POPULARITY
Categories
829 episodes with CV
373 episodes with CV
318 episodes with CV
339 episodes with CV
52 episodes with CV
68 episodes with CV
111 episodes with CV
109 episodes with CV
50 episodes with CV
35 episodes with CV
65 episodes with CV
53 episodes with CV
33 episodes with CV
23 episodes with CV
42 episodes with CV
142 episodes with CV
60 episodes with CV
51 episodes with CV
32 episodes with CV
33 episodes with CV
24 episodes with CV
40 episodes with CV
30 episodes with CV
51 episodes with CV
16 episodes with CV
31 episodes with CV
25 episodes with CV
19 episodes with CV
30 episodes with CV
10 episodes with CV
12 episodes with CV
27 episodes with CV
54 episodes with CV
27 episodes with CV
15 episodes with CV
35 episodes with CV
10 episodes with CV
310 episodes with CV
14 episodes with CV
22 episodes with CV
13 episodes with CV
18 episodes with CV
14 episodes with CV
7 episodes with CV
11 episodes with CV
25 episodes with CV
22 episodes with CV
15 episodes with CV
238 episodes with CV
20 episodes with CV
8 episodes with CV
10 episodes with CV
22 episodes with CV
216 episodes with CV
In this episode, Jim Garrity argues for more frequent videotaping of depositions, especially those of parties and witnesses likely to be unavailable at trial. The reason? Unlike live witnesses - who are generally called once in trial - videotaped testimony can be played two or more times. This technique utilizes one of the most effective tools of persuasion ever invented, repetition, borrowed straight from Madison Avenue, where repetition is everything. Clips played during the trial, during closing, and sometimes in opening by consent or court order, allow you to essentially present the same witness and testimony multiple times. This kind of repetition isn't possible with live witnesses, and is far superior to reading deposition transcripts to the jury. In a world where people are accustomed to getting their information through video, reading a transcript of testimony is likely to test your jurors' attention span (and patience). Garrity discusses a UCLA professor's "7-38-55 rule" to underscore the point. The gist of this rule is that when people communicate, only 7% of the message is conveyed through words, 38% through tone and voice, and a whopping 55% through body language. That's what makes the presentation of deposition testimony by video clips so powerful. Listen in!SHOW NOTESSmith, et al. v. City of Chicago, etc., Case No. 21-cv-1159, 2025 WL 1744919 (N. D. Ill. June 24, 2025) (denying use of video depo testimony in opening, but allowing it in closing argument that was admitted into evidence during trial, over objections by defendants that permitting video testimony during closing statements would be “unfairly prejudicial because it emphasizes testimony that is presented by video through repetition, and that opportunity does not exist for a live witness”)Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus Inc., No. C-05-00334 RMW, 2008 WL 190990, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2008) (denying use of video depo testimony in opening, but would consider allowing reading from transcript; “If the parties wish to read a portion of a deposition transcript in their opening statement, they are to exchange any excerpt with opposing counsel sufficiently in advance of opening statements so that the court can rule on any dispute over use”)Doe v. City of San Diego, No. 12CV689-MMA (DHB), 2014 WL 11997809, at *6 (S.D. Cal. July 25, 2014) (collecting cases refusing to allow playing of videotaped deposition testimony during opening statements) (“See In re Ethicon, Inc., 2014 WL 505234, at *8 (S.D. W. Va. Feb. 5, 2014) (“[T]he use of video clips during opening statements is precluded as to all parties ....”) (quoting In re Bard, Inc., 2013 WL 3282926, at *8 (S.D. W. Va. June 27, 2013)); Carpenter v. Forest Meadows Owners Ass'n, 2011 WL 3207778, at *7 (“Video recordings of the deposition will not be permitted.”) (emphasis in original); Chopourian v. Catholic Healthcare W., No. 09–2972 KJM, 2011 WL 6396500, at *7 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2011) (denying the plaintiff's motion to use portions of videotaped depositions during opening statement); Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus, Inc., 2008 WL 190990, at *1 (N.D. Cal. 2008) (“Neither side shall use any videotaped deposition testimony in its opening statement.”); but see Sadler v. Advanced Bionics, LLC, at *3 (W.D. Kent. April 1, 2013) (providing that the court “may” consider allowing the parties to utilize videotaped deposition testimony during opening statements); MBI Acquisition Partners, L.P. v. Chronicle Pub. Co., 2002 WL 32349903, at *2 (permitting party to play segments of video deposition in its opening statement))Beem v. Providence Health & Servs., No. 10-CV-0037-TOR, 2012 WL 13018728, at *2 (E.D. Wash. Apr. 19, 2012) (rejecting request to play videotaped deposition during opening, and rejecting argument by plaintiff that, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 32(a)(3), she may use the deposition of an adverse party “for any purpose,” stating that “What Plaintiff proposes to do, is to introduce evidence during opening statement. The Court will not allow the showing of video deposition excerpts during opening statement. The motion is denied.”)K.C. ex rel. Calaway v. Schucker, No. 02-2715-STA-CGC, 2013 WL 5972192, at *7 (W.D. Tenn. Nov. 8, 2013) (“there is no per se ban on the use of video excerpts of depositions in closing arguments”; also citing 88 C.J.S. Trial § 300 (2013) (“[T]here is no blanket prohibition against counsel playing selected portions of a videotaped deposition for a jury during closing argument, and trial courts have discretion to permit, or to refuse, the replaying of videotape segments in closing argument.”)MBI Acquisition Partners, L.P. v. Chron. Pub. Co., No. 01-C-0177-C, 2002 WL 32349903, at *1 (W.D. Wis. Oct. 2, 2002) (allowing use of video depo excerpt in opening, stating, without further discussion, that “Defendants may use excerpts from the video deposition of David Straden during opening argument. Counsel are to advise plaintiff's counsel promptly of the particular excerpts they intend to show”)Sadler v. Advanced Bionics, LLC, No. 3:11-CV-00450-TBR, 2013 WL 1340350, at *3 (W.D. Ky. Apr. 1, 2013) (preliminarily allowing use of videotaped deposition testimony in opening statements, saying If this testimony is otherwise admissible at trial and is not unnecessarily lengthy, the Court may consider allowing this procedure for both parties”)Northfield Ins. Co. v. Royal Surplus Lines Ins. Co., No. SACV 03-0492-JVS, 2003 WL 25948971, at *3 (C.D. Cal. July 7, 2003) (subject to further objection and ruling before trial, “The Court is generally of the view that a party in opening statement may use any piece of evidence which the party in good faith believes will be ultimately received at trial. Rule 32(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits the use of a party deposition “for any purpose”) you like the shoes I wore in high schoolSmith v. I-Flow Corp., No. 09 C 3908, 2011 WL 12627557, at *4 (N.D. Ill. June 15, 2011) (“The Court denies I–Flow's request to bar use in opening statement of excerpts from video deposition testimony. The Court will expect plaintiffs to disclose by no later than noon on the Friday before the start of trial any such excerpts they intend to use in opening statements and will expect defendants to make reciprocal disclosures by no later than 5:00 p.m. on the Saturday before the start of trial.”)Fed. R. Civ. P. 32(a)(3) (providing that "An adverse party may use for any purpose the deposition of a party or anyone who, when deposed, was the party's officer, director, managing agent, or designee...") (emphasis added)
AI writes the job ad. Algorithms screen the CV. Gen Z rolls its eyes at “Head of Belonging” job titles that still come with outdated systems. So… why is a stand alone Human Resources department relevant at all?A skeptical leader puts Anna on the spot:
Parce que… c'est l'épisode 0x606! Préambule Nous avons rencontré un problème technique durant l'enregistrement. L'équipement a cessé de fonctionner, sans que nous nous en rendions compte. Nous avons conservé le segment qui est utilisable. Shameless plug 12 au 17 octobre 2025 - Objective by the sea v8 10 au 12 novembre 2025 - IAQ - Le Rendez-vous IA Québec 17 au 20 novembre 2025 - European Cyber Week 25 et 26 février 2026 - SéQCure 2026 Description Ce podcast enregistré lors de NorthSec réunit l'animateur et Martin Dubé pour une discussion nostalgique sur l'évolution de la communauté cybersécurité québécoise, particulièrement autour du Hackfest et de NorthSec. Les débuts du Hackfest et l'innovation des CTF Martin Dubé raconte ses débuts en 2010 au Hackfest, alors qu'il était étudiant en deuxième année d'université. À cette époque, l'événement était très différent d'aujourd'hui : les organisateurs transportaient des serveurs physiques hébergés chez eux jusqu'à l'hôtel, utilisant des technologies comme Proxmox et VMware. Cette période artisanale contraste fortement avec l'automatisation moderne mise en place par des équipes comme celle de Laurent au NorthSec. L'innovation majeure de cette époque fut l'introduction du format “attaque-défense” pour les CTF, remplaçant le traditionnel format “jeopardy” (matrice de challenges par catégories). Ce nouveau format permettait aux participants d'attaquer les infrastructures des autres équipes tout en défendant la leur, créant une dynamique plus réaliste et complexe. Leadership et apprentissage par la pratique Martin souligne l'importance de l'aspect leadership dans son rôle de responsable des CTF. Gérer une équipe de bénévoles non rémunérés lui a enseigné des compétences précieuses en gestion d'équipe, motivation par la reconnaissance et coordination de projets complexes. Cette expérience s'est révélée cruciale pour sa carrière professionnelle, démontrant que l'implication dans la communauté offre bien plus que des compétences techniques. Il encourage fortement les nouveaux arrivants dans le domaine à s'impliquer dans de tels événements, car cela permet de garnir son CV d'expériences pertinentes et facilite l'entrée sur le marché du travail. Cette recommandation reste valable aujourd'hui, même si le domaine s'est professionnalisé. L'innovation de la track Windows Un moment marquant fut la création de la “track Windows” au NorthSec, une innovation que Martin et Stéphan Sigman considèrent comme pionnière. Contrairement aux challenges synthétiques habituels, cette track simulait un véritable environnement d'entreprise avec Active Directory, partages réseau mal configurés, GPO contenant des mots de passe, et autres vulnérabilités typiques des infrastructures corporatives. Cette approche répondait à une critique importante : les CTF traditionnels développaient des compétences sur des challenges artificiels, tandis que les vrais pentesters doivent attaquer des réseaux d'entreprise réels. La track Windows a forcé les participants à développer des compétences directement applicables au Red Teaming et aux tests d'intrusion internes. Évolution technologique et impact de l'IA La discussion aborde l'évolution technologique du domaine. Martin observe que la sécurité par défaut s'est considérablement améliorée depuis les années 2010, rendant les vulnérabilités basiques moins fréquentes. L'arrivée de l'intelligence artificielle transforme également le paysage professionnel, mais plutôt comme un assistant qu'un remplaçant pour les pentesteurs. L'IA automatise certains aspects du travail de sécurité, notamment dans les outils de défense comme Sentinel pour l'analyse de logs. Cependant, Martin et l'animateur s'accordent sur le fait que l'IA reste un multiplicateur de force nécessitant une direction humaine, particulièrement en Red Team et pentest. Expérimentations mémorables Le podcast évoque plusieurs expérimentations marquantes, notamment les CTF avec des maquettes physiques comme le barrage hydroélectrique de 2013, précurseur des préoccupations actuelles sur la sécurité IoT et OT. Ces innovations visuelles permettaient aux non-participants de comprendre concrètement ce qu'était le hacking. L'expérience la plus mémorable reste les éditions “taupes” : des CTF 12 vs 12 ou 20 vs 20 où certains participants étaient secrètement des espions pour l'équipe adverse, simulant l'espionnage industriel. Ces expérimentations, bien que créatrices de “drama”, démontraient l'importance de prendre des risques calculés pour innover. Communauté et networking professionnel Un aspect crucial souligné est la valeur du réseau professionnel créé par ces événements. La communauté cybersécurité québécoise, bien que pas nécessairement composée d'amis proches, forme un réseau où chacun connaît les autres et peut interagir facilement. Cette connectivité s'avère particulièrement précieuse lors des transitions de carrière ou des périodes de recherche d'emploi. Cette dimension communautaire devient encore plus importante dans le contexte économique actuel, où les restrictions budgétaires entraînent des licenciements même dans le secteur technologique traditionnellement stable. Gestion des risques et culture d'apprentissage La conversation aborde la culture du risque et de l'erreur dans la communauté. Martin prône une approche permettant l'expérimentation et l'erreur, créant un “safe space” pour les bénévoles. Il partage un exemple récent où un bénévole a rencontré des difficultés opérationnelles, et comment son expérience lui a permis d'accompagner cette personne pour désamorcer le stress et trouver une solution. Cette philosophie s'oppose à l'élitisme parfois présent dans la communauté cybersécurité. Les deux interlocuteurs s'accordent sur l'importance de permettre aux nouveaux arrivants de faire des erreurs et d'apprendre, condition essentielle pour éviter la stagnation communautaire et favoriser l'inclusion. Réflexions sur l'humilité et l'évolution Le podcast se termine sur une note d'humilité, évoquant comment Olivier (probablement le président sortant de NorthSec) a publiquement reconnu avoir peut-être poussé trop fort ses équipes de bénévoles vers la perfection. Cette reconnaissance publique illustre la maturité croissante de la communauté et l'importance de l'équilibre entre excellence et bienveillance. Martin partage également ses propres “blessures de guerre” professionnelles, ces erreurs passées qui, bien que parfois encore douloureuses, constituent un apprentissage précieux qu'il souhaite transmettre aux générations suivantes. Conclusion Ce podcast offre un regard privilégié sur l'évolution de la cybersécurité québécoise, montrant comment l'innovation, la prise de risques calculés et la construction communautaire ont façonné l'écosystème actuel. Il souligne l'importance de maintenir un équilibre entre excellence technique et bienveillance humaine, tout en continuant à expérimenter pour faire évoluer le domaine. L'expérience de Martin Dubé illustre parfaitement comment l'implication bénévole peut catalyser une carrière professionnelle tout en contribuant significativement au développement d'une communauté technique dynamique et inclusive. Collaborateurs Nicolas-Loïc Fortin Martin Dubé Crédits Montage par Intrasecure inc Locaux réels par Northsec
We're continuing our job preparation series with Trenton Voss, MS, RDN, LDN, as we dive into what really happens inside the interview room—whether it's virtual or in person. More importantly, we focus on how to craft and confidently share your personal story—beyond what's listed on your resume or CV. Trenton offers valuable insights, practical advice, and personal experiences to help you feel prepared for interviews, both after passing the RD exam and even for roles you may take on beforehand.Mastering the Art of Storytelling in Interviews: Your Path to Success: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/mastering-art-storytelling-interviews-your-path-success-paranjpe/
Ep 201 One World in New World with Lonnee Rey
Hablamos sobre lo más importante de un CV y algunos de los errores que pueden ser muy fáciles de cometer al realzar uno... Escucha con atención.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Esto es un extracto de la Tertulia de AutoFM que se emite cada jueves en Onda Cero El nuevo Audi Q5 2025 inaugura su tercera generación asentado sobre la nueva Plataforma Premium de Combustión (PPC). Crece hasta los 4,72 m de longitud —medidas que lo sitúan frente a BMW X3 o Mercedes-Benz GLC— y se distingue por un exterior actualizado, un habitáculo más amplio y motorizaciones de hibridación ligera que mejoran la eficiencia. En la mayor parte de las versiones se mantiene la tracción quattro, uno de los sellos de identidad del modelo. El puesto de conducción combina un cuadro digital Audi Virtual Cockpit de 11,9 pulgadas con una pantalla táctil MMI de 14,5 pulgadas, ambas con tecnología OLED y un nuevo sistema operativo basado en Android Automotive capaz de recibir actualizaciones remotas y descargar aplicaciones. Completa el conjunto un Head-Up Display configurable y un nuevo asistente de voz con comprensión contextual. La gama se articula en tres acabados —Advanced, S Line y Black Line— que añaden progresivamente detalles estéticos, tapicerías específicas y llantas de mayor diámetro. En el caso del S Line, se subraya el carácter deportivo con suspensiones específicas y paragolpes de diseño propio. Gama de motores Audi Q5 2025 • 2.0 TFSI 204 CV Tracción delantera o quattro – MHEV 48 V – cambio S tronic 7 v • 2.0 TDI 204 CV Quattro – MHEV 48 V – S tronic 7 v • SQ5 3.0 TFSI V6 367 CV Quattro – MHEV 48 V – S tronic 7 v Todos los propulsores recurren a un sistema mild-hybrid de 48 voltios que permite arranques más suaves, posibilita navegar a vela y recupera energía en deceleraciones. Consumo y emisiones Audi Q5 2025 Versión Potencia Consumo medio WLTP 2.0 TFSI 204 CV 6,8-7,4 l/100 km 2.0 TDI 204 CV ≈ 6,5 l/100 km SQ5 V6 367 CV ≈ 9,1 l/100 km Los valores sitúan al Q5 en línea con los referentes del segmento; la versión diésel se muestra algo menos frugal que la alternativa equivalente de BMW, mientras que la variante de gasolina iguala la eficiencia de sus rivales directos. El SQ5, orientado a un uso deportivo, incrementa el gasto pero ofrece prestaciones superiores. Prestaciones Audi Q5 2025 • 2.0 TFSI 204 CV – 0-100 km/h en 7,6 s – 222 km/h • 2.0 TDI 204 CV – 0-100 km/h en 7,9 s – 219 km/h • SQ5 3.0 V6 367 CV – 0-100 km/h en 4,9 s – 250 km/h (autolimitada) Con estas cifras, el Q5 básico supera ligeramente en aceleración al BMW X3 sDrive 20i y al Mercedes-Benz GLC 200. El SQ5 se coloca entre los SUV medianos más rápidos del mercado. Asistencias a la conducción Audi Q5 2025 De serie incorpora control de crucero, limitador de velocidad, aviso de salida de carril, asistente de aparcamiento trasero con sensores perimetrales, detector de fatiga y asistente de eficiencia. De forma opcional pueden añadirse: • Asistente de conducción adaptativa plus (conducción semiautónoma en determinadas vías). • Asistente de frenada activa con función evasiva, ayuda al giro y detección de tráfico cruzado. • Park Assist plus con maniobras automáticas en línea y batería. • Control de crucero inteligente que adapta la velocidad a los límites detectados. Estas ayudas posicionan al Q5 entre los modelos más avanzados en conducción semiautónoma de su categoría. El Audi Q5 2025 conserva la fórmula que lo convirtió en un éxito: tracción integral disponible, un equilibrio convincente entre dinamismo y confort, y un interior al nivel de los mejores SUV premium. A ello suma ahora un ecosistema digital de última generación y motorizaciones electrificadas que reducen consumo y emisiones sin sacrificar prestaciones. Todos los podcast: https://www.podcastmotor.es Twitter: @AutoFmRadio Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/autofmradio/ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@AutoFM Contacto: info@autofm.es
Recomendados de la semana en iVoox.com Semana del 5 al 11 de julio del 2021
Juicios, Evolución y Fontaneros Aquí no hablamos de la boda de Mr. Amazon del Espacio… Hablamos de algo mucho más surrealista: CEOs que se interrumpen en podcasts, modelos que se entrenan con libros pirata, juicios donde el copyright depende del día… y un padrino de la IA que, en vez de calmar, advierte que esto huele a extinción. ¿Listos para conocer a Brad, a Dario, a Samdios y al que recomienda estudiar fontanería? PUNTOS CLAVE: Altman y Brad entran como estrellas en un directo del NYT… y se van igual de rápido. Pero no sin dejar un recadito legal. Brad Lightcap deja de ser el COO desconocido y se convierte en protagonista con CV de oro y tablas de Excel bajo el brazo. Anthropic y Meta ganan juicios por derechos de autor, pero con asteriscos grandes como data centers. La privacidad y el copyright ya no están en la misma sala… y puede que tampoco tú. Geoffrey Hinton se pone en modo Darwin y te explica cómo un chatbot egoísta puede ser tu sustituto natural. El empleo del futuro se debate entre ser técnico en IA… o fontanero con bata. ¿Y si el futuro ya no lo decide el humano? Bienvenidos al capítulo donde hasta el botón de apagar parece simbólico. Artículos de Referencia Sam Altman en el NYT https://www.aol.com/debate-over-whether-ai-create-091203653.html https://es.wired.com/articulos/este-historico-fallo-sienta-las-bases-del-uso-legal-de-libros-para-entrenar-ia https://officechai.com/ai/geoffrey-hinton-explains-why-ai-agents-could-one-day-compete-with-humans-for-resources/ https://es.wired.com/articulos/meta-gana-un-importante-caso-de-derechos-de-autor-tras-usar-libros-para-entrenar-su-ia
324. PharmDs in IT - From Pharmacy School to Full Stack Engineer feat. Dr. Khanh Theresa Mai Originally recorded in 2024 In this fascinating episode, Tony sits down with Dr. Mai, a pharmacist-turned-full-stack software engineer. She shares her unconventional journey from clinical pharmacy to health tech, her candid thoughts on the gaps in pharmacy education, and actionable advice for pharmacists interested in breaking into the technology space. Key Topics Discussed Her Career Path: Dr. Mai graduated from pharmacy school and started her career in hospital pharmacy, and transitioned to pharmacy informatics before making a leap into software engineering via a coding boot camp. The Pharmacy-Tech Gap: Dr. Mai highlights the lack of technology education in most pharmacy curriculums, even as pharmacists regularly interact with advanced tech systems, EMRs, and automation in their daily workflow. Her Work in Informatics: She recounts her role managing Nebraska's Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP), integrating it with EMRs, and improving statewide medication data access. Transition to Software Engineering: After informatics, Dr. Mai pursued a full coding bootcamp, took on her first tech role at a startup, and eventually found her way back to healthcare tech where she could combine her clinical and technical expertise. Advice for Pharmacists Considering Tech: The importance of networking and “selling yourself” in tech interviews Translating clinical experience into technical language on resumes Keeping running lists of technical projects or ideas from pharmacy work Tips for tailoring resumes for technical roles and leveraging different formats (CV vs. resume) PharmDs in IT Project: Dr. Mai gives a sneak peek into her side project—an online platform connecting clinicians with tech roles in healthcare, allowing users to search for jobs by clinical specialty. Links: https://linktr.ee/pharmdsinit https://www.linkedin.com/in/astropharmacist/ https://pharmdsinit.com You can reach Dr Mai at khanhmai@creighton.edu Disclaimer: Views expressed are those of the individuals and do not reflect thoughts and opinions of any entity with which speakers have been, is now, or will be affiliated. New to LinkedIn and not sure where to start? Download my free ebook, "Professional Networking Unlocked", at https://www.tonydaopharmd.com/#ebook Follow us on social media! Twitter: @pharmacyitme Instagram: @pharmacyinformatics LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pharmacyitme/ Website: Pharmacy IT & Me Email: tony@pharmacyitme.com Follow Tony's personal Twitter account at @tonydaopharmd Network with other pharmacists at Pharmacists Connect!http://pharmacistsconnect.com For more information on pharmacy informatics, check out some of the following useful links: ASHP's Section of Pharmacy Informatics and Technology: https://www.ashp.org/Pharmacy-Informaticist/Section-of-Pharmacy-Informatics-and-Technology/ HIMSS: https://www.himss.org/resources/pharmacy-informatics-and-its-cross-functional-role-healthcare Disclaimer: Views expressed are my own and do not reflect thoughts and opinions of any entity with which I have been, am now, or will be affiliated.
Any mid-life woman knows that once you hit your 40s, 50s, or 60s, things will not go well if you eat the same way you did when you were 20. But it's confusing to know what to eat, and how much to eat, without downloading multiple APPs and carrying around a calculator My guest, Alexandra Filingeri, holds a doctorate in Clinical Nutrition with a focus on evidence-based nutrition interventions, particularly in mid-life and menopause. In this episode, we cover practical nutrition tips- what to eat and how much to eat to maximize health aging. Dr. Filingeri also answered questions that came in from my Substack readers. By the way, my favorite frozen vegetables that I couldn't remember the name of? Puravida Fire Roasted Vegetable Melange What changes post menopause Obesity, hot flashes and weight loss The impact of insomnia on weight Individual energy requirements Macronutrients vs micronutrients Protein supplements- yay or nay Glycemic index Sugar and belly fat Grocery store strategies Dr. Alexandra Filingeri is a Registered Dietitian with a Doctorate degree in Clinical Nutrition. During her doctoral studies, Dr. Filingeri focused on metabolic disorders, nutritional biochemistry, and clinical research methodologies, equipping herself to deliver evidence-based nutrition interventions. Her clinical expertise focuses on midlife nutrition and hormone-related health. Website: Nutrition by Dr. Alexandra – Beauty From The Inside Out Instagram: Dr. Alexandra Filingeri DCN RDN (@nutritionby_dralexandra) • Instagram photos and videos Linkedln: Alexandra Filingeri, DCN RDN - Registered Dietitian in Private Practice - Nutrition By Dr Alexandra | LinkedIn Dr. Streicher is on SUBSTACK DrStreicher.Substack.com Articles Monthly newsletter All COME AGAIN podcast episodes Monthly News Flash Reports on recent research Monthly Zoom Ask Me Anything Webinar Information on Dr. Streicher's COME AGAIN Podcast- Sexuality and Orgasm Lauren Streicher MD, is a clinical professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine, the founding medical director of the Northwestern Medicine Center for Sexual Medicine and Menopause, and a Senior Research Fellow of The Kinsey Institute, Indiana University. She is a certified menopause practitioner of The Menopause Society. She is the Medical Director of Community Education and Outreach for Midi Health. Dr. Streicher is the medical correspondent for Chicago's top-rated news program, the WGN Morning News, and has been seen on The Today Show, Good Morning America, The Oprah Winfrey Show, CNN, NPR, Dr. Radio, Nightline, Fox and Friends, The Steve Harvey Show, CBS This Morning, ABC News Now, NBCNightlyNews,20/20, and World News Tonight. She is an expert source for many magazines and serves on the medical advisory board of The Kinsey Institute, Self Magazine, and Prevention Magazine. She writes a regular column for The Ethel by AARP and Prevention Magazine. LINKS Subscribe To Dr. Streicher's Substack Information About the COME AGAIN Podcast Dr. Streicher's CV and additional bio information To Find a Menopause Clinician and Other Resources Glossary Of Medical Terminology Books by Lauren Streicher, MD Slip Sliding Away: Turning Back the Clock on Your Vagina-A gynecologist's guide to eliminating post-menopause dryness and pain Hot Flash Hell: A Gynecologist's Guide to Turning Down the Heat Sex Rx- Hormones, Health, and Your Best Sex Ever The Essential Guide to Hysterectomy Dr. Streicher's Inside Information podcast is for education and information and is not intended to replace medical advice from your personal healthcare clinician. Dr. Streicher disclaims liability for any medical outcomes that may occur because of applying methods suggested or discussed in this podcast.
Hay coches ya clásicos cuyas cotizaciones, a mi modo de ver, se han disparado. Para mí, pese a que sean maravillosos, no valen lo que cuestan. ¡Pero!... hay alternativas. Hay modelos y versiones que, de acuerdo, no son lo mismo. Pero se le acercan. Y sobre todo… ¡cuestan mucho menos! Auténticas “Compras Maestras”. ¿Qué no puede faltar en un buen video dedicado a los clásicos? Está clarísimo… ¡el consultorio clásico!” En este video tenemos a Jaime Sánchez de “Seat en Rodaje”. Audi Quattro: ¿Has pensado en el Coupé GT B2? ¿Te parece caro un Quattro de los primeros por 50.000 €? Pues si encuentras uno en buen estado por ese precio, ¡cómpralo! Es un chollo. Y el Coupé GT puede costar la cuarta parte… no, no es lo mismo, sobre todo si tu idea es invertir. Para disfrutar de un clásico, el Coupé me parece más que suficiente. BMW M3 E30: ¿Has pensado en el 325i? Las versiones especiales superan, en ocasiones con holgura, los 100.000 € y los “normales” están sobre los 80.000 €. ¿Estamos locos? Fijaos, este M3 tenía motor de 4 cilindros y 200 CV. Y un 325 tenía motor de 6 cilindros y 171 CV, o sea, un 15 por ciento menos. Y estos coches, en muy buen estado, los encuentras en el entorno de los 15.000/20.000 €. Como inversión no es lo mismo, pero como disfrute, si te lo curras un poco en suspensiones y frenos… la diferencia de sensaciones no compensa la diferencia de inversión. Citroën AX GTi: ¿Has pensado en el GT? El AX GT ofrecía 85 CV y el GTi, con el mismo motor, pero inyección, ofrecía 95, o sea algo más de un 10 por ciento de potencia extra. En este caso es difícil establecer un baremo, pues hay pocas unidades en buen estado así que te diré que si encuentras un GT en buen estado y a buen precio…. No te empeñes en encontrar un GTi. Citroën 2 CV: ¿Has pensado en el Dyane 6? Vale, el 2CV es un mito, un coche clave en la historia, distinto y original. Pero el Dyane 6 es objetivamente mejor en todo. Y sobre todo en el precio. Mini Cooper: ¿Has pensado en el 1275 GT? El Cooper “español” de Authi ofrecía 68. Su predecesor en España del Cooper fue el Mini 1275 GT, con el mismo motor, pero solo 60 o 65 CV. Pero que, con cuatro retoques, supera al Cooper español. La diferencia de precio es alta, puede ser de dos a uno, el doble, pero menor que en otros casos, porque hay pocos coches de estos en un estado que valga la pena. Opel Calibra 2.0 16V: ¿Has pensado en el 8V? Para mí no hay duda: El Opel Calibra más “redondo” por delante de los V6 y del Turbo es el 2 litros de 16 válvulas con 150 CV. Pero es que si prueba el 8 válvulas de 115 CV te das cuenta de que, para disfrutar, incluso para ir ligero, a lo mejor no necesitas más, en un motor de fábula. Y los encuentras por precios casi de “risa”. Peugeot 205 GTi: ¿Has pensado en el GTX? He visto Peugeot 1.6 de 105 CV a precios brutales, hasta de 20.000 €, pero en modelos que estén bien, rara vez menos de 15.000 €. Pues bien, por menos de la mitad tienes en “GTi de Villaverde” con 96 CV, es decir, solo 9 CV menos que el primer 1.6. Y me dirás: “Las suspensiones y los asientos no son igual”. No, pero con lo que te ahorras, puedes poner las mejores suspensiones y los mejores asientos del mercado. Y te seguirá sobrando dinero. Renault 5 Copa: ¿Has pensado en el TS/TX? El R5 TS o TX no es lo mismo. Su motor de la misma cilindrada, pero con culata plana no hemisférica diseñada por Alpine apenas ofrece 65 CV contra los 90 del Copa o los 110 CV del turbo. ¡Pero valen la cuarta parte! Renault 8: ¿Has pensado en el R10? Para hacer esta parte del guion he puesto en mi buscador “R8 TS vendo” y me ha dado la solución: En una página de venta de coches sale un R8 con buena pinta, aunque unas ruedas excesivas para mi gusto, por el que piden 13.000 € y justo debajo un tío listo pone “Vendo R10. Lleva el motor del 8TS”. Los cual es rigurosamente cierto, y pide … 3.900 €. Seat León V6: ¿Has pensado en el 1.8 Turbo 20V? Como coche de colección el León MKI es una joya, con motor V6 de 2.8 litros, 205 CV y tracción total. No solo es la tracción total, es que la suspensión posterior de paralelogramo deformable es mucho más refinada, aunque el precio a pagar por la tracción total y el motor V6 es de casi 200 kg, pues peso en el entorno de los 1.500 kg. Es un coche muy buscado pero que aún se puede encontrar a precios interesantes, pero difícilmente por menos de 15.000 €. El 1.8 con motor de 1781 cm3, de 5 válvulas por cilindro, inyección y turbo ofrece 180 CV y un peso de unos 1.300 kg. Y lo puedes encontrar hasta un 30 por ciento más barato. No es un premio de consolación es un grandísimo coche al que para mi lo único que la falta es la suspensión del 4x4, no la tracción… por cierto que era la configuración del Copa de competición, como el que yo tuve, que era 4x2, pero con la suspensión “buena”.
On Thursday's Morning Focus, Peter O'Connell was joined by Tommy Hayes. Tommy is a man of many talents. The renowned musician/percussionist has made his mark on the musical landscape, having played with Stockton's Wing, Altan, and Riverdance amongst others. He has been to the forefront of traditional Irish music for over 40 years, performing on more than 400 albums. Tommy also has an impressive array of film appearances on hsi CV, including Titanic, The Devil's Own, Rob Roy, In the Name of the Father, and The Field. Tommy's latest project, 'The Garden Where The Praties Grow' is described as “a cinematic story of the potato and its lasting impact on Irish culture told through traditional Irish music, song and dance.” The premiere of the film is taking place on July 1st, with further screenings scheduled – including at Glór in Ennis on the 15th of July 15th. PHOTO CREDIT: The Garden Where The Praties Grow via Youtube
Functional ingredients, protein-ification, healthy aging, personalized nutrition, weight management, gut health…and you probably think I'm just rattling off numerous powerful trends driving the CPG industry, which I am, but this time, not involving my typical contextual vantagepoint. Did you know that just over half of pet owners not only consider their pets to be a part of their family…but say they are as much a part of their family as a human member? So, with most pet owners now considering their pets full-fledged family members, it's safe to say that “humanization” is no longer just a trend…but rather a foundation of the pet nutrition market. And while I'm not saying that I'll be pivoting drastically (or even much at all), I am expressing that you'll begin seeing my increasing interest in adjacent CPG marketplaces like early childhood nutrition and pet nutrition within content creation, as I'm a relatively new dad in both the human and dog aspect of that definition. But where do we start, right? To create some constraint, this initial content piece will concentrate only on certain aspects of the pet industry that evolved since the “Great Shutdown” era. Firstly, compared to other CPG categories, which have seen declines and rebounds, pet sales have grown (around 10%) each year since that period. Next, what underpins that growth probably shouldn't be surprising at this point…with stay-at-home orders and the remote work flexibility creating an environment where many Americans added a furry friend to their household. And currently, it results in U.S. consumers purchasing around $70 billion worth of pet food (and treats), but that market size increases substantially when you include both veterinary care (and product sales), OTC medications, and pet supplements. Also, while the “CV-19 Effect” didn't create the “health and wellness” underlying driver shaping today's pet nutrition market…it provided a powerful tailwind to this increasingly important customer purchasing behavior. Lastly, pet owners (which Millennials account for the largest category) are paying just as much attention to their pets' health and holistic well-being as to their own…and are seeking food (and treats) that help their furry friends live longer, healthier lives. In fact, 85% of pet owners now believe proper nutrition and supplements are as important for pets as they are for humans. But with pet owners taking a more active role in their pets' wellness, particularly in the ways they supplement their pets' diets for optimal health benefits…pet brands are starting to face a similar challenge as their human CPG counterparts have been dealing with for the last decade (especially within low barriers-to-entry categories like sports nutrition). And no matter if we're talking humans or pets…across today's functional CPG marketplace, winning essentially requires a distinctive brand making great tasting products in attractive formats with proven benefits in desirable health condition segments. But in my latest first principles thinking content, I'll unpack that statement further to extract impactful insights. Nevertheless, there are many opportunities available (and no shortage of exciting market developments), so hopefully you'll follow along as I help increase your strategic clarity by separating out the key pet industry “signals” from the immense amount of “noise.”
The signing of the first ever Memorandum of Understanding between the world-renowned Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies (DIAS) and a Technological University was witnessed by James Lawless, Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science. The agreement with the Technological University of the Shannon (TUS) was signed during the celebrations of the Institute's 85th year anniversary, marking its lauded track record since it was set up by Eamon De Valera's Government at the time when its first Director of Theoretical Physics was Nobel-prize winner Erwin Schrödinger. The MOU, signed by Dr Eucharia Meehan, CEO of DIAS, and President of TUS, Professor Vincent Cunnane, will strengthen collaboration in research and innovation between the institutions, with a focus on advancing education and practical knowledge in Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML) and Computer Vision (CV) and their application to Radio Astronomy. Under the terms of the agreement, two TUS PhD research students, funded by the university, will be appointed DIAS scholars, receiving mentorship from DIAS's world-renowned researchers at Dunsink Observatory and participating in cutting edge research, working on the prestigious I-LOFAR at Birr Castle in Offaly. I-LOFAR stands for Irish Low Frequency Array and it is Ireland's largest radio telescope. It is part of a Europe-wide collaborative astronomy project where Irish scientists and students participate in pan-European research in areas such as: Astrophysics, Cosmic magnetism, Space weather, Solar physics and Big Data and AI applications in astronomy. I-LOFAR generates massive volumes of complex data - often terabytes per day - and CV and ML play a crucial role in how that data is processed, analysed, and interpreted. DIAS and TUS will jointly collaborate on applying High Performance Computing including AI, ML and CV to the detection, classification and characterisation of targeted phenomena in the I-LOFAR data. Initially this will focus on Space Weather / Solar Phenomena but will be expanded to include others. The research outputs will be held in a new centralised Astrophysics storage and High Performance Computing facility at TUS which will benefit all researchers nationally. This new facility will train undergraduates in modelling large datasets. Together TUS and DIAS have also committed to regional educational and industrial workshops to create awareness of the expertise available from the collaboration. The first workshops will be held in conjunction with the LEO office in Offaly. Congratulating both Institutions, Minister James Lawless TD, Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation, and Science said: "I warmly congratulate DIAS and TUS on the signing of this important Memorandum of Understanding. Strategic collaboration such as this strengthens our research base and positions Ireland globally at the forefront of technological progress". Dr. Eucharia Meehan, CEO, DIAS said: "We are proud to formalise this collaboration with TUS as we mark 85 years of discovery at DIAS. Since our earliest days, DIAS has been a centre of discovery where students are welcomed and supported in their research endeavours. With this MOU we are further strengthening the research ecosystem to support talent, to foster innovation, and to deliver real impact for our research community and our economy. Building on our track record of developing research infrastructure for the benefit of research in Ireland and further afield, the establishment of a new centralised Astrophysics storage and High Performance Computing facility in partnership with TUS will provide an important resource for current and future generations of researchers." President of TUS, Professor Vincent Cunnane, said: "TUS is proud to embark on this new frontier with DIAS which will enable our students to explore previously undiscovered areas of research in the disciplines of engineering, science and technology. ...
Analyses of over 40,000 documents, computer vision papers and downstream patents spanning four decades indicates the extent of this surveillance and the rise of obfuscating language that helps to normalise such approaches. New research has underlined the surprising extent to which pervasive surveillance of people and their habits is powered by computer vision research - and shone a spotlight on how vulnerable individuals and communities are at risk. Analyses of over 40,000 documents, computer vision (CV) papers and downstream patents spanning four decades has shown a five-fold increase in the number of computer vision papers linked to downstream surveillance patents. The work also highlights the rise of obfuscating language that is used to normalise and even hide the existence of surveillance. The research, conducted by Dr Abeba Birhane and collaborators from Stanford University, Carnegie Mellon University, University of Washington and Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence (AI2), has just been published in leading international journal Nature. Dr Birhane directs the AI Accountability Lab (AIAL) in the ADAPT Research Ireland Centre at the School of Computer Science and Statistics in Trinity College Dublin. Dr Birhane said: "This work provides a detailed, systematic understanding of the field of computer vision research and presents a concrete empirical account that reveals the pathway from such research to surveillance and the extent of this surveillance." "While the general narrative is that only a small portion of Computer vision research is harmful, what we found instead is pervasive and normalised surveillance." Among the key findings were that: 1. The field has evolved linguistically, with a trajectory away from generic papers in the 1990s towards a heightened focus on analysing semantic categories and humans and their behaviours in the 2010s 2. Surveillance has been increasingly hidden by jargon and obfuscating language that distracts from people being at the heart of the surveillance 3. Rights to privacy and certain freedoms are under threat Additionally, the work indicated the top institutions producing the most surveillance are: 1.Microsoft; 2. Carnegie Mellon University; 3. MIT; 4. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; 5. Chinese University of Hong Kong, and the top nations are: 1. US; 2. China; 3. UK. Dr Birhane added: "Linguistically the field has increasingly adapted to obfuscate the existence and extent of surveillance. One such example is how the word 'object' has been normalised as an umbrella term which is often synonymous with 'people'." "The most troublesome implications of this are that it is harder and harder to opt out, disconnect, or to 'just be', and that tech and applications that come from this surveillance are often used to access, monetise, coerce, and control individuals and communities at the margins of society." "Due to pervasive and intensive data gathering and surveillance, our rights to privacy and related freedoms of movement, speech and expression are under significant threat." However, the researchers stress that a major, more hopeful takeaway from the work is that nothing is written in stone, and that this large-scale, systematic study can aid regulators and policy makers in addressing some of the issues. Dr Birhane said: "We hope these findings will equip activists and grassroots communities with the empirical evidence they need to demand change, and to help transform systems and societies in a more rights-respecting direction." "CV researchers could also adopt a more critical approach, exercise the right to conscientious objection, collectively protest and cancel surveillance projects, and change their focus to study ethical dimensions of the field, educate the public, or put forward informed advocacy." The published paper can be read at https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-08972-6 after publication. An embargoed PDF copy is available on request in advance. Dr Birhane ha...
En este podcast contamos con la colaboración de Airbnb https://www.airbnb.es/. Te voy a contar algunas experiencias que he tenido disfrutando de sus servicios, que seguro te van a dar buenas ideas a la hora de viajar. Ya sabéis que soy un verdadero “friki” y me gustan esos coches incomprendidos, injustamente olvidados, que no tuvieron el aprecio que merecían. En esta ocasión he seleccionado 10 de estos modelos de los años 70 y 80 que, en mi opinión, no alcanzaron el éxito que merecían. Y ahora, voy a decir lo que pienso: Incluso en la actualidad el mercado de coches en España es muy inmaduro… pues imaginaos hace 40 años o más. Si ahora la gente no sabe de coches, en esos años era un fenómeno nuevo y los clientes compraban primero, lo que podían, y luego se dejaban llevar por opiniones no del todo expertas. Simca 900 (1963). Comenzamos con un coche que cuya vida arrancó en los 60 y acabo en los 70. Y del que nadie se acuerda, porque su hermano mayor el 1.000 le ha robado todo el protagonismo hasta el punto de que he charlado con aficionados que ni conocían el modelo. Renault 10 (1966). Renault aspiraba a competir en un escalón algo superior al R8 y no se lo ocurrió otra cosa que alargar los voladizos delantero y trasero y poner un capo plano en vez del personal capo en V del R8. El coche pasaba de los 4 metros del R8 a los 4,20 del R10, pero con idéntica distancia entre ejes. Sencillamente, la treta no coló. Citroën Dyane 6 (1968). Aunque nacido antes de los 70, en 1967, como se vendió hasta 1983 lo he incluido. En España se comenzó a ofrecer en 1968 y es un caso similar al del 850 con el 600: Mucha gente prefería el 2 CV aún a pesar del que el Dyane 6 era mejor en todo. Renault 7 (1974). Un amigo mío, periodista, decía en tono despectivo: “España, el país del R7”. Yo lo refrendo, pero en positivo, porque el R-7, primero con denominación numérica y luego en letra, “Siete” era una propuesta muy interesante de un coche con todas las ventajas del primigenio R5, pero con 4 puertas laterales y un buen maletero. Seat 133 (1974). El 127 era ya un éxito y Seat quiso aprovechar de alguna manera ese éxito con un modelo que era la base del 850 pero con la estética del 127. Para asimilar sui comportamiento al de un tracción delantera, lo que hizo Seat fue bajar la suspensión posterior, ¡por fin! para que tuviese caída negativa y hacer justo lo contrario en el eje delantero, poner caída positiva para forzar a hacer al coche subvirador… que lo era salvo si forzabas al máximo. Chrysler 180 (1976). En España se lanzaron primero las versiones con denominación 180 y 2 litros, esta última con un motor más potente y, sobre todo, con cambio automático. La idea era buscar un sucesor razonable al Dodge, caro, gastón y ya algo anticuado. Más tarde apareció el 180 Diesel, con motor de 65 CV y una acabado algo más austero, pensado sobre todo como coche de servicio público en general y como taxi en particular. Seat 128 (1976). El Fiat 128 berlina, no el Coupé, fue un coche importante para la marca porque representaba el paso a la tracción delantera en este segmento. Era obra del Genial Dante Giacosa. De esa berlina derivó un Coupé muy interesante porque era un coche bonito, deportivo, pero habitable, con buen maletero y portón posterior… muy práctico. Lancia HPE (1979). Las siglas HPE venían de las palabras “High Perfomance Estate” algo así como “familiar de altas prestaciones”. En España el coche, sencillamente, no gustó, como digo porque, sobre todo, no se entendió la propuesta… pero a mí es un coche que me encanta y que incluso creo que se adelantó a su tiempo. Talbot Horizon (1980). El mismo modelo aparecido en 1977 se vendió con marca Chrysler, Simca o Talbot, la más conocida en España. Y en España, cuando se comenzó a vender en 1980, era el sucesor del Simca 1200 un coche con cierto prestigio en nuestro país. Citroën LNA (1983). Sencillamente este modelo, llamado por todos “Helena”, era ni más ni menos que un Peugeot 104 con un motor bicilíndrico Citroën. Para los “citroenistas” era un Peugeot y para el resto, un Citroën con carrocería de Peugeot. Conclusión. Creo que ninguno de estos modelos merece ser olvidado, porque como decía mi querido Ramón Roca, “todos los coches van al cielo” … y estos allí estarán. Coche del día. Lo tengo claro, un Seat 128 blanco con motor 1430 como homenaje a mi apreciada “Señorita Vila”. Ese coche me encantaba y me parecía curioso que una señora “mayor”, ella tendría unos 50 pero yo tenía 16, llevase un coche deportivo como ese… pero “Le quedaba bien”.
After 5.5 years, 400 episodes, and a journey that started with a Kiwisaver convo during my PwC internship... I'm officially wrapping up The OneUp Project.This episode is a reflective goodbye — sharing the real reason I'm ending the pod, the unexpected lessons it taught me, and why pressing pause can be a power move. Whether you've been here since day one or just joined, this one's from the heart. Thank you for growing with me
Ep 200 One World in a New World with Anthony NayaganThe Infinite Within: Mysticism, Leadership & Conscious Systems
In the case of John Doe v. Sean Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, and associated entities, the plaintiff, John Doe, has filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and various affiliated companies, including Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, Bad Boy Records LLC, and others. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, under case number 1:25-CV-00996-JLR. The plaintiff, through his legal representation, The Bloom Firm, is seeking legal action based on the allegations made by John Doe, who asserts claims arising from his personal experience and information he has gathered about the actions of the defendants.John Doe's lawsuit includes several corporate entities affiliated with Sean Combs, such as Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings Inc., Bad Boy Productions Holdings Inc., and Bad Boy Books Holdings Inc. Additionally, the complaint also lists Doe Corporations 1-10 and Doe Defendants 11-20, indicating that the plaintiff may pursue further claims against other unidentified individuals or entities involved in the matter. The plaintiff is requesting a jury trial as part of his legal proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapuccisource:*Microsoft Word - 2025.01.17 Complaint REDACTEDBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
In the case of John Doe v. Sean Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, and associated entities, the plaintiff, John Doe, has filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and various affiliated companies, including Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, Bad Boy Records LLC, and others. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, under case number 1:25-CV-00996-JLR. The plaintiff, through his legal representation, The Bloom Firm, is seeking legal action based on the allegations made by John Doe, who asserts claims arising from his personal experience and information he has gathered about the actions of the defendants.John Doe's lawsuit includes several corporate entities affiliated with Sean Combs, such as Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings Inc., Bad Boy Productions Holdings Inc., and Bad Boy Books Holdings Inc. Additionally, the complaint also lists Doe Corporations 1-10 and Doe Defendants 11-20, indicating that the plaintiff may pursue further claims against other unidentified individuals or entities involved in the matter. The plaintiff is requesting a jury trial as part of his legal proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapuccisource:*Microsoft Word - 2025.01.17 Complaint REDACTEDBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
In the case of John Doe v. Sean Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, and associated entities, the plaintiff, John Doe, has filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and various affiliated companies, including Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, Bad Boy Records LLC, and others. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, under case number 1:25-CV-00996-JLR. The plaintiff, through his legal representation, The Bloom Firm, is seeking legal action based on the allegations made by John Doe, who asserts claims arising from his personal experience and information he has gathered about the actions of the defendants.John Doe's lawsuit includes several corporate entities affiliated with Sean Combs, such as Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings Inc., Bad Boy Productions Holdings Inc., and Bad Boy Books Holdings Inc. Additionally, the complaint also lists Doe Corporations 1-10 and Doe Defendants 11-20, indicating that the plaintiff may pursue further claims against other unidentified individuals or entities involved in the matter. The plaintiff is requesting a jury trial as part of his legal proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapuccisource:*Microsoft Word - 2025.01.17 Complaint REDACTEDBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In the case of John Doe v. Sean Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, and associated entities, the plaintiff, John Doe, has filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and various affiliated companies, including Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, Bad Boy Records LLC, and others. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, under case number 1:25-CV-00996-JLR. The plaintiff, through his legal representation, The Bloom Firm, is seeking legal action based on the allegations made by John Doe, who asserts claims arising from his personal experience and information he has gathered about the actions of the defendants.John Doe's lawsuit includes several corporate entities affiliated with Sean Combs, such as Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings Inc., Bad Boy Productions Holdings Inc., and Bad Boy Books Holdings Inc. Additionally, the complaint also lists Doe Corporations 1-10 and Doe Defendants 11-20, indicating that the plaintiff may pursue further claims against other unidentified individuals or entities involved in the matter. The plaintiff is requesting a jury trial as part of his legal proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapuccisource:*Microsoft Word - 2025.01.17 Complaint REDACTEDBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Boasting in God and His Work, Not Ourselves or Our Work Please turn to 2 Corinthians 10. Our sermon text is chapter 10 verses 8-18. That is on page 1150. As you are turning there, be reminded that the apostle Paul has been defending his apostleship over and against the false apostles. This morning's reading continues the contrast between true and false apostles. These verses focus on boasting and comparing. In whom should we boast and with whom should we compare ourselves. Listen for those things as I read. Reading of 2 Corinthians 10:8-18 Prayer As I was studying this passage, I realized that it's pretty relevant for our church's 5th anniversary. I promise I didn't pick this text for that purpose. And then as I studied it, more, I realized, oh this is actually pretty convicting. I was reflecting back on all the feelings I was going through when we were organizing. This is going back to 2019 and early 2020. A big one was fear of failure. I had read that something like 80% of church plants don't make it. That was hard to consider. My temptation, like other pastors, is to connect my identity to the success or failure of the church. When things are seemingly going well, it's tempting to think that somehow it's due to my gifts or leadership. And on the other side, when things are seemingly not going well, the temptation is to feel like a failure instead of turning to Christ and relying on him. So that was one thing. But also, I had feelings of rejection. Like when a person or family was exploring churches, but decided to go to another church, it was (and it still is!) easy to feel a personal rejection. Related to that, it has been tempting to compare myself with other pastors or compare our church with other churches. I have struggled with those but especially when we were beginning. I've had to ask myself some hard questions. 1. Is my identity wrapped up our church instead of Christ? That's a hard question for any pastor. 2. Do I have a worldly understanding of success and failure? That's another hard one. Am I focused on numeric growth or, instead, spiritual growth? 3. Am I comparing myself with others or looking for affirmation from others instead of from Jesus? Those are hard things to ask. The reason I'm bringing these up is because our text this morning asks and answer some of these very questions. Now, to be sure, none of us are apostles. No, Paul had a special ordained role as one of the apostles called by Jesus himself. Moreover, the office of apostle concluded in the first century when the Scriptures were complete. However, even though none of us are apostles, the foundation that Paul laid for the church, and the pattern that he modelled as a faithful shepherd certainly apply to us today. In these verses, as Paul compares the true apostles to the false apostles, we can see the pattern. On the one hand, God glorifying, Christ exalting ministry and on the other, man-centered, self-exalting ministry. As we work through this, my hope is that we, as a church, can hear and apply these words to us. In the outline provided, you'll see 3 questions. 1. Whose standard are we using? 2. Whose glory are we seeking? 3. Whose message are we proclaiming? Actually, I want to extend that third question. Whose message are we proclaiming and what mission are we pursuing? Pencil that in. Again, whose standard, whose glory, whose message, and what mission. 1. Whose standard are we using? So, #1 whose standard? We've already considered that the impostors in Corinth critiqued Paul because he appeared weak in the flesh. Look at verse10: “For they say, ‘His letters are weighty and strong, but his bodily presence is weak, and his speech of no account.'” There are really three critiques here. 1) Paul was physically weak or at least he came across as wimpy; 2) his speech was unimpressive. In other words, because he didn't use all the rhetorical devices of the era, he was therefore sub-par... and 3) he was self-contradictory. His letters were strong but that wasn't matched by a strong in-person impression. That last one is addressed directly in verse 11. Paul writes, “Let such a person understand that what we say by letter when absent, we do when present.” He was saying to them, you may have an impression of weakness when we are in person, however, we are living out our boldness in our lives when we are with you. And make no mistake, we are prepared to speak with the same boldness if necessary. What was the false apostles standard? How were they evaluating Paul? And the answer is, they were using the world's standards. They were comparing Paul to what they considered superior. Verse 12 gets to the heart of their problem. It says, “Not that we dare to classify or compare ourselves with some of those who are commending themselves. But when they measure themselves by one another and compare themselves with one another, they are without understanding.” They were measuring themselves with one another. Their standard did not come from God, it came through their worldly comparison. I think we can all understand the temptation. Our natural sinful disposition is to look to others. We constantly measure ourselves by what we see around us. I was recently reading a book that identified the 10th commandment – do not covet – as the consummate problem with the entire world. The author was saying that man's covetous heart is the source of all evil and war and anger and stealing and adultery. Someone has something that we don't have and we want it. We want to be better than and stronger than and more prominent than and more popular than our neighbor. Do you see how that is true? A covetous heart leads to ungodly and self-centered thoughts and words and actions that betray God's standard of righteousness. Now, I do not believe the 10th commandment is the only path to sin and evil in the world. I think the 1st and 2nd commandments are also an entry point into corruption and evil. The 1st and 2nd commandments are about having no other god and not making or worshiping an idol in the place of God. But for sure, coveting was a big problem in Corinth. The false apostles coveted what Paul had – they wanted his authority and popularity. And so what did they do? They turned to each other and the world's standards… and they undermined Paul, whom God had ordained as faithful and true. Last month, something really sad and unfortunate happened. A prominent pastor in the reformed church world was found to be slandering other pastors. He had created multiple anonymous X accounts, and he was using those fake accounts to criticize and undermine other pastors. This pastor was doing the same thing as the false apostles in Corinth. He was elevating himself and suppressing others. Now, that's a negative example and I think it's a rare example. At least, I hope. A more common example is when we envy the so-called success of other churches and try to mimic their tactics. In other words, when we see or hear of another church attracting a bunch of people, we think, what are they doing that we could also do or even do better? On my way here last week, I drove by a big church. Lots of cars were pulling in. And there was a guy with one of those giant bubble makers. You know, with the rope, and it makes big ubbles. And I thought, do we need a giant bubble maker? Just kidding. Actually, I was a little irritated because one of the bubbles popped on my car. On a serious note, much of today's church growth movement is focused on external things. It's just a modern version of what the false apostles were doing. Today it's about emotionally driven and high production experiences; or innovations to attract people; or it's a focus on feel-good messages that avoid difficult topics like sin and judgment and repentance and holiness; Now, I am not saying that we shouldn't be thoughtful and engaging in the responsibilities God has given his church. We definitely should. Rather, I'm saying that our natural sinful proclivity is to turn to the world's standards and approach which includes compare ourselves to others. It's one of my temptations and I think probably to some extent, a temptation for all of us. Instead, we should be looking to the Lord and his criteria. That begins by seeking to be faithful to him and to his ways and to his purposes rather than the world's. Instead of being man-centered we should seek to be God glorifying. We should focus on the Gospel – our utter need for God's grace in Christ because of our sin and God's judgment. In our practices, we should submit them to God's Word. Those are just a few. So, whose standard are we using? Are we following God's standard which he has reveled to us in his Word, or are we following the world's standard, comparing ourselves to one another? 2. Whose glory are we seeking? #2. Whose glory are we seeking? Are we seeking God's glory and are we boasting in him, or are we boasting in and exalting ourselves? You heard the word boast in these verses. It's used 7 times. In fact, the theme of boasting will continue into chapters 11 and 12. And we get the sense that Paul doesn't even like the word boasting. But because the so-called super apostles were boasting, Paul needed to correct their misguided boasting by presenting what they should really be boasting in – which is the Lord. By the way, let me give you a definition of the word boasting. The Greek word boast is to brag about, or rejoice in, or have confidence in something. To boast is to lift up something or someone as exceptionally noteworthy. Paul is saying all throughout these verses that our boasting needs to be in the Lord and his work. Nowhere in these verses does Paul commend himself. Rather, he directs their attention to the Lord and what the Lord commends. Let's look at two examples here. First, verse 8. Paul writes, “For even if I boast a little too much of our authority.” Do you hear that uneasiness. But listen to what he says next, “which the Lord gave….” You see, he focuses on the Lord. It's not a self commending authority, but an authority that the Lord gave. Verse 18 is similar. “For it is not the one who commends himself who is approved, but the one whom the Lord commends.” The impostors were boasting in their own self-assigned authority. It was not a God-ordained authority. They were putting each other on a pedestal. I don't know if you'll remember this from chapter 3, but they even had letters of recommendation to somehow prove their authority in the church. It was all very self-serving and not God glorifying. It's kind of like they were applying for a job. You know the drill. The way to get a job is self-promotion. You put together a resume or a CV. You have to include all your expertise and credentials and education and certifications. Then if you get an interview, you basically have to talk about why you are the best… or at least the best fit for the job. It's a little uncomfortable, isn't it? …because you are essentially boasting about yourself. That's the way the world works, and it's hard to break out of that mindset in ministry. It's not that Paul didn't have the credentials. Actually, in the next chapter he is going to be clear about his credentials. Rather, what he is emphasizing is that we need to direct our attention to the Lord. It is his work, not ours. It's his work in us, his work through us, and he is the one to be exalted in it. Let me put it this way: No heart transforming work happens in anyone's life by man's work. No, it is the work of God in Christ through the Holy Spirit that turns hearts of stone into hearts of flesh. Furthermore, there is no sanctification in one's life that happens by our will, no, rather it is likewise the ministry of God's Word through his Spirit that matures us in Christ. Our church is here today, not because of anything that any of us did. I am not saying that seeking to be faithful to fulfill God's call for the local church is not important. It is important. But there have been many faithful church plants that have closed. There was a church plant in Lilburn that closed a couple of years ago. It was a daughter church of Perimeter in John's Creek – Perimeter is a sister church of ours. And I remember a very meaningful comment by Perimeter's church plant director. As they prepared to close their doors, he encouraged them that their labors were not in vain. No, rather that the Lord had been faithfully at work during the time of their existence as a church. And furthermore, he said, that when that great day comes when Christ returns, the work that the Lord did through their church plant will be celebrated… celebrated as part of the broader kingdom work of God throughout the world. It was a great reminder that it was the Lord's work. That's hard to get our minds around because we often apply the world's criteria of success and failure. But we can still boast in what God has done in that community and the lives of his people. The key verse is right there in verse 17. It's a quote from Jeremiah. “Let the one who boasts, boast in the Lord.” Paul is clearly boasting here. But he is boasting in God's authority over his apostleship, and he is boasting in the Lord's work in Corinth. There is only one place to direct our boasting. It is to the Lord. What he has done and is doing. So, whose glory are we seeking? Are we seeking our own glory? Are we commending and boasting in ourselves or are we seeking to give glory to God and his work? 3. Whose message are we proclaiming and what mission are we pursuing? Which brings us to the third question. Whose message are we proclaiming and what mission are we pursuing? We've already seen throughout 2 Corinthians that the false apostles were not only promoting themselves, but they were proclaiming a false gospel. Their gospel was about power and it was about prestige. It was not about the true Gospel of Christ crucified and the weakness and suffering and humility that comes from that. Furthermore, their mission was to build up themselves and their little kingdom. We're not given any sense in 2 Corinthians that the false apostles desired to spread the Gospel. Paul focuses on these things in verses 14 and 15. And they merit a little explaining. He says in verse 14, “we are not overextending ourselves as though we did not reach you.” What he means is that they had a vested interest in Corinth. Corinth was under their oversight. They were not interjecting themselves into the situation in Corinth without warrant. On the contrary, they had come, as it says, “all the way to them to bring the Gospel of Jesus Christ.” Paul and the others had sacrificed much to bring the Gospel to them and had labored many months to establish the church. When Paul planted the church in Corinth, he was there for 18 months. Of course he desired to see the church in Corinth prosper. And there are two things on his mind. First, he wanted them to be firmly established with the Gospel message and, second, he wanted them to participate in the Gospel mission. The message of the Gospel and the mission of the Gospel go hand and hand. As Paul said in his letter to the Romans in chapter 1, “The Gospel is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Gentile.” Paul was the apostle to the Gentiles. He wanted to see the Gospel message go to the ends of the earth. And he wanted the Corinthians to help. That is what the second half of verse 15 means. “our hope is that as your faith increases, our area of influence among you may be greatly enlarged.” In other words, as you grow in your faith, we hope you will take the Gospel to other communities around you and thus enlarge what God began. And then look what he says in verse 16, “so that we may preach the gospel in lands beyond you.” When the church in Corinth matures in Christ and stabilizes, two things will happen. First, the Gospel will spread in southern Greece. And second, Paul, Timothy, Titus, and the others will no longer need to focus their efforts on Corinth. They will be able to take the Gospel to other lands that have never heard of Jesus Christ. A church that loses the Gospel message loses the Gospel mission. You may have heard this, but a couple of months ago, the mainline Presbyterian denomination in the US ended its foreign mission's agency. They let go their remaining 60 missionaries. Over the last 100 years, they had slowly lost their belief in Jesus as the only hope for salvation. And with that loss of message, they slowly lost the purpose of missions. If there's no message, then why bother with the mission? When the so-called super apostles infiltrated Corinth, not only did they distract the church away from the truth, they also distracted the church away from its mission. And it furthermore required a lot of effort from Paul and others, which distracted them from their broader mission to take the Gospel to the ends of the earth. Are we seeking to be true to the message of the Gospel and faithful to our mission to proclaim it to all the world? Conclusion To recap: 1. Whose standard are we using? Are we comparing ourselves to others using the world's standards or are we seeking what the Lord commends and has designed for his church? 2. Whose glory are we seeking? Are we boasting in ourselves , or are we boasting in the Lord and his work, recognizing that in him and through him and to him are all things? 3. Whose message are we proclaiming and what mission are we pursuing? Are we being faithful to the hope that is found in Christ alone and faithful to the great commission… or is the message and mission waning in our lives and church? Every church needs to be constantly evaluating and re-evaluating these questions. I don't know what plans the Lord has for us over the next 5 years. But my prayer is (1) that we would not align ourselves to the standards of the world, (2) that we would boast in the Lord and his work, and (3) that we would be faithful to Christ, seeking to be a light of his Gospel to our neighbors and taking that Gospel to the “lands beyond” as the apostle put it. In all of it, boasting in the Lord. Amen.
Un año “perruno” equivale a 7 años humanos. ¿Y un año de un coche, a cuantos años humanos equivale? Vamos a reflexionar sobre este punto, porque hay coches que envejecen bien… y otros que envejecen mal. Como las personas. ¿Cuáles son los “secretos” para la eterna juventud? Te contamos los secretos por lo que algunos coches envejecen bien… para las personas, mejor busca otro canal. Os propongo un juego. ¡Nos vamos a divertir! Ya sabéis que di versos estudios concluyen que el equivalente de la edad entre un, pero de tamaño medio y de un humano, seria de 7 a 1. Un, pero de la raza pastor alemán de 10 años seria como una persona humana alemana, pastor o no, de 70 años. ¿Nos atrevemos a hacer un equivalente de la edad coche-persona? Se estima que la vida media de un coche es de unos 15 años. La esperanza de vida en España, donde vivimos un montón, es de 83 años. Esto promediando hombres y mujeres, que viven más…no entro en los motivos. Así que matemáticamente la equivalencia entre la edad de los coches y los humanos es de 5,5 a 1. Pero creo que hay un factor corrector porque el deterior de un coche y creo que es más justo 2,5 a 1. Un coche de 10 años tendría 30… ¿Os parece más justo? Os voy a traer ejemplos de coches que se mantienen jóvenes. El Nissan 350 Z va a cumplir 55 años… más o menos la edad de Maribel Verdú. El Honda S2000 se acerca a los 65… más o menos como George Clooney. El Dodge Viper es ya un “madurita de buen ver” con sus casi 75 años… he pedido a Rodrigo que ponga una foto de Sean Connery con 75 años. El Mercedes de la generación W124 seria centenario… mira las imágenes… y es un crack, incomparable con ninguna persona… Ahora que muchos acusan a los coches modernos de tener la llamada Obsolescencia programada, estos son algunos ejemplos de coches que tiene “un pacto con el Diablo”. La pregunta es ¿cuál es su secreto? Y en rigurosa exclusiva te lo vamos a contar en Garaje Hermético. 1. Plazos de renovación. 2. La trampa de la moda. 3. Innovación: Adelantarte a tu tiempo. 4. Exclusividad: Lo minoritario se cotiza. 5. Fiabilidad: Condición “sine qua non”. 6. La competición: El deporte rejuvenece. 7. Imagen “de marca” potente. 8. Ayuda del fabricante… para cuidar tu coche. 9. El efecto “saga”. 10. Factor “seducción”. Conclusión. Seguro que hay más aspectos que he olvidado, porque la “eterna juventud” está lleno de ellos. Pero para eso estáis vosotros y la caja de comentarios. Coche del día. Voy a escoger un coche con 87 años “humanos” pero que seguro que os va a encantar: El Mercedes 500E de 1990, el tope de la gama y que se presentó en el Salón de París de ese año. Mercedes-Benz unió sus fuerzas a Porsche para la puesta a punto de motor y chasis. Exteriormente se distinguía por unos pasos de rueda ligeramente ensanchados pero lo más importante no se veía, el motor V8 de 4.973 cm3, 326 CV de potencia… un “maduro” en muy buena forma.
You will never look at alcohol the same after this... kidding - you will most likely have a drink after listening to this episode. But maybe you will also be better educated on how to mitigate the impacts this prevelant drug has on our everyday lives.In this episode, we dive into the mind-blowing science behind Why We Sleep by Matthew Walker, this book changed how I view rest forever. Whether you're a night owl, burnout queen or just curious about how to get better zzz's, this one's for you. At OneUp we believe in being curious and taking a little bit of value from everyone, so welcome to the breadcrumb series. Where we get bite sized amounts of previous episodes and can hear a new perspective.Breadcrumb 119 is from the episode - "Your Natural Superpower: The Science and Impact of Sleep"Listen to the full episode on Spotify or Apple Podcasts.Need help creating a CV? Here's one of the best FREE CV creators.Keen to learn more about personal growth, career and money? Find me on Instagram or Tik Tok Thank you for listening, it means so much to me. Please leave a rating or review if you're enjoying and we will chat in the next episode. Want to get in touch directly? sarah@theoneupproject.nz
In the case of John Doe v. Sean Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, and associated entities, the plaintiff, John Doe, has filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and various affiliated companies, including Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, Bad Boy Records LLC, and others. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, under case number 1:25-CV-00996-JLR. The plaintiff, through his legal representation, The Bloom Firm, is seeking legal action based on the allegations made by John Doe, who asserts claims arising from his personal experience and information he has gathered about the actions of the defendants.John Doe's lawsuit includes several corporate entities affiliated with Sean Combs, such as Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings Inc., Bad Boy Productions Holdings Inc., and Bad Boy Books Holdings Inc. Additionally, the complaint also lists Doe Corporations 1-10 and Doe Defendants 11-20, indicating that the plaintiff may pursue further claims against other unidentified individuals or entities involved in the matter. The plaintiff is requesting a jury trial as part of his legal proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapuccisource:*Microsoft Word - 2025.01.17 Complaint REDACTEDBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
In the case of John Doe v. Sean Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, and associated entities, the plaintiff, John Doe, has filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and various affiliated companies, including Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, Bad Boy Records LLC, and others. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, under case number 1:25-CV-00996-JLR. The plaintiff, through his legal representation, The Bloom Firm, is seeking legal action based on the allegations made by John Doe, who asserts claims arising from his personal experience and information he has gathered about the actions of the defendants.John Doe's lawsuit includes several corporate entities affiliated with Sean Combs, such as Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings Inc., Bad Boy Productions Holdings Inc., and Bad Boy Books Holdings Inc. Additionally, the complaint also lists Doe Corporations 1-10 and Doe Defendants 11-20, indicating that the plaintiff may pursue further claims against other unidentified individuals or entities involved in the matter. The plaintiff is requesting a jury trial as part of his legal proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapuccisource:*Microsoft Word - 2025.01.17 Complaint REDACTEDBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
In the case of John Doe v. Sean Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, and associated entities, the plaintiff, John Doe, has filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and various affiliated companies, including Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, Bad Boy Records LLC, and others. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, under case number 1:25-CV-00996-JLR. The plaintiff, through his legal representation, The Bloom Firm, is seeking legal action based on the allegations made by John Doe, who asserts claims arising from his personal experience and information he has gathered about the actions of the defendants.John Doe's lawsuit includes several corporate entities affiliated with Sean Combs, such as Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings Inc., Bad Boy Productions Holdings Inc., and Bad Boy Books Holdings Inc. Additionally, the complaint also lists Doe Corporations 1-10 and Doe Defendants 11-20, indicating that the plaintiff may pursue further claims against other unidentified individuals or entities involved in the matter. The plaintiff is requesting a jury trial as part of his legal proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapuccisource:*Microsoft Word - 2025.01.17 Complaint REDACTEDBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
In the case of John Doe v. Sean Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, and associated entities, the plaintiff, John Doe, has filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and various affiliated companies, including Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, Bad Boy Records LLC, and others. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, under case number 1:25-CV-00996-JLR. The plaintiff, through his legal representation, The Bloom Firm, is seeking legal action based on the allegations made by John Doe, who asserts claims arising from his personal experience and information he has gathered about the actions of the defendants.John Doe's lawsuit includes several corporate entities affiliated with Sean Combs, such as Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings Inc., Bad Boy Productions Holdings Inc., and Bad Boy Books Holdings Inc. Additionally, the complaint also lists Doe Corporations 1-10 and Doe Defendants 11-20, indicating that the plaintiff may pursue further claims against other unidentified individuals or entities involved in the matter. The plaintiff is requesting a jury trial as part of his legal proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapuccisource:*Microsoft Word - 2025.01.17 Complaint REDACTEDBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In the case of John Doe v. Sean Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, and associated entities, the plaintiff, John Doe, has filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and various affiliated companies, including Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, Bad Boy Records LLC, and others. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, under case number 1:25-CV-00996-JLR. The plaintiff, through his legal representation, The Bloom Firm, is seeking legal action based on the allegations made by John Doe, who asserts claims arising from his personal experience and information he has gathered about the actions of the defendants.John Doe's lawsuit includes several corporate entities affiliated with Sean Combs, such as Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings Inc., Bad Boy Productions Holdings Inc., and Bad Boy Books Holdings Inc. Additionally, the complaint also lists Doe Corporations 1-10 and Doe Defendants 11-20, indicating that the plaintiff may pursue further claims against other unidentified individuals or entities involved in the matter. The plaintiff is requesting a jury trial as part of his legal proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapuccisource:*Microsoft Word - 2025.01.17 Complaint REDACTEDBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In the case of John Doe v. Sean Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, and associated entities, the plaintiff, John Doe, has filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and various affiliated companies, including Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, Bad Boy Records LLC, and others. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, under case number 1:25-CV-00996-JLR. The plaintiff, through his legal representation, The Bloom Firm, is seeking legal action based on the allegations made by John Doe, who asserts claims arising from his personal experience and information he has gathered about the actions of the defendants.John Doe's lawsuit includes several corporate entities affiliated with Sean Combs, such as Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings Inc., Bad Boy Productions Holdings Inc., and Bad Boy Books Holdings Inc. Additionally, the complaint also lists Doe Corporations 1-10 and Doe Defendants 11-20, indicating that the plaintiff may pursue further claims against other unidentified individuals or entities involved in the matter. The plaintiff is requesting a jury trial as part of his legal proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapuccisource:*Microsoft Word - 2025.01.17 Complaint REDACTEDBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
watch the video intro https://youtu.be/pzmaa74LErc?si=xydH-biTfjTbKUYh It's our 1-year anniversary and our Question of the Week is: What should and shouldn't you put on your CV and say in an interview Also discussion around:
Program notes:0:35 Screen time trajectories in adolescents1:33 31% had increasing addictive use trajectories2:31 Females more involved in social media3:06 Cannabis and CV risk4:06 Smoking or using other products5:06 Mechanisms include oxidative stress6:06 Haven't regulated6:28 Tau PET imaging in Alzheimer's7:28 90% of tau positivity concurs with AB8:30 Will blood test obviate?9:30 Imaging to detect spread9:43 CT perfusion for death by neurological criteria10:43 Validation threshold 98%11:43 Maybe adding another technique12:43 End
ぬるぽ放送局投稿フォーム https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScwYSAEyRhDCHd-JRk9dLA05JKnGINgvnDhY3Xmkw2lwwDjQw/viewform 2025年6月パワープレイ 01. Stay Foolish 編曲：D.watt 原曲：東方紅魔郷 / おてんば恋娘 収録アルバム：TOHO BOOTLEGS 9 2025・5・5 Release https://www.iosysos.com/discographyportal.php?cdno=IO-0341 番組時間：98分10秒 出演者：夕野ヨシミ、たくや VOICEVOX:ずんだもん VOICEVOX:四国めたん ---- 2025/6/19に公開録音したものを配信いたします。 ラジオ記事はリスナーのEEチャンピオンさんが書いてくれているので楽してます。 ＜オープニング＞ ・21時きっかりに始まりました ・2回に1回は2の倍数 ・北海道なのにエアコン付けてますよ ・即売会におけるイオシスの列のよう ・よそのサークルの列整理してますし ・シャッター前配置って昭和の話してます？ ・列整理の同人誌 ・名華祭はイベントスタッフが多い ・お弁当がいいのかな？ ・ラフな格好した刺青入りガードマン ・彫物だけにね ＜Aパート＞ ・ふつおたです ・元同僚の結婚式で横浜へ ・初老のイベントやってますよ ・0時から酒飲んで仕上げて行く ・結婚式は寝てても大丈夫 ・エンジニア寝をしてる夕野ヨシミ氏 ・ラーメン博物館って何があるんですか？ ・ラーメンの化石 ・アンパンマン博物館は何があるんですか？ ・そんな、まじめなことをネイキッドロフトでやられてもな ・渋谷のはかせの部屋 ・俳優を見ると犯人が分かるドラマ ・はかせがアニメの話をしないときは儲かってる ・前川が落ちてた ・陰謀論流行ってるんだ ・歩き始めためかとき ・3年B組ー！唯我独尊ー！ ・ブラウザ三国志のスマホアプリ版 ・steam版ブラウザ三国志のMOD ・クラスはバッター ・元祖二刀流 宮本武蔵 ・つまぽんがプロ野球にハマってる ・サンキューピッチおすすめです ・2000万円のリースとは ・炎上商法なのか？ ・名華祭の話 ・感想はよかったです（語彙力） ・C＆Cさんは、ちゃんとやってましたよ ・まろんくんはサークル反復横跳びが出来る ・アクスタの現物をどこかに置きたい ・スカ警アクスタはいいぞ ・老舗のアクリルサークルになっちゃった ・石川のねこ ・あのswitch2は当たったやつだから ・今週は芸能界とスポーツ界がプチ炎上なんだな、なるほど ・って毎週やん ・赤い三角コーン ・プリキュアのシャア ・来週は実写かな？ ・ぬるぽ聞いてます（ｺｯｿﾘ） ・5％アップするのに押すの？ ・懲役も禁固もなくなりました ・半分がリピーター ・大人のキッザニアだ ・老人福祉施設になってる ・ぬるぽは幅広く何でもウエルカムです ＜Bパート＞ ・アレンジがちゃんと令和最新版 ・デジタルリリースも始まってるのでお聞きください ・これはどこで聞けるんですか？ ・東方アレンジもいろんなところで聞けるってすごいな ・CD焼いてたあの頃 ・出すのは簡単だけど聞いてもらうのは大変 ・CDにちゃんとシール貼るのも大変 ・やることないから仕事してるんだ ・みつをたです ・6月の気温じゃねー！ ・嘘だと言ってよみつを ・新装版発売おめでとう ・しかも免税かい ・働く車は高いよ ・母親29歳にビックリ ・レベルEいいぞ ・飛影はそんなこと言わない ・知らないところでお見合いが組まれてる ・11年前に結婚してる ・ダブルインパクトは年寄りの大会に ・梅雨前線に喝！出ちゃった ・子供がいると子供の話始めちゃう ・親子で すってはっくん ・全部隠語だったのか ・こいつらヒメウズラしたんだ！ ・ED曲にBEYOND THE TIMEはズルじゃん ・親戚じゃない小室さん ・頬を赤らめるハロ ・みんながおめでとう ・ホロライブswitch2当選早抜けレース ・じゃあ、エンディングに行きましょう ＜エンディング＞ ・イオパの中継はなくなりましたので現地で聞いてください ・Aiobahn +81 feat. ななひら & P丸様。- 天天天国地獄国 (Official Music Video) 作詞：夕野ヨシミ(IOSYS) YouTube1000万再生めでたい！ ・作詞しましたｲｴｰｲ ・何がとは言わないんだけど、最近話題のTシャツがありますよ 2025イオシス万博公式ロゴマークTシャツ ・楽曲提供のお知らせ 〖 Original 〗 ぴゅぴゅっと☆エロイムエッサイム / なぃとめあ 〖 IOSYS (D.watt&まろん) 〗 作詞：まろん(IOSYS) 作編曲：D.watt(IOSYS) ・ランプ（意味深） ・作詞提供のお知らせ 【主題歌 解禁PV】『ネコぱら セカイコネクト』（ネココネ）スマホ/PC向け新作 ゲーム Aiobahn書き下ろし新曲『Cute Domination』 作詞：john=hive（IOSYS） 作編曲：Aiobahn +81 歌唱：水無月時雨（CV. M・A・O） ・デジタルリリースのお知らせ TOHO BOOTLEGS 9 リッスンナウしてねー ・IO-0335 IOSYS ALL TIME TOHO BEST COLLECTION IOSYSの在庫が完売しました！ 追加のCDプレス予定はありません～ ・提供楽曲のMVが公開されました！ 『ぬこぬこ♡なでにゃん♡ETERNAL♡』 作詞：恋汐りんご・七条レタス(IOSYS) 作編曲：D.watt(IOSYS) ・6/21-22 北海道ご当地キャラフェスタ ・中々発表にならないものたくさんありまーす ・7/3の生放送は2本録りの予定です ・イオシスショップも20周年 ・土曜日はブルアカの生放送あります（出演はありません） ・うなぎ食べてがんばろう
When did you last pause to consider what it takes to turn daring ideas from a lab into reality? In this episode of Tech Talks Daily, I spend time with Mike Otworth, Executive Chairman of Innventure, whose career reveals what happens when breakthrough technology leaves the safety of research and collides with real-world demands. Mike's view offers an honest look at what changes when you match influential inventions with a team that moves quickly and welcomes a little discomfort. We begin with Mike's unexpected transition from working on Capitol Hill to joining a group of brilliant scientists in Florida. That twist of fate shaped his life's direction and planted the seed for what later became Innventure. He explains how they tackle a problem that many overlook: big companies often create advanced solutions but lack the speed or drive to launch them effectively. His answer was to build an organization that runs on agility, quick learning, and a firm belief that course corrections are normal, not failures. One idea that sticks is what Mike calls "adaptive strategic positioning." In plain English, it means leaders must remain flexible and innovative enough to adjust their direction as soon as reality reveals something new. For founders juggling investors and product timelines, this can feel uncomfortable, yet it remains a necessary task. He also shares why he looks for "athletes" rather than box-ticking hires. For Mike, mindset beats a perfect CV every time. He seeks individuals who bring determination, resilience, and an appetite for new challenges, regardless of their starting point. We also explore how team culture can't be built with beanbags and table football alone. Real innovation teams keep an eye on the big goal and value shared wins more than individual credit. Mike also discusses giving every team member a stake in the outcome, ensuring everyone rows in the same direction. He gives a heartfelt nod to Dr. John Scott, a mentor whose sharp mind and honest opinions shaped his knack for spotting which tech has a chance in the market. This episode is more than another story of startup life. It's a clear window into how leadership must evolve as a company grows from a scrappy experiment to a trusted player. Mike's reflections on when to step back and let new leaders steer add a layer of honesty that many founders rarely share. If you enjoy hearing how a few bold decisions can ripple through entire industries, this chat offers plenty to chew on. Expect thoughtful lessons about courage, flexibility, and what it takes to build a company where every person is trusted to run with an idea and find a way forward. For anyone curious about early-stage success beyond the headlines, settle in and hear how Mike and Innventure prove that speed, trust, and the right people still matter most.
In this episode, we talk with Desert Storm Navy Veteran Karl Kuhlenschmidt, who served aboard the CV-66 USS America with VF-102 Diamondbacks from 1988 to 1992. Karl completed three tours—1989, 1990, and 1992—and shares what life was like at sea during the Gulf War. Get access to past and bonus content with exclusive guest. Please help support the podcast and veterans so we can keep making the show - patreon.com/GulfWarSideEffects▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬Life Wave Patches: https://lifewave.com/kevinsimon/store/products*Here is my recommendations on what patches to get and what has helped me.Ice Wave - this helps with my neuropathy.x39 - this helps me with brain fog and my shakesx49 - helps with bone strengthGludifion - helps get rid of toxinsMerch: https://gulfwar-side-effects.myspreadshop.com/Contact me with your questions, comments, or concerns at kevinsimon@gulfwarsideeffects.com
Si la F1 y MotoGp corriesen juntos en Montmeló, los monoplazas estarían doblando a las motos en 3 vueltas. Si la F1 y los Hypercars de resistencia corriesen juntos en Spa-Francorchamps, los monoplazas estarían doblando a los Hypercars en la quinta vuelta. Si la F1 y la Indycar corriesen juntos en el Circuito de las Américas, en 16 vueltas los F1 estarían doblando a los F-Indy. ¿Por qué los F1 son tan ENDIABLADAMENTE rápidos? Te vamos a contar esto… y algunos “secretillos” de la F1. Os voy a contar porque los F1 son tan rápidos, pero antes os quiero demostrar que, realmente, son rápidos, muy rápidos. 4 contra 2. Nos vamos a Montmeló, uno de los pocos circuitos que comparten motos y coches. Para abrir boca, te doy unas cifras: El récord en coche lo tiene todavía Schumacher, desde 2006, con un tiempo de 1:14:637. El de motos, que caerá este año, lo mantiene Aleix Espargaró desde 2023, con un tiempazo de 1:28:686, es decir, Michael rodó algo más de 14 segundos más rápido. Pero comparemos la vuelta rápido en carrera de la F1 de 2025 contra la de Moto GP de 2024, pues en el momento de escribir este guion no se ha disputado la prueba de 2025. En este caso es de 1:39:664 de la MotoGP contra el 1:15:743 de la F1… ¡casi 24 segundos más rápidos! Como os decía, al comienzo de la 4ª vuelta los F1 estaría comenzarían a doblar a las MotoGP. Hypercar vs. Fórmula 1. En el espectacular circuito belga de Spa-Francorchamps se disputan carreras de F1 y del WEC o “Campeonato del Mundo de resistencia”. En 2024 la vuelta rápida de los Hypercars fue de 2:06:459 mientras en la F1 fue de 1:44:701… es decir, los F1 fueron 21:758 segundos más rápidos… como decía al comenzar en la 5ª vuelta los F1 estarían doblando a los Hypercars. América contra el Mundo. Hay un circuito donde compiten los coches de la Indycar y los F1: El Circuito de las Américas en Austin, Texas. Ya sabéis que la Indycar se disputa en circuitos ovales y ruteros. La vuelta rápida en este circuito, sobre un Fórmula Indy, la tiene nuestro piloto Alex Palou en unos increíbles 1:43:171 segundos… en realidad son 1:43:1709, poque la Indy se mide a la milésima. La vuelta rápida de la F1 es de 1:37:330 segundos, es decir unos 6 segundos más rápidos. En este caso los F1 necesitarían 16 vueltas para doblar a los Indycar. Ahora que ya sabemos y os hemos demostrado que son más rápidos, veamos los motivos. Y para eso, echemos un ojo a los reglamentos y dejamos para el final al de la F1. MotoGP: Solo dos ruedas. La mayor desventaja de las MotoGP respecto a un F1 es evidente: Solo tienen dos ruedas. Esto hace que tengan que inclinarse para tomar las curvas y limitan sus posibilidades aerodinámicas y de neumáticos. Hypercars: Híbridos y con tracción total. Como los F1, los Hypercars con híbridos, pero tiene la potencia limitada a 690 CV, sumando la potencia de la unidad térmica y el motor o motores eléctricos. Frente a la F1 tienen una ventaja importante: En según qué condiciones, dependiendo sobre todo de la velocidad, los motores eléctricos aplican su potencia a las ruedas delanteras lo que convierten a estos coches en tracción total, una ventaja importante respecto a un F1. Fórmula Indy: Todos iguales. Hay que tener en cuenta una base de partida: La F1 pretende ser una Campeonato a nivel Mundial que sea el escaparate tecnológico y banco de ensayos para las marcas… ese espíritu se ha ido perdiendo con reglamente cada vez más restrictivos, pero la idea original era esa. La Fórmula Indy pretende dar espectáculo y aumentar la igualdad, de forma que los pilotos marquen la diferencias y que las carreras sean más entretenidas. Por eso el reglamento es casi de copa monomarca, con el mismo chasis Dallara para todos. La Fórmula 1: Categoría reina. A la F1 siempre se la ha denominada “Categoría reina” del Mundo del Motorsport y para mí, con razón. Parto de la base de que siempre sigo que, para mí, en la actualidad, el reglamento es demasiado restrictivo lo que merma el ingenio y las ideas de los ingenieros. Recordad que la F1 ha dado lugar a coches con 6 ruedas, al uso del Turbo, al empleo de motores de turbina, sistemas de tracción total, llevó a la aerodinámica y al “efecto suelo” a su máxima expresión, planteó coches con doble chasis con suspensiones electrónicas, aspiradores que pegaban el coche a suelo… y solo por citar algunas “ideas originales” de ingenieros, en ocasiones propias en otras, mejoras de sistemas que ya existían. Su mayor ventaja es La aerodinámica, que marca la diferencia. No hace falta ser un “as” del inglés para saber que “Downforce” significa “fuerza hacia abajo” y es el peso aparente que genera la aerodinámica en un coche, en este caso de un F1… te vas a sorprender. Si te digo que hay muchas fuentes con datos no siempre fiables y que es un dato que cambia de coche a coche y de año a año.
The Lancet Volume 353, Issue 9146 p9-13 January 02, 1999Background: Accumulating data at the time suggested functional benefits of antagonism of beta-adrenoreceptors in patients with heart failure. Multiple specific beta-blockers were being tested in trials. The CIBIS 1 trial found a trend towards 20% lower mortality in the bisoprolol (a highly cardio-selective beta-blocker) group and 30% fewer admissions to hospital for worsening heart failure. The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II (CIBIS-II) trial was designed to test this evidence further.Patients Eligible patients had New York Heart Association Class III-IV symptoms with LVEF ≤ 35% and were stable on diuretics and ACE-inhibitors. Exclusion criteria included recent MI or coronary intervention, AV block or resting heart rate less 60 bpm and systolic BP < 100 mmHg. Patients already on beta-blockers or with planned therapy with beta-blockers were also not enrolled.Cardiology Trial's remains independent, free of industry ads, due to reader generosity. Please consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.Baseline Characteristics The mean age of patients was 61 years, 81% male, and 83% Class III. The mean LVEF was 28%. About half the patients had ischemic heart disease, 12% primary dilated cardiomyopathy and nearly 40% had a mixture of valvular heart disease, hypertensive heart disease or unproven ischemic disease.The mean SBP on enrollment was 130 mmHg and resting HR was 80 bpm. The mean duration of heart failure before enrollment was 3.5 years. About 20% had AF at baseline. Nearly all patients were on ACE-I and half were on digoxin.Trial Procedures There was no run-in period. CIBIS II was double blinded. Slightly more than 2,600 patients were randomized 1:1 to bisoprolol or placebo in 274 hospitals across 18 countries.Patients in the bisoprolol group were started at 1.25 mg daily and titrated up weekly to as high as 10 mg daily. The goal was to attempt the highest tolerated dose. Patients were seen every 3 months.Endpoints The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints included all-cause hospital admissions, cardiovascular mortality, combined CV death and CV hospital admissions, and premature treatment withdrawals.The authors estimated a 11.2% mortality in the placebo group and powered the trial to find a 25% reduction in death in the bisoprolol arm over 2 years.Results The trial was sopped early (mean follow-up 1.3 years) after the planned second interim analysis for benefit. The primary outcome of all-cause death occurred in 11.8% in the bisoprolol group vs 17.3% in the placebo arm (HR 0.66 (95% CI 0.54-0.81, p < 0.0001)).Bisoprolol reduced sudden death (3.6% vs 6.3%), all-cause hospitalization (33% vs 39%), CV death (9% vs 12%). Permanent treatment withdrawal occurred in 15% of both arms.The subgroup analysis showed no substantial treatment heterogeneity. The most common dose was 10 mg daily reached in 43% of patients.Conclusion The 34% reduction in death was clinically meaningful and statistically robust. Our confidence in such a large effect size stems from a) previous data on beta-blockers, which found similar effects, b) the 42% reduction in sudden death in the bisoprolol arm and c) the large reductions in all-cause hospitalization. In addition, the trial conduct appeared strong with almost no lost-to-follow up. The lack of run-in period strengthens the external validity of CIBIS II.The same caveats seen in the US carvedilol trial also apply to CIBIS II, namely that patients were ambulatory, outpatients, mostly with Class III symptoms. Patients enrolled in the trial had a mean SBP of 130 mmHg and a resting heart rate of 80. Nearly all patients were tolerating ACE-I and half were taking digoxin. In addition, patients were started on low-dose and gradually titrated higher. The majority of patients were on higher than 5 mg daily.The authors warned against applying these results to non-ambulatory patients with Class IV symptoms, especially if there was recent instability. Get full access to Cardiology Trial's Substack at cardiologytrials.substack.com/subscribe
In this episode of Reddit Readings, we cover a post from Reddit r/AskReddit. We hear the answers to "What was something on someone's CV/resume that made you either immediately want to hire them or immediately reject them?" See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
This one's a little different. I've been sitting on some thoughts about where the world's heading from one of the world's biggest brands possible downfall to the rise of AI influencers and why less might actually become the new luxury.Some of these takes might age terrible and others might just be spot on. Either way, it's a fun, thought-provoking ride into the next decade!!What we discuss:Why one of the worlds largest tech companies might lose its crown and who could take the throneThe shift from more to less — why minimalism might become premium againHow freelancing and contract work are becoming the new 9–5How your personal brand is becoming your job application and how to work on itThe future of education — and why it may become deeply personal and more expensiveMeet your new marketing manager...Some philosophical reflections on whether we're headed in the right direction — or just surviving in a system that's shifting too fastKeen to learn more about personal growth, career and money? Find me on Instagram or Tik Tok Thank you for listening, it means so much to me. Please leave a comment, rating or review if you're enjoying and we will chat in the next episode. Need help creating a CV? Here's one of the best FREE CV creators. Want to get in touch directly? sarah@theoneupproject.nz Disclaimer: All opinions are my own, please seek professional financial advice.
El número 18 de “nuestra” revista CEROaCIEN que dedica el BMW M3 E30, el primero, un verdadero deportivo muy “humano”. La revista le dedica casi 80 páginas… ¿Qué os voy a decir? Para mi esta revista sigue siendo una referencia, una fuente fiable y una inspiración. En este número te cuentan como este coche, nacido para la competición, revolucionó el mercado de los deportivos de calle y se convirtió en una nueva referencia que llega hasta nuestros días. Por si hay algún despistado, os recuerdo que CEROaCIEN solo se vende online, ¡no vayas a preguntar por ella en el quiosco! Y también te recuerdo que si eres garajista, tienes condiciones especiales… te lo contamos todo en el texto descriptivo. Y es que hubo un tiempo en que los deportivos eran más “humanos”. Tenían una potencia elevada, pero no exagerada… Eran ligeros, con bastidores muy afinados, se “comunicaban” bien con su conductor y eran muy divertidos de conducir. Y no existían las ayudas electrónicas para “domarlos” y disfrutarlos. ¿Seguro que la necesitaban? Os voy a hablar de este asunto desde un punto de vista diferente.... Antes de que nadie se rasgue las vestiduras: Todo aquello que contribuye a la seguridad, a salvar vidas, nos parece bien. Eso es indiscutible e innegociable. He insinuado que esos deportivos más “humanos” de los años 80 y 90, que algunos ven como potros salvajes y a lo mejor no lo eran tanto, quizás “no necesitaban” ayudas electrónicas. Resulta exagerado decir que “no necesitaban” ayudas electrónicas, pero quizás no lo sea decir tanto que las necesitaban menos… Porque ahora la deportividad no se mide en disfrute de conducción, sino en caballos… gran error. Como siempre “nuestra” revista CEROaCIEN, que patrocina este video, es una fuente de sabiduría. El último número está dedicado al BMW M3, aparecido en 1985, un coche al que le bastó un motor 4 cilindros de 2,3 litros, 16 válvulas y 200 CV para convertirse en un coche deportivo mítico. Eso sí, con solo 1.200 kg ¿Alguien se atreve a decir que este M3 no es deportivo y divertido? Nos venimos al momento presente. Os leo un titular de una página Web, no voy a decir cuál, pero hubo muchas en la misma línea: “El Hyundai Ioniq 5 N de 650 CV la promesa de un deportivo eléctrico”. Un coche que declara 2.200 kg y mide más de 1,6 metros de alto en el que la electrónica no para de inmiscuirse en la conducción… ¿esto es un deportivo? Aquí llega el planteamiento que os citaba: Vamos a imaginarnos que subimos a un elevador al citado BMW M3 y al Este Ioniq… ¿Qué veríamos? La mecánica antes que la electrónica. Hablemos del BMW. Las suspensiones del primer M3 eran una verdadera maravilla, con muy buenas geometrías y unos amortiguadores de máxima calidad, lo que hacía que, pese a su propulsión trasera y ausencia de control de estabilidad electrónico, fuera un coche predecible y muy noble, incluso en mojado. Este BMW M3 lo “sentías” al volante, te “entendías” bien con él enseguida, inspiraba confianza, pero a la vez era un coche muy eficaz y endiabladamente rápido. Y desde luego resultaba muy divertidos de conducir. Los ingenieros no contaban con la ayuda de la electrónica en forma de control de estabilidad y por ello “echaban el resto” en la parte mecánica, con suspensiones de geometría sofisticadas, muy buena puesta a punto, frenos potentes pero modulables y dirección con buen tacto… esas eran sus herramientas. Sin duda un M3 con electrónica sería más seguro… y seguramente la electrónica seria menos “intrusiva” en la conducción, porque solo lo haría en casos limite… por decirlo de alguna manera, sería una “red de seguridad” no un recurso imprescindible. Esto que digo del M3 se puede aplicar a otros muchos coches, por ejemplo, al Honda NSX un “superdeportivo” que tenía solo 270 CV, poco más de 1.250 kg y un chasis y suspensión puesto a punto por el mismísimo Ayrton Senna. Quedaos con este concepto: Chasis muy afinados en los que la electrónica no era una “ayuda” en la conducción, sino una “red de seguridad” para cuando te equivocabas. La electrónica antes que la mecánica. No me voy a cebar con el citado Hyundai, porque muchos coches modernos, SUV y no SUV, chinos y no chinos, recurren al mismo sistema: Suspensiones simplonas asistidas electrónicamente. ¿Para qué complicarse con sofisticadas suspensiones, carísimo amortiguadores y afinadas puestas a punto? Antes las marcas hablaban de los tipos de suspensión y de su geometría… ahora dedican ese espacio a hablar de la conectividad y el info-entretenimiento. Una forma de dar por supuesto que ese coche es endiabladamente aburrido de conducir, por mucho que en recta aceleren como un cohete. Veo en algunos coches modernos el esquema de suspensión y me parece que hay carritos de golf con suspensiones más “curradas”. Y es que en el fondo les da igual a las marcas, porque saben que será la electrónica la que ayude a conducir ese coche. El cambio de paradigma es que los sistemas electrónicos pasan de ser un sistema de seguridad solo para casos extremos, a ser una ayuda “imprescindible”, muy intrusiva y sin la cual, el coche, sería un verdadero peligro. Por supuesto esto sucede en unas marcas más que en otras. Hay marcas que hacen deportivos con buenas suspensiones, sería el caso del BMW, Porsche o Toyota, por citar algunas, que tienen buenos bastidores y buenas ayudas electrónicas. Pero hay otras, y me atrevo a citar a la mayoría de las chinas, que lo fían todo a la electrónica. Veo videos de coches chinos que pasan por baches sin que el coche se mueva un pelo, luego se ve a otro coche, generalmente europeo, dando botes, y al apasionado “influencer” de turno diciendo que los chinos van muy por delante… ¿Han probado esos apasionados “influencer” si en curvas ese coche con unos amortiguadores electrónicos es más progresivo, más seguro, más predecible y más agradable de conducir? Hacer un vídeo sobre eso es más difícil… Conclusión: ¿Por qué no hacéis caso a Chapman? Todos conocéis la célebre frase de “quítame un kilo antes de darme un caballo”. ¿Por qué no le hacemos casos? Los deportivos de ahora son exageradamente potentes, incluso diría que innecesariamente potentes.
In McKinney v. Combs et al., Case No. 24-CV-03931, defendants Sean Combs, along with several associated entities including Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, Sean John Clothing LLC, and Daddy's House Recordings, Inc., submitted a letter to Judge Buchwald outlining their motion to dismiss the plaintiff's Amended Complaint. The defendants argue that the claims lack substantive legal merit and that procedural deficiencies render the case unsustainable. Representing both Sean Combs and the corporate defendants, they emphasize the insufficiency of the allegations and seek dismissal based on the failure to establish a valid cause of action under applicable laws. The filing complies with the court's procedural requirements and aims to streamline resolution.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.621909.40.0.pdf
The story of Cricinfo is the history of sport's relationship with the internet and digital culture.It remains central to the experience of millions of cricket fans. But what does it tell us about how the internet changed what we define as sporting fandom? Alex Balfour co-founded the site and sold it to ESPN in the noughties and he is a global expert on sports relationship with the internet and digital channels.He was head of digital for the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games, his company Generate Digital advises clients on the value of digital assets, and his CV is includes The Guardian Newspaper's first websites, the UK's first general election website, the first UK government online consultation, and the first International 2020 cricket tournamentHe co-founded Cricinfo and sold it to ESPN. It remains the world's leading cricket publisher and India's favourite sports website. Unofficial Partner is the leading podcast for the business of sport. A mix of entertaining and thought provoking conversations with a who's who of the global industry. To join our community of listeners, sign up to the weekly UP Newsletter and follow us on Twitter and TikTok at @UnofficialPartnerWe publish two podcasts each week, on Tuesday and Friday. These are deep conversations with smart people from inside and outside sport. Our entire back catalogue of 400 sports business conversations are available free of charge here. Each pod is available by searching for ‘Unofficial Partner' on Apple, Spotify, Google, Stitcher and every podcast app. If you're interested in collaborating with Unofficial Partner to create one-off podcasts or series, you can reach us via the website.
Send us a textThe Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5) stands as a cornerstone in modern mental health assessment, offering clinicians and researchers a sophisticated tool that marries systematic evaluation with clinical flexibility. This semi-structured interview masterfully balances the precision of standardized questioning with the nuance of open-ended exploration, allowing mental health professionals to gather essential diagnostic information while honoring each client's unique lived experience. The approach creates space for clients to describe their symptoms in their own words, ensuring both diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic rapport.Recognizing diverse professional needs, the SCID-5 comes in three specialized formats: the streamlined Clinician Version (SCID-5-CV) for daily practice, the comprehensive Research Version (SCID-5-RV) for academic studies, and the rigorous Clinical Trials Version (SCID-5-CT) for standardized research protocols. The clinician version includes ten meticulously organized diagnostic modules covering 39 common mental health conditions, from major depression and anxiety disorders to substance use problems and ADHD, while screening for 17 additional disorders.The interview process unfolds naturally, beginning with an introductory conversation that establishes rapport while gathering crucial background information. As the assessment progresses, clinicians follow decision trees that mirror expert diagnostic reasoning, systematically evaluating potential diagnoses based on DSM-5 criteria. This methodical approach empowers professionals to make evidence-based diagnostic determinations while remaining responsive to new information that may emerge throughout treatment.Join us as we explore how this remarkable diagnostic tool transforms mental health assessment, creating a bridge between standardized criteria and clinical wisdom that ultimately leads to better outcomes for those seeking care. Subscribe now for more insights into the cutting-edge approaches shaping modern mental healthcare.If you need to study for your national licensing exam, try the free samplers at: LicensureExamsThis podcast is not associated with the NBCC, AMFTRB, ASW, ANCC, NASP, NAADAC, CCMC, NCPG, CRCC, or any state or governmental agency responsible for licensure.
In McKinney v. Combs et al., Case No. 24-CV-03931, defendants Sean Combs, along with several associated entities including Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, Sean John Clothing LLC, and Daddy's House Recordings, Inc., submitted a letter to Judge Buchwald outlining their motion to dismiss the plaintiff's Amended Complaint. The defendants argue that the claims lack substantive legal merit and that procedural deficiencies render the case unsustainable. Representing both Sean Combs and the corporate defendants, they emphasize the insufficiency of the allegations and seek dismissal based on the failure to establish a valid cause of action under applicable laws. The filing complies with the court's procedural requirements and aims to streamline resolution.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.621909.40.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Women are generally told that if they have a breast cancer diagnosis, they should steer clear of estrogen. In this episode, I have a conversation with Dr. Swati Kulkarni, the lead investigator of a new study in which women with a newly diagnosed breast ductal carcinoma in situ, DCIS, were given a month's worth of hormone therapy before standard treatment to see the impact it would have on developing cancer cells. What DCIS is and how it is typically diagnosed. If DCIS is considered to be a pre-cancer or a cancer If DCIS is untreated, how often it will progress to invasive cancer If treated, how often women with DCIS go on to develop invasive cancer? Why this particular form of hormone therapy, conjugated estrogens and bazodoxifene (Duovee™) was used in the study The details of the study The results of the study The Promise Study: A presurgical randomized clinical trial of CE/BZA vs placebo in postmenopausal women with ductal carcinoma in situ. Link to Abstract My summary of the study on Substack https://drstreicher.substack.com/p/can-hormone-therapy-shrink-breast Link to Kagan episode on Duovee with Dr. Kagan Episode 124 All Hormones Are Not Created Equal with Dr. James Simon Dr. Streicher is on SUBSTACK DrStreicher.Substack.com Articles Monthly newsletter All COME AGAIN podcast episodes Monthly News Flash Reports on recent research Monthly Zoom Ask Me Anything Webinar Information on Dr. Streicher's COME AGAIN Podcast- Sexuality and Orgasm https://drstreicher.substack.com/p/all-about-come-again Lauren Streicher MD, is a clinical professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine, the founding medical director of the Northwestern Medicine Center for Sexual Medicine and Menopause, and a Senior Research Fellow of The Kinsey Institute, Indiana University. She is a certified menopause practitioner of The Menopause Society. She is the Medical Director of Community Education and Outreach for Midi Health. Dr. Streicher is the medical correspondent for Chicago's top-rated news program, the WGN Morning News, and has been seen on The Today Show, Good Morning America, The Oprah Winfrey Show, CNN, NPR, Dr. Radio, Nightline, Fox and Friends, The Steve Harvey Show, CBS This Morning, ABC News Now, NBCNightlyNews,20/20, and World News Tonight. She is an expert source for many magazines and serves on the medical advisory board of The Kinsey Institute, Self Magazine, and Prevention Magazine. She writes a regular column for The Ethel by AARP and Prevention Magazine. LINKS Subscribe To Dr. Streicher's Substack Information About the COME AGAIN Podcast Dr. Streicher's CV and additional bio information To Find a Menopause Clinician and Other Resources Glossary Of Medical Terminology BOOKS by Lauren Streicher, MD Slip Sliding Away: Turning Back the Clock on Your Vagina-A gynecologist's guide to eliminating post-menopause dryness and pain Hot Flash Hell: A Gynecologist's Guide to Turning Down the Heat Sex Rx- Hormones, Health, and Your Best Sex Ever The Essential Guide to Hysterectomy Dr. Streicher's Inside Information podcast is for education and information and is not intended to replace medical advice from your personal healthcare clinician. Dr. Streicher disclaims liability for any medical outcomes that may occur because of applying methods suggested or discussed in this podcast.
Mihai Morar îl are ca invitat pe managerul care a obținut cea mai mare performanță pentru fotbalul românesc după 1989, Mihai Stoica.CV-ul lui Meme Stoica impresionează din mai multe perspective. Este omul pe a cărui carte de vizită a stat scris atât Steaua, cât și FCSB. În ambele cazuri, în postura de conducător al clubului. A realizat cea mai mare surpriză a campionatului, luând titlul cu nou promovata Unirea Urizceni, cu care a reușit o serie de meciuri extraordinare în cupele europene. Nu în ultimul rand, s-a aflat la conducerea clubului Steaua, când acesta realiza cea mai mare performanță la nivel de club, și nu numai, în perioada modernă: semifinala Cupei UEFA cu Middlesborough.Însă nu toate momentele din CV-ul său sunt lăudabile. Mihai Stoica s-a remarcat inițial prin agresivitate, scandaluri și tensiune. O perioadă pe care a depășit-o de mult și pe care o regretă sincer pentru impactul negativ avut asupra familiei sale. Iar schimbarea este evidentă. De la omul care lovea un suporter pe stadion, Meme este acum cel care hrănește visurile de glorie ale următoarei generații pe care o plimbă prin baza FCSB-ului. Pentru că adevăratul marketing sportiv este făcut cu sufletul și atenția îndreptată spre suporteri. Iar atragerea noii generații către sport, mai ales în lumea de azi, este mai importantă și dificilă ca oricând.Ce l-a îmblânzit totuși pe omul care s-a luptat cu proprii săi demoni, cu dependențele, depresiile și presiunea la care era supus? Ai azi ocazia să descoperi un altfel de Mihai Stoica decât, poate, îl știai din presă. Cel care, deși are în continuare 7 titluri de campion și nu poate trăi fără sport... a descoperit ce contează cu adevărat în viață. A devenit din hater, om, cum spune chiar el. Și-a recuperat fiica în urma unui adevărat miracol. Și a găsit în Dumnezeu sprijinul de care avea nevoie atunci când nu mai dorea să trăiască.Vă invităm deci să îl redescoperiți pe MEME Stoica. Și să aflați, printre altele, cine antrenează de fapt FCSB. De ce e atât de loial lui Gigi Becali. Și care este cadoul nesperat primit cât timp s-a aflat în detenție, cadou ce i-a schimbat viața.Despre sport și viață, la Fain & Simplu, cu Mihai Morar.
As Aucklanders digest their new property valuations, questions are being raised over whether using these CV's are the best way to work out rates.
In episode 251 of the Pool Nation Podcast, Edgar, John, and Zach go full pool nerd mode and dive deep into real-world pool chemistry questions submitted by new pool pro Jonah Callahan. From pH creep in saltwater pools to the truth about chlorine lock and how to properly shock your pool, this episode is packed with must-know insights for every pool tech—from beginner to seasoned vet. John breaks down complex chemistry topics in a way that's simple and practical, and the team shares insider strategies for managing high CYA, enzymes, calcium hardness, and more. Whether you're battling algae, scaling, or just trying to maintain balanced water, this is the episode you don't want to miss. Plus: Edgar announces key dates for the Pool Nation Awards, Women's Summit, and the $10K Pool Pro Challenge, and the team drops some exclusive details on Business Matrix-only content at the upcoming Pool Nation Conference.
Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/3DAtOqbCSh0Day 21 of the Karen Read Retrial happened on May 27, 2025. Week six of evidence included a voir dire of Dr. Welcher, the Commonwealth's accident reconstructionist. Concerns were raised about updated slides and changes to the presentation at the direction of Special Prosecutor, Hank Brennan, without informing the defense. Dr. Welcher also mentioned being "inundated" with emails about issues with Burgess' CV but he was told by the court not to read or discuss them.The accident reconstructionist focused on the "trigger event," during a three point turn and its connection to Ian Whiffin's last point of contact. There was also discussion of variance, the three-point turn of the Lexus, and the backing event. Dr. Welcher analyzed the Lexus's tech stream data, which records data before and after a trigger event, such as reversing and accelerating. The data showed the backing event occurred about 8 minutes after the three-point turn. There are discrepancies and confusing aspects of Dr. Welcher's testimony and PowerPoint slides.He also revealed that the Lexus's tires were spinning and slipping during the backing event, and the car traveled a total of 87 feet. Dr. Welcher ultimately concluded that the Lexus struck John O'Keefe, which led to objections and a sidebar discussion. Dr. Dr. Welcher struggled to provide exact details, such as the point of impact or speed, and that many of his findings showed “results that were all over the map”. He also mentions he is only certain that damage to Karen Read's tail light didn't come from John O'Keefe's Chevy. Though this expert's testimony was tedious and disorganized, it did provided many areas doubt which is a win for the defense. Direct Examination will continue on Day 22.RESOURCESWhat You Need to Know About the Retrial - https://youtu.be/89Jpa8vz1RQ Karen Read Retrial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKOJlfL__9F027hlETVU-vo Karen Read Trial - 2024 - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKUeCUzApgsEuQRXu5IXeTSThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
