Podcasts about CV

RE27FLAT-Z57-DEsser 16 CV - 1568 - Calisto, el mundo joviano del silencio y los secretos. Universo de Misterios tiene reservado el derecho de admisión y publicación de comentarios. Generalmente, los comentarios anónimos no serán publicados. Si hace comentarios con afirmaciones dudosas, arguméntelas aportando enlaces a fuentes fiables (este muro NO es una red social). En caso de no respaldar su comentario como se indica en la caja de descripción del episodio, su comentario podrá ser eliminado. Contacto con Universo de Misterios: universodemisteriospodcast@gmail.com La imagen de la miniatura que ilustra este episodio ha sido creada con la ayuda de una Inteligencia Artificial. Puedes hacerte Fan de Universo de Misterios y apoyarlo económicamente obteniendo acceso a todos los episodios cerrados, sin publicidad, desde 1,99 €, pero, si prefieres una tarifa plana en iVoox, consulta estos enlaces: https://www.ivoox.vip/premium?affiliate-code=397358271cac193abb25500d6dffa669 https://www.ivoox.vip/premium?affiliate-code=151a00607cbb1cb51c715a0e5ba841d2 https://www.ivoox.vip/plus?affiliate-code=af18e7aba430f5e6cd6342407a3b2cb9 Aunque a algunas personas, a veces, puede proporcionar una falsa sensación de alivio, la ignorancia nunca es deseable. Escucha el episodio completo en la app de iVoox, o descubre todo el catálogo de iVoox Originals

Hemos hecho vídeos de la historia de muchas marcas… pero nos faltaba nada menos que Audi. La historia de esta marca es larga y complicada así que la voy a hacer “a mi manera”, contando brevemente cómo nació la marca y repasando los 10 coches que a mí me parecen claves en su historia… a ver qué os parece la idea. Aunque la historia de Audi se puede remontar a 1899 cuando nace la marca Horch, semilla de la actual empresa, la Audi moderna nace en realidad en 1965 cuando pasa a formar parte del Grupo VAG o Volkswagen AG. En el vídeo damos un repaso a los años que van de 1899 a 1965. Aquí vamos con el listado de coches. 100 coupé C1 (1969). ¿El primer Audi Premium? Podría estar en esta lista el 100 berlina, que ya contaba con muchas de las cualidades de este coupé, pero es que esta marca desde el principio ha cuidado los modelos deportivos y coupés, esos que la han ayudado a tener la imagen de marca tan buena que ahora tiene… y esos que esta, lamentablemente, abandonando. Quattro (1980). Y todo fue diferente. Clave, porque su enorme éxito en competición, el hecho de cambiar por completo la tecnología en el mundo de los rallyes, y sus éxitos pusieron a la marca en primera fila como marca tecnológica y capaz de hacer coches muy sofisticados y eficaces… y como decía, fue el comienzo de la tecnología “Quattro”, con distintas tecnologías, hasta el día de hoy. 100 C3 (1982). Aerodinámica e inyección directa. Este 100 fue probablemente el primer coche de serie que llevaba los cristales enrasados con la carrocería, uno de los motivos de que su CX se situase en el 0,30, muy notable en su momento. Luego en 1989 llegó el motor turbodiésel de 2,5 litros con inyección directa, los famosos, para bien y para mal, TDi… recordad el “dieselgate”. A8 (1994). Chasis de aluminio y tracción total. En 1994 ni BMW ni Mercedes ofrecían una buena tracción total y una carrocería de aluminio para compensar el sobre peso de la tracción “Quattro”. Este modelo asestó un duro golpe de imagen a su competencia. RS2 Avant (1994). Con la ayuda de Porsche. Este break, o Avant como los llama Audi, era y es un verdadero devorador de las autopistas de velocidad libre en Alemania. Porsche ayudó en la puesta a punto del motor y del bastidor. El motor era un 5 cilindros de 2.226 cm3, 20 válvulas y un gran turbocompresor de forma que se alcanzaban los 315 CV. A3 (1998). Crecer por abajo. Este coche me parecía un Golf disfrazado de Audi y cuando lo probé me di cuenta de que no, era una declaración de intención es de Audi de que podía crecer hacia abajo, pero proponiendo coches con todo el ADN de Audi. Y ese A3 durante sus ya 4 generaciones, lo ha conseguido... TT (1998). ¡Te echamos de menos! Echo de menos al TT doblemente. Primero, porque tuve un TTS de la segunda generación con motor 2.0 TFSi de 272 CV y un excepcional cambio de doble embrague de 6 marchas… le echo de menos. Y todos le echaremos de menos porque ha dejado de fabricarse. R8 LMP (2000). ¡Cinco victorias en Le Mans! Este modelo fue el comienzo. En este momento Audi es la segunda marca con más victorias en las 24 horas de Le Mans, con 12+1, detrás de Porsche con 19. Y todo comenzó con este espectacular coche. RS4 B7 (2005). Lobo con piel de cordero. Y es que este coche, ya sea en berlina o Avant, parece un inocente coche familiar. Pero en su interior se esconde un motor de 4,2 litros y 420 CV combinado con la tracción total tipo Quattro. Se puede decir que Audi con este coche se reafirmó como constructor de coche de estética “inocente”, prácticos y con prestaciones de auténtico deportivo. R8 (2006). ¡Tiembla Ferrari! En realidad, este Audi seguía más el camino que abrió el Honda NSX que la gama Ferrari. Porque era un coupé de altas prestaciones, pero al mismo tiempo muy utilizable en el día a día, incluso confortable y amable. A esa “amabilidad” de su comportamiento colaboraba la tracción total. He probado estos coches en carretera y a fondo en circuito, en 2015, nada menos que Montmeló la versión V10 Plus de 610 CV… y me sorprende los “fácil” que resulta un coche de este nivel. Otro modelo que Audi ya ha dejado de fabricar… ya les diría a los “chicos” de Audi, ¿estáis seguros de lo que hacéis? Conclusión. Sinceramente a Audi le costó mucho esfuerzo ponerse a la par de las otras marcas Premium alemanas como BMW y Mercedes. Y lo consiguió a base de hacer buenos coches, de ser muy dinámicos presentando nuevos modelos de forma incesante y estando presente con modelos que son verdaderos “motores de imagen” para la marca. En cambio, últimamente, han estado un poco despistados o no han tenido mucho acierto. Su apuesta “a muerte” por los eléctricos, de Audi y de prácticamente todo el grupo VAG, casi ignorando a los híbridos, se ha mostrado todo un error.

I veckans avsnitt av Maxa med Daniel möter vi Thomas Eriksson, styrelseordförande för Max Matthiessen Värdepapper och en välkänd profil inom svensk finans. Thomas har ett imponerande CV efter en lång och framgångsrik karriär i branschen, där han sedermera avslutade sin operativa bana som vd för Carnegie Investment Bank. Vi pratar med Thomas om hur han fått ihop livspusslet, vad som händer när man lämnar de operativa chefsrollerna – och om hur finansbranschen har förändrats genom åren samt hur framtidens marknad kan se ut. Investeringar i finansiella instrument är förknippade med risk och en investering kan både öka och minska i värde eller komma att bli värdelös. Historisk avkastning är ingen garanti för framtida avkastning. Ingen del av podcasten skall uppfattas som en uppmaning eller rekommendation att utföra eller disponera över någon typ av investering eller att ingå några andra transaktioner. De uppfattningar som redogjorts för i podcasten återspeglar de medverkandes uppfattning för tillfället och kan således komma att ändras. Informationen i podcasten tar inte hänsyn till någon specifik mottagares särskilda investeringsmål, ekonomiska situation eller behov. Informationen är inte att betrakta som en personlig rekommendation eller ett investeringsråd. Adekvat och professionell rådgivning skall alltid inhämtas innan några investeringsbeslut fattas och varje sådant investeringsbeslut fattas självständigt av kunden och på dennes eget ansvar. Max Matthiessen frånsäger sig allt ansvar för direkt eller indirekt förlust eller skada som grundar sig på användandet av information i podcasten.

¡Vamos a escribir una carta a los Reyes Magos de Oriente!... o mejor dos. He hecho una lista de 20 coches de los que me gustaría que las marcas respectivas hiciesen un “remake”. Pero espero hacer una segunda lista con vuestras propuestas… ¡Este va a ser un podcast divertido! Un remake que, para que valga la pena, tiene que cumplir unas condiciones: Primera: Mantener el espíritu del modelo original. Segunda: Ofrecer un nuevo modelo dirigido a un tipo de cliente similar. Tercera: Respetar las líneas estéticas maestras del original. Cuarta: Que exista un hilo conductor también en el aspecto técnico. Quinto: Y a lo mejor, la más importante, ¡ser valientes! Vamos con mi lista de candidatos. 1. Aston Martin DB5 (1963). Para mí no hay un Aston Martin más bonito que este. 2. Cadillac Eldorado (1959). ¡Hay que ser valientes! 3. Citroën DS (1955). Para mi uno de los coches que más se prestan y se merecen algo así. 4. Citroën C15 (1984). Probablemente la furgoneta de las llamadas “derivadas” con más mística… 5. Citroën 2 CV (1948). No hay un remake que respete nuestras 5 condiciones. 6. DMC DeLorean (1981). ¡Pocos coches se merecen más una segunda oportunidad que este! 7. De Tomaso Pantera (1971). La verdad es que pocos coches han envejecido mejor que este. 8. Fiat Multipla (1998). Para mí este modelo fue más incomprendido que feo. 9. Fiat-Seat 127 (1971). Este modelo, nacido como Fiat en 1971, merece un remake. 10. Honda S2000 (1999). Este modelo, que cumple 26 años, requeriría de muy poco para volver a estar en activo. 11. Jaguar E (1961). Esta idea me vuelve loco. 12. Lamborghini Miura (1966). ¿Quién tiene lo que hay que tener para pretender mejorar la obra, genial, del genial Marcello Gandini? 12+1. Lancia 037 (1982). Hablamos del último coche capaz de ganar un Mundial de Rallyes con tracción a un solo eje. 14. Lancia Stratos (1973). Una mezcla de las dificultades del Miura y del 037. 15. Lotus Esprit (1976). Un coche a menudo olvidado a pesar de ser “coche Bond” . 16. Mach 5 de Meteoro (1967). He incluido este coche de ficción, aunque lo hubo “funcionales”. 17. Mazda Mx3 (1991). En este caso no se trata solo de carrocería, sino de hacer un moderno motor V6 de 1.8 litros. 18. Opel Kadett GSi (1984). Opel dejo escapar por el sumidero la imagen del Kadett GSi, en particular y del último Kadett en general. 19. Peugeot 205 (1983). Peugeot realmente nunca ha sido capaz de llenar el vacío que dejó su 205. Y puede que solo sea posible llenar el hueco del 205 con… otro 205. 20. Toyota 2000 GT (1967). Personalmente agradezco a Toyota que sea una de las pocas marcas que sigue apostando con los coupés. Conclusión. Comentábamos en un video sobre los “remake” que faltan ideas. Ideas y valentía. Pero ya que las marcas no saben hacer modelos con capacidad de seducción que recuperen, como ya ha hecho BMW con Mini, Fiat con su 500 y ahora Renault con su R5, las buenas ideas del pasado. Es una buena opción, ¿no os parece?

Dr. Martín SabadiniEste podcast trata un tema súper importante que nos impacta a todos, especialmente a quienes tienen una dificultad con su prepaga, se conocieron cambios en cómo se resuelven los problemas con las obras sociales y prepagas en la super de salud y una nueva herramienta llamada PROMESA.Sabemos que a veces lidiar con las empresas de salud puede ser un dolor de cabeza, ¿verdad? Trámites que no avanzan, respuestas que no llegan, o la incertidumbre de si te van a cubrir lo que necesitás. Para ponerle un freno a eso, la Superintendencia de Servicios de Salud, que es el organismo que las controla, sacó una resolución importante, la **Resolución 951/2025**.### Cambios en los Reclamos: Más Rapidez y Transparencia¿Qué busca esta resolución? Simplificar y hacer más rápido el proceso cuando vos, como afiliado, tenés un problema, hacés una denuncia o sentís que no te están cumpliendo. Antes, los trámites eran lentos y burocráticos, y muchas veces, te dejaban con un problema de salud sin resolver. Con esta nueva medida, se busca que todo sea más ágil, claro y que realmente se garantice tu derecho a la salud.* **Tiempos de Resolución Más Ágiles**: La resolución es muy clara: se busca la **celeridad, accesibilidad y eficiencia**. Esto significa que los tiempos de espera para que tus reclamos se resuelvan deberían reducirse significativamente. La meta es dejar atrás esos procesos que generaban "demoras significativas" y que vos obtengas una respuesta oportuna.* **Más Responsabilidad y Penalidades Claras**: Un punto crucial es que se establece la **inversión de la carga de la prueba en ciertos casos**. ¿Qué significa esto? Que la obra social o prepaga es la que deberá demostrar que te está brindando la cobertura o el servicio, no vos. Además, la Superintendencia va a aplicar **sanciones estandarizadas** a las entidades que no cumplan, y para que haya más transparencia, se creará un **ranking público**. Este ranking mostrará la conducta y reincidencia de cada empresa de salud, incentivándolas a mejorar su servicio y a respetar tus derechos.* **¿Dónde Reclamar?** Todas estas denuncias y reclamos se gestionan directamente ante la **Superintendencia de Servicios de Salud**. en la parte de usuarios y luego reclamos### PROMESA: Una Vía Rápida para Solucionar Conflictos¿Qué es PROMESA? Es una especie de "charla guiada" o instancia de mediación antes de llegar a un juicio. Si tenés un conflicto con tu obra social, seguro de salud o medicina prepaga, PROMESA te ofrece una alternativa para resolverlo de forma más rápida y económica, sin tener que ir directamente a los tribunales.Pensalo así: en lugar de un largo proceso judicial, podés sentarte con un mediador especializado en salud, que va a intentar encontrar una solución que los deje conformes a vos y a la empresa de salud. Es un procedimiento optativo, pero que busca que se llegue a un acuerdo más rápido,Incluso si ya tenías un juicio en curso, un juez podría sugerir que prueben con PROMESA para ver si llegan a un acuerdo. Y un dato importante: para que el mediador sea de confianza, tiene que ser alguien muy capacitado y ético.En resumen, estos cambios son una alternativa para resolver conflictos, siempre y cuando tengas el tiempo para esperar esa solución.Por un lado, la Resolución 951/2025 busca que las denuncias sean más efectivas y que las empresas de salud se responsabilicen con plazos más cortos y sanciones claras.Para más información, pueden visitar los enlaces oficiales sobre la Resolución 951/2025 del Boletín Oficial y la noticia sobre PROMESA en Argentina.gob.ar.CV autor: Abogado consultor en derecho y protección de la salud inclusiva. Titular de Amparando Salud

After Hamilton 1-4 Hearts in the Premier Sports Cup, Craig and Joel discuss the change of shape to a back three and the seven changed to the starting XI, before getting to the main event: Claudio Braga.#heartsfc #scottishfootball #spfl #premiersportscup How one new Hearts signing stole the show in 4-0 win over Accieshttps://www.heartsstandard.co.uk/news/25315820.one-new-hearts-signing-stole-show-4-0-win-accies/ Derek McInnes on Hearts shape change and Claudio Braga impacthttps://www.heartsstandard.co.uk/news/25315825.derek-mcinnes-hearts-shape-change-claudio-braga-impact/ ////////////////////////////////////////////////////Our sponsors, s1jobs, have thousands of job opportunities across Scotland!Based in Glasgow since 2001, s1jobs has been at the heart of Scottish recruitment for over 20 years. As Scotland’s go to job site, they continue to help jobseekers at every stage of their career journey. Looking for your first job?Ready for a career change?Want to take the next step in your industry? No matter where you are in your career, s1jobs has the right opportunity for you. With thousands of roles across a diverse range of sectors, your next job could be just a click away. Start your search today: www.s1jobs.com Make sure you’re ready to apply - upload your CV today! Not only can you apply quickly, but top employers can also headhunt you directly. Let your next opportunity come to you! Follow s1jobs for the latest job updates and career tips:Facebook: www.facebook.com/s1jobs/Instagram: www.instagram.com/s1jobs_scotland/LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/s1jobs-com/TikTok: www.tiktok.com/@s1jobs.comSupport the show: https://www.heartsstandard.co.uk/subscribe

Dans ce nouvel épisode, j'ai le plaisir de recevoir Camille, plus connue sous le nom de @elle.investit sur les réseaux, pour un échange riche et sans filtre ! On démarre fort avec son anecdote de "job ingrat" au sein d'un Big Four : comment un CV légèrement "optimisé" l'a menée à des appels mémorables de garagistes espagnols. Une leçon de "poker face" à retenir ! 

CV göndərərkən nələri nəzərə almalıyıq? İş mühitində davranış qaydaları necə olmalıdır? Korporativ yazışmalarda hansı əməllərə riyayət etmək lazımdır? Azərbaycanda etiket qaydaları necə formalaşıb? Qonağımız psixoloq, etiket mütəxəssisi Xanım Kamran oldu.

Send us a textIn this bonus episode of Work It Like a Mum, I'm joined by brilliant career coach Kim Holland to help you get clear on your next steps, whether you're job hunting, thinking about a pivot, or simply feeling stuck.Summer break is around the corner  and while the pace of life slows down for many, it can be the perfect time to pause and check in with where you are in your career.This is the first session of our Momentum Masterclass Series, a six-week programme designed to help you keep career growth and job search momentum going throughout the slower-paced summer months.

Pixel Perfect Videojuegos, tu programa de radio de ninguna radio, presenta el episodio 111 (14/07/2025). ¡Encuéntranos en YouTube (@elpixelpodcast), TikTok y Patreon (audio 320kbps antes que nadie)! Gracias a nuestra pedazo de comunidad. ¡Suscríbete y activa la campanita para no perderte nada!Lo Más Fresco: Terremoto en Xbox y Despidos MasivosMicrosoft ha sacudido la industria con el despido de 9000 personas, afectando gravemente a estudios como The Initiative y Rare. Juegos esperados como Perfect Dark y Everwild han sido cancelados, y equipos clave de Forza Motorsport y Halo han sufrido recortes. Phil Spencer justifica los despidos por "eficiencia" y "crecimiento", a pesar de que Xbox vive su "momento más rentable". ¿Es la IA la verdadera razón? La polémica crece con la recomendación de usar ChatGPT para los CV de los despedidos. ¡Un golpe duro para la industria y los jugadores!Made in Japan: Resident Evil Requiem, Miedo AdictivoCapcom desvela más detalles de Resident Evil Requiem, la novena entrega que llega el 27 de febrero de 2026. Con un enfoque en el "miedo adictivo", la protagonista será Grace Ashcroft, una miedosa agente del FBI. ¿Verás a Leon? Se confirma la opción de jugar en primera o tercera persona. La historia te sitúa 30 años después de RE2 en una Raccoon City devastada. ¡Prepárate para el Resident Evil más terrorífico!Noticias: Ghost of Yotei, Stop Killing Games y Subnautica 2Ghost of Yotei, la secuela espiritual de Ghost of Tsushima, deslumbra con un gameplay de 20 minutos. Con gráficos espectaculares y un mundo abierto más libre, llega el 2 de octubre. ¡Atención a los nuevos modos "Miike" y "Watanabe"!El movimiento Stop Killing Games ha superado el millón de firmas contra la eliminación de juegos online, como el caso de The Crew de Ubisoft. ¿Es un ataque a tus derechos como consumidor? Las empresas se oponen, pero la iniciativa busca soluciones como servidores comunitarios. ¡Tu firma en stopkillinggames.com puede cambiar el futuro de los videojuegos preservación!También, el retraso de Subnautica 2 a 2026 genera polémica: ¿capitalismo vs. arte? Exdirectivos denuncian que Krafton busca evitar un bonus de 250 millones de dólares.Titulares y Quemando ControlesEn titulares: Atomic Heart 2 promete una "evolución radical". Se filtran los precios de las ROG Xbox Ally (599€) y Ally X (899€). Elgato mejora la compatibilidad de sus webcams con Nintendo Switch 2. ¡Cristiano Ronaldo llega a Fatal Fury City of the Wolves! Anunciado Resident Evil: Survival Unit para móviles. Un bar en China recrea el Saloon de Red Dead Redemption. Monument Valley Trilogy llega en físico a España. PEAK es el bombazo indie del verano.En Quemando Controles: Dani visita el Museo Arcade Vintage en Ibi, Alicante para la presentación del libro Replay del mítico Jordan Mechner, y te cuenta su experiencia con recreativas clásicas y modernas. Mientras que Nacho comenta que ha terminado The Last of Us II y ha empezado a jugar Horizon Forbidden West. Música: Midnight Club Los Angeles - The Eagles Of Death Metal - Wannabe in L.A.

Cuando el calor aprieta nuestros coches, especialmente nuestros motores, sufren. Unos piensan que un motor térmico, que trabaja normalmente a 90 grados, con más de 30 grados sufre mucho. Otros, que los motores eléctricos, con una temperatura de trabajo inferior 30 grados y sus baterías, lo llevan aún peor. Y por último, hay quienes opinan que los híbridos, que usan ambos tipos de propulsión a la vez, son los que peor lo llevan… te vamos a sacar de dudas. Siempre se dice que la temperatura optima de trabajo de un motor de combustión se sitúa en torno a los 90 grados… pero en nuestros motores térmicos el interior en la cámara de combustión, en momentos puntuales, se acerca a los 2.000 grados. Un coche normal, con todo en perfecto estado, puede funcionar sin problemas con temperaturas de 40 grados o superiores… si está en movimiento. Cuando está parado, caso de una gran ciudad, a veces los electroventiladores, que se ponen en marcha para forzar el paso de aire por el radiador, pueden no ser suficientes. Hay que tener especial cuidado con coches veteranos o directamente clásicos. No solo porque su sistema de refrigeración puede no estar en plena forma, sino porque incluso estándolo, puede no ser tan eficaz. Por ejemplo, coches con refrigeración por aire, como pueda ser un 2 CV, lleva peor el calor extremo… aunque se defienden mejor de lo que piensas. De hecho, el 2CV triunfó en África. Cuando un motor térmico sube de temperatura, la culata, casi siempre de aluminio y más “frágil” que el bloque motor, se deforma, la junta de culta se “quema” y parte de la presión del motor se pasa al circuito de refrigeración. No es el único problema. Cuando hace calor el aire se dilata y a igualdad de volumen, contiene menos oxígeno. Con lo cual, el rendimiento baja. Es lo mismo que hacen los intercooler, pero al revés: Los intercoolers enfrían el aire, para que entre más oxígeno y con temperaturas altas, a igualdad de volumen, es decir, de cilindrada, hay menos oxigeno… y el motor rinde menos. Los motores eléctricos sufren poco con el calor. Trabajan entre unos 20 y 30 grados, y aunque en el ambiente tengamos 40 o 50ª este tipo de motor mantiene su eficiencia. Pero los componentes electrónicos y sobre todo la batería sí son muy sensibles a las altas temperaturas. Diversas fuentes, entre ellas la propia Renault, te avisan de que con temperaturas por encima de los 30 grados la autonomía se reduce hasta un 30 por ciento. Si la temperatura es mayor o además usas el A/A puede recortarse hasta un 50 por ciento. En todo caso las altas temperaturas no afectan a la vida y durabilidad de las baterías, pues, el calor extremo envejece aceleradamente las baterías y acortan su vida útil. Un consejo: Con mucho calor no trates de cargar las baterías al 100x100, lo cual también las sobrecaliente, confórmate con el 70 u 80 por ciento y tu batería lo agradecerá. Como en los térmicos, el calor también puede afectar conectores, aislamientos y componentes electrónicos, ciertos aislantes, placas de circuitos y todas esas cosas que llevan estos coches. Siempre decimos que los híbridos reúnen lo mejor de dos mundos, pero hoy decimos que reúne lo peor de dos mundos, porque les afectan los problemas de unos y de otros… Esa es la mala noticia, la buena es que les afecta menos. Porque en un híbrido, sea “Mild Hybrid”, convencional o enchufable, el sistema eléctrico es una “ayuda” y resulta menor crítico. Además, juegan con otra ventaja: Los híbridos, de media, son coches jóvenes no comparados con los eléctricos, que por ahí andan, pero sí con los térmicos. Y en estos casos la “modernidad” es una ventaja. Algunos consejos. Antes de la conclusión os voy a dar algunos consejos, unos comunes y otros específicos. - Siempre que puedas, huye de viajar a las horas de más calor. Y si no te molesta, plantéate viajar de noche, más fresco y con menor tráfico. - Aparca a la sombra. No siempre es posible. Y si es al col pon el parasol y bajo un centímetro las ventanillas. - Revisa el coche antes de salir. El térmico, clave los niveles y la batería… la de 12 voltios; eléctricos e híbridos. que funcionan el sistema de ventilación de las baterías. - Software actualizado. Especialmente en híbridos y eléctricos. - No abuses del aire acondicionado, en todos por tu salud, en los eléctricos por tu salud y tu autonomía. - No cargues a tope ni al sol. Poner tu coche a cargar al 100x100 a pleno sol... no es buena idea. - Pre-acondicionamiento. Sobre todo, en eléctricos, si puede pon a enfriar el coche y la batería cuando aún este enchufado.

#499 Climb Part 2 - A Game of Gear Inches Welcome to Episode #499 of the 303 Endurance Podcast. We're your hosts Coaches Rich Soares and April Spilde. Thanks for joining us for another week of news, coaching tips and discussion. July is bike climbing month here in the front range. Pikes Peak climb last weekend and this weekend we have two iconic events with serious climbs - Saturday is the Triple Bypass Ride with 10,800 and 118 miles and Sunday is the Boulder Peak triathlon with 3 miles of 10%.    Show Sponsor: UCAN UCAN created LIVSTEADY as an alternative to sugar based nutrition products. LIVSTEADY was purposefully designed to work with your body, delivering long-lasting energy you can feel. Whether UCAN Energy Powders, Bars or Gels, LIVSTEADY's unique time-release profile allows your body to access energy consistently throughout the day, unlocking your natural ability to finish stronger and recover more quickly!   In Today's Show Announcements and News  Ask A Coach: How to improve my climbing? Get Gritty Tip: The Four Agreements TriDot Workout of the Week: FTP Fun Segment: Triple Bypass Trivia!   Announcements and News: Our Announcements are supported by VESPA Power today. Vespa Power Endurance helps you tap into steady, clean energy—so you stay strong, focused, and in the zone longer. Vespa is not fuel, but a metabolic catalyst that shifts your body to use more fat and less glycogen as your fuel source. Vespa comes in CV-25, Junior and Concentrate. Less sugar. Higher performance. Faster recovery.  Home of Vespa Power Products | Optimizing Your Fat Metabolism Use discount code - 303endurance20   TriDot Pool School July 26-27. https://www.tridotpoolschool.com/component/eventbooking/pool-school/tridot-pool-school-20250726-844-986-401-167-857/94?Itemid=762   Ask A Coach Sponsor: G2G Endurance Your watch gives you data. But does your training plan know what to do with it? Ours does. Grit2Greatness Endurance Coaching has partnered with TriDot to deliver custom workouts powered by cutting-edge analytics. You bring the sweat, we'll bring the smarts. Start with a free 2-week trial, then keep building for only $14.99/month. We have our sign-up links waiting for you in the show notes—click one and let's geek out on your progress. Website - Grit2Greatness Endurance Coaching Facebook page @grit2greatnessendurance   Coach April Spilde April.spilde@tridot.com TriDot Signup - https://app.tridot.com/onboard/sign-up/aprilspilde RunDot Signup - https://app.rundot.com/onboard/sign-up/aprilspilde    Coach Rich Soares Rich.soares@tridot.com Rich Soares Coaching TriDot Signup - https://app.tridot.com/onboard/sign-up/richsoares RunDot Signup - https://app.rundot.com/onboard/sign-up/richsoares   Ask A Coach: What gearing do I need for X Grade Climb?  When the road tilts upward, smart gearing can make or break your climb. Whether you're grinding up a 5% incline or crawling up a brutal 15%, choosing the right gear ratio is key to maintaining an efficient cadence—ideally around 80 RPM. Here's a breakdown of ideal gear inches and recommended chainring/cassette combinations for gradients from 5% to 15%. Gear Inches Table | BikeCalc   Takeaway Tips: Lower gear inches help maintain cadence on steeper grades. A compact crankset (e.g., 34/50T) paired with a wide-range cassette (up to 31T or 32T) gives you the flexibility to tackle tough climbs. For gradients above 12%, consider a granny gear setup or even a 1x drivetrain with a wide-range cassette.   Get Gritty Tip: The Four Agreements Get Gritty Tip: Master Your Mindset with The Four Agreements This week, let's talk about The Four Agreements—a powerful framework for living with intention, resilience, and clarity. These four simple principles can help us break free from limiting beliefs and live with more purpose in both triathlon and life. 1. Be Impeccable with Your Word. Your words create your reality. In triathlon, this means speaking positively to yourself and others. When you talk about your abilities, your goals, and your progress, choose words that empower and uplift. If you say, “I can do this,” you're setting yourself up for success. But if you tell yourself “I'll never get faster” or “This is too hard,” you're building mental barriers. Choose words that propel you forward. 2. Don't Take Anything Personally. People's opinions and reactions are a reflection of them, not you. In triathlon, you'll face challenges, setbacks, and criticism, whether it's a tough race, a hard workout, or someone questioning your pace. But remember: It's not about you. Their words and actions are influenced by their own journey. Instead of letting it derail you, stay focused on your own path, goals, and growth. 3. Don't Make Assumptions. We often create stories in our minds about what others think of us or what we think is happening in a race or workout. But assumptions only hold us back. Instead, ask questions, seek clarity, and stay open-minded. Don't assume you know the outcome of a race or a workout before you even begin. Focus on the process, not the assumptions. 4. Always Do Your Best. This one's simple but powerful: give everything you have in each moment. Whether it's an interval, a long ride, or an intense swim, always give your best effort. And remember, your best changes from day to day. Some days you'll have more energy, and some days will feel like a struggle. But as long as you show up and give your best, you are making progress.     Action Item: Apply The Four Agreements to your training this week. Focus on the words you use, let go of external opinions, stay clear of assumptions, and always do your best. This simple mindset shift will help you approach both your triathlon journey and life with more clarity, resilience, and grit.   TriDot Workout of the Week: Functional Threshold Power   Today's workout is a Functional Threshold Test (20-minute) Session Note Conducting time trial (TT): Goal is to hold pace you can sustain for the entire TT without blowing up early or having enough left to kick at the end.   10 min @ Z2 with 3 x 30 sec (30 sec) Spinups and 3 x 1 min (1 min) @ Z4   20 min - all out maximal effort   Be sure to enter/confirm your assessment results to update your training intensities and race projections.     Fun Segment: Triple Bypass Trivia! It's time to shift gears and test your mountain mettle with the Triple Bypass Trivia Showdown! Whether you've tackled this legendary Colorado ride or it's still on your bucket list, these questions will challenge your knowledge of one of the most iconic endurance events in the U.S. Grab your water bottle, clip in, and let's find out if you're a seasoned alpine expert—or just coasting! When did the first Triple Bypass ride take place? A) 1978 B) 1988 C) 1998 Answer: B) 1988 — One July day in 1988, a group of avid cyclists decided that it would be fun and challenging to ride from Evergreen to the Vail Valley, Colorado. And so it was. Thirty-seven years later and thousands of more friends beside them, the Triple Bypass is an epic bucket-list ride.   True or False: The full Triple Bypass covers approximately 118 miles with over 10,000 feet of climbing. Answer: True — The classic route takes cyclists over three mountain passes and gains roughly 10,800–10,000 feet in elevation. But what about the Double Bypass?  Answer: A good entry ride, The Double Bypass covers 801 miles and gains 6,500 feet of elevation over two mountain passes: Loveland and Vail. The Double Bypass start location for 2025 is in Empire.  Which three mountain passes are included in the full Triple Bypass route? A) Juniper, Loveland, Vail B) Independence, Kenosha, Red Mountain C) Monarch, Cottonwood, Hoosier Answer: A) Juniper, Loveland, Vail — These iconic Colorado climbs define the course. True or False: The event is a competitive race with official timing and podiums. Answer: False — The Triple Bypass is a non-competitive, fully supported challenge ride focused on endurance, experience, and personal accomplishment.    Roughly how much has the event donated to charity since its inception? A) $500,000 B) $3.5 million C) $10 million Answer: B) $3.5 million — Over the decades, the ride (organized by Team Evergreen Cycling) has contributed millions to nonprofits.   Boulder Peak Close The first Boulder Peak Triathlon was held in 1992. It quickly became one of Colorado's most iconic triathlons, known for its challenging course, especially the infamous Olde Stage Road climb. Over the years, it has attracted both elite and amateur athletes and has been a staple of the summer triathlon season in Boulder. Would you like a timeline of its notable milestones or how the course has evolved over the years?   Here's a **timeline of notable milestones** in the history of the **Boulder Peak Triathlon**, one of Colorado's most iconic endurance events: Boulder Peak Triathlon Timeline   - **1992****Inaugural Race**   - Founded by Paul Karlsson and David Jensen.   - Featured the now-famous **Olde Stage Road** climb.   - Attracted top pros like Dave Scott and Mark Allen in its first year.   - 400 participants and a $500 prize purse.   - **1996****Pro Women's Head Start Introduced**   - Suggested by Paula Newby-Fraser to increase spectator excitement.   - Created a dramatic “chase” dynamic between men and women.   - **Early 2000s****Ironman World Championship Qualifier**   - Boulder Peak briefly served as a qualifier for Kona, elevating its prestige.   - **2004****Ownership Change**   - Sold to **5430 Sports**, run by Barry and Jodee Siff.   - Continued to grow in popularity and professionalism.   - **2009****Acquired by Life Time Fitness**   - Became part of the Life Time Triathlon Series.   - Integrated into a national network of high-profile triathlons.   - **2014****Returned to Local Ownership**   - Taken over by **Without Limits Productions**, led by Lance Panigutti.   - Renewed focus on community, athlete experience, and local flavor.   - **2017** **National Recognition**   - Named one of the **Top 15 Most Amazing Triathlons in the U.S.** by *The Culture Trip* [1](https://www.withoutlimits.co/boulder-peak-triathlon-duathlon).   - **2020****COVID-19 Cancellation**   - Like many races, the event was paused due to the pandemic.   - **2021–Present****Resurgence**   - Strong return with growing participation.   - Continues to be the **crown jewel of the Colorado Triathlon Series**.   Thanks again for listening this week. Please be sure to follow us @303Triathlon and @grit2greatnessendurance and of course go to iTunes and give us a rating and a comment. We'd really appreciate it! Stay tuned, train informed and enjoy the endurance journey!

Benji Portwin has a CV stuffed with recognisable names, from Spotify to Monzo bank, alongside product leadership roles at accuRx and New Look. These days, he's running an agency dedicated to helping organisations learn how to design and build awesome products. Benji's hot take? Having been diagnosed with ADHD relatively recently, he's come to regard ADHD as somewhat of a superpower for product managers, and something that enables him and others to be more effective at their jobs rather than being something to be suffered from. Find Benji on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/benjiportwin. Or check out People Building Products: https://pbp.team/

   Dr. Dawn Mussallem, a board-certified lifestyle medicine physician, was diagnosed with Stage 4 cancer at age 26, followed by a heart transplant.  She walks the walk when it comes to healthy lifestyle choices.  At the Mayo Clinic Breast Center, Dr. Mussallem is the go-to expert for how healthy choices not just prolong life, but also make life better.. not just for women living with a cancer diagnosis, but all women.   Dr. Mussalem's personal story- and how lifestyle medicine saved her life What Lifestyle Medicine is The six pillars of lifestyle medicine that impact longevity and quality of life: Stress Management Physical Activity-and is there such a thing as overdoing it? Avoidance of Risky Substances Nutrition and the importance of maintaining a specific BMI vs body composition Restorative Sleep Positive Social Connections  American College of Lifestyle Medicine- https://lifestylemedicine.org/ The Ethel Circle Facebook Group https://www.facebook.com/groups/theethelcircle/ Dr. Streicher is on SUBSTACK      DrStreicher.Substack.com Articles Monthly newsletter All COME AGAIN podcast episodes Monthly News Flash Reports on recent research  Monthly Zoom Ask Me Anything Webinar    Information on Dr. Streicher's COME AGAIN Podcast- Sexuality and Orgasm     Lauren Streicher MD, is a clinical professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine, the founding medical director of the Northwestern Medicine Center for Sexual Medicine and Menopause, and a Senior Research Fellow of The Kinsey Institute, Indiana University. She is a certified menopause practitioner of The Menopause Society. She is the Medical Director of Community Education and Outreach for Midi Health.   Dr. Streicher is the medical correspondent for Chicago's top-rated news program, the WGN Morning News, and has been seen on The Today Show, Good Morning America, The Oprah Winfrey Show, CNN, NPR, Dr. Radio, Nightline, Fox and Friends, The Steve Harvey Show, CBS This Morning, ABC News Now, NBCNightlyNews,20/20, and World News Tonight. She is an expert source for many magazines and serves on the medical advisory board of The Kinsey Institute, Self Magazine, and Prevention Magazine. She writes a regular column for The Ethel by AARP and Prevention Magazine.    LINKS Subscribe To Dr. Streicher's Substack Information About the COME AGAIN Podcast Dr. Streicher's CV and additional bio information To Find a Menopause Clinician and Other Resources  Glossary Of Medical Terminology Books by Lauren Streicher, MD    Slip Sliding Away: Turning Back the Clock on Your Vagina-A gynecologist's guide to eliminating post-menopause dryness and pain Hot Flash Hell: A Gynecologist's Guide to Turning Down the Heat Sex Rx- Hormones, Health, and Your Best Sex Ever The Essential Guide to Hysterectomy                                        Dr. Streicher's Inside Information podcast is for education and information and is not intended to replace medical advice from your personal healthcare clinician. Dr. Streicher disclaims liability for any medical outcomes that may occur because of applying methods suggested or discussed in this podcast.                                     

¡Como me gusta este podcast! ¡Como me gustan estos coches! Excesivos, brutales… sencillamente son, para mí, los coches de competición en circuito más espectaculares de la historia. Fruto de un reglamento poco restrictivo… no como los de ahora… Si conoces los “Silueta” te va a interesar mucho este video, pero si nos los conoces… ¡te va a interesar más! Te lo prometo. Lo primero que hay que hacer, porque quizás alguno no lo sepa, es responder a esta pregunta: ¿Qué es un coche “silueta”? Lo primero que hay que decir es que los “silueta” son coches del entonces llamado Grupo 5, pero no todos los grupo 5 son coches de la categoría “silueta”. Los Grupo 5 nacieron en 1966 e inicialmente eran coches nacidos para la competición. Te pongo algunos ejemplos: Alfa Romeo TT33TT/12, Alpine Renault A442, Ford GT40, Ferrari 512 M/S, Matra Simca MS670 o Porsche 917 por citar unos ejemplos… coches preciosos y que, seguro, merecen otro video para ellos. Pero en 1976 y hasta 1982, época de mi adolescencia y juventud, nace la cuarta y última generación del Grupo 5 y estos son los “silueta”. La FIA creó esta categoría para coches derivados de la calle, pero ampliamente, yo diría que muy ampliamente, modificados. La federación exigía que el capó, parabrisas, puertas completas y techo fueran los mismos que en el coche original. Pero lo demás, incluidos los pasos de rueda y la parte posterior era libre. El motor debía contar con el bloque motor original y en la posición original. Es decir, no podías hacer un 911 con motor delantero, pero sí ponerlo más bajo o más adelantado y prepararlo a fondo, incluso aumentando la cilindrada o añadiendo “turbos” a placer siempre que el bloque fuese original. Lo mismo sucedía con la suspensión, debía ser de igual sistema, pero de diseño y componentes libres. Había exigencias en cuanto a normas de seguridad, pesos mínimos y dimensiones, pero en general las normas eran muy “laxas” y ello dio lugar a verdaderos monstruos de la competición… ¿Qué no te lo crees? Vamos a ver unos cuantos… 1. BMW 3.0 CSL (1972). Uno de los primeros trabajos del departamento M fue la fabricación de un coupé de la serie E9 para ser preparado para competición. 2. Lancia Stratos Turbo (1976). Terminada su etapa en los Rallyes el Stratos tuvo una segunda oportunidad en los circuitos de la mano del reglamento de los silueta… pero no tan exitosa. 3. Chevrolet Corvette Greenwood (1976). He elegido de este modelo la versión denominada “Spirit of Le Mans 1976”. Este coche, como un Ferrari que veremos más adelante, participaba dentro de una categoría de la norteamericana IMSA. 4. Porsche 911-935 (1976). Uno de los “silueta” por excelencia. Y en el caso concreto del 911-935 de nominado “Moby Dick” probablemente el más brutal de todos y al que dedicamos un video completo titulado “Moby Dick: el Porsche Turbo más brutal” que te animo a que lo veas. 5. BMW 320i Turbo (1977). El CSL era demasiado grande y demasiado antiguo así que BMW pensó en un más manejable serie 3, pero eso sí, con turbo y una potencia que según algunas fuentes llegaron a los 900 CV… 6. Ferrari 512 BB LM (1977). Este coche corrió Le Mans encuadrado en la categoría norteamericana IMSA… que fue prohibida en esta prueba en 1983. 7. Toyota Celica LB Turbo (1977). El apoyo de Toyota Alemania al preparador, muy prestigioso, Schnitzer, hizo posible que naciese este modelo que declaraba 560 CV para un peso claramente por debajo de los 900 kg. 8. Ford Capri Turbo Zakspeed (1978). Ford quiso competir en la categoría “hasta 2 litros” del Grupo 5 “siluetas” y para ello encargó al prestigiosos preparados Zakspeed un motor de 1.4 litros para montar en un espectacular y aerodinámico Ford Capri. 9. Lancia Beta Montecarlo Turbo (1979). Lancia tenía una base excelente, como era el coupé Montecarlo con dos plazas y motor central, para crear un silueta destinada al Grupo 5 de la FIA. 10. Mazda RX-7 252i (1979). El grupo 5 “Silueta” tuvo continuidad en Japón una vez acabada su vida en Europa, en el Campeonado del Mundo FIA. Y hubo muchos coches japoneses preparados bajo este reglamento. Conclusión. Siempre digo lo mismo: Los reglamentos actuales son tan estrictos y tan detallados que dejan poco a la imaginación… antes no era así y eso producía coches como estos, como los Grupo B, como los prototipos y Formula 1 de los años 70 y 80.

Life After Prison will be back with you soon but while we are finalising series 9 in the studio, we thought that we'd share some episodes of another podcast here. It's called Money Mondays and is made by our colleagues at the Prison Radio Association.In this episode Zak & Emma are looking at CVs - What they are, why they are useful and how to create an effective one. It can be daunting putting a CV together, particularly if you might have large gaps due to stints in prison. Zak is here to tell you how he navigated this and Emma has some general tips on how to make your CV stand out and what to include on there.USEFUL LINKS:Clean SlateQuids In MagazineUnlock - CV GapsUnlock - DisclosureQuids in - Job Readiness QuizCV ExampleCV Writing TipsIf you would like to get in touch with Money Mondays and ask us a question, suggest a topic or start a conversation, you can E-mail us at...

Have you ever dreamed of working in a more holistic, patient-centered way—without having to start your own practice from scratch? If so, you're going to love today's episode. We're diving into the growing field of integrative and functional medicine—especially for those who want the stability of an employed role while practicing in a more meaningful, whole-person way. In this episode, I'm joined by Lisa McDonald, founder of Integrative Connections, a leading job board and recruiting service for integrative and functional medicine. Lisa is not a physician, but her own healing journey through functional medicine inspired her to help others find their way into this meaningful field. She shares what these roles really look like and how to find your path into one. Whether you're just starting to explore this field or wondering what kind of training might be helpful, Lisa offers practical tips, personal stories, and lots of encouragement for taking that first step—or simply testing the waters. You can find the show notes for this episode and more information by clicking here: www.doctorscrossing.com/episode224 In this episode we're talking about: What is integrative and functional medicine? Why are more physicians seeking to incorporate these modalities into how they care for patients? What kinds of patients and conditions do these practices typically see? The training and certifications that can increase your knowledge and help you stand out Typical visit length, scheduling, and expectations in integrative jobs How to explore these roles and ask the right questions in interviews Advice for physicians curious about pivoting into integrative or functional care Links for this episode: https://integratedconnects.com https://integratedconnects.com/professional-development/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/lisapmcdonald/ Andrew Weil Center For Integrative Medicine - 2-year fellowship with several onsite weeks in AZ https://awcim.arizona.edu/education/fellowship Institute for Functional Medicine - can be fully remote, but also in-person conferences. Free 1.5 hour CME course https://ifm.org Episode #23: Curious About Integrative and Functional Medicine? Carpe Diem Resume Kit - Converting your CV to a resume helps recruiters better understand why you are a great match for a specific job. My resume kit will guide you through creating a polished resume for your desired job. Templates are included as well as a bonus on writing your cover letter. Reach out to us at team@doctorscrossing.com for more information!

Last month, the U.S. Supreme Court concluded its latest Term. And over the past few weeks, the Trump administration has continued to duke it out with its adversaries in the federal courts.To tackle these topics, as well as their intersection—in terms of how well the courts, including but not limited to the Supreme Court, are handling Trump-related cases—I interviewed Professor Pamela Karlan, a longtime faculty member at Stanford Law School. She's perfectly situated to address these subjects, for at least three reasons.First, Professor Karlan is a leading scholar of constitutional law. Second, she's a former SCOTUS clerk and seasoned advocate at One First Street, with ten arguments to her name. Third, she has high-level experience at the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), having served (twice) as a deputy assistant attorney general in the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ.I've had some wonderful guests to discuss the role of the courts today, including Judges Vince Chhabria (N.D. Cal.) and Ana Reyes (D.D.C.)—but as sitting judges, they couldn't discuss certain subjects, and they had to be somewhat circumspect. Professor Karlan, in contrast, isn't afraid to “go there”—and whether or not you agree with her opinions, I think you'll share my appreciation for her insight and candor.Show Notes:* Pamela S. Karlan bio, Stanford Law School* Pamela S. Karlan bio, Wikipedia* The McCorkle Lecture (Professor Pamela Karlan), UVA Law SchoolPrefer reading to listening? For paid subscribers, a transcript of the entire episode appears below.Sponsored by:NexFirm helps Biglaw attorneys become founding partners. To learn more about how NexFirm can help you launch your firm, call 212-292-1000 or email careerdevelopment at nexfirm dot com.Three quick notes about this transcript. First, it has been cleaned up from the audio in ways that don't alter substance—e.g., by deleting verbal filler or adding a word here or there to clarify meaning. Second, my interviewee has not reviewed this transcript, and any transcription errors are mine. Third, because of length constraints, this newsletter may be truncated in email; to view the entire post, simply click on “View entire message” in your email app.David Lat: Welcome to the Original Jurisdiction podcast. I'm your host, David Lat, author of a Substack newsletter about law and the legal profession also named Original Jurisdiction, which you can read and subscribe to at davidlat dot Substack dot com. You're listening to the seventy-seventh episode of this podcast, recorded on Friday, June 27.Thanks to this podcast's sponsor, NexFirm. NexFirm helps Biglaw attorneys become founding partners. To learn more about how NexFirm can help you launch your firm, call 212-292-1000 or email careerdevelopment at nexfirm dot com. Want to know who the guest will be for the next Original Jurisdiction podcast? Follow NexFirm on LinkedIn for a preview.With the 2024-2025 Supreme Court Term behind us, now is a good time to talk about both constitutional law and the proper role of the judiciary in American society. I expect they will remain significant as subjects because the tug of war between the Trump administration and the federal judiciary continues—and shows no signs of abating.To tackle these topics, I welcomed to the podcast Professor Pamela Karlan, the Montgomery Professor of Public Interest Law and Co-Director of the Supreme Court Litigation Clinic at Stanford Law School. Pam is not only a leading legal scholar, but she also has significant experience in practice. She's argued 10 cases before the Supreme Court, which puts her in a very small club, and she has worked in government at high levels, serving as a deputy assistant attorney general in the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice during the Obama administration. Without further ado, here's my conversation with Professor Pam Karlan.Professor Karlan, thank you so much for joining me.Pamela Karlan: Thanks for having me.DL: So let's start at the beginning. Tell us about your background and upbringing. I believe we share something in common—you were born in New York City?PK: I was born in New York City. My family had lived in New York since they arrived in the country about a century before.DL: What borough?PK: Originally Manhattan, then Brooklyn, then back to Manhattan. As my mother said, when I moved to Brooklyn when I was clerking, “Brooklyn to Brooklyn, in three generations.”DL: Brooklyn is very, very hip right now.PK: It wasn't hip when we got there.DL: And did you grow up in Manhattan or Brooklyn?PK: When I was little, we lived in Manhattan. Then right before I started elementary school, right after my brother was born, our apartment wasn't big enough anymore. So we moved to Stamford, Connecticut, and I grew up in Connecticut.DL: What led you to go to law school? I see you stayed in the state; you went to Yale. What did you have in mind for your post-law-school career?PK: I went to law school because during the summer between 10th and 11th grade, I read Richard Kluger's book, Simple Justice, which is the story of the litigation that leads up to Brown v. Board of Education. And I decided I wanted to go to the NAACP Legal Defense Fund and be a school desegregation lawyer, and that's what led me to go to law school.DL: You obtained a master's degree in history as well as a law degree. Did you also have teaching in mind as well?PK: No, I thought getting the master's degree was my last chance to do something I had loved doing as an undergrad. It didn't occur to me until I was late in my law-school days that I might at some point want to be a law professor. That's different than a lot of folks who go to law school now; they go to law school wanting to be law professors.During Admitted Students' Weekend, some students say to me, “I want to be a law professor—should I come here to law school?” I feel like saying to them, “You haven't done a day of law school yet. You have no idea whether you're good at law. You have no idea whether you'd enjoy doing legal teaching.”It just amazes me that people come to law school now planning to be a law professor, in a way that I don't think very many people did when I was going to law school. In my day, people discovered when they were in law school that they loved it, and they wanted to do more of what they loved doing; I don't think people came to law school for the most part planning to be law professors.DL: The track is so different now—and that's a whole other conversation—but people are getting master's and Ph.D. degrees, and people are doing fellowship after fellowship. It's not like, oh, you practice for three, five, or seven years, and then you become a professor. It seems to be almost like this other track nowadays.PK: When I went on the teaching market, I was distinctive in that I had not only my student law-journal note, but I actually had an article that Ricky Revesz and I had worked on that was coming out. And it was not normal for people to have that back then. Now people go onto the teaching market with six or seven publications—and no practice experience really to speak of, for a lot of them.DL: You mentioned talking to admitted students. You went to YLS, but you've now been teaching for a long time at Stanford Law School. They're very similar in a lot of ways. They're intellectual. They're intimate, especially compared to some of the other top law schools. What would you say if I'm an admitted student choosing between those two institutions? What would cause me to pick one versus the other—besides the superior weather of Palo Alto?PK: Well, some of it is geography; it's not just the weather. Some folks are very East-Coast-centered, and other folks are very West-Coast-centered. That makes a difference.It's a little hard to say what the differences are, because the last time I spent a long time at Yale Law School was in 2012 (I visited there a bunch of times over the years), but I think the faculty here at Stanford is less focused and concentrated on the students who want to be law professors than is the case at Yale. When I was at Yale, the idea was if you were smart, you went and became a law professor. It was almost like a kind of external manifestation of an inner state of grace; it was a sign that you were a smart person, if you wanted to be a law professor. And if you didn't, well, you could be a donor later on. Here at Stanford, the faculty as a whole is less concentrated on producing law professors. We produce a fair number of them, but it's not the be-all and end-all of the law school in some ways. Heather Gerken, who's the dean at Yale, has changed that somewhat, but not entirely. So that's one big difference.One of the most distinctive things about Stanford, because we're on the quarter system, is that our clinics are full-time clinics, taught by full-time faculty members at the law school. And that's distinctive. I think Yale calls more things clinics than we do, and a lot of them are part-time or taught by folks who aren't in the building all the time. So that's a big difference between the schools.They just have very different feels. I would encourage any student who gets into both of them to go and visit both of them, talk to the students, and see where you think you're going to be most comfortably stretched. Either school could be the right school for somebody.DL: I totally agree with you. Sometimes people think there's some kind of platonic answer to, “Where should I go to law school?” And it depends on so many individual circumstances.PK: There really isn't one answer. I think when I was deciding between law schools as a student, I got waitlisted at Stanford and I got into Yale. I had gone to Yale as an undergrad, so I wasn't going to go anywhere else if I got in there. I was from Connecticut and loved living in Connecticut, so that was an easy choice for me. But it's a hard choice for a lot of folks.And I do think that one of the worst things in the world is U.S. News and World Report, even though we're generally a beneficiary of it. It used to be that the R-squared between where somebody went to law school and what a ranking was was minimal. I knew lots of people who decided, in the old days, that they were going to go to Columbia rather than Yale or Harvard, rather than Stanford or Penn, rather than Chicago, because they liked the city better or there was somebody who did something they really wanted to do there.And then the R-squared, once U.S. News came out, of where people went and what the rankings were, became huge. And as you probably know, there were some scandals with law schools that would just waitlist people rather than admit them, to keep their yield up, because they thought the person would go to a higher-ranked law school. There were years and years where a huge part of the Stanford entering class had been waitlisted at Penn. And that's bad for people, because there are people who should go to Penn rather than come here. There are people who should go to NYU rather than going to Harvard. And a lot of those people don't do it because they're so fixated on U.S. News rankings.DL: I totally agree with you. But I suspect that a lot of people think that there are certain opportunities that are going to be open to them only if they go here or only if they go there.Speaking of which, after graduating from YLS, you clerked for Justice Blackmun on the Supreme Court, and statistically it's certainly true that certain schools seem to improve your odds of clerking for the Court. What was that experience like overall? People often describe it as a dream job. We're recording this on the last day of the Supreme Court Term; some hugely consequential historic cases are coming down. As a law clerk, you get a front row seat to all of that, to all of that history being made. Did you love that experience?PK: I loved the experience. I loved it in part because I worked for a wonderful justice who was just a lovely man, a real mensch. I had three great co-clerks. It was the first time, actually, that any justice had ever hired three women—and so that was distinctive for me, because I had been in classes in law school where there were fewer than three women. I was in one class in law school where I was the only woman. So that was neat.It was a great Term. It was the last year of the Burger Court, and we had just a heap of incredibly interesting cases. It's amazing how many cases I teach in law school that were decided that year—the summary-judgment trilogy, Thornburg v. Gingles, Bowers v. Hardwick. It was just a really great time to be there. And as a liberal, we won a lot of the cases. We didn't win them all, but we won a lot of them.It was incredibly intense. At that point, the Supreme Court still had this odd IT system that required eight hours of diagnostics every night. So the system was up from 8 a.m. to midnight—it stayed online longer if there was a death case—but otherwise it went down at midnight. In the Blackmun chambers, we showed up at 8 a.m. for breakfast with the Justice, and we left at midnight, five days a week. Then on the weekends, we were there from 9 to 9. And they were deciding 150 cases, not 60 cases, a year. So there was a lot more work to do, in that sense. But it was a great year. I've remained friends with my co-clerks, and I've remained friends with clerks from other chambers. It was a wonderful experience.DL: And you've actually written about it. I would refer people to some of the articles that they can look up, on your CV and elsewhere, where you've talked about, say, having breakfast with the Justice.PK: And we had a Passover Seder with the Justice as well, which was a lot of fun.DL: Oh wow, who hosted that? Did he?PK: Actually, the clerks hosted it. Originally he had said, “Oh, why don't we have it at the Court?” But then he came back to us and said, “Well, I think the Chief Justice”—Chief Justice Burger—“might not like that.” But he lent us tables and chairs, which were dropped off at one of the clerk's houses. And it was actually the day of the Gramm-Rudman argument, which was an argument about the budget. So we had to keep running back and forth from the Court to the house of Danny Richman, the clerk who hosted it, who was a Thurgood Marshall clerk. We had to keep running back and forth from the Court to Danny Richman's house, to baste the turkey and make stuff, back and forth. And then we had a real full Seder, and we invited all of the Jewish clerks at the Court and the Justice's messenger, who was Jewish, and the Justice and Mrs. Blackmun, and it was a lot of fun.DL: Wow, that's wonderful. So where did you go after your clerkship?PK: I went to the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, where I was an assistant counsel, and I worked on voting-rights and employment-discrimination cases.DL: And that was something that you had thought about for a long time—you mentioned you had read about its work in high school.PK: Yes, and it was a great place to work. We were working on great cases, and at that point we were really pushing the envelope on some of the stuff that we were doing—which was great and inspiring, and my colleagues were wonderful.And unlike a lot of Supreme Court practices now, where there's a kind of “King Bee” usually, and that person gets to argue everything, the Legal Defense Fund was very different. The first argument I did at the Court was in a case that I had worked on the amended complaint for, while at the Legal Defense Fund—and they let me essentially keep working on the case and argue it at the Supreme Court, even though by the time the case got to the Supreme Court, I was teaching at UVA. So they didn't have this policy of stripping away from younger lawyers the ability to argue their cases the whole way through the system.DL: So how many years out from law school were you by the time you had your first argument before the Court? I know that, today at least, there's this two-year bar on arguing before the Court after having clerked there.PK: Six or seven years out—because I think I argued in ‘91.DL: Now, you mentioned that by then you were teaching at UVA. You had a dream job working at the NAACP Legal Defense Fund. What led you to go to UVA?PK: There were two things, really, that did it. One was I had also discovered when I was in law school that I loved law school, and I was better at law school than I had been at anything I had done before law school. And the second was I really hated dealing with opposing counsel. I tell my students now, “You should take negotiation. If there's only one class you could take in law school, take negotiation.” Because it's a skill; it's not a habit of mind, but I felt like it was a habit of mind. And I found the discovery process and filing motions to compel and dealing with the other side's intransigence just really unpleasant.What I really loved was writing briefs. I loved writing briefs, and I could keep doing that for the Legal Defense Fund while at UVA, and I've done a bunch of that over the years for LDF and for other organizations. I could keep doing that and I could live in a small town, which I really wanted to do. I love New York, and now I could live in a city—I've spent a couple of years, off and on, living in cities since then, and I like it—but I didn't like it at that point. I really wanted to be out in the country somewhere. And so UVA was the perfect mix. I kept working on cases, writing amicus briefs for LDF and for other organizations. I could teach, which I loved. I could live in a college town, which I really enjoyed. So it was the best blend of things.DL: And I know, from your having actually delivered a lecture at UVA, that it really did seem to have a special place in your heart. UVA Law School—they really do have a wonderful environment there (as does Stanford), and Charlottesville is a very charming place.PK: Yes, especially when I was there. UVA has a real gift for developing its junior faculty. It was a place where the senior faculty were constantly reading our work, constantly talking to us. Everyone was in the building, which makes a huge difference.The second case I had go to the Supreme Court actually came out of a class where a student asked a question, and I ended up representing the student, and we took the case all the way to the Supreme Court. But I wasn't admitted in the Western District of Virginia, and that's where we had to file a case. And so I turned to my next-door neighbor, George Rutherglen, and said to George, “Would you be the lead counsel in this?” And he said, “Sure.” And we ended up representing a bunch of UVA students, challenging the way the Republican Party did its nomination process. And we ended up, by the student's third year in law school, at the Supreme Court.So UVA was a great place. I had amazing colleagues. The legendary Bill Stuntz was then there; Mike Klarman was there. Dan Ortiz, who's still there, was there. So was John Harrison. It was a fantastic group of people to have as your colleagues.DL: Was it difficult for you, then, to leave UVA and move to Stanford?PK: Oh yes. When I went in to tell Bob Scott, who was then the dean, that I was leaving, I just burst into tears. I think the reason I left UVA was I was at a point in my career where I'd done a bunch of visits at other schools, and I thought that I could either leave then or I would be making a decision to stay there for the rest of my career. And I just felt like I wanted to make a change. And in retrospect, I would've been just as happy if I'd stayed at UVA. In my professional life, I would've been just as happy. I don't know in my personal life, because I wouldn't have met my partner, I don't think, if I'd been at UVA. But it's a marvelous place; everything about it is just absolutely superb.DL: Are you the managing partner of a boutique or midsize firm? If so, you know that your most important job is attracting and retaining top talent. It's not easy, especially if your benefits don't match up well with those of Biglaw firms or if your HR process feels “small time.” NexFirm has created an onboarding and benefits experience that rivals an Am Law 100 firm, so you can compete for the best talent at a price your firm can afford. Want to learn more? Contact NexFirm at 212-292-1002 or email betterbenefits at nexfirm dot com.So I do want to give you a chance to say nice things about your current place. I assume you have no regrets about moving to Stanford Law, even if you would've been just as happy at UVA?PK: I'm incredibly happy here. I've got great colleagues. I've got great students. The ability to do the clinic the way we do it, which is as a full-time clinic, wouldn't be true anywhere else in the country, and that makes a huge difference to that part of my work. I've gotten to teach around the curriculum. I've taught four of the six first-year courses, which is a great opportunityAnd as you said earlier, the weather is unbelievable. People downplay that, because especially for people who are Northeastern Ivy League types, there's a certain Calvinism about that, which is that you have to suffer in order to be truly working hard. People out here sometimes think we don't work hard because we are not visibly suffering. But it's actually the opposite, in a way. I'm looking out my window right now, and it's a gorgeous day. And if I were in the east and it were 75 degrees and sunny, I would find it hard to work because I'd think it's usually going to be hot and humid, or if it's in the winter, it's going to be cold and rainy. I love Yale, but the eight years I spent there, my nose ran the entire time I was there. And here I look out and I think, “It's beautiful, but you know what? It's going to be beautiful tomorrow. So I should sit here and finish grading my exams, or I should sit here and edit this article, or I should sit here and work on the Restatement—because it's going to be just as beautiful tomorrow.” And the ability to walk outside, to clear your head, makes a huge difference. People don't understand just how huge a difference that is, but it's huge.DL: That's so true. If you had me pick a color to associate with my time at YLS, I would say gray. It just felt like everything was always gray, the sky was always gray—not blue or sunny or what have you.But I know you've spent some time outside of Northern California, because you have done some stints at the Justice Department. Tell us about that, the times you went there—why did you go there? What type of work were you doing? And how did it relate to or complement your scholarly work?PK: At the beginning of the Obama administration, I had applied for a job in the Civil Rights Division as a deputy assistant attorney general (DAAG), and I didn't get it. And I thought, “Well, that's passed me by.” And a couple of years later, when they were looking for a new principal deputy solicitor general, in the summer of 2013, the civil-rights groups pushed me for that job. I got an interview with Eric Holder, and it was on June 11th, 2013, which just fortuitously happens to be the 50th anniversary of the day that Vivian Malone desegregated the University of Alabama—and Vivian Malone is the older sister of Sharon Malone, who is married to Eric Holder.So I went in for the interview and I said, “This must be an especially special day for you because of the 50th anniversary.” And we talked about that a little bit, and then we talked about other things. And I came out of the interview, and a couple of weeks later, Don Verrilli, who was the solicitor general, called me up and said, “Look, you're not going to get a job as the principal deputy”—which ultimately went to Ian Gershengorn, a phenomenal lawyer—“but Eric Holder really enjoyed talking to you, so we're going to look for something else for you to do here at the Department of Justice.”And a couple of weeks after that, Eric Holder called me and offered me the DAAG position in the Civil Rights Division and said, “We'd really like you to especially concentrate on our voting-rights litigation.” It was very important litigation, in part because the Supreme Court had recently struck down the pre-clearance regime under Section 5 [of the Voting Rights Act]. So the Justice Department was now bringing a bunch of lawsuits against things they could have blocked if Section 5 had been in effect, most notably the Texas voter ID law, which was a quite draconian voter ID law, and this omnibus bill in North Carolina that involved all sorts of cutbacks to opportunities to vote: a cutback on early voting, a cutback on same-day registration, a cutback on 16- and 17-year-olds pre-registering, and the like.So I went to the Department of Justice and worked with the Voting Section on those cases, but I also ended up working on things like getting the Justice Department to change its position on whether Title VII covered transgender individuals. And then I also got to work on the implementation of [United States v.] Windsor—which I had worked on, representing Edie Windsor, before I went to DOJ, because the Court had just decided Windsor [which held Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional]. So I had an opportunity to work on how to implement Windsor across the federal government. So that was the stuff I got to work on the first time I was at DOJ, and I also obviously worked on tons of other stuff, and it was phenomenal. I loved doing it.I did it for about 20 months, and then I came back to Stanford. It affected my teaching; I understood a lot of stuff quite differently having worked on it. It gave me some ideas on things I wanted to write about. And it just refreshed me in some ways. It's different than working in the clinic. I love working in the clinic, but you're working with students. You're working only with very, very junior lawyers. I sometimes think of the clinic as being a sort of Groundhog Day of first-year associates, and so I'm sort of senior partner and paralegal at a large law firm. At DOJ, you're working with subject-matter experts. The people in the Voting Section, collectively, had hundreds of years of experience with voting. The people in the Appellate Section had hundreds of years of experience with appellate litigation. And so it's just a very different feel.So I did that, and then I came back to Stanford. I was here, and in the fall of 2020, I was asked if I wanted to be one of the people on the Justice Department review team if Joe Biden won the election. These are sometimes referred to as the transition teams or the landing teams or the like. And I said, “I'd be delighted to do that.” They had me as one of the point people reviewing the Civil Rights Division. And I think it might've even been the Wednesday or Thursday before Inauguration Day 2021, I got a call from the liaison person on the transition team saying, “How would you like to go back to DOJ and be the principal deputy assistant attorney general in the Civil Rights Division?” That would mean essentially running the Division until we got a confirmed head, which took about five months. And I thought that this would be an amazing opportunity to go back to the DOJ and work with people I love, right at the beginning of an administration.And the beginning of an administration is really different than coming in midway through the second term of an administration. You're trying to come up with priorities, and I viewed my job really as helping the career people to do their best work. There were a huge number of career people who had gone through the first Trump administration, and they were raring to go. They had all sorts of ideas on stuff they wanted to do, and it was my job to facilitate that and make that possible for them. And that's why it's so tragic this time around that almost all of those people have left. The current administration first tried to transfer them all into Sanctuary Cities [the Sanctuary Cities Enforcement Working Group] or ask them to do things that they couldn't in good conscience do, and so they've retired or taken buyouts or just left.DL: It's remarkable, just the loss of expertise and experience at the Justice Department over these past few months.PK: Thousands of years of experience gone. And these are people, you've got to realize, who had been through the Nixon administration, the Reagan administration, both Bush administrations, and the first Trump administration, and they hadn't had any problem. That's what's so stunning: this is not just the normal shift in priorities, and they have gone out of their way to make it so hellacious for people that they will leave. And that's not something that either Democratic or Republican administrations have ever done before this.DL: And we will get to a lot of, shall we say, current events. Finishing up on just the discussion of your career, you had the opportunity to work in the executive branch—what about judicial service? You've been floated over the years as a possible Supreme Court nominee. I don't know if you ever looked into serving on the Ninth Circuit or were considered for that. What about judicial service?PK: So I've never been in a position, and part of this was a lesson I learned right at the beginning of my LDF career, when Lani Guinier, who was my boss at LDF, was nominated for the position of AAG [assistant attorney general] in the Civil Rights Division and got shot down. I knew from that time forward that if I did the things I really wanted to do, my chances of confirmation were not going to be very high. People at LDF used to joke that they would get me nominated so that I would take all the bullets, and then they'd sneak everybody else through. So I never really thought that I would have a shot at a judicial position, and that didn't bother me particularly. As you know, I gave the commencement speech many years ago at Stanford, and I said, “Would I want to be on the Supreme Court? You bet—but not enough to have trimmed my sails for an entire lifetime.”And I think that's right. Peter Baker did this story in The New York Times called something like, “Favorites of Left Don't Make Obama's Court List.” And in the story, Tommy Goldstein, who's a dear friend of mine, said, “If they wanted to talk about somebody who was a flaming liberal, they'd be talking about Pam Karlan, but nobody's talking about Pam Karlan.” And then I got this call from a friend of mine who said, “Yeah, but at least people are talking about how nobody's talking about you. Nobody's even talking about how nobody's talking about me.” And I was flattered, but not fooled.DL: That's funny; I read that piece in preparing for this interview. So let's say someone were to ask you, someone mid-career, “Hey, I've been pretty safe in the early years of my career, but now I'm at this juncture where I could do things that will possibly foreclose my judicial ambitions—should I just try to keep a lid on it, in the hope of making it?” It sounds like you would tell them to let their flag fly.PK: Here's the thing: your chances of getting to be on the Supreme Court, if that's what you're talking about, your chances are so low that the question is how much do you want to give up to go from a 0.001% chance to a 0.002% chance? Yes, you are doubling your chances, but your chances are not good. And there are some people who I think are capable of doing that, perhaps because they fit the zeitgeist enough that it's not a huge sacrifice for them. So it's not that I despise everybody who goes to the Supreme Court because they must obviously have all been super-careerists; I think lots of them weren't super-careerists in that way.Although it does worry me that six members of the Court now clerked at the Supreme Court—because when you are a law clerk, it gives you this feeling about the Court that maybe you don't want everybody who's on the Court to have, a feeling that this is the be-all and end-all of life and that getting a clerkship is a manifestation of an inner state of grace, so becoming a justice is equally a manifestation of an inner state of grace in which you are smarter than everybody else, wiser than everybody else, and everybody should kowtow to you in all sorts of ways. And I worry that people who are imprinted like ducklings on the Supreme Court when they're 25 or 26 or 27 might not be the best kind of portfolio of justices at the back end. The Court that decided Brown v. Board of Education—none of them, I think, had clerked at the Supreme Court, or maybe one of them had. They'd all done things with their lives other than try to get back to the Supreme Court. So I worry about that a little bit.DL: Speaking of the Court, let's turn to the Court, because it just finished its Term as we are recording this. As we started recording, they were still handing down the final decisions of the day.PK: Yes, the “R” numbers hadn't come up on the Supreme Court website when I signed off to come talk to you.DL: Exactly. So earlier this month, not today, but earlier this month, the Court handed down its decision in United States v. Skrmetti, reviewing Tennessee's ban on the use of hormones and puberty blockers for transgender youth. Were you surprised by the Court's ruling in Skrmetti?PK: No. I was not surprised.DL: So one of your most famous cases, which you litigated successfully five years ago or so, was Bostock v. Clayton County, in which the Court held that Title VII does apply to protect transgender individuals—and Bostock figures significantly in the Skrmetti opinions. Why were you surprised by Skrmetti given that you had won this victory in Bostock, which you could argue, in terms of just the logic of it, does carry over somewhat?PK: Well, I want to be very precise: I didn't actually litigate Bostock. There were three cases that were put together….DL: Oh yes—you handled Zarda.PK: I represented Don Zarda, who was a gay man, so I did not argue the transgender part of the case at all. Fortuitously enough, David Cole argued that part of the case, and David Cole was actually the first person I had dinner with as a freshman at Yale College, when I started college, because he was the roommate of somebody I debated against in high school. So David and I went to law school together, went to college together, and had classes together. We've been friends now for almost 50 years, which is scary—I think for 48 years we've been friends—and he argued that part of the case.So here's what surprised me about what the Supreme Court did in Skrmetti. Given where the Court wanted to come out, the more intellectually honest way to get there would've been to say, “Yes, of course this is because of sex; there is sex discrimination going on here. But even applying intermediate scrutiny, we think that Tennessee's law should survive intermediate scrutiny.” That would've been an intellectually honest way to get to where the Court got.Instead, they did this weird sort of, “Well, the word ‘sex' isn't in the Fourteenth Amendment, but it's in Title VII.” But that makes no sense at all, because for none of the sex-discrimination cases that the Court has decided under the Fourteenth Amendment did the word “sex” appear in the Fourteenth Amendment. It's not like the word “sex” was in there and then all of a sudden it took a powder and left. So I thought that was a really disingenuous way of getting to where the Court wanted to go. But I was not surprised after the oral argument that the Court was going to get to where it got on the bottom line.DL: I'm curious, though, rewinding to Bostock and Zarda, were you surprised by how the Court came out in those cases? Because it was still a deeply conservative Court back then.PK: No, I was not surprised. I was not surprised, both because I thought we had so much the better of the argument and because at the oral argument, it seemed pretty clear that we had at least six justices, and those were the six justices we had at the end of the day. The thing that was interesting to me about Bostock was I thought also that we were likely to win for the following weird legal-realist reason, which is that this was a case that would allow the justices who claimed to be textualists to show that they were principled textualists, by doing something that they might not have voted for if they were in Congress or the like.And also, while the impact was really large in one sense, the impact was not really large in another sense: most American workers are protected by Title VII, but most American employers do not discriminate, and didn't discriminate even before this, on the basis of sexual orientation or on the basis of gender identity. For example, in Zarda's case, the employer denied that they had fired Mr. Zarda because he was gay; they said, “We fired him for other reasons.”Very few employers had a formal policy that said, “We discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation.” And although most American workers are protected by Title VII, most American employers are not covered by Title VII—and that's because small employers, employers with fewer than 15 full-time employees, are not covered at all. And religious employers have all sorts of exemptions and the like, so for the people who had the biggest objection to hiring or promoting or retaining gay or transgender employees, this case wasn't going to change what happened to them at all. So the impact was really important for workers, but not deeply intrusive on employers generally. So I thought those two things, taken together, meant that we had a pretty good argument.I actually thought our textual argument was not our best argument, but it was the one that they were most likely to buy. So it was really interesting: we made a bunch of different arguments in the brief, and then as soon as I got up to argue, the first question out of the box was Justice Ginsburg saying, “Well, in 1964, homosexuality was illegal in most of the country—how could this be?” And that's when I realized, “Okay, she's just telling me to talk about the text, don't talk about anything else.”So I just talked about the text the whole time. But as you may remember from the argument, there was this weird moment, which came after I answered her question and one other one, there was this kind of silence from the justices. And I just said, “Well, if you don't have any more questions, I'll reserve the remainder of my time.” And it went well; it went well as an argument.DL: On the flip side, speaking of things that are not going so well, let's turn to current events. Zooming up to a higher level of generality than Skrmetti, you are a leading scholar of constitutional law, so here's the question. I know you've already been interviewed about it by media outlets, but let me ask you again, in light of just the latest, latest, latest news: are we in a constitutional crisis in the United States?PK: I think we're in a period of great constitutional danger. I don't know what a “constitutional crisis” is. Some people think the constitutional crisis is that we have an executive branch that doesn't believe in the Constitution, right? So you have Donald Trump asked, in an interview, “Do you have to comply with the Constitution?” He says, “I don't know.” Or he says, “I have an Article II that gives me the power to do whatever I want”—which is not what Article II says. If you want to be a textualist, it does not say the president can do whatever he wants. So you have an executive branch that really does not have a commitment to the Constitution as it has been understood up until now—that is, limited government, separation of powers, respect for individual rights. With this administration, none of that's there. And I don't know whether Emil Bove did say, “F**k the courts,” or not, but they're certainly acting as if that's their attitude.So yes, in that sense, we're in a period of constitutional danger. And then on top of that, I think we have a Supreme Court that is acting almost as if this is a normal administration with normal stuff, a Court that doesn't seem to recognize what district judges appointed by every president since George H.W. Bush or maybe even Reagan have recognized, which is, “This is not normal.” What the administration is trying to do is not normal, and it has to be stopped. So that worries me, that the Supreme Court is acting as if it needs to keep its powder dry—and for what, I'm not clear.If they think that by giving in and giving in, and prevaricating and putting things off... today, I thought the example of this was in the birthright citizenship/universal injunction case. One of the groups of plaintiffs that's up there is a bunch of states, around 23 states, and the Supreme Court in Justice Barrett's opinion says, “Well, maybe the states have standing, maybe they don't. And maybe if they have standing, you can enjoin this all in those states. We leave this all for remind.”They've sat on this for months. It's ridiculous that the Supreme Court doesn't “man up,” essentially, and decide these things. It really worries me quite a bit that the Supreme Court just seems completely blind to the fact that in 2024, they gave Donald Trump complete criminal immunity from any prosecution, so who's going to hold him accountable? Not criminally accountable, not accountable in damages—and now the Supreme Court seems not particularly interested in holding him accountable either.DL: Let me play devil's advocate. Here's my theory on why the Court does seem to be holding its fire: they're afraid of a worse outcome, which is, essentially, “The emperor has no clothes.”Say they draw this line in the sand for Trump, and then Trump just crosses it. And as we all know from that famous quote from The Federalist Papers, the Court has neither force nor will, but only judgment. That's worse, isn't it? If suddenly it's exposed that the Court doesn't have any army, any way to stop Trump? And then the courts have no power.PK: I actually think it's the opposite, which is, I think if the Court said to Donald Trump, “You must do X,” and then he defies it, you would have people in the streets. You would have real deep resistance—not just the “No Kings,” one-day march, but deep resistance. And there are scholars who've done comparative law who say, “When 3 percent of the people in a country go to the streets, you get real change.” And I think the Supreme Court is mistaking that.I taught a reading group for our first-years here. We have reading groups where you meet four times during the fall for dinner, and you read stuff that makes you think. And my reading group was called “Exit, Voice, and Loyalty,” and it started with the Albert Hirschman book with that title.DL: Great book.PK: It's a great book. And I gave them some excerpt from that, and I gave them an essay by Hannah Arendt called “Personal Responsibility Under Dictatorship,” which she wrote in 1964. And one of the things she says there is she talks about people who stayed in the German regime, on the theory that they would prevent at least worse things from happening. And I'm going to paraphrase slightly, but what she says is, “People who think that what they're doing is getting the lesser evil quickly forget that what they're choosing is evil.” And if the Supreme Court decides, “We're not going to tell Donald Trump ‘no,' because if we tell him no and he goes ahead, we will be exposed,” what they have basically done is said to Donald Trump, “Do whatever you want; we're not going to stop you.” And that will lose the Supreme Court more credibility over time than Donald Trump defying them once and facing some serious backlash for doing it.DL: So let me ask you one final question before we go to my little speed round. That 3 percent statistic is fascinating, by the way, but it resonates for me. My family's originally from the Philippines, and you probably had the 3 percent out there in the streets to oust Marcos in 1986.But let me ask you this. We now live in a nation where Donald Trump won not just the Electoral College, but the popular vote. We do see a lot of ugly things out there, whether in social media or incidents of violence or what have you. You still have enough faith in the American people that if the Supreme Court drew that line, and Donald Trump crossed it, and maybe this happened a couple of times, even—you still have faith that there will be that 3 percent or what have you in the streets?PK: I have hope, which is not quite the same thing as faith, obviously, but I have hope that some Republicans in Congress would grow a spine at that point, and people would say, “This is not right.” Have they always done that? No. We've had bad things happen in the past, and people have not done anything about it. But I think that the alternative of just saying, “Well, since we might not be able to stop him, we shouldn't do anything about it,” while he guts the federal government, sends masked people onto the streets, tries to take the military into domestic law enforcement—I think we have to do something.And this is what's so enraging in some ways: the district court judges in this country are doing their job. They are enjoining stuff. They're not enjoining everything, because not everything can be enjoined, and not everything is illegal; there's a lot of bad stuff Donald Trump is doing that he's totally entitled to do. But the district courts are doing their job, and they're doing their job while people are sending pizza boxes to their houses and sending them threats, and the president is tweeting about them or whatever you call the posts on Truth Social. They're doing their job—and the Supreme Court needs to do its job too. It needs to stand up for district judges. If it's not willing to stand up for the rest of us, you'd think they'd at least stand up for their entire judicial branch.DL: Turning to my speed round, my first question is, what do you like the least about the law? And this can either be the practice of law or law as a more abstract system of ordering human affairs.PK: What I liked least about it was having to deal with opposing counsel in discovery. That drove me to appellate litigation.DL: Exactly—where your request for an extension is almost always agreed to by the other side.PK: Yes, and where the record is the record.DL: Yes, exactly. My second question, is what would you be if you were not a lawyer and/or law professor?PK: Oh, they asked me this question for a thing here at Stanford, and it was like, if I couldn't be a lawyer, I'd... And I just said, “I'd sit in my room and cry.”DL: Okay!PK: I don't know—this is what my talent is!DL: You don't want to write a novel or something?PK: No. What I would really like to do is I would like to bike the Freedom Trail, which is a trail that starts in Montgomery, Alabama, and goes to the Canadian border, following the Underground Railroad. I've always wanted to bike that. But I guess that's not a career. I bike slowly enough that it could be a career, at this point—but earlier on, probably not.DL: My third question is, how much sleep do you get each night?PK: I now get around six hours of sleep each night, but it's complicated by the following, which is when I worked at the Department of Justice the second time, it was during Covid, so I actually worked remotely from California. And what that required me to do was essentially to wake up every morning at 4 a.m., 7 a.m. on the East Coast, so I could have breakfast, read the paper, and be ready to go by 5:30 a.m.I've been unable to get off of that, so I still wake up before dawn every morning. And I spent three months in Florence, and I thought the jet lag would bring me out of this—not in the slightest. Within two weeks, I was waking up at 4:30 a.m. Central European Time. So that's why I get about six hours, because I can't really go to bed before 9 or 10 p.m.DL: Well, I was struck by your being able to do this podcast fairly early West Coast time.PK: Oh no, this is the third thing I've done this morning! I had a 6:30 a.m. conference call.DL: Oh my gosh, wow. It reminds me of that saying about how you get more done in the Army before X hour than other people get done in a day.My last question, is any final words of wisdom, such as career advice or life advice, for my listeners?PK: Yes: do what you love, with people you love doing it with.DL: Well said. I've loved doing this podcast—Professor Karlan, thanks again for joining me.PK: You should start calling me Pam. We've had this same discussion….DL: We're on the air! Okay, well, thanks again, Pam—I'm so grateful to you for joining me.PK: Thanks for having me.DL: Thanks so much to Professor Karlan for joining me. Whether or not you agree with her views, you can't deny that she's both insightful and honest—qualities that have made her a leading legal academic and lawyer, but also a great podcast guest.Thanks to NexFirm for sponsoring the Original Jurisdiction podcast. NexFirm has helped many attorneys to leave Biglaw and launch firms of their own. To explore this opportunity, please contact NexFirm at 212-292-1000 or email careerdevelopment at nexfirm dot com to learn more.Thanks to Tommy Harron, my sound engineer here at Original Jurisdiction, and thanks to you, my listeners and readers. To connect with me, please email me at davidlat at Substack dot com, or find me on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn, at davidlat, and on Instagram and Threads at davidbenjaminlat.If you enjoyed today's episode, please rate, review, and subscribe. Please subscribe to the Original Jurisdiction newsletter if you don't already, over at davidlat dot substack dot com. This podcast is free, but it's made possible by paid subscriptions to the newsletter.The next episode should appear on or about Wednesday, July 23. Until then, may your thinking be original and your jurisdiction free of defects. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit davidlat.substack.com/subscribe

Han er dansk miljømedicins ride or die. God father. Philippe Grandjean. Miljømediciner, professor ved Syddansk Universitet og forskningsprofessor ved University of Rhode Island. Læge fra KU helt tilbage i '74 – dengang hvor halvdelen af Danmark stadig røg indendørs og troede bly i benzinen var en god idé. Fuldstændig vanvittigt. Over 30 år som faglig sværvægter i Sundhedsstyrelsen. Adjungeret professor på Boston University, Harvard og University of Rhode Island. Og når der er ballade eller nogen er bims i kemikaliernes verden, når miljø og menneskekrop clasher– så ringer man ikke til nogen. Man ringer til Grandjean. Og nu er han i studiet på Frederiksberg med et budskab. Du er giftig. fordi vi lever i en verden, hvor maden, luften og naturen omkring dig er plastret til med PFAS, bly og alt det andet kemiske stads, vi har slæbt med os ind i systemet. Miljømedicinens Godfather, og det mest vanvittige CV, det første ophold i USA, og asbest i 1970'erne, ‘Du er giftig, og nogen vil skjule det', kviksølv, bly og PFAS i vores kroppe, firstmovers på luftmålinger af bly i luften, danskeren vil ikke kunne sælges som kød, 10.000 forskellige kemikalier i drikkevand og fødevarer, stoffer der har skadet hjerner og kroppen gennem tiden, den første erfaring med de store milliardvirksomheder, ring til din kommune, og spørg til drikkevandet, fjern momsen på økologi, fiskemel fra Vesterhavet overført til æggene, I skal ikke komme provokerende til Niels E. Skakkebæk, cocktail-effekten af mindst 100 stoffer, myndighedernes ansvar, og deres forsvar af indsats. Få 30 dages gratis prøveperiode (kan kun benyttes af nye Podimo-abonnenter)- http://podimo.dk/hgdg (99 kroner herefter)Værter: Esben Bjerre & Peter FalktoftRedigering: PodAmokKlip: PodAmokMusik: Her Går Det GodtInstagram:@hergaardetgodt@Peterfalktoft@Esbenbjerre

In die tweede onderhoud van ons 2025 onderhoudreeks gesels Louismet Prof Oppel Greeff. 'n Man met 'n indrukwekkende CV en 'n passie vir medisyneontwikkeling en vir Afrikaans. Hoe is die Afrikaanse geneeskundige vaktaal ontwikkel?Wat is die moontlikheid dat ons weer dokters in Afrikaans sal oplei?Hoekom is dit die moeite werd om in Afrikaans te studeer al is dit soms meer moeite?Podlitiek word aangebied deur:Arno RoodtLouis BoshoffErnst van Zyl

En este podcast contamos con la colaboración de Airbnb https://www.airbnb.es/. Te voy a contar algunas experiencias que he tenido disfrutando de sus servicios, que seguro te van a dar buenas ideas a la hora de viajar. Primero hicimos el podcast de “Coches que me asustaron”, luego una segunda entrega titulada “Coches que me decepcionaron” y ahora llega la tercera, consecuencia de las anteriores: Coches de los que esperaba poco... ¡y me sorprendieron! Claro está que para bien. Os traigo 10 casos en los que mis “tablas” de periodista no impidieron que los coches me sorprendiesen. Opel Kadett (1984). Este coche me sorprendió. El motor era una delicia, gastaba poco, no poco, ¡muy poco! Corría, era establa, cómodo y de una calidad para mi casi desconocida en un coche de esa categoría. En esos años Opel estaba muy fuerte... no como ahora. Citroën Visa GTi (1985). En esta lista hay 3 Citroën… curioso. El Visa era un coche que convencía, pero no enamoraba… no era esa su función. Pero no fue el caso del GTi. No sé si por la mayor ligereza del Visa, si por sus 30 mm extras de distancia entre ejes o por la puesta a punto, pero este Citroën no resultaba tan dulce como el 205, pero era en mi opinión más eficaz, mucho más barato y me sorprendió… Peugeot 205 GTX (1986). Ya había probado el 205 GTi de 105 CV y me había gustado mucho por su equilibrio entre prestaciones, confort y facilidad de conducción. Pero era un coche carísimo, mucho más que sus rivales. Cuando en 1986 pude probar el GTX con motor 1.6 de 96 CV, me pareció una opción más recomendable que el carísimo GTi con 9 CV más. La estética era muy parecida, el comportamiento similar y resultaba mucho, muchísimo más barato. Fiat Tipo (1988). El Tipo, venía a sustituir al Fiat Ritmo, un coche que conocía muy bien, tanto en versión Fiat como Seat, como Ritmo o como Ronda, prácticamente lo mismo. Un coche, el Ritmo, que no me entusiasmaba mucho si he de ser sincero. Y esperaba que el Tipo fuese mejor… pero no “tanto” mejor. Para comenzar al natural me pareció precioso el diseño conjunto entre I.DE.A Institute (Turín) y el Centro Stile Fiat bajo la dirección del diseñador Ercole Spada. BMW 318i (1989). Hablo de la generación E30. Había probado el 320i con motor 2 litros de 6 cilindros en línea y 125 CV. No era un motor con muchos bajos, pero era “finísimo” y subía de vueltas que daba gusto. También había probado el 318i con motor de 4 cilindros 1.8 y 110 CV. Más equilibrado, por peso, pero de escasa potencia par ser un BMW. Y de repente BMW anuncia si 318is, con el motor de 318, pero con culata de 16 válvulas y 136 CV. R19 16v Cabrio (1991). El R19 ni siquiera en sus versiones más deportivas, era un coche que despertase pasiones por su estética. Y pensé: Pues si a un R19 16v le quitamos el techo y el coche es menos rígido… pues, pero para todo. Fiat Coupé (1993). Este modelo en 1996 llegó a montar el maravilloso motor de 5 cilindros con 20 válvulas y turbo que desarrollaba 220 CV. Pero el que yo probé llevaba el motor del Integrale, pero “rebajado” a 185 CV. El bastidor de este coche, muy afinado, guardaba un “as” en su manga: El uso de autoblocante Fergusson. Audi A3 (1996). Recuerdo que era director de una revista mensual y en el último momento nos llegó la info del Audi A3. Escribí yo mismo, con prisas, el reportaje hecho con fotos e información oficiales y cambiamos la portada poniendo una buena foto de A3 y el titular de “El Golf de Audi” que es la conclusión que saqué leyendo el dossier oficial de la marca. Periodísticamente fue un acierto porque la revista se vendió bien. Pero cuando por fin pude probar el A3 me di cuenta de mi error: Citroën Berlingo (1996). La propuesta de Citroën con el Berlingo parecía muy sensata: Diseñar un coche desde cero pensado en hacer una pequeña furgoneta. Llegó a la redacción y me la llevé esa tarde… después de tres semáforos y apena un kilómetro me enamoré de la Berlingo. Citroën Xsara Picasso (2000). Lo del nombre Picasso, que por cierto no fue nada fácil, me parecía. Pero un nombre bonito no hace mejor a un coche. Pero una vez que lo probe… ¡me pareció genial! De repente la mecánica y bastidas del sencillo Xsara lucia más, la visibilidad era magnifica, el coche amplio y práctico, y además de confortable tenía una estabilidad a prueba de bombas…

Many punters have noted the absence of Luke Currie from the Melbourne riding ranks in recent weeks. The popular jockey has simply taken advantage of the off-season period to attend to a nagging knee issue he's been dealing with for quite some time.  He's making great progress and hopes to return to the saddle in just a few weeks. Luke Currie has had a presence among Victoria's top bracket of riders for close to three decades posting more than 1500 winners with 13 Gr 1's prominent on his CV. He's been on our podcast shortlist for a long time and we've been able to make it happen during his current layoff. Luke begins by tendering a full report on his troublesome knee. He says the timing of his hiatus wasn't ideal. He'd been riding winners everywhere. The jockey looks back on his Tasmanian upbringing and an early apprenticeship to his father Ricky. He looks back on a couple of winners in his home state. The system was such that any Tasmanian wins would have had an effect on his Victorian claim. He had to relocate as soon as possible.  Luke looks back on his time with trainer and former champion jockey Pat Hyland. He talks of a transfer to Robbie Griffiths in the latter stages of his apprenticeship, and the golden opportunity he was given by his new boss. The high profile jockey looks back on a six race association with champion mare Makybe Diva. Luke remembers his first Gr 1 success on hardy gelding Roman Arch in the famous Toorak Hcp. He pays tribute to mentor, confidant and friend the late Deane Lester. He reminisces about two C.F Orr victories on Suavito and Manuel. The jockey pays a heartfelt tribute to brilliant mare Sunlight  who provided him with ten wins including two Gr 1's. He recalls her fighting effort to beat some star colts in the Coolmore Stud Stakes.  Luke marvels at the mind boggling money generated by Sunlight and her relatives in the sale ring. Currie will always have a soft spot for Hey Doc. He rode the sprinter-miler 27 times for 8 wins including 4 Gr 1's. He reviews his two memorable Blue Diamond wins on Lyre and Artorius. Luke says he was thrilled to win the 2021 Newmarket for old friend Matthew Ellerton. He agrees his McKinnon Stakes win on Arcadia Queen was perhaps the easiest elite level win he's ever been involved with. Luke looks back on his Hong Kong experience at the height of the covid pandemic. He won at his first race ride, but everything went “belly up” from there. He says there was one memorable development during his time in Hong Kong when invited to fly home to ride Mr. Brightside in the All Star Mile at Moonee Valley. The story had a happy ending. Luke pays tribute to his girls- wife Sophia and daughters Mia and Miley.  This is a laid back chat with a Melbourne jockey whose reputation for hard work and reliability precedes him wherever he goes. 

For more information regarding this CME/CE activity and to complete the CME/CE requirements and claim credit for this activity, visit:https://www.mycme.com/courses/the-latest-data-in-ckd-progression-10197SummaryEmerging evidence highlights the potential of GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) to slow CKD progression and reduce cardiovascular and kidney-related mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Yet, despite updated guidelines, these therapies remain underused. This program will explore the latest clinical data supporting the role of GLP-1 RAs in risk mitigation and provide practical strategies for implementing guideline-based treatment to reduce cardio-renal risk and improve outcomes in patients with T2D and CKD.This podcast was recorded and is being used with permission of the presenters.Learning ObjectivesAt the conclusion of this activity, participants should be better able to:Discuss emerging data on GLP-1 RA therapy for CKD progression in T2DImplement guideline-based care to minimize CV risk and CKD progressionThis activity is accredited for CME/CE CreditThe National Association for Continuing Education is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.The National Association for Continuing Education designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.The National Association for Continuing Education is accredited by the American Association of Nurse Practitioners as an approved provider of nurse practitioner continuing education. Provider number: 121222. This activity is approved for 0.25 contact hours (which includes 0.25 hours of pharmacology).For additional information about the accreditation of this program, please contact NACE at info@naceonline.com.Summary of Individual DisclosuresPlease review faculty and planner disclosures here.Disclosure of Commercial SupportThis activity is supported by an educational grant from Novo Nordisk.Please visit http://naceonline.com to engage in more live and on demand CME/CE content.

From Pandemic Setback to Google PM: Gabor's Playbook for Career ComebacksIn this inspiring episode of Product Confidential, Michael Palmer sits down with Gabor Mayer, a Google product manager and career coach, to unpack his incredible journey from pandemic-era unemployment to landing a coveted role at Google. Gabor shares real talk on job hunting, why LinkedIn visibility matters more than ever, and powerful tips to stand out in today's crowded market. Whether you're job hunting, pivoting careers, or just feeling stuck, this episode is packed with honest advice, CV hacks, and motivation to keep going. Your next big break might be closer than you think.Perfect for: Aspiring PMs, career changers, and anyone navigating the job search grind.Chapters00:00 Navigating Career Challenges During COVID-1907:46 Lessons Learned from Unemployment15:17 Current Job Market Insights and Trends27:24 Mastering the Interview Process39:53 Future Projects and Resources for Job SeekersFind Gabor on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/mayergabor/

No hay duda: El Renault 5 es un mito. Y a ello ha colaborado su estética muy innovadora en su momento, su fiabilidad, su confort… y sus éxitos en competición. En particular en los rallyes, donde sus modelos de dos ruedas delanteras motrices ya destacaron, pero con la llegada del Turbo, llegaron victorias y títulos. #coches #renault #motorsport Renault, en mi opinión, ha hecho bien dos cosas, con el R5 y en general. Apostar por la competición para mejorar sus productos y su imagen. Y elegir pilotos no solo muy competentes, sino, además, muy carismáticos. Es este caso hay que destacar a Bruno Saby, Guy Fréquelin, especialmente al malabarista Jean Ragnotti, y a nuestro Carlos Sainz. Todos ellos brillaron a los mandos de diversos R5. Antes de entrar a hablar del “curriculum” del R5 en los rallyes, ya sabéis que Renault ha reeditado este modelo en versión eléctrica… os adelanto que lo probaremos a fondo durante un mes y os contaremos nuestras sensaciones y conclusiones. Conviértete en miembro de este canal para disfrutar de ventajas: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBG3pvXhocK7_GjeIx2sUeg/join El R5 aparece en 1972 y se puede decir que su éxito es inmediato. En Francia se puede decir que arrollador, pues entre 1974 y 1983 fue el coche más vendido… increíble. A pesar de la modestia de su mecánica inicial, a pesar de no ser en realidad más que un R-4 con una bonita carrocería obra de Michel Boué, desde siempre el R5 quiso tener una cierta vocación deportiva. No olvidemos que en esos años Renault a finales de los 70, Renault vence en Le Mans, lo hemos contado recientemente en el video titulado “Renault gana a Porsche … y tu coche lleva turbo”, y apostaba por la F1… Pero tanto los prototipos de Le Mans como la F1 se disputan con coches cuya estética queda lejos de los coches de calles que el cliente puede comprar. En cambio, en los Rallyes se corre con coches que los espectadores pueden identificar con el suyo o que el que pueden comprar… Y Renault decide competir también en rallyes. En 1977 participan en el San Remo con el R5 Alpine, aún sin turbo, donde obtienen un prometedor séptimo puesto… y deciden acudir la primer rallyes de 1978: El Montecarlo. En esa edición del rallye de Montecarlo el equipo Fiat y Lancia presentaba una armada potentísima. Frente a toda esa escuadra italiana se oponía el Porche 911 de Jean-Pierre Nicolás, que era del equipo privado de los hermanos Almeras y los dos Renault 5 oficiales, de apenas unos 130 CV, pilotados por Guy Fréquelin y Jean Ragnotti. Esperaba un duelo entre Fiat y Lancia cuando de repente que encontré con un amigo mío que no sé cómo se había enterado y me dijo: Los R5 van segundo y tercero en el Montecarlo… honestamente no me lo creí. ¡Bendita nieve! Porque ese año nevó mucho en Montecarlo y sobre la nieve a los Fiat 131 les faltaba motricidad, ya sabéis motor delantero y propulsión trasera, y a los Lancia Stratos les sobraban caballos y “mal carácter” … conducir un Stratos sobre la nieve debe ser algo mucho más que complicado. Por fin, en 1981, con el implacable Jean Ragnotti a sus mandos, el R5, en su variante Turbo de motor central, consigue su primera victoria.A pesar del Grupo B, a pesar del Audi Quattro, a pesar de toda una oleada de modelos del Grupo B, sobre todo el Peugeot 205 Turo 16, la mayoría con tracción total, el R5 consigue en su terreno predilecto, el asfalto del Tour de Corse, y con su piloto predilecto, Jean Ragnotti, vencer las ediciones de 1982 y de 1985. Se suele olvidar que la última victoria del R5 en el Mundial de rallyes no fue en el Tour de Corse, sino en la edición de 1986 del Rallye de Portugal… fatídica edición. El piloto portugués Joaquim Santos se salió del tramo con su Ford RS200 arrollando a una multitud de espectadores con un terrible resultado: Tres fallecidos. La retirada de muchos equipos, en señal de duelo, propicio la victoria de otro piloto portugués, Joaquim Moutinho al volante de un R5 Turbo privado.

In this practical summer organization episode, President and executive writing coach Christine Tulley introduces a systematic approach to managing academic conference logistics, planning, and participation. She shares her streamlined method for transforming the often chaotic world of conference attendance into a manageable, strategic process that saves time and reduces stress throughout the academic year. Christine opens by acknowledging the common academic struggle with conference management chaos - missed deadlines for desired conferences, last-minute scrambling for hotel reservations, lost abstracts, and the tendency to attend conferences out of habit rather than strategic professional development. Her solution emerged from recognizing that summer provides the ideal window for systematic conference planning when academic schedules allow for thoughtful decision-making. As someone who attends approximately four conferences annually, all requiring travel and significant logistical coordination, Christine developed this maintenance system to ensure she presents at conferences aligned with her current research interests while avoiding the stress of deadline-driven panic decisions. She emphasizes that this process typically requires only about an hour of focused work, making it accessible even for busy academics. Tools Mentioned: Asana - Free project management software for idea tracking Email search functions - For CFP and acceptance management Calendar blocking - Strategic scheduling protection Airline alerts - Automated flight price monitoring Related Episodes: Episode 74 - CV and Online Profile Updating  Episode 119: Making Time for Career Advancement Tasks Resources from Defend, Publish & Lead: Summer Professional Development: Defend Publish & Lead offers multiple free webinars and seminars designed for faculty developers, graduate students, and academics at all career stages, available through their Eventbrite page. Free Resources Available: Visit defendpublish.com and click "Events" to access comprehensive faculty development programming including writing group facilitation, administrative writing support, and dissertation writing strategies. Need help developing systematic approaches to conference planning or other professional development organization? Contact Defend, Publish & Lead for personalized coaching support. Email Christine directly at christine@defendpublish.com for guidance on creating sustainable academic organization systems.

ぬるぽ放送局おたより投稿フォーム https://forms.gle/6tbmBzK6wbyavJG47 2025年7月パワープレイ M6. 月夜のアイとキミの嘘 Produced by RoughSkreamZ Vocal by DD"Nakata"Metal, PASTEL RADIO 収録アルバム：RoughSkreamZ / With Skreaming Friendz 2025・4・27 Release https://notebookrecords.net/discographyportal.php?cdno=NBCD-049 番組時間：50分49秒 出演者：夕野ヨシミ、たくや VOICEVOX:ずんだもん VOICEVOX:四国めたん ---- 2025/7/3に公開録音したものを配信いたします。 ラジオ記事はリスナーのEEチャンピオンさんが書いてくれているので楽してます。 ＜オープニング＞ ・2本録りの1本目 ・すき家レイディオやっていきましょう ・あれ、何分尺なの？ ・うなおたやってるんじゃない？ ・今回も先にイオシス情報です ・タイトーさんのお知らせ 　「グルーヴコースター フューチャーパフォーマーズ」 　尾流渦キララ (CV：のぐちゆり)のテーマソングを楽曲提供します！ 　作詞：john=hive 　作曲：コバヤシユウヤ ・おまるポルカみたいでしょ ・ズブズブでやらしてもらってます ・はー、かわいい ・セガさんのお知らせ 　オンゲキ描き下ろし曲「BOUNCE & DANCE／IOSYS TRAX」がCHUNITHMへ2025/7/3に収録されます！ ・まもなくチュウニズム10周年！祝！ 　「アーティスト」のコバヤシユウヤと、「スタッフ」のD.watt/七条レタスがお祝いコメントをお届けしました ・D.wattはセガの社員じゃないから ・好きな言葉　正しい癒着 ・IOSYSのインターネット通販サイト IOSYS_SHOP はもうすぐ運営20周年！ 　IOSYSアイテムの記念セール（おまけつき）を今月末から実施予定です。お楽しみに～ ・これ、売り物にした方がいいのでは？ ・RiJ2025summer ゲームの味見会(通称：芋煮会)やりました ・面白いゲーム、イオシスが見つけたことにならないかなー ・mikoさんが参加する江西省THO（2025/7/11-13）にて 　IOAC-0220 新装版 miko BEST Toho of IOSYS 　が海外先行頒布されます（日本での頒布は未定です） 　(新装版 東方氷雪大感謝も頒布されます) 　※イベントにIOSYSは参加しません ・シューマッハと悟飯 ・2週間後空けといてください ・シューマッハと馬糞？？イオシスとして？？ ・もうエンディング感 ・え？1本目おわっちゃう？ ＜Aパート＞ ・ふつおたです ・こんばんわー！ ・1番短いお便りかも ・3xICEの話 ・音ゲー老人会青年部 ・こうやって財布を忘れていくんだろうな ・糖質制限したいお年頃 ・D.wattを1人で外に出してはいけない ・高温多湿地獄で辛い ・雪解け水で、こっちは大丈夫 ・道民の老人はクーラーを使うことを知らない ・あたし、ケチらないピーポーなの ・いろんな部位にｼﾞｭ ・アマプラの話 ・笑ゥせぇるすまんのビジュアルがすごい ・手抜きお便りのコーナー ・映画のタイトルの羅列です ・侍ストリッパー見てください ・映画ってホントにいいものですね ・はかせ転職する ・夕野さんスク水を買う ・2本録りだから、このくらいで ＜Bパート＞ ・みつをたです ・山形新幹線を何とかして欲しいのだ ・どこもかしこも暑い ・本当の親不孝が見れる ・イオシスショップ20周年おめでとうございます ・MOCさんもすごいけど、つまぽんもすごい ・つまぽんに弱みはない ・かなたんの結石 ・YES!ロリータNO!タッチの精神は大事なんだなぁ ・ちひろさん蒸してたあの頃がなつかしいなぁ ＜エンディング＞ ・特にないですー ・朝飯は外で食ってきた方がいい ・ホームベーカリーは、つまぽんにあげます ・わぁー社長ありがとー ・時間が合わせられないホームベーカリー ・焼きたての米 ・今からパン焼けるのか ・すき家にパンはないからなー ・まぜそばは簡単なんだろうな

HOW TO ASSESS JOB CANDIDATES FOR AI LITERACY?   There is no company in the world that is not interested in becoming more AI-enabled. One of the ways to do this is directly relevant to us - recruit new people who can bring up the level of AI literacy in the workforce. In a direct analogy to the digitisation wave of the early 2000's, we now have the AI wave of the 2020's - becoming AI-enabled by hiring AI-enabled employees.   Question is...how do we assess for this? This is the topic of Brainfood Live   - What is AI-literacy? - How close are we to an industry consensus on levels of capability? - Can we identify AI literacy on CV / background? - If so, what signals? - If not, can we do so via any other online method? - What is the best interview technique to assess candidates AI-fluency? - How do we assess in a non-interview based way? - What assessment tech assists that can help us with this? - Does AI fluency correlate with traits or attributes in any way? - For recruiter roles - what kind of assessments should we undertake to hire AI-fluent candidates?   All this and more with Martyn Redstone, Founder, Eunomia HR, Johannes Sundlo, FullStack HR & friends   We are on Friday 4th July, 2pm BST - follow the channel here (recommended) and save your spot for this demo by clicking on the green button.     Ep315 is sponsored by our friends BrightHire   BrightHire is the leading Interview Intelligence platform, used by teams at Canva, Hubspot, Ramp, Webflow, and 500+ other organizations to:   Scale structured interview planning   Improve interview quality   Speed up feedback   Level up quality of hiring decisions   Optimize with powerful insights   Learn why world class companies choose BrightHire to drive significant efficiency while raising the bar.  

durée : 00:04:16 - Le Reportage de la rédaction - À l'accueil, à la billetterie, au bar... Être saisonnier en festival permet aussi à des étudiants d'étoffer leur CV, dans un secteur culturel compétitif. Illustration aux Nuits de Fourvière, à Lyon.

"J'ai un truc qui plait à certaines personnes et que d'autres détestent : c'est que je suis très intense." (Vidéo ici)Je reçois Theo Avoyne - fondateur de Candix : une nouvelle startup IA qui met en relation les meilleurs talents Tech avec les meilleures startups.Theo n'a jamais été en CDI.Il a démarré en freelance où il a développé une expertise en automatisation et en productivité - avant de créer divers projets.Exemple : une app qui permet de générer une attestation de déplacement en plein Covid (les beaux souvenirs).Il ne l'a pas monétisée - il explique pourquoi.Mais avec Candix, c'est autre chose : il vient chambouler les codes du recrutement, et génére seul plusieurs centaines de K€ en quelques mois.Dans cet épisode, on discute des problématiques majeures du recrutement, de la puissance de l'IA dans l'optimisation des mises en relation, et la composante humaine derrière chaque CV.Il me aussi partage son expérience de solo founder : la rigueur, la passion et l'intensité qui guident son quotidien malgré son rôle de papa.

In this episode, Jim Garrity argues for more frequent videotaping of depositions, especially those of parties and witnesses likely to be unavailable at trial. The reason? Unlike live witnesses - who are generally called once in trial - videotaped testimony can be played two or more times. This technique utilizes one of the most effective tools of persuasion ever invented, repetition, borrowed straight from Madison Avenue, where repetition is everything. Clips played during the trial, during closing, and sometimes in opening by consent or court order, allow you to essentially present the same witness and testimony multiple times. This kind of repetition isn't possible with live witnesses, and is far superior to reading deposition transcripts to the jury. In a world where people are accustomed to getting their information through video, reading a transcript of testimony is likely to test your jurors' attention span (and patience). Garrity discusses a UCLA professor's "7-38-55 rule" to underscore the point. The gist of this rule is that when people communicate, only 7% of the message is conveyed through words, 38% through tone and voice, and a whopping 55% through body language. That's what makes the presentation of deposition testimony by video clips so powerful. Listen in!SHOW NOTESSmith, et al. v. City of Chicago, etc., Case No. 21-cv-1159, 2025 WL 1744919 (N. D. Ill. June 24, 2025) (denying use of video depo testimony in opening, but allowing it in closing argument that was admitted into evidence during trial, over objections by defendants that permitting video testimony during closing statements would be “unfairly prejudicial because it emphasizes testimony that is presented by video through repetition, and that opportunity does not exist for a live witness”)Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus Inc., No. C-05-00334 RMW, 2008 WL 190990, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2008) (denying use of video depo testimony in opening, but would consider allowing reading from transcript; “If the parties wish to read a portion of a deposition transcript in their opening statement, they are to exchange any excerpt with opposing counsel sufficiently in advance of opening statements so that the court can rule on any dispute over use”)Doe v. City of San Diego, No. 12CV689-MMA (DHB), 2014 WL 11997809, at *6 (S.D. Cal. July 25, 2014) (collecting cases refusing to allow playing of videotaped deposition testimony during opening statements) (“See In re Ethicon, Inc., 2014 WL 505234, at *8 (S.D. W. Va. Feb. 5, 2014) (“[T]he use of video clips during opening statements is precluded as to all parties ....”) (quoting In re Bard, Inc., 2013 WL 3282926, at *8 (S.D. W. Va. June 27, 2013)); Carpenter v. Forest Meadows Owners Ass'n, 2011 WL 3207778, at *7 (“Video recordings of the deposition will not be permitted.”) (emphasis in original); Chopourian v. Catholic Healthcare W., No. 09–2972 KJM, 2011 WL 6396500, at *7 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2011) (denying the plaintiff's motion to use portions of videotaped depositions during opening statement); Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus, Inc., 2008 WL 190990, at *1 (N.D. Cal. 2008) (“Neither side shall use any videotaped deposition testimony in its opening statement.”); but see Sadler v. Advanced Bionics, LLC, at *3 (W.D. Kent. April 1, 2013) (providing that the court “may” consider allowing the parties to utilize videotaped deposition testimony during opening statements); MBI Acquisition Partners, L.P. v. Chronicle Pub. Co., 2002 WL 32349903, at *2 (permitting party to play segments of video deposition in its opening statement))Beem v. Providence Health & Servs., No. 10-CV-0037-TOR, 2012 WL 13018728, at *2 (E.D. Wash. Apr. 19, 2012) (rejecting request to play videotaped deposition during opening, and rejecting argument by plaintiff that, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 32(a)(3), she may use the deposition of an adverse party “for any purpose,” stating that “What Plaintiff proposes to do, is to introduce evidence during opening statement. The Court will not allow the showing of video deposition excerpts during opening statement. The motion is denied.”)K.C. ex rel. Calaway v. Schucker, No. 02-2715-STA-CGC, 2013 WL 5972192, at *7 (W.D. Tenn. Nov. 8, 2013) (“there is no per se ban on the use of video excerpts of depositions in closing arguments”; also citing 88 C.J.S. Trial § 300 (2013) (“[T]here is no blanket prohibition against counsel playing selected portions of a videotaped deposition for a jury during closing argument, and trial courts have discretion to permit, or to refuse, the replaying of videotape segments in closing argument.”)MBI Acquisition Partners, L.P. v. Chron. Pub. Co., No. 01-C-0177-C, 2002 WL 32349903, at *1 (W.D. Wis. Oct. 2, 2002) (allowing use of video depo excerpt in opening, stating, without further discussion, that “Defendants may use excerpts from the video deposition of David Straden during opening argument. Counsel are to advise plaintiff's counsel promptly of the particular excerpts they intend to show”)Sadler v. Advanced Bionics, LLC, No. 3:11-CV-00450-TBR, 2013 WL 1340350, at *3 (W.D. Ky. Apr. 1, 2013) (preliminarily allowing use of videotaped deposition testimony in opening statements, saying If this testimony is otherwise admissible at trial and is not unnecessarily lengthy, the Court may consider allowing this procedure for both parties”)Northfield Ins. Co. v. Royal Surplus Lines Ins. Co., No. SACV 03-0492-JVS, 2003 WL 25948971, at *3 (C.D. Cal. July 7, 2003) (subject to further objection and ruling before trial, “The Court is generally of the view that a party in opening statement may use any piece of evidence which the party in good faith believes will be ultimately received at trial. Rule 32(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits the use of a party deposition “for any purpose”) you like the shoes I wore in high schoolSmith v. I-Flow Corp., No. 09 C 3908, 2011 WL 12627557, at *4 (N.D. Ill. June 15, 2011) (“The Court denies I–Flow's request to bar use in opening statement of excerpts from video deposition testimony. The Court will expect plaintiffs to disclose by no later than noon on the Friday before the start of trial any such excerpts they intend to use in opening statements and will expect defendants to make reciprocal disclosures by no later than 5:00 p.m. on the Saturday before the start of trial.”)Fed. R. Civ. P. 32(a)(3) (providing that "An adverse party may use for any purpose the deposition of a party or anyone who, when deposed, was the party's officer, director, managing agent, or designee...") (emphasis added)

VYS0051 | Can You Recommend The Moon? - Vayse to Face with Phil Ristaino - Show notes Finally finding someone who is more obsessed with Twin Peaks and Under the Silver Lake that they are, Hine and Buckley enthusiastically welcome Phil Ristaino to Vayse. Phil has an intimidatingly impressive CV, as an actor, artist, singer and host of the joyful, thoughtful and perhaps a little insane Post Relevant Podcast, a podcast which analyses the meaning and symbolism of Under the Silver Lake and Twin Peaks the Return in minute, intelligent and perhaps a little insane detail. The discussion galavants from Phil's special areas of obsession, Under the Silver Lake and Twin Peaks, to his wider thoughts on magic, the essential intrinsic delight of creativity, art as an expression of life... and then out of nowhere Phil recommends the moon... (Recorded 9 June 2025) Thanks to Phil for his time and thanks, as always to Keith for the show notes - you can find him on Bluesky here: @peakflow.bsky.social Phil Ristaino online The Post Relevant Podcast website (https://www.postrelevant.com/) Phil's website (https://www.thesearedreams.com/) Agents of Venus - Bandcamp (https://agentsofvenus.bandcamp.com/album/boduvt) Phil on Instagram (https://www.instagram.com/philristaino/) Intro Under the Silver Lake - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Under_the_Silver_Lake) Under the Silver Lake | Official Trailer HD - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mwgUesU1pz4) Under The Silver Lake - Reddit (https://www.reddit.com/r/underthesilverlake/) Twin Peaks Season 3 (The Return) - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin_Peaks_season_3) Twin Peaks Season 3, Showtime teasers - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W32wYIN4BX4) Vayse to Face with Phil Ristaino David Lynch - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Lynch) Rip Van Winkle - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rip_Van_Winkle) Answer To The Ultimate Question - The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZLtcTZP2js) The Simpsons - Save Me Jebus - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wb0c1b4KXVo) 10 Reasons The Story Of Jesus Might Be An Allegory For The Sun - ListVerse (https://listverse.com/2017/08/16/10-reasons-the-story-of-jesus-might-be-an-allegory-for-the-sun/) Cronus - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cronus) Catholic theology - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_theology) White Rabbit - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Rabbit) Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sgt._Pepper%27s_Lonely_Hearts_Club_Band) Monty Python - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monty_Python) 2001: A Space Odyssey - The Star Gate - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1DNbkKBW0K8) VYS0003 | Welcome to Vayse, Population 2 (https://www.vayse.co.uk/vys0003) Ferris Bueller's Day Off (1986) Official Trailer - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZDbKhkLxTs) Back to the Future (1985) Offical Trailer - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvsgGtivCgs) Labyrinth (1986) Official Trailer - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2yd4em1I6M) Jeff Wayne's War of the Worlds (full album playlist) - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6YwFvmnbj3E&list=PLFV_pTSMduaURY4rVeOeWDCIWcgdAW7PZ) Richard Burton - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Burton) Justin Hayward - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justin_Hayward) The Moody Blues - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Moody_Blues) Forever Autumn (song) - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forever_Autumn_(song)) Ulla - War Of The Worlds Wiki (https://waroftheworlds.fandom.com/wiki/Ulla) PBS (Public Broadcasting Service) - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PBS) Going Live! - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Going_Live!) Motormouth - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motormouth) The 8:15 from Manchester - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_8:15_from_Manchester) Rushmore (1998) Trailer #1 - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZVdXXG3KN8) Red Letter Media: Half in the Bag Episode 163: Under the Silver Lake - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sPqYOImouvk) Hero's journey - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hero%27s_journey) Mycelium - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycelium) Blind men and an elephant - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_men_and_an_elephant) David Robert Mitchell - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Robert_Mitchell) What is Revelation of the Method? - Warfoo (https://warfoo.com/what-is-revelation-of-the-method/) A24 Films website (https://a24films.com/) 28. PRP3: Twin Peaks: the Return: the DECODE episode 2 (incl. Pt 1 of interview with Buckley) (https://www.postrelevant.com/podcast/episode/1ccc3f4d/28-prp3-twin-peaks-the-return-the-decode-episode-2) 29. PRP3: Twin Peaks: the Return: the DECODE episode 3 (incl. Pt 2 of interview with Buckley) (https://www.postrelevant.com/podcast/episode/38374efc/29-prp3-twin-peaks-the-return-the-decode-episode-3) Cicada 3301 - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cicada_3301) Cicada 3301 Mystery Finally Solved And It's Not Good - Quanta (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rt8q86j60bM) Dark Web: Cicada 3301 - Official Trailer - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GkNcAeublE) Millennials, baby boomers or Gen Z: Which one are you and what does it mean? - BBC (https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/articles/zf8j92p) GTA1: Grand Theft Auto (video game) - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Theft_Auto_(video_game)) Will AI Kill Human Creativity? - Kellogg Insight (https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/will-ai-kill-human-creativity) DUMBO, Brooklyn - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dumbo,_Brooklyn) The Military Origins of Facebook - Unlimited Hangout (https://unlimitedhangout.com/2021/04/investigative-reports/the-military-origins-of-facebook/) Capitalism - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalism) Neoliberalism - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoliberalism) Mandelbrot set - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandelbrot_set) Fractal - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractal) Fibonacci sequence - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibonacci_sequence) Louis C.K. - God's Earth - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTusfMpVfVc) Atlanta | Official Series Trailer | FX - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CetGXHU5aOA) Secret Cipher of the Ufonauts, by Allen Greenfield - Goodreads (https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1940959.Secret_Cipher_of_the_Ufonauts) VYS0010 | Amazing Stories - Vayse to Face with Dr Allen H Greenfield Pt.1 (https://www.vayse.co.uk/vys0010) VYS0011 | Weird Tales - Vayse to Face with Dr Allen H Greenfield Pt.2 (https://www.vayse.co.uk/vys0011) Hellier (TV series) - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hellier_(TV_series)) Hellier Seasons 1&2 - Planet Weird (https://www.planetweird.tv/hellier-season-1) Aleister Crowley - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleister_Crowley) The Book of the Law - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Book_of_the_Law) The Secret History of Twin Peaks, by Mark Frost - Goodreads (https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/29102955-the-secret-history-of-twin-peaks) Cave painting - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cave_painting) Albert Hofmann - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Hofmann) Synchronicity - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synchronicity) Promethea - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Promethea) Blue moon - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_moon) John Constantine From Fiction to Reality - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXXHi4oojkY) Grant Morrison - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grant_Morrison) The Invisibles - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Invisibles) Doom Patrol - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doom_Patrol) Grant Morrison on Chaos Magic, the occult & Sigil creation (from DisInfoCon 2000) - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTMFBYXmvMk) Disinformation (TV series) - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disinformation_(TV_series)) Disinfo YouTube channel (https://www.youtube.com/@disinfo/videos) Counterculture - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterculture) Book of Lies: The Disinformation Guide to Magick and the Occult, by Richard Metzger (Editor), GrantMorrison (Introduction) - Goodreads (https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/22446.Book_of_Lies) Chaos magic - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_magic) Sigil - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigil) Invocation - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invocation) VYS0036 | Infinite Game - Vayse to Face with Joseph Matheny (https://www.vayse.co.uk/vys0036) Ong's Hat website (https://ongs-hat.com/) Conspiracy theory - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theory) Alternate reality game (ARG) - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternate_reality_game) Ong's Hat Compleat (audiobook), by Joseph Matheny, Sequoyah Kennedy (narrator), Stephen James Buckley (music) - Goodreads (https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/226695932-ong-s-hat) Joseph Matheny's substack (https://substack.com/@josephmatheny) Aidan Wachter's website (https://www.aidanwachter.com/) VYS0042 | Grinding Out Some Low-End - Vayse to Face with Aidan Wachter (https://www.vayse.co.uk/vys0042) Reality tunnel - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality_tunnel) VYS0033 | Battle-Owl vs Sci-fi Centipede - Vayse to Face with Loren Fetterman (https://www.vayse.co.uk/vys0033) Is the moon a planet? - Live Science (https://www.livescience.com/space/the-moon/is-the-moon-a-planet) VYS0039 | Try Not To Be A Dick Shall Be The Whole Of The Law - Vayse to Face with Duncan Barford (https://www.vayse.co.uk/vys0039) The Baptist's Head Compendium: Magick as a Path to Enlightenment, by Alan Chapman and Duncan Barford - Goodreads (https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/192793439-the-baptist-s-head-compendium) Liber Samekh: The Knowledge and Conversation of the Holy Guardian Angel - Open Magick (https://openmagick.com/en/a/ceremonial-magick/liber-samekh-the-knowledge-and-conversation-of-the-holy-guardian-angel) The Going Down: An Esoteric Novel, by Duncan Barford - Goodreads (https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/230734488-the-going-down) Occult Experiments in the Home: Personal Explorations of Magick and the Paranormal, by Duncan Barford - Goodreads (https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6855862-occult-experiments-in-the-home) The Moon (tarot card) - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Moon_(tarot_card)) Triple Goddess (Neopaganism) - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triple_Goddess_(Neopaganism)) Diana (mythology) - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diana_(mythology)) Three Witches (Macbeth) - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Witches) Psychedelics and the Eleusinian Mysteries in Ancient Greece - Greek Reporter (https://greekreporter.com/2025/06/15/psychedelics-ancient-greece-eleusinian-mysteries/) Stoned ape theory - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stoned_ape_theory) Manna From Heaven: Psilocybe Mushrooms? - Deoxy.org (https://jacobsm.com/deoxy/deoxy.org/manna.htm) Crrow777: The first Lunar Wave from Sept 2012 - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3axPn65MGM) Pleroma - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pleroma) I Saw The TV Glow | Official Trailer HD | A24 - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kymDzCgPwj0) Mr. Melancholy - Villains Wiki (https://villains.fandom.com/wiki/Mr._Melancholy) Georges Méliès - A Trip To The Moon (1902) - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4u7-IcUWuMw) Teletubbies Baby Sun - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zwb4t0EtYew) The Mighty Boosh: The Moon - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IzASbRXGBco) 27. PRP3: Twin Peaks: the Return: the DECODE episode 1 (https://www.postrelevant.com/podcast/episode/1c952aa0/27-prp3-twin-peaks-the-return-the-decode-episode-1) David Lynch explains the symbolism of electricity in his movies - Far Out (https://faroutmagazine.co.uk/david-lynch-electricity-movies/) Twin Perfect: Twin Peaks ACTUALLY EXPLAINED (No, Really) - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7AYnF5hOhuM) The evolution of the Arm (Twin Peaks - Season 3) - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgAsEsdpeU0) Kyle MacLachlan - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyle_MacLachlan) Twin Peaks: Ed and Norma - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nmmKkKoamc) Big Ed Gets a Little Loopy - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2faRM5FgYXY) - Note: The glitch in Ed's reflection can be seen from 0:13, just above the oil drum in the centre. 30. PRP3: Twin Peaks: The Return: The DECODE episode 4 (https://www.postrelevant.com/podcast/episode/31612341/30-prp3-twin-peaks-the-return-the-decode-episode-4) Bob (Twin Peaks): Conceptual history - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_(Twin_Peaks)#Conceptual_history) Nick Cave - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Cave) 30. PRP3: Twin Peaks: The Return: The DECODE episode 4 (https://www.postrelevant.com/podcast/episode/31612341/30-prp3-twin-peaks-the-return-the-decode-episode-4) Sonny Jim Jones (TWIN PEAKS Character Series #59) - Lost in the Movies (https://www.lostinthemovies.com/2023/03/sonny-jim-jones-twin-peaks-character.html) Sonny Jim's gymset scene (fan edited) - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSOf8KBbhKg) The X-Files - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_X-Files) We live inside a dream - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3F2vdS_6O1E) Phil's recommendations XTC - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XTC) What Do You Call That Noise? The XTC Podcast (https://whatdoyoucallthatnoise.transistor.fm/episodes) The Phoenician Scheme - Official Trailer - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEuMnPl2WI4&t=12s) The Doom Patrol Omnibus, by Grant Morrison, Richard Case (Illustrator) - Goodreads (https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18850661-the-doom-patrol-omnibus) Lint, by Steve Aylett - Goodreads (https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/407035.Lint) Buckley's closing question Mr C (Dale Cooper doppelganger) - Twin Peaks Wiki (https://twinpeaks.fandom.com/wiki/Dale_Cooper_(doppelganger)) Phillip Jeffries - Twin Peaks Wiki (https://twinpeaks.fandom.com/wiki/Phillip_Jeffries) Garland Briggs - Twin Peaks Wiki (https://twinpeaks.fandom.com/wiki/Garland_Briggs) Gordon Cole - Twin Peaks Wiki (https://twinpeaks.fandom.com/wiki/Gordon_Cole) Vayse online Website (https://www.vayse.co.uk/) Twitter (https://twitter.com/vayseesyav) Bluesky (https://bsky.app/profile/vayseesyav.bsky.social) Instagram (https://www.instagram.com/vayseesyav/) Bandcamp (Music From Vayse) (https://vayse.bandcamp.com/) Ko-Fi (https://ko-fi.com/vayse) Email: vayseinfo@gmail.com Special Guest: Phil Ristaino.

Summer isn't just a time to unwind—it can also be the perfect season to take small, meaningful steps towards a better career.In this episode of Mid Career Change, I share six practical ways you can use the summer months to reflect, reset and gently build momentum—especially if you're mid-career and starting to feel like something needs to shift.Whether you're feeling stuck, starting to consider a change, or simply want to feel more aligned with your work, this episode will help you make the most of the space and slower rhythm that summer offers.We'll explore:• How to clear the mental and physical clutter and create room for clarity• Simple journaling prompts to help you gain insight into what's next• Key questions to reflect on your progress and recalibrate your direction• Why your CV and LinkedIn should reflect who you're becoming• How to reconnect with your network in a natural, low-pressure way• Ideas for small-scale self-development that can spark big shifts• And why real momentum often begins with rest, not actionYou don't need a grand plan this summer—just a bit of space, intention, and curiosity.So grab a notebook, find a quiet spot, and let this episode guide you into a clearer, more energised version of what's next.Thanks for listening! If you need support with your career:call me on 07833 593875email mark@bravocoaching.co.ukvisit www.bravocoaching.co.uk

AI writes the job ad. Algorithms screen the CV. Gen Z rolls its eyes at “Head of Belonging” job titles that still come with outdated systems. So… why is a stand alone Human Resources department relevant at all?A skeptical leader puts Anna on the spot:

This week we're joined by Maud, a true powerhouse in the world of private staffing. While many strive for long-term positions, Maud carved her own path – thriving in seasonal roles across Europe, working in chalets, villas, and luxury properties for UHNW clients.Starting as a total newcomer with just 15 minutes' notice before her first butler shift, she's now built a reputation as the ultimate fixer – trusted to walk into any household and deliver excellence. Her story takes us from Courchevel to Saint-Tropez, from working solo in high-pressure environments to becoming a sought-after property manager and remote PA.If you've ever questioned the value of a seasonal CV, this episode will make you think again. Maud's adaptability, drive, and perspective on success show there's more than one way to thrive in the private sector.

We're continuing our job preparation series with Trenton Voss, MS, RDN, LDN, as we dive into what really happens inside the interview room—whether it's virtual or in person. More importantly, we focus on how to craft and confidently share your personal story—beyond what's listed on your resume or CV. Trenton offers valuable insights, practical advice, and personal experiences to help you feel prepared for interviews, both after passing the RD exam and even for roles you may take on beforehand.Mastering the Art of Storytelling in Interviews: Your Path to Success: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/mastering-art-storytelling-interviews-your-path-success-paranjpe/

RECRUITER SKILLS PROFILE: HOW AI CHANGES THE GAME   We all know that AI is going to change every job, but we don't know precisely how or when, much less the implications on the type of skills we need to be hiring when recruiting for 'AI first' employers.     - What do we know about the impact of AI / Automation in knowledge work? - What skills are going to be insulated and valued from this impact? - Do we 'design out' job roles which have high component of these insulated skills? - How do humans uniquely add value to any process, for any outcome? - Do we actually do this? - If AI takes on admin, logistics, note taking, CV screening etc - what other activities remain? - Will these remain valuable for the business or simply disappear if the scaffolding that holds up the rest of the job disppears? - What do we know are the skill we WON'T need on future TA? - What are the skills which we will need going forward? - How do we assess for those skills - with AI or without AI? - Do we go back to attribute based hiring? - Can incumbent employees improve their attributes in order to be future fit? - How do companies ensure that you have the right skills / capability mix in your recruiting team? - What do leaders themselves need to do to be future fit?   All this and more, with Brainfood Live On Air.   We're with the one and only Tom Sayer, Global Recruiting Strategy (Accenture)   We are on Friday 27th June, 2pm BST   Click on the Save My Spot button to attend for free, and follow the channel here (recommended) to be notified for this and all future Brainfood Lives   Ep314 is sponsored by our friends Teamtailor   Great teams start with great hiring — and that's exactly what Teamtailor is built for.   Loved by companies like Happy Socks, OneFlow, Oatly, and Five Guys, Teamtailor is the all-in-one recruitment platform trusted by over 10,000 businesses and 150,000 recruiters worldwide.   It combines a powerful ATS with fully customizable, AI-powered tools to elevate your employer brand and deliver a standout candidate experience.   From career sites to collaboration workflows, Teamtailor helps talent teams move faster, work smarter, and create hiring journeys that people actually enjoy — candidates and hiring managers alike.   See how top teams are hiring better with Teamtailor: Experience the magic today!

Ep 201 One World in New World with Lonnee Rey

Hablamos sobre lo más importante de un CV y algunos de los errores que pueden ser muy fáciles de cometer al realzar uno... Escucha con atención.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

En este podcast contamos con la colaboración de Car Vertical, que te hace un descuento del 20% al introducir el código GH. https://bit.ly/40yvHDI Y es que comprar un coche usado no es como jugar a la ruleta rusa, pero casi. Car Vertical te da el historial real del coche con solo introducir la matrícula. En un minuto tienes un informe que te dice si ha tenido accidentes, si ha sido robado, si tiene los kilómetros manipulados, si ha pasado por media Europa o ha sido taxi, coche de alquiler... o todo a la vez. Esto no es solo para particulares, ojo. Si eres profesional, un compraventa o un taller, es una herramienta buenísima. Te ayuda a saber lo que tienes entre manos antes de comprar, vender o reparar. En Garaje Hermético nos gusta dar bueno consejos. Y si vas a comprar, ya sea un coche, una moto o una furgoneta, hazte un favor: míralo antes en Car Vertical. Te puede ahorrar dinero, disgustos... y muchas visitas al taller. Llevamos más, muchos más de 1.000 videos y muchos me preguntáis: ¿No se te acaban las ideas? ¡Pues no! Porque hay muchas historias que contar, muchos coches de que hablar y en algunos casos, completamente olvidados o muy poco conocidos. Te traigo 15 coches que, si no los conoces… ¡deberías! #coches #cochesclasicos Conviértete en miembro de este canal para disfrutar de ventajas: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBG3pvXhocK7_GjeIx2sUeg/join 1. AC Ace (1953). Un modelo que ahora se vuelve a fabricar y cuyas primeras entregas están previstas para este mismo verano. 2. Amilcar C6 (1926). Todos hemos leído y escuchado que la gran Isadora Duncan perdió la vida cuando su pañuelo se enrollo en el eje trasero del Bugatti conducido por Benoit Falchetto… todo es verdad salvo que el coche no era un Bugatti sino un Amilcar. 3. Bristol Fighter (2004). El Bristol Fighter de cuatro ruedas cuenta con un motor V10 de 8 litros y 532 CV, que suben a 660 en la versión S, para un peso de apenas 1.600 kg. Y no sé si es bonito, pero impresionante, sí. 4. Checker Marathon A12 (1975). Conocía este coche por las revistas, pero cuando fui a Nueva York estaba deseando subirme a uno, nada más parecía más norteamericano que este coche, ni siquiera la Coca Cola. 5. DAF 66 (1972). En la actualidad la marca holandesa DAF es muy conocida por sus camiones, pero también fabricó coches y unos coches muy originales. Aunque los hubo con motor de origen DAF estos modelos enseguida montaron motores de origen Renault de 1.1 y 1.3 litros y entre unos 45 y casi 60 CV. 7. Donkervoort D8 GTO-JD70 (2025). Seguimos con coches holandeses… que no es que haya habido muchos. Joop Donkervoort comenzó haciendo coches inspirados en los Lotus Super Seven, pero muy evolucionados. 7. Facel Vega Facel II (1962). El coche no era nada malo, pues resultaba bonito, potente gracias a su V8 Chrysler de más de 6 litros y 390 CV. Pero faltó marketing, servicio postventa y la marca, tras su último intento, el Facelia, cerró sus puertas. 8. Hillman Imp (1963). Este modelo me resulta simpático, pues su estética está inspirada en el innovador Chevrolet Corvair, pero en un coche que también contaba con motor posterior, pero era mucho, pero mucho más pequeño. 9. Hispano-Alemán Castilla (1972). La historia de este coche, como todas las historias que rodean al fundador de la marca, Ben Heidrich, parecen sacadas de una telenovela. 10. Horch 830 BL (1937). El automóvil que utilizó el General Charles De Gaulle en el famoso desfile por los Campos Elíseos el 18 de junio de 1945, tras la rendición de Alemania. 11. Iso Rivolta Lele (1969). Iso fabricó motos de gran calidad, mi padre tuvo una, motocarros de enorme éxito y… coches de lujo. En 1969 presente este Lele con la idea de competir con Ferrari, Lamborghini y Maserati… ambición no le faltaba a Piero Rivolta, hijo de Renzo Rivolta, fundador de la marca. 12. Jensen Interceptor (1966). A mí el coche me parece bonito a rabiar, original, casi desconocido y… no le he probado… así que, si alguien tiene uno por ahí, ¿me lo dejaría? 12+1. Marcos Mantara LM600 (1993). Jem Marsh y el aerodinamista Frank Costin decidieron crear una marca para hacer pequeños deportivos al estilo inglés… más tarde decidieron con sus ligeros coches hacer sus “pinitos” en competición… pero con el tiempo se fueron “viniendo arriba” y un día decidieron conquistar Le Mans. 14. Noble M400 (2006). Uno de los coches más modernos de esta selección y que también tuvo cierto éxito en competición. 15. Stutz Blackhawk (1971). Obra de Virgil Exner que contó con la ayuda del diseñador italiano Ghia y usó componentes de General Motors. Estaban de alguna manera inspirados en los clásicos Stutz, pero actualizados.

324. PharmDs in IT - From Pharmacy School to Full Stack Engineer feat. Dr. Khanh Theresa Mai Originally recorded in 2024 In this fascinating episode, Tony sits down with Dr. Mai, a pharmacist-turned-full-stack software engineer. She shares her unconventional journey from clinical pharmacy to health tech, her candid thoughts on the gaps in pharmacy education, and actionable advice for pharmacists interested in breaking into the technology space. Key Topics Discussed Her Career Path: Dr. Mai graduated from pharmacy school and started her career in hospital pharmacy, and transitioned to pharmacy informatics before making a leap into software engineering via a coding boot camp. The Pharmacy-Tech Gap: Dr. Mai highlights the lack of technology education in most pharmacy curriculums, even as pharmacists regularly interact with advanced tech systems, EMRs, and automation in their daily workflow. Her Work in Informatics: She recounts her role managing Nebraska's Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP), integrating it with EMRs, and improving statewide medication data access. Transition to Software Engineering: After informatics, Dr. Mai pursued a full coding bootcamp, took on her first tech role at a startup, and eventually found her way back to healthcare tech where she could combine her clinical and technical expertise. Advice for Pharmacists Considering Tech: The importance of networking and “selling yourself” in tech interviews Translating clinical experience into technical language on resumes Keeping running lists of technical projects or ideas from pharmacy work Tips for tailoring resumes for technical roles and leveraging different formats (CV vs. resume) PharmDs in IT Project: Dr. Mai gives a sneak peek into her side project—an online platform connecting clinicians with tech roles in healthcare, allowing users to search for jobs by clinical specialty. Links: https://linktr.ee/pharmdsinit https://www.linkedin.com/in/astropharmacist/ https://pharmdsinit.com You can reach Dr Mai at khanhmai@creighton.edu Disclaimer: Views expressed are those of the individuals and do not reflect thoughts and opinions of any entity with which speakers have been, is now, or will be affiliated. New to LinkedIn and not sure where to start? Download my free ebook, "Professional Networking Unlocked", at https://www.tonydaopharmd.com/#ebook Follow us on social media! Twitter: @pharmacyitme Instagram: @pharmacyinformatics LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pharmacyitme/ Website: Pharmacy IT & Me Email: tony@pharmacyitme.com Follow Tony's personal Twitter account at @tonydaopharmd Network with other pharmacists at Pharmacists Connect!http://pharmacistsconnect.com For more information on pharmacy informatics, check out some of the following useful links: ASHP's Section of Pharmacy Informatics and Technology: https://www.ashp.org/Pharmacy-Informaticist/Section-of-Pharmacy-Informatics-and-Technology/ HIMSS: https://www.himss.org/resources/pharmacy-informatics-and-its-cross-functional-role-healthcare Disclaimer: Views expressed are my own and do not reflect thoughts and opinions of any entity with which I have been, am now, or will be affiliated.

Any mid-life woman knows that once you hit your 40s, 50s, or 60s, things will not go well if you eat the same way you did when you were 20. But it's confusing to know what to eat, and how much to eat, without downloading multiple APPs and carrying around a calculator  My guest, Alexandra Filingeri, holds a doctorate in Clinical Nutrition with a focus on evidence-based nutrition interventions, particularly in mid-life and menopause.  In this episode, we cover practical nutrition tips- what to eat and how much to eat to maximize health aging. Dr. Filingeri also answered questions that came in from my Substack readers.  By the way, my favorite frozen vegetables that I couldn't remember the name of?  Puravida Fire Roasted Vegetable Melange What changes post menopause Obesity, hot flashes and weight loss The impact of insomnia on weight Individual energy requirements Macronutrients vs micronutrients Protein supplements- yay or nay Glycemic index Sugar and belly fat Grocery store strategies Dr. Alexandra Filingeri is a Registered Dietitian with a Doctorate degree in Clinical Nutrition. During her doctoral studies, Dr. Filingeri focused on metabolic disorders, nutritional biochemistry, and clinical research methodologies, equipping herself to deliver evidence-based nutrition interventions. Her clinical expertise focuses on midlife nutrition and hormone-related health.  Website: Nutrition by Dr. Alexandra – Beauty From The Inside Out Instagram: Dr. Alexandra Filingeri DCN RDN (@nutritionby_dralexandra) • Instagram photos and videos  Linkedln: Alexandra Filingeri, DCN RDN - Registered Dietitian in Private Practice - Nutrition By Dr Alexandra | LinkedIn Dr. Streicher is on SUBSTACK      DrStreicher.Substack.com Articles Monthly newsletter All COME AGAIN podcast episodes Monthly News Flash Reports on recent research  Monthly Zoom Ask Me Anything Webinar    Information on Dr. Streicher's COME AGAIN Podcast- Sexuality and Orgasm   Lauren Streicher MD, is a clinical professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine, the founding medical director of the Northwestern Medicine Center for Sexual Medicine and Menopause, and a Senior Research Fellow of The Kinsey Institute, Indiana University. She is a certified menopause practitioner of The Menopause Society. She is the Medical Director of Community Education and Outreach for Midi Health.   Dr. Streicher is the medical correspondent for Chicago's top-rated news program, the WGN Morning News, and has been seen on The Today Show, Good Morning America, The Oprah Winfrey Show, CNN, NPR, Dr. Radio, Nightline, Fox and Friends, The Steve Harvey Show, CBS This Morning, ABC News Now, NBCNightlyNews,20/20, and World News Tonight. She is an expert source for many magazines and serves on the medical advisory board of The Kinsey Institute, Self Magazine, and Prevention Magazine. She writes a regular column for The Ethel by AARP and Prevention Magazine.    LINKS Subscribe To Dr. Streicher's Substack Information About the COME AGAIN Podcast Dr. Streicher's CV and additional bio information To Find a Menopause Clinician and Other Resources  Glossary Of Medical Terminology Books by Lauren Streicher, MD  Slip Sliding Away: Turning Back the Clock on Your Vagina-A gynecologist's guide to eliminating post-menopause dryness and pain Hot Flash Hell: A Gynecologist's Guide to Turning Down the Heat Sex Rx- Hormones, Health, and Your Best Sex Ever The Essential Guide to Hysterectomy                                      Dr. Streicher's Inside Information podcast is for education and information and is not intended to replace medical advice from your personal healthcare clinician. Dr. Streicher disclaims liability for any medical outcomes that may occur because of applying methods suggested or discussed in this podcast.             

Hay coches ya clásicos cuyas cotizaciones, a mi modo de ver, se han disparado. Para mí, pese a que sean maravillosos, no valen lo que cuestan. ¡Pero!... hay alternativas. Hay modelos y versiones que, de acuerdo, no son lo mismo. Pero se le acercan. Y sobre todo… ¡cuestan mucho menos! Auténticas “Compras Maestras”. ¿Qué no puede faltar en un buen video dedicado a los clásicos? Está clarísimo… ¡el consultorio clásico!” En este video tenemos a Jaime Sánchez de “Seat en Rodaje”. Audi Quattro: ¿Has pensado en el Coupé GT B2? ¿Te parece caro un Quattro de los primeros por 50.000 €? Pues si encuentras uno en buen estado por ese precio, ¡cómpralo! Es un chollo. Y el Coupé GT puede costar la cuarta parte… no, no es lo mismo, sobre todo si tu idea es invertir. Para disfrutar de un clásico, el Coupé me parece más que suficiente. BMW M3 E30: ¿Has pensado en el 325i? Las versiones especiales superan, en ocasiones con holgura, los 100.000 € y los “normales” están sobre los 80.000 €. ¿Estamos locos? Fijaos, este M3 tenía motor de 4 cilindros y 200 CV. Y un 325 tenía motor de 6 cilindros y 171 CV, o sea, un 15 por ciento menos. Y estos coches, en muy buen estado, los encuentras en el entorno de los 15.000/20.000 €. Como inversión no es lo mismo, pero como disfrute, si te lo curras un poco en suspensiones y frenos… la diferencia de sensaciones no compensa la diferencia de inversión. Citroën AX GTi: ¿Has pensado en el GT? El AX GT ofrecía 85 CV y el GTi, con el mismo motor, pero inyección, ofrecía 95, o sea algo más de un 10 por ciento de potencia extra. En este caso es difícil establecer un baremo, pues hay pocas unidades en buen estado así que te diré que si encuentras un GT en buen estado y a buen precio…. No te empeñes en encontrar un GTi. Citroën 2 CV: ¿Has pensado en el Dyane 6? Vale, el 2CV es un mito, un coche clave en la historia, distinto y original. Pero el Dyane 6 es objetivamente mejor en todo. Y sobre todo en el precio. Mini Cooper: ¿Has pensado en el 1275 GT? El Cooper “español” de Authi ofrecía 68. Su predecesor en España del Cooper fue el Mini 1275 GT, con el mismo motor, pero solo 60 o 65 CV. Pero que, con cuatro retoques, supera al Cooper español. La diferencia de precio es alta, puede ser de dos a uno, el doble, pero menor que en otros casos, porque hay pocos coches de estos en un estado que valga la pena. Opel Calibra 2.0 16V: ¿Has pensado en el 8V? Para mí no hay duda: El Opel Calibra más “redondo” por delante de los V6 y del Turbo es el 2 litros de 16 válvulas con 150 CV. Pero es que si prueba el 8 válvulas de 115 CV te das cuenta de que, para disfrutar, incluso para ir ligero, a lo mejor no necesitas más, en un motor de fábula. Y los encuentras por precios casi de “risa”. Peugeot 205 GTi: ¿Has pensado en el GTX? He visto Peugeot 1.6 de 105 CV a precios brutales, hasta de 20.000 €, pero en modelos que estén bien, rara vez menos de 15.000 €. Pues bien, por menos de la mitad tienes en “GTi de Villaverde” con 96 CV, es decir, solo 9 CV menos que el primer 1.6. Y me dirás: “Las suspensiones y los asientos no son igual”. No, pero con lo que te ahorras, puedes poner las mejores suspensiones y los mejores asientos del mercado. Y te seguirá sobrando dinero. Renault 5 Copa: ¿Has pensado en el TS/TX? El R5 TS o TX no es lo mismo. Su motor de la misma cilindrada, pero con culata plana no hemisférica diseñada por Alpine apenas ofrece 65 CV contra los 90 del Copa o los 110 CV del turbo. ¡Pero valen la cuarta parte! Renault 8: ¿Has pensado en el R10? Para hacer esta parte del guion he puesto en mi buscador “R8 TS vendo” y me ha dado la solución: En una página de venta de coches sale un R8 con buena pinta, aunque unas ruedas excesivas para mi gusto, por el que piden 13.000 € y justo debajo un tío listo pone “Vendo R10. Lleva el motor del 8TS”. Los cual es rigurosamente cierto, y pide … 3.900 €. Seat León V6: ¿Has pensado en el 1.8 Turbo 20V? Como coche de colección el León MKI es una joya, con motor V6 de 2.8 litros, 205 CV y tracción total. No solo es la tracción total, es que la suspensión posterior de paralelogramo deformable es mucho más refinada, aunque el precio a pagar por la tracción total y el motor V6 es de casi 200 kg, pues peso en el entorno de los 1.500 kg. Es un coche muy buscado pero que aún se puede encontrar a precios interesantes, pero difícilmente por menos de 15.000 €. El 1.8 con motor de 1781 cm3, de 5 válvulas por cilindro, inyección y turbo ofrece 180 CV y un peso de unos 1.300 kg. Y lo puedes encontrar hasta un 30 por ciento más barato. No es un premio de consolación es un grandísimo coche al que para mi lo único que la falta es la suspensión del 4x4, no la tracción… por cierto que era la configuración del Copa de competición, como el que yo tuve, que era 4x2, pero con la suspensión “buena”.

Functional ingredients, protein-ification, healthy aging, personalized nutrition, weight management, gut health…and you probably think I'm just rattling off numerous powerful trends driving the CPG industry, which I am, but this time, not involving my typical contextual vantagepoint. Did you know that just over half of pet owners not only consider their pets to be a part of their family…but say they are as much a part of their family as a human member? So, with most pet owners now considering their pets full-fledged family members, it's safe to say that “humanization” is no longer just a trend…but rather a foundation of the pet nutrition market. And while I'm not saying that I'll be pivoting drastically (or even much at all), I am expressing that you'll begin seeing my increasing interest in adjacent CPG marketplaces like early childhood nutrition and pet nutrition within content creation, as I'm a relatively new dad in both the human and dog aspect of that definition. But where do we start, right? To create some constraint, this initial content piece will concentrate only on certain aspects of the pet industry that evolved since the “Great Shutdown” era. Firstly, compared to other CPG categories, which have seen declines and rebounds, pet sales have grown (around 10%) each year since that period. Next, what underpins that growth probably shouldn't be surprising at this point…with stay-at-home orders and the remote work flexibility creating an environment where many Americans added a furry friend to their household. And currently, it results in U.S. consumers purchasing around $70 billion worth of pet food (and treats), but that market size increases substantially when you include both veterinary care (and product sales), OTC medications, and pet supplements. Also, while the “CV-19 Effect” didn't create the “health and wellness” underlying driver shaping today's pet nutrition market…it provided a powerful tailwind to this increasingly important customer purchasing behavior. Lastly, pet owners (which Millennials account for the largest category) are paying just as much attention to their pets' health and holistic well-being as to their own…and are seeking food (and treats) that help their furry friends live longer, healthier lives. In fact, 85% of pet owners now believe proper nutrition and supplements are as important for pets as they are for humans. But with pet owners taking a more active role in their pets' wellness, particularly in the ways they supplement their pets' diets for optimal health benefits…pet brands are starting to face a similar challenge as their human CPG counterparts have been dealing with for the last decade (especially within low barriers-to-entry categories like sports nutrition). And no matter if we're talking humans or pets…across today's functional CPG marketplace, winning essentially requires a distinctive brand making great tasting products in attractive formats with proven benefits in desirable health condition segments. But in my latest first principles thinking content, I'll unpack that statement further to extract impactful insights. Nevertheless, there are many opportunities available (and no shortage of exciting market developments), so hopefully you'll follow along as I help increase your strategic clarity by separating out the key pet industry “signals” from the immense amount of “noise.”

In the case of John Doe v. Sean Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, and associated entities, the plaintiff, John Doe, has filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and various affiliated companies, including Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, Bad Boy Records LLC, and others. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, under case number 1:25-CV-00996-JLR. The plaintiff, through his legal representation, The Bloom Firm, is seeking legal action based on the allegations made by John Doe, who asserts claims arising from his personal experience and information he has gathered about the actions of the defendants.John Doe's lawsuit includes several corporate entities affiliated with Sean Combs, such as Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings Inc., Bad Boy Productions Holdings Inc., and Bad Boy Books Holdings Inc. Additionally, the complaint also lists Doe Corporations 1-10 and Doe Defendants 11-20, indicating that the plaintiff may pursue further claims against other unidentified individuals or entities involved in the matter. The plaintiff is requesting a jury trial as part of his legal proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapuccisource:*Microsoft Word - 2025.01.17 Complaint REDACTEDBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the case of John Doe v. Sean Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, and associated entities, the plaintiff, John Doe, has filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and various affiliated companies, including Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, Bad Boy Records LLC, and others. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, under case number 1:25-CV-00996-JLR. The plaintiff, through his legal representation, The Bloom Firm, is seeking legal action based on the allegations made by John Doe, who asserts claims arising from his personal experience and information he has gathered about the actions of the defendants.John Doe's lawsuit includes several corporate entities affiliated with Sean Combs, such as Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings Inc., Bad Boy Productions Holdings Inc., and Bad Boy Books Holdings Inc. Additionally, the complaint also lists Doe Corporations 1-10 and Doe Defendants 11-20, indicating that the plaintiff may pursue further claims against other unidentified individuals or entities involved in the matter. The plaintiff is requesting a jury trial as part of his legal proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapuccisource:*Microsoft Word - 2025.01.17 Complaint REDACTEDBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

When did you last pause to consider what it takes to turn daring ideas from a lab into reality?  In this episode of Tech Talks Daily, I spend time with Mike Otworth, Executive Chairman of Innventure, whose career reveals what happens when breakthrough technology leaves the safety of research and collides with real-world demands. Mike's view offers an honest look at what changes when you match influential inventions with a team that moves quickly and welcomes a little discomfort. We begin with Mike's unexpected transition from working on Capitol Hill to joining a group of brilliant scientists in Florida. That twist of fate shaped his life's direction and planted the seed for what later became Innventure. He explains how they tackle a problem that many overlook: big companies often create advanced solutions but lack the speed or drive to launch them effectively. His answer was to build an organization that runs on agility, quick learning, and a firm belief that course corrections are normal, not failures. One idea that sticks is what Mike calls "adaptive strategic positioning." In plain English, it means leaders must remain flexible and innovative enough to adjust their direction as soon as reality reveals something new. For founders juggling investors and product timelines, this can feel uncomfortable, yet it remains a necessary task. He also shares why he looks for "athletes" rather than box-ticking hires.  For Mike, mindset beats a perfect CV every time. He seeks individuals who bring determination, resilience, and an appetite for new challenges, regardless of their starting point. We also explore how team culture can't be built with beanbags and table football alone. Real innovation teams keep an eye on the big goal and value shared wins more than individual credit.  Mike also discusses giving every team member a stake in the outcome, ensuring everyone rows in the same direction. He gives a heartfelt nod to Dr. John Scott, a mentor whose sharp mind and honest opinions shaped his knack for spotting which tech has a chance in the market. This episode is more than another story of startup life. It's a clear window into how leadership must evolve as a company grows from a scrappy experiment to a trusted player. Mike's reflections on when to step back and let new leaders steer add a layer of honesty that many founders rarely share. If you enjoy hearing how a few bold decisions can ripple through entire industries, this chat offers plenty to chew on. Expect thoughtful lessons about courage, flexibility, and what it takes to build a company where every person is trusted to run with an idea and find a way forward. For anyone curious about early-stage success beyond the headlines, settle in and hear how Mike and Innventure prove that speed, trust, and the right people still matter most.

In this episode of Reddit Readings, we cover a post from Reddit r/AskReddit. We hear the answers to "What was something on someone's CV/resume that made you either immediately want to hire them or immediately reject them?" See ⁠acast.com/privacy⁠ for privacy and opt-out information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices