Podcasts about learnings

Interested in buying a franchise? Check out Connor's website here: https://connorgroce.com/landerCome to HoldCo Conference for business owners, Feb 9-11 → https://links.girdley.com/hcc-ytIn this rerun episode, the hosts revisit a $65K Utah Christmas tree lot deal and debate whether this nostalgic seasonal hustle is worth the location headaches and short sales window.Welcome to Acquisitions Anonymous – the #1 podcast for small business M&A. Every week, we break down businesses for sale and talk about buying, operating, and growing them.Subscribe for more episodes: https://www.youtube.com/@AcquisitionsAnonymousPodcast?sub_confirmation=1Subscribe to our Newsletter: https://www.acquanon.com/newsletterConnect with us on Social Media:Twitter: https://twitter.com/acquanonLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/acquanon

Wahrscheinlich kennst du das: Du rennst von Call zu Call, planst Content, launchst, optimierst,– Du wolltest mit deinem Business mehr Freiheit – und hast stattdessen Dauerstress. Ich war an genau diesem Punkt. Bis ich verstanden habe: So geht es nicht weiter. Ich will JETZT Freiheit, Genuss, Lebendigkeit. In dieser Folge teile ich mit dir 4 Learnings, die mein Mindset über Arbeit, Verantwortung und Leichtigkeit komplett verändert haben – und vielleicht auch deins verändern werden. Du willst mit automatisierten Funnels endlich konstante, planbare Monatsumsätze kreieren? → Buch jetzt dein kostenloses Beratungsgespräch für unser brandneues Programm Souverän Skaliert: https://carolinepreuss.de/souveraenskaliert/ Plane, erstelle und vermarkte dein Online-Produkt mit ErfolgsKurs! → Setz dich jetzt auf unsere exklusive Warteliste für April 2026: https://carolinepreuss.de/erfolgskurs-angebot/ Du willst dir auf Instagram eine aktive, kaufkräftige Community aufbauen? → Melde dich zu Planbar Sichtbar an. Klick jetzt hier: https://carolinepreuss.de/planbar-sichtbar-angebot/ Go For It ist der Business Podcast für alle Selbstständigen und UnternehmerInnen, die ein profitables Online-Business aufbauen wollen. Caroline Preuss gibt in ihrem Business Podcast ihr erprobtes Wissen rund um Marketing, Social Media, Onlinekurse und Community-Aufbau auf Instagram weiter – ausführlich und Schritt für Schritt, damit du entspannt mit deinem digitalen Business sichtbar wirst und und deinen eigenen Onlinekurs erfolgreich vermarktest.

In this episode the hosts dig into a $7.1 M cash‑price listing for a specialty pharmacy in Beverly Hills — evaluating its 1.49 M EBITDA, market position and regulatory complexity to see whether it's a viable acquisition.Business Listing – https://www.bizbuysell.com/business-opportunity/specialty-medical-pharmacy-in-prime-southern-california-location/2445305/Welcome to Acquisitions Anonymous – the #1 podcast for small business M&A. Every week, we break down businesses for sale and talk about buying, operating, and growing them.

Welcome to Episode #64 of the No Conference for Old Men podcast. Like last season, it was a mixed bag for Houston at the Players Era Festival.  With lots of "wisdom and learnings," as Coach Sampson likes to say, the team won two games against Syracuse and Notre Dame. But the Coogs also suffered a close loss to a Tennessee team seeking payback for last season's Elite 8 loss.  The Cougars are now 7-1 for the season and are ranked #7 in the coaches poll, #8 in the AP poll, and #9 in KenPom.  There's been plenty of time to work on the issues during this 10-day break before facing FSU at the Toyota Center. Please have a listen as the 3 Old Men break down the games from Vegas and provide some thoughts on what to expect from a team-adjustment perspective heading into this final stretch of non-conference games.  We also discuss the two elite HS players to sign with the Cougars during the early signing period.  - No Conference for Old Men is available for free via Spotify / Apple Podcast / SoundCloud & the GoCoogs.com website; we're also available via the Republic of Football Podcast feed from the folks at Dave Campbell's Texas Football as their only basketball-centric offering - Intro / Exit music: Ground Zero provided by FreeBeats.io - Please follow us on gocoogs.com/old-men/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Welcome to Episode #64 of the No Conference for Old Men Podcast.Like last season, it was a mixed bag for our Houston Cougars at the Players Era Festival. With lots of "wisdom & learnings", as Coach Sampson described, for this year's Cougars team. The team won 2 games over Syracuse & Notre Dame, but suffered a close loss in between to a tough Tennessee team looking for payback for last season's Elite 8 loss. Our Cougars are now 7-1 for the season and now ranked #8 in both the AP & KenPom rankings. But lots for the team to work on in this 10-day break before facing FSU at the Toyota Center.Please have a listen as the 3 Old Men break the games down from Vegas, as well as provide some thoughts on what to expect from a team adjustment perspective heading into this final stretch of non-conference games. We also provide our perspectives on the 2 elite HS kids to sign with the Cougars during the early signing period. Needless to say, another elite class w/ Diane & Alozie coming on board next season.- No Conference for Old Men is available for free via Spotify / Apple Podcast / SoundCloud & the GoCoogs.com website; we're also available via the Republic of Football Podcast feed from the folks at Dave Campbell's Texas Football as their only basketball-centric offering- Intro / Exit music: Ground Zero provided by FreeBeats.io- Please follow us on gocoogs.com/old-men/

Zeitlose Marken entstehen aus Haltung, Verzicht und ständiger Selbstbefragung: Vitra und USM zeigen, wie Beständigkeit und radikale Reduktion im Design-Kompass ganze Generationen prägen. Zwischen Nachhaltigkeit, KI-getriebenen Kundenreisen und dem nervösen Markt wächst der Druck, Differenz zu leben und trotzdem offen zu bleiben – auch wenn es bedeutet, sich Trends und Erwartungen zu entziehen. Eine Episode für alle, die echte Relevanz im Wandel suchen. Du erfährst... …wie Designklassiker durch Beständigkeit und Authentizität entstehen …welche Rolle Modularität und Nachhaltigkeit in der Möbelbranche spielen …wie sich der Möbelmarkt durch Digitalisierung und KI verändert __________________________ ||||| PERSONEN |||||

In dieser Folge sprechen Matthis und Tim über die Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede der Future of Revenue Marketing Events in Berlin und London. Die beiden teilen knallhartes Feedback und diskutieren über Ideen, was sie bei kommenden Events im Jahr 2026 anders machen können. Diese Folge ist Pflicht für jede B2B SaaS Company, die nächstes Jahr ebenfalls auf Events als strategischen Marketing Kanal setzen möchte.

Insights into the past, present and future of crypto with Erik Voorhees. Follow the podcast ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠here⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠. Venice.ai founder Erik Voorhees joins "CoinDesk Spotlight" to discuss his prediction of a sovereign bond market collapse and the predominant role of bitcoin in that future. Voorhees explains why he is fundamentally against a U.S. strategic bitcoin reserve, why crypto lobbying is "gross," and his thesis that cryptocurrency was actually built for AI agents. - This content should not be construed or relied upon as investment advice. It is for entertainment and general information purposes. - Break the cycle of exploitation. Break down the barriers to truth. Break into the next generation of privacy. Break Free. Free to scroll without being monetized. Free from censorship. Freedom without fear. We deserve more when it comes to privacy. Experience the next generation of blockchain that is private and inclusive by design. Break free with Midnight, visit midnight.network/break-free - Need liquidity without selling your crypto? Take out a ⁠⁠Figure Crypto-Backed Loan⁠⁠, allowing you to borrow against your BTC, ETH, or SOL with 12-month terms and no prepayment penalties. They have the lowest rates in the industry at 8.91%, allowing you to access instant cash or buy more Bitcoin without triggering a tax event. Unlock your crypto's potential today at Figure! ⁠⁠https://figuremarkets.co/coindesk⁠ - Timestamps: 01:20 - Voorhees' First Memory of Money Mattering04:00 - Discovering Bitcoin As a Solution to the Financial Crisis06:13 - Could Bitcoin Replace Gold Completely?07:17 - When Will There Be A Complete Financial Collapse?10:47 - The Separation of Money and State13:57 - Why Voorhees is Divided on Governments Holding Bitcoin15:53 - Crypto Industry Engagement with Politicians Is "Gross"19:49 - Voorhees' History with the SEC21:48 - From Satoshi Dice to Prediction Markets24:09 - What Does "Sufficiently Decentralized" Actually Mean?27:35 - Ethereum's Trajectory29:07 - Voorhees Predicts Base Will End Up the Predominant L232:01 - Sci-Fi and Technological Optimism34:06 - Learnings from ShapeShift's DAO Structure38:01 - Venice AI: Separation of Mind and State40:24 - How Do We Avoid a Dystopian Future?43:19 - How Venice AI Differs from ChatGPT and Gemini47:46 - Unprogramming Human Instincts for Privacy50:24 - The VVV Token54:25 - Crypto is Built for AI Machines56:56 - How He Lost 50K BTC Fighting The SEC - This episode was hosted by Jennifer Sanasie. “CoinDesk Spotlight” is produced by Sam Ewen, Jennifer Sanasie, Taylor Fleming and Victor Chen.

In this episode the hosts walk through evaluating a potential acquisition of a Houston‑area elevator services company, debating whether a 7.5× EBITDA asking price can pencil out given the financing constraints and growth challenges.Business Listing - https://www.bizbuysell.com/business-opportunity/strong-cash-flow-elevator-services-business-houston-texas/2439153/?J=bot&bn=114637964&bd=20251110&utm_source=bizbuysell&utm_medium=emailsite&utm_campaign=htmlbotWelcome to Acquisitions Anonymous – the #1 podcast for small business M&A. Every week, we break down businesses for sale and talk about buying, operating, and growing them.

Nicht Logik, sondern persönliche Überzeugungen prägen, wie Entscheidungen entstehen – selbst Fakten führen kaum aus alten Denkmustern heraus. Julia Dorandt zeigt, wie individuelle Filter und emotionale Prägungen dabei die Richtung vorgeben, warum echtes Bewusstsein und das „Wozu“ weiterführen als reine Daten und wie Führung Raum für Zweifel, Trauer und Wandlung braucht. Jede bewusste Entscheidung bleibt ein individuelles Ringen – und birgt die Weisheit, mit Unvollkommenheit zu leben. Du erfährst... ...wie du bewusste Entscheidungen triffst, die wirklich zählen. ...welche Rolle Überzeugungen bei der Entscheidungsfindung spielen. ...wie du im Business-Alltag Entscheidungen reflektierst und optimierst. __________________________ ||||| PERSONEN |||||

Wenn die Digitalisierung fehlschlägt: The London Ambulance System DisasterWas passiert, wenn Politik alles automatisieren will, ein starres Pflichtenheft ohne Tests verabschiedet und eine kleine Agentur in Rekordzeit ein hochkritisches System auf Visual Basic liefern soll? 1992 ging das Notrufsystem des London Ambulance Service mit einem Big Bang Rollout live. Ohne vollwertige Schulung, ohne belastbare Lasttests und ohne echten Backup-Plan. Das Ergebnis: Fehldispatches, endlose Wartezeiten, Ausnahmezustand in der Leitstelle und ein technischer Kollaps durch ein simples Memory Leak.In dieser Episode sprechen wir über den gesamten Projektverlauf vom London Ambulance System Disaster: Von der Zettelwirtschaft mit Förderband über ein überambitioniertes Automatisierungsvorhaben, NIH-Syndrom in der Ausschreibung, unrealistische Deadlines und Budgets, fehlendes Projektmanagement sowie Quality Assurance. Wir beleuchten die Live-Inbetriebnahme im Oktober 1992, GPS- und Statusprobleme in den Ambulanzen, die Exception-Flut auf den Monitoren, das ungetestete Failover und die Folgen für Personal, Vertrauen und Öffentlichkeit.Wir ordnen das Desaster für die Tech Community ein und ziehen Parallelen zu heute: AI- und Cloud-Rollouts ohne Fallback, Fix-forward statt Rollback, End-to-End- und Lasttests mit realistischen Szenarien, SRE-Praktiken, soziotechnische Systeme, UX in kritischen Workflows und die ethische Verantwortung von Entwicklerinnen. Außerdem: moderne Beispiele wie die Boeing 737 Max und Pandemie-Apps, die zeigen, wie zeitlos diese Learnings sind.Bonus: Das Kernsystem lief auf Visual Basic unter Windows 3. Klingt retro, war aber alles andere als ein Retro-Game.Unsere aktuellen Werbepartner findest du auf https://engineeringkiosk.dev/partnersDas schnelle Feedback zur Episode:

In this episode the hosts walk through evaluating a potential acquisition of a Houston‑area elevator services company, debating whether a 7.5× EBITDA asking price can pencil out given the financing constraints and growth challenges.Business Listing - https://www.bizbuysell.com/business-opportunity/strong-cash-flow-elevator-services-business-houston-texas/2439153/?J=bot&bn=114637964&bd=20251110&utm_source=bizbuysell&utm_medium=emailsite&utm_campaign=htmlbotWelcome to Acquisitions Anonymous – the #1 podcast for small business M&A. Every week, we break down businesses for sale and talk about buying, operating, and growing them.

In Folge #165 des 121WATT Podcasts sprechen Sarah und Patrick darüber, warum sich so viele Marketingabteilungen an der Realität aufreiben und was du konkret tun kannst, um wieder mehr Wirkung und weniger Frust im Arbeitsalltag zu erleben. Basierend auf tausenden Teilnehmenden aus Seminaren und Beratungen zeigen die beiden typische Probleme auf, die fast überall auftreten, von fehlender strategischer Ausrichtung bis zu unklaren Zielen und überfrachteten Kanälen.

In dieser besonderen Podcast-Folge werfen wir gemeinsam mit Günter Löchner, Geschäftsführer bei L-mobile, einen fundierten Blick zurück auf das Industrie-Jahr 2025.

In dieser besonderen Jahresabschlussfolge blicken wir gemeinsam auf das Jahr 2025 zurück. Eine ehrliche und reflektierende Episode über persönliche Erfahrungen, geistliche Learnings und wertvolle Momente als Ehepaar.Wir teilen unter anderem:wie Esther mit Seelsorge begonnen hat, um traumatische Erlebnisse aus Israel zu verarbeitenwelche Bücher uns dieses Jahr besonders geprägt und inspiriert habenwelche Podcastgäste uns 2025 besonders beeindruckt habenwie wir gelernt haben, auch schwere Zeiten dankbar aus Gottes Hand anzunehmenunsere größten persönlichen und gemeinschaftlichen Learnings – sowohl einzeln als auch als EhepaarEine Folge voller Reflexion, Dankbarkeit und geistlicher Tiefe, ideal für alle, die ihr Jahr bewusst ausklingen lassen und Inspiration für das kommende Jahr mitnehmen möchten. Ganz viel Segen!!

B2B ChatGPT Prompts Vorlagen gratis? ➔ Hier laden: https://xhauer.com/downloads-podcast Gratis AI LEAD MAGNET GENERATOR ➔ Lead Magnet erstellen in 20 Min, der verkauft: https://xhauer.com/ai-generator-pod WORKSHOP "Volle Leads-Pipeline durch virtuelle KI-Marketing-Mitarbeiter in ChatGPT & LinkedIn" ➔ Hier ansehen: https://xhauer.com/workshop-pod ERWÄHNTE FOLGEN:➔ Marketing & Sales ICP Guide: https://youtu.be/HjZWtWbZAR4In dieser Folge zeige ich die drei KI-Prompts, die im B2B-Marketing wirklich abliefern. Wie schärft ihr euer ICP, sodass Kampagnen greifen? Wie baut ihr einen Lead-Magneten, für den Zielkunden gerne ihre Daten hergeben? Und wie wird aus bestehendem Content eine E-Mail-Serie? Prompts und Vorlagen gibt's kostenlos dazu.Wenn du neu auf meinem Kanal bist:Mein Name ist Michael Asshauer. Ich bin Gründer und Geschäftsführer von XHAUER. Mein Team und ich helfen jeden Tag Anbietern im komplexen und technischen B2B, ihre Pipeline mit guten Verkaufsgelegenheiten zu füllen. Durch eine systematische Kombination aus Performance- und Content-Marketing. Ganz ohne Bunte-Bildchen-Marketing, sondern datengetrieben nach dem Grundsatz “Do more of what works”.Ein paar Fakten für dich, wie ich hierher gekommen bin und welche Reise ich auf diesem Kanal dokumentiere:25 Jahre: Gründung meines ersten Technologie-Unternehmens Familonet25 Jahre: Abschluss meiner Studiengänge Volkswirtschaftslehre, Betriebswirtschaftslehre und International Business (Hamburg & Melbourne)28 Jahre: Ausgründung unserer B2B-Software-Entwicklungsagentur onbyrd 30 Jahre: Übernahme unserer Unternehmen durch den Daimler-Konzern (heute Mercedes-Benz Group AG)31 Jahre: Gründung meiner Business-Content-Plattform “Machen!”32 Jahre: Gründung meines Performance-Recruiting-Unternehmens Talentmagnet (und anschließender Verkauf)34 Jahre: Gründung unserer B2B-Marketing-Agentur & Beratung XHAUER, gemeinsam mit Paula.Heute: Paula, unser Team und ich sind auf dem Weg, eine der besten B2B-Agenturen & Beratungen weltweit aufzubauen.Auf diesem Kanal teile ich alle Erkenntnisse, Learnings und Best Practices aus Tausenden Kampagnen offen mit dir, sodass du sie für euer Marketing anwenden kannst.Für B2B-Marketing, das die Pipeline füllt.Dein Michael Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The Journey and Vision Gresham Harkless opens the segment by discussing his current need to reconfigure and reboot his entire business. He notes that what brought him to his current level of success is not what will take him to the next level. This insight is driving him to look at things and operate differently, posing the challenge of "how to unlearn the things that you've been doing." He introduces this content as a special episode and a snippet documenting his journey into starting a new venture called Blue Star Franchise, which will also lead to a sub-site/channel called Franchise CEO within CB Nation. His purpose is to document this building-out process to be helpful for others considering franchises or starting any type of business. Challenges, Learnings, and Real-World Results Harkless candidly shares that the journey has not gone the way he wanted, leading to a feeling of scrambling over the last three to six months. He realizes that while he has been testing things (like DMs) on a low scale, the core problem is the need to put more "gasoline on the fire"—to test things with enough energy/money to truly see if they work and then iterate. He explains that he's had to reboot the entire business because things weren't performing at the desired level. This rebuild has required him to spend more time there, which has had a domino effect, pulling him away from dedicating sufficient time to the new broker business. Personal responsibilities, like having a new baby, further contribute to feeling "fractured and very split". Re-Prioritization and Forward Momentum Harkless is at a crossroads, questioning how to do what needs to be done. He is wondering if leaning on his current team—including a good VA and his integrator—can help take the business to the next level. He acknowledges that scaling has been challenging and he has had to have difficult conversations to get where he needs to be. He concludes that the central issue is not just direction, but the "figuring out part"—reconfiguring the entire operation. He recognizes that reaching a level of success requires asking, "How do I take it to the next level?" Moving forward, he must continue to ask himself, "What do I want and how do I make that happen?" and commit to taking it a day at a time.   Previous Episode: https://iamceo.co/iam2665-running-the-long%e2%80%91term-race-in-business/ Blue Star Franchise: bluestarfranchise.com Browse the Franchise Inventory: bluestarfranchise.com/franchise Is franchising right for you? Check this out to see: bluestarfranchise.com/assessment Franchise CEO (A CBNation Site – coming soon) – franchiseceo.co Check out our CEO Hack Buzz Newsletter–our premium newsletter with hacks and nuggets to level up your organization. Sign up HERE.    I AM CEO Handbook Volume 3 is HERE and it's FREE. Get your copy here: cbnation.co/iamceo3. Get the 100+ things that you can learn from 1600 business podcasts we recorded. Hear Gresh's story, learn the 16 business pillars from the podcast, find out about CBNation Architects and why you might be one and so much more. Did we mention it was FREE? Download it today!

The Journey and Vision Gresham Harkless opens the episode by reflecting on the importance of staying afloat amid a busy schedule, then using that stability as a springboard for bigger achievements. He outlines his current project, Blue Star Franchise, and explains that he's documenting the startup process on his “I AM CEO” podcast and on YouTube. The purpose is two‑fold: to provide a roadmap for anyone considering a franchise or any new venture, and to create a “Franchise CEO” sub‑channel within the broader CB Nation community. Challenges, Learnings, and Real‑World Results He candidly shares the reality of juggling client emergencies, personal obligations, and the inevitable setbacks that come with building a business. Over the past year, only two deals closed—one from within his own network and another from a friend—yet he still perceives strong alignment with his overall mission. Harkless emphasizes that early‑year losses are normal, that opportunities exist if you keep cultivating them, and that a “marathon mindset” is essential for long‑term progress. Re‑Prioritization and Forward Momentum Facing a confluence of professional rebuilds (digital‑marketing systems, franchise infrastructure) and personal pressures (condo issues, family responsibilities), Harkless resolves to re‑prioritize, carve out dedicated time, and lean into the work that generates the most impact. He argues that a business should not be judged solely on its first‑year performance; perseverance, continuous improvement, and running the “marathon race” will ultimately unlock the phenomenal results he envisions. Previous Episode: https://iamceo.co/iam2632-day-281-franchise-broker-journey/ Blue Star Franchise: bluestarfranchise.com Browse the Franchise Inventory: bluestarfranchise.com/franchise Is franchising right for you? Check this out to see: bluestarfranchise.com/assessment Franchise CEO (A CBNation Site – coming soon) – franchiseceo.co Check out our CEO Hack Buzz Newsletter–our premium newsletter with hacks and nuggets to level up your organization. Sign up HERE. 

In this episode the hosts dissect a bankruptcy‑sale opportunity involving dolphin‑habitat real estate in the Riviera Maya, Mexico — and explore whether the outsized risk of “ditch‑risk” is worth the potential payoff.Business Listing – https://www.keen-summit.com/project/bankruptcy-sale-dolphin-aquariums-real-estate/Welcome to Acquisitions Anonymous – the #1 podcast for small business M&A. Every week, we break down businesses for sale and talk about buying, operating, and growing them.

I am Rolf Claessen and together with my co-host Ken Suzan I am welcoming you to episode 169 of our podcast IP Fridays! Today's interview guest is Prof. Aloys Hüttermann, co-founder of my patent law firm Michalski Hüttermann & Partner and a true expert on the Unified Patent Court. He has written several books about the new system and we talk about all the things that plaintiffs and defendants can learn from the first decisions of the court and what they mean for strategic decisions of the parties involved. But before we jump into this very interesting interview, I have news for you! The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is planning rule changes that would make it virtually impossible for third parties to challenge invalid patents before the patent office. Criticism has come from the EFF and other inventor rights advocates: the new rules would play into the hands of so-called non-practicing entities (NPEs), as those attacked would have few cost-effective ways to have questionable patents deleted. The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) reports a new record in international patent applications: in 2024, around 3.7 million patent applications were filed worldwide – an increase of 4.9% over the previous year. The main drivers were Asian countries (China alone accounted for 1.8 million), while demand for trademark protection has stabilized after the pandemic decline. US rapper Eminem is taking legal action in Australia against a company that sells swimwear under the name “Swim Shady.” He believes this infringes on his famous “Slim Shady” brand. The case illustrates that even humorous allusions to well-known brand names can lead to legal conflicts. A new ruling by the Unified Patent Court (UPC) demonstrates its cross-border impact. In “Fujifilm v. Kodak,” the local chamber in Mannheim issued an injunction that extends to the UK despite Brexit. The UPC confirmed its jurisdiction over the UK parts of a European patent, as the defendant Kodak is based in a UPC member state. A dispute over standard patents is looming at the EU level: the Legal Affairs Committee (JURI) of the European Parliament voted to take the European Commission to the European Court of Justice. The reason for this is the Commission’s controversial withdrawal of a draft regulation on the licensing of standard-essential patents (SEPs). Parliament President Roberta Metsola is to decide by mid-November whether to file the lawsuit. In trademark law, USPTO Director Squires reported on October 31, 2025, that a new unit (“Trademark Registration Protection Office”) had removed approximately 61,000 invalid trademark applications from the registries. This cleanup of the backlog relieved the examining authority and accelerated the processing of legitimate applications. Now let's jump into the interview with Aloys Hüttermann: The Unified Patent Court Comes of Age – Insights from Prof. Aloys Hüttermann The Unified Patent Court (UPC) has moved from a long-discussed project to a living, breathing court system that already shapes patent enforcement in Europe. In a recent IP Fridays interview, Prof. Aloys Hüttermann – founder and equity partner at Michalski · Hüttermann & Partner and one of the earliest commentators on the UPC – shared his experiences from the first years of practice, as well as his view on how the UPC fits into the global patent litigation landscape. This article summarises the key points of that conversation and is meant as an accessible overview for in-house counsel, patent attorneys and business leaders who want to understand what the UPC means for their strategy. How Prof. Hüttermann Became “Mr. UPC” Prof. Hüttermann has been closely involved with the UPC for more than a decade. When it became clear, around 13 years ago, that the European project of a unified patent court and a unitary patent was finally going to happen, he recognised that this would fundamentally change patent enforcement in Europe. He started to follow the legislative and political developments in detail and went beyond mere observation. As author and editor of several books and a major commentary on the UPC, he helped shape the discussion around the new system. His first book on the UPC appeared in 2016 – years before the court finally opened its doors in 2023. What fascinated him from the beginning was the unique opportunity to witness the creation of an entirely new court system, to analyse how it would be built and, where possible, to contribute to its understanding and development. It was clear to him that this system would be a “game changer” for European patent enforcement. UPC in the Global Triangle: Europe, the US and China In practice, most international patent disputes revolve around three major regions: the UPC territory in Europe, the United States and China. Each of these regions has its own procedural culture, cost structure and strategic impact. From a territorial perspective, the UPC is particularly attractive because it can, under the right conditions, grant pan-European injunctions that cover a broad range of EU Member States with a single decision. This consolidation of enforcement is something national courts in Europe simply cannot offer. From a cost perspective, the UPC is significantly cheaper than US litigation, especially if one compares the cost of one UPC action with a bundle of separate national cases in large European markets. When viewed against the territorial reach and procedural speed, the “bang for the buck” is very compelling. China is again a different story. The sheer volume of cases there is enormous, with tens of thousands of patent infringement cases per year. Chinese courts are known for their speed; first-instance decisions within about a year are common. In this respect they resemble the UPC more than the US does. The UPC also aims at a roughly 12 to 15 month time frame for first-instance cases where validity is at issue. The US, by contrast, features extensive discovery, occasionally jury trials and often longer timelines. The procedural culture is very different. The UPC, like Chinese courts, operates without discovery in the US sense, which makes proceedings more focused on the written record and expert evidence that the parties present, and less on pre-trial disclosure battles. Whether a company chooses to litigate in the US, the UPC, China, or some combination of these forums will depend on where the key markets and assets are. However, in Prof. Hüttermann's view, once Europe is an important market, it is hard to justify ignoring the UPC. He expects the court's caseload and influence to grow strongly over the coming years. A Landmark UPC Case: Syngenta v. Sumitomo A particularly important case in which Prof. Hüttermann was involved is the Syngenta v. Sumitomo matter, concerning a composition patent. This case has become a landmark in UPC practice for several reasons. First, the Court of Appeal clarified a central point about the reach of UPC injunctions. It made clear that once infringement is established in one Member State, this will usually be sufficient to justify a pan-European injunction covering all UPC countries designated by the patent. That confirmation gave patent owners confidence that the UPC can in fact deliver broad, cross-border relief in one go. Second, the facts of the case raised novel issues about evidence and territorial reach. The allegedly infringing product had been analysed based on a sample from the Czech Republic, which is not part of the UPC system. Later, the same product with the same name was marketed in Bulgaria, which is within UPC territory. The Court of Appeal held that the earlier analysis of the Czech sample could be relied on for enforcement in Bulgaria. This showed that evidence from outside the UPC territory can be sufficient, as long as it is properly linked to the products marketed within the UPC. Third, the Court of Appeal took the opportunity to state its view on inventive step. It confirmed that combining prior-art documents requires a “pointer”, in line with the EPO's problem-solution approach. The mere theoretical possibility of extracting a certain piece of information from a document does not suffice to justify an inventive-step attack. This is one of several decisions where the UPC has shown a strong alignment with EPO case law on substantive patentability. For Prof. Hüttermann personally, the case was also a lesson in oral advocacy before the UPC. During the two appeal hearings, the presiding judge asked unexpected questions that required quick and creative responses while the hearing continued. His practical takeaway is that parties should appear with a small, well-coordinated team: large enough to allow someone to work on a tricky question in the background, but small enough to remain agile. Two or three lawyers seem ideal; beyond that, coordination becomes difficult and “too many cooks spoil the broth”. A Game-Changing CJEU Decision: Bosch Siemens Hausgeräte v. Electrolux Surprisingly, one of the most important developments for European patent litigation in the past year did not come from the UPC at all, but from the Court of Justice of the European Union. In Bosch Siemens Hausgeräte v. Electrolux, the CJEU revisited the rules on cross-border jurisdiction under the Brussels I Recast Regulation (Brussels Ia). Previously, under what practitioners often referred to as the GAT/LuK regime, a court in one EU country was largely prevented from granting relief for alleged infringement in another country if the validity of the foreign patent was contested there. This significantly limited the possibilities for cross-border injunctions. In Bosch, the CJEU changed course. Without going into all procedural details, the essence is that courts in the EU now have broader powers to grant cross-border relief when certain conditions are met, particularly when at least one defendant is domiciled in the forum state. The concept of an “anchor defendant” plays a central role: if you sue one group company in its home forum, other group companies in other countries, including outside the EU, can be drawn into the case. This has already had practical consequences. German courts, for example, have issued pan-European injunctions covering around twenty countries in pharmaceutical cases. There are even attempts to sue European companies for infringement of US patents based on acts in the US, using the logic of Bosch as a starting point. How far courts will ultimately go remains to be seen, but the potential is enormous. For the UPC, this development is highly relevant. The UPC operates in the same jurisdictional environment as national courts, and many defendants in UPC cases will be domiciled in UPC countries. This increases the likelihood that the UPC, too, can leverage the broadened possibilities for cross-border relief. In addition, we have already seen UPC decisions that include non-EU countries such as the UK within the scope of injunctions, in certain constellations. The interaction between UPC practice and the Bosch jurisprudence of the CJEU is only beginning to unfold. Does the UPC Follow EPO Case Law? A key concern for many patent owners and practitioners is whether the UPC will follow the EPO's Boards of Appeal or develop its own, possibly divergent, case law on validity. On procedural matters, the UPC is naturally different from the EPO. It has its own rules of procedure, its own timelines and its own tools, such as “front-loaded” pleadings and tight limits on late-filed material. On substantive law, however, Prof. Hüttermann's conclusion is clear: there is “nothing new under the sun”. The UPC's approach to novelty, inventive step and added matter is very close to that of the EPO. The famous “gold standard” for added matter appears frequently in UPC decisions. Intermediate generalisations are treated with the same suspicion as at the EPO. In at least one case, the UPC revoked a patent for added matter even though the EPO had granted it in exactly that form. The alignment is not accidental. The UPC only deals with European patents granted by the EPO; it does not hear cases on purely national patents. If the UPC were more generous than the EPO, many patents would never reach it. If it were systematically stricter, patentees would be more tempted to opt out of the system. In practice, the UPC tends to apply the EPO's standards and, where anything differs, it is usually a matter of factual appreciation rather than a different legal test. For practitioners, this has a very practical implication: if you want to predict how the UPC will decide on validity, the best starting point is to ask how the EPO would analyse the case. The UPC may not always reach the same result in parallel EPO opposition proceedings, but the conceptual framework is largely the same. Trends in UPC Practice: PIs, Equivalents and Division-Specific Styles Even in its early years, certain trends and differences between UPC divisions can be observed. On preliminary injunctions, the local division in Düsseldorf has taken a particularly proactive role. It has been responsible for most of the ex parte PIs granted so far and applies a rather strict notion of urgency, often considering one month after knowledge of the infringement as still acceptable, but treating longer delays with scepticism. Other divisions tend to see two months as still compatible with urgency, and they are much more cautious with ex parte measures. Munich, by contrast, has indicated a strong preference for inter partes PI proceedings and appears reluctant to grant ex parte relief at all. A judge from Munich has even described the main action as the “fast” procedure and the inter partes PI as the “very fast” one, leaving little room for an even faster ex parte track. There are also differences in how divisions handle amendments and auxiliary requests in PI proceedings. Munich has suggested that if a patentee needs to rely on claim amendments or auxiliary requests in a PI, the request is unlikely to succeed. Other divisions have been more open to considering auxiliary requests. The doctrine of equivalents is another area where practice is not yet harmonised. The Hague division has explicitly applied a test taken from Dutch law in at least one case and found infringement by equivalence. However, the Court of Appeal has not yet endorsed a specific test, and in another recent Hague case the same division did not apply that Dutch-law test again. The Mannheim division has openly called for the development of an autonomous, pan-European equivalence test, but has not yet fixed such a test in a concrete decision. This is clearly an area to watch. Interim conferences are commonly used in most divisions to clarify issues early on, but Düsseldorf often dispenses with them to save time. In practice, interim conferences can be very helpful for narrowing down the issues, though parties should not expect to be able to predict the final decision from what is discussed there. Sometimes topics that dominate the interim conference play little or no role in the main oral hearing. A Front-Loaded System and Typical Strategic Mistakes UPC proceedings are highly front-loaded and very fast. A defendant usually has three months from service of the statement of claim to file a full statement of defence and any counterclaim for revocation. This is manageable, but only if the time is used wisely. One common strategic problem is that parties lose time at the beginning and only develop a clear strategy late in the three-month period. According to Prof. Hüttermann, it is crucial to have a firm strategy within the first two or three weeks and then execute it consistently. Constantly changing direction is a recipe for failure in such a compressed system. Another characteristic is the strict attitude towards late-filed material. It is difficult to introduce new documents or new inventive-step attacks later in the procedure. In some cases even alternative combinations of already-filed prior-art documents have been viewed as “new” attacks and rejected as late. At the appeal stage, the Court of Appeal has even considered new arguments based on different parts of a book already in the file as potentially late-filed. This does not mean that parties should flood the court with dozens of alternative attacks in the initial brief. In one revocation action, a plaintiff filed about fifty different inventive-step attacks, only to be told by the court that this was not acceptable and that the attacks had to be reduced and structured. The UPC is not a body conducting ex officio examination. It is entitled to manage the case actively and to ask parties to focus on the most relevant issues. Evidence Gathering, Protective Letters and the Defendant's Perspective The UPC provides powerful tools for both sides. Evidence inspection is becoming more common, not only at trade fairs but also at company premises. This can be a valuable tool for patentees, but it also poses a serious risk for defendants who may suddenly face court-ordered inspections. From the perspective of potential defendants, protective letters are an important instrument, especially in divisions like Düsseldorf where ex parte PIs are possible. A well-written protective letter, filed in advance, can significantly reduce the risk of a surprise injunction. The court fees are moderate, but the content of the protective letter must be carefully prepared; a poor submission can cause more harm than good. Despite the strong tools available to patentees, Prof. Hüttermann does not view the UPC as unfair to defendants. If a defendant files a solid revocation counterclaim, the pressure shifts to the patentee, who then has only two months to reply, prepare all auxiliary requests and adapt the enforcement strategy. This is even more demanding than at the EPO, because the patentee must not only respond to validity attacks but also ensure that any amended claims still capture the allegedly infringing product. It is entirely possible to secure the survival of a patent with an auxiliary request that no longer covers the defendant's product. In that scenario, the patentee has “won” on validity but lost the infringement case. Managing this tension under tight time limits is a key challenge of UPC practice. The Future Role of the UPC and How to Prepare Today the UPC hears a few hundred cases per year, compared with several thousand patent cases in the US and tens of thousands in China. Nevertheless, both the court itself and experienced practitioners see significant growth potential. Prof. Hüttermann expects case numbers to multiply in the medium term. Whether the UPC will become the first choice forum in global disputes or remain one pillar in parallel proceedings alongside the US and China will depend on the strategies of large patentees and the evolution of case law. However, the court is well equipped: it covers a large, economically important territory, is comparatively cost-effective and offers fast procedures with robust remedies. For companies that may end up before the UPC, preparation is essential. On the offensive side, that means building strong evidence and legal arguments before filing, being ready to proceed quickly and structured, and understanding the specific styles of the relevant divisions. On the defensive side, it may mean filing protective letters in risk-exposed markets, preparing internal processes for rapid reaction if a statement of claim arrives, and taking inspection requests seriously. Conclusion The Unified Patent Court has quickly moved from theory to practice. It offers pan-European relief, fast and front-loaded procedures, and a substantive approach that closely mirrors the EPO's case law. At the same time, national and EU-level developments like the Bosch Siemens Hausgeräte v. Electrolux decision are reshaping the jurisdictional framework in which the UPC operates, opening the door for far-reaching cross-border injunctions. For patent owners and potential defendants alike, the message is clear: the UPC is here to stay and will become more important year by year. Those who invest the time to understand its dynamics now – including its alignment with the EPO, the differences between divisions, and the strategic implications of its procedures – will be in a much better position when the first UPC dispute lands on their desk. Here is the full transcript of the interview: Rolf Claessen:Today's interview guest is Prof. Aloys Hüttermann. He is founder and equity partner of my firm, Michalski · Hüttermann & Partner. More importantly for today's interview, he has written several books about the Unified Patent Court. The first one already came out in 2016. He is co-editor and author of one of the leading commentaries on the UPC and has gained substantial experience in UPC cases so far – one of them even together with me. Thank you very much for being on IP Fridays again, Aloys. Aloys Hüttermann:Thank you for inviting me, it's an honour. How did you get so deeply involved in the UPC? Rolf Claessen:Before we dive into the details, how did you end up so deeply involved in the Unified Patent Court? And what personally fascinates you about this court? Aloys Hüttermann:This goes back quite a while – roughly 13 years. At that time it became clear that, after several failed attempts, Europe would really get a pan-European court and a pan-European patent, and that this time it was serious. I thought: this is going to be the future. That interested me a lot, both intellectually and practically. A completely new system was being built. You could watch how it evolved – and, if possible, even help shape it a bit. It was also obvious to me that this would be a complete game changer. Nobody expected that it would take until 2023 before the system actually started operating, but now it is here. I became heavily interested early on. As you mentioned, my first book on the UPC was published in 2016, in the expectation that the system would start soon. It took a bit longer, but now we finally have it. UPC vs. US and China – speed, cost and impact Rolf Claessen:Before we go deeper into the UPC, let's zoom out. If you compare litigation before the UPC with patent litigation in the US and in China – in terms of speed, cost and the impact of decisions – what are the key differences that a business leader should understand? Aloys Hüttermann:If you look at the three big regions – the UPC territory in Europe, the US and China – these are the major economic areas for many technology companies. One important point is territorial reach. In the UPC, if the conditions are met, you can get pan-European injunctions that cover many EU Member States in one go. We will talk about this later in more detail. On costs there is a huge difference between the US and the UPC. The UPC is much cheaper than US litigation, especially once you look at the number of countries you can cover with one case if the patent has been validated widely. China is different again. The number of patent infringement cases there is enormous. I have seen statistics of around 40,000 infringement cases per year in China. That is huge – compared with roughly 164 UPC infringement cases in the first year and maybe around 200 in the current year. On speed, Chinese courts are known to be very fast. You often get a first-instance decision in about a year. The UPC is comparable: if there is a counterclaim for revocation, you are looking at something like 12 to 15 months for a first-instance decision. The US can be slower, and the procedure is very different. You have full discovery, you may have juries. None of that exists at the UPC. From that perspective, Chinese and UPC proceedings are more similar to each other than either is to the US. The UPC is still a young court. We have to see how influential its case law will be worldwide in the long run. What we already see, at least in Germany, is a clear trend away from purely national patent litigation and towards the UPC. That is inside Europe. The global impact will develop over time. When is the UPC the most powerful tool? Rolf Claessen:Let's take the perspective of a global company. It has significant sales in Europe and in the US and production or key suppliers in China. In which situations would you say the UPC is your most powerful tool? And when might the US or China be the more strategic battleground? Aloys Hüttermann:To be honest, I would almost always consider bringing a case before the UPC. The “bang for the buck” is very good. The UPC is rather fast. That alone already gives you leverage in negotiations. The threat of a quick, wide-reaching injunction is a strong negotiation tool. Whether you litigate in the US instead of the UPC, or in addition, or whether you also go to China – that depends heavily on the individual case: where the products are sold, where the key markets are, where the defendant has assets, and so on. But in my view, once you have substantial sales in Europe, you should seriously consider the UPC. And for that reason alone I expect case numbers at the UPC to increase significantly in the coming years. A landmark UPC case: Syngenta vs. Sumitomo (composition patent) Rolf Claessen:You have already been involved in several UPC cases – and one of them together with me, which was great fun. Looking at the last 12 to 18 months, is there a case, decision or development that you find particularly noteworthy – something that really changed how you think about UPC litigation or how companies should prepare? Aloys Hüttermann:The most important UPC case I have been involved in so far is the Syngenta v. Sumitomo case on a composition patent. It has become a real landmark and was even mentioned in the UPC's annual report. It is important for several reasons. First, it was one of the first cases in which the Court of Appeal said very clearly: if you have established infringement in one Member State, that will usually be enough for a pan-European injunction covering all UPC countries designated by the patent. That is a powerful statement about the reach of UPC relief. Second, the facts were interesting. The patent concerned a composition. We had analysed a sample that had been obtained in the Czech Republic, which is not a UPC country. Later, the same product was marketed under the same name in Bulgaria, which is in the UPC. The question was whether the analysis of the Czech sample could be used as a basis for enforcement in Bulgaria. The Court of Appeal said yes, that was sufficient. Third, the Court of Appeal took the opportunity to say something about inventive step. It more or less confirmed that the UPC's approach is very close to the EPO's problem-solution approach. It emphasised that, if you want to combine prior-art documents, you need a “pointer” to do so. The mere theoretical possibility that a skilled person could dig a particular piece of information out of a document is not enough. For me personally, the most memorable aspect of this case was not the outcome – that was largely in line with what we had expected – but the oral hearings at the appeal stage. We had two hearings. In both, the presiding judge asked us a question that we had not anticipated at all. And then you have about 20 minutes to come up with a convincing answer while the hearing continues. We managed it, but it made me think a lot about how you should prepare for oral hearings at the UPC. My conclusion is: you should go in with a team, but not too big. In German we say, “Zu viele Köche verderben den Brei” – too many cooks spoil the broth. Two or three people seems ideal. One of them can work quietly on such a surprise question at the side, while the others continue arguing the case. In the end the case went very well for us, so I can speak about it quite calmly now. But in the moment your heart rate definitely goes up. The CJEU's Bosch Siemens Hausgeräte v. Electrolux decision – a real game changer Rolf Claessen:You also mentioned another development that is not even a UPC case, but still very important for European patent litigation. Aloys Hüttermann:Yes. In my view, the most important case of the last twelve months is not a UPC decision but a judgment of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU): Bosch Siemens Hausgeräte v. Electrolux. This is going to be a real game changer for European IP law, and I am sure we have not seen the end of its effects yet. One example: someone has recently sued BMW before the Landgericht München I, a German court, for infringement of a US patent based on acts in the US. The argument is that this could be backed by the logic of Bosch Siemens Hausgeräte v. Electrolux. We do not know yet what the court will do with that, but the fact that people are trying this shows how far-reaching the decision might be. Within the UPC we have already seen injunctions being issued for countries outside the UPC territory and even outside the EU, for example including the UK. So you see how these developments start to interact. Rolf Claessen:For listeners who have not followed the case so closely: in very simple terms, the CJEU opened the door for courts in one EU country to rule on patent infringement that took place in other countries as well, right? Aloys Hüttermann:Exactly. Before Bosch Siemens Hausgeräte v. Electrolux we had what was often called the GAT/LuK regime. The basic idea was: if you sue someone in, say, Germany for infringement of a European patent, and you also ask for an injunction for France, and the defendant then challenges the validity of the patent in France, the German court cannot grant you an injunction covering France. The Bosch decision changed that. The legal basis is the Brussels I Recast Regulation (Brussels Ia), which deals with jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters in the EU. It is not specific to IP; it applies to civil cases generally, but it does have some provisions that are relevant for patents. In Bosch, a Swedish court asked the CJEU for guidance on cross-border injunctions. The CJEU more or less overturned its old GAT/LuK case law. Now, in principle, if the defendant is domiciled in a particular Member State, the courts of that state can also grant cross-border relief for other countries, under certain conditions. We will not go into all the details here – that could fill a whole separate IP Fridays episode – but one important concept is the “anchor defendant”. If you sue a group of companies and at least one defendant is domiciled in the forum state, then other group companies in other countries – even outside the EU, for example in Hong Kong – can be drawn into the case and affected by the decision. This is not limited to the UPC, but of course it is highly relevant for UPC litigation. Statistically it increases the chances that at least one defendant will be domiciled in a UPC country, simply because there are many of them. And we have already seen courts like the Landgericht München I grant pan-European injunctions for around 20 countries in a pharmaceutical case. Rolf Claessen:Just to clarify: does it have to be the headquarters of the defendant in that country, or is any registered office enough? Aloys Hüttermann:That is one of the open points. If the headquarters are in Europe, then it is clear that subsidiaries outside Europe can be affected as well. If the group's headquarters are outside Europe and only a subsidiary is here, the situation is less clear and we will have to see what the courts make of it. Does the UPC follow EPO case law? Rolf Claessen:Many patent owners and in-house counsel wonder: does the UPC largely follow the case law of the EPO Boards of Appeal, or is it starting to develop its own distinct line? What is your impression so far – both on substantive issues like novelty and inventive step, and on procedural questions? Aloys Hüttermann:On procedure the UPC is, of course, very different. It has its own procedural rules and they are not the same as at the EPO. If we look at patent validity, however, my impression is that there is “nothing new under the sun” – that was the title of a recent talk I gave and will give again in Hamburg. Substantively, the case law of the UPC and the EPO is very similar. For inventive step, people sometimes say the UPC does not use the classical problem-solution approach but a more “holistic” approach – whatever that is supposed to mean. In practice, in both systems you read and interpret prior-art documents and decide what they really disclose. In my view, the “error bar” that comes from two courts simply reading a document slightly differently is much larger than any systematic difference in legal approach. If you look at other grounds, such as novelty and added matter, the UPC even follows the EPO almost verbatim. The famous “gold standard” for added matter appears all over UPC decisions, even if the EPO case numbers are not always cited. The same is true for novelty. So the rule-based, almost “Hilbertian” EPO approach is very much present at the UPC. There is also a structural reason for that. All patents that the UPC currently deals with have been granted by the EPO. The UPC does not handle patents granted only by national offices. If the UPC wanted to deviate from EPO case law and be more generous, then many patents would never reach the UPC in the first place. The most generous approach you can have is the one used by the granting authority – the EPO. So if the UPC wants to be different, it can only be stricter, not more lenient. And there is little incentive to be systematically stricter, because that would reduce the number of patents that are attractive to enforce before the UPC. Patent owners might simply opt out. Rolf Claessen:We also talked about added matter and a recent case where the Court of Appeal was even stricter than the EPO. That probably gives US patent practitioners a massive headache. They already struggle with added-matter rules in Europe, and now the UPC might be even tougher. Aloys Hüttermann:Yes, especially on added matter. I once spoke with a US practitioner who said, “We hope the UPC will move away from intermediate generalisations.” There is no chance of that. We already have cases where the Court of Appeal confirmed that intermediate generalisations are not allowed, in full alignment with the EPO. You mentioned a recent case where a patent was revoked for added matter, even though it had been granted by the EPO in exactly that form. This shows quite nicely what to expect. If you want to predict how the UPC will handle a revocation action, the best starting point is to ask: “What would the EPO do?” Of course, there will still be cases where the UPC finds an invention to be inventive while the EPO, in parallel opposition proceedings, does not – or vice versa. But those are differences in the appreciation of the facts and the prior art, which you will always have. The underlying legal approach is essentially the same. Rolf Claessen:So you do not see a real example yet where the UPC has taken a totally different route from the EPO on validity? Aloys Hüttermann:No, not really. If I had to estimate how the UPC will decide, I would always start from what I think the EPO would have done. Trends in UPC practice: PIs, equivalents, interim conferences Rolf Claessen:If you look across the different UPC divisions and cases: what trends do you see in practice? For example regarding timelines, preliminary injunctions, how validity attacks are handled, and how UPC cases interact with EPO oppositions or national proceedings? Aloys Hüttermann:If you take the most active divisions – essentially the big four in Germany and the local division in The Hague – they all try to be very careful and diligent in their decisions. But you can already see some differences in practice. For preliminary injunctions there is a clear distinction between the local division in Düsseldorf and most other divisions. Düsseldorf considers one month after knowledge of the infringement as still sufficiently urgent. If you wait longer, it is usually considered too late. In many other divisions, two months is still viewed as fine. Düsseldorf has also been the division that issued most of the ex parte preliminary injunctions so far. Apart from one special outlier where a standing judge from Brussels was temporarily sitting in Milan, Düsseldorf is basically the only one. Other divisions have been much more reluctant. At a conference, Judge Pichlmaier from the Munich division once said that he could hardly imagine a situation where his division would grant an ex parte PI. In his words, the UPC has two types of procedure: one that is fast – the normal main action – and one that is very fast – the inter partes PI procedure. But you do not really have an “ultra-fast” ex parte track, at least not in his division. Another difference relates to amendments and auxiliary requests in PI proceedings. In one recent case in Munich the court said more or less that if you have to amend your patent or rely on auxiliary requests in a PI, you lose. Other divisions have been more flexible and have allowed auxiliary requests. Equivalence is another area where we do not have a unified line yet. So far, only the Hague division has clearly found infringement under the doctrine of equivalents and explicitly used a test taken from Dutch law. Whether that test will be approved by the Court of Appeal is completely open – the first case settled, so the Court of Appeal never ruled on it, and a second one is still very recent. Interestingly, there was another Hague decision a few weeks ago where equivalence was on the table, but the division did not apply that Dutch-law test. We do not know yet why. The Mannheim division has written in one decision that it would be desirable to develop an autonomous pan-European test for equivalence, instead of just importing the German, UK or Dutch criteria. But they did not formulate such a test in that case because it was not necessary for the decision. So we will have to see how that evolves. On timelines, one practical difference is that Düsseldorf usually does not hold an interim conference. That saves them some time. Most other divisions do hold interim conferences. Personally, I like the idea because it can help clarify issues. But you cannot safely read the final outcome from these conferences. I have also seen cases where questions raised at the interim conference did not play any role in the main oral hearing. So they are useful for clarification, but not as a crystal ball. Front-loaded proceedings and typical strategic mistakes Rolf Claessen:If you look at the behaviour of parties so far – both patentees and defendants – what are the most common strategic mistakes you see in UPC litigation? And what would a well-prepared company do differently before the first statement of claim is ever filed? Aloys Hüttermann:You know you do not really want me to answer that question… Rolf Claessen:I do! Aloys Hüttermann:All right. The biggest mistake, of course, is that they do not hire me. That is the main problem. Seriously, it is difficult to judge parties' behaviour from the outside. You rarely know the full picture. There may be national proceedings, licensing discussions, settlement talks, and so on in the background. That can limit what a party can do at the UPC. So instead of criticising, I prefer to say what is a good idea at the UPC. The system is very front-loaded and very fast. If you are sued, you have three months to file your statement of defence and your counterclaim for revocation. In my view, three months are manageable – but only if you use the time wisely and do not waste it on things that are not essential. If you receive a statement of claim, you have to act immediately. You should have a clear strategy within maybe two or three weeks and then implement it. If you change your strategy every few weeks, chances are high that you will fail. Another point is that everything is front-loaded. It is very hard to introduce new documents or new attacks later. Some divisions have been a bit generous in individual cases, but the general line is strict. We have seen, for example, that even if you filed a book in first instance, you may not be allowed to rely on a different chapter from the same book for a new inventive-step attack at the appeal stage. That can be regarded as late-filed, because you could have done it earlier. There is also case law saying that if you first argue inventive step as “D1 plus D2”, and later want to argue “D2 plus D1”, that can already be considered a new, late attack. On the other hand, we had a revocation action where the plaintiff filed about 50 different inventive-step attacks in the initial brief. The division then said: this does not work. Please cut them down or put them in a clear hierarchy. In the end, not all of them were considered. The UPC does not conduct an ex officio examination. It is entitled to manage the case and to tell the parties to limit themselves in the interest of a fair and efficient procedure. Rolf Claessen:I have the feeling that the EPO is also becoming more front-loaded – if you want to rely on documents later, you should file them early. But it sounds like the UPC is even more extreme in that regard. Aloys Hüttermann:Yes, that is true. Protective letters, inspections and the defendant's perspective Rolf Claessen:Suppose someone from a company is listening now and thinks: “We might be exposed at the UPC,” or, “We should maybe use the UPC offensively against competitors.” What would you consider sensible first steps before any concrete dispute arises? And looking three to five years ahead, how central do you expect the UPC to become in global patent litigation compared to the US and China? Aloys Hüttermann:Let me start with the second part. I expect the UPC to become significantly more important. If we have around 200 cases this year, that is a good start, but it is still very small compared to, say, 4,000 to 5,000 patent cases per year in the US and 40,000 or so in China. Even François Bürgin and Klaus Grabinski, in interviews, have said that they are happy with the case load, but the potential is much larger. In my view, it is almost inevitable that we will see four or five times as many UPC cases in the not-too-distant future. As numbers grow, the influence of the UPC will grow as well. Whether, in five or ten years, companies will treat the UPC as their first choice forum – or whether they will usually run it in parallel with US litigation in major disputes – remains to be seen. The UPC would be well equipped for that: the territory it covers is large, Europe is still an important economy, and the UPC procedure is very attractive from a company's perspective. On sensible first steps: if you are worried about being sued, a protective letter can make a lot of sense – especially in divisions like Düsseldorf, where ex parte PIs are possible in principle. A protective letter is not very expensive in terms of court fees. There is also an internal system that ensures the court reads it before deciding on urgent measures. Of course, the content must have a certain quality; a poor protective letter can even backfire. If you are planning to sue someone before the UPC, you should be extremely well prepared when you file. You should already have all important documents and evidence at hand. As we discussed, it is hard to introduce new material later. One tool that is becoming more and more popular is inspection – not just at trade fairs, where we already saw cases very early, but also at company premises. Our firm has already handled such an inspection case. That is something you should keep in mind on both sides: it is a powerful evidence-gathering tool, but also a serious risk if you are on the receiving end. From the defendant's perspective, I do not think the UPC is unfair. If you do your job properly and put a solid revocation counterclaim on the table, then the patentee has only two months to prepare a full reply and all auxiliary requests. And there is a twist that makes life even harder for the patentee than at the EPO. At the EPO the question is mainly: do my auxiliary requests overcome the objections and are they patentable? At the UPC there is an additional layer: do I still have infringement under the amended claims? You may save your patent with an auxiliary request that no longer reads on the defendant's product. That is great for validity, but you have just lost the infringement case. You have kept the patent but lost the battle. And all of this under very tight time limits. That creates considerable pressure on both sides. How to contact Prof. Hüttermann Rolf Claessen:Thank you very much for this really great interview, Aloys. Inside our firm you have a nickname: “the walking encyclopedia of the Unified Patent Court” – because you have written so many books about it and have dealt with the UPC for such a long time. What is the best way for listeners to get in touch with you? Aloys Hüttermann:The easiest way is by email. You can simply write to me, and that is usually the best way to contact me. As you may have noticed, I also like to speak. I am a frequent speaker at conferences. If you happen to be at one of the conferences where I am on the programme – for example, next week in Hamburg – feel free to come up to me and ask me anything in person. But email is probably the most reliable first step. Rolf Claessen:Perfect. Thank you very much, Aloys. Aloys Hüttermann:Thank you. It was a pleasure to be on IP Fridays again. Some of your long-time listeners may remember that a few years ago – when you were not yet part of our firm – we already did an episode on the UPC, back when everything was still very speculative. It is great to be back now that the system is actually in place and working. Rolf Claessen:I am very happy to have you back on the show.

In this episode the hosts dissect a bankruptcy‑sale opportunity involving dolphin‑habitat real estate in the Riviera Maya, Mexico — and explore whether the outsized risk of “ditch‑risk” is worth the potential payoff.Business Listing – https://www.keen-summit.com/project/bankruptcy-sale-dolphin-aquariums-real-estate/Welcome to Acquisitions Anonymous – the #1 podcast for small business M&A. Every week, we break down businesses for sale and talk about buying, operating, and growing them.

+++ Du willst die Neujahrschallenge 2026 nicht verpassen und Teil von über 4.000 Frauen werden, die gemeinsam ins Jahr starten? Melde dich hier bei unserem Newsletter an und sichere dir am 4. Dezember dein Ticket. +++Ent-Stress dein Q4 – Der November Check-out mit Cordelia Röders-ArnoldWie schaffst du es in einen entspannten Dezember, ohne dich zwischen Deadlines, Mental Load, Familienerwartungen, Jahresabschluss und Weihnachtsstress komplett zu verlieren?Diese Folge ist dein liebevoller, ehrlicher und kraftvoller Check-Out für den November – und deine Einladung, Q4 bewusst zu gestalten, statt dich durch den Jahresendspurt ziehen zu lassen.In dieser Check-Out-Folge schauen Vera Strauch und Cordelia Röders-Arnold zurück in den letzten Monat, der vor allem geprägt war von einem Event: dem großen Female Leadership Summit mit über 300 Frauen. Sie teilen, wie das Dear Monday-Team über sich hinaus gewachsen ist, welche Learnings sie selbst von den Speakerinnen mitnehmen und welche Gespräche mit Absolventinnen nachhallen. Außerdem im November: Lady Gaga-Konzert und Laternenlauf, Yogamatte und Weihnachtspunsch – und der Wunsch, den Dezember dieses Jahr ganz gekonnt zu ent-stressen. Vera und Cordelia teilen persönliche Geschichten, Erfahrungen aus Leadership-Kontexten und konkrete Tools, die dir helfen, das Jahresende bewusst und erfüllt zu gestalten.In dieser Episode sprechen Vera Strauch und Cordelia Röders-Arnold darüber:Warum der November energetisch so intensiv ist Was dir hilft, den Dezember nicht zum Overload-Monat werden zu lassenWie du Grenzen setzt – bei Terminen, Erwartungen und Traditionen (mit Veras Keine-Termine-Tipp und Cordelias Geschenke-Hack)Wie du Familie, Führungsposition, Feiertage und dich selbst unter einen Hut bekommstWie du deine eigene Jahresend-Strategie aufsetzt – achtsam, klar und entstresstDiese Folge ist für dich, wenn du im Q4 spürst:

If you're a startup selling to enterprises, understanding how a CIO discovers and evaluates you can change everything. Most founders believe that cold emails and polished decks drive attention, but Karthik Chakkarapani, CIO of Zuora shares that nearly 80% of the startups he evaluates are found through outbound - while researching solutions, through peers, or even on LinkedIn. For many startups, this alone can reshape how they think about go-to-market.How does an enterprise decide whether to buy from a startup or not? Karthik walks us through Zuora's three-step buying process. It starts with understanding the problem the startup solves and how quickly the product can show value. If the early signals are strong, the next step is a deeper look at ROI, integration, security and whether the company is mature enough to be a long-term partner. The final stage is legal and procurement, which is where many early-stage startups slow down.If you're building a startup, this episode offers a practical look into how CIOs think, how they make decisions and what it really takes to go from a first conversation to a signed contract.0:00 – Trailer0:53 – Buying process of startups05:19 – How Zuora's SaaS portfolio looked 2 years ago09:00 – Inbound vs outbound10:53 – How initial contact with potential customers works13:34 – Startups should be thought partners16:57 – How long it takes to create value for customers19:59 – Where startups draw the line in growth vs efficiency23:06 – Top 5 largest spends24:01 – Why only 1-year contracts for new AI startups?26:12 – Why legal & procurement struggle to understand startups29:46 – 20% of portfolio is 0–5 year old companies30:46 – Are startups not backed by VCs a red flag?34:29 – 60% in growth + 40% in day-to-day37:42 – Learnings from peer CIOs41:38 – Featurely: Case Study45:14 – Atomicwork: Case Study46:55 – Trupeer: Case Study47:51 – How Zuora uses OpenAI & Anthropic49:39 – How AI is helping personal productivity51:26 – How agents will be managed54:02 – Number of SaaS apps will go down, agents will go up55:45 – Building the right security for AI56:31 – India vs US: where founders are building from-------------India's talent has built the world's tech—now it's time to lead it.This mission goes beyond startups. It's about shifting the center of gravity in global tech to include the brilliance rising from India.What is Neon Fund?We invest in seed and early-stage founders from India and the diaspora building world-class Enterprise AI companies. We bring capital, conviction, and a community that's done it before.Subscribe for real founder stories, investor perspectives, economist breakdowns, and a behind-the-scenes look at how we're doing it all at Neon.-------------Check us out on:Website: https://neon.fund/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/theneonshoww/LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/beneon/Twitter: https://x.com/TheNeonShowwConnect with Siddhartha on:LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/siddharthaahluwalia/Twitter: https://x.com/siddharthaa7-------------This video is for informational purposes only. The views expressed are those of the individuals quoted and do not constitute professional advice.Send us a text

Hier wird Marketing mit KI-Agenten einmal komplett durchdekliniert: Joel spricht mit Dominik von Pröck (Leaders of AI) darüber, wie ein schlankes Team mit Dutzenden spezialisierter Agents Content, Newsletter, Podcast, Video und Performance-Marketing skaliert. Vom LinkedIn-Autor „Hansi“ (Hooks, Posting, Bildgenerierung) über Leser-Personas wie „Nora & Sven“ als Quality-Gate bis zum „Teamleiter“ Jürgen, der die KI-Crew führt: Du bekommst konkrete Abläufe, Tools und Guardrails. Dazu: personalisierte Newsletter statt Massenmail, Podcast-Produktion in Dominiks Stimme, generative Videos (Sora/Veo/11Labs), Silicon Sampling für Marktforschung, und was GAIO für SEO bedeutet. Ideal für CMOs, Content-Teams und Performance-Menschen, die Output, Qualität und Effizienz gleichzeitig hochfahren wollen. Du erfährst... ...wie Dominik Pröck mit KI-Agenten LinkedIn-Posts revolutioniert. ...welche Rolle KI in der personalisierten Marktforschung spielt. ...wie Unternehmen KI für kreatives und Performance-Marketing nutzen. __________________________ ||||| PERSONEN |||||

Was hat ein Flug mit einem reichen Amerikaner mit deinem Erfolg zu tun? Alles. In dieser Folge nehme ich dich mit auf eine Reise über den Wolken, bei der mir ein Satz so tief ins Herz geknallt ist, dass er mein Denken für immer verändert hat: „Dein Netzwerk ist dein Netto-Wert." Bäm. Kein Netflix, kein Chillen – sondern ein Weckruf in 10.000 Metern Höhe. Während andere sich in ihrer Freizeit durch Serien bingen und glauben, sie könnten sich damit Freiheit erholen, baust du dir in der gleichen Zeit Brücken, die dich durch jede Krise tragen. Ich teile mit dir die besten Learnings aus meinem Leben – direkt, ehrlich und manchmal auch mit einer liebevollen Ohrfeige. Du erfährst, warum Netzwerken nichts mit Visitenkarten sammeln zu tun hat, sondern mit echtem Dienen. Warum du nicht sofort ernten wirst, aber sehr wohl säst. Und wieso dein gepflegtes Auftreten mehr Türen öffnet als dein Lebenslauf. Ich erzähle dir, wie du durch Diplomatie und Geduld zum Magneten wirst. Wie du dich unersetzlich machst, nicht durch Lautstärke, sondern durch Wiederholung, Präsenz und ehrliches Interesse am anderen. Und du erfährst, wie mein eigener Podcast nicht nur meine Bekanntheit gesteigert hat, sondern letztlich mein Buch zum Spiegel-Bestseller gemacht hat. Wenn du wissen willst, wie du mit Herz, Haltung und Strategie in die Champions League der Beziehungen aufsteigst – dann ist dieses Video deine Eintrittskarte. Kein Bullshit, kein Hochglanz-Coaching. Sondern echte Geschichten, echte Tipps und eine klare Botschaft: Hör auf zu konsumieren. Fang an zu investieren – in Menschen. Denn eines ist sicher: In einer Welt, in der sich viele in Bildschirme flüchten, wirst du zum Leuchtturm. Und glaub mir: Die Welt braucht mehr Leuchttürme.   ---------------------   SICHERE DIR TÄGLICHE INSPIRATION IN 2025 ➡️ Tritt jetzt der neuen Telegram Community bei: tobias-beck.com/telegram   STARTE DEINE AUSBILDUNG BEI TOBIAS BECK ➡️ Lass dich jetzt unverbindlich beraten: tobias-beck.com/mentor   ---------------------   #persönlichkeitsentwicklung #transformation #tobiasbeck #networking #umfeld #erfolg #business

Casually reflecting on my training, performance, and experimentation for the month, including: Recap of November goals (hits and misses) Learnings from my second 12c What being "board strong" has meant for my route climbing  What it took to send 12a, 12b, 12c, and 12d in the past 6 weeks My first session on Bulldog boulder (V6 / V8) How I'm adjusting my training during this performance window The fear factor of trying higher moves on a boulder Patron questions December goals Thank you so much for supporting me. I love hearing what you're up to, so feel free to hit me up on IG. Have an awesome month!

Beide machen 50 % Care-Arbeit. Er bekommt Applaus. Sie bekommt Mom-Shaming. In der neuen Folge spricht Marie darüber, welche Verantwortungen man von außen sieht – und welche unsichtbar bleiben, obwohl sie den Alltag bestimmen. Die Folge ist ein ehrlicher Einblick in Working Mom Realität, Mental Load und die Dynamiken, die entstehen, wenn Job, Familie und Beziehung gleichzeitig stattfinden. Wir sprechen über: *Mom-Shaming & gesellschaftlicher Druck *Entstehung, Erfolg & Ende des Podcasts Family Feelings *Mutterschaft, Care-Arbeit & Mental Load *Trennung & öffentliche Beziehungen  Timecodes: 00:00:00 - 00:04:57 Life-Check-In mit Marie 00:04:58 - 00:11:16 Karriererückblick  00:11:17 - 00:16:45 Wie Familie zu Content wurde & warum das wichtig ist  00:16:46 - 00:29:45 Mom-Shaming, Mental Load, Sichtbarkeit & der Balance-Akt als Mutter                               00:29:46 - 00:40:19 “Family Feelings”: Wie der Podcast entstand und was ihn erfolgreich machte 00:40:20 - 01:03:59 Beziehung, Öffentlichkeit & Medienberichte über die Trennung 01:04:00 - 01:15:21 Learnings, persönliche Entwicklung & Zukunftswünsche Werbung: LBS: Ganz entspannt ins eigene Zuhause. Mit LBS-Bausparen jetzt den ersten Baustein zur Mietfreiheit legen. Hier erfährst du wie. Baby got Business Bootcamp:  Kompakt. Effizient. Topaktuell. Das 10-Wochen-Online-Programm ist der Wissens-Boost für alle Social-Media-Professionals, Creator:innen und Gründer:innen. Starttermine 2026: 5. Februar, 4. März, 17. September oder 7. Oktober. Jetzt⁠⁠ ⁠⁠hier⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ einen der begrenzten Plätze für die neuen Termine 2026 sichern! In der Folge erwähnt: Serie - Die Paartherapie Podcastpartner: Hier⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ findet ihr alle aktuellen Supporter unseres Podcasts & aktuelle Rabattcodes. Hier findest du mehr über uns:  Website⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instagram ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠TikTok⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠LinkedIn⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Impressum⁠⁠⁠⁠ YouTube Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Philipp Schröder, Gründer von 1KOMMA5°, spricht über die ersten Investoren und M&A-Learnings. Er teilt, warum seine ehemaligen Chefs als erste investierten, wie sie 140 Millionen in Handwerksbetriebe investierten und warum der Rückenwind der Energiekrise manchmal zu optimistischen Bewertungen führte. Was du lernst: Wie du erste Investoren überzeugst Die richtige M&A-Strategie finden Warum regionale Dichte wichtig ist Den richtigen Mix aus Wachstum und Realität ALLES ZU UNICORN BAKERY: https://stan.store/fabiantausch   Mehr zu Philipp: LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/philipp-schr%C3%B6der-b94b6576/  Website: https://1komma5.com/de/  Join our Founder Tactics Newsletter: 2x die Woche bekommst du die Taktiken der besten Gründer der Welt direkt ins Postfach: https://www.tactics.unicornbakery.de/ 

In this episode the hosts dissect a $19 million “painting‑on‑demand” e‑commerce business making ~$15 million in sales and ~$3.67 million in earnings, and debate whether the price tag is justified given a crowded market and uncertain moat.Business Listing – https://mailchi.mp/websiteclosers/new-deal-alert-online-art-gallery-ecommerce-brand-handmade-paintings-collection-strong-repeat-order-rate-3600-48-star-reviews2?e=42dc999128Welcome to Acquisitions Anonymous – the #1 podcast for small business M&A. Every week, we break down businesses for sale and talk about buying, operating, and growing them.

Schneller Kulturwandel im E-Commerce: Whatnot verwandelt Livestreams in Marktplätze voller Community-Spirit. Deutschlandchefin und Head of Collectibles Europa Isabelle Weiser schildert, wie Leidenschaft, Transparenz und gelebte Interaktion Verkäufer:innen und Käufer:innen zusammenbringen – warum der Aufbau von Vertrauen, radikaler Fokus auf Nischen und echte Nutzerbindung sogar Betrug ausbremst und wie Erfolg jenseits von Algorithmen entsteht. Wem Social Media zu beliebig erscheint, lernt hier neue Nähe im Handel kennen. Du erfährst... …wie Whatnot die Live-Shopping-Welt mit interaktiven Auktionen revolutioniert. …warum die Community und Leidenschaft das Herzstück von Whatnot bilden. …wie Verkäufer*innen mit kreativen Strategien auf Whatnot erfolgreich werden. __________________________ ||||| PERSONEN |||||

Doppelt so schnell zu sein bringt dir nichts, wenn du in die falsche Richtung läufst. Viele Founder tappen in die "Productivity Trap": Sie optimieren ihren Output, haben aber keine Klarheit über ihr eigentliches Ziel. Mike teilt seine Learnings aus 10 Jahren radikaler Exploration – warum er Robotik und Mathe studiert hat, um am Ende doch Unternehmer zu werden, und wie du systematisch herausfindest, was du wirklich willst. Du erfährst, wie du das "Ikigai"-Modell taktisch für dein Startup nutzt , warum du beim Validieren deiner Idee niemals deine Mutter fragen solltest und mit welchen 4 Instrumenten du echten Product-Market-Fit findest, statt nur Annahmen zu treffen. Was du lernst: - Speed vs. Direction: Warum die Richtung wichtiger ist als die Geschwindigkeit und wie du verhinderst, effizient das Falsche zu tun. - Ikigai für Founder: Wie du Purpose, Profit, Talent und Marktbedürfnisse vereinst. - Identität ist theatralisch: Warum dein Selbstbild oft falsch ist und du dich jederzeit neu erfinden kannst. - Validation Framework: Die 4 konkreten Instrumente (Desk Research, Observation, Immersion, Interviews), um echte Probleme zu identifizieren. ALLES ZU UNICORN BAKERY: ⁠https://zez.am/unicornbakery⁠ Mehr zu Daniel: LinkedIn: ⁠https://www.linkedin.com/in/danieldippold/⁠ Website: ⁠https://www.ewor.com/⁠ Mehr zu Co-Host Mike: LinkedIn: ⁠https://www.linkedin.com/in/mikemahlkow/⁠ Website: ⁠https://fastgen.com/⁠ Join our Founder Tactics Newsletter: 2x die Woche bekommst du die Taktiken der besten Gründer der Welt direkt ins Postfach: ⁠https://www.tactics.unicornbakery.de/⁠ Kapitel: (00:00) Intro: Warum Founder-Produktivität allein nicht reicht (01:04) Die Alice im Wunderland Analogie: Richtung schlägt Speed (02:18) Das Ikigai-Modell: Wie finde ich meinen Purpose? (06:49) Exploration vs. Exploitation: Mikes 10 Jahre "Trial & Error" (11:40) Negative Selektion: Warum es hilft zu wissen, was du nicht willst (14:40) Hyper Focus & Hyper Delegation: Wie man sich Zeit freischaufelt (16:22) "Es gibt keinen Spiegel für die Seele": Warum du externes Feedback brauchst (23:30) Identität als Entscheidung: Du spielst nur eine Rolle (28:33) Problem First vs. Tech First: Wie startet man ein Unicorn? (30:22) Warum der TAM (Total Addressable Market) oft irreführend ist (36:53) Das Luck-Skill-Continuum: Warum PMF am Anfang oft Glückssache ist (40:00) Das Framework zur Ideen-Validierung: Desk Research, Observation, Immersion & Interviews (41:30) Buchempfehlung: "The Mom Test" – Wie man richtig Fragen stellt (43:25) Start Specific: Warum du spezifisch starten musst, um groß zu pivoten

In this episode the hosts dissect a $19 million “painting‑on‑demand” e‑commerce business making ~$15 million in sales and ~$3.67 million in earnings, and debate whether the price tag is justified given a crowded market and uncertain moat.Business Listing – https://mailchi.mp/websiteclosers/new-deal-alert-online-art-gallery-ecommerce-brand-handmade-paintings-collection-strong-repeat-order-rate-3600-48-star-reviews2?e=42dc999128Welcome to Acquisitions Anonymous – the #1 podcast for small business M&A. Every week, we break down businesses for sale and talk about buying, operating, and growing them.

Folge 125 here we are! Schön, dass ihr alle wieder eingeschaltet habt, wir freuen uns sehr! Heute gibt es mal eine riesige Update Folge. Es ist auch einiges passiert bei den Mädels. Soso und Emma berichten vom Affect Launch Even in Berlin am vergangenen Wochenende. Wie ist es als Small Business so ein Event auf die Beine zu stellen? Konnte Soso das ganze Überhaupt richtig genießen? Gab es Learnings? Wir sind auf jeden Fall stolz wie Bolle auf unsere Soso und sind gespannt auf alles was kommt. Außerdem wird She´s Talking jetzt zum Fernsehstar! Wir werden Anfang nächstem Jahres in einer Reportage zu sehen sein und sind gespannt euch davon zu berichten. Außerdem berichtet Hanna von ihrer aktuellen Situation in Sydney und warum es ihr schwer fällt neue Leute kennenzulernen. Schreibt uns gern über shestalking@web.de oder über @shesstalking auf Instagram und TikTok solltet ihr auch gern teil des Podcasts sein wollen. Wir hören uns nächste Woche Kusssss Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Was würden Marco und Stefan, Gründer von immocation, heute anders machen beim Bestandsaufbau? Wir kaufen für Buy & Hold, also halten wir die Immobilien für immer. Das haben die beiden sehr lange gedacht, aber mit der Zeit gemerkt, ab und an macht es durchaus Sinn, auch mal was aus dem Bestand zu verkaufen, um noch schneller wachsen zu können. Trotz zahlreichen Immobilien lernt man auch immer als Immobilieninvestor bei jeder Immobilie hinzu. Denn schnell kommt etwas, womit man nicht gerechnet hat. Die 7 größten Learnings rund um Zinsen, Rendite, Co-Investments erfahrt ihr in dieser Folge. immocation. Lerne Immobilien.

In this episode the hosts dissect a $23 million asking‑price acquisition of a Miami‑based specialty contractor with $41 M revenue, $4.7 M EBITDA, a $52 M backlog—and dig into its contract structure, accounting risks and deal suitability.Business Listing Link – https://businessesforsale.nuwireinvestor.com/business-opportunity/specialty-contractor-with-long-term-contracts-and-62mm-backlog/2395873/?J=ANWelcome to Acquisitions Anonymous – the #1 podcast for small business M&A. Every week, we break down businesses for sale and talk about buying, operating, and growing them.

David Alain Wohl, MD - Inpatient Management of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Applying Learnings From Real World Evidence to Real World Practice

In this episode of the Learnings and Missteps podcast, Jesse interviews Uri Salgado, a bilingual business development executive at Detritus. Yuri shares her remarkable journey from helping her mother with translation in her childhood to achieving a milestone of 10 years at her previous company. She discusses the influence of her multicultural background, the importance of empathy in her career, and how divine timing has played a significant role in her professional growth. Yuri also talks about her transition to Detritus, the supportive company culture, and her future aspirations to mentor others.00:00 Introduction and Guest Overview01:09 Meet Miss Uri Salgado03:19 Understanding Divine Timing07:13 Early Life and Career Beginnings10:00 Lessons from Childhood14:16 Career Transitions and Challenges21:28 Joining Detritus28:50 Impact and Legacy31:37 Support Systems and Challenges32:48 Industry Competition and Personal Growth36:53 Balancing Work and Life48:31 Empathy and Client Relations59:46 The Importance of the JourneySet the stage for an amazing new year with the Self First Framework.https://calendly.com/jesse04/self-first-webinar Download a PDF copy of Becoming the Promise You are Intended to Behttps://www.depthbuilder.com/books

Meetings schlucken Zeit, Energie und oft auch Ambitionen – 37 Prozent aller Termine starten verspätet, ein Drittel erscheint überflüssig. Woran Meetings wirklich scheitern: fehlende Klarheit, mangelnde Vorbereitung, soziale Routinen, die niemand in Frage stellt. Wie radikale Agenda-Disziplin, geteilte Verantwortung und kleine Tools verpuffte Stunden in produktive Zusammenarbeit verwandeln, zeigt Erik Pfannmöller – Gründer und Kulturberater. Eine Einladung zum ehrlichen Blick auf Meetingkultur, die Menschen und Arbeit schützt. Du erfährst... …wie Erik Pfannmöller Meetings revolutioniert und Produktivität steigert. …welche Best Practices für Organisator*innen und Teilnehmende gelten. …warum One-on-One-Meetings entscheidend für Führungskräfte sind. __________________________ ||||| PERSONEN |||||

In dieser Episode spreche ich offen über die größten Stolperfallen bei der Altersvorsorge für Unternehmer und Geschäftsführer – und warum viele mit klassischen Lösungen am Ende leer ausgehen. Gemeinsam mit Steven Lichtger von der Deutschen Mittelstandsversorgung räumen wir mit Mythen rund um Betriebsrente, ETF-Sparen und Berufsunfähigkeit auf. Wir zeigen, wie moderne, steueroptimierte Wege funktionieren und wie du als Unternehmer oder Mitarbeiter wirklich für die Zukunft vorsorgen kannst. Dabei teile ich auch meine eigenen Erfahrungen, Ängste und Learnings auf dem Weg zur finanziellen Sicherheit. Hör rein, wenn du wissen willst, wie du deine Rentenlücke wirklich schließt und dein Unternehmen als Vorsorge-Booster nutzt.

In this episode the hosts dig into a $2.7 million EdTech business serving architects—$450K revenue, ~$227K profit, ~30 % growth—yet debate whether its 11.9× profit asking price makes any sense.Business Listing – https://app.acquire.com/startup/aUdw7lekR1TbMTB7h3oH00Of2KH2/9zqyExayXzwGmnlz6QWA?utm_medium=email&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-98r-wxCcPABDrP80rGNweSlNs2VkMvwGKxMByTIVyTIen9tvlCC_HRGTYrJ1hp08w7BlWcQs_9_6gkpNUKm734YYgaCg&_hsmi=386717396&utm_content=386717396&utm_source=hs_emailWelcome to Acquisitions Anonymous – the #1 podcast for small business M&A. Every week, we break down businesses for sale and talk about buying, operating, and growing them.

Was tue ich, wenn das Selbstbild eines Mitarbeitenden und die Realität massiv weit auseinander liegen? Wenn die Person sich als eine Säule des Teams betrachtet, in Wirklichkeit aber hinter den Erwartungen zurückbleibt? Vanessa Laszlo, Sparringspartnerin für Top-Führungskräfte, zeigt, warum positives Selbstmarketing gefährlich werden kann und wie Führung in solcher einer Situation die Balance bewahrt: Engmaschige Führung, klare Grenzen, minimaler Raum für Idealisierungen, um so unterschiedliche Werte bei gleichem Ziel zusammenbringen zu können. Du erfährst... …wie Führungskräfte schwierige Mitarbeitende effektiv führen können …welche Kommunikationsstrategien Konflikte im Team entschärfen …warum ein optimales Maß an Illusionen im Berufsleben wichtig ist __________________________ ||||| PERSONEN |||||

“ Innovation is about putting together creativity and mastery. Mastery is driven by education, knowledge, and insights. Creativity is driven by values and diversity. When we put those together, we create a powerful, innovative company.”Victor Aguilar is P&G's Chief Research, Development & Innovation Officer. Victor leads P&G's R&D organization, the company's global innovation program and strategy, which includes its nearly $2 billion annual investment in R&D and end-to-end packaging transformation. Victor brings over three decades of P&G experience spanning three continents - from Latin America, Central & Eastern Europe, Middle East & Africa, and North America - across multiple categories including Fabric and Baby Care, Future Works and Corporate R&D. Victor has led innovation that has accelerated growth through a commitment to superiority, agility and consumer-inspired solutions. Victor studied Chemical Engineering in Mexico at Monterrey Institute of Technology and Higher Education, started at P&G in 1989, and later received his MBA from the Warwick Business School in the UK. From his earliest days as a young entrepreneur, DJ, and soon R&D leader in Mexico, to his time leading an international, multi-billion-dollar organization. Victor operates with a growth mindset, is a fast learner, and a big fan of podcasts - being an early supporter and internal advocate for this Learnings from Leaders Podcast, and also a champion of P&G's internal More Than Soap podcast - which we've featured from time to time here. You'll enjoy hearing about Victor's emphasis on his own and others' careers - on the value of curiosity, as it relates to not just learning and mastery, but also innovation. 

In this episode, the hosts dissect a $17.5M electrolyte powder Amazon FBA brand with 86% margins and 20K subscribers—debating whether it's a goldmine or a marketing death spiral in disguise.Business Listing – https://quietlight.com/listings/16065383/Welcome to Acquisitions Anonymous – the #1 podcast for small business M&A. Every week, we break down businesses for sale and talk about buying, operating, and growing them.

Boris Sofman is the CEO and Co-Founder of Bedrock Robotics, a company turning existing construction equipment into fully autonomous fleets through same-day hardware upfits. With over $80 million in funding from Eclipse, 8VC, NVIDIA Ventures, and former Waymo CEO John Krafcik, Bedrock is tackling a major bottleneck in the global economy: a massive construction labor shortage just as demand for data centers, clean energy projects, housing, and manufacturing is skyrocketing. In this episode, Boris shares how his experience building autonomous vehicles at Waymo inspired him to apply similar AI and machine learning approaches to heavy equipment. He explains why full autonomy matters in construction, what it unlocks for efficiency and safety, and how Bedrock plans to accelerate infrastructure and industrial development through robotic automation.Episode recorded on Sept 30, 2025 (Published on Nov 13, 2025)In this episode, we cover: [02:45] Boris's background in robotics and autonomous vehicles[04:50] Learnings from Waymo applied to construction[10:09] Boris's predictions for autonomous vehicles in the future[18:44] Why he left Waymo to start Bedrock Robotics[22:59] Choosing construction as the first market for autonomy[25:26] How Bedrock upfits machines without permanent modifications[26:25] Why excavators are the first target use case[28:20] Training AI to navigate changing job site environments[30:54] Skipping teleoperation and going straight to autonomy[35:52] Bedrock's GTM focus on heavy industrial sectors[40:46] How to work with traditional industries effectively[43:55] How autonomy solves labor shortages and safety challenges Enjoyed this episode? Please leave us a review! Share feedback or suggest future topics and guests at info@mcj.vc.Connect with MCJ:Cody Simms on LinkedInVisit mcj.vcSubscribe to the MCJ Newsletter*Editing and post-production work for this episode was provided by The Podcast Consultant

In this episode of the Learnings and Missteps podcast, host Jesse interviews Brian Anderson, President of Bear Construction. Brian shares his journey of starting his own construction company, driven by his desire to create his own values and methods. Despite initial setbacks, such as working for companies that went under and facing financial struggles, Brian successfully established his business, Bear Construction, with intentionality and faith. He also discusses leveraging LinkedIn for both business growth and talent acquisition, emphasizing the importance of transparency, respect, and building genuine relationships. Brian's story is a testament to hard work, faith, and the impact of a supportive community.00:00 Introduction and Personal Values00:29 Meet Mr. Brian Anderson02:14 The Importance of Hard Work03:10 Journey in the Construction Industry04:36 Family Legacy in Construction05:26 Starting Bear Construction07:44 Joining Peer Groups for Growth15:39 Building Relationships and Networking23:17 Overcoming Business Challenges30:48 Starting a Business from Scratch33:59 Starting with Limited Resources35:13 The Importance of Intentionality36:16 Delegation and Growth38:00 Hiring Challenges and Lessons46:59 Leveraging Social Media for Business54:15 Spiritual and Personal Growth58:40 Final Thoughts and ReflectionsSet the stage for an amazing new year with the Self First Framework.https://calendly.com/jesse04/self-first-webinar Download a PDF copy of Becoming the Promise You are Intended to Behttps://www.depthbuilder.com/books

US Olympic Marathon Trials champion Fiona O'Keeffe joins us at 55:03 to break down her 4th-place finish at the NYC Marathon, how she rebounded from Olympic heartbreak, and what it's like training under Amy and Alistair Cragg. She opens up about her workouts, recovery from injury, and her long-term goals for 2026 and beyond. Before that, we dive into a wild week in track and field: USADA quietly banned Marvin Bracy, the 2022 World 100 m silver medalist, for nearly four years after he provided "substantial assistance" in a federal doping investigation involving the AIU and the DEA. The story first broke through former sprinter Rae Edwards (RaesTake), who claimed Bracy had been serving a secret suspension and said Bracy's then-coach Dennis Mitchell tipped off the authorities after Bracy confided in him about using a PED. The case has sparked major questions about transparency, informants, and how far USADA should go in keeping suspensions hidden. Plus, the IOC bans males from women's sports, Conner and Kylie Mantz headline the Two Cities Marathon, Elise Cranny may be training with Keely Hodgkinson in the UK, and much more.

In this episode, the Acquisitions Anonymous crew breaks down a freshly listed $1.9M indoor pickleball club in Houston, debating whether it's a sports goldmine or a post‑trend trap.Business Listing – https://www.bizbuysell.com/business-opportunity/pickleball-club/2414949/Welcome to Acquisitions Anonymous – the #1 podcast for small business M&A. Every week, we break down businesses for sale and talk about buying, operating, and growing them.

In this episode of Acquisitions Anonymous, the hosts dig into a $4.4 M e‑commerce business in the diabetes sensor accessory space and debate whether its 41% net margin, Australian base, and licensing opportunity make it a smart buy—or a risky startup in disguise.Business Listing – https://websiteproperties.com/websites/13755-sticking-with-success-great-business-opportunity-in-the-growing-diabetes-market/Welcome to Acquisitions Anonymous – the #1 podcast for small business M&A. Every week, we break down businesses for sale and talk about buying, operating, and growing them.