Podcasts about NDM

SummaryIn this episode of the Trainers Bullpen, Chris Butler interviews Brian Moon, a leading expert in naturalistic decision making (NDM). They discuss the importance of NDM in law enforcement, the role of experience and intuition in decision making, and the challenges experts face in articulating their decisions. Brian shares insights from his journey in the field, emphasizing the need for cognitive task analysis to bridge the gap between implicit knowledge and explicit articulation, ultimately enhancing training and decision-making processes in high-stakes environments. In this conversation, Brian discusses the importance of expertise management and cognitive task analysis in training, particularly within law enforcement. He emphasizes the need to capture the knowledge of experienced professionals before they leave organizations and how structured conversations can elicit valuable insights. The discussion also covers the integration of these insights into training scenarios and decision-making games to enhance learning and performance.TakeawaysNaturalistic decision making (NDM) is essential for effective law enforcement.Experience plays a critical role in decision making, but does not guarantee infallibility.Cognitive task analysis can help articulate implicit knowledge in decision making.Experts often struggle to articulate their decision-making processes after high-pressure situations.Recognition of familiar cues is key in naturalistic decision making.Training should focus on learning from experiences rather than the school of hard knocks.Anticipation of outcomes is crucial in decision-making processes.Expertise is developed through experience and reflection on past decisions.Designing systems that support cognitive work is vital for effective decision making. Expertise management focuses on retaining knowledge from senior professionals.Cognitive task analysis helps in understanding decision-making processes.Story elicitation techniques can capture valuable experiences from experts.Training should incorporate real-world scenarios to enhance learning.Decision games allow for experiential learning and skill development.Mentorship plays a crucial role in knowledge transfer.Imagination can create high-fidelity training experiences.Understanding context is vital in decision-making.Facilitated conversations can uncover deeper insights.Organizations must prioritize capturing expertise before it walks out the door.For more information about Brian Moon, Cognitive Task Analysis and Naturalistic Decision Making training opportunities as well as other educational resources, check out Perigean at https://perigeantechnologies.com/

In today's podcast I talk about: My race day at NDM. Feeling awesome. Flight to Hyderabad.

In today's podcast I talk about: How Universe helps you in many different ways. Trusting the guiding force. Awesome track workout. Confident about 3:15 at NDM. Packing started. Lead magnet lessons and application.

As a new microbiologist sometimes terms like beta-lactams, beta-lactamases, or penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) can be confusing. Are you familiar with the New-Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase (NDM) and its variants? How many are there? How does this enzyme affect beta-lactam drugs?How about NDM-5? In this episode Luis is joined by Dr. Raneem Pallotta, an infectious diseases pharmacist. In the episode we go over these terms. Dr. Pallotta also talks about an NDM-producing E. coli that harbors PBP3 variants. How do these variants affect beta-lactam antibiotics? Tune in for a great episode.Link to Dr. Pallotta's article: https://www.contagionlive.com/view/ndm-producing-e-coli-harboring-pbp-insert-variants-emerges-as-new-threatLink to other articles: https://bmcmicrobiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12866-017-1012-8https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5527577/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34800710/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32040179/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25634992/https://www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/amr-guidance/Questions? Feedback? Send those to letstalkmicro@outlook.comWant to support the podcast? Here's how:Venmo: https://venmo.com/u/letstalkmicroBuy me a Ko-fi: https://ko-fi.com/letstalkmicro

On the verge of a post-antibiotic reality, there is an urgent clinical need for new antibiotics. Luckily, new candidates are in the pipeline and older agents are getting a second breath of life through combination therapy.  In this episode of Communicable, host Erin McCreary invites Dr. Markus Zeitlinger of the University of Vienna (Austria) and scientific expert for the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and Dr. Michael Dudley, president and CEO of Qpex Biopharma, to discuss antimicrobials in the clinical development pipeline.  Together they unpack how the WHO curate the priority list of pathogens and how companies adapt such lists into their antimicrobial development business plans. They also discuss the unique challenges and complexities of developing antibiotics, from return on investments and defining the ‘novelty' of an agent to the conundrum of balancing post-market approval and antimicrobial stewardship. Beta-lactamase inhibitors and oral carbapenems in the pipeline targeting ‘the big three' (Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter) are the primary focus. This episode was edited by Kathryn Hostettler and peer-reviewed by Dr. Benjamin Berinson of the Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Germany. For more information on the WHO Priority Pathogens List and its 2024 update, check out our previous episode, Communicable E3 (see Literature).  Literature  Communicable E3 - The New WHO Priority Pathogens List: which bugs to target first? 17 June 2024. https://communicable.transistor.fm/episodes/communicable-e3-the-new-who-priority-pathogens-list-which-bacteria-to-target-first  WHO Bacterial Priority Pathogens List, 2024: bacterial pathogens of public health importance to guide research, development and strategies to prevent and control antimicrobial resistance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 17 May 2024. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240093461  C. Le Terrier et al, NDM-9 resistance to taniborbactam. Lancet Infect Dis 23, 401-402 (2023). doi 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00069-5      P. B. Eckburg et al, Oral Tebipenem Pivoxil Hydrobromide in Complicated Urinary Tract Infection. N Engl J Med 386, 1327-1338 (2022). doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2105462  A Study of Oral Tebipenem Pivoxil Hydrobromide (TBP-PI-HBr) Compared to Intravenous Imipenem-cilastatin in Participants With Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) or Acute Pyelonephritis (AP) (PIVOT-PO). https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06059846 Meiji Seika Pharma Initiated the Global Phase III Clinical Trials of OP0595, a Novel beta-Lactamase Inhibitor for Combatting Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR). Tokyo: Meiji Seika Pharma Ltd; 26 April 2023. https://www.meiji.com/global/news/2023/pdf/230426_01.pdf

Das heutige Gespräch wurde mit Ella Schindler geführt. Sie ist Vorsitzende der Neuen deutschen Medienmacher (kurz: NdM). Zudem ist sie hauptberuflich Redakteurin und verantwortlich für die Volontärs-Ausbildung beim Verlag der Nürnberger Presse. Ella hat vor allem von ihrem Ehrenamt und ihren Tätigkeiten bei den NdM berichtet und erzählt, was sich in der Welt des Journalismus ändern muss, damit diese vielfältiger wird und warum diese Veränderung so wichtig ist. Du hast Fragen, Lob oder Kritik? Dann schreib uns doch gerne eine Mail an podcast@masifunde.de oder folge uns auf Instagram masifunde_de.

Are you tired of trying to make traditional parenting approaches work for you? Ready to make a profound shift that fosters genuine connections and sustainable growth for your child, teen, or young adult? In this episode, we explore the transformative power of NDM™ NeuroDevelopmental Mentoring and how adopting a mentor mindset can revolutionize your parenting journey. Discover the key to alleviating pressure, fostering autonomy, and nurturing meaningful connections that lead to long-term positive outcomes. What You’ll Learn: Why it’s critical to shift to a mentoring mindset. How adopting a mentoring mindset can alleviate pressure, judgments, and prioritize genuine connection with your neurodivergent child, teen, or young adult. The proactive and influential dynamic of the mentor-mentee relationship, emphasizing autonomy and sustainable development. Practical strategies for investing in the mentoring process, including building strong connections and providing unconditional positive regard. The transformative journey from power-driven relationships to collaborative partnerships, and the significance of fostering stability and trust in our relationship dynamics. Start your journey towards NDM NeuroDevelopmental Mentoring today! Join our free upcoming 4-week mini-course ‘PARENTING to MENTOR’ for resources, support, and guidance. Visit JasonDebbie.com/parentingcourse to sign up. Connect with us on social media instagram.com/debbiegrygla to stay updated on the latest insights and discussions on NDM NeuroDevelopmental Mentoring. If you found this episode valuable, share it with fellow parents and mentors who are seeking to better support neurodivergent individuals through meaningful connections. Together, let's create a nurturing environment where every individual can thrive.

Friends, Hello! We've got something exciting to share with you in this episode! You know, parenting can be a rollercoaster, especially when it comes to raising neurodivergent young people. But, guess what? It doesn't have to be a struggle without hope. In today's episode, we're peeling back the curtain on our personal transformation moments and the lessons that have led us to our big announcement this month. Let's dive straight in! We're thrilled to introduce the Parenting to Mentor mini-course – a game-changer designed for parents, grandparents, teachers, coaches, and all you amazing helping professionals out there. This FREE 4-week mentoring course is kicking off LIVE online on March 27th, 2024, and it's tailor-made to transform your relationships with neurodivergent loved ones. FREE for a limited time!

Drs. Robert Bonomo, Ryan Shields (@ryankshields), and Erin McCreary (@ErinMcCreary) deep dive into the world of metallo-beta-lactamases. This riveting discussion is full of the nerdiest pub trivia nuggets and the “must know” details of novel beta lactams and beta-lactamase inhibitors, and their uses for MBLs. Funding for this podcast was provided by Shionogi Inc. Listen to Breakpoints on iTunes, Overcast, Spotify, Listen Notes, Player FM, Pocket Casts, TuneIn, Blubrry, RadioPublic, or by using our RSS feed: https://sidp.pinecast.co/ References: Urgent need for metallo B lactamase: DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30868-9 NDM-9 Resistance to Taniborbactam: DOI 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00069-5 AAC Taniborbactam inhibition of NDM-1: DOI 10.1128/aac.01332-23 OFID NDM E. coli with cefiderocol and aztreonam/avibactam resistance: DOI 10.1093/ofid/ofad276 Check out our podcast host, Pinecast. Start your own podcast for free with no credit card required. If you decide to upgrade, use coupon code r-7e7a98 for 40% off for 4 months, and support Breakpoints.

In this podcast, Julie Ann Justo, PharmD, MS, FIDSA, BCPS, discusses treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infections, including:Burden of CRE infections in the United StatesMechanisms of resistanceChanging epidemiologyUse of rapid diagnostic testsIDSA guidance recommendations, including supporting dataApproach to designing treatment regimens, including weighing patient- and infection-related factorsFaculty:Julie Ann Justo, PharmD, MS, FIDSA, BCPSClinical Pharmacist Lead – Infectious DiseasesInpatient PharmacyDartmouth Hitchcock Medical CenterLebanon, New HampshireLink to full program: https://bit.ly/41a8Mj0Link to accompanying ClinicalThought commentary:https://bit.ly/4865T57Link to downloadable infographic: https://bit.ly/3t7NpT2

In this podcast, Julie Ann Justo, PharmD, MS, FIDSA, BCPS, discusses treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infections, including:Burden of CRE infections in the United StatesMechanisms of resistanceChanging epidemiologyUse of rapid diagnostic testsIDSA guidance recommendations, including supporting dataApproach to designing treatment regimens, including weighing patient- and infection-related factorsFaculty:Julie Ann Justo, PharmD, MS, FIDSA, BCPSClinical Pharmacist Lead – Infectious DiseasesInpatient PharmacyDartmouth Hitchcock Medical CenterLebanon, New HampshireLink to full program: https://bit.ly/41a8Mj0Link to accompanying ClinicalThought commentary:https://bit.ly/4865T57Link to downloadable infographic: https://bit.ly/3t7NpT2

In this episode of Wellness Curated, host Anshu Bahanda explores the world of decision-making with the distinguished guest, Gary Klein, pioneer of Naturalistic Decision Making (NDM) and author of "Sources of Power" and "The Power of Intuition," among other influential titles. Gary's groundbreaking work in collaboration with the U.S. Army and Marines has reshaped our understanding of decision-making in high-pressure situations.In this discussion, Gary shares insights from his extensive research and real-world applications of NDM. He highlights various professions, examining how instincts and intuition play a crucial role in decision-making processes.Tune in to unravel the secrets of making better choices, and explore the intriguing concept of 'shadowboxing,' a technique used by the US military and other domains that Gary Klein has influenced. Shadowboxing allows individuals to mentally prepare for various scenarios, anticipate challenges, and refine their decision-making skills.Listeners will gain a deeper understanding of decision-making, including distinguishing intuition from instinct, with insights from Gary's expertise in managing biases. This balanced episode considers rational thought and intuitive decisions, offering practical insights from Gary Klein's studies and examples to improve decision-making.If you liked our episode, you can subscribe to our podcast on any of the major podcasting platforms like Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and Google Podcasts. Please leave us a review on Apple iTunes and help others discover this podcast. You can visit wellnesscurated.life and follow us on Twitter @WellnessCurated, On Instagram @wellnesscuratedbyanshubahanda,On Facebook @Wellness Curated by Anshu Bahanda,On LinkedIn @Wellness Curated by Anshu Bahanda, And on YouTube @wellnesscuratedbyanshubahanda. for more wellness tips to help you live your best life.

In this episode,Emily Heil, PharmD, MS, BCIDP, AAHIVP; Laila Woc-Colburn, MD; and Trevor Van Schooneveld, MD, FSHEA, FACP, discuss their approach to managing infections caused by NDM-producing Enterobacterales, including: Ambler classification of β-lactamasesMechanisms of resistance2023 IDSA guidance recommendationsThe latest clinical data by antimicrobial regimen:Ceftazidime/avibactam and aztreonamCefiderocolInvestigational aztreonam/avibactamClinical case of NDM-producing E. coli with pan-β-lactam resistanceProgram Director:Trevor Van Schooneveld, MD, FSHEA, FACP Professor, Division of Infectious DiseasesProgram Director, Infectious Diseases FellowshipMedical Director, Antimicrobial Stewardship ProgramUniversity of Nebraska Medical CenterOmaha, NebraskaFaculty:Emily Heil, PharmD, MS, BCIDP, AAHIVPAssociate ProfessorDepartment of PharmacyUniversity of Maryland School of PharmacyID Clinical Pharmacy SpecialistUniversity of Maryland Medical CenterBaltimore, MarylandLaila Woc-Colburn, MDAssociate ProfessorDivision of Infectious DiseasesEmory University School of Medicine Atlanta, GeorgiaContent based on a CME program supported by an educational grant from Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.Follow along with a downloadable slideset at: https://bit.ly/476v2wILink to full program:https://bit.ly/40HyvPy

In this episode, Emily Heil, PharmD, MS, BCIDP, AAHIVP; Laila Woc-Colburn, MD; and Trevor Van Schooneveld, MD, FSHEA, FACP, discuss their approach to managing infections involving Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance, including: Mechanisms of β-lactam resistanceEffect of resistance mechanism on susceptibility to antipseudomonal agent2023 IDSA guidance recommendations Activity against newer antipseudomonal β-lactams in the United StatesThe latest clinical data by antimicrobial regimen:              - Ceftolozane/tazobactam              - Ceftazidime/avibactam              - Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam              - CefiderocolApplying antimicrobial stewardship principlesProgram Director:Trevor Van Schooneveld, MD, FSHEA, FACP  Professor, Division of Infectious DiseasesProgram Director, Infectious Diseases FellowshipMedical Director, Antimicrobial Stewardship ProgramUniversity of Nebraska Medical CenterOmaha, NebraskaFaculty:Emily Heil, PharmD, MS, BCIDP, AAHIVPAssociate ProfessorDepartment of PharmacyUniversity of Maryland  School of PharmacyID Clinical Pharmacy SpecialistUniversity of Maryland Medical Center|Baltimore, MarylandLaila Woc-Colburn, MDAssociate ProfessorDivision of Infectious DiseasesEmory University School of Medicine  Atlanta, GeorgiaContent based on a CME program supported by an educational grant from Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.Follow along with a downloadable slideset at: https://clinicaloptions.com/CE-CME/infectious-disease/cmv-prevention-in-sot-recipients/26139Link to full program: https://bit.ly/40HyvPy 

Episode Notes Drs. Paul Ambrose and Michael Dudley (@MikeMndudley) join Dr. Julie Ann Justo (@julie_justo) for a review of beta-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) pharmacokinetics & pharmacodynamics. They discuss factors affecting BLI's restorative activity, the convoluted math behind establishing exposure-response relationships for BLIs, some geeky medicinal chemistry, and a little-known easter egg in the published literature. Learn more about the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists: https://sidp.org/About Twitter: @SIDPharm (https://twitter.com/SIDPharm) Instagram: @SIDPharm (https://www.instagram.com/sidpharm/) Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sidprx LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/sidp/ SIDP welcomes pharmacists and non-pharmacist members with an interest in infectious diseases, learn how to join here: https://sidp.org/Become-a-Member Listen to Breakpoints on iTunes, Overcast, Spotify, Listen Notes, Player FM, Pocket Casts, Stitcher, Google Play, TuneIn, Blubrry, RadioPublic, or by using our RSS feed: https://sidp.pinecast.co/ References SIDP Insight on Tazobactam for ESBLs: Monogue M, et al. Pharmacotherapy. 2021 Oct;41(10):864-880. doi: 10.1002/phar.2623. PMID 34689349. Tazobactam with cefepime: VanScoy BD, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Nov 22;61(12):e01052-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01052-17. PMID: 28947475. Another great review of BLIs: Ambrose PG, et al. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2017 Oct;36:86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2017.09.001. PMID: 29096172. Meropenem-vaborbactam target attainment: Bhavnani SM, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Dec 20;66(12):e0213021. doi: 10.1128/aac.02130-21. PMID: 36374023. Meropenem-vaborbactam pulmonary exposures: Wenzler E, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Dec;59(12):7232-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01713-15. PMID: 26349830. Stand-alone BLI discussion based on CB-618: Ambrose PG, et al.. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Nov 22;61(12):e00630-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00630-17. PMID: 28947474. NDM-9 resistance to taniborbactam: Le Terrier C, et al. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Apr;23(4):401-402. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00069-5. PMID: 36796395. New boronate drugs and NDM: Lomovskaya O, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2023 Aug 31:e0057923. doi: 10.1128/aac.00579-23. PMID: 37650617. Helpful BLI PK-PD review: Crass R, Pai MP. Pharmacotherapy. 2019 Feb;39(2):182–195. doi: 10.1002/phar.2210. PMID 30589457. Discovery of QPX7728 (Xeruborbactam): Hecker SJ, et al. J Med Chem. 2020 Jul 23;63(14):7491-7507. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01976. PMID 32150407. Xeruborbactam binding to PBPs directly: Lomovskaya O, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Feb 15;66(2):e0216821. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02168-21. PMID: 34902261. Xeruborbactam predicted best by fAUC/MIC with oral ceftibuten: Tarazi Z, et al. Open Forum Infect Dis. Volume 9, Issue Supplement_2, December 2022, ofac492.666, https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.666 (Poster 614) Xeruborbactam predicted best by fAUC/MIC with meropenem: Tarazi Z, et al. Open Forum Infect Dis. Volume 9, Issue Supplement_2, December 2022, ofac492.667, https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.667 (Poster 615) First 2013 AAC paper on tazobactam with ceftolozane from Ambrose group: VanScoy B, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Jun;57(6):2809-14. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02513-12. PMID: 23629705. Second 2013 AAC paper on tazobactam with ceftolozane from Ambrose group: Vanscoy B, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Dec;57(12):5924-30. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00656-13. PMID: 24041895. Electric Telescope, 52 Class 530 Series 1080p LCD/HD; Samsung Group, Seoul, South Korea, available at: https://www.samsung.com/ca/support/model/LN52C530F1FXZC/ Tazobactam with Piperacillin from Ambrose group: Nicasio AM, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Mar 25;60(4):2075-80. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02747-15. PMID: 26787689. Check out our podcast host, Pinecast. Start your own podcast for free with no credit card required. If you decide to upgrade, use coupon code r-7e7a98 for 40% off for 4 months, and support Breakpoints.

Dr. Joan H. Johnston (Retired) has over 30 years of experience as a Senior Research Scientist with the U.S. Navy and U.S. Army. She has written and collaborated on over 100 publications and has given innumerable presentations and tutorials about her research which has had a significant impact on advancing the science of Learning, Team Training, Decision Making under Stress, Performance Measurement, and Organizational Development. She obtained her M.A. and Ph.D. in Industrial & Organizational Psychology from the University of South Florida. Dr. Johnston's career with the Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division (NAWCTSD) was marked by extensive collaborations across the Department of Defense, academia, and private industry. She was a principal Investigator and project manager for the Office of Naval Research (ONR) sponsored Tactical Decision Making Under Stress (TADMUS) program; ONR recognized her outstanding performance with the Dr. Arthur E. Bisson Prize for Naval Technology Achievement. In 2001 the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology also recognized this achievement with the M. Scott Myers Award for Applied Research in the Workplace. In recognition of her sustained performance excellence NAVAIR made Dr. Johnston a Research and Engineering Associate Fellow in 2008. After 22 years Dr. Johnston moved on to a promotionas the U.S. Army Research Institute's Unit Chief in Orlando, and then eventually joined the U.S. Army Research Laboratory as a Senior Scientist at the Simulation Training and TechnologyCenter (STTC). She continued to work across agencies and services in pursuit of advancing the science of team training. She and her colleagues were recognized in 2016 for their outstanding accomplishments with the Department of the Army Achievement Medal for Civilian Service and the NTSA Modeling and Simulation Team Award. Dr. Johnston's leadership on this program Learn more about Joan: Connect on LinkedIn See more of her work Learn more about NDM at NaturalisticDecisionMaking.org. Where to find the hosts: Brian Moon Brian's website Brian's LinkedIn Brian's Twitter Laura Militello Laura's website Laura's LinkedIn Laura's Twitter

After record highs during the pandemic, the short-term rental industry is adjusting to a market that's reportedly softening, with travelers being more selective about where they stay, and why. In this episode, OBJ Editor in Chief Sean McCrory connects with Nick Falcone, Managing Principal of NDM Hospitality and Rentyl Resorts, who's betting on a new, upscale model for short-term rentals.

Christian is interested in human worlds, human perception and the skill of observation, which is reflected in the diversity of his professional experience. He has been a full time Professor of Applied Humanities at The New School for Social Research; a Senior Fellow at The Health and Global Policy Institute (HGPI) in Tokyo, Japan and a Distinguished Visitor at The Buffett Center for International Affairs at Northwestern University in Chicago.He co-founded ReD Associates, a pioneering consultancy with offices in Copenhagen, Paris, London and New York City, and a health data start-up Lateral Data based in Dallas TX. His board appointments include Chairman of the top-tier architectural firm Bjarke Ingels Group: BIG; Independent director of the luxury furniture manufacturer Fritz Hansen; Independent director and Nomination/Governance Committee chairman at the battery metals company The Metals Company; Member of the high-end home textiles manufacturer Kvadrat; and Board member at Red Associates Holding. His work has been featured in publications such as The Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, Financial Times, The Washington Post, Der Spiegel, and Bloomberg Business week. And he is the author of three books: The Moment of Clarity - Using the Human Sciences to Solve Your Toughest Business Problems Sensemaking - The Power of The Humanities in the Age of the Algorithm And just released:Look - How to pay attention in a world of distraction. Learn more about Christian: Connect on LinkedIn See more of his work Learn more about NDM at NaturalisticDecisionMaking.org. Where to find the hosts: Brian Moon Brian's website Brian's LinkedIn Brian's Twitter Laura Militello Laura's website Laura's LinkedIn Laura's Twitter

Kevin Oden is an LM Fellow at Lockheed where has work for 14 years. Currently, he leads research initiatives focused on Human-Autonomy Collaboration. In this role, he supports cross corporation efforts and has responsibilities for engagements with universities, DOD service labs, and small business partners. He was earned his Ph.D. in Applied Experimental and Human Factors Psychology at the University of Central Florida. He was a Graduate Research Fellow at the Consortium of Universities in Washington D.C. Learn more about Kevin: Connect on LinkedIn See more of his work Learn more about NDM at NaturalisticDecisionMaking.org. Where to find the hosts: Brian Moon Brian's website Brian's LinkedIn Brian's Twitter Laura Militello Laura's website Laura's LinkedIn Laura's Twitter

Today we welcome David Feldon, Professor of Instructional Technology & Learning Sciences, College of Education and Human Services, Utah State University. Dr. Feldon's research examines two lines of inquiry that are distinct but mutually supportive. The first characterizes the cognitive components of expertise as they contribute to effective and innovative problem solving, as well as how they affect the quality of instruction that experts can provide. The second examines the development of research skills within STEM disciplines as a function of instruction and other educational support mechanisms. He also conducts some research into technology-facilitated instructional approaches and research methods for examining them. David's work currently focuses on: Cognitive load and motivation with brain imaging and eye tracking Longitudinal study of PhD students in the biological sciences Simulation based assessments of open-ended problem solving. Learn more about David: Connect on LinkedIn See more of his work Learn more about NDM at NaturalisticDecisionMaking.org. Where to find the hosts: Brian Moon Brian's website Brian's LinkedIn Brian's Twitter Laura Militello Laura's website Laura's LinkedIn Laura's Twitter

Today we welcome Thomas Lahnthaler. Thomas is an experienced crisis manager, facilitator, and author. For the past two decades, he has worked in over 30 countries, started two companies, and published his first book last summer, called Navigating Beyond Crisis. Thomas currently manages the leadership development of a global holding company. He advises companies globally on leadership and learning and has turned his passion for human dynamics into his profession, specializing in designing and facilitating experiential learning arenas. He constantly strives to get new perspectives, and his approach is heavily influenced by his work and time spent with indigenous peoples. He currently resides in Norway, where he gets inspired by his two most excellent teachers, as he calls them, his children. Learn more about Thomas: Connect on LinkedIn Learn about Navigating Beyond Crisis Learn more about NDM at NaturalisticDecisionMaking.org. Where to find the hosts: Brian Moon Brian's website Brian's LinkedIn Brian's Twitter Laura Militello Laura's website Laura's LinkedIn Laura's Twitter

Nancy Cooke is a professor in Human Systems Engineering at the Polytechnic School, one of the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. She also directs Global Security Initiative's Center for Human, AI, and Robot Teaming. Professor Cooke's research interests include the study of individual and team cognition. Applied research topics include: · the development of cognitive and knowledge engineering methodologies, · sensor operator threat detection, · cyber and intelligence analysis, · remotely-piloted aircraft systems, · human-robot teaming, · healthcare systems, and · emergency response systems. She specializes in the development, application, and evaluation of methodologies to elicit and assess individual and team cognition. Dr. Cooke is a Past President of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society and the past chair of the Board on Human Systems Integration at the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine. She also recently chaired a study panel for the National Academies on the Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science. Dr. Cooke was a member of the US Air Force Scientific Advisory board from 2008-2012, and in 2014, she received the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society's Arnold M. Small President's Distinguished Service Award. Learn more about her work at the links below: ASU Human Systems Engineering Program ASU Global Security Initiative CHART Program CHART-ing the Future of Space Exploration Learn more about NDM at NaturalisticDecisionMaking.org. Where to find the hosts: Brian Moon Brian's website Brian's LinkedIn Brian's Twitter Laura Militello Laura's website Laura's LinkedIn Laura's Twitter

Staying curious may be one of the essential ingredients to empathy and our ability to connect with the young people we parent and mentor. One of the goals of NDM or Neuro-developmental Mentoring,™️ the approach we developed and teach, is to shift our focus from trying to fix a problem to a focus on mentoring development. To be an effective mentor you you can't fake curiosity. There are nuances to utilizing curiosity effectively. Get full show notes: JasonDebbie.com/77

Staying curious may be one of the essential ingredients to empathy and our ability to connect with the young people we parent and mentor. One of the goals of NDM or Neuro-developmental Mentoring,™️ the approach we developed and teach, is to shift our focus from trying to fix a problem to a focus on mentoring development. To be an effective mentor you you can't fake curiosity. There are nuances to utilizing curiosity effectively. Get full show notes: JasonDebbie.com/77

Original Air Date: 1/29/2021 Show Description: Simon Henderson is an independent deception consultant working in the UK and the US. His career has involved researching, teaching, and consulting on deception, counter-deception, information operations and cyber operations within a variety of government, military, and law enforcement organizations. He is passionate about novel and pro-social applications of these fields. Learn more about Simon's work: Deception by Design Evaluation of the counter fake-news game, Harmony Square Immersive theatre company, Punchdrunk Learn more about the NDM Association and register for our 2022 conference! NaturalisticDecisionMaking.org Where to find the hosts: Brian Moon Brian's website Brian's LinkedIn Brian's Twitter Laura Militello Laura's website Laura's LinkedIn Laura's Twitter Timestamps: Simon's early path to a career in deception [1:15] First exposure to NDM [5:54] Proposing to apply magic and deception skills to military [20:59] The technique of misdirection in deception [24:42] Nuances of using deception on experts [32:31] One question that could determine if someone is a magician [41:51] Differences between observing and performing magic [47:58] Outlook for the next 15 years and details about Simon's blog and book [51:48] Two truths and a lie [1:02:55]

This episode contains a keynote delivered by Gary Klein at the NDM Association's 2022 virtual Open House. Dr. Klein pioneered the Naturalistic Decision Making movement in 1989. He is well-known for his work in advancing a number of decision-making tools, methods, and cognitive models. These include the Recognition-Primed Decision (RPD) model, the Data/Frame model of sensemaking, the PreMortem method of risk assessment, techniques for Cognitive Task Analysis, and the ShadowBox training approach. Klein is also the best-selling author of Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions, and four other books plus three co-edited volumes. His newest book, Snapshots of the Mind, is scheduled for publication in October. Learn more and register for the 2022 NDM conference at naturalisticdecisionmaking.org.

Dies sind die Moin Elmshorn Kurznachrichten der Kalenderwoche 14:Viele Unfälle auf der A23In der letzten Woche ist es leider zu einer ganzen Reihe von Unfällen auf der Autobahn im Bereich Elmshorn gekommen. Teilweise waren Hagelschauer der Grund. So am Freitag (8.4.22) gegen 22:30 Uhr in Richtung Hamburg. Hier war eine vierköpfige Familie betroffen. Kurz nachdem sich die Familie hinter der Leitplanke in Sicherheit gebracht hat, fuhr ein weiteres Fahrzeug in die Unfallstelle. Hierbei verletzten sich Fahrer und Beifahrerin leicht. Einen Tag später, am Samstag (9.4.22), ging um kurz vor 8 Uhr der erste Notruf ein. Diesmal in Richtung Norden. Sechs Personen mussten hier mit leichten Verletzungen ins Krankenhaus. Auch hier verlor ein Fahrer im Hagelschauer die Kontrolle und fuhr auf ein anderes Fahrzeug mit vier Personen auf.Kurz vor 16 Uhr kam es dann noch zu einem Totalschaden an einer Corvette. Das Fahrzeug prallte bei Tornesch frontal gegen die Mittelleitplanke. Hier war allerdings nicht das Wetter schuld. Zur Unfallursache und wie schwer die Verletzungen der Frau und des Mannes sind, ist noch nichts bekannt.https://www.shz.de/lokales/barmstedter-zeitung/Unfaelle-in-Hagelschauer-Zwei-Verletzte-auf-A23-bei-Elmshorn-id37058962.htmlhttps://www.shz.de/lokales/barmstedter-zeitung/Unfall-nach-Hagelschauer-bei-Elmshorn-acht-Verletzte-auf-A23-id37061662.htmlhttps://www.shz.de/lokales/uetersener-nachrichten/A23-Unfall-bei-Tornesch-Corvette-Fahrer-kracht-in-Leitplanke-id37063207.html+++KriminalstatistikLeider steigen sie wieder. Die Straftaten in der größten Stadt des Kreises Pinneberg, sind im letzten Jahr um rund 1200 Straftaten im Vergleich zum Jahr 2020 gestiegen. In Elmshorn hat die Polizei 2021 9620 Straftaten aufgenommen.https://www.schleswig-holstein.de/DE/Landesregierung/POLIZEI/DasSindWir/PDen/Segeberg/_downloads/pks/pks_pdbadsegeberg_2021.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&+++Gleis 1 gesperrtBereits in den letzten Wochen wurden Routinearbeiten an den Bahnbrücken über die Krückau im Bereich des Bahnhofes gemacht. Sichtbar an einem Gerüstaufbau im Fluss. Der Zustand der Brücke von Gleis 1 wurde dabei so schlecht beurteilt, dass das Gleis sofort gesperrt werden musste. Ein Bahnsprecher sagte der SHZ, dass die Brücke nicht mehr gleichmäßig auf den vier Widerlagern aufliegt. Jetzt soll die Brücke repariert werden, Fachleute planen derzeit, wie dieses schnellstmöglich gelingen kann. Bis mindestens mitte Mai wird sie jedoch gesperrt bleiben. Die Nordbahn-Verstärkerzüge zwischen Altona und Elmshorn um kurz vor und nach der vollen Stunde entfallen und ein langsameres Durchfahren des Bahnhofes von ICE und Güterzügen sind die Folge.https://www.shz.de/lokales/elmshorner-nachrichten/Bahnhof-Elmshorn-Bruecke-ueber-Krueckau-defekt-ein-Gleis-gesperrt-id37047387.html(eigene Recherche)+++Bauarbeiten an der Hamburger StraßeZwei Wochen war Baustopp auf der Baustelle zwischen Hainholzer- und Adenauerdamm. Aufgrund der vielen Regenfälle ist aufgefallen, dass sich die Straße in einer Senke befindet. Die Pläne wurden daraufhin überarbeitet und nun wird die Straße in diesem Bereich leicht angehoben. So soll vermieden werden, dass die Straße in Zukunft bei größeren Regenfällen Schaden nimmt.https://www.shz.de/lokales/elmshorner-nachrichten/Bauarbeiten-Hamburger-Strasse-in-Elmshorn-muss-hoeher-gelegt-werden-id37044637.html+++Gold und drei WeltrekordeTanja Scholz hat es geschafft, bei den Internationalen Deutschen Meisterschaften im Para-Schwimmen in Berlin hat sich ein Traum erfüllt. „Es ist einfach nur Wahnsinn. Ich war extrem nervös vor dem ersten Start und habe alles rausgeholt“ sagte sie den EN. Auf 200 Meter Freistil schlug sie ihren eigenen Weltrekord aus dem Vorlauf im Finale um weitere 3 Sekunden und gewann Gold. Bei den anderen Wettkämpfen war es genauso. Auch 50, 100 und 400 Meter gewann sie. Insgesamt also viermal Gold in Berlin.Als nächstes steht die Weltmeisterschaft im Juni auf Madeira an.https://www.shz.de/lokales/elmshorner-nachrichten/Tanja-Scholz-mit-Weltrekorden-und-Gold-im-Para-Schwimmen-id37026882.html+++Auch die Schwimmerinnen und Schwimmer des EMTV waren in Bestform. In Hannover holten sie insgesamt 24 mal Gold, 14 mal Silber und 11 mal Bronze.https://www.holsteiner-allgemeine.de/versteckte-seiten/detailansicht-news/12-w98-hannover-diapolo-meet.html+++Volleyballgemeinschaft ist Norddeutscher MeisterMit einem 25:23 gegen den Gastgeber aus Rostock gewannen die Ü64-Senioren der VG und sind jetzt Norddeutsche Meister.https://www.shz.de/lokales/elmshorner-nachrichten/Ue64-Senioren-der-VG-Elmshorn-sichern-sich-den-Titel-bei-der-NDM-id37027252.html+++Wahlstand beschädigtEin Unbekannter hat am Samstag (2.4.22) zweimal einen Wahlkampfstand der AfD vor der Nikolaikirche umgeworfen. Zunächst um 11:30 Uhr, dann rund 45 Minuten später erneut. Beim zweiten Vorfall versuchte Bernhard Noack den Angreifer abzuwehren und fiel daraufhin zu Boden. Er musste ins Krankenhaus gebracht werden. Gebrochen ist aber nichts.https://www.shz.de/lokales/elmshorner-nachrichten/Polizei-ermittelt-Mann-ueberfaellt-AfD-Wahlstand-in-Elmshorn-id37014577.html+++Am Mittwochvormittag (13.4.22) sind Aminata Touré von den Grünen und Thomas Losse-Müller von der SPD in der Innenstadt, um mit den Bürger*innen ins Gespräch zu kommen.+++Krieg und die FolgenZum Februar 2021 gab sie das Amt als Vorsitzende der Elmshorner Tafel weiter. Jetzt meldete sich Dörte Lippold wieder zu Wort und zeigt ein Problem auf, das derzeit viele Tafeln haben. Aufgrund des Ukraine-Krieges werden die Lebensmittel knapp. Es wird weniger von den Supermärkten gespendet und die Ausgaben für Energie und Kraftstoff steigen.2021 sagte sie den Elmshorner Nachrichten, dass die Flüchtlingskrise 2015 und der Beginn der Corona-Pandemie 2020 ihre größten Herausforderungen waren. 2022 wird wohl erneut zu einer Belastungsprobe.https://www.shz.de/lokales/elmshorner-nachrichten/Hohe-Preise-und-weniger-Spenden-Elmshorner-Tafel-in-Not-id36987757.html+++WeinfestPandemiebedingt ist es die letzten Jahre ausgefallen. In diesem Jahr wird es aber wieder eine Neuauflage des Wein- und Schlemmerfest auf dem Alten Markt geben und zwar vom 19. bis 22. Mai. Ein Weinfest ohne Königin oder König, für den VBV keine Option. Deshalb kann sich jede und jeder ab 18 Jahren ab sofort bewerben.https://www.yumpu.com/de/document/read/66656589/holsteiner-allgemeine-14-2022/1+++Soweit die Kurznachrichten. Wir gehen in eine kleine Osterpause und melden uns in zwei Wochen wieder.Gelesen und geschrieben von Peter Horst.Wir wünschen euch einen guten Start in die neue Woche und frohe Ostern!

Marek Prášil vystudoval hned dva vysokoškolské obory - dirigování a klarinet. Je v angažmá NDM a má za sebou řadu velmi významných hostujících působení na prestižních jevištích. Vedle toho je ale taky místopředsedou oblastní výkonné rady Českého červeného kříže.

Welcome to Episode 4 of Season 2, 'Year of the Tiger'. In this episode, I ask 'How are your values?'. If aspiring to Sergeant, Inspector or Chief Inspector, you need to become familiar with values. They are indeed central to the Competency and VALUES Framework (CVF) used for promotion processes across the UK. I cover various topics to get you thinking on values, familiarising you with the concepts so that you can conduct meaningful preparation ahead of your promotion opportunity. Why are values important? What are values? What is integrity? How do values relate to ethics and the NDM? All discussed here! About me: As a coach/mentor supporting UK (and beyond!) police promotion candidates, I aim to provide valuable and meaningful guidance, tips and information to help you succeed in promotion, especially those aspiring to Sergeant, Inspector and Chief Inspector. I hope you find this podcast helpful leadership CPD, please share it to help develop others. As always, I welcome your thoughts/feedback. See my blogs and YouTube videos for more free support on your promotion journey to success. Of course if you want complete and in-depth information on promotion aligned to the CVF and values, my unique Digital Toolkits and 4 hr Video Masterclass will support you throughout, whatever the competitive promotion process in your force. Even better, use discount code RSGUIDES20 for 20% off anything at checkout! See more free Rank Success content to read, watch and listen in the following places... Main Blog: https://ranksuccess.wordpress.com Premium eGuides & Video Masterclass content: https://www.ranksuccess.co.uk Police Hour Blogs: https://policehour.co.uk/category/police-promotion YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCRM4aUxiSEPzmslrur6KToQ --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/ranksuccess/message

In today's podcast I talk about: Created lofty questions for my kid. Lockdown impact on kids. Worked on my book. Added Shatakarma section to explain Neti process. Humans as weapons of mass destruction. Planning to go for NDM.

In der letzten Folge vor der Winterpause geht es um Nachwuchsförderung und Diversität in der deutschen Medienlandschaft. Dazu spreche ich mit keiner geringeren als Ferda Ataman. Ferda ist Journalistin, Kolumnistin und Mitgründerin des Vereins Neue Deutsche Medienmacher*innen. Warum sie das Projekt damals ins Leben gerufen hat, was ihre Aufgaben sind und, was sie davor beruflich mit Armin Laschet (!) zu tun hatte, klären wir heute. Mehr zu Ferda findet ihr auf Twitter unter @FerdaAtaman. Wenn ihr euch über die Neuen Deutschen Medienmacher*innen informieren wollt, schaut mal auf neuemedienmacher.de vorbei. Um zu erfahren, wann die nächste Staffel Medienzirkus losgeht, abonniert den Podcast, dann verpasst ihr nichts. Ansonsten folgt doch gerne auf Instagram unter @medienzirkus_podcast, da erfahrt ihr auch alles Wichtige. Habt eine schönes Weihnachtszeit! Greta :)

This is part 2 of our minisodes about Neighbourhood Decision Making  In this episode, we go over how to vote THIS SATURDAY, November 6th, and we go through our top 2 ideas from each of the geographical areas!  Be sure to check out all the ideas that you are able to vote for on Vote day by going to www.getinvolved.london.ca/NDM and check out the area that you live in! Don't worry, you are able to vote for 3 ideas, so you don't have to try and choose only one great idea.  Neighbourhood Decision Making is such a great way to get together within your community and vote for something that will make your community better! Mark your calendars!

In 2010, scientists identified bacteria which were resistant to the strongest antibiotics in Delhi. The enzyme that makes the bacteria resistant was named after the city - New Delhi Metallo-beta Lactamase or NDM-1. Alexander Fleming who discovered the first antibiotic, penicillin predicted the evolution of smarter germs or superbugs way back in 1945. This episode of Science of Us traces the history of antibiotics, and how humans have been outwitted by the microbe time after time. We spoke to Dr Ponnari Gottipati, the lead for the initiative, Superheroes against Superbugs that aims to build a community to tackle the growing threat of antibiotic resistance in India. I asked her what drug resistance is.See sunoindia.in/privacy-policy for privacy information.

Welcome back to London's Pretty Cool Podcast. Today we are speaking with Karen Oldman and Julie Ryan from Neighbourhood Decision Making. Neighbourhood Decision Making is a program in which Londoners are able to come up with ideas to improve their local communities. You are able to submit your ideas and get your community to vote on which ideas you all want to see come to life. Because you know what is needed in your neighbourhood better than anyone. Submissions close on September 21st. This part is about submitting your ideas. We want to encourage our listeners to submit their ideas for your neighbourhood before the submissions close. In part 2 we will showcase the ideas that are up for a vote in each neighbourhood so you know what you are able to vote for and also, how to go about doing that. Remember to rate and subscribe and all those fun things and follow us on social media to know when part 2 is out!    In this episode, we talk with Karen Oldman who is the manager of this program. We speak with her about how this program was started, how it has a positive impact on the community, the types of ideas that are already being submitted for 2021, the most popular ideas that have won in the past and more. We also have Julie Ryan on. Julie's idea - the murals under the Richmond Street underpass - was a previous winner of the Neighbourhood Decision Making Program. She tells us about the process of submitting an idea to this program, from the initial submission to completing the project with your community.    Submit your ideas: https://getinvolved.london.ca/NDM    https://www.instagram.com/lpcpodcast/  https://www.facebook.com/LPCPod

Derek Hockaday interviews John Ledingham, professor of Clinical Medicine and former Director of Clinical Studies, 2013. Topics discussed include: (00:00:04) entrance to Oxford; (00:00:51) national service in Hong Kong; (00:01:41) changing Oxford course to medicine, tutors for first three years at Oxford; (00:05:00) experience of first three years and schools years; (00:07:12) inspiration from Path and Bac course and Rob Smith; (00:09:25) Oxford compared to London in terms of medical education; (00:11:45) travelling scholarship to New York; (00:13:08) functioning of the Radcliffe Infirmary compared to Columbia Presbyterian Hospital; (00:16:20) comparisons of standard of nursing care across hospitals; (00:17:26) appointment in Oxford as physician; (00:19:38) interest in nephrology; (00:22:32) anecdote illustrating medicine now and then, the renal unit; (00:26:33) Nuffield Department of Medicine readership; (00:28:39) research on kidney, hypertension and supervision of Dphil students; (00:30:55) George Alberti; (00:32:41) involvement in committees and the Medical Research Society; (00:34:15) publishing research; (00:37:39) consultants on firms for the NHS and Nuffield Department of Medicine; (00:40:52) introducing case discussions at the NDM; (00:53:41) ward takes changing through career; (00:45:34) National Renal Association, reading in nephrology; (00:46:42) Paul Beeson's role in Oxford medicine; (00:50:09) surgery at Oxford hospitals; (00:56:10) evolution of drugs to treat hypertension; (00:59:05) interaction with New College; (01:01:55) influence of Emergency Bed Service on London medicine; (01:03:50) unification, George Pickering's vision of Oxford Medicine team; (01:06:08) medical administration. Note the following sections of audio are redacted: 00:24:08-00:24:15; 00:51:09-00:51:40.

Date: 3/9/2021 Show Description: Dr. Mosier is an Emeritus Professor of Psychology from San Francisco State University and the Founder and Principal Scientist of TeamScape LLC, a company founded to conduct research on teams in work environments. She is the President of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA), the federation of ergonomics and human factors societies around the world. The mission of the IEA is to elaborate and advance ergonomics science and practice, and to expand its scope of application and contribution to society to improve the quality of life, working closely with its constituent societies and related international organizations. Learn more about Kathleen's work: Berkeley Interdisciplinary Center for Healthy Workplaces Kathleen's LinkedIn Learn more about NDM: NaturalisticDecisionMaking.org Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making Where to find hosts Brian Moon and Laura Militello: Brian's website Brian's LinkedIn Brian's Twitter Laura's website Laura's LinkedIn Laura's Twitter Timestamps: How Kathleen transitioned from being a high school humanities teacher to an NDM researcher [2:02] Kathleen's experience in pursuing research at San Francisco State University [05:21] Founding TeamScape, LLC [6:23] Challenges acquiring government clients as an NDM researcher [7:34] Kathleen's current project with NASA researching teams in space [14:47] Cultural nuances of interactions on NASA crews operating in different countries [20:40] “Which research project has been most rewarding for you?” [22:10] What kind of automation systems planes were using in the 1990's [24:01] Kathleen's early NDM influences [28:04] Changes witnessed in the NDM community over time [29:50]

Ram Kalyan Kelly talks to Richard Russell, Consultant Physician Senior Clinical Researcher Respiratory Medicine, NDM University of Oxford about Stop Smoking.

Enter S(a)NDM(a)N to Your Voice on the Mark: From Vegas to NYC, DJ SNDMAN is known for getting people on their feet at nightclubs across the country. But given our current way of living, he's had to find a new way to "get the party started" for everyone at home. SNDMAN talks about his new way of "working - livestream DJing. We also discuss his new show on Sirius XM that discusses pop culture and current events and what the future of nightclubs and DJing may look like. Sponsored by: TAJA Collection --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/genna-revitz/message

Date: 12/10/2020 Show Description: Lia DiBello is president and director of research at WTRI, Inc. She received her Ph.D. in cognitive psychology at CUNY Graduate School in New York, where she studied under the late Distinguished Professor Sylvia Scribner, a well known pioneer in the area of workplace cognitive and the author of many now classic works. Since she started directing the research at WTRI, Dr. DiBello has been the recipient of 17 basic research funding awards from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and The Russell Sage Foundation. DiBello is best known for the development of a particular kind of activity-based “strategic rehearsal” approach that has been shown to greatly accelerate learning through cognitive reorganization. Where to find Leah: LinkedIn WTRI Learn more about NDM: NaturalisticDecisionMaking.org Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making Where to find hosts Brian Moon and Laura Militello: Brian's website Brian's LinkedIn Brian's Twitter Laura's website Laura's LinkedIn Laura's Twitter Timestamps: How Leah first became involved in NDM [1:50] Leah's methods for developing new methods [9:45] Strategies for measuring the impact of a training to know if it's working [18:45] Leading a financial services firm to new a new profitable approach [32:15] Capturing mental models prior to training [32:57] Advantages of using virtual worlds to achieve NDM goals [36:08] Career influences in and outside the NDM community [44:00] One single question that could determine whether someone truly practices NDM [45:49] Where Leah plans to take her research next [46:29] Two truths and a lie [52:19]

Date: 02/11/2021 Show Description: Shawn received a PhD and MA in Cognitive/Experimental Psychology from Ohio State University, with specializations in cognitive engineering, quantitative psychology, and psycholinguistics. He previously received a BA in Psychology/Music from Binghamton University (SUNY). He is a member of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, the American Psychological Association, the National Defense Industrial Association, and the Cognitive Science Society. Where to find Shawn: Aptima Human Centered Engineering Learn more about NDM: NaturalisticDecisionMaking.org Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making Where to find hosts Brian Moon and Laura Militello: Brian's website Brian's LinkedIn Brian's Twitter Laura's website Laura's LinkedIn Laura's Twitter Timestamps: Describing Aptima and how it connects to the NDM community [1:28] How human centeredness is expressed in Aptima's core domains [6:17] Shawn's experience transitioning from research to a more executive role [11:00] Staying true to core principles when working with a multidisciplinary team [19:04] Pushback when making the case for NDM methods [26:17] Biggest influences on Shawn's career [31:30] Future research priorities for Aptima [38:11] How to decide whether to file a patent and what that process is like [42:18] One question to determine if someone is a human centered practitioner [46:52] Some things that not many people know about Shawn [49:58]

Date: 02/05/2021 Show Description: Mike is grateful for the privilege of studying and supporting decision makers in over 100 military and commercial domains over the past 25 years, ranging from intelligence analysts and Special Operations Forces to computer hackers and cyber-security personnel, to intelligence analysts and firefighters. He speaks both psychology and engineering and enjoys helping to bridge the gap between these often-disconnected worlds. In his free time, Mike enjoys spending time with his family, backpacking, playing several sports poorly, and eating the hottest foods on the planet. He has an M.S. in Psychology and a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Dayton. Where to find Mike: 361 Interactive LinkedIn Learn more about NDM: NaturalisticDecisionMaking.org Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making Where to find hosts Brian Moon and Laura Militello: Brian's website Brian's LinkedIn Brian's Twitter Laura's website Laura's LinkedIn Laura's Twitter Timestamps: Mike's experience starting 361 Interactive and growing his small business [1:21] Current crowdsourcing tool project for the U.S. Navy [4:17] Contrasting work on a large-scale metadata project versus research on individual perspectives [11:16] Mike's most rewarding project working with Navy SEALs [15:14] The value of making mistakes in training exercises [26:08] Nearly running over a colonel during a research trip [31:21] Encountering resistance to research findings and recommendations [39:04] Three most influential people on Mike's career and approach [42:23] “If you were given one question to determine if someone practices NDM, what would you ask?” [47:55] Two truths and a lie [49:08]

Date: 1/29/2021 Show Description: Simon Henderson is an independent deception consultant working in the UK and the US. His career has involved researching, teaching, and consulting on deception, counter-deception, information operations and cyber operations within a variety of government, military, and law enforcement organisations. He is passionate about novel and pro-social applications of these fields. Learn more about Simon's work: Deception by Design Evaluationof the counter fake-news game, Harmony Square Immersive theatre company, Punchdrunk Learn more about NDM: NaturalisticDecisionMaking.org Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making Where to find hosts Brian Moon and Laura Militello: Brian's website Brian's LinkedIn Brian's Twitter Laura's website Laura's LinkedIn Laura's Twitter Timestamps: Simon's early path to a career in deception [1:15] First exposure to NDM [5:54] Proposing to apply magic and deception skills to military [20:59] The technique of misdirection in deception [24:42] Nuances of using deception on experts [32:31] One question that could determine if someone is a magician [41:51] Differences between observing and performing magic [47:58] Outlook for the next 15 years and details about Simon's blog and book [51:48] Two truths and a lie [1:02:55]

Date: 12/17/2020 Show Description: John Flach received his PhD in human experimental psychology from The Ohio State University in 1984. After more than 30 years of teaching and supervising graduate research in universities, he joined Mile Two--a custom software development company--as a senior cognitive systems engineer. John has written extensively about cognitive systems engineering (CSE) and ecological interface design (EID) approaches to human performance and design, including three co-authored books, three co-edited books, and more than 180 archival publications. After many years of talking and writing about CSE and EID, he is enjoying the opportunity to test what he has learned against the challenges of designing practical solutions to contemporary problems in sociotechnical systems. Learn more about John's work: John's blog Mile Two A Meaning Processing Approach to Cognition Amazon author page Learn more about NDM: NaturalisticDecisionMaking.org Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making Where to find hosts Brian Moon and Laura Militello: Brian's website Brian's LinkedIn Brian's Twitter Laura's website Laura's LinkedIn Laura's Twitter Timestamps: John's early experiences as a mental health counselor [1:40] Making the shift to Human Factors [7:16] Becoming introduced to the Naturalistic Decision Making community [9:06] Connection to Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands [10:30] Parallels between human factors, NDM, and cognitive system engineering [13:23] Explaining complex ideas in creative ways [19:26] BLANK [22:35 – 22:58] Surprises in shifting to an applied setting [24:23] Things, events, and experiences that have had an impact on John's perspective as a researcher [29:32] “There may not be individual cognition' [31:47] Something about John that most people don't know [39:24] The kind of work that has been the most rewarding [41:10] What's next on John's research agenda [47:04] “If you could instantly become an expert in something, what would you choose?” [51:06]

Date: 12/03/2020 Show Description: Dr. Mica Endsley is widely recognized as a pioneer and world leader in the study and application of situation awareness in advanced systems. She is a former President of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society and former Chief Scientist for the U.S. Air Force. Dr. Endsley is the author of over 200 scientific articles and reports on situation awareness, decision-making, and human-system integration and is widely cited in professional journals. She is the co-author of “Designing for Situation Awareness” and speaks extensively at conferences. Dr. Endsley has a Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering from the University of Southern California. She is a Certified Professional Ergonomist (CPE). Learn more about Mica's work: SA Technologies ResearchGate Designing for Situation Awareness: An Approach to User-Centered Design, Second Edition Handbook of Distributed Team Cognition Learn more about NDM: NaturalisticDecisionMaking.org Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making Where to find hosts Brian Moon and Laura Militello: Brian's website Brian's LinkedIn Brian's Twitter Laura's website Laura's LinkedIn Laura's Twitter Timestamps: The first paper Dr. Endsley ever published [1:00} The importance of situation awareness [3:10] The challenges of dealing with cognitive dissonance and confirmation bias [8:35] How to encourage open-mindedness [12:20] UFO's and how individuals respond when their mental models fail [14:50] Past research projects that have been particularly rewarding [19:50] Reflections on serving as chief scientist for the Airforce [21:13] Insights on experiences of trying to convince others to think differently [23:30] Interesting projects surrounding situation awareness [29:57] Advice for people just entering the field of NDM [32:32] Major influences in Dr. Endsley's career [34:25] Ideas on ways to better manage the COVID-19 response [35:32] One question that can determine if someone is an NDM researcher [40:15] Some things that not many people know about Dr. Endsley [42:18] “If you could become an expert in anything instantly, what would it be?” [43:30]

Date: 11/24/2020 Show Description: Anne Miller Is currently a Lead Human Factors Researcher with Cerner Corporation, Kansas City, Missouri, where she develops supervises and conducts Human Factors research related to 'high risk' electronic health record applications. Where to find Anne: Researchgate LinkedIn Learn more about NDM: NaturalisticDecisionMaking.org Where to find hosts Brian Moon and Laura Militello: Brian's website Brian's LinkedIn Brian's Twitter Laura's website Laura's LinkedIn Laura's Twitter Timestamps: Making the shift from nursing to human-computer interaction and human factors [1:25] Pros and cons of working in various roles across continents [7:45] Changing identity from a nurse to a human factors engineer [12:50] Staying in your lane when eliciting expert knowledge [20:30] Insights about work in the ICU relevant to the COVID-19 pandemic [22:45] Current role at Cerner Corporation [33:15] Responses toward Anne's research [40:53] People who influenced Anne's career and approach to NDM [47:50] One question Anne would ask to determine if someone practices NDM [51:24] Two truths and a lie [55:07]

Link to bioRxiv paper: http://biorxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2020.10.26.355222v1?rss=1 Authors: Loh, B., Chen, J., Manohar, P., Yu, Y., Hua, X., Leptihn, S. Abstract: Acinetobacter baumannii is of major clinical importance as the bacterial pathogen often causes hospital acquired infections, further complicated by the high prevalence of antibiotic resistant strains. Aside from natural tolerance to certain antibiotic classes, resistance is often acquired by the exchange of genetic information via conjugation but also by the high natural competence exhibited by A. baumannii. In addition, bacteriophages are able to introduce resistance genes but also toxins and virulence factors via phage mediated transduction. In this work, we analysed the complete genomes of 177 A. baumannii strains for the occurrence of prophages, and analysed their taxonomy, size and positions of insertion. Among all the prophages that were detected, Siphoviridae and Myoviridae were the two most commonly found families, while the average genome size was determined as 3.98 Mbp. Our data shows the wide variation in the number of prophages in A. baumannii genomes and the prevalence of certain prophages within strains that are most successful or potentially beneficial to the host. Our study also revealed that only two specific sites of insertion within the genome of the host bacterium are being used, with few exceptions only. Lastly, we analysed the existence of genes that are encoded in the prophages, which confer antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Several phages carry AMR genes, including OXA-23 and NDM-1, illustrating the importance of lysogenic phages in the acquisition of resistance genes. Copy rights belong to original authors. Visit the link for more info

In der siebten Folge von Multivitamin geht es um Rassismus in der deutschen Sprache. Dafür haben wir unter anderem mit Prof. Dr. Susan Arndt gesprochen. Sie ist Germanistin, Anglistin und Afrikawissenschaftlerin. Sie hat uns erklärt, woher rassistische Begriffe kommen, warum es sie noch gibt und wie wir sie loswerden können. Einen großen Einfluss auf unsere Sprache haben die Medien und diejenigen, die mit ihrer Sprache viele Menschen erreichen. Die neuen deutschen Medienmacher*innen (NdM) haben ein Glossar mit wertfreien, präzisen Formulierungshilfen für Journalist*innen entwickelt. Ferda Ataman ist eine der Mitbegründer*innen der NdM. Wir haben mit ihr über rassistische Narrative und ihr Buch „Ich bin von hier. Hört auf zu fragen!“ gesprochen. Ihr hört uns auf Spotify, YouTube, Soundcloud und I-Tunes! Wenn ihr Fragen, Anmerkungen oder Themenvorschläge für die nächsten Folgen von Multivitamin habt oder gerne Teil unseres Teams werden wollt, schreibt uns gerne an podcast@kohero-magazin.de! Das Multivitamin-Team: Lilli Janik, Lena Wilborn, Kim Sarah Eckert, Marie Lina Smyrek, Anne-Josephine Thiel, Sally Wichtmann, Anna Seifert, Stefanie Grolig Links zur Folge: https://glossar.neuemedienmacher.de/ https://kubragumusay.com/buch/ https://www.fischerverlage.de/buch/ferda-ataman-ich-bin-von-hier-hoert-auf-zu-fragen-9783103974607 https://www.bpb.de/gesellschaft/migration/afrikanische-diaspora/59407/afrikaterminologie

In der siebten Folge von Multivitamin geht es um Rassismus in der deutschen Sprache. Dafür haben wir unter anderem mit Prof. Dr. Susan Arndt gesprochen. Sie ist Germanistin, Anglistin und Afrikawissenschaftlerin. Sie hat uns erklärt, woher rassistische Begriffe kommen, warum es sie noch gibt und wie wir sie loswerden können. Einen großen Einfluss auf unsere Sprache haben die Medien und diejenigen, die mit ihrer Sprache viele Menschen erreichen. Die neuen deutschen Medienmacher*innen (NdM) haben ein Glossar mit wertfreien, präzisen Formulierungshilfen für Journalist*innen entwickelt. Ferda Ataman ist eine der Mitbegründer*innen der NdM. Wir haben mit ihr über rassistische Narrative und ihr Buch „Ich bin von hier. Hört auf zu fragen!“ gesprochen. Wenn ihr Fragen, Anmerkungen oder Themenvorschläge für die nächsten Folgen von Multivitamin habt oder gerne Teil unseres Teams werden wollt, schreibt uns gerne an podcast@kohero-magazin.de! Das Multivitamin-Team: Lilli Janik, Lena Wilborn, Kim Sarah Eckert, Marie Lina Smyrek, Anne-Josephine Thiel, Sally Wichtmann, Anna Seifert, Stefanie Grolig Links zur Folge: https://glossar.neuemedienmacher.de/ https://kubragumusay.com/buch/ https://www.fischerverlage.de/buch/ferda-ataman-ich-bin-von-hier-hoert-auf-zu-fragen-9783103974607 https://www.bpb.de/gesellschaft/migration/afrikanische-diaspora/59407/afrikaterminologie

Date: 9/24/2020 Show Description: Dr. Pamela Richards leads the University of Central Lancaster's vision for the research theme “Developing Expertise in individuals and teams”. Richards supervises over 18 doctoral students in the UK and worldwide in decision-making (including military / fire & technical, complex rescues & elite sport). Her research focuses on the development and operationalization of shared mental models in high pressurized naturalistic settings. Pam works externally as a consult to the English Institute of Sport working with five podium sports and has experience of working in related domains of emergency services and military research. Where to find Pam: Twitter Commentary: Team Cognition in Sport: How Current Insights Into How Teamwork Is Achieved in Naturalistic Settings Can Lead to Simulation Studies Learn more about NDM: NaturalisticDecisionMaking.org Where to find hosts Brian Moon and Laura Militello: Brian's website Brian's LinkedIn Brian's Twitter Laura's website Laura's LinkedIn Laura's Twitter Timestamps: How Pam got involved in NDM after working as a coach [1:30] Autonomous decision making in team sports [3:40] Applying cognitive task analysis to coaching players [4:30] Balancing self-reflection and knowledge elicitation when facilitating CTA as a coach [8:20] Using concept mapping to contextualize play patterns [11:05] Getting players to take responsibility for their own self-reflection [15:00] Creating a shared performance vision to inform player decision-making [18:05] Teaching and applying decision-making skills at both an elite and developmental level [21:20] What Pam misses about coaching [25:15] Exploring the high-pressurized decision-making framework [26:12] Applying coaching skills to academic work [30:15] Thoughts on motivation [31:30] Major influences within and outside the NDM community [34:30] Working with law enforcement and first responders [36:00] Using body camera footage for police training [40:47] The role of goals in sport and non-sport domains [43:20] What is one question you could ask to determine if someone is a real NDM practitioner? [47:30] Favorite part of coaching team hockey [50:30] How to incorporate NDM and CTA tools into coaching without drastically increasing workload [52:55]

Marek Šedivý byl odmalička obklopen hudbou. Bylo přirozené, že si ji vybere i pro svou profesi. Stal se dirigentem a jako velmi mladý muž dnes šéfuje opeře NDM.

Marek Šedivý byl odmalička obklopen hudbou. Bylo přirozené, že si ji vybere i pro svou profesi. Stal se dirigentem a jako velmi mladý muž dnes šéfuje opeře NDM.

Date: 9/11/2020 Show Description: Dr. Stephen M. Fiore is Director, Cognitive Sciences Laboratory, and Professor with the University of Central Florida's Cognitive Sciences Program in the Department of Philosophy and Institute for Simulation & Training. He maintains a multidisciplinary research interest that incorporates aspects of the cognitive, social, organizational, and computational sciences in the investigation of learning and performance in individuals and teams. His primary area of research is the interdisciplinary study of complex collaborative cognition and the understanding of how humans interact socially and with technology. Where to find Steve: ResearchGate Learn more about NDM: NaturalisticDecisionMaking.org Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making Where to find hosts Brian Moon and Laura Militello: Brian's website Brian's LinkedIn Brian's Twitter Laura's website Laura's LinkedIn Laura's Twitter Timestamps: Highlights of work at Cognitive Sciences Laboratory [2:00} Where NDM fits into interdisciplinary research and how it relates to anthropology [3:50] How Steve became familiar with NDM [5:25] “Aha” moments that led to interest in understanding the psychology of groups and teams {9:10] Current CSL projects, including new applications for Artificial Intelligence {12:10} Potential breakthroughs in Theory of Mind project [17:10] How leadership in NDM spaces has shaped Steve's approach to the work [22:37] The idea os “stewardship” to help direct where the field of NDM should go [25:35] Trends in NDM that warrant debate [27:30] Developing “problem spaces” for better identify and understand complex issues [33:55] Building relationships to raise funding and support around complex problems [35:45] Early career in marketing for the Computer Learning Center and the transition to cognition [39:00] Major influences that shaped Steve's thinking [42:30] Others' reaction to NDM when being introduced to it for the first time [50:42] If you could choose three philosophers to be your student, mentor, and collaborator, who would they be? [54:12]

Date: 6/29/2020 Show Description: We're pleased to be talking today with Joel Suss. Joel is Assistant Professor of Human Factors in the Department of Psychology at Wichita State University. His research work focus on understanding and improving perceptual-cognitive performance – in particular, anticipation, decision making -- in complex and challenging operational settings, such as law enforcement, security, military command and control, aviation, and emergency medicine. He has examined perceptual and cognitive aspects of CCTV monitoring and how automated, intelligent videos surveillance systems are changing the human operator's role in security surveillance. Joel is perhaps best known known for his work investigating ways to train police officers to make better decision in stressful situations. Originally from Australia, Joel completed his PhD in Applied Cognitive Science and Human Factors at the Michigan Technological University. Where to find Joel: Wichita State's Human Factor's Ph.D. Program Online cognitive-skills training for improving police decision making: Can it work? Professor investigates what makes a good law enforcement officer through lab research Learn more about NDM: NaturalisticDecisionMaking.org Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making Where to find hosts Brian Moon and Laura Militello: Brian's website Brian's LinkedIn Brian's Twitter Laura's website Laura's LinkedIn Laura's Twitter Timestamps: How Joel got involved in NDM and cognitive expertise in law enforcement [1:40] The role of anticipation in police decision-making [12:30] How do you help police be better calibrated in their responses? [15:37] National Institute of Justice project to create tactical decision making exercises for police [17:35] Law enforcement's response to NDM approaches [21:55] Cultural skepticism toward academics within law enforcement [26:30] People within and outside the NDM community who influenced Joel's career [30:25] How have you benefited from helping others break into the NDM world? [34:25] The role of mentorship as a supplement to NDM graduate programs [38:10] Ways the NDM community can do a better job of developing young NDM researchers [44:05] Joel's current and future research focus [49:40] Joel's connection to Peter Fadde [55:07] If you could instantly achieve expertise in anything what would it be? [56:15]

Date: 6/18/2020 Show Description: Today we welcome Shawna Perry. Shawna is an emergency medicine physician and runs a consulting firm called SJP Consulting. In both her roles as a physician and a consultant, she actively advocates for systems level views of patient safety. She is an active member of the naturalistic decision making community, the human factors and ergonomics society, and the resilience engineering association. She uses her vast and varied clinical experiences to mentor countless resident physicians and also to inform applied research. Shawna very generously serves on panels, gives invited talks, and collaborates on writing projects to share her front-line perspective on the organizational constraints, competing goals, and other challenges emergency department physicians face every day as they care for patients. Dr. Perry spent 6 years as the Director for Patient Safety System Engineering at Virginia Commonwealth University Health Systems and is currently an Associate Professor of Emergency Medicine at the University of Florida Health Science Center in Jacksonville, FL. Where to find Shawna: 1. Klein, G., Pliske, R., Crandall, B., & Woods, D. D. (2005). Problem detection. Cognition, Technology & Work , 7 (1), 14-28. DOI: 10.1007/s10111-004-0166-y 2. Cook, R., & Rasmussen, J. (2005). “Going solid”: a model of system dynamics and consequences for patient safety. BMJ Quality & Safety , 14 (2), 130-134. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2003.009530 3. Perry, S., Wears, R. L., Anderson, B., & Booth, A. (2007). Peace and war: Contrasting cases of resilient teamwork in healthcare. In Eighth International Naturalistic Decision Making Conference, Pacific Grove, CA . Learn more about NDM: NaturalisticDecisionMaking.org Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making Where to find hosts Brian Moon and Laura Militello: Brian's website Brian's LinkedIn Brian's Twitter Laura's website Laura's LinkedIn Laura's Twitter Timestamps: How did you become interested in NDM? [1:50] What are different attitudes that you've observed in regard to patient safety in clinical settings? [12:30] What are some times you've gotten pushback on your ideas? [23:35] What's a favorite story where you had to rely on your intuition? [42:40]

Show Description: Peter Fadde is professor and director of the Learning Systems Design and Technology (LSDT) graduate program at Southern Illinois University. Olivia Brown is a Research Associate at the University of Bath, School of Management. Where to find Peter: Accelerating the Acquisition of Intuitive Decision-Making through Expertise-Based Training (XBT) Instructional Design for Accelerated Macrocognitive Expertise in the Baseball Workplace TEDx talk "Frugal Engineering in Baseball and Beyond" Association for Applied Sport Psychology: Virtual Conference on Technology in Applied Sport Psychology Practice Where to find Olivia: University of Bath Teamwork in extreme environments: identifying challenges and generating solutions CREST Research Learn more about NDM: NaturalisticDecisionMaking.org Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making Where to find hosts Brian Moon and Laura Militello: Brian's website Brian's LinkedIn Brian's Twitter Laura's website Laura's LinkedIn Laura's Twitter Timestamps: “Extreme team” research premise [2:30] Forming expedition teams for team research [4:45] Team research data and observations [6:15] Prepping research participants on how to share their data [9:05] Peter describes the background of his award-winning research in expertise-based training [10:10] Explaining the video occlusion method [21:30] How good are experts at articulating their expertise? [27:00] Debate between immersive experience training vs. targeted skill training [31:00] How Olivia got into Naturalistic Decision Making [33:00] Justifying NDM's unconventional research methods [35:10] Advice for those looking to conduct similar NDM studies [36:00] Olivia's background in extreme environments and what drew her to “extreme team” research [38:15] What "extreme team" research can teach us about how people work together generally [40:45] Applying sports-based NDM research to real life [42:15] Peter compares STEM training to sports training [46:45] None of us are immune, and maybe de-stigmatizing racism will lead more people to confront it in ourselves [53:15] "If both of you could instantly become an expert in something, what would it be?" [56:30]

Date: 5/22/2020 Show Description: “Jan Maarten is Principal Scientist at TNO and Professor of Applied Cognitive Psychology at the University of Twente, The Netherlands. His research interests include resilience engineering, team communication processes, and human-machine teaming. He is the lead editor on two influential volumes: Cognitive Task Analysis (2000) and Naturalistic Decision Making and Macrocognition(2008). He is co-editor of the recently released Oxford Handbook of Expertise (2020). He is editor in chief of the Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making. Dr. Schraagen holds a PhD in Cognitive Psychology from the University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.” Where to find Jan Maarten: University of Twente TNO LinkedIn JCEDM The Oxford Handbook of Expertise Learn more about NDM: NaturalisticDecisionMaking.org Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making Where to find hosts Brian Moon and Laura Militello: Brian's website Brian's LinkedIn Brian's Twitter Laura's website Laura's LinkedIn Laura's Twitter Timestamps: What is the first paper you ever published? [2:00] Experience conducting research with children [4:11] Nature of Jan Maarten's 1993 research study on expertise [6:15] Working with Herb Simon at Carnegie Mellon [10:57] What led Jan Maarten to attend the 1994 NDM conference in Dayton [13:00] Discussing the birth and significance of the book "Cognitive Task Analysis" [17:25] Experience and advice for navigating difficult research interviews [20:35] Interviewing technique advice for students [23:52] The most exciting project Jan Maarten is working on right now [27:47] Goals and directions for future work [36:50] What is a "cyber-physical system"? [40:20] Industries that could benefit from an NDM perspective [42:30] Which project has been the most rewarding for you? [47:50] Evaluating the success of Dutch navy training simulations [54:50] One questions that can reveal if someone is an NDM practitioner [57:06] Two truths and a lie [58:30]

Date: 5/15/2020 Show Description: “Colonel Shattuck is Senior Lecturer and Director of the Human Systems Integration Program at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, California. Dr. Shattuck holds a faculty appointment in the Operations Research Department where he teaches human systems integration and human factors engineering. Colonel Shattuck graduated from the United States Military Academy in 1976, and following distinguished service as a signal officer and receiving his PhD from the Ohio State University in Cognitive Engineering, he returned to his alma mater to teach Engineering Psychology until his retirement from the Army in 2005. He has been at NPS since, he co-directs the Human Systems Integration Program. Larry has been an active researcher in the domain of military command and control for nearly two decades. He is unique among his peers in the NDM community for his ability to draw on deep operational experience when studying processes such as how commanders communicate their intent, the manner in which decision makers fuse data in tactical environments, and the ways in which data and information flow through technological system elements to the human agents in that system.” Where to find Larry: Naval Postgraduate School HSI DL Certificate Program HSI DL Master's Degree Program Learn more about NDM: NaturalisticDecisionMaking.org Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making Where to find hosts Brian Moon and Laura Militello: Brian's website Brian's LinkedIn Brian's Twitter Laura's website Laura's LinkedIn Laura's Twitter Timestamps: How Larry's military operational experience has informed his research findings [2:20] Making the shift to engineering psychology [7:47] Takeaways from the Army research laboratory's advanced decision architecture program [10:12] Examples of the program's contributions to the Army [13:58] Making progress with NDM solutions within a government context [19:10] Explaining the relationship between NDM and Human Systems Integration [29:07] Making the NDM research process more efficient [34:40] How NDM perspectives have influenced Larry's approach to teaching [38:26] The aspect of Larry's work that has been most rewarding [40:10] Lessons learned from students [43:45] Larry's top three mentors [45:46] Influences outside of NDM [49:25] One question that can determine if someone is an NDM practitioner [51:07] Two truths and a lie [52:08]

S1E34: Rochester 585 Metal Collab Vol: 1 - Become The Disfigured//Panzer Plates (FREE MERCH GIVEAWAY) Do you think you know the local 585 Rochester Metal Scene inside and out? Let's test that question out right now. Maybe you'll win something out of it? 0:00 - 0:440:44 - 1:27 1:27 - 2:112:11 - 2:552:55 - 3:39 3:39 - 4:23 4:23 - 5:18 Enter a chance to win some free band merch by simply commenting (with timestamps) on the NOISE DOSAGE MEDIA Facebook Page who's playing on each individual part. *** 3 RANDOM WINNERS WILL BE ANNOUNCED A WEEK FROM TODAY***Joe Lamoureux & Alex Zillioux (Nuclear Winter) Jon Lambert (PALEBLOOD/Noise Dosage Media/ex.Vertigo Freeway) Johnny Volatile Bustos (Deadrider) Josh Zalar & Alex Dunn (Invictra) John JT Taylor (Spit Nickels) Owen Miller and Erica Marino (Cabin in the Woods) Zane Knight (Gates of Paradox) Graphic Design/Editing - Noise Dosage MediaMixed and Mastered by - Zane KnightArtwork by - Thomas Green (Vile Throne) and @begrudgingly_benny In a band? Let's chat about it.https://www.facebook.com/noisedosagemedia/www.noisedosagemedia.comInstagram: @noisedosagemediaContact us: noisedosagemedia585@gmail.com Special thanks from NdM to everyone who made this happen, stay heavy.

Date: 5/15/2020 Show Description: “Today we welcome Julie Gore. Julie Gore is a Reader in Organizational Psychology, at the School of Management, University of Bath in the UK. She is a Chartered Psychologist and Fellow of the British Psychological Society. Her research focus is on the psychology of expertise and Naturalistic Decision Making (NDM) across a range of professions working under uncertainty. She is Associate Editor for Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology and serves on the boards of the British Journal of Management and Frontiers in Organizational Psychology. Julie is also an academic advisor for Nasdaq's Behavioural Science Lab. Dr Gore received one of the world's first NDM PhD degrees in Applied Cognitive Psychology from Oxford Brookes University, UK.” Where to find Julie's work: The Oxford Handbook of Expertise The University of Bath Naturalistic Decision Making and Uncertainty Naturalistic decision making: navigating uncertainty in complex sociotechnical work SPRITE+ Learn more about NDM: NaturalisticDecisionMaking.org Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making Where to find hosts Brian Moon and Laura Militello: Brian's website Brian's LinkedIn Brian's Twitter Laura's website Laura's LinkedIn Laura's Twitter Timestamps: Experience as one of the first NDM PhD program participants [1:46] How Julie initially heard about NDM [3:03] Julie's PhD research question [3:55] Discoveries made during PhD research [5:18] Advice for young NDM PhD students [6:15] Common barriers students need help managing [8:02] Surprises and concerns about today's generation of NDM researchers [10:10] Examples of PhD students whose perspectives have been transformed by NDM models [12:05] Making space for NDM research papers in journals and publications [14:52] Nature of Julie's work with NASDAQ [16:32] Exciting research on decision-making ethics and accountability in the digital space [19:23] Organizations' and outsiders' attitudes toward NDM [23:17] Showcasing the utility of NDM methods [25:18] A particularly rewarding project [27:10] An explanation of "adaptive expertise" [29:12] Opportunities to advance NDM in the context of today's novel circumstances [32:37] Three people who influenced Julie's career [33:47] Influences from outside NDM [34:43] Changes in the NDM community [36:35] One question that can determine if someone is an NDM researcher [37:30] Directions for future research [39:37] Two truths and a lie [41:02]

Date: 5/7/2020 Show Description: “Today we welcome our friend, Rob Hutton. Rob is co-founder and director of Trimetis Ltd, a four-person cognitive systems engineering consultancy in Bristol, England. Rob and I started our careers together as young research assistants at Klein Associates in the early 1990s. His thinking contributed to early cognitive task analysis methods and he helped articulate models of macrocognition. Rob is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Ergonomics and Human Factors. He is also a part-time lecturer in Nottingham Trent University's psychology department.” Where to find Robert: Trimetis Nottingham Trent University Learn more about NDM: NaturalisticDecisionMaking.org Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making Where to find hosts Brian Moon and Laura Militello: Brian's website Brian's LinkedIn Brian's Twitter Laura's website Laura's LinkedIn Laura's Twitter Timestamps: Starting an NDM business in England [1:30] Types of client organizations [3:30] A project that Rob is excited to be working on [6:05] Challenges conveying the value of NDM theory to students [8:45] What's the craziest situation you've found yourself in, in the name of science? [16:40] Challenges of cognitive task analysis field research [23:55] A rewarding impactful project [25:10] Success of Co-authored Applied Cognitive Task Analysis paper [29:10] What is the most valuable proposition that you offer your customers? [29:50] Cultural differences of NDM research in the US vs. the UK [33:05] Who are three people who have influenced your approach? [41:40] What question would you ask someone to determine whether they practice NDM? [46:30] Two truths and a lie [50:00]

Die "Medien-Woche" Ausgabe 124 vom 15. Mai 2020 Der Werbepartner dieser Ausgabe der “Medien-Woche” ist Blinkist: Blinkist bietet Zusammenfassungen von über 3.000 Sachbüchern auf deinem Smartphone – in nur 15 Minuten pro Buch Das Jahresabo von Blinkist-Premium gibt es jetzt über die “Medien-Woche” mit einem Rabatt von 25 Prozent Unter: blinkist.de/medienwoche Teste Blinkist vorher 7 Tage kostenlos +++ Feedback: Wie sicher ist Telegram / Pressefreiheit https://www.sueddeutsche.de/digital/telegram-chat-krypto-sicherheit-hongkong-1.4577747 https://telegra.ph/Why-Isnt-Telegram-End-to-End-Encrypted-by-Default-08-14 +++ Kann das weg? Die Schnellrubrik: -Erhöhung des Rundfunkbeitrags fraglich https://www.ndr.de/der_ndr/presse/mitteilungen/NDR-beschliesst-Sparmassnahmen-von-300-Millionen-Euro-Information-und-regionale-Berichterstattung-bleiben-stark,pressemeldungndr21718.html https://www.dwdl.de/nachrichten/77552/knuths_kassensturz_beim_ndr_sparkurs_im_norden/ https://www.cicero.de/wirtschaft/rundfunkbeitrag-cdu-sachsen-anhalt-thueringen-ard-zdf-reiner-haseloff/plus https://www.welt.de/kultur/medien/plus206072635/Rundfunkbeitrag-Sachsen-Anhalt-fordert-Selbstverpflichtungen-von-ARD-und-ZDF.html -Oliver Pochers Insta-Aktivitäten in der Kritik https://www.welt.de/kultur/plus207898975/Feminismus-Debatte-Das-Pocher-Psychogramm.html https://www.zeit.de/kultur/film/2020-05/oliver-pocher-instagram-influencerinnen-sexismus https://www.rtl.de/cms/tvnow-doku-laura-und-der-wendler-klappt-es-mit-der-hochzeit-in-vegas-4532019.html https://rp-online.de/panorama/fernsehen/michael-wendler-vs-oliver-pocher-so-kam-es-zu-dem-grossen-streit_aid-49139227 -Thomas Gottschalk wird 70 https://www.spiegel.de/kultur/tv/zdf-thomas-gottschalk-bekommt-show-zum-70-geburtstag-a-82f93465-3583-445f-b14b-d4ba361aba45 -Media Pioneer startet Bezahlmodell https://meedia.de/2020/05/11/gaborsteingarts-media-pioneer-startet-bezahlmodell/ +++ WERBUNG: Blinkist +++ Thema: Diversität in Redaktionen -Neue Deutsche Medienmacher*innen (NdM) haben Vielfalt in Chefredaktionen untersucht Konstantina Vassiliou-Enz von den NdM im Interview Die Untersuchung: https://www.neuemedienmacher.de/diversity-im-journalismus-bericht/ +++ Is´noch was? Promis grüßen gegen Geld https://memmo.me

Date: 5/1/2020 Show Description: “Today we welcome our pal, Jennifer Phillips. Jenni is the CEO of the Cognitive Performance Group, which she cofounded in 2006. Her work focuses expert decision-making, primarily in the military training community. She and her colleagues at CPG have pioneered research into the development of skilled performance, and designed innovation in the areas of decision-centered training and assessment, including the development and application of mastery models. Among her many publications is a chapter in the Oxford Handbook of Expertise exploring mastery models and their value in supporting the acquisition and assessment of expertise.” Learn More About Jenni: Cognitive Performance Group Developing Mastery Models to Support the Acquisition and Assessment of Expertise Learn more about NDM: NaturalisticDecisionMaking.org Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making Where to find hosts Brian Moon and Laura Militello: Brian's website Brian's LinkedIn Brian's Twitter Laura's website Laura's LinkedIn Laura's Twitter Timestamps: Jenny describes her focus of expertise, including tactical thinking in the marine corps and mastery models [1:30] Jenni breaks down the term “mastery model” and its stages [3:45] Jenni gives a mastery model example from her work with marine corps instructors [6:05] Work on assessment of decision skills, performance rubrics, and the process of adaptability [9:50] Major influences in Jenni's career in NDM [14:05] Other people and organizations outside the NDM community who have impacted Jenni's work [16:30] What makes Jenni's approach and expertise unique in her field [19:15] Challenges and nuances of working in a military environment [21:30] Difficulty getting buy-in to conduct research in law enforcement [23:45] A favorite anecdote from research in IED defeat work [24:45] Some distinct and difficult nuances of IED defeat work in Afghanistan and Iraq [29:45] Meaning and application of “cognitive fidelity” [32:50] A surprising characteristic of young researchers [35:20] One single question that can determine if someone is an NDM practitioner [39:05] Two truths and a lie [39:45] Excitement about research on making mastery models work at a large scale [42:10]

Date: 4/24/2020 Show Description: “Today we are talking with our friend and colleague, Emilie Roth. I first met Emilie at the second Naturalistic Decision Making meeting in Dayton, OH in 1994, but she had been studying how people manage complexity long before that meeting. In fact, I remember at that meeting thinking: ‘I want to be like her.' Emilie is one of the people that inspired me to think I really could be a scientist. And I know Emilie has inspired many others over the course of her career. She is one of the architects of the cognitive systems engineering movement. She had an important role in redesigning nuclear power plant control rooms in the wake of Three Mile Island. And that was just the beginning; her contributions have been felt far and wide. She now lives in Palo Alto, CA where she runs Roth Cognitive Engineering.” Where to find Emily: Roth Cognitive Engineering Resources: Oxford Handbook of Expertise Designing collaborative planning systems: Putting Joint Cognitive Systems Principles to Practice Cognitive work analysis Facets of complexity in situated work Learn more about NDM: NaturalisticDecisionMaking.org Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making Where to find hosts Brian Moon and Laura Militello: Brian's website Brian's LinkedIn Brian's Twitter Laura's website Laura's LinkedIn Laura's Twitter Timestamps: Emily's first published paper [1:30] Events that shifted Emilie's focus from experimental psychology to NDM [7:30] Developing the observation tools and methods for developing systems of expertise [12:25] Challenges in creating expert decision-making models for nuclear operations at Westinghouse [17:15] Experience navigating a world of engineers as a female psychologist [20:00] The benefits of work culture at Westinghouse [21:45] Observations of railroad industry culture, practices, and informal procedures [23:00] Optimistic outlook on specific research and applications of NDM [28:45] Two things about Emilie's personal life that others might not know [34:20] Three books that influenced Emilie's work [38:00] Associative thinking exercise [44:15] Elaborating on automation pros and cons [45:25]

Extraordinary stories, ordinary people, it's Tiny Dots.  Today we are joined by musician, comedian, content curator, and rat enthusiast, Chad Mojito. In this episode, we discuss what it is like taking care of rats, what a meme culture really is, early days of the internet, and much much more.  You can find all of his links here: https://about.me/NDM?fbclid=IwAR3XVy4s3C3jz0LUVXGkN-BnAl-GQXwdcz7CJBAcIroIwyp7Fl3mNhsQybE https://www.patreon.com/Mojito1 (and here) 

Show Description: “Robert is a luminary in the NDM community, a widely recognized world leader in cognitive systems engineering and Human-Centered Computing, and a senior member and fellow of numerous international science and engineering societies. Since 1999, he has called the Institute for Human and Machine Cognition his organizational home, and he organized the NDM 6 conference in 2003 in his hometown of Pensacola, FL. He has co-authored and co-edited 18 scholarly books – including two with your hosts! – and is co-author on over 100 publications in peer-reviewed journals. For twenty years, he served as Co-Editor for the Department on Human-Centered Computing in IEEE: Intelligent Systems. He was a co-founder of The Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, a major publication outlet for NDM research.” Where to find Robert: Institute for Human and Machine Cognition Books by Robert: Minding the weather: How expert forecasters think. Cognitive Systems Engineering: The Future for a Changing World. Perspectives on Cognitive Task Analysis: Historical Origins and Modern Communities of Practice. Applied concept mapping: Capturing, analyzing, and organizing knowledge. Learn more about NDM: NaturalisticDecisionMaking.org Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making Where to find hosts Brian Moon and Laura Militello: Brian's website Brian's LinkedIn Brian's Twitter Laura's website Laura's LinkedIn Laura's Twitter Timestamps: Robert's first published paper [1:45] Event's that led to Robert's interest in NDM [5:15] Robert's shift from psychometrics [14:00] NDM research project that Robert is most excited about [17:00] The falsifiability of NDM and research limitations surrounding the coronavirus [22:40] Shortcomings of graduate psychology and computer programs [25:30] Advice for people interested in exploring the NDM field [27:45] Two experiences and the lessons they imparted about eliciting expert knowledge [29:45] Some things about Robert that others might not know [35:30] Reasons why Robert loves football so much [37:45] Athletes and cognitive task analysis [40:17] Word association exercise [42:00]

Show Description: “Today we are talking with my friend and business partner, Gary Klein. Gary is one of the pioneers of the Naturalistic Decision Making movement. He is known for moving the study of decision making out of the laboratory and into the wild. In 1989, he invited a small group of international researchers to meet in Dayton, OH to talk about decision making in natural environments and how to study this phenomenon. It was that group of 32 researchers who came up with the term Naturalistic Decision Making. Gary's many contributions include the recognition-primed decision model that has greatly influenced how we all think about decision making and expertise. He and his colleagues developed early cognitive task analysis methods that have been a core set of tools for studying decision making in real world environments. He has mentored countless researchers, including both of us. Gary now lives in Boston, MA. He runs a company called ShadowBox LLC, and is also part-owner and advisor to Applied Decision Science, LLC.” Where to find Gary ShadowBox LLC Website LinkedIn Psychology Today Column Learn more about NDM: Website: https://naturalisticdecisionmaking.org/ Where to find hosts Brian Moon and Laura Militello: Brian's website Brian's LinkedIn Brian's Twitter Laura's website Laura's LinkedIn Laura's Twitter Resources mentioned during the show: Sources of Power by Gary Klein Seeing What Others Don't: The Remarkable Ways We Gain Insights by Gary Klein Timestamps: Gary's first published paper [1:36] How Gary got started in Naturalistic Decision Making [4:48] Gary's research on Israeli aircraft maintainers' coping methods during Yom Kippur War [7:55] Current NDM-related research that Gary is most excited about [12:10] Two of the biggest mistakes of Gary's career and how he recovered from them [14:53] Gary shares his favorite research stores: -A firefighter whose quick thinking saved several of his colleague's lives [22:53] -A British naval officer whose quick, life-saving decision was at first mistaken for ESP [28:00] -A neonatal nurse's expert instincts helped save a baby's life [33:33] Suggestions for how the NDM community can help during today's coronavirus crisis 37:15] Where Gary would prioritize funding and research investment right now [44:05] Associative thinking exercise [46:18] How the scientific method is “often a trap” that can limit researchers' learning opportunities [48:55]

Group yoga session. Easy run. Easy ride. How to achieve 1% improvement on a day to day basis? Show time at NDM

Last long fartlek run before NDM. Malayalam class. Setting up monthly goals.

Wie zu viel Stress langfristig zu gesundheitlichen Problemen führen kann zeigen wir an Pascals Beispiel und sprechen dann über seinen Wechsel zu einem neuen Coach, die damit einhergehenden Änderungen in seinem Training und wie die Vorbereitung zur NDM läuft. Am Ende gibt es noch eure Fragen von Instagram. Pascal Su ist Powerlifter, YouTuber und Fitness-Entrepreneur. Pascal ist auf Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/yuribeuga/ Pascal auf YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-tQs7fJ3Fbmf47OnSQF7oQ Werde Teil des Kraftraum als Patron: https://damienzaid.de/patreon Unterstütze den Podcast mit einer Spende: http://bit.ly/KraftraumSpende Kaufe Merch und supporte den Podcast: http://bit.ly/KraftraumShop Lass dich von mir coachen: http://bit.ly/KraftraumCoaching Folge mir auf Instagram: http://bit.ly/KraftraumInstagram Abonniere den Kraftraum auf YouTube: http://bit.ly/KraftraumYoutube Kaufe bei Aesparel Hosen für trainierte Beine und spare 10% mit dem Code KRAFTRAUM: https://www.damienzaid.de/aesparel

In this episode, Vince Westin, Dell Technical Evangelist for PowerMax, discusses the just-released Storage Class Memory (SCM) and NVMe over fabric features of PowerMax. SCM drives can be added non-disruptively and cut read miss times in approximately half - yielding about a 50 µSec improvement in read miss performance, significant when many transactions are down to only a few hundred µSecs. Healthcare workloads involve many different file types and SCM’s machine learning automatically puts the hottest data in the SCM tier, making a relatively small amount of SCM added to an array show a dramatic improvement in overall performance. NVMe over fabric bypasses front end protocols to provide memory-class performance with only minor non-disruptive changes to the environment. Both SCM and NVMe over fabric reduce latency and increase overall throughput. Vince then explains how multiple Epic workloads in Healthcare can be consolidated onto PowerMax, and goes on to discuss the latest advances in NDM (non-disruptive migration). Vince concludes with where to find more information and final thoughts.

NUEVA WEB: https://nuevodesordenmundial.com LA WEB OFICIAL DE LA DIRECCIÓN CIENTÍFICA NUEVA CRONOLOGÍA http://chronologia.org/ Andreu Marfull : https://andreumarfull.com/nc-castellano/ CANAL YOUTUBE DE SECRET & MYSTIC : HISTORIA DISTORSIONADA. Parte 1. MIL AÑOS INVENTADOS. Engaño Global en las Dataciones.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQc9fGeyGI0&t=667s TEMA MUSICAL INTERMEDIO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3kGFfzBtu4 DESCARGA PDF COMPRIMIDO EN RAR DE LA INFORMACION DE LA WEB: http://www.mediafire.com/file/4s9bbi2o826wfse/NdM.rar/file

Guests: Brandon Hays: @tehviking | Blog Chris Freeman: @15lettermax In this episode, former Fronsiders, Brandon Hays and Chris Freeman join Charles and Taras to talk about the difference between a framework and a library, whether or not React + Redux a framework in itself, red flags to signal that you're actually building a framework, attributes of a good framework, how can you tell if you created a bad framework, and how you can make a bad framework better. Resources: Test Sizes by Simon Stewart This show was produced by Mandy Moore, aka @therubyrep of DevReps, LLC. ** Transcript:** CHARLES: Hello everybody and welcome to The Frontside Podcast. My name is Charles. I'm a developer here at Frontside and today, we're going to be talking about the things that go into making a JavaScript framework. Because, hey, there's not enough of those in the world today, so we're going to talk about that and with me is Taras. TARAS: Hello, hello. CHARLES: And we've got two very special guests, who have a lot of experience with this topic. Mr Chris Freeman and Brandon Hays. Hey, guys. CHRIS: Hi, there. BRANDON: Hi, there. We're talking about the poofberry framework, right? CHARLES: What's a poofberry? BRANDON: There's a tweet that's going around right now that one of them says, "I don't know what I should be doing," and the next person says, "Oh, just use poofberry." What is that? It's like fluffnuts but the [inaudible]. Hey, dot, dot, dot. Then, it integrates with log bungler. CHARLES: There's a reason that I'm dying laughing. BRANDON: It's so true. CHARLES: It's so true, laugh, cry, laugh, cry. Let's start with kind of a very basic assessment here. Because there's a lot of different things that you can use to compose the applications that you build but for some reason, some of these things are grouped and considered as libraries and some of them are considered frameworks. I don't know that the boundary is very clear like I'll know it when I see it type thing. Maybe, we can start with what is the difference between a framework and a library? CHRIS: I have some thoughts of these. I feel like this is one of those questions that could easily just turn into an infinite bike-shed but I remember reading something a while ago that stuck with me for a long time. I'm pretty sure it's related to Java but that makes sense because if anyone is going to talking about frameworks, it's Java developers. But it was saying that the difference between a library and a framework is inversion of control and the idea is a thing that's a library is a thing where you are in control. You bring the library code into your code and it's up to you what you do with it. In a framework, the framework code calls you as I think what it said. It's like, you call the library code, the framework code calls you and -- CHARLES: In Soviet framework. CHRIS: Yeah, exactly. A framework says, "Here are a bunch of open spaces for you to put your code in and I will take care of the rest," versus a library is just like... I don't know, "Here's some things that you can use. It's up to you. What do you want to do with them?" CHARLES: Right, so in kind of like [inaudible], that would be basically, a framework would be the thing that's got the main method. I think the same thing in JavaScript and when you call it, does it actually implement the main method. In JavaScript, it'll probably like in node. Under that definition, it would be like, "Are you the main scripts when you invoke node? Do you control the main script?" If you were doing your own command line parsing, for example, you're looking at the process.rb and pulling off the command lines and doing all the things but even if you're using something like Yargs or option parser in Ruby, that's more of like a framework. I guess Yargs is a library because you're still implementing the script. You're instantiating the Yargs thing. TARAS: React calls render to figure out what to convert to DOM. Does that make React the framework? CHARLES: I think React as a library. That's a good question. What's the equivalent of the main method on the web? CHRIS: I think there's a very clear distinction, especially if you look at React versus something like Ember and I'm sure Angular does this as well. In React, by default, to build a React thing, you're going to pull in React, you may write some components, you may import them elsewhere but the main method is that you have an index.html with some div in it and you are the one that has to call ReactDOM.render and you pass it like document.query selector or whatever and then, your top level component and that can be as simple as complicated as you like or you can have a webpack plugin do it or whatever else. But the onus is on you to actually take that React app and get it starting up on the page versus Ember, it's like, "There's an index.html. It's fully wired up." There is one point where you sit down and say, "Start my program here," like Ember abstracted all that away. To me, that's the main method for a frontend application. CHARLES: Right and if you actually look at something that Ember generates, then look at index.html, they generate a script tag for you that instantiate your application and mounts it on an element. If you want to change that element, that's actually a configuration option that you can change but it still a configuration option that's consumed by the framework. In that sense, there is that inversion of control. I see what you mean like in React, you're the one who flicks off the first domino, like who's the prime mover. Is it you or is it the framework that knocks over the first domino? BRANDON: I like Chris's explanation and I think it's elegant to say because I was thinking in terms of structure. If it imposes a structure on you but really, the structure is there, it's like one of those Ikea shelf systems for you to put stuff into. If you're trying to solve a problem, here's a shelving system for you to put stuff into, whereas a library is just the tool that you might get out to put something together. Something that's multi-purpose but doesn't impose any structure on you or a ton of structure on you. My question is what's the usefulness of distinguishing between the two? TARAS: I think what's interesting and I had experienced this in a last couple of projects is that people, especially React when they kind of assume, because a lot of people entering to React not understanding the context within which React emerged and so, they're getting into React assuming that it has everything you need to build application that you need to build. A lot of them haven't necessarily built a single page application from scratch before and so, the jump into building something with React and then, it takes about a year for them to realize the full scope of all of the features that their application actually has and then, they kind of take a retroactive look and look like, "Okay, what do I have now?" and what emerges is that they've actually over the last year, they may be creating a framework without realizing that this is actually happening. CHARLES: They've imposed the structure of saying, "Here's the shelving system. Books about geography go here. Books on English literature go there and so on and so forth." BRANDON: But when you rolled your own framework, that's not how it goes. It's like, "You have to launch this balloon into the stratosphere to put a book on the shelf from geology." Taras, to your point, it sounds like the importance is setting expectations properly for people, so that they know what they're in for because kind of calling back to Ryan Florence's post a few years ago, you can't not have a framework. At some point, you will have a framework in order to ship something. I would actually take it one step further. My friend, Kyle talks about this that library is the smallest unit that you're working within a framework but that still doesn't take your code to production and put it in a debugable state. You need a platform. It's arguable, if you're handling deployment tasks and debugging tasks and operating software in production, you now have a platform and it's fair to say that Rails crossed that threshold at one point. It's fair to say that Ember has probably crossed that threshold, if you combine Ember with CLI deploy and the CLI tooling and all of that stuff. This almost like acts as a platform if you're owning and maintaining the software in production. CHARLES: Now, can I play devil's advocate here and say, the platform, is that necessarily predicated on a framework? Is there a pyramid where it goes library, framework, platform and one is built on top of the other? Why couldn't I have a library? Because what I'm hearing is the scope of concerns is just rendering HTML based on a state is a very small chunk. The actual scope of things that you need to do to get that code in production and have it be reliable and do all of the features that you want to do is just massive but why is that predicated on a framework? For example, one thing you have is a bunch of libraries out there, like routing for managing the title tag, managing all these things that you have to do for managing deployment, for building your application, for compressing it. There's all these different libraries out there. What if there was one massive library that just picked a bunch of other libraries but I was still in control? TARAS: I've actually seen this happen in the last of the projects. When people jump into building, they will eventually realize that they're building a platform but what happens before that is that they take user's requirements and they break those up by sections and then they assign them to a bunch of development teams who go and actually start to build. On one platform, they end up building five or six or 10 of siloed, packaged applications that have, in some cases, have their own dependencies, they have similar architecture, might not have similar architecture. Each team kind of implements thing differently and there's an expectation that once you package these things as npm and then you install them into one package, to one application when you run build, it's just going to work together. That's where I think, with the framework, it does create a foundation for these verticals to be implemented using kind of common foundation. This is what a lot of times that as if you don't realize that what you're trying to set out to build, the way that the projects get managed quite often, especially for big applications, for big platforms is that, it creates this period of about two years, where there's a lot of confusion and there's a lot of duplication and then, you end up seeing code that it's hard to put in production. CHARLES: Yeah, I agree. I'm curious then, because we'd started out talking about library and framework and talked about it takes two years to recognize that you're building a framework or you're building not a framework but a platform. Brandon, you said something very interesting. Rails for example, crossed the threshold of being more than a framework and actually, being a platform. What are the concerns of a platform that are beyond a framework? We talked about and using the kind of loose definition of a framework as being something where the framework create spaces for your code, to run your code so you can just take little dollops of code and they have one concern but the framework manages the coordination of the concerns but what's the next level? BRANDON: For the purposes of this conversation, I may have muddied the waters a little bit because I think it's more interesting to talk about the transition and the level of which you've crossed the threshold from being a library or using libraries or collecting libraries, into maintaining a framework because it's where you're going to experience more pain more than likely, than to me, the idea from works on my machine, to deployed and supported across a lot of users, it sounds like it's more interesting but it's not where we experience most of our pain actually. From my experience, maintaining frontend single page applications most of the pain is actually getting the damn thing to work on your machine and getting the libraries to collectively work together and then, getting that to production, it kind of enters back into an area of more known unknowns. I think that's a surprisingly a more mature ecosystem, still getting from this thing works on my machine to getting it out the door. That wasn't true when Rails was invented and so, Rails had to invent a lot of its own ecosystem around this stuff. Like I said, I don't want to muddy the waters too much. I think to me, the interesting question is how do you know you've crossed this threshold? What pain points are exposed when you start crossing that threshold or when you're pushing the boundaries of that threshold? Because you should not be using a framework if you're using React to do a select dropdown. I think of it as, if you're using it the way to replace something you might do with a jQuery plugin five or 10 years ago, you're using React like it's a library. One of the questions that you brought up was is the combination of React and Redux is a framework and I would argue that it is but I kind of want to throw that out -- CHRIS: Oh, interesting. CHARLES: I would say, it's two libraries stuck together to make a bigger library. It's like a monolithic library. BRANDON: But by the time you're actually using that to do anything, maybe the third thing in there is like transitioning states when you transition routes. At what point is that threshold crossed? I didn't build most of the software that led me to some of the opinions that I have about this. This was actually Chris Freeman's, though. I may defer to you on this. CHRIS: I think React + Redux constitutes if you look at what it does. You have like this view layer and this state layer. There's a set of opinions on there that is useful and there is the foundation for doing quite a bit but in my experience, you've already kind of alluded to this a little bit. I don't think it's a framework because as soon as you start using those two things, suddenly the next thing you hit is, "Wait. How do I handle asynchronous things?" There's a lot of different options for that. "Oh, now, I need to do routing. How do I incorporate routing into my React app but also in a way, that is amenable to state transitions in Redux but also, that is aware of the async stuff that I'm doing, that is going to possibly be triggered by my routes and by my Redux actions or by some other side of things?" Suddenly, you are very quickly pulling out a bunch of other libraries but also, probably starting to build abstractions on top of them because you're already finding a lot of common patterns that you're repeating over and over as you incorporate more and more pieces of the stack and then, you're writing a lot of glue code. I think that's the point where suddenly, you look back and behind you is the footsteps of this framework that's been walking alongside you the whole time. BRANDON: That is where I carried you, then dropped you, then sort of drowned you. CHRIS: Yeah. CHARLES: And then, kicked your core. TARAS: I'd like to suggest a way to think about this. As you guys are talking about, it kind of occurred to me is that it seems to me that libraries concentrate on how and frameworks focus on the 'what.' CHRIS: Oh, I love that. TARAS: Because if you think about for example, React is how geostack efficiently update DOM, then Redux is how do you wire together state across multiple components that might be in different parts of state tree and if you look at, for example, a React router or a kind of a routing component is how do you choose which components you want to render when you navigates specific URL. Because those things by themselves are not a complete solution but when you combine them together, what you get is you have a way of saying, "When I navigate to specific URL, I'm going to load specific data, provide that data to components and then, I would have a way to navigate through a different URL when you click on a link." From that, I think what happens when you get to the framework level is you actually have a kind of a bigger umbrella and under that umbrella, you have ways to address problems that you did not have previously. I think that's what framework does it is over time, it's a way of addressing concerns that cannot be addressed with a solution. They have to address with a collection of solutions and then, they provide a specific solution. I don't know if that's -- CHARLES: That actually sparked off a train of thought in my mind that perhaps what you really want to do is say, "I'm going to go a little bit like Lisp on you all," in the sense of every code at some point is data, that maybe every library, at some point is a framework. It's just that you can look and say, "What is the scope of the 'what' that I'm tackling." For some point, you can say like React is a framework. It creates this space where I can put my JSx, AKA the render function and I'm basically inverting control and so, what it is, it is a framework for efficiently rendering HTML or efficiently mapping an object to a fragment of DOM and then the DOM that gets generated from your render function, patching that into the HTML. You don't have to worry about that. There's that inversion of control. It creates that space but that's the only space that it creates. From that perspective, React is a framework for generating HTML but that's all it is but it is a library for constructing applications. Does that make any sense? I think as you layer on concerns, your framework create spaces for you. You use your library code to put stuff in and so, in the same way, I think one of the key realizations, I'm going to call up like BigTest and I'm not going to take credit for this, which is actually a blog post that I read at Google. I can't remember what it is but we'll link to it in the show notes where he said, "There are no such thing as unit tests. There are no such thing as acceptance tests. There are just tests of varying scope." They're all acceptance tests. To use that one thing, they're all experiments. It's just what is the scope of the test that you're trying to accomplish and his argument was we want to make that scope as big as possible by default and then, where appropriate, you narrow down. Maybe, the framework library distinction is a little bit constructed, kind of a construction of our own minds and what really is there, there's just frameworks of varying scope. BRANDON: Agreeing on a shared scope is actually probably the most important part of this conversation. We're referring to building end-to-end an application from data access to rendering to testing -- CHARLES: To deployment to routing. BRANDON: Yeah. CHARLES: To one day accessibility. BRANDON: Yeah. Adding that into the discussion is like a baseline of what constitutes an application. It's the percentage of people that are able to actually use it, the people that are locked out from using it by ability. That's a very useful frame for the discussion. Let's agree on the scope of what an application is and then, coming back to what Taras was saying is basically, when you're talking about the 'how,' that's a decision point. You hear a lot of people talk about decision fatigue in JavaScript and it's almost a played out trope at this point but it hasn't gone away as a problem, so what frameworks are doing is they're making a series of decisions for you that allow you to basically connect the pieces from end to end. Basically, somebody threw a rope bridge across the canyon and it doesn't have to be the best solution to get end to end but we have to solve the problem end to end. If we agree on the places end to end and the problem is when you're building your own series of libraries, you're like, "I'm going to choose best in class of A, best in class of B, best in class of C," and that sounds really good but if you're trying to build a bridge across a canyon and you're building in 10 best of class sections, for the type of connection we're trying to make here in the middle, we're going to use the best in class here. The weak point is in the connections, so you had better be the world's foremost engineer if you're going to be the person connecting all these disparate pieces that are each best in class, in order to bridge this canyon. That's the thing that's interesting to me and it's not even agreed in our industry that JavaScript-based web applications are a good thing or that the browser is web application runtime, those are things that are up for debate. But I think if we make that assumption, this is sort of the founding principle of where Ember came from and it executed to the best of its ability at the time and that philosophy is, I think you can prove it out in terms of results based on if you have two different applications, one of them is built by somebody trying to jam together best in class components and the other person is starting with an end to end solution with a community of people rallied around that solution. It's been interesting to watch those approaches play out over time. I know Chris has a very specific hands-on experience of having done both of these. I'm curious to get your hot take. CHRIS: There's actually a concept that I think about a lot in relation to this question. It's something that I actually heard come up again recently so the timing was great but it's called hypocognition. The idea is hypocognition is when you either just like can't see or can't understand some kind of cognitive representation of something because you don't have the words for it. An example is in Western cultures, especially like in English speaking cultures, there are not that many words for the color blue but in a lot of other cultures, they have many, many words for the color blue. After doing a big study they found that these English speakers actually have a harder time recognizing different shades of blue, like more of them just look the same versus other cultures where their brains are actually wired to see all this variety because they actually have the linguistic representations for these ideas already. When you were talking about maybe a library is a framework at some point, I think that's right on. I think one of the things that I think about a lot when talking about frameworks and seeing these debates happen on the internet about, "What is a framework?" but also like, "Do you even need a framework?" is obviously, there's a lot of people who absolutely... Like Ryan Florence. Ryan Florence clearly knows what a framework is. He knows what it takes to build a web application and he does not lack the words to define a framework versus a library. He's just made that choice and it's a very informed choice but I wonder if there's also a lot of people who are getting into web development for the first time and they look at something like a framework and it seems just absurd to anyone would want all of the things that like in Ember or in Angular is talking about, when they can make a basic UI with React and it's easy and fun and really cool. But then this two-year path happens and they look back and they've learned a whole bunch and now it's like, "Ooh, you couldn't even have explained this to me before," because all of the words would have fallen on deaf ears but now suddenly, it makes a staggering amount of sense. CHARLES: Right. I love that. BRANDON: You have to make a bad one. CHARLES: Just so that you can inherit the vocabulary to understand why you made a bad one. Now, you guys actually have some experience with this. Brandon, you gave a talk about it, which I think you should give more widely because it's fantastic but for those folks who may or may not be aware that they are walking this to your path, I want to talk first about what are the signs that you're walking along this path and then two, what are the consequences in terms of the cost you're paying for walking this path. Let's start with that first thing. What are the signs? How can you tell that I am building a framework? CHRIS: I think one of the telltale signs and one of the biggest red flags that caused me and Brandon to have a very serious heart to heart about our own personal framework was when we hit the point where you could look at a set of tickets for features and all you saw was 'framework features' that you needed to write before you could build the feature itself. You know like, "Oh, we have basic routing setting and we have it set up so that if you have a route transition and you would like a data request to happen when a certain route transition happens, that will happen," but then someone would like infinite scroll and we want to use a query param. When a query param changes, I want to update the query and fetch more records, except that the glue code that we wrote to tie our router to our redux async stuff is not aware of query params. It has no concept of what a query param is or what to do when it changes. Also, it has no concept of refetching the data without a full route transition, so what do we do, this person wants infinite scroll but I first have to implement several layers of framework code before I build the UI feature that you want? CHARLES: The basic heuristic there is ratio of direct feature code to code that supports the direct feature code and code that supports the code that supports direct feature code. It's anytime you're anywhere above that first layer on the stack. CHRIS: Yeah, I think Taras nailed it like what's the 'what' versus the 'how.' If you're asked a question that is concerned with the 'what' and you spend more time focused on the 'how,' then you might have a framework. BRANDON: I think people will think of building an application like a recipe. If you think of it in those terms, people think of frameworks as very restrictive but I'm a big fan of Blue Apron, a sponsor of this podcast. Thank you. They pre-select the ingredients and they give you the instructions and you know what to do, you still have to do the effort but you know if you connect these pieces together properly that you're going to wind up having a good experience and then, it gives you a lot of freedom to experiment and be creative beyond that, should you choose to. I think one of the signs that you've done a crummy job is that you're staring down, like Chris Freeman said, you actually starting to restrict your choices like, "I can't actually build you that feature because we don't have time to take on the amount of work necessary to build the support structure, to build you that feature," or if you find yourself writing a test framework. CHRIS: Oh, yeah we did that too. BRANDON: You know, we were real deep in this. There are developers that are like, "I really want to feel like I'm walking into a grocery store and selecting all the things necessary for my recipe," and so it really depends on what the problem actually is. If you're working at a giant megacorp and you have a two-year timeline to deliver something and their goals are not about delivering stuff on a tight turnaround, that's usually a recipe for a software failure anyway but let's say, that you're in the 5% of those types of projects that's going to succeed, that might be a good place where you can say, "What we're trying to do here is so custom and we have such a long lead time and a long leash and such a high level of internal expertise here that we should be shopping in the grocery store and we should be selecting all these things and we should be solving these problems." Basically, when is it time to use a framework? Well, when you don't have 10 times the time you think you do, when you don't have the ability to spend 80% to 90% of your time in the first three to four months of your project, maybe six months, debugging you're glue code in between the different libraries that you're gluing together and then coming back and realizing that you've painted yourself into a corner and you have to re-architect your whole framework, then you could be so proud of this baby, 18 months to two years from now, when you actually have delivered both a framework that took about 70% of your time and an application that took 25% or 30% of your time. CHARLES: Yeah. I think it's important to realize that people think we'll do it and we'll build it as we go but I want to call out right there, you will be spending 80% of your time and you have to be upfront about it. Of this two years, 18 months of it is going to be spent building this framework and six months of it is going to be spent actually writing the feature code and you have to be 75% of your tickets or your issues, whoever track the work, 75% of that has to be dedicated to the framework. BRANDON: If you're going to bake in that kind of overhead purely for the satisfaction of a single or one or two developers that like inventing things, that is literally the worst possible reason you could do that. That is almost like a guaranteed recipe for failure. It has to be for some other business reason like, "We want to be the company that owns this." There has to be business value attached in making that kind of investment. If you can't justify that at the outset, then you should probably just go ahead and lean on an existing framework and join a community of people. CHARLES: Yeah and I think one good litmus test for that is, "Is this a 'what' for which there is currently no 'how?' One of the reasons we're writing BigTest is because for the general JavaScript community, there are a number of acceptance test frameworks out there but the market is very, very limited. When we look to actually acceptance tests, our React application, this thing does not exist. Now, we had experience with something that was very like Ember specific and so, we kind of knew what the 'what' was, we experienced the 'what' but there was no 'how' for our current situation. That's like a place where you might be called upon where makes business sense to actually invest in a framework. I'll tell you another thing too is if you have made the decision to kind of follow the beaten path on the other areas, then when a framework is called for, you have the bandwidth. You've allowed for the buffer, for the margin, for you to write in with that framework, whereas if you're already just by default, maintaining all the glue code in every single thing, then if some unique 'what' comes along, for which there is no 'how,' you're not going to have a bandwidth to tackle it. BRANDON: Yeah. That's a real bad situation to be in. TARAS: There's something else that I find interesting is because there's a certain point, like this two-year mark where everyone's like, "We want to fix this now." I think what is interesting what comes next which is the three years of undoing all the stuff that you made because the biggest challenge, especially in really big projects. When your projects has to borderline into platforms and a platform threshold is when you have a multiple teams working separately to write separate modules that run, maybe in a separate Git repo and maybe, packaged in separate npm package and assembled together. Then what happens at that point, the question arises like how do you actually make this changes in this environment. Answering that question is actually really difficult. I think if you look at frameworks like Ember, Ember has made it their business to figure out exactly how to make this happen and I think they've done it really well but it's a really challenging endeavor, especially in incorporate environments where they don't have an update. You have like upgrades are like a curse. It's like a thing that you don't really want to ever do and because most quite often, they don't have the right testing habits in place to be able to support the change if necessary. I think what a lot of times happens is that the team that made the framework in the first place, they end up trying to maintain a fort but you won't have like 10 people and they only have machetes, you know? All you can do is run around and try to chop down little twigs but at the end of day, the trees is still going to keep growing. I think that's the really challenging part of being two years into a project, where you realize that you actually need something much more comprehensive than initially thought you needed. CHARLES: On that, assuming that you have decided that you are going to make a framework, it's a good business decision for you. Based on the criteria of this discussion, how can you assess whether it's good? Chris, you talked about needing to integrate query params with routing and asynchronous data loading and making sure all of that coordination happened and worked together easily. What's the difference between your framework just missing features kind of having holes in it that can be filled in, versus something that's not good and it's going to cost you lots of money down the road. CHRIS: Yeah. TARAS: One thing, if you look at what makes a good library of any kind, it tends to be like how effectively and how much words to take the address the use cases that you need. The problem is that to build a good framework, you need to understand the use cases. This is what usually happens over time. Two years in, you've actually understood the use cases and now, it's time to change and so, I think if you want to build a good framework, you actually need to understand those use cases quite early on or account for understanding use cases over time and that's a big question -- how do you figure out how to know what you don't know. CHRIS: Yeah, I think that's exactly right. I think about what you were just saying Charles and Taras like one of the things that I think has a big impact on and what this process looks like is the completeness of vision for what's your project actually is. If you have a very, very clear idea of what the entire product you're building is going to be or, at least what the key money-making feature is going to be and you can understand the ins and outs of that, then I think that's the point where you can look at what you have and say, "Have I created a good or bad framework? Does this framework have the ability to solve this one very important thing that I have to be able to do? If the framework doesn't do it, then I need to build my own but I now know what very important features I need to front load my framework with." I kind of think of it as imagine that you're like Jeremiah Johnson, the Reverend Jeremiah Johnson and you're going to go trekking through the woods for some unknown amount of time and you have no idea yet. You don't actually know where you're going. You don't know what you're going to see. You don't even know what's out there because you haven't done the research or whatever and you need to be prepared for anything, so you bring just a hodgepodge of stuff. If that's you at the beginning of your company or the beginning of your product and yours is kind of like... I don't know, we got to get product market fit and that means that we may have to kind of pivot once or twice or we need to be very flexible, then I would think long and hard before you commit to writing your own framework because you don't even know what framework to build and you might as well take a broad array of tools and use what you need. There will be times where that's frustrating and there won't be exactly the right tool for the job but 80% of the time, it's going to do just fine but if you know you have to do this one very special thing and you know that a framework is going to give you a lot of stuff that you won't need and it doesn't really excel at the one thing you do need, then don't force the framework. There may be time to build your own but just know that you need to go in with a very clear idea of what you're doing before you start building the abstractions that constitute a framework, rather than just like a constellation of libraries. CHARLES: I have a question on that then. Going back to one of the things we were talking about like React plus Redux. Your opinion, Chris that it is not a framework, so the question is does a framework actually exist for React? CHRIS: My guess is that many frameworks exist for React. CHARLES: Is there a public framework? TARAS: There is one called Fusion but it's [inaudible] what you would have imagine. It is essentially Redux and React together conventionalized. They addressed a bunch of concerns around service rendering and such but it does exist. CHRIS: How about Next? Next.js? TARAS: I'm not familiar with its features from a single page application perspective. CHARLES: I think it does have a router. It does bundle with Redux and this is one of the things that when you first started using Redux, it's like, "How do I even get my store to my components?" Yes, I can connect them but there's actually a lot of stuff that you have to do. First, you have to say, "I'm going to put my reducers here and then when I create my store, I'm going to fold all my reducers. If I've got a whole bunch of reducers in my application, I've got to fold them all together. I've got to pass them off to the store. When I create the store, I have to inject the middleware and then, everybody else just imports my store and then, I have to put in a provider and then, I can connect my components." That's actually a lot of stuff that you have to do and I think that, for example, Fusion just says, "Put your reducers here and we'll take care of all that process," and so it makes that decision for you, right? It says, "For state management, you're going to use Redux. For your reducers, they're going to go here. For your actions, they're going to go here." I don't know exactly how it's laid out but I remember reading the ReadMe, it was basically layering conventions over that. That's definitely going into framework territory but that's the only one that I know of, which is really, really odd. TARAS: There's something interesting that's happening also and this goes to what Brandon was saying earlier is that choosing the best in class, there's this 10 things but then, what if one of the best in class stops being the best in class. The fact that the creators of Redux was essentially saying that we needed to basically provide a way to do Flux that was better than 10 different options that were available, so here's Redux. We've created Redux but we don't really think it's ultimately the solution. We need to have something else in React that provides a foundation for us to be able to deliver a better state management than what Redux is, so what happens when one of the best in class is no longer the best in class? The bridge is already standing. There's people walking across the bridge already. How do you replace one of the chains in it? CHRIS: Over the course of six months while you figure out the differences in API between Flux and Redux and all the custom route transition data loading stuff you did with your Ajax library in your state management software that you put in a case statement inside there that you now have to change over. It's easy. It's no big deal. Don't worry about it. BRANDON: Just a simple matter of programming. TARAS: At least 25 years of collective frontend development experience is laughing like hyenas about the simplicity of building a -- BRANDON: Yeah, I'm actually looking at some of the old code that Chris wrote for trying to glue together, Redux Saga. I've been out of the game long enough to not know whether that's been superseded by some new or best in class piece of technology and even then, it was really challenging. This is true for frameworks too, is they don't really optimize for best in class. They optimize, hopefully for best fit for purpose but the world has moved on since Ember launched obviously. A lot of things have changed and it's, at least as difficult to try to keep that up to date with evolving trends and technologies and updates for a core team at a framework level as it is for you, as an engineer on the team. The difference is you get to outsource that work to a core team for a framework. Ember has not done a fantastic job in keeping up with. They've done a good job and they've tried their best but if there were more people working on it or if there was more effort applied to it or if it was a higher priority, you would see Ember being a more up-to-date framework using more modern tools. As a framework author, if you stay too close to the bleeding edge, all you're going to do is change out your build system. You're going to replace a Broccoli with webpack, with Rollup, whatever's after that. What's new in Packer? CHRIS: Parcel? CHARLES: Parcel. BRANDON: Parcel. You should immediately go build your framework with that and have fun. I am excited by the new and interesting stuff that's happening in these ecosystems and I think it's important not to get lulled into the siren song if your goal is to actually ship a piece of software on a timetable or a budget. TARAS: One thing, if it's a red flag, if you think this is easy, if you think your decisions can be made in this isolation without talking to somebody else and actually kind of flashing it out, then you're probably doing something wrong because a lot of these things are not trivial. There's a lot of thought, there's a lot of considerations used to go into decisions that you make, especially when you're creating something that is going to be used by more than a few people. I think that's really one of those things where it's hard to know what you don't know but if you think you know and you haven't done this before, you haven't done this a few times before, you're probably missing some pieces. BRANDON: Yeah, I agree with that. CHRIS: I think one of the things that's really enticing about React and Taras, you just hit on it but I've never felt as clever as when I was writing a React app. If I'm clever, I mean, clever in the same way that I felt really clever when I wrote some unbelievably convoluted Scala one-liner that six months later, neither me nor anyone else could decipher what it meant but at that time, I felt like a god of programming. That's how it felt like, "Well, a lot of the React stuff is addicting." It felt so much fun. It was so much fun until I really had to do something and it mattered for my job and there was a deadline and people were depending on me and I've realized that the clever thing I had done a month later was not the right clever thing but I can see how, if you're like what Taras was saying, where you are at the point where these decisions are easy. These decisions make sense. We're going to be fine and you haven't done it enough to kind of like know where all of the pitfalls are. That cleverness that you feel is fantastic and I can see why it takes two years before you look back and if the cleverness was finally worn off and then, you're just mortified at what you've done. CHARLES: Pride cometh before the fall. CHRIS: Yeah. BRANDON: It's like being a dungeon master in Dungeons and Dragons, where you're like, "Oh, look at this fiendish world." All right, cool. Now, you actually live there though. I have to move into an apartment on Mordor. TARAS: You know what's the funny flipside to that is that coming from Ember world where it's so normal to leverage the work of other clever people, like really smart people who've invested a lot of time to solve a particular problem, is that there's no stronger sense of being dumb than having to write it from scratch in React. That first feeling of like, "I've actually never had to implement this from scratch," and I feel like a bunch of applications before but because I've leaned on for accessibility, I've leaned on something that someone else has done and it worked really well for me and it was perfect. But now, I need to implement autocomplete from scratch in React and I have no support. I'm basically learning as I'm going on this and it's that sense of discomfort that you get from having to do it from scratch and then, comes the euphoria of having to figure it out. But if you figured it out, you figured it out in the last month. You've written it for the first time in the last month and you now understand what all the things that the Ember implementation does for you. It's an interesting psychology of doing this -- CHARLES: Yeah, it gives you a lot of perspective but you have to ask as a business owner, who may or may not be technical and this is the hardest thing for technical people who are business owners is to be able to not see things through a tactical lens. Is what you really want to pay for is to basically give your programmers this kind of a-ha moment of their own shortcomings because that what you want to be buying. BRANDON: Yeah, you want to maximize leverage. Your goal with technology is to maximize leverage. It's like being hired as a chef and you walk in and then you're like, "I'm a terrific chef. I worked in these fancy kitchens in New York and I'm known as a great chef," and they're like, "Okay, cool. Here's some flint and steel and a spear." CHARLES: Go hunt. BRANDON: You're like, "Wait, what?" Yeah, yeah, yeah. Show me what you can do. TARAS: We had a conversation in one of the previous podcast with Michael Jackson and we asked him, "What is the one thing you wish like React community would do more of?" and he's like, "I really wish React community have more conventions." All of this is to kind of say as like, there is a place for frameworks in React world. There's a very strong place for it. The question is how and what it said and how do you actually build it and when do you --? BRANDON: So we need a framework for making framework. TARAS: Getting really meta here. BRANDON: I totally agree with that and that's a great observation and that was actually the point of my talk as well, which is if I could convince people just to use Ember and improve Ember, that would be great because I think it's a really great starting point. But the React community is much larger because it had such a great adoption story. The adoption of Ember was very difficult and the adoption of React was very easy and it expanded to include the scope of full end to end applications in terms of what people thought the problem spaces they were thinking of with React. Ember was built to solve that but it was hard to get into. React was really easy to get into but it's actually hard to build applications with. I would love to see a dedicated subset of the React community, except the idea of shared solutions and the philosophies that made Ember into sort of a powerhouse of value delivery but built out of tools that satisfy the React community and a little more modular and a little more available for people to customize and built in that ecosystem. I'd really love to see that that included all of the main components of what we accept as, "This is an application framework. It handles testing. It handles accessibility. It handles data loading," and it doesn't have to be best in class in every scenario but it does have to be a reasonable bridge across that chasm and have a group of people look at this the same way. I would love to see a collective subset of the React community dedicate themselves to this idea. I don't know if that's too culturally opposed or even orthogonal to what the value system inside the React community. I haven't been able to fish that out but I would really love to see that emerge. this is something I would love to push for and I'd love to see other people jump in and push for as like, "What if 20 of us got together and decided we're all building our applications in similar ways, instead of one person saying, 'I'm going to use --'" Even create React app is kind of a Band-Aid on that, it isn't useful past a certain stage of life. I would love to see a group of people, though, get together that are sort of like-minded like that, the Michael Jacksons and maybe even Dan Abramov or a group of people that shared that set of values or came into React from the Ember community. That's actually one piece of advice I would give to people. You said, "How do you convince this engineer that they've built a bad framework?" Use a decent one. That's the biggest guide. Use a decent one. Build something in Ember and ship it to production and go, "Oh, I get it." If you've used a good framework, you can't go back to rolling a crappy one. Your standards have been ratcheted up. CHRIS: I wholeheartedly agree that you should try something else and Ember is a great option but I don't want to dismiss just like, "React is cool as hell," and there's a lot of stuff in React that's really, really awesome and things that I wish that will show up in Ember and they are starting to show up in Ember but they're taking a while and it'll be nice in there but who knows when that will be but I would encourage even more so is both sides, like Ember folks who are listening to this podcast, if you have never messed around with React because you feel some kind of tribal affiliation that you can't betray, please set that aside and go do something in React because you will learn a lot about why Ember does what it does and you will see a lot of really interesting things that will probably jostle some ideas loose in your brain. The same thing goes for React developers. You, 100% should spend a weekend building something in Ember and nothing about that means that you have to switch or it's going to change the path that you're going on at work but I guarantee you, you will go back to your React application with some new and fair useful perspective that you didn't have before and that's okay. That's great. There's no identity crisis that will come about as a result of that. CHARLES: That is a fantastic advice, Chris. It will only stretch you. CHRIS: Yeah. BRANDON: I think developers have been sold this idea of a competitive landscape by authors of these frameworks because it helps sell the framework. You can build and strengthen a community by leaning into the tribalism that can surround the usage of a tool. The older I've gotten as a person who was deeply tribalistic about Ruby on Rails when I got into it and Ember when I got into it, because I love tribes, I think tribes are awesome and it's a way to make friends but when you really lean into that, the costs are too high and experimenting with other technologies and noticing flaws in your own technology is not only not a betrayal, it's actually critical to your growth as a developer. The more people that do that, like Chris was saying, the better both of those ecosystems will get. CHARLES: Absolutely because having spent as much time in React as I have, I really appreciate the precious things about Ember. It will make you appreciate the things that you hold dear. It will make you appreciate the really, really, really special things about the tool that you're using and at the same time, it will highlight the weaknesses which you can immediately use to feedback and make your tool better. It really is a win-win situation. TARAS: I just want to do a little plug before we close up. I think the feels of working with Ember is actually gone into microstates and we're still getting our things together to make microstates look accessible and usable by everyone but that feeling of pleasure that you get from working with Ember and just things just being there for you, like we really want to reproduce that and make that available in React community and the stuff that we do in microstates is actually really designed for that. CHRIS: Yeah, I see that in BigTest too as well. That's definitely another place where it's like, "These people definitely used to spend time in Ember and they're now in React-land." It's cool to see that stuff getting ported over. CHARLES: Absolutely because it fundamentally changes your taste. Working with an application that doesn't have like a bolted on testing framework is like eating water soup. You just can't enjoy your life. It really is flavored everything that we do. On that note, we can go ahead and wrap up. There actually is some pretty exciting news. We're actually going to be launching a BigTest launcher. Up until this point, you kind of had to roll your own using BigTest for your assertions but using something like Karma to actually launch the browsers and we're actually launching our own launcher. I guess we've written our own launcher and we're going to be pushing it to NDM, not to overload the word launch. You can look for that in the next couple of weeks. There's going to be a CLI that ships with BigTest to help you do even more set up, to make it so that you can just drop BigTest right into your application, whether it's jQuery, React, Ember, you name it. That should be really, really fun. Be looking for that and with that, if anybody has any other remarks... BRANDON: If people are coming through RubyConf this year, I'll be there talking about management stuff. That's my only near-future conference stuff coming up. Hope to see some of the more Ruby-flavored folks out there. CHARLES: All right-y. Definitely, go to every single talk that Brandon ever gives. You won't regret it. I can base that on very dear personal experience. You won't be disappointed. You know, not to put the pressure on or anything like that but you could never put any more pressure on Brandon than he puts on himself. With that, we will say good bye. Bye Chris, bye Brandon. Thank you so much. This is a great conversation. It certainly clarified a lot in my mind -- TARAS: Yes, same here. CHARLES: -- About these problems. With that, we will say goodbye. Thank you for listening The Frontside Podcast. Please get in touch with us at @TheFrontside on Twitter or contact at Frontside.io on email. We do a range of custom services from full stack project development to JavaScript mentoring, to as you go JavaScript help desks kind of stuff. If you need to reach out to an expert, please get in touch. Our podcast as always is produced by the inimitable, Mandy Moore. Thank you very much and we'll see you all next time.

   Ryan Schaaf is an author, speaker, professor, consultant and blogger. Today we are talking about his book (written with Ian Jukes and Nicky Mohan) Reinventing Learning for the Always-On Generation: Strategies and Apps that Work (Solution Tree, 2015.) He is the author of three other books and has a couple more in the works. Reinventing Learning, an IPPY award winner for its contributions as a resource book for educators, is an incredible tool that focuses on 9 attributes that educators should understand when working with the Always-On Generation. We take some time to talk about the 9 attributes and take a deep dive into three of them: Attribute #4 is my favorite - It states, "Digital learners prefer to network and collaborate simultaneously with many others." #6 - "Digital learners prefer just in time learning." And # 9 - Digital learners prefer learning that is simultaneously relevant, active, useful, and fun." Wait until you discover all of the extra resources that are included with the book! Wow!!! Lots to learn.  Thanks for listening. Have an awesome day!   Contact Ryan: rschaaf@NDM.edu Tweet Ryan @ryanlschaaf More information as well as other resources: Reinventing Learning for the Always-On Generation: Strategies and Apps that Work (Solution Tree, 2015) Game On: Using Digital Games to Transform Teaching, Learning, and Assessment (Solution Tree, 2017) Ryan's Amazon Page Solution Tree Ryan's Page on Solution Tree Listen to Ryan on the Teach Thought Podcast Part 1: Ep. 81 Reinventing Learning: Why Are Kids Different Today? Part 2: Ep. 84 Reinventing Learning: The Nine Core Learning Attributes Of The Digital Generation – A Primer Part 3: Ep. 85 Reinventing Learning: A#1: Digital Learners Prefer Receiving Information From Multiple, Hyperlinked Sources Part 4: Ep. 88 Reinventing Learning: A#2: Digital Learners Prefer Parallel Processing and Multitasking Part 5: Ep. 89 Reinventing Learning: A#3: Digital Learners Prefer Processing Video, Images, and Sound Part 6: Ep. 90 Reinventing Learning A#4: Digital Learners Prefer Collaboration Part 7: Ep. 91 Reinventing Learning A#5: Digital Readers Read In An ‘F’ or Fast-Pattern Part 8: Ep. 96 Reinventing Learning A#6: Digital Learners Prefer Just-In-Time Learning Part 9: Ep. 99 Reinventing Learning A#7: Digital Learners Prefer Instant Gratification https://infosavvy21.com/    Length - 49:22

V tomto podcaste si povieme o nepravdivej časti správ, ktoré informovali o tom, prečo USA nezakázali na svoje územie vstup občanom z bohatších moslimských krajín. Ďalej si povieme o novej nádejnej technológii v oblasti antibiotík a skúsime zodpovedať na otázku, či sa máme nalievať destilovanou vodou alebo radšej nie. TémyZdroje Intro Prečo USA nezakázali vstup na svoje územie aj občanom bohatších moslimských krajín?  Nová technológia v oblasti antibiotík  Čo s nami spraví, ak sa napijeme destilovanej vody?  Fakt a fikcia Outro Donald Trump didn’t come up with the list of Muslim countries he wants to ban. Obama did. Molecule shows ability to thwart pathogens’ genetic resistance to antibiotic Peptide-conjugated phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomer (PPMO) restores carbapenem susceptibility to NDM-1-positive pathogens in vitro and in vivo HEALTH RISKS FROM DRINKING DEMINERALISED WATER 80-million-year-old dinosaur collagen confirmed Figure 1: Growing graphene films in the ambient-air process. Observation of the Wigner-Huntington transition to metallic hydrogen Physicists doubt bold report of metallic hydrogen

Wider Statin Use Saves Lives The largest and most reliable study ever to examine the effect of statins has found them to reduce the risk of heart attacks, strokes and premature deaths among a wide range of apparently healthy people. The benefits greatly exceed any known risks associated with taking these drugs.

Professor Townsend tells us about lessons to be drawn from the history of immunology in Oxford, from 1979 onwards, until his current research on active and passive immunity to influenza. All these developments happened in Oxford because the atmosphere was right, open, researchers were encouraged to explore, and there was an enthusiasm in a great environment. Experiments and discoveries were made possible by the very open attitude of the supervisors at the time, telling their team that they they could do anything they wanted.

Professor Townsend tells us about lessons to be drawn from the history of immunology in Oxford, from 1979 onwards, until his current research on active and passive immunity to influenza. All these developments happened in Oxford because the atmosphere was right, open, researchers were encouraged to explore, and there was an enthusiasm in a great environment. Experiments and discoveries were made possible by the very open attitude of the supervisors at the time, telling their team that they they could do anything they wanted.

Professor Townsend tells us about lessons to be drawn from the history of immunology in Oxford, from 1979 onwards, until his current research on active and passive immunity to influenza. All these developments happened in Oxford because the atmosphere was right, open, researchers were encouraged to explore, and there was an enthusiasm in a great environment. Experiments and discoveries were made possible by the very open attitude of the supervisors at the time, telling their team that they they could do anything they wanted.

Three of the interns from Summer 2012 tell us about their experience of working in NDM's laboratories and staying in an Oxford college. Three of the interns from Summer 2012 tell us about their experience of working in NDM’s laboratories and staying in an Oxford college. If you are interested in applying for a Summer Internship at the Nuffield Department of Medicine, the please take a look at our main internships page with information on how to apply.

Colin Baigent, Professor of Epidemiology, Clinical Trial Service Unit, Oxford, talks about why the drug Statin saves lives.

Colin Baigent, Professor of Epidemiology, Clinical Trial Service Unit, Oxford, talks about why the drug Statin saves lives.

Manuel joined Oxford in 2010, after completing an undergraduate degree in Mathematics at MIT. He works on Rare and low-frequency DNA variants and their contribution to individual predisposition to common diseases. Every year, about 65 DPhil students start a life changing experience in the Nuffield Department of Medicine in Oxford. The Department offers a highly competitive studentship for our DPhil programme to outstanding candidates of any nationality. The candidates are judged on the basis of their academic and research potential. The NDM Prize Studentship is a four year course which includes full payment of all fees and an annual stipend.

Zhe Zhao joined Oxford in 2010, after completing an undergraduate degree in Biological Science at Tsinghua University in Beijing and a Msc at Leiden University Medical Centre. He works on Transcription Regulation in Coronary Development. Every year, about 65 DPhil students start a life changing experience in the Nuffield Department of Medicine in Oxford. The Department offers a highly competitive studentship for our DPhil programme to outstanding candidates of any nationality. The candidates are judged on the basis of their academic and research potential. The NDM Prize Studentship is a four year course which includes full payment of all fees and an annual stipend.

Karolis Bauza joined Oxford in 2009 after completing an undergraduate degree in Pre-Medicine at Belmont Abbey College, North Carolina. He works on Malaria pre-erythrocytic stage vaccines: targeting antigen combinations. Every year, about 65 DPhil students start a life changing experience in the Nuffield Department of Medicine in Oxford. The Department offers a highly competitive studentship for our DPhil programme to outstanding candidates of any nationality. The candidates are judged on the basis of their academic and research potential. The NDM Prize Studentship is a four year course which includes full payment of all fees and an annual stipend.

Katherine Bull completed preclinical studies at Cambridge in 1999 and graduated in Clinical Medicine in 2002 at Oxford. She works on Whole Genome Sequencing in ENU mutagenesis and Autoimmunity under the supervision of Richard Cornall. Every year, about 65 DPhil students start a life changing experience in the Nuffield Department of Medicine in Oxford. The Department offers a highly competitive studentship for our DPhil programme to outstanding candidates of any nationality. The candidates are judged on the basis of their academic and research potential. The NDM Prize Studentship is a four year course which includes full payment of all fees and an annual stipend.

Yang Li joined Oxford in October 2010 after completing an undergraduate degree in Maths and Computer Science at McGill University in Montreal, Canada. He works on A comparative genomics approach to de novo genome assembly of next-generation sequencing. Every year, about 65 DPhil students start a life changing experience in the Nuffield Department of Medicine in Oxford. The Department offers a highly competitive studentship for our DPhil programme to outstanding candidates of any nationality. The candidates are judged on the basis of their academic and research potential. The NDM Prize Studentship is a four year course which includes full payment of all fees and an annual stipend.

Annette Böhmer joined Oxford in 2010 after completing an undergraduate degree in Medicine at the University of Leipzig. She is working on Defining Hepatitis C genotype 3 immune responses under the supervision of Dr Ellie Barnes. Every year, about 65 DPhil students start a life changing experience in the Nuffield Department of Medicine in Oxford. The Department offers a highly competitive studentship for our DPhil programme to outstanding candidates of any nationality. The candidates are judged on the basis of their academic and research potential. The NDM Prize Studentship is a four year course which includes full payment of all fees and an annual stipend.

After user research has discovered content opportunities what is the transition that needs to occur for the research outputs to activate a content strategy? This presentation will discuss how NDM are trying to understand and test content consumption and discuss approaches to being influential with the content experts.

John McConnell discusses the media reaction to the recent NDM-1 antibiotic resistance research article.

In this talk, Dr Chris Khalil of News Digital Media (NDM) will explain how NDM are using an innovative web/mobile based approach to Cultural Probes (digital scrapbooks) and other research tools, utilising an array of low cost and freely available web and mobile applications such as Tumblr and Facebook.

Those initial stages of converting your company to web standards are much like trying to score that first kiss with the princess. You seduce them with the business benefits of web-standards development, and the rest of the arguments we have all read, written, and preached to anyone who will listen. But getting corporate web standards in place is just a sign that the real relationship is about to begin. The honeymoon is over, and now it’s time to figure out what has gone wrong and why the prince and princess now seem to be constantly bickering - when they were meant to live happily ever after. Scott draws on his experiences leading the development of eight large media web sites for News Digital Media to examine the ideals of web standards and how they translate within a large organisation. Learn how to make web standards work for you, when rules must be broken and how to deliver a final product that meets deadlines and still keeps project teams happy. Scott has had over 6 years experience developing websites in large corporate environments. Most recently, his role was Web Technology Strategist at News Digital Media (NDM) in Sydney, involving the strategy and education of best practice web development across the company. He has lead several major redesigns of NDM websites, converting them from legacy table based layouts to standards compliant, accessible and search engine friendly websites. In a company of over 500 employees this can incorporate its share of challenges and rewards. Scott’s current role is co-founder of molt:n digital, a Sydney based web consultancy. In his spare time he finds time to blog about SEO, accessibility and all things web standards on his website, standardzilla.com. Licensed as Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/).

There can be a feeling in the web development community that "SEO is evil" - Scott Gledhill cuts through the hype to focus on how developing accessible, standards compliant websites is the first step in creating search engine friendly websites - and also talks about what is being done in the industry to make websites more findable, sometimes at the cost of making them less usable. SEO is big business and it’s attracting a whole new breed of web practitioners into our industry. Learn the advantages that we have as web standards developers when it comes to the practice of search engine optimisation, as well as some of the disadvantages, and how to overcome them. We will discuss how to handle overzealous search engine marketers, how to find your way through the hype and buzzwords of the industry and, most importantly, how not to compromise your websites’ integrity, best practice development and usability when being confronted by SEO. Scott Gledhill is Web Technology Strategist at News Digital Media (NDM) in Sydney. He has lead several major redesigns of NDM websites, converting them from legacy table based layouts to standards compliant, accessible and search engine friendly websites. His current role involves strategy and education on search engine optimisation, accessibility and best practice web development across the broad network of NDM websites. Scott believes and practices a holistic approach of usability, design, development and findability, and communicates the end result across all areas of the business. Scott also moonlights as co-founder for molt:n digital, a Sydney based web consultancy. In his spare time he finds time to blog about SEO, accessibility and all things web standards on his website, standardzilla.com Licensed as Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/).

In neonatal diabetes mellitus (NDM), a rare genetic disorder, insulin therapy is required but the management is difficult. Frequent blood glucose determinations are necessary in most cases. Microdialysis subcutaneous glucose monitoring (MSGM) is feasible in neonates and has been proposed to reduce painful blood sampling and blood loss. We have applied long-term MSGM to a small-fordate female newborn with transient NDM. We found a good correlation of subcutaneous and blood glucose concentration over a wide range of values. MSGM enabled a reduction in blood glucose determinations during optimization of intravenous insulin treatment and initiation of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. We conclude that long-term MSGM is feasible and may reduce painful blood sampling and blood loss in NDM. Furthermore, long-term MSGM may hold a potential for avoiding hypoglycemic episodes and earlier discharge. Copyright (C) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.