Podcasts about Puffer

Wolken: Was wir von ihnen lernen können; Weg vom "Wir gegen die" - Warum Demokratie Training braucht; Warum Vergessen wichtig ist; E-Autos als Puffer in der Energiewende; Social Media: Für Kinder und Jugendliche ungesund; Ötzis Mikrobiom ist noch immer aktiv; Stress im Job: Warum nicht nur die Arbeitsmenge belastet; Moderation: Martin Winkelheide. Von WDR 5.

Heute reden wir über folgende Fragen aus der Community: Meine täglichen Routinen funktionieren nicht. Was kann ich tun? Gibt es in TickTick oder über eine andere App eine Möglichkeit, automatisierte Aufgabenketten anzulegen? Wie kann ich den Überblick über Wochen- und Monatsaufgaben in den Dailies behalten? Wie sieht deine Wochenplanung aus? Gibt es feste Blöcke oder viel Flexibilität und wie planst du Puffer ein? Das Sammeln meiner Aufgaben funktioniert gut, aber ich scheitere am Abarbeiten. Hast du einen Hack für mich? Wenn du auch eine Frage hast, reich die gern per E-Mail ein! -- Mails an: info@zeitplanerin.de Zeitplanerin auf Discord: https://discord.gg/Z7MTSptaWf Zeitplanerin auf Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/zeitplanerin/ Zeitplanerin-Magazin abonnieren: https://zeitplanerin.de/newsletter/ Zeitplanerin auf Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDdAKA41HqQNuU719-7fzdw

Es geht für die USA um alles: Der Petrodollar steht auf dem Spiel. Was gerade im Nahen Osten passiert, ist kein regionaler Konflikt. Es ist ein Kampf um die Weltleitwährung – und Amerika weiß, dass es ihn nicht verlieren darf. Denn ohne den Petrodollar fehlen den USA bis zu einer Billion Dollar im Jahr. Das ist kein Puffer. Das ist der Unterschied zwischen Weltmacht und Abstieg. Dr. Markus Krall ordnet das Ganze ein. Ohne Schönfärberei: - Warum Amerika diesen Krieg gewinnen muss – egal, was es kostet? - Warum Europa der größte Verlierer sein wird – und die Bevölkerung es noch nicht begriffen hat? - Was die Straße von Hormuz mit deinem Einkauf im Supermarkt zu tun hat? - Droht uns wirklich eine globale Nahrungskrise – und wie realistisch ist das? - Was das USA-China-Treffen wirklich bedeutet – und was hinter verschlossenen Türen besprochen wurde? Mehr dazu in der heutigen Tippausgabe von Faszination Freiheit.

Have you ever head of PUFFER FISHING? In this video, Lee Hammock breaks down the exact mechanics of this toxic behavior and explains why abusers and controlling people suddenly turn freezing cold the exact moment a relationship becomes emotionally real. I take a deep dive into how toxic individuals act deeply affectionate and attentive at first, only to "puff up" their defenses, lash out, or pick fights over trivial matters when true intimacy is required. If you've ever felt completely stranded by a partner who clams up, runs away, or ghosted you just as you were getting close, you are likely dealing with the defensive mechanism of an abusive person trying to regain control. Connect with Lee:My Courses: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://courses.mentalhealness.net⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ 1-on-1 Coaching Calls: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://link.me/mentalhealness⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠All My Link: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://beacons.page/mentalhealness ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Follow on Instagram/TikTok: @mentalhealnesssIf this episode helped you gain clarity, please leave a 5-star review on Spotify! It helps others find the validation they need to heal.

Mit dem Hund tricksen: Clevere Kopfarbeit für deinen Hund. Tricksen ist so viel mehr als nur Hunde-Beschäftigung gegen Langeweile! In dieser Folge dreht sich bei Claudia (die Hundetrainerin) und Binni (die Hundehalterin) alles um die wunderbare Welt des Tricktrainings. Angeregt durch ein Video von Hörerin Kati sprechen die beiden darüber, wie wertvoll clevere Kopfarbeit für unsere Vierbeiner wirklich ist. Ihr erfahrt in dieser Episode: ➡️ „Rüber“: Wie das selbstständige Wechseln der Seite hinter dem Rücken aufgebaut wird und warum es dir als perfekter Puffer bei schwierigen Hundebegegnungen den „Superhelden-Ummantel“ im Alltag schenkt. ➡️ Pfötchen geben für Fortgeschrittene: Warum dieser vermeintlich einfache Trick Binis Rüden Pitti und Angsthund Teufelchen vor echte Rätsel stellt und welche unterschiedlichen Trainingswege (wie das Post-it-Targeting) es gibt. Körperschulung & Sicherheit: Warum Tricks wie die „Acht durch die Beine“, das „Slalom“ oder das Einparken in der „Mitte“ (Home) nicht nur die Fitness fördern, sondern unsicheren Hunden enormen Halt geben. Psychologie im Training: Warum Kopfarbeit müder macht als stundenlanges Fahrradfahren, was das „Heiß-Kalt-Spiel“ beim Shapen bedeutet und warum man immer mit einem Erfolgserlebnis aufhören sollte. Packt die Kekse aus, lasst euch inspirieren und macht euren nächsten Spaziergang einfach mal zu einem spannenden Trick-Abenteuer! Welche Tricks können eure Hunde schon am besten? Schreibt es uns unbedingt in die Kommentare bei Spotify oder besucht uns auf Instagram unter @claudia_pauliks!

Puffer War I by Sebastian by 826 Valencia

Jules und Frank besprechen in Folge 31 den souveränen Heimsieg gegen Wolfsburg. Dieser war im Kampf um Platz 3 genauso wichtig wie die Wiedergutmachung der Schlappe gegen Nürnberg. Dieser wurde mit 4:1 nach Hause geschickt, was einen Hauch zu hoch war. Dadurch war der Puffer gross genug, dass die Niederlage in München alles offen lässt. So muss gegen Union mindestens ein Unentschieden her, aber ein Sieg wäre die sichere Seite. Abgänge gibt es auch schon zu besprechen, ebenso wie Hoffnung stiftende Zugänge. Fazit: Es bleibt spannend bis zum Schluss. Daumen drücken!Kicktipp Sieger AP Bundesliga Frauen:SGE-Papa 285 PunkteRegine 283 PunkteMicha 281 Punkte ============ PARTNER ===========

Let's get this straight, pal: only ME AND MY FRIENDS are allowed to make thousands on hardcore. Capiche? https://www.gofundme.com/manage/save-the-bug-house-help-tate-reclaim-his-home  Intro Music: Sportswear- Keep It Together Submit music to demolistenpodcast@gmail.com. Become a patron at https://www.patreon.com/demolistenpodcast. Leave us a message at (260)222-8341 Queue: Paper Jam, Apartment 213, Psycho Terrorist Despair System, Violent Imagery, Fire Magic, Sarin, Fentanyl Tapwater, Subversive Intent, Puffer, Army Of God https://unlawfulassembly.bandcamp.com/album/army-of-god-s-t-cassette https://puffpuffpuff.bandcamp.com/album/street-hassle https://rebirthrecordsphl.bandcamp.com/album/subversive-intent-s-t https://phagetapes.bandcamp.com/album/youth-in-asia-fentanyl-tapwater https://sarinnwi.bandcamp.com/album/the-world-goes-on-without-you https://stygianblackhand.bandcamp.com/album/memories-of-fire  

Während die USA und der Iran in einen militärischen Konflikt am Golf verwickelt sind, scheint China sich vornehm zurückzuhalten. Aber der Schein trügt. Rixa Fürsen spricht mit dem China-Spezialisten Felix Lee über Pekings Doppelstrategie. Warum blockiert China Resolutionen im UN-Sicherheitsrat, obwohl es massiv auf Ölimporte aus der Golfregion angewiesen ist? Lee analysiert Chinas „Energiewende“, die vor allem sicherheitspolitisch motiviert ist und weshalb das Land durch seine massiven Reserven resistenter gegen den aktuellen Ölpreisschock ist als der Westen. Felix Lee erklärt außerdem die chinesische Taktik des Einkreisens und Unterlaufens. Während Donald Trump US-Militär vom Indopazifik abzieht, um den Iran zu bekämpfen, nutzt China dieses Machtvakuum zur Expansion. Besonders im Hinblick auf Taiwan. Zudem beleuchtet er die bizarre Beziehung zwischen Trump und Xi Jinping vor dem geplanten Staatsbesuch in Peking. Von seltenen Erden bis hin zu chinesischen Drohnen, die am Golf plötzlich US-Abwehrsysteme alt aussehen lassen. Wenn die westliche Diplomatie versagt, könnte China am Ende doch die Karten neu mischen. Lee und Fürsen diskutieren, warum Peking Pakistan als Puffer vorschickt und ab wann der wirtschaftliche Schaden durch den blockierten Welthandel so groß wird, dass China selbst offensiv in den Konflikt eingreifen muss. Das Berlin Playbook als Podcast gibt es jeden Morgen ab 5 Uhr. Gordon Repinski und das POLITICO-Team liefern Politik zum Hören – kompakt, international, hintergründig. Für alle Hauptstadt-Profis: Der Berlin Playbook-Newsletter bietet jeden Morgen die wichtigsten Themen und Einordnungen. Jetzt kostenlos abonnieren. Mehr von Rixa Fürsen gibt es auch hier: Instagram: @rixafu | X: @rixa_fursen. POLITICO Deutschland – ein Angebot der Axel Springer Deutschland GmbH Axel-Springer-Straße 65, 10888 Berlin Tel: +49 (30) 2591 0 information@axelspringer.de Sitz: Amtsgericht Berlin-Charlottenburg, HRB 196159 B USt-IdNr: DE 214 852 390 Geschäftsführer: Carolin Hulshoff Pol, Mathias Sanchez Luna Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Geschätzte Lesedauer: 11 Minuten Hand aufs Herz: Wie viele Marketing-Kanäle hast du schon ausprobiert, ohne dass am Ende ein Kunde wirklich gesagt hat: „Ich habe das Gefühl, wir kennen uns schon"? Genau hier liegt die Stärke von einem Podcast für Unternehmen. Und das Beste daran ist: Du brauchst keine Million Downloads. Denn 50 Downloads pro Folge reichen oft schon aus, sofern du damit genau die richtigen Entscheider erreichst. In dieser VertriebsFunk-Episode spreche ich mit Florian Schartner, einem der renommiertesten Podcast-Experten im deutschsprachigen Raum. Er unterstützt mittelständische Unternehmen dabei, einen Unternehmenspodcast gezielt für Marketing und Vertrieb einzusetzen. Außerdem hat er meinen eigenen Podcast bei der Optimierung und Post-Production begleitet. Was du in dieser Folge lernst: Warum Audio-Content der direkteste Weg ins Ohr deines Kunden ist, wie du mit minimalem Aufwand startest – und weshalb ein Podcast für Unternehmen der unterschätzte Vertriebskanal für den Mittelstand ist. Warum ein Podcast für Unternehmen heute kein Nice-to-have mehr ist Du nutzt selbst Podcasts. Vermutlich hörst du sie beim Pendeln, beim Sport oder zwischendurch im Büro. Dabei holst du dir Inspiration, lernst etwas dazu und bildest dir eine Meinung. Genau das machen deine Kunden auch. Sie wollen sich weiterbilden. Außerdem wollen sie verstehen, was in ihrer Branche passiert. Und sie wollen wissen, mit wem sie es zu tun haben, bevor sie ein Erstgespräch buchen. Der entscheidende Punkt: Sobald ein potenzieller Kunde deinen Unternehmenspodcast hört, bist du wenige Zentimeter vom Gehirn entfernt. Du bist im Ohr. Dadurch erzeugst du Vertrauen, Sympathie und Expertise – alles auf einmal. Diese Wirkung erreichst du mit keinem anderen Medium so direkt. Denn weder ein Werbeplakat noch ein Mailing oder ein Reel auf LinkedIn schafft das. Die unterschätzte Vertrauensökonomie im B2B Im B2B-Vertrieb ist Vertrauen die Währung. Du kennst das selbst: Wenn zwei Anbieter dasselbe Produkt anbieten und einer ist dir sympathischer, gewinnt der mit dem besseren Bauchgefühl. Genau hier setzt ein Corporate Podcast Mittelstand an. Ein Hörer, der dir 30 Minuten zugehört hat, kennt nämlich deine Werte, deine Sprache und deine Haltung. Wenn ihr euch dann zum ersten Mal trefft, ist das Eis längst gebrochen. Google liebt jeden Podcast für Unternehmen Was viele unterschätzen: Suchmaschinen ranken Podcast-Inhalte überraschend hoch. Das heißt, falls dein potenzieller Kunde dich googelt, weil ihr einen Termin habt, ist die Wahrscheinlichkeit groß, dass deine Folgen ganz oben auftauchen. Was passiert dann? Der Kunde kommt vorbereitet ins Gespräch. Er sagt Sätze wie „Ich habe Ihren Podcast gehört, das war so spannend, da müssen wir uns unbedingt unterhalten." Genau das ist der Türöffner-Effekt, den kein klassischer Vertriebskanal so liefert. 50 Downloads reichen: Warum dein Podcast für Unternehmen Relevanz vor Reichweite stellt Vergiss große Charts. Vergiss Top-100-Platzierungen. Sobald du einen Unternehmenspodcast als Vertriebsinstrument nutzt, reden wir nicht über Reichweite, sondern über Relevanz. Bereits 50, 500 oder 1.000 Downloads pro Folge können ausreichen, sofern es die richtigen Hörer sind. Ein Beispiel aus der Praxis: Florian betreut einen Firmen-Podcast aus dem Bereich Maschinenbau und Automatisation. Hardcore-Nische, sehr nerdig. Eine Folge dauert 50 Minuten. Trotzdem werden die Episoden gefeiert – mit rund 600 Aufrufen pro Folge. Warum? Weil die Hörer einen echten Bedarf für das Thema haben. Sie wollen genau das wissen, was dort besprochen wird. Genau darin liegt die Magie des Mediums: Du sprichst nicht zur breiten Masse, sondern direkt zu deinem Wunschkunden. Die Mathematik hinter dem Podcast für Unternehmen ist simpel Stell dir vor, du betreust 50 Schlüsselkunden. Davon hören 30 regelmäßig deinen Unternehmenspodcast. Du erscheinst alle zwei Wochen für 30 bis 60 Minuten in ihrem Ohr. Über ein Jahr summiert sich das pro Hörer auf 12 bis 24 Stunden Aufmerksamkeit. Ehrlich: Welche andere Marketingmaßnahme generiert 12 Stunden ungestörte Aufmerksamkeit bei deinem Wunschkunden? Keine. Genau deshalb funktioniert ein Podcast für Unternehmen so kraftvoll im B2B-Vertrieb. Der Aufwand für deinen Unternehmenspodcast: Viel weniger als du denkst „Ich habe doch keine Zeit dafür" – das ist der häufigste Einwand. Und er ist falsch. Schau dir mal an, wie viel Zeit du täglich auf dem Handy verbringst. Wie viele Stunden pro Woche fließen in Netflix, YouTube oder Social Media? Eine Folge pro Woche bedeutet maximal acht Stunden Aufwand pro Monat. Das ist weniger als ein einziger Tagesausflug zum Kunden von Frankfurt nach München. Die Grundsatzentscheidung steht am Anfang Sobald du dich entscheidest, dass du das wirklich willst, findest du auch eine Lösung. Die Technik ist heute so weit, dass du in zwei Tagen einen Podcast für Unternehmen launchen kannst. Wirklich. Denn die Hürde sitzt nicht im Equipment, sondern im Kopf. Bei dem Gedanken: „Ich muss mich da hinsetzen, ich muss perfekt sein, ich muss alles richtig machen." Vergiss das. Die ersten fünf Folgen sind selten gut. Das ist normal. Außerdem wirst du besser, je mehr du machst – wie beim Laufen oder Fahrradfahren. Das technische Setup für deinen Firmen-Podcast: Quick & Dirty oder Profi? Du brauchst nicht viel. Wirklich nicht. Hier sind die Basics, die ein guter Corporate Podcast oder ein VertriebsFunk-Setup ausmachen: Mikrofon und Software für deinen Podcast für Unternehmen Ein gutes USB-Mikrofon ab 100 Euro reicht aus, um qualitativ guten Sound zu produzieren. Modelle wie das Rode NT-USB oder das Shure MV7 Plus liefern Studio-Qualität für den Heim-Schreibtisch. Software wie Riverside, Squadcast oder einfach Zoom funktionieren für Remote-Aufnahmen. Wichtig ist nur eins: Kopfhörer aufsetzen, Soundcheck machen, übersteuern vermeiden. Schnitt und Bearbeitung Du brauchst kaum zu schneiden. Audacity ist kostenlos, während Adobe Podcast kostenlose KI-Audio-Enhancement-Tools bietet. Wichtig dabei: Schneide nicht zu viel raus. Denn Pausen, Atmer und kleine „Ähms" gehören zur Authentizität. Wenn du jeden Hauch wegschneidest, klingt das künstlich – und das spüren die Hörer sofort. Hosting und Verbreitung Spotify for Creators bietet kostenloses Podcast-Hosting an. Von dort verteilst du auf Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts und alle anderen Plattformen. Per RSS-Feed kannst du den Podcast für Unternehmen sogar automatisch auf YouTube ausspielen lassen. Das ist heute alles ein Klick. B2B Podcast starten: Welche Formate wirklich funktionieren Falls du einen B2B Podcast starten willst, ist die Themenfindung oft die größte Hürde. Mein Rat: Mach es dir leicht. Hier sind die Formate, die im Mittelstand zuverlässig funktionieren: Das Kundeninterview als Königsdisziplin im Unternehmenspodcast Das ist mein absoluter Favorit. Du lädst einen zufriedenen Kunden ein und stellst ihm drei Fragen: Wie war deine Situation vor unserer Zusammenarbeit? Warum hast du dich für uns entschieden? Wie ist deine Situation heute? Daraus entsteht ein 30-minütiges Gespräch, das gleich vier Effekte erzielt: Erstens hast du ein gigantisches Testimonial. Zweitens hat dein Kunde sich öffentlich zu dir bekannt – die Loyalität steigt dadurch messbar. Drittens hören andere Kunden das und denken: „Wenn der zufrieden ist, lohnt sich das wohl." Viertens erreichst du genau die Lookalikes deines Kunden. Wer ähnliche Probleme hat, klickt sofort auf die Folge. Das CEO-Interview im Corporate Podcast Mittelstand Wo kommt die Firma her? Warum machen wir das alles? Welche Werte treiben uns an? Gerade mit dem Generationenwechsel im Mittelstand – die Boomer gehen in Rente, während die nächste Generation übernimmt – sind solche Folgen Gold wert. Sie konservieren die Legacy. Außerdem geben sie Mitarbeitern und Kunden ein Gesicht. Und sie schaffen eine emotionale Bindung, die kein Mission Statement auf der Website jemals leisten könnte. Experten- und interne Interviews Hol deine Vertriebsleiter, deine Ingenieure und deine Spezialisten ans Mikro. Lass sie über das sprechen, was sie täglich tun. Im Maschinenbau? Lass zwei Ingenieure über aktuelle Werkzeugentwicklung reden – ohne die Firma zu pitchen. HubSpot macht das mit „Marketing Against the Grain" vor: Zwei Nerds reden über KI, ohne ein einziges Mal über HubSpot selbst zu sprechen. Genau das ist gutes Content-Marketing. How-to-Folgen und Einwände entkräften Frag deinen Vertrieb: Was sind die Standard-Einwände, die du jeden Tag hörst? Daraus entstehen 20 Folgen in einem Workshop-Nachmittag. Jede Einwandbehandlung wird zu einer eigenen Episode. Auch jedes neue Produkt ergibt eine eigene Episode. Jede Messe, jede Veranstaltung und jeder Trend liefert Stoff – Themen findest du also zuhauf, sobald du einmal warm bist. Der größte Fehler beim Podcast für Unternehmen: Pitchen statt liefern Ein Unternehmenspodcast ist kein klassischer Werbekanal. Du musst nicht dreimal pro Folge dein Produkt einfügen. Bitte keine Jingles mit „Jetzt kaufen". Das wirkt sogar kontraproduktiv. Denn Hörer merken sofort, wenn du verkaufen willst – und schalten ab. Die richtige Haltung lautet: Liefere Mehrwert. Erzähl Geschichten. Stell kritische Fragen. Bring Persönlichkeit rein. Sobald du als Manager, Geschäftsführer oder Vertriebsleiter offen über deine Erfahrungen sprichst, wird daraus automatisch das beste Marketing, das du je gemacht hast. Du musst nichts verkaufen. Denn du bist die Werbung – allein durch das, was du sagst und wie du es sagst. Konstanz schlägt Perfektion bei jedem Firmen-Podcast Achtzig Prozent aller Podcasts scheitern nach fünf bis sechs Folgen. Das ist die berüchtigte Statistik. Wer es über die ersten zehn Folgen hinausschafft, ist schon weiter als die meisten. Mein Rat aus der Praxis: Produziere am Anfang 15 bis 20 Folgen am Stück. Innerhalb eines Monats. Drei Viertel davon intern, ein Viertel mit Kunden oder externen Experten. Dann hast du Vorrat. Anschließend veröffentlichst du alle ein bis zwei Wochen eine Folge. Außerdem hast du Ruhe, falls mal Urlaub, Krankheit oder ein voller Terminkalender dazwischenkommt. Der Druck der wöchentlichen Veröffentlichung ist real. Wenn dein Kalender bereits voll ist, brauchst du einen Puffer. Sonst gibst du nach drei Monaten auf. Und das wäre schade, weil sich der Effekt eines Podcasts oft erst nach 50 oder 100 Folgen vollständig entfaltet. Mehrfachverwertung: Eine Folge, zehn Inhalte Hier liegt der wahre Hebel. Aus einer einzigen Folge entsteht mit modernen KI-Tools ein ganzes Content-Universum: Aus dem Transkript machst du Blogartikel wie diesen hier. Außerdem entstehen daraus mehrere LinkedIn-Posts. Das Geile dabei: Da steht dein echter Wortlaut drin, nicht der typische KI-Schreibstil mit Ein-Wort-Sätzen. Auch Lead-Magnete und White Papers leitest du ab. Genauso entstehen Mini-Landingpages zu Spezialthemen. Kurze Reels und Shorts wandern auf TikTok, Instagram und YouTube. Ein Newsletter wird daraus. Sogar Sales-Enablement-Material für deinen Vertrieb fällt nebenbei ab. Florian erzählt von einem Kunden, der seine Podcast-basierten LinkedIn-Posts alle sechs Monate erneut veröffentlicht. Seit drei Jahren. Die Posts performen jedes Mal aufs Neue. Denn niemand erinnert sich, was du vor sechs Monaten gepostet hast. Evergreen-Content in Reinform. Das Wichtigste: Buy-in von oben und Vorbereitung Bevor du loslegst, hol dir das Buy-in der Geschäftsführung. Mach keine U-Boot-Aktionen. Bei über 1.000 produzierten Folgen hatten wir nur einen einzigen Fall, in dem ein Chef im Nachhinein eine Folge gelöscht haben wollte – aber das Risiko gibt es trotzdem. Pitch deinen Podcast für Unternehmen intern: Wenig Aufwand, hoher Gain, langfristige Wirkung, deutlich nachhaltiger als jede Messe oder jedes Mailing. Und ein letzter, ehrlicher Tipp: Hol dir am Anfang einen Experten dazu. Jemanden wie Florian, der das Setup macht, dich technisch begleitet, bei der Themenfindung hilft und die Post-Production übernimmt. Sobald das Ding läuft, kannst du es selber stemmen oder weiter outsourcen. Allerdings verhindert der Start mit Profi-Begleitung die typischen Anfängerfehler. Außerdem verhindert er, dass du nach drei Monaten frustriert sagst: „Podcast funktioniert für uns nicht." Quick Takeaways: Das musst du dir merken 50 Downloads pro Folge reichen aus, sofern es die richtigen Hörer sind. Reichweite ist nicht das Ziel – Relevanz ist es. Maximal 8 Stunden Aufwand pro Monat für eine Folge pro Woche. Weniger als ein einziger Außendiensttag. Technik ist heute kein Hinderungsgrund mehr – ein USB-Mikro für 100 Euro plus kostenlose Software reichen für den Start. Kundeninterviews sind das Top-Format für jeden Unternehmenspodcast: Testimonial, Bindung, Lookalike-Reichweite und Vertrauen in einem. Niemals pitchen – wer im Corporate Podcast verkaufen will, verliert die Hörer in Sekunden. Konstanz schlägt Perfektion: 80 Prozent scheitern an Folge 5. Wer durchhält, gewinnt automatisch. Mehrfachverwertung ist der größte Hebel: Eine Folge wird zu Blog, LinkedIn, Newsletter, Reel, White Paper. Fazit: Dein Podcast für Unternehmen ist dein bester Vertriebler Ein Podcast für Unternehmen ist kein Marketing-Spielzeug. Er ist ein strategisches Vertriebsinstrument, das im deutschen Mittelstand massiv unterschätzt wird. Du erreichst deine Wunschkunden direkt im Ohr. Außerdem baust du Vertrauen auf, bevor das erste Gespräch überhaupt stattfindet. Du etablierst dich als Experte deiner Branche. Und du machst Mehrfachverwertung möglich, die kein anderes Format dir bietet. Der Mittelstand wartet noch zu oft, bis die Konkurrenz vorgelegt hat. Genau das ist deine Chance. Während andere noch über Messen und klassische Werbung diskutieren, sitzt du bereits im Ohr deiner Zielkunden. Wenn du Florian und mich also fragst: Es gibt kaum einen Hebel im B2B-Vertrieb, der so wenig Aufwand bei so großer Langzeitwirkung bringt wie ein gut gemachter Unternehmenspodcast. Mein Tipp: Nimm dir 30 Minuten, mach eine Liste mit deinen ersten zehn potenziellen Folgen, ruf einen zufriedenen Kunden an und buche dir ein Erstgespräch mit jemandem wie Florian – oder mit mir, falls du einen Sparringspartner für die Vertriebs-Strategie dahinter brauchst. Was du auf gar keinen Fall machen solltest: warten. Denn jeder Monat ohne Podcast ist ein Monat, in dem deine Wettbewerber die Chance haben, vorher im Ohr deiner Wunschkunden zu landen. FAQ zum Podcast für Unternehmen Wie viele Downloads braucht ein erfolgreicher Corporate Podcast Mittelstand? Im B2B reichen oft schon 50 bis 1.000 Downloads pro Folge aus, sofern du damit genau deine Wunschkunden erreichst. Reichweite ist nicht das Ziel – Relevanz ist es. Ein nischiger Maschinenbau-Unternehmenspodcast mit 600 Hörern pro Folge kann für deinen Vertrieb wertvoller sein als ein Mainstream-Format mit 50.000 Hörern, die nicht zu dir passen. Wie viel Zeit muss ich für einen Podcast für Unternehmen einplanen? Für eine Folge pro Woche solltest du maximal acht Stunden Aufwand pro Monat einplanen. Das ist weniger Zeit, als du für einen einzigen Außendiensttag aufwendest. Mit einem Profi-Partner für Schnitt und Post-Production reduziert sich dein eigener Aufwand auf das reine Aufnehmen. Welches Format funktioniert am besten, wenn ich einen B2B Podcast starten will? Kundeninterviews sind das absolute Top-Format. Du gewinnst gleichzeitig ein Testimonial, stärkst die Kundenbindung und sprichst die Lookalikes deines Kunden an. Daneben funktionieren CEO-Interviews zur Unternehmensgeschichte, Experteninterviews mit eigenen Mitarbeitern und How-to-Folgen, in denen du typische Einwände aus deiner Branche entkräftest. Welche Technik brauche ich, um einen Podcast für Unternehmen zu starten? Ein USB-Mikrofon ab 100 Euro (Rode NT-USB oder Shure MV7 Plus), eine kostenlose Recording-Software wie Riverside oder Zoom und ein Schnittprogramm wie Audacity oder Adobe Podcast genügen. Spotify for Creators hostet deinen Unternehmenspodcast kostenlos und verteilt ihn auf alle relevanten Plattformen inklusive Apple Podcasts. Soll ich im Podcast für Unternehmen meine Produkte oder Dienstleistungen pitchen? Auf keinen Fall. Klassisches Pitchen ist im Corporate Podcast kontraproduktiv und vertreibt dir die Hörer. Stattdessen lieferst du Mehrwert, erzählst Geschichten und zeigst Expertise. Der Verkauf passiert automatisch, weil Hörer dich als Experten wahrnehmen und Vertrauen aufbauen, bevor das erste Gespräch überhaupt stattgefunden hat. Anleitung: In 7 Schritten zu deinem Podcast für Unternehmen So startest du strukturiert und ohne Frust deinen eigenen Unternehmenspodcast – auch ohne technisches Vorwissen. Buy-in von der Geschäftsführung holen Pitch den Podcast für Unternehmen intern: wenig Aufwand, hoher Gain, langfristige Wirkung. Vermeide U-Boot-Aktionen und kläre Verantwortlichkeiten. Themen und Format definieren Sammle in einem Workshop 20 bis 30 Themen. Wähle ein Hauptformat (Interview, Solo, Mischung) und definiere deinen thematischen Nordstern. Technisches Setup einrichten USB-Mikrofon ab 100 Euro besorgen, Recording-Software (Riverside, Zoom) einrichten, Hosting bei Spotify for Creators registrieren. Erste 15 bis 20 Folgen vorproduzieren Nimm in einem Monat einen Stapel Folgen auf. Drei Viertel intern, ein Viertel mit Kunden oder Experten. So hast du Vorrat für die ersten Monate. Veröffentlichungsrhythmus festlegen Veröffentliche alle ein bis zwei Wochen eine Folge. Konstanz schlägt Perfektion. Plane mit Buffer oder ähnlichen Tools im Voraus. Mehrfachverwertung systematisieren Aus jeder Folge entstehen Blogartikel, LinkedIn-Posts, Newsletter, Reels und White Papers. Plane diesen Recycling-Prozess von Anfang an mit. Kontinuierlich optimieren und Feedback einholen Hör nach 10 Folgen rein, frag Kunden nach ihrer Meinung, optimiere Tonqualität und Themen. Die ersten Folgen sind nie perfekt – das ist normal. Deine Meinung ist gefragt Hast du selbst schon mit einem Podcast für dein Unternehmen experimentiert – oder schreckt dich der Aufwand noch ab? Was ist deine größte Hürde: die Technik, die Themenfindung oder einfach die Konstanz? Schreib mir auf LinkedIn und teile diesen Beitrag gerne, sobald er dir weitergeholfen hat. Ich freue mich auf deine Geschichte aus der Praxis.

He loves being called that.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Fußball aus aller Welt Hansa Rostock droht im Aufstiegskampf die Luft auszugehen. Und während an der Ostsee sämtliche Alarmglocken läuten, kämpft Eintracht Braunschweig im dichten Dschungel der 2. Bundesliga um den Klassenerhalt. Auch Werder Bremen und der Hamburger SV sind beileibe noch nicht gerettet, haben aber immerhin ein bisschen Puffer nach unten. Doch wird das reichen? Dazu sprechen David und Robert mal wieder über das leidige Thema Handspiel, Wucherpreise bei der WM und einen Ex-Bundesliga-Trainer, der in Spanien erstmals seine Karriere vergoldete. Tretet mit mir direkt in Kontakt: E-Mail: redaktionfussballfilmundmehr@gmail.com Instagram: @fussballfilmundmehr Twitter: @fussballfilmun1 Hier findet Ihr alle wichtigen ... WERBUNG Wenn du deinem Vierbeiner eine Freude machen willst: Bei Fressnapf sind in teilnehmenden Märkten dauerhaft über 500 Preise reduziert. Klick fressnapf.de/aktionen-angebote/dauerhaft-reduziert/ Dieser Podcast wird vermarktet von der Podcastbude.www.podcastbu.de - Full-Service-Podcast-Agentur - Konzeption, Produktion, Vermarktung, Distribution und Hosting.Du möchtest deinen Podcast auch kostenlos hosten und damit Geld verdienen?Dann schaue auf www.kostenlos-hosten.de und informiere dich.Dort erhältst du alle Informationen zu unseren kostenlosen Podcast-Hosting-Angeboten. kostenlos-hosten.de ist ein Produkt der Podcastbude.

Warkens Sparpaket zerlegt das Gesundheitssystem von innen.Die explodierenden Ausgaben werden mit drastischen Einsparungen beantwortet, die vor allem Arbeitnehmer und Familien treffen. Statt struktureller Lösungen wächst die Belastung für jene, die das System finanzieren.Ein Kommentar von Janine Beicht.Die gesetzlichen Krankenkassen steuern ungebremst auf ein historisches Defizit zu. Nach offiziellen Angaben beliefen sich die Ausgaben der Krankenkassen im vergangenen Jahr auf über 352 Milliarden Euro und dürften in naher Zukunft auf nahezu 370 Milliarden Euro anwachsen (1). Damit gehört das deutsche Gesundheitssystem zu den teuersten weltweit, während zugleich seine finanzielle Stabilität zunehmend unter Druck gerät. Prognosen zufolge droht im Jahr 2027 eine Finanzierungslücke von rund 15 Milliarden Euro. (2)Die Ausgaben explodieren schneller als die Einnahmen, das System ist längst in einer strukturellen Schieflage. Doch statt die wahren Ursachen anzupacken, präsentierte Bundesgesundheitsministerin Nina Warken, in einer Pressekonferenz (3) am 14. April 2026 ein Paket, das angeblich ausgewogen sein soll. In Wahrheit ist es ein weiterer Kraftakt auf dem Rücken derer, die ohnehin schon alles finanzieren: der arbeitenden Bevölkerung. Die schwarz-rote Koalition feiert Tempo und Verantwortung, doch das Paket entlastet vor allem die Politik selbst, während Kliniken, Praxen und Familien die Zeche zahlen sollen.Warken greift auf die 66 Empfehlungen (4) einer von ihr selbst eingesetzten Expertenkommission zurück und will mehr als drei Viertel davon umsetzen. Den Anspruch, die Empfehlungen umfassend umzusetzen, formulierte Warken selbstbewusst wie folgt:„Vor zwei Wochen hat ja die Finanzkommission Gesundheit ihre Vorschläge vorgestellt […] Die Kommission hat ja […] einen guten Werkzeugkasten vorgelegt […] und wir haben uns jetzt die Werkzeuge ausgesucht […] Über drei Viertel der Maßnahmen der Vorschläge der Kommission wollen wir umsetzen.“ (3)Das Ergebnis: fast 20 Milliarden Euro Einsparungen für 2027 (5), ein Puffer von fünf Milliarden inklusive. Die Ausgaben sollen künftig strikt an die reale Einnahmenentwicklung gekoppelt werden. Nur Leistungen mit nachweisbarem medizinischen Nutzen bleiben bezahlt. Klingt vernünftig, wäre da nicht die bittere Realität, dass genau diese Politik seit Jahren die Solidargemeinschaft ausblutet, ohne die eigentlichen Kostentreiber zu benennen. Die Kommission hatte ein Einsparpotenzial von über 42 Milliarden Euro für 2027 errechnet, perspektivisch sogar mehr als 60 Milliarden bis 2030 (6). Ein Großteil davon ohne Verschlechterung der Versorgung. Ungeachtet dessen bleibt die systemische Schieflage unangetastet: Die Krankenkassen finanzieren jährlich Leistungen in Milliardenhöhe für Nichtbeitragszahler, während der Bund seiner vollständigen Ausgleichspflicht nicht nachkommt (7)....https://apolut.net/das-grosse-ausplundern-der-beitragszahler-von-janine-beicht/ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Vier Jahre nach unserer ersten gemeinsamen Episode ist Jonas Deichmann zurück bei MainAthlet – und diesmal geht's um drei große Kapitel, die zeigen, warum Ausdauer nicht nur eine Sportart, sondern ein Lebensstil sein kann: 2024 die Challenge 120 (120 Ironman-Distanzen in 120 Tagen), 2025 das Jahr der Mikroabenteuer und ein Ausblick auf die kommenden Projekte 2026.Jonas nimmt dich mit hinter die Kulissen seines härtesten Vorhabens: Jeden Tag 3,8 km Schwimmen, 180 km Radfahren, 42 km Laufen – ohne Puffer. Du erfährst, warum dieses Projekt körperlich „mit Abstand das härteste“ war und weshalb bei so einer Dauerbelastung nicht Tempo, sondern Grundlagenausdauer, Ernährung und Schlaf die Währung sind. Jonas spricht offen über Zahlen und Prinzipien: ein durchschnittlich niedriger Puls (um Belastung zu steuern), der tägliche Bedarf von „10.000 Kalorien“, und warum „6,5 bis 7,5 Stunden Schlaf“ bei so einem Mammutplan bereits die Untergrenze sein können. Besonders spannend für alle Läuferinnen und Läufer: seine Sicht auf Verletzungsprophylaxe – von Laufkilometern sammeln bis Stabi, Dehnen, Yoga, plus die Basics, die oft unterschätzt werden: Regeneration, Schlaf, Ernährung.Mental wird's richtig greifbar, als Jonas von kritischen Momenten erzählt – etwa als er „an Tag 54 mit einem Hexenschuss“ aufwacht und trotzdem weitermacht. Er erklärt, was bei Ultra-Ausdauer wirklich zählt: nicht „Motivation“ als Feuerwerk, sondern Routinen und Gewohnheiten, die dir die tägliche Überwindung abnehmen. Sein bestes Beispiel: Wenn die Laufschuhe schon morgens „an“ sind, diskutierst du weniger – und kommst leichter ins Tun. Dazu kommt ein Mindset, das viele Sportfans (egal ob Leichtathletik, Triathlon oder Running) feiern werden: Anstrengung ist nicht der Preis – sie ist der Weg zu den Erinnerungen.Im zweiten Teil der Folge wird's community-lastig: Jonas erzählt vom „Jahr der Mikroabenteuer“ mit offenen Langdistanz-Events, Swimpacking und sogar einer 48-Stunden-Challenge mit Gebirgsjägern – inklusive Schlafentzug und dem mentalen Spiel mit Ungewissheit. Zum Abschluss gibt's einen Blick nach vorn: Europa-Umrundung per Gravelbike (24.000 km) und ein großes Lauf-Community-Projekt rund um Baden-Württemberg.Hier ist der Link zum Buch: Onlineshop | Verlag waller denglerKeywords (SEO): Jonas Deichmann, Challenge 120, Ironman, Ausdauertraining, Grundlagenausdauer, Lauftraining, Regeneration, Verletzungsprophylaxe, mentale Stärke, Routinen, Mikroabenteuer, Triathlon, Marathon, Motivation, MainAthlet.Alle aktuellen Partner findest du hier:NordVPN mit verschlüsselter Verbindung und blockiert schädliche Seiten & Tracker.Exklusiv: Großer Rabatt auf das 2-Jahrespaket + 4 Extra-Monate gratis.

Warum die Fahnenstange dein Spiel häufiger rettet, als du denkst Kaum eine Frage sorgt auf dem Grün für mehr Diskussionen: Fahne drin lassen oder rausnehmen? Viele Golfer entscheiden aus Gewohnheit oder Gefühl – doch was sagt eigentlich die Wissenschaft dazu? In dieser Folge spricht Fabian mit David Veit, der genau diese Frage in einer Studienarbeit untersucht hat. Das Ergebnis: Die Fahne ist in vielen Fällen ein klarer Vorteil – vor allem, wenn es um Distanzkontrolle geht. Das erwartet dich in der Folge:Der wissenschaftliche Ansatz: Wie mithilfe einer Rampe und konstanten Geschwindigkeiten getestet wurde, welchen Einfluss die Fahne wirklich hat. Das zentrale Ergebnis: Mit Fahne gehen mehr Bälle ins Loch – und vor allem bleiben deutlich mehr Bälle näher dran. Warum die Fahne hilft: Sie wirkt wie ein „Puffer“ und reduziert die Energie des Balls – besonders bei zu schnellen Putts. Gerade vs. seitliche Putts: Egal ob mittig oder leicht daneben – die Fahne verbessert die Chancen in beiden Fällen. Die größten Unterschiede: Ohne Fahne rollen zu schnelle Putts deutlich weiter vorbei – mit Fahne bleiben sie oft spielbar nah.

Wenn du 2026 mit weniger als 20.000 € Rücklage eine Immobilie kaufst und auf 110 % finanzierst, gehst du oft eine gefährliche Wette ein – keine clevere Strategie. Viele unterschätzen dabei, dass schon eine einzige Sonderumlage dich finanziell aus dem Gleichgewicht bringen kann. Das größte Risiko ist nicht der Zins, sondern dein fehlender Puffer. In dieser Folge erfährst du die drei entscheidenden Red Flags und wie du erkennst, ob du dir so ein Investment wirklich leisten kannst. Außerdem zeige ich dir, welche Alternative du hast, um sicher mit wenig Eigenkapital zu starten.

The weekend is here and I'm ready to take a nap. Took the bus trip to Milwaukee yesterday for the Brewer game and while I had a lot of fun, got home WAY past my bedtime last night and didn't get much sleep before coming to work this morning. So, I definitely see a siesta in my future plans this afternoon. In the news this morning, the latest on the escaped kangaroo in Wisconsin, the TSA lines are really bad all over the country but there are ways to check ahead to see just how long the lines are, President Trump's signature is going to appear on US currency, Dash Crofts passes away at age 87, and apparently…some people are finding out that their short flights are being replaced with bus rides…just like in "Home Alone". In sports, the Brew Crew got a nice win over the White Sox yesterday, the Bucks play tomorrow afternoon and only have 11 games left in the regular season, a recap of yesterday's Sweet 16 action and a look at this weekend's men's & women's tournaments. Plus, the Badger men's hockey team beats Dartmouth to advance in the Frozen Four. We talked about what's on TV this weekend and what's new in theaters. Netflix raises their prices AGAIN!!!! And a new, animated "Stranger Things" series is coming next month! Elsewhere in sports, Tom Brady recently asked the NFL about returning to the field to play quarterback, and Hootie is buying into a NASCAR team! A Boy Scout recently got a very rare honor after saving his Scout Master's life, a couple of State Troopers in Maryland are getting recognized for saving and infant's life, and a woman is reunited with her dog after it went missing NINE years ago! Brian recapped his bus trip to the Brewer game yesterday. Doc joined us to talk racing thanks to County Materials in Holmen & in Eau Claire. And in today's edition of "Bad News with Happy Music", we had stories about a KFC pickle jacket, an officer that was drunk on-duty, a #FloridaMan who drove onto an airport runway and tried getting onto a couple of planes, and a #FloridaMan who tried to save his vehicle from hail damage during a recent storm.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In dieser Folge des Energiezone-Podcasts haben wir Claus Hartmann, Professor für nachhaltige Energieversorgung an der Hochschule Flensburg, zu Gast. Mit seiner umfangreichen Erfahrung aus der Arbeit mit Stadtwerken und innovativen Projekten im Bereich der Energieversorgung bietet Claus einen tiefen Einblick in die Strategien und Herausforderungen, denen sich Stadtwerke, insbesondere in Flensburg, gegenübers sehen. Wir beginnen unsere Diskussion mit einem Blick auf das Flensburger Wärmenetz und dessen Entwicklung. Claus erläutert, dass Flensburg, ähnlich wie Dänemark in den 60er und 70er Jahren, eine Weg von Gasnetzen hin zu einem zentralen Wärmenetz eingeschlagen hat. Dies wurde als strategischer Schritt angesehen, um fossile Brennstoffe zu vermeiden und die Anzahl der kleinen, ineffizienten Heizungen in Haushalten zu reduzieren. Trotz des Erfolgs gibt es Herausforderungen, wie die teilweise hohen Preise für Fernwärme, was uns zu Überlegungen bezüglich der Optimierung von Kosten und Effizienz führt. Ein weiteres zentrales Thema unserer Unterhaltung ist die Volatilität der Strompreise an der Börse und die Auswirkungen auf Stadtwerke. Claus teilt seine Einsichten zur Notwendigkeit, flexibel auf sich ändernde Marktbedingungen zu reagieren und die Integration erneuerbarer Energien in die bestehenden Systeme voranzutreiben. Es wird deutlich, dass die Herausforderung nicht nur in der Technologie, sondern auch in der Denkweise der Akteure innerhalb der Stadtwerke liegt. Klaus gibt uns einen aufschlussreichen Einblick in die Geschäftsprozesse und die oftmals langwierigen Entscheidungsfindungen, die innovative Projekte behindern können. Die Unterhaltung bietet auch einen Blick auf die Rolle von Batterien und deren Potenzial für Stadtwerke in der Zukunft. Claus diskutiert die Möglichkeiten, die sich durch Batteriespeicher ergeben, besonders im Hinblick auf die flexible Handhabung von Strommengen. Das Gespräch führt zu einer spannenden Überlegung darüber, wie solche Systeme den Stadtwerken wirtschaftliche Vorteile bieten können, indem sie als Puffer zwischen Angebot und Nachfrage fungieren. Webseite: http://www.energiezone.org Community: https://forum.energiezone.org Feedback: team@energiezone.org Alexander Graf: https://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandergraf Ilan Momber: https://www.linkedin.com/in/imomber/

Minna kann einfach nicht einschlafen und genau in diesem Moment kommt Willi mit seinem handtellergroßen Ruderboot über ihr Kissen gerudert. Er ist auf der Suche nach den Puffer-Inseln. Aber wo liegen die denn? (Eine Geschichte von Kathi Roman, erzählt von Axel Milberg.)

Kleinere und mittlere Unternehmen bekommen keinen Industriestrompreis. Sie haben anders als Autofahrer keine Lobby und anders als große Konzerne keinen Draht ins Wirtschaftsministerium. Ihr finanzieller Puffer? Gering. Ihre Margen? Auch. Steigende Energiekosten sind tödlich. Ihnen bleiben zwei Möglichkeiten, um den Iran-Schock zu bewältigen: Energiefresser finden, dann unabhängig werden. "Eine eigene Solaranlage hat das größte Einsparpotenzial", sagt Niels Keunecke im Podcast. Der Chef von Meistro Energie versorgt 13.000 kleine und mittlere Unternehmen mit Strom und Gas. Seine Prognose ist düster: "Selbst, wenn der Krieg im Nahen Osten zeitnah endet, deuten die Preise an der Börse darauf hin, dass sich die Energiepreise erst Ende 2027 wieder in normales Fahrwasser bewegen." Eine gut geplante Energiewende mit klaren Vorgaben würde helfen, doch das deutsche Energiesystem wie ihm zufolge ähnlich gemanagt wie die Deutsche Bahn. Gast: Niels Keunecke, CEO der Meistro GmbH und Chef von Meistro Energie Moderation: Clara Pfeffer und Christian Herrmann Wir freuen uns über Feedback und Zuschriften: klimalabor@ntv.de Ihr möchtet uns unterstützen? Dann bewertet das "Klima-Labor" bei Apple Podcasts oder Spotify Das Interview als Text? Einfach hier klicken. Dieser Podcast wird vermarktet von Julep Media: sales@julep.de

-Doug the Neighbor- & -TK/IRISH- chat about Minor League Baseball and The Puffer Bellies.

幻冬舎の暗号資産（仮想通貨）/ブロックチェーンなどWeb3領域の専門メディア「あたらしい経済 https://www.neweconomy.jp/ 」がおくる、Podcast番組です。 ーーーーー 【番組スポンサー】 この番組は、暗号資産取引におけるフルラインナップサービスを提供する「SBI VCトレード」のスポンサーでお届けします。 ーーーーー SBI VCトレードは、「暗号資産もSBI」のスローガンのもと、国内最大級のインターネット総合金融グループであるSBIグループの総合力を生かし、暗号資産取引におけるフルラインナップサービスを提供しております。暗号資産交換業者・第一種金融商品取引業者・電子決済手段等取引業者として高いセキュリティ体制のもと、暗号資産の売買にとどまらない暗号資産運用サービスや法人向けサービスの展開、さらにステーブルコインのユーエスディーシー（USDC）を国内で初めて取り扱っております。 ーーーーー SBI VCトレード公式サイト：https://account.sbivc.co.jp/signup?hc_ak=1RNML.3.M06AS ーーーーー 【紹介したニュース】 ・金融庁、暗号資産の無登録販売について罰則強化へ＝報道 ・国内初、ワイルダーワールド（WILD）がGMOコインに上場へ ・メタプラネット、最大約1220億円調達へ。21万BTC取得目標を推進 ・ストラテジーが約1.5Bドルでビットコイン追加購入、総保有数は約76万1068BTCに ・ビットマインがイーサリアム追加取得、総保有数は約459万5562ETHに ・マツモトとJPYC、新DAT構想におけるステーブルコインの実証実験へ ・アステリア、JPYC向け会計監査支援ツール提供へ ・オープンシー、SEAトークン発行を延期。市況など考慮で ・スシトップ、セブン銀行らとATM×NFT販促モデルのPoC開始、AI-OCR活用で ・アブラ、SPACとの合併でナスダック上場を計画 ・暗号資産犯罪、2025年に過去最高の1540億ドル規模に＝チェイナリシスレポート ・サークル、AIエージェント向け開発支援「Circle Skills」公開 ・HSBCとスタンダードチャータード、香港でのステーブルコイン発行認可の初期候補か＝報道 ・アンカレッジデジタル、機関投資家向けリキッドリステーキング対応開始、アイゲンレイヤー上の「Puffer」統合で ・【アジェンダ公開】Web3・AIカンファレンス「TEAMZ Summit 2026」が4/7・8に八芳園で開催へ 【あたらしい経済関連リンク】 ニュースの詳細や、アーカイブやその他の記事はこちらから https://www.neweconomy.jp/

Turbopuffer came out of a reading app.In 2022, Simon was helping his friends at Readwise scale their infra for a highly requested feature: article recommendations and semantic search. Readwise was paying ~$5k/month for their relational database and vector search would cost ~$20k/month making the feature too expensive to ship. In 2023 after mulling over the problem from Readwise, Simon decided he wanted to “build a search engine” which became Turbopuffer.We discuss:• Simon's path: Denmark → Shopify infra for nearly a decade → “angel engineering” across startups like Readwise, Replicate, and Causal → turbopuffer almost accidentally becoming a company • The Readwise origin story: building an early recommendation engine right after the ChatGPT moment, seeing it work, then realizing it would cost ~$30k/month for a company spending ~$5k/month total on infra and getting obsessed with fixing that cost structure • Why turbopuffer is “a search engine for unstructured data”: Simon's belief that models can learn to reason, but can't compress the world's knowledge into a few terabytes of weights, so they need to connect to systems that hold truth in full fidelity • The three ingredients for building a great database company: a new workload, a new storage architecture, and the ability to eventually support every query plan customers will want on their data • The architecture bet behind turbopuffer: going all in on object storage and NVMe, avoiding a traditional consensus layer, and building around the cloud primitives that only became possible in the last few years • Why Simon hated operating Elasticsearch at Shopify: years of painful on-call experience shaped his obsession with simplicity, performance, and eliminating state spread across multiple systems • The Cursor story: launching turbopuffer as a scrappy side project, getting an email from Cursor the next day, flying out after a 4am call, and helping cut Cursor's costs by 95% while fixing their per-user economics • The Notion story: buying dark fiber, tuning TCP windows, and eating cross-cloud costs because Simon refused to compromise on architecture just to close a deal faster • Why AI changes the build-vs-buy equation: it's less about whether a company can build search infra internally, and more about whether they have time especially if an external team can feel like an extension of their own • Why RAG isn't dead: coding companies still rely heavily on search, and Simon sees hybrid retrieval semantic, text, regex, SQL-style patterns becoming more important, not less • How agentic workloads are changing search: the old pattern was one retrieval call up front; the new pattern is one agent firing many parallel queries at once, turning search into a highly concurrent tool call • Why turbopuffer is reducing query pricing: agentic systems are dramatically increasing query volume, and Simon expects retrieval infra to adapt to huge bursts of concurrent search rather than a small number of carefully chosen calls • The philosophy of “playing with open cards”: Simon's habit of being radically honest with investors, including telling Lachy Groom he'd return the money if turbopuffer didn't hit PMF by year-end • The “P99 engineer”: Simon's framework for building a talent-dense company, rejecting by default unless someone on the team feels strongly enough to fight for the candidate —Simon Hørup Eskildsen• LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sirupsen• X: https://x.com/Sirupsen• https://sirupsen.com/aboutturbopuffer• https://turbopuffer.com/Full Video PodTimestamps00:00:00 The PMF promise to Lachy Groom00:00:25 Intro and Simon's background00:02:19 What turbopuffer actually is00:06:26 Shopify, Elasticsearch, and the pain behind the company00:10:07 The Readwise experiment that sparked turbopuffer00:12:00 The insight Simon couldn't stop thinking about00:17:00 S3 consistency, NVMe, and the architecture bet00:20:12 The Notion story: latency, dark fiber, and conviction00:25:03 Build vs. buy in the age of AI00:26:00 The Cursor story: early launch to breakout customer00:29:00 Why code search still matters00:32:00 Search in the age of agents00:34:22 Pricing turbopuffer in the AI era00:38:17 Why Simon chose Lachy Groom00:41:28 Becoming a founder on purpose00:44:00 The “P99 engineer” philosophy00:49:30 Bending software to your will00:51:13 The future of turbopuffer00:57:05 Simon's tea obsession00:59:03 Tea kits, X Live, and P99 LiveTranscriptSimon Hørup Eskildsen: I don't think I've said this publicly before, but I just called Lockey and was like, local Lockie. Like if this doesn't have PMF by the end of the year, like we'll just like return all the money to you. But it's just like, I don't really, we, Justine and I don't wanna work on this unless it's really working.So we want to give it the best shot this year and like we're really gonna go for it. We're gonna hire a bunch of people. We're just gonna be honest with everyone. Like when I don't know how to play a game, I just play with open cards. Lockey was the only person that didn't, that didn't freak out. He was like, I've never heard anyone say that before.Alessio: Hey everyone, welcome to the Leading Space podcast. This is Celesio Pando, Colonel Laz, and I'm joined by Swix, editor of Leading Space.swyx: Hello. Hello, uh, we're still, uh, recording in the Ker studio for the first time. Very excited. And today we are joined by Simon Eski. Of Turbo Farer welcome.Simon Hørup Eskildsen: Thank you so much for having me.swyx: Turbo Farer has like really gone on a huge tear, and I, I do have to mention that like you're one of, you're not my newest member of the Danish AHU Mafia, where like there's a lot of legendary programmers that have come out of it, like, uh, beyond Trotro, Rasmus, lado Berg and the V eight team and, and Google Maps team.Uh, you're mostly a Canadian now, but isn't that interesting? There's so many, so much like strong Danish presence.Simon Hørup Eskildsen: Yeah, I was writing a post, um, not that long ago about sort of the influences. So I grew up in Denmark, right? I left, I left when, when I was 18 to go to Canada to, to work at Shopify. Um, and so I, like, I've, I would still say that I feel more Danish than, than Canadian.This is also the weird accent. I can't say th because it, this is like, I don't, you know, my wife is also Canadian, um, and I think. I think like one of the things in, in Denmark is just like, there's just such a ruthless pragmatism and there's also a big focus on just aesthetics. Like, they're like very, people really care about like where, what things look like.Um, and like Canada has a lot of attributes, US has, has a lot of attributes, but I think there's been lots of the great things to carry. I don't know what's in the water in Ahu though. Um, and I don't know that I could be considered part of the Mafi mafia quite yet, uh, compared to the phenomenal individuals we just mentioned.Barra OV is also, uh, Danish Canadian. Okay. Yeah. I don't know where he lives now, but, and he's the PHP.swyx: Yeah. And obviously Toby German, but moved to Canada as well. Yes. Like this is like import that, uh, that, that is an interesting, um, talent move.Alessio: I think. I would love to get from you. Definition of Turbo puffer, because I think you could be a Vector db, which is maybe a bad word now in some circles, you could be a search engine.It's like, let, let's just start there and then we'll maybe run through the history of how you got to this point.Simon Hørup Eskildsen: For sure. Yeah. So Turbo Puffer is at this point in time, a search engine, right? We do full text search and we do vector search, and that's really what we're specialized in. If you're trying to do much more than that, like then this might not be the right place yet, but Turbo Buffer is all about search.The other way that I think about it is that we can take all of the world's knowledge, all of the exabytes and exabytes of data that there is, and we can use those tokens to train a model, but we can't compress all of that into a few terabytes of weights, right? Compress into a few terabytes of weights, how to reason with the world, how to make sense of the knowledge.But we have to somehow connect it to something externally that actually holds that like in full fidelity and truth. Um, and that's the thing that we intend to become. Right? That's like a very holier than now kind of phrasing, right? But being the search engine for unstructured, unstructured data is the focus of turbo puffer at this point in time.Alessio: And let's break down. So people might say, well, didn't Elasticsearch already do this? And then some other people might say, is this search on my data, is this like closer to rag than to like a xr, like a public search thing? Like how, how do you segment like the different types of search?Simon Hørup Eskildsen: The way that I generally think about this is like, there's a lot of database companies and I think if you wanna build a really big database company, sort of, you need a couple of ingredients to be in the air.We don't, which only happens roughly every 15 years. You need a new workload. You basically need the ambition that every single company on earth is gonna have data in your database. Multiple times you look at a company like Oracle, right? You will, like, I don't think you can find a company on earth with a digital presence that it not, doesn't somehow have some data in an Oracle database.Right? And I think at this point, that's also true for Snowflake and Databricks, right? 15 years later it's, or even more than that, there's not a company on earth that doesn't, in. Or directly is consuming Snowflake or, or Databricks or any of the big analytics databases. Um, and I think we're in that kind of moment now, right?I don't think you're gonna find a company over the next few years that doesn't directly or indirectly, um, have all their data available for, for search and connect it to ai. So you need that new workload, like you need something to be happening where there's a new workload that causes that to happen, and that new workload is connecting very large amounts of data to ai.The second thing you need. The second condition to build a big database company is that you need some new underlying change in the storage architecture that is not possible from the databases that have come before you. If you look at Snowflake and Databricks, right, commoditized, like massive fleet of HDDs, like that was not possible in it.It just wasn't in the air in the nineties, right? So you just didn't, we just didn't build these systems. S3 and and and so on was not around. And I think the architecture that is now possible that wasn't possible 15 years ago is to go all in on NVME SSDs. It requires a particular type of architecture for the database that.It's difficult to retrofit onto the databases that are already there, including the ones you just mentioned. The second thing is to go all in on OIC storage, more so than we could have done 15 years ago. Like we don't have a consensus layer, we don't really have anything. In fact, you could turn off all the servers that Turbo Buffer has, and we would not lose any data because we have all completely all in on OIC storage.And this means that our architecture is just so simple. So that's the second condition, right? First being a new workload. That means that every company on earth, either indirectly or directly, is using your database. Second being, there's some new storage architecture. That means that the, the companies that have come before you can do what you're doing.I think the third thing you need to do to build a big database company is that over time you have to implement more or less every Cory plan on the data. What that means is that you. You can't just get stuck in, like, this is the one thing that a database does. It has to be ever evolving because when someone has data in the database, they over time expect to be able to ask it more or less every question.So you have to do that to get the storage architecture to the limit of what, what it's capable of. Those are the three conditions.swyx: I just wanted to get a little bit of like the motivation, right? Like, so you left Shopify, you're like principal, engineer, infra guy. Um, you also head of kernel labs, uh, inside of Shopify, right?And then you consulted for read wise and that it kind of gave you that, that idea. I just wanted you to tell that story. Um, maybe I, you've told it before, but, uh, just introduce the, the. People to like the, the new workload, the sort of aha moment for turbo PufferSimon Hørup Eskildsen: For sure. So yeah, I spent almost a decade at Shopify.I was on the infrastructure team, um, from the fairly, fairly early days around 2013. Um, at the time it felt like it was growing so quickly and everything, all the metrics were, you know, doubling year on year compared to the, what companies are contending with today. It's very cute in growth. I feel like lot some companies are seeing that month over month.Um, of course. Shopify compound has been compounding for a very long time now, but I spent a decade doing that and the majority of that was just make sure the site is up today and make sure it's up a year from now. And a lot of that was really just the, um, you know, uh, the Kardashians would drive very, very large amounts of, of data to, to uh, to Shopify as they were rotating through all the merch and building out their businesses.And we just needed to make sure we could handle that. Right. And sometimes these were events, a million requests per second. And so, you know, we, we had our own data centers back in the day and we were moving to the cloud and there was so much sharding work and all of that that we were doing. So I spent a decade just scaling databases ‘cause that's fundamentally what's the most difficult thing to scale about these sites.The database that was the most difficult for me to scale during that time, and that was the most aggravating to be on call for, was elastic search. It was very, very difficult to deal with. And I saw a lot of projects that were just being held back in their ambition by using it.swyx: And I mean, self-hosted.Self-hosted. ‘causeSimon Hørup Eskildsen: it's, yeah, and it commercial, this is like 2015, right? So it's like a very particular vintage. Right. It's probably better at a lot of these things now. Um, it was difficult to contend with and I'm just like, I just think about it. It's an inverted index. It should be good at these kinds of queries and do all of this.And it was, we, we often couldn't get it to do exactly what we needed to do or basically get lucine to do, like expose lucine raw to, to, to what we needed to do. Um, so that was like. Just something that we did on the side and just panic scaled when we needed to, but not a particular focus of mine. So I left, and when I left, I, um, wasn't sure exactly what I wanted to do.I mean, it spent like a decade inside of the same company. I'd like grown up there. I started working there when I was 18.swyx: You only do Rails?Simon Hørup Eskildsen: Yeah. I mean, yeah. Rails. And he's a Rails guy. Uh, love Rails. So good. Um,Alessio: we all wish we could still work in Rails.swyx: I know know. I know, but some, I tried learning Ruby.It's just too much, like too many options to do the same thing. It's, that's my, I I know there's a, there's a way to do it.Simon Hørup Eskildsen: I love it. I don't know that I would use it now, like given cloud code and, and, and cursor and everything, but, um, um, but still it, like if I'm just sitting down and writing a teal code, that's how I think.But anyway, I left and I wasn't, I talked to a couple companies and I was like, I don't. I need to see a little bit more of the world here to know what I'm gonna like focus on next. Um, and so what I decided is like I was gonna, I called it like angel engineering, where I just hopped around in my friend's companies in three months increments and just helped them out with something.Right. And, and just vested a bit of equity and solved some interesting infrastructure problem. So I worked with a bunch of companies at the time, um, read Wise was one of them. Replicate was one of them. Um, causal, I dunno if you've tried this, it's like a, it's a spreadsheet engine Yeah. Where you can do distribution.They sold recently. Yeah. Um, we've been, we used that in fp and a at, um, at Turbo Puffer. Um, so a bunch of companies like this and it was super fun. And so we're the Chachi bt moment happened, I was with. With read Wise for a stint, we were preparing for the reader launch, right? Which is where you, you cue articles and read them later.And I was just getting their Postgres up to snuff, like, which basically boils down to tuning, auto vacuum. So I was doing that and then this happened and we were like, oh, maybe we should build a little recommendation engine and some features to try to hook in the lms. They were not that good yet, but it was clear there was something there.And so I built a small recommendation engine just, okay, let's take the articles that you've recently read, right? Like embed all the articles and then do recommendations. It was good enough that when I ran it on one of the co-founders of Rey's, like I found out that I got articles about, about having a child.I'm like, oh my God, I didn't, I, I didn't know that, that they were having a child. I wasn't sure what to do with that information, but the recommendation engine was good enough that it was suggesting articles, um, about that. And so there was, there was recommendations and uh, it actually worked really well.But this was a company that was spending maybe five grand a month in total on all their infrastructure and. When I did the napkin math on running the embeddings of all the articles, putting them into a vector index, putting it in prod, it's gonna be like 30 grand a month. That just wasn't tenable. Right?Like Read Wise is a proudly bootstrapped company and it's paying 30 grand for infrastructure for one feature versus five. It just wasn't tenable. So sort of in the bucket of this is useful, it's pretty good, but let us, let's return to it when the costs come down.swyx: Did you say it grows by feature? So for five to 30 is by the number of, like, what's the, what's the Scaling factor scale?It scales by the number of articles that you embed.Simon Hørup Eskildsen: It does, but what I meant by that is like five grand for like all of the other, like the Heroku, dinos, Postgres, like all the other, and this then storage is 30. Yeah. And then like 30 grand for one feature. Right. Which is like, what other articles are related to this one.Um, so it was just too much right to, to power everything. Their budget would've been maybe a few thousand dollars, which still would've been a lot. And so we put it in a bucket of, okay, we're gonna do that later. We'll wait, we will wait for the cost to come down. And that haunted me. I couldn't stop thinking about it.I was like, okay, there's clearly some latent demand here. If the cost had been a 10th, we would've shipped it and. This was really the only data point that I had. Right. I didn't, I, I didn't, I didn't go out and talk to anyone else. It was just so I started reading Right. I couldn't, I couldn't help myself.Like I didn't know what like a vector index is. I, I generally barely do about how to generate the vectors. There was a lot of hype about, this is a early 2023. There was a lot of hype about vector databases. There were raising a lot of money and it's like, I really didn't know anything about it. It's like, you know, trying these little models, fine tuning them.Like I was just trying to get sort of a lay of the land. So I just sat down. I have this. A GitHub repository called Napkin Math. And on napkin math, there's just, um, rows of like, oh, this is how much bandwidth. Like this is how many, you know, you can do 25 gigabytes per second on average to dram. You can do, you know, five gigabytes per second of rights to an SSD, blah blah.All of these numbers, right? And S3, how many you could do per, how much bandwidth can you drive per connection? I was just sitting down, I was like, why hasn't anyone build a database where you just put everything on O storage and then you puff it into NVME when you use the data and you puff it into dram if you're, if you're querying it alive, it's just like, this seems fairly obvious and you, the only real downside to that is that if you go all in on o storage, every right will take a couple hundred milliseconds of latency, but from there it's really all upside, right?You do the first go, it takes half a second. And it sort of occurred to me as like, well. The architecture is really good for that. It's really good for AB storage, it's really good for nvm ESSD. It's, well, you just couldn't have done that 10 years ago. Back to what we were talking about before. You really have to build a database where you have as few round trips as possible, right?This is how CPUs work today. It's how NVM E SSDs work. It's how as, um, as three works that you want to have a very large amount of outstanding requests, right? Like basically go to S3, do like that thousand requests to ask for data in one round trip. Wait for that. Get that, like, make a new decision. Do it again, and try to do that maybe a maximum of three times.But no databases were designed that way within NVME as is ds. You can drive like within, you know, within a very low multiple of DRAM bandwidth if you use it that way. And same with S3, right? You can fully max out the network card, which generally is not maxed out. You get very, like, very, very good bandwidth.And, but no one had built a database like that. So I was like, okay, well can't you just, you know, take all the vectors right? And plot them in the proverbial coordinate system. Get the clusters, put a file on S3 called clusters, do json, and then put another file for every cluster, you know, cluster one, do js O cluster two, do js ON you know that like it's two round trips, right?So you get the clusters, you find the closest clusters, and then you download the cluster files like the, the closest end. And you could do this in two round trips.swyx: You were nearest neighbors locally.Simon Hørup Eskildsen: Yes. Yes. And then, and you would build this, this file, right? It's just like ultra simplistic, but it's not a far shot from what the first version of Turbo Buffer was.Why hasn't anyone done thatAlessio: in that moment? From a workload perspective, you're thinking this is gonna be like a read heavy thing because they're doing recommend. Like is the fact that like writes are so expensive now? Oh, with ai you're actually not writing that much.Simon Hørup Eskildsen: At that point I hadn't really thought too much about, well no actually it was always clear to me that there was gonna be a lot of rights because at Shopify, the search clusters were doing, you know, I don't know, tens or hundreds of crew QPS, right?‘cause you just have to have a human sit and type in. But we did, you know, I don't know how many updates there were per second. I'm sure it was in the millions, right into the cluster. So I always knew there was like a 10 to 100 ratio on the read write. In the read wise use case. It's, um, even, even in the read wise use case, there'd probably be a lot fewer reads than writes, right?There's just a lot of churn on the amount of stuff that was going through versus the amount of queries. Um, I wasn't thinking too much about that. I was mostly just thinking about what's the fundamentally cheapest way to build a database in the cloud today using the primitives that you have available.And this is it, right? You just, now you have one machine and you know, let's say you have a terabyte of data in S3, you paid the $200 a month for that, and then maybe five to 10% of that data and needs to be an NV ME SSDs and less than that in dram. Well. You're paying very, very little to inflate the data.swyx: By the way, when you say no one else has done that, uh, would you consider Neon, uh, to be on a similar path in terms of being sort of S3 first and, uh, separating the compute and storage?Simon Hørup Eskildsen: Yeah, I think what I meant with that is, uh, just build a completely new database. I don't know if we were the first, like it was very much, it was, I mean, I, I hadn't, I just looked at the napkin math and was like, this seems really obvious.So I'm sure like a hundred people came up with it at the same time. Like the light bulb and every invention ever. Right. It was just in the air. I think Neon Neon was, was first to it. And they're trying, they're retrofitted onto Postgres, right? And then they built this whole architecture where you have, you have it in memory and then you sort of.You know, m map back to S3. And I think that was very novel at the time to do it for, for all LTP, but I hadn't seen a database that was truly all in, right. Not retrofitting it. The database felt built purely for this no consensus layer. Even using compare and swap on optic storage to do consensus. I hadn't seen anyone go that all in.And I, I mean, there, there, I'm sure there was someone that did that before us. I don't know. I was just looking at the napkin mathswyx: and, and when you say consensus layer, uh, are you strongly relying on S3 Strong consistency? You are. Okay.SoSimon Hørup Eskildsen: that is your consensus layer. It, it is the consistency layer. And I think also, like, this is something that most people don't realize, but S3 only became consistent in December of 2020.swyx: I remember this coming out during COVID and like people were like, oh, like, it was like, uh, it was just like a free upgrade.Simon Hørup Eskildsen: Yeah.swyx: They were just, they just announced it. We saw consistency guys and like, okay, cool.Simon Hørup Eskildsen: And I'm sure that they just, they probably had it in prod for a while and they're just like, it's done right.And people were like, okay, cool. But. That's a big moment, right? Like nv, ME SSDs, were also not in the cloud until around 2017, right? So you just sort of had like 2017 nv, ME SSDs, and people were like, okay, cool. There's like one skew that does this, whatever, right? Takes a few years. And then the second thing is like S3 becomes consistent in 2020.So now it means you don't have to have this like big foundation DB or like zookeeper or whatever sitting there contending with the keys, which is how. You know, that's what Snowflake and others have do so muchswyx: for goneSimon Hørup Eskildsen: Exactly. Just gone. Right? And so just push to the, you know, whatever, how many hundreds of people they have working on S3 solved and then compare and swap was not in S3 at this point in time,swyx: by the way.Uh, I don't know what that is, so maybe you wanna explain. Yes. Yeah.Simon Hørup Eskildsen: Yes. So, um, what Compare and swap is, is basically, you can imagine that if you have a database, it might be really nice to have a file called metadata json. And metadata JSON could say things like, Hey, these keys are here and this file means that, and there's lots of metadata that you have to operate in the database, right?But that's the simplest way to do it. So now you have might, you might have a lot of servers that wanna change the metadata. They might have written a file and want the metadata to contain that file. But you have a hundred nodes that are trying to contend with this metadata that JSON well, what compare and Swap allows you to do is basically just you download the file, you make the modifications, and then you write it only if it hasn't changed.While you did the modification and if not you retry. Right? Should just have this retry loops. Now you can imagine if you have a hundred nodes doing that, it's gonna be really slow, but it will converge over time. That primitive was not available in S3. It wasn't available in S3 until late 2024, but it was available in GCP.The real story of this is certainly not that I sat down and like bake brained it. I was like, okay, we're gonna start on GCS S3 is gonna get it later. Like it was really not that we started, we got really lucky, like we started on GCP and we started on GCP because tur um, Shopify ran on GCP. And so that was the platform I was most available with.Right. Um, and I knew the Canadian team there ‘cause I'd worked with them at Shopify and so it was natural for us to start there. And so when we started building the database, we're like, oh yeah, we have to build a, we really thought we had to build a consensus layer, like have a zookeeper or something to do this.But then we discovered the compare and swap. It's like, oh, we can kick the can. Like we'll just do metadata r json and just, it's fine. It's probably fine. Um, and we just kept kicking the can until we had very, very strong conviction in the idea. Um, and then we kind of just hinged the company on the fact that S3 probably was gonna get this, it started getting really painful in like mid 2024.‘cause we were closing deals with, um, um, notion actually that was running in AWS and we're like, trust us. You, you really want us to run this in GCP? And they're like, no, I don't know about that. Like, we're running everything in AWS and the latency across the cloud were so big and we had so much conviction that we bought like, you know, dark fiber between the AWS regions in, in Oregon, like in the InterExchange and GCP is like, we've never seen a startup like do like, what's going on here?And we're just like, no, we don't wanna do this. We were tuning like TCP windows, like everything to get the latency down ‘cause we had so high conviction in not doing like a, a metadata layer on S3. So those were the three conditions, right? Compare and swap. To do metadata, which wasn't in S3 until late 2024 S3 being consistent, which didn't happen until December, 2020.Uh, 2020. And then NVMe ssd, which didn't end in the cloud until 2017.swyx: I mean, in some ways, like a very big like cloud success story that like you were able to like, uh, put this all together, but also doing things like doing, uh, bind our favor. That that actually is something I've never heard.Simon Hørup Eskildsen: I mean, it's very common when you're a big company, right?You're like connecting your own like data center or whatever. But it's like, it was uniquely just a pain with notion because the, um, the org, like most of the, like if you're buying in Ashburn, Virginia, right? Like US East, the Google, like the GCP and, and AWS data centers are like within a millisecond on, on each other, on the public exchanges.But in Oregon uniquely, the GCP data center sits like a couple hundred kilometers, like east of Portland and the AWS region sits in Portland, but the network exchange they go through is through Seattle. So it's like a full, like 14 milliseconds or something like that. And so anyway, yeah. It's, it's, so we were like, okay, we can't, we have to go through an exchange in Portland.Yeah. Andswyx: you'd rather do this than like run your zookeeper and likeSimon Hørup Eskildsen: Yes. Way rather. It doesn't have state, I don't want state and two systems. Um, and I think all that is just informed by Justine, my co-founder and I had just been on call for so long. And the worst outages are the ones where you have state in multiple places that's not syncing up.So it really came from, from a a, like just a, a very pure source of pain, of just imagining what we would be Okay. Being woken up at 3:00 AM about and having something in zookeeper was not one of them.swyx: You, you're talking to like a notion or something. Do they care or do they just, theySimon Hørup Eskildsen: just, they care about latency.swyx: They latency cost. That's it.Simon Hørup Eskildsen: They just cared about latency. Right. And we just absorbed the cost. We're just like, we have high conviction in this. At some point we can move them to AWS. Right. And so we just, we, we'll buy the fiber, it doesn't matter. Right. Um, and it's like $5,000. Usually when you buy fiber, you buy like multiple lines.And we're like, we can only afford one, but we will just test it that when it goes over the public internet, it's like super smooth. And so we did a lot of, anyway, it's, yeah, it was, that's cool.Alessio: You can imagine talking to the GCP rep and it's like, no, we're gonna buy, because we know we're gonna turn, we're gonna turn from you guys and go to AWS in like six months.But in the meantime we'll do this. It'sSimon Hørup Eskildsen: a, I mean, like they, you know, this workload still runs on GCP for what it's worth. Right? ‘cause it's so, it was just, it was so reliable. So it was never about moving off GCP, it was just about honesty. It was just about giving notion the latency that they deserved.Right. Um, and we didn't want ‘em to have to care about any of this. We also, they were like, oh, egress is gonna be bad. It was like, okay, screw it. Like we're just gonna like vvc, VPC peer with you and AWS we'll eat the cost. Yeah. Whatever needs to be done.Alessio: And what were the actual workloads? Because I think when you think about ai, it's like 14 milliseconds.It's like really doesn't really matter in the scheme of like a model generation.Simon Hørup Eskildsen: Yeah. We were told the latency, right. That we had to beat. Oh, right. So, so we're just looking at the traces. Right. And then sort of like hand draw, like, you know, kind of like looking at the trace and then thinking what are the other extensions of the trace?Right. And there's a lot more to it because it's also when you have, if you have 14 versus seven milliseconds, right. You can fit in another round trip. So we had to tune TCP to try to send as much data in every round trip, prewarm all the connections. And there was, there's a lot of things that compound from having these kinds of round trips, but in the grand scheme it was just like, well, we have to beat the latency of whatever we're up against.swyx: Which is like they, I mean, notion is a database company. They could have done this themselves. They, they do lots of database engineering themselves. How do you even get in the door? Like Yeah, just like talk through that kind of.Simon Hørup Eskildsen: Last time I was in San Francisco, I was talking to one of the engineers actually, who, who was one of our champions, um, at, AT Notion.And they were, they were just trying to make sure that the, you know, per user cost matched the economics that they needed. You know, Uhhuh like, it's like the way I think about, it's like I have to earn a return on whatever the clouds charge me and then my customers have to earn a return on that. And it's like very simple, right?And so there has to be gross margin all the way up and that's how you build the product. And so then our customers have to make the right set of trade off the turbo Puffer makes, and if they're happy with that, that's great.swyx: Do you feel like you're competing with build internally versus buy or buy versus buy?Simon Hørup Eskildsen: Yeah, so, sorry, this was all to build up to your question. So one of the notion engineers told me that they'd sat and probably on a napkin, like drawn out like, why hasn't anyone built this? And then they saw terrible. It was like, well, it literally that. So, and I think AI has also changed the buy versus build equation in terms of, it's not really about can we build it, it's about do we have time to build it?I think they like, I think they felt like, okay, if this is a team that can do that and they, they feel enough like an extension of our team, well then we can go a lot faster, which would be very, very good for them. And I mean, they put us through the, through the test, right? Like we had some very, very long nights to to, to do that POC.And they were really our biggest, our second big customer off the cursor, which also was a lot of late nights. Right.swyx: Yeah. That, I mean, should we go into that story? The, the, the sort of Chris's story, like a lot, um, they credit you a lot for. Working very closely with them. So I just wanna hear, I've heard this, uh, story from Sole's point of view, but like, I'm curious what, what it looks like from your side.Simon Hørup Eskildsen: I actually haven't heard it from Sole's point of view, so maybe you can now cross reference it. The way that I remember it was that, um, the day after we launched, which was just, you know, I'd worked the whole summer on, on the first version. Justine wasn't part of it yet. ‘cause I just, I didn't tell anyone that summer that I was working on this.I was just locked in on building it because it's very easy otherwise to confuse talking about something to actually doing it. And so I was just like, I'm not gonna do that. I'm just gonna do the thing. I launched it and at this point turbo puffer is like a rust binary running on a single eight core machine in a T Marks instance.And me deploying it was like looking at the request log and then like command seeing it or like control seeing it to just like, okay, there's no request. Let's upgrade the binary. Like it was like literally the, the, the, the scrappiest thing. You could imagine it was on purpose because just like at Shopify, we did that all the time.Like, we like move, like we ran things in tux all the time to begin with. Before something had like, at least the inkling of PMF, it was like, okay, is anyone gonna hear about this? Um, and one of the cursor co-founders Arvid reached out and he just, you know, the, the cursor team are like all I-O-I-I-M-O like, um, contenders, right?So they just speak in bullet points and, and facts. It was like this amazing email exchange just of, this is how many QPS we have, this is what we're paying, this is where we're going, blah, blah, blah. And so we're just conversing in bullet points. And I tried to get a call with them a few times, but they were, so, they were like really writing the PMF bowl here, just like late 2023.And one time Swally emails me at like five. What was it like 4:00 AM Pacific time saying like, Hey, are you open for a call now? And I'm on the East coast and I, it was like 7:00 AM I was like, yeah, great, sure, whatever. Um, and we just started talking and something. Then I didn't know anything about sales.It was something that just comp compelled me. I have to go see this team. Like, there's something here. So I, I went to San Francisco and I went to their office and the way that I remember it is that Postgres was down when I showed up at the office. Did SW tell you this? No. Okay. So Postgres was down and so it's like they were distracting with that.And I was trying my best to see if I could, if I could help in any way. Like I knew a little bit about databases back to tuning, auto vacuum. It was like, I think you have to tune out a vacuum. Um, and so we, we talked about that and then, um, that evening just talked about like what would it look like, what would it look like to work with us?And I just said. Look like we're all in, like we will just do what we'll do whatever, whatever you tell us, right? They migrated everything over the next like week or two, and we reduced their cost by 95%, which I think like kind of fixed their per user economics. Um, and it solved a lot of other things. And we were just, Justine, this is also when I asked Justine to come on as my co-founder, she was the best engineer, um, that I ever worked with at Shopify.She lived two blocks away and we were just, okay, we're just gonna get this done. Um, and we did, and so we helped them migrate and we just worked like hell over the next like month or two to make sure that we were never an issue. And that was, that was the cursor story. Yeah.swyx: And, and is code a different workload than normal text?I, I don't know. Is is it just text? Is it the same thing?Simon Hørup Eskildsen: Yeah, so cursor's workload is basically, they, um, they will embed the entire code base, right? So they, they will like chunk it up in whatever they would, they do. They have their own embedding model, um, which they've been public about. Um, and they find that on, on, on their evals.It. There's one of their evals where it's like a 25% improvement on a very particular workload. They have a bunch of blog posts about it. Um, I think it works best on larger code basis, but they've trained their own embedding model to do this. Um, and so you'll see it if you use the cursor agent, it will do searches.And they've also been public around, um, how they've, I think they post trained their model to be very good at semantic search as well. Um, and that's, that's how they use it. And so it's very good at, like, can you find me on the code that's similar to this, or code that does this? And just in, in this queries, they also use GR to supplement it.swyx: Yeah.Simon Hørup Eskildsen: Um, of courseswyx: it's been a big topic of discussion like, is rag dead because gr you know,Simon Hørup Eskildsen: and I mean like, I just, we, we see lots of demand from the coding company to ethicsswyx: search in every part. Yes.Simon Hørup Eskildsen: Uh, we, we, we see demand. And so, I mean, I'm. I like case studies. I don't like, like just doing like thought pieces on this is where it's going.And like trying to be all macroeconomic about ai, that's has turned out to be a giant waste of time because no one can really predict any of this. So I just collect case studies and I mean, cursor has done a great job talking about what they're doing and I hope some of the other coding labs that use Turbo Puffer will do the same.Um, but it does seem to make a difference for particular queries. Um, I mean we can also do text, we can also do RegX, but I should also say that cursors like security posture into Tur Puffer is exceptional, right? They have their own embedding model, which makes it very difficult to reverse engineer. They obfuscate the file paths.They like you. It's very difficult to learn anything about a code base by looking at it. And the other thing they do too is that for their customers, they encrypt it with their encryption keys in turbo puffer's bucket. Um, so it's, it's, it's really, really well designed.swyx: And so this is like extra stuff they did to work with you because you are not part of Cursor.Exactly like, and this is just best practice when working in any database, not just you guys. Okay. Yeah, that makes sense. Yeah. I think for me, like the, the, the learning is kind of like you, like all workloads are hybrid. Like, you know, uh, like you, you want the semantic, you want the text, you want the RegX, you want sql.I dunno. Um, but like, it's silly to like be all in on like one particularly query pattern.Simon Hørup Eskildsen: I think, like I really like the way that, um, um, that swally at cursor talks about it, which is, um, I'm gonna butcher it here. Um, and you know, I'm a, I'm a database scalability person. I'm not a, I, I dunno anything about training models other than, um, what the internet tells me and what.The way he describes is that this is just like cash compute, right? It's like you have a point in time where you're looking at some particular context and focused on some chunk and you say, this is the layer of the neural net at this point in time. That seems fundamentally really useful to do cash compute like that.And, um, how the value of that will change over time. I'm, I'm not sure, but there seems to be a lot of value in that.Alessio: Maybe talk a bit about the evolution of the workload, because even like search, like maybe two years ago it was like one search at the start of like an LLM query to build the context. Now you have a gentech search, however you wanna call it, where like the model is both writing and changing the code and it's searching it again later.Yeah. What are maybe some of the new types of workloads or like changes you've had to make to your architecture for it?Simon Hørup Eskildsen: I think you're right. When I think of rag, I think of, Hey, there's an 8,000 token, uh, context window and you better make it count. Um, and search was a way to do that now. Everything is moving towards the, just let the agent do its thing.Right? And so back to the thing before, right? The LLM is very good at reasoning with the data, and so we're just the tool call, right? And that's increasingly what we see our customers doing. Um, what we're seeing more demand from, from our customers now is to do a lot of concurrency, right? Like Notion does a ridiculous amount of queries in every round trip just because they can't.And I'm also now, when I use the cursor agent, I also see them doing more concurrency than I've ever seen before. So a bit similar to how we designed a database to drive as much concurrency in every round trip as possible. That's also what the agents are doing. So that's new. It means just an enormous amount of queries all at once to the dataset while it's warm in as few turns as possible.swyx: Can I clarify one thing on that?Simon Hørup Eskildsen: Yes.swyx: Is it, are they batching multiple users or one user is driving multiple,Simon Hørup Eskildsen: one user driving multiple, one agent driving.swyx: It's parallel searching a bunch of things.Simon Hørup Eskildsen: Exactly.swyx: Yeah. Yeah, exactly. So yeah, the clinician also did, did this for the fast context thing, like eight parallel at once.Simon Hørup Eskildsen: Yes.swyx: And, and like an interesting problem is, well, how do you make sure you have enough diversity so you're not making the the same request eight times?Simon Hørup Eskildsen: And I think like that's probably also where the hybrid comes in, where. That's another way to diversify. It's a completely different way to, to do the search.That's a big change, right? So before it was really just like one call and then, you know, the LLM took however many seconds to return, but now we just see an enormous amount of queries. So the, um, we just see more queries. So we've like tried to reduce query, we've reduced query pricing. Um, this is probably the first time actually I'm saying that, but the query pricing is being reduced, like five x.Um, and we'll probably try to reduce it even more to accommodate some of these workloads of just doing very large amounts of queries. Um, that's one thing that's changed. I think the right, the right ratio is still very high, right? Like there's still a, an enormous amount of rights per read, but we're starting probably to see that change if people really lean into this pattern.Alessio: Can we talk a little bit about the pricing? I'm curious, uh, because traditionally a database would charge on storage, but now you have the token generation that is so expensive, where like the actual. Value of like a good search query is like much higher because they're like saving inference time down the line.How do you structure that as like, what are people receptive to on the other side too?Simon Hørup Eskildsen: Yeah. I, the, the turbo puffer pricing in the beginning was just very simple. The pricing on these on for search engines before Turbo Puffer was very server full, right? It was like, here's the vm, here's the per hour cost, right?Great. And I just sat down with like a piece of paper and said like, if Turbo Puffer was like really good, this is probably what it would cost with a little bit of margin. And that was the first pricing of Turbo Puffer. And I just like sat down and I was like, okay, like this is like probably the storage amp, but whenever on a piece of paper I, it was vibe pricing.It was very vibe price, and I got it wrong. Oh. Um, well I didn't get it wrong, but like Turbo Puffer wasn't at the first principle pricing, right? So when Cursor came on Turbo Puffer, it was like. Like, I didn't know any VCs. I didn't know, like I was just like, I don't know, I didn't know anything about raising money or anything like that.I just saw that my GCP bill was, was high, was a lot higher than the cursor bill. So Justine and I was just like, well, we have to optimize it. Um, and I mean, to the chagrin now of, of it, of, of the VCs, it now means that we're profitable because we've had so much pricing pressure in the beginning. Because it was running on my credit card and Justine and I had spent like, like tens of thousands of dollars on like compute bills and like spinning off the company and like very like, like bad Canadian lawyers and like things like to like get all of this done because we just like, we didn't know.Right. If you're like steeped in San Francisco, you're just like, you just know. Okay. Like you go out, raise a pre-seed round. I, I never heard a word pre-seed at this point in time.swyx: When you had Cursor, you had Notion you, you had no funding.Simon Hørup Eskildsen: Um, with Cursor we had no funding. Yeah. Um, by the time we had Notion Locke was, Locke was here.Yeah. So it was really just, we vibe priced it 100% from first Principles, but it wasn't, it, it was not performing at first principles, so we just did everything we could to optimize it in the beginning for that, so that at least we could have like a 5% margin or something. So I wasn't freaking out because Cursor's bill was also going like this as they were growing.And so my liability and my credit limit was like actively like calling my bank. It was like, I need a bigger credit. Like it was, yeah. Anyway, that was the beginning. Yeah. But the pricing was, yeah, like storage rights and query. Right. And the, the pricing we have today is basically just that pricing with duct tape and spit to try to approach like, you know, like a, as a margin on the physical underlying hardware.And we're doing this year, you're gonna see more and more pricing changes from us. Yeah.swyx: And like is how much does stuff like VVC peering matter because you're working in AWS land where egress is charged and all that, you know.Simon Hørup Eskildsen: We probably don't like, we have like an enterprise plan that just has like a base fee because we haven't had time to figure out SKU pricing for all of this.Um, but I mean, yeah, you can run turbo puffer either in SaaS, right? That's what Cursor does. You can run it in a single tenant cluster. So it's just you. That's what Notion does. And then you can run it in, in, in BYOC where everything is inside the customer's VPC, that's what an for example, philanthropic does.swyx: What I'm hearing is that this is probably the best CRO job for somebody who can come in and,Simon Hørup Eskildsen: I mean,swyx: help you with this.Simon Hørup Eskildsen: Um, like Turbo Puffer hired, like, I don't know what, what number this was, but we had a full-time CFO as like the 12th hire or something at Turbo Puffer, um, I think I hear are a lot of comp.I don't know how they do it. Like they have a hundred employees and not a CFO. It's like having a CFO is like a runningswyx: business man. Like, you know,Simon Hørup Eskildsen: it's so good. Yeah, like money Mike, like he just, you know, just handles the money and a lot of the business stuff and so he came in and just hopped with a lot of the operational side of the business.So like C-O-O-C-F-O, like somewhere in between.swyx: Just as quick mention of Lucky, just ‘cause I'm curious, I've met Lock and like, he's obviously a very good investor and now on physical intelligence, um, I call it generalist super angel, right? He invests in everything. Um, and I always wonder like, you know, is there something appealing about focusing on developer tooling, focusing on databases, going like, I've invested for 10 years in databases versus being like a lock where he can maybe like connect you to all the customers that you need.Simon Hørup Eskildsen: This is an excellent question. No, no one's asked me this. Um, why lockey? Because. There was a couple of people that we were talking to at the time and when we were raising, we were almost a little, we were like a bit distressed because one of our, one of our peers had just launched something that was very similar to Turbo Puffer.And someone just gave me the advice at the time of just choose the person where you just feel like you can just pick up the phone and not prepare anything. And just be completely honest, and I don't think I've said this publicly before, but I just called Lockey and was like local Lockie. Like if this doesn't have PMF by the end of the year, like we'll just like return all the money to you.But it's just like, I don't really, we, Justine and I don't wanna work on this unless it's really working. So we want to give it the best shot this year and like we're really gonna go for it. We're gonna hire a bunch of people and we're just gonna be honest with everyone. Like when I don't know how to play a game, I just play with open cards and.Lockey was the only person that didn't, that didn't freak out. He was like, I've never heard anyone say that before. As I said, I didn't even know what a seed or pre-seed round was like before, probably even at this time. So I was just like very honest with him. And I asked him like, Lockie, have you ever have, have you ever invested in database company?He was just like, no. And at the time I was like, am I dumb? Like, but I think there was something that just like really drew me to Lockie. He is so authentic, so honest, like, and there was something just like, I just felt like I could just play like, just say everything openly. And that was, that was, I think that that was like a perfect match at the time, and, and, and honestly still is.He was just like, okay, that's great. This is like the most honest, ridiculous thing I've ever heard anyone say to me. But like that, like that, whyswyx: is this ridiculous? Say competitor launch, this may not work out. It wasSimon Hørup Eskildsen: more just like. If this doesn't work out, I'm gonna close up shop by the end of the mo the year, right?Like it was, I don't know, maybe it's common. I, I don't know. He told me it was uncommon. I don't know. Um, that's why we chose him and he'd been phenomenal. The other people were talking at the, at the time were database experts. Like they, you know, knew a lot about databases and Locke didn't, this turned out to be a phenomenal asset.Right. I like Justine and I know a lot about databases. The people that we hire know a lot about databases. What we needed was just someone who didn't know a lot about databases, didn't pretend to know a lot about databases, and just wanted to help us with candidates and customers. And he did. Yeah. And I have a list, right, of the investors that I have a relationship with, and Lockey has just performed excellent in the number of sub bullets of what we can attribute back to him.Just absolutely incredible. And when people talk about like no ego and just the best thing for the founder, I like, I don't think that anyone, like even my lawyer is like, yeah, Lockey is like the most friendly person you will find.swyx: Okay. This is my most glow recommendation I've ever heard.Alessio: He deserves it.He's very special.swyx: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Amazing.Alessio: Since you mentioned candidates, maybe we can talk about team building, you know, like, especially in sf, it feels like it's just easier to start a company than to join a company. Uh, I'm curious your experience, especially not being n SF full-time and doing something that is maybe, you know, a very low level of detail and technical detail.Simon Hørup Eskildsen: Yeah. So joining versus starting, I never thought that I would be a founder. I would start with it, like Turbo Puffer started as a blog post, and then it became a project and then sort of almost accidentally became a company. And now it feels like it's, it's like becoming a bigger company. That was never the intention.The intentions were very pure. It's just like, why hasn't anyone done this? And it's like, I wanna be the, like, I wanna be the first person to do it. I think some founders have this, like, I could never work for anyone else. I, I really don't feel that way. Like, it's just like, I wanna see this happen. And I wanna see it happen with some people that I really enjoy working with and I wanna have fun doing it and this, this, this has all felt very natural on that, on that sense.So it was never a like join versus versus versus found. It was just dis found me at the right moment.Alessio: Well I think there's an argument for, you should have joined Cursor, right? So I'm curious like how you evaluate it. Okay, I should actually go raise money and make this a company versus like, this is like a company that is like growing like crazy.It's like an interesting technical problem. I should just build it within Cursor and then they don't have to encrypt all this stuff. They don't have to obfuscate things. Like was that on your mind at all orSimon Hørup Eskildsen: before taking the, the small check from Lockie, I did have like a hard like look at myself in the mirror of like, okay, do I really want to do this?And because if I take the money, I really have to do it right. And so the way I almost think about it's like you kind of need to ha like you kind of need to be like fucked up enough to want to go all the way. And that was the conversation where I was like, okay, this is gonna be part of my life's journey to build this company and do it in the best way that I possibly can't.Because if I ask people to join me, ask people to get on the cap table, then I have an ultimate responsibility to give it everything. And I don't, I think some people, it doesn't occur to me that everyone takes it that seriously. And maybe I take it too seriously, I don't know. But that was like a very intentional moment.And so then it was very clear like, okay, I'm gonna do this and I'm gonna give it everything.Alessio: A lot of people don't take it this seriously. But,swyx: uh, let's talk about, you have this concept of the P 99 engineer. Uh, people are 10 x saying, everyone's saying, you know, uh, maybe engineers are out of a job. I don't know.But you definitely see a P 99 engineer, and I just want you to talk about it.Simon Hørup Eskildsen: Yeah, so the P 99 engineer was just a term that we started using internally to talk about candidates and talk about how we wanted to build the company. And you know, like everyone else is, like we want a talent dense company.And I think that's almost become trite at this point. What I credit the cursor founders a lot with is that they just arrived there from first principles of like, we just need a talent dense, um, talent dense team. And I think I've seen some teams that weren't talent dense and like seemed a counterfactual run, which if you've run in been in a large company, you will just see that like it's just logically will happen at a large company.Um, and so that was super important to me and Justine and it's very difficult to maintain. And so we just needed, we needed wording for it. And so I have a document called Traits of the P 99 Engineer, and it's a bullet point list. And I look at that list after every single interview that I do, and in every single recap that we do and every recap we end with.End with, um, some version of I'm gonna reject this candidate completely regardless of what the discourse was, because I wanna see people fight for this person because the default should not be, we're gonna hire this person. The default should be, we're definitely not hiring this person. And you know, if everyone was like, ah, maybe throw a punch, then this is not the right.swyx: Do, do you operate, like if there's one cha there must have at least one champion who's like, yes, I will put my career on, on, on the line for this. You know,Simon Hørup Eskildsen: I think career on the line,swyx: maybe a chair, butSimon Hørup Eskildsen: yeah. You know, like, um, I would say so someone needs to like, have both fists up and be like, I'd fight.Right? Yeah. Yeah. And if one person said, then, okay, let's do it. Right?swyx: Yeah.Simon Hørup Eskildsen: Um. It doesn't have to be absolutely everyone. Right? And like the interviews are always the sign that you're checking for different attributes. And if someone is like knocking it outta the park in every single attribute, that's, that's fairly rare.Um, but that's really important. And so the traits of the P 99 engineer, there's lots of them. There's also the traits of the p like triple nine engineer and the quadruple nine engineer. This is like, it's a long list.swyx: Okay.Simon Hørup Eskildsen: Um, I'll give you some samples, right. Of what we, what we look for. I think that the P 99 engineer has some history of having bent, like their trajectory or something to their will.Right? Some moment where it was just, they just, you know, made the computer do what it needed to do. There's something like that, and it will, it will occur to have them at some point in their career. And, uh. Hopefully multiple times. Right.swyx: Gimme an example of one of your engineers that like,Simon Hørup Eskildsen: I'll give an eng.Uh, so we, we, we launched this thing called A and NV three. Um, we could, we're also, we're working on V four and V five right now, but a and NV three can search a hundred billion vectors with a P 50 of around 40 milliseconds and a p 99 of 200 milliseconds. Um, maybe other people have done this, I'm sure Google and others have done this, but, uh, we haven't seen anyone, um, at least not in like a public consumable SaaS that can do this.And that was an engineer, the chief architect of Turbo Puffer, Nathan, um, who more or less just bent this, the software was not capable of this and he just made it capable for a very particular workload in like a, you know, six to eight week period with the help of a lot of the team. Right. It's been, been, there's numerous of examples of that, like at, at turbo puff, but that's like really bending the software and X 86 to your will.It was incredible to watch. Um. You wanna see some moments like that?swyx: Isn't that triple nine?Simon Hørup Eskildsen: Um, I think Nathan, what's calledAlessio: group nine, that was only nine. I feel like this is too high forSimon Hørup Eskildsen: Nathan. Nathan is, uh, Nathan is like, yeah, there's a lot of nines. Okay. After that p So I think that's one trait. I think another trait is that, uh, the P 99 spends a lot of time looking at maps.Generally it's their preferred ux. They just love looking at maps. You ever seen someone who just like, sits on their phone and just like, scrolls around on a map? Or did you not look at maps A lot? You guys don't look atswyx: maps? I guess I'm not feeling there. I don't know, butSimon Hørup Eskildsen: you just dis What about trains?Do you like trains?swyx: Uh, I mean they, not enough. Okay. This is just like weapon nice. Autism is what I call it. Like, like,Simon Hørup Eskildsen: um, I love looking at maps, like, it's like my preferred UX and just like I, you know, I likeswyx: lotsAlessio: of, of like random places, soswyx: like,youswyx: know.Alessio: Yes. Okay. There you go. So instead of like random places, like how do you explore the maps?Simon Hørup Eskildsen: No, it's, it's just a joke.swyx: It's autism laugh. It's like you are just obsessed by something and you like studying a thing.Simon Hørup Eskildsen: The origin of this was that at some point I read an interview with some IOI gold medalistswyx: Uhhuh,Simon Hørup Eskildsen: and it's like, what do you do in your spare time? I was just like, I like looking at maps.I was like, I feel so seen. Like, I just like love, like swirling out. I was like, oh, Canada is so big. Where's Baffin Island? I don't know. I love it. Yeah. Um, anyway, so the traits of P 99, P 99 is obsessive, right? Like, there's just like, you'll, you'll find traits of that we do an interview at, at, at, at turbo puffer or like multiple interviews that just try to screen for some of these things.Um, so. There's lots of others, but these are the kinds of traits that we look for.swyx: I'll tell you, uh, some people listen for like some of my dere stuff. Uh, I do think about derel as maps. Um, you draw a map for people, uh, maps show you the, uh, what is commonly agreed to be the geographical features of what a boundary is.And it shows also shows you what is not doing. And I, I think a lot of like developer tools, companies try to tell you they can do everything, but like, let's, let's be real. Like you, your, your three landmarks are here, everyone comes here, then here, then here, and you draw a map and, and then you draw a journey through the map.And like that. To me, that's what developer relations looks like. So I do think about things that way.Simon Hørup Eskildsen: I think the P 99 thinks in offs, right? The P 99 is very clear about, you know, hey, turbo puffer, you can't run a high transaction workload on turbo puffer, right? It's like the right latency is a hundred milliseconds.That's a clear trade off. I think the P 99 is very good at articulating the trade offs in every decision. Um. Which is exactly what the map is in your case, right?swyx: Uh, yeah, yeah. My, my, my world. My world.Alessio: How, how do you reconcile some of these things when you're saying you bend the will the computer versus like the trade

Mit Ende 20 als Geschäftsführer in der vierten Generation eines Familienunternehmens – Max Derwald von der Derwald Immobiliengruppe beschreibt, was das wirklich bedeutet: Verantwortung für Jahrzehnte Aufbauarbeit, einen Einstieg mitten in die Zinswende und die Frage, wo im eigenen Unternehmen die echte Wertschöpfung steckt. Vom Bauunternehmen mit 700 Mitarbeitern zum Projektentwickler und Bestandshalter im Ruhrgebiet – und warum Bestand genau dann trägt, wenn der Markt krank ist.[DARUM GEHT ES IN DIESER FOLGE]• Wie Max Derwald als Nachfolger in das Familienunternehmen eingestiegen ist – und was ihn dort wirklich erwartet hat: ein Schreibtisch, ein Stuhl, eine Lampe• Wie die Derwald Immobiliengruppe die Zinswende erlebt hat – und warum langfristiger Bestand der entscheidende Puffer war• In-Sourcing vs. Outsourcing: Warum eigene Architektur, Hausverwaltung und jetzt ein eigenes Facility-Management-Unternehmen strategisch Sinn ergeben• Wie Familienunternehmen Nachfolge strukturieren – und warum es ohne Vertrauen und klare Strukturen scheitert• Warum das Ruhrgebiet als Immobilienstandort massiv unterschätzt wird – und welches Aufholpotenzial Max dort sieht[DAS NEHMEN WIR MIT]1. Bestand lässt gut schlafen. Wer langfristig finanziert und nicht exitgetrieben agiert, muss in Krisenzeiten nicht panisch reagieren. Die Derwald Immobiliengruppe konnte die Zinswende aussitzen – weil der Bestand den Spielraum gab.2. Fokus auf Wertschöpfung schlägt alles andere. Egal ob erstes Mehrfamilienhaus oder vierte Unternehmergeneration – die Frage ist immer dieselbe: Wo entsteht bei mir der größte Wert? Da gehört die Energie hin. Alles andere ist nachrangig.3. In-Sourcing ist eine Philosophie-Frage. Wer an Kernprozessen die Kontrolle abgibt, riskiert Qualität und Abhängigkeit. Aber: Was man intern aufbaut, sollte von Anfang an so strukturiert sein, dass es auch standalone funktioniert – sonst steht es einem im Weg.[ÜBER DEN GAST]Max Derwald ist Geschäftsführer in der vierten Generation der Derwald Immobiliengruppe im Ruhrgebiet – einem Unternehmen, das nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg als Bauunternehmen gegründet wurde und sich über Jahrzehnte zum Projektentwickler und Bestandshalter gewandelt hat. Er ist 2021 eingestiegen – direkt in die Zinswende – und hat seitdem Controlling, Akquise und die Gründung neuer Tochtergesellschaften verantwortet.• https://www.linkedin.com/in/maximilianderwald/?originalSubdomain=de• https://www.instagram.com/maxderwald?igsh=Y29yZnVpc2Z1N3Mz&utm_source=qr---

We get louder with new tracks from KÜKEN, Puffer and more. Plus we spin new sounds from Crooked Fingers, Ivan The Tolerable, and Danz CM!

Du sanierst deine Immobilie und das sollte am besten alles möglichst reibungslos verlaufen? Bodo, Immobilieninvestor, Rechtsanwalt und immocation Coach und Martin Groszewski, Immobilieninvestor und immocation Coach, kennen die wichtigsten Fehler, die am Ende dazu führen, dass dein Sanierungsplan nicht aufgeht. Wie kalkuliert du die Kosten und wie viel Puffer solltest du einplanen? Wie präzise sind die zeitlichen Angaben von Handwerkerfirmen? Was solltest du beachten, wenn du Angebote einholst? Warum du immer den Fortschritt auf der Baustelle kontrollieren solltest und warum du mit zu frühen Zahlungen vorsichtig sein solltest, das erfährst du in dieser Folge. immocation. Lerne Immobilien.

Olivia interviews Jolene Puffer, a real estate broker, entrepreneur, Ironman finisher, author, and CEO. Jolene shares her journey of embracing bravery, highlighting how completing her first Ironman transformed her beliefs about what she could accomplish.  Jolene also discusses her book 'How Big Is Your Brave?' Speed Round:  entrepreneurship, social media, artificial intelligence,  endurance sports and more.00:25 The Importance of Being Brave02:19 Overcoming Challenges and Ironman Journey03:50 Bravery in Everyday Life07:49 Speed Round: What Matters?https://www.instagram.com/jolenerocksrealestate/https://www.amazon.com/How-Your-Brave-Jolene-Roberts/dp/B0CS3TFGTH/This podcast is brought to you by Matters.com. A new social media and collaboration platform - launching soon. Join thousands getting the Matters.com newsletter — world news, fresh perspectives, and early beta access.

On today's show: One of Bill's boys had no school today, but the other one had to go! You can have date night and save a lot of money at Applebee's. Would you like a keg of ketchup in your kitchen? Good Vibes! Cupid's Undie Run is a week from tomorrow (Saturday, February 7th). Red Flag Friday: Bree didn't like a comment that a guy made during their first date. Plus, Alyssa's College of Knowledge, Free Plug Friday, and are you a Puffer? Because it's illegal in Ohio....

In dieser Episode geht es darum, warum bei Kids mit ADHS alles "scheibchenweise" ​abläuft bzw. besser funktioniert: Essen in vielen Miniportionen, Hausaufgaben in kleinen Einheiten, Babyschritte beim Selbständigwerden, schlechte Nachrichten portionsweise mit Puffer dazwischen etc.

KI, KI, KI. Es kann sein, dass 2026 so aussieht. Das wär gut für GE Vernova (WKN: A404PC), Siemens Energy (WKN: ENER6Y), Wärtsilä (WKN: 881050), SK Hynix (WKN: 907210) und Micron (WKN: 869020). Es kann aber auch sein, dass KI einen Dämpfer kriegt. Dann könnten Konsumgüter & Gesundheit ein Puffer sein. Oder günstige Bewertungen bei PayPal (WKN: A14R7U), Sixt (WKN: 723132) & Dassault Systèmes (WKN: A3CRC5). KI-Glaubensfragen kann man sich bei Salesforce (WKN: A0B87V), Adobe (WKN: 871981), Constellation Software (WKN: A0JM27) oder SAP (WKN: 716460) stellen. Und wer gar nix mit KI zu tun haben will, kann's mal bei 3i (WKN: A0MU9Q), Benefit Systems (WKN: A1JALK), Basic-Fit (WKN: A2AJXD), Build-A-Bear (WKN: A0DK8F) und Floor & Decor (WKN: A2DQHZ) versuchen. Oder man setzt mit Adidas (WKN: A1EWWW), Visa (WKN: A0NC7B) und Lufthansa (WKN: 823212) auf WM-Fieber. Die europäische Industrie (Prysmian (WKN: A0MP84), Schneider Electric (WKN: 860180)), Banken, Argentinien und Singapur sollte man auch nicht vergessen. Aktien hören ist gut. Aktien kaufen ist besser. Bei unserem Partner Scalable Capital geht's unbegrenzt per Trading-Flatrate und auf der hauseigenen European Investor Exchange, die genau auf Privatanleger zugeschnitten ist. Alle weiteren Infos gibt's hier: scalable.capital/oaws. Diesen Podcast vom 02.01.2026, 3:00 Uhr stellt dir die Podstars GmbH (Noah Leidinger) zur Verfügung.

Sal and Lizzy talk the Star Wars Rebels episodes Path of the Jedi and Idiot's Array!Life Day has occurred!We promise this is not a Final Fantasy or Silent Hill podcast...The characters of Rebels shine here!Ezra has the best lightsaber OF ALL TIME.Yoda and Lando! Guess who the kids lose their minds over?Puffer pigs and Azmorigan!⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Check out the Rogue Rebels Rebels Spotify playlist!⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Follow us EVERYWHERE!⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@TheRogueRebels on Bluesky!⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@TheRogueRebels on TikTok⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠IG: @TheRogueRebels ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Rogue Rebels on FB⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Hometown Radio 12/11/25 3:30p: Charlie Puffer introduces us to local filmmakers

Welcome to the Pinkleton Pull-Aside Podcast. On this podcast, let's step aside from our busy lives to have fun, fascinating life-giving conversation with inspiring authors, pastors, sports personalities and other influencers, leaders and followers. Sit back, grab some coffee, or head down the road and let's get the good and the gold from today's guest. Our host is Jeff Pinkleton, Executive Director of the Gathering of the Miami Valley, where their mission is to connect men to men, and men to God. You can reach Jeff at GatheringMV.org or find him on Facebook at The Gathering of the Miami Valley.As a father, former Major League Pitcher, author, coach, and motivational speaker, Brandon Puffer is now ready to share his story with the world.He played 15 seasons of professional baseball, with the pinnacle of his career being a part of the Boston Red Sox roster when they won the 2004 World Series. (Yes, he received a ring).Unfortunately, one bad decision led to being a prison sentence for 5 years...ultimately ending his professional baseball career. His story to share is about the redemption that came afterward. After working through pain, embarrassment and complete failure, his new hope is to spread a message of restoration and encouragement so others might keep moving forward.

In der heutigen Folge sprechen die Finanzjournalisten Daniel Eckert und Nando Sommerfeldt über gute Geschäfte der Wall-Street-Banken, ETF-Krösus Blackrock und eine Überraschung bei LVMH. Außerdem geht es um Arista Networks, Nvidia, Broadcom, Wells Fargo, JP Morgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, Brenntag, Gerresheimer, ASML Holding, Helsing, 1Komma5, Tacto, Bunch, Xtrackers MSCI Nordic ETF ausschüttend (WKN: A1T791), JPM US Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay Active ETF ausschüttend (A41D5S) und JPM US Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay Active ETF thesaurierend (A41D5R), JPM Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF ausschüttend (WKN: A41D5P) und JPM Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF thesaurierend (WKN: A41D5Q) und iShares US Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (A4148H) Wir freuen uns über Feedback an aaa@welt.de. Noch mehr "Alles auf Aktien" findet Ihr bei WELTplus und Apple Podcasts – inklusive aller Artikel der Hosts und AAA-Newsletter. Hier bei WELT: https://www.welt.de/podcasts/alles-auf-aktien/plus247399208/Boersen-Podcast-AAA-Bonus-Folgen-Jede-Woche-noch-mehr-Antworten-auf-Eure-Boersen-Fragen.html. Der Börsen-Podcast Disclaimer: Die im Podcast besprochenen Aktien und Fonds stellen keine spezifischen Kauf- oder Anlage-Empfehlungen dar. Die Moderatoren und der Verlag haften nicht für etwaige Verluste, die aufgrund der Umsetzung der Gedanken oder Ideen entstehen. Hörtipps: Für alle, die noch mehr wissen wollen: Holger Zschäpitz können Sie jede Woche im Finanz- und Wirtschaftspodcast "Deffner&Zschäpitz" hören. +++ Werbung +++ Du möchtest mehr über unsere Werbepartner erfahren? Hier findest du alle Infos & Rabatte! https://linktr.ee/alles_auf_aktien Impressum: https://www.welt.de/services/article104636888/Impressum.html Datenschutz: https://www.welt.de/services/article157550705/Datenschutzerklaerung-WELT-DIGITAL.html

Warum Börsen trotz Krisen Rekorde setzen Sind die Märkte realitätsfern – oder antizipieren sie Produktivität, Anpassungsfähigkeit und globalen Anlagedruck? Europa vs. USA im Fokus Europa: Infrastruktur, Energie & Sicherheit als Treiber. USA: KI-Wertschöpfungsketten und Produktivität als Wachstumsmotor. Zinsen als Taktgeber Fed und EZB formen Erwartungen – entscheidend sind Richtung und Kommunikation, nicht die Nachkommastelle. Der stille Großtreiber Weltweit wachsendes Vermögen sucht Rendite und stützt Aktien langfristig. Konkrete Leitplanken für Anleger Investiert bleiben – mit Puffer. Global und faktororientiert streuen. Diszipliniert rebalancieren. Regionen differenzieren. Ertragsbausteine ergänzen – Qualität vor Story. Moderation DIALOG MODERIERT Volker Pietzsch Finanzstratege Antonio Sommese Sommese & Kollegen | Ihr Vermögen sicher klug aufbauen Webinare | Sommese & Kollegen Blog | Sommese & Kollegen

Co-hosts Juju Gotti and Trysta Krick talk about the WNBA playoffs, the epic, milky, puffer jacket choices of Skylar Diggins, the lack of accountability from Alyssa Thomas, and the incredible story of Courtney Williams and the StudBudz. It's playoff time with Alley Oop the comedy show that talks about all things basketball, hoops, and hoopers. #wnba #wnbaplayoffs #pheonixmercury #minnesotalynx #seattlestorm #connecticutsun #courtneywilliams #studbudz Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

It's silly turned up to 11, as Mick catches up with brilliantly bonkers comedian Harriet Dyer, who describes her standup as a fizzy blancmange of whimsy. Delicious.  Harriet's currently on her biggest UK tour to date with her show Easily Distra…, but found some time to chat to Mick about mental health, getting trapped in cupboards and what she's like at parties.  Tickets for Harriet's tour can be found here: harrietdyer.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Absage in 10 Sekunden! Diese 7 Fehler zerstören den ersten Eindruck im Bewerbungsgespräch   Der erste Eindruck entscheidet – oft in wenigen Sekunden. Deshalb ist die Startphase im Interview kein Smalltalk, sondern die halbe Miete. Ich erlebe es immer wieder: Noch bevor die erste Fachfrage kommt, hat sich beim Gegenüber bereits ein Bild gefestigt. Die gute Nachricht: Mit Vorbereitung, klarer Struktur und kluger Kommunikation steuerst du diesen Moment aktiv.   Warum ist das so wichtig? Weil Haltung, Auftreten und Relevanz sofort sichtbar sind – lange bevor dein Lebenslauf zählt. Außerdem schaffen starker Einstieg und souveräne Selbstvorstellung Vertrauen. Wenn du typische Stolperfallen vermeidest, sammelst du direkt Pluspunkte und legst die Basis für ein konstruktives Gespräch.   Die 7 Fehler, die deinen ersten Eindruck ruinieren – und wie du sie vermeidest   1) Zu spät (oder zu früh) kommen. Plane vorausschauend und sei idealerweise 10–15 Minuten vorher da; dadurch hast du Puffer, senkst den Puls und wirkst professionell. 2) Falscher Dresscode. Orientiere dich an Position und Kultur; im Zweifel minimal overdressed. So bleibst du flexibel und kannst Jackett oder Krawatte notfalls ablegen. 3) Ungepflegtes Erscheinungsbild. Saubere, gebügelte Kleidung, ordentliche Frisur und gepflegte Hände – dadurch signalisierst du Respekt und Einsatzbereitschaft. 4) Schwache Körpersprache. Aufrechte Haltung, ruhige Stimme, klarer Blickkontakt und ein authentisches Lächeln zur Begrüßung. Dadurch vermittelst du Souveränität – ohne Arroganz. 5) Negatives Warm-up. Kein Jammern über Bahn, Stau oder Wetter. Antworte stattdessen kurz, positiv und fokussiert: „Danke, alles gut gefunden – ich freue mich auf das Gespräch.“ 6) Selbstvorstellung ohne Relevanz. Vermeide Lebensgeschichten. Führe lieber in 60–120 Sekunden durch 2–3 Stationen, die exakt zu den Kernaufgaben passen – inklusive messbarer Erfolge. 7) Kein „Warum wir und warum diese Rolle?“ Liefere 2–3 handfeste Gründe (Markt, Verantwortung, Technologie, Internationalität). Dadurch wird Motivation greifbar.   Pro-Tipp für deine Self-Intro: Lies die Stellenanzeige aufmerksam und mappe die Top-Anforderungen 1:1 auf deine Ergebnisse. Beispielsweise: „Projekt X unter Zeitdruck termingerecht geliefert, Budget eingehalten, Stakeholder wöchentlich synchronisiert.“ Dadurch erzeugst du Relevanz und belegst Leistung.   Zusätzlich hilft eine klare Dramaturgie: Zunächst begrüßen, dann kurz Positionierung („Was kann ich besonders gut?“), anschließend 2–3 Belege, schließlich dein „Warum diese Rolle“. Danach bist du in einem starken Frame: professionell, positiv und vorbereitet. Entsprechend verlaufen auch die Fachfragen strukturierter – und deine Zusage-Wahrscheinlichkeit steigt.   Unterm Strich gilt: Wer Auftakt, Auftreten und Argumentation bewusst gestaltet, gewinnt das erste mentale Duell im Raum. Also: Trainiere den Einstieg, teste Formulierungen laut und hole dir Feedback – dadurch eliminierst du Unsicherheiten und punktest ab Sekunde eins.  

Auf unserer Koppel werden asthmatische Pferde gepflegt und beschäftigt, haben wir bei einem frühmorgendlichen Samstagsgespräch erfahren. Es geht in dieser Folge aber auch mal wieder um mein 3D-Druck Hobby, jede Menge Gartenarbeit und um Puffer.

Wildspace wildlife is pretty ... um ... strange. Details of Aidan's monster contest here! Getcher Budget Bestiary here! If you're enjoying the show, why not consider supporting it on Patreon? You'll get access to lots of new bonus content, including my other podcast, Patron Deities! Thanks to Ray Otus for our thumbnail image. The intro music is a clip from "Space Quest" by ROBOVALJEAN, used under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Vor etwa einem Jahr war Livia schon einmal bei uns im Podcast und hat offen über ihre Zuckersucht gesprochen. Jetzt ist sie zurück – und erzählt, was seitdem passiert ist. Wer mag, kann ihre erste Folge noch einmal nachhören, um ihren Weg besser einordnen zu können: https://open.spotify.com/episode/5z9Oj5rnZwOliua7tr5V5X?si=vhkm8W3ET82GkdTaSoXCyg Heute ist Livia seit einem Jahr zuckerfrei. Doch mit dem Wegfall des Zuckers als emotionalem Puffer wurde plötzlich spürbar, wovor sie sich all die Jahre unbewusst geschützt hatte: überflutende Gefühle und alte Verletzungen. Livia spricht mit großer Offenheit darüber, was nach dem Aufhören kam. Über die innere Unruhe, das Gefühl des Getriebenseins, die Erkenntnis, dass Zucker nicht das eigentliche Problem war – sondern eher ein Schutzmechanismus. Und über den Beginn ihrer Traumatherapie, die ihr hilft, die darunterliegenden Themen zu verstehen und zu halten. Diese Folge ist ein ehrlicher Einblick in einen tiefen, emotionalen Prozess. Und sie zeigt: Heilung passiert nicht an einem Tag, sondern in vielen kleinen, manchmal schmerzhaften Schritten. Aber es lohnt sich, dranzubleiben. Du möchtest mehr über unsere Werbepartner erfahren? Hier findest du alle Infos & Rabatte: https://linktr.ee/jakobsweg_podcast

In the fourth episode of Season 21 of Star Wars: In a Galaxy, Eli and special guests Keith and Kerwin from Father, Son, Galaxy discuss the ninth, tenth, and eleventh episodes of Season 1 of STAR WARS: REBELS : "Path of the Jedi", "Idiot's Array", and "Vision of Hope". Among their discussion:– Is Ezra ready to be a Jedi? – The Grand Inquisitor (or actually, a vision of him) being real creepy. – Animated Frank Oz Yoda! – Old Billy Dee as Young Lando. – Azmorigan's disgusting. – An episode that... doesn't really go anywhere. – The consequences of Force visions. – Closing of story loops with Zare Leonis. – Gall Travyis sucks and you can quote me on that The next episode of Star Wars: In a Galaxy will release on June 20, 2025.Follow our guests on BlueSky, Twitter, and Instagram: @FatherSonGalaxy Subscribe to their YouTube channel:https://www.youtube.com/@fathersongalaxyFollow us on BlueSky, Instagram, and Threads: @InaGalaxyPod/@inagalaxypod.bsky.appFollow our spinoff trivia show on BlueSky: @inagalaxytrivia.bsky.socialFollow Eli everywhere:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://linktr.ee/_ochifan327⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Leave us a 5-star rating and review on Apple and Spotify! It really helps!You can email us at swinagalaxy@gmail.com

Today, we're thrilled to welcome back one of our favourite guests — the hilarious and unfiltered Urzila Carlson. This episode is perfect if you need a real chuckle! Urzila joined the pod back in 2022 for an episode titled ‘Gags, Guns, and Grenades’ and that should indicate that she was one of the funniest people we’ve ever interviewed. In that chat we spoke about growing up ‘proper poor’ in South Africa, before moving to New Zealand and becoming a comic. Urzila has recently finished a very successful run of shows at the Melbourne International Comedy Festival and started her new You Don’t Say tour. But that's not all — she's also now a big movie star in Netflix’s rom com Kinda Pregnant, starring alongside Amy Schumer. It was the number one movie worldwide with over 25 million views in its first week.​ In today’s episode we spoke about: Urzila starring in a huge Netflix film alongside Amy Schumer What Amy Schumer and Adam Sandler are like Urzila’s divorce, then engagement, then break up and whether she’ll stay single Her ‘exclusive’ and iconic break up line that you can also use! How Urzila got the part and Britt’s attempt to copy her How comedy is crafted and how Urzila finds some of her best jokes in mundane things The behind the scenes of the film and how much Urzila got to make her own lines Needing a friend who will clean out your humiliating things You can find more from Urzila and tickets to her show Urzila’s instagram You can watch us on Youtube Find us on Instagram Join us on tiktok Or join the Facebook Discussion Group Tell your mum, tell your dad, tell your dog, tell your friend and share the love because WE LOVE LOVE! XxSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Spring loaded tracks, no traps. Break into warm weather with some modern classics, new music, and songs to stomp to, including DYNAMITE, PUFFER, GOUGE AWAY, DRY SOCKET, and more. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Amir Forouzani is the CoFounder and CEO at Puffer Labs.In this episode, we unpack why Ethereum builders according to Amir, remain heads-down focused on building, how based rollups like Puffer UniFi could unlock a simpler UX across all rollups on Ethereum, and what's coming this year to boost Ethereum/ETH's fundamentals.------

Today we're answering listener questions! What are our best Amazon finds? How do we plan our days? What is your favorite and not so favorite season of motherhood? Join us for all these and more! Julie's Amazon finds: Card holders Flicker flame light bulbs Solar pathway lights Travel pillow Lululemon dupe shorts Dimmable pharmacy lamp Puffer jacket Self-inking stamps Canvas drop cloths Curtain tie backs Mindy's Amazon finds: Curtains Wireless charging station Food storage lids Bra pad inserts Summer dresses here and here Argan oil Smart plugs Area rug Gym bag Marie's Amazon finds Picture frame Bluetooth speaker Towel holder Storage/luggage bags Microfiber towels Decorative plate holders We'd love to hear from you! Find us here: Instagram: Midlife Matters Podcast Website: midlifematterspodcast.com Email: midlifematterspodcast@gmail.com

SUBSCRIBE TO THE BNC CHANNEL: https://bit.ly/45Pspyl   Ad Free & Bonus Episodes: https://bit.ly/3OZxwpr NEW MERCH: https://shoptmgstudios.com  This week Brooke and Connor discuss the latest in their lives, from battling mysterious illnesses, to bar fights, to thrifting hidden gems. Plus, their thoughts on the new season of White Lotus and SNL 50. Join our Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/groups/5356639204457124/  Start your hair growth journey and get $10 off your first month's subscription and free shipping at https://Nutrafol.com with code bandc. Download the app and date your way on Bumble! This episode is brought to you by BetterHelp. Give online therapy a try at https://betterhelp.com/bandc and get on your way to being your best self. B+C IG: https://www.instagram.com/bncmap/ B+C Twitter: https://twitter.com/bncmap TMG Studios YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/tinymeatgang TMG Studios IG: https://www.instagram.com/realtmgstudios/ TMG Studios Twitter: https://twitter.com/realtmgstudios BROOKE https://www.instagram.com/brookeaverick https://twitter.com/ladyefron https://www.tiktok.com/@ladyefron  CONNOR https://www.instagram.com/fibula/ https://twitter.com/fibulaa https://www.tiktok.com/@fibulaa Hosted by Brooke Averick & Connor Wood, Created by TMG Studios, Brooke Averick & Connor Wood, and Produced by TMG Studios, Brooke Averick & Connor Wood. Chapters: 00:00 good to SEE you 03:00 intro 3:18 setting it straight 8:30 fingers in mouth 10:00 nutrafol 11:55 celeb sighting  12:40 mic flirting 13:42 celeb sighting pt 2 15:01 starstruck at the bar 17:27 saved by go puff 19:06 connor's life updates 20:35 sweaty tits 21:55 bumble 24:05 beanie baby reunion 29:17 puffers in kappa 33:18 mom's weekend 35:51 betterhelp  38:07 little shop of horrors 39:21 trying therapy 41:11 bar fight 47:52 briefs 50:10 snl 50 54:04 george costanza  57:04 bridget jones diary  59:14 white lotus  1:05:31 the plane crash  1:07:36 see you in bonus!!!