en uddannet børnelæge, der mener, at COVID-19-vaccinerne indeholder alien-DNA. Et tredje, der handler om en erklæring, hvor mere end 31.000 “videnskabsfolk” skrev under på, at der ikke findes klimaforandringer - heriblandt falske eksperter som Charles Darwin og en lang række Star Wars-karakterer.Udover hovedtemaet om falske eksperter når vi en omgang korte nyheder og lidt indslag fra feedet, der alt sammen tager udgangspunkt i kongeriet. For det viser sig, at en af de helt store konspirationsteorier måske stammer fra en lejlighed på Amager, at en TV2-opgørelse over corona-indlæggelser måske ikke er helt retvisende, og så har der været røre over nogle stole på Lyngby Apotek, der var reserveret til vaccinerede mennesker. Vi runder selvfølgelig af med en omgang ‘Fup eller fakta'.Husk, at du kan skrive til Torben og Morten med ris, ros og ideer på: sind@heartbeats.dkShow notes: - Den videnskabelige artikel om effekten af misinformation i overskrifter: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2014-44652-001- Den nyeste konsensusartikel om klimaforandringer: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ac2966 - Wikipedia-side om Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Architects_%26_Engineers_for_9/11_Truth- Artikel om årsagen til kollapset af World Trade Center fra American Society of Civil Engineers: https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%290733-9399%282008%29134%3A10%28892%29- Reuters-artikel om Kary Mullis' udtalelser om PCR-testen: https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-pcr-idUSKBN24420X- TjekDet-artikel om Geert vanden Bossche: https://www.tjekdet.dk/faktatjek/massevaccination-kan-skabe-et-ubetvingeligt-coronamonster-lyder-opraab-fra-dyrlaege-og- Artikel om Luc Montagnier fra det prisbelønnede uafhængige indiske nyheds-site, The Wire: https://science.thewire.in/the-sciences/luc-montagniers-views-on-covid-vaccines-are-latest-of-his-wrong-vexing-ideas/- Wikipedia-artikel om ”Nobelsyge”: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_disease- Oversigtsartiklen fra 1984, baseret på 33 studier udi at ændre sine svar i en objektiv test: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/009862838401100303- Artiklen fra 2005 om at ændre svar og første inskydelse-fejlslutningen: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15898871/- FLICC: https://skepticalscience.com/history-FLICC-5-techniques-science-denial.html- Oregon-erklæringens underskriftindsamling med 31.000 'eksperter': http://www.oism.org/pproject/- Bill Gates-konspirationsteorien har et udspring i en dansk blog: https://www.zetland.dk/historie/segJ4JyJ-ae2KvJdE-26d5d- TV2-artiklen med corona-statistikker (nu revideret): https://nyheder.tv2.dk/samfund/2021-10-18-storstedelen-af-coronaindlagte-er-faerdigvaccinerede-alligevel-viser-data-klart

Oxide and Friends Twitter Space: September 20th, 2021Theranos, Silicon Valley, and the March Madness of Tech FraudWe've been holding a Twitter Space weekly on Mondays at 5p for about an hour. Even though it's not (yet?) a feature of Twitter Spaces, we have been recording them all; here is the recording for our Twitter Space for September 20th, 2021.In addition to Bryan Cantrill and Adam Leventhal, speakers on September 20th included Land Belenky, Toasterson, Cole Frederick, and Simeon Miteff. (Did we miss your name and/or get it wrong? Drop a PR!)Some of the topics we hit on, in the order that we hit them: John Carreyrou on Theranos  “Bad Blood: Secrets and Lies in a Silicon Valley Startup” 2018 book “Bad Blood the Final Chapter” podcast as the trial proceeds (announcement), on apple, spotify Cole's tweet linking to a ~5min video of a would-be Theranos competitor commenting on its collapse > The lone inventor is a dangerous impression to give people. Related: Brian Fitzpatrick and Ben Collins-Sussman “The Myth of the Genius Programmer” 2009 talk ~55mins [@9:47](https://youtu.be/YWdk9CKML2g?t=587) Companies that drive scientific people nuts  uBeam “claims to be developing a wireless charging system to work via ultrasound. Scientists have strongly criticised the plausibility under physics of this proposal.” uBiome > To innovate, you have to balance the world as it is with the world as it isn't. [@13:44](https://youtu.be/YWdk9CKML2g?t=824) Theranos' fantastical vision. European attitudes around business and innovation.  PCR Polymerase chain reaction invented 1983 by Kary Mullis. [@18:39](https://youtu.be/YWdk9CKML2g?t=1119) Fake it till you make it?  Optative voice > The secrecy of Theranos should have been a red flag [@23:57](https://youtu.be/YWdk9CKML2g?t=1437) Whistleblower Avie Tevanian. Smoke and mirrors, giving the board the run around. [@29:05](https://youtu.be/YWdk9CKML2g?t=1745) “Everyone was relying on someone else to do their due diligence”  Tech risk, venture capital Cerebras Systems wafer scale processors Ellen Pao NYT editorial “The Elizabeth Holmes Trial is a Wake-up Call for Sexism in Tech” [@35:20](https://youtu.be/YWdk9CKML2g?t=2120) Software cure-all 737 MAX failures [@40:14](https://youtu.be/YWdk9CKML2g?t=2414) Founding myths  Jean-Louis Gassée 2015 “Theranos Trouble: A First Person Account” blog 2018 “Theranos Could Have Been Stopped” blog [@44:06](https://youtu.be/YWdk9CKML2g?t=2646) Tesla “Autopilot”, Uber self driving  Anthony Levandowski > Judge Alsup: This is the biggest trade secret crime I have ever seen. > This was not small. This was massive in scale. [@48:21](https://youtu.be/YWdk9CKML2g?t=2901) March Madness of Silicon Valley Fraudsters  Solyndra bankrupt 2011 Tether [@59:02](https://youtu.be/YWdk9CKML2g?t=3542) Levandowski jeopardizes employee  Better Place The Economist Obituary Juicero Flip Video bought by Cisco 2009 [@1:04:35](https://youtu.be/YWdk9CKML2g?t=3875) Warning signs of fraudulent companies  Transparency, celebrity boards Optane Inconsistency between board and leadership on what the coming milestones are If we got something wrong or missed something, please file a PR! Our next Twitter space will likely be on Monday at 5p Pacific Time; stay tuned to our Twitter feeds for details. We'd love to have you join us, as we always love to hear from new speakers!

There are a lot of reports coming in around strange happenings related to women's menstrual cycles for those that have gotten the shots, as well as those that haven't.  We give our take on it and also try to explain in better detail the fact that the virus has never actually been proven to exist in an isolated sample.   To expand the conversation, join us on telegram: https://t.me/tcrpodcast Resources from this episode...   Millions Against Medical Mandates: Could Their Shot Be Harming You?: https://mamm.org/could-their-shot-be-harming-you/ University of Illinois Voluntary Research Study Survey pertaining to Mentrual Cycle Experiences: https://redcap.healthinstitute.illinois.edu/surveys/index.php?s=LL8TKKC8DP Period Changes Possible After Getting Shot: https://nbc-2.com/news/health/covid/2021/04/12/period-changes-possible-after-covid-19-vaccine/ Health Freedom for Humanity Podcast (Dr Tom Cowan Interview, Author of "The Contagion Myth"): https://www.audible.com/pd/Interview-With-Dr-Tom-Cowan-Author-of-The-Contagion-Myth-Podcast/B08PJBHYML?ref=a_pd_Health_c1_lAsin_1_5 The Contagion Myth Book by Dr Tom Cowan: https://drtomcowan.com/products/the-contagion-myth/ Dr Kary Mullis interview (Part of larger video): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ljxah4NrYKU    

ILLUMINATED ILLUSIONS PODCAST: A Virus is a solvent made in our cells | EXOSOME THEORY Visit Our Website: http://illuminated-illusions.com/livestream Join us on Rumble:
 https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all Donation: 
https://paypal.me/pools/c/8uJzowuzzv 


Dr. Kary Banks Mullis was a fascinating and complicated man. After winning a Nobel Prize in 1993 the first thing he did was go surfing. His discovery has been called the most important in the last century and it has been used to exonerate falsely accused men on death row; and most recently we have all been faced with being tested by a product of his method. His mysterious death in 2019 has led some people to believe that there is more to the story. In this episode I'll tell you the story of an extraordinary maverick that's been called among other things, a Hunter S. Thomson in a lab coat. Links and references: Dr. Mullis' book https://www.amazon.com/Dancing-Naked-Mind-Field-Mullis/dp/0679774009 | 1996 Interview with Gary Noll : https://youtu.be/QrYXouD0nAY | Interview club about misuse of PCR test : https://youtu.be/cfumoyYhkh0 | examples of militant climate change activists: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/apr/15/david-buckel-lawyer-climate-change-protest , https://thenewamerican.com/un-climate-boss-resigns-in-scandal-says-mission-is-religion/ | Fauci funding gain of function experiments in Wuhan : https://www.newsweek.com/dr-fauci-backed-controversial-wuhan-lab-millions-us-dollars-risky-coronavirus-research-1500741 , Event 201 : https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/

Colombian singer-songwriter Darwin Grajales penned this lyric: “Cuando hay música en tu alma, la oye todo el universo.” When there is music in your soul, the whole universe hears it. Many spiritual people, and even some scientifically minded, talk about the ideas of a fractal universe or a holographic universe. The idea is if you look at any individual part of the universe, you will find a kind of blueprint for the whole universe. The part contains the whole, and the whole contains every part. Kary Mullis, inventor of the PCR process, said that by using the process, one could find “just about anything in just about anyone”, saying that it made him partial to the Buddhist idea that everything contains everything else. If that is the case, even making a small change within ourselves might echo through all that exists. Doing whatever work or joyful growth to create music in our souls, perhaps it really will be heard by the universe. For the transcript: Music In Your Soul A Beautiful Thought --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/beautiful-thought/message

Listen as we interview Becky Kucera, who was at the bench during the early years after the concept of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was conceived by Kary Mullis.

Dr Kary Mullis was a firebrand. He spent the majority of his scientific career fighting the establishment. If it wasn't the HIV=AIDS=Death hypothesis, it was climate change.  He said there was no “settled science.” He held that all science was to be questioned, and if it couldn't withstand criticism then it wasn't a scientific fact. That's why his passing in August of 2019 is truly tragic. He would have been one of the CV=COVID19=Death detractors.  

Recorded December 20, 2020Current Episodes at https://walkinverse.buzzsprout.com/I am moving all podcast here slowly. I will keep buzzsprout for all public reports and here for member only content.Report 26, "Dr. Kary Mullis Slams Fauci & His PCR Test." In this episode, we will hear what Dr. Mullis has to say about Fauci and the PCR test. As stated, the test cannot be used to diagnose disease. In the end it renders false positives giving you everything and anything. Therefore, allowing the fear to drive into the hearts and souls of the public.Dr. Kary Mullis, an expert in Molecular biology [1], invented the PCR technique. A process used by corrupt officials across the world to track the Wu Han Virus. His work awarded him the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1993 [2]. Before the outbreak, he passed away but left us with words we must hear.First, unlike the liars in the medical field, Mullis spoke the truth. He stressed [3] the PCR test does not diagnose disease, period. End of story. When asked about its misuse, Kary sets the record straight. “One does not misuse the PCR test.” If done correctly, the test makes believers in the Buddhist mantra: “Everything is contained in everything else.” The test can't show if someone's sick or if what they have will hurt them. But when practitioners set the amplification (aka Cycle Thresholds) high enough, the test claim's positive for anything [4].It's a win, win for Fauci. False positives flow, and the agenda enacted.To prove this point, in a December 2020 study by Cambridge University [5], over nine thousand students [6] returned false positives from the PCR test. To repeat Kary's words, the test produces the results needed for a pandemic to exist when done right. It's manipulation at its finest.Second, the fact we all know, because someone claims the title of a doctor does not make them one. As Mullis put it, Fauci, our favorite little weasel, lies on camera for those who pay his salary. Nothing more, and nothing less. But when the media and Mr. Fraud spin the agenda, people eat it like GMO apple pie. Each bite brings their demise. When challenged by actual scientists, he refuses to debate. Why? If called out his career and this pandemic end tonight.Your willingness for injection or lock down will not stop the worldwide episode of fraud. Instead, the tyrants will squeeze until your last breath of air expels and your soul floats into the afterlife. The death certificate will read “COVID” as the media pushes the narrative, “Vaccines, for public health,” when in actuality it's unnecessary toxins for profits.These manufacturers and so-called health experts will play this crisis for every angle possible. And why not, for as an evil man once said, “never let a good crisis go to waste.”WIV Reports — Uncensored is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.References1. Kerry Grens. Kary Mullis, Inventor of the PCR Technique, Dies. The Scientist Magazine® https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/kary-mullis–inventor-of-the-pcr-technique–dies-66256 (2019).2. N/A. The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1993. NobelPrize.org https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/1993/mullis/interview/ (2005).3. Tyler Durden. Why COVID-19 Testing Is A Tragic Waste. ZeroHedge https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/why-covid-19-testing-tragic-waste (2020).4. Dr Kary Mullis Explains the PCR Test. https://www.brighteon.com/2d4f2b32-a417-4f17-94d2-a58a0e2e4744.5. Dr. Ben Warne. UoC Asymptomatic COVID. (2020).6. Tim Brown. Bombshell Cambridge Documents: Of All Positive COVID Tests Of 9,000+ Students, 100% Were FALSE POSITIVES. Sons of Liberty Media https://sonsoflibertymedia.com/bombshell-cambridge-documents-of-all-positive-covid-tests-of-9000-students-100-were-false-positives/ (2020). This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit walkinverse.substack.com/subscribe

We explore Germ Theory vs Terrain Theory and speculate on what other factors are possibly in play for not only what may be making people sick, but how we classify the sick people based on the faulty PCR test that is always in the mix.  We talk a little about Dr. Thomas Cowan's new book, "The Contagion Myth" and some ways to get out of the traditional box of germ causation.   To expand the conversation, join us on telegram: https://t.me/tcrpodcast Some clips and resources referenced in this episode... Dr. Kary Mullis and his thoughts on Dr. Tony Fauci https://youtu.be/5aISPlTLbJo Full 18-minute Interview w/ Dr. Kary Mullis about the myths of HIV (Parallels to Coronavirus) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19sz3DocJ-Q&feature=youtu.be World Doctor's Alliance Open Letter to the World https://worlddoctorsalliance.com/ims/WDAOpenLetter.pdf Tales From The Pandemic - Settling Science by Fabiola Hart http://delicatebelly.com/tales-from-the-pandemic-settling-science/ Do Virus's Really Exist? Pt.2 - Interview with Dr. Thomas Cowan MD (Melissa Floyd's What They Aren't Telling You Podcast) https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/episode-23-do-viruses-exist-interview-dr-tom-cowan/id1518542708?i=1000498029282 The Contagion Myth - By Thomas Cowan MD and Sally Fallon Morrell https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/The-Contagion-Myth/Thomas-S-Cowan/9781510764620 PFAS Chemical Associated With Severe Covid19 https://theintercept.com/2020/12/07/pfas-pfba-severe-covid-study/ Children and Blood Vessel Damage from Covid19 https://www.studyfinds.org/children-with-covid-blood-vessel-damage/ Brandy Vaughan's Learn The Risk Website https://learntherisk.org  

In this episode we dive into the primary test used to diagnose the presence of SARS-Cov-2, known as RT-PCR.  We discuss how the reported cases are driven by this test that has some inherent problems that aren't being addressed in a transparent manner.   To expand the conversation, join us on telegram: https://t.me/tcrpodcast Some clips and resources discussed in the episode... David Crowe - Flaws in Coronavirus Pandemic Theory: https://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf Dr. Kary Mullis discussing what PCR is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_cMF_s-fzc Jeffrey Jaxen and Del Bigtree, from The Highwire, discussing the latest revelations on the use of PCR for testing with SARS-Cov-2: https://thehighwire.com/videos/new-details-in-covid-testing-scandal/ Dr. Anthony Fauci discussing the issue with PCR cycle thresholds over 35 cycles: WebMD interviews Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell about his experience in a NY hospital during the initial Covid surge and what he thinks about hospital protocols related to the use of ventilators: https://blogs.webmd.com/public-health/20200407/coronavirus-in-context-do-covid-19-vent-protocols-need-a-second-look Kiss the Ground Documentary (2020): https://kisstheground.com      

“The rest of my life has passed quite suddenly. Around ten or twelve I fell into the inevitable logarithms of time. It seems to go faster and faster. I wonder now why we have to have Christmas so often.” – Kary MullisOur friend Kary Mullis died on Aug. 7, 2019, at the age of 74. His first trip to Wizard Academy with Nancy was more than 15 years ago. They were in the same class as (L to R) Chris Lowry of Savannah and Mike Greene of Asheville and Jane Fraser of Halifax (in teal, below Chris and Mike) along with 20 other delightful people. Kary's colleagues in science called him “an untamed genius.” His discovery of polymerase chain reaction in 1983 opened the door for us to study DNA and won him the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. I agree with Kary's observation concerning the inevitable logarithms of time, don't you? Wasn't it just a few months ago that you and I walked across an open field and spoke of what we would build together? That campus is nearly finished now. Do you remember when 106 of the cognoscenti of Wizard Academy worked together on a book called Accidental Magic? I pulled my copy off the shelf just now and marveled at it, as I have done at least once a year for the past 18 years. I do the same thing with your book, People Stories: Inside the Outside. Your talent continues to amaze me. Do you remember when Ray Bard arrived with those 200 hardbacks of Accidental Magic just as your book-release party began in 2001? You had already landed in Austin and were on your way to the Academy while Ray was still sitting anxiously at the airport, waiting for the first printing of your book to arrive. This summer, Avital Rotbart worked nonstop for several weeks on our long-promised book, Secrets of the Wizard Academy Campus. We hope to have those available on May 2, but as we have learned, printers often have schedules of their own. Likewise, we expect to be able to unveil The Ad Writer's Masters Class. Working at the speed of light, a person could – in theory – complete that class in a year, but in reality, it will take most people two years. You will instantly be able to recognize an Ad Master when you meet one. I'll tell you how on https://www.wizardacademy.org/product/2020-academy-reunion-may-2nd/ (May 2 when we gather) for an unforgettable campus tour and celebration. It will be epic. We'll feast like kings. When a person reminisces as I have done in today's Monday Morning Memo, we usually assume they will soon be departing and are singing us a soft goodbye. Let me assure you this is not the case. We're simply hosting a catered half-time show. Let us know if you plan to come. Roy H. Williams

On a cool spring night while on the road to Mendocino, Kary Mullis had a stroke of genius. He devised a technique that would revolutionize how DNA research is conducted. As it turns out, PCR was a gift to science but Kary Mullis... not so much. From bizarre encounters with glowing raccoons to spreading pseudoscience, Kary Mullis takes us on a trip through the astral plane. And somehow we end up in the middle of the O.J. trial. --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/bunsenburnerpod/support