Encyclopedia accessible via the Internet or other electronic means
POPULARITY
18 episodes with internet encyclopedia
9 episodes with internet encyclopedia
4 episodes with internet encyclopedia
14 episodes with internet encyclopedia
5 episodes with internet encyclopedia
4 episodes with internet encyclopedia
2 episodes with internet encyclopedia
About 300 kilometers west, away from the crowd and the noise of the capital city of Kyiv lies the historic and picturesque town of Berdychiv. 西部约300公里，远离人群，而首都基夫的噪音是历史悠久的风景如画的伯迪奇镇。It is a place where the sound of birds singing blends with the morning mist at sunrise. Nobody hurries here. Life goes on in Berdychiv. 在这里，鸟类的声音与日出时的早晨薄雾融为一体。 没有人在这里招募。 生活在贝迪奇夫（Berdychiv）继续。 The town in northern Ukraine was founded in 1430. It is a place where three world cultures, Polish, Ukrainian and Jewish, meet and are preserved. 乌克兰北部的小镇成立于1430年。在这里，三种世界文化，波兰，乌克兰和犹太人，见面并得到了保存。 Britannica Dictionary says the town started as a Lithuanian fortress before turning into a Polish city from 1569 until 1793. At one point, it was the fourth-largest city in Ukraine with a large Jewish population. 大不列颠词典说，该镇是立陶宛要塞开始的，然后从1569年至1793年变成了波兰城市。在某一时刻，它是乌克兰的第四大城市，拥有大量的犹太人人口。 Overlooking the Hnylopiat River is the ancient monastery fortress of the Barefoot Carmelites, known as the Sanctuary of the Mother of God of the Holy Scapular. The complex was built in the 16th century by the Janusz Tyszkiewicz family. The Internet Encyclopedia of Ukraine says the complex, along with a school and publishing house, turned the city into an important Polish religious center. 俯瞰着hnylopiat河是赤脚卡梅利特人的古老修道院堡垒，被称为圣肩cap骨的母亲的圣所。 该综合大楼是由Janusz Tyszkiewicz家族于16世纪建造的。 乌克兰的互联网百科全书说，该综合大楼以及一所学校和出版社将这座城市变成了重要的波兰宗教中心。 The complex is popular with visitors who take pictures of its magnificent buildings and lifelong residents who take part in life ceremonies like weddings and graduations. 该建筑群在游客中很受欢迎，他们为其宏伟的建筑物和终身居民拍照，他们参加了婚礼和毕业典礼等生活仪式。 Across the Catholic church in the same complex is a museum to celebrate the life of Joseph Conrad. The English writer was born in 1857 in Berdychiv to a family of Polish patriots who fought against Russian rule. They were arrested and exiled to northern Russia where Conrad first learned English at the age of four. Conrad left Russia and traveled the world as a mariner before starting his writing career. 在同一个综合大楼的整个天主教会上，都是庆祝约瑟夫·康拉德（Joseph Conrad）生活的博物馆。 这位英国作家于1857年出生在贝迪奇夫（Berdychiv），是一群反对俄罗斯统治的波兰爱国者。 他们被捕并流放到北部俄罗斯北部，康拉德在四岁时首次学习英语。 康拉德（Conrad）离开俄罗斯，在开始写作生涯之前以水手身份旅行。 Down a narrow path near the complex is an old building on the river banks. It is an art school where Ukrainians study to become designers, artists, and photographers. It is a place where many modern Ukrainian artists come from and a place filled with great works of art. 在综合大楼附近的一条狭窄小路上是河岸上的一栋古老建筑。 这是一所艺术学校，乌克兰人研究成为设计师，艺术家和摄影师。 在这里，许多现代乌克兰艺术家来自这里，也是一个充满艺术品的地方。 In the city center is an art installation: Suit from Berdychiv. Here visitors often take pictures, eat pizza, and sit in a café with a view of the center. Not far from the city center is the Berdychiv Historical Museum. Founded in 1926, the museum has a collection of valuable fabrics and paintings. 在市中心是艺术装置：贝迪奇夫的西装。 在这里，游客经常拍照，吃披萨，坐在咖啡馆里，可以欣赏中心的景色。 距市中心不远的是Berdychiv历史博物馆。 该博物馆成立于1926年，有一系列有价值的面料和绘画。 Berdychiv is known for one event related to the world of literature. The well-known French writer Honoré de Balzac married Éveline Hanska, a Polish countess, in 1850 in St. Barbara's Church after an 18-year courtship.Berdychiv以与文学世界有关的一个事件而闻名。 著名的法国作家HonoréDeBalzac于1850年在圣巴巴拉教堂（St. Barbara's Church）与波兰伯爵夫人的ÉvelineHanska结婚，经过18年的求爱。 Some believe they chose the church for its beauty and history in a city of writers, and a city of love and culture. 有些人认为，他们在一个作家之城和一个爱与文化之城中选择了教会的美丽和历史。
Dnešná epizóda otvára našu podcastovú sezónu na rok 2024-25 a až do letných prázdnin vás pozývame 2x mesačne zamýšľaš sa s nami nad veľkými a zveochtivími otázkami z obastí a na priesečníku filozofie, vedy, náboženstva či dejín. A dnešnou témou bude metaetika. Súvisiace dávky: PD#4: Morálny kompas, http://bit.ly/davka4 PD#18: Emotivizmus, http://bit.ly/davka18 PD#44: David Hume a spor rozumu a vášní, http://bit.ly/davka44 Použitá a odporúčaná literatúra: Geoff, "Metaethics", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2023) DeLapp, "Metaethics", Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy *** Baví ťa s nami rozmýšľať? Podpor našu tvorbu priamo na SK1283605207004206791985 alebo cez Patreon (https://bit.ly/PDtreon), kde Ťa odmeníme aj my.
John Venn created the Venn diagram, and though he's an important figure in the fields of mathematics and logic, he eventually left that work behind to write historical accounts of the places and people that were important in his life. Research: Baron, Margaret E.. “A Note on the Historical Development of Logic Diagrams: Leibniz, Euler and Venn.” The Mathematical Gazette, vol. 53, no. 384, 1969, pp. 113–25. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/3614533 Bassett, Troy J. "Author: Susanna Carnegie Venn." At the Circulating Library: A Database of Victorian Fiction, 1837—1901, 3 June 2024, http://www.victorianresearch.org/atcl/show_author.php?aid=661 com Editors. “John Venn Biography.: A&E. April 2, 2014. https://www.biography.com/scientists/john-venn Boyer, Carl B.. "Leonhard Euler". Encyclopedia Britannica, 21 Jun. 2024, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Leonhard-Euler Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia. "Boolean algebra". Encyclopedia Britannica, 14 May. 2024, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Boolean-algebra Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia. "Kingston upon Hull". Encyclopedia Britannica, 23 Jun. 2024, https://www.britannica.com/place/Kingston-upon-Hull “A Cricket Sensation.” Saffron Walden Weekly News. June 11, 1909. https://www.newspapers.com/image/800046974/?match=1&terms=John%20Venn%20cricket%20machine Collier, Irwin. “Cambridge. Guide to the Moral Sciences Tripos. James Ward, editor, 1891.” Feb 26, 2018. https://www.irwincollier.com/cambridge-on-the-moral-sciences-tripos-james-ward-editor-1891/ Duignan, Brian. "John Venn". Encyclopedia Britannica, 12 Jun. 2024, https://www.britannica.com/biography/John-Venn Duignan, Brian. "Venn diagram". Encyclopedia Britannica, 25 Apr. 2024, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Venn-diagram Gordon, Neil. “Venn: the person behind the famous diagrams – and why his work still matters today.” EconoTimes. April 14, 2023. https://www.econotimes.com/Venn-the-person-behind-the-famous-diagrams--and-why-his-work-still-matters-today-1654353 Hall, Madeleine. “The Improbably Genius of John Venn.” The Spectator. April 4, 2023. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-improbable-genius-of-john-venn/ “History.” Highgate School. https://www.highgateschool.org.uk/about/our-history/ “The Jargon.” Queens' College Cambridge. https://www.queens.cam.ac.uk/visiting-the-college/history/university-facts/the-jargon “John Venn Of Caius.” The British Medical Journal, vol. 1, no. 3250, 1923, pp. 641–42. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20423118 Lenze, Wolfgang. “Leibniz: Logic.” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/leib-log/ O'Connor, J.J. and E.F. Robertson. “John Venn.” Mac Tutor. School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St. Andrews, Scotland. October 2003. “Professor Hugh Hunt leads engineering team to recreate historic cricket bowling machine.” Trinity College Cambridge. June 6, 2024. https://www.trin.cam.ac.uk/news/professor-hugh-hunt-leads-engineering-team-to-recreate-historic-bowling-machine-that-bowled-out-australian-cricketers-more-than-100-years-ago/ Venn, John. “The logic of chance. An essay on the foundations and province of the theory of probability, with especial reference to its logical bearings and its application to moral and social science.” London. Macmillan, 1876. Accessed online: https://archive.org/details/50424309/page/n19/mode/2up Venn, John. “The principles of empirical or inductive logic.” 1889. https://archive.org/details/principlesempir00venngoog B.H. “John Venn.” Obituary notices of fellows deceased. Royal Society Publishing. April 1, 1926. Accessed online: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/epdf/10.1098/rspa.1926.0036 Young, Angus. “John Venn Inspired £325k makeover of Hull's Drypool Bridge is now complete.” Hull Live. June 5, 2017. https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news/drypool-bridge-turned-work-art-91547 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
This lecture was given on December 8th, 2024, at an Intellectual Retreat at the Dominican House of Studies in Washington, D.C. About the speaker: Fr. James Dominic Brent is an Assistant Professor of Philosophy and Chaplain to Commuter Students at the Dominican House of Studies in Washington DC. He has articles in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy on Natural Theology, in the Oxford Handbook of Thomas Aquinas on “God's Knowledge and Will”, and an article forthcoming on “Thomas Aquinas” in the Oxford Handbook of the Epistemology of Theology.
This lecture was given on December 8th, 2024, at an Intellectual Retreat at the Dominican House of Studies in Washington, D.C. About the speaker: Fr. James Dominic Brent is an Assistant Professor of Philosophy and Chaplain to Commuter Students at the Dominican House of Studies in Washington DC. He has articles in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy on Natural Theology, in the Oxford Handbook of Thomas Aquinas on “God's Knowledge and Will”, and an article forthcoming on “Thomas Aquinas” in the Oxford Handbook of the Epistemology of Theology.
This lecture was given on December 8th, 2023, at the Dominican House of Studies. For more information on upcoming events, visit us atthomisticinstitute.org/upcoming-events About the speaker: Fr. James Dominic Brent is an Assistant Professor of Philosophy and Chaplain to Commuter Students at the Dominican House of Studies in Washington DC. He has articles in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy on Natural Theology, in the Oxford Handbook of Thomas Aquinas on “God's Knowledge and Will”, and an article forthcoming on “Thomas Aquinas” in the Oxford Handbook of the Epistemology of Theology.
Jesus prayed, “I speak these things in the world so that they may have my joy made complete in themselves” (Jn. 17). Acts 1:15-17, 21-26 Psalm 1 1 John 5:9-13 John 17:6-19 Friendship According to Aristotle and Jesus 1. “We seek one mystery, God, with another mystery, ourselves. We are mysterious to ourselves because God's mystery is in us.” [i] Gary Wills wrote these words about the impossibility of fully comprehending God. Still, we can draw closer to the Holy One. I am grateful for friends who help me see our Father in new ways. This week my friend Norwood Pratt sent me an article which begins with a poem by Li Bai (701-762). According to legend he died in the year 762 drunkenly trying to embrace the moon's reflection in the Yangtze River. Li Bai writes, “The birds have vanished from the sky. / Now the last cloud drains away // We sit together, the mountain and me, / until only the mountain remains.” [ii] For me this expresses the feeling of unity with God that comes to me in prayer. This poet was one of many inspirations for a modern Chinese American poet named Li-Young Lee (1957-). Lee's father immigrated to the United States and served as a Presbyterian pastor at an all-white church in western Pennsylvania. Lee feels fascinated by infinity and eternity. He writes this poem about the “Ultimate Being, Tao or God” as the beloved one, the darling. Each of us in the uniqueness of our nature and experience has a different experience of holiness. He writes, “My friend and I are in love with the same woman… I'd write a song about her. I wish I could sing. I'd sing about her. / I wish I could write a poem. / Every line would be about her. / Instead, I listen to my friend speak / about this woman we both love, / and I think of all the ways she is unlike / anything he says about her and unlike / everything else in the world.” [iii] These two poets write about something that cannot easily be expressed, our deepest desire to be united with God. Jesus also speaks about this in the Gospel of John, in his last instructions to the disciples and then in his passionate prayer for them, and for us. In his last words Jesus describes the mystery of God and our existence using a surprising metaphor. At the center of all things lies our experience of friendship. On Mother's Day when we celebrate the sacrifices associated with love I want to think more with you about friendship and God. To understand the uniqueness of Jesus' teaching, it helps to see how another great historical thinker understood this subject. 2. Long before Jesus' birth the Greek philosopher Aristotle (384-322 BC) studied at Plato's school in Athens (from the age of 17 to 37). After this Aristotle became the tutor of Alexander the Great and founded a prominent library that he used as the basis for his thought. Scholars estimate that about a third of what Aristotle wrote has survived. He had a huge effect on the western understanding of nature. He also especially influenced the thirteenth century theologian Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) and therefore modern Roman Catholic approaches to Christian thought. For Aristotle God is eternal, non-material, unchanging and perfect. He famously describes God as the unmoved mover existing outside of the world and setting it into motion. Because everything seeks divine perfection this God is responsible for all change that continues to happen in the universe. We experience a world of particular things but God knows the universal ideas behind them (or before them). For Aristotle God is pure thought, eternally contemplating himself. God is the telos, the goal or end of all things. [iv] Aristotle begins his book Nicomachean Ethics by observing that “Happiness… is the End at which all actions aim.” [v] Everything we do ultimately can be traced back to our desire for happiness and the purpose of Aristotle's book is to help the reader to attain this goal. Happiness comes from having particular virtues, that is habitual ways of acting and seeking pleasure. These include: courage, temperance, generosity, patience. In our interactions with others we use social virtues including: amiability, sincerity, wit. Justice is the overarching virtue that encompasses all the others. Aristotle writes that there are three kinds of friendships. The first is based on usefulness, the second on pleasure. Because these are based on superficial qualities they generally do not last long. The final and best form of friendship for him is based on strength of character. These friends do not love each other for what they can gain but because they admire each other's character. Aristotle believes that this almost always this happens between equals although sometimes one sees it in the relation between fathers and sons (I take this to mean between parents and children). Famous for describing human beings as the political animal, Aristotle points out that we can only accomplish great things through cooperation. Institutions and every human group rely on friendly feelings to be effective. Friendship is key to what makes human beings effective, and for that matter, human. Finally, Aristotle believes that although each person should be self-sufficient, friendship is important for a good life. 3. The Greek word for Gospel, that particular form of literature which tells the story of Jesus, is euangelion. We might forget that this word means good news until we get a sense for the far more radical picture of God and friendship that Jesus teaches. For me, one of the defining and unique features of Christianity as a religion comes from Jesus' insistence that our relation to God is like a child to a loving father. Jesus teaches us to pray, “Our Father who art in heaven.” Jesus clarifies this picture of God in his story of the Prodigal Son who goes away and squanders his wealth in a kind of first century Las Vegas. In the son's destitution he returns home and as he crests the hill, his father “filled with compassion,” hikes up his robes and runs to hug and kiss him. Jesus does not just use words but physical gestures to show what a friend is. In today's gospel Jesus washes his friends' feet before eats his last meal with them. The King James Version says, “there was leaning on Jesus' bosom one of his disciples, whom Jesus loved” (Jn. 13:23). [vi] Imagine Jesus, in the actual embrace of his beloved friend, telling us who God is. Jesus explicitly says I do not call you servants but friends (Jn. 15). A servant does not know what the master is doing but a friend does. And you know that the greatest commandment is to love one another. Later in prayer he begs God to protect us from the world, “so that [we] may have [his] joy made complete in [ourselves]” (Jn. 17). 4. Gregory of Nyssa (c. 332-395) was born ten years after the First Council of Nicaea and attended the First Council of Constantinople. He writes about how so many ordinary people were arguing about doctrine, “If in this city you ask anyone for change, he will discuss with you whether the Son was begotten or unbegotten. If you ask about the quality of the bread you will receive the answer, “The father is the greater and the Son is lesser.' If you suggest a bath is desirable you will be told, ‘There was nothing before the Son was created.'” [vii] Gregory with his friends Basil and Gregory Nazianzus wondered what description of Jesus would lead to faith rather than just argument. [viii] Gregory of Nyssa came to believe that the image of God is only fully displayed when every human person is included. [ix] In his final book Life of Moses Gregory responds to a letter from a younger friend who seeks counsel on “the perfect life.” [x] Gregory writes that Moses exemplifies this more than all others because Moses is a friend to God. True perfection is not bargaining with, pleading, tricking, manipulating, fearing God. It is not avoiding a wicked life out of fear of punishment. It is not to do good because we hope for some reward, as if we are cashing in on the virtuous life through a business contract. Gregory closes with these words to his young admirer, “we regard falling from God's friendship as the only dreadful thing… and we consider becoming God's friend the only thing worthy of honor and desire. This… is the perfection of life. As your understanding is lifted up to what is magnificent and divine, whatever you may find… will certainly be for the common benefit in Christ Jesus.” [xi] On Thursday night I was speaking to Paul Fromberg the Rector of St. Gregory's church about this and he mentioned a sophisticated woman who became a Christian in his church. In short she moved from Aristotle's view of friendship among superior equals to Jesus' view. She said, “Because I go to church I can have real affection for people who annoy the shit out of me. My affection is no longer just based on affinity.” [xii] 5. I have been thoroughly transformed by Jesus' idea of friendship. My life has become full of Jesus' friends, full of people who I never would have met had I followed Aristotle's advice. Together we know that in Christ unity does not have to mean uniformity. Before I close let me tell you about one person who I met at Christ Church in Los Altos. Even by the time I met her Alice Larse was only a few years away from being a great-grandmother. She and her husband George had grown up together in Washington State. He had been an engineer and she nursed him through his death from Alzheimer's disease. Some of my favorite memories come from the frequent summer pool parties she would have for our youth groups. She must have been in her sixties when she started a “Alice's Stick Cookies Company.” Heidi and I saw them in a store last week! At Christ Church we had a rotating homeless shelter and there were several times when Alice, as a widow living by herself, had various guests stay at her house. When the church was divided about whether or not to start a school she quickly volunteered to serve as senior warden. She was not sentimental. She was thoroughly practical. She was humble. She got things done… but with a great sense of humor. There was no outward indication that she was really a saint. I missed her funeral two weeks ago because of responsibilities here. I never really had the chance to say goodbye but I know that one day we will be together in God. Grace Cathedral has hundreds of saints just like her who I have learned to love in a similar way. Ram Dass was a dear friend of our former Dean Alan Jones. He used to say, “The name of the game we are in is called ‘Being at one with the Beloved.' [xiii] The Medieval mystic Julian of Norwich writes that God possesses, “a love-longing to have us all together, wholly in himself for his delight; for we are not now wholly in him as we shall be…” She says that you and I are Jesus' joy and bliss. [xiv] We seek one mystery, God, with another mystery, ourselves. We are mysterious to ourselves because God's mystery is in us.” [xv] In a world where friendship can seem to be only for utility or pleasure I pray that like Jesus, you will be blessed with many friends, that you find perfection of life and even become friends with God. [i] Gary Wills, Saint Augustine (NY: Viking, 1999) xii. [ii] Li Bai, “Zazen on Ching-t'ing Mountain,” tr. Sam Hamill, Crossing the Yellow River: Three Hundred Poems from the Chinese, (Rochester, NY: BOA Editions, 2000). About 1000 poems attributed to Li still exist. https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/48711/zazen-on-ching-ting-mountain [iii] Ed Simon, “There's Nothing in the World Smaller than the Universe: In The Invention of the Darling, Li-Young Lee presents divinity as spirit and matter, profound and quotidian, sacred and profane,” Poetry Foundation. This article quotes, “The Invention of the Darling.” https://www.poetryfoundation.org/articles/162572/theres-nothing-in-the-world-smaller-than-the-universe [iv] More from the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: “Aristotle made God passively responsible for change in the world in the sense that all things seek divine perfection. God imbues all things with order and purpose, both of which can be discovered and point to his (or its) divine existence. From those contingent things we come to know universals, whereas God knows universals prior to their existence in things. God, the highest being (though not a loving being), engages in perfect contemplation of the most worthy object, which is himself. He is thus unaware of the world and cares nothing for it, being an unmoved mover. God as pure form is wholly immaterial, and as perfect he is unchanging since he cannot become more perfect. This perfect and immutable God is therefore the apex of being and knowledge. God must be eternal. That is because time is eternal, and since there can be no time without change, change must be eternal. And for change to be eternal the cause of change-the unmoved mover-must also be eternal. To be eternal God must also be immaterial since only immaterial things are immune from change. Additionally, as an immaterial being, God is not extended in space.” https://iep.utm.edu/god-west/ [v] Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, trans. H. Rackham, Loeb Classical Library vol. XIX (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975) 30-1. [vi] h™n aÓnakei÷menoß ei–ß e˙k tw◊n maqhtw◊n aujtouv e˙n twˆ◊ ko/lpwˆ touv ∆Ihsouv, o§n hjga¿pa oJ ∆Ihsouvß (John 13:23). I don't understand why the NRSV translation translate this as “next to him” I think that Herman Waetjen regards “in Jesus' bosom” as correct. Herman Waetjen, The Gospel of the Beloved Disciple: A Work in Two Editions (NY: T&T Clark, 2005) 334. [vii] Margaret Ruth Miles, The Word Made Flesh: A History of Christian Thought (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2005), 105. [viii] Ibid., 108. [ix] From Jesse Hake, “An Intro to Saint Gregory of Nyssa and his Last Work: The Life of Moses,” 28 July 2022: https://www.theophaneia.org/an-intro-to-saint-gregory-of-nyssa-and-his-last-work-the-life-of-moses/ “For example, Gregory says that the image of God is only fully displayed when every human person is included, so that the reference in Genesis to making humanity in God's image is actually a reference to all of humanity as one body (which is ultimately the body of Jesus Christ that is also revealed at the end of time): In the Divine foreknowledge and power all humanity is included in the first creation. …The entire plenitude of humanity was included by the God of all, by His power of foreknowledge, as it were in one body, and …this is what the text teaches us which says, God created man, in the image of God created He him. For the image …extends equally to all the race. …The Image of God, which we behold in universal humanity, had its consummation then. …He saw, Who knows all things even before they be, comprehending them in His knowledge, how great in number humanity will be in the sum of its individuals. …For when …the full complement of human nature has reached the limit of the pre-determined measure, because there is no longer anything to be made up in the way of increase to the number of souls, [Paul] teaches us that the change in existing things will take place in an instant of time. [And Paul gives to] that limit of time which has no parts or extension the names of a moment and the twinkling of an eye (1 Corinthians 15:51-52).” [x] Gregory of Nyssa, The Life of Moses trans. Abraham J. Malherbe and Everett Ferguson, “Preface” by John Myendorff (NY: Paulist Press, 1978) 29. [xi] Ibid., 137. [xii] Paul Fromberg conversation at One Market, Thursday 9 May 2024. [xiii] Alan Jones, Living the Truth (Boston, MA: Cowley Publications, 2000) 53. [xiv] Quoted in Isaac S. Villegas, “Christian Theology is a Love Story,” The Christian Century, 25 April 2018. https://www.christiancentury.org/lectionary/may-13-easter-7b-john-17-6-19?code=kHQx7M4MqgBLOUfbwRkc&utm_source=Christian+Century+Newsletter&utm_campaign=1ccba0cb63-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_SCP_2024-05-06&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_-31c915c0b7-%5BLIST_EMAIL_ID%5D [xv] Gary Wills, Saint Augustine (NY: Viking, 1999) xii.
Predstavte si, že ráno otvoríte noviny a hneď na titulke čítate: "Gándi bol brutálnejší ako Hitler". Zhrozený otočíte strany a čítate: "Ľudstvo je OK, ale 99 % ľudí sú nudní" a na otázku "Čo vás deprimuje?" odpovedá autor novinového rozhovoru: "Vidieť hlúpych ľudí šťastných." ----more---- Už takmer zatvárate noviny, ale zvedavosť vám nedá, listujete očami ďalej a zrazu vás rozrozmýšľajú tieto výroky. Prvý: "Cítime sa slobodní, pretože nám chýba jazyk, ktorým by sme vyjadrili svoju neslobodu." Druhý: "Šťastie nebolo nikdy dôležité. Problémom je, že nevieme, čo naozaj chceme. To, čo nás robí šťastnými, nie je dostať to, čo chceme. Ale snívať o tom." A po tretie: "Film je ultimatne zvrhlé umenie. Nedáva vám to, po čom túžite - hovorí vám, ako túžiť." Po prvotnom pohoršení a druhotnom rozrozmýšľaní sa možno pýtate, kto je autorom týchto provokatívnych vyjadrení a nie je ním nikto iný ako súčasný slovinský filozof Slavoj Žižek. Dnes vám predstavím jeho netradičný avantgardný spôsob filozofovania a v závere sa zastavíme pri otázke, či by sme nemohli považovať za novodobého Sokrata. Súvisiace dávky: PD#301: Ako nevyhorieť vo vyhorenej spoločnosti, http://bit.ly/davka301 PD#299: Žijeme v dobe konzumného narcizmu, http://bit.ly/davka299 PD#294: Ideológia a jej mnohotvárnosť, http://bit.ly/davka294 PD#275: Filozofia Simone Weil, http://bit.ly/davka275 PD#269: Filozofia G.W.F. Hegla, http://bit.ly/davka269 PD#156: Frankfurtská škola, http://bit.ly/davka156 PD#154: Štrukturalizmus, http://bit.ly/davka154 PD#144: Postmodernizmus, http://bit.ly/davka144 Použitá alebo odporúčaná literatúra: Sharpe, "Slavoj Žižek" (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy) Žižek, Too Late to Awaken (Allen Lane, 2023) "The life and philosophy of Slavoj Žižek" (The Institute of Art and Ideas, 2023, YouTube) Steinbauer, "Interview with Slavoj Žižek" (Philosophy Now, 2017) Parker, "Slavoj Žižek" (Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2024) Matějčková, "Slavoj Žižek, „nejnebezpečnější filozof současnosti“" (podcast Pravda neexistuje? Ep#13) West, "Episode #196 - The Improbable Slavoj Zizek - Pt. 1" (podcast Philosophize This!) *** Baví ťa s nami rozmýšľať? Podpor našu tvorbu priamo na SK1283605207004206791985 alebo cez Patreon (https://bit.ly/PDtreon), kde Ťa odmeníme aj my.
On May 28, in the year 585 BCE, there was a total solar eclipse during a battle between the kingdoms of Media and Lydia. This eclipse had been predicted by Thales of Miletus, and it led to the ends of both the battle and the war. Maybe. Research: "Thales of Miletus." Math & Mathematicians: The History of Math Discoveries Around the World, edited by Leonard C. Bruno, UXL, 2008. Gale In Context: Science, link.gale.com/apps/doc/K1669000047/GPS?u=mlin_n_melpub&sid=bookmark-GPS&xid=941ff118. Accessed 18 Mar. 2024. "Thales." Complete Dictionary of Scientific Biography, vol. 13, Charles Scribner's Sons, 2008, pp. 295-298. Gale In Context: U.S. History, link.gale.com/apps/doc/CX2830904273/GPS?u=mlin_n_melpub&sid=bookmark-GPS&xid=78008eeb. Accessed 18 Mar. 2024. Airy, G. B. “On the Eclipses of Agathocles, Thales, and Xerxes.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, vol. 143, 1853, pp. 179–200. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/108561. Accessed 21 Mar. 2024. Batten, A. H. “The Saros Period and Halley's Comet.” Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada, Vol.76, NO. 4, P. 258, 1982. https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1982JRASC..76..258B Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia. "Thales of Miletus". Encyclopedia Britannica, 21 Dec. 2023, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Thales-of-Miletus. Accessed 20 March 2024. Cantor, Lea. “Thales – the ‘first philosopher'? A troubled chapter in the historiography of philosophy.” British Journal of the History of Philosophy. 2022, VOL. 30, NO. 5, 727–750. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2022.2029347 Couprie, Dirk L. “How Thales Was Able to "Predict" a Solar Eclipse without the Help of Alleged Mesopotamian Wisdom.” Early Science and Medicine , 2004, Vol. 9, No. 4 (2004). https://www.jstor.org/stable/4130201 Downey, Ed. “Thales of Miletus.” Great Neck Publishing. 8/1/2017. Via EBSCO. Gershon, Livia. “How Astronomers Write History.” JSTOR Daily. 3/10/2024. https://daily.jstor.org/how-astronomers-write-history/ Leloux, Kevin. “The Battle of the Eclipse (May 28, 585 BC): A Discussion of the Lydo-Median Treaty and the Halys Border.” Polemos 19 (2016). https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/264738 Miguel Querejeta, ‘On the Eclipse of Thales, Cycles and Probabilities', Culture And Cosmos, Vol. 15, no. 1, Spring/Summer 2011, pp. 5–16. www.CultureAndCosmos.org Mosshammer, Alden A. “Thales' Eclipse.” Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-2014). 1981, Vol. 111 (1981). Via JSTOR. https://www.jstor.org/stable/284125 O'Grady, Patricia. “Thales of Miletus (c. 620 B.C.E.—c. 546 B.C.E.).” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/thales/ Redlin, Lothar et al. “Thales' Shadow.” Mathematics Magazine , Dec., 2000, Vol. 73, No. 5 (Dec., 2000). Via JSTOR. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2690810 Stanley, Matthew. “Predicting the Past: Ancient Eclipses and Airy, Newcomb, and Huxley on the Authority of Science.” Isis, vol. 103, no. 2, 2012, pp. 254–77. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.1086/666355. Accessed 21 Mar. 2024. Worthen, Thomas. “Herodotus' Report on Thales' Eclipse.” Vol. 3, No. 7. May 1997. https://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/ElAnt/V3N7/worthen.html See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
As the Radical Thoughts Podcast is no longer active, I am making these old bonus episodes from Patreon publicly available so that listeners don't have to pay for an inactive podcast. - Patrick In this special crossover episode, Patrick talks with C Derick Varn of Varn Vlog about the legacy of Jean-Luc Nancy. While both bemoan the more frivolous stylings of French theory, the discussion appreciates the serious questions that Nancy raised about the nature of community and the assumptions that underpin the concept.This episode was released as a crossover episode also available to Varn Vlog Patreon supporters. Varn Vlog Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/varnvlog/ Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy page for Nancy: https://iep.utm.edu/nancy/ Verso Interview: https://www.versobooks.com/blogs/5150-jean-luc-nancy-communism-means-conceiving-being-in-common
This lecture was given on June 1st, 2023, at the 12th Annual Aquinas Philosophy Workshop at the Dominican House of Studies. For more information on upcoming events, please visit our website: thomisticinstitute.org/upcoming-events Speaker Bio: Fr. James Brent, O.P. was born and raised in Michigan. He pursued his undergraduate and graduate studies in Philosophy, and completed his doctorate in Philosophy at Saint Louis University on the epistemic status of Christian beliefs according to Saint Thomas Aquinas. He has articles in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy on Natural Theology, in the Oxford Handbook of Thomas Aquinas on “God's Knowledge and Will”, and an article forthcoming on “Thomas Aquinas” in the Oxford Handbook of the Epistemology of Theology. He earned his STL from the Pontifical Faculty of the Immaculate Conception, and was ordained a priest in the same year. He taught in the School of Philosophy at The Catholic University of America from 2010- 2014, and spent the year of 2014-2015 doing full time itinerant preaching on college campuses across the United States.
This lecture was given on June 1st, 2023, at the 12th Annual Aquinas Philosophy Workshop at the Dominican House of Studies. For more information on upcoming events, please visit our website: thomisticinstitute.org/upcoming-events Speaker Bio: Fr. James Brent, O.P. was born and raised in Michigan. He pursued his undergraduate and graduate studies in Philosophy, and completed his doctorate in Philosophy at Saint Louis University on the epistemic status of Christian beliefs according to Saint Thomas Aquinas. He has articles in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy on Natural Theology, in the Oxford Handbook of Thomas Aquinas on “God's Knowledge and Will”, and an article forthcoming on “Thomas Aquinas” in the Oxford Handbook of the Epistemology of Theology. He earned his STL from the Pontifical Faculty of the Immaculate Conception, and was ordained a priest in the same year. He taught in the School of Philosophy at The Catholic University of America from 2010- 2014, and spent the year of 2014-2015 doing full time itinerant preaching on college campuses across the United States.
Slavoj Žižek is a Slovenian-born political philosopher and cultural critic. He was described by British literary theorist, Terry Eagleton, as the “most formidably brilliant” recent theorist to have emerged from Continental Europe. (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy) To support Within Reason on Patreon, please visit https://www.patreon.com/cosmicskeptic
This lecture was given on June 30th, 2023, at the Thomistic Institute Student Leadership Conference at the Dominican House of Studies. For more information, please visit our website: thomisticinstitute.org/upcoming-events Speaker Bio: Fr. James Dominic Brent, O.P. was born and raised in Michigan. He pursued his undergraduate and graduate studies in Philosophy, and completed his doctorate in Philosophy at Saint Louis University on the epistemic status of Christian beliefs according to Saint Thomas Aquinas. He has articles in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy on Natural Theology, in the Oxford Handbook of Thomas Aquinas on “God's Knowledge and Will”, and an article forthcoming on “Thomas Aquinas” in the Oxford Handbook of the Epistemology of Theology. He earned his STL from the Pontifical Faculty of the Immaculate Conception, and was ordained a priest in the same year. He taught in the School of Philosophy at The Catholic University of America from 2010- 2014, and spent the year of 2014-2015 doing full time itinerant preaching on college campuses across the United States.
The lecture was given on June 29th, 2023, at the Thomistic Institute Student Leadership Conference at the Dominican House of Studies. For more information on upcoming events, please visit our website: thomisticinstitute.org/upcoming events Speaker Bio: Fr. James Dominic Brent, O.P. was born and raised in Michigan. He pursued his undergraduate and graduate studies in Philosophy, and completed his doctorate in Philosophy at Saint Louis University on the epistemic status of Christian beliefs according to Saint Thomas Aquinas. He has articles in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy on Natural Theology, in the Oxford Handbook of Thomas Aquinas on “God's Knowledge and Will”, and on “Thomas Aquinas” in the Oxford Handbook of the Epistemology of Theology. He earned his STL from the Pontifical Faculty of the Immaculate Conception. He taught in the School of Philosophy at the Catholic University of America from 2010-2014, and spent the year of 2014-2015 doing full-time itinerant preaching on college campuses across the United States. Since then, he has been an Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the Dominican House of Studies.
The HPS Podcast - Conversations from History, Philosophy and Social Studies of Science
This episode features Caleb Hazelwood, philosopher of science and PhD candidate, talking on the topic of Scientific Metaphysics. As Caleb explains, ‘scientific metaphysics' refers to coming to grips with what ‘really is' in the world – and being crystal clear about the concepts we use to describe natural phenomena and how they interact. For example, Caleb talks about the importance of differentiating between entities we consider stable across the universe – such as the elements – compared with more space-bound entities – such as biological species.While exploring such fundamental questions may appear difficult and abstract, Caleb does a wonderful job in showing how debates such as these provide for fruitful interactions between scientific practice and philosophical reasoning. See the following links for more on the topic:· Caleb Hazelwood - https://calebhazelwood.com/· Catherine Kendig - https://www.canr.msu.edu/people/catherine-kendig· Yasmin Haddad - https://www.yasminhaddad.com/· Thomas Pradeu on ‘Individuality and the Microbiome' - https://invivomagazine.com/en/focus/interview/article/350/you-can-identify-individuals-based-on-their-unique-features-of-their-microbiomes· Thomas Pradeu on Philosophy of Immunology - https://newbooksnetwork.com/philosophy-of-immunology· Caleb's review of Charles Pence's The Causal Structure of Natural Selection - http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/21945/· James Woodward – Causation with a Human Face· James Woodward – ‘Causation and Manipulability' SEP - https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/causation-mani/· ‘Metaphysics of Science' (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy)· Aeon article by John Dupré on ‘Science-based Metaphysics'A full transcript of the episode can be found here: https://www.hpsunimelb.org/post/episode-9-transcriptThanks for listening to The HPS Podcast with your current hosts, Samara Greenwood and Carmelina Contarino.You can find more about us on our blog, website, bluesky, twitter, instagram and facebook feeds. This podcast would not be possible without the support of School of Historical and Philosophical Studies at the University of Melbourne.www.hpsunimelb.org
TOPIC-SPECIFIC LINKS (BY ROUGH ORDER OF MENTION): "Dogmatic Theology", The Catholic Encyclopedia: https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14580a.htm "Relativism", Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/relativism/ "Objectivity", Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy https://iep.utm.edu/objectiv/#:~:text=1.,do%20persons%20having%20subjective%20states. Bakhita Radio report on Bishop Ameyu's elevation as Bishop of Torit (slideshow): https://fb.watch/l-f9z53yFk/?mibextid=Nif5oz Humanae Vitae https://www.vatican.va/content/paul-vi/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-vi_enc_25071968_humanae-vitae.html Vatican press release on Bishop Mulla's elevation as Bishop of Torit: https://press.vatican.va/content/salastampa/en/bollettino/pubblico/2019/01/03/190103b.html Current situation in Sudan: https://www.christianitytoday.com/news/2023/may/sudan-christians-burhan-rsf-civil-war-khartoum-churches.html Coverage of opposition to Bishop Ameyu's appointment: https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/43209/controversy-continues-regarding-south-sudan-archbishop-appointment More coverage of opposition to Bishop Ameyu's appointment: https://sudantribune.com/article67243/ Eye Radio report on Bishop Ameyu's elevation to Cardinal: https://www.eyeradio.org/pope-francis-promotes-archbishop-stephen-ameyu-to-cardinal/?amp Cardinal-Elect Ameyu's reaction: https://www.ncronline.org/news/cardinal-designate-south-sudan-seen-peacemaker-ethnic-conflicts Crux write-up of the three new African Cardinals, including Cardinal-Elect Ameyu. https://cruxnow.com/church-in-africa/2023/07/meet-pope-franciss-new-african-cardinals THE USUAL LINKS: Cardinal-Elect Stephen Ameyu Martin Mulla on Catholic-Hierarchy.org: https://www.catholic-hierarchy.org/bishop/bamm.html Cardinal-Elect Stephen Ameyu Martin Mulla on Gcatholic.org: http://www.gcatholic.org/p/47068 See of Juba on Gcatholic.org: http://www.gcatholic.org/dioceses/diocese/juba0.htm?tab=info See of Juba on Catholic-Hierarchy.org: https://www.catholic-hierarchy.org/diocese/djuba.html Aletia bios of new Cardinals from the Americas, including Cardinal-Elect Grzegorz Ryś: https://aleteia.org/2023/07/12/6-prelates-from-the-americas-to-join-the-sacred-college/ The same Vatican press statement with bio information I keep linking (Italian): https://press.vatican.va/content/salastampa/it/bollettino/pubblico/2023/07/09/0503/01120.html IMAGE CRED: Radio Bakhita THANKS AND SUCH: Thank you for listening, and thank my family and friends for putting up with me and for helping me out or for being polite when declining. As always, feel free to email the show at Popeularhistory@gmail.com If you would like to financially support Popeular history, go to patreon.com/Popeular. If you don't have any money to spare, spreading the word is worth more than gold!
In this episode we do a case study of someone who wove together a number of the themes we have talked about in earlier episodes, including the importance of a commitment to truth and the life of the mind, being a part of a vibrant faith community, dealing with challenges, and being faithful to God's call. These lessons from the life of philosopher Edmund Husserl, as well as some of his philosophical insights, provide great encouragement and challenge for Christians today. In this podcast, we discuss: Who Edmund Husserl is and why his work matters to Christians. How others helped Husserl, JP, Stan, and Jordan in their journeys. How commitment to the truth lead us to be counter-cultural. How we can be faithful through lonely and challenging times. Unexpected ways God uses the seeds we plant to bring Him glory. How Husserl's philosophical insights help shape our understanding of what is true, good, and beautiful. Resources and Citations: Dermot Moran, Edmund Husserl: Founder of Phenomenology Herbert Spiegelberg, The Phenomenological Movement Marianne Sawicki, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Edmund Husserl (1859-1938) Roman Ingarden and Edmund Husserl, Briefe an Roman Ingarden: Mit Erläuterungen und Erinnerungen an Husserl Karl Schuhmann, Husserl-Chronik: Denk- und Lebensweg Edmund Husserls Hanne Jacobs, The Husserlian Mind Britannica, German philosopher: Edmund Husserl Edmund Husserl, Obituary Notice of Adolf Reinach Karl Schuhmann, Dariusz Bęben, Husserl i Masaryk K. Chesterton, Quote from Orthodoxy
Láska bože láska. Čo sa ale myslí pod tým každodenným pojmom? Je láska o hľadaní našej chýbajúcej polovičky alebo je o sebapresahovaní a s telesnosťou nemá v princípe nič? Alebo existuje nejaká tretia možnosť?----more---- Súvisiace dávky: PD#283: Platónov dialóg Republika, http://bit.ly/davka283 PD#115: Scruton, filozof, ktorý žil krásu, http://bit.ly/davka115 PD#31: Scruton o kráse, http://bit.ly/davka31 PD#26: Platónová jaskyňa, http://bit.ly/davka26 Použitá a odporúčaná literatúra: Helm, „Love“, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Moseleym, „Philosophy of Love“, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy de Sousa, Love: A Very Short Introduction (OUP, 2015) Keeble, „The Philosophy of Romantic Love“ (Philosophy Now, 2022) Andr, Philosophy of Love in the Past, Present, and Future (Routledge, 2022) Reeve, „Plato on Friendship and Eros“, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy *** Baví ťa s nami rozmýšľať? Získaj extra obsah cez Patreon (https://bit.ly/PDtreon), alebo nás podpor ľubovoľným darom (https://bit.ly/PDdar)
This talk was given on March 23, 2023 at the University of Florida. For more information please visit thomisticinstitute.org. About the speaker: Fr. James Dominic Brent, O.P. was born and raised in Michigan. He pursued his undergraduate and graduate studies in Philosophy, and completed his doctorate in Philosophy at Saint Louis University on the epistemic status of Christian beliefs according to Saint Thomas Aquinas. He has articles in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy on Natural Theology, in the Oxford Handbook of Thomas Aquinas on “God's Knowledge and Will”, and on “Thomas Aquinas” in the Oxford Handbook of the Epistemology of Theology. He earned his STL from the Pontifical Faculty of the Immaculate Conception. He taught in the School of Philosophy at The Catholic University of America from 2010-2014, and spent the year of 2014-2015 doing full time itinerant preaching on college campuses across the United States. Since then he has been an Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the Dominican House of Studies.
Ako rozpoznať pravú vedu od pseudovedy? A dá sa podobný princíp aplikovať aj na rozlíšenie medzi dobre a zle fungujúcou spoločnosťou? Dnes sa zamyslíme nad dielom rakúsko-britského filozofa Karla Poppera, o ktorého myšlienkach falzifickácie a otvorenej spoločnosti ste už verím mnohí počuli.----more---- Súvisiace dávky: PD#283: Platónov dialóg Republika, http://bit.ly/davka283 PD#193: Rozhovor s neurovedcom Jedličkom aj o Popperovi, http://bit.ly/davka193 Použitá a odporúčaná literatúra: diskusia na FB, https://bit.ly/41wMGqF Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery (Routledge, 2002) Popper, The Open Society and Its Enemies (PUP, 2013) Thornton, „Karl Popper“,The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2022) Shea, „Karl Popper: Philosophy of Science“, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy Bragg, „Popper“ (BBC, In Our Time podcast) Karl Popper, Science, & Pseudoscience: Crash Course Philosophy #8 (YouTube) Philosophy Overdose, „Karl Popper on Science & Absolute Truth (1974)“ (YouTube) Philosophy Overdose, „Karl Popper on the Three Worlds (1989)“ (YouTube) *** Baví ťa s nami rozmýšľať? Získaj extra obsah cez Patreon (https://bit.ly/PDtreon), alebo nás podpor ľubovoľným darom (https://bit.ly/PDdar)
In this episode we explore the concepts of civic virtue and citizenship in democratic societies. Joining the conversation are: Christopher Beem, author of The Seven Democratic Virtues: What You Can Do to Overcome Tribalism and Save Our Democracy; Richard Haass, author of The Bill of Obligations: The Ten Habits of Good Citizens; and Lorraine Pangle, author of Reason and Character: The Moral Foundations of Aristotelian Political Philosophy. Jeffrey Rosen, president and CEO of the National Constitution Center, moderates. This program is made possible through the generous support of Citizen Travelers, the nonpartisan civic engagement initiative of Travelers. Additional Resources Richard Haass, The Bill of Obligations: The Ten Habits of Good Citizens Christopher Beem, The Seven Democratic Virtues: What You Can Do to Overcome Tribalism and Save Our Democracy Christopher Sheilds, "Aristotle," Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Robert Pasnau, "Thomas Aquinas," Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Lorraine Pangle, Reason and Character: The Moral Foundations of Aristotelian Political Philosophy Lorraine and Thomas Pangle, The Learning of Liberty: The Educational Ideas of the American Founders Lorraine Pangle, The Political Philosophy of Benjamin Franklin Scotty Hendricks, "Ben Franklin's 13 Guidelines for Living a Good Life," Big Think Xenophon, Memorabilia Eve Browning, "Xenophon," Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy Federalist 10 Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics George Washington, First Annual Message to Congress (1790) Adam Harris, "George Washington's Broken Dream of a National University," The Atlantic National Constitution Center, "Lessons from Tocqueville in America," Live at the National Constitution Center Stay Connected and Learn More Continue the conversation on Facebook and Twitter using @ConstitutionCtr. Sign up to receive Constitution Weekly, our email roundup of constitutional news and debate, at bit.ly/constitutionweekly. Please subscribe to Live at the National Constitution Center and our companion podcast We the People on Apple Podcasts, Stitcher, or your favorite podcast app.
Oto jedno z największych pytań w historii filozofii: czym są pojęcia ogólne? Kiedy na przykład mówimy o krześle – nie żadnym konkretnym, tylko w ogóle jakimś, to o czym tak naprawdę mówimy? A co z pojęciami, które zawsze są abstrakcyjne – np. miłość, wiedza, życie? Czym są obiekty matematyczne, takie jak liczba 3 lub trójkąt równoboczny? To jest właśnie tzw. spór o uniwersalia, jeden z największych problemów metafizyki. W tym odcinku przyjrzymy się jego głównym stanowiskom. Informacje o II Forum Filozofek: https://facebook.com/events/s/ii-forum-filozofek/5958068344215694/ Podcast możesz wesprzeć na Patronite :) O tutaj: https://patronite.pl/filozofiapoprostu/description To niezwykle pomocne i motywujące – dziękuję! :) Zapraszam też na sociale: Instagram: @filozofia_po_prostu https://www.instagram.com/filozofia_po_prostu/?hl=en Facebook: Filozofia Po Prostu https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100068611986622 kontakt: filozofia.po.prostu.podcast@gmail.com Podcast powstaje dzięki niesamowitym Patronom i Patronkom: Ewa Kaliszewska, Bartłomiej Wachacz, Anna Limanowska, Justyna Wydra, Andrzej Manoryk, Pola Weryszko, Adrian Sokołowski, Patryk Neumann, Krzysztof Trela, Mateusz Merta, Mateusz Krawczyk, Krzysztof Trela, Marcin Galusik, Natalia Pietrzak, Michał Semczyszyn, Magda Juraszewska, Piotr Flak, Przemek Łukasiński, Anita Włosek, Ewa Kaminska, Filip Więcek, Piotr Romanowski, Paweł Gliwny, Aggy Dabrowska, Paweł Litwinowicz, Waldemar Wendrowski, Sebastian Cychowski, Michał Bukała, Kuba Dziadosz, Alicja Zielińska, Grzegorz Jot, Magdalena Rutkowska, Agnieszka Myszkowska, Agata Boczkowska, Ewa Glu, Michał Klatka, Beata Kupczyńska, Karol Ciba, Maria Góralska, Sebastian Cichosz, Marta Lankamer, Paweł Jastrzębski, Piotr Juszczyński, Stefan Basista, Ela Petruk, Katarzyna Ergang, Paweł Litwinowicz, Kinga Kasińska, Kinga Kasińska, Jan Nowak, Kosma Fuławka, Czeski Kot, Michał Grązka, Theodor musi, oraz Patroni i Patronki anonimowi. Dziękuję! OPRACOWANIA & ŹRÓDŁA: Po angielsku: M. Loux – „Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction” (jest tam świetnie opracowany współczesny problem uniwersaliów w sposób problemowy, czyli skupia się na problemie i argumentach, nie na historii) Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy – „the Problem of Universals” – https://iep.utm.edu/universa/(krótkie opracowanie problemu) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy – „The Medieval Problem of Universals” – https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/universals-medieval/– (szczegółowe opracowanie średnioweicznego sporu o uniwersalia) Po polsku: Filozofuj! – „Problem uniwersaliów” https://filozofuj.eu/arkadiusz-chrudzimski-spor-o-uniwersalia/(krótki opis problemu i stanowisk) A. Jaroszewska – „Spór o uniwersalia” – file:///Users/user/Downloads/Sp%C3%B3r_o_uniwersalia.pdf(krótki opis problemu, stanowisk i jego historii) T. Tatarkiewicz – „Historia Filozofii” F. Copleston – „Historia Filozofii” W kompendiach historii filozofii na pewno warto zajrzeć w starożytności do rozdziałów o Platonie i Arystotelesie, następnie w średniowieczu do Tomasza z Akwinu i Williama Ockhama. W średniowieczu problem uniwersaliów był bardzo poważnym problemem (jeżeli ktoś z was przygotowuje się do matury lub olimpiady z filozofii [lub jest fascynatem historii tego problemu], należy zapoznać się z przebiegiem tzw. średniowiecznego sporu o uniwersalia). W filozofii współczesnej przede wszystkim: Husserl, Frege, Russel, Popper, Carnap. Przywołane myśli Platona są w: Platon – „Państwo”
Nepozornosť je asi univerzálnou ľudskou skúsenosťou. Od malého mala sme boli upozorňovaní, aby sme dávali pozor – či už vtedy, keď nám niečo vysvetľovanie rodičia alebo učitelia; alebo tesne pred tým, ako sme začali hrať nejakú novú hru. Ak nedám pozor, nebudem vedieť pravidlá, a potom nebudem vedieť samozrejme zvíťaziť.----more---- Otázka pozornosti je ale hlboko morálna, ba priam až psychologicko-duchovná záležitosť, a okrem samotného bytia pozorným je tu ešte dôležitejšie otázka, ktorá znie nasledovne: Čomu dať našu pozornosť? A túto otázku môžeme rozbiť pod-otázkami ako: Sú veci, ktoré si zasluhujú našu pozornosť viac ako iné? Sú veci, ktorým by mal venovať pozornosť každý a to až do takej miery, že ak ich nebudeme brať aktívne na vedomie, stanú sa z nás morálne nižší ľudia? A akej povahu sú tie tzv. veci, voči ktorým, ak budeme nepozorní, riskujeme, že niečo v našom vnútri pomaly odumrie alebo, naopak, nikdy nevyrastie a nevykvitne? Tieto otázky sú v jadre filozofie francúzskej mysliteľky a aktivistky Simone Weilovej a v dnešnej dávke si ju ako aj jej dielo predstavíme. Pôjde ale o neľahké až existenciálne rozmýšľanie, pretože pandémia nepozornosti, ktorou dnes trpíme, má za následok tragickú skutočnosť, že ničíme živote ľudí okolo nás (a tiež svoje) a to tým, že sami zo seba a druhých robíme veci – inštrumentalizujeme a dehumanizujeme. Súvisiace dávky: PD#26: Platónová jaskyňa, http://bit.ly/davka26 PD#159: Nacionalizmus je kresťanská heréza, http://bit.ly/davka159 PD#228: Murdoch a dobro, http://bit.ly/davka228 Použitá a odporúčaná literatúra: Weil, Waiting for God (HarperCollins, 2009) Rozelle-Stone (et at.). "Simone Weil" (The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2023), http://bit.ly/3iYu01K Lynch, "Simone Weil (1909—1943)" (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy), http://bit.ly/401P1JN BBC In Our Time podcast, „Simone Weil“, http://bit.ly/3iX9kHE Philosophize This! podcast, „Episode #172 - Simone Weil – Attention“ (2023), http://bit.ly/3H1AhSh Philosophize This! podcast, „Episode #173 - Simone Weil - The Need For Roots“ (2023), http://bit.ly/3Jbb6PO *** Baví ťa s nami rozmýšľať? Získaj extra obsah cez Patreon (https://bit.ly/PDtreon), podpor náš ľubovoľným darom (https://bit.ly/PDdar) a čo tak štýlový merč? (https://bit.ly/mercPD) Ďakujeme!
At 0815 on the morning of August 6th, 1945, an atomic bomb known as ‘Little Boy' was released by Bombardier Thomas Ferebee above the Japanese city of Hiroshima. What followed was a new type of destruction never before visited upon humanity. Buildings burned, Japanese citizens ambled about in confused terror and pain, and radiation began its deadly work. Join us for the first episode of Hardtack as we explore the seemingly peaceful moments before the bomb dropped, and the immediate aftermath as told through some of the survivors of this tragic event. You can find the HSMH community on all our socials via our linktree. If you have any feedback on our episodes or suggestions for future episodes, please send us an email. Sources: “Anscombe, G. E. M. | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.” Accessed July 9, 2022. https://iep.utm.edu/anscombe/. “Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki | Date, Facts, Significance, Timeline, Deaths, & Aftermath | Britannica.” Accessed July 9, 2022. August 6, 1945: Statement by the President Announcing the Use of the A-Bomb at Hiroshima | Miller Center Chemistry LibreTexts. “12.1: Isotopes,” November 4, 2020. https://chem.libretexts.org/Courses/Monterey_Peninsula_College/MPC_CHEM_30A_Introduction_to_Chemistry_for_Health_Sciences/12%3A_Nuclear_Reactions/12.01%3A_Isotopes. Chemistry LibreTexts. “20.7: The Discovery of Fission- The Atomic Bomb and Nuclear Power,” March 11, 2016. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/General_Chemistry/Map%3A_A_Molecular_Approach_(Tro)/20%3A_Radioactivity_and_Nuclear_Chemistry/20.07%3A_The_Discovery_of_Fission-_The_Atomic_Bomb_and_Nuclear_Power. Chilled Moose. Barefoot Gen 1983 *FULL MOVIE* [ENGLISH DUB], 2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=olFmklCCccE. Hiroshima Diary: The Journal of a Japanese Physician by Michihiko Hachiya, Director, Hiroshima Communications Hospital Hiroshima for Global Peace (hiroshimaforpeace.com) Japan At War: An Oral History by Haruko Taya Cook & Theodore F. Cook Hachiya M.D and Michihiko. Hiroshima Diary: The Journal of a Japanese Physician, August 6-September 30, 1945, 2011. Lawfare. “Hiroshima and the Myths of Military Targets and Unconditional Surrender,” August 21, 2020. https://www.lawfareblog.com/hiroshima-and-myths-military-targets-and-unconditional-surrender. nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb525-The-Atomic-Bomb-and-the-End-of-World-War-II/documents/009.pdf PBS NewsHour. “How a Hiroshima Survivor Helped Remember 12 U.S. POWs Killed by Bomb,” May 27, 2016. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/how-a-hiroshima-survivor-helped-remember-12-u-s-pows-killed-by-bomb. NBC News. “Japanese American Hiroshima Victim on Reality of Being Bombed by His Own Country.” Accessed July 9, 2022. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/asian-america/japanese-american-hiroshima-victim-reality-being-bombed-his-own-country-n1235912. Sink, Bob. “Who Are The Hibakusha? | Hibakusha Stories.” Accessed July 9, 2022. https://hibakushastories.org/who-are-the-hibakusha/. TV Tropes. “Barefoot Gen (Manga).” Accessed July 9, 2022. https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Manga/BarefootGen. TIME.com. “Survivors of the Atomic Bomb Share Their Stories.” Accessed July 5, 2022. https://time.com/after-the-bomb/. Why Did The U.S. Choose Hiroshima? : NPR --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/hardtackpod/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/hardtackpod/support
Michael Spicher is a writer and philosopher, who is specialised in art and aesthetics. He is based in Boston and earned his PhD in Philosophy from the University of South Carolina. He currently teaches at Massachusetts College of Art & Design and Boston Architectural College. Apart from that he also founded the Aesthetics Research Lab in 2016, with an excellent website that showcases a lot of fascinating research and projects that showcase the importance of aesthetics in our everyday lives. He is currently co-editing a book about digital fashion for Bloomsbury Publishing. This episode dives deep into the questions of what aesthetics are, why they are important, the difference between beauty and taste and the great value of what can be achieved when various fields of research are combined. Visit Michael's website here: Aesthetics Research Lab Social Media: Twitter | LinkedIn | PhilPeople Michael is the Aesthetics Area Editor of the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy Books In this episode, Michael talks about the following books: The survival of the Prettiest, Nancy Etcoff The Abuse of Beauty, Arthur C. Danto Beauty: A Quick Immersion, Crispin Sartwell The Aesthetic Brain, Anjan Chatterjee Feeling Beauty, G. Gabrielle Starr ------ For more information on The Aesthetic City, find our website on https://theaestheticcity.com/ Love what we do? Become a patron! With your help we can grow this platform even further, make more content and hopefully achieve real, lasting impact for more beautiful cities worldwide. Visit our Patreon page here: https://www.patreon.com/the_aesthetic_city Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/_Aesthetic_City Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/the.aesthetic.city/
This talk was given on May 27th, 2022 at the 11th Annual Aquinas Philosophy Workshop on Aquinas on the Soul. The handout for the talk can be found here: https://tinyurl.com/mr224yuv For information on upcoming events, please visit our website at www.thomisticinstitute.org. About the speaker: Fr. James Dominic Brent, O.P. was born and raised in Michigan. He pursued his undergraduate and graduate studies in Philosophy, and completed his doctorate in Philosophy at Saint Louis University on the epistemic status of Christian beliefs according to Saint Thomas Aquinas. He has articles in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy on Natural Theology, in the Oxford Handbook of Thomas Aquinas on “God's Knowledge and Will”, and an article forthcoming on “Thomas Aquinas” in the Oxford Handbook of the Epistemology of Theology. He earned his STL from the Pontifical Faculty of the Immaculate Conception, and was ordained a priest in the same year. He taught in the School of Philosophy at The Catholic University of America from 2010- 2014, and spent the year of 2014-2015 doing full time itinerant preaching on college campuses across the United States.
Cavendish was a prolific poet, playwright, and natural philosopher. She published multiple works under her own name before that was common for a woman, and she published at least five major works on natural philosophy. Research: Boyle, Deborah. “Margaret Cavendish on Gender, Nature, and Freedom.” Hypatia vol. 28, no. 3 (Summer 2013). Via JSTOR. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24542000 British Library. “Margaret Cavendish.” https://www.bl.uk/people/margaret-cavendish British Library. “Margaret Cavendish's Blazing World.” https://www.bl.uk/collection-items/margaret-cavendishs-blazing-world "Cavendish, Margaret." Renaissance and Reformation Reference Library, edited by Julie L. Carnagie, et al., vol. 3: Vol. 1: Biographies, UXL, 2002, pp. 60-65. Gale In Context: World History, link.gale.com/apps/doc/CX3426300052/GPS?u=mlin_n_melpub&sid=bookmark-GPS&xid=36cbb94b. Accessed 25 Apr. 2022. Cavendish, Margaret, Duchess of Newcastle and C.H. Firth. “The life of William Cavendish, duke of Newcastle, to which is added The true relation of my birth, breeding and life.” London : J.C. Nimmo. 1886. Cunning, David, "Margaret Lucas Cavendish", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/margaret-cavendish/. Donagan, B. Lucas, Sir Charles (1612/13–1648), royalist army officer. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Retrieved 28 Apr. 2022. Donagan, B. Lucas, Sir Thomas (1597/8–1648/9), royalist army officer. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Retrieved 28 Apr. 2022. English Heritage. “Margaret Cavendish.” https://www.english-heritage.org.uk/learn/histories/women-in-history/margaret-cavendish/ Fransee, Emily Lord. “Mistress of a New World: Early Science Fiction in Europe's ‘Age of Discovery.'” Public Domain Review. 10/11/2018. https://publicdomainreview.org/essay/mistress-of-a-new-world-early-science-fiction-in-europes-age-of-discovery Frederickson, Anne. “First Lady.” Distillations. Science History Institute. 4/15/2013. https://www.sciencehistory.org/distillations/first-lady Gryntaki, Gelly. “Margaret Cavendish: Being A Female Philosopher In The 17th Century.” The Collector. 7/24/2021. https://www.thecollector.com/margaret-cavendish-female-philosopher-17th-century/ Knight, J. Cavendish, Margaret, Duchess of Newcastle (1624?–1674). Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Retrieved 27 Apr. 2022, from https://www.oxforddnb.com/view/10.1093/odnb/9780192683120.001.0001/odnb-9780192683120-e-4940. Marshall, Eugene. “Margaret Cavendish (1623—1673).” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/margaret-cavendish/ Newcastle, Margaret, Duchess of Newcastle. “The cavalier in exile; being the lives of the first Duke & Duchess of Newcastle.” London, G. Newnes, Ltd. 1903. Poetry Foundation. “Duchess of Newcastle Margaret Cavendish.” https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poets/margaret-cavendish Project Vox team. (2019). “Margaret Cavendish, Duchess of Newcastle-upon-Tyne.” Project Vox. Duke University Libraries. https://projectvox.org/cavendish-1623-1673/ Robbins, Michael. “The Royally Radical Life of Margaret Cavendish.” The Paris Review. 4/15/2019. https://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2019/04/15/the-royally-radical-life-of-margaret-cavendish/ Sarasohn, Lisa T. "Cavendish, Margaret, Duchess of Newcastle." Complete Dictionary of Scientific Biography, vol. 20, Charles Scribner's Sons, 2008, pp. 79-81. Gale In Context: U.S. History, link.gale.com/apps/doc/CX2830905568/GPS?u=mlin_n_melpub&sid=bookmark-GPS&xid=88a78131. Accessed 25 Apr. 2022. Walter, J. Lucas, John, first Baron Lucas of Shenfield (1606–1671), royalist landowner. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Retrieved 28 Apr. 2022. Wilkins, Emma. “Margaret Cavendish and the Royal Society.” Notes and Records. Volume 68, Issue 3. 5/14/2014. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsnr.2014.0015 Wills, Matthew. “'Mad Meg,' the Poet-Duchess of 17th Century England.” JSTOR Daily. 3/10/2019. https://daily.jstor.org/mad-meg-the-poet-duchess-of-17th-century-england/ Woolf, Virginia. “The Common Reader.” New York. Harcourt, Brace and Company. 1925. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Welcome to the Fifty-sixth episode of The Exploring Antinatalism Podcast! Today, Amanda ‘Oldphan' Sukenick speaks with Assistant Professor of Philosophy and Director of the Center for Faith and Human Flourishing at LCC International University, Lithuania, and Research Associate in the Department of Philosophy at the University of Pretoria, and, author of the recent entry on Antinatalism on the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Kirk Lougheed! https://www.kirklougheed.com/Read Kirk Lougheed's entry on Antinatalism on the Internet Encylopedia of Philosophy here: https://iep.utm.edu/anti-nat/Books by Kirk Lougheed: https://www.amazon.ca/s?i=digital-text&rh=p_27%3AKirk+Lougheed&s=relevancerank&text=Kirk+Lougheed&ref=dp_byline_sr_ebooks_1https://philpeople.org/profiles/kirk-lougheedThank you for listening to The Exploring Antinatalism Podcast! This has been Amanda Oldphan Sukenick! You can find me on Youtube channel, Anti-Natal Wolf! https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZrRegIYlkF-x5Fc9RzgeNwKeep up with my daily Antinatalist News updates at Anti-natal news on Twitter! https://twitter.com/AntinatalNewsPlease follow the podcast on:Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ExploringAntinatalismTwitter: https://twitter.com/ExploringANInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/exploring_antinatalism_podcast/Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCA8FKcLhdLOHkZtrsGJGUoAListen on: Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/exploring-antinatalism/id1497076755 Google Podcasts: https://podcasts.google.com/search/The%20Exploring%20Antinatalism%20PodcastBuzzsprout: http://exploringantinatalism.buzzsprout.com Stitcher: https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/exploring-antinatalismSoundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/user-727548853Amazon.com: https://www.amazon.com/The-Exploring-Antinatalism-Podcast/dp/B08JJSQ6WX/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=The+Exploring+Antinatalism+Podcast&qid=1626809690&sr=8-1And email me at exploringantinatalism@gmail.comWebsite designed by Visions Noirs! Follow him at: https://www.bilenoire.comInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/visionsnoires/ Logo art by LifeSucks! Follow him on:YT: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCli91fEAsC8hZ7rexRzq9HQMerch: https://www.etsy.com/shop/LifeSucksPublishingMusic by EyeDoubtIt! Subscribe to him on Youtube HERE:https://www.youtube.com/user/EyeDoubtAnd check out our collaborative project along with our friend, EFIL WV:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcaz_CCNWEwFq8qxrM_vxYgThe Right to no Longer Exist, which includes the podcast, The Right to no Longer Exist: A Right to Die Podcast! https://www.youtube.com/c/TheRightToNoLongerExist
♥ Tu étais le seul qui n'a pas abandonné jusqu'à ce qu'il ait conquis mon cœur et la chose la plus mignonne de toutes est que tu continues à le faire tous les jours. Joyeuse Saint-Valentin, mon amour! ♥ A tes côtés je me sens la femme la plus heureuse du monde et je me rends compte que mon cœur était rempli d'un amour pour toi qui grandit et s'approfondit. Félicitations pour notre journée! ♥ Toi seul as le pouvoir de me faire sentir que je peux flotter dans les airs et avec chacun de tes baisers tu me fais toucher le ciel. Joyeuse Saint-Valentin 2022, ma vie! ♥ Cette journée est parfaite pour te montrer à quel point je t'aime, être à tes côtés et te rendre si heureux. Profitons d'une belle Saint-Valentin! " ♥ Si nos chemins se croisent par coïncidence ce n'est pas grave, je sais juste que je t'aime de toute la force de mon cœur et que je t'aimerai pour toujours. L'amour. Le grand, le vrai, celui avec un grand A. L'amour qui transcende, secoue, désarçonne et transporte. Cet amour véritable qui, depuis toujours, a nourri les artistes, de l'écrivain(e) au peintre, du/de la cinéaste au/à la musicien(ne). Et bien que personne ne remette son existence en cause, la notion du « vrai amour » reste ardue à définir. Car rien n'est plus personnel que le sentiment amoureux. Dans ce contexte, difficile donc de vous donner une signification de l'amour vrai, claire et objective. À la place, voici la définition - très personnelle - d'hommes et de femmes qui l'ont expérimenté. L'amour vrai et sincère, qui résiste au temps Pour Emma, architecte bordelaise, le vrai amour, c'est celui qui résiste au temps. Celui qui ne s'explique pas, mais qui chamboule tout sur son passage. « J'ai vécu une relation en pointillé pendant toute ma vingtaine. Lorsque je l'ai rencontré, j'étais en couple. J'ai eu une aventure avec lui, ai sérieusement songé à quitter mon compagnon de l'époque mais suis finalement restée, par crainte de faire une erreur. J'ai coupé les ponts et nous nous sommes retrouvés deux ans plus tard. Cette fois-ci les rôles s'étaient inversés : j'étais célibataire, il était en couple. La situation s'est répétée, puis c'est lui qui a, cette fois-ci, coupé les ponts. Puis, deux ans plus tard, l'histoire se répète à nouveau. Nous sommes alors tous les deux en couple. Il me propose de tout quitter pour partir avec lui. J'ai très sérieusement songé à le suivre, mais je n'ai pas eu le courage de renoncer à mon quotidien, mon confort. Il est aujourd'hui marié. Malgré tout, une partie de moi ne peut s'empêcher de penser qu'on finira un jour par se (re)trouver. Entre nous, c'est un amour qui ne s'explique pas, qui résiste au temps, à l'absence de l'autre. Et qui est toujours aussi fort quand on se retrouve, même après des années de silence. » Le véritable amour existe Marta, institutrice de 36 ans, estime que le vrai amour, c'est celui qui tient bon face aux difficultés de la vie. https://lesen.amazon.de/kp/embed?asin=B07DHTHDGG&preview=newtab&linkCode=kpe&ref_=cm_sw_r_kb_dp_9HM6ACQRTCMNYG4324V3&tag=storeup09-20 ☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆ https://linktr.ee/jacksonlibon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #facebook #instagram #amour #couple #couplegoals #famille #relation #doudou #TotalEnergiesAFCON2022 #TeamTunisia #CAN2021 $BTC $ETH #cryptocurrency #Bitcoin #Ethereum #Avalanche#altcoins #Crypto #NFTs #Avalanche #innovation #CryptocurrencyNews #cashback #YieldFarming #TotalEnergiesAFCON2021 #TeamMali #TUNMLI #teamegypt #afcon2021 #TeamCameroon #youtube #twitter #tiktok #love #reeĺs #shorts #instagood #follow #like #ouy #oyu #babyshark #lilnasx #girl #happybirthday #movie #olive #garden #menu #deviance #autotrader #trading #khan #academy #carter #carguru #ancestry #accords #abc #news #bts #cbs #huru bluebook #socialmedia #whatsapp #music #google #photography #memes #marketing #india #followforfollowback #likeforlikes #a #insta #fashion #k #trending #digitalmarketing #covid #o #snapchat #socialmediamarketing
Alasdair MacIntyre. Škótsky morálny filozof, ktorý patrí k jedným z najvplyvnejších etikov druhej polovice minulé storočia a taktiež storočia súčasného. Minulý mesiac oslávil svoje 93. narodeniny a dnes vám chcem priblížiť jednu z jeho známym a vplyvných myšlienok, teda jeho chápanie racionality, ktoré je doslova proti-osvietenské.----more---- Racionalita nie je abstraktne objektívna až neosobná, ale viaže sa podľa neho nevyhnutne na živú tradíciu ľudských komunít a príbehy a texty, ktoré tieto tradície tvoria. Racionalita je tak životopisom ľudstva a ľudských spoločenstiev. ERRATUM: v 13:15 mylne zaznelo, že podľa MacIntyra sú racionalita a komunita ľudí využívajúca racionalitu "od seba nezávislé". V textovej podobe dávky je to správne, a teda že sú "na sebe závislé". Prečítajte si túto dávku ako článok na SME. Súvisiace dávky: PD#228: Oxfordský kvartet, http://bit.ly/davka228 PD#213: Rozhovor o Nietzscheho filozofii, http://bit.ly/davka213 PD#207: Nietzsche a postmodernizmus, http://bit.ly/davka207 PD#154: Štrukturalizmus, http://bit.ly/davka154 PD#144: Postmodernizmus, http://bit.ly/davka144 PD#107: Aristoteles a šťastie, http://bit.ly/davka213 PD#4: Kant, Aristoteles a utilitarizmus, http://bit.ly/davka04 Použitá a odporúčaná literatúra: Alasdair MacIntyre, Whose Justice? Which Rationality? (1988) recenzia na knihu Whose Justice? Which Rationality?, https://bit.ly/3rBUIyV Alasdair MacIntyre, After Virtue (1981) Alasdair MacIntyre, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://bit.ly/3siTdo8 Lawrence Cahoone, „Rediscoverning the Premodern“, The Modern Intellectual Tradition: From Descartes to Derrida, https://bit.ly/3354XSK prednášky A. MacIntyra, https://bit.ly/334YVBx *** Baví ťa s nami rozmýšľať? Získaj extra obsah cez Patreon (https://bit.ly/PDtreon), podpor náš ľubovoľným darom (https://bit.ly/PDdar) a čo tak štýlový merč? (https://bit.ly/mercPD) Ďakujeme!
Today we are joined by Daniele Bolelli. Daniele is an Italian writer, university professor, martial artist, and podcaster based in Southern California. He is the author of several books on philosophy, and martial arts, including On the Warrior's Path. Known for his writing since the 1990s in Italy and the early 2000s in the United States, Bolelli rose to greater public prominence in the 2010s, beginning with his appearances on popular podcasts such as The Joe Rogan Experience. He went on to create his own podcasts, and has hosted The Drunken Taoist since 2012 and History on Fire since 2015.Bolelli holds M.As in American Indian Studies and history from UCLA and California State University, Long Beach, and did postdoctoral research in history at Cardiff University. As a professor, he has taught a wide variety of courses in the arts, humanities, and social sciences on topics including Native American history and culture, Taoist philosophy, and Ancient Rome. Currently, he teaches at California State University at Long Beach and Santa Monica College. You can find more about Daniele on Official Website, Twitter and Instagram. Show Notes:Daniele Bolelli | Official WebsiteHistory on Fire Podcast | Official WebsiteThe Drunken Taoist Podcast | Official WebsiteFriedrich Nietzsche (1844—1900) | Internet Encyclopedia of PhiolosophyCivilized to Death, The Price of Progress by Christopher Ryan | Simon & SchusterSex at Dawn: The Prehistoric Origins of Modern Sexuality by Christopher Ryan | Goodreads‘The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable' by Nassim Nicholas Taleb | The New York TimesA Long Walk to Freedom: 1918-1962: Early Years, 1918-1962 v. 1 by Nelson Mandela | GoodreadsHardcore History Podcast | Dan Carlin Official WebsitePreaching conservation: Theodore Roosevelt and the rhetoric of civil religion by Leroy Dorsey | Texas A&M University LibrariesWhat Has Posterity Ever Done for Us? | Quote Investigator
Episode discussion topics Stoicism? Really? Why you may wonder? It holds valuable timeless wisdom from our ancient ancestors. Being a human is pretty much a universal struggle for all humans throughout time. Who would have thought? It provides practical steps and methods for being a better, less anxious, and happier human. It aims to provide tools for you to become the best version of yourself based on your own measure. Practicing the methods will make you a better citizen of our republic. How does self-rule translate into the economy? How do we leave behind the concrete plantation that was built by the owners of the system? So what is it? A fad diet? A religion? Where did it come from? Do I need to attend a church or go to meetings? According to the College of Stoic Philosophers is a complete philosophy informed by an integrated system of Logic, Physics, and Ethics. The ethics part helps it feel like religion - guidance on making decisions and physics as the nexus of all things, and logic helps you in the process of considering things. It's a philosophy all about being human and more specifically about you being you and having agency in a world outside of your control. During its heydays, it was a religion with ideas originating back in Greece circa Socrates. Actually, it was a lot more than what religion is today because it included other areas like cosmology, physics, psychology, and of course philosophy. We must note that much of what the Greeks taught had come from other peoples and times before them. We just don't have a lot of records today. It lived on through many thousands of years from Greece to the Romans who picked it up after. No church nor extraordinary socializing is required for you to study and practice this philosophy. It's practical as you are and where you are right now with whoever is normally in your life. No change, unless you seek it out. The meditation, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, and other mental health practices of our modern time draw from ancient stoic wisdom and you will notice more of it as you study it. But this practice is arguably beyond those in the capacity for it to affect your life in a positive way. For perspective, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy is good for treating symptoms of mental health conditions (fear, anger, foreboding, self-loathing, etc.), but practicing Stoicism will help remove the disease from your life thus reducing or eliminating symptoms altogether. Why is it called Stoicism? It got named from the Greek word stoa, which was a covered open area where Zeno (last name), the attributed founding father of "Stoicism", began his public lectures. Zeno was calling it something else, but the people called it based on the building, and alas we have Stoics practicing Stoicism. So what's this thing all about? Stoicism is a set of ancient practices born out of our ancestors' struggle with the human condition. Most of all the teachings and writings have been lost to destruction, from Alexandria to the fall of Rome. What we have are journals and accounts from a small number of philosophers who documented accounts of stoic thinking. They range from Greece to Rome in time and space and life experiences ranging from a former slave to an emperor and many in-between, all stoics. They all struggled in ways that Stoicism helped them overcome. Our struggles are remarkably similar to theirs. This system works for our lives too. There are many flavors of this thing because each of us makes it our own. This is why the writings from the ancients are used as a stable foundation of reference, like a Tora, Bible, Koran, or other, for learning and growing the philosophy. How might it help me better myself and my community? It offers practical guidelines for you to implement in your life in your way. You do you. With practice it can become useful for anyone's situations in life, it's that's flexible. It consists of concepts around how to apply a set of virtues and disciplines in making decisions about things that are under your control. We learn about how they operate through understanding the wisdom we've received from the ancients, through their stories, experiences, and even their thoughts in letters and in journals. A practicing stoic is always challenging themselves to be a better person to themselves and to others. The philosophy teaches that the natural and happy state for humans to be in is a cooperative one. Here are some quotes from Emperor Marcus Aurelius' Meditations: “The happiness of your life depends upon the quality of your thoughts.” “Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth.” “Waste no more time arguing about what a good man should be. Be one.” Some quotes from Lucius Annaeus Seneca, a Roman philosopher, statesman, orator, and tragedian, who lived during the time of Christ: "Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful." "As is a tale (story), so is life: not how long it is, but how good it is, is what matters." "Hang on to your youthful enthusiasms -- you'll be able to use them better when you're older." "If a man knows not to which port he sails, no wind is favorable." Some quotes from Epictetus, who was born as a slave to a master that allowed schooling so that when he earned his freedom, he become a philosopher: "There is only one way to happiness and that is to cease worrying about things which are beyond the power of our will." "If anyone tells you that a certain person speaks ill of you, do not make excuses about what is said of you but answer, "He was ignorant of my other faults, else he would not have mentioned these alone." "It's not what happens to you, but how you react to it that matters." "Any person capable of angering you becomes your master..." "The key is to keep company only with people who uplift you, whose presence calls forth your best." "He who laughs at himself never runs out of things to laugh at." Calls to Action: Get wiser - there are a few resources you can explore on your own. This is not a complete list, just some onramps that seemed more accessible to us as we also begin our journey down this rabbit hole. Stoic Coffee Break podcast and website. Daily Stoic website, email, podcast, articles, and books on this and related topics. An easy read and good overview on Kindle is "The Beginner's Guide to Stoicism: Tools for Emotional Resilience and Positivity" by Matthew Van Natta. It's free for Kindle Unlimited subscribers. Check out these foundational documents from the ancients (translated) at Daily Stoic for 3 Must-Read Books To Get You Started. They might all be free from one e-book service or another, so look around by name. Give practicing it a try! Even if at first you don't succeed, keep trying and you will succeed with time. Your hosts: Michael V. Piscitelli and Raymond Wong Jr. More info If you want to connect with others in the stoic community near you, so far the only national network we've found is The Stoic Fellowship whose mission is, "Building, Fostering, and Connecting Communities of Stoics Around the World." Otherwise, check on MeetUp.com maybe. The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy is a peer-reviewed academic resource on key topics in all areas of philosophy. We have transcripts located at the end of each podcast episode's page on our site. Check it out, but know this: It's all AI and not us. So thank you in advance for forgiving any and all errors. Please feel free to share your thoughts through our Contact Us page or like us on Facebook. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed on this podcast are for listener consideration and are not necessarily those of the show or its sponsors. Learn more and reach out Head to Citizens Prerogative for additional information and log in or sign up to leave a comment. Don't forget to join our free newsletter and get 10% off at our shop! Go the extra mile by supporting us through Patreon. Please contact us with any questions or suggestions. Special thanks Our ongoing supporters, thank you! Our sponsor CitizenDoGood.com. Graphic design by SergeShop.com. Intro music sampled from “Okay Class” by Ozzy Jock under creative commons license through freemusicarchive.org. Other music provided royalty-free through Fesliyan Studios Inc.
This talk was given on June 26th, 2021 at the 10th Annual Aquinas Philosophy Workshop: Knowledge, Truth, and Wisdom in Aquinas. For information on upcoming Thomistic Institute events, please visit our website at www.thomisticinstitute.org. About the speaker: Fr. James Dominic Brent, O.P. was born and raised in Michigan. He pursued his undergraduate and graduate studies in Philosophy, and completed his doctorate in Philosophy at Saint Louis University on the epistemic status of Christian beliefs according to Saint Thomas Aquinas. He has articles in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy on Natural Theology, in the Oxford Handbook of Thomas Aquinas on “God's Knowledge and Will”, and on “Thomas Aquinas” in the Oxford Handbook of the Epistemology of Theology. He earned his STL from the Pontifical Faculty of the Immaculate Conception. He taught in the School of Philosophy at the Catholic University of America from 2010-2014, and spent the year of 2014-2015 doing full-time itinerant preaching on college campuses across the United States. Since then, he has been an Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the Dominican House of Studies.
This talk was given on June 24th, 2021 at the 10th Annual Aquinas Philosophy Workshop, on Knowledge, Truth, and Wisdom in Aquinas. For information on upcoming events, please visit our website at www.thomisticinstitute.org. About the Speaker: Fr. James Dominic Brent, O.P. was born and raised in Michigan. He pursued his undergraduate and graduate studies in Philosophy, and completed his doctorate in Philosophy at Saint Louis University on the epistemic status of Christian beliefs according to Saint Thomas Aquinas. He has articles in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy on Natural Theology, in the Oxford Handbook of Thomas Aquinas on “God's Knowledge and Will”, and an article forthcoming on “Thomas Aquinas” in the Oxford Handbook of the Epistemology of Theology. He earned his STL from the Pontifical Faculty of the Immaculate Conception, and was ordained a priest in the same year. He taught in the School of Philosophy at The Catholic University of America from 2010- 2014, and spent the year of 2014-2015 doing full time itinerant preaching on college campuses across the United States.
This lecture was livestreamed from the Dominican House of Studies on May 13, 2021. Subscribe to the Thomistic Institute YouTube channel for more lectures like this one. For information on other upcoming events, please visit our website at www.thomisticinstitute.org. About the speaker: Fr. James Dominic Brent, O.P. was born and raised in Michigan. He pursued his undergraduate and graduate studies in Philosophy, and completed his doctorate in Philosophy at Saint Louis University on the epistemic status of Christian beliefs according to Saint Thomas Aquinas. He has articles in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy on Natural Theology, in the Oxford Handbook of Thomas Aquinas on “God's Knowledge and Will”, and on “Thomas Aquinas” in the Oxford Handbook of the Epistemology of Theology. He earned his STL from the Pontifical Faculty of the Immaculate Conception. He taught in the School of Philosophy at the Catholic University of America from 2010-2014, and spent the year of 2014-2015 doing full-time itinerant preaching on college campuses across the United States. Since then, he has been an Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the Dominican House of Studies.
Podcast Why Truth Requires Proof Is Culture Copyright2021.mp3PODCAST 120 WHY TRUTH REQUIRES PROOF IS CULTURE is a textual analysis viewed through many lens which is grounded in numerous theories and captured and framed in podcast 120 and verbalized in 13 chapters of publication 231, in ISBN 978-976-96689-1-1.Truth can only be seen by those with truth in them. He who does not have Truth in his heart, will always be blind to her.” and there's your proof.” “Fashion does not have to prove that it is serious. It is the proof that intelligent frivolity can be something creative and positive WORKS CITED Alberto Vanzo, "Kant on the Nominal Definition of Truth", Kant-Studien, 101 (2010), pp. 147–66.Alexis G. Burgess and John P. Burgess (2011). Truth (hardcover) (1st ed.). Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-14401-6. Retrieved October 4, 2014. a concise introduction to current philosophical debates about truthAlfred North Whitehead, Dialogues, 1954: Prologue.Alfred Tarski, Introduction to Logic and to the Methodology of the Deductive Sciences (ed. Jan Tarski). 4th Edition. Oxford Logic Guides, No. 24. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994, xxiv + 229 pp. ISBN 0-19-504472-XAsay, Jamin. "Truthmaker Theory". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Baudrillard's attribution of this quote to Ecclesiastes is deliberately fictional. "Baudrillard attributes this quote to Eccle-siastes. However, the quote is a fabrication (see Jean Baudrillard. Cool Memories III, 1991–95. London: Verso, 1997). Editor's note: In Fragments: Conversations With François L'Yvonnet. New York: Routledge, 2004:11, Baudrillard acknowledges this 'Borges-like' fabrication." Cited in footnote #4 in Smith, Richard G., "Lights, Camera, Action: Baudrillard and the Performance of Representations" Archived 2018-04-25 at the Wayback Machine, International Journal of Baudrillard Studies, Volume 2, Number 1 (January 2005)Baudrillard, Jean. "Simulacra and Simulations", in Selected Writings Archived 2004-02-09 at the Wayback Ma-chine, ed. Mark Poster, Stanford University Press, 1988; 166 ffBeebee, Helen; Dodd, Julian. Truthmakers: The Contemporary Debate. Clarendon Press. pp. 13–14.Chaitin, Gregory L., The Limits of Mathematics (1997) 1–28, 89 ff.Chaitin, Gregory L., The Limits of Mathematics (1997) esp. 89 ff.Cicéron, Marcus Tullius Cicero; Bouhier, Jean (1812). Tusculanes (in French). Nismes: J. Gaude. p. 273. OCLC 457735057.Compare 1 Thessalonians 5:21: "Prove all things [...]."Cupillari, Antonella. The Nuts and Bolts of Proofs. Academic Press, 2001. Page 3.David, Marion (2005). "Correspondence Theory of Truth" in Stanford Encyclopedia of PhilosophyDefinition of digitization at WhatIs.comDefinition of proof | Dictionary.com". www.dictionary.com.Die Wahrheit ist die Bewegung ihrer an ihr selbst." The Phenomenology of Spirit, Preface, ¶ 48Digitization/digitisation" in Collins English DictionaryElliott Mendelson; Introduction to Mathematical Logic; Series: Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications; Hard-cover: 469 pages; Publisher: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 5 edition (August 11, 2009); ISBN 1-58488-876-8.Etymology, Online. "Online Etymology"Evidence, proof, and facts: a book of sources by Peter Murphy 2003 ISBN 0199261954 pages 1–2Foucault, M. "The Order of Things", London: Vintage Books, 1970 (1966)Garrido, Angel (2012). "A Brief History of Fuzzy Logic". Revista EduSoft., EditorialGittens, William Anderson Author, Cinematographer Dip.Com., Arts. B.A. Media Arts SpecSupport the show (http://www.buzzsprout.com/429292)
This lecture was delivered to the George Mason University chapter on April 19, 2021. For more information on upcoming events, please visit our website at www.thomisticinstitute.org. About the speaker: Fr. James Dominic Brent, O.P. was born and raised in Michigan. He pursued his undergraduate and graduate studies in Philosophy, and completed his doctorate in Philosophy at Saint Louis University on the epistemic status of Christian beliefs according to Saint Thomas Aquinas. He has articles in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy on Natural Theology, in the Oxford Handbook of Thomas Aquinas on “God's Knowledge and Will”, and an article forthcoming on “Thomas Aquinas” in the Oxford Handbook of the Epistemology of Theology. He earned his STL from the Pontifical Faculty of the Immaculate Conception, and was ordained a priest in the same year. He taught in the School of Philosophy at The Catholic University of America from 2010- 2014, and spent the year of 2014-2015 doing full time itinerant preaching on college campuses across the United States.
Mere Liberty Courses courses.mereliberty.com Resources for the Episode: American Heritage Dictionary definition https://www.ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=feminism Etymology https://www.etymonline.com/word/feminism Coleman Hughes https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLERGkXwsnU The New Discourses https://newdiscourses.com/ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminist-philosophy/ Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy https://iep.utm.edu/f/ Women's Liberation of Front at the Heritage Foundation https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/conservative-group-hosts-anti-transgender-panel-feminists-left-n964246 Women Thinkers in Antiquity and the Middle Ages https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLmbzLDB0GOlPKnni0ZH6RWbI0s0ukjqOF Mary Wollstonecraft https://oll.libertyfund.org/title/wollstonecraft-boll-33-mary-wollstonecraft-a-vindication-of-the-rights-of-woman-1792 Gloria Steinem https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gloria_Steinem Isabel Paterson https://mises.org/power-market/isabel-paterson-woman-whose-wisdom-could-literally-save-world https://mises.org/profile/isabel-paterson Rose Wilder Lane https://mises.org/library/libertarian-legacy-rose-wilder-lane Katherine Bushnell https://www.cbeinternational.org/resource/article/priscilla-papers-academic-journal/legacy-katherine-bushnell Lady Demaris Cudworth Masham https://meinong.stanford.edu/entries/lady-masham/ Hypatia https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqzpHYfAdsE Macrina the Younger https://historyofwomenphilosophers.org/project/directory-of-women-philosophers/macrina-the-younger-327-379/ Sor Juana Inez de la Cruz https://youtu.be/9wSOt3z_-YY Gloria Alvarez https://youtu.be/cd4rlZ1Npeg Wendy McElroy http://www.wendymcelroy.com/news.php Aya Gruber https://www.ayagruber.com/ Camille Paglia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camille_Paglia Join my effort! Mereliberty.com/membership Follow Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/mereliberty/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/MereLiberty Minds: https://www.minds.com/KerryBaldwin/ Locals: https://mereliberty.locals.com
This lecture was given at the Wisdom, Light, and Truth: The Holy Spirit in the Church and in Our Soul intellectual retreat in Litchfield, CT on February 20, 2021. For more information on upcoming events, please visit our website at www.thomisticinstitute.org. About the Speaker: Fr. James Dominic Brent, O.P. was born and raised in Michigan. He pursued his undergraduate and graduate studies in Philosophy, and completed his doctorate in Philosophy at Saint Louis University on the epistemic status of Christian beliefs according to Saint Thomas Aquinas. He has articles in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy on Natural Theology, in the Oxford Handbook of Thomas Aquinas on “God’s Knowledge and Will”, and an article forthcoming on “Thomas Aquinas” in the Oxford Handbook of the Epistemology of Theology. He earned his STL from the Pontifical Faculty of the Immaculate Conception, and was ordained a priest in the same year. He taught in the School of Philosophy at The Catholic University of America from 2010- 2014, and spent the year of 2014-2015 doing full time itinerant preaching on college campuses across the United States.
This lecture was given to the UVA chapter on March 15, 2021. Fr. Brent's lecture concludes at 1:05:15. The remainder of the lecture is a Q&A session with Fr. Brent. For more information on upcoming events, please visit our website at www.thomisticinstitute.org. About the Speaker: Fr. James Dominic Brent, O.P. was born and raised in Michigan. He pursued his undergraduate and graduate studies in Philosophy, and completed his doctorate in Philosophy at Saint Louis University on the epistemic status of Christian beliefs according to Saint Thomas Aquinas. He has articles in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy on Natural Theology, in the Oxford Handbook of Thomas Aquinas on “God’s Knowledge and Will”, and an article forthcoming on “Thomas Aquinas” in the Oxford Handbook of the Epistemology of Theology. He earned his STL from the Pontifical Faculty of the Immaculate Conception, and was ordained a priest in the same year. He taught in the School of Philosophy at The Catholic University of America from 2010- 2014, and spent the year of 2014-2015 doing full time itinerant preaching on college campuses across the United States.
Olympe de Gouges is known primarily for her 1791 pamphlet “Declaration of the Rights of Woman and the Citizen.” But her writing and political activity went far beyond that one pamphlet, and she was actually executed for a completely different reason. Tracy's Research: Douglas, Allen. "Gouges, Olympe de 1748–1793." Encyclopedia of Sex and Gender, edited by Fedwa Malti-Douglas, vol. 2, Macmillan Reference USA, 2007, pp. 657-658. Gale In Context: Global Issues, link.gale.com/apps/doc/CX2896200277/GPS?u=mlin_n_melpub&sid=GPS&xid=2979d54d. Accessed 5 Jan. 2021. "Marie-Olympe de Gouges." Encyclopedia of World Biography Online, vol. 23, Gale, 2003. Gale In Context: Biography, link.gale.com/apps/doc/K1631008043/GPS?u=mlin_n_melpub&sid=GPS&xid=01a0e821. Accessed 5 Jan. 2021. HESSE, CARLA. "Gouges, Olympe de." Europe 1789-1914: Encyclopedia of the Age of Industry and Empire, edited by John Merriman and Jay Winter, vol. 2, Charles Scribner's Sons, 2006, pp. 993-996. Gale In Context: World History, link.gale.com/apps/doc/CX3446900357/GPS?u=mlin_n_melpub&sid=GPS&xid=a40a2b9c. Accessed 5 Jan. 2021. "Marie-Olympe De Gouges." Historic World Leaders, edited by Anne Commire, Gale, 1994. Gale In Context: Biography, link.gale.com/apps/doc/K1616000246/GPS?u=mlin_n_melpub&sid=GPS&xid=110589b6. Accessed 5 Jan. 2021. Lyons, Matthew. “Execution of a Feminist.” History Today. Vol. 70, Issue 11, November 2020. https://www.historytoday.com/archive/months-past/execution-feminist Columbia College. “Olympe de Gouges.” https://www.college.columbia.edu/core/content/olympe-de-gouges Kuiper, Kathleen et al. “Olympe de Gouges: Additional Information.” Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Olympe-de-Gouges/additional-info#content-5 Woolfrey, Joan. “Olympe de Gouges (1748—1793).” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/gouges/ “The Trial of Olympe de Gouges,” LIBERTY, EQUALITY, FRATERNITY: EXPLORING THE FRENCH REVOUTION, accessed January 7, 2021, https://revolution.chnm.org/d/488. Vanpée, Janie. “Performing Justice: The Trials of Olympe de Gouges.” Theatre Journal. Volume 51, Number 1, March 1999. Via Project Muse. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/34586 Diamond, Marie Josephine. “Olympe de Gouges and the French Revolution: Construction of Gender as Critique.” Dialectical Anthropology , 1990, Vol. 15, No. 2/3 (1990). Via JSTOR. https://www.jstor.org/stable/29790339 Nielsen, Wendy C. “Staging Rousseau's Republic: French Revolutionary Festivals and Olympe de Gouges.” The Eighteenth Century , FALL 2002, Vol. 43. Via JSTOR. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41467908 Scott, Joan Wallach. “French Feminists and the Rights of 'Man': Olympe de Gouges's Declarations.” History Workshop , Autumn, 1989, No. 28 (Autumn, 1989). Via JSTOR. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4288921 Brown, Gregory S. “The Self-Fashionings of Olympe de Gouges, 1784-1789.” Eighteenth-Century Studies, Volume 34, Number 3, Spring 2001. Via Project Muse. https://doi.org/10.1353/ecs.2001.0019 Mousset, Sophie. “Women's Rights and the French Revolution: A Biography of Olympe De Gouges.” Routledge; 1st edition, July 2017. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://news.iheart.com/podcast-advertisers
This lecture was delivered to the William & Mary chapter on October 5, 2020. Fr. Brent's lecture concludes around 35:05. The rest of the recording is a Q&A session with students from the William & Mary Thomistic Institute chapter. For more information on upcoming events, please visit our website: www.thomisticinstitute.org About the speaker: Fr. James Dominic Brent, O.P. was born and raised in Michigan. He pursued his undergraduate and graduate studies in Philosophy, and completed his doctorate in Philosophy at Saint Louis University on the epistemic status of Christian beliefs according to Saint Thomas Aquinas. He has articles in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy on Natural Theology, in the Oxford Handbook of Thomas Aquinas on “God’s Knowledge and Will,” and an article forthcoming on “Thomas Aquinas” in the Oxford Handbook of the Epistemology of Theology. He earned his STL from the Pontifical Faculty of the Immaculate Conception, and was ordained a priest in the same year. He taught in the School of Philosophy at The Catholic University of America from 2010- 2014, and spent the year of 2014-2015 doing full time itinerant preaching on college campuses across the United States.
We discuss the metaphysical views of pessimist philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer, as elaborated in his magnum opus, The World as Will and Representation. Schopenhauer developed a fascinating dual-aspect monism, according to which from outside, the world appears as representation, but from inside, it appears as will: ontological monism and epistemological dualism. To Schopenhauer, desire-driven will is what we are from inside, and he goes on to argue that we should think of the underlying reality of all appearance in the same way. You represent my will as a body, but I know that there’s an underlying reality to your representation that’s experiential in character. Schopenhauer thinks the basis of this dual-aspect character of reality pervades the natural world, organic and inorganic. Why? Because this is our only form of insight into—or acquaintance with—anything as a thing in itself. “[O]n the path of objective knowledge, thus starting from the representation, we shall never get beyond the representation, i.e., the phenomenon. We shall therefore remain at the outside of things; we shall never be able to penetrate into their inner nature, and investigate what they are in themselves…So far, I agree with Kant. But … we ourselves are the thing-in-itself. Consequently, a way from within stands open to us to that real inner nature of things to which we cannot penetrate from without. It is, so to speak, a subterranean passage, a secret alliance, which, as if by treachery, places us all at once in the fortress that could not be taken by attack from without.” - Schopenhauer Schopenhauer on Will and Representation - Academy of Ideas (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNDw9lO8uKg) [YouTube] Peter Sjöstedt-H - Noumenautics: Metaphysics - Meta-Ethics - Psychedelics (https://www.amazon.com/Noumenautics-Metaphysics-Psychedelics-Peter-Sjostedt-H/dp/0992808855) [Amazon] Schopenhauer and the Philosophy of Mind - Peter Sjöstedt-H (http://www.philosopher.eu/texts/schopenhauer-and-the-philosophy-of-mind/) [Philosopher.eu] Hedda Hassel Mørch - Argument for Panpsychism from Experience of Causation (https://philpapers.org/rec/MRCTAF) [PDF] Nietzsche’s Metaphysics? - Galen Strawson (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DoNKiM968cU) [YouTube] Idealism - Schopenhauer (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/idealism/#Scho) [Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy] Arthur Schopenhauer (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/schopenhauer/) [SEP] Arthur Schopenhauer (https://iep.utm.edu/schopenh/) [Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy] Transcripts available at emersongreenblog.wordpress.com (https://emersongreenblog.wordpress.com/) Rate the show on iTunes here (https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/walden-pod/id1474408172) Listen to our sister show Counter Apologetics here (https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/counter-apologetics/id1273573417?mt=2) Subscribe to CA and Walden Pod on YouTube here (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCqBy2TfJbYXjqBL3cQOFUig) Support the show at patreon.com/waldenpod Contact me at emersongreen@protonmail.com or on Facebook (http://facebook.com/counterapologeticspodcast) Follow on Twitter @waldenpod and @OnPanpsychism
Where do we go to find information about Ukraine? This week we highlight the efforts of Ukrainian research in the diaspora with a look at the Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies and their work in the creation of the Internet Encyclopedia of Ukraine. Stay tuned after for a discussion of Servant of the People's recent loss in Zelenskyy's home town.
Can subjective observations, no matter how well-substantiated and supported, ever lead to knowledge of objective reality? Discussed in this episode: René Descartes' theory on objective reality, skepticism about the possibility of perceiving objective reality, differences in perceptions between species, Immanuel Kant 's influence on these lines of thinking, and questions about whether science can get us closer to understanding objective reality. Related reading: Gaukroger, S. (2012). Objectivity: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press; Mulder, D. Objectivity. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy; Julian, R. & Sprenger, J. Scientific Objectivity. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2020 Edition). https://www.insightfulthinkersmedia.com/
Visit our website BeautifulIllusions.org for a complete set of show notes and links to almost everything discussed in this episodeSelected References:2:03 - Existentialism entry from the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (IEP) and Existentialism: Crash Course Philosophy #16 (YouTube video)2:20 - Atheism (IEP)6:07 - The Quran, The Book of Mormon, The Bhagavad Gita, Buddhism, Daoism10:41 - The Drunkard’s Walk: How Randomness Rules Our Lives by Leonard Mlodinow14:46 - Subliminal: How Your Unconscious Mind Rules Your Behavior by Leonard Mlodinow 15:13 - See “Why People Choose Coke Over Pepsi” and “How the Brain Reveals Why We Buy” 15:45 - Thinking, Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman15:54 - Douglas Vigliotti17:40 - Keith Stanovich and Richard West coined the terms System 1 and System 2 in their work on dual process theory, as noted by Kahneman in the first chapter of Thinking, Fast and Slow entitled “The Characters of the Story” - Psychologists have been intensely interested for several decades in the two modes of thinking evoked by the picture of the angry woman and by the multiplication problem, and have offered many labels for them. I adopt terms originally proposed by the psychologists Keith Stanovich and Richard West, and will refer to two systems in the mind, System 1 and System 2.18:16 - Incognito: The Secret Lives of the Brain by David Eagleman18:34 - Thus Spake Zarathrustra by Friedrich Nietzsche19:10 - The Overman 20:18 - See “Tool-Making Crows Are Even Smarter Than We Thought” video from National Geographic regarding the New Caledonian Crow20:22 - See images of bowerbird nests and “What Makes Bowerbirds Such Good Artists” (Scientific American, 2015) “Bowerbirds, Art, and Aesthetics” (Communicative & Integrative Biology Journal, 2012)21:05 - See “You Don’t Have a Lizard Brain” and “It’s Time To Correct Neuroscience Myths” and “A Theory Abandoned But Still Compelling”24:23 - Self-Consciousness gives us an ability to reflect on our experience and project into the future and recognize that we exist26:50 - Simulacrum and Simulation by Jean Beaudrillard27:13 - Hyperreality27:17 - The Crying of Lot 49 by Thomas Pynchon27:20 - Postmodernism30:04 - BeautifulIllusions.org - “Today abstraction is no longer that of the map, the double, the mirror, or the concept. Simulation is no longer that of a territory, a referential being, or a substance. It is the generation by models of a real without origin or reality: a hyperreal.” -Jean Beaudrillard30:08 - Read “On Exactitude in Science” by Jorge Luis Borges31:32 - See “Baudrillard’s Thoughts on Media” (Philosophical Society.com)33:10 - See “Modern human brain organization emerged only recently” (Science Daily, 2018) - “The Homo sapiens fossils were found to have increasingly more modern endocranial shapes in accordance with their geological age. Only fossils younger than 35,000 years show the same globular shape as present-day humans, suggesting that modern brain organization evolved some time between 100,000 and 35,000 years ago.”33:13 - See “The (Violent) Origin of Sports” (Psychology Today, 2008) and the Wikipedia entry on the history of sport - “It is likely that after the switch from hunter-gathering to farming becoming the primary means of providing food became dominant, those individuals who had previously been assigned to the Hunter role- and were likely naturally more physically built for the purpose- had little way to utilize their skill sets in a practical setting anymore, so instead entered a form of perpetual preparation for hunting and practicing the skills required, which then let to competitive bouts intended to indicate whomever was the most "prepared" for the different elements of the hunt- for example the speed to chase down, strength to wrestle down or accuracy to rapidly dispatch the prey and associated wagering on the outcomes of contests, which them evolved gradually into what we would recognize as sports as we would know them today.”33:35 - See “On the Phenomenon of Bullshit Jobs: A Work Rant” by David Graeber (STRIKE! Magazine, 2013), and this 2018 Vox interview with Graeber about his book Bullshit Jobs: A Theory34:07 - George Carlin on “natural” (YouTube video, definitely NSFW)38:35 - Can we overcome our cognitive biases? See “Your Lying Mind: The Cognitive Biases Tricking Your Brain” (The Atlantic, 2018) and this 2015 interview with Daniel Kahneman (The Guardian)44:01 - Freaks and Geeks (TV Show)This episode was recorded in November 2020The “Beautiful Illusions Theme” was performed by Darron Vigliotti (guitar) and Joseph Vigliotti (drums), and was written and recorded by Darron Vigliotti
Having covered virtue ethics briefly in Season 2 of the Fresh AiR podcast, we thought we would take a closer look at Aristotelian Virtue Ethics tonight. Virtue Ethics (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)Virtue Ethics | Internet Encyclopedia of PhilosophyVirtue ethics – Wikipedia Want to Watch us Live? You can watch us live on: YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/Answers-in-reasonTwitch: http://twitch.tv/u/davidiantwitchyballsTwitter:... Read More
Introduction Jack was walking down a street. It was a day like any other. As ever, his mind was a flurry of thoughts, worries, and anxieties, stimulated by coffee and the bright light of his phone. In a bid to relieve his stress, he put his phone in his pocket, and tried to notice the details he would usually ignore. As he walked past the pharmacy, he saw a sick man coughing and spluttering; he was throwing medication back to stop his disease from decaying his body. Jack kept walking and came across an old woman waiting at a bus stop. She was fragile, crooked, and anxious; clearly age had taken much from her. Crossing the road away from the bus stop, he waited for the traffic to pass. Driving slowly past him was a hearse: a coffin on full display, surrounded by flowers, proceeded by a stream of weeping mourners. Jack fell to his knees, overwhelmed with despair, “we all get sick, we all age, and we all die. We cannot escape this fate!” His head against the pavement, he didn’t move for almost an hour. When he got up, he was approached by a homeless man, to whom he said, “sorry, I don’t have any change.” The man replied, “It is you who needs a little change, young monk. I know why you fall to your knees in despair: the inescapable suffering of life weighs on us all. Let me tell you of someone who was once like you, who tried to remove suffering from our minds… let me tell you the story of Siddhartha Gotama, The Buddha.” Contents Part I. The Life of Siddhārtha Gautama Part II. The Four Noble Truths Part III. The Cycle of Life Part IV. The Eightfold Path Part V. Further Analysis and Discussion Links Buddhism: A Very Short Introduction. Book. Buddhist Ethics: A Very Short Introduction. Book. Why Buddhism Is True, Robert Wright. Book. The Foundations of Buddhism, Rupert Gethin. Book. Buddhism, The Great Courses. Lecture series. What the Buddha Taught, Walpola Rahula. Pdf. The Problem of Mindfulness, Sahanika Ratnayake. Online essay. Buddha, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Webpage. Buddha, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Webpage.
Podcast: The Panpsycast Philosophy Podcast (LS 49 · TOP 1% what is this?)Episode: Episode 88, Buddhism (Part V - Further Analysis and Discussion)Pub date: 2020-11-22Introduction Jack was walking down a street. It was a day like any other. As ever, his mind was a flurry of thoughts, worries, and anxieties, stimulated by coffee and the bright light of his phone. In a bid to relieve his stress, he put his phone in his pocket, and tried to notice the details he would usually ignore. As he walked past the pharmacy, he saw a sick man coughing and spluttering; he was throwing medication back to stop his disease from decaying his body. Jack kept walking and came across an old woman waiting at a bus stop. She was fragile, crooked, and anxious; clearly age had taken much from her. Crossing the road away from the bus stop, he waited for the traffic to pass. Driving slowly past him was a hearse: a coffin on full display, surrounded by flowers, proceeded by a stream of weeping mourners. Jack fell to his knees, overwhelmed with despair, “we all get sick, we all age, and we all die. We cannot escape this fate!” His head against the pavement, he didn't move for almost an hour. When he got up, he was approached by a homeless man, to whom he said, “sorry, I don't have any change.” The man replied, “It is you who needs a little change, young monk. I know why you fall to your knees in despair: the inescapable suffering of life weighs on us all. Let me tell you of someone who was once like you, who tried to remove suffering from our minds… let me tell you the story of Siddhartha Gotama, The Buddha.” Contents Part I. The Life of Siddhārtha Gautama Part II. The Four Noble Truths Part III. The Cycle of Life Part IV. The Eightfold Path Part V. Further Analysis and Discussion Links Buddhism: A Very Short Introduction. Book. Buddhist Ethics: A Very Short Introduction. Book. Why Buddhism Is True, Robert Wright. Book. The Foundations of Buddhism, Rupert Gethin. Book. Buddhism, The Great Courses. Lecture series. What the Buddha Taught, Walpola Rahula. Pdf. The Problem of Mindfulness, Sahanika Ratnayake. Online essay. Buddha, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Webpage. Buddha, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Webpage.The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Jack Symes | Andrew Horton, Oliver Marley, Gregory Miller, which is the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Listen Notes, Inc.
Čo je to takzvaný Nový ateizmus? O čo mu ide, čo ho spája a čo rozdeľuje? A ako ho možno ohodnotiť?----more----Prečítajte si túto dávku aj ako článok na SME: https://bit.ly/SME_davka177 Použitá a odporúčaná literatúra:Dawkins, The God Delusion, 2006.Dennett, Breaking the Spell, 2006.Fergusson, Faith and Its Critics, 2009.Harris, The End of Faith, 2004.Hitchens, God Is Not Great, 2007.Kaufman, “New Atheism and Its Critics”, 2019.LeDrew, The Evolution of Atheism, 2016."The New Atheists", Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Súvisiace dávky:PD#168: Spinoza a pátranie po prvom ateistovi, https://bit.ly/davka168 PD#166: Môže za ateizmus kresťanstvo? https://bit.ly/davka166 PD#147: Kresťanskí fundamentalisti, https://bit.ly/davka147 ***Dobré veci potrebujú svoj čas. Staň sa patrónom Tvojho obľúbeného podcastu cez Patreon ❤️ (https://bit.ly/PatreonPD) alebo nás podpor jednorazovo či trvalým príkazom (https://bit.ly/CHCEMpodporit). Ďakujeme!
Introduction Jack was walking down a street. It was a day like any other. As ever, his mind was a flurry of thoughts, worries, and anxieties, stimulated by coffee and the bright light of his phone. In a bid to relieve his stress, he put his phone in his pocket, and tried to notice the details he would usually ignore. As he walked past the pharmacy, he saw a sick man coughing and spluttering; he was throwing medication back to stop his disease from decaying his body. Jack kept walking and came across an old woman waiting at a bus stop. She was fragile, crooked, and anxious; clearly age had taken much from her. Crossing the road away from the bus stop, he waited for the traffic to pass. Driving slowly past him was a hearse: a coffin on full display, surrounded by flowers, proceeded by a stream of weeping mourners. Jack fell to his knees, overwhelmed with despair, “we all get sick, we all age, and we all die. We cannot escape this fate!” His head against the pavement, he didn’t move for almost an hour. When he got up, he was approached by a homeless man, to whom he said, “sorry, I don’t have any change.” The man replied, “It is you who needs a little change, young monk. I know why you fall to your knees in despair: the inescapable suffering of life weighs on us all. Let me tell you of someone who was once like you, who tried to remove suffering from our minds… let me tell you the story of Siddhartha Gotama, The Buddha.” Contents Part I. The Life of Siddhārtha Gautama Part II. The Four Noble Truths Part III. The Cycle of Life Part IV. The Eightfold Path Part V. Further Analysis and Discussion Links Buddhism: A Very Short Introduction. Book. Buddhist Ethics: A Very Short Introduction. Book. Why Buddhism Is True, Robert Wright. Book. The Foundations of Buddhism, Rupert Gethin. Book. Buddhism, The Great Courses. Lecture series. What the Buddha Taught, Walpola Rahula. Pdf. The Problem of Mindfulness, Sahanika Ratnayake. Online essay. Buddha, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Webpage. Buddha, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Webpage.
Podcast: The Panpsycast Philosophy Podcast (LS 49 · TOP 1% what is this?)Episode: Episode 88, Buddhism (Part III - The Cycle of Life)Pub date: 2020-11-08Introduction Jack was walking down a street. It was a day like any other. As ever, his mind was a flurry of thoughts, worries, and anxieties, stimulated by coffee and the bright light of his phone. In a bid to relieve his stress, he put his phone in his pocket, and tried to notice the details he would usually ignore. As he walked past the pharmacy, he saw a sick man coughing and spluttering; he was throwing medication back to stop his disease from decaying his body. Jack kept walking and came across an old woman waiting at a bus stop. She was fragile, crooked, and anxious; clearly age had taken much from her. Crossing the road away from the bus stop, he waited for the traffic to pass. Driving slowly past him was a hearse: a coffin on full display, surrounded by flowers, proceeded by a stream of weeping mourners. Jack fell to his knees, overwhelmed with despair, “we all get sick, we all age, and we all die. We cannot escape this fate!” His head against the pavement, he didn't move for almost an hour. When he got up, he was approached by a homeless man, to whom he said, “sorry, I don't have any change.” The man replied, “It is you who needs a little change, young monk. I know why you fall to your knees in despair: the inescapable suffering of life weighs on us all. Let me tell you of someone who was once like you, who tried to remove suffering from our minds… let me tell you the story of Siddhartha Gotama, The Buddha.” Contents Part I. The Life of Siddhārtha Gautama Part II. The Four Noble Truths Part III. The Cycle of Life Part IV. The Eightfold Path Part V. Further Analysis and Discussion Links Buddhism: A Very Short Introduction. Book. Buddhist Ethics: A Very Short Introduction. Book. Why Buddhism Is True, Robert Wright. Book. The Foundations of Buddhism, Rupert Gethin. Book. Buddhism, The Great Courses. Lecture series. What the Buddha Taught, Walpola Rahula. Pdf. The Problem of Mindfulness, Sahanika Ratnayake. Online essay. Buddha, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Webpage. Buddha, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Webpage.The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Jack Symes | Andrew Horton, Oliver Marley, Gregory Miller, which is the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Listen Notes, Inc.
Introduction Jack was walking down a street. It was a day like any other. As ever, his mind was a flurry of thoughts, worries, and anxieties, stimulated by coffee and the bright light of his phone. In a bid to relieve his stress, he put his phone in his pocket, and tried to notice the details he would usually ignore. As he walked past the pharmacy, he saw a sick man coughing and spluttering; he was throwing medication back to stop his disease from decaying his body. Jack kept walking and came across an old woman waiting at a bus stop. She was fragile, crooked, and anxious; clearly age had taken much from her. Crossing the road away from the bus stop, he waited for the traffic to pass. Driving slowly past him was a hearse: a coffin on full display, surrounded by flowers, proceeded by a stream of weeping mourners. Jack fell to his knees, overwhelmed with despair, “we all get sick, we all age, and we all die. We cannot escape this fate!” His head against the pavement, he didn’t move for almost an hour. When he got up, he was approached by a homeless man, to whom he said, “sorry, I don’t have any change.” The man replied, “It is you who needs a little change, young monk. I know why you fall to your knees in despair: the inescapable suffering of life weighs on us all. Let me tell you of someone who was once like you, who tried to remove suffering from our minds… let me tell you the story of Siddhartha Gotama, The Buddha.” Contents Part I. The Life of Siddhārtha Gautama Part II. The Four Noble Truths Part III. The Cycle of Life Part IV. The Eightfold Path Part V. Further Analysis and Discussion Links Buddhism: A Very Short Introduction. Book. Buddhist Ethics: A Very Short Introduction. Book. Why Buddhism Is True, Robert Wright. Book. The Foundations of Buddhism, Rupert Gethin. Book. Buddhism, The Great Courses. Lecture series. What the Buddha Taught, Walpola Rahula. Pdf. The Problem of Mindfulness, Sahanika Ratnayake. Online essay. Buddha, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Webpage. Buddha, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Webpage.
Introduction Jack was walking down a street. It was a day like any other. As ever, his mind was a flurry of thoughts, worries, and anxieties, stimulated by coffee and the bright light of his phone. In a bid to relieve his stress, he put his phone in his pocket, and tried to notice the details he would usually ignore. As he walked past the pharmacy, he saw a sick man coughing and spluttering; he was throwing medication back to stop his disease from decaying his body. Jack kept walking and came across an old woman waiting at a bus stop. She was fragile, crooked, and anxious; clearly age had taken much from her. Crossing the road away from the bus stop, he waited for the traffic to pass. Driving slowly past him was a hearse: a coffin on full display, surrounded by flowers, proceeded by a stream of weeping mourners. Jack fell to his knees, overwhelmed with despair, “we all get sick, we all age, and we all die. We cannot escape this fate!” His head against the pavement, he didn’t move for almost an hour. When he got up, he was approached by a homeless man, to whom he said, “sorry, I don’t have any change.” The man replied, “It is you who needs a little change, young monk. I know why you fall to your knees in despair: the inescapable suffering of life weighs on us all. Let me tell you of someone who was once like you, who tried to remove suffering from our minds… let me tell you the story of Siddhartha Gotama, The Buddha.” Contents Part I. The Life of Siddhārtha Gautama Part II. The Four Noble Truths Part III. The Cycle of Life Part IV. The Eightfold Path Part V. Further Analysis and Discussion Links Buddhism: A Very Short Introduction. Book. Buddhist Ethics: A Very Short Introduction. Book. Why Buddhism Is True, Robert Wright. Book. The Foundations of Buddhism, Rupert Gethin. Book. Buddhism, The Great Courses. Lecture series. What the Buddha Taught, Walpola Rahula. Pdf. The Problem of Mindfulness, Sahanika Ratnayake. Online essay. Buddha, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Webpage. Buddha, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Webpage.
Podcast: The Panpsycast Philosophy Podcast (LS 49 · TOP 1% what is this?)Episode: Episode 88, Buddhism (Part II - The Four Noble Truths)Pub date: 2020-11-01Introduction Jack was walking down a street. It was a day like any other. As ever, his mind was a flurry of thoughts, worries, and anxieties, stimulated by coffee and the bright light of his phone. In a bid to relieve his stress, he put his phone in his pocket, and tried to notice the details he would usually ignore. As he walked past the pharmacy, he saw a sick man coughing and spluttering; he was throwing medication back to stop his disease from decaying his body. Jack kept walking and came across an old woman waiting at a bus stop. She was fragile, crooked, and anxious; clearly age had taken much from her. Crossing the road away from the bus stop, he waited for the traffic to pass. Driving slowly past him was a hearse: a coffin on full display, surrounded by flowers, proceeded by a stream of weeping mourners. Jack fell to his knees, overwhelmed with despair, “we all get sick, we all age, and we all die. We cannot escape this fate!” His head against the pavement, he didn't move for almost an hour. When he got up, he was approached by a homeless man, to whom he said, “sorry, I don't have any change.” The man replied, “It is you who needs a little change, young monk. I know why you fall to your knees in despair: the inescapable suffering of life weighs on us all. Let me tell you of someone who was once like you, who tried to remove suffering from our minds… let me tell you the story of Siddhartha Gotama, The Buddha.” Contents Part I. The Life of Siddhārtha Gautama Part II. The Four Noble Truths Part III. The Cycle of Life Part IV. The Eightfold Path Part V. Further Analysis and Discussion Links Buddhism: A Very Short Introduction. Book. Buddhist Ethics: A Very Short Introduction. Book. Why Buddhism Is True, Robert Wright. Book. The Foundations of Buddhism, Rupert Gethin. Book. Buddhism, The Great Courses. Lecture series. What the Buddha Taught, Walpola Rahula. Pdf. The Problem of Mindfulness, Sahanika Ratnayake. Online essay. Buddha, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Webpage. Buddha, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Webpage.The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Jack Symes | Andrew Horton, Oliver Marley, Gregory Miller, which is the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Listen Notes, Inc.
The focus of this episode is George Herbert Mead who has had a tremendous impact on sociology, psychology and philosophy. See the end of this post for links to the episode. I talk to Darren Nixon about Mead's most famous contribution; his conceptualisation of the self as as being comprised of two parts, “I” and the “Me”. Mead's great insight is that our “self” is not part of a transcendent “spirit” or biologically predisposed but is a “social self” that is produced through our interactions with others. As well as his most famous insight we also discuss his contribution to broader social and political thought in particular his analysis of the relationship between our acceptance of our knowledge of the world and what is useful to us. Darren and I consider what his insights might mean for some contemporary issues including social media use and the increasing acceptance of populist ideology. Mead's work is mostly not available open access but this introduction from the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy is good. There is also a chapter by him in a collection on pragmatist philosophy available on Project Gutenberg . It is usually possible to pick up his books quite cheaply second hand such as his Mind, Self & Society. If you have access to a good library I highly recommend Ian Burkitt's books Social Selves which has some excellent sections on Mead's work. Theme music is Wirklich Wichtig by Checkie Brown used on a Creative Commons license Incidental music is Disco Stomp by Jonas78 used on a Creative Commons license You can follow me on Twitter @chrishtill Anchor https://anchor.fm/chris-till Breaker https://www.breaker.audio/social-theory-podcast Apple Podcasts https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/social-theory-podcast/id1533951560 Pocket Casts https://pca.st/yueatxzh Radio Public https://radiopublic.com/social-theory-podcast-WoKrjx Spotify https://open.spotify.com/show/0RBMehx0NHJKjEnySugQNn Stitcher https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/chris-till/social-theory-podcast?refid=stpr
Massimo and Julia answer listeners' questions. In this installment the topics include: can political discourse be rational, who changed M&J's opinion on something and when have they changed someone's opinion, how do they guard against biases when they debate people, the morality of bestiality, and did Samir Okasha really solve the induction problem? Plus, M&J's favorite sources for philosophy: - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy - philpapers.org - An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding by David Hume - Language, Truth, and Logic by Alfred Jules Ayer - Mortal Questions byThomas Nagel - Practical Ethics by Peter Singer Sped up the speakers by [1.0, 1.1272727272727274]
Podcast: The Panpsycast Philosophy Podcast (LS 49 · TOP 1% what is this?)Episode: Episode 88, Buddhism (Part I - The Life of Siddhartha Gautama)Pub date: 2020-10-25Introduction Jack was walking down a street. It was a day like any other. As ever, his mind was a flurry of thoughts, worries, and anxieties, stimulated by coffee and the bright light of his phone. In a bid to relieve his stress, he put his phone in his pocket, and tried to notice the details he would usually ignore. As he walked past the pharmacy, he saw a sick man coughing and spluttering; he was throwing medication back to stop his disease from decaying his body. Jack kept walking and came across an old woman waiting at a bus stop. She was fragile, crooked, and anxious; clearly age had taken much from her. Crossing the road away from the bus stop, he waited for the traffic to pass. Driving slowly past him was a hearse: a coffin on full display, surrounded by flowers, proceeded by a stream of weeping mourners. Jack fell to his knees, overwhelmed with despair, “we all get sick, we all age, and we all die. We cannot escape this fate!” His head against the pavement, he didn't move for almost an hour. When he got up, he was approached by a homeless man, to whom he said, “sorry, I don't have any change.” The man replied, “It is you who needs a little change, young monk. I know why you fall to your knees in despair: the inescapable suffering of life weighs on us all. Let me tell you of someone who was once like you, who tried to remove suffering from our minds… let me tell you the story of Siddhartha Gotama, The Buddha.” Contents Part I. The Life of Siddhārtha Gautama Part II. The Four Noble Truths Part III. The Cycle of Life Part IV. The Eightfold Path Part V. Further Analysis and Discussion Links Buddhism: A Very Short Introduction. Book. Buddhist Ethics: A Very Short Introduction. Book. Why Buddhism Is True, Robert Wright. Book. The Foundations of Buddhism, Rupert Gethin. Book. Buddhism, The Great Courses. Lecture series. What the Buddha Taught, Walpola Rahula. Pdf. The Problem of Mindfulness, Sahanika Ratnayake. Online essay. Buddha, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Webpage. Buddha, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Webpage.The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Jack Symes | Andrew Horton, Oliver Marley, Gregory Miller, which is the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Listen Notes, Inc.
Introduction Jack was walking down a street. It was a day like any other. As ever, his mind was a flurry of thoughts, worries, and anxieties, stimulated by coffee and the bright light of his phone. In a bid to relieve his stress, he put his phone in his pocket, and tried to notice the details he would usually ignore. As he walked past the pharmacy, he saw a sick man coughing and spluttering; he was throwing medication back to stop his disease from decaying his body. Jack kept walking and came across an old woman waiting at a bus stop. She was fragile, crooked, and anxious; clearly age had taken much from her. Crossing the road away from the bus stop, he waited for the traffic to pass. Driving slowly past him was a hearse: a coffin on full display, surrounded by flowers, proceeded by a stream of weeping mourners. Jack fell to his knees, overwhelmed with despair, “we all get sick, we all age, and we all die. We cannot escape this fate!” His head against the pavement, he didn’t move for almost an hour. When he got up, he was approached by a homeless man, to whom he said, “sorry, I don’t have any change.” The man replied, “It is you who needs a little change, young monk. I know why you fall to your knees in despair: the inescapable suffering of life weighs on us all. Let me tell you of someone who was once like you, who tried to remove suffering from our minds… let me tell you the story of Siddhartha Gotama, The Buddha.” Contents Part I. The Life of Siddhārtha Gautama Part II. The Four Noble Truths Part III. The Cycle of Life Part IV. The Eightfold Path Part V. Further Analysis and Discussion Links Buddhism: A Very Short Introduction. Book. Buddhist Ethics: A Very Short Introduction. Book. Why Buddhism Is True, Robert Wright. Book. The Foundations of Buddhism, Rupert Gethin. Book. Buddhism, The Great Courses. Lecture series. What the Buddha Taught, Walpola Rahula. Pdf. The Problem of Mindfulness, Sahanika Ratnayake. Online essay. Buddha, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Webpage. Buddha, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Webpage.
Introduction One day when Jack, Olly, and Andy were accompanying Confucius, Confucius said: “Why don’t each of you tell me what you have your mind set on.” Andy was the first to reply, he said he wanted to be as profitable and the prestigious as the Duke of Zhou. Once he had profit and prestige, he could have all things his heart desired. Jack, having suspected that Andy had given a poor response, said he wished to cultivate humanness by helping others to help themselves. He wanted to allow others to see how their selfishness prevented them from becoming truly human and from experiencing true joy. Finally, Olly simply responded that he wished not to make any promises he couldn’t keep but that he hoped to learn from the ancients, respect the roles he had been assigned, and care for his friends and family. Confucius sat quietly for a moment and then said: “Andy, you have mistaken what made the Duke of Zhou so well pleased. Jack, you have said the right words but for the wrong reason. Olly, you can learn from the ancients but also from your less capable friends, see if you share any of their qualities.” Contents Part I. The Life of Confucius Part II. The Analects Part III. Practices Part IV. Further Analysis and Discussion Links The Analects (pdf). The Analects (Oxford Classics). Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Confucius. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Confucius. Confucius from the Heart, Yu Dan (Pan Macmillan). The Great Courses, The Analects of Confucius (Audible). Confucius: A Guide for the Perplexed, Yong Huang (Bloomsbury). Confucianism: A Very Short Introduction, Daniel Gardner (Oxford).
Introduction One day when Jack, Olly, and Andy were accompanying Confucius, Confucius said: “Why don’t each of you tell me what you have your mind set on.” Andy was the first to reply, he said he wanted to be as profitable and the prestigious as the Duke of Zhou. Once he had profit and prestige, he could have all things his heart desired. Jack, having suspected that Andy had given a poor response, said he wished to cultivate humanness by helping others to help themselves. He wanted to allow others to see how their selfishness prevented them from becoming truly human and from experiencing true joy. Finally, Olly simply responded that he wished not to make any promises he couldn’t keep but that he hoped to learn from the ancients, respect the roles he had been assigned, and care for his friends and family. Confucius sat quietly for a moment and then said: “Andy, you have mistaken what made the Duke of Zhou so well pleased. Jack, you have said the right words but for the wrong reason. Olly, you can learn from the ancients but also from your less capable friends, see if you share any of their qualities.” Contents Part I. The Life of Confucius Part II. The Analects Part III. Practices Part IV. Further Analysis and Discussion Links The Analects (pdf). The Analects (Oxford Classics). Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Confucius. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Confucius. Confucius from the Heart, Yu Dan (Pan Macmillan). The Great Courses, The Analects of Confucius (Audible). Confucius: A Guide for the Perplexed, Yong Huang (Bloomsbury). Confucianism: A Very Short Introduction, Daniel Gardner (Oxford).
How to Be a Feminist in History The Lesbian Historic Motif Podcast - Episode 125 with Heather Rose Jones So you want your historic character to be a feminist. What does that mean? How early can we find women expressing opinions about gender equality and what did they think it looked like? What would your historic feminist's blind spots be? What arguments and evidence would she bring to the table? In this episode we talk about: Christine de PisanExcerpts from: Christine de Pizan (trans by Earl Jeffrey Richards). 1982. The Book of the City of Ladies. Persea Books, New York. Moderata Fonte (Modesta di Pozzo)Excerpts from: Fonte, Moderata (trans by Virginia Cox). 2018. The Merits of Women (Wherein is Revealed Their Nobility and Their Superiority to Men). The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Marie de GournayExcerpt from: Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy Olympe de GougesExcerpts from: Olympe de Gouges: English Translations of the Original French Texts Mary WollstonecraftExcerpts from: A Vindication of the Rights of Women (Project Gutenberg) A transcript of this podcast is available here. Links to the Lesbian Historic Motif Project Online Website: http://alpennia.com/lhmp Blog: http://alpennia.com/blog RSS: http://alpennia.com/blog/feed/ Twitter: @LesbianMotif Discord: Contact Heather for an invitation to the Alpennia/LHMP Discord server The Lesbian Historic Motif Project Patreon Links to Heather Online Website: http://alpennia.com Email: Heather Rose Jones Twitter: @heatherosejones Facebook: Heather Rose Jones (author page)
Introduction One day when Jack, Olly, and Andy were accompanying Confucius, Confucius said: “Why don’t each of you tell me what you have your mind set on.” Andy was the first to reply, he said he wanted to be as profitable and the prestigious as the Duke of Zhou. Once he had profit and prestige, he could have all things his heart desired. Jack, having suspected that Andy had given a poor response, said he wished to cultivate humanness by helping others to help themselves. He wanted to allow others to see how their selfishness prevented them from becoming truly human and from experiencing true joy. Finally, Olly simply responded that he wished not to make any promises he couldn’t keep but that he hoped to learn from the ancients, respect the roles he had been assigned, and care for his friends and family. Confucius sat quietly for a moment and then said: “Andy, you have mistaken what made the Duke of Zhou so well pleased. Jack, you have said the right words but for the wrong reason. Olly, you can learn from the ancients but also from your less capable friends, see if you share any of their qualities.” Contents Part I. The Life of Confucius Part II. The Analects Part III. Practices Part IV. Further Analysis and Discussion Links The Analects (pdf). The Analects (Oxford Classics). Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Confucius. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Confucius. Confucius from the Heart, Yu Dan (Pan Macmillan). The Great Courses, The Analects of Confucius (Audible). Confucius: A Guide for the Perplexed, Yong Huang (Bloomsbury). Confucianism: A Very Short Introduction, Daniel Gardner (Oxford).
Introduction One day when Jack, Olly, and Andy were accompanying Confucius, Confucius said: “Why don’t each of you tell me what you have your mind set on.” Andy was the first to reply, he said he wanted to be as profitable and the prestigious as the Duke of Zhou. Once he had profit and prestige, he could have all things his heart desired. Jack, having suspected that Andy had given a poor response, said he wished to cultivate humanness by helping others to help themselves. He wanted to allow others to see how their selfishness prevented them from becoming truly human and from experiencing true joy. Finally, Olly simply responded that he wished not to make any promises he couldn’t keep but that he hoped to learn from the ancients, respect the roles he had been assigned, and care for his friends and family. Confucius sat quietly for a moment and then said: “Andy, you have mistaken what made the Duke of Zhou so well pleased. Jack, you have said the right words but for the wrong reason. Olly, you can learn from the ancients but also from your less capable friends, see if you share any of their qualities.” Contents Part I. The Life of Confucius Part II. The Analects Part III. Practices Part IV. Further Analysis and Discussion Links The Analects (pdf). The Analects (Oxford Classics). Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Confucius. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Confucius. Confucius from the Heart, Yu Dan (Pan Macmillan). The Great Courses, The Analects of Confucius (Audible). Confucius: A Guide for the Perplexed, Yong Huang (Bloomsbury). Confucianism: A Very Short Introduction, Daniel Gardner (Oxford).
We live in an age of religious pluralism. This religious pluralism is more than a fact of diversity but is also a value of our society. In a pluralistic society, if anyone claims exclusive, absolute truth, then they are deemed intolerant and arrogant. Religious pluralism poses a challenge to the Christian faith which claims that salvation is only available through the work of Jesus Christ. How should Christians respond to the challenge of religious pluralism? In this episode, Aaron explains the worldview of pluralism and shows how Christians can respond to the challenge. Show Notes Proponents of religious pluralism argue that exclusive truth claims are divisive and dangerous for the world. Religious pluralism is the belief that all religions and worldviews are equally valid and true. The worldview of religious pluralism is self-contradictory. Christianity provides a better answer for the divisiveness of religion. Truth is exclusionary by nature. The gospel is exclusive in its claim that salvation is only in Jesus. The gospel is the most inclusive of any religious claims since it offers salvation by grace. When people are formed by the gospel, then they will be loving and merciful to those who are different from themselves. Resources See my newest article at Boundless.org “Is Jesus the Only Way?” Read about religious pluralism at the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Read the chapter “Religious Pluralism” in Christian Apologetics by Douglas Groothuis. For a longer, more philosophical treatment of the subject, see William Lane Craig's article at Reasonable Faith “How Can Christ Be the Only Way to God?” Watch “Exclusivity: How can there be just one true religion?” by Timothy Keller on the Gospel in Life YouTube channel. Subscribe and Connect If you're in the Acadiana area, visit us at Redeemer City Church. We'd love to see you! YouTube Apple Podcasts Spotify Follow Aaron on Facebook, Instagram, or Twitter at @aaronmshamp.
As our government teeters and our populace becomes increasingly polarized, many fear war is on the horizon. Some of us have realized it is already here. How can we wage a just war? How can we work for a just peace? And how can we fight monsters without becoming monsters ourselves? Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae (Prima Secundae Partis) https://www.newadvent.org/summa/2.htm Kenaz Filan, "Toward the Unknown Shore" https://europaschildren.com/2020/08/09/toward-the-unknown-shore/ "What We Know of the Ring" https://europaschildren.com/2020/08/10/what-we-know-of-the-ring/ Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, “Just War Theory” https://iep.utm.edu/justwar/ Eric Patterson, "Just War Theory and Terrorism" in Providence Magazine (Summer 2016) https://providencemag.com/2016/11/just-war-theory-terrorism/ "St. Joan of Arc" at Catholic Online http://catholic.org/saints/saint.php?saint_id=295 Gene Wolfe, "The Best Introduction to the Mountains" http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20040113063643/http%3A//home.clara.net/andywrobertson/wolfemountains.html
This talk was given as part of the Thomistic Institute's Holy Week Retreat, April 9-12, 2020. For more information on upcoming events, please visit our website: thomisticinstitute.org. About the speaker: Fr. James Dominic Brent, O.P. was born and raised in Michigan. He pursued his undergraduate and graduate studies in Philosophy, and completed his doctorate in Philosophy at Saint Louis University on the epistemic status of Christian beliefs according to Saint Thomas Aquinas. He has articles in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy on Natural Theology, in the Oxford Handbook of Thomas Aquinas on “God’s Knowledge and Will”, and an article forthcoming on “Thomas Aquinas” in the Oxford Handbook of the Epistemology of Theology. He earned his STL from the Pontifical Faculty of the Immaculate Conception, and was ordained a priest in the same year. He taught in the School of Philosophy at The Catholic University of America from 2010- 2014, and spent the year of 2014-2015 doing full time itinerant preaching on college campuses across the United States.
در اپیزود دوم رادیو چیستا، نگاهی میاندازیم به اسطوره خلقت مصر باستان، یکی از چهار اسطوره باستانی دنیا. میبینیم که مصریان ریشه و ماهیت واقعیت جهان رو در کجا میدیدند و تفکرشون چه شباهتی با تفکر مسیحی داره. نقش زبان و واژگان در زندگی ما چیه؟ آیا ادراک و شناخت ما با واقعیت بیرون منطبقه؟ یا اینکه همه چیز فقط یه توهمه؟ خالق: سهراب مصاحبی گویندگان مهمان: سمن اویسی، کیانرخ نعمت گرگانی با تشکر از همکاری پرارزش: آرمان شادبخش و با تشکر از سبیل های نیچه! موسیقیهای استفاده شده (به ترتیب): 1. Isis / Derek Fiecher 2. Echoes of Ancient Egypt / Michael Levy 3. My Planet / Kako Band 4. Right Where It Belongs / Nine Inch Nails 5. Parvaz Kon / Jamshid Najafi منابع علمی به کار رفته: * Crane, T., & French, C. (2015, Dec 31). The Problem of Perception. Retrieved May 05, 2020, from Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/perception-problem/ * Dilman, I. (2016). Wittgenstein's Copernican Revolution: The Question of Linguistic Idealism. Springer. * Guyer, P., & Horstmann, R.-P. (2015, Aug 30). Idealism. Retrieved Apr 30, 2020, from Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/idealism * Harris, C. (n.d.). Language and Cognition. Retrieved Apr 20, 2020, from Boston University Website: https://www.bu.edu/psych/charris/papers/Encyclopedia.pdf * McManus, D. (2003). Wittgenstein and Scepticism. Routledge. * Perlovsky, L., & Sakai, K. (2014). Language and Cognition. Frontiers in Behavioural Neuroscience, 8. * Pham, L. (2016). Nietzsche on Language and Our Pursuit of Truth. The Expositor: A Journal of Undergraduate Research in theHumanities, 6, 58-69. * Rescorla, M. (2019, May 28). The Language of Thought Hypothesis. Retrieved Apr 25, 2020, from Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/language-thought/ * Robbins, S., & Judge, T. (2017). organizational behavior (17th ed.). New York: Pearson Education. * Thornton, S. (n.d.). Solipsism and the Problem of Other Minds. Retrieved Apr 15, 2020, from Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: https://www.iep.utm.edu/solipsis * هارت, ج. (1383). اساطیر مصری. در جهان اسطورهها (ع. مخبر, مترجم, ص. 333-440). تهران: نشر مرکز. حمایت مالی از پادکست حمایت غیرمالی از پادکست شنوتو کستباکس تلگرام توییتر ایمیل
Act Utilitarianism Act Utilitarianism is our next adventure in moral theories. In some respects it is like a form of hedonism (which we discussed last week) but holds some differences too. Further ReadingStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: ‘The History of Utilitarianism’Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: ‘Mill’s Moral and Political Philosophy’Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: ‘Act and Rule Utilitarianism’Mill,...Read More
Súčasná pandémia vírusu SARS-CoV-2 ponúka veľký priestor aj pre filozofické uvažovanie. Dnes chcem pripomenúť jednu z hlavých úloh filozofie, ktorou je----more---- pomôcť nám správne rozlišovať a nejde tu len o pomenovanie jasných rozdielov v štýle „buď-alebo“. Filozofia nám často ukazuje, že skôr ako čierno-biele „áno alebo nie“ sa život zvykne uberať cestou “aj áno, aj nie“. Sme s ochorením Covid-19 vo vojne? Aj áno, aj nie. Prečítajte si túto minidávku aj ako článok na SME: https://bit.ly/2JoONGd Použitá a odporúčaná literatúra: Seth Lazar, „War“ na The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://stanford.io/2vHMvPmAlexander Moseley, „Just War Theory“ na Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://bit.ly/2Ja8zFGHenrik Syse, „Philosophy and Ethics in the Age of Corona Virus“ na PRIO, https://bit.ly/39jofB7Holman Jenkins, „What Victory Looks Like in the Coronavirus War“ na WSJ, https://on.wsj.com/33LDYaL Súvisiace dávky: PD#038: Kto vymyslel filozofiu?, https://bit.ly/davka38PD#118: Koronavírus a bioinžinrstvo, https://bit.ly/davka118PD#123: Rozhovor s Antonom Vydrom, https://bit.ly/davka123***Dobré veci potrebujú svoj čas. Pomohla ti táto dávka zamyslieť sa nad niečím zmysluplným? Podpor tvoj obľúbený podcast sumou 1€, 5€ alebo 10€ (trvalý príkaz je topka!) na SK1283605207004206791985. Ďakujeme! Viac info o podpore na pravidelnadavka.sk/#chcem-podporit
V dnešnej dávke sa pozrieme na to, prečo má podľa Petra Singera prevažná väčšina zvierat morálny status, z čoho pramení, a prečo je dokonca časť zvierat na rovnakej morálnej úrovni ako ľudia a zdieľame status osoby.----more----V závere sa pozrieme na tri možné námietky voči jeho teórii a veľmi zaujímavou tu napríklad otázka, či vlastne v rámci Singerovho utilitarizmu môžu vôbec existovať neodňateľné práva ľudí či zvierat. Použitá literatúra: Peter Singer, Animal Liberation (2015; pôvodne vydaná v 1975), Bodley Heads, https://bit.ly/2W9s7l9Tom Regan, The Case for Animal Rights (2004; pôvodne vydaná v 1983), University of California Press, https://amzn.to/2wXoHakLori Gruen, „The Moral Status of Animals",The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2017), https://stanford.io/2WbOBSCScott Wilson, „Animals and Ethics“, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://bit.ly/2U5OCEG Súvisiace dávky:PD#04: Utilitarizmus, https://bit.ly/2QeQxFUPD#89: Immanuel Kant, https://bit.ly/33iotGVPD#99: Kritika utilitarizmus, https://bit.ly/2wVJTO0 ***Dobré veci potrebujú svoj čas. Pomohla ti táto dávka zamyslieť sa nad niečím zmysluplným? Podpor tvoj obľúbený podcast sumou 1€, 5€ alebo 10€ (trvalý príkaz je topka!) na SK1283605207004206791985. Ďakujeme! Viac info o podpore na pravidelnadavka.sk/#chcem-podporit
Existențialism IV (4 din 4) „Omul este condamnat să fie liber; pentru că odată aruncat în lume, el este responsabil pentru tot ceea ce face. Depinde de tine să-i dai vieții un sens” a spus Jean-Paul Sartre. Însă ce înseamnă fraza “ești condamnat să fii liber?” Sartre spunea că „existența precede esența”. Noi mai întâi existăm, și apoi ne formăm pe parcursul vieții. Cine vom deveni depinde de noi. Responsabilitatea e doar a noastră. Albert Camus spunea că „Există o singură problemă filosofică cu adevărat gravă și aceasta este sinuciderea.” El a fost bântuit de întrebarea dacă suicidul ar putea fi singurul răspuns rațional la absurditatea vieții. Filosoafa Simone de Beauvoir afirma că tu ca individ exiști în relație cu alți indivizi, și că existența altora justifică existența ta ca individ. Cum aș putea să-mi asum libertatea într-un mod etic fără ca simultan să-mi doresc libertatea altora? Deoarece suntem conectați, să-ți dorești propria libertate e să-ți dorești libertatea altora, spunea de Beauvoir. Emil Cioran te trezea din somn cu aforisme tragico-ironice ca “Numai optimiștii se sinucid, optimiștii care nu mai reușesc să fie optimiști. Ceilalți, neavând motive să trăiască, de ce ar avea ei motive să moară?” și "Dacă nu ar fi existat religie și muzică, m-aș fi făcut paznic de bordel" Ce aveau toți acești gânditori în comun, și ce îi diferenția? În timpul și după al Doilea Război Mondial, când orașul Paris începea să se reconstruiască, Sartre și Camus au dat glas la dispoziția zilei. Europa fusese imolată, dar cenușa lăsată de război a creat spațiul pentru a-și imagina o nouă lume. Cititorii de atunci s-au uitat spre Sartre și Camus pentru a articula cum ar putea arăta acea lume nouă. „Am fost”, și-a amintit colega Simone de Beauvoir, „pentru a oferi epocii războiului ideologia ei”. În acest episod eu sumarizez și în sfârșit închei curentul filosofic Existențialist. Audiere plăcută! ------------------------------------------------------------------- 00:00 Nașterea Universului 02:05 „Punctul Palid Albastru” (Carl Sagan) 05:05 Lumea Socială 11:21 Epoca Rațiunii și Moartea lui Dumnezeu 14:18 Intro 16:24 Jean-Paul Sartre 17:40 Rea-Credință 26:04 Ce este Existențialismul? 33:29 „Existențialismul Este Un Umanism” 45:24 Albert Camus 50:25 Absurdul și Mitul lui Sisif 56:01 Sartre vs Camus (Moralitatea Europei postbelice din secolul 20) 1:06:35 Simone de Beauvoir 1:10:43 „Al Doilea Sex”: o critică 1:17:13 Libertatea și Etica Ambiguității 1:27:04 Emil Cioran 1:38:52 Existențialismul și Psihoterapia (Jordan Peterson) 1:44:45 Fatalismul lui Sartre vs Revolta lui Camus 1:50:28 Scopul Vieții ------------------------------------------------------------------- Surse: “Existențialismul este un Umanism” (Existentialism is a Humanism, Jean-Paul Sartre), “Mitul lui Sisif” (The Myth of Sisyphus, Albert Camus), “Greața” (Nausea, Jean-Paul Sartre), “Despre neajunsul de a te fi născut” (Emil Cioran), “Etica Ambiguității” (The Ethics of Ambiguity, Simone de Beauvoir), “Al Doilea Sex” (The Second Sex, Simone de Beauvoir), www.aeon.co, Philosophize This! Podcast, www.philosophytalk.org, www.goodreads.com, www.medium.com, YouTube, www.theschooloflife.com, Wikipedia, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (www.iep.utm.edu), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (www.plato.stanford.edu), www.independent.co.uk ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Muzica din episod: Claude Thomain - Un Soir de Blanco Jacqueline Taieb - 7 heure du matin Maria Tănase - Cine Iubeşte Şi Lasă (Târaitul Şarpelui) Le Système Crapoutchik - All What I Have Jacques Dutronc – Le Responsable
Môže byť morálka objektívna? Teda, sú dôvody na moje morálne konanie nezávislé od toho, čo si o nich myslím alebo či práve po danom rozhodnutí túžim? Alebo platí staré známe: de gustibus non est disputandum—proti chuti žiadny dišputát? Alebo, a do tretice, nič ako morálka vlastne neexistuje a každý si môže, ale dokonca musí robiť, čo chce? Dnes sa pozrieme na prvú z týchto otázok a v budúcej dávke budeme pokračovať s ďalší dvoma----more---- Použitá a odporúčaná literatúra: Geoff Sayre-McCord, „Moral Realism“, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2017), https://stanford.io/35OHEcm Shin Kim, „Moral Realism“, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://bit.ly/2N1RmjdPiers Benn, „The objectivity of morality“, Ethics (Routledge: London, 2007) Súvisiace dávky: PD#02: Aristotelovská etika, https://bit.ly/33NRolePD#04: Kantov morálny systém, https://bit.ly/2NicUcVPD#89: Kant o čistom rozume, https://bit.ly/2VKrQCJ ***Dobré veci potrebujú svoj čas. Pomohla ti táto dávka zamyslieť sa nad niečím zmysluplným? Podpor tvoj obľúbený podcast sumou 1€, 5€ alebo 10€ (trvalý príkaz je topka!) na SK1283605207004206791985. Ďakujeme! Viac info o podpore na pravidelnadavka.sk/#chcem-podporit
Čo je to ten zdravý rozum, alebo „common sense“, na ktorom stojí filozofia škótskeho osvietenca Thomasa Reida? Na vysvetlenie uvádza tento príklad: aj malá húsenica sa preplazí cez tisíc listov až kým nenájde ten, ktorý je vhodný pre jej stravu. Čo chcel týmto príkladom povedať? Aj to som si dnes povieme.----more---- Použitá a odporúčaná literatúra: Ryan Nichols a Gideon Yaffe, „Thomas Reid“, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2016), https://stanford.io/35AP6I7 Marina Folescu „Thomas Reid: Philosophy of Mind“, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://bit.ly/2ONm2Hd Daniel N. Robinson, „Thomas Reid and the Scottish School“, videokurz Great Ideas of Philosophy, 2nd Edition, The Great Courses (2004), https://bit.ly/2m79xKl Daniel N. Robinson, „Reid’s Critique of Hume“, videokurz, Oxforská univezita (2014), https://bit.ly/2ME8fQI Eva Peterková, „Thomas Reid and Notion of Common Sense“, Ostium (2015), https://bit.ly/35BWrXI Súvisiace dávky: PD#77: Intro do rozmýšľania o realite, https://bit.ly/2lULT3DPD#79: Locke o ľudskom chápaní, https://bit.ly/2kD51TAPD#81: Leibniz o nemateriálnom svete, https://bit.ly/2kFE8yvPD#83: Berkeley a vnímanej existencii, https://bit.ly/2lkPGaAPD#85: Hume o prirodzenom poznaní, https://bit.ly/31VOlHePD#87: Kant o paradoxe poznania, https://bit.ly/2VKrQCJ ***Dobré veci potrebujú svoj čas. Pomohla ti táto dávka zamyslieť sa nad niečím zmysluplným? Podpor tvoj obľúbený podcast sumou 1€, 5€ alebo 10€ (trvalý príkaz je topka!) na SK1283605207004206791985. Ďakujeme! Viac info o podpore na pravidelnadavka.sk/#chcem-podporit
Existențialism III (3 din 4) Voi v-ați gândit vreodată, care-i rolul unui artist în viață? Să descrie realitatea, sau să o schimbe? De ce atunci când artistul dezvăluie adevăruri pătrunzătoare despre lume el devine în același timp înstrăinat de acea lume? Van Gogh scria în jurnalul său, “Mi-am pus inima și sufletul în arta mea și mi-am pierdut mințile în proces.” Filosoful german Martin Heidegger, analizându-l pe Nietzsche, construiește o imagine a lumii în care arta, stilul de viață artistic și imaginea artistului joacă un rol important. Lumea însăși, presupune Heidegger, este doar un set dinamic de relații, proprietăți și atribute care construiesc întregul posibilității umane, deci, a sensurilor și semnificațiilor umane. Ca atare, susține Heidegger, esența lumii este ascunsă și uitată, nedezvăluită în întregime, îngropată adânc sub mai multe straturi de interpretări metafizice și anxietăți religioase. Lumea artei, pe de altă parte, oferă rezoluție și dezvăluire. Ea dezvăluie câmpurile de bază ale semnificației, care sunt altfel reprimate și ignorate. Arta și modul artistului dezvăluie nu numai totalitatea semnificațiilor, ci și, în primul rând, simpla posibilitate de sens. Are arta un rol transcendent? Dacă da, atunci ce ar dezvălui ea despre viață? Iar dacă nu, atunci care sunt consecințele psihologice pentru mintea artistului atunci când el se confruntă cu această realizare? Ce se întâmplă atunci când artistul confundă viața cu arta? Ca să încerc să răspund la aceste întrebări, voi compara două lumi diferite, folosind două dintre celebrele lor parabole: povestea lui Nietzsche despre un „Acrobat pe frânghie” și povestea lui Kafka “Prima Întristare” despre un acrobat la trapez într-un circ. Voi încerca să vă explic concepția “saltului artistului” și în cele din urmă, voi concluziona ce ne-ar putea învăța, dacă este vreo învățătură, comparația dintre Nietzsche și Kafka cu privire la perspectiva lui Heidegger asupra vieții artistice. ------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Surse: Prima Întristare (First Sorrow, Franz Kafka), Metamorfoza (Metamorphosis, Kafka), Așa Grăit-a Zaratustra (Thus Spoke Zarathustra, Friedrich Nietzsche), Nașterea Tragediei(Birth of Tragedy, Nietzsche), Știința Voioasă (The Gay Science, Nietzsche), Wikipedia, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (www.iep.utm.edu), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (www.plato.stanford.edu), www.iwm.at ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Instagram: www.instagram.com/meditatii.podcast Facebook: www.facebook.com/MeditatiiPodcast iTunes: itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/medit…ast/id1434369028 YouTube: www.youtube.com/channel/UC-ONPBDKSNytH-O5eIQKItA
David Hume ho prebudil z jeho dogmatických driemot, ale namiesto toho, aby sa stal verným zástancom empirizmu, Immanuel Kant išiel o mnoho racionálnym míľ ďalej a dnes ho radíme medzi ne-empiristických, idealistických filozofov. Dnes si posvietime na jeho chápanie ľudského chápania a na to ako nadviazal na Humea, ako ho potom hodil cez palubu a ako sa Hume nakoniec na tú palubu i tak vyšplhal späť, ale ku kormidlu sa nedostal.----more---- Použitá a odporúčaná literatúra: Michael Rohlf, „Immanuel Kant“, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2018), https://stanford.io/33erMxGMatt McCormick, „Immanuel Kant: Metaphysics“, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://bit.ly/2LYcqI3Daniel N. Robinson, „What Is Enlightenment Kant on Freedom“, videokurz Great Ideas of Philosophy, 2nd Edition, The Great Courses(2004), https://bit.ly/2m79xKlDaniel N. Robinson, „Kant's Critique of Pure Reason“, videokurz, Oxforská univezita (2011), https://bit.ly/2OBtyoq Bryan Magee v rozhovore s Geoffrey Warnockom o filozofii a živote Immanuela Kanta, YouTube (1987), https://bit.ly/2osA3iKImmanuel Kant, všeobecný sumár jeho troch kritík, Wikipédia, https://bit.ly/2VpDSBiThe School of Life, „Philosophy – Immanuel Kant“, YouTube (2015), https://bit.ly/1nBVzLT Súvisiace dávky:PD#77: Intro do rozmýšľania o realite,https://bit.ly/2lULT3DPD#79: Locke o ľudskom chápaní, https://bit.ly/2kD51TAPD#81: Leibniz o nemateriálnom svete, https://bit.ly/2kFE8yvPD#83: Berkeley a vnímanej existencii, https://bit.ly/2lkPGaAPD#85: Hume o prirodzenom poznaní,https://bit.ly/31VOlHe***Dobré veci potrebujú svoj čas. Pomohla ti táto dávka zamyslieť sa nad niečím zmysluplným? Podpor tvoj obľúbený podcast sumou 1€, 5€ alebo 10€ (trvalý príkaz je topka!) na SK1283605207004206791985. Ďakujeme! Viac info o podpore na pravidelnadavka.sk/#chcem-podporit
Existențialism II (2 din 4) În episodul precedent, Nietzsche declarase că “Dumnezeu e mort” și că “noi toți suntem ucigașii lui.” Însă ar fi asta o concluzie definitivă despre secularizarea societății moderne? Cum ne mișcăm înainte? Cât de radicală trebuie să fie această “transvaluare a valorilor”? Putem păstra ceva din morala Creștină, ori e mai “rațional” să începem de la început? Care sunt consecințele acestor încercări de a ne crea propriile valori din abisul nihilismului? Dacă Dumnezeu e just și binevoitor, atunci de ce omul în genere a fost pus să sufere? În ceea ce privește „Moartea lui Dumnezeu”, sunt încă multe lucruri de discutat. Marele scriitor rus Fyodor Dostoyevsky, deși era acord că dogma Creștină a fost învinsă de intelectul uman, totuși ar fi avut câteva obiecții cruciale la încercarea lui Nietzsche de ași crea propriile valori. Aceste obiecții le putem observa în nuvelele lui, în particular „Frații Karamazov” și „Crimă și Pedeapsă”. Problema moralității moderne de fapt e încă mai gravă și complexă decât pare la prima vedere. Deși Nietzsche și Dostoyevsky aveau perspective diferite, ei totuși aveau și viziuni comune, în special, ambii au prezis profetic nihilismul și regimurile totalitariste care vor ieși la iveală în secolul XX (ex: Fascismul, Comunismul). În esență, în Nietzche și în Dostoyevsky avem două tabere de gândire: Prima crede că din această prăpastie nihilistă e posibil să-ți afirmi valori noi și ca rezultat să depășești acel nihilism inițial, evoluând într-o stare etică și spirituală mai avansată. Iar a doua tabără concluzionează că nihilismul, precipitat de Moartea lui Dumnezeu, e baza necesară pe care se află toate gândurile lui Nietzsche, adică nihilismul și căutarea valorilor noi sunt chestii ce NU pot fi separate vreodată, și respectiv, omul, după natura și limitele sale biologice, e incapabil să se autodepășească așa cum a sperat Nietzsche. Ca să înțelegem diferențele între aceste două viziuni, e nevoie de o analiză și juxtapunere minuțioasă. Anume asta și voi întreprinde în acest episod. ------------------------------------------------------------------- 0:00 Introducere 8:28 Creștinismul și problemele sale (Jordan Peterson) 46:02 Pierderea moralității Occidentale 52:22 Nihilism activ vs nihilism pasiv 54:12 Dostoyevsky vs Nietzsche (în multe, multe...detalii) 2:01:34 Tirania moralității în viziunea lui Nietzsche 2:10:32 Evoluția lui Darwin și interpretarea greșită a lui Nietzsche 2:23:02 Concluzia 2:27:56 Moartea Dumnezeilor -------------------------------------------------------------------- Surse: Frații Karamazov (Dostoyevsky), Dincolo De Bine și Rău (Nietzsche), Genealogia Moralității (Nietzsche), 12 Reguli Pentru Viață (Jordan Peterson), academyofideas.com, theschooloflife.com, salvomag.com, YouTube, Wikipedia, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (iep.utm.edu), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (plato.stanford.edu), philosophymajor.wordpress.com, Sea of Faith (BBC, Don Cupitt) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Muzica de la sfârșit: Slow Meadow – Absence Sleeping At Last – Atlas: Hearing Johann Johannsson – The Rocket Builder They Dream By Day – Birdsong ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Video: Interviul lui „Dostoyevsky” (BBC) https://youtu.be/ApyQIl5YKtM „Omul nebun”, Așa Grăita Zarathustra, Nietzsche (BBC, Sea of Faith) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gq3SeX24iYI Michio Kaku, despre 2 tipuri de "Dumnezeu" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KoGYObRNn6A ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Instagram: www.instagram.com/meditatii.podcast Facebook: www.facebook.com/MeditatiiPodcast iTunes: itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/medit…ast/id1434369028 YouTube: www.youtube.com/channel/UC-ONPBDKSNytH-O5eIQKItA
How to Be a Feminist in History The Lesbian Historic Motif Podcast - Episode 38d with Heather Rose Jones So you want your historic character to be a feminist. What does that mean? How early can we find women expressing opinions about gender equality and what did they think it looked like? What would your historic feminist’s blind spots be? What arguments and evidence would she bring to the table? In this episode we talk about: Christine de PisanExcerpts from: Christine de Pizan (trans by Earl Jeffrey Richards). 1982. The Book of the City of Ladies. Persea Books, New York. Moderata Fonte (Modesta di Pozzo)Excerpts from: Fonte, Moderata (trans by Virginia Cox). 2018. The Merits of Women (Wherein is Revealed Their Nobility and Their Superiority to Men). The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Marie de GournayExcerpt from: Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy Olympe de GougesExcerpts from: Olympe de Gouges: English Translations of the Original French Texts Mary WollstonecraftExcerpts from: A Vindication of the Rights of Women (Project Gutenberg) A transcript of this podcast is available here. Links to the Lesbian Historic Motif Project Online Website: http://alpennia.com/lhmp Blog: http://alpennia.com/blog RSS: http://alpennia.com/blog/feed/ Links to Heather Online Website: http://alpennia.com Email: Heather Rose Jones Twitter: @heatherosejones Facebook: Heather Rose Jones (author page) If you enjoy this podcast and others at The Lesbian Talk Show, please consider supporting the show through Patreon: The Lesbian Talk Show Patreon The Lesbian Historic Motif Project Patreon
Svet a myseľ. V akom sú vzťahu? Ako spolu interagujú? Je svet jednou veľkou mysľou alebo je myseľ iba súčasťou materiálneho sveta? Dnes budeme v rozmýšľaní nad nimi pokračovať s ďalším empirikom, ktorý priamo nadväzuje na Johna Locke a nie je ním nikto iný ako škótsky osvietenec David Hume.----more---- Dnes sa pozrieme detailnejšie na tú časť jeho filozofie, ktorá sa zvykne nazývať filozofia mysle. Ak ste o nej ešte nepočuli, dnes si obzvlášť posvietime na tzv. Humeovu vidličku, na ktorú vieme metaforicky napichnúť iba to, čo je v našom jazyku, a teda v našich myšlienkach, zmysluplné. Použitá a odporúčaná literatúra: William Edward Morris a Charlotte R. Brown, „David Hume", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019 Edition), https://stanford.io/2mnhNpT James Fieser, „David Hume“, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://bit.ly/2kNXEbX Daniel N. Robinson, „Hume and the Pursuit of Happiness“, videokurz Great Ideas of Philosophy (2nd Edition),https://bit.ly/2m79xKl Peter Millican, „Hume’s Central Principles“, videokurz, Oxforská univezita (2012), https://bit.ly/2mlSzIk Bryan Magee v rozhovore s Johnom Passmorom o filozofii Davida Humea, YouTube(1987), https://bit.ly/2mq9Tfu The School of Life, „Philosophy – David Hume“, YouTube (2016), https://bit.ly/2STvJal Súvisiace dávky:PD#77: Intro do rozmýšľania o realite, https://bit.ly/2lULT3DPD#79: Locke o ľudskom chápaní, https://bit.ly/2kD51TAPD#81: Leibniz o nemateriálnom svete, https://bit.ly/2kFE8yvPD#83: Berkeley a vnímanej existencii, https://bit.ly/2lkPGaA ***Dobré veci potrebujú svoj čas. Pomohla ti táto dávka zamyslieť sa nad niečím zmysluplným? Podpor tvoj obľúbený podcast sumou 1€, 5€ alebo 10€ (trvalý príkaz je topka!) na SK1283605207004206791985. Ďakujeme! Viac info o podpore na pravidelnadavka.sk/#chcem-podporit
Dá sa Boh dokázať? Takýmto niečim sa zaoberá prirodzená teológia, o ktorej bude táto dávka. Ide o formu filozofickej teológie, ktorá sa snaží o Bohu rozprávať len čisto na rozumovom základe. Aké otázky pri nej vyvstávajú a prečo ide o veľmi zaujímavú tému? A aké sú niektoré zdroje na čiastočné uspokojenie vašej zvedavosti, ktoré vám autor odporúča? Počúvajte a dozviete sa viac.----more----Odporúčaná literatúra:Natural Theology and Natural Religion, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2019).Natural Theology, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2019).John Hedley Brooke, Veda a náboženstvo (Kaligram, 2011).Russell Manning (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Natural Theology (Oxford, 2015).William L. Craig, J. P. Moreland (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology (Blackwell, 2012).Odporúčané Youtube videá:Giffordove prednášky v Edinburghu (pozri aj St. Andrews, Abederdeen, Glasgow) Odporúčané webstránky:Closer to TruthGifford Lectures***Dobré veci potrebujú svoj čas. Pomohla ti táto dávka zamyslieť sa nad niečím zmysluplným? Podpor tvoj obľúbený podcast sumou 1€, 5€ alebo 10€ (trvalý príkaz je topka!) na SK1283605207004206791985. Ďakujeme! Viac info o podpore na pravidelnadavka.sk/#chcem-podporit
Prof. Nancy Jecker came to Queen's University Belfast to speak at this philosophy conference (https://philevents.org/event/show/64710) on the ethics of chronic illness, and I used that opportunity to ask her about her philosophical interests and work. We talked about life and death – in particular, lives lived with chronic illneses, and the ways that a person's story doesn't end just at the moment that they die. We talked about intergenerational ethical issues (for example, about caring for the dependent elderly). She introduced me to the concept of an 'itai hoteru', which are Japanese hotels-for-the newly-deceased, and the 421-problem in China. Here are some links to help you find out more about Nancy and her work: * Nancy Jecker's webpage (https://phil.washington.edu/people/nancy-s-jecker) at the philosophy department at the University of Washington * A list of Nancy Jecker's publications (https://philpapers.org/s/Nancy%20S.%20Jecker) from PhilPapers.org - many with links to the articles. Don't forget that if you need help getting access to paywalled articles, you can try contacting authors and politely asking them whether they'd be happy to send you a .pdf. Using the hashtag #icanhazpdf on twitter can be sometimes be useful as well. * Here's Nancy's piece on itai hoteru in the journal Bioethics: 'What do we owe the newly dead? (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12578) An ethical analysis of findings from Japan's corpse hotels workers', co-authored with Eriko Miwa. It's behind a paywall at this link, but you can read a pre-print version on her ResearchGate page here (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332242536_What_do_we_owe_the_newly_dead_An_ethical_analysis_of_findings_from_Japan's_corpse_hotels_workers). * In the episode Nancy talks about using the 'capabilities approach' to justice in her work on intergenerational justice and the ethics to do with ageing. Over on the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy you can find this entry on Amartya Sen's 'capabilities approach' (https://www.iep.utm.edu/sen-cap/), which is a good overview. But more recently people are discussing Martha Nussbaum's version of this approach, so you might find it useful to skip down to §7 (https://www.iep.utm.edu/sen-cap/#H7). * We mention the 4-2-1 problem (or 4:2:1 problem, strictly, since it's about ratios), and here's an accessible article in io9 which talks more generally about China's looming population crisis. 'The Unintended Consequences Of China's One-child Policy' (https://io9.gizmodo.com/the-unintended-consequences-of-chinas-one-child-policy-5948528) by George Dvorsky. * We briefly talked about 'Parfit's non-identity problem' without really explaining it. It's a problem that Derrick Parfit proposes in the final section of his book Reasons and Persons (1984, chapter 16). The problem is summarised in this (slightly challenging, not hugely accessible) entry of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nonidentity-problem/). You can see Parfit discussing it in person over on this YouTube video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtU0pah4R8Q), again, not entirely accessible to people who are new to philosophy. Please do feel encouraged to get in touch to send any thoughts, responses, ideas, reactions, feedback or ideas about this episode or any of the others, I'd love to hear from you. To do that, you can just head over to the contact (https://www.generousquestions.co.uk/contact) page. The theme music is from li_serios05 (https://store.broken20.com/album/li-series-05-jack-on-piano) by TVO on Broken20 records (https://store.broken20.com/) under Creative Commons license BY-NC-SA (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/). A transcript of this conversation is available, you just need to click on the button that says 'transcript'. The transcripts for each episode have been beautifully prepared by Becci.
Existențialism II (2 din 4) Cam din secolul 18 încoace, rolul religiei a scăzut considerabil, lumea nu mai crede în Dumnezeu ca înainte, însă suntem noi oare conștienți de consecințele acestei schimbări în valorile noastre? Nietzsche a spus că nu, noi nici nu înțelegem pe deplin ce înseamnă Moartea lui Dumnezeu. Nietzsche fost un diagnostician al nihilismului, ci nu un propunător. El a analizat minuțios psihologia modernă umană și a încercat să pună o bază pentru noi valori pozitive. Cât de bine i-a reușit lui asta? Ar fi oare posibil să afirmi valori morale fără vreo autoritate externă? De unde au venit noțiunile de bine și rău? O fi ele ghidate de ordinea cosmică? Ori sunt niște invenții deștepte ale omului pentru a potoli anxietatea care reiese din lipsa de sens al Universului? Ce înseamnă să fii „super-om”? Care sunt cele 3 etape de dezvoltare a individului? Nietzsche a vorbit despre toate aceste lucruri în stilul său distinct—plin de ironie, aforisme, și profunzime. El e o persoană complexă, având critici, la fel ca și admiratori. Numit de alții ca cel mai profund filosof, cel mai adolescentin, cel mai controversat, cel mai poetic, cel mai nedemocratic. Una e cert: e un filosof care te scutură din apatie și are potențialul să te provoace să-ți reconsideri întregul sistem de gândire. ------------------------------------------------------------------- Secțiuni cronologice: 0:00 — Ce este Moartea lui Dumnezeu? 11:20 — Voința de Putere și Reapariția Veșnică 30:19 — Anti-Darwin 34:18 — Ubermensch sau „super-omul” 45:47 — Zarathustra (Originea Binelui și Răului) 55:16 — Ubermensch: cele 3 etape de dezvoltare a individului 1:21:15 — Recepția lui Nietzsche 1:25:50 — Critica Creștinismului 1:29:34 — Apollo vs Dionis 1:35:37 — Concluzia ------------------------------------------------------------------- Surse: Philosophy Now, Partially Examined Life, Wikipedia, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Philosophize this! podcast. Cărți menționate de-ale lui Nietzsche: Știința Voioasă, Așa Grăit-a Zaratustra, Nașterea Tragediei, Dincolo De Bine și Rău. Video-uri introductive despre Nietzsche: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wHWbZmg2hzU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxiKqA-u8y4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnhMJl11JUo ------------------------------------------------------------------- Instagram: www.instagram.com/meditatii.podcast Facebook: www.facebook.com/MeditatiiPodcast iTunes: itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/medit…ast/id1434369028 YouTube: www.youtube.com/channel/UC-ONPBDKSNytH-O5eIQKItA
Existențialism I (1 din 4) În ce constă paradoxul existenței umane? Care e diferența între adevărul obiectiv și cel subiectiv? Care-i rolul ironiei și umorului în dezvoltarea individului? Ce este “nevroza normală”? În ce constă Existențialismul Creștin și maturitatea spirituală? La toate aceste întrebări a încercat să răspundă printr-o elocvență unică “unul din cei mai buni gânditori ai secolului 19” și după părerea multora, ultimul intelectual autentic Creștin pe care omenirea l-a avut, Søren Kierkegaard. Tatăl Existențialismului—după cum îl numesc mulți academici, despre el și voi vorbi în acest episod. Analiza lui a condiției umane, a psihologiei religiei, a anxietății, a groazei de moarte, a psihozei și nevrozei, a inspirat psihoterapia secolului 20 în frunte cu Sigmund Freud și a pus temelia curentului Existențialist care va fi în plină desfășurare în secolul celor două războaie mondiale. Episodul e foarte lung, așa că am indicat o cronologie cu tematicele corespunzătoare. Prima parte (mai dificilă) e introductorie, cu context istoric, biografic, și filosofic. A doua parte (mai ușoară) e psihoanalitică, psihologică, și spirituală. Secțiuni cronologice: 0:00 — Introducere 6:27 — Contextul istoric și cultural 12:04 — Contextul biografic al lui Kierkegaard 32:16 — Ce este Existențialismul Creștin? 38:27 — Recepția lucrărilor lui Kierkegaard 52:36 — Comunicarea directă vs comunicarea indirectă 1:00:13 — Ironia și Umorul 1:13:55 — Parabole 1:19:22 — Adevărul obiectiv, adevărul subiectiv, și paradoxul existenței 1:40:40 — Transmiterea adevărului subiectiv 1:48:34 — Kierkegaard vs Hegel 1:51:52 — Universul lui Hegel ------------------------------------------------------------------- Partea 2-a: 1:58:55 — Psihoanalistul Kierkegaard 2:02:30 — Paradoxul existențial ca începutul psihologiei și religiei 2:06:29 — Caracterologia lui Kierkegaard 2:20:32 — Kierkegaard ca teoriticianul psihozei (schizofrenia și depresia) 2:37:39 — Nevroza normală 2:39:38 — Alte îndemnări ale libertății 2:50:33 — Semnificația maturității 3:11:16 — Concluzie ------------------------------------------------------------------- Muzica de la sfârșit: Balmorhea – Remembrance Surse: The Sea of Faith (Don Cupitt), Kierkegaard: an essential introduction (Michael Watts), The Denial of Death (Dr. Ernest Becker), youtube, Wikipedia, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. ------------------------------------------------------------------- Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/meditatii.podcast Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/MeditatiiPodcast iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/medita%C8%9Bii-podcast/id1434369028 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-ONPBDKSNytH-O5eIQKItA
This talk was offered on February 16th, 2019 at Princeton Theological Seminary. It was one of the talks offered at the "Faith, Science and Nature Conference" co-sponsored by the Thomistic Institute, the Scala Foundation and PTS. For more information about upcoming TI events, visit: https://thomisticinstitute.org/events-1 Speaker Bio: Fr. James Dominic Brent, O.P. was born and raised in Michigan. He pursued his undergraduate and graduate studies in Philosophy, and completed his doctorate in Philosophy at Saint Louis University on the epistemic status of Christian beliefs according to Saint Thomas Aquinas. He has articles in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy on Natural Theology, in the Oxford Handbook of Thomas Aquinas on “God’s Knowledge and Will”, and an article forthcoming on “Thomas Aquinas” in the Oxford Handbook of the Epistemology of Theology. He earned his STL from the Pontifical Faculty of the Immaculate Conception, and was ordained a priest in the same year. He taught in the School of Philosophy at The Catholic University of America from 2010- 2014, and spent the year of 2014-2015 doing full time itinerant preaching on college campuses across the United States. He currently serves as an Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the Pontifical Faculty of the Immaculate Conception.
Show NotesRUTs and BUTsJudge John Hodgman - Episode 379, Race Closed A Jonathan Coulton Primer - songs to start withShop Vac - Song and AnimationLinks Referenced Reductio Ad Absurdum - Article from the Internet Encyclopedia of PhilosophyConfronting a Sexual Rite of Passage - The AtlanticEuthanasia and Senicide - Brief introduction Scripture ReferencedEcclesiastes 1:2,3Romans 2:12-15John 8:31, 32Books ReferencedOrthodoxy by GK Chesterton - free eBookReasonable Faith by William Lane Craig - see chapter on the Absurdity of Life without GodWhat we Can't Not Know: A Guide by J. Budziszewski
Since this is the inaugural episode of Stoicism On Fire it would be natural for you the listener to wonder what this podcast is about. Obviously, it’s about Stoicism, but What is Stoicism on Fire? As the introduction states, this podcast is about Stoicism as a philosophical way of life, which includes a rational form of spirituality. That form of Stoicism has become known as traditional Stoicism in modern times. Ancient Stoicism: 300 BCE – 200 CE Many credible sources are available to explore the doctrines of Stoicism. Both of these trusted sources provide accurate explanations of Stoic doctrines and contrast that with modern or contemporary versions of Stoicism: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Stoicism Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy – Stoicism Neo-Stoicism: 16th and 17th centuries Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy – Neo-Stoicism Modern Stoicism Has its roots in Lawrence Becker’s book A New Stoicism in 1998 – an attempt to revive Stoicism in a secular form. Modern Stoicism Blog Traditional Stoicism Grew out of Erik Wiegardt’s creation of the New Stoa in 1996. Traditional Stoicism is an attempt to make sense of the ancient Stoic way of life in light of what we have learned about human nature and the cosmos over the last two thousand years while remaining true to the deeply religious nature of Stoicism. Traditional Stoicism Blog The History of Philosophy Without Any Gaps Peter Adamson, Professor of Philosophy at the LMU in Munich and at King's College London, takes listeners through the history of philosophy, "without any gaps." The series looks at the ideas, lives and historical context of the major philosophers as well as the lesser-known figures of the tradition. Lectures 60 through 68 address Stoicism; they can be found here: 60 – Walking on Eggshells: the Stoics on Logic 61 – Nobody’s Perfect: the Stoic on Knowledge 62 – We Didn’t Start the Fire: the Stoics on Nature 63 – Like a Rolling Stone: Stoic Ethics 64 – David Sedley on Stoicism 65 – Anger Management: Seneca 66 – You Can Chain My Leg: Epictetus 67 – The Philosopher King: Marcus Aurelius 68 – John Sellars on the Roman Stoics John Cooper John Cooper, of Princeton University, also provides a great one-hour long lecture on ‘The Stoic Way of Life’ as part of the 2011 John Locke lecture series produced by University of Oxford. Some key points of interest for traditional Stoics: @ 6:29 – The coherence of the Stoic philosophical system @ 6:48 – John Cooper argues: “In order to understand properly the Stoic way of life and its philosophical basis, we’re going to have to learn a great deal about their metaphysical and physical theory into which, as I have said, their ethical theory is set as the centerpiece of their whole philosophical system. @ 13:55 – The human relationship to the divine mind The full lecture can be found here: John Cooper Lecture A Box of my favorite things Kevin Patrick Jr wrote a blog post in November of 2015 that has remained quite relevant as the modern Stoic movement grows. He asks, How many of us have a box of our favorite things which we’ve haphazardly scrawled “STOICISM” across the side? Inside this box of decades’, generations’ worth of baggage, is there much room leftover for the ideas of Epictetus? Kevin's post is worth reading; he blogs as Mountain Stoic and this post can be found here: A box of my favorite things, with “STOICISM” scrawled on the side Pierre Hadot Maybe more than any other modern philosopher, Pierre Hadot reintroduced moderns to the concept of philosophy as a way of life. His books emphasize the deeply spiritual nature of Stoicism. In his book on the Meditations of Marcus Aurelius, he wrote in the conclusion: All the dogmas of Stoicism derive from this existential choice. It is impossible that the universe could produce human rationality, unless the latter were already in some way present within th...
Lyt med, når IDA Podcast sætter fokus på evolutionære algoritmer og kunstige neurale netværk. Det er kognitive teknologier, som er fuldstændigt centrale for udviklingen indenfor kunstig intelligens i dag - og ikke til at overse, når vi skal forstå det eksponentielt accelererende paradigme, vi lever i. Vi stiller også skarpt på spørgsmålet, om maskiner kan være kreative, og på den vigtige rolle, kunstig intelligens spiller i en verden, hvor datamængden og processorkraften bare vokser og vokser. Podcasten er produceret af Danmarks ingeniørforening, IDA, i samarbejde med Brain Gain Group. Episoden er den tredje i en serie om fremtidsteknologi. Medvirkende Sebastian Risi, Associate Professor ved ITU og co-director for forskningsenheden Robotics, Evolution and Art Laboratory (REAL): http://bit.ly/2kTEKOC Thomas Terney, ph.d. i kunstig intelligens, foredragsholder og iværksætter: http://bit.ly/2kOQlik Vært og tilrettelæggelse: Matias Seidler Producer: Tobias Ankjær Jeppesen Lyddesign: Alexander Clerici SHOW NOTES [00:23] IBMs Deep Blue blev den første computer som slog en stormester, Garry Kasparov, i skak. Det skete i 1997: http://bit.ly/2kIkvkB [01:32] Link til præsentation af Henry Lieberman, MIT Media Lab, som forklarer forskellen mellem symbolsk (klassisk) kunstig intelligens og subsymbolsk kunstig intelligens: http://bit.ly/2k4lN7X [02:05] For en frisk introduktion til Deep Learning, tjek WIREDs artikel, ‘Why We Need To Tame Our Algorithms Like Dogs’: http://bit.ly/2kIIqQV [02:45] Forskningsenheden på ITU, ‘Robotics, Evolution and Arts Lab’, kan du kigge nærmere på her: http://bit.ly/2ksAxAE [03:27] For en illustrativ oversigt over hvad biologisk inspirerede algoritmer har af anvendelsesmuligheder kan du tjekke tag-søgningen på Robohub.org ud: http://bit.ly/2knkZf1 [04:42] Der er flere internationale priser og konkurrencer om at løse ‘General Artificial Intelligence’-udfordringen. Se bl.a. denne på 35M$: http://bit.ly/2knrUVA [06:32] Thomas Terney taler om styrkeforholdet mellem neuroner (eller enheder i netværket). Det betegnes som ‘weights’ på engelsk. Her er der en tråd med en række forskelligartede, uddybende besvarelser: http://bit.ly/2k40vMx [08:51] Baidu er den kinesiske ækvivalent til Google og har i januar 2017 hyret nogle af Microsofts dygtigste AI-udviklere: http://bit.ly/2lrPuS1 [10:34] Se NASAs whitepaper ‘Automated Antenna Design with Evolutionary Algorithms’: http://go.nasa.gov/2llsiYO [11:32] MIT Technology Review har en interessant artikel med løsningsforslag på problematikken: ‘Algorithms That Learn with Less Data Could Expand AI’s Power’: http://bit.ly/2ksG1M2 [14:23] I 2016 trak Googles AlphaGo headlines i hele verden da den slog Lee Sedol i det - i forhold til skak usammenligneligt - komplekse spil, ‘Go’. Og AlphaGo bliver ved med at sejre, se bare her: http://bit.ly/2k4t7jK [19:57] Apple er i fuld gang med at anvende ‘unsupervised learning’-princippet i udviklingen af selvkørende biler: http://bit.ly/2lplN3e [21:23] ‘Do you think computers have minds?’ Det er ikke kun Sebastian Risi, som synes det spørgsmål er godt. Bevidsthedsfilosofien har søgt seriøse svar på det, helt siden Alan Turing formulerede sin berømte test i 1950. Det er blevet omdrejningspunktet for en filosofisk tradition, hvis mest interessante og udfoldede svar elegant beskrives i The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: http://bit.ly/2k4Bqw5
David and Tamler list three things they've changed their minds about in their careers. (This episode was recorded before Episode 75, but that one was way too long already.) What does Tamler think about X-phi these days? Has Dave lost his faith in the power of reason? What the hell is 'non-cognitivism'? Plus, Dave disagrees with John Hodgman about the metaphysical property of a hot dog. And a couple of listener shout-outs, including giving credit to a listener for giving us a topic idea we discussed without realizing she had suggested it in an email weeks ago. LinksEthical Expressivism (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy)Moral Anti-Realism (Stanford Encylopedia of Philosophy)John Hodgman on the hot dog/sandwich debate. (NY Times Mag)"Perspectives on P.F. Strawson's "Freedom and Resentment." (Really good introduction by Michael McKenna and Paul Russell.)
John Duns Scotus (d. 1308), nicknamed by tradition "the Subtle Doctor," was one of the most important medieval Christian philosophers, and was notorious for the difficulty of his thought. In this episode, we hear a specialist in medieval philosophy give a conference presentation on Scotus's views on identity (sameness) and distinction (difference). Nowadays most philosophers and logicians recognize qualitative sameness (aka similarity), which comes in degrees, and numerical sameness (aka numerical or absolute identity), which doesn't come in degrees, and which is a symmetrical, transitive, and reflexive relation. This latter, numerical identity, is a relation which a thing can only bear to itself. If these are all we have to work with, then we get apparent contradictions from trinitarian claims. For instance, consider this triad of claims: The Father is God. The Son is God. The Father is not the same as the Son. If the Father is numerically identical to God (1), and so is the Son (2), then it follows (because the relation is symmetrical and transitive), that the Father and Son are numerically identical. (So, 3 is false) The above three claims, so understood, are an inconsistent triad - if any two are true, the remaining claim is false. But arguably, the "Athanasian Creed" requires them all. That is, interpreting the above triad in terms of numerical identity, there would be this valid argument: f = g s = g g = s (from 2, symmetricality) f= s (from 1 and 3, by transitivity) But 4 is a disastrous conclusion. We know that a thing can't, at the same time and in the same way, differ from itself. But according to the New Testament, the Father and Son have differed. To put it differently, numerical sameness forces indiscernibility. If any A just is some B, then A and B can't differ in the smallest way. But the Father and Son do differ, and so they must be non-identical, which is to say, numerically distinct. What does it mean to say, then, that each of them "is God." Perhaps the statements simply mean that each is divine, that each has the divine attributes or a divine nature. Father and Son would then be not numerically identical, but rather similar - that is, like one another, in respect of being divine. But then we have two beings, each of which is divine; this would appear to be two gods. What now? One response is to make additional distinctions, to argue that our concepts of numerical and qualitative sameness are not enough. This is the course pursued by John Duns Scotus. He holds that we must consider sameness and difference both in the mind, and as it were "on the side of things" in the world, and then he goes on to make further distinctions, which he thinks are relevant not only to theology, but also to more general metaphysics. Our presenter is Dr. Joshua Blander, Assistant Professor of Philosophy at The King's College in New York City. His paper is called "Being the Same without Being the Same: Duns Scotus on Identity and Distinction." Here is his handout from the presentation, which will help you to follow along. You can also listen to this episode on stitcher or itunes (please subscribe and rate us in either or both). If you would like to upload audio feedback for possible inclusion in a future episode of this podcast, put the audio file here. Links for this episode: Dr. Joshua Blander John Duns Scotus at the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy at the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy at the Franciscan Archive previous trinities posts on identity on the indiscernibility of identicals (and another) on the minority view in present-day philosophy that there can be numerical sameness without identity pro con episodes on "Before Abraham was, I am." (John 8:58): episode 62, episode 63 The Apostolic Fathers
Michael Boylan is the John J. McDonnell jr chair in Ethics, and professor and chair of the philosophy department at Marymount University in Arlington, Virginia. In addition to being a poet and novelist, he has written more than 100 published articles and 25 books primarily in ethics, social and political philosophy, philosophy of science, and the intersection of philosophy and literature. He was a fellow at the Center for American Progress, a Washington DC policy think tank from 2007-2009 and is the general editor of a series of trade books on public philosophy with Basil Blackwell Publishers and another series of books with Prentice Hall as well as being the ethics editor for the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Boylan was actually the first guest that I had never met before, so I had no idea how the interview would go – nor what kind of person Boylan was. There was no need for worry, though, as Boylan turned out to be engaged, enthusiastic and inspiring – on top of being a very nice guy. We had a great conversation, mostly centred around the relationship between philosophy and literature, (ancient) philosophy of biology, the good life and several other topics covered in Boylan’s impressive oeuvre.
Simone de Beauvoir and Hannah Arendt: Logical ladies possessing giant intellects.Forget the teachings which say that women are solely emotional creatures, incapable of sophisticated reasoning. The fact is that females have repeatedly proved throughout history that they're just as logical as their male counterparts. Listen up.Note: Apologies on the delay, we had some sound quality/technical issues while recording.Right click here and save as to downloadFurther Reading:Simone de Beauvoir:"A Dangerous Liaison: A Biography of Simone de Beauvoir and Jean-Paul Sartre" by Carole Seymour-Jones (2008). The Overlook Press, Peter Mayer Publishers, Inc., New York. (2009)"The Second Sex." (1949) translated by H M Parshley, Penguin (1972); published by Jonathan Cape in 1953."Memoirs of a Dutiful Daughter." by Simone de Beauvoir"The Prime of Life." By Simone de Beauvoir"Philosophy as Passion" by Simone de BeauvoirStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Simone de Beauvoir Hannah Arendt:Origins of Totalitarianism by Hannah ArendtEichmann in Jerusalem by Hannah ArendtThe Human Condition by Hannah ArendtMen in Dark Times by Hannah ArendtReflections on Violence by Hannah ArendtReflections on Little Rock by Hannah ArendtHannah Arendt and Martin Heidegger by Elzbieta EttingerFembio on Hannah ArendtArendt's Judgment by Mark Greif, Dissent MagazineStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Hannah ArendtInternet Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Hannah ArendtMusic: Beethoven Kreutzer Sonata*Pictures done up by LP*Thanks to Sasha for audio help.
Massimo and Julia answer listeners' questions. In this installment the topics include: can political discourse be rational, who changed M&J's opinion on something and when have they changed someone's opinion, how do they guard against biases when they debate people, the morality of bestiality, and did Samir Okasha really solve the induction problem? Plus, M&J's favorite sources for philosophy: - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy - philpapers.org - An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding by David Hume - Language, Truth, and Logic by Alfred Jules Ayer - Mortal Questions byThomas Nagel - Practical Ethics by Peter Singer
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
