Podcasts about agenda setting

Er ist einer der stillen Marvel-SHEROES des Investigativen Journalismus in Deutschland und steht realistisch und felsenfest auf demokratischen Grundsätzen: Daniel Drepper. Nach seinen Enthüllungen über Machtmissbrauch durch Ex-Bild-Chefredakteur Julian Reichelt verlor nicht nur Reichelt seinen Job sondern auch Drepper und sein Team. Die Recherchen mit seinem Team um die berüchtigte „Row Zero“ bei der Band Rammstein befeuerten die #metoo-Debatten in Deutschland und der Musikszene weltweit. Drepper war Mitbegründer des Recherche-Kollektivs „Correctiv“ und ist Vorsitzender des „Netzwerks Recherche“, das 2004 das „Informationsfreiheitsgesetz“ mit auf den Weg brachte. Darüber schrieb Drepper übrigens bereits 2013 seine Diplom-Arbeit, bevor er sich an der Columbia University auf Investigativen Journalismus spezialisierte. Drepper wurde für seine journalistische Arbeiten vielfach ausgezeichnet und ist heute Leiter des Rechercheverbunds NDR, WDR und Süddeutsche Zeitung. Bei FREIHEIT DELUXE erzählt Daniel Drepper, was investigativen Journalismus für ihn ausmacht: Nicht nur über Themen zu berichten, die Andere auf die Agenda setzen, sondern selbst Missstände aufzudecken und die Informationen der Öffentlichkeit zugänglich zu machen, um damit Diskussionen anzustoßen. Die ist mit Jagoda Marinić auch gleich in vollem Gange, denn die beiden rollen auf, was die Recherchen um Reichelt und Rammstein verändert haben - oder auch nicht. Sie ergründen, wie Gegenstrategien inzwischen eingesetzt werden, um journalistische Arbeit zu diskreditieren. Dabei geht es auch um die Angriffe aus der Politik, etwa mit der drohenden Einschränkung des Informationsfreiheitsgesetzes oder der „Kleinen Anfrage“ der CDU zur Finanzierung gemeinnütziger Vereine in Deutschland. Doch Daniel Drepper und Jagoda Marinić sprechen auch konkret und konstruktiv darüber, wie Menschen in Deutschland selbst das Informationsfreiheitsgesetz für sich nutzen können oder dazu beitragen können, skandalöse Zustände öffentlich zu machen. Und schließlich erzählt Daniel Drepper ganz persönlich, was ihn antreibt und warum Pressefreiheit für ihn ganz plastische Bedeutung hat. Hier hört ihr, was Pressefreiheit für Daniel Drepper bedeutet (2:59) inwiefern Agenda-Setting im Journalismus funktionieren kann (13:42) wie das Team um Juliane Löffler und Daniel Drepper die Causa Reichelt aufdeckte (21:26) was passiert, wenn sein Team Tipps bekommt (32:08) welche Rolle „Litigation PR“ inzwischen spielt (44:05) worum es beim „Informationsfreiheitsgesetz“ geht (58:51) wie er auf die Enthüllungen von „Correctiv“ zum Geheimtreffen in Potsdam schaut (1:05:24) welche Verpflichtungen er für den Journalismus in Deutschland sieht (1:17:47) FREIHEIT DELUXE mit Jagoda Marinić ist eine Produktion des Hessischen Rundfunks in Zusammenarbeit mit dem Börsenverein des deutschen Buchhandels. Redaktionsteam: Andrea Geißler und Christoph Scheffer. Ihr erreicht uns per Mail: freiheitdeluxe@hr.de

Tom Kalil is the CEO of Renaissance Philanthropy. Tom served in the White House for two presidents (Obama and Clinton) and in collaboration with his team worked with the Senate to give every federal agency the authority to support incentive prizes for up to $50 million. Tom also designed and launched dozens of White House science and technology initiatives, including the $40 billion National Nanotechnology Initiative, announced by President Clinton; The BRAIN Initiative, announced by President Obama; The Next Generation Internet initiative, announced by President Clinton and Vice President Gore; and initiatives in advanced materials, robotics, smallsats, data science, and EdTech. About Foresight InstituteForesight Institute is a research organization and non-profit that supports the beneficial development of high-impact technologies. Since our founding in 1987 on a vision of guiding powerful technologies, we have continued to evolve into a many-armed organization that focuses on several fields of science and technology that are too ambitious for legacy institutions to support.Allison DuettmannThe President and CEO of Foresight Institute, Allison Duettmann directs the Intelligent Cooperation, Molecular Machines, Biotech & Health Extension, Neurotech, and Space Programs, alongside Fellowships, Prizes, and Tech Trees. She has also been pivotal in co-initiating the Longevity Prize, pioneering initiatives like Existentialhope.com, and contributing to notable works like "Superintelligence: Coordination & Strategy" and "Gaming the Future".Get Involved with Foresight:Apply to our virtual technical seminars Join our in-person events and workshops Donate: Support Our Work – If you enjoy what we do, please consider this, as we are entirely funded by your donations!Follow Us: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedInNote: Explore every word spoken on this podcast through Fathom.fm, an innovative podcast search engine. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Du hast bock auf das Retreat deines Lebens?

'Lottocracy' is a system where political representation is determined randomly. Is this a better system than democracy? We discuss the shortcomings of current electoral democracies, including the influence of media and special interests, and examine innovative models like deliberative democracy and specialized legislative structures. How should we balance between expertise and random selection, and combat elite influence and corruption? [00:00] Introduction to the Thought Experiment [00:52] Moral Obligations in Crisis [05:14] Challenges of Political Institutions [06:51] Electoral Democracy vs. Lottocracy [14:44] Implementing Lottocracy [21:15] Potential Issues and Objections [29:20] Ensuring Representative Participation [36:41] Challenges of Single Party Dominance [37:32] Risks of Random Selection in Politics [38:39] Expertise and Agenda Setting [46:55] Corruption and Influence in Politics [55:34] Social Pressure and Decision Making

Kuram diyor ki… Hem ticaret hem de siyaset için hayati önem taşıyan bir iletişim uygulaması olan“gündem belirleme” (Agenda Setting), iki şekilde tezahür eder, daha doğrusu ‘etmeli'… Ya ortaya çıkmış/atılmış bir gündem konusunda ‘racon kesme' şeklinde (pasif, reaktif) ya da ortada bir konu yokken tam da o konuyu kendiniz yaratarak, durduk yerde, dikkatleri bir anda üzerinize çekmek üzere hamle yaparak (aktif, proaktif)…

Featured Photo is Dr. Amy Huberman The Amy Story, Part 2: The Joys of Doing the Laundry! Amy and her exuberant son, Sasha, and wife, Alena Last week you heard Part 1 of the Amy session, which included T = Testing, E = Empathy, and A = Assessment of Resistance. Today, you will hear Part 2 of Amy's exciting journey from perfectionism to JOY. M = Methods We used a variety of Methods to help Amy challenge her negative thoughts, starting with the first, “I'm failing my patients.” We started with Identify and Explain the Distortions, then went to the Double Standard Technique, and ended up with the Externalization of Voices. As a reminder, you can see Amy's  Daily Mood Log at the start of her session here.. As an exercise, see how many distortions, or thinking errors, you can find in her first Negative Thought, “I'm failing my patients,“ using the list of cognitive distortions on the bottom of her Daily Mood Log. You'll find the list of the ten cognitive distortions if you click here.  After you've identified each distortion, see if you can explain two things about it: Why is this distortion in Amy's thought unrealistic and misleading? Why might it be incredibly unfair and hurtful? You'll find my list of the distortions in this thought at the end of the show notes. But don't look until you've made your list! These techniques we used were effective , as you'll hear on the podcast, especially the Externalization of Voices. You'll hear us doing role-reversals with Amy, and the method that “won the day” was the CAT, or Counter-Attack Technique, combined with the Acceptance Paradox. The Acceptance Paradox involves finding truth in a negative thought with a sense of peace or even humor. The CAT involves confronting the hostile voice in your head and tell it to go fly a kite, or other gentle but firm message You'll enjoy seeing some striking changes in Amy, as her tears and feelings of intense self-doubt are suddenly transformed into joy and laughter. Those changes created strong feelings of joy for Jill and me as well. We both have incredibly fondness and admiration for Amy, and feel great joy as well when she feels joy. Here are Amy's final scores at the end of the session. Emotions % Now % Goal % After Sad, blue, depressed, down, unhappy 80 25 0 Anxious, worried, panicky, nervous, frightened 80 20 0 Guilty, remorseful, bad, ashamed 90 5 0 Worthless, inadequate, defective, incompetent 100 15 5 Lonely, unloved, unwanted, rejected, alone       Embarrassed, foolish, humiliated, self-conscious       Hopeless, discouraged, pessimistic, despairing 90 5 0 Frustrated, stuck, thwarted, defeated 80 5 5 Angry, mad, resentful, annoyed, irritated, upset, furious       Other         The Joyous Dr. Amy! Sudden and dramatic change is pretty trippy, but it isn't much good if it doesn't last. And it won't! Negative thoughts and feelings will always return, because no one can be happy all the time. That's why some relapse prevention training and ongoing practice and refinement of what you've learned can be vitally important. In our follow-up session with Amy one week later she said she'd felt way better during the week, but did, in fact, have some relapses and had to challenge her negative thoughts again. She'd been helped a lot by the idea that it was okay to fail, to seek consultation, and learn, and that failing with patients gave us endless opportunities to learn and grow as therapists. And it was also okay not to have to listen so intently to the attempts of the negative self to put her down. In fact, our misery almost never results from our failures, but from telling ourselves that we “shouldn't” ever fail, and from punishing ourselves mercilessly when we do. One of her most exciting statements in our follow-up session was that she discovered that even something as humble as putting the dirty clothes into the washing machine could be a joyous experience without that negative voice in her brain constantly hollering at her that she wasn't good enough! Teaching points It was hard, at first, for Amy to “see” how distorted and unfair her negative thoughts were. She is an extremely intelligent, accomplished, and beloved colleague, and yet most of us cannot “see” or really “grasp” that we can be pretty mean to when we're feeling down and anxious. I have often said that feeling anxious and depressed is a lot like being in a deep hypnotic trance, telling yourself and believing things that just aren't true. For example, Amy is doing beautiful work with the great majority of her patients, and is doing the exact same thing with the patients who are responding beautifully as she is with the two who are stuck. So, when she tells herself she's a failure, she's clearly involved in All-or-Nothing Thinking. In other words, she's thinking that if she's not perfect, she's a complete failure and a fraud. She also seems to have many Hidden Shoulds (e.g. I SHOULD be able to help every single patient quickly) and Mental Filtering (focusing only on the negatives) and Discounting the Positive (ignoring the positives, as if they didn't count.) The techniques that were the most helpful for Amy were Positive Reframing: that's where we pointed out the positive aspects of Amy's Negative Thoughts and feelings. The Externalization of Voices with Self-Defense, the Acceptance Paradox, and the CAT. Be Specific: Amy was Labeling herself as a “fraud” and a “failure,” and she was Overgeneralizing from two patients to her entire self and career. Jill emphasized Be Specific. In other words, focus on and accept what's real. What's real is that Amy has been valiantly struggling to help two patients who are stuck. She can just accept that, and get some consultation and guidance from a colleague, which would probably help her get unstuck. So, instead of labelling yourself as “a failure” and “a fraud,” which are just mean, vague words, you can tell yourself that you have a specific problem—in Amy's case, getting stuck with two very anxious patients. Then you can focus on getting some help in solving that specific problem—for example, by seeking consultation from a colleague. Jill said that's what she does when she gets stuck. I used to do that every week, especially when I was first learning cognitive therapy. Getting stuck, then, can simply be an opportunity for growth and learning cool new tools. If we never got stuck, we'd never learn anything new! The very moment Amy stopped believing her negative thoughts, her feelings instantly and dramatically changed. That change happened suddenly, over the course of about 30 seconds, and you can SEE it in her face and hear it in her voice. But it won't last forever! Jill pointed out that the belief at the root of Amy's problem was Perfectionism, and the idea that “I should know exactly what to do with all of my patients.” That may be a pleasant fantasy, and it might even motivate us to work hard and achieve, but it's also a recipe for misery! Follow-up Rapid recovery is great, but will it stick? You will hear excerpts from our brief follow-up session one week later for Relapse Prevention Training. The idea is that none of us can feel happy forever, and negative thoughts will creep back into our minds sooner or later. However, you can anticipate this and prepare for it by challenging your negative thoughts with the same techniques that helped you the first time you improved. That's because the details will usually be different every time you're upset, but the pattern of self-critical negative thoughts will usually be the same. And this DID happen to Amy, just as it will happen to you. But this was an opportunity for her to deepen her understanding of perfectionism and to refine and enhance her ability to respond to her negative thoughts. During the weeks following the recording of this podcast, Amy found that she experienced some resistance to using the counterattack technique. She began to feel like she was relating to her perfectionism as an enemy and attacking it—and in doing so, was discounting all the good in it, including the values that came shining through during the Positive Reframing. She found that a better fit for her, instead of the counterattack, was to disarm her perfectionistic thoughts by seeing the truth in them. In fact, you could view this as yet another form of acceptance. When she did this, the perfectionistic voice in her head naturally backed down and gave her the space to do what matters to her unencumbered by self-criticism. I thought it was cool when she described experiencing waves of joy while doing the laundry—an activity that had always felt like a chore to her before, when it was accompanied by thoughts like “I should have finished this laundry days ago.”   She discovered that without beating up on herself, something as humble as doing the laundry could be incredibly rewarding! After our follow-up meeting, I got a lovely email from Amy about the joys of giving up the need for perfection, and sent this follow-up reply to Amy: Thank you, Amy, you are the BEST! I did a four-day intensive in San Antonio years ago with a small group of about 25 therapists. As you know, I always BS and say “As the Buddha so often said . . . “ followed by something goofy or quasi-mystical or whatever, and most people seem to kind of like that and see it as fun or humorous or whatever. Well, I was doing that at the workshop, and at one of the breaks a woman approached me and said she was interested in my Buddhist remarks because she had been raised as a Buddhist in an Asian country where Buddhism is prominent. I panicked and thought I'd been found out and exposed as a fraud. She went on to say that their family gave up Buddhism, however, and she was sad. I asked why they gave up Buddhism, and she explained that her mother suffered from severe depression, and the Buddhists taught that's because you think you “need” things, and if you're a good Buddhist you won't think that way and you won't ever suffer. Since she suffered, she felt like a failure as a Buddhist, so the family gave up Buddhism. I told her that she might not be aware that there are actually two schools of Buddhism. There's low-level Buddhism and high-level Buddhism. In low-level Buddhism, you're not allowed to want or need anything, and you're not allowed to suffer. That's sounds like that was the school of Buddhism your family was raised in. But there's another type of high-level Buddhism. In high level Buddhism you're allowed to suffer and struggle, and screw up, and fail, and all sorts of stuff. She got animated and said, “I didn't know that. Thank you so much. You've restored my faith in Buddhism, and I can't wait to tell my mother!” Aside from my being elderly and half-demented, I hope that makes some sense in light of our work together with Jill! So, if you need any translation or explanation, Amy, I'm inviting you to join the high-level Buddhist therapist group where you're allowed to screw up with some of your patients, or even many! Warmly, david Subsequent Follow-Up I forgot to tell you what happened to Amy's two “stuck patients.” Well, she got some consultation about why these patients might be stuck, which is nearly always an Agenda Setting problem—the therapist is working harder than the patient due to the need to “help,” and this plays into the patient's ambivalence. This struck a chord, and Amy was very excited to see her patients again, and both suddenly got “unstuck,” although in somewhat different ways. And that is why I call it the Acceptance Paradox. The moment YOU change, and accept yourself, your world will also change! Or, to put it differently. We often see the world as “different” or as “other,” thinking we are separated. The Buddhists see the world as “one,” and that is certainly true in therapy as well. Answers to the Quiz Question David's list of Distortions in Amy's Negative Thought: “I'm failing my patients.” 1.     All-or-Nothing Thinking. This is not realistic because Amy is not stuck with all of her patients. And even though she's still far short of her hopes for these two patients, they may feel they are getting lots of TLC and support from Amy. 2.     Overgeneralization. This is misleading because she's overgeneralizing from her two failures to her “self,” and labeling herself as “a fraud and a failure.” She also overgeneralizing to the future, thinking things will never change or improve so she should get a new career. 3.     Mental Filtering. She only focusing on the two patients who are stuck. 4.     Discounting the Positive. She's overlooking the fact that she's going excellent work with a great many people, and has tremendous integrity, skill, and commitment to her patients. 5.     Magnification and Minimization. She's kind of blowing things out of proportion, although it's always good to focus on patients who aren't yes improving. 6.     Emotional Reasoning, She FEELS like a failure so thinks she IS a failure. 7.     Hidden Should Statement. She thinks she SHOULD be perfect! 8.     Labeling. Same as Overgeneralization. See above. 9.     Self-Blame. She's blaming herself instead of loving herself and focusing on getting she help she needs and deserves! Thanks for listening today! Rhonda, Amy, and David  

„Je mehr ich weiß, desto mehr weiß ich, dass ich nichts weiß!“ Kein anderer Satz beschreibt das Wissenschaftsdilemma der deutschsprachigen Physiotherapie und Sportwissenschaft so gut. Gerade sonnten wir uns noch im Licht der letzten Studie, die unseren Bias füttert, da kommt Daniel Kadlec mit seiner aktuellen Arbeit "With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility: Common Errorsin Meta‑Analyses and Meta‑Regressions in Strength & Conditioning Research“ um die Ecke und berichtet davon, dass in den letzten zwanzig meist zitierten Meta-Analysen signifikante Rechenfehler enthalten sind… und wir dachten, sie wären der Goldstandard. Warum man trotzdem nicht, dem nihilistischen Impuls nachgeben sollte, sämtliche Forschung über Bord zu werfen, darüber unterhalten wir uns mit Tabea Arens, angehende PhDlerin an der MSH Hamburg und Thomas Kott, seines Zeichens Doktor der Mathematik und Schwager von Heppi. Welchen Einfluss haben Publikationszwang, Gate Keeper Phänomene im Agenda Setting der Journals und die Tücken der Statistik auf den Einfluss unserer Studien? Wir wünschen Euch viel Spaß mit der Folge! Shownotes: Daniel Kadlec et al: "With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility: Common Errors in Meta‑Analyses and Meta‑Regressions in Strength & Conditioning Research“ https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40279-022-01766-0 Natalie Bittencourt et al: "Complex systems approach for sports injuries: Moving from risk factor identification to injury pattern recognition-narrative review and new concept" https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305518394_Complex_systems_approach_for_sports_injuries_Moving_from_risk_factor_identification_to_injury_pattern_recognition-narrative_review_and_new_concept Roald Bahr et al: "Why screening tests to predict injury do not work—and probably never will…: a critical review“ https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/50/13/776

E339– Inner Voice – A Heartfelt Chat with Dr. Foojan. In this episode, Dr. Foojan Zeine chats with Dr. David D. Burns, an American psychiatrist and adjunct professor emeritus in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at the Stanford University School of Medicine. He is the author of bestselling books such as Feeling Good: The New Mood Therapy, The Feeling Good Handbook, and Feeling Great: The Revolutionary New Treatment for Depression and Anxiety. Dr. Burns developed an approach to psychotherapy called T.E.A.M. Therapy. T.E.A.M. is an acronym denoting Testing, Empathy, Assessment of Resistance (formerly Agenda Setting), and Methods. TEAM claims to address some of the shortcomings in cognitive therapy and proposes that motivation influences our thoughts, feelings, and actions just as much as our thoughts (or cognitions). Burns states that he draws from at least 15 schools of therapy and hopes that the TEAM approach will be as revolutionary a breakthrough in psychotherapy as C.B.T. was decades ago. www.feelinggood.com, and for the app, go to www.feelinggreat.com. Dr. Burns shared his experience with empathy in joining psychological resistances or conditions for treatment purposes. Check out my website: www.FoojanZeine.com, www.AwarenessIntegration.com, www.Foojan.com

In der vierundneunzigsten Episode unseres populistischen Medien-Podcasts „Voll in die Presse“ spüren wir Populisten in Osteuropa bis Südamerika auf, mit Zwischenstopp bei süddeutschen Naturvölkern. Dabei steht uns Totti als „Kind der Demokratie“ mit politischem Sachverstand zur Seite. Mitgebracht hat sie einen Tennis spielenden Kürbis, eine kampfeslustige Zwiebel und natürlich den einzig wahren Bunga-Bunga-Ritter. Und was haben wir eigentlich mit Barack Obama gemeinsam? Die vollständigen Shownotes mit allen Bildern und Artikel-Links findet ihr unter: www.benanza.de/2024/podcast/vidp94-bayern-blackout-oeko-pariser-und-populisten-twitter-populismus-edition-mit-totti

Agenda Setting erleben wir sehr häufig. Ohne uns dessen bewusst zu sein. Aber so gut wie keine Zeitung und keine Nachrichtensendung berichtet "objektiv." Das betrifft nicht nur die Tendenz in den Artikeln. Sondern auch schon, worüber überhaupt berichtet wird. Welches Thema es auf die Titelseite schafft. Und welches irgendwo an Randnotiz endet. Agenda Setting ist ein wichtiger Teil der politischen Kommunikation. Kann aber auch im Alltag genutzt werden. Genau darüber mehr in dieser Folge.

In our first episode, we reveal exclusive transfer news that could have a big impact on the Premier League title race. Host Lewis Peers is joined by Football Insider editor Wayne Veysey and transfer correspondent Pete O'Rourke to set the agenda and discuss the deals already taking shape ahead of the January window. We have a Ruben Neves exclusive (but, it's not Newcastle United), news on a Liverpool defender deal, a shock Tottenham player move and we also reveal a sensational Aston Villa plan that will raise eyebrows. Newcastle have devised a new three-man signing plan as injury crisis heralds complete U-turn, while a surprise Premier League club is emerging as the most active in the market ahead of January and they are ready to smash their transfer record to achieve their ambitious plans! We also have the latest on big-name moves in January for Jadon Sancho, Kalvin Phillips and Aaron Ramsdale. In the Championship, we discuss Leeds United wonderkid Archie Gray and if a move to Liverpool really could happen. The essential new football podcast for football fans.   Subscribe to https://www.youtube.com/@footballinsiderchannel Follow our Clips page https://www.youtube.com/@footballinsiderchannel/shorts Follow us: Website: https://www.footballinsider247.com/ Facebook:  / insiderfootball    Twitter:  / footyinsider247   Instagram: @football_insider247     ​  

Sports, Media, and Communication Lecture 9 - Agenda Setting. What is it and what are the different types? Also, we discuss gatekeeping and look at a sports highlight.

This week on the show begins the first of three student segments from my Media & Politics course at UVA Wise. Please join Michael Martin and Morgan Blankenship as they chat with Susan Liebell (Saint Joseph's University) and Annelise Russell (University of Kentucky) about the relationship between media coverage and public opinion and the government's focus on guns.

It is one thing to find a desirable location to start up or purchase a practice. It is quite another thing to create an enduring practice brand. The Two-Step Model is a useful process to do this effectively and scientifically.  This episode is a follow-up to our episode on Framing Theory and Agenda Setting of a couple of weeks ago. The question is "How do you build credibility quickly and at a low-cost *and reasonable effort.  That is where the application of this theory really becomes useful. 

Russia seeks to lay siege to remaining Ukrainian forces in the eastern city of Bakhmut; China lays out its economic and policy agenda for the year ahead; and nearly 200 countries reach a landmark deal on the high seas.

This week our episode deals with presenting the reasons the patient base should choose YOUR practice and how you can present the benefits of seeking can in a more persuasive manner. It is based upon tools we call Agenda Setting and Framing Theories and they are cutting-edge market research. They have been proven wildly effective in recent decades to help "move the needle" for healthcare practices to not only choose YOUR practice but to build a loyal and enthusiastic patient base. When you are ready Doctor Demographics can customize your image and practice promotion to make them more effective and targeted. Come to www.DoctorDemographics.com to get a sample report and a price quote.

Hier geht es zu unserem kostenfreien Storytelling Buch: https://www.storytellingbuch.de Welche Themen kann ich z.B. als Dienstleister, Coach oder Berater in Social Media auf Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn, Youtube und Co. bringen? Wie müssen meine Themen im B2B Bereich z.B. in einem Industrie-Unternehmen gestaltet sein? Alle Antworten bekommst du hier! Hast du auch eine Frage? Dann sende sie uns an: office@kuvg.de Zu unserem kostenlosen neuen Buch geht es hier: https://www.storytellingbuch.de Hier geht es zu den 7 goldenen Regeln im Copywriting: https://www.geschichtendieverkaufen.de/goldene-regeln Hier findest du unseren YouTube-Kanal: https://www.youtube.com/c/Geschichtendieverkaufen Der Podcast für Content Marketing, Business Storytelling, Social Media und Kommunikation in Marketing, HR und Vertrieb & Sales

Hazte mecenas: https://www.patreon.com/simplepolitica - Existe desde hace décadas un teoría, la de la agenda setting, que nos dice que los temas sobre los que hablan los medios son aquellos temas sobre los que los ciudadanos se basarán para tomar decisiones y hacer valoraciones sobre sus líderes políticos y partidos. _ Comenta y pídenos temas: https://www.simplepolitica.com/contactar/ Echa un vistazo a nuestros cursos: https://www.simplepolitica.com/cursos Síguenos en Twitter: https://twitter.com/simple_politica Síguenos en Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/simple_politica/ Síguenos en Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/simplepolitica

CNN Following Davos Orders, Weaponized Vagueness, & YouTube Censored Us (DNB) Thank you for listening. Help Keep The Show Going With A One Time Donation At The Like Below PayPal.Me To Get Exclusive XR Content, DNB Ad Free, Check Out The Links Below Propaganda Report is creating Podcasts | Patreon Propaganda Report Community (locals.com) Propaganda Report | Rokfin Follow me on Twitter (12) Binkley (@freedomactradio) / Twitter Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Profs Jarman and Greer explain how some problems get on the political agenda while others are ignored. How can health policy advocates use Kingdon's 'three streams' model to better understand the political process and their chances of creating change?Find work from the HMP Governance Lab at www.hmpgovernancelab.org and on Twitter @HMPgovlabMusic: 'Blippy Trance' by Kevin MacLeod

Think Tanks? Denkfabriken? Politische Lobbyisten? Drei Begriffe -mit unterschiedlicher Anmutung- für mittlerweile viele Tausend Einrichtungen, die sich dem Agenda-Setting, der Politik-Beratung und der Einflussnahme auf die öffentliche Meinungsbildung verschrieben haben. Der Begriff Think Tank kommt natürlich aus dem angelsächsischen Raum und zu den bekanntesten und ältesten Denkfabriken gehören die Brookings Institution aus den USA oder das Chatham House in Großbritannien. Bei uns in Deutschland sind traditionell eher die parteinahen Stiftungen, wie die Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung und die Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, eine Art Think Tank. In den letzten Jahrzehnten sind jedoch nach US-Vorbild sehr viele weitere Player hinzugekommen. Die meisten Think Tanks haben klare politische Ziele und je nach Art des Think Tanks variiert der Anteil an eigenen wissenschaftlichen Mitarbeitern und überwiegen Marketing- und PR-Experten. Und stets ein Netz an einflussreichen Persönlichkeiten aus der Politik oder der Wirtschaft. Man unterscheidet zwischen staatlichen, akademischen und advokatorischen Denkfabriken. Haben Kritiker Recht, dass gerade diese eher Meister in der agendagerechten Verpackung und Aufbereitung sind und teilweise sehr aggressiv in der Beeinflussung – also toughe Lobbyisten?

Welcome to The Agenda – Setting the scene for your week in the world of The Cynic and Celtic.We break down The Cynic schedule for the upcoming week and what you can expect.We discuss Celtic's fantastic performance in the 4-0 victory over Ross County at the weekend. We focus on all the recent news including Maeda pulling out of the Japan squad and Kyogo discussing his return. We look over upcoming fixtures and the opportunities the break provides for the manager and squad.Lewis Laird returns with The Colt Report.

This time on Tony's Political Ramblings, I discuss who has the most control over setting the Federal Agenda.REFERENCES:https://www.robertcaro.com/the-books/master-of-the-senate/https://www.amazon.com/Alternatives-Policies-Epilogue-Classics-Political/dp/020500086X

La selezione delle notizie da parte dei media influenza enormemente la nostra percezione della realtà. Ne parlo in questo video a partire da un case history particolare riguardante le morti causa parto.

Digiloglounge Digital | Online Diskussion [30.09.2021] Prof. Dr. Marc Debus spricht mit uns über den Rückgang an Vertrauen in politische Institutionen und welchen Einfluss Online-Aktivitäten von Bürger:innen und die Interaktion mit Politiker:innen auf ihre Wahrnehmung, Einstellungen und Verhalten haben. Die bisherige Forschung hat gezeigt, dass digitale Medienbeteiligung einen positiven, wenn auch geringen Effekt auf die politische Beteiligung hat. Während sich die Wissenschaft meist auf die Erklärung der Größe dieses Effekts konzentriert hat, soll im Projekt von Prof. Dr. Marc Debus, Prof. Dr. Harald Schoen und Dr. Rosa M. Navarrete untersucht werden, wie sich das Agenda Setting von oben nach unten und von unten nach oben durch den Gebrauch digitaler Medien verändert hat. Im Projekt wird unter Anderem analysiert, ob und wie Parteien und Politiker:innen ihre Online-Beteiligung nutzen, um das Verhalten der Bürger:innen zu beeinflussen.

Unsere Gäste Die Global Solutions Initiative ist ein global orientiertes Institut, das aus einem Netzwerk weltbekannter Think Tanks besteht. Er schlägt politische Antworten auf die großen globalen Probleme vor, die von den G20, den G7 und anderen Foren der globalen Governance angegangen werden. Mit Katharina und Christoph spreche ich unter anderem über forschungsbasierte Politikberatung, globales Agenda-Setting und wie wir Wohlstand neu definieren können. https://www.global-solutions-initiative.org/

Jordana Zeldin is the Founder and Sales Coach at Spriing Training. In this episode, Jordana digs into discovery and her D.I.S.A.R.M. agenda-setting framework. It's a killer way to disarm your prospects and get the discovery call started on the right foot. Connect with Jordana on LinkedIn here and Spriing Training here. Resources mentioned in the episode: Show Notes Page  Here are three more ways to get help with your prospecting: Our best bite-sized content. Want my best LinkedIn posts, podcasts, and webinars? Stuff you can implement in 10-15 minutes or less? Look no further. Outbound Squad. A program for reps who crave accountability, structure, and results over theory. If you hate hitting plateaus in your sales career, check it out. Accelerator. Give your team hands-on training and coaching to overcome call reluctance, build meaningful relationships with prospects, and land more meetings through their cold outreach.

The Cynic Weekly for the next few weeks will showcase the content that goes out on our subscription service.Today we present 'The Agenda' which was recorded on Monday 31.05.2021 at midday and released straight after. It records every Monday.Welcome to The Agenda – Setting the scene for your week in the world of The Cynic and Celtic.We break down The Cynic schedule for the upcoming week and what you can expect.We discuss the fallout from Friday night and the news that Eddie Howe will not be the Celtic manager. We look at the timeline of events and the reasoning given from both sides. Ange Postecoglu is then discussed at length.

Secrets Of Saturn Live Stream - 59 - March 24, 2021 - The Agenda-Setting Function Of Mass Media by Jason Lindgren

Im Interview: Hans Peter Riegel, Art Direktor, Autor und Beuys-Biograf, spricht über 100 Jahre Joseph Beuys und seine Skepsis. Agenda-Setting als wahrer Kern des Bundestagswahlkampfs. Börsenreporterin Sophie Schimansky analysiert den Kurssturz bei den Tech-Werten an der Wall Street. Bayern-Star Thomas Müller vor National-Elf-Comeback? Bienen als fliegender Corona-Schnelltest.

Die Podcastin kontrovers: Isabel Rohner und Regula Stämpfli über Annalena Baerbock, Medien, Kandidaturen, Schauspielende, Agenda Setting, Kritik & digitale Verleumdungsmaschinen. Die Rohnerin führt ins Thema Kanzlerinnen-Kandidatur ein: Personalentscheidungen bei Union und Grünen. Konkret zu Annalena Baerbock und Robert Habeck, die gemeinsam verkündeten, dass Baerbock die erste grüne Kanzlerinkandidatin wird. Medienbeobachtung von der Rohnerin: 1. Hätten sich zwei Frauen einigen müssen, wäre die Nr. ZWEI NIE so ein Thema gewesen. 2. In der Berichterstattung über die grüne Entscheidung schwang - bewusst oder unbewusst - eine Gönnerhaftigkeit mit: Baerbocks Erfolg wurde über Habeck definiert. So hieß es in den Medien, er habe ihr "die Bühne überlassen", er habe "Macht abgegeben", er habe "verzichtet". Verzichten kann man allerdings nur, wenn man selber einen Anspruch auf eben eine Sache hat. 3. Leerstellen von Sprache und die Gefahr, in übliche Denk- oder Sprachmuster zu verfallen. Übel die Nachfragen im ZEIT-Interview mit Robert Habeck: "Kann eine Nummer 1 eine Nummer 2 werden" oder ob Annalena Baerbock "das Maskottchen des grünen Wahlkampfes" sei.Die Podcastin stimmt überein: Rollen umkehren. Frauen keine Fragen stellen, die Männer nicht auch gestellt werden. Dann heftige Diskussion von Isabel Rohner und Regula Stämpfli über die Schauspielende-Aktion #allesdichtmachen, die auf TWITTER mit #allesschlichtmachen beantwortet wurde. laStaempfli entnervt und mit klarer Positionierung zur Kritik als Parrhesia: Der Zeitgeschichte ist der Mut, die Fähigkeit und auch die Auseinandersetzung mit echter Kritik, d.h. an die Wurzeln gehende Kritik, abhanden gekommen. Rohnerin findet das überhaupt nicht: Die Aktion sei zynisch, verfehlt und führe ins Leere. Die Podcastin stimmt überein, dass sie in dieser Frage mehr als geteilt ist

Aufbauend auf Gewohnheit 4 - Klarheit schaffen und ihren 4 Dimensionen 1. Klarheit in der Intention, 2. Klarheit in der Vision, 3. Klarheit in der Kommunikation Aufbauend auf Gewohnheit 4 - Klarheit schaffen und ihren 4 Dimensionen (1. Klarheit in der Intention, 2. Klarheit in der Vision, 3. Klarheit in der Kommunikation 4. Klarheit des Fokus) beschäftigen wir uns in der heutigen Folge damit, wie diese Klarheit sich in der eigenen Kommunikation widerspiegelt. Oder eben auch nicht ...

Teori Penentuan Agenda pertama kali dirumuskan pada tahun 1972 oleh Maswell McCombs dan Donald Shaw menjelaskan relasi antara penekanan media massa pada isu tertentu dan arti penting yang dinisbahkan audien kepada isu itu. Audio ini juga akan dipublish di youtube yang bisa diakses melalui akun Miftahul Arzak

The latest Cabinet reshuffle sees several women elevated to the highest ranks in government and the establishment of a women's taskforce. But will it leave women doing the heavy lifting? David Crowe, the chief political correspondent for The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age, joins Fran and PK.

In this special episode-a look at Agenda Setting Theory. This podcast is taken from one of my college lectures that discusses the impact of this important mass media theory. Take a listen.

Este fue el segmento semanal del programa "Hoy Mismo" con José Elías Torres por WPAB 550 AM PONCE:. Agenda setting theory – teoría de establecer la agenda temática, aplicado a los temas de los turistas desordenados, el aniversario de la pandemia y la controversia entre El Nuevo Día y la senadora de Proyecto Dignidad en torno a las terapias de conversión. --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/sandrarodriguezcotto/support

Week 5 (Mar 1) of COMM 226 - The Social Impact of Mass Media This episode covers the theory of Agenda Setting and if, how, and why news media decide which stories are newsworthy and important. With instructor Stephen Warren

En este episodio aprenderás sobre la "agenda setting" y cómo estar familiarizado con esta teoría puede ayudarte en tus apariciones en los medios de comunicación como televisión, radio o prensa escrita.  Descarga esta guía que recoge las 10 claves más básicas pero esenciales para APARECER y PERMANECER en las redes sociales. Para ayudarte a mantener la credibilidad y generar confianza. Algo así como un protocolo para el manejo de redes sociales de profesionales o líderes.   ¡Descárgala! Es gratis Link: https://velmahernandez.com/podcast/

Listen, Subscribe, Share the show with friends, Donate. Help us keep this train rollin! Share and subscribe. The Propaganda Report Podcast: DNB: Media Agenda Setting Theory In Full Effect, AJC Ignores Huge Story In It's Own Backyard, & Please Debunk It!   Propaganda Report Store https://the-propaganda-report.myshopify.com/collections/all SPONSORS Neighbors Feed & Seed https://www.neighborsfeedandseed.com/ Coupon Code: PROP True Hemp Science https://www.truehempscience.com/propreport/ Coupon Code: PROPCODE Propaganda Report Patreon https://www.patreon.com/propagandareport Propaganda Report Rokfin https://rokfin.com/post/17767/The-Great-Reset-Part-I-The-Future-The-Elites-Are-Planning-For-You DONATE LINKS If you find value in the content we produce and want to help us keep this train rollin, drop us a donation via Paypal or become a Patreon. (links below) Every little bit helps. Thank you! And thank you to everyone who has and continues to support the show. It’s your support that enables us to continue producing shows. Paypal Patreon SUBSCRIBE LINKS Subscribe on iTunes  Subscribe on Google Play Music Listen on Google Podcasts Listen on Tunein Listen on Stitcher Follow on Spotify Like and Follow us on Facebook Follow Monica on Twitter Follow Binkley on Twitter Subscribe to Binkley’s Youtube Channel https://www.paypal.me/BradBinkley https://www.patreon.com/propagandareport https://twitter.com/freedomactradio https://twitter.com/MonicaPerezShow https://www.youtube.com/bradbinkley https://www.youtube.com/monicaperez 

Zeitungen waren die sicheren Verlierer der Digitalisierung. Bis sie doch gewannen. Alteingesessene Medienmarken schlagen plötzlich Magazine, die während der Digitalisierung geboren wurden. Wie haben sie das geschafft? Was können wir von der Zeitungsbranche lernen? Bonus: The Defender aus Chicago. Eine afroamerikanische Zeitung zeigt uns, wie wir durch Agenda Setting die Gesellschaft ändern können. Lrnings: 1. Man kann sich in Größe und Relevanz nicht hineinschrumpfen. 2. Klagen ist keine Strategie. Man muss mit der Welt so arbeiten, wie man sie vorfindet, und nicht so, wie man sie sich vorstellt. 3. Wenn du eine Unternehmung weiterentwickeln möchtest, fang an ihrem Kern an. 4. Egal wie groß und unbezwingbar das Projekt erscheint: formuliere eine Vision, definiere Ziele und fang an. 5. Versuche nicht mit einem Modell alles richtig zu machen. Nähere dich durch viele kleine Tests dem optimalen Ergebnis an. 6. Investier in die Marke und in Qualität, nicht in Short Cuts. 7. Wenn du willst, dass dein Problem gelöst wird, bemühe dich darum, dass es sichtbar wird. Alle Quellen findest du in den Shownotes oder auf www.Lrnings.de!

Pembahasan kali ini mengenai Teori Agenda Setting. Materi podcast ini mencoba menjelaskan secara sederhana bentuk-bentuk penerapan dari Teori Agenda Setting dan relevansinya hingga saat ini. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/yuri-alfrin-aladdin/message

Ein Beitrag von Wolfgang Wodarg. Die Bundesländer wurden vom Gesundheitsminister in der letzten Oktoberwoche aufgerufen, überall in Deutschland die Einrichtung von insgesamt circa 60 Impfzentren vorzubereiten. Damit wird erstmals der normale Impfbetrieb weitgehend aus den Arztpraxen in Einrichtungen verlegt, die – wie schon die PCR-Testungen – hauptsächlich in der Hand von großen privaten Laboren und Dienstleistern betrieben werden. Es wäre – auch wenn durch Notverordnungen rechtlich möglich gemacht – grobe Fahrlässigkeit, die Eingriffe von patientenfernen Hilfskräften in Massenaktionen durchführen zu lassen. Es ist immer der gleiche Trick: Eine Krankheit wird unter der medialen Lupe vergrößert und als möglichst schreckliche Gefahr präsentiert. Das mögen Medien ja gern. Durch solches Agenda-Setting merken die meisten Menschen erstmalig, dass es die angeblich gefährliche Krankheit überhaupt gibt. Das war früher bei Seuchen anders. Den Rest erledigen korrupte Politiker und Wissenschaftler. Und wenn die Angst groß genug ist, müssen Regierungen natürlich reagieren. Bisher haben sie bei „Pandemien“ immer nur Impfstoffe finanziert, aufgekauft und für Impfungen die Werbung übernommen. Jetzt helfen sie sogar selbst mit, die Angst vor der „Seuche“ zu organisieren. ... hier weiterlesen: https://kenfm.de/die-impfaktion-nutzen-fuer-wenige-schaden-fuer-viele-von-wolfgang-wodarg See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Dr. Terri Towner, Professor of Political Science at Oakland University, discusses her research on political campaigning and information on Instagram. We also give first impressions from the last presidential debate between Trump and Biden, and break down some poll results about citizens' social media use during the coronavirus pandemic. Here are the two studies we discuss in the episode: The Image is the Message: Instagram Marketing and the 2016 Presidential Primary SeasonInstagramming Issues: Agenda Setting During the 2016 Presidential Campaign

Paul Wolter erklärt wie der Bundesverband daran arbeitet, die politischen Rahmenbedingungen für eine erfolgreiche Gründerszene mitzugestalten, welchen Herausforderungen er beim Einstieg vor 4 Jahren gegenüber stand und was sich bis heute getan hat. Besonders große Aufmerksamkeit erhielt der Verband in Medien und Politik, mit und seit der Wahl des neuen Verbandspräsidenten Christian Miele Ende 2019. Christian Miele ist bekannte Szenengröße, Investor und Multiplikator in der deutschen Digitallandschaft und markiert die neue Agenda und Ära des Verbandes maßgeblich mit. Paul gibt einen Einblick, warum sich das Team für dieses Jahr kommunikativ vor allem auf das Thema Mitarbeitervergütung konzentriert, welche Ziele hier schon erreicht wurden und wie sich die Lage von Startups durch Corona verändert hat. In einer spannenden Diskussion rund um den Digitalstandort Deutschland verrät Paul auch, mit welchen Tools sein Team erfolgreich arbeitet, um die schnellste Verbandskommunikation Deutschlands zu organisieren.

El punto central de esta teoría es la capacidad de las “mass media” o medios de comunicación para graduar la importancia de la información que se va a difundir, dándole un orden de prioridad para obtener mayor audiencia, mayor impacto y una determinada conciencia sobre la noticia. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/fernando-c-more/message

Why do we pay attention to some problems and not others? Profs Jarman and Greer discuss the process of agenda setting, and we learn that Prof Greer can't bake a cake.HMP 615 Canvas siteFind work from the HMP Governance Lab at www.hmpgovernancelab.org and on Twitter @HMPgovlabMusic: 'Blippy Trance' by Kevin MacLeod

Why do we pay attention to some problems and not others? Profs Jarman and Greer take a look at the process of agenda setting and John Kingdon's multiple streams model. And we learn that Prof Greer can't bake a cake.PH 384 Canvas siteFind work from the HMP Governance Lab at www.hmpgovernancelab.org and on Twitter @HMPgovlabMusic: 'Blippy Trance' by Kevin MacLeod

Di sini kamu bakal tau siapa penggagasnya, definisinya, asumsinya dan lain-lain. Yuk check this out! Mendengarkan itu mudah

In this episode, I discuss three topics related to the media and crime. First, I explore how the news and entertainment media directly effect crime by examining the Great Aggression Model and the Rudder Theory (including copycat criminals). Next I talk about bias in crime reporting, both racial and political. Lastly, I speak to how the media influences criminal justice policy and reform through tactics such as agenda setting and priming, all in an attempt to move forward a political agenda. Sources for this episode: Beale, S. (2006). The News Media's Influence on Criminal Justice Policy: How Market-Driven News Promotes Punitiveness. William and Mary Law Review. *Curiel, R., Cresci, S., Muntean, C., Bishop, S. (2020). Crime and its fear in social media. Palgrave Communications. *Eisen, L, Roeder, O. (2015). America's Faulty Perception of Crime Rates. Brennan Center for Justice. *Ghandoosh, N. (2014). Race and Punishment: Racial Perceptions of Crime and Support for Punative Policies. The Sentencing Project. *Guy, F. (2018). The Columbine Effect and Mass School Shootings.Crime Traveler. Holbrook, R., Hill, T. (2006). Agenda-Setting and Priming in Prime Time Television: Crime Dramas as Political Cues. Political Communication, 22(3), 277-295.  Ifill, G. (1992). The 1992 Campaign: The Democrats; Clinton, in Houston Speech, Assails Bush on Crime. The New York Times. *Lynch, P. (2020). 5 Notorious Copycat Killers in the 20th Century. History Collection. Olasov, I. (2016). Offensive Political Dog-Whistles: You know them when you hear them. Or do you? Vox. *Pew, A., Goldbeck, A., Halsted, C., Zuckerman, D. (2020). Does Media Coverage Inspire Copy Cat Mass Shootings? National Center for Health Research. *Relman, E. (2018). These are the most and least biased new outlets in the US, according to Americans. Business Insider. *Rios, V., Ferguson, C. (2018). News media coverage of crime and violent drug crime. A case for cause of catalyst. Justice Quarterly. Forthcoming. Werner, E. (2015). Media Effects on Attitudes Towards Criminal Justice System. Undergraduate Honors Thesis. *Withers, R. (2018). George H.W. Bush's “Willie Horton” ad will always be the reference point for dog-whistle racism. Vox. **I ran out of characters in the description to put the web addresses for the sources. If you would like any of the websites from the above sources, please email me at crisisofcrime@gmail.com and I will send them to you. Thanks! 

สวัสดีครับ ตอนนี้ของส่องสื่อ Weekly Podcast เราจะมาพูดกันถึงเรื่องของ Agenda Setting ว่าอันที่จริงแล้วมันเกิดได้อย่างไร? แล้วคนนำมาใช้กันอย่างไรบ้าง? รวมไปถึงผลกระทบที่เกิดจากการใช้ Social Network ที่ต้องระวังก่อนที่จะโพสต์ต่างๆ อีกด้วย ติดตามความหมายพร้อมเรื่องราวความรู้ที่เกี่ยวข้องใน “ส่องสื่อ Weekly” ตอนนี้ได้เลยครับ Host:- นนท์-กาศิพัฒณ์ วงศ์วิทยกำจร สายป่าน-กนกวรรณ ภารยาท --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/modernistth/support

01:23 Wie kam Gerald Loacker zur Gesundheitspolitik?08:02: Agenda Setting im politischen Wettbewerb14:40: Zielgruppen und Wähler*innenschaft20:34: Inhaltliche Komplexität und Reduktion – ein Spagat33:30: Social Media Plattformen als politische BühneWer hat das österreichische Gesundheitssystem eigentlich wirklich verstanden? Glaubt man Gerald Loacker, Sprecher für Soziales und Gesundheit bei den NEOS, die Wenigsten. Und tatsächlich eignen sich Themen wie Krankenversicherung und Finanzierung des Gesundheitssektors nur mäßig für prägnante und knackige politische Slogans. Zumal das Feld durch Unterschiede je nach Berufsfeld und Bundesland umso heterogener wirkt. Eine geeignete Kommunikationsstrategie muss also den Spagat zwischen pointierter Profilierung und inhaltlicher Komplexität, die der Thematik gerecht wird, erreichen. Eine Aufgabe, die umso schwerer fällt, wenn mal als kleine Partei wie die NEOS nicht auf den Kommunikationsapparat der großen Parteien zurückgreifen kann. Um im medialen Diskurs nicht unterzugehen, kann sich die Politik auf Strategien verlassen, die auch im Marketing unerlässlich sind:  Kenntnis der Zielgruppe: In der Politik wie im Content Marketing ist eine möglichst breite Streuung der Inhalte nicht zwingend das Ziel. Vielmehr schützt eine möglichst genaue Definition der Zielgruppe bzw. der Wähler*innenschaft vor allzu großen Energieverlusten. Und sorgt für eine qualifizierte Aufnahme der Inhalte.  Cleverer Einsatz von Plattformen: Gerade weil man es mit seinen Themen nicht jeden Tag auf die Titelseite der Heute schaffen kann, braucht es eine Vielzahl von Kanälen und Plattformen, die Inhalte entsprechend transportieren können. So musste sich Gerald Loacker neben Facebook, Twitter und LinkedIn auch an Instagram als Plattform gewöhnen. In einem Newsletter fasst er außerdem die Ergebnisse vergangener Plenarsitzungen zusammen. Doch auch hier geht ohne eine gute Content Strategie nichts, schließlich hat jeder Kanal seine Tücken und Eigenheiten. Doch solange man authentisch bleibt, spricht nichts gegen mehrere Social Media Plattformen als Bühne für guten Content. Ob in der Politik oder im Healthcare Marketing.  Wie auch die Gesundheitspolitik stehen Produkte und Dienstleistungen aus Pharma und Healthcare Sektor vor einem grundsätzlichen Problem: Sie haben essentielle Bedeutung für alle Menschen, doch lassen sie sich aufgrund ihrer Komplexität häufig schwer vermarkten. Inhalte müssen daher ansprechend aufbereitet und zielgenau ausgespielt werden. Inhaltliche Expertise und das Wissen über gute Kommunikation sind da von Vorteil. In einem Beratungsgespräch mit unserem Experten René Neubach erfahren Sie, welche Möglichkeiten Sie für die Präsentation ihrer Themen und Produkte habe. Wir freuen uns über Ihre Nachricht! 

Unser Gespräch rollt an allerlei Themen vorbei wie dem Perspektivwechsel, welcher beispielsweise aus den Augen eines Kindes die Frage aufwerfen könnte, wer eigentlich unsere Städte und Mobilität plant? Wir sprechen darüber, wieso solch wichtige Aufgaben wie zum Beispiel für eine gleichberechtigtere Mobilitätskultur zu kämpfen eigentlich immer ehrenamtlich geleistet werden? Was das mit intrinsischer Motivation zu tun hat und wie Isabell und Changing Cities es schaffen, das Agenda-Setting in der lokalen oder nationalen Politk zu beeinflussen. Wir reden natürlich über Pop-Up aka Corona-Bikelanes in Berlin und wieso diese weltweiten Provisorien eine seltene Gelegenheit sind für nachhaltigen Wandel. Solange der politische Wille und die gesetzliche Grundlage in Form des Mobilitätsgesetzes in Berlin vorhanden sind.

¿Qué impactos tiene el coronavirus (COVID-19) en la manera en la que vivimos y socializamos? ¿Qué implicaciones tiene para la agenda de desarrollo? Esto y más, en el primer episodio de la segunda temporada de Agenda Setting.

Die (erste) Jubiläumsepisode. Ein Rückblick auf zwei Monate Ennoying und eine Vorschau auf die kommende Zeit. Im Interview: Dr. Tong-Jin Smith, Journalistin, Dozentin und Mentorin vieler junger Öffentlichkeitsmenschen. So auch von mir. / Shownotes: https://ennoying.de/?p=449 / Social Media: @ennoyingpodcast / Musik und Mix: Torben Budelmann + Cartas a Felice (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0) / Feedback: hallo@ennoying.de

Rhonda and David address five fascinating questions in today’s podcast, including these: “I’m incredibly shy. How do you talk to girls?” How did you get over your fear of vomiting? Do you still use behavioral techniques like Exposure? Should I try to include the E and A of TEAM when trying to crush my negative thoughts on my daily mood log? And how would I do this? Please give us a podcast on how to express anger. Nandini writes: I have zero experience dating and talking to girls. I don't know how to even make girl as friend. Whenever I talk to a girl, the next day I think “How should I talk to her?” Should I go to her because now she wants me to talk to her? Which makes me very nervous. And also. if am talking to a girl I think about when I will have to go to her next time. When I’m doing my work, I think should I go to her, because she works in our office. Means I don't know how to do that! Can you help? Rhonda and David respond with some simple advice, but encourage all listeners to use the search function on his website to get lots of great links to helpful material on just about any mental health topic, including flirting, dating, shyness, or just about anything. In additon, my book, Intimate Connections, could be really helpful to Nandini, as well as my books, When Panic Attacks and The Feeling Good Handbook, that all have extensive sections on anxiety. You can find all of them at my books page (https://feelinggood.com/books/). In addition, we’ve recently featured several podcasts on shyness and social anxiety, including: 128: Intense Social Anxiety–I’m Losing Control! What Can I Do? 134: Smashing Shyness: Part 1 135: Smashing Shyness: Part 2 169: More on Social Anxiety–the Case for Vulnerability 142: Performance Anxiety: The Story of Rhonda, Part 1 143: Performance Anxiety: The Conclusion 088: Role-Play Techniques —Feared Fantasy Revisited How did you get over your fear of vomiting? DB, I know you probably don't remember me because it's been years since we emailed, but you helped me via your Ask The Guru section of your old website years ago and we occasionally emailed back and forth after that. Which reminds me to once again thank you for your books and how you've dedicated your life to your work. It has made a difference in my life and I would imagine literally millions of others. What a wonderful thing. I stumbled upon an article about you in the Stanford Magazine from 2013 and learned something I didn't know -- you suffered at one time from a fear of vomiting. I've dealt with that since I was a kid. It's not as severe now as it once was, but I'm wondering what CBT methods might be useful for that particular issue. (No chance I'm taking ipecac syrup!). I know you're busy so I understand if you can't answer, but wanted to reach out anyway. Thanks in advance, Steve  Do you still use behavioral techniques? Dear Dr Burns, I really appreciate your efforts in this area cognitive behavioral therapy, but your efforts and techniques are so powerful and you use them so efficiently that almost no time you have to use the behavioral part of it as patients seem to be relieved enough with cognitive work. One thing I am curious about is that if you can't get enough response with cognitive work, and if you have to use the exposure model, and the patient is afraid of exposure because he or she goes into a severe state of anxiety, depersonalization or derealization symptoms and feels like gonna go crazy and lose control, would you still push him or her to the cognitive exposure and are there any risks of it? Thank you very much. Jordan  Should I try to include the E and A of TEAM when trying to crush my negative thoughts on my daily mood log? And how would I do this? Dr. Burns, It would be impossible for me to heap sufficient praise over you and your podcasts because I've really gained an intangible amount of benefits and continue to learn something actionable from both on a weekly basis. I'm currently finishing Feeling Good Together and am finding the experience transformative. I wanted to see if I could ask you a question regarding the Daily Mood Log and crushing negative thoughts. I'm completely on board with the notion of fractal psychotherapy and the idea that all of our negative emotions will be captured in a single negative thought and by crushing it, we will feel substantial relief and even euphoria. I've been using the Daily Mood Log to inconsistent effect. I write down my negative thoughts, identify the distortions and then identify statements to attack that thought that are 100% true. Perhaps I am rushing through the exercise too quickly, as I try to make it a daily habit. But is it possible I'm missing an element? I've noticed in your live therapy that you allocate a sizable chunk of time to Empathy and Agenda Setting. Is it possible that the E and A in TEAM's absence in my Daily Mood Log is stunting my progress? Is there a way and should I be implementing both into the exercise? I would appreciate any input you have on this question and I look forward to continuing to listen to the podcast as new episodes come out, along with your new book and App! Best regards, Tommy Dr. Burns, Thank you! I’d be happy for you to use my first name. I’ll look out for it in the upcoming podcasts. Have a great rest of the week. Tommy Please give us a podcast on how to express anger! Hey Dr. Burns, I’m loving the podcast, and my favorite podcasts are the Ask David and Live Treatment ones! Also, I can’t wait for the new app and book! I did have a question, which I can go into more detail if need be. Specifically, what podcasts and book would you recommend for anger? I’m unsure how to express anger in a productive way (in my relationship), and would love more guidance and practice prior to trying to use the 5 secrets “live”. Thanks in advance! Thanks for listening today, and thanks for all the kind comments and totally awesome questions! David and Rhonda

This insight is taken from our full interview with María José Barragán in episode 018 of the podcast, where you can listen to the full interview.  Our ‘Insight’ episodes feature short interview segments taken from our previous regular interviews, highlighting noteworthy topics discussed. María José is the Science Director of the Charles Darwin Foundation on the Galapagos Islands, Ecuador. She oversees the organization's 20 marine and terrestrial research projects, and is helping to make many of them interdisciplinary and inclusive of local stakeholder needs and knowledge. In the episode she explains the multi-stakeholder and multi-disciplinary agenda setting processes guiding the Charles Darwin Foundation and their research activities on the Galapagos Islands. https://www.darwinfoundation.org/en/ María José received a PhD in Human Geography at Memorial University of Newfoundland in St. John’s, Canada. Her undergraduate degree was in the Biological Sciences at the Pontifical Catholic University, Ecuador, and Master’s degree from the Technical University of Munich, Germany (TUM) focusing on coastal marine ecosystems and marine protected areas (MPAs).  Her Ph.D. research was inspired by the interactive governance framework, and was applied to better understand the governability of MPAs (with a case study developed in the Galapagos Marine Reserve). After graduation she collaborated with research clusters of the Too Big To Ignore (TBTI) Global Research Partnership for Small-Scale Fisheries Research, conducting research and publishing on small-scale fisheries. Later on, she had a postdoctoral research position at the “Development and Knowledge Sociology” Working Group at the Leibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research (ZMT) in Bremen, Germany. During that time, she conceptualized and co-developed new research agendas, by integrating the development and knowledge sociology approach into small-scale fisheries sustainability, fishing communities’ viability, food security from the marine perspective and marine resource governance. Finding Sustainability Podcast @find_sust_pod https://twitter.com/find_sust_pod Environmental Social Science Network https://essnetwork.net/ https://twitter.com/ESS_Network @ESS_Network

Rhonda and David address a question from Karolina, a therapist in Poland who was failing with a depressed patient who felt totally convinced he was a “useless” human being. I think you will find their discussion of this case fascinating, as it deals with the cause of practically ALL therapeutic failure, and illustrates the solution al well, using TEAM-CBT methods and concepts. Today’s podcast is intended for therapists and patients alike! For the show notes, we are including the email David received from Karolina, as well as his initial response. Dear Dr. Burns, I've been listening to your podcast for 6 months now and it's been so helpful with my work as a therapist as well as in my personal life. I'm starting to develop a habit of considering every unwanted state with a "what does it say that's awesome about me?" and I'm much happier now :). I'm wondering if you'd consider helping me some more. I have a client who's been struggling with depression for many years. At the moment he's doing ok and his mood is up. Lately the topic of his uselessness came up again and he's willing to work on that. He said he'll consider the possibility that he's not a useless human being and asked me to not to dismiss the possibility that he is - that's how he'll know that I'm not just trying to cheer him up. It's been bugging me ever since. Although I've agreed, I really can't find in me any part that is ready to think that. I strongly believe he's not a useless person. I can't imagine labeling anyone in that way and in his case it feels so personal as I like him very much and I care about him. I'm starting to have dreams about our next session when I fail him by trying to convince him to think as I do. How can I be open about our conclusion when my mind is already fixed? Any thoughts on this would be deeply appreciated. Best wishes from Poland Karolina Hi Karolina, Thanks! The term has no meaning. It is just a vague put down, like what a bully might say. I might ask him what time of day he was feeling useless, and then have him fill out a Daily Mood Log for that moment, step by step. We can only help him at one specific moment. You can use a large number of techniques but must first get an A on Empathy, and then do effective paradoxical agenda setting, starting with the Paradoxical Invitation Step and then asking “what type of help would you be looking for?” then you can do the Magic Button and Positive Reframing. All of the negative thoughts and feelings on the Daily Mood Log will be advantageous and will show something about him that is awesome and positive. You should be able to generate a list of at least 25 overwhelming positives. Then you can use the Magic Dial. When you get to M = Methods, you can put the thought, “I am a useless human being” in the middle of a recovery circle, and then select a minimum of 16 methods to challenge it. You can start with Identify the Distortions. There are likely at least 9 distortions in the thought, including AON, OG, MF, DP, MAG / MIN; ER; LAB; SH; SB. You can try, “let’s define terms,” and ask what’s the definition of a “useless human being”? You’ll find that no matter how you try to define it, The definition will apply to all human beings. The definition will apply to no human beings. The definition does not apply to him. The definition does not make sense. The definition is based on some kind of arbitrary cut-off points. You can do this as a role-play, being a close friend trying to find out if you’re useless, and asking him for guidance on how to find out. You can do the Paradoxical Double Standard Techniques, Downward Arrow, Hidden Emotion, Externalization of Voices, Acceptance Paradox / Self-Defense Paradigm, Examine the Evidence, Semantic Method, and on and on. The problem is NOT that he’s a “useless human being” but rather that he’s obsessing and wasting time on a meaningless construct, and beating up on himself. The whole key to success will be agenda setting. You can take the position that maybe this is not something that he really wants to challenge, since it may be working for him, and also reflects all those 25 wonderful things about him. The whole key to success will be agenda setting. You can take the position that maybe this is not something that he really wants to challenge, since it may be working for him, and also reflects all those 25 wonderful things about him. Remember that just about 99.9% of therapeutic failure results from Agenda Setting errors. Is this something you want to help him with, or something he is desperately asking you for help with? I am almost 100% positive that this is your agenda, not his. In fact, your need to “help” him with this may actually keep him stuck. In fact, here is the proof. You write: “I'm starting to have dreams about our next session when I fail him by trying to convince him to think as I do. How can I be open about our conclusion when my mind is already fixed?” If you don’t understand this, I recommend some supervision from a TEAM therapists or join one of the online classes, or attend my workshop on resistance, coming up in a month or so, check out my website workshop page for details. You can join online. David D. Burns, M.D. Hi Dr. Burns, Thank you so much for your quick and thorough response! I kinda felt that my "helping" is the issue here as I've felt my own frustration rising... Thanks for reminding me that uselessness is just a meaningless concept, I needed that. And I love the idea of role-playing as a friend asking for help with defining his uselessness. I'll pace myself, though, and give us time to walk through all the steps, especially Empathy and Agenda Setting and check how it goes and what my clients wants, not I. I appreciate information on the resources and supervision I can access online, so good to know there are options! You can use my real name, can't wait to hear the podcast :). Karolina Thanks for listening today! By the way, if you are looking for CE credits or training in TEAM-CBT, my upcoming workshop on therapeutic resistance on February 9, 2020 will be a good one. You'll learn how to use the techniques described in today's podcast. See below for details and links! David

Supratim Adhikari is the technology editor for the Australian Newspaper. Prior to setting agenda's on technology and business discourse nationwide, he had lived in India and Trinidad. When he came to Australia he found himself as a chef at Attica, considered to be Australia’s best restaurant. Far from being satisfied landing in an amazing, ground-breaking, kitchen, Supratim, the renaissance man, landed a job at the Australian newspaper in Business and now technology. Supratim has witnessed Disruption with massive changes in the newsroom. We talk about how did we go from great journalism to a hyper commoditised product. We discuss the interaction and intersection of technology and business, and particular in Australia we discuss digital transformation and productivity gains from technology. Enjoy our discussion.

Es difícil -si no imposible- pensar hoy nuestra vida cotidiana sin la mediación tecnológica: 124 años nos separan de la aparición del cine, casi 100 años pasaron desde que los locos de la azotea inauguraron en la Ciudad de Buenos Aires la primera transmisión radiofónica de la Argentina, 74 años de Televisión harían temblar al padre de Mafalda que siempre quería disimular “la caja boca” detrás de una maceta. Sin embargo todo parece acelerarse en estos últimos ‘veintipocos' años. En 1995 fechamos el boom de internet en nuestro país, en 2004 el uso extendido de la web 2.0 o la internet colaborativa. Y qué decir de las redes sociales digitales que desde ese año y a la fecha nos cuesta seguir en su lista vertiginosa: Messenger, LinkedIn, Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter, Snapchat, Instagram, y el nuevo chico en el vecindario: TikTok… Sin embargo parece que estar más conectados no equivale a estar más informados sino todo lo contrario, si leemos críticamente la circulación permanente de fake news o noticias falsas que se emiten con la intención deliberada de engañar, inducir a error, manipular decisiones personales u obtener rédito político. Lejos estamos de poder aplicar acríticamente los clásicos modelos de la comunicación, tales como la Teoría de la aguja hipodérmica de Lasswell o la Agenda Setting de McCombs, a esta nueva realidad que combina la masividad de los medios tradicionales con la construcción de múltiples emisores-receptores que cruzan y fracturan las fronteras entre lo individual y lo social. Esta noche le preguntaremos a nuestros invitados: hiperconectados pero... ¿incomunicados? Bienvenidos a La brújula!

¿Sigue siendo la democracia una aspiración universal? ¿Hay soluciones fáciles para problemas complejos? ¿Cómo pueden las redes sociales garantizar el debate libre y democrático? Respondemos estas preguntas y más en este episodio de Agenda Setting. Rafael Goldzweig nos habla sobre la intersección entre tecnología, política y desarrollo.

Hi Listeners: Many of our podcasts are inspired by listeners like you who send us really cool emails with show ideas. Sometimes the emails are from people wanting self-help with emotional or relationship conflicts. And sometimes, they are from therapists wanting more training and information about TEAM. Rhonda and I love your emails! Yesterday, I got the following email from Dipti Joshi, one of our listeners and TEAM-CBT therapists from India. Dipti flew all the way from India to Canada with her lovely daughter last summer for my Intensive in Whistler, Canada. I am hopeful that Dipti will one day create the first TEAM Treatment and Training Center in India. How cool would that be! Here’s the email that Dipti sent me: Dear David, I am really enjoying all the educational materials available on your website. Thank you! I will soon be taking my Level 3 TEAM certification exam, and am seeking your kind blessings for the same! Also, I have a special request for you. Is it possible to have a workshop or podcast on “paradoxical techniques?” I feel this is a very challenging area, and that a lot of skill is needed. Perhaps you can also talk about why paradoxical techniques can be so effective. Meanwhile can you suggest me something to read or listen to for this? Regards, Dipti  Thanks, Dipit! Today’s podcast will be an introduction to the use of paradox in TEAM therapy, a kind of overview. When my new book, Feeling Great, comes out, I am hoping to do a series of workshops on a variety of powerful paradoxical techniques. And of course, the new book will have a great deal of instruction on paradoxical techniques as well. These are the four key components of TEAM: T = Testing E = Empathy A = (Paradoxical) Agenda Setting M = Methods In today's podcast, Dr. Rhonda and I will explain why each of these components is inherently paradoxical. For example, when you do the T = Testing, you assess changes in the patient’s symptoms from the start to the end of the session, and the patient rates you on the Empathy and Helpfulness scales as well, When you look at the ratings, you will probably discover that you aren’t helping your patient much, if at all. You may also discover that your perxceptions of how the patient feels, and how the patients feels about  you, are off-base, and sometimes alarmingly so. This can be very disturbing, especially if you’re not use to this kind of information. However, in TEAM, we are actually hoping for failure, and welcome that kind of "disturbing" information. Why is this? Isn’t therapy all about recovery and making positive changes? Why in the world would the therapist want to know that he or she is not helping? It's because many of the most important breakthroughs in therapy come from the therapist's discovery that he or she is failing. We WANT to fail! Why?  David illustrates this paradox by describing his discovery that he was not actually helping a patient he thought he’d helped enormously. David explains how and why this shocking information led to a tremendous breakthrough. When you review how your patient rated you at the end of the session, you may discover that your patient gives you failing grades on the E = Empathy scale. The patient’s ratings may indicate that he or she didn't experience you as sufficiently warm and caring, or completely trustworthy, and that you didn’t really “get” how she or he was feeling inside. Once again, as TEAM therapists we welcome failing grades on the Empathy Scale. Why? It’s because your worst therapeutic failure will nearly always be your greatest success in disguise. How can this be? It seems absurd, or impossible. Karl Rogers told us that empathy is the necessary and sufficient condition for personality change. So why would a TEAM therapist hope to discover that he or she is failing in this category? You’ll discover the explanation for this paradox on today’s podcast. When the patient asks for help during the A = Agenda Setting phase of the session, the TEAM therapist doesn’t jump in and offer to help, using this or that therapy method. In fact, the TEAM therapist will often assume the role of the patient subconscious resistance and argue for the status quo, sincerely encouraging the patient to cling to the feelings of depression, anxiety, shame, worthlessness, hopelessness, and anger. The therapist will bring out all the reasons why the patient should RESIST change. Why in the world would a therapist want to do that? It sounds crazy! You'll find out on this podcast. And finally, during the M = Methods phase of the session, the TEAM therapist will be working with the patient on his or her negative thoughts, like, “I’m worthless,” or “I’m not as good as I should be,” or "I'm hopelessly damaged because of the abuse I experienced as a child." And the TEAM therapist’s goal is not success, but rather failing as fast as you can, trying technique after technique that DOESN'T work and the patient's belief in the Negative Thought is still 100%. Why would a therapist want to fail over and over? Isn’t that the opposite of what a skillful, compassionate, and effective therapist would want to do? Listen to this podcast and you’ll discover the answer to these questions. You’ll also see that the patient, not the therapist, is the expert in TEAM, and discover how the patient, and not the therapist, guides all the changing. David and Rhonda talk about the important difference between healthy and unhealthy use of paradoxical ideas and techniques in therapy, and describe how narcissistic therapists may use paradoxical techniques in an effort to manipulate “resistant” or annoying patients. This dysfunctional use of paradox is unfortunately common, and will rarely or never be effective.  David and Rhonda

E.J. is joined by special guest host Bryan Jones, director of the Policy Agendas Project. They interview three undergraduate J.J. Pickle Research Fellows, Krysta Kilinski, Matt Maldonado, and Chloe Slusher, about their research and experience working with the Policy Agendas Project. Krysta examines if polarization is caused by the replacement of old members of Congress, or adaptation by existing members. Matt examines how problems first appear in party platforms before moving to State of the Union addresses and Congressional hearings. Chloe examines how the Supreme Court's agenda reacted to the build-up of the federal bureaucracy. 

Julie Crosson, MD, shares 10 tools she teaches to help physicians negotiate the agenda with their patients, which helps improve patient satisfaction.

President Trump presented his State of the Union. Was it a knockout blow to the Democrats? How did the American left show their true colors?Follow me for more @DebbieCanWeTalk

Gw ngomongin agenda setting media di acara reuni 212. Bener nggak sih ada agenda terselubung dari enggannya media ngeliput? bener nggak media yang nggak ngeliput itu "sedang bunuh diri"? bener nggak media-media itu condong ke kubu sebelah?. selamat mendengarkan

Agenda-Setting, der heilige Gral der Kommunikationswissenschaft. Fast 50 Jahre Forschung, aberhunderte Studien und seltene Einigkeit in der wissenschaftlichen Community: Das gibt es. Und was will uns das Modell sagen? Die Medienagenda entspricht gerne mal der Publikumsagenda. Soll heißen, die Themen die für die Tagesschau relevant sind, werden auch ihrem Publikum relevant und möglicherweise beim nächsten Brunch heiß diskutiert. Wieso das so ist, welche Faktoren die Agenden beeinflussen und welche (gesellschaftlichen) Konsequenzen dies nach sich zieht, besprechen Sebastian und Jessica in einem äußerst konzentrierten Seminar. Also reinhören und morgen beim Frühstück allen davon erzählen!Eure Lieblings-WhistleblowerFür die Nacharbeit:Ursprüngliche Studie von McCombs und Shaw.Das Update aus 2014: "New Directions in Agenda-Setting Theory and Research"Google lohnt sich für: Chapel Hill-Studie, Agenda-Setting, Priming, Framing, Agendamelding und die Herren Maxwell McCombs, Donald Shaw, David Weaver und Berhard Cohen

"HörsaalLeaks" ist ein Podcast über Wissenschaft, der komplexe Themen auf lockere Häppchen runterbricht und dabei auch noch unterhält. So präsentieren sich Sebastian und Jessica hier. Oder besser gesagt, so framen sie ihr Angebot. "Framing" ist eine in der Sozial- und Kommunikationswissenschaft weit verbreitete Theorie. Gemeint sind damit Deutungsmuster, die helfen neue Informationen einzuordnen und allgemein zu verarbeiten. Logischerweise kommt es bei diesen Mustern immer darauf an, welche Absicht die Urheber*innen verfolgen. Diesel wurde jahrelang als umweltfreundlich geframed, jetzt betonen Umweltschutzorganisationen die negativen Aspekte in der Öffentlichkeit. Schwieriges Feld. Aber eure Whistleblower sind zur Stelle. Zwar nicht für ihre Masterarbeit, aber zumindest zu eurer Unterhaltung. Eure Lieblings-WhistleblowerFür die Nacharbeit: The one and only Bertram Scheufele hat hier einiges zum Thema geschrieben. Ihr könnt euch aber auch einfach durchgoogeln: Framing, Schemata, Journalistische Frames, Medien-Frames, Priming, Agenda-Setting, Bertram Scheufele, Robert Entmann.

Philipp Lahm hat Joachim Löw öffentlich kritisiert. Nicht über die Presse sondern über Social Media - und zwar über LinkedIn. Warum das auch für weniger prominente Menschen eine gute Option ist, um die Agenda zu setzen, erklären wir in dieser Episode.

David and Jill do A = (Paradoxical) Agenda Setting with Lee, starting with the Invitation: Jill asks Lee if he wants help with the relationship conflict, and if this would be a good time to roll up our sleeves and get to work. Lee indicates that he does want help. They review the first two steps of his Relationship Journal, where Lee had recorded one specific thing his wife said to him, and exactly what he said next. Here’s what he wrote down: Step 1 – She said: Write down exactly what the other person said. Be brief: I was trying to convince my 18-month-old daughter to put her pajamas on. I was calm. Eventually, I raised my voice an octave or two and in a stern voice I told my daughter to put her pajamas on. Afterwards, Liza said, “I don’t think you need to use that tone with a small child.” Step 2 – I said: Write down exactly what you said next. Be brief: I said, “I don’t think there was anything wrong with what I did. You can be stern without losing your shit*. There are times when she needs to know I am serious and not messing about anymore.” It then devolved into a debate over a clash of values on how to raise our daughter. * Transcribed as-is from Lee’s Relationship Journal. Lee also circled all the emotions he thought she was having, along with all of the emotions he was having. He thought she was feeling: Sad and unhappy Anxious and worried Rejected and alone Discouraged, pessimistic, and despairing Frustrated and stuck Angry, annoyed, irritated and upset Other feelings: troubled, defensive, dismayed, downhearted, and disconnected Here’s how he was feeling: Unhappy Anxious and worried Guilty, remorseful, bad and ashamed Inferior, inadequate, defective and incompetent Embarrassed, foolish and self-conscious Hopeless, discouraged and despairing Frustrated Angry, mad, resentful, annoyed, irritated, upset and furious Other feelings: hostile, loud, critical, agitated, defensive, stubborn, exasperated, sarcastic, powerless, diminished, low, resistant, confused, judgmental, vulnerable, inept Step 3. Good vs. Bad Communication. When David and Jill ask Lee to examine his response to his wife, he had to admit that his response in Step 2 had all the characteristics of bad communication—he did not acknowledge any of her feelings, he did not share his own, and he did not convey love and respect. This was disturbing and surprising to Lee. Step 4. Consequences. When David and Jill asked Lee to examine the impact of what he said to his wife, they suddenly ran into a wall of resistance, which is almost universal in relationship work. The Relationship Journal is an incredibly powerful tool, and it can be extremely painful because you have to stop blaming the other person and examine your own role in the relationship. Lee suddenly and painfully discovered the answer to his question of why his wife was so controlling and critical of him—it was NOT because of the influence of her mother, but rather because he was forcing her to treat him like that almost every time he interacted with her. This insight cannot be denied when you do the Relationship Journal, and it’s potentially incredibly empowering, but it can be incredibly painful at the same time. You will also hear a masterful and paradoxical response by Dr. Levitt when Lee resists—and as a result, his resistance suddenly disappears, and he jumps on board!

Bob, a psychiatric resident named was treating a divorced woman who complained bitterly about her ex, and constantly argued with him whenever he came to visit with the children. Their relationship was clearly acrimonious, so Bob asked the woman if she wanted some help with the way she was communicating with her ex. She bristled and said that she was an attorney and that she could communicate just fine, thank you! Bob’s error was the same that many therapists make—of thinking that people with troubled relationships want help. Clearly, Bob’s patient was not asking for help. She just wanted Bob to agree that her ex was a bum! In many cases, and perhaps most, individuals who aren’t getting along with someone—such as their spouse, sibling, parent, colleague, or friend—aren’t really asking for help. They just want to vent and persuade you to buy into their negative view of the person they aren’t getting along with. They just want you to know what a loser the other person is! So how do we help people with troubled relationships? David emphasizes that empathy is always the first step. You try to see the world through the eyes of the patient without jumping in to try to “help.” Empathy, of course, is the "E" of TEAM therapy. Once the person feels understood and supported, the next step is called Agenda Setting. That’s the A of TEAM. One of the most important tools in Agenda Setting for individuals with troubled relationships is to first ask, “Is this relationship conflict something you want help with?” In many cases, the patient will say no, so you can ask if there’s something else he or she wants to work on. In the language of TEAM, this is called “Sitting with Open Hands.” The therapist has to let go of his or her attachment to “helping.” This is difficult for many therapists, due to the therapist’s compulsive urges to help. If the patient does want help, the next step is called Interpersonal Decision-Making. You ask what kind of help the patient wants, and make it clear that the patient has three choices. To leave the relationship. To improve the relationship. To stay in the relationship and behave in a way that will guarantee that the relationship will remain miserable. David emphasizes that the last choice is by far the most popular. The second most popular choice is the decision to leave the relationship. And occasionally, you’ll find a person who wants help improving the relationship. As you can see, Interpersonal Decision-Making is simply a more sophisticated way of asking the patient if she or he wants help! If the answer is still yes, the next Agenda Setting step is the Blame Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA). You can ask the patient something along these lines: “Who, in your opinion, is more to blame for the problems in the relationship? You? Or the other person? And who, in your opinion, is the bigger jerk? You? Or the other person?” At least 80% of the time, the patient will say, “the other person!” You may feel the same way if you’re in a conflict with someone right now. However, blame is the most formidable barrier to intimacy, so before we can continue with the treatment, this issue must be skillfully addressed, or the treatment will probably fail. David and Fabrice guide the listener in doing a written Blame CBA, listing the advantages and disadvantages of blaming others for the problems in our relationships with them. They encourage you to pause the recording and to the written exercise during the podcast, but warn you not to do it if you are driving! Then they discuss how to process the results of the Blame CBA. If you would like to see a completed Cost-Benefit Analysis, click here. As you can see, the weightings at the bottom have not been filled out, so you can do that for yourself if you like. Make sure you put two numbers that add up to 100 in the two circles. Put the larger number in the circle under the column that feels more desirable. For example, if the advantages of blame greatly outweigh the disadvantages, you might put a 70 in the circle on the left and a 30 in the circle on the right. If the patient concludes that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages, you can proceed to the M = Methods phase of the TEAM therapy session, which involves the Relationship Journal (RF). This is a powerful tool that David has designed to create interpersonal enlightenment and the death of the ego. David and Fabrice will discuss and illustrate the RJ in the next podcast.

The Hidden Side of Depression, Anxiety, Defectiveness, Hopelessness and Rage We nearly always think about negative feelings, such as moderate or severe depression, as problems that an expert must try to fix, using drugs and / or psychotherapy. There are a multitude of theories about why humans become depressed, including, but not limited to: We get depressed because reality sucks. We believe our mood slumps result from the circumstances in our lives, such as being alone following a rejection, experiencing the loss of a loved one, not having enough money, education or resources, social prejudice, or (as in Marilyn’s case) facing some catastrophic circumstance, such as severe illness. We get depressed because of insufficient love and nurturing in childhood, or because of traumatic childhood experiences. Biological factors. We get depressed because of our genes, or diet, or because of a chemical imbalance in our brains. Certainly, there can be some truth in all of these theories. Reality does kick us all in the stomach from time to time, and the pain we feel is understandable. My wife and I lost her father to Parkinson’s Disease a few years ago. We loved him tremendously, and his loss was extremely painful for everyone in our family. And most of us have experienced less than ideal circumstances when growing up, and many have even been victimized by horrific and tragic circumstances, such as child abuse. And clearly, some severe psychiatric illnesses, such as schizophrenia, do result from some kind of brain abnormality. But the problem with all of these theories is that they put us at the mercy of forces that are largely beyond our control—since we often cannot do much to change reality, rewrite our childhoods, or modify our brains short of taking this or that medication. In this podcast, Matt and David take a radically different approach, and argue that Marilyn’s intense feelings of depression and anxiety are not “mental disorders” that reflect some defect in Marilyn, but rather the expression of what is most beautiful and awesome about her. They also argue that there are large numbers of advantages, or benefits, of feeling the way she does, using several Paradoxical Agenda Setting techniques such as the Miracle Cure Question, Magic Button, Positive Reframing, and Magic Dial. The results are stunning and unexpected. Or, as Marilyn put it, this portion of the session was “mind-blowing.” The third and final podcast next week will include the M = Methods phase of the session along with the end-of-session T = Testing and wrap-up, including Relapse Prevention Training. Marilyn DML with goal column

Hallo liebe Hörer, Agenda Setting ist bei Kommunikationsprofis ein bekanntes Phänomen. Aber wer gibt die Themen vor. Sind das die so genannten Spin Doctors, oder sind es die Medien. Und können Unternehmen Agenda Setting als Instrument einsetzen? ManagementRadio sprach dazu […]

“My problems are real! The world really IS screwed up! And that’s not a distortion. So what can I do about my severe depression and anxiety?” David and Fabrice discuss two questions submitted by Feeling Good Podcast listeners. #1. Shari writes: “I read your book Feeling Good and now I am reading your book When Panic Attacks--thanks to April's podcast with you. I still struggle but recently our current political situation and environmental research about our negative impact on earth—has triggered severe anxiety and depression again. The problem is that I don't think my thoughts are distorted—it certainly seems logical to assume that life on earth is threatened. So I am not sure how to do this. How can I make progress with my mental and emotional health while being aware of situations around the world? Any advice or thoughts would be deeply appreciated.” This is a wonderful note, and I’m sure that huge numbers of people feel the same way, in varying degrees. So how can we attend to our own emotional well-being in the face of genuine adversity? Dr. Burns discusses this from the perspective of Paradoxical Agenda Setting, which is the key component of TEAM-CBT, and emphasizes the most common therapeutic error of all—jumping in to try to help, without seeing all the really GOOD reasons for the patient NOT to change. From this perspective, Shari’s question becomes the most important question in all of psychiatry and psychotherapy—how do we help patients who may not want to change? #2. After listening to the A = Agenda Setting portion of the live therapy with Mark, Paul submitted this question: “Hi David, Thanks to you, Fabrice and Jill for this episode - as with the previous episodes with Mark, this has really helped in bringing the TEAM approach to life. As I have been using your books in the past few years to self-treat feelings of anxiety and depression, I was very keen to hear how the new agenda setting step works. I am wondering what your thoughts are on how effectively the "A" step can be carried out by a patient on his/her own (i.e. without someone else verbalizing the reasons not to change / playing the part of the patient's sub-conscious)? Do you have any tips? I think I heard Mark say something to the effect that, on his own, he wouldn't have thought of all the positives that you came up with in the session. Thanks again for sharing these great tools and techniques - looking forward to the "M" step soon. Paul” This was another terrific question on a topic of great importance. David explains that it is actually easier for patients to learn to use Positive Reframing and the other Paradoxical Agenda Setting techniques than for therapists to learn them. Because of his excitement over this prospect, David has just begun a new book which will show depressed and anxious individuals exactly how to do this on their own in a step-by-step manner. He is optimistic that the new TEAM-CBT techniques, in book form, may be even more helpful to patients than his first book, Feeling Good: The New Mood Therapy. Research studies indicate that 65% of patients with moderate to severe depression improve substantially within four weeks of receiving a copy of Feeling Good, even without any other treatment. Dr. Burns is hopeful that his new book will provide the answers for the 35% who were not helped by Feeling Good. So the answer is yes, I think many individuals WILL be able to do the “A” step on their own, and I am hopeful the positive impact will be great! If you would be interested in David's new book, please indicate this in the Survey attached to this podcast. David and Fabrice have exciting plans for upcoming podcasts. They will be addressing these two questions in one or two podcasts: Is it possible to measure our “worthwhileness” or “worthlessness” as human beings? Do we even have a “self”? These two questions have been discussed by experts for thousands of years, going all the way back to the Buddha, and most recently by the incredible Austrian philosopher, Ludwig Wittgenstein. And although the answers are tremendously simple, people can’t seem to “get it.” The issues are not simply philosophical, but eminently practical, since most depression and anxiety result from the perception that one is “worthless,” or “inferior,” or simply “not good enough.” In addition, David and Fabrice are hoping to create a second live therapy session broken into smaller podcast chunks, but featuring David and a totally awesome former student and now highly esteemed colleague, Matthew May, MD. For the past ten years, David has been telling workshop audiences that Matt is one of the finest therapists in the world. So this is an event you won’t want to miss! Click here to listen to Fabrice being interviewed on Dr. Carmen Roman's podcast.

Jill and David encourage Mark to develop his list of positives. Mark draws a blank at first. This is very common among patients and therapists alike. Most of us have not been trained to think about depression, anxiety, shame, defectiveness, hopelessness and anger as being good or positive. In fact, we think of them as symptoms of “mental disorders,” according to the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association.) So we think of them as bad, something to get rid of, something needing treatment. But after David and Jill prime the pump, Mark is surprised that they quickly come up with a list of 16 positives that are real and powerful. At this point, they ask Mark why in the world he’d want to press the Magic Button and have all of his symptoms suddenly disappear--given all these positives. This is called the Acid Test and it's also paradoxical. David and Jill have now become the resistant part of Mark's subconscious mind--the part that clings to these symptoms. And when the therapists become the voice of the resistance, the patient will nearly always become the voice that argues for change. The paradox is resolved with the Magic Dial. Toward the end of this podcast, you will want to review Mark’s Daily Mood Log, with the Goal column filled out on the table of negative emotions. David points out that there is no single tool or technique that triggers recovery in patients. Instead, each component of T E A M contributes in radically different ways to the substantial or even dramatic improvement the therapists are hoping to bring about it today's session. In the next Podcast, David and Jill will begin the M = Methods portion of the session.

In the early days of my career, I (Dr. Burns) would have assumed that Mark definitely wanted to change--after all, he'd been in a lot of pain for a long time, and he came to the session because he wanted help. So, following the empathy phase of the session, I would have jumped in with a variety of cognitive therapy techniques to help Mark challenge his Negative Thoughts, such as “I’ve been a failure as a father,” or "my brain is defective." Although this might have been effective, there’s a good chance that it might not have worked. That's because Mark might have “yes-butted” me or insisted that he really was a failure and that I just wasn’t “getting it.” In fact, the attempt to help the patient without first dealing with the patient’s resistance is the cause of nearly all therapeutic failure. But most therapists make this mistake over and over--and don't realize that their well-intentioned efforts to help actually trigger and reinforce the patient's resistance. Instead, TEAM Therapists use a number of Paradoxical Agenda Setting (PAS) techniques designed to bring the patient’s subconscious resistance to conscious awareness. Then we melt the resistance away before attempting to change the way the patient is thinking and feeling. I (DB) have developed 15 or 20 PAS techniques, and Jill and I  used several of them in our session with Mark: The Invitation Step The Miracle Cure Question The Magic Button Positive Reframing The Acid Test The Magic Dial When Jill and I use Positive Reframing, we are hoping that Mark will make an unexpected discovery--that his negative thoughts and feelings, such as his sadness, shame, discouragement, and inadequacy actually reflect his core values and show what a positive, awesome human being he is. In other words, he will discover that his core values are actually the source of his symptoms as well as his resistance to change. This approach represents a radical departure from the way many psychiatrists and psychologists think about psychiatric symptoms as well as resistance.  When I was a psychiatric resident, I (DB) was trained to think about resistance as something negative. For example, we may tell ourselves that resistant patients cling to their feelings of depression and worthlessness because they want attention, because they want to feel sorry for themselves, because they fear change, or because they are afraid will lose their identity if they recover. While there’s some truth in these formulations, they may not be helpful because they tend to cast the patient in a negative light, as if their symptoms and their resistance to change were somehow bad, or childish, or based on some kind of chemical imbalance in their brains. As you will see, the TEAM-CBT approach approaches resistance is radically different manner. We will give you the chance to pause the podcast briefly and try your own hand at Positive Reframing before you hear it live during the session. Specifically, we will ask you to review Mark's Daily Mood Log, and ask yourself these two questions about each of his negative thoughts and feelings: What does this negative thought or feeling show about Mark that is beautiful, positive, and awesome? What are some benefits, or advantages, of this negative thought or feeling? Are there some ways that this thought or feeling is helping Mark? As you so this, make a list of as many Positives as you can on a piece of paper. See what you can come up with. I want to warn you that it may be difficult to come up with your list of Positives at first. If so, this is good, because when you hear the next podcast, you'll have many "ah ha!" moments and it will all become quite obvious to you. Then you will have a new and deeper understanding of resistance--an understanding that can help you greatly if you are a therapist or if you are struggling with your own feelings of depression and anxiety. Jill gives a great overview of why the paradoxical approach is necessary during the Paradoxical Agenda Setting phase of the session. To learn more about Paradoxical Agenda Setting, you can read David’s featured article in the March / April 2017 issue of Psychotherapy Networker entitled "When Helping Doesn’t Help." You will see how he helped a woman struggling with intense depression, anxiety and rage due to decades of horrific domestic rape and violence.

Gunn Enli er professor ved Institutt for medier og kommunikasjon, Universitetet i Oslo, og var leiar for  forskingsprosjektet Social Media and Agenda-Setting in Election Campaigns (SAC).

Dr. Burns suddenly abandons the role of healer and instead assumes the role of the patient’s angry, paranoid and defiant resistance.

The benefits of agenda setting

What is therapeutic resistance? You will find out that therapeutic resistance is NOT what you were taught in graduate school or read about in the writings of Sigmund Freud! You will also discover why overcoming therapeutic resistance can be the key to high-speed, dramatic recovery for many depressed and anxious individuals.

In questa puntata condividiamo le nostre esperienze a riguardo e parliamo di comunicazione nei suoi più diversi aspetti, svariando dalla pubblicità alla politica, dal giornalismo alla PNL. La nostra risposta a questa risposta? Niente, tranne quando cala l'attenzione.. Buon ascolto!

Supported by the Criminalization of HIV Transmission and Exposure Working Group, Law, Policy and Ethics Core at the Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS (CIRA) at Yale University. This work session aimed to articulate a research agenda around HIV criminalization drawing on the expertise of relevant stakeholders including policymakers, advocates, researchers, and other individuals who have been affected by laws that criminalize HIV transmission and exposure such as prosecutors, public defenders, and defendants. Twenty-two people attended the work session including members of the research community, representative from HIV/AIDS advocacy organizations, public health experts, and legal practitioners.

Supported by the Criminalization of HIV Transmission and Exposure Working Group, Law, Policy and Ethics Core at the Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS (CIRA) at Yale University. This work session aimed to articulate a research agenda around HIV criminalization drawing on the expertise of relevant stakeholders including policymakers, advocates, researchers, and other individuals who have been affected by laws that criminalize HIV transmission and exposure such as prosecutors, public defenders, and defendants. Twenty-two people attended the work session including members of the research community, representative from HIV/AIDS advocacy organizations, public health experts, and legal practitioners.

Planning, Agenda-Setting, & the Environmental Media

Massenmedien bestimmen nicht, was wir denken, aber worüber wir nachdenken. Die Agenda-Setting-These beschäftigt die Kommunikationswissenschaft seit Beginn der 70er Jahre. Wie werden Individuen auf bestimmte Themen aufmerksam? Welche Institutionen haben Teil an der Strukturierung öffentlicher Aufmerksamkeit bei politischen Streitfragen? Der vorliegende Band gibt einen systematisehen Überblick über die umfangreiche Forschungsliteratur und legt eine theoretische Fundierung des Agenda-Setting-Ansatzes auf individueller und gesellschaftlicher Ebene vor (inhaltlich unveränderte Neuauflage der Erstveröffentlichung von 1996).